Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2023.01.12Traffic Safety and Parking Commission City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Online via Zoom7:00 PMThursday, January 12, 2023 On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 361, which allows a local agency to meet remotely when: 1) The local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency; 2) State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or 3) Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. On December 19, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution Number 149-2022 stating that the City Council and Commissions will continue to meet remotely for at least thirty days for the following reasons: 1) There is still a declared state of emergency; 2) County Health Orders require that all unvaccinated individuals in public spaces maintain social distancing and wear masks; and 3) The City can't maintain social distancing requirements for the public, staff, and Commissioners, in their meeting spaces. Pursuant to Resolution Number 149-2022, the City Council Chambers will not be open to the public for the January 12, 2023 Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting. Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below. Additionally, the meeting will be streamed live on Youtube and uploaded to the City's website after the meeting. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame.org. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda. The length of the emailed comment should commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, please submit your email no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 12. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time, but cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 p.m. deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission after the meeting. Members of the public may comment on any action or discussion item appearing on the agenda at the time it is called. Comments on other items should be made under agenda item #5. Provision of identifying information is optional but assists in preparation of the minutes. All votes are unanimous unless separately voted for the record. 1. Call To Order To Join the Zoom Meeting (Note - the link below doesn't look like a hyperlink, but it is): https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82978199427?pwd=TlFmb0wyekh2MjhoYm1XWDhYK0cyQT09 Webinar ID: 829 7819 9427 Passcode: 589057 Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/9/2023 January 12, 2023Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting Agenda 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes December 8, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutesa. Meeting MinutesAttachments: Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The Commission Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 5. Public Comments: Non-Agenda 6. Discussion/Action Items TSPC Subcommittee Reviewa. 2023 TSPC Priority Listb. Priority ListAttachments: 7. Information Items Public Comment Related to Informational Itemsa. Community B/PAC Updateb. Engineering Division Reportsc. Staff ReportAttachments: Police Department Reportsd. Collision ReportAttachments: TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communicationse. 8. Committee Reports Public Comment Related to Committee Reportsa. Burlingame Avenue Safety and Access (Leigh & Ng)b. Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/9/2023 January 12, 2023Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting Agenda Community Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Leigh & Rebelos)c. BIS Safety Audit (Israelit & Ng)d. Mercy School Traffic Calming (Israelit & Martos)e. Hwy 101 Corridor Connectivity (Leigh & Rebelos)f. 9. Future Agenda Items 10. Adjournment NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: February 9, 2023 Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/9/2023 1 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of Thursday, December 8, 2022 1.CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m. 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT:Israelit, Leigh, Martos, Ng, Rebelos MEMBERS ABSENT: 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES a)October 13, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes Chair Martos requested an edit to page one of the minutes by correcting the reference to the approval of minutes under item 4.a from October 14 to July 14. Vice-Chair Israelit made a motion to accept the regular meeting minutes for the October 13 meeting with the edit above; seconded by Commissioner Leigh. The motion passed by a roll call vote of 5-0. b)November 10, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes Commissioner Ng made a motion to accept the regular meeting minutes for the November 10 meeting as written; seconded by Vice-Chair Israelit. The motion passed by a roll call vote of 5-0. 5.PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA No non-agenda public comments received. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS a)Burlingame Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing Wayfinding Item 4.a 2 Mr. Wong stated he is looking for feedback from the Commission and public on this item and shared it was brought up at a previous City Council meeting. He also indicated that wayfinding is part of the overall Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Mr. Wong explained that the Rosalie O’Mahony bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing brings travelers from the east side of the City over the freeway towards the downtown areas. He said the overcrossing will take you to the intersection of Rollins Road and Cadillac Way. He indicated the idea is to bring people down Cadillac and then direct people towards Broadway, Burlingame Caltrain Station, and Burlingame Avenue. 3 4 In closing, Mr. Wong reiterated the desire for feedback on the signs and locations and stated staff would revise the layout based on a review of the feedback received. He said staff will then coordinate with the Corp Yard for the sign installations. Commissioner Leigh pointed out that some of the proposed signs are in their subcommittee area so she and Commissioner Rebelos met yesterday to discuss the signage. She said they first discussed that the wayfinding signage is less of a priority in the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan for people exiting the bridge and that they weren’t sure who the signs are directing—cars, pedestrians, or bicyclists. She stated the signs seemed suited for cars since pedestrians would not look up at signs like that and requested signage on the ground for pedestrians. Additionally, Commissioner Leigh stated she and Commissioner Rebelos thought it was more important and necessary to direct people to the bridge, not away from it. Specifically, she asked for signage to the bridge at Carolan and Cadillac and in the area of Airport/Old Bayshore/Broadway. Commissioner Leigh also said they thought there should be mid-block signage just south of the Hyatt directing people to the bridge (overcrossing). She pointed out that the signs she shared via email are much more clean and simple. Commissioner Leigh suggested that OC be spelled out on the signage as the abbreviation means different things to different people. Commissioner Rebelos confirmed Commissioner Leigh covered everything they discussed. Commissioner Rebelos went on to say they though there should be signage further from the overcrossing to direct them there, especially on the east side of the City. He reiterated the desire for the mid-block crossing near the Hyatt. He felt it was important to guide the pedestrians from the east side. Commissioner Rebelos explained that if you don’t know where the overcrossing is going, pedestrians will tend to aim for the Broadway overpass. He also requested a sign on Broadway, to the west of California Drive, so people would have a sense where to go from there. Mr. Wong thanked Commissioners Leigh and Rebelos for their comments and stated he would mark up the plans to include more signage to the overcrossing, as opposed to away from it. He also indicated he would include areas further to the northeast. Mr. Wong stated putting items on the surface for pedestrian is doable but stated the suggestions sent via email are tricky as it changes the surface and may become a hazard. Mr. Wong also said signs sprayed on the surface for pedestrians would need to be simple. He also clarified the proposed signs are for bicyclists and pedestrians, not vehicles. Commissioner Leigh stated all they need is a sign that says “ped/bike overcrossing” with an arrow stenciled on the ground. She also said the more simple the sign, the better. Commissioner Leigh requested to review the proposed signage again and said we don’t need the bike and ped symbols up top and also suggested to have signs on both sides of the overcrossing that states “Rosalie O’Mahony Bike and Pedestrian Overcrossing.” Commissioner Leigh asked how low the signs can go for the bicyclists and pedestrians. Mr. Wong stated the bottom of the sign has to be 7 feet high. 5 Vice-Chair Israelit agreed for the need to spell out “overcrossing” and to make the signs simple to read. She said she is also in favor of leaving Rosalie O’Mahony’s name off the actual wayfinding signage and have it on the actual bridge. Vice-Chair Israelit disagreed in that she likes the City logo and the bike and pedestrian symbols on the wayfinding signage as most signs are for vehicles. She said she agreed with her fellow Commissioners on the overall goal of the wayfinding signage and shared she found it confusing to get to the pedestrian bridge from Broadway. Vice-Chair Israelit said she disagreed with the foot signage as she thought it would be helpful for pedestrians, but not bicyclists. In order to make the ground stencil signage small but noticeable, she suggested similar markings used for the “drains to bay” near the sewers, and recommended a bay logo (waves) with arrow that states “bay trail” as another wayfinding idea. Vice-Chair Israelit also suggested wayfinding for people to walk over the Broadway overpass as well as the ped/bike overcrossing. Commissioner Leigh responded to say signage for the Broadway overpass was a great idea as pedestrians and bicyclist can be sensitive about adding more distance to their route. Commissioner Leigh also pointed out there is no crosswalk on the south side of Broadway to cross Rollins to get over towards the Audi dealership. Commissioner Leigh stated that this plan does not address the concern of safe access to Cadillac Way, which she would like to see addressed. Mr. Wong stated they can drop signs everywhere but inquired about the preferred route to the overcrossing—i.e. Broadway to Rollins or Broadway to Carolan to Cadillac. Commissioner Ng said his comments align with his fellow Commissioners. He stated simplification of signage is key and pointed out past discussions of having too much signage. Commissioner Ng asked if the Commission would see the revised signage plan prior to implementation. Mr. Wong indicated he would share the revised locations and signs before implementing. Commissioner Ng said he felt it would be best to let Mr. Wong come back with a revised plan at this point instead of confusing matters further with additional comments. Commissioner Rebelos stated his preferred route is the overcrossing to Cadillac in both directions. He also pointed out that going forward he thought the Commission will have to address Google maps navigation as it always routes you to the overpass, with no option to use the overcrossing. Vice-Chair Israelit stated that staff can contact Google and they can make the update. Mr. Wong stated they had to go through that process with the new California Drive roundabout. Chair Martos stated he liked the suggestions from his fellow Commissioners, especially the idea of adding signage to the overcrossing from the other side of Highway 101 by the hotels. He questioned the east most sign on Cadillac and wondered if that is the best location. Additionally, Chair Martos requested signage at Broadway directing people to the bayside. At the other end at Oak Grove, Chair Martos asked what we are trying to do—direct people to Carolan or stay on California Drive. Mr. Wong clarified the signage would direct them to Carolan and up that way. Chair Martos pointed out that it’s hard to state the best arrangement until the improvements on 6 California Drive are considered. He also concurred about making the signage simple. Vice-Chair Israelit stated that Cadillac may look like a safer surface street but she stated there are cars always pulling in and out and double parked (Audi dealership) so while she understands in theory it would be a safer street, she said she is more comfortable staying on Broadway and going around the wide curve. She also stated that she agreed with Chair Martos in that we should not include Oak Grove signage at this stage as it will be changing with the upcoming California Drive bike facility improvements. Commissioner Leigh said she agreed that is was premature to put up signage near California Drive and Oak Grove Avenue since the new bike facility hasn’t been implemented yet. She also stated she is hesitant to add visual clutter near California Drive/Oak Grove, Carolan/Oak Grove, and Morrell/Carolan due to past traffic collisions. Commissioner Rebelos suggested using a Caltrain logo instead of “Burlingame Sta.” for the wayfinding signage directing people to the train station. Mr. Wong said they could try to do that and use less text. Mr. Wong stated staff will iron out what the signs will look like. He said the California Drive improvements should be coming up in the next year. Chair Martos opened the public comment period. Drew stated for the signs, the logo could be moved to the top with the other symbols and suggested adding a scooter. He said it could just be a narrow band at the top. In terms of the height of the signs, he asked if they could be mounted lower if it was off the sidewalk. Drew stated if he was a visitor from a new area, he would want to walk on Broadway because there is activity there, as opposed to being routed further to an unfamiliar quiet area. Ms. Brewer read the following email for public comment from Manito Velasco: There are so many other critical safety issues in the City, and yet these small green guide signs somehow rose to the top and will have valuable Commissioner hours used up to discuss. The priority I remember from both BPAC and from the Bike Ped Plan is how to improve the safety of the bike route connection between the Cadillac/Rollins overpass to the California/Broadway intersection. These signs don't do anything to improve safety. In fact, the guide signs tell bike riders coming from the overpass to turn left to go to the Ave or downtown. I'm not sure if anyone here has tried to make that left turn on a bike but it is scary dangerous. Drivers are coming fast in both directions, and gaps are few and far in between during commute hours. Why is something not being done about that instead? 7 Going northbound on Carolan, bike riders have to go from a right side bike lane, and fight their way blindly to end up in the center bike lane by the car dealership, to reach California Dr and Broadway. This dangerous movement is notoriously bad, BHS students flee to the safety of the sidewalk rather than mix it up there. And yet that's what the guide sign is telling them to do. Has anyone tried to do this maneuver? And then at the intersection of Oak Grove and Carolan, by BHS, there again is the dangerous center bike lane design that bike ped advocates have raised numerous times to the City. Nothing is being done about that. In terms of signage, that intersection already has a ton of signs. In fact the city has had a hard time placing signs for southbound Carolan because of all the trees and bushes there. These signs will be useless there because users, drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists have a tough enough time trying to survive that crazy intersection. These signs won't add any value. And may even detract attention from the other more important signage like STOP signs, lane signs, etc. Lastly at Oak Grove/Carolan, bike riders are being told to make a left turn west to south, from the tracks. Left turn into what? There's no bike lane there. This guide signage seems premature and is needed only after the bike lanes are installed there later. Is it possible to know how a project like this is initiated and prioritized? Was this requested by BPAC? Your time as Commissioners are precious, as is the public's. It would best if it was spent on the most critical issues rather than guide signs. John Kevranian posted in the chat (Via YouTube) that tourists will not know what “Burlingame Sta.” means and suggested to use a train picture. b) TSPC Nominations Vice-Chair Israelit and Commissioner Leigh were nominated for Chair for 2023. Vice-Chair Israelit was voted in as Chair by a vote of 3-2. Athan Rebelos was nominated as Vice-Chair for 2023 to which he accepted. No public comments were received for this item. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a) Public Hearing Related to Informational Items Ms. Brewer read the following email from Manito Velasco for public comment. Thank you again Commissioners for another full year of your valuable service. Appreciate your giving up your regular Thursday nights for this important civic duty and for your patience and your 8 efforts to shape safety and accessibility in Burlingame. I’m looking forward to hearing about the following projects in the Engineer’s Report: 1. California Drive bikeway project – this one is from Broadway and Oak Grove. This was last heard at TSPC in August 2021, and Council Sept 2021. Since then the project has gone dark, with zero updates for the last 15 months. TSPC provided significant comments and asked to review and incorporate various design elements. Were they incorporated? When will this project go back in front of TSPC or Council? When will it break ground? 2. Oak/Grove Carolan Signal – staff said they would provide an update on this important project. To date, there has been zero update on the website or on any of the last 12+ monthly engineer’s report. Has this project been approved by CPUC and Caltrain? What is the next step? 3. Carmelita and Paloma bike boulevards – when will the all-way stop be installed at Carmelita and Paloma? How about the other measures? 4. California Dr north of Broadway – although there are bike lanes here, it has gotten gravely dangerous. The bike lanes on the track side are pinched at the large drains and drivers are passing bike riders headed to the Bart station within inches. On top of that the asphalt has warped to create v-shaped ditches esp around the Oxford and Cambridge jumbo drains. Hope to hear some much needed communication about these important projects. If possible, it would be great if these were made regular bullet points on the Engineer’s reports going forward so they are not out of sight, out of mind. b) Community B/PAC Update Ms. Brewer read the following email on behalf of B/PAC Chair Lesley Beatty. Hi TSPC and staff, We hope you are having a wonderful holiday season. As we wrap up the year, we (BPAC) would like to thank you for the great work that you do here. Here is a summary of our meeting from yesterday: We are still discussing why BPAC was not informed or asked to provide feedback on the city's recent SMCTA grant application for bike/ped projects. Additionally, while we saw that Chair Martos wrote a letter of support for the grant applications, we also don't remember these grant applications coming in front of this commission for discussion or public comment. It would appear that beyond Chair Martos, none of the commissioners got to review these grant applications, along with no members of the BPAC and no members of the general public. 9 We hope that in the future, there is more transparency for Burlingame about what projects the city applies for. Frankly, it wouldn't be a big deal if the city were following the Bike/Ped master plan prioritization, as approved by city council in its grant applications. But, the project at Rollins Road was not included at all in Burlingame's bike/ped project plan, yet it was presented as a high level bike/ped priority by the city of Burlingame in this grant application. We are still confused as to why this was the case, when there are major bike and pedestrian priorities in the bike/ped plan that would provide more value, including projects along the Broadway corridor, the area around Burlingame Intermediate School, and the increasingly dangerous area around Burlingame High School. Like you, we want the city to be successful at its grant applications. We also want to see the county's grant money that is designated for bike and pedestrian projects go to projects that enhance bicycle and pedestrian access and safety. We'd like to request that the commission add an agenda item in the New Year for the city to clarify its grant application process, and when/who it seeks feedback from during the process. Again, thanks so much for all you do for Burlingame and happy holidays. We look forward to partnering on projects such as the Broadway corridor, Carolan/Cadillac/Oak Grove, and California Drive in 2023. Best, Lesley c) Engineering Division Reports • Peninsula/Lorton RRFB Update – The noticing by San Mateo staff at the intersection was to solicit community feedback regarding the relocation of the crosswalk. Based on that feedback, staff from both agencies have determined both crosswalks on Peninsula will receive RRFBs. Commissioner Leigh requested updates for active projects on a monthly basis. Vice-Chair Israelit recalled a past conversation that the Commission agreed to have updates on active projects so they are up to speed on the status. Mr. Wong requested the Commissioners top five projects as he pointed out the report will become rather long if all active projects are listed within the Engineer’s Report. TSPC Priority List (revised December 2022): TSPC Led Effort 1 Broadway/Carmelita Bike/Ped TSPC Study 2/10/22: Item 6c 2 BIS School Safety Improvements 3 Pedestrian Safety at California/Burlingame Ave 10 4 Lorton Corridor TSPC Study (Roundabout to Howard) 5 SB California Lane Configuration (Bike Mobility) 6 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 7/14/22: Item 6b 7 Parking Garage Usage 2/10/22: Item 7a 8 Downtown Parking and Access 9 Broadway Parking 10 School Transportation and Safety Issues 11/10/22: Item 6a Staff Updates 1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2 Downtown Parking Strategies 3 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 5 Bike\Ped Plan Implementation 7/14/22: Item 6b 6 Chapin Avenue Green Streets Project 7 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (n/o Broadway) 8 Grant Opportunities 7/14/22: Item 7a 9 Broadway Grade Separation 6/9/22: Item 6b 10 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 11 School Speed Limit Updates 12 School Safety Improvements 13 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 14 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 15 Broadway/California Update 2022 Agenda Item Action Status 1 Various Stop Signs Approved at the 4/4/22 CC mtg. d) Police Department Reports Sergeant Perna reviewed the collision report and reported 22 documented collisions for this reporting period. He shared there were 2 DUI collisions, three hit and runs, two vehicle/pedestrian collisions, and one vehicle/bicycle collision. The Commissioners asked clarifying questions regarding the above referenced collisions. Commissioner Leigh asked Mr. Wong if he had a chance to check what the furthest legal limit is to implement 20 MPH zones that surround a school. Mr. Wong stated he would double check but said it is between 500-800 feet. Commissioner Leigh inquired about lowering it around BHS and the other schools. Vice-Chair Israelit thought the legal distance was a much smaller number. 11 Sergeant Perna indicated that this will be his last meeting with TSPC and said Sergeant Jason Roberts would be taking over as the Traffic Sergeant. He thanked the Commission for volunteering their time. Vice-Chair Israelit thanked Sergeant Perna for patiently answering all of their questions, all the work put into the heat maps, and for just being so helpful. Chair Martos also thanked Sergeant Perna and concurred with Vice-Chair Israelit’s comments. He wished him the best back on patrol. e) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications No updates. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS a) Public Hearing Related to Committee Reports No public comments. b) Burlingame Avenue Safety and Access (Leigh & Ng) No update. c) Community Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Leigh & Rebelos) No update. d) BIS Safety Audit (Israelit & Ng) Commissioner Ng stated they have been communicating with Mr. Wong and staff to coordinate a sit down meeting to talk through it—he said he is hopeful it will take place tomorrow and the Committee will have a progress report in January. e) Mercy School Traffic Calming (Israelit & Martos) Mr. Wong stated staff is working on what they can until they hear back from Mercy School. Vice- Chair Israelit also pointed out they are waiting to hear back from the school. f) Hwy 101 Corridor Connectivity (Leigh & Rebelos) Discussed as part of item 6.a. 12 Commissioner Leigh stated that now people are working so much from home, our local traffic has become more competitive (faster and aggressive) and she didn’t feel it would get any better unless we help slow traffic down. Commissioner Rebelos stated people are driving more east to west all hours of the day, rather than getting on the freeway to commute to work. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS • 2023 priorities and goals • New subcommittees (and rules to be reviewed with the City Attorney’s Office) In closing, Chair Martos thanked his fellow Commissioners and City staff for all of their efforts this year. 10. ADJOURNMENT 8:49 p.m. RANKTSPC (Active)RANKEngineering Staff (Passive)1 Broadway/Carmelita Bike/Ped TSPC Study1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor2 BIS School Safety Improvements2 Downtown Parking Strategies3 Pedestrian Safety at California/Burlingame Ave3 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda4 Lorton Corridor TSPC Study (Roundabout to Howard)4 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal5SB California Lane Configuration (Bike Mobility)5 Bike\Ped Plan Implementation6 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities6 Chapin Avenue Green Streets Project7 Parking Garage Usage7 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (n/o Broadway)8Downtown Parking and Access8 Grant Opportunities9 Broadway Parking 9 Broadway Grade Separation10 School Transportation and Safety Issues10 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC11 School Speed Limit Updates12 School Safety Improvements13 Lyon‐Hoag  Neighborhood Traffic Calming14300 Burlingame Point Traffic ImpactsJoint meeting with City Council15 Broadway/California UpdateParking and traffic considerations w/Planning1617Item 5.b 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO: 7.c MEETING DATE: January 12, 2023 To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Date: January 12, 2023 From: Michael Tsai, Transportation Engineer – (650) 558-7230 Subject: Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission receive an update on various Public Works – Engineering projects and activities. BACKGROUND • BIS Traffic Calming Effort – Staff working with the TSPC committee have developed a circulation option. This option to be shared with BIS staff and then brought to the TSPC for additional feedback. • Chapin Avenue Feasibility Study – The San Mateo County Stormwater Resource Plan identified Chapin Avenue as a priority green street development project to reduce stormwater and pollutant runoff. Burlingame approved funding for a feasibility study to identify conceptual alternatives of Chapin Avenue. Final design and construction were not part of the funding approved by Council, therefore this project is currently on hold until other funding opportunities have been secured. • California Drive Bike Facilities (Broadway to Oak Grove) – Project is currently being advertised for construction. Project bid opening is scheduled for the end of January and award by the end of February. Start of construction is anticipated for April. TSPC Priority List (revised December 2022): TSPC Led Effort 1 Broadway/Carmelita Bike/Ped TSPC Study 2/10/22: Item 6c 2 BIS School Safety Improvements 3 Pedestrian Safety at California/Burlingame Ave 4 Lorton Corridor TSPC Study (Roundabout to Howard) 5 SB California Lane Configuration (Bike Mobility) 6 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 7/14/22: Item 6b Item 7.c – Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update January 12, 2023 2 7 Parking Garage Usage 2/10/22: Item 7a 8 Downtown Parking and Access 9 Broadway Parking 10 School Transportation and Safety Issues 11/10/22: Item 6a Staff Updates 1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2 Downtown Parking Strategies 3 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 5 Bike\Ped Plan Implementation 7/14/22: Item 6b 6 Chapin Avenue Green Streets Project 7 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (n/o Broadway) 8 Grant Opportunities 7/14/22: Item 7a 9 Broadway Grade Separation 6/9/22: Item 6b 10 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 11 School Speed Limit Updates 12 School Safety Improvements 13 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 14 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 15 Broadway/California Update 2022 Agenda Item Action Status 1 Various Stop Signs Approved at the 4/4/22 CC mtg. DISCUSSION Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that would typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City Capital Improvement Projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are addressed as Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6). Case #Date Time Locale Road Type Speed Limit Minor Injuries Major Injuries DUI Involve d Collision Type Caused By Juve? Primary Collision Factor Hit & Run Misd. Hit & Run Felony Occurred On At Intersection Other Location Vehicle Involved With BRM2203318 12/09/2022 1256 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350 CVC F F CALIFORNIA DR OAK GROVE AV Other motor vehicle BRM2203323 12/09/2022 2117 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22107 CVC T F FLORIBUNDA AV ALMER RD Other motor vehicle BRM2203327 12/10/2022 311 Street City Street 25 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22107 VC F F BALBOA AV CARMELITA AV Parked motor vehicle BRM2203365 12/14/2022 841 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F CVC 22106 F F OAK GROVE AV CAROLAN AV Other motor vehicle BRM2203367 12/14/2022 1124 Intersection City Street 35 2 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F F F BROADWAY ROLLINS RD Other motor vehicle BRM2203373 12/15/2022 1008 Street City Street 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22107 CVC F F TROUSDALE DR MAGNOLIA AV Parked motor vehicle BRM2203382 12/15/2022 1925 Street City Street 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F T F CALIFORNIA DR MILLS AV Parked motor vehicle BRM2203405 12/17/2022 2049 Intersection City Street 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350 VC F F CALIFORNIA DR BAYSWATER AV Other motor vehicle BRM2203411 12/18/2022 1425 Intersection City Street 15 0 0 F Vehicle-Object F VC 22107 F F BURLINGAME AV PARK RD Fixed object BRM2203436 12/20/2022 1530 Street Highway 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22106 CVC F F SR 82 (El Camino Real) EASTON DR Other motor vehicle BRM2203441 12/22/2022 1150 Street City Street 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22107 F F CALIFORNIA DR RHINETTE AVE Other motor vehicle BRM2203450 12/23/2022 1149 Intersection Highway 35 2 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21801(a) CVC F F SR 82 (El Camino Real) PENINSULA AVE Other motor vehicle BRM2203458 12/23/2022 2253 Street City Street 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21650 F F TROUSDALE DR SEQUOIA AV Parked motor vehicle BRM2203484 12/27/2022 1104 Street City Street 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21804(A)F F CALIFORNIA DR BROADWAY Other motor vehicle BRM2203485 12/27/2022 1116 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22107 CVC F F COLUMBUS AV HILLSIDE DR Parked motor vehicle BRM2203486 12/27/2022 1133 Parking Lot Private Property 5 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22106 T F 975 ROLLINS RD Parked motor vehicle BRM2203510 12/27/2022 1345 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22106 VC F F HOWARD AV LORTON AV Parked motor vehicle BRM2203513 12/30/2022 1050 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22107 VC F F LORTON AV BURLINGAME AV Other motor vehicle 18 Accidents Item 7.d