HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1975.04.14THE CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
April 14, 1975
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT
Francard None
City Planner Swan
Jacobs
Asst.Planner Yost
Kindig
City -Engineer Davidson
Mink
City Attorney Coleman
Norberg
Sine
Taylor
ROLL CALL
The above named members were present.
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame Planning Commission was called to
order on the above date at 7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of March 24, 1975 were approved and adopted.
Chairman Mink announced that Agenda Items 1 and 2, dealing with
Anza Pacific Corporation would be delayed until the arrival of Mr.
David Keyston, and Item 3 would be discussed first.
3. VARIANCE FROM FRONT SETBACK REOUI REMENTS IN R-1 DISTRICT AT
2301 EASTON DRIVE (APN 027-154-070) BY CHARDS TERRY (CONTINUED
FAM :M%RCH 24,1975)
Chairman Mink reminded the Commission that the public hearing on this
application had been closed at the meeting of March 24 on the Chair's
assumption that the matter would go to vote. However, the Commission
had requested that Mr. Terry return with additional information.
Therefore, at this time the public hearing would be reopened.
Mr. Charles Terry was accorded the priviioge of the floor, and
announced himself available for Commission questioning. Commissioner
Taylor questioned if he had investigated alternatives of construction
so that variance would not be required. Mr. Terry stated he had made
calculations on revising the kitchen to meet the code. This would
involve reducing the area of the kitchen by one-half from 80 square
feet to 40 square feet. This would defeat his purpose of remodeling
the kitchen to accommodate an area for dining, and thus use as a
family kitchen. Mr. Terry considered that denial would constitute
undue property loss, and added that appliances have been ordered and
cabinets manufactured and finished. He distributed an overlay of his
previous plans with the modification for Commission inspection. Mr.
Terry also pointed out that he had mitigated two existing encroachments
by removal of an old existing garage which projected into the front
setback 716" and was built to the side property line.
In response to a question from Commissioner Sine, Mr. Terry indicated
the project was completed to the point that walls had been erected,
- 2 -
master panel installed, and exterior sheathing on. He stated no work
had been done since the Planning Commission meeting of March 24.
Chairman Mink requested audience comment.
Mr. Paul Hesse._ 2307 Easton Drive, said that he had thought the
public hearing was closed and had therefore written a letter which he
requested be read. Chairman Mink summarized his letter as stating
that since Mr. Terry's project was so advanced, the variance should be
granted, but that the city should be more careful in the future. Mr.
Haag• agreed that was the gist of his communication and questioned what
a property holder is supposed to do when he had submitted plans to the
City and attempted to comply with regulations.
Mr. Ralph Mitchell, 2223 Easton Drive,: stated he would be pleased
rsee Mr. Terry's project completed since it has been in progress
18 months. However, to protect bA,*:own and possible purchaser's
imtereat in event of resale of his home, he thought all additions
gbould be built in accordance with codes of the City.
Secretary Jacobs read letter dated 4/9/75 from Mr. and Mrs. Edward
Lycett, 105 Alturas and letter dated 4/3/75 from F. R. Ludwell, 2217
Easton Drive, both urging that the variance be granted.
Mr. Herbert S. Tanner, 1345 Columbus, protested the granting of the
variance on grounds of hardship because of the large size of this lot,
noting further than an oversight by both the builder and the Building
Department does not justify a variance. He added many in the
neighborhood had stated they would sign a petition protesting a variance
if granted.
Commissioner Taylor questioned if there wouldbe adequate room from
the garage if the kitchen were moved back on the lot. Mr, Terry
thought that a distance of -25' must be•,employed for an accessory
building. upon Commission cement that only -40 was required, he stated
that.Vwalls are already up and the kitchen entrance off the driveway
would prohibit moving the kitchen.
in response to audience comment, Chairman. fink summarized reasons
OW setbacks. He concluded that side setbacks are primarily for fire
protection between buildings and front setbacks'are for visual open
space.
There were no further commeats and the public hearing was declared
closed.
commissioner Jacobs moved that the variance from setback be granted
as shown on Exhibit C, with the qualification that she would vote
against her own motion. commissioner Sine seconded the motion with
the sine stipulation of voting. The motion carried on the following
roll call vote*
AYES* COMMISSIONERS* FRANCARD,KINDIG,NORBERG,MINK
NAYE S* COMMISSIONERS* JACOBS,SINE,TAYLflR
Chairman Mink informed the applicant that this variance grant is subject
to appeal to the City Council.
- 3 -
City Attorney Coleman informed staff and Commission he would prepare
an appropriate finding for this action by the next regular meeting.
Chairman Mink directed staff to prepare a report on the circumstances
surrounding the applicant's new two story garage. This should include
a history of the building, site plans and checks taken during the
construction.
Commissioner Kindig commented his favorable vote was because of this
particular street and did not constitute a precedent on his part.
1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, EIR-33P, FOR ANZA PACIFIC
CORPORATION'S APPLICATION TO PARK VEHICLES IN C-4 DISTRICT, BY
DAVID H. KEYSTON OF ANZA PACIFIC CORPORATION AND PLANNING
DEPAR NT. CITY Or MURLINGAW
Chairman Mink announced hearing on this EIR and requested report from
City Planner Swan,
The City Planner commented the project described by this EIR is to
park vehicles on a portion of Anza Pacific property for a temporary
period of time, and stated information had been supplied by the
applicant. The City Planner had added his evaluations, and pointed
out that the task of the Commission was to determine if the information
was adequate.
At the request of the Chairman, Mr. David Keyston addressed the
Commission, stating he would develop additional information if
necessary.
Discussion followed of Item 6, Poeftive. Environmental Effects, with
suggestions that it be changed to "Enlarge the General Tax Base"
and the comment that this project would enable Anza to proceed with its
Master Plan, tentatively approved in concept. Commissioner Jacobs
remarked that after inspection of the site she saw no problems with
temporary use of this type.
commissioner Mink suggested several mitigating factors under Item 7.
These are: Prohibition of parking on Anza Pacific property north of
Airport Boulevardt no parking in front setbackst no on -street loading
or unloading of vehicles: for fire protection, parking should be at
a reasonable distance from occupied structures. He suggested 150'
for this latter. He also suggested loading pads be built for loading
and unloading on .the site so that dirt would not be tracked on public
streets. Mr. Keyston commented that a forthcoming ordinance prohibiting
parking on Airport -Boulevard would insure that no on -street loading
and unloading would go on. Both commissioner Jacobs and Commissioner
Sine thought 1500 distance from a building was too restrictive in view
of the type of building construction, and suggested input from the
Fire Department on this point. Mr. Keyston considered this relatively
unimportant since there are so few structures, and stated Anza Pacific
would take the responsibility for -cleaning the streets. Chairman
Mink agreed to substitute "reasonable distance" for 1500. Mr. Keyston
stated he would move the parking lots back from the front setback and
put a driveway along Airport Boulevard.
Discussion followed of elimination of lots to the north from the EIR
- 4 -
and application. These to be eliminated would be state parcels 6,7,8,10
and portions of Anza Airport park #4,5,6 north of Airport Boulevard.
City Attorney Coleman commented all lots should remain in the SYR
but could be stricken from the application. The applicant agreed to
come in with another application if parking on lots north of Airport
Boulevard would be necessary.
in response to his questions, commissioner Franeard established that
landscaping would be on Anza property, -not on right of way: and that
Anza Pacific would be agreeable to having the permit reviewed regularly.
Chairman Mink reviewed the amends►ents proposed for the SIR and requested
audience comment. There was none, and the public hearing was declared
closed.
Commissioner Jacobs moved that draft EIR 33P be accepted with
amendments proposed at this meeting and agreed to by Mr. Keyston.
Commissioner Kindig seconded the notion and it ,carried on unanimous
roll call vote.
City Attorney Coleman stated he would prepare a formal resolution for
adoption at the next regular meeting.
2. SPECIAL PERMIT TO PARK CARS IN C-4 DISTRICT, ANZA AIRPORT PARK,
UNITS 4,5 AND 6, WITH STATS LEASED PARCELS 1, 6. 7, 8 AND 10, BY
.DAVID H. KEYSMX FOR ANZA PACIFIC CORPORhVION (CONTINUED FROM
MM 24 1975
At the Chair's invitation, Mr. David Keyston addressed the Commission.
no made formal request to delete from the special permit application
State Parcels 6,7,8, and 10 and portions of Anza Airport Park #4,5,
and 6 north of Airport Boulevard.
Chairman Mink requested audience comaent. There was none and the
public bearing was declared closed.
Commissioner Kindig favored the periodic review of this permit,
remarking that in view of economic conditions he felt more lenient
toward interim uses. He saw no objection to dead storage, but disliked
auto rental lots because of traffic engendered. Mr. Keyston agreed.
He stated he had one auto rental company, but their new cars are
merely delivered to the site and then sent out to various locations.
At the end of the business year they are returned ftr auction. He
specified that rental cars as such are consolidated on the Airport
Parking lot -where there is a 24-hour attendant. He stated he could
rake this a condition of the approval if necessary, as well as the
provision that the permit could be reviewed at any time. Chairman
Mink stated he disliked rapid -turnover of stock, and suggested a
minimum period of two weeks or more. He garstioned if the permit
would be issued specifically to Anza, not to lessees, and if Anza
would be willing to police. Mr. Keyston agreed.
City Planner swan questioned if businesses leasing sites would be
required to have business licenses. Mr. Keyston stated that to his
knowledge he had never leased to anyone without a business license,
but he would be alert to the situation and request that licenses
be procured.
- 5 -
Commissioner Jacobs moved that this special permit be approved with
conditions that.parking area is limited to State Parcel l and portions
of Anza Airport Park Units 4, 5 and 6 located south of Airport Boulevard,
no cars shall be parkgd in front setback, a reasonable distance shall
be maintained from existing buildings, the special permit.shall be
subject to annual review, and it shall be revoked for a lot or parcel
upon issuance of a building permit for that parcel of land. Commissioner
Taylor seconded -the motion and it carried on unanimous roll call vote.
4. SIGN PERMIT FOR 30 SF ILLUMINATED WALL SIGN AT 125 HIGHLAND AVENUE
BY ROBERT EHNI OF CYCLES UNLINITED
Chairman Mink requested report on this application from City Planner
Swan. The City Planner stated that Mr. Ehni had been in the process
of replacing a 30 SF sign advertil3ing Suzuki Nsemcycles with a
sign of identical size advertisng Yamaha when the building inspector
intervened and referred Mr. rhfti to the Planning Department. An
administrative decision had been made and Mr. Ehni had been permitted
to put the sign in place, since he would lose business by lack of
advertising, on the condition that he apply for a permit.
The City Planner noted this sign projects above the existing parapet
and can be considered a roof sign. The sign permit is for the entire
signage program on the face of the building. All signs except the new
one were there -prior to the City's present sign code. Other signage
includes Sign A, 16 SF advertising Norton= Sign B, 24 Sr, advertising
Triumph? Sign C, 48 Sr, "Cycles Unlimited"s and miscellaneous logos
on the building ftee.
Mr. Ehni addressed the Commission, stating that the terms of his
franchise agreement with Yamaha require him to show adequate identification.
The same is true for the two other large signs for Triumph and Norton.
However, he stated he was willing to move the Yamaha sign down to
parapet level, taking it out of the classification of a roof sign.
Diagrams of the signage program were distributed to Commissioners.
Commissioners were interested in reducing the signage on the -building
front still further, and after considerable discussion, Mr. Ehni
agreed to removing the 48 SP painted sign "Cycles Unlimited." He
stated he had replaced the Suzuki sign in good faith, not knowing that
sign permit must be obtained. Mr. Greg Beck, of Cycles Unlimited,
confirmed this, stating the first knowledge they had of the code was
when a building inspector had preemptorily informed them they could
not replace the sign without a Building Permit.
Commissioner Jacobs moved that this sign permit be approved, conditional
upon the removal of the painted sign "Cycles Unlimited" and the
lowering of the Yamaha sign to roof level. Commissioner Kindig seconded
the motion and it carried on unanimous roll call vote.
Chairman Mink suggested that when anyone is issued a business license,
the City give him a copy of -the sign.ordinance. This would tend to
eliminate problems. Commissioners Sine and Jacobs agreed with this
idea. Discussion followed of how to enforce the regulation that
business owners must take down signs when a place of business is
vacated.
- 6 -
5. BUWNGAHE 21N MY4 QUESTi W-MRR
City Planner Swan reported to the commission that under the State
Code duties of planning agencies include investigating and making
recommendations to the legislAtive body for putting into effect the
General Plan or a part thereof. This may include rendering an annual
report to the legislative body on the status of. the plan and progress
in its:;spplication.
The City Planner stated than in an attempt to gain the citizenso
attitude toward the General Pian, the Planning Department had circulated
a questionnaire to a group of people, 38 in number, itho had worked
on the General Plan Review Cocspittee. They were asked if they
considered it timely to review and update the General Plan. The City
Planner suggested answers to these questionnaires might prove valuable
to the Commission in their consideration of several priorities of the
General Plan. He briefly..discussed these priorities aa: adoption
of mandatory elements - seismic safety, safety, scenic roadways, and
noise= City-wide property i0spection report (accomplished)= reconsider-
ation of rezoning area between Peninsula and Howard from R-3 to C-1.
He suggested the possibility of revising -the General Plan, stating
that in his opinion the City does not -=have a General Plan that reflects
the present attitudes toward the future of the City.
Chairman Mink requested staff to summarize results of the questionnaires,
and report to the Commission in one month.
6. PARCEL MAP, HSING A RESUBDIVISION -OF LOTS 7 AND 8, EtOCK 18,
EASTON ADDITION No. 2 AT 1021 AND 1029 EL CAMINO REAL (APN
026-164-070/080) ZONED R-3, BY RICHARD EISEXX FOR MAX AND JEANNE
City Engineer Davidson distributed copies of this parcel map. He
explained that it contemplates two existing lots of 100' and 50'
frontage. The 100' parcel -has an existing apartment building on it.
The other lot has no structure. it is proposed to move the present
property line between the two lots so that one=lot, with the -apartment
building, will have 70' frontage, and the other lot will have_79'+.
He drew attention to the second sheet. of the parcel map, which shows plans
for ten -unit apartment buildina on this. 79' lot.
The City Engineer voiced concerns with these parcels. There are no
building setback lines on the map. Front setback appears to be 154,
side setback less than 39, and rear appears to be 111. These are
non -conforming. Parking ori the present structure is non -conforming.
By moving the property line closer to the building, it eliminates the
possibility of making parking conform. Lot coverage appears to be
excessive - approximately 66%. There is some question about water
service from the 2" main on'El Camino, but the sewer appears to be
adequate. He questioned the proposed, -24' common driveway for egress
and ingress between the two -lots= and,=also questioned if there were
any herttaw..- trees on the -vacant lot"*- The,_City Engineer then
introduced Mr. Richard Eiselt, son of the owners.
Mr. Eiselt displayed photographs of the existing structure, pointing
out it was about 35-40 years old, and was non -conforming only because
of present codes. It was built on an original 50' lot, and an additional
- 7 -
50 feet had been purchased later to improve parking. The remaining
54 feet would accommodate only a 5 -unit apartment house. He spoke
of conforming to code in building the new structure, and noted that because
of the layout of the old structure its parking cannot be rearranged.
Chairman Mink ccmn►ented that a variance application for lot coverage
should be submitted if this map is approved.
Discussion followed, concerning conditions for variance, and calculation
of lot coverage with a mutual easement. The City Engineer suggested
that this be considered only as a tentative soap if set for hearing
because of the complicationeto be resolved. After further Commission
discussion, Chairman Mink requested the applicant to work with staff
in resolving problems with the map and asked for a staff progress
report at the meeting of April 28.
7. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE AND CONTRACTOR'S STORAGE YARD IN M-1
DISTRICT AT 1616 ROLLINS YAM (APN 025-•262170) BY MUNKDALE BROTHERS,
INOORPORATEDt LAVENSTBIN AND COMPANY, AGENTSs ELIZABETH C. KUHN,
Assistant City Planner Yost distributed plans for the modification of
this existing building. Modification contemplates establishing new
office space by means of partitions, new landscaping, and establishment
of contractor's storage yard in the rear. He pointed out 24 parking
spaces are provided as required. Landscaping covers 7% of the site
in two areas in front. In his opinion this application could be set
for hearing.'
Commission concerns were with the gas pumps shown on the plan, and
conti-kation was requested that the Fire Department would check this
proposal. Also it was noted the new signs for the establishment
must be cleared for a permit.
Mr. Munkdale affirmed that the north side of the building would also
be landscaped, and that the storage yard would be used for a small
amount of pipe. He said most equipment would be stored in the warehouse
and that there would be no encroachment on the parking spaces by the
storage.
Chairman Mink set this application for hearing April 28.
8. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ADD A LIBRARY AND CLASSROOMS FOR GRADUATE STUDY
AT 731 EL CAMINO REAL (APN 028-141-070) ZONED R-3, FOR DAVID AND
ADFLE ADLER , PENINSU,LA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC.
Chairman Mink reported that these applicants had requested this item
be continued until the month of May.
9. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR TRUCKING ESTABLISHMENT IN M-1 DISTRICT AT 189
AIRPORT BOULEVARD (PORTION OF LOTS 7 AND 8, ANZA AIRPORT PARK UNIT
NO. 2, RSM 65/'27,28) BY GLEN R. HUBBARD OF GLENOID TRUCK LINESs
L. IZ IRIAN,
OWNE��
City Planner Swan reviewed background of this application. He stated
Mr. Hubbard had leased this site in November when it was owned by Anza.
cw_*]=
His trucks were parked on.Airport Boulevard. In January, the property
was sold. Glenco has been operating without a business license for
a period of time. When business licenge was reviewed, Mr. Hubbard
was informed that a special permit would be required. Mr. Hubbard had
submitted an application which was incomplete in that there was no
indication of where trucks were to be parked. However, it was
indicated that they intents to lease space where Undahl Model Homes
have been removed.
The City Planner stated Mr. Hubbardhad been present earlier in the
meeting but had left after being requested to submit a site plan
showing parking_.- There was discussion of the forthcoming ordinance
which will prObibit parking on Airport Boulevard.
Chairman Mink requested staff report at the meeting of May 12.
10. FINAL REVIEW OF TWO ILLUMINATED WALL SIGNS, TOTAL AREA OF 33 SF
AT 1843 EL CAMINO REALt OUTLINE APPROVAL GRANTED 2/24/75 TO STEVE
J. MUSICH,_PMERTY OWNER.
Assistant City Planner Yost presented perspectives of Signs D and E
which have not been approved, pending tenancy of this part of the
building. He told Commissioners this space will be leased to
Craighead Realty and the signs.will be black and white in keeping with
the motif of See's Candies. Commissioners inspected the illustrations.
Commissioner Taylor moved that Signs D and E be approved for this
site. Commissioner Sine seconded the motion and it carried by voice
vote.
CITY PLANNER DEPORT t
City Planner Swan.reviewed Council activities originating in the
Planning Commission. He noted Resolution No. 19-75 had been passed
establishing new fees for planning applicationst and commented
Commissioners might wish to attend Council meeting of April 21 which
will consider zoning code amendments and rezoning in Burlingame Park
and East Burlingame. He also noted pending Council consideration of
making the General Plan identical to zoning.
There was discussion of correspondence dated April 8, 1975 from
G. J. Gehlhaber, 2505 Easton Drive, objecting to zoning violations on
a neighbor's property.
The City Planner noted minor permit procedure had been approved by
Council and the sign and fence exception code becomes effective
April 17.
There was discussion of roof sign ordinance. City Attorney Coleman
stated he had recommended to Council to include pole supported roof
signs in the definition.
City Planner Swan announced Land Use Conference on June 20 and 21 and
requested reservations be made by contacting the staff. He also
made announcements of Regional Coastal Workshop in San Francisco on
May 2, and of League of California Cities Planners and Planning
Commissioners at Coronado the end of July.
- 9 -
The City Planner stated City Attorney Coleman had established there
were two unzoned. parcels of land in Burlingame - the present site
of Fling's and the Peninsula Tennis Club property. He questioned if
Planners had completed their Conflict of Interest forms.
Chairman Mink noted letter from Anza Pacific to the City Council
requesting study of Anza's plans to improve their access road.
Chairman Mink also noted election of officers was scheduled for the
April 28 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting regularly adjourned at 10:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth E. Jacobs
Secretary