Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - BC - 2023.10.05• City of Burlingame BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 F I� Meeting Agenda Beautification Commission Thursday, October 5, 2023 6:30 PM Burlingame Community Center 850 Burlingame Avenue Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below. The meeting video will be uploaded to the City's website after the meeting. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to parksadmin@burlingame.org. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda or is on the Consent Calendar. The length of the emailed comment should be commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Beautification Commission for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00 PM on October 5, 2023. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time but cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 PM deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Beautification Commission after the meeting. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 9/29/2023 Beautification Commission Meeting Agenda October 5, 2023 Please click the link below to join the webinar. https://us02web.zoom. us/j/83157855729?pwd=L3ZgYmZIRUg4L 1 diZnQ3Ni90RHITZz09 Passcode: 623043 Or One tap mobile: +16699006833„83157855729#,,,,*623043# US (San Jose) +16694449171„ 83157855729#,,,, *623043# US Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 669 444 9171 US +1 719 359 4580 US +1 253 205 0468 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 646 9313860 US +1 689 278 1000 US +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 305 224 1968 US +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +1 564 217 2000 US Webinar ID: 831 5785 5729 Passcode: 623043 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kcMaPDesEv 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. MINUTES A. Auaust 3. 2023 BBC Draft Minutes Attachments: Draft Minutes 4. CORRESPONDENCE 5. FROM THE FLOOR City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 9/29/2023 Beautification Commission Meeting Agenda October 5, 2023 Speakers may address the Commission concerning any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda. Additional public comments on agenda action items will be heard when the Commission takes up those items. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff, although provision of name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each, although the Commission may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Trees of Burlingame Ad Hoc Committee Members Update 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Watering of Newly Planted Street Trees Attachments: Staff Report Exhibit A Exhibit B B. Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the City Arborist's Approval of the Removal of a Protected Private Tree at 1134 Douglas Ave Attachments: Staff Report Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C 8. REPORTS 9. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS Next Regular Meeting: November 2, 2023 Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities should contact the Parks & Recreation Dept. at (650) 558-7330 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the agenda packet is available for review at the Recreation Center, 850 Burlingame Avenue, during normal office hours. The Agendas and minutes are also available on the City's website: www.burlingame.org. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Burlingame Beautification Commission regarding any items on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at 850 Burlingame Avenue during normal business hours. City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 9/29/2023 BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION Draft Minutes August 3, 2023 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Bauer. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Bauer, Commissioners Batte, Chu, Khoury, and Kirchner Absent: None Staff: Parks and Recreation Director Glomstad, Parks Superintendent/City Arborist Holtz, and Recording Secretary Flores Others: None MINUTES Commissioner Chu made a motion to approve the July 6, 2023, Regular Meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Batte and was approved 5-0-0. CORRESPONDENCE None. I all :311 [K411]0V lu I OQI I Jennifer Pfaff thanked the Parks Division for preparing the Large Tree Maintenance Program and presenting it to the City Council. OLD BUSINESS 1. Trees of Burlingame Ad Hoc Committee Members Update Commissioner Kirchner explained that the written portion had been completed apart from one chapter regarding Washington Park. He stated that an Ad Hoc Committee meeting was scheduled for August 10, 2023, at the Community Center, 6:00 p.m., to review the next steps for publication. 2. Consideration of Themed Block Tree Species Modification for the 1500-2000 Blocks of Easton Drive City Arborist Holtz summarized the June 1, 2023, discussion of the Easton Drive Themed Block area. He explained that residents met the threshold to petition to modify the Themed Block, and the Commission heard directly from many residents. The Commission confirmed that they would treat the 1500-2000 Blocks of Easton Drive as one Themed Block area. City Arborist Holtz reached out to neighboring municipalities of San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Palo Alto about their experience with the Lemon -Scented Gum. He stated that generally, Blue Gums are much taller than Lemon Scented Gums, which tend to be more balanced and have more of an open form; they are both fast-growing and low-water use trees; and that the Lemon Scented Gum are typically prized for their scent, flowers, and showy bark, versus the Blue Gum that has shedding bark which can be a nuisance and is considered an invasive species buy most IPM websites. City Arborist Holtz explained that a heritage grove would be an area of trees of similar size, species, and age, such as Easton, El Camino Real, and Francard Groves, and confirmed that there is no legal or municipal enforcement of these trees and groves. City Arborist Holtz presented additional species options, including Incense Cedar, Camphor, Lemon Scented Gum, Catalina Ironwood, Coast Live Oak, Scarlet Oak, Valley Oak, Cork Oak, Coastal Redwood, and Patriot Elm. He explained that in looking at the interest of the petition and what is sustainable, he took a closer look at two existing street trees. The Coast Live Oak is on the list for wide planter areas, generally growing wide, native to California, slow growing, long lives, good decay compartmentalization, and has strong branch attachments. The second was the Camphor Tree, which is native to Asia and has a similar form, is not as dense of a canopy, can have more surface roots, moderate growth, strong branch attachments, and good decay compartmentalization. He explained that a few Camphor Trees were lost on Burlingame Avenue in the past due to Verticillium Wilt and that Coast Live Oak is the terminal host of sudden oak death. City Arborist Holtz stated that it could be a three -tree street list for the Easton Drive Themed Block residents, and if an existing tree was removed, the resident could choose one of the three trees. Further, he explained that any decision other than keeping the Lemon -Scented Gum theme would need to be approved by the City Council. Commissioner Kirchner asked about the history of Elm trees on Easton Drive. City Arborist Holtz stated that he had only seen Monterey Pines, Monterey Cypress, Red Gum, and Blue Gum Eucalyptus. Further, he stated that the Eucalyptus trees on El Camino Real were planted to provide wind break for the Elm trees, but he was not certain if the intent was the same on Easton Drive. Commissioner Kirchner inquired about the number of Lemon Scented Gums planted along Easton Drive. City Arborist Holtz stated there are 17 Lemon Scented Gum on Easton Drive. He explained that once a decision was made, the Parks Division would plant at least 20 new trees on Easton Drive. Commissioner Kirchner asked whether the Lemon Scented Gum is more stable than the Blue Gum. City Arborist Holtz confirmed that the Blue Gum is considered to have a medium/weak branch attachment, Lemon Scented Gum has moderate branch attachments, and the Camphor and Coast Live Oaks have strong branch attachments per a Cal -Poly study. Commissioner Chu asked whether there were any thoughts on what species would do best together if a multiple -species theme was determined to be the best option. City Arborist Holtz explained that he did not have experience planting Lemon Scented Gum with other species but that Easton Drive is a good example of a landscape doing very well underneath Eucalyptus trees. Commissioner Batte inquired about keeping an aesthetically pleasing composition and what recommendations City Arborist Holtz would offer. City Arborist Holtz stated that there is beauty in a monoculture and a single species theme block, but it can also pose a danger. He explained that ISA recommends never to have more than 30% of one family, 20% of one genre, or 10% of one species throughout an urban forest. Chair Bauer opened the floor to public comment. Julie Cockle, an Easton resident, stated that she liked the diversified approach and giving residents the choice to pick their tree from an approved list but believes the Lemon Scented Gum should be removed as an option given the increased risk of branch failure and a majority of residents speaking against the species. Also, she suggested a less wide option to avoid the street looking too dark. Leslie McQuaide, a Burlingame resident, stated that it is important for everyone to understand that the Lemon Scented Gum is very drought -resistant. She explained that they are beautiful and soothing to see in monoculture areas. Also, she stated that all trees drop limbs and can require a lot of maintenance and believes the Lemon Scented Gum will do very well in this area. Jennifer Pfaff, a Burlingame resident, mentioned that per the City's General Plan, a goal under Community Character/Historic Resources is to protect the character and quality of Burlingame's historic buildings, tree groves, open spaces, neighborhoods, and districts. She explained that it also means replanting and spoke in support of the three -specie theme block list proposal for Easton. She stated that it would match the initial intent for this area. Secretary Flores read a letter from Easton residents Brook and Scott Hill and Susie and Sam Lahey. They stated their support for further consideration from the Commission and keeping past, present, and future constituents in mind. They explained that Easton is well -suited to support large canopy trees, and settling for a tree species estimated at 60 feet in height would result in Easton being far too similar to other residential streets. They stated their opinion of keeping the Lemon Scented Gum theme and encouraged more research if the Commission is considering a multi -species theme. Secretary Flores read an email from Easton resident Lynn Israelit stating her support for keeping the Lemon Scented Gum theme on Easton Drive in order to preserve the historic, unique, and majestic landmark and is not opposed to interspersing other species between the Lemon Scented Gum. Chair Bauer closed public comment and opened Commissioner discussion. Chair Bauer asked whether it was decided that the Commission would change the tree theme designation. City Arborist Holtz explained that a vote had not been taken on any action, and either modification or keeping the original designation were still viable options. Commissioner Batter explained that she favored keeping the 1500-2000 blocks as a themed section and was open to the recommendation of a three -species theme. Commissioner Khoury stated she favored keeping the Lemon Scented Gum theme and believed they are beautiful and do not pose a high danger of limb loss as the Blue Gum. Chair Bauer also believed that residents reacted out of fear after the storms experienced earlier this year and the damage caused by Blue Gum trees as opposed to Lemon Scented Gum, but she understood the motivation to incorporate other species nonetheless. Commissioner Kirchner stated that the two options he saw were to either keep the theme block designation the way it is with the Lemon Scented Gum as the only replacement species or modify it to incorporate multiple species. He thought Easton Drive historically naturally contrasts with any block around it due to the verticality of trees that line it. From an aesthetic standpoint, he would lean towards keeping the existing theme block without deluding it. He inquired about the number of new trees estimated to be planted versus the number of existing trees. City Arborist Holtz stated that 20 new trees will be planted, and there are 100 tree planting areas total on Easton Drive. Commissioner Chu stated it would be difficult to please all but that allowing residents to choose from a multi -species list, including the Lemon Scented Gum, would be a good compromise. He explained that if enough residents chose the Lemon Scented Gum, it would help preserve a degree of uniformity while giving others a choice, such as a native oak tree. Chair Bauer asked whether any other commissioners thought adding multiple species would dilute the way Easton Drive currently looks. Commissioner Chu explained that it may change how it looks, but that preference for uniformity is subjective. He stated that any tree that is well -suited to the site is a good option. Commissioner Batter made a motion to retain the 1500-2000 Easton Drive blocks as one Themed Block and modify the designated theme to a three -species list to include Lemon Scented Gum, Coast Live Oak, and Camphor trees. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Khoury and was approved 3-2-0. NEW BUSINESS 1. Residential and Business Landscape Award Voting Commissioner Chu explained that the Commission received nine nominations for the Residential Landscape Award (RLA) and nine nominations for the Business Landscape Award (BLA). Further, he suggested omitting 1600 Ray Drive from the nomination list, as they were the winners last year. Chair Bauer stated that she favored 5 Valdivia Court. Commissioner Batter stated she considered 1900 Hillside Drive to be a good contender. Commissioner Chu explained that one of his considerations when reviewing the nominees was whether the site had any large trees or trees that could potentially become large. Commissioner Batte stated that her consideration included properties with drought -resistant landscapes. The Commission polled votes by show of hands for each residential nominee. 5 Valdivia Court received the highest tally of votes. Chair Bauer made a motion to approve 5 Valdivia Court as the 2023 Residential Landscape Award winner. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Batte and was approved 5-0-0. The Commission polled votes by show of hands for each commercial nominee. 1501 Trousdale Ave received the highest tally of votes. Chair Bauer made a motion to approve 1500 Trousdale Ave, Mills -Peninsula Hospital, as the 2023 Business Landscape Award winner. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Chu and approved 5-0-0. 2. Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the City Arborist's Approval of the Removal of a Protected Private Tree at 1385 Hillside Circle City Arborist Holtz summarized the application process for removing a Redwood tree located at 1385 Hillside Circle, Burlingame, CA. He explained that the tree met the requirements for approval per the City's Municipal Code and its proximity to infrastructure and hardscape. He stated that the appellant's concern was the stripping of the landscaping throughout the years. City Arborist Holtz confirmed that several previous protected trees were approved for removal, and a few without permission were captured under the previous permit that required 13 new trees to be planted on the property. Although the previous City Arborist signed off on the permit and replanting, City Arborist Holtz could only locate eight new trees in various stages of health. He also noted that many trees removed from the site were undersized and not a part of our permit program. Commissioner Kirchner inquired about penalty fees for removing trees of protected size without the necessary permissions or permits. City Arborist Holtz confirmed that there were fines but none associated with the unpennitted work on this site, only replacement requirements that were signed off previously. Further, he explained that the City's Municipal Code currently does not state that a tree must be maintained, which he is working closely with the City Attorney's office to change. Chair Bauer opened the floor to public comment. With no one wishing to speak from the public, Chair Bauer closed public comment. The applicant, Sherman Chiu, clarified that the previous removal was of a Pine tree and not a Redwood tree, as stated in the letter from the appellant, with the approval of the previous City Arborist. He explained that the property was unkept and had many trees in bad condition when they took over the home. Many trees were removed due to safety concerns. Further, he explained that the Redwood tree is in a confined space and on a landscape retaining wall. He wanted to avoid it coming down on a neighbor's property in the future or towards the roads that may impact pedestrians from the nearby school. Commissioner Chu asked the applicant the distance from the property to the neighboring school. Mr. Chiu estimated that it is approximately 200-400 feet. Chair Bauer inquired whether a sprinkler system or watering was available near new tree plantings to ensure their success. Mr. Chiu confirmed a sprinkler system was installed during the previous tree replacements but that the trees that failed did so due to storms and the trees being uprooted. Commissioner discussion ensued. Commissioner Batte stated that she is concerned with the current state of the tree and retaining wall and that a future strong storm could weaken it further. For safety reasons, she would agree with the approval to remove the tree. Chair Bauer expressed her displeasure with the number of trees that were previously on the site and removed but understands that the current tree meets the removal qualifications due to health and location and supports the removal. Commissioner Kirchner agreed with Chair Bauer and stated that when focusing on the specific tree at hand, he would agree with the recommendation for removal. Commissioner Khoury was also in agreement. Commissioner Kirchner made a motion to uphold the City Arborist's decision to remove the tree due to its proximity to infrastructure and deny the appeal. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Batte and approved 4-0-1. Commissioner Chu abstained from voting. REPORTS Director Glomstad reported that the last Music in the Park concert is on Friday, August 11, 2023, and encouraged the Commissioner to attend. She stated that the Public Art Ad Hoc Committee meeting was held earlier that day and hoped to go to the City Council with an updated policy in September. Also, the draft Aging City's Action Plan was being prepared for the City Council to review and approve. She reported that the Robert Barry Awards are expected to be installed in September or October this year. The California Conservation Corps had completed work to open the lower trail at Mills Canyon, and the full Ed Taylor loop is open for use. She explained that the staff was working on resurfacing the Washington Park Tennis Courts but was having trouble getting quotes. Also, the Park and Recreation Commission would be discussing adding pickleball lines to the other courts. Director Glomstad reported that the Foundation donated three new ping pong tables. Lastly, she explained that the Community Center will be closed for internet maintenance on August 31, 2023, at 1 p.m. Superintendent Holtz reported that significant tree work around town had started. Commissioner Chu inquired about the remaining number of trees being removed. Superintendent Holtz confirmed that 432 out of 800 Eucalyptus trees are being removed along Rollins Road, 13 on Burlingame Avenue, 18 trees on Oak Grove Avenue, 18 trees on Easton Road, and approximately 40 trees along Skyline Boulevard and Bayside Park. New trees will be planted once the removals are completed. Commissioner Khoury reported a fundraiser would be taking place at the Wine Walk on August 30, 2023, for Burlingame Avenue's year-round tree lighting and side streets. She explained that lights will be strung once the street trees are trimmed after Labor Day. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:08 p.m. The next Beautification Commission meeting is scheduled for September 7, 2023. Respectfully submitted, Vervviica -Flores Veronica Flores Administrative Staff BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT To: Beautification Commission Date: October 5, 2023 From: Margaret Glomstad, Parks and Recreation Director Rich Holtz, Parks Superintendent & City Arborist Subject: Watering of Newly Planted Street Trees RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission review the staff report and provide input regarding watering of newly planted street trees. BACKGROUND Commission Chu raised concerns about residents and property owners watering newly planted street trees in the planter strips adjacent to the properties in the City. He asked to discuss the matter at a Commission meeting. To help inform the discussion, background information about newly planted City trees is below. The City is always trying to repellence and increase the urban forest. The City advertises free street tree plantings in the City's right of way through its social media outlets. Unfortunately, most residents do not take advantage of this program, and some even protest street tree planting in the City right of way adjacent to their property. City staff has three planting cycles each year to replace street trees that have been removed. To help ensure the survival of newly planted trees, planting is limited to fall, winter, and spring seasons. City staff utilize multiple methods to inform the public of the importance of watering street trees, particularly during the dry season. Adjacent property owners have been notified during the notification process of tree planting via email and US mail. Staff has also placed door hangers (Exhibit A) on adjacent properties when planting new trees. In recent years, staff have transitioned to an educational sticker (Exhibit B) that is attached to tree stakes when the tree is planted. In addition, several times a year, staff shares the importance of trees and how to help keep young trees alive through postings in the eNews and on social media. When the City is notified about an under -watered tree, the location is recorded in the tree asset management system and added to the watering list. In 2023, the City dedicated more resources than ever to water young trees across the City. Since June 2023, the department has employed a temporary, full-time employee to help water street trees. The employee waters 50 trees/day with a goal of watering each young tree twice per month. The current list has over 500 young trees in need of additional water. Trees that receive adequate water from property owners are removed from the list so that resources can be dedicated to those locations needing the most assistance. Thus far, in 2023, we have spent $14,710.23 watering street trees. Despite these efforts, staff replaced approximately 10% of trees planted in the past year. During drought years, the City experiences an approximately 30% replacement rate. DISCUSSION Commissioner Chu included in his request some ideas to start the Commissioner discussion. 1. Attaching a sign next to newly planted trees stating something to the effect of: "Newly planted trees must be watered deeply and regularly, especially in the first three summers. It is the homeowner's responsibility to keep this tree watered. If this tree appears to be receiving inadequate water, please notify the homeowner as the first recourse; secondarily, please call Burlingame Parks and Recreation at (650) 558-7330." 2. The City could establish a policy for how to respond if somebody notifies City staff about an under -watered tree. 3. As a condition for receiving a street tree, the homeowner acknowledges reading and understanding a notice that (1) describes proper watering practice and (2) discusses how the benefits of keeping street trees alive far outweigh the costs of water usage, even under drought conditions. 4. Tabling by volunteers at City -sponsored events to spread awareness about proper watering and the benefits of trees. FISCAL IMPACT From June 2023 through September 8, 2023, the City has spent $14,710 in staff time to water City street trees. Expenditures for the purpose are anticipated to exceed $20,000 for the calendar year of 2023. EXHIBITS A. Door Hangers B. Planting Sticker 2 EXHIBIT A CITY OF BU RLI NGAM E PARKS [DIVISION 558-7330 Dear Resident: The City's tree crew has planted a: It is very important, during the next two to three years, as this young tree is trying to get established, that it be watered at least 5 gallons of water once each week during the dry seasons. It is important to note, that all trees need water to thrive and survive and should always receive regular watering during the dry seasons throughout the year. If the City tree should have any maintenance needs, or if you have any .questions or concerns, please contact our office at (650) 558-7330. Thanks for assisting us in our efforts to maintain our beautiful Urban Forest and helping us make Burlingame a "greener" and healthier place to live!!! Burlingame Parks & Recreation Department TREE CITY USA Y!tLlNGAMEII' A gift from the CITY OF BURLINGAME Your new tree is a ... WATER AND PROTECTION are the two most important needs for young trees. WE NEED YOUR HELP Deep water young trees... • Summer: once each week. 5-10 gallons • Winter: once each month. 5-10 gallons • Deep watering prevents surface roots • Young trees require regular watering for good health and disease prevention Protect your tree... • Watch for signs of drought stress including leaves wilting, yellowing, curling or browning at the edges • Keep the base of the tree free of weeds, lawn and other plants • Protect trunk from damage by weed whackers and mowers • Mulch around trees protects young roots from drying out and suppresses weeds Tree questions, contact us... • For any tree maintenance or pruning needs Burlingame Parks and Recreation Department (650) 558-7330 treecare@burlingame.org Thank you! Trees, a valuable resource... • Trees... are the most beautiful solution to global climate change. • Trees... remove CO2 and other greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. • Trees... clean our air, removing particulates and other harmful pollutants. • Tree roots... filter rain water and runoff, cleaning and recharging drinking water resources. • Trees... slow the rush of rain water to the storm system, protect creeks, prevent flooding and reduce storm management costs for cities. • Trees... provide cooling shade and reduce energy costs. • Trees... raise property values Tree Plantings are made possible through the City of Burlingame — Parks and Recreation Department and through donations to the tree fund by Burlingame citizens, organizations, and businesses. (9- TREE CITY USA EXHIBIT B ne r l 0- 15 gallons once a week 316 the sail each spring • MOS eD SOI I if it hardems pep Area £ lea r :jrarnd r tree w Not TElm branches they help I;).-e fourlsh Type of Tree-. r M AM-n".* Let's make Burlingame beautiful one tre-e at a time! 7betxsi bn*to plain a Oa was10yeaisago. The +next best Inv 1-5 rKP& d - • , •-Chkv-se Praverb Mukh Litiot"h en S61 Keep Area Cleat Do No# Trim 1 D-15 gall a ibd le{� ardens sroLind your tree b•i inc- a-� they help the Vee Miifish 7J ft 1 k68 MF 1 k i : I 1 11 E, 1 BU.IRLINGAME STAFF REPORT l{n 11 To: Beautification Commission Date: October 5, 2023 From: Richard Holtz, Parks Superintendent/City Arborist Subject: Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the City Arborist's Approval of the Removal of a Protected Private Tree at 1134 Douglas Ave. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission review the City Arborist's decision to approve the removal of a privately protected tree at 1134 Douglas Ave. A decision from the Commission shall be made to uphold or reject the City Arborist's decision. BACKGROUND On September 5, 2023, the City Arborist visited 1134 Douglas Ave. to view a private protected tree. The visit was taken shortly after receiving a call regarding a private tree that could fall. Upon viewing the site, it was determined the tree did not appear to need immediate removal under the emergency authorization. The property owner subsequently submitted a Private Tree Removal Application. The City Arborist approved the removal in accordance with the City's Municipal Code section 11.06.060, which allows removal for the following reasons: (d) (1) the condition of the tree with respect to the proximity to existing or proposed structures, yards, driveway, and other trees... and, (d) (7) the economic consequences and obligations of requiring a tree to remain. The tree is growing in a non -ideal location on the property line between 1132 and 1134 Douglas Ave. Asphalt covers the entire growing space on the 1134 Douglas Ave. side of the tree. Evidence of asphalt heaving is apparent, though no fresh cracking is visible. It appears a recent asphalt repair was made. Additionally, the 1134 Douglas Ave. side of the tree has been heavily pruned, likely to have accommodated significant construction approximately 12 years ago. This left the tree significantly out of balance and leaning over the and on the residence of 1132 Douglas Ave. These tree branches appear to be supporting the weight of the tree by leaning heavily atop the roof of the residence at 1132 Douglas Ave. It is unknown if the tree could support itself in the absence of this support. The City Arborist confirmed the infrastructure conflict, limited growing space, and significant trunk lean and off -balance pruning. All of these site conditions contribute to a greater likelihood of failure. Several attempts to reach the property owner of 1132 Douglas Ave. have been unsuccessful. Appeal of protected Tree Removal at 1134 Douglas Ave. October 5, 2023 ni-gr_1ICSI[1N Site Conditions The Coast Live Oak exists on a shared property line between 1132 and 1134 Douglas Ave. It appeared that the tree's growing point (base of trunk) resides by majority on the 1134 Douglas Ave. property. Despite this, more than 90% of the trunk and tree branches exist over the property space of 1132 Douglas Ave. Branches from this tree extend 10' over 1134 Douglas Ave and over 30' over 1132 Douglas Ave. This increases the weight loading of the tree further into the direction of the lean (Exhibit A). The canopy of this tree is very dense. The United States Fire Prevention Administration recommends trimming branches that overhang structures at least 10' away. Achieving the recommended pruning of 10' and reducing end weight on elongated branches over 1132 Douglas Ave would significantly remove much of the tree canopy, with difficulty finding appropriate branches to prune back to. Appellants The removal of this tree affects 1132 Douglas Ave. to a greater degree by loss of privacy, shade, and the aesthetic beauty of the tree. The appellant, Lisa Brady, is a longtime resident of 1132 Douglas Ave. Ms. Brady is not the property owner but does state she is entrusted with the upkeep of the property on the owner's behalf. Ms. Brady has communicated to the applicant that she would like to take over maintenance and liabilities associated with the tree. Ms. Brady's goal would be to preserve the tree if a certified arborist report states preservation is feasible. An additional appeal has been received by John Root of 1133 Douglas Ave. Mr. Root shared his concern with the removal of this tree as it would soften the look of future development. The owner of 1132 Douglas Ave. also owns the adjacent parcel at 1128 Douglas Ave. Development plans dating back to 2015 have been approved to develop a 27-unit, five -story building on the two properties. Due to inactivity since 2019, the Planning Division approval has expired, and the process must begin anew. Mr. Root notes that other trees that had been screening the property have died, and further loss of vegetation would create a much more imposing presence should development occur as had been proposed. EXHIBIT A. Site Photos B. Tree Removal Application C. Appeal Letter 2 IVA � r�� + �� �•S � i . i' :.y ■ -� �++ �_�� L � 1 ���. . ir' � ` �Y � 15 4 .�{ .3. � , �' i - .l. ` : 1 '', - `.�� ��." R •�� � - f� �� . ..r' } F1 yl �� j � � = ti�_. - - 1 � �� _=�. :� -.� .. � L 'td� �11t i �` �d . �� � � - ti� a. � � i'�e. -. - . , ,/ � i . Tt.' +� - ' Y. • _ r. .. �� bur �'Iv I' a/me, t vrI I Fa r�a,-VAvec i 4-� 5 �� �� ► Vke-, AT 2 b'Q L Q LIA-3' ar t,,O f-e Pyo V,e/W-f/Vrf 1 0 t', � , k.�►2 Private Protected Tree Removal Permit Application Burlingame Parks Division ` *16-8urlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 650-558-73301 parksadmin@burtingame.org EXHIBIT B Permit Policies Please click here to read the Private Protected Tree Permit Guidelines (http://cros6.revize.corrVrevizelbu d ingamecity/burlingameparksandrer,s/document_ renterffrees/Private%20Protected%2OTree%2OPermit%a2CAppli initial below to indicate you understand the conditions of applying for this permit. Per the City ordinance 11.06.02, a protected tree is any tree with a circumference of forty-eight (48) inches or more when measured fifty-four (54) inches above natural grade. If approved. the Private Protected Tree Removal Permit requires planting a 24" box size single stem landscape tree(s) (no fruit. nut, or cypress) anywhere on the private property. Applicant's initials * I have read the Protected Tree Permit Guidelines and agree to the conditions - Initial here. a Applicant Information Date * gr' et -1,0Z,3 Property Owner's First Name' 'DtvA4 Property Owner's Last Name f 4 e 1= r-TA14 Property Owner's Phone Number Please enter number as indicated (555) 555-5555 Property Owner's email'ra S� C yLjat' ► CpW( � J Street Number Street Name L01 0�4y ! v Property Owner's Address {if different than property address) Street Address Address Line 2 City 6VP_ G 1PCAM Postal / Zip Code Free irltormadon How many trees need removing? Species04g, Select Tree Species from the Rropdown list below Circumference: ' 36 f, Circumference of the tree most be more that 48" Work to be performed KRemoval Trim More Than 1 /3 of Crown G Other Location on property el Si e Back Other State I Province 1 Region C4. Country D Alt rztt Reason Work is Necessary 8 A! f N N f NG 73 L MN I 4f5 Rii�'j,4e'D if e evr Or ALi� t�,ur 1S •4 hC�i4r mN � 4/.kBo,�A ,yr Please provide additional details for why the tree needF;7;7-,6 g. Mt t u1 � � tg(r �oG� &K Is this part of a building project? O Yes jj�No Photographs) and Schematics A photograph of the trees) and a schematic drawing of the location of the tree(s) in relation to the street and structure are required. Additional documentation might be required to support removal. Attach any documentation you may have. (Example: Report from Independent Arborist, pictures of damaged structures, letters of concern from neighbors, etc.) * You may upload more than one file by clicking upload again. A total maximum of 15MB can be uploaded - please resize your photos if necessary. Upload Signature €t Payment Application language Tne undersigned owner of the property hereby applies for a permit to remove or prune more that 113 of the canopy of the following protected trees(s) and has read and agrees to the conditions of a Private Protected Tree Remov Perrot Application_ Slemt re' 11 i { i 9 Payment A 51A 5107� required for atl Protected Tree Permit Applicatiom S 1G7,CO EXHIBIT C September 22, 2023 Richard Holtz, Park Supervisor City of Burlingame 850 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mr. Holtz, My wife and I have lived at Douglas Avenue, Unit for 11 years. Several years ago in 2017, a multi -unit, five story apartment building was proposed and approved for 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue.. During the application process public input was sought and received and an extensive EIR was prepared and approved. The trees on the property played a significant part in the discussion and acceptance by the Planning Commission and City Council. We suggest selective pruning should be done of the tree in question prior to considering removal. The large trees on the site softened the imposing presence of the proposed building. At that time I do not remember strong objections whether by Douglas residents or the EIR suggesting the tree in question should be removed. In the proposal the developer planned to demolish the 100+ year old house at the 1132 Douglas address to accommodate the new construction. Saving/supporting the tree in question should be considered. The death of the large, old oak tree on the easterly edge of the property which borders 1128 Douglas has made the consequences of the request even more significant. There was extensive Council discussion of a redwood tree adjacent to the deceased oak. These three trees played a significant role in the discussions and project approval. The removal of the tree in question reduces that number to one. Please consider this letter an appeal for further consideration prior to your proposed action. John S.Root Douglas Avenue PARKS/REC-Veronica Flores From: PARKS -Richard Holtz Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 4:14 PM To: Lisa Brady Cc: Parks Admin Subject: RE: Appeal of tree removal at 1134 Douglas Thank you Lisa. Your comments will be shared with the Commissioners. Richard J Holtz Ow �u�ur�onr�€ Parks Superintendent / City Arborist Certified Arborist WE- 8393AM fto 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 Office (650) 558-7333 / Cell (650) 759-3126 Please consider the environment before printing this email. Sign up for eNews From: Lisa Brady @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 4:11 PM To: PARKS -Richard Holtz <rholtz@burlingame.org> Subject: Appeal of tree removal at 1134 Douglas Hello Richard, In writing to the response of my neighbor at 1134 Douglas Ave to remove the Oak tree that sits between 1132-1134 Douglas Ave would be a travesty to1132 as it adds beauty, and shading from the heat and sun, and doesn't seem to sick, although it should have been better maintained by the landlord and because my landlord lives in China most of the time, and still resides in Burlingame a small amount of the year, I am willing to take the expense of having tree properly thinned out in order for it not to a be a safety Hazzard (weather permitting) not only to 1132, but also to 1134 Douglas. In order for the tree to be maintained a letter releasing 1134 of any legal responsibility would be written up to release liability. As a renter for the last 13 years, I initially invested in the interior & exterior of the home at my own expense. Now due to severe health & financial hardship issues, I've been unable to keep the exterior garden up to my liking. My gardener, Lee's Garden Service has worked with me many years over many past properties, and he has had generously worked on basic maintenance without charging me, which has been so wonderful. Please understand this tree has become an old, trusted friend & whatever I can do within reason to ensure the livelihood of the tree, I'm committed to helping its longevity. After all, my childhood favorite book is 'The Giving Tree' by Shel Silverstein & a book I read nightly to my daughter Keegan as a wide eyed child. Thank you for your consideration. Lisa Myshall Brady ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Lisa Brady @gmail.com> Date: Wed, Sep 27, 2023, 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Appeal of tree removal at 1134 Douglas To: PARKS -Richard Holtz <rholtz@burlingame.org> Hi Richard, As I'm on a small vaca with my daughter visiting from East Coast, this response may be received after close of business day. I will do my best to have it to you by 5PM today. Many thanks, Lisa On Wed, Sep 27, 2023, 10:32 AM PARKS -Richard Holtz <rholtz@burlingame.org> wrote: Hello Ms. Brady, I Hope you are doing well. I am writing you to request your objection to the tree removal in writing. You were traveling and dealing with a significant challenge last week when you called me. It was understandable that you were not able to write at the time. Our policy does require written appeals. Can you please write to me why you are objecting to the tree removal? It is important for us to receive this information to be included in our staff report for our commissioners to consider in advance of the October 5 commission meeting. This information must be received by close of business today to be included in the staff report. Thank you. Richard J Holtz Parks Superintendent / City Arborist Certified Arborist WE- 8393AM 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 Office (650) 558-7333 / Cell (650) 759-3126 Please consider the environment before printing this email. Sign up for eNews From: Lisa Brady @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:16 AM To: PARKS -Richard Holtz <rholtz@burl ingame.org> Subject: Re: Appeal of tree removal at 1134 Douglas Thank you for the update. I look forward to making all work out:) Many thanks, Lisa Brady On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, 8:15 AM PARKS -Richard Holtz <rholtz@burlingame.org> wrote: Hello Ms. Brady. Thank you for your contact. This is to confirm I have received your request to appeal the removal of the tree at 1134 Douglas. We will follow-up with you at a later date. Richard J Holtz Parks Superintendent / City Arborist Certified Arborist WE- 8393AM 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 Office (650) 558-7333 / Cell (650) 759-3126 Please consider the environment before printing this email. Sign up for eNews This email is from an external source. Please take caution when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, contact your IT Department This email is from an external source. Please take caution when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, contact your IT Department