Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - TSP - 2021.09.091 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Approved Minutes Regular Meeting of Thursday, September 9, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Israelit, Martos, Rebelos, Wettan MEMBERS ABSENT: Leigh 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) August 12, 2021 Meeting Minutes (To be Approved at the October 14, 2021 Meeting) 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA Ms. Rosales stated she sent a note to Chair Wettan a few weeks back and has been in communication with Lilliana Cifuentes in Public Works regarding how in the span of less than two years, the curb ramps at Adeline and Cortez would have been replaced twice now. She said she suspects this might be the case at other locations as well. Ms. Rosales indicated that she received information from an Associate Engineer that one curb ramp was replaced in 2011 and the others were not replaced for approximately 15 years. She stated it was strange that on October 15, 2019, three ramps were redone and those same ramps were just replaced a few months ago. Although Ms. Rosales acknowledged there may be a good reason for this, she explained she was not satisfied with the response from the Department of Public Works and would like a more compelling explanation. She specifically requested the TSPC’s time and attention to this matter, especially how we are spending City funds. Manito Velasco stated he missed the last B/PAC and TSPC meetings in August when the California Drive project alternative was discussed. He stated he has serious concerns from a driver’s perspective and would like to have it documented. Mr. Velasco inquired about the best way to provide his comments regarding the alternative that has appeared to be chosen. 2 Without addressing the substance of Mr. Velasco’s comment, Chair Wettan suggested that Mr. Velasco write a thoughtful email containing his points. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS a) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only) B/PAC Chair Leslie Beatty stated after their meeting last month about the California Drive project between Broadway and Oak Grove, they compiled their feedback and sent it in writing to the City. She said they would be happy to share that feedback with the TSPC as well. Ms. Beatty explained that the City asked them to think about temporary, interim solutions for the transition on California Drive from San Mateo into Burlingame where there are now bike lanes in San Mateo that end at Peninsula Avenue. While we wait to get our own bike lanes, Ms. Beatty said they asked for a pilot striped bike line, which she then indicated did not sound possible. Additionally, she stated they asked for advanced pedestrian and bicyclist light timing at that intersection. Lastly, Ms. Beatty shared that the City is starting to work on the bike boulevards, specifically at Carmelita, Paloma, Capuchino, and Grove, and they were able to meet with the consultant this evening. She said it will become a big topic of conversation as to what the features of the bike boulevards will be from a traffic calming standpoint and how they handle intersections for streets we are trying to prioritize. Ms. Beatty indicated that Carmelita seems as though it will be a tough one based on conversations. Chair Wettan stated he would like Ms. Beatty to forward the consolidated comments about California Drive to him. He also asked Ms. Beatty to clarify why they think Carmelita will be a tough bike boulevard location. She explained that it seems with parking restrictions and the huge current flow of traffic, it will be hard to implement significant traffic calming measures to meet what she believes would be the standard of neighborhood bike boulevards. Commissioner Rebelos stated he feels very strongly about the stretch of Carmelita east of El Camino Real. He said he thinks that parking restrictions and the “business bypass of Broadway”, would not exist if it was not a multi-family housing stretch of road. Commissioner Rebelos said ironically, the road also leads directly to the Caltrain Station and the intersection of Carmelita and California Drive where bike lanes are supposed to convene south of Broadway. He stated if we are going to talk about a true bicycle highway, this is the road to do it. Additionally, Commissioner Rebelos stated the road also leads to Broadway and BIS. He went on to explain he is befuddled there appears to be a car first policy on this road. Commissioner Rebelos made it clear he does not want to be disrespectful to past history or politics of Burlingame but looking forward, he said he cannot imagine a better road in Burlingame to turn into a bicycle and pedestrian first road. 3 b) All-Way Stop Discussion at Trousdale Drive/Loyola Drive Mr. Wong provided a history of proposed stop signs along Trousdale Drive. At the March 13, 2014 TSPC meeting, he said staff proposed adding stop signs on Trousdale Drive at Toledo Avenue, Loyola Drive, Ogden Drive, and Marco Polo Way. Mr. Wong explained that at that time, the TSPC supported the addition of stop signs only at Ogden Drive and Marco Polo Way to improve right-of-way assignment at both intersections. The TSPC did not support stop signs at Loyola Drive and Toledo Drive based on public comment at the time and lack of collision history related to both intersections. Mr. Wong stated that staff recently received a request for a stop sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive due to concerns associated with accessing and exiting Loyola Drive during the morning and afternoon rush hours, as well as school drop-off and pick-up times. Additionally, Mr. Wong shared this area is primary residential with no new major development—it is build out. He said although they will need to run current warrants at this intersection, he said he reviewed the collision history from the past three years and there have been no recorded collisions at this location. Chair Wettan opened public comment. Silvia Mak said she appreciated the second consideration for a stop sign at this location, as she was not aware this was considered previously. She stated they often try to turn from Loyola to Trousdale (downhill) and it is very difficult, especially during the rush hour times. She said it also gets confusing because there is a stop sign for those traveling up Trousdale Drive. Ms. Mak said the other thing that makes it complex is the curved road, which makes visibility difficult from the stop sign until you pull out which puts you into the road. She reiterated that it is dangerous during rush hour periods and she tries to avoid that particular intersection at certain times of the day. Manito Velasco stated he also has difficulty at this location. He said it is hard to figure out who is going to stop and who is not. As a pedestrian trying to cross, Mr. Velasco indicated it’s even more hairy so he shares the concern with Trousdale Drive. He went on to explain the road is dangerous and referred to it as “I-380 Jr.” Mr. Velasco stated he has talked to Mr. Wong and possibly the TSPC in the past pertaining to the speed limit on Trousdale Drive as he felt it is not well set. He shared that in 2014, the City decided to keep the 35 MPH speed limit even though 30 MPH could have been justified. Mr. Velasco said he thinks speed limit should be 30 MPH and closer to Franklin, Mills Hospital, Red Cross, the shopping center, and care facilities, should be 25 MPH as there is no reason for the 35 MPH speed limit. He indicated he is hoping as part of the outcome of this discussion, there is serious consideration to reset the speed limit to be in more aligned with the neighborhood and for safety. Mr. Terry stated he lives three houses down from said intersection and is very familiar with the area. He stated he agrees with the person that submitted the request, particularly 4 because of the road curvature. He said it is a problem when you are trying to go left from Loyola Drive to east Trousdale—there is very poor visibility for oncoming traffic. Mr. Terry said his observation is when traffic is going the speed limit, there is barely enough to make it out into the intersection, but quite often people exceed the speed limit, which makes it very challenging, especially during rush hour. He said people frequently have to pull out well into the road, blocking west bound traffic, to see what is coming. Additionally, Mr. Terry said coming down from east Trousdale, he often finds people do not see the stop sign. He indicated he is highly in favor of adding the stop sign. Mr. Terry stated that anecdotally, he has not observed any accidents but they hear screeching and honking regularly, which implies there are issues with people understanding and navigating that intersection. He stated again he is supportive of a stop sign at Loyola Drive. Richard Chiu indicated that he also lives in the area of Trousdale and Loyola Drive and wanted to formally oppose the proposed stop sign installation. He stated this is a t- intersection and based on his observations over the last ten plus years, there is not an issue here in regards to collisions. Mr. Chiu said stop signs require certain warrants to be met and there is a reason for that—it is important that certain criteria is met. Mr. Chiu stated he heard there has not been any change to the area since the last discussion seven years ago. Furthermore, Mr. Chiu said he heard comments about speed and difficulty getting out but shared that is not what the purpose of stop signs are for. He closed his comments by stating stop sign installations should not be based on a popularity contest— that is why the state has certain criteria set in order to install stop signs. The Commission Secretary read the following emails received for public comment. To the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission: I strongly support the addition of a stop sign on the uncontrolled approach of Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive. Lack of a stop sign has resulted in a hazardous intersection and traffic congestion as drivers attempt to navigate turns. Thank you for addressing this issue and considering this comment. Best wishes, Saeher Muzazffar _______________________________________________________________ Dear Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, I fully support the addition of a stop sign on the uncontrolled approach of Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive because this will improve the safety for our community. Our family have lived at the same address on Loyola here in Burlingame since 2014 and have three daughters that attend both Franklin Elementary and Burlingame Intermediate School. Over the last seven years walking to and from school as well as driving to and from work using this intersection has become 5 increasingly dangerous. We have observed an increase in the speeds of vehicles on Trousdale and more confusion for those at the uncontrolled approach at Trousdale Drive and Loyola Drive, and observed several near vehicle vs vehicle and pedestrian versus vehicle near misses that could have resulted in injury/harm. By improving the visibility and addition of a stop sign at this intersection, the vehicle speeds will be reduced, and drivers will be more controlled and aware at this intersection. In my opinion, the elegance behind this simple action will likely decrease the possibility of harm to pedestrian traffic and also decrease the potential for preventable collisions by vehicles along Trousdale. I would be happy and delighted to see a proactive public safety action such as this intersection, so please add a stop sign at Trousdale and Loyola. Thank you, Robert Ardrey ________________________________________________________________ Lina Leung wrote: We do not need any more stop signs along Trousdale. The sound pollution as it is, is horrible enough. All of that stop and go will not help. ________________________________________________________________ To Whom it May Concern, I am against the proposed addition of a stop sign eastbound on Trousdale at Loyola. I believe this will have limited benefit and impede the flow of traffic on Trousdale in the eastbound direction. There are two stop signs to slow traffic within about 100 yards of the proposed sign. Further, the stop sign at Trousdale and Castenada is supported by a crossing guard during school hours and is an appropriate place for pedestrians to cross to access Franklin elementary (not at Loyola where it is strictly residential). Drivers turning left from Loyola onto Trousdale may be the biggest beneficiaries of the proposed stop sign, but they have the benefit of a northbound stop sign on Trousdale, and clear visibility from the eastbound direction on Trousdale to engage in a safe eastbound turn. To summarize, I believe this proposed stop sign is unwarranted. Thanks for listening. Petra Campos ________________________________________________________________ Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, I am a resident of Burlingame and live in the area of the request stop sign. I am writing in opposition of the request to add a stop sign for the eastbound direction at Trousdale Drive and Loyola Drive. The staff report indicates that the Traffic 6 Safety and Parking Commission rejected the proposal in 2014 based on unsatisfied stop sign warrants and lack of collision history for this location. It is my understanding that no recent stop sign warrants analysis has been performed for this intersection and no reportable accidents for the last three years. It appears there is no new information supporting the installation of a stop sign at this location. Adding an unwarranted stop sign on one of Burlingame’s busiest streets, not only is unsafe for the hundreds of drivers going through this intersection each day, it also poses a huge liability for the City. I strongly oppose any consideration of adding a stop sign at this location and hope that the current Traffic Safety and Parking Commission can make the same decision as in 2014 to uphold the safety standards and reject the stop sign request. Regards, Susanna Chan _____________________________________________________________ Dear TSPC, We have lived on Loyola Dr for 33 years. Entering Trousdale going eastbound is always a challenging experience. We have to be cautious of motorists running the westbound stop sign, while also waiting for clear access to enter the eastbound lane. We feel that the eastbound stop sign will assist in a safer condition for all motorists. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Larry and Joanne Barulich 1821 Loyola Drive _____________________________________________________________ Karen Pachmayer wrote: My parents received a letter from the City of Burlingame that there would be a public meeting tonight regarding a possible new stop sign on Trousdale at Loyola (which having lived on Loyola Drive growing up, my family and I would be in full support of one!). Chair Wettan closed the public comment period and opened it up for Commissioner questions before diving into their comments. Vice-Chair Martos inquired about recent stop sign warrants and how long it would take to complete. Mr. Wong indicated now that things are slowly returning to normal, staff could complete traffic counts. Mr. Wong also pointed out that part of the warrant process includes a collision history, to which it appears there have not been any collisions at the intersection in question. Chair Wettan requested that Sergeant Perna pull up the collision tool, which was used for discussion purposes. Sergeant Perna stated the collision history goes back to 2016 and 7 includes bicycle and pedestrian collisions as well. Based on the map tool, he pointed out an accident along the Trousdale corridor at Castenada Drive involving a pedestrian. Commissioner Rebelos inquired about the accuracy of the collision data given some accidents can go unreported for a number of reasons. Sergeant Perna explained Burlingame Police Department is a full service department and they will come out to an accident regardless of injury if they are called—sometimes to just help facilitate an information exchange. With that, he did state that a police report would not be generated in all circumstances. Commissioner Rebelos said there is a well-documented increase in overall vehicle speeds in California since the pandemic. He also noted the intersection of Castenada/Martinez is the next intersection from Loyola and Trousdale Drive. Commissioner Rebelos added he lives on Frontera, which feeds directly into Loyola Drive, and he is very familiar with the intersection being discussed. He said he has sympathy for those that live on Loyola Drive that want to turn on to Trousdale Drive. Commissioner Rebelos wrote down that there were 7 comments in favor of the stop sign, and all 7 of those comments came from people that live on Loyola Drive. He stated there were four people that were against the stop sign of which only one person lived on Loyola Drive. When he thinks of that intersection, he said he also thinks of bicyclists, not just cars, trying to get to eastbound Trousdale to reach destinations such as Burlingame Plaza, Caltrain, or Broadway. He stated there are limited options for the routes one can take. He said a comfortable route potentially could be from Frontera to Loyola to Trousdale. Additionally, Commissioner Rebelos stated people tend to roll through stop signs and there also should not be an assumption everyone is familiar with Trousdale Drive. He pointed out future development plans for Burlingame Plaza and felt there is a lot going on once you cross Quesada. Commissioner Rebelos felt having a stop sign at Loyola for people going eastbound on Trousdale Drive makes a lot of sense as it slows drivers down and prepares them for a narrower road, and the transition to a commercial district with seniors and children. He also said it gives an opportunity for those wanting to commute down the hill by bike or foot to eventually use Trousdale Drive. In summary, he stated he supports a stop sign at the proposed location but also understands the oversight of the state. Commissioner Israelit said she listened to the various public comments and was surprised how many were not in favor of the stop sign. She stated Richard Chui’s comments really resonated with her in that there are many intersections in Burlingame that are difficult to see or tricky to navigate (Hillside) but we cannot put stop signs at every intersection and need to use warrants to justify the means. Commissioner Israelit said they know stop signs do not help reduce speeds. She also said there are other options to cross Trousdale and there is a crossing guard at Castenada during school hours. With no collision history or bike/pedestrian incidents, she said she is against a stop sign at this location. Vice-Chair Martos confirmed with Mr. Wong that the situation really has not changed since this was brought before TSPC in 2014, except we do not have recent warrants. He also confirmed there have been no recorded accidents at the intersection of Loyola and 8 Trousdale Drive. Vice-Chair Martos confirmed with Mr. Wong that the TSPC did not support the stop sign in 2014 as it did not meet warrants and the situation has not changed, except we do not have recent warrants. Vice-Chair Martos also confirmed there were no actual reported collisions at the intersection of Trousdale and Loyola Drive. Additionally, he indicated he spoke to a homeowner on Loyola who also has not seen or heard of any collisions at the intersection in the ten plus years he has lived there. Vice-Chair Martos confirmed with Mr. Wong that the speed limit changes from 35 MPH to 25 MPH near Franklin Elementary. Vice-Chair Martos shared that prior to tonight’s meeting he parked on Loyola Drive facing Trousdale, he pulled up to the intersection, and did not see any issue at all with driver’s turning from either direction on to Loyola Drive. He stated the issue is turning left onto Trousdale from Loyola with cars coming down the hill. Vice-Chair Martos said there is a stop sign at Toledo and pointed out there is no red curbing on Trousdale at Loyola Drive. He said he could perceive that cars could park there and obscure the vision even more, which would make it difficult for drivers. Vice-Chair Martos stated he is not in favor of putting in a stop sign without the hard facts to justify it and be consistent, but what said he would like to see is red curbing to help with visibility and does not think it would impact the homeowner given the front door faces Loyola Drive. He also stated he would like to consider the speed limit reduction once you hit the stop sign at Toledo which in theory would give driver’s more time to see the cars coming down the hill. Vice-Chair Martos then asked Mr. Wong for additional suggestions to improve visibility for drivers. Mr. Wong stated that red curbing is an excellent suggestion to enhance safety. He stated additional signage may assist people unfamiliar in the area. In terms of a speed limit reduction, Mr. Wong indicated a speed survey would have to be completed in order to make the speed limit enforceable by the police department. Mr. Wong also explained that now is not the ideal time to conduct a speed survey since speeds are up. Based on the process, he said the City may be required to round up the speed limit as they were required to do the last time. Nonetheless, Mr. Wong said staff would go out to the area with radar guns. Sergeant Perna stated he reviewed all the collisions along the Trousdale corridor. He said those collisions included a vehicle striking a parked car in 2016 close to said intersection, the second one was a rear-end collision in 2019 which occurred 600 feet west of Loyola Drive, and the last one in 2017 was a hit-and-run rear-end collision near the intersection. Chair Wettan stated he strongly disagrees with the idea of automated decision making. He said he thinks warrants are important guidance by using certain indicators to look for, but at the end of the day we should be responsible for our own judgements—not rules written for an entire state with endless possibilities for different intersections. With that said, Chair Wettan indicated he does not agree with putting a stop sign in at this juncture. He said he thinks improving visibility at intersections, particularly at curved roads, is always a good idea and liked Vice-Chair Martos’ suggestion for red curbing. Chair Wettan said the speed suggestion is very good and Vice-Chair Martos makes an excellent point regarding lowering the speed limit as you approach the school. He added there could be 9 an unintended consequence for adding a stop sign that could create a greater risk. The Commission continued to discuss and clarify their points before generating the following motion. Motion: Move to recommend the stop sign at Trousdale and Loyola. MSC; Rebelos/Wettan, 1/3/1 The above motion failed, and as a result, a second motion was made. Motion: Move that the City studies the consideration of red curbing along the intersection at Loyola and Trousdale to improve visibility, as well as considering studying decreasing the speed limit eastbound beginning at the stop sign at Toledo Avenue at Trousdale. MSC; Israelit/Wettan, 4/0/1 c) Burlingame Intermediate School Walking Audit Transportation Program Manager Lisha Mai provided an informational presentation regarding the recent Burlingame Intermediate School (BIS) Walking Audit. She explained the walking audit is a school safety assessment which gathers data on environmental conditions that impact walking and biking to school. Ms. Mai said the objective of the BIS assessment was to identify existing conditions that help or hinder safe walking and biking in the vicinity of the school, and to develop recommendations for transportation infrastructure and policy improvements based on observations made. Ms. Mai thanked the School District for leading the assessment efforts prior to diving into the details. She shared the assessment was conducted on May 25, 2021 and participants included BIS, the BIS School Safety Committee, Parisi Transportation Consulting, the Community Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (B/PAC), the TSPC School Traffic Sub-Committee, and City of Burlingame staff. Ms. Mai stated that observations were made during the afternoon pick-up period and participants watched the behavior/movements of drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians at important key locations such as Quesada Way, Clarice Lane, Davis Drive, Ray Drive, Devereux Drive, and Marco Polo. She then went over the findings as summarized below. On Quesada Way, vehicles were observed to be parked in a lot of the red zones fronting the school site. At the existing bike cage, the report noted it was over capacity during school hours. In the morning, as bicyclists ride up Quesada, there are conflicts between bikes turning left towards the bike cage and drivers going south on Quesada Way. In front of the school driveways, drivers were queuing up at the pickup time and vehicles were spilling into the roadway blocking crosswalks and restricting visibility. Site distance is a concern at Quesada and Clarice. At the intersection of Quesada and Clarice Lane, there 10 are two crosswalks with only one crossing guard. At the same intersection, conflicts were observed between drivers and large volumes of students exiting the school by foot or bike. As they walked on Quesada towards Davis Drive, there were pedestrians observed walking into roadway due to the narrow sidewalk that was overcrowded due to students buying ice cream from an ice cream truck that was parked along the curb. At Clarice Lane U-turns were observed in the roadway and used as a secondary drop-off and pickup area. On Davis Drive drivers used this road as secondary vehicular access to El Camino Real. Trousdale Drive provides access for students walking and biking from neighborhoods north of the school. The crosswalks on Ray Drive lack warning signs and the roadway curvature restricts sight distance. At Devereux Drive and Bernal Road, the large curb radii results in a long crossing and vehicles turning the corners fast. Additionally, the crosswalks lack warning signs and it appeared this location is used as an informal morning meeting place for pedestrians and bicyclists before heading to school. Vehicles were also observed parking close to the intersection. As a result of the audit, Ms. Mai went over the recommendations. For a detailed list of recommendations and the exact locations, please refer to the meeting video and/or presentation. • Prohibit parking at intersections by restricting parking minimum 20’ at near-side approaches and minimum 10’ at far-side approaches. • Formalize walk/bike routes to school. • Prepare preferred driving route map to campus to educate and encourage parents to access the school by the preferred routes. • Install wayfinding signage through the neighborhood for their bicycle routes. • Install School Warning Assembly A signage on all streets connecting with Quesada Way, consistent with California MUTCD guidance. Signage should be installed between 500’ – 1,000’ from the school grounds. In closing, Ms. Mai provided information regarding the implementation of the recommended improvements. She stated the short-term improvements were already completed prior to the start of the school year. Ms. Mai indicated the stop sign analysis and crosswalk study have been started. She said temporary bulb outs are being considered as part of upcoming pedestrian improvement projects. Ms. Mai shared that the recommended travel routes in the report are being considered and staff is working with the appropriate parties for drop off and pick up routes, adding loading zones at the school frontage, and roadway access restrictions. Commissioner Israelit stated she and Chair Wettan participated in the walk audit and they worked with the team to come up with some of the recommendations. She said she had a lot of time to go through this and agrees with most of it. However, Commissioner Israelit indicated there were some loose ends that were not tied up such as a site for a second bike cage, and consideration of additional red curbing or widening of sidewalks. She also said the preferred route for school drop off is a concern and suggested that parents won’t 11 go down Quesada to turn right on Davis—they will go straight to the school. Commissioner Israelit said the only way she sees the preferred route working is if there is signage prohibiting drivers to go straight. Similarly, in order to minimize conflicts at Clarice and Quesada, she said they discussed signage saying no left turn onto Clarice during school drop off and pick up. Commissioner Rebelos said he supported Commissioner Israelit’s comments regarding the preferred traffic flow and also suggested physical barriers. He said it is a great plan but it won’t mean anything unless someone is somehow enforcing it. Vice-Chair Martos said it was a lot to digest but something definitely needs to be done. He then inquired about implementation, prioritization, and funding. Ms. Mai stated implementation for short-term quick improvements were completed with the help of Corp Yard staff. She said funding for other improvements, such as curb bulb outs, would be programmed into the upcoming pedestrian improvement plan. Additionally, she shared the City received $200k in MTC grant funding but could also potentially use existing funds to implement improvements as soon as possible. Ms. Mai addressed the preferred route for drivers and stated they would like to digest things a little more as there are some lingering questions pertaining to driver behavior. Chair Wettan said there is typically resistance to implementation of a one-way route, but in his experience, once it’s been done, people are happy with the improved outcome. He said we should be thinking very hard about the one-way flow and agreed regarding the secondary impacts. Additionally, Chair Wettan stated we have been able to overcome route changes with signage and aggressive education. He said drop zones off of Quesada could be helpful. Chair Wettan agreed that an additional bike cage was necessary and suggested we look to the school district and or parents to fund. Chair Wettan said he did not love he speed tables and felt speeding is not the problem as there is too much congestion to go fast. He closed his comments by acknowledging that this matter is more complicated at BIS than at other Burlingame schools. The Commissioners continued to discuss their thoughts on the matter. For more detailed information regarding considerations and recommendations, please see the presentation located in the September agenda packet online. No public comments were received. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a) Engineering Division Reports Mr. Wong provided updates on the following projects • California Drive Bicycle Facility – Staff is reviewing the feedback obtained from the August TSPC meeting. Staff will revise the presentation for City Council for the 12 September 20, 2021 meeting. • Broadway Grade Separation Project – Staff to provide the City Council a project update at an upcoming meeting as the team is still looking at the value engineering options. • Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvements – Project has been awarded to Bay Area Lightworks, Inc. at the City Council meeting on August 16, 2021. Staff is working with the contractor to kick-off project. • Old Bayshore Highway Corridor Study – Design team moving forward towards finalizing the study. Project update, which will include the entire corridor, is scheduled for the October TSPC meeting. • Highland Parking Garage Update – Garage opening is anticipated for late- September 2021. A soft opening occurred today, September 9 and parking is currently free. b) Police Department Reports Sergeant Perna provided the Collision Report and stated there were 19 collisions this reporting period which is up from the last report. He said there were a good number of injury collisions (12). Sergeant Perna pointed out a number of collisions on El Camino Real. He said there were four or five accidents where a motorist hit an object. For the railroad collision, he said he does not have details because it was handled by the Sherriff’s Office for Caltrain. Commissioner Israelit inquired about the collision near Carolan and Cadillac Way. Sergeant Perna explained it was a three-vehicle rear end accident caused by unsafe speed. Chair Wettan inquired about the collision at California Drive and Oak Grove. Sergeant Perna stated it occurred about 600 feet from the intersection and was due to a vehicle pulling out from a driveway that failed to yield to oncoming traffic. Chair Wettan also asked Sergeant Perna about the various collisions that occurred along El Camino Real. Sergeant Perna stated there was one rear-end collision due to unsafe speed, two red- light violations resulting in collisions, two left-turn yield collisions, and one due to an unsafe turning movement (lane change). c) Farmer’s Market Chair Wettan stated he did not reach out to former Commissioner Londer. He said the Farmer’s Market appears to be picking up and he will take action to secure a space to interact with the public. d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications 13 Commissioner Israelit stated she lives on Columbus and during public comment this evening, Ms. Rosales brought up a concern regarding the frequency in which the curb ramps are replaced and indicated she had several neighbors voice similar concerns. Mr. Wong stated staff would continue to look into this. Chair Wettan confirmed with Mr. Wong that he received an email today regarding a mid- block crosswalk in front of Ray Park. Chair Wettan requested an update via the Engineer’s Report regarding the outcome. Commissioner Rebelos said he did not receive the email being discussed to which Chair Wettan forwarded to him. 8. COMMISSION & SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan) No update, but Chair Wettan stated the City discussed the parklets at an August Council meeting. Mr. Wong clarified that the direction was for the Planning Department to look into a parklet program. b) Broadway Parking/Traffic Issues (Israelit & Leigh) Commissioner Israelit stated they provided a draft of issues to Mr. Wong last month. c) School Traffic (Israelit & Wettan) Chair Wettan indicated that they could be a resource to Ms. Mai related to the walking audit. d) Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Rebelos & Wettan) No update this month. e) Community Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory (Leigh & Rebelos) No update this month. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS • California Drive north of Broadway • Carmelita bike boulevard • Old Bayshore • EV chargers 10. ADJOURNMENT 10:01 p.m.