HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 2024.05.06 (Regular Meeting)CITY 0
BURLINGAME
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Approved Minutes
Regular City Council Meeting on May 6, 2024
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in person and via Zoom
at 7:05 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
The pledge of allegiance was led by Andrea Pappajohn. Mayor Colson welcomed Councilmember
Pappajohn. Councilmember Pappajohn thanked everyone who supported her.
a. SWEARING IN OF DISTRICT 1 INTERIM CITY COUNCILMEMBER ANDREA PAPPAJOHN
Kimathi Marangu swore in District 1 Interim City Councilmember Andrea Pappajohn.
4. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson*, Pappajohn, Stevenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
Mayor Colson appeared via Zoom.
S. REQUEST FOR AB 2249 REMOTE PARTICIPATION
There was no request.
6. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
7. UPCOMING EVENTS
1
Vice Mayor Beach reviewed upcoming events in the city.
8. PRESENTATIONS
a. RECOGNIZING MAY AS MENTAL HEALTH MONTH
NAMI Director Rober Taylor spoke of the importance of recognizing May as mental health month.
b. AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION ACCREDIATION PRESENTATION
American Public Works Association ("APWA") Region VIII Director Joubin Pakpour congratulated the City,
and more specifically the Public Works Department, on their APWA accreditation. He noted that only 17
other organizations in the state are accredited.
DPW Murtuza thanked Mr. Pakpour and noted that this is the highest achievement that a public works
department can obtain. He thanked the Public Works staff and recognized Lilliana Cifuentes for her
leadership in the process.
The City Council congratulated staff for their hard work and achievement.
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS
An individual discussed the need for more traffic control on Burlingame Avenue.
10. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Vice Mayor Beach asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from the
Consent Calendar. Councilmember Brownrigg pulled item 101. City Attorney Guina pulled items 10a
through 10c.
Councilmember Stevenson made a motion to approve the following items for the Consent Calendar: 10d,
10e, 10f, 10g, 10h, 10i, 10j, 10k, 10m, 10n, 10o, and 10p; seconded by Councilmember Brownrigg. The
motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE APRIL 15, 2024 CITY COUNCIL AND
BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION STUDY SESSION
Vice Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the April 15,
2024 City Council and Beautification Commission Study Session; seconded by Councilmember Stevenson.
The motion passed by roll call vote, 4-0-1. (Councilmember Pappajohn abstained because she was not yet a
Councilmember at the April 15 meeting).
b. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE APRIL 15. 2024 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
Vice Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the April 15,
2024 Regular City Council Meeting; seconded by Councilmember Stevenson. The motion passed
unanimously by roll call vote, 4-0-1. (Councilmember Pappajohn abstained because she was not yet a
Councilmember at the April 15 meeting).
c. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE APRIL 17, 2024 SPECIAL MEETING TO
INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR THE DISTRICT 1 INTERIM COUNCIL SEAT
Vice Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the April 17,
2024 Special Meeting to Interview Applicants for the District 1 Interim Council Seat; seconded by
Councilmember Stevenson. The motion passed by roll call vote, 4-0-1. (Councilmember Pappajohn
abstained because she was not yet a Councilmember at the April 17 meeting).
d. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE RENEWING THE BURLINGAME POLICE DEPARTMENT MILITARY
EQUIPMENT USE POLICY; CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15378. 15061(B)(3)
Police Chief Matteucci and City Attorney Guina requested Council adopt Ordinance Number 2028.
e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2023 STREET RESURFACING PROJECT BY
INTERSTATE GRADING AND PAVING, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 86400 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,517,570.70
DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 52-2024.
f. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE EMS UPGRADES AT THE MAIN LIBRARY BY BAY
POINT CONTROL, INC. DBA MARINA MECHANICAL, CITY PROJECT NO. 85310 IN THE AMOUNT OF
375 830
DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 53-2024.
g. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO RENEW THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME AVENUE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2024-25; AND DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2024-25 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING
DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 054-2024, Resolution Number 055-2024, and
Resolution Number 056-2024.
h. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE UTILITIES
INSPECTOR/LOCATOR CLASSIFICATION
Human Resources Director Saguisag-Sid requested Council adopt Resolution Number 057-2024.
L ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE LIST OF DESIGNATED OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES
REQUIRED TO FILE FORM 7005 PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF BURLINGAME'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CODE
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council adopt Resolution Number 058-2024.
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH CUMMING MANAGEMENT GROUP. INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT FOR THE CUERNAVACA PARK ATHLETIC TURF RENOVATION PROJECT, CITY
PROJECT NO. 86070, IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,000
DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 059-2024.
k. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING AND CALLING FOR THE NOVEMBER 5. 2024. GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO FILL TWO (FULL TERM) CITY COUNCIL VACANCIES IN COUNCIL DISTRICTS
2 AND 4 AND FILL ONE (PARTIAL TERM) CITY COUNCIL VACANCY IN COUNCIL DISTRICT 1
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council adopt Resolution Number 060-2024.
I. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH CBRE FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BROKER SERVICES FOR A NEW CITY HALL
Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he pulled this item because he thought it was important that staff do
a better job on public outreach regarding the City's need for a new City Hall. City Manager Goldman
replied in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 061-2024; seconded by
Councilmember Pappajohn. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
m. OPEN NOMINATION PERIOD TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
4
City Manager Goldman requested Council approve opening nomination period to fill one vacancy on the
Library Board of Trustees.
n. OPEN NOMINATION PERIOD TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
City Manager Goldman requested Council approve opening nomination period to fill one vacancy on the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
o. APPROVAL OF QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2024
Finance Direction Yu -Scott requested Council approve the Quarterly Investment Report for the period
ending March 21, 2024.
p
UPDATE AND CONFIRMATION OF THE MAYOR'S COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2024
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve the Mayor's Council Assignments for 2024.
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF AN
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FENCE VARIANCE FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE -UNIT
DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE ON A LOT CONTAINING AN EXISTING SINGLE -UNIT DWELLING
(TO REMAIN) AT 900 PALOMA AVENUE
Vice Mayor Beach reviewed the appeal process. She asked her colleagues if they had any disclosures
relevant to the hearing. All Councilmembers acknowledged that they had read the emails from the public
and visited the site.
CDD Gardiner reviewed the background of the appeal:
Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review and Fence Variance for fence
height for a new, two-story single -unit dwelling and an attached garage at 900 Paloma Avenue,
zoned R-2, on March 25, 2024
• Approved project consists of:
o building a new, two-story single unit dwelling and an attached garage on a lot that currently
contains an existing one-story single -unit dwelling
o new carport
o two detached ADUs
o proposed lot coverage would be 3,392 square feet, which is under the maximum allowed of
4,906 square feet
CDD Gardiner stated that the site is located in the Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AH, which requires that
the new dwelling and ADUs be constructed at the Design Flood Elevation or above the Base Flood Elevation
plus one foot to comply with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and California Building
Code requirements. He explained that this requires that the finished floor elevations of the structures be at
or above elevation 17' and also provide venting in the crawl space to allow water to pass should there be a
flood event. He noted that this application complies with the requirements. He added that during the
building permit review, the applicant will be required to provide more detailed civil engineering plans that
show drainage and water management on the site.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked if he was correct that per the City's regulations, stormwater has to be
managed on the applicant's site itself. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked how the City determines season high groundwater. DPW Murtuza replied
that it is based on the groundwater table for a specific area. He noted that one way the project can
determine the groundwater level is by drilling.
Mr. Barber, speaking on behalf of the appellants, started his ten minutes.
Vice Mayor Beach then gave Michael Barber, on behalf of the appellant, ten minutes to explain their
position.
Mr. Barber reviewed the appellants' concerns with the project including:
• the project site includes the Terrace Creek Lagoon, which regularly floods and is at a low point in the
neighborhood
• neighbors have purchased industrial sump pumps to address flood concerns and are worried that
with more development, more stormwater will be shed downhill, causing more flooding
Mr. Barber showed historical maps that outlined the Terrace Creek Lagoon's position in the neighborhood
and pictures of the flooding that the neighbors had recently dealt with due to the winter storms. He
suggested that the City consider raised pilings for projects in flood zones and voiced concern about
monitoring that builders adhere to the building codes.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked about Mr. Barber's suggestion for raised pilings. Mr. Barber replied that
the pilings would allow standing water to better permeate the ground and flow through properties to the
storm drains.
Mayor Colson asked if 900 Paloma currently includes any flood mitigation. Mr. Barber replied that he
didn't believe so.
Project designer Tim Raduenz discussed the project and the public outreach that they conducted. He
explained that his team held a community meeting at the Community Center and reviewed the project's
civil engineering drawings with members of the public. He added that currently the site has no flood
mitigation. He stated that the project design includes:
• Anew water catchment system under the new driveway
6
• Concrete will be replaced with vegetation to allow for water to permeate the ground
Mr. Raduenz explained that both City building officials and his team will be inspecting the crawl spaces and
the structure elevation to ensure the project's compliance with FEMA and California Building Code
requirements.
Mayor Colson asked about the cost of the catchment system. Mr. Raduenz replied that it is estimated to
cost between $80,000 and $120,000.
Mayor Colson discussed how often frequently projects are inspected by the City Building Official to ensure
the project matches with the approved plan. CDD Gardiner replied that staff are very thorough and
regularly check projects.
Mayor Colson asked if she was correct that the R2 district that 900 Paloma is located in requires lots to
have their own drainage. CDD Gardiner replied that the R2 district has a wide variety of developments, and
stormwater standards in the past may not have been as stringent as current standards.
Councilmember Pappajohn asked for clarification on water flow on the lot. CDD Gardiner replied that the
project is designed in such a way that water should be able to be absorbed through the ground via
permeable designed surfaces.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the drainage system under the driveway. CDD Gardiner replied
that the catchment design allows for the water to be caught, stored, and released in a timely manner, as
well as allowing the water to permeate through the ground.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the City's liability for approving a development on a property on
which flooding may occur. City Attorney Guina replied that the planning and engineering standards that
any home must be built to are designed to mitigate risk to the people living in it and the people around it.
Vice Mayor Beach stated that the project, which sits in a FEMA flood zone, must adhere to the Burlingame,
State, and FEMA regulations. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Beach asked if she was correct that the project met these standards. CDD Gardiner replied in
the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Beach asked if the standards regulate how the development affects neighboring properties.
CDD Gardiner replied that the standards require the management of the water that falls on an individual
property be treated by that property.
Vice Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment.
Rosemary Macleod voiced support for delaying the project to address flooding concerns.
7
Jonathan voiced concern about protecting the trees on 900 Paloma and also about potential flooding from
900 Paloma onto neighboring lots.
Vice Mayor Beach closed public comment.
Vice Mayor Beach gave the appellant an opportunity for a rebuttal.
Mr. Barber discussed his belief that the FEMA standards were low. He explained that he thought the
standards should consider a larger storm event than a 10-year flood.
Jonathan voiced concerns about the catchment system.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked staff if the City needs more time to study the hydrology of the area. DPW
Murtuza replied that in order for the project to get its building permit, it must submit a hydrology report
and calculations. He noted that once that is submitted, staff will review the report and calculations. He
added that staff will look at whether this project will increase flooding on the nearby properties and have
an adverse impact on potential flooding.
Councilmember Stevenson stated that currently, there are no flooding mitigation measures on the lot, and
the lot includes a lot of concrete. He asked if water from 900 Paloma currently floods neighboring
properties. DPW Murtuza replied that he was unsure.
Mayor Colson stated that the community's concerns might open up a larger conversation about flooding
and flood mitigation techniques in conjunction with One Shoreline.
Mayor Colson stated that because the developer met the required City, State, and FEMA standards and the
Planning Commission approved the project, she is inclined to deny the appeal.
Councilmember Brownrigg concurred with Mayor Colson. However, he asked if it would be feasible to have
the project come back to Council with an update, once the hydrology report has been received and
reviewed by staff.
Vice Mayor Beach stated that the project was approved by the Planning Commission after it was
determined that it met the required standards. She added that she believed the parcel will fare better with
the proposed flood mitigation techniques.
Councilmember Stevenson concurred with Vice Mayor Beach.
Councilmember Pappajohn concurred with her colleagues.
City Attorney Guina clarified that the conditions of approval include some additional items addressing the
catch basement and tree mitigation issues. He noted that if the developer does not meet the checkmarks
0
stated throughout the process or is in violation of the building code, staff can choose to not sign off on the
building permit.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked about a presentation regarding the results of the hydrology report.
Mayor Colson suggested that this presentation be given to the Planning Commission.
CDD Gardiner stated that in addition to the Planning Commission conditions of approval, there are 32
conditions of approval from Public Works, and condition 31 states that due to the surrounding existing
drainage pattern, a drainage plan will be required during the building permit phase to quantify the amount
of stormwater that will drain to the property and how it will be retained and that no greater than 40% of
the parcel can be discharged from the site. He noted it is unusual to report out on building permit
issuances.
Mayor Colson made a motion to deny the appeal and confirm the Planning Commission's approval.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked if the Mayor would amend her motion to include a presentation to the
Planning Commission once the hydrology report was submitted and verified.
Mayor Colson replied in the affirmative with the understanding that the report is an informational item not
an action item.
Councilmember Brownrigg agreed.
Mayor Colson's amended motion was seconded by Councilmember Stevenson. The motion passed
unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
b. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Finance Director Yu -Scott explained that on April 1, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to
levy the Broadway Area BID assessments for FY 2024-25 and order a public hearing for May 6. She
explained that approximately $32,950 in assessments is collected annually with City business licenses, and
all of these funds are forwarded to the Broadway Area Business Improvement District for improvements as
authorized by the BID Board of Directors.
Finance Director Yu -Scott asked if the City Clerk received any protests. City Clerk Hassel -Shearer replied in
the negative.
Vice Mayor Beach opened the public hearing. No one spoke.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 062-2024 seconded by
Councilmember Pappajohn. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
0
c. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25: AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION UPDATING
THE USER FEE COST RECOVERY POLICY FOR THE CITY
Finance Director Yu -Scott stated that the City hired Matrix Consulting Group to perform a comprehensive
study analyzing the cost -of -service relationships that exist between fees for service activities in the
following areas: Building, Public Works, Finance, City Clerk, Library, Parks and Recreation, Planning, and
Police. She explained that the results of the study provide a tool for understanding current service levels,
the cost and demand for those services, and what fees for service can and should be charged. She noted
that as costs associated with the services fluctuate over time, a significant component in the development
of any fee schedule is that it allows the flexibility to remain current.
Vice Mayor Beach voiced her concern regarding building fees for smaller projects. Matrix Consulting Group
representative Khushboo Ingle replied that the fees are set up to represent the true cost of staff providing
that particular service.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked if the City could offer a $500 subsidy on all building projects, thus
depressing the cost of the smaller projects substantially. Ms. Ingle replied that if you subsidize the smaller
projects, you start getting into the unfairness of permit valuations and projects potentially lying about their
valuations.
CDD Gardiner stated that one of the reasons a lower valuation has such a high fee is that the smaller
projects do use a disproportionate amount of staff time.
Vice Mayor Beach asked if adoption of the Master Fee Schedule could be delayed until a financial analysis
of Councilmember Brownrigg's idea was conducted. Finance Director Yu -Scott replied in the affirmative.
Mayor Colson argued that Council should pass the fee schedule as is, and if needed, come back and amend
the schedule with any changes after doing the analysis. Vice Mayor Beach agreed with Mayor Colson.
Mayor Colson made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 063-2024; seconded by Councilmember
Brownrigg. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
12. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE OF THE PARKLET PROGRAM BEYOND JUNE 30, 2024
10
CDD Gardiner stated that at the December 4, 2023 meeting, the Council indicated support for establishing a
semi -permanent parklet program, beyond the current temporary program's expiration on June 30, 2024.
This matter was then brought to the Economic Development Subcommittee on March 13 and April 10,
2024.
CDD Gardiner explained that following direction from the City Council and Economic Development
Subcommittee, the following changes would be made to the parklet program:
• Parklets will only be allowed for businesses that already have a parklet as of June 30, 2024. New
parklets where there was not already a parklet previously will not be permitted, and once a parklet
is removed, it will not be allowed to be replaced. The intent is to encourage new businesses to
utilize the sidewalk for outdoor dining, rather than adding a new parklet.
• Parklets will only be allowed within the frontage of the business storefront. Parklets will no longer
be allowed to utilize the frontage of adjacent storefronts. The intent is to provide equity with non -
restaurant commercial businesses that have not had the benefit of a parklet, and to restore on -
street parking spaces.
• Parklets located adjacent to intersection crosswalks will be required to be setback at least 15 feet
from a bulb -out crosswalk or 20 feet from the crosswalk. The intent is to provide visibility for
pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles at intersections, and to comply with Assembly Bill (AB) 413.
• Water -walls will be required to be covered/clad on both sides, facing both the interior of the parklet
as well as the street and surrounding parking spaces. The intent is to offer an attractive appearance
from both the sidewalk and the street.
• Curb gutters will be required to be kept unobstructed to allow proper drainage.
• Roofs, trellises, or tent shade structures will no longer be allowed. No structural elements will be
allowed to extend beyond the top of the walls. Umbrellas will be allowed for shade. The intent is to
address safety during storms and allow better visibility to adjacent businesses.
• No gas piping or electrical lines and cords will be allowed to be extended to the parklet. Such lines
and cords represent a potential safety issue and conflict with building code requirements. Space
heaters will be permitted if they are an outdoor approved type, are in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications, and are located at least two feet from the edge of any umbrella
canvas, tablecloths, any foliage, or any other flammable object or material.
• Furnishings will not be allowed to be stored in the parklet when not in use. When the business is
not open, tables, chairs, and other furnishings must be cleared from the parklet.
• All existing parklets will be required to be removed at the conclusion of the current program, and
any returning parklets will be built anew following review and approval of new permits. The intent
is to allow cleaning of the street surface below existing parklets, assess locations of utilities below
parklets, and ensure rebuilt parklet structures comply with new design guidelines.
• Inspections will be changed from quarterly to annually. Staff believes this will be sufficient to
monitor the physical condition of the parklets. However, staff anticipates ongoing enforcement of
operations and would inspect parklets on an as -needed basis when compliance issues arise.
11
CDD Gardiner stated that the current fee under the pilot program is $1,590 per year with a monthly
cleaning fee of $265. However, he noted that after reviewing several long-term parklet programs, the fee
structure varies, with Campbell offering grants ranging from $25,000 to $40,000 for the construction of a
parklet to Walnut Creek with a fee of $48 per square foot.
Vice Mayor Beach asked if staff considered an escalator for the monthly cleaning fee. CDD Gardiner replied
that a fee structure still needs to be determined. However, he noted that the cleaning fee reflects the true
cost to clean the area.
Vice Mayor Beach asked about the decision to not allow new parklets. CDD Gardiner replied that the
concern is there are already a lot of parklets, and if more are added, the commercial district might become
too restaurant -heavy and potentially discourage other types of businesses.
Mayor Colson stated that the Town Square will create more outdoor dining space in the future.
Councilmember Stevenson stated that he thought the program was lucrative to restaurants since the
addition of more tables should translate to more revenue. He agreed with the need to tighten up the
design of parklets and showed concern for the non -restaurant businesses.
Vice Mayor Beach opened the item for public comment.
Mr. Mendell, from Kerns Jewelry, voiced concern for the non -restaurant businesses.
Mr. Gross, a retail owner, supported the permanent removal of parklets.
Mr. Farrell, owner of Paper Caper, supported the removal of parklets.
Dimitri voiced support for the parklets and making Burlingame Avenue pedestrian only. (Comment
submitted via publiccomment@burlingame.org)
Lace voiced support for a long-term parklet program. (Comment submitted via
publiccomment@burlingame.org)
Doug Bojack voiced support for a long-term parklet program. (Comment submitted via
publiccomment@burlingame.org)
Vice Mayor Beach closed public comment.
Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he approved of the parklet designs and concurred that no new
parklets should be allowed.
12
Vice Mayor Beach stated that she wanted to ensure that the City recovered its costs from administering the
program. She voiced support for the parklet program and the vibrancy it brings to Burlingame. She noted
that she thought the new program would mean fewer parklets.
Vice Mayor Beach summarized Council's direction that Council wanted to see commitment from
restaurants with parklets by June 30 that they will continue under a longer -term parklet program.
13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council reviewed their committee appointments.
14. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Pappajohn asked to agendize a discussion of micromobility devices (e-bikes, scooters, etc.);
seconded by Councilmember Stevenson.
15. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking
Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are
available online at www.burlingame.org.
16. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Beach adjourned the meeting at 10:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer
City Clerk
13