HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1936.05.25?fr4
thelr respective arrounts.
The Council adJourned. to.o,eet l!{onday, &{ay asth 1956, Et 8:00 P.M.
on motlon by Councllnan Hlgh.
Respeo ys bmltte{.,
Appro &t
J-a
a6
Burllngalne, Oallfornla
May 25, 1956.
A regular meetlng of the Clty CounclL of the Clty of Burllngamcras helcl on the above glven d.ate as pqr aclJournnent of May L8th.
I'he meetlng was callecl together at 8:00 P.M., Mayor Buck ln the
Chalr.
Councllmen Buck, H1Bh, IIlves, Hunt anil Ward answered ro11 call.
Absent : CounclLmen, None.
The read.ing of the mlnutes of May 18th was cllspensed. wlth, each
uember of the Council belng furntshed wtth a copy of sartre.
IY.I[. Med.1ey, Preslclent of the Fire Cornmlsslon, ad.clressed. the
Councll asklng for an lncrease la the personneL of 4 ad.dltlonql
members to tbe fire ilepartment, submitttng clata to Justlfy sucha request..0n motlon by Councllman lllves and second.ed. .by
Councllman High, the Council voted, to go lnto conference wlth theFire Commlssion on May 87th to go over the matter at lssue.
The wldening of Broad.way from the rallroad to the Bayshore was
dlscussed. with property owners anil representatlves consisttng of
Messrs. Dore, Nesbltt anel Stsllery; also a letter was read fron
G,A. Lfon, property owner, favoring the lmprovement and offerlngto clonate a strip of his property for that purpose but folt he
shouldl be free from any assessments levled for the lmprovement..After d.iscusston a motion was offered. .by Councllman fl1ves ancl
seeonilecl by CounclLman Hlgh that the Clty Engineer be tnstructed.to prepare plans and speciflcatlons and submlt approxlmate eost ofthe work, the improvement to lnclude curbs ancl sldewalks as we1L.
Orcllnance No. 295 provldlng for a llcense tax on publlc*ptiIlty
organlzatlons ancl prescrlbing what such llcense shall bd'sglven ltsflrst readlng. A long cllsousslon followed., participated 1n wtth
Messrs. Ilrlght and Cantlen of the Paclflc Telephone and Telegraph
Company and the CounclL. Attorney Wrlght speaklng for the Paclfic
Telephono and. Telegraph Company arguecl that the fee of $1500 as
prescrlbed. ln the ord,lnance Just reacl was unreasonab.Ie.
Councll"man Hlgh sponsoreil the ordinanco as read, the same taklngtts flrst read.ing.
John I[. Fiekeisen, Seoretary of the master bakers of San Mateo
County spoke on the subJect of the advisablllty of enforcement ofthe County Sanltary Bakery ordlnance in the Clty of Burllngame.Clty Attorney Davls was lnstructed. to prepare an amenclment to
Ordinance No,1?8 for the pui'pose of controlllng a lteense fee onthe sale of certified bread, ln llne wlth Mr. Fickelsenfs remarks.
i
I
I
205
A ResoLution aecepting deod from Ansel M. Easton and. Louise
Easton for a strip adJoinlng Lots I and 2, Burlingame H111s, was
introduced. by Councllman HlveE and was second.ed. by Counctlman II1gh.
Carrted---a11 voting AlE.
Letters were read from Geo. K. Doltlngs, Gladys and Thorburn Adams,
N.I[. and Ingeborg 01son, MIs. and" Miss G.F. Burgess, MI. and Mrs.
John M. Jac[sonr-M". an& Mrs. W.f,. Jackson, thanking the Councll
for opposing th6 remod.ellng of plans as presented by Drs. l*[acomber
and Martln at recent Councll sesslon.
fhe Counc 11, thereupon, ad.journed.
Respect ly submltted,
fr
v a
Appro vec[:
I
I
i
(