HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1960.10.10CITY OF BURLINGAME• PLANNING COMMISSION
October 10, 1960
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT OTHM S PRESENT
Cistulli Kindig City Attorney Karmel
Diederichsen City Engineer Marr
Martin Plan. Cons. Mann
Moore
Norberg
Stivers
CALL, TO ORDER
A study meeting of the Burlingame Planning Commission, regularly
scheduled for this date, was called to order at 8:00 p.m. -
Chairman Diederlchsen presiding.
ROLL CALL
A roll call recorded the above members present.
Cbabissioner Kindig, having previously advised that he would be away
from the City, was excused.
The following subjects were submitted to the Commission for review:
1. REStBDIVISION - Lot 3, Block 11, Ray Park Subdivision &
Parcel "A" of Resubdivision of Lot 12, Block 55,
Easton Addition No. 5.
A resubdivision map, filed with the City Engineer by F.K. Kennedy and
Kathe Kennedy, owners of the property described as Parcel "A" on said
map, proposed to move the common lot line between Parcel "A" and
Lot 3, Block 11, Ray Park Subdivision, designated as Parcel "B" on the
map.
Mr. Kennedy was in attendance and advised that he recently acquired
ownership of a small area at the rear of the Ray :Park lot, which is
adjacent to his property; this is practically all creek and it is
his intention to preserve the natural beauty of the site.
The City Engineer indicated that the application appeared to be in order.
A public hearing was scheduled for the regular meeting to be held on
October 31, 1960.
Z. RESUBDIVISION - Molakidis Prouertles On Bayshore Boulevard,
An application to resubdivide the Molakidis properties on Bayshore
Boulevard was submitted by the City Engineer.
A letter dated October 5, 1960, from Wilsey, Ham & Blair, Civil
Engineers, accompanied the map. The communication advised that the
resubdivision proposes a change in property lines at two places.
Commissioners reviewed the map,.and the City Engineer indicating that
the application was in order, a public hearing was scheduled for the
next regular meeting.
3. VARIANCE - Plate Property, 1215 Vancouver Aveftue. Proposing Less
Than Legal Lot Frontage.
An application filed by Eileen T. Plate, owner of property at
1215 Vancouver Avenue, requested a variance to permit one lot of a
three lot resubdivision to have a street frontage of 30 feet.
A letter dated October 6, 19609 filed by the applicant, advised that
subsequent to a recent request to resubdivide the property, which
was approved by the Planning Commission under date of February 23, 19600
at which time permission was granted to divide into three lots, each
bavibg a frontage of 50 feet on Ve-mouvver_ Avenueait was determined that
such_ development would not provide the fleet use o;K the property.
The commuAcatJ4.on ot.,at€ d that normission was requested at this 'Lime to
establish two 60 foot x 150 foot lots; the third lot, consisting of
the balance of the prcaperty_, to have street frontage by reason of a
30 foot drIveway whir oh presently serves the existing house.
Robovrt Daan Tur.:r r of Coldwell-Banker Company was in attendance to
represent the applicant.
Coamissloa6rs reviewed the map ap!d were shown polaroid snaps illus-
trating the grade of the land, above street level, also the i ne-?t ion
of the drive -way.
Commissioner Martin mentioned that he was familiar with the property
and suggested that a hedge at the southerly end of the property would
appear to offer a natural subdivision line. Perhaps the two lots
across the Vancouver Avenue frontage could be increased to 65 foot
width.
After some further discussion, during which Commissioners agreed to
Inspect the site, the application was scheduled for hearing on
October 31, 1960.
4. SPECIAL PERMIT - Ralmund B. klurlitzer. Validated Parkins Lot._
An application was filed by Mr. Raimund B. Wurlitzer for a use permit
to operate a validated parking lot on property at 1460 Chapin Avenue,
(Lot F, Block 11, Burlingame Land Subdivision).
Mr. Wurlitzer was in attendance and advised that he is the owner, that
the property has been used as a parking lot for marry years, serving
the commercial buildings which he owns on Burlingame Avenue. He
stated that it is his intention that the lot will continue to provide
parking for the buildings but under a system of merchant validation.
The Commission was advised that there is space to accommodate approx-
imately 51 cars; further, that it has not yet been determined whether
an attendant will be on duty.
The application was scheduled for public hearing on October 31, 1960.
-2 -
5. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA REQUESTS TIME EXTENSION VARIANCE GRANT.
A communication from the Aluminum Compares of America, dated
October 4, 1960, requested an extension for a period of six months
to accomplish a variance relative to a commercial building to be
constructed in the Mills Estate area. The communication was scheduled
for formal consideration at the next regular meeting.
6. SPECIAL PERMIT - Paul J. Constantino. Study/Rumpus Room In
Accessory- Building.
An application filed by Paul J. Constantino, 1920 Carmelita Avenue,,
requested a use permit to convert and enlarge an existing accessory
building on the property into a study and playroom for family use.
The building was originally constructed with maid's quarters oeeupy-
Ing one portion and the garage the other. The present plan will
eliminate the garage; however, Mr. Constantino has ample land and
has agreed to construct a new carport.
Following a brief review of the application, a public hearing was
scheduled for the next regular meeting.
7. BAYSHORE HIGHWAY NAM CHANGE DISCUSSED,
The Planning Consultant advised that in accordance with the request of
the Commission he had discussed with the City Manager the possibility
of retaining the name "Bayshore" and perhaps changing the word
"Highway" to some other designation. He stated that he was informed
that the Highway Department will not consider any compromise involving
the word "Bayshore"; that they want this eliminated before any steps
will be taken to provide directional signs at the Broadway Overpass.
A list of names suggested by a number of interested citizens was
submitted and discussed. Commissioners agreed that the matter would
be brought to some.conclusion at the next regular meeting.
8. RAPID TRANSIT: PLANNING ASPECTS.
The Planning Consultant advised that the County Planning Commission
and the Board of Supervisors have requested an expression from the
various cities concerning the proposed route of the Rapid Transit
System in San Mateo County. The Planning Consultant stated that draw-
ings are available of the'system as it will affect the City of
Burlingame. The subject was scheduled for further discussion at the
study meeting of November 14, 1960, at which time: the Planning Con-
sultant and the City Engineer were to present pertinent material.
A suggestion was made that a representative of the District be in-
vited to attend the meeting.
Commissioners agreed that at the time of the study meeting a decision
would be made concerning the advisability of holding an open meeting
at which time interested citizens would be invited to participate
in public discussion on the planning aspects of the system.
9. ZONING AM33 1MMENTS.
The Planning Consultant reported progress in compiling material for
additional amendments to the Zoning Ordinance.
"JOURNKvM The meeting was regularly adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, D.A. Stivers. Sens-a+.,..-