Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1960.09.12-:.d BURLINGAME CITY PLANNING CO1,ff4ISSION C01" MiSSIONERS PRESENT Cistulli Diederichsen Kindig m 8:05 Martin a 8:20 Moore Norberg Stivers CALL TO ORDER STUDY MEETING September 120 1960 COMMISSIOITERS ABSENT OT MIT?S PRESENT None City Attorney Krrmel City Engineer Mlarr Plan.Consultant Mann Councilman Lorenz A study meeting of the Burlingame City Planning Commission, head on the above given date was called to order by Chairman Diederichsen at 8:00 p.m. The following subjects were submitted for nC U review: 1. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 2890 ADELINE DRIVE The Planning Consultant advised that Mr. and Mrs. William Schoenhard, ,2890 Adeline Drive, have filed a tentative map with the City Engineer )'proposing a subdivision of their property into four lots. The property consists of a large parcel with approaches from Adeline Drive and if approved, access to each of the lots will be required because of the steepness of the property. The Consultant stated that to adhere to the policy heretofore maintained by the Commission, street improvements must be indicated at the time a tentative map is filed. The City Engineer advised that the property itself Is within the confines of the City;.however, the street is county property. Stressing the:. importance of Ithe ownbr-2,mproving his one half of the street, the.Commission was advised by the Planning Consultant to determine a minimum width for the street to be so improved, Questioned by the Consultant whether the project should be considered on the basis of a resubdivision or a subdivision, particularly in view of the installation of public works and the subsequent inspection of the improvement, the City Attorney advised that the proposed project should be treated` as a full subdivision. On the question of county -owned streets, the Commission was advised that In the past the County has indicated its willingness to relinquish its jurisdiction over streets to be improved in the manner proposed on this occasion. Following some discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission that a minimum street between six and eight feet, depending upon a dete .,inatio of the property lines be established. To summariz®, the applicants were advised that (1) the general "lay -out" of the proposed plan appears satisfactory; (2) a I;entative map indicating street improvements should be presented at the ne.i;t regular meeting of the Commission, or (3) to expedite the proceeding.i, a final map indicating the required public work improvements may be submitted at the -next regular meetings $eptember 26, 1960. 2. REZ ONI G REO-M- ST LOT 9,. BLOCK 13, T94N, OF BURLI WGAKl. An application was received from Charles Vel oon, 1.71.9 Toledo Avenue, Burlingame, .requesting consideration to a change in zone on property located on the easterly side of .Highland Avenue (Lot 9r Block 13, Town of Burlingame Subdivision) From C-2 to R-3. Mr. Belton appeared in his own ;behalf and stated his proposal to erect an apartment house on the property; houaver, to conform to a No. 1 Fire Zone regulation within the area, he would be required to conseruct a "four- hour fire restrlvtive" block wall structure, the cost of which would be prohibitive in his case.. A variance was therefore requested in order to construct a "one -hour fire -restrictive" building compattble with provisions stipulated in an R-3 zone. The Planning Consultant-confirmad the "No. 1 Fire '"one =egulation" and advised of the detailed procedure that will be requ' r+ed to rezone the ', property and to amend the Fire Zone re quiremon is and the . '1.angth of time .;to take the appropriate steps, After considerable discussion, the ne:ct regular. meeting was scheduled whereby the Commission, by its own_ motion, would initiate pr%.deedings to conduct a public hearing on the subject of rezoning the .easte.•ly side of Highland Avenue, between Peninsula Avenue and Blayswater Avenue;` The Secreta-y was instructed to place the subject on the Commasion agenda. The application for' a change in Zone from C-2 to R-3 was withdrawn -by Charles Helton, pending the outcome of the proposed hearing. 3. VARIANCE - UPIJOLSTERY SHOP;.247 CALIFORNIA DRIVE A communication was received from the firm of Anderson rBros., ^caring the signature of Jack Anderson, currently operating an upW.stery 91.op on Primrose Road and announcing intention to relocate the business at 247 California Drive.`- A variance from a C-1 to a C- 2 use wne requester. The Planning Consultant advised that adjacent property is currently operating under a C-2 usage and that the location proposed by AndersoN Bros. -Is "definitely C-2 property." A public hearing on the application, for the variance was scheduled for the regular meeting, September 26, 1960. 4 - SPECIAL P,, MIT - DAY NURSERY, 1024 OAK GROVE AVENUE An application for a special permit to continue the operation of a Day Nursery at 1024 Oak Gro®e Avenue, was submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Frnest L. Cook. The Planning Consultant advised that the premises, involving city -owned right -of -stay property was previously operated on a "cooperative basis" with the city ddnating the use of the playground area in exchangs for the maintenance of the gro-Lands and that the business TP.Tas purchased by the applicants in June, 1958, A public hearing was schedule-d for ,the next regular meeting of the Commission, September 26, 1960. ADJOU71RHEINT The meeting was adjourned at 9:30` p.m., with members of the Conan:--Ussion reminded of a special study meeting scheduled Wednesday, September 14, 1960, to review proposed zoning amendments. Respectfully submitted, Da A. STIVERS, Secretary