The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - BC - 2023.08.03• City of Burlingame BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 F I� Meeting Agenda Beautification Commission Thursday, August 3, 2023 6:30 PM Burlingame Community Center 850 Burlingame Avenue Commissioner Kirchner will be attending the meeting remotely at the following address: Andril Fireplace Cottages 569 Asilomar Blvd., Pacific Grove, CA 93950-3701 Individuals who are interested in participating may appear at 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California (Maple Room), or at the above address in Pacific Grove, California. Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below. The meeting video will be uploaded to the City's website after the meeting. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to vflores@burlingame.org. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda or is on the Consent Calendar. The length of the emailed comment should be commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Beautification Commission for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00 PM on August 3, 2023. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time but cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 PM deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Beautification Commission after the meeting. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 7/27/2023 Beautification Commission Meeting Agenda August 3, 2023 httpsJ/us02web.zoom. us/j/86767357470?pwd=WFprd3RyZENIRkk1 L2hB THR5b Gh WQ T09 Passcode: 816232 Or One tap mobile: +16694449171„86767357470#,,,,*816232# US +16699006833„86767357470#,,,,*816232# US (San Jose) Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): +1 669 444 9171 US +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 719 359 4580 US +1 253 205 0468 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 689 278 1000 US +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 305 224 1968 US +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +1 564 217 2000 US +1 646 9313860 US Webinar ID: 867 6735 7470 Passcode: 816232 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdSt5ixnt6 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. MINUTES A. July 6, 2023 BBC Draft Minutes Attachments: Draft Minutes 4. CORRESPONDENCE 5. FROM THE FLOOR City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 7/27/2023 Beautification Commission Meeting Agenda August 3, 2023 Speakers may address the Commission concerning any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda. Additional public comments on agenda action items will be heard when the Commission takes up those items. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff, although provision of name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each, although the Commission may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Trees of Burlingame Ad Hoc Committee Members Update B. Consideration of Themed Block Tree SDecies Modification for the 1500-2000 Blocks of Easton Drive Attachments: Staff Report Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Residential and Business Landscape Award Voting B. Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Protected Private Tree at 1385 Hillside Circle Attachments: Staff Report Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I 8. REPORTS 9. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS Arborist's ADDroval of the Removal of a City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 7/27/2023 Beautification Commission Meeting Agenda August 3, 2023 Next Regular Meeting: September 7, 2023 Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities should contact the Parks & Recreation Dept. at (650) 558-7330 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the agenda packet is available for review at the Recreation Center, 850 Burlingame Avenue, during normal office hours. The Agendas and minutes are also available on the City's website: www.burlingame.org. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Burlingame Beautification Commission regarding any items on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at 850 Burlingame Avenue during normal business hours. City of Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 7/27/2023 BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION Draft Minutes July 6, 2023 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 6:30 pm by Chair Bauer. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Bauer, Commissioners Batte, Chu, Khoury, and Kirchner Absent: None Staff: Parks Superintendent/City Arborist Holtz, and Recording Secretary Flores Others: None MINUTES Commissioner Batte made a motion to approve the June 1, 2023, Regular Meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Commission Kirchner and was approved 5-0-0. CORRESPONDENCE None. PUBLIC COMMENT None. OLD BUSINESS 1. Trees of Burlingame Ad Hoc Committee Members Update Commissioner Kirchner presented Secretary Flores with a thumb drive with the up-to-date chapters of the Trees of Burlingame book. He explained that the remaining items are a chapter on Washington Park that he and Commissioner Khoury are working on and duplicating a few maps from the previous publication. Commissioner Kirchner spoke of a small number of Eucalyptus groves that are not recognized and explained that he would work with the Historical Society to clarify. He also inquired about an updated landscape plan for Washington Park, including tree locations. He spoke of forming an Ad Hoc committee to meet and discuss the collation of the final publication. He took a poll, and Commissioner Batte confirmed she would like to join the committee, along with Commissioner Khoury and Kirchner. 2. Residential and Business Landscape Award Update Commissioner Chu provided a brief reminder that voting on both the Residential and Business Landscape Awards will occur during the August Beautification Meeting. Commissioner Khoury discussed the possibility of adding an apartment or multi -unit property landscape award. Chair Bauer confirmed that a new award could be implemented for the next year. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ad Hoc Committee to Review the Art in Public Places Policy Commissioner Kirchner explained the possibility of charging new development projects a percentage of the construction cost towards art on the development site or the City for public art. Chair Bauer explained that she and Commissioner Kirchner have volunteered to be on the Ad Hoc Committee to discuss this policy further. REPORTS Commissioner Khoury reported on the all -year tree lighting project fundraiser to help light the side streets of Lorton Avenue, Primrose Road, Park Road, and Howard Avenue. She explained that the timeframe for installation is currently estimated for after the Labor Day Holiday. Further, she said that Broadway is not currently included in the fundraising. City Arborist Holtz reported that the City Council approved three large tree contracts to do maintenance work in some of our large Eucalyptus groves, including reduction pruning and some removals. Further, he spoke of several staff projects coming out of winter and larger projects in the exploratory or plan phases that have been funded for the new fiscal year, such as the Town Square, Laguna Park Playground, Cuernavaca ballfield, and a new batting cage in Washington Park. Chair Bauer asked about the status of tree removals along El Camino Real. City Arborist Holtz explained that these trees belong to the State of California and are not the City's responsibility. He stated that Caltrans had been actively having trees inspected by several independent arborists, and several trees would be removed before the rehabilitation project due to concerns that the tree might be compromised or at greater risk of failure. City Arborist Holtz explained that we will revisit the Easton Theme Block item, and there will be a new tree appeal to consider for next month's meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:54 pm. The next Beautification Commission meeting is scheduled for September 7, 2023. Respectfully submitted, Vcroviicoi -Flores Veronica Flores Administrative Staff BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT To: Beautification Commission Date: August 3, 2023 From: Richard Holtz, Parks Superintendent/City Arborist Subject: Consideration of Themed Block Tree Species Modification for the 1500 - 2000 Blocks of Easton Drive RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission review options to modify the present Themed Block designated species of Corymbia citriodora (Lemon -Scented Gum). BACKGROUND The City received a petition to modify the present designated Themed Block species from Corymbia citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum) to a smaller, native species that requires less maintenance. The 1600, 1700, and 2000 blocks of Easton have met the threshold of at least 75% of property owners expressing a desire to modify the present Themed Block designation. On June 1, 2023, the City Arborist presented a STAFF REPORT (Exhibit A) that included the petition and some potential options for the Commission to consider. During the meeting, significant public comment expressed both support for continuing with the present Themed Block designation of Corymbia citriodora and for changing the tree designation due to continued concerns about the existing species. During the Commissioner's discussion, the Commissioners agreed that the corridor of 1500 — 2000 blocks should be treated as one Themed Block area instead of individual themed blocks. They also agreed to consider changing the present Themed Block designated species however, the Commission requested additional information. The Commission asked staff to do further research on species options and return at a future meeting. Specifically, Commissioners asked for the following: • Experiences other agencies have had with Corymbia citriodora • Differences between Eucalyptus globulus (Blue Gum) and Corymbia citriodora (Lemon - Scented Gum) • Difference between a heritage tree and a heritage grove • Comparison of additional species that could be considered 1 Consideration of Themed Block Modification for the 1500-2000 Blocks of Easton Drive August 3, 2023 nmri iCSinKj Other Agencies Experience Staff contacted neighboring municipalities of San Francisco and Palo Alto regarding their experience with Corymbia citriodora. The information provided was quite limited. San Francisco reported 25 trees in their inventory. However, their inventory is likely greater, considering they had recently planted several along Van Ness Ave and Potrero Hill near 24t" (Exhibit B). San Francisco did report challenges in establishing these trees due to wind, vandalism, and traffic constraints. Palo Alto reported having 21 of this species. All are located in two parks. They do not actively plant this species and have favored native trees in the public right of way. The only work record shown was the retrieval of a large, downed branch. Parks staff also contacted Southern California municipalities of Lomita, Ventura, and Santa Barbara. Only Santa Barabara responded. They stated they have over 150 of this species. Most are in Parks or non -street locations. These specimens were believed to have been planted in the 1950s and 1960s. They are observed to have a typical height of sixty feet, though some have grown taller. Sant Barbara does note that their experience was that the species had an elevated likelihood of large branch failures compared to the average failure rate of other species in their urban forest. They believe the risk could be mitigated through regular inspection and pruning. This requires additional maintenance to prune these specimens' end weight to lessen the likelihood of failure. This included significant train pruning during younger years of growth to establish appropriate form, branch spacing, and strong attachments. Eucalyptus Globulus vs. Corymbia Citrodora Both species are part of the Eucalypt family. Until 1995, species in the genus Corymbia were labeled as genus Eucalyptus. Taxonomists reclassified this group into the newly formed genus of Corymbia because of notable differences in the form of the flowering structure. Species Common Name Height Width Eucalyptus Globulus Blue Gum 150'+ 50-100' Corymbia Citriodora Lemon Scented Gum 60-100' 15-50' Eucalyptus globulus is a fast-growing large tree that has been used worldwide for quick timber growth. The tree produces significant eucalyptol oil utilized in medications and other remedies. The tree sheds bark and has a propensity for creating a lot of debris. Accumulated debris and natural oils can increase fire intensity in un-maintained landscapes. The tree was brought to California in 1853 for ornamental and lumber purposes. Over time, the species proved to be poor quality for lumber. It is now classified as a pest and is not recommended to be planted in California. Additionally, the large specimens have shown, in some cases, to have a greater likelihood of large branch and whole tree failures. Corymbia citrodora is a tree that is prized in landscapes for its striking white bark coloration and open branching form. The tree is well adapted to California. Leaves expel a "lemon scent" when crushed. This specimen is smaller in size and does not produce the long bark strips nor significant 2 Consideration of Themed Block Modification for the 1500-2000 Blocks of Easton Drive August 3, 2023 vegetative debris that the Eucalyptus globulus does. This tree does have an increased likelihood of large branch failure and is also shallow -rooted. The City of Burlingame has been planting Corymbia citriodora trees since 2007. The largest specimen is located at 1800 Easton Drive (Exhibit C). Heritage Tree vs. Heritage Grove The City has a heritage tree program established by Municipal Code 11.06.030 in 1975. Citizens can nominate both public and private trees to be considered to receive this designation by the Burlingame Beautification Commission and City Council. Trees receiving this designation receive additional scrutiny before being approved for removal. Though still in existence, this program has been rarely utilized since 1976. The focus of our urban forest program has been to preserve the entire urban forest by focusing efforts on the Private Protected Tree Removal program. This requires private property owners to apply for a permit from the City before removing or pruning a tree greater than 33%. This requirement is for all species with a Diameter at Standard Height (DSH) greater than 14". The heritage designation is bestowed upon one tree or a grove consisting of multiple trees of similar species, size, or age along City streets or growing in a specific locale (Exhibit D). City Council designated Easton Drive a heritage grove of pines, cypress and eucalyptus trees in 1973- 75. The designation was bestowed on these mostly common trees because of their immense size. At present, 33 larger Eucalyptus trees remain. Additional Species to Consider The planter strip areas along the 1500-2000 blocks of Easton were made intentionally wide to accommodate growing space for the large trees planted. Because of the increased area available for future growth, species larger than typically included on our general street tree lists should be considered. This is not only to preserve the intended "look" of Easton Drive but also for the ecological benefits large specimen trees provide our community. Petitioners have indicated an interest in a shorter, native tree that requires less maintenance. Commissioners have indicated they would like to see tree replacement options that mimic the intended canopy the Corymbia citriodora would provide, whether native or non-native. Staff conducted significant research, including discussions with other municipalities, a review of municipal planting plans, and web research, including https://selectree.calpolV.edu/. After a review of opportunities available, experience with the species, and infrastructure and maintenance considerations, including water use, branch strength, root conflict, size, and typical shape, the following ten trees meet the criteria (Exhibit E has a comprehensive comparison of the species). Species Common Name Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar Cinamomum camphora Camphor tree Corymbia citriodora Lemon Scented Gum Lyonothamnus floribundus Catalina Ironwood Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 3 Consideration of Themed Block Modification for the 1500-2000 Blocks of Easton Drive August 3, 2023 Quercus coccinea Scarlet oak Quercus lobata Valley Oak Quercus suber Cork Oak Sequoia sempervirens Coastal Redwood Ulmus 'Patriot' Patriot Elm The City Arborist recommends two additional species in addition to the present theme of Corymbia citriodora: Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak) and Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor). Both trees have a similar rounded form with strong branching attachments. This has allowed both species to successfully grow wider than high with a low incidence of branch failure or other infrastructure conflict. The planter strips on Easton are wider than on Burlingame Ave, where we have successfully planted camphor trees with little conflict. The selected camphor and coast live oak trees aim to create an umbrella canopy across Easton Drive similar to that of Burlingame Ave. The Corymbia citriodora would elevate the canopy above the Camphors or Coast Live Oaks. Additionally, selecting a multi -genera approach is in line with common industry recommendations. Utilizing trees from differing families lessens the likelihood of urban forest devastation due to pests and disease. The Dutch Elm Disease of the 1900's caused whole urban landscapes to be stripped of mature trees. The same is true of ash trees being removed wholesale in neighborhoods throughout the mid -west due to the Emerald Ash Borer. Limiting property owner choice on species planted along Easton Drive to a few key species helps balance public demand and risk and provides sound pest and disease management options. Any decision made by the Commission to modify the Themed Block designation will subsequently be presented to the City Council for approval before the change can take effect. FISCAL IMPACT The decision to modify the Themed Block Species designation will not have any fiscal impact. EXHIBITS A. Staff Report June 1, 2023 B. Examples of San Francisco Planting of Corymbia Citriodora C. Growth Rate Corymbia Citriodora Planted in Burlingame 2007 D. List of Heritage Groves and Trees E. Matrix of Additional Species to Consider on Easton Themed Blocks ONMMII:11r_1 BU.RLINGAME STAFF REPORT l{n 11 To: Beautification Commission Date: June 1, 2023 From: Richard Holtz, Parks Superintendent/City Arborist Subject: Consideration of Changing the Themed Block Tree Species for the 1600 - 1700 Blocks of Easton Drive RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission review the petition received for the 1600 - 1700 blocks of Easton Drive and consider changing the current Themed Block tree species. BACKGROUND Themed Blocks are street blocks throughout the City designated as one defined tree species as the only tree to replace street trees removed on the Themed Block. The purpose of a Themed Block is to establish a singular species along a designated block to maintain the intended character of the original plantings. However, trees are not removed for the purpose of contributing to a Themed Block designation. Trees are replaced for health, safety, or infrastructure conflict concerns. The process of having every tree on the Themed Block as the designed Themed species can take generations to complete. Themed Blocks can be one block of a street, a couple of blocks of a street, or the full street. The process to have a block(s) designated as a Themed Block follows an application process that the Beautification Commission hears at a public meeting with the final approval from the City Council. The petition form to Apply for the Establishment, Modifying, or Removing a Street Tree Themed Block can be found on the City website under Parks and Recreation, Trees, Online Tree Documents. When street trees are replaced on blocks not designated a Themed Block, the resident or City Arborist (depending on the location) picks the replacement tree from the Approved Street Tree lists. Easton Drive Easton Drive was once the private driveway to the Black Hawk estate owned by the Easton family. Famed Golden Gate Park Landscaper John Maclaren was enlisted to plant the Blue Gums in the 1870s. Many of the trees have been preserved and endured for decades. In 1976, the Easton Drive trees were included in a Heritage Grove designation (Exhibit A). As large Eucalyptus trees were removed, some community members expressed an interest in keeping Easton Drive as a large canopy grove. As a result, the Beautification Commission held 1 Consideration of Themed Block Revision for 1600-1700 Block of Easton Drive June 1, 2023 public meetings to discuss establishing Easton Drive's 1500 - 2000 blocks as Themed Blocks as a long-range plan for Easton Drive (Exhibit B). Some of the meetings that were held included arboriculture experts Larry Costello and David Dockter, offering opinions of Eucalypt species more suitable for the Urban environment. The meetings were publicly noticed and culminated with a community meeting at the Presbyterian Church on June 28, 2007. The final decision was to establish Corymbia Citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum) as the Themed species for this area whenever a tree was replaced. The Lemon Scented Gum was selected because of its shorter stature, less propensity for branch failure, and cleaner presence than its cousin, the Blue Gum. Since 2008, this tree has been planted to replace trees removed on Easton Drive's 1500 - 2000 blocks. The oldest Lemon Scented Gum planted on Easton Drive is located in front of the Easton Library. It was planted in 2008 to replace "Tom the Tree," a large Blue Gum Eucalyptus tree. Lemon Scented Gum The Lemon Scented Gum is a relative of the Eucalyptus tree. Where the Blue Gum specimen can reach heights of over 200 feet tall and has a reputation as a messy tree shedding large barks straps and dropping acorns, the Lemon Scented Gum, in contrast, has a smaller stature reaching a typical height of 75 feet tall in the urban environment. This species does not shed bark straps nor drop large acorns. The tree has been planted in many municipal landscapes, including San Francisco, Santa Monica, and Coronado. The specimen is featured and recommended as a specimen tree in landscapes. It has been found on recommended plant lists by an Australian government agency (Exhibit C). This is due to the tree's ecological benefits, wildlife support, climate adaptability, low-water use, disease resistance, and life expectancy. The tree has also been found on a do not plant list due to invasiveness and branch failure rate (Exhibit D). Another discussion in 2013 stated that arborists have not been able to demonstrate a higher instance of branch failure among Lemon Scented Gums (Exhibit E). The City's experience with this species is limited to plantings along Easton Drive and Burlingame Avenue. Easton Drive Eucalyptus Since the early 2000s, the Easton Drive Eucalyptus trees have experienced an accelerated maintenance program. This includes independent arborist reporting every two years and pruning every three years. The accelerated program aims to identify the potential increased likelihood of failure. Reduction of the likelihood of failure is achieved through pruning and canopy reduction or removal if warranted. The canopy reduction reduces the loading effect of wind to reduce the likelihood of a toppling event. When the risk cannot be mitigated through pruning, whole tree removals are considered. Since the Themed Block was established for Easton Drive, no requests to change the Themed designation have been received by City staff. ni-qr_i i-qcinm 2 Consideration of Themed Block Revision for 1600-1700 Block of Easton Drive June 1, 2023 The significant storms of winter 2023 saw many large tree failures. One large Blue Gum Eucalyptus tree failed, and six others showed significant movement in the soil, indicating an elevated risk for potential failure. Out of an abundance of caution, City staff recommended the evacuation of homes near trees with the perceived elevated risk. As staff met with Easton Drive residents, some expressed concern about living amongst these tall trees. They shared that they did not want the Lemon Scented Gum tree to be the replacement tree. A resident circulated a letter that some residents signed requesting the Beautification Commission's consideration of a shorter, native species that are more sustainable and requires less maintenance. Residents circulated the required petition and received the signatures of 80% of the property owners of the 1600 block of Easton Drive (Exhibit F). The 1700 block of Easton Drive received 88.8% of property owners (Exhibit G). Petitions were also sought from 1500, 1800, 1900, and 2000 blocks of Easton Drive. Only the 1600 - 1700 blocks met the 75% threshold for Themed Block modification. Overall, the sentiment of the property owners is to remove Lemon Scented Gum as the Themed species on all of the Themed Blocks at a rate of 61.5% to modify to a native species, with 32 of 52 property owners signing the petition letter (Exhibits H). Exhibit I shows which property owners signed the petition, noted in yellow. The properties noted in red either didn't sign the petition or could not be verified as the property owner based on the County property records search. The Commission has several options to consider below. However, though the petition only met the threshold to consider changing the Theme on the 1600 - 1700 blocks, the entirety of the 1500 - 2000 block corridor should be reviewed due to the grove's heritage designation, reforestation plan for the area, and petition statement. In addition, the Commission should consider how possible species will interact with overhead conductors on the south side of Easton Drive. Reject the Petition By rejecting the petition, the Lemon Scented Gum will remain the Themed Block species for the 1600-1700 blocks of Easton Drive. The basis for this decision could include that significant community outreach occurred in 2007. Industry experts and staff invested considerable time in developing a long-range reforestation plan for Easton Drive to create a sustainable grove that embraced the history and uniqueness of Easton Drive for generations to enjoy. By selecting the Lemon Scented Gum, it addressed the community concerns regarding debris produced and the height of mature trees. Modify the Existing Long -Range Reforestation Plan for the 1600 - 1700 Blocks of Easton Drive Recognizing a shift in neighborhood demographics and desires, the Commission could change the existing Themed of Lemon -Scented Gum. The options include: 1. The Commission could select a new Themed species on the 1600 - 1700 blocks of Easton Drive. 2. The Commission could include additional tree options on an Easton Drive -specific Street Tree list, allowing property owners or the City Arborist to select replacement trees from a narrow list. This option may or may not include the Lemon Scented Gum. 3 Consideration of Themed Block Revision for 1600-1700 Block of Easton Drive June 1, 2023 Because the planter strips on this part of Easton Drive were kept very wide to accommodate the large Eucalyptus trees, large trees should be considered due to a lessened likelihood of infrastructure conflict and the greater benefits large trees provide to the community. Examples of some potential tree species to consider are below. Species Common Name Height CA Native Evergreen Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 100'+ Yes Yes Cinamomum camphora Camphor tree 40-60' No- East Asia Yes Corymbia citriodora Lemon Scented Gum 60-100' No -Australia Yes Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 40-80' Yes- CA Coast Yes Quercus lobata Valley Oak 70-100' Yes- CA Valley No Quercus suber Cork Oak 30-50' No- Mediterranean Yes Sequoia sempervirens Coastal Redwood 100'+ Yes- CA Coast Yes Ulmus' Patriot' Patriot Elm 50-80' No No Remove Themed Block Designation The 1600 — 1700 blocks of Easton Drive would no longer be a Themed with the Lemon Scented Gum, and the property owner or City Arborist would choose a replacement tree from the Street Tree list for planter strips widths over 6' (Exhibit J). Request Additional Information To help in the decision -making process, the Commission could require additional information. If this is the case, the Commission can table the item until the additional information is ready for the Commission's review at a future regularly scheduled Commission meeting date. EXHIBITS A. Easton Drive Heritage Grove Designation 1976 B. Long -Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive C. Lemon Gum Recommendation (Australia) D. Lemon Gum Do Not Plant List (Australia) E. Lemon Gum Branch Failure Rate Discussion (Australia) F. Petition Letter 1600 Block of Easton Drive G. Petition Letter 1700 Block of Easton Drive H. 1500 - 2000 Block Easton Drive Signature List I. 1500 - 2000 Block Easton Drive Map J. Trees to Be Planted in Areas 6' Wide and Over EXHIBIT B 1700 Mission St. San Francisco Van Ness at Clay, San Francisco EXHIBIT C 1800 Easton Drive "Tommy" the tree 2008 2011 iO . . . . . . . . . . ir Ji GU IL 2022 EXHIBIT D HERITAGE TREE DESIGIIATION /minatian Address Species Su mitted b P 1 HERITAGE TREE DESIGNATION Page 2 Date Of urination Date to Council Date of Date To Council mitted b Address Species Commission Action Notification commission Action Notificatit 24 0 k G ve Ave Italian Stone 5/6/76 6/8/76 Street Tree Grove eter Grossman 313 Chapin Ave.1-Coast Redwood 11/7/75 12/2175Y 12/3/759 .Gilbert Larrish 2000 Carmelita 1-Giant Sequoia 2/6/75 3/18/75 4/l/75 .L.Hechinger 1025 Cabrillo I -Weeping Bottle 6/5/75 7/7/75 Brush rs.Marshall S. 1521 Vancouver 1-Flowering Chestnse 6/5/75 7/7/75 George ut &M Richard Reed 1112 Drake Ave.1-3unya-Bunya 8/ 7/75 8/18/75 ark Director, Carolan/Burl.Aves. John E. Hoffman -Washington Park 1-Dawn Redwood 8/ 7175 8/18/75 ark Director Washington Park 1-Camperdown Elm 8/7/75- 9/18/75 ark Director Washington Park I -Primrose Tree 8/7/75 8/18/75 ark Director Washington Park 1-Strawberry Tree 8/7/75 8/18/75 a�Director Washington Park 1-American Elm 8/7/75 8/18/75 ark Director Washington Park I -Giant Sequoia 8/7/75 8/18/75 ark Director Washington Park 1-Blue Atlas8/7/75 8/18/75 dar ark Director Washington Park I- e ChineseSchoPagoda/ Scholar 8/7/75 8/18/75 of M est 407 Occidental 1-Cryptomeria 1012/75 11/4/75 japonica,'Elegans' +`eautification (Grove)"All of Trees Lining E1 10/2175 11/4/75 Commission Camino Real,Burlingame" rs.Martha Carol & East [Grave] 40 f"exican Benson Carol Avenues Fan Palms 11/6/75 11/1II/75 m.F.Hauser 1783 E1 Camino 1-Pinus pinea 1/8/76 2/17/76 [Peninsula Hospital] enneth Meyer 7DI Burlingame Ave. Bottle Tree 5/6/76 6/8/76 elpth Meyer 617 Burlingame Ave. Flowering Peach 5/6/76 6/8/76 enneth Meyer 605 Burlingame Ave. Flowering Peach 5/6/76 6/8/76 enneth Meyer 601 Burlingame Ave. Flowering Peach 5/6/76 6/8/76 8/20/75 11/7/75 2/24/76 Street Trc Street Tre Street Trc Street Tre .enneth Meyer & 5 a obert Fisse Pine ark Dir.Hoffman 1600 Howard Ave. She -oak 5/6/76 6/8/76 ark Dir.Hoffman Washington Park- Southern 6/6/76 6/8/76 Carolan/Burl.Aves. Magnolia ark Dir.Haffman Washington Park Olive 5/6/76 6/8/76 ark Dir.Hoffman Washington Park Monterey Pine 5/6/76 6/8/76 ark, Dir.Hoffman St.Isle-Primrose & Canary Island 5/6/76 6/8/76 Bellevue (3 Trees) Date Palms os.E. Harvey (Grove) Calif.Dr.,£. Blue Gum 5/6/76 6/8/76 Side,Burl.Ave to Palm os.E. Harvey (Grove) Easton Dr. f/ Eucalyptus,Pine,5/6/76 6/8/75 'ark Dir.Hoffman E.C.R. to Vancouver Cypress, Other 'r]artha Benson 400 & 500 Blks., Camphor (Grove) 5/6/76 6/8/76 16 Burlingame Ave. Irs.Martha Benson 1400 Blk. Balboa Common Catalpa 5/6/76 6/8/76 ark Dir.Hoffman 100 &'200 Blks., Stanley Road I&hi A.F.Castle 1021 Capuchino Ave :enneth Meyer 132 Elm Ave Irs.Aline Lorenz 104 Pepper Ave (Grove) Tulip (Grove) 5/6/76 6/8/76 Calif.Redwood 5/6/76 6/8/76 (Twin Trees) Italian Stone 5/6/76 6/8/76 Pine Canary Island 7/l/76 7/19/76 Pine Street Tree On City Pr( On City Pr( Street Tre( Street Tre( Street Tree 6/9/76 6/9/76 7/20/76 Irs.Willa Sexton 113 Occidental Ave. Jelecote Pine 7/l/76 7/19/76 7/20/76 rs.Sexton/Lorenz 1612 Barroilhet Ave.Strawberry Tree 7/l/76 7/19/76 7/20/76 "rs.Sexton/Lorenz 121 Pepper Ave. Bunya-Bunya 7/l/76 7/19/76 7/20/76 ames 14. Smith 1257 Cabrillo Ave. Camphor Tree 7/1/76 7/19/75 7120/76 r.exton/Lorenz 317 Howard Ave. Blackwood Acacia 711/76 7/19/76 Street Tree :ITY OF BURLINGAME PARK DEPARTMENT HERITAGE GROVE DESIGNATION Date Apri`1 1 1976 h'O,MINATION FOR HERITAGE TREE STATUS IS HEREBY MADE BY: 7 Name 1) Mr. Joseph E•. Harvey, 2205 Adeline Dr. .,BUrlingame;CA Phone:3446210 2)Park Director John Hoffman, City Hall, Burlingame, CA Phone:342-893' sty fate (�1P) FOR TEE FuLLOVIu Common game Eucalyptus, Pine, Cypress, Other Species Botanical i•lamc --- —__— Located JM on Easton Drive, from El Camino Real to Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame, California 94010: All trees on the street right of -way.. Owned by the City of Burlingame, 501 Primrose Rd.. Burlingame, CA QUALIFICATIOINS OF THE GROVE .Historic Significance Planted by early land owners Planted by John Mc Laren Date of Planting 1870's Age 100 year; Character Impressive avenue of giant trees Beauty Massive trunks, tall imposing trees Rarity Most species in grove not rare, some are uncommon Other. Spec ial Characteristics Some of largest eucalypti and cypress in Burlingame. Monterey Cypresses 12 7 0 D ra K e,; 1, 7Cirm, = Di am. • t ' � Signed by:%�� :'7 S i g n t o o f IjoAn i pa-t o------- Approved by Owner of Tree:i -/ �� ' Sig tature ner Representative BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION REVIEW CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATION.: The Commission revieved the nomination and rude the following recommendation: Approval [✓] Disapproval [ � -—�Signat;urej� � Uutt�} Heritage Status [v� No Heritage Status [ 1griaturC �f)atej ,R CE1V CITY OF BURLINGAME -NOV-05".75 PARK DEPARTMENT. CITY OF BURLINGAME HERITAGE GROVE DESIGNATION Date October 2, 1975 14ONINATI014 FOR HERITAGE TREE STATUS IS HEREBY HADE BY: Name BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION Burlingame, California °4010 ty . State i j1 FOR THE FOLLOWING. TREES:. -ALL OF THE TREES LINING EL CAMINO REAL. Common Blame BLUE GUM and MANNA GUM EUCALYPTUS, ELMS, PINES and others Botanical Name EUCALYPTUS SPP., ULMUS SP., PINUS SP. ,'and others Located on E1 Camino Real ri ht -of-wa from Barroilhet and Peninsula Avenues to Murchison. Drive. 0,wned- by State of California and City of Burlingame____ QUALIFI-CATIOtIS OF THE TREES; _ - Ranging in size from_6" diameter-�0'88" diameter_ �. Historic Significance •Most of the eucalyptus andelmswere planted 3&1K4gKM4 by John McLaren for Landowners Howard, Ralston, Mills and Poett Date of Planting 1880 approximately Age 95 years Character Largest and oldest e cal tus trees in Burlinzameapproximat. Beauty Massive, imposing, blue gugms,, white harked _gums, ,-_c�hi�g e1 Rarity Rare because of their age and size Other Special Characteristics Tfie row of eucalyptus was de zignatefi "Point of Historic Interest" by the San Mateo County Historic Sites Signed by: CommitteE Chairman Signature of t,omir.ator Beautif.Commic Approved by Owner of Tree: Mayor Signature of caner BEAUTIFICATION. COW,IISSION REVIE14 CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATIWi : The Commission reviewed the nomination ` and made the folIo%ving recommendation: t{erfta9s Grove Statics QC Approval [] Disapproval [ A'a E'eri ta9e Grove Staters - Dlatc t� _ �i �- ��Sigr a �— t / ,na r Date EXHIBIT E Species Common Name Height Width Form Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 100' 20-40' Conical Cinamomum camphora Camphor tree 40-60' 30-60' Rounded Corymbia citriodora Lemon Scented Gum 60-100' 15-50' Rounded Lyonothamnus floribundus Catalina Ironwood 40' 20' Rounded or Conical Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 40-80' 20-50' Rounded Quercus Coccinea Scarlet oak 70' 50' Rounded Quercus lobata Valley Oak 60-100' 50' Rounded Quercus suber Cork Oak 40-60' 30-50' Rounded Sequoia sempervirens Coastal Redwood 60-100' 30-60' Conical Ulmus' Patriot' IPatriot Elm 40-50' 30-40 Vase/Rounded Evergreen GrowthWater Rate Use Branch Att Roots conflict California Native Yes Slow Medium Medium Moderate Yes Yes Slow Medium Strong High No- Asia Yes Fast Low Medium Moderate No- Australia Yes Moderate Medium Strong Moderate Yes Yes Slow Low Strong Low -Moderate Yes No Fast Medium Strong Moderate No- Eastern US No Fast Medium Medium Moderate Yes Yes Slow Low Strong Moderate No- Mediterranean Yes Fast High Strong Low Yes No IModerate I IMedium High No- Eastern US Notes Susceptible to incense branch canker. Often wider than tall. Susceptible to verticillium wilt. Striking bark and form. Can shed large branches. Striking bark. Lives 100's of years. Often wider than tall. Susceptible to Sudden Oak Death Excellent Fall Color. Susceptible to armeleria root rot. Susceptible to root rot diseases. Susceptible to root rot diseases. Lives 100's of years. Suffers during drought without significant suplemental water. Lower height cultivars available. Reauires train pruninR in vounRer vears to establish Rood form. Susceptible to aphids. Data Link https://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/832 https://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/357 https://seIectree.caIpoly.edu/tree-detai1/533 https://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/832 https://seIectree.caIpoly.edu/tree-detai1/1227 https://seIectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detai1/1233 https://seIectree.caIpoly.edu/tree-detai1/1246 https://seIectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/1263 https://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/1325 https://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/1611 BU.IRLINGAME STAFF REPORT lin 11 To: Beautification Commission Date: August 3, 2023 From: Richard Holtz, Parks Superintendent/City Arborist Subject: Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the City Arborist's Approval of the Removal of a Protected Private Tree at 1385 Hillside Circle RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission review the City Arborist's decision to approve the removal of a privately protected tree at 1385 Hillside Circle. A decision from the Commission shall be made to uphold or reject the City Arborist's decision. BACKGROUND On June 21, 2023, the City Arborist visited 1385 Hillside Circle to view a private protected tree for which the property owner submitted a Private Tree Removal Application. The Application included a certified arborist (Exhibit A) recommendation to remove the tree. The report supported removal for the following reasons: 1. Infrastructure conflicts with hardscape areas (pathways, pond, and retaining wall). 2. Potentially compromised root ball due to confined planting space (leaning trunk). 3. Redwood trees growth habit of invasive root systems. The City Arborist confirmed the infrastructure conflict and limited growing space. The City Arborist noticed the lean but could not determine if it resulted from wind forces experienced in the Winter of 2023 or a compromised root ball. Based on the infrastructure conflict and supportive arborist report, the permit was granted for removal on June 23, 2023. Public notice was sent to neighboring residences (Exhibit B). On June 28, 2023, staff received an email from resident Marco Romani at 1381 Hillside Circle protesting the removal of the redwood tree (Exhibit C). DISCUSSION Site Conditions The appellant (Marco Romani) stated that several trees have been removed from the property over time. He alleged some were removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit. Staff reviewed Department records, which showed that a Private Protected Tree Removal Permit was applied for in February 2019 for 1385 Hillside Circle (Exhibit D). The Application was to remove five trees. The City Arborist approved all for removal. The City Arborist also noted that three of 1 Appeal of protected Tree Removal at 1385 Hillside Circle August 3, 2023 the trees were illegally removed. Six trees were required for replacement as per site conditions. The City Arborist confirmed they were replanted in August 2019. In May of 2019, another application was received for 1385 Hillside Circle (Exhibit E). The application was to remove ten protected trees. The City Arborist at the time approved seven removals. Seven replacement trees were required. Records show this was completed in October of 2020. The current City Arborist visited the site again on July 12, 2023 to follow-up on allegations from the appeal. Four young laurel trees and four young redwood trees are observed to be growing. (Exhibit F) These specimens coincide with the replacement planting timeline. It appears that eight of the required thirteen trees remained, and those that many of the remaining specimens were in poor health, form and vigor due to lack of irrigation. Additionally noted is evidence that over thirty potentially protected trees and over forty non -protected trees had been previously removed from the property (Exhibits G & H). At least three of these trees appeared to have been tree failures. Three significant oak trees remain on the parcel. Redwood The redwood tree grows upon a hillside in a created planter bordered by a retaining wall. The specimen is also growing adjacent to other hardscape features of a cement pathway and pond. Cracking, heaving, and bowing are evident in all of these areas. The redwood has overgrown its intended planting location. Root pruning is not a viable solution to prevent further damage to the immediate hardscape. This is due to the path's proximity to the tree's trunk (Exhibit 1). In addition, redwood trees have a significantly expansive root system and become stressed during drought. The applicant has provided the necessary data to support removing and replacing redwood tree per Burlingame's Municipal Code Chapter 11.06.060 criteria. The City Arborist viewed the tree in question and confirmed the existence of site conditions conducive to replacement. If this site were subject to development or construction, the present number of trees existing would meet the minimum requirement for a building permit. EXHIBITS (A) Independent Arborist Report (B) City Arborist Removal Approval Letter (C) Appeal Protesting the Removal of Redwood Tree (D) February 2019 Tree Removal Application (E) May 2019 Tree Removal Application (F) Photos of Previous Replacement Trees (G) Photos of Present Site Conditions (H) Google Streetview of Changing Site Conditions 2018-2022 (1) Photos of Redwood Tree 2 EXHIBIT A KIELTY ARBORISTS SERVICES LLC Certified Arborist WE#10724A TRAQ Qualified P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650- 532-4418 June 16th, 2023 Sherman Chiu 1385 Hillside Cir Burlingame, CA 94010 Subject: Tree Removal Request - 1385 Hillside Cir Dear Mr Chiu, After conducting a thorough assessment of the trees located at 1385 Hillside Cir, Burlingame, CA, on May 17th, 2023, Kielty Arborists Services recommends the removal of the following trees in accordance with the city regulations and for the reasons stated: Discussion of Species: Tree #6: Redwood Trunk Diameter: 31.6 Health Rating: Fair to poor Structural Rating: Fair Form Rating: Poor Overall Condition: 50% Reason for Removal: The redwood tree exhibits fair to poor vigor, fair structure, and poor form. It is currently experiencing drought stress, with the top of the tree showing signs of decline. Additionally, the tree is slightly leaning towards the street and may be due to limited soil volume caused by a retaining wall and the past winter's strong wind events. Lack of irrigation further adds to the tree's stress and compromised health. Redwood trees are native in mountain areas where precipitation from the incoming moisture off the ocean is high. In their natural habitat they get 5 0- 100 inches of rain annually, including fog, which cools the tree tops. A mature redwood tree is capable of using up to 500 gallons of water in one day. Here in Burlingame (oak woodland habitat) the annual rainfall is significantly lower than the native range of the species, so supplemental irrigation is a must for the species to survive. The recent water cutbacks by the governor reducing water use by 25% in urban areas has pushed redwood trees in the area to extreme drought stress. The tops of mature redwood trees around town, as well as overall vigor are looking poor, and is likely due to the trees being outside of their native range, and being grown in drought like conditions for the species. Tops of redwood trees often die in this area due to drought stress related issues, resulting in new epicormic growth that eventually creates multiple new trunks (or tops). Redwood trees also have large surface roots than can generate a lot of force. Their insatiable appetite for water, particularly from fog drip, has resulted in redwoods developing a shallow and very extensive lateral root system which can extend 100 feet from the trunk of a mature specimen. The root system often causes problems with foundations of nearby buildings and underground utilities. For this reason redwood trees are generally recommended to be planted at least 50 feet from any existing structure where their roots will eventually cause problems. The Soil Science and Management book by Edward J. Plaster states that roots can exert up to 150 pounds per square inch of pressure when growing into a crack in rock. In this same fashion roots can exert their pressure into home foundations and surrounding hardscapes causing significant damage to any home or hardscape in close proximity to large tree roots. Photos showing redwood tree 2 Tree #19: Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) Trunk Diameter: 28 inches Health Rating: Fair Structural Rating: Poor Overall Condition: 30% Reason for Removal: The coast live oak tree demonstrates fair vigor, poor structure, and poor form. It leans towards the street and has been previously topped, resulting in hazardous growing conditions. Its location, across the street from a school, poses a potential risk as children frequently walk below the tree. Based on our evaluation, the removal of these trees is necessary to ensure the safety of the property and surrounding areas. We understand the value of trees and their contribution to the environment. Therefore, we recommend replacing the removed trees with species that are better suited to the site conditions and are resistant to the prevailing stress factors. This will help maintain the aesthetic appeal of the property while ensuring a healthier and safer landscape. If you have any further questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. We are here to assist you and provide the necessary guidance throughout the process. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, L66tri-jL8a-96m David Beckham Certified Arborist WE#10724A TRAQ Qualified 3 KI TY A"RIM SERVICES LLC Certified Arborist WE#10724A TRAQ Qualified ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other government regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. 5. Loss, alteration, or reproduction of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply a right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser. 7. Neither all nor any part of this report, nor any copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser particularly as to value conclusions, the identity of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any professional society or initialed designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualification. 8. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consult/appraiser, and the consult/appraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 11 9. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. 10. Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like a medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist's services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, landlord -tenant matters, etc. Arborists cannot take such issues into account unless complete and accurate information is given to the arborist. The person hiring the arborist accepts full responsibility for authorizing the recommended treatment or remedial measures. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled To live near a tree is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks is to eliminate all trees. Arborist: �66W_W (%, ff-k lGtIM David Beckham Date: June 16th, 2023 EXHIBIT B City of Burlingame BURLINGAME Parks & Recreation Department 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 phone: (650) 558-7330 • parksadminkburlin-a�g June 23, 2023 Jenny Ngo 1385 Hillside Cir. Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: Private Tree Removal Application -1385 Hillside Circle The application for removal of (1) Coast Redwood tree and (1) Cost Live Oak tree has been reviewed and approved. The Redwood tree has grown in confined space and is significantly affecting the surrounding hardscape. Gaps and buckling are evident in the surrounding pathways, pond and retaining wall. The arborist report provided, notes a lean that may be due to confined space and/or storm events experienced in Winter 2023. The Coast Live Oak is growing in a confined space on a hillside and has developed a significant lean over a public street. The arborist report provided makes notation of the poor form and structure of this tree. There is evidence of poor pruning practices on this tree. Therefore, I am approving removal of these trees based on the criteria in Chapter 11.06 of the Municipal Code, Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance, section 11.06.060 which allows removal for the following reasons: (d) (1) the condition of the tree with respect to the proximity to existing or proposed structures, yards, driveway and other trees... and, (d)(7) the economic consequences and obligations of requiring a tree to remain. Replacement with TWO 24-inch box standard size single stem landscape trees (no fruit, nut, Japanese Maple, Palm, or Italian Cypress) will be required to be planted anywhere on the private property as defined in Section 11.06.090. Replacement trees must have a mature height of over 15 feet. Adjacent property owner(s) within 100 feet of the property listed above are also receiving notification of this decision. Appeals to this decision or any of its conditions or findings, must be filed in writing to our office by, July 10, 2023 as provided in Section 11.06.080 of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). The permit will be issued at the end of the workday on July 10, 2023, if no appeal has been received by that date. Sincerely, -Rlc 1 o rd 44 o l+L (vf) Richard Holtz Park Supervisor Certified Arborist WE-8393AM RH/vf CC: Adjacent Property Owners EXHIBIT C PARKS/REC-Veronica Flores From: Marco Romani <romani.marco@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 9:18 PM To: Parks Admin Subject: 1385 Hillside Circle Private tree removal letter dated June 23 2023 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged You don't often get email from romani.marco@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Dear Mr. Holtz, I am writing regarding a letter received stating 2 trees at 1385 Hillside Circle are going to be removed. A few questions / comments 1) 1 only see one redwood remaining on that property. I do not an see anything wrong with the redwood tree or the surrounding walkways etc. I would like a bit more explanation on why that tree is being removed. It does look like a redwood was moved from the front of the property since the the ownership change. I do not recall being informed of that tree removal permit being granted and believe that tree was removed illegally. 2) This lot used to have many trees on it and when it changed ownership was nearly clear cut without city permission. After a quick walk thru of the property today I quickly counted more than 15 stumps. The property changed ownership in late 2018 and by the summer of 2019 was nearly clearcut. According to https://Iibrarv.acode.us/lib/burlineame ca/pub/municipal code/item/title 11-chapter 11 06-11 06 090 section 2.b.2 states "Any tree removed without a valid permit shall be replaced by two (2) 24-inch box size, or two (2) 36- inch box size landscape trees for each tree so removed as determined below." No trees have been replaced since 2019. What is the time period for tree replacement? 3) The referenced letter is not clear on which coastal oak on the property is to removed. Is it the one in the front of the house along Hillside Circle? If so that one also looks perfectly fine. 4) In summary I do not agree to the removal of the Redwood and depending on which oak tree I am appealing the permit to cut those two trees. But definitely applealing the removal of the redwood and would like to know the status the replacement for the trees cut 4 years ago. fop N, Alp Sincerely, Marco Romani 1381 Hillside Circle 415.412.9203 This email is from an external source. Please take caution when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, contact your IT Department EXHIBIT D PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL �URL� PERMIT APPLICATION k. g Parks and Recreation Department ;- 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 (650) SS8-7330 Date: 12 — Zy (� The undersigned owner of the property at: Address: ( 3 F '3- t r LS t`4, hereby applies for a permit to remove or prune more than 1/3 of the canopy of the following protected tree(s): 3-i{ Specie: Circume: L) w H6 W &I r l Location on Property oo 4 <, �- \ I A,,1- - Work to be Performed: Removal Reason Work is Necessary: Trim More Than 113 of the Crown i Is this Tree Removal Request Part of a Building Project? YES. Note: A photograph of the tree(s) and a schematic drawing of the location of the tree(s) on the property must be submitted along with a $75.00 payment to: City of Burlingame. Additional documentation maybe required to support removal. Attach any documentation you may have. (Example: Report from an Independent Arborist, pictures of damaged structures, letters of concern from neighbors, etc). OWNER (Print) _ S %� e w& a ti C PHONE ADDRESS (� �"' �� S I d 0 C 1 r EMAIL C P r�.O*.f0 k4 (If different from above) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERMIT — OFFICE ' � E �'� Payment RecZ'��ayment Method Z� 1 This permit allows the applicant to remove or prune the above listed tree(s) in accordance with the provisions of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). By signing this permit, the applicant acknowledges receipt of a copy of Chapter 11.06, and agrees to comply with its provisions and all conditions listed below; and that all appeals have expired or been resolved. 75, OWNER SIGNATURE Pig CITY ARBORIST �c=, , - CONDITIONS: 24 - inch box size standard single stem landscape tree(s) (no fruit or nut (� trees) will be required and may be planted anywhere on the property. If conditions are not met within the allotted time as specified in Chapter 11.06.090.(b)(5), payment of $1,200.00 for each tree into the tree replacement fund will be required. NO replacement(s) required. Contact the Parks Division at (650) 558-7330 when removal(s) are completed. BUILDING PROJECT: Permit ineffective until after Building Commission review and approval. DATE PERMIT EFFECTIVE i t PERMIT EXPIRES C1 ` I DATE COMPLETED This work should be done by qualified tree professionals and a copy of this permit must be available at the job site at all times when work is being performed. 6/2o18revised City of Burlingame Parks & Recreation Department e,J4M '1 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 sURLINGAME phone: (650) 558-7330 • fax: (650) 696-7216 borba burlin ame.org February 27, 2019�� Sherman Chiu 1385 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Sherman, I reviewed your request for the removal of four (4) Oak trees and one (1) Acacia tree at 1385 Hillside Circle and based on the information you have provided, I have made the following determination: All four Oak trees have poor structure, excessive end weight, co -dominant leaders and have poor form. These trees have not been properly maintained and are now a hazard in their current condition. The Acacia tree also has poor form and is typically approved for removal because they are susceptible to whole tree failure, limb failure and characteristically have poor structure. Therefore, I intend to issue a permit for the removal of the four (4) Oak trees and one (1) Acacia tree. The trees are subject to the provisions of the Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 11.06.060(d)(1). (1) The condition of the tree(s) with respect to disease, danger of falling; proximity to existing or proposed structures, yards, driveways and other trees; and interference with public services; Replacement with 6 —24" box standard single stem size landscape tree(s) (no fruit or nut) will be required to be planted anywhere on the private property as defined in Section 11.06.090. If you agree with the conditions, please sign the enclosed permit and return in the self-addressed envelope BEFORE March 13, 2019. Adjacent property owner(s) at the address(s) listed below are also receiving notification of this decision. Appeals to this decision or ally of its conditions or findings, must be filed in writingto our office by March 13, 2019 as provided in Section 11.06.080 of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). The permit will be issued after March 13, 2019, if no appeal has been received by that date. Sincerely, Bob Disco Park Superintendent/City Arborist Certified Arborist WE-6891A ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor BD/gb Enclosure Property Owner 2804 Easton Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Property Owner 2812 Easton Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Property Owner Property Owner 1387 Hillside Circle 1388 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner 1281 Hillside Circle 1384 Hillside Circle 1386 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Kielty Arborist Services LLC Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-515-9783 January 31, 2019 Attn: Jenny Ngo 1385 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA Site: 1385 Hillside Circle, Burlingame, CA Dear Ms. Ngo, As requested on Tuesday, January 22, 2019, I visited the above site to inspect and comment on several trees. The site has not been maintained for some time and the future health and safety of the trees has prompted this visit. Method: All inspections were made from the ground; the trees were not climbed for this inspection. The trees in question were located on a hand drawn map provided by me. The tree was then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). A condition rating (CON) is provided using 50 percent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Poor 50 - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the trees were measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was paced off (HT/SP). Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. Oak tree #lwith a heavy lean over the street below. 1385 Hillside Cir/1/31/19 (2) Observations: The first tree in question is a coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) with a diameter at breast height of 27.1 inches. The tree is located in the rear of the property near Easton drive. The estimated height of the tree is 40 feet with a total crown spread of 45 feet. The vigor of the oak is fair with normal shoot growth for the species. The form of the tree is poor with heavy lean over Easton drive. The location of the oak is poor with the tree being close to a rock retaining wall which is being damaged by the trees roots. The tree receives a condition rating of 45 on a 1-100 scale (poor). ,the second tree in question is a coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) with a diameter at breast heights of 16.9 and 14.8 inches. The tree is located in the rear of the property near Easton drive. The estimated height of the tree is 35 feet with a total crown spread of 45 feet. The vigor of the oak is fair with normal shoot growth for the species. The form of the tree is poor with codominant leaders at the base and a heavy lean over Easton drive. The location of the oak is poor with the tree being close to a rock retaining wall which is being damaged by the trees roots. The tree receives a condition rating of 40 on a 1-100 scale (poor). Tree#2 with a heavy lean over the lower road. The third tree in question is a coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) with a diameter at breast height of 17.3 inches. The tree is located in the rear of the property near Easton drive. The estimated height of the tree is 35 feet with a total crown spread of 50 feet. The vigor of the oak is fair with normal shoot growth for the species. The form of the tree is poor with heavy lean over tree #2. The location of the oak is poor with the tree being close to a rock retaining wall which is being damaged by the trees roots. The tree receives a condition rating of 40 on a 1-100 scale (poor). Tree #3 leaning heavily over tree #2. 1385 Hillside Cir/1/31/19 (3) Fri x � a The Fourth tree in question is a coast live oak f§ (Quercus agrifolia) with a diameter at breast ` height of 50 inches. The tree is located at the rear ` g _ southern corner of the home. The estimated height " of the tree is 55 feet with a total crown spread of f 45 feet. The vigor of the oak is poor air with less ' f than normal shoot growth for the species. The Pform of the tree is poor with large limb removal having taken place in the past. The location of the oak is very poor with the tree undermining the home and the rear corner of the house resting on the trunk. The tree receives a condition rating of ° 25 on a 1-100 scale (very poor). If N "'AJ ` a� Tree #4 with the home on top of the trunk. The expanding trunk is destroying the home. ; I ZWO fifth tree is a black acacia (Acacia melanoxylon) a diameter at breast height of 21.9 inches. The is located behind the garage on the edge of a rung wall. The estimated height of the tree is 50 with a total crown spread of 40 feet. The vigor of acacia is good with normal shoot growth for the ies. The form of the tree is poor with a heavy to the northeast over the garage structure. Roots e tree are destroying the retaining watt. Ia ##5 is destroying the retaining wall. 1385 Hillside Cir/1/31/19 (4) Summary: The five trees in question all have poor form and are quite hazardous. The roots of the trees are destroying the retaining walls that run throughout the property. Oak tree #4 is currently destroying the southern corner of the house. Remove and replace the four oaks and one acacia as trimming the tree within ANSI standards or Best management practices will not improve the trees poor form or lessen the chances of failure making the trees an immediate hazard. Replace the trees with native oaks (coast live or valley oak.a Chinese pistache, red oak or red maple. Removal of the five. trees is the only method that eliminates all hazards and liabilities associated with the trees. The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476A EXHIBIT E L�2� [SD PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL BU .LINGAME PERMIT APPLICATION Parks and Recreation Department 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 n. (650) 558-7330 Date: The undersigned owner of the property at: Address: �� lf,5 "ty , f -� �1�4t�� hereby applies for a permit to remove or prune more n.1/3 of the canopy of the following protected tree(s): p �-� t 5 $�� 'k� ' )aVS Specie/v S G1 ` Circumference: 1 1 �� l Location on Property �} tL �C e? Work to be Performed: Removal Y Trim More Than 1/3 of Reason Work is Necessary: Is this Tree Removal Request Part of a Building Project? YES NO Note: A photograph of the tree(s) and a schematic drawing of the location of the tree(s) on the property must be submitted along with a $75.00 payment to: City of Burlingame. Additional documentation maybe required to support removal. Attach any documentation you may have. (Example: Report from an Independent Arborist, pictures of darrglaged structures, letters of concern from neighbors, etc). y OWNER (Print) _ �,i t�'1 , PHONE iS -A 77 -/ / ADDRESS EMAILShU Al a b b c t► ,(, CO rn (If different from above) PERMIT - OFFICE Payment Rec. Payment Method This permit allows the applicant to remove or prune the above listed tree(s) in accordance with the provisions of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). By signing this permit, the applicant acknowledges receipt of a opy of Chapter 11.06, and agrees to comply with its provisions and all conditions l' ¢ below; and t ' all appeals have expired or been resolved / OWNER SIGNAT_U CITY ARBORIST CONDITIONS: �l 24 - inch box size standard single stem landscape tree(s) (no fruit or nut trees) will be required and may be planted anywhere on the property. If conditions are not met within the allotted time as specified in Chapter 11.06.090.(b)(5), payment of $1,200. 00for each tree into the tree replacement fund will be required. NO replacement(s) required Contact the Parks Division at (650) 558-7330 when removal(s) are completed. BUILDING PROJECT. Permit ineffective until after Building Commission review and approval. DATE PERMIT EFFECTIVE l „ -3 : t 01 PERMIT EXPIRES DATE COMPLETED This work should be done by qualified tree professionals and a copy of this permit must be available at the job site at all times when work is being performed 612018revised Kielty Arborist Services LLC Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-515-9783 April 24, 2019 Attn: Jenny Ngo 1385 Hillside Circle, Burlingame CA Site: 1385 Hillside Circle, Burlingame, CA Dear Ms. Ngo, As requested on Tuesday, April 23, 2019, I visited the above site to inspect and comment on the trees. The site has not been maintained for some time and the future health and safety of the trees has prompted this visit. A tree protection plan will be included for any trees to be retained. Method: All inspections were made from the ground; the trees were not climbed for this inspection. The trees in question were located on a hand drawn map provided by me. The tree was then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). A condition rating (CON) is provided using 50 percent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Poor 50 - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the trees were measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was paced off (HT/SP). Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. Oak tree #4 with poor vigor and poor form, the buried root crown is the probable cause of the decline of the tree. 1385 Hillside Cir/4/24/19 (2) City of Burlingame Parks & Recreation Department 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 EuRLMGAME phone: (650) 558-7330 • fax: (650) 696-7216 borba ct,burlingame.org June 20, 2019 Sherman Chiu 1385 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Sherman, I reviewed your request for the removal of one (1) Monterey Pine tree #2, one (1) Black Acacia tree #3, six (6) Coast Live Oaktrees #1, #4, #5, #6, #13, #14 and two (2) Bay Laurel trees #7, #10 at 1385 Hillside Circle and based on the information you have provided, I have made the following determination: The following trees have been denied for removal. Three (3) Oak trees #1, #13, #14. Tree #1 can have the weight removed over the drive way and structurally trimmed; Trees #13 and #14 can be trimmed, deadwood removed and irrigated to increase the vigor and improve the trees structure. The Monterey Pine tree shows signs of disease; the Black Acacia has poor structure and is susceptible to limb drop; the Coast Live Oaks #4, #5, #6 all have poor vigor and structure; and the Bay Laurels have poor structure and transmit Sudden Oak Death to the surrounding Oak trees. Therefore, I intend to issue a permit for the removal of 1) Monterey Pine tree #2, one (1) Black Acacia tree #3, three (3) Coast Live Oak trees #4, #5, #6, and two (2) Bay Laurel trees #7, #10. The trees are subject to the provisions of the Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 11.06.060(d)(1). (1) The condition of the tree(s) with respect to disease, danger of falling; proximity to existing or proposed structures, yards, driveways and other trees; and interference with public services; Replacement with seven 24-inch box standard size single stem landscape trees (no fruit or nut) will be required to be planted anywhere on the private property as defined in Section 11.06.090. If you agree with the conditions, please sign the enclosed permit and return in the self- addressed envelope BEFOREJuly 3, 2019. Adjacent property owner(s) at the address(s) listed below are also receiving notification of this decision. Appeals to this decision or any of its conditions or findings, must be filed in writing to our office by July 3, 2019 as provided in Section 11.06.080 of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). The permit will be issued after July 3, 2019, if no appeal has been received by that date. Sincerely, \ Bob Disco Park Superintendent/City Arborist Certified Arborist WE-6891A ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor BD/gb Enclosure CC: Property Owner 1301 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Property Owner 1384 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Property Owner Property Owner 2804 Easton Drive 2812 Easton Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner 1386 Hillside Circle 1387 Hillside Circle 1388 Hillside Circle Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 EXHIBIT F } r' _ r • ..�. ��4� µme, -. _ r#. mill, - - f �iJh4x50 n.. � . ✓�� - . . .. �ti.t•��r��;��i-1�1�:1�'�rJ�Ll�IC: �.�ti��,1. .fir �. 5J#.Y.'. ^ .. .. . 4 EXHIBIT G I kk "T f �' '� =JOB � • � '` f _ � - �. r �Ty'� �xt� r tea• "��le t4' • .1 � x � x pk41 tl � .Yn1lRl Nw1010 ApeM Fl20L "1¢r M15 Js, lOK Ap All A,11�iVC aK'1eq'' f ,LRi 1 v1A, Ar 1, a r r- 1 '1 - tl ■ Arn]4,Y ,brio Aa » row Ap ao,s 1-1— Ap zo>> p s • GaNe SbMY4x MwiRO A�tlMgbN View from Easton Dr. November 2020 View from Hillside Circle February 2018 xw Ap r�xeu Ap xms � xola Ap.xmi Av xooe t�ae ewsia.ar p io ! 6 9 a Rat y Iv Iry OEM �Iyfp 10}S Nw 16x0 Apr 3019 FMZO10 Apr- 1-4 Ap xOtl APr 1000 View from Hillside Circle August 2022 M 4■P-1121 .�