Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1971.11.22THE CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1971 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT Cistulli None City Planner Swan Jacobs City Attorney Karmel Kindig City Engineer Marr Mink Norberg RECEIVED Sine Taylor DEC 1-1971 CALL TO ORDER CITY Of BURLINGW A regular meeting of the Burlingame Planning Commission was called to order on the above date at 8:00 p.m., Chairman Sine presiding. . ROLL CALL The above -named members were present. MT MTTTF. ,'- The minutes of the regular meeting of October 27, the adjourned meeting of November 8, and the study meeting of November 8, 1971, submitted to members previously were approved and adopted. 1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR PROPERTY OF MRS. MELBA P . RILEY (OITNER OF RECORD MR3. MELBA P. MOORE) 3.50 AC MOL AT 1554 FAYSHORE HIGIT-7AY Chairman Sine announced the consideration of this application continued from the adjourned meeting of November 8. a a - The City Planner reported that he had verbal communication on this matter, but was not aware of the receipt of any legal documents tending toward its resolution. The City Attorney summarized what had happened to date. He stated he had received a telephone communication that Mrs. Riley had been able to arrange financing to purchase the additional 10' from Mr. O'Hara; that in a subsequent telephone conversation he had told Mrs. Riley's attorney that there would have to be a dedication of the easement to the city with ingress and egress and water main for fire purposes; also that the parcel map cannot be granted by the Commission but must be referred to the City Council for acceptance. City Attorney Karmel told the attorney he would prepare a grant of easement and subdivision improvement agreement upon receipt and examination of agreement between Mrs. Riley and Mr. O'Hara. He stated he had received this agreement from Mrs. Riley this evening immediately before the meeting and had had no opportunity to examine it. Apparently it covered necessary points but several items must be checked: easement must cover 20'' strip on Old Bayshore; where does this easement lie with regard to the triangle of land; how does this agreement affect O'Hara's agreement with the City to sell him a portion of the land over the drainage ditch? He pointed out that these points must be 2 - cleared up before the Commission can act. Chairman Sine asked if the Commission would like to continue this matter to an adjourned meeting so that this could be done. Mrs. Riley protested that she had received the documents only today and that they contained everything the City had asked. There was further discussion. Commissioner Cistulli moved that this matter be adjourned to the next study meeting. Commissioner Norberg asked if action could be taken subject to completion of documents. The City Attorney repeated that it would be best not to do so. The agreement received had no exhibits A & B, exhibits C & D are metes and bounds descriptions which must be checked with the City Engineer's office. The City Planner had not seen the agreement nor had the City Engineer. Drawings have been submitted which are likewise subject to checking by the Engineer's office. I - Mr. C. Hall, attorney for Mrs. Riley, addressed the commission, stating he had raised $50,000 for purchase of the additional land from O'Hara, subject to City approval, and he feared further delays might cause the financing agent to withdraw his offer. He was reminded by the Chairman that at the last hearing it was requested that all documentation be completed and examined by staff so that the Commission could make a decision. The City Attorney commented that while the matter was much further along than it had been, he could not approve a document placed before him just prior to the meeting. The agreement concerned not only Mrs. Riley and Mr. O'Hara but also the City of Burlingame. It must be satisfactory to the City. City Engineer Marr noted that he had not seen any revisions to the parcel map showing the 25' easement, and this should be revised before the next meeting. Commissioner Mink seconded the motion to adjourn this hearing to the next study meeting, December 13, and it passed by voice vote. ACKNOEEDGEMENTS Chairman Sine and Commission members extended congratulations to Commissioner Everett Kindig upon his recent marriage. Chairman Sine acknowledged the presence at the meeting of Councilman Mangini. ,r- ;� 2. RECLASSIFICATION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 3, BURLINGAME PARK NO. 2 RSM B/17 FROM R-1 TO R-3A, BEING CITY OF BURLINGAME PARKING LOT 3. RECLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 8, 11, AND 12, BLOCK 3, BURLINGAME PARK NO. 2 RSM B/17, FROM R-1 TO R-3A, BEING 1513 AND 1517 BURLINGAME AVENUE (APPLICANT AND Oy NER: RICHARD F. MC LAUGHLIN) 4. VARIANCE TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ON ONE LOT, LOTS 8, 11, AND 12, BLOCK 3, BURLINGAME PARK NO. 2, RSM B/17 (APPLICANT: RICHARD F. MC LAUGHLIN) Chairman Sine announced a hearing on these applications, which were again considered together because of their inter -relation. City Planner btaan reviewed the background of these applications, commenting that R-3A is for medium density and is an apartment type between R-2 and R-3. He stated that next to Dr. McLaughlin's 3 lots there is a - 3 - city parking lot. Since a group of four lots cannot be considered spot zoning it was decided to include all four in the reclassification action. The density permitted by the General Plan guides the change in this particular area. The General Plan permits a density of 20 units per net acre. The McLaughlin property would comprise 26,300 square feet or .6 of an acre and 12 units would be permitted. He noted that the condominium could be handled on a variance basis but that reclassification would indicate commission policy. He recommended the reclassification and the variance for placement of three buildings on one lot be considered, noting that when an intensi- fication of use occurs there should be an upgrading of public facilities. The commission discussed the merits of a variance as opposed to reclassification in this case. City Engineer Marr stated he had prepared a written report regarding the water supply and the proposed widening of the street to be consistent with the portion already accomplished. Secretary Kindig read the letter of application and also the City Engineer's letter which stated that an 8" main, costing approximately $15,000, would be necessary. The letter also stated that the widening of the street to the westerly property line of the applicant's property would cost approximately $4,000. The City Engineer suggested that the applicant deposit with the City an estimated amount so that a City fund could be built up to upgrade the water system. Chairman Sine gave the audience ground rules for a public hearing and asked that the applicant's representative address the meeting. James McLaughlin, developer for the project, gave a set of plans to the Commission for their examination. He then introduced his archi- tect, William Kelley. The architect stated that the plans are pre- liminary design; the 3 buildings would be of Spanish design, pedestrian oriented and in keeping with the residential character of the neighbor- hood. Underground parking would accommodate 24 cars and there would be a large area for recreation. The Chairman invited comments from the audience in favor of this development. Mr. Dan Thurston, 1530 Burlingame Avenue, stated that he lived in the neighborhood and the general opinion was that the lots were bought because they were going to be rezoned. He stated he would like to see the whole block rezoned and get it over with. He suggested R-3 rather than R-3A. Helen O'Conner, 1549 Burlingame Avenue, had questions regarding the upkeep of the condominium and the widening of the street. The City Engineer informed her that the 42' widening would be taken off the one side of the street and only to the limits of the proposed development. The architect then explained the plans to the audience and a recess was declared by the Chairman at 9:00 p.m. so that all could examine the plans personally. -RECONVENE The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 9:15 p.m. RECLASSIFICATION (CONTINUED) A resident who lives at Occidental and Ralston stated that there were many non -conforming properties in this area and she would like to see a general improvement of the area. She would like to see the develop- ment go through so it would encourage elimination of non -conforming properties. Bernice Barnett of 1575 Ralston, agreed. Mrs. Jon Rosell, 1525 Burlingame Avenue,owner of property adjoining the proposed development, objected to the swimming pool being on her side of the property because of the noise. She asked if the pool could be on the other side away from them. On a question by the Chairman, Mr. McLaughlin stated that the pool could be relocated on the other side. Mrs'. Rosell stated she would be happy to see the street upgraded - the swimming pool was the only objection. The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Norberg indicated he thought the plan very well conceived and that.it would be an asset to the City. He cautioned that the Commission should make certain that the property is developed according to plan after reclassification. There was commission discussion as to how this could best be implemented. I.f the reclassification were accomplished first, the applicant could conceivably withdraw the application for variance and the Commission would have no control over the type of building. The City Attorney suggested that action could be taken upon the variance conditional upon the completion of the reclassification. The City Planner stated, as a resolution of the problem, that the variance could be considered now and the reclassification be accom- plished at a time more convenient to the Commission; or the applicant could withdraw the reclassification and the City could be the applicant. Mr. McLaughlin indicated approval of the postpomnent of the reclassi- fication. commissioner Taylor moved that the reclassification items for the City parking lot and the McLaughlin property be continued until the regular Commission meeting on February 28. Commissioner Mink seconded, and the motion carried on voice vote. In considering the variance, City Planner Swan commented that the roof and garage would be commonly owned; that the condominium group would buy -one life insurance policy for the entire development. The structures must meet all city codes and the fire department would require a one -hour fire wall. He commented that the additional intensity of use should pay its share of the increased water supply. He suggested that an approved landscaping plan be a condition of the variance. Commissioner Cistulli asked for more information as to how maintenance of the condominium was paid. Mr. McLaughlin explained that condominiums operate under direct control of the State. The condominium owners form an association which charges dues monthly. Out of this, all condominium arrangements, such as insurance, landscaping, maintenance etc. must be paid. No one person can degrade the building. There was no audience comment on this variance, since all opinions had been expressed previously. The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Norberg had no comments. Commissioner Jacobs approved =A= of the development with the stipulations of adequate water supply, the meeti g of the fire codes, replacement of trees in the parking, and a landscaping plan. Commissioner Taylor agreed that the use was good and it would upgrade the area. He did feel that additional stipulations should be that there be no more than three buildings, and relocation of swimming pool be noted. Commissioner Mink approved the development. Commissioner Kindig had no comment on the plans but raised the question of how the dater main replacement and street widening was to be accomplished cost -wise. Commissioner Cistulli approved of the development, noting that the near -downtown location would make it suitable for senior citizens. Chairman Sine stated it was an excellent overall concept, and the first time used in Burlingame. He noted, however, that the present water supply was inadequate. The City Engineer suggested financing of the never main. The Chairman commented he did not feel the people living on the street should be penalized -by assessment for this larger main, and asked the developer if he would object to putting up the front money for development of the water main and street widening, in the approximate amount of $15,000 - 20,000. He noted that as the area was developed further this money could be refunded. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he would be amenable to putting up the front money for this project. The City Engineer stated that he had a water project in the amount of $200,000 coming up for bid next month and that he had control of the time limit. If he could have assurance in the next two or three weeks that the McLaughlin project were going through, he could include it in the water project. There was discussion of hoTa the applicant could make an agreement with the City. The City Attorney suggested that the effective date of the variance be the effective date of an agreement between the City of Burlingame and the applicant.'VCommissioner Mink moved the variance be approved to allow more than one residential building on one o Lots 8, 11, and 12, Block 3, Burlingame Park No. 2, Richard F. McLaughlin, subject to the following conditions: the condominum be built per the plans submitted with the relocation of the swimming pool, the structure is to meet all city codes, it is to be of one hour fire construction, there is to be submerged parking with at least two spaces per unit, there is to be an approved landscaping plan, there shall be submission of a parcel map to combine lots, the variance shall become effective upon execution of agreement between the City of Burlingame and property owner to develop an 8" water supply and fire hydrants, and agreement to widen the southerly side of Burlingame Avenue 4'6". Commissioner Cistulli seconded the motion and it passed on the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CISTULLI, JACOBS, KINDIG, MINK, NORBE RG, TAYLOR NAYS S: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER SINE ABSENT: NONE 5. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR CONTRACTOR'S STORAGE YARD IN AN M-1 DISTRICT. JAMES R. TEEVAN, 1019 BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. OWNER, WILLIAM ROESE. The Secretary read correspondence from the applicant. The City Planner stated the revised plot plan shows three parking spaces which satisfied code requirements. A Mr. Kenzy, with Burlingame Realty, addressed the Commission as representative of the applicant in the purchase of this property. He noted that the small area in the rear would be unusual in any type of operation like this, and could be used only for storage. There was no one in the audience either for or against this application. The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Norberg noted that the request seemed reasonable. Commissioner Jacobs had no comments. Commissioner Taylor questioned possible additional leasing and objections of Northpark tenants. Mr. Teevan stated no additional tenants were contemplated, and that the apartment complex was some distance away. Commissioner Mink questioned the storage of -thinners and other inflammatory materials, and the nature of the trash which might also become a fire hazard. Mr. Teevan replied that thinners were stored in an underground storage tank, and it was brought out that such tanks are under the juris- diction of the Fire Department, they are inspected and code enforced. With regard to the trash, Mr. Teevan stated that most paint used is water based. Surplus material such as extra paint on the completion of a job is hauled to the dump. Chairman Sine commented that any paint and storage area is especially watched by the Fire Department. He had no comments about the application, but stated he wished to see good housekeeping. Mr. Teevan agreed this would be watched. Commissioner Kindig moved the special permit application for a contractor's storage yard in an M-1 district at 1019 Bayshore by `.'. James R. Teevan be approved contingent upon compliance with the fire` code as policed by the Fire Department. Commissioner Mink seconded the motion and it passed unanimously on roll call vote. Chairman Sine informed the applicant the special permit would become effective December 7 unless appealed, and cautioned Mr. Teevan that it was subject to revocation unless conditions were followed. 6. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR LIMITED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE OF EXISTING METAL WAP,EHOUSE BUILDING, 1470 BAYSHORL HIGHY7AY, APPLICANT WILLIAM F . MC CLENAHAN This item was announced for hearing by Chairman Sine. Secretary Kindig read the letter of application which noted the proposed renovation of an old warehouse building and its use for light manufac- turing because of company expansion. The, City Planner told the Commission that this usage of the building was a good solution to the problem of what to do about an existing structure that would no longer be permitted in this area. The proper'Cy would be redeveloped for use until 1979. He stated the applicants propose to update the building, meet code requirements and provide for adequate parking. He recommended favorable consideration of the application. Mr. Mitzner, representative of Aluminum Plumbing Fixtures Corporation, who would be leasing the building told the Commission his company needed extra space for expansion. They would make the building more attractive. There was no one in the audience either for or against this application, arm and the public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Norberg had no comment on the application. Commissioner Jacobs stated he did not condone non -conforming buildings, but this usage would improve a present eyesore. Commissioner Taylor thought that such usage of a non -conforming building for the next seven years would mean a loss of opportunities to improve the area. Commissioner Mink questioned the ownership of the permit, and it was brought out that the owner would be the Smallcomb estate, T-Jm. F. MCClenahan acting as their agent, and it could be a condition of the permit that if Aluminum Plumbing Fixtures Corporation vacated the premises before 1979, the special permit would terminate. Commissioner Kindig had also questioned this point before it was clarified. Commissioner Cistulli had no comment. Chairman Sine had no comment. City Engineer Marr stated that he had some verbal commitment that the Bank of America wished to share in putting in street improvements in this area and suggested that this be a condition of :;he permit. Commissioner Mink moved that the special permit for limited light industrial use of the existing metal warehouse building at 1470 Bayshore Highway be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. metal building must meet all fire and building code regulations: one -hour e.-.terior walls and fire resistant roof. 2. Remove or fill underground gasoline storage tank with inert material. 3. Special Permit for limited time period ending April 30, 1979 at which time the permitted use is to be amortized. 4. Permit for exclusive use of Aluminum Plumbing Fixtures Corporation. 5. Refinishing and landscaping of the exterior of the building on the Bayshore Highway and Burlway Road frontages to match existing buildings at 750, 770, 771-779 Burlway Road. 6. All off street parking areas be surfaced. 7. Participate in cost to construct street improvements in an amount as approved by City Engineer. Commissioner Jacobs seconded the motion and it passed unanimously on roll call vote. The applicant was informed the permit would become effective on December 7 unless appealed to the City Council. 7. SPECIAL PE1U4IT FOR SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AT RETAIL IN AN M-1 DISTRICT, 1028 CAROLAN AVENUE, APPLICANT: PENINSULA GENERAL TIRE COMPANY AND LOUIS M. SEGAL Chairman Sine announced this application for hearing. Secretary Kindig read letter of application. The City Planner reviewed the application and raised the question of parking, especially since the owner intends to build another building across the back of the property. He stated the existing parking spaces available on the north side next to the apartment complex were not included in the lease. He suggested the parking requirement for Peninsula General Tire Company be one space for each two employees, one space for each business vehicle and one space for each service bay. Lease of additional paved space at the rear for six more parking spaces was suggested. He noted that the Fire Inspector had inspected the building and prepared a list of revisions to bring it up to code. He suggested that the driveway would function best if it could carry two-way traffic and a turn- around area were provided on the rear property. Mr. Segal introduced Ralph Button. Mr. Button stated he had drawn the plans and it was his impression that the parking on the PTV side was for the use of the tenant, Mr. Segal. He noted that Mr. Segal runs his business much by appointment, there is no pickup and delivery service for cars; hence there would probably be no traffic congestion. He noted that Peninsula General Tire Company's present location is extremely hazardous as far as traffic is concerned and this location would be much better. There was no one in the audience either for or against this application. The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Norberg stated the application seemed reasonable and had no objection. Commissioner Jacobs was concerned about the parking and Commissioner Taylor thought there was too much activity in too small a space. Commissioner Kindig thought there was reasonable parking now, and Commissioner Cistulli felt the traffic situation would work out since this is an in and out type of business. Chairman Sine had no objections, stating, there would be a traffic flow from the front and rear, that cars would be going through the shop; that it was an improvement over the present use, and Peninsula Tire gave excellent service. He noted there should be a letter from Oscar Person agreeing to move construction equipment from the premises. Copy of Person's letter of November 17 to Mr. Segal was read. Commissioner Cistulli moved that the special permit for sale of goods and services at 1028 Carolan Avenue, applicant Peninsula General Tire and Louis Segal be approved subject to the application and receipt i of a letter from Oscar Person agreeing to move construction equipment. Commissioner Jacobs seconded the motion and it carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CISTULLI, JACOBS, KINDIG, NORBERG, SINE NAYS: COMMISSIONERS MINK, TAYLOR ABSENT: NONE The applicant was informed the permit would become effective December 7 unless appealed to the City Council. S. SPECIAL PERMIT TO RAISE PRESENT HYATT HOUSE SIGN AND MODIFY READS RBOARD OF EXISTING ADVERTISING DISPLAY AT 1333 BAYSHORE HIGH+VAY This application was announced for hearing. City Planner Swan noted that billboards should advertise what is occupying the property on which they are placed, and stated that as an individual he liked the sign just the way it is. Mr. Ken Cutter, Assistant Manager of the Cabana Hyatt House, addressed the Commission, stating they wished a reader hoard more legible from the standpoint of traffic on the freeway. He also presented overlays of proposed sign, present sign, and previous sign. 1 No one in the audience was for or against this application. The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Norberg thought the modified sign was an improvement 9 - over that previously proposed. Commissioner Jacobs objected to the carn� val ai mnct�l�PYP n,-oiected by the siq�n. Commissioner Taylor stated no objection to raising of the I.D. sign and commented that the present readerboard does not function and they should have one that functions or none at all. Commissioner Mink agreed. Commissioner Kindig had no comment, stating he liked the present sign. Commissioner Cistulli had no objection to the I.D. sign raising, but commented that the reader board will be screened by growing trees. Chairman Sine objected to the reader board, stating it was not of definite bene!it to the hotel itself, and stated that as the trees keep growing, there will be a condition of "Can you top this?" Commissioner Taylor moved that the special permit to raise the present Hyatt House sign and modify the reader board to existing advertising display at 1333 Bayshore Highway be approved. Commissioner Kindig seconded the motion. The motion failed on the following roll call vote: AYES: COM14I SSIONERS MINK, TAYLOR NAPES: . COMMISSIONERS CISTULLI, JACOBS, KINDIG, NORBERG, SINE ABSENT: NONE The applicant was informed he had the right of appeal to the City Council. NETK BUSINESS: Department of Planning Administration The City Planner informed the Commission that suggested procedures would help expedite the work of the planning department, and he would like to have commission approval on record. One item was that applicants have applications in at least three working days prior to the study meeting; another, that a detailed plot plan be submitted as a basic document. After some discussion, Commissioner Kindig moved that the City Planner may require submittal of all applications for variances, amendments and special permits, and other matters on which the Planning Commission is authorized to act three full working days before the first regularly scheduled monthly meeting date to permit reasonable review, report and placement on the agenda. Commissioner Taylor seconded the motion and it passed -unanimously on roll call vote. Commissioner Kindig moved that the City Planner may require submittal of a plot plan drawn to scale to show existing improvements, including parking, and the location of any proposed changes to support an application for consideration by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Jacobs seconded the motion and it passed unanimously on roll call vote. Resolution recommendinq underqround district for Chapin Avenue The City Planner told the Commission that a draft of a resolutionto establish an undergrounding district on Chapin Avenue had been prepared. This is mainly for the purpose of aiding the development of the Bank of America project at Chapin and E1 Camino, and future development of other properties on Chapin. This district will be contiguous with City Hall property. He stated that a letter had been received November 22 from David Keyston of Anza Pacific requesting that his shoreland properties be considered for undergrounding district - 10 - concurrently with other areas in the city. The City Planner noted that the present draft could be altered to include another district, or another resolution could be prepared to specify the Anza Pacific property. He suggested that both areas be taken into consideration_. City Engineer Marr commented that the City has an annual allotment for undergrounding, that there is some money on hand but there will be more after the first of the year. He stated he understood that conduit is already in place under the street on Chapin Avenue, and that this was done when the street was widened. The cost of Chapin would be very small compared to the cost of the Bayshore properties. He noted cost estimates must be prepared. Mr. Keyston stated he called P.G. & E. to determine how much money was available. He was unaware that the conduits were in on Chapin, but it was his understanding that in excess of $120,000 would be available after paying for Peninsula Hospital,and another undergrounding project. He hoped there would be enough for both his land and Chapin Avenue and asked the Commission's recommendation of both. There was Commission discussion, and the City Planner recommended that a parallel resolution be prepared for the study meeting and the Commission could then act on both. Commissioner Cistulli moved that another resolution be prepared for the Anza Pacific property and that both resolutions be considered at the next study meeting. Commissioner Jacobs seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously by voice vote. MEETING NOTED: The City Planner announced the League of California Cities Peninsula Division i;Jorkshop meeting Thursday, December 9, 1971. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting regularly adjourned at 12:01 A.M. Respectfully submitted, Everett K. Kindig, Secretary