HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 2024.03.18 (Regular Meeting)CITY c-
BURLINGAME
�FaT[o J N[ 6
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Approved Minutes
Regular City Council Meeting on March 18, 2024
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in person and via Zoom
at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
The pledge of allegiance was led by Donnie.
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, Ortiz, Stevenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. REQUEST FOR AB 2249 REMOTE PARTICIPATION
There were no requests.
S. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
6. UPCOMING EVENTS
Mayor Colson reviewed upcoming events in the city.
7. PRESENTATIONS
a. REVIEW OF THE CITY'S OTHER POST -EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS— RETIREE HEALTHCARE PLAN (OPEB)
I IAR11 ITIPC
Finance Director Yu -Scott stated that the City provides post -employment healthcare benefits to eligible
employees who retired directly from the City under CalPERS. She explained that that the program allows
1
retirees to continue participation in the medical insurance program after retirement. This benefit is often
referred to as OPEB ("Other Post -Employment Benefits").
Foster & Foster Senior Consulting Actuary Doug Pryor explained that OPEB includes:
• Medical
• Life insurance
• Dental
• Vision
• Other
He noted that OPEB does not include retiree defined contribution arrangements such as HRAs.
Mr. Pryor explained that GASB Statement Number 75 covers OPEB accounting. He stated that the full
actuarial valuation is required every two years:
• Each valuation then provides results for two fiscal years for GASB reporting
• It also provides funding recommendations for two fiscal years
Mr. Pryor reviewed the history of the City's OPEB Plan. He explained that in response to the prospect of
alarmingly high future employer contribution rates, the City modified the Plan through negotiations with
bargaining units throughout the years. Currently, the City has three tiers of retiree medical benefits.
Employees hired on or after January 1, 2012 (or an earlier date as defined in the MOUs) are members of
Tier 3 and only eligible to receive a City contribution equal to the Public Employees' Medical & Hospital
Care Act ("PEMHCA") minimum upon retirement from the City.
Mr. Pryor reviewed the City's complex benefit tier system for OPEB recipients:
Group
Tier 1 Hired Before
Tier 2 Hired Between
Tier 3 Hired After
Teamsters
March 31, 2008
March 31, 2008 to
August 15, 2011
August 14, 2011
AFSCME 829
March 31, 2008
March 31, 2008 to
January 1, 2012
December 31, 2011
BAMM
March 31, 2008
March 31, 2008 to
November 1, 2011
Council/Department
October 31, 2011
Heads/ Unrepresented
PON Police Admin/
June 26, 2006
June 26, 2006 to
November 1, 2010
Sergeants
October 31, 2010
• Premium Cap
• Lowest Dual
• $157 per month
BENEFIT CAP
• Varies by group
Premium
• City HRA
and retirement
• Vesting schedule
contribution
date
years City
based on City
service:
service:
• 50% at 10
2
• 75% at 15 to 19
• 2% less than 5
• 100% at 20
years
• 3% for 5 to 19
years
• 5.5% for 20 plus
years
Mr. Pryor reviewed a chart that depicted the 2024 PEMHCA monthly premiums for the various healthcare
plans that are available to those who are OPEB recipients.
Mr. Pryor reviewed the City's OPEB payments:
• FY 2005-06 - $1.5 million
• FY 2006-07 - $1.8 million
• FY 2007-08 - $1.9 million
• FY 2008-09 - $2.3 million
• FY 2009-10 - $2.2 million
• FY 2010-11 - $2.4 million
• FY 2011-12 - $2.3 million
• FY 2012-13 - $2.5 million
• FY 2013-14 - $2.4 million
• FY 2014-15 - $2.8 million
• FY 2015-16 - $2.8 million
• FY 2016-17 - $2.8 million
• FY 2017-18 - $2.7 million
• FY 2018-19 - $2.8 million
• FY 2019-20 - $2.8 million
• FY 2020-21 - $3.2 million
• FY 2021-22 - $3.1 million
• FY 2022-23 - $3 million
Mr. Pryor reviewed the following chart depicting the number of participants in the different tiers:
Group
Jan 1, 2013
June 30,
2015
June 30,
2017
June 30,
2019
June 30,
2021
June 30,
2023
Active Tier 1
142
118
n/a
n/a
n/a
59
Active Tier 2
29
29
n/a
n/a
n/a
17
Active Tier 3
23
50
n/a
n/a
n/a
160
TOTAL
ACTIVES
194
197
208
216
235
236
TOTAL
RETIREES
265
266
269
278
283
287
3
Mr. Pryor discussed the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) Fund, which is a Section 115
trust fund offered to cities by CalPERS to help fund benefits for retirees. He noted that CERBT has three
investment strategies:
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Target Allocation
• Global Equity
49%
34%
23%
• Fixed Income
23%
41%
51%
• TIPS
5%
5%
9%
• Commodities
3%
3%
3%
• REITs
20%
17%
14%
• TOTAL
100%
100%
100%
Expected
6.25%
5.75%
5.25%
Return/Discount Rate
He explained that the City was utilizing Strategy 2.
Mr. Pryor reviewed the market value of the City's Plan assets:
FY 2021-22 (amount in
thousands)
FY 2022-23 (amount in
thousands)
Market Value (beginning of
$300,305
$27,117
year)
• Contributions
$720
$480
• Benefit Payments
-
-
• Admin Expenses
($15)
($13)
• Investment Expenses
($11)
($10)
• Investment Earnings
3 882
982
Market Value (end of year)
$27,117
$28,557
Approximate Return
(12.7%)
3.6%
He noted that the investments fell short of expectations since the previous study. He added that the City
started its trust in FY 2013-14, and on average, the City has received an approximate return of 5.5%.
Mr. Pryor reviewed the City's OPEB funding status:
June 30, 2021 (amount in
thousands)
June 30, 2023 (amount in
thousands)
Actuarial Accrued Liability
• Actives
$12,136
$15,579
• Retirees
$32,345
$49,337
• Total
$44,481
$64,916
Assets
$30,298
$28,557
Unfunded Liability
$14,183
$36,359
4
Funded Ratio 168.1% 44.0%
Mr. Pryor reviewed the following chart depicting the actuarial gains and losses
AAL
Assets
UAAL
(amount in
(amount in
(amount in
thousands)
thousands)
thousands)
Actual at June 30, 2021
$44,481
$30,298
$14,183
Expected at June 30, 2023
$44,814
$33,606
$11,207
Increase/(Decrease)
• Dependent benefits valued and implicit subsidy
$2,300
-
$2,300
valued post 65
• Current retirees not in Medicare plans
$5,300
-
$5,300
• Updated medical trend and mortality
$5,300
-
$5,300
• Discount rate 6% to 5.75%
$1,700
-
$1,700
• Other/Demographic
$5,502
-
$5,502
• Asset changes
-
($5,049)
$5,049
• Total changes
$20,102
($5,049)
$25,152
Actual at June 30, 2023
$64,916
$28,557
$36,359
Vice Mayor Beach asked about the other/demographic category. Mr. Pryor replied that this category
includes fluctuations that the actuarial isn't able to identify.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the category of "current retirees not in Medicare plans". Mr. Pryor
replied that PEMHCA doesn't require retirees to sign up for Medicare.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked if the benefits the City gives are better than Medicare, or is there just a
lack of awareness. Mr. Pryor replied that this is a PEMHCA policy. He explained that if a retiree is eligible
for premium -free Medicare Part A, then PEMHCA will require that the retiree enroll in Medicare, and then
the individual will get to the lower premium. He stated that if the retiree is not eligible for the premium -
free Medicare Part A, then PEMHCA doesn't require the retiree to enroll in Medicare. He added that the
retiree doesn't have an incentive to enroll in Medicare as it may increase their cost.
Councilmember Stevenson asked what prevents a retiree from being eligible for Medicare Part A. Mr.
Pryor replied that to be eligible, an individual needs 10 years of paying Medicare payroll taxes.
Mayor Colson asked if the City should move towards a more aggressive investment portfolio. Mr. Pryor
replied that most agencies are in Strategy 1, but with that comes more risks. He explained that this is really
a decision for the individual agencies.
Mayor Colson stated that the City doesn't need to change strategies, but it is worthy of a discussion. The
Council concurred.
5
Finance Director Yu -Scott noted that the City was in Strategy 1 but switched to Strategy 2 in 2019
Mr. Pryor reviewed the following chart regarding actuarially determined contributions ("ADC")
June 30, 2021
June 30, 2021
June 30, 2023
June 30,
Valuation
Valuation
Valuation
2023
Valuation
2022
2023
2024
2025
ADC - $
• Normal Cost
$701
$672
$940
$935
• Unfunded Amortization
$1,225
$1,253
$3,370
$3,463
• Total Cost
$1,926
$1,925
$4,310
$4,397
Projected Payroll
$23,586
$24,247
$26,580
$27,311
ADC - %
• Normal Cost
3.0%
2.8%
3.5%
3.4%
• Unfunded Amortization
5.2%
5.2%
12.7%
12.7%
• Total ADC
8.2%
7.9%
16.2%
16.1%
Mr. Pryor reviewed the City's OPEB projections:
FYE
Contribution
- Cash
Benefits
(amount in
thousands)
Contribution
- Implied
Subsidy
Benefits
(amount in
thousands)
Contribution
- Pre-
Funding
(amount in
thousands)
Contribution
- Total
(ADC)
(amount in
thousands)
Pay
ADC
Percentage
of Pay
Funded
Percentage
2025
$3,361
$669
$280
$4,310
$26,580
16.2%
47%
2026
$3,481
$690
$226
$4,397
$27,311
16.1%
49%
2027
$3,647
$766
$76
$4,489
$28,062
16.0%
52%
2028
$3,775
$802
$6
$4,583
$28,833
15.9%
54%
2029
$3,904
$848
($73)
$4,679
$29,626
15.8%
57%
2030
$3,927
$827
$22
$4,776
$30,441
15.7%
60%
2031
$4,016
$845
$15
$4,876
$31,278
15.6%
64%
2032
$4,077
$862
$42
$4,981
$32,138
15.5%
67%
2033
$4,158
$905
$26
$5,089
$33,022
15.4%
72%
2034
$4,175
$908
$117
$5,200
$33,930
15.3%
76%
Councilmember Brownrigg asked what the delta is between what the City has to pay to be responsible and
what the City is currently paying. He asked if the chart above in the "contribution - pre -funding" showed
what the City needed to pay in order to get on track. Mr. Pryor replied in the affirmative.
Mayor Colson discussed the end date of OPEB. She noted that it is a moving target depending on the
market, how long people live, etc.
0
Councilmember Brownrigg stated that the City's debt is being paid because the City has a healthy budget
and reserves.
Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Mayor Colson thanked staff for the presentation.
8. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
9. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Colson asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from the
Consent Calendar. DPW Murtuza pulled item 9d.
Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to approve 9a, 9b, 9c, 9e, 9f, 9g, 9h, 9i, and 9j from the Consent
Calendar; seconded by Councilmember Brownrigg. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
M7 W_\111:Z91T/1S919101kWK419111Z14INuLaIV[Ht•4U,1IjM11111IT913I:L*W_1.101:ILA 1111•I1 •,1<*t91;1AM&%**j[00
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve of the City Council Meeting Minutes for the March 4,
2024 Closed Session.
b. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE MARCH 4, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve of the City Council Meeting Minutes for the March 4,
2024 City Council Meeting.
c. APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR CITY STAFF TO ATTEND THE 2024 OPENGOV
TRANSFORM CONFERENCE
DPW Murtuza requested Council approve of out-of-state travel for City staff to attend the 2024 OpenGov
Transform Conference.
d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROCUREMENT OF FIVE VEHICLES FOR THE CITY'S
FLEET SYSTEM AS PART OF THE FY 2023-24 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT
OF $302,475.90
This item was pulled from the Consent Calendar by staff as a result of the potential option to purchase
electric vehicles.
7
e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO.
1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SCS ENGINEERS FOR ENGINEERING AND
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SERVICES RELATED TO THE CLOSED BURLINGAME LANDFILL IN THE
AMOUNT OF $75,500, FOR A NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $281,100 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT
DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 031-2024.
f. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A $729,342 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO REDGWICK
CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR THE BURLINGAME SQUARE TRANSIT HUB PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO.
84710. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 032-2024.
g. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ASIDE LETTER
AGREEMENT FOR THE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 856 BARGAINING GROUP
HR Director Saguisag-Sid requested Council adopt Resolution Number 033-2024.
h. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGES TO THE COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLAN
FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DEPARTMENT HEAD AND UNREPRESENTED CLASSIFICATIONS,
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE PLAN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
HR Director Saguisag-Sid requested Council adopt Resolution Number 034-2024.
L ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO.
1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SWA GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,475,
FOR A TOTAL COMPENSATION OF $624,625, FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION AND BID
PHASE SERVICES FOR THE TOWN SQUARE PROJECT ON CITY PARKING LOT E; CITY PROJECT NO.
86120
CDD Gardiner requested Council adopt Resolution Number 035-2024.
OPEN NOMINATION PERIOD TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION
City Manager Goldman requested Council open the nomination period to fill one vacancy on the Planning
Commission.
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.
11. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
0
a. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 8.18,
"SMOKING," OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW ON -SITE CONSUMPTION OF
HOOKAH (SHISHA) TOBACCO AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.19, "TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT,"
TO TITLE 8 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT
PROGRAM; CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS
15378 AND 15061(b)(3)
Mayor Colson discussed the Council's history with this item. She noted that usually, the seconding reading
of an ordinance is on the Consent Calendar. Because the Council was not unanimous in their decision to
approve the ordinance, however, it was put on the agenda as a Staff Report.
Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment.
Blythe Young voiced support for a retail license program. (Comment submitted via
publiccomment@burlingame.org).
Don Gross voiced concern with the ordinance regulating the distance between tobacco stores and distance
from "youth populated area". He noted that this would limit him from moving his business and doesn't
support diversity.
Mayor Colson closed public comment.
Mayor Colson asked about the number of hookah lounges that would be allowed under the proposed
ordinance. ACA Spansail replied that under the proposed ordinance, two would be allowed.
Mayor Colson asked if after a year, the City only has one application, can they close down the application
period and limit the number to one. ACA Spansail replied that the ordinance would need to be amended.
Mayor Colson asked her colleagues if they would want to revisit the number of hookah lounges allowed in a
year. The Council concurred.
Mayor Colson asked for the definition of a "youth populated area." ACA Spansail stated that a "youth
populated area" is defined as the following:
A parcel of real property that is occupied, in whole or in part, by any of the following:
(1) A private or public school that educates children in grades kindergarten through
high school;
(2) A library that is open to the public
(3) A playground that is open to the public;
(4) A Youth Center, defined as a facility where children ages 6 to 17 come together
for programs and activities;
(5) A Recreation Facility open to the public, defined as an area, place, structure, or
other facility that is used either permanently or temporarily for community
9
recreation, even though it may be used for other purposes. "Recreation Facility"
includes, but is not limited to, a gymnasium, playing court, playing field, and
swimming pool;
(6) A public or private college or university that serves as an institution for education
beyond the high school level;
(7) A licensed child-care facility or preschool, other than a small -family day care
home or a large -family daycare home as defined in California Health & Safety
Code § 1596.78.
Councilmember Brownrigg asked for clarification on what is barred within 1000 feet of a "youth populated
area." ACA Spansail replied that under Section 8.19.230(c), "no new Tobacco Retailer's Permit may be
issued to authorize Tobacco Product Sales at any location within 1,000 feet of a Youth -Populated Area, as
measured by a straight line from the nearest point of the property line of any parcel on which a Youth -
Populated Area is located and any point along the property line of the parcel on which the Permit applicant
has or proposes to locate the business." He noted that businesses that are already established will be built
into the program regardless of their distance from a "youth populated area."
The Council discussed the limited locations that a new tobacco retailer would be allowed in relation to the
1,000 feet requirement.
ACA Spansail stated that additionally, under the proposed ordinance, no new tobacco retailer can open up
within 500 feet of an existing tobacco retailer. He noted that this would also limit locations.
Councilmember Ortiz asked if he was correct that the City's proposed Tobacco Retailer Permit Program was
modeled after the County's program. ACA Spansail replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ortiz stated that the Council has been talking about this issue for a long time, and he was
ready to move forward.
Mayor Colson asked if an existing business could ask for a variance or exemption if they wanted to move
their business within the 1,000 feet. ACA Spansail stated that the City would need to amend the ordinance.
Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he was worried that the 1,000 feet would effectively act as a ban on
new tobacco locations. However, he agreed with Councilmember Ortiz that the City could amend the
ordinance in the future if this became an issue.
Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to adopt Ordinance Number 2026; seconded by Councilmember
Brownrigg. The motion passed 4-1. (Councilmember Beach voted against).
b. HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (APR)
CDD Gardiner explained that every year, the City is required to complete an Annual Progress Report ("APR")
in regards to the status and progress of implementation of the Housing Element. He explained that the APR
10
must be prepared in accordance with the provisions set forth by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development ("HCD") and on the forms that HCD provides.
CDD Gardiner explained that the Housing Element APR includes information about housing production
since the start of the planning period in January 2023, including:
• Information on the types of housing units that were issued building permits;
• Information on the City's progress in meeting its regional housing needs allocation; and
• Progress report on implementation of Housing Element programs.
CDD Gardiner reviewed the 2023 highlights included in the APR:
• 159 homes entitled (planning approval)
• 839 building permits issued
• 72 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) applications received and 39 permits issued
• 199 homes completed
CDD Gardiner reviewed the Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA") as measured by building permits
issued:
• 317 net new building permits finaled between June 30, 2022 and January 30, 2023
• 839 net new building permits issued in 2023
• 3,257 units in RHNA 6 Cycle 2023-2031— 35.5% fulfilled
• 204 below market rate units in RHNA 6 Cycle 2023-2031— 18% of total
CDD Gardiner reviewed the work that the City has done in RHNA 6:
Income Level
RHNA
Building Permits Issued
Percentage of RHNA
2023-2031 Goal
Very Low (50%AMI)
863
106
12.3%
Low (80%AMI)
497
92
18.5%
Moderate (120% AMI)
529
6
1.1%
Above Moderate (120%
AMI +)
1,368
952
69.6%
TOTAL
3,257
1,156
35.5%
CDD Gardiner reviewed the 2023 San Mateo County Area Median Income ("AMI"):
• $122,500 for a single -person household
• $140,000 for a two -person household
• $157,500 for a three -person household
• $175,000 for a four -person household
Councilmember Stevenson asked if it was fair to say that while the City is gaining a lot of housing, the
hardest category to obtain housing in is for the very low income. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative.
11
Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he was interested in the progress the City was making on housing in
conjunction with the General Plan. He discussed the importance of preserving housing and stated that he
thought this was the best way to reach lower income levels.
Mayor Colson stated that when the Village at Burlingame was run through permitting, the AMI was
$100,000. She noted that when that project came online, the AMI was closer to $175,000. She explained
that this meant that the City wasn't reaching the levels it thought it would. She asked if the City can create
a rule that the AMI that will be applicable to the project is the date at which the project is approved. CDD
Gardiner replied that these projects are generally tax credit projects. He stated that one of the things he
has been thinking about is the ranges set up for income levels and that usually developers use the top
number in the range.
Mayor Colson discussed draft state legislation that would create rent control for affordable housing.
CDD Gardiner stated that for individuals interested in keeping up-to-date on the projects going on in the
City, staff releases a Residential Application Overview table each month. This document can be found at
www.burlingame.org/ma6orprojects.
Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment.
Andrea Pappajohn congratulated the City on their hard work to increase housing in the community.
Councilmember Ortiz stated that he is proud of the work the City has done in regard to housing.
Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to accept the 2023 Housing Element Annual Progress Report and
authorize its transmittal to the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") and the
California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD"); seconded by Councilmember
Stevenson.
Councilmember Brownrigg thanked staff for all the reporting they are required to do under State
mandates.
The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TENTH AMENDMENT OF THE CITY MANAGER'S
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE A SALARY INCREASE OF 0.5% AND LONGEVITY PAY OF
2.5% AND APPROVING THE CITY OF BURLINGAME PAY RATES AND RANGES (SALARY SCHEDULE)
HR Director Saguisag-Sid stated that following the completion of negotiations, the Council discussed City
Manager Goldman's compensation in a Closed Session on March 4, 2024. She explained that in recognition
of City Manager Goldman's positive performance, the Council discussed a proposal to increase her salary by
0.5% and provide longevity pay in the amount of 2.5% of base salary. This salary increase and longevity pay
12
premium match the salary increase and pay premium benefit provided to the City Department Heads and
Unrepresented employees.
HR Director Saguisag-Sid stated that in order to increase City Manager Goldman's salary and provide the
longevity pay, Section 5 of the employment agreement must be amended to increase the monthly salary
from $23,900.87 per month to $24,015.23 per month effective March 25, 2024, and to provide longevity
pay in the amount of 2.5% effective the first full pay period of July 2024.
Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 036-2024; seconded by
Councilmember Stevenson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council reviewed their committee appointments.
13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
There were no future agenda items.
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking
Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are
available online at www.burlingame.org.
15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Colson adjourned the meeting at 9:04 p.m. in memory of Joseph Bodovitz.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
13