Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1967.10.23} CITY OF BURL. NtAIME PLANNING COMMISSION C' s Norbe g Pierce CAUL_, TO C?DE' ,< October 23, 1967 COMIIV'ISSIONFRS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT Ka dig Ci tv Attorney Karme l City Plaaner Mann City Engineer Marr Councilman Johnson The regular m nthl meet— ng of -h �� :. ?.�� 3a��� P lannina Cam -mission was RQU, CALL The eabovti?'"''ii .ed ri6smbe—'_'; �$��i��� 'f��}e thxe secretary-'s rail call. Was dlesignat-,::�d MIN U TfrS the w..n€v. s of fJihe neC-? rg or September 2S and, the Study meetingOf. October 9, 1967_, pr ViousIy p�3�3rab14ed� to members, were approved and ACKNOWLEDGMENT Chf iTmian C:is a:ul li a nz7 v GdEsr'd c e '< PF. esence of f`+.2i,?1Cilmaan Johnson t a ex-officio eirt4eE of the cc"siami ss, ora. MAPS aR sock S' c av `_d =.:; Park F. E' :' '�$i XE y� '�{t%s @. -s: " r '_G, 'w r3.�".'wo-rp? --4 d� Howard \3o Si�.l�fevy Civil L t �- - >..rrSr _. +�€..,.� Fto �?fs�3�4'�s Co.,,1.IRSce ' toco1�'Li.F.ne E.;in ts K n d' % (d he,� fvre.hwess�,erly -5 feet ofLot 4 ..n F,0 a e'in�r g e.cr tisic;s', t �'�; --`�.. 4��i .., .. ..17c` s . ud?r F:ya` rs.ing and s chedi f i-kd for yi zw ' s.. Va-rc--, A _ €.. 0r..dCg-t Y ,, _ s_`�` �° _ rt r'sp 30 feet width, 4.�Rt-:, r��...- C."g..9s 44 �.,. 4' .:-r _` .. a�«a i..s :For open. J���>C'•-ce betty :•ert "i!--e EDN't�sldi Eft s, floor.from the 'mr. Danlc f'_ .; representing CAten Compatny, 1510 Rollins Road, t. operty r# �.a inquired whether e C -* 1r 9it ._�iai �.. C's C:O' Te"10 d 1. �`J �: '..`i zy easement�k. Roberts.poi w�o'.'tve the two to al" C} NN i�d time by Mr. M • Hicko a -�±; F:'+' � .� ���.� is a''eprtsentative a informed the CompO ss v €fin e fz @ te'L O-F Such -an e as et3-p.ent 0 Er�..ty {. ` 3.- :": "} - h. Ghems"-. C.Yatv P.tE..arr-c--re o'iirf e the officialu s G^ �. uhe pity ?':ginner advised that A.. S t y . t'' Est;{ -reduced.-i-in- by Commissioner Pierce, a -ad B%'iVvne , arpro?r ng the resubd3tl_`f=.sr_€S'11 Ili, MAP i�� 4.w f ` 0c;' .s? 1' i'�i�E Ga•6K Airport Park .•k 4r c�-ems 6 property, J Prepared y r.evie-wad &- th-e study icet1-ng and scheduled for formal z_ proposed to establish two Luew parcels c=:s 1�ez,w h !Road by combining, Lot I and a parts n of Lod; 2 int v Parcel <'B" with an axea of 50,t.900 square feet; and Lot 3, with the P:�;oaindrr of Lot 2, Combined in -to Parcel gets with an area of 1 S r POG 5q uG.:Fa a feet. In respozs` Ito the Chew the City Ei,,igi ;"er and the City Planner rev Se 10 Une-s F<A . s c<.`,:comm od'a e, a new bud d ng to he constructed on Parcel B • "uhKa ,e were no ct:=mmwdu -v 14Eronm he fl€ ey in response to the Chair's Or a inu-ao„aEmcwd by C'vu_?s::..ss.z.cne_. .,.:'au-neis'y,,� SwcUk�f�eE by��r'i�a.ai5s9.vrfi�,. �' _ t:y wt C �,. li 's Vic' y..fi, �� rr ! i' _.. i s C f a .�. C.. a F:.'.:. % No. S G 11! < i "'! `'.. 7 of 1_.1" r-a r, t s. Fse e 4`.uy nz^",, i; 3 V �i yy^^��C e. d S9 ;a '_'. €' o-y-, C .+.,._.'1 Er;;"in�e�'s' for t';:.o-- �srs.., Anza- P&F. fic Cor- -... a is. -fir c: '.. i ea . ii.c' 'azt'a'y 's?�ap with4:r".'i'r exxc,`ep� Y' .. p - ,. ... ..�":.�n s¢�,°,s ._.t_u- ..C.,..3s�5,'n'.4 c'�.-fin T_..�: e:.: E,�Y`t4 _ ._ ., ., .� f h .. C"•� ice. a.e •- ; !`J . �; u .. .- k.7,"s � �.'� r t h e,- .`�'�; i e cn. `R" C H:. ,.. ✓ (,e a Gt ,? �Ji de xv y_R G_.a hte ccp-ta a, Evf the st— eet he electreliers with double arils located ere �, and that street. li Z-here, details are presented as a part of the s.ubd.ivision improvement plans. followed a brief period of discussion concerning the lot ...?1`ck 2and t s�e oss ia i� w:y that "the street design may be>,At n� f-rSYsed.t some time in 6ha :?74le-ipclde a cul-de-sac DI -to Block A ;it ion 1nt:roduced by Corimnissioner Noaberg to recornimo-nd approval of m� �.q +yy Cf''- t Council,subject t } ec _ agr e ens: between the cad +6?` the Za Co E, 6. i�,PJ�� LL. 4. tG aa�G �La �9a gr taK-e the su divides as to the ncathe:rly access to the subd-l', islon cFconded by �.*mm_,.ssicner Mink and carried unani-ousiv on roll e, it9 to �`.�`ubla4.`, a_ yc.i%�, 9 SFoa.?i3Egs i.+'V'hc'LdfrS'cte as AFo. owsi PENCE VARIANCE M RUSSIMN! CHURCH, 74.4 EL CAMINO REAL A letter dated October 3, 1967 from Russian Orthodox BrotherhooJ in the Name of All Saints, signed by V . V . Krassovsky, , Chairman of the Beard and Presidient,. requested approvax of a variance to erect an aCCe-SSOTY structure in feat of the recently constructed Russian chus-soh at 744 El Camino Real. The communication, advised that the structure will consist of open steel lattXce-work to a he gist of 6 feet 7 1/2 inches, four concrete eund brick pillars 7 iFeet 6 inches hi&h£ and a cross on the gate 8 feet 4 inches from ground level., The communication stated that the fence has been designed to comple- ment the church wilding as a part .of a long -rang< program to improve the property. Chairman Cistulli recognized Mr. Krassovsky, representing the applicants, who furnished Commissioners with an emended set of blue- piints replacing the original drawings filed Front the application. k. Thae City Planner, at th_- Chair's invitation to coo ent discussed the aesthetic value of t-he structure, stated that beca.Lso the design is un—I _sual and apparently quite costly there would appear to be little cause for concern that a precedent could be si:auwisrh d ardl , -fur 3:her, expressed the opinion that approval of the variance should create no problems. iz' o s atr•s b v� '1 .':2 w r�i �a: A to h`.�.. _'.5c.i`a a?u'°A+m d cc+ 3 :"w... f✓ �. ,. a:" 4C;' ©C'S i.'. .% : �� ' `ice _.Si:.'-,.�.'., i'c F' .. Cnetr C.� ,1.. 'posed st a.e.S.tu're, thaF.. V ,> eie.cion i:: 010 type Of church building. 1" s , ponsa to c�`.`1`si33.._.s.�s._on t l: zn »I b€ 9 f4 . Scr ss y ,. ,kv i:Y, a ik ..s .:. v i 1 _ �� .�� d.. ., tea C�s- w � c, k e�i:i?.W bIj,S1�,. ... ..., :� 4. °7.'1 E�.-. rvZ-_oS L. a. -hat t1 4.' (32-i. .. ._.:. '; --< Ea i_, the w.1 r _. be graded sa.0f C A constructed on a le — a w4 h the ek st—ir g 5idewall . �1 There were no comments from the floor in response to the Chair's inqui.r; . Commissioner Nerberg objected to the proposed height, suggesting that a fence: of lesser dimensions mould be an equally attractive addition n:o the property. 1 i Commissioner Br aunef referred to the applicant's comments concerning traditional aspects of the structure, height of he church [wilding-, aesthetic advantages deriving to the E.l Camino Real frontage, comments heard at the study meeting concerning incidents of tres- passing and vandali.so and, thereafter, introduced a motion to approve the var izance subject to construction conforming to the drawings on file. Motion seconded by Commissioner Mink. Mr. Kr ssovs yp in reply to Commission inquiry, stated that the steel, rails will be painted black to si.muiate wrought iron. The motion was declared carried on the following roll call: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Braune NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Horberg ABSENT: :.OPIIMI SSIOMERS: :indig 2. FENCE VARIANCE APPROVED HOWARD OLDS, 282 EAST LATE. Cis1ulls. iinkr fierce A letter dated October 2, 19;7 from Howard Olds, 1021 Burlingame Avenue, signed by Howard L. Robinson, Gerneral Manager, requested approval of variance to construct an addition to an existing fence to a height of eight (S) feet on the property located at. 282 East Larne (adjacent to HOWARD OLDS formerly Rector Cadillac -Olds). The communication advised that baked white enamel aluminum corrugated sheeting will be used for the purpose in an attempt to improve the appearance of the sot used for auk omtobi le storage in connection with the operation of `he automobile agency. Colored snapshots s and a sze'=?.c of the r--ojierty were filed indicating the location rl: the ff enc;e and on, the lot adiazert to the € uth. Commissioner Cisdc:lli r a€>ogniied N!r. i oirili 2 on EJho advised that the project is a fu.xther step in a continuing program to maintain the property any he g-a'te a? _y; he ad<-i-ceFd that- a nurii,-er of d e l a p i d y? t e E: structures v),r.,. r - , r e w fence !3 ;a. n e fi c'7' -n d «2 Yys°rrc IonOv ._..._PC»i tii- facing yth eJ, 34,ildilqgii__.t.x., _.`_ate%. R!._. _ x1r _c.?.t.4 f.•. is '.? ... �: �. • "l l�. to ��.c.6 .: Ci S> �?pa�..5-n �... s�S the- .. .y 5.... it. _. _t �`. _ c�"jii', r, ;: ky c": �t i. .,:YafE .-��. :. s' r`h zd�r` c7' Of ac:t. r:r� E. �1t,._ L'.1._� a' - WaI _. ^-.is �a,.vatp'it ...s prP,p-,:.,: ."Fr t! ps% r,e .�t`rx .. a.'.."``�-C..� � c.'�;`a..�._ �. tJ ...c t.,_:�: G�� a^.•-f fe fence to i� 4 � �R �",S y _ _ .,s[ a .ie _ ., t, r.. ..7 f. 0r,I_.5brC i. a .. btl e T nit% anod :a alb r... _ ... .... _. :._:� 4:•i!% "CC. h e , 7•a ;.i !'.t_,1 .:.fi'�`�_med i ate iy ar, •i` «._2.. .. v�i �" to .��k4��`..R Y �•: • it '... i.r .__...' .... Ftailed that #f1* c' 'i ., t,._. IS -0.._ � , as f. "1(!t 1)5 t ERA. ;ice I v .. s.. 7 a v tti•� e, 0 jo �'� y s_ S ut k ..� ,. r Ei s .... _, _, �_ e, .,„ .. r .,C ^ ,.... (_ ....`. �. 110 �• There were no comments from the floor in response to the Chair's inquiry. '�.. r %'60 u..`a-.'ht y u} 4 �..i w'�,.s I.r Commissioner No ��''�� F,. �% G}.l. e�'.• :v+Ke the variance O'n the i4a:sc3 E :' 2 td t-hat thci co-r- i?gated material not extend bf y€: nd s h ` r; A i of the building on the sis.'-'. o E : i 6 g Property tqa- th-- sout.-a :;ras saconded by COO ISSi )ner P ieTce an-d! Carried j "axas��lm�5us s y onx t3�.� call.. 3. SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE �13 �, AL, I er I A COURIT. (continued) fo•. variance f-Bled by F- riskE. .andl_c^a t-,GT bi, y Valdivia ourt (Lot 43� Biock 19 Ray c'fr"i �, - �_..`��_4v`.s.Uaap requested, approval. of ai+..e setback _ r O1 h-hree G-="� -}o'et lwhf�,Ye .-Jve 151 is reau red for the purpose o _ t C F n. n, anx <l �a.'`�t`a o Zn Vie`'. atin , f �A j �''" S am i 3 y -a i '+ �ig u _. e. G { { �, dated -n ,. 1 � 196F advid that the }•i.� 4'S�, i� -. �i••/.i. ra ]. � ;, tv C,-6.. •:rim ,aC �w'Eo `..3 Ye�f:.�r:��}l�a �' �di a Proposed v3. - enlarge the Yi fc{.rile ie? Y rC on] com V 9_ aty, and 4,c ac r C, 'p er 4 t to the SW.L -S. ng pool. % 6a_e Cif: a,Ii C .. S.C; N :.i-.A dZ1 Ae Z)t �Gb�zT- P —.`k<ngusla- n dra t h4 a,�)pl lic -4 : a1 _a c t w c t tS� ate ilra 's��t % 3N as ,. s: . 1, a_ F ' - 1 • y.- � ° I � C. c.. �_ AL 8 a. � i F..: u �... i,.'w observe i G In response to the City Planner's comment that should the variance he permitted : recaul&-J, ns i usl.- be ta'k---n to keep the sid yard free of obstructions, Mr. r e;O)i advised that concr-ete € i. r. bo placed in In `:frog .sere p s &-as �Fi 53d E s%oneeob.L g = � �Z -"= } eU1_ iot1 v whereby e� le;gal se :•�)u `'it �o�.E.� i?E preserved � Y1 �cj ��sa nsi E lO�rr r� 4. a d �. Z'4T �, @, a area. Mr. Lembi pointed eut that the bililding %'oou d extend into the '�c u w3 xno _: :' I— �> � `^E;ii:E. t '1.'� i�? to ? ��1� 2Fls�iil-, - O the .- yin_.F3R.e ..__ a. .e .�.. �i f-_,_:t._.JS.,il_.. .�i .+r. c+.'4z.. �.�.4 �,1'.r `'=�• air .�. �' �..�� �. f �•ES �.=1;5?! E _: f`�, `,,. �:..�., of 1� _ .y �.,,�- Y,F.-_. d d [ q 6 t - ,r 2 x l 4: l e3 � 1 Y•` d `� :'- r y.-.t'r` 1' e6Su 1 ,lent _<a..,>�:.a3 c- �d u, t�.,e�.�3 � � ,e�_ c• t 7:.iw. � a x.E! o � Ke lot. v. e - _. _.. �.. .. .. -_ ter, ,. ..: t__ .. ri� •r .... , .< ..... L --.._ _ 3.' _. .. ._ �-. )',.- . _ ....._ C. F ..'+ � � � _.- .... ? E .1. "_ _..._ \. ... I _. _ ..._..... a . -i .... __ .. e._ _. ...,.: _ . i l .,w l .' (, : i%t",`. _ f_1 F: <:. <r •.�. _r f' r vni the E.. .:v: < EF. •._ r . i� �_ � . .. ,.c ... ,,,! l%i_ �. d ..27b .sue Mr. b..embi indicated that pe hi 1p z, four feet of setback in lieu, of �'. three nuruld be possible. A suggestion to delay for 30 Flays and revised plans be prepared for the November study meeting was accepted by Aar. Lembi. The motion to deny was withdrawn, followed by Commissioner Mink's iiotiou to coat-i nue thQ hearing to the meeting of November 27, 1967, seconded by Comm ssl.oner Brauaer and carried unanimously. 4.. SPECIAL PERMIT APPROVED PHILLI'PS PETROLEUM COMPANY, CALIFORNIA DRIVE AT BROADWAY. An applicat-lon filed by Phillips Petroleum Company, One Bush Street, SaoJranclscog requested api rovai of a special permit to ernlaroe an existing service station at tine northwest corner of California Drive and Broadway. A plot wl.an and elevations were riled. In response to the Chair, the City Planner. advised that the applicant propose to remove the old buildixn'a which houses three small shops on the southwesterly o taon of the lot and remodel the whole of the property for the se --vice station use. The City Planner reported that the r:ra e.,ings were examined and round to be in order. Chairman Cistulli raccg nixed INkr. :I: L. Stevenson, representing the - applicants, who stated that b ick veneer be used to improve the appearance of existi-ng, service station buildings and a planting area maintained. Mr. Stevenson discussed improvements proposed to be made on the canopJes and the general layout of the facilities. H-- slated that it is not ` ntended to revise the sign d" splay. There were no c°omiments fro-m the floor in response to the Chair The City Engineer indicated no problems of concern to has department. ot.Y e n introduced by Commis ^ crier Pacrce to approve the ,s,,pecial p Pyym, it in accordance with the drawings on 'He was seconded by Cota?i_=r scion e mink a-nd carried unanimously ari roll call. RECESS Ehe Cfics - declared d a recess at 9:45 p.iii. CALL 7Z'0 ORDER Die ,-.s.-,s e3-...s _c .>�_.,. ,�. ,"r` *..w...EzFi S`�� r.%4f� .e:-.r it C:�t ..M � v.�' Ss Fi. c. F S "! C.- L l FRE T :Sa !'4 CA ��$ °.�!3+�_�. 7 33 1> Y;f i11 TEE ! lcQ Ri\F 9l!A Y `i s t - z .- �_ s .s:. t. a �.S b c.� e S7 s C> 2 L s E, 2E k, ii Tim ' r s S i yf. an Y, K - 6 - air freight forwarding business in the industrial area at r 1231 whit `horr_ Way. The app.licaK-t =s communication dated October 3, 196•7,. explained that the opera. on consists of colly cti-.15 freight from vrariaus shippers, conso» ida: er ng into a single unji t and reds-livering to the airport pnal shipment. The cowhi alc.at.io'n stated that it is pro -posed to maintain office and terminal. facilitics _:ith pickup and delivery contracted to sub - haulers and that the building has s�,.,Mtiient floor space with a large receiving door so that the freight can be handled under carver. A sketch to .indicate the location was filed. Mr. Caster, in response to the Chair, advised that, normally, there is no overnight storage, exce p : . whera export shipmentsare involved., and that the maximun aumiber o-E empleyees is not expected to exceed eight (3) . Mr. Carter stated than.:. FAA regulations apply so that there would be no problems of improper `rating or storage of combustible or inflammable materials. ` hze City plan.-zer reported heinspec 'ed the premises ei�sd discussed the operation with IMT. Carter and had no ns to the use. `here were no co:tment s from the floor isa response to the Ch: iv. A motion introduced by Commissioner Mink to approve the special permit was seconded by Commissioner Braunar and carried unanimously on roll call. 6. S'ECI.AL PERMIT An application fOr special permit filed by Robert H. Lipke dba A&B Cr-ading u pa ing£ 301 California Drive.. Burlingame, proposed to use a portion of propri;rty at 1554 Baysho 'a I-.igh- gay as ,a storage yard. IV `,pplicw c`r`'s, le tevr doted f -t--a er 9. 1967, advised that small remains at the j0h SitO bllji , beCa-ISe O efri?9��.�nS�c there is a n ed for as aaea to ac.cc'mmodall- three dump trucks, a sm- al3-'recto and a 9x9 tool shed whe-n not in use. A sketch to 11)'d:e.s ate 'r.-he boot -Ion was' __Pau The Galt* P .. _.m .- c ,. JUn . =v r3f°•nse to th!,, C' WA " -Fe ferred to a d i s cu!s`:' t.4'j— '26 th.�. S 1-� 1a7-�CE! t-hen Mir. �?p�.s •��_����'.,i;� rE_. ;��t�`.z1��.. €.� ...�.- °" yry != +: Pig �p p� t s' v € _f. 'd2 jai_ ..._: �`'. ?_ .. - i 3 a., � ..� ?4+vi�� .`y fix . o -.?e.. east's •a� Moot o �`�nd Mh... l'..e-Y- eay the end of caz..s of Burlway Ilkt=+a-6o The City :p.n, e.euWi eCi adz:.the l aT3•4 zso.:..• never been properly established: he suo-z es-tei Ci.hat if the 136,' :l it is require grsd. ng, with a 1iC;hi. to coritrol dust and p-rob le7ii5 r s se: Frf3 'o, th s..i` :.. .: e3xclos ed and. M a .�i,.. i has i n c ''t r that- _- G_,f;. �in F a r Commerits w-oYe invited from the ra Mr. Hugh 1vU- z err represQntring Rilcris Company, 778 Burlway Road, inTaired as to ingress aad eg;eeso s�aZ'ing that there is an easefent across t„hf:.ir lots to trho t400re and Masters property,and questioned ­!hather other access The City Planner reported thz3L' -he proper-t y has no acttval street ", .-ro:nt"age; however., the record ­ cr• S�F al lcoL�lab Industrial Park includes a 00 foot wide ersRment a L-1he rear of the lot. presently owned and occupl era by Big l z: iss fee he psr. 'd3Css'�s of accoss to Burlway Z oase-i:zent across -he Lands of O'Hara provides " ngTess and egress a.t 11.ashore Highway. Chairman CiStu? 11 i recognul"Ted N r0 H. C G lara, 35 Mosswc_2od Road, Hillsborough:, owner of acreage abuttin& .Z,1he subject property. Mr. O'Hara in—IFOr-tried she ;101`i that in 1950 ar agreement s'''or an alsement 15 wide ands. 260 toot long across a portSio a of his Rands was negotiakad with: Mr. and Mrs. George Moore fo-r the purposes of access to their property `fo-fs= Bay. -shore Highway, w w13 the under- standing r hlat the ous".6a be sub ect to change as the land ';&s filled. He adviseek ch at wu_ --he n r erdha g years waSement: �' i- b t"se r a GF 3;_ 4 �z. fv €.F.G d A E n e s `• � prop le s and nu-merous attemnts beeNL i_':.idF.: :��. w:_ �->:�. �. �, a., � to meet with Mrs. Raley Cob er ly Mrs. t'•Aoar;e) in an attempt to resolve the s Cuation s finallyv -atw"''.g:s were 'vi e; to 3-nit1_eivv t: court action. Mr. O'Hara reported that he has-rece3ii-ved word frow, his attorney of za pre-trial settlement-C.- meoti g within a few days and requested the Ev ;u s on'6 to d,waf=' c.c--ion -tri -_ l CS • �y pl erica ion pen d ��h� out- come of than: meet.iingja In response to i 3? uE d 3` 3s t (b C-1EYT?{Ei n Mr. �..1" ra advised that the actual use Of tn'a rear proparYy does not depend upon the driveway € n his p "€�pes'�<` s �3 w4 o easement off Bu�'25�%�y l�Co�f� adequate.is With the applicant's coxt lirrence, the hearing was continued to the meeti sa of None Tberr a! 1967, rxi ;-2- fF�ot sn IFS.` Toduced -?3yg Corznzi ssione—,.7 Pierce.- seconded by No-eberg and ur'sanimous ly carr ed "i1he Chair requested :hzz a ma; o ' 3ua-r-i&may Roae. aval- ySoRla£pble z:;t the � �F me ' —ing. GS 7. lsIiRGAMIE` SHORE KJAND CCIMIP�11Y APPLIE .-:ATIONS APPROVED: Oct, y_3 ln.;� a) �'axc l 12 a 9 ar �.�c�fs a �y.ag 3 ,; Y>'-0 three PV -r'< r 's r ix' y- 6.:'>... 4 _ Y 4 s_ d L (.�. _ F+ � :. �}LO �p�qp fJ Ci:% b VS+:- .._ cx �`�a-� �. .K.a�a-7��x.1..�.r-! w�..� � �-i_� �.. �.4 ..e_--_e �-_-� ��-.y _' _.x.� - ��=�iae.<��r� z-.. �( 3E �n �'0 �•f��a -.ux•�r ^<+ At the s-Cuv. y�is,�.'.v^ tf ...YAZ�" 'Jfi�. piaQ6�4u,.� .� � :. � to.c cyvmmai z f-��g-t Tt„6prz_' :�a�i�i�2-.'`'�.�a. ���.r .�'3 ?2: ��� `�''�`.�v.�,., �_;E.eR. _,'f.. ... 6':v,.�k .a�S��.J'?F+.'� T','�.S�o x.. ....... der t`f.'a �`-t.Fr';.¢!✓'d:�� 3� r Edward, a� ? resew f !. ! ..vri ,.! _N q E' }.q z Oscar t„ K r 5 a a €sc _ s:. s s_: i r e._ tc;,-�� . d? 141 a '.J.��. ar F � ew, �.<'n 6--' s cwf",i.. v proposal �Ta�. -„�s � `,.'�' �:s(�'�C<t.., +."sp . �'' r%. �_st w...�.::v w•.. `:` s�, l:�e- .(C�.Y`.'.•?4~4.4� f °�r';;<� ��c{*: r�F-e l/s f-+ ..,�i:� l,te r F aA�,.tte,F,•-. Of: C. Y... .a lJ .': C;. v`_�g LT3 �.. �a j'ip�e- J.'3.: t": .i Ga. ri+� ��•'iv v. '�. u+ W. iS:k i�`Ls /n'.. App2Ji-.-.�_..e- .4�1( ».1:. ? C -`�: a A,'V s�L-e E- d •-w�R.a. •e..yt9 Ize 4 (( L�.. �i.:. ere F„ 3. E.�. � �)). U. ji C � v and .i. � . (s .. :, ci �$ `e. �.'• 1'« i': -a- lllz in = 4�.� �. .. ] ... Y !.> L�i...A, ,J by ...:C.REJG•1.S dl G. F2 c ..4 W=y , Ci i I t:nlG�11. _ __are ubdi.vi sign o� acreage which lies between Bayshore Eou evard. and Carolan Avenue, southeasterly of Cadillac Way" and a request for variance 11t construct two c63pmercIi.c`al buildings on a -00-M 071 F property_ nog.- zoned R-4 (Fourth Residential) -a" The City P lanno . in rep y to the Chair, adviised th�p,,t the matter .Vs boiole- he Com.-oissiona O-n re- a ral from x:he City C '<.n xl l SO- se6{ e-in . -to a pet:$t:A�.on by the applicants that CC9uncii agree to ar;=end an existi-rig contract restricting the use of the laud t® a specific type of apaTtnent construction. A c ly of a letter dated October 5, 1967$ written by the City o Mr. RobeTt Thompson, attorney for the 2appl.lcantst, stIgg 'sting a eC-hQd of procedure iin deurel i--Ing a substitute plan Y or the prover=dy q was read. Copies of the parcel map were distributed showing the property &Vidkadl as follows. Parcel A - proposed to be improved with an apartment building of 1.-00 units c6vustruF"cted to neet all O- the code req Lj-re'Faents I.or $-4 zoning; Parcel 3 o sire of the pre posed commercial busild =magi, and P --rce , C w reserved for future develo3men. t. Ine City € fanner referred to an existing one—story office build-.ngn included within 4the area of Parcel C,, -rid advised that the nort Lerl s boundary Tree of Parcel B bisects the building driveway anad eliminates the parking area. He advised that the ;gals cannot bo a _ � approved as draw j:drecommended the maerba referred to staff to be resolved prior to submittal to the City Council. n. Sommers, upon recognition by the Chair, advised that he was ~alga%Fare of the error and agreed that tho parcei line will be redrawn. Com .ssioners ioere furnished ished arehitectui-al sketches showing place- Haut of the proposed buildings, parking facill ties e landscap:Lng and setbacks. Mx,. Sommers explained teat the city's approval will permit the Oerje, tO improve and develop the land zv IF_Isaancing :is possible for E-he : omb"ned spaartme °et /commer ial cot1 l.e . He adyfted Via- the site 'dill tie improved with `r o Tbu ldBngs designed in h-- m ali er- aY the 4°towrt z nd country" sin oppLn' a centers mud it wns =t 6 IFGIIOW �.s4 Considerable deliberni.`: on a to the rema:�n e f the property: to proceed with the of e apartment building and ga `- e� e c ti r r f future :>� .� Ra s o. e _ _�..... � n... �? s'`I 53riA�.�� s�� o-�vu,va�.F��sa�`•;;:�c;� n_, t.b", use. c F y S, Yet Ciy :i R con x .n f<..<e i w? i': SG .=i •L 9. �'Y )H 1.. .-. 2..FS.:. 55':ee!`i' - -, w... us [- .7 .v L.a.Cl fir`= i Awv withe 4l i Cyrh the '4i2k ut�' were ia'E -Y tod. fro -the t oor. _ a CJat.eI1.'Le E. R"4,e'• Jchi 138A 3 F 1r.s de t � ��'�'�� �s✓F �::,�, �. :, .;�. LE w?!i� �y�fo ' $ S 9 ... ..�._ .3. ac10 �G' t �..E 4.1. C?sL d�'3 sr:�:1 1-,,a ,�, r3�:':r tie ucfh. Ci � o Mr. AlF ed Kaufmann. resident of 2615 Easton Drive, and engaged in business on Broadway, protested that the city°s population cannot support another retail commercial district as evidenced by the vacant stores on Broadway and the downtown shopping district. He concurred .with thy: previous speaker's comments concerning industrial use oA the property. During a period of Commission discussion, Commissioner pierce recalled that there were protests.from the residential�$gfitherly of the property to a- prior plan, restricting the use to commercial; however, the present plan, with the apartment building situated toward the existing residences, appears to be "a start in the right direction." Commissioner Brauner referred to code conditions requisite to variance grants, stating that a situation of hardship does exist in that the owner is unable to develop the land in compliance with the regc rements of the previous reciaussification to RV4o Commissioner Norberg described the project as 44a balanced develop- ment" with the residential building to the south and the commercial adjacent to the existing automobile agency. Chaan Cis*aulli and Commissioner herb; both mentioned that the shopping center type of merchandising appears to have; strong appeal to the buying public and may be the factor to give impetus to the retail business situation in this community. Commissioner Mink commented that the ow.aers have been faced with a situation where a plan for improving the property was determined to be unfeasiblei and, in attempting to put together a suitable alternative, have taken the long-range approach which is the essence of good planning. Mr. deWolf discussed architectural design and landscaping and advised that parking will meet code requirements. The City planner informed. the Commission that parking exceeds the code by two spaces for the comnercial use. The hearing was declared concluded, A motion was introduced by Comraiss? ones Brauner to rtcommend approval, of the parcel map to the City Council on the condition that the lame between Parcels B and C at the northeasterly corner shall be adjusted as required by the City Engineer to provide the axist.ing office b uil6in with access from Cadillac Way and proper pa.rlking a iInd motion was seconded by Commissioner Mini: and carried unaniAous ly can roll call. A motion recommending that the City Council approve ''Zhe varian. e -1-0 permit comma ci l e-f Parce r. B of the parcei map, G: ondi ioimlupo�l the architect-ura;.l design conforming to age 2 of tote drawings an file prepeared by eeWolf & Associates; adeliti rally, signs to be M-9itwev c a single disply i dertifying the shoppl aag center roof signs pro- hibited - and individual signs aatta ed to the building to identify each store, ail to Freet Iequ rements of the signs rode existing on this date was introduced by Coquiss loner Mink Mot-J'fon sec*nded by Commissioner Brauner and carried unanimously on roll call. ADJOURNMENT Tho meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Edwin L. Pierce Secretary Pro-Tempore CLI BURj5L-JGAME PLANNING COMMISSION &-tober 23, 1967 CL-- CL� C A L- L ORDER I T "A L 1, Sclizember 25 arid October 9, 1967 14APS 1, k- s ubdiv"! on -map - Logs I & 2, Block 3 Nil. 1 1-1s da If, Park R. Id i S i 0-a maa p - Lots 1,2,3 Block 2,,. A-tiza A-`--I,-� ort Par';; Z; -P i,a-- ta: s 'ark OS, E A'R 1-0J, Cj S ice va-plance - Russian church, 744 El Camino Real., iu,,,.riance - Howard Olds, Z82 East Lsne, variance - Fratk and Olga Lembi, 13 Vald.i.via Ct�- Sil-cxial pe-t-17-it Phi llips Petroleum Company en-,argr,- j;ert;ice star-ioa, California Drive at Bro-adway. pecia.1 P-,rpit Golele,,i C-ate. Air Freight.... T-nc,. freight if, 4 -1 Es3Mtu---'10 23� 1 rn Wav, "R olrb c r t H, cfju,tT.t,.%:'Ltor1-- sto-7-,agc. yard, Y..; map Bu rlingame, Land Cow,, &---y --f e sge C,-i xe 1 an Avenue Baysh ore K ghw ay and C4e--11.ia(: X`ae, C(1— vV CA1- 0- CL- CLI Ck-