HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1972.08.14TILE CITY OF BURLINGA14h PLANNING COMMISSION
August 14, 1972
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT
Cistulli
Kindig
Norberg
Sine
Taylor
CALL TO ORDER
Jacobs (excused)
Mink (excused)
City Planner Swan
City Engineer Marr
City Attorney Karmel
Planning Aide Hendrickson
An adjourned meeting of the Burlingame Planning Commission, from
the regular meeting of July 24, 1972, was called to order on the
above date at 8:00 p.m., Chairman Cistulli presiding.
ROLL CALL
The above -named members were present. Commissioners Jacobs and
Mink were excused, having given previous notice that business com-
mittments prevented their attendance.
HEARINGS:
1. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF RETAIL STORE IN AN M-1
DISTRICT AT 1180 CAROLAN AVENUE (APN 026-233-010) BY DONALD D.
TATEOSIAN.
Chairman Cistulli announced this item for hearing. PAr. Tateosian
stated that he wished to present two documents: Grant of Easement
between Oscar F. Person and. Rector Cadillac Company and Donald D.
Tateosian, granting easement for parking only, not exclusive, for
a period of five years, and Grant of Easement between Oscar F.
Person and Rector Cadillac Company and Donald D. Tateosian, granting
easement for egress only, not exclusive, for a period of five years.
Mr. Tateosian thought these documents would support and assure the
parking spaces and egress rights required by code for granting of
the permit.
City Attorney Karmel observed that the major problem had been off-
street parking and circulation, that the commission suggested parking
be on the easement and circulation be effected through egress on
Rector Cadillac premises. Mr. Karmel stated he and Mr. Tateosian
had agreed right-of-way across [and on] the Oscar Person property,
Rector Cadillac, tenant, should be obtained, thus resolving the
problem. He would ask the engineer's office to check the description
to see it proved satisfactory.
Commissioner Taylor noting that the easement was not exclusive,
wondered if the owner of the land could enter into some other agree-
ment. This could account for two parking spaces. Would this inter-
fere with the Guyselman easement? City Attorney Karmel thought
since this had been resolved, the parking difficulty had been resolved.
Commissioner Kindig asked for clarification on Mr. Tateosian's request
to keep the gasoline pump in service. Mr. Tateosian felt that as the
- 2 -
whole building was sprinklered and as the fire inspector had said
that if in active use the gas pump could remain, it would be ad-
vantageous for the present tenants and an asset to the property.
Commissioner Sine expressed concern as to additive parking. tie also
referred to lack of a permit for the present sign, illegally installed.
Mr. Finkelstein, attorney for Mr. Dimicelli, stated that he had recom-
mended the sign be covered for the time being. Commissioner Sine re-
minded him that an application by the antique store for a sign permit
was still necessary.
Commissioner Taylor moved that the special permit for establishment
of a retail store in an M-1 district at 1180 Carolan Avenue by Donald
D. Tateosian be granted conditionally: 1) The documents submitted
be approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer, and 2) that
the application be limited to and extensive with the life of the
lease, not to exceed five years. Motion was carried 5 - 0 on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS KINDIG, NORBERG, SINE, TAYLOR, CISTULLI
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JACOBS, MINK
2. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A LADIES READY-TO-WEAR STORE IN AN M-1 DISTRICT
AT 1047 BROADWAY (PORTION OF APN 026-233-010; OWNED BY DONALD D.
AND N. L. TATEOSIAN) BY RHODA SMALL.
Neither bars. Small nor a representative responded when Chairman
Cistulli announced Item 2 open for hearing. City Planner Swan ad-
vised the commission that only verbal notification of application
withdrawal had been received from Mrs. Rhoda Small. At that time,
she was informed that a letter stating her intention was required.
However, because the application fee was not refundable, bars. Small
indicated there (probably) would be no further communication. The
City Planner stated a letter from the Police Department giving the
traffic circulation in that area had been received but review would
seem academic.
Chairman Cistulli observed that there was no proof to file of the
fact that Mrs. Small was withdrawing the application. If the motion
were tabled, it would continue to be carried, serving no purpose.
It was noted that application rejection would apply only to Mrs.
Small, not to the property owners.
Commissioner Taylor moved that the application for a special permit
for a Ladies Ready -to -Wear Store in an MI-1 district at 1047 Broadway
by Rhoda Small be denied. Motion was carried 5 - 0 on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: COMIMISSIONERS KINDIG, NORBERG, SINE, TAYLOR, CISTULLI
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JACOBS, MINK
Chairman Cistulli adjourned the adjourned meeting of July 24 at
8:40 p.m. to the regular study meeting of August 14, 1972.
- 3 -
Planning Commission Study Meeting of August 14, 1972
APPLICATIONS:
1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 40 AND PORTION OF
LOTS 39 AND 41, BLOCK 58, EASTON ADDITION TO BURLINGAME NO. 7,
ZONED R-1 BY R. C. DAUBEMIRE
Chairman Cistulli introduced the application for study.
Mr. George Beatty, engineer, was present to display and explain a
revised plan which involves remodeling the existing house so as to
establish two 50' lots. There exists on one parcel a dwelling which
has a 6.2' portion extending over the 50' line. A porch encroaches
and on the back,the diningroom, which does not go up to the second
story. The plan is to remove the porch and modify the area of the
dining room and incorporate the entry way into what is now the
living room. Removing this portion would not change the architecture
of the building (the present door would be replaced with a stationary
window when the entry is moved). Being presented at this time are
only plans for redesign of the exterior of the building to make it
conform with present code. No special permit would be necessaryif
it would meet all code requirements.
Commissioner Taylor asked if these portions of the structure could
be removed before application for resubdivision in two weeks at the
hearing. He would suggest as a more practical approach asking the
city engineer permission to post a bond to remove portions of the
existing house. The entire project would need extra time.
City Engineer Marr observed that a decision could not be made tonite.
A parcel map cannot be signed until after the house has been re-
modeled. It would seem satisfactory if that portion of the house
on the other lot were demolished before request is made for division.
There would still have to be a 5' setback to make this legal. Post-
ing of a bond would be up to the City Attorney.
Commissioner Sine noted that the plan for lot at 39A, the building,
would be substantially revised. He felt that as the neighborhood
was deeply concerned, those that signed the petition, regidents
within 500' around the subject resubdivision, should be notified of
the hearing.
Commissioner Kindig asked City Planner Swan or City Attorney Karmel
if there were some way to eliminate the illegal extra foot from the
existing fence. City Planner Swan replied it could be strongly
suggested that legal action would be forthcoming unless this were
done.
Chairman Cistulli informed the applicant his request for resubdivision
would be set for public hearing on August 28.
- 4 -
2. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A RECREATION VEHICLE DEALERSHIP IN AN M-1
DISTRICT AT ADRIAN COURT AND ADRIAN ROAD BY BAYWEST ASSOCIATES
RECREATION VEHICLE COMPANY
City Planner Swan observed that of concern are type of advertising
and a sign that would be involved. The application for a special
permit is for a use designated for a different district.
Mr. Carl E. Kirker, president of the company, defined a recreation
vehicle as a self-contained, self-propelled vehicle, and stated
that the dealership would handle new merchandise as well as resale
of vehicles turned in.
In addition to carrying motor homes from 18' to 28', self-contained
vehicles having water, electrical and gas systems, the company would
also have travel trailers which are towed by another vehicle, campers
to place on truck tops and caps for pick-up trucks. The latter
generally used in an urban area with facilities enabling them to go
for several days without servicing.
Two schematic plans of the site covering approximately 3.8 acres
were shown. The development includes building for show -room, offices,
rental units and shops, areas designated for servicing and parking,
and landscaping to establish the proper atmosphere and screen working
areas.
In reply to questions from Chairman Cistulli and Commissioner Sine,
Mr. Beatty stated that a maximum of 100-135 new and used vehicles
would be stocked on hand. When Commissioner Taylor asked if banners,
balloons and that type of display would be used, Mr. Beatty stated
that the company would not have any gimmicks that would detract from
the area, but would like a sign commensurate with other properties
and so placed as to be seen from the freeway.
Chairman Cistulli asked how many employees were anticipated and if
proper parking were provided. Mr. Kirker listed the personnel as
6 in sales, 7-8 in service and repair, 3 for vehicle cleaning and
5 for the office. Customer parking is provided in front and employee
parking (not tandem) in the rear.
Answering Commissioner Taylor, Mr. Kirker stated there would be a
full service operation for repair, flushing containers and motor
servicing. Regarding a refuse tank dump, waste would go to the City
Sanitation System after being put through a clarifier. City Engineer
Marr stated that he would have to know more about the chemical used
in vehicle facilities before use of the City system would be approved.
Chairman Cistulli requested the City Engineer be given a break -down
of the chemicals. As for car -washing drainage, City Engineer 1"9arr
informed Mr. Kirker that the City would object to soap in the storm
drains.
City Planner Swan told the commission that Mr. Kirker had been noti-
fied that noise generated by planes at the airport was greatest in
this particular area of Burlingame. When Chairman Cistulli asked
what this meant in an M-1 district, the City la er id
d that ew
development in this area is to be brought to/Re RTra90ntARc e
Committee for recommendation. Air. Kirker felt that was not a draw-
back for this type of enterprise; however, Commissioner Kindig
- S -
questioned the effect on those working within the office building.
Chairman Cistulli pointed out that the commission was acting on
the special use of both -building and land. Commissioner Sine sug-
gested scheduling the hearing, stating that some permits granted
are conditional to meeting certain requirements and the commission
could look further into what would be more appropriate.
Application was scheduled for hearing at the meeting of August 28.
3. VARIANCE TO ALLOW J. H. SNYDER COMPANY OFFICE IN THE EXISTING
MASONRY STRUCTURE AT 1011 CADILLAC WAY, LOCATED ALONG THE
NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE, AND JOINT USE OF PARKING WITH NORTHPARK
APARTMENTS IN AN R-4 DISTRICT BY L. BURLINGAME, INC., HENRY L.
RICHMAN
Application was declared open for study. Mr. Richman stated that
as in submitted letter, he would like to remodel and convert the
building to use as an office for the operation of the Northpark
Apartments. Replying
to Chairman Cistulli, Mr. Richman said the building would be repainted
but there would be no exterior structural changes, only a few interior
modifications. "We will utilize parking for the guests of the complex,"
as 1) The office would be open from 8:30 to 5:30 only and guest
parking is generally not used during these hours, and 2) Approximately
250 apartments are Studios which accommodate one person but there are
1-1/2 parking spaces per unit which means 400 spaces for 250 people.
We will use probably 15 spaces.
With regard to parking: Commissioner Sine observed that would be
taking guest parking for his own use, and that in his [Mr. Sine's)
review of minutes, where Northpark had previously had parking spaces,
some had been taken away. Commissioner Kindig stated that the com-
mission had reviewed parking for the Northpark Apartments once and
shouldn't go through it again. City Planner Swan noted that there
was no parking on the south side of Cadillac Way and only 2 hours
parking on the other side. Commissioner Taylor referred to the fact
that parking requirements were incorporated in the agreement, there-
fore there would be no way that the commission could allow the pro-
posed parking.
Chairman Cistulli suggested further discussion be withheld and public
hearing scheduled for August 28.
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR VELVET TURTLE RESTAURANT AT 1095 ROLLINS ROAD
BY SAGA ENTERPRISES. INC.
City Planner Swan stated that the agreement between Saga Enterprises
and the City included approval of landscaping plans by the City.
Upon request two weeks ago plans were submitted by Saga Enterprises
and are being presented to the Planning Commission for review. The
Director of Parks has seen the drawings, and Planner Swan would
suggest that the Beautification Commission also be given the op-
portunity to comment.
- 6 -
Chairman Cistulli proposed inviting the Beautification Commission
to the public hearing, asking the Chairman and Vice Chairman if
they could arrange to see the plans prior to the meeting.
Commissioner Sine stated that he would like to have a representative
of Saga Enterprises management also present.
Public hearing was scheduled for August 28.
5. SIGN VARIANCE FOR ROOF SIGN EXCEEDING TWENTY (20) FEET IN
HEIGHT FROM ROOF LEVEL AT 1021 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-2,
BY CUMMINGS AND COMPANY FOR LEE OLDSMOBILE
City Planner Swan quoted code limitation: ..No roof sign shall
exceed 20' in height, measured from the roof level to the highest
point of the sign, with the further limitation that no portion of
such sign shall exceed fifty feet in height, measured from the
ground level...", and suggested that the upper portion of the sign
[two sections] be lowered so that it would comply.
Replying to Chairman Cistulli, Mr. Lee said that the upper sign
was a General Motors Corporate sign, for identification purpose,
and that it was this main sign for which he was asking a variance.
In answer to query, Mr. Robertson stated that the sign would be
internally lighted, face California Drive, and that no light would
be so placed as to interfere with the adjacent residents.
Air. Lee explained that the application for variance was being made
because the firm is not located on Automobile Row and the prominent
sign was needed to identify location and attract customers.
Public hearing was set for August 28.
City Planner Swan would ask that a representative of the management
be in attendance at the hearing.
OLD BUSINESS
6. SIGN VARIANCE FOR SKYLINE TERRACE BY DIANE SIIANE
City Planner Swan presented and Commissioner Sine read to commission
the July 10, 1972, letter from Mrs. Diane Shane.
Following discussion, commissioners concurred the matter should con-
tinue to be handled by the City Planner and Airs. Shane advised of
the attitude of the commission: The sign is to be installed exactly
as agreed upon or else torn down.
7. VARIANCE TO ALLOW UPGRADING THE EXISTING APARTMENT BUILDING AT
1452 BELLEVUE AVENUE BY JAMES GONG (FOR STUDY ONLY)
Mr. F. B. Schlageter, attorney for Mr. Gong, was present to submit
modified plans and gain some background on the problems attendant
to the application.
- 7 -
Commissioner Taylor observed that the shear wall and parking were
concerns that had been discussed, and wondered if an internal post
were not also involved.- Commissioner Sine noted the shear wall
had been incorporated; however, parking had to be modified before
application would be amenable to the commission. New locations of
some parking spaces under the building were pointed out, but Com-
missioners Sine and Norberg saw no way that cars could safely
maneuver from the garage. They would still have to back into the
street. Commissioner Sine advised members that he had been to the
site several times with the Building Inspector and Fire Marshal
and felt more adequate parking was all that was left to be resolved.
Mr. Schlageter will contact City Planner Swan prior to the public
hearing which was scheduled for August 28.
NEW BUSINESS
RE: SPECIAL PERMIT FOR REVISION OF ATLANTIC RICHFIELD SERVICE
STATION AT BROADWAY AND ROLLINS ROAD
City Planner Swan told commission that subsequent to the July 24
hearing, Atlantic Richfield had conferred with the Fire Department
to verify fact that self -serve gasoline stations were not permitted
in Burlingame. Mr. Clausen had written letter to City Council re-
questing the plan be returned to the Planning Commission for further
study. Revised plans must be awaited. The Planner said he had
heard there was the possibility of a third bay containing a car
wash being added in new plans.
Regarding the station, City Engineer Marr stated that widening of
the street had been discussed but there was still no binding agree-
ment with Arco that they would participate in payment of the project.
The Engineer was asked if, when the street -widening contract were
let, the low bidder could be asked to hold the agreement for 90
days. Mr. Marr replied that would be too late.
RECONVENE
After a recess at 9:45 p.m., meeting reconvened at 9:55 p.m.
PLANNING STUDIES
City Planner Swan stated that in his opinion the items slated for
review warranted a special study session; however, Items 1 and 4
were most timely and should be covered at this time, for needed
direction on implementation of the General Plan.
1. RECLASSIFICATION STUDY - INDICATORS FOR CHANGE
In researching the Arundel area, Planning Intern Hendrickson cited
two key factors for evaluation: percentage of owner -occupied
living units [in comparison to rental property], and the ratio of
assessed value of improvements to the assessed value of land.
These two indicators reveal that the Arundel area has a relatively
high proportion of rental units (less than 500 of homes are owner
occupied on many blocks), and that the value of improvements in
- 8 -
relation to land is comparatively low, indicating deteriorating
or underdeveloped property within the area.
City Planner Swan observed that he would favor more owner -occupied
housing. A major problem is water supply for multi -family units.
Until the cost is resolved, nothing concrete can be done in the
way of reclassification.
Various means of financing adequate water systems in renewal areas
were discussed. There was also discussion about the extent of the
area to be proposed for rezoning. The Planning Commission favored
the entire study area rather than sequential or subarea reclassi-
fication.
2. SECOND DRAFT - R-2A DISTRICT REGULATIONS
City Planner Swan felt this should be covered at the suggested
special study session.
3. FIRST DRAFT - SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
This, too, should be considered at the proposed special study meeting.
4. INTERIM OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
City Planner Swan observed that this should be scheduled for public
hearing on August 28. A state law requires that an Open Space
Element of the Burlingame General Plan be prepared and submitted.
By complying with the state law and adopting an interim open space
element, Burlingame would be eligible to apply for federal and
state funds.
S. POSSIBLE CODE AIMENDMENTS
Postponed for later study were a) Parking Regulations - Parking
permits, and b) Home Occupations.
The meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas W. Sine
Acting Secretary
i�