Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet - PC - 2023.10.10
Planning Commission City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers/Online7:00 PMTuesday, October 10, 2023 Consistent with Government Code Section 54953, this Planning Commission Meeting will be held via Zoom in addition to in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can observe the meeting from home or attend the meeting in person. Below is information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting. To Attend the Meeting in Person: Location: Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California 94010 To Observe the Meeting via Zoom: To access the meeting by computer: Go to www.zoom.us/join Meeting ID: 871 6946 7655 Passcode: 678009 To access the meeting by phone: Dial 1-346-248-7799 Meeting ID: 871 6946 7655 Passcode: 678009 To Provide Public Comment in Person: Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a "Request to Speak" card located on the table by the door and then hand it to staff. The provision of a name, address, or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each, however, the Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. To Provide Public Comment via Email: Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame.org to be read aloud during the public comment period for an agenda item. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting, or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda or is on the Consent Calendar. The length of the comment should be commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments which is approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Planning Commission for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 10, 2023. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time but cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 p.m. deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Planning Commission after the meeting. Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 10/6/2023 October 10, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m. - Council Chambers/Online 2. ROLL CALL 3. REQUEST FOR AB 2449 REMOTE PARTICIPATION Announcements/consideration and approval of requests by Planning Commissioners to participate remotely pursuant to AB 2449 (Government Code Section 54943(f)). 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Draft September 25, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting Minutesa. Draft September 25, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting MinutesAttachments: 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON-AGENDA The public is permitted to speak on items that are listed under the Consent Calendar, Commissioner ’s Reports, Director Reports, Requests for Future Agenda Items, new items, or items not on the agenda . Public comments for scheduled agenda items should wait until that item is heard by the Planning Commission. Persons are required to limit their remarks to three (3) minutes unless an extension of time is granted by the Chair. Speakers desiring answers to questions should direct them to the Planning Commission and, if relevant, the Commission may direct them to the appropriate staff member. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Planning Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. 7. STUDY ITEMS Presentation on Safety Element Update - Staff Contact: Ruben Hurina. Safety Element Update - Staff ReportAttachments: 8. CONSENT CALENDAR There are no Consent Calendar Items. 9. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 10/6/2023 October 10, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 1312 Mills Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permits for second story balcony and attached garage for a new, two -story single-unit dwelling and attached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc ., applicant and designer; Mohith and Ruchika Julapalli, property owners) (66 noticed) Staff Contact: Fazia Ali a. 1312 Mills Ave - Staff Report 1312 Mills Ave - Attachments 1312 Mills Ave - Plans Attachments: 10. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY 740 Fairfield Road, zoned R -1 - Application for Design Review and Parking Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single -unit dwelling. (Tim Raduenz, Form One Design, applicant and designer; Arjun Dutt, property owner) (76 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi a. 740 Fairfield Rd - Staff Report 740 Fairfield Rd - Attachments 740 Fairfield Rd - Historic Resource Evaluation 740 Fairfield Rd - Plans Attachments: 11. COMMISSIONER’S REPORTS 12. DIRECTOR REPORTS - Commission Communications - City Council regular meeting of October 2, 2023 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 14. ADJOURNMENT Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 10/6/2023 October 10, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Notice: Any individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed at the meeting, should contact Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager, by 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at rhurin@burlingame.org or 650-558-7256. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting, the materials related to it, and your ability to comment. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for inspection via www.burlingame.org/planningcommission/agenda or by emailing the Planning Manager at rhurin@burlingame.org. If you are unable to obtain information via the City's website or through email, contact the Planning Manager at 650-558-7256. An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action on October 10, 2023. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 2023, the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $784.00, which includes noticing costs. Page 4 City of Burlingame Printed on 10/6/2023 BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM Council Chambers/OnlineMonday, September 25, 2023 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m. - Council Chambers/Online The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Staff in attendance: Community Development Director Kevin Gardiner, Planning Manager Ruben Hurin, Associate Planner 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi, and Assistant City Attorney Scott Spansail. 2. ROLL CALL Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and TsePresent7 - 3. REQUEST FOR AB 2449 REMOTE PARTICIPATION There were no requests. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a.Draft September 11, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Draft September 11, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting MinutesAttachments: Chair Pfaff noted that she was not present at the September 25, 2023 meeting, but watched the meeting video and reviewed the meeting minutes, and feels comfortable participating in the vote. Commissioner Schmid noted that he was not present at the meeting and did not watch the meeting video, and therefore abstained from participating in the vote. Vice-Chair Lowenthal made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to approve the meeting minutes. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Shores, and Tse6 - Abstain:Schmid1 - 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON-AGENDA There were no Public Comments. 7. STUDY ITEMS There were no Study Items. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Page 1City of Burlingame September 25, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Minutes a.Consideration of a Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 25 of the Burlingame Municipal Code Regarding Application Processing Procedures Which Expand City Cost Recovery Efforts. Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. (newspaper notice) Staff Contact: Scott Spansail Staff Report Draft Ordinance Resolution Public Notice Attachments: Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 - 9. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS a.5 Rio Court, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to an existing single -unit dwelling. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Audrey Tse, Insite Design Inc., applicant and architect; Angela and Sandy Yee, property owners ) (38 noticed) Staff Contact: Fazia Ali 5 Rio Ct - Staff Report 5 Rio Ct - Attachments 5 Rio Ct - Plans Attachments: All Commissioners have visited the project site. Commissioner Tse was recused from this item for business reasons. Community Development Director Gardiner provided an overview of the staff report. Chair Pfaff opened the public hearing. Angela Yee, property owner and Lauren Lee, designer, represented the applicant regarding the application. Public Comments: >Lawrence Barulich, 1821 Loyola Drive: My wife, Joanne and I are here to oppose the second story addition at 5 Rio Court. Once again, I must quote some of the comments that were made on the May 8th Planning Commission meeting. One commissioner said, “On the other hand, I do agree that a second story on this street is out of character and out of scale for this area. I find it hard to want to support that given how much higher it is going to be than others. Neighbors downhill will be impacted as well from a much taller structure .” A second commissioner said, “To echo what my fellow commissioner said about the neighborhood, this cul -de-sac has no other second stories and doesn ’t quite fit. The design of it is lovely. I like the design, but unfortunately, it doesn ’t quite coincide with what we are seeing on the same cul-de-sac.” All present agreed. At that May 8th meeting, the commissioners made these statements after evaluating the site, taking into consideration the architectural balance of surrounding neighborhood and past precedents and overwhelmingly believe in their hearts that a second story did not fit this neighborhood and that is a public record. At the August 14th meeting, there was a complete shift in opinion from some of the commissioners disregarding the impact on the future of the neighborhood and Page 2City of Burlingame September 25, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Minutes past precedents. Others had obvious concerns. Several of you are struggling to approve this project. It does not have to be approved tonight. Commissioner Lowenthal stated, “As a contractor, I know there are other options.” Commissioner Shores stated, “I do think there are some measures that can be taken to negate how prominent the second story is and the fact that from the street there is absolutely, unmistakably a big second story. Consider making the second story feel less imposing. De-emphasize the vertical elements and put more emphasis on the horizontal elements .” I also had two commissioners tell me that “Someone has to be first .” Because someone has to be first should not be how you determine the future of the residents that live in this neighborhood. 5 Rio Court was purchased over two years ago and has never been occupied. We need to take the time to exhaust all options before allowing this absolutely, unmistakable big second story to go forward. Thank you for your time and consideration. Chair Pfaff closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: >I initially was skeptical of this project, the height, and the neighborhood. When we had the May 8th meeting, we didn’t have story poles up yet, so it was hard to say how much bigger it is going to be. The story poles added a lot and made subsequent visits a lot clearer on the impact of that view. I don ’t feel that this is a view impact issue. Yes, it adds a bit more height, if I am not mistaken it is 6’-11”, which is a nominal amount of height to add for a second story addition. I like the changes that were made to the windows and other items. They have looked into many of the alternatives we have talked about to try and exhaust them. In order to make this all work, this might actually be the best solution. I don ’t see a reason to hold them back on this. I support it and I think it should move forward. >Compared to older plans, I am happy with the changes. The architect basically made all the right moves in addressing all the comments. Stucco is the right move over horizontal siding. Changing the windows and adding the extra roof peak over the entry are great changes. Generally, that is the best result I could have asked for outside of moving the whole second story which I know is completely not cost-feasible. The comments have been addressed very well and I am happy to support the project. >At first glance, I was taken by the size of the addition in the plans, but then the story poles went up and my viewpoint changed a little bit. In regard to the house itself, it looks really nice. It checks all the boxes that I would want to see in the neighborhood. It fits the neighborhood ’s character, it is just a little bit taller. It is not a lot taller, as my fellow commissioner said it is 6’-11” more. Everything else in the application seems to fall in line. Is this impacting distant views? Distant views of the sky, absolutely. I am not sure it is impacting distant views of the bay as defined in the code. I tend to agree with my fellow commissioners. The changes that were made accentuate the addiction. It doesn ’t detract and it fits nicely on the property. I am inclined to support it. >I have nothing to add. I was supportive the last time. >I want to thank my fellow commissioners who wanted to see the horizontal elements. It has improved and has been made a better project. For the same reasons, I am also inclined to be in support of this project. Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Horan, to approve the application. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, and Shores6 - Recused:Tse1 - b.442 Chatham Road, zoned R -1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single -unit dwelling. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Adam Bittle, Architecture Allure, applicant and architect; Michal and Jeff Braker, property owners) (52 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Page 3City of Burlingame September 25, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 442 Chatham Rd - Staff Report 442 Chatham Rd - Attachments 442 Chatham Rd - Plans Attachments: All Commissioners have visited the project site. Associate Planner Kolokihakaufisi provided an overview of the staff report. Chair Pfaff opened the public hearing. Ginger Feretto, designer, represented the applicant regarding the application. Public Comments: >There were no public comments. Chair Pfaff closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > I liked it before, and I like it still. > I agree. Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Chair Pfaff, to approve the application. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 - 10. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY There were no Design Review Study Items. 11. COMMISSIONER’S REPORTS There were no Commissioner's Reports. 12. DIRECTOR REPORTS There were no reportable actions from the last City Council meeting regarding Planning matters. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS No Future Agenda Items were suggested. 14. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:33 p.m. Page 4City of Burlingame Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STUDY ITEM: Presentation on Safety Element Update STAFF CONTACT: Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: October 10, 2023 AGENDA ITEM NO: 7a The Safety Element of Burlingame’s General Plan is a State-mandated element that identifies potential natural and human-caused hazards that could affect residents, businesses, and services in the community. The purpose of the Safety Element is to establish a framework that identifies and anticipates these hazards and prepares the community to minimize risks and harm resulting from these hazards. The Safety Element identifies the natural and human-caused hazards that affect Burlingame, describes present and expected future conditions, and sets goals and policies to minimize hazards to safety. This includes efforts to protect the health and safety of community members, minimize physical harm to the buildings and infrastructure, and reduce damage to local economic systems, community services, and ecosystems. Purpose of the Safety Element Update In recent years, the complexity of safety elements has increased due to expanded State requirements. In addition, safety elements are able to rely on improved and updated science, more sophisticated mapping, and an expanded set of best practices and tools for hazard mitigation and resilience. The purpose of this project is to not only address the safety element legal requirements in the California Government Code since the previous Safety Element (referred to as “Community Safety” in the 2019 General Plan Update; see www.envisionburlingame.org/element/community-safety) but also address recent hazards and related issues of concern in Burlingame and across the county, respond to community concerns, and create a unified approach to improving resilience countywide. The Safety Element Update is part of the Multi-Jurisdictional Safety Element Collaborative Project, which is a partnership of the County of San Mateo and the cities of Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, Burlingame, East Palo Alto, Half Moon Bay, Pacifica, and San Bruno. This collaborative effort provides greater efficiency and effectiveness to the safety element outreach and program overall. Although this is a multi- agency effort, Burlingame will receive an updated Safety Element that is tailored to our community and consistent with other General Plan elements and applicable agency plans, enhance eligibility for grant funding, and maintain compliance with State regulations. A consultant team is providing project management and technical assistance to the project. Community Planning Collaborative is serving as project manager to coordinate and communicate the needs of all agencies through the process. PlaceWorks is leading the technical and subject matter expert team, with support from Atlas Planning Solutions, Climate Resilient Communities, and Nexus Planning & Research. October 10, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting – Agenda Item 7a Safety Element Update 2 State Law Requirements for Safety Elements California Government Code Section 65302(g) contains the requirements for Safety Elements, including that it must be updated upon each revision of the housing element or local hazard mitigation plan, but not less than once every eight years. In recent years, State legislation has updated the Government Code to include additional requirements for flood, wildfire, and climate change adaptation and resilience. SB 1241 added Section 65302(g)(3) to the California Government Code, requiring jurisdictions in a state responsibility area or very high fire hazard severity zone to provide background, historical context, and goals, policies, and implementation measures to address wildfire risks in a community. SB 1035, which established Section 65302(g)(6) of the California Government Code, builds on previous legislation and requires local governments to review and update their Safety Element during an update to their Housing Element or Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), or no less than every eight years. Any revisions should include updated information related to flood hazards, fire hazards, and climate adaptation and resilience. SB 379 requires local governments to conduct vulnerability assessments as part of their long-range planning efforts and to prepare resilience and adaptation policies that will protect against harm caused by climate change. AB 2140 added Sections 8685.9 and 65302.6 of the California Government Code, enabling cities and counties to adopt an LHMP into the Safety Element. SB 99 established Section 65302(g)(5) of the California Government Code and requires jurisdictions to review and update the Safety Element to include information identifying residential developments in hazard areas that do not have at least two emergency evacuation routes. AB 747 added Section 65302.15 to the California Government Code (amended by AB 1409), requiring local governments to identify the capacity, safety, and viability of evacuation routes and locations in the Safety Element or LHMP. This work is being done as part of a separate countywide effort and is not part of the Multi-Jurisdictional Safety Element update project. Safety Element Update Process The Safety Element Update process includes several steps to ensure that the element includes the most up-to-date information, addresses climate change vulnerability, and integrates community input into the goals, policies, and actions. The Safety Element Update process includes seven primary tasks. 1. Initial Identification & Ideas. Research, review of background materials, and community input will be used to identify each community’s hazards, needs and assets for further analysis. October 10, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting – Agenda Item 7a Safety Element Update 3 2. Conduct climate change vulnerability assessments. The vulnerability assessment will analyze how climate-related hazards may affect populations and assets in the participating communities especially as these hazards become more frequent and intense in the future. These assessments will follow the four steps outlined in the California Adaptation Planning Guide: 1) Identify exposure; 2) analyze sensitivity and potential impacts; 3) evaluate adaptive capacity; and 4) conduct vulnerability prioritization. This task also includes conducting an evacuation constraints analysis and providing hazard mapping. 3. Compile background information on hazards. Background information will be updated to discuss the regulatory context that informs the Safety Element, the purpose of the Safety Element and the reason for updating them, and information about each of the key issue areas. This includes mapping, current and historic conditions and events, and how the issue may change in the future. 4. Prepare goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs. This step includes identifying regional best practices, reviewing existing plans and requirements, and drafting the goals and policies. The goals, policies, and programs build upon the data collection efforts, vulnerability assessment, and community and stakeholder feedback to detail the specific steps required to implement the Safety Element policies. 5. Compile Draft Safety Element. Once the individual segments of the Safety Element update are ready, the results will be assembled into a draft Safety Element. These documents will incorporate all the content and analyses prepared in prior steps. 6. Conduct environmental review. After the Safety Elements are drafted, a CEQA-compliant environmental analyses will be conducted along with required Native American tribal consultation. 7. Local and State Agency Reviews and Approvals. Jurisdictions that include State Responsibility Areas or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones must submit their draft Safety Element for Board of Forestry Review at least 90 days prior to adoption. (At this time, Half Moon Bay and San Mateo County will go through the Board of Forestry Review process.) Once agency review is complete, the last step in the process is Public Agency Review and Approval, which includes study sessions and approval hearings at Planning Commission and City Council. Community Engagement Due to the collaborative focus of this effort, the community engagement program is robust with numerous tools and different approaches to reach different communities. Community engagement will occur throughout the Safety Element update process, to inform the background information, mapping, vulnerability assessment, and goals/policies/implementation programs. The community engagement for this project will take an equity-focused approach to ensure that the Safety Element accurately reflects the hazards, vulnerabilities, and needs to improve community resilience. The Safety Element Collaborative will conduct the following types of engagement opportunities: October 10, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting – Agenda Item 7a Safety Element Update 4 Project Website: Create an easy to access location for information regarding the Safety Element components, engagement efforts and tools, and draft deliverables. Community Workshops: Obtain input from residents, employees, and business owners across the county. Hard-to-reach Community Group Meetings: Create partnerships with Community Based Organizations and residents that may not have previously participated in planning processes. Stakeholder Meetings: Learn how businesses, service organizations, and utilities provide resources and adapt to climate hazards. Mapped Survey Tool: Reach those unable to attend workshops to obtain data on where hazards are occurring and lived experiences. Study Sessions: Inform decision-makers about the Safety Element project and get their feedback. Public Hearings: Ensure that the draft Safety Element is feasible and meets the needs of the community. Adopt the Safety Element. Schedule Overall, the project is expected to last for two years, from August 2023 to June 2025. The timing for the seven primary tasks are as follows, and depicted graphically below: 1. Initial Identification & Ideas: August 2023 to October 2023 2. Compile background information on hazards: August 2023 to January 2024 3. Conduct climate change vulnerability assessments: December 2023 to June 2024 4. Prepare goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs: March 2024 to September 2024 5. Compile Draft Safety Element: August 2024 to March 2025 6. Conduct environmental review: August 2024 to May 2025 7. Local and State Agency Reviews and Approvals: December 2024 to June 2025 City of Burlingame Design Review and Special Permits Address: 1312 Mills Avenue Meeting Date: October 10, 2023 Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permits for a second story balcony and attached garage for a new, two-story single-unit dwelling and attached garage. Designer: Jesse Geurse, GCD, Inc. APN: 026-071-130 Property Owners: Mohith and Ruchika Julapalli Lot Area: 6,000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot that contains an existing one-story single-unit dwelling and a detached garage. The applicant is proposing to demolish all structures on the site and build a new, two-story single-unit dwelling and new attached one-car garage. The project proposes a total floor area of 3,019 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3,020 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes 151 SF front porch exemption). The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for an attached garage. A Special Permit is also being requested for a 75 SF second story balcony at the rear of the house (Special Permit required for any second story balcony; 75 SF maximum allowed). There would be a total of four bedrooms in the proposed main dwelling. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The new attached one-car garage measures 10’ x 18’ (clear interior dimensions) and provides the required covered parking; one uncovered parking space (9’ x 18’) is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The site contains one existing landscape tree (Redwood tree) at the rear of the lot which will remain. The proposed landscape plan shows five new 24-inch box landscape trees (Red Maple) to be planted on-site. Based on the proposed floor area, three landscape trees are required on-site. Therefore, the project complies with the tree reforestation ordinance requirements. Staff would note that currently there are two street trees along this frontage which are to remain. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ▪ Design Review for a new, two-story single-unit dwelling and attached garage (C.S. 25.68.020(C)(1)(a)); ▪ Special Permit for a new attached garage (C.S. 25.10.035 (1)); and ▪ Special Permit for second floor balcony (75 SF proposed where up to 75 SF is allowed with a Special Permit) (C.S. 25.10.035(7)). This space intentionally left blank. Item No. 9a Regular Action Item Design Review and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue -2- 1312 Mills Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stamped: September 22, 2023 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front Setbacks (1st flr): (2nd flr): 20’-2” 20’-2” 20’-2” block average 20’-2” block average Side Setbacks (left): (right): 4’-0” 5’-0” 4'-0" 4’-0” Rear Setbacks (1st flr): (2nd flr): 46’-10” 46’-10” 15'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 1,969 SF 33% 2,400 SF 40% FAR: 3,019 SF 0.50 FAR 3,020 SF 1 0.50 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 --- Off-Street Parking: 1 covered (10’ x 18’ clear interior dimensions) 1 uncovered (9' x 18') 1 covered ² (10’ x 18’ clear interior dimensions) 1 uncovered (9' x 18') Plate Heights (1st flr): (2nd flr): 9’-0” 8’-0” 9’-0” 8’-0” Building Height: 29’-10” 30'-0" Declining Height Envelope: complies C.S. 25.10.55(A)(1) Second Floor Balcony: 75 SF 3 (14’-5” left side setback & 19’-11” right side setback) 75 SF (8’-0” side setbacks) 1 (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF = 3,020 SF (0.50 FAR) 2 Special Permit required for an attached garage. 3 Special Permit required for a second floor balcony (75 SF second floor balcony proposed where 75 SF is the maximum allowed). Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: aluminum clad simulated true divided lites • Doors: aluminum clad wood garage and entry doors • Siding: cement plaster and brick veneer • Roof: asphalt shingles • Other: wood porch columns, wood corbels, wood shutters and wood gable vents, decorative galvanized chimney Design Review and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue -3- Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on August 28, 2023, the Commission had several comments and suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the Regular Action Calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached August 28, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter, date stamped September 18, 2023, and revised plans date stamped September 22, 2023, to address the Planning Commission’s comments and suggestions. Please refer to the applicant’s letter for a detailed list of the changes made to the project (see attachments). Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by the City Council on December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows: 1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines; 2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures; 5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; 6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and 7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the existing structure as remodeled. Required Findings for Design Review: Any decision to approve a Major Design Review application shall be supported by written findings addressing the criteria set forth in Chapter 25.68. In making such determination, the following findings shall be made: 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of Title 25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations, and most specifically, the standards established in the Design Review Criteria above, as applicable. 2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and 3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property. Suggested Findings for Design Review: 1. The proposed single-unit dwelling is consistent with the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of Title 25; The proposed materials, including cement plaster and brick veneer siding, aluminum clad simulated true divided lite windows, aluminum clad wood garage and entry doors, wood porch columns, wood corbels, wood shutters and wood gable vents and asphalt shingle roofing, compliment this architectural style and is consistent with the design and materials found in the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other circumstances to accommodate the proposed development as shown on the proposed plans. 3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property because the project complies with setback, lot coverage, floor area ratio, declining height envelope and building height requirements. Design Review and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue -4- Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit for attached garage and second story balcony, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure’s design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city’s reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Suggested Findings for Special Permit (Second Story Balcony): 1. The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the proposed second story balcony are consistent with the design of the new dwelling and that the 75 SF second story balcony is within the maximum balcony size allowed (75 SF) and is setback from the side property lines as required (19’-11” proposed right side setback and 14’-5” on the left side setback where 8’-0” is the minimum required). 2. The variety of façade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed second floor balcony are consistent with the existing structure and will be screened with vegetation. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City in that the proposed structure is compatible with the requirements of the City's design review criteria as noted above. For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's Special Permit criteria. Suggested Findings for Special Permit (Attached Garage): 1. The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the attached garage are consistent with the character of the street and neighborhood which consists of one and two-story single-unit dwellings in a variety of architectural styles and massing with attached and detached garages and is appropriate proportionality on this interior lot. 2. The roof line of the attached garage is consistent with the first floor roof of the house so that it’s interface with the street is not prominent; that the design of the wood garage door breaks up the mass and plane of its facade so that is not out of proportion with the rest of the front elevation; and that the attached garage is incorporated well into the design of the proposed two-story single-unit dwelling with matching siding and roofing materials. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City in that the proposed structure is compatible with the requirements of the City's design review criteria as noted above. Design Review and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue -5- Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission’s decision and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 22, 2023, sheets A.1 through A.6, sheets L1, SP.1 and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first-floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; Design Review and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue -6- 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Fazia Ali Assistant Planner c. Jesse Geurse, designer Mohith and Ruchika Julapalli, property owners Attachments: August 28, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant’s Response Letter, date stamped September 18, 2023 Project Application Form Special Permit Applications Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed September 29, 2023 Area Map BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM Council Chambers/OnlineMonday, August 28, 2023 a.1312 Mills Avenue, zoned R -1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permits for second story balcony and attached garage for a new, two story single -unit dwelling and attached garage. (Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc ., applicant and designer; Mohith and Ruchika Julapalli, property owners) (66 noticed) Staff Contact: Fazia Ali All Commissioners have visited the project site. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. Chair Pfaff opened the public hearing. Jesse Geurse, designer, represented the applicant and answered questions regarding the application. Public Comments: >There were no public comments. Chair Pfaff closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: >Concerned about the impact on privacy of the proposed removal of the redwood tree at the back. >Please clean up drafting errors on the landscape plan. >It is a nice-looking project and captures the Burlingame charm with the design. Based on the neighborhood, it is going to fit well with the massing. There are several houses on Mills Avenue with attached garages, so I can find support for that. The second story balcony does not bother me. I certainly understand the privacy concerns, but it will be no different if there were windows there. It looks like it will conform with all the reforestation that is required. The Parks Division will take care of the redwood tree, I do not know if that is in our purview. I would hate to see a redwood tree go away, but I do not know if it is within our control. I can find support moving this project forward. >As it relates to the redwood tree, I have a property with a next door neighbor that has five redwood trees on a 6,000 square foot lot. The droppings are horrible and the roots have uplifted the concrete in my backyard; it is unfortunate. I truly do not believe that these trees belong on a 6,000 square foot lot; they belong more in a park. I would like to see a more robust landscape plan and more trees by the back fence to create some privacy if you are going to remove the redwood tree. >I agree, it is a good looking project. Personally, I do not like attached garages, but at least it is one car and it does not overwhelm the fa çade. I do not like second floor balconies. Right now, it is an open lattice railing. Consider using a more solid balcony railing to provide privacy. The front porch is great but with the bulky columns it makes the porch less than 4’ deep. Recommend looking at a deeper front porch so you can put some furniture out there. >I like the idea of increasing the depth of the porch. >It is our responsibility to comment on the redwood tree. I agree that the front porch needs to be deeper. I really like the house. There is plenty of room for an ADU because the garage is in the front. I do not like that this very important tree is being removed. Look into accommodating the redwood tree and Page 1City of Burlingame August 28, 2023Planning Commission Meeting Minutes see if it can be cleaned up because it will be a very vast change if it is removed. Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Vice-Chair Lowenthal, to place on the item on the Regular Action Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Schmid, and Shores5 - Nay:Pfaff1 - Absent:Tse1 - Page 2City of Burlingame Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 September 18, 2023 City of Burlingame Attn: Fazia Ali, Planner 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Response to Planning Commission’s comments Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning Commission, We thank you for your concerns and suggestions made with regard to our application for design review for the proposed new residence located at 1312 Mills Avenue. We too, are architecturally sensitive and very eager to address your concerns. We had responded to your comments either verbally or per plans. We hope that you find the revised project acceptable for approval. Please see below for response to changes. In response to your particular comments and or recommendations: 1. Commissioner Pfaff: “Comment regarding removal of redwood tree” a) GCD Response: Redwood tree to remain, will not remove. 2. Commissioners: “Comment second story deck” a) GCD Response: Redwood tree to remain will migate privacy to the rear. We had also added addition scypress trees to the left neighbor for addition privacy as well as making the left side guardrail solid. We had also side trees to red maple for larger species and added additional to the rear. 3. “Commissioner: “Comment regarding porch depth ” a) GCD Response: In review of the plan and planning square footage numbers it works out that we only had 1 s.f. to add and pulling back porch would add an additional 15 s.f. to the second front bedroom so we will keep porch depth as is. Thank you for this opportunity to further consider our proposed addition. Should you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650-703-6197 Sincerely, Jesse Geurse Principal GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 2 PLANNING APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—PLANNING DIVISION 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 TEL: 650.558.7250 | FAX: 650.696.3790 | E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT@BURLINGAME.ORG PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR’S PARCEL # (APN) PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT INFORMATION PROPERTY OWNER NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL ARCHITECT/DESIGNER ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE (IF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNER) DATE I AM AWARE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATION AND HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION/DIVISION. PROPERTY OWNER’S SIGNATURE DATE AUTHORIZATION TO REPRODUCE PLANS I HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST AND/OR POST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AS PART OF THE PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTION (INITIALS OF ARCHITECT/DESIGNER) STAFF USE ONLY STAFF USE ONLY APPLICATION TYPE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) VARIANCE (VAR) SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) OTHER: ____________________________ DATE RECEIVED: MINOR MODIFICATION HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # WIRELESS ZONING FENCE EXCEPTION APPLICANT? APPLICANT? *FOR PROJECT REFUNDS* - Please provide an address to which to all refund checks will be mailed to: ADDRESS NAME 1312 MILLS AVENUE BURLINGAME CA. 94010 026-071-130 R-1 2 STORY RESIDENCE WITH ATTACHED 1 CAR GARAGE: 4 BEDROOMS, 1/2 BATH, 3 FULL BATHROOMS, LIVING ROOM, DINING ROOM FAMILY ROOM, KITCHEN, LAUNDRY CLOSET. . X MOHITH JULAPALLI 1312 MILLS AVENUE BURLINGAME CA. 94010 E:MAIL: ruchikajulapalli@gmail.com JESSE GEURSE/GCD, INC. 650-703-6197 405 BAYSWATER AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 JGEURSE@GMAIL.COM NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2023 JESSE GEURSE/GCD, INC.405 BAYSWATER AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 5/9/2023 5/9/2023 City of Burlingame Community Development Department 501 Primrose Road P (650) 558-7250 www.burlingame.org City of Burlingame Special Permit Application (R-1 and R-2) The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City’s Ordinance (Chapter 25.78). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Refer to the end of this form for assistance with these questions. 1.Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure’s design and with the existing street and neighborhood. 2.Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3.How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City? 4.Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the City’s reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Proposed Rear Deck 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure’s design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don’t feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city’s reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. City of Burlingame Community Development Department 501 Primrose Road P (650) 558-7250 www.burlingame.org City of Burlingame Special Permit Application (R-1 and R-2) The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City’s Ordinance (Chapter 25.78). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Refer to the end of this form for assistance with these questions. 1.Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure’s design and with the existing street and neighborhood. 2.Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3.How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City? 4.Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the City’s reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Proposed attached 1 car garage 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure’s design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don’t feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city’s reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. Secretary RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, AND SPECIAL PERMITS RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Design Review and Special Permits for a new, two-story single-unit dwelling and attached garage at 1312 Mills Avenue, zoned R-1, Mohith and Ruchika Julapalli, property owners, APN: 026-071-130; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 10, 2023, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review and Special Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permits are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, _____________ , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 2023 by the following vote: EXHIBIT “A” Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue Effective October 20, 2023 Page 1 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 22, 2023, sheets A.1 through A.6, sheets L1, SP.1 and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; EXHIBIT “A” Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Special Permits 1312 Mills Avenue Effective October 20, 2023 11. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first-floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 1312 Mills Avenue 300’ noticing APN: 026-071-130 City of Burlingame Design Review and Variance Address: 740 Fairfield Road Meeting Date: October 10, 2023 Request: Application for Design Review and Parking Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form One Design APN: 029-042-100 Property Owner: Arjun Dutt Lot Area: 9,288 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Background: Based upon information submitted to the Planning Division by the previous property owner during the sale of the property earlier this year, it was indicated that the property/structure(s) may have historical characteristics that would indica te that it could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or Californi a Register of Historical Places. Therefore, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing property/structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated June 1, 2023 (see attachments). The results of the evaluation concluded that 740 Fairfield Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot and contains an existing two-story single-unit dwelling totaling 2,217 SF (0.24 FAR). The applicant is proposing a first and second floor remodel/addition and a new single-car detached garage. The project would have a total floor area of 3,313 SF (0.36 FAR) where 4,366 SF (0.47 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes covered porch exemption). The existing site is nonconforming in parking since there is no covered parking provided (garage or ca rport). The existing house contains four bedrooms. With this application, the number of bedrooms would increase to five (office on first floor qualifies as a bedroom). Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required for a five-bedroom house. The proposed detached garage provides one covered parking space (13’-5” x 20’-5” clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered parking space (9’ x 18”) is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the applicant is also requesting a Variance for one covered parking space because a second covered parking space is not provided. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The site contains eight existing trees which include three fruit trees and five landscape trees. There is also an existing street tree which will remain. Of the five landscape trees, one is a protected size tree (33.3-inch diameter Coast Live Oak). A Pre-Construction Tree Evaluation was prepared by Kielty Arborist Services, dated July 27, 2023 (see attached). The report identifies all trees on-site, assesses the health of each tree, and provides a Tree Protection Plan. Three, new 15-gallon Oak trees are also proposed to be planted (one in the front yard and two in the rear yard). Based on the proposed floor area, three landscape trees are required on -site. Therefore, the project complies with the tree reforestation ordinance requirements. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ▪ Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S. 25.68.020©(1)(b)); and ▪ Parking Variance for one covered parking space where two covered parking spaces are requ ired (C.S. 25.40.030 (B)(1)(b)). Item No. 10a Design Review Study Design Review and Variance 740 Fairfield Road -2- 740 Fairfield Road Lot Area: 9,288 SF Plans date stamped: September 21, 2023 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (1st flr): (2nd flr): 20’-4” (to porch) 33’-9” no change 34’-9” 28’-6” (block average) 28’-6” (block average) Side (left): (right): 8’-4” 29’-11” 12’-5” (to addition) 28’-9” (to addition) 7’-0” 7’-0” Rear (1st flr): (2nd flr): 41’-10” (to deck) 54’-8” 21’-4” (to deck) 50’-1” 15’-0” 20’-0” Lot Coverage: 1,753 SF 18.9% 2,586 SF 27.8% 3,715 SF 40% FAR: 2,217 SF 0.24 FAR 3,313 SF 0.36 FAR 4,366 SF 1 0.47 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 5 --- Off-Street Parking: 0 covered 2 1 uncovered (9’ x 18’) 1 covered 3 (13’-5" x 20’-5”) 1 uncovered (9' x 18') 2 covered (20' W x 18' D) 1 uncovered (9' x 18') Plate Height: (1st flr): (2nd flr): 8’-9” 7’-4” 9’-0” 7’-4” 9’-0” maximum 8’-0” maximum Building Height: 24’-2” 24’-9” 30'-0" Declining Height Envelope: complies complies C.S. 25.10.055(A) 1 (0.32 x 9,288 SF) + 1,100 SF + 294 SF = 4,366 SF (0.47 FAR) 2 Existing nonconforming parking. 3 Parking Variance for one covered parking is required. Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: wood clad with true simulated divided lites • Doors: wood clad • Siding: horizontal wood • Roof: asphalt shingles • Other: brick porch base, wood deck with steel raili ng, wood brackets, wood gable ends Staff Comments: None. Design Review and Variance 740 Fairfield Road -3- Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as estab lished in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by the City Council on December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows: 1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines; 2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the exist ing character of the neighborhood; 3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures; 5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent proper ties; 6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and 7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the existing structure as remodeled. Required Findings for Design Review: Any decision to approve a Major Design Review application shall be supported by written findings addressing the criteria set forth in Chapter 25.68. In making such determination, the following findings shall be made: 1. The project is consistent with the Ge neral Plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of Title 25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations, and most specifically, the standards established in the Design Review C riteria above, as applicable. 2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topog raphy, and other circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and 3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consid eration to ensure the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring p roperty. Required Findings for a Variance: In order to grant a Variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a -d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condit ions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unr easonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application would not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenienc e; and (d) that the use of the property would be compatibl e with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. ‘Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Tim Raduenz, Form One Design, applicant and designer Attachments: Project Application Variance Application Letter of Explanation, dated July 19 , 2023 Pre-Construction Tree Evaluation prepared by Kielty Arborist Services, dated July 27, 2023 Materials sheet Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed September 29, 2023 Area Map Design Review and Variance 740 Fairfield Road -4- Separate Attachments: Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated June 1, 2023 City of Burlingame Community Development Department 501 Primrose Road (650) 558-7250 planningdept@burlingame.org Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to post plans submitted with this application on the City’s website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. _________ (Initials of Architect/Designer) Project Application - Planning Division Type of Application: Accessory Dwelling Unit Conditional Use/Minor Use Permit Design Review Hillside Area Construction Permit Minor Modification Special Permit Variance Other Project Address: Assessor’s Parcel #: Zoning: Project Description: Applicant Property Owner Name: Name: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: E-mail: E-mail: Architect/Designer Name: Address: Phone: E-mail: Burlingame Business License #: * Architect/Designer must have a valid Burlingame Business License. Applicant: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant’s signature: Date: Property Owner: I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Division. Property owner’s signature: Date: Date Application Received (staff only): 740 Fairfield Road Tim Raduenz 415.819.0304 tim@formonedesign.com Tim Raduenz 415.819.0304 tim@formonedesign.com Arjun Dutt 650.814.1638 arjun@arcushousing.com 24809 07.19.23 TR 029-042-100 R1 4843 Silver Springs Drive Park City, UT. 84098 4843 Silver Springs Drive Park City, UT. 84098 ✔ 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 1. First and second floor remodel of existing 2-story home 2. First and second floor addition to rear of existing home 07/25/2023 RECEIVED CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIVISION 扇をヂ詐乏A ・縮偽名ア紗 City of BurIingame ◆ Communjty Deve-opment Departnent ◆与01 Primrose Road ◆ P (6与0) 558-7250 ◆ City of Buriingame Variance AppIication The帥ng commISSion is required by -aw to make f-ndings as defjned by the cjty′s ord…ance (Code sectiOn 25.84.030). Your answers to the foIIowing quest-OnS Can assist the p-anning Comm-SSion in making the decision as tO Whether the f-ndings can be made for your request. Refer to the end ofthis form for assistance with these A. Describe the exceptiona` or extraordinary circumstances or conditions軸cab-e to your property Which do not applyto other prope暁s in this area. 薫んをA裡4心秘抄のんの居猛牛んクとJ〆缶∠侍女T○○園圏麹四囲匿四囲四囲閉遊園四壁四四百 h雄琴後高一努ズ乙夕地名をゑ宝/物各所を勧老_ 〆幼少牝勢, B. ExpIaiれWhy the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantiai PrOPerty right and what unreasonab-e property loss or unnecessary hardship might resuIt from the denial of the application. 履誰乞切を在れ〆多彩-ム衝夕ィ∽な望みレ勧婦A動梯形後を明後鐙努考東4/型 〆後・ク均㍉姥乞み久々∠4砲主 動勢′有色. C.軸n why the proposed use at the proposed -ocation will rot be detrimentaI or injurious to PrOPerty or improvements jn the vicinity or to p輔c hea-th′ Safety′ genera- weIfare or COnVenience. ≦陵縮祐考カラチか勧均"匁を伍ケ祐一 疎埼V移牝うん彰巧をr D. How w冊e proposed project be compatibIe with the aesthetics′ maSS・ bu-k and character ofthe eXistjng and potential uses on adjoining properties in the genera- vicjnity? 脇疹/復′珍客ナ槻"互多多謝 佐〆切鯵参殿幽診秦野あ卑ろ初功初/"_ 困四囲 Page 1 of 2 Form + One ▪ Design & Planning ▪ 4843 Silver Springs Drive▪ Park City ▪ UT ▪ 84098 ▪ (415) 819.0304 ▪ tim@formonedesign.com Form + One 4843 Silver Springs Drive Park City, UT 84098 P+ 415.819.0304 E + tim@formonedesign.com TRANSMITTAL FORM To: City of Burlingame From: Tim Raduenz Subject: 740 Fairfield Road Date: 07.19.23 Written Review of Project Number of Pages:2 Written Review of Project: In working with the planning department along with the owners, we believe it was in our best interest to keep a cool craftsmen style home and add to the rear of the existing home. This keeps an old home, full of original character intact and creates a new modern living situation! The scope of the work was to add living space to the back of the property and create a minimum of 3 bedrooms on the top floor, which works well within the confines of the existing plan and the lot size! We also added a detached garage at the far-left corner of the lot and retained the historical driveway pattern. Also, please see the sheet PH for photos of the existing home to see the overly large front porch! As you can see from the site plan, we are giving up a few feet to push the house to the front of lot line, so we want you to understand we are also giving up a few things in the process of keeping the original home intact. In closing: even though it may have been easier and cheaper to demo the entire existing home and start from scratch, we thought it was best for this project to remain as intact as possible to help preserve the original charm and attractiveness of the details on the front façade, and overall existing home. The character of the house, and wanting to keep as much original allure as possible to the front of the home kept us from doing what would normally be a teardown project and instead making the best out of what was already there, and building off of the original attraction. Best, Tim Raduenz Page 2 of 2 Form + One ▪ Design & Planning ▪ 4843 Silver Springs Drive▪ Park City ▪ UT ▪ 84098 ▪ (415) 819.0304 ▪ tim@formonedesign.com Pre-Construction Tree Evaluation For 740 Fairfield Rd Prepared For: Tim Raduenz Site:740 Fairfield Rd Burlingame,CA 94010 Submitted by: David Beckham,Certified Arborist WE#10724A TRAQ Qualified Summary: On June 20th,at 9:00 AM,Kielty Arborists Services LLC conducted a tree survey at 740 Fairfield Rd in Burlingame.The property was surveyed for a total of nine trees,out of which two were identified as protected trees.The protected trees on the property include Coast Live Oak (Quercia agrifolia)tree #1 and London Plane Sycamore Street tree #2.Both of these trees were found to be in fair condition. Showing Oak tree #1 and London Plane #2,the only protected trees on site The survey revealed that the property is surrounded by hedges consisting of privets,African ferns pines,and Photinias.Unfortunately,all of these hedges are in poor condition,displaying signs of decline and having large areas of deadwood.The hedge material on the property is not expected to improve regardless of mitigation measures.The remaining trees on the property are small fruit trees located in the rear yard.However,their health was also found to be poor.Tree removal of the non-protected trees on this site is a valid option as they are all in poor condition and not expected to improve. Based on the survey findings,tree number one (Coast Live Oak)and tree number two (London Plane Sycamore)will require tree protection fencing as they are protected trees.At this time no impacts are expected for the retained protected trees as no work is proposed within 10 times the diameter of a retained tree. Kielty Arborist Services LLC 1 Assignment As requested on June 20,Kielty Arborists Services LLC visited the above site for the purpose of providing a Tree Inventory Report/Tree Protection Plan for the proposed construction.A construction project consisting of a home addition,new deck,new detached garage,and new paver driveway is proposed for this site,and as needed an Arborist Report is required when submitting landscape plans to the city of Burlingame.The plan reviewed for this project is A1.0 dated 7/14/23. This Tree Inventory Report is not a Tree Risk Assessment.As such,no trees were assessed for risk in accordance with industry standards,nor are there any tree risk ratings or risk mitigation recommendations provided within this preservation plan unless stated otherwise.This report addresses the following as part of this assignment: 1.Identify and assess the trees on the construction site that may be impacted by the proposed development. 2.Determine the potential impacts of the construction on the health and stability of the trees,including the potential for root damage or crown damage. 3.Provide recommendations for tree protection and preservation during the construction process,including measures to mitigate potential impacts on the trees. 4.Ensure that the construction plans comply with all local regulations related to tree preservation and protection,as well as tree removal. 5.Provide ongoing monitoring and maintenance recommendations to ensure the continued health and stability of the trees after the construction is completed. Please note that specific recommendations for tree protection and preservation will be provided in the detailed report,taking into account the unique characteristics of each tree and the construction plans. Limits of the Assignment: Kielty Arborist Services LLC did not perform an aerial inspection of the upper crown,a detailed root crown inspection,or plant tissue analysis on the subject trees.No risk assessments were completed as a part of this report. Method of Inspection: All inspections were made from the ground;the trees were not climbed for this inspection.No tissue samples or root crown inspections were done.The trees in question were located on the site plan provided by you.The trees were then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height)using a D-Tape.The protected trees were rated for health and structure.Below is an explanation of these ratings. Kielty Arborist Services LLC 2 Tree Health:Rated Good,Fair,or Poor,using the following criteria: •Good:Vigorous growth with foliage of normal size,shape,and color.Canopy density 90- 100%,little to no dead wood,minor or no pest infestation,and little to no decay.The tree is expected to live its natural lifespan. •Fair:All or some of the new growth shoots are shorter than expected for the species.Canopy density 60-90%.Some small branch dieback.Noticeable pest infestation and/or decay.The tree is not in decline right now,but further stress such as construction impacts,increased pest pressure,drought,etc.may cause a decline in health. •Poor:Little to no new growth and significant dieback.Foliage may be undersized,distorted, yellowed,or another color abnormal for the species.Canopy density 20-60%or less.Significant dead wood,pest infestation,or decay.The tree is not expected to live its natural lifespan. Tree Structure:Rated Good,Fair,or Poor,using the following criteria: •Good:Minor structural flaws may be corrected through pruning.The tree has an upright trunk and a single trunk tapering to a single leader at the top,or a single leader may be easily trained. Most scaffold branches are smaller than the leader,attached to the trunk at angles approaching 45 degrees,and are spaced apart on the trunk both vertically and radially.The structure does not contain included bark (bark inside the juncture of multiple trunks).No sign of previous branch failures.Foliage is evenly distributed on the limbs.Symmetrical or mostly symmetrical canopy. •Fair:Some structural flaws are not correctable through pruning.The tree may have more than one trunk or leader;the trunk may have a slight lean.Scaffold branches may be attached at angles less than 30 to 10 degrees and/or may be crowded on the trunk.A structure may have included bark,previous branch failures,or end-heavy limbs.Some asymmetries in the canopy. •Poor:Significant structural flaws not correctable through pruning.Significant dead wood or decay.More than one trunk or leader and/or branches crowded together on the trunk. Significantly end heavy limbs may be present.A structure may contain significantly included bark,previous branch failures,and/or asymmetry.Precipitous lean may be present.The tree is likely to be hazardous. Tree Form: ·Good:Nearly ideal for species.Generally symmetric with minor asymmetries/deviations from species norm.Function and aesthetics are not compromised.Mostly consistent with the intended use. ·Fair:Major asymmetries/deviations from species norm and/or intended use.Function and/or aesthetics are compromised ·Poor:Largely asymmetric/abnormal.Detracts from intended use and/or aesthetics to a significant degree.Visually unappealing.Provides little to no function in the landscape. Kielty Arborist Services LLC 3 Suitability for Preservation:Based only on the tree itself and not related to potential construction impacts.Rated Good,Fair,or Poor,using the following criteria: •Good:The tree is currently an asset to the landscape and may be expected to survive minor to moderate construction impacts if adequately protected. •Fair:The tree contributes something to the landscape and may be improved by pruning or other maintenance activities.May be expected to survive minor construction impacts if adequately protected.Protection measures are probably worth taking except where construction impacts are extensive. •Poor:Tree does not contribute to the landscape.It is in poor health and may be hazardous.It is not expected to survive any construction impacts.Some trees with poor viability may be retained if they will not be impacted by construction Condition rating:The trees were then given a condition rating based on a combination of tree health,structure and form using the following scale: Condition Ratings 1 -29 Very Poor 30 -49 Poor 50 -69 Fair 70 -89 Good 90 -100 Excellent Kielty Arborist Services LLC 4 Survey Report: Kielty Arborist Services LLC 5 Survey Map: Observations: During the tree survey conducted on June 20th at 740 Fairfield Rd,several observations were made regarding the condition and health of the trees on the property.The following discussion highlights the key findings: Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia)-Tree #1: Oak tree #1 exhibited fair overall health and structure.However,there were notable issues, including poor form as the tree is suppressed and growing away from street tree #2.Minor crown reduction pruning is recommended to reduce risk of a limb failure. London Plane -Sycamore Street tree: London plane street tree #2,another protected tree,is in fair condition (lower end).This tree has been topped in the past at 12’with dead wood in the canopy observed.A general crown cleaning is recommended to remove dead wood from the canopy.Where appropriate crown reduction pruning cuts are also recommended. Kielty Arborist Services LLC 6 Other Trees: The remaining trees on the property comprised Crab Apple,Wild Plum,Photinia,Pittosporum, and Privet.Unfortunately,these trees exhibited poor health,with signs of decline,crossing limbs, co-dominant branches,and large areas of deadwood.Overall,they were not well-maintained,and their condition is not expected to improve with any mitigation measures. Protected Trees: These trees have been identified as protected and should be handled with care. ●#1 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) ●#2 London Plane (Platanus x hispanica) Plan Review: No impacts to the protected trees are expected as no work is taking place within 10x the diameter of a protected tree.Impacts to the non protected trees are expected.Crab apple trees #3 and #4 are to be impacted by the new deck and home addition work.Photinia hedge #7 is expected to be impacted by the proposed detached garage.Pittosporum hedge #8 and Privet tree #9 are to be impacted by the proposed paver driveway.Impacts are expected to be moderate to high for these trees as the existing health of the trees is poor (in most cases).By hand excavating the foundation when within the tree drip lines and hand excavation for the driveway while cleanly cutting roots and providing irrigation to the trees,impacts can be somewhat mitigated.The trees are recommended to be deeply irrigated before the start of the work.The area within the dripline of the trees is recommended to be irrigated until the top foot of soil is saturated.This should be done weekly for two months following the proposed work.The following spring the trees should be fertilized to act as an additional mitigation measure.If the trees continue to decline,the trees should be removed and replaced. Tree Protection Plan: Tree protection zones should be established and maintained throughout the entire length of the project.Fencing for the protection zones should be 6-foot-tall metal chain link type supported by 2-inch diameter metal poles pounded into the ground to a depth of no less than 2 feet.The support poles should be spaced no more than 10 feet apart in the center.The location for the protection fencing for the protected trees on site should be placed at 10x the tree diameters where possible.Tree protection fencing for Coast Live Oak tree #1 is recommended to be placed at 27.7’from the tree where possible (type 1).Tree protection fencing for London Plane tree #2 is recommended to be placed in a way that completely fences off the entire street tree planting strip (type 2).All other non-protected trees are recommended to be protected by fencing placed at the drip line.No equipment or materials should be stored or cleaned inside protection zones.Signs should be placed on fencing signifying “Tree Protection Zone -Keep Out”.If fencing needs to be reduced for access or any other reasons,the non-protected areas must be protected by a Kielty Arborist Services LLC 7 landscape buffer.All tree protection and inspection schedule measures,design recommendations, watering,and construction schedules shall be implemented in full by the owner and contractor. Below is a diagram showing the recommended tree protection zones. Showing the recommended tree protection in red for the protected trees Landscape Buffer Where tree protection does not cover the entire root zone of the trees at the dripline or when a smaller tree protection zone is needed for access,a landscape buffer consisting of wood chips spread to a depth of six inches with plywood or steel plates placed on top will be placed where foot traffic is expected to be heavy.The landscape buffer will help to reduce compaction to the unprotected root zone.If plywood is used the pieces of plywood shall be attached in a way that minimizes movement. Tree Pruning (not expected) During construction,any Pruning will be supervised by the Project Arborist and must stay underneath 20%of the tree total foliage.ANSI A300 pruning standards are required to be followed anytime a tree is to be pruned. Root Cutting All work within 10x the diameter of a protected tree on site must be done by hand under the Project Arborist's supervision.Any roots to be cut are recommended to be monitored and documented within this distance.Roots to be cut measuring larger than 1.5”in diameter shall be shown to the Project Arborist before being cut.The Project arborist may recommend irrigation or fertilizing at that time.Cut all roots clean with a saw or loppers.Roots to be left exposed for a period of time should be covered with layers of burlap and kept moist daily by the contractor. Kielty Arborist Services LLC 8 Trenching and Excavation Trenching for irrigation,electrical,drainage,or any other reason,should be located outside of the tree's calculated root zone of 10 times the tree diameters when possible.If not possible, trenching shall be hand dug when beneath the dripline of desired trees.Any excavation underneath the dripline of a protected tree will need to be supervised by the Project Arborist. Hand digging and careful placement of pipes below or beside protected roots will dramatically reduce root loss,thus reducing trauma to desired trees.Trenches should be backfilled as soon as possible using native materials and compacted to near original levels.Trenches to be left open with exposed roots shall be covered with burlap and kept moist.Plywood laid over the trench will help to protect roots below.Roots retained within trenches are recommended to be wrapped in layers of wetted-down burlap to avoid root desiccation. Irrigation Imported trees-On a construction site,I recommend irrigation during winter months,1 time per month.Seasonal rainfall may reduce the need for additional irrigation.During the warm season, April –November,my recommendation is to use heavy irrigation,2 times per month.This type of irrigation should be started prior to any excavation.The irrigation will improve the vigor and water content of the trees.The on-site arborist may make adjustments to the irrigation recommendations as needed.Deep irrigation is recommended.The top foot of the soil should be saturated.The use of soaker hoses is recommended.The foliage of the trees may need cleaning if dust levels are extreme.Removing dust from the foliage will help to reduce mite and insect infestation.The native oak tree #1 is recommended to be only irrigated in the months of May and September to combat prolonged drought periods.No other dry season irrigation is recommended unless the tree’s root zone is impacted. Grading All existing grades underneath the dripline of a protected tree shall remain as is where possible. Grading within 10x the diameter of a protected tree is required to be done under the supervision of the project arborist. Inspections The site will be inspected after the tree protection measures are installed and before the start of construction.Other inspections will be carried out on an as-needed basis.It is the contractor ’s responsibility to notify the site arborist when construction is to start,and whenever there is to be work performed within the dripline of a protected tree on-site at least 48 hours in advance. During the site visits the site arborist will offer mitigation measures specific to the work completed.Kielty Arborist Services can be reached at 650-532-4418,or by email at davidkieltyarborist@gmail.com. This information should be kept on-site at all times.The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely,David Beckham David Beckham Certified Arborist WE#10724A TRAQ Qualified Kielty Arborist Services LLC 9 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1.Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct.Any titles and ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable.No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character.Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear,under responsible ownership and competent management. 2.It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes,ordinances,statutes, or other government regulations. 3.Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources.All data has been verified insofar as possible;however the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4.The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made,including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. 5.Loss,alteration,or reproduction of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6.Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply a right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed,without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser. 7.Neither all nor any part of this report,nor any copy thereof,shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client,to the public through advertising,public relations,news,sales,or other media,without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser particularly as to value conclusions,the identity of the consultant/appraiser,or any reference to any professional society or initialed designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualification. Kielty Arborist Services LLC 10 8.This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consult/appraiser,and the consult/appraiser’s fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value,a stipulated result,the occurrence of a subsequent event,nor upon any finding to be reported. 9.Sketches,diagrams,graphs,and photographs in this report,being intended as visual aids,are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. 10.Unless expressed otherwise:1)information in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection;and 2)the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection,excavation,probing,or coring.There is no warranty or guarantee,expressed or implied,that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge,training,and experience to examine trees,recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees.Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand.Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground.Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances,or for a specified period of time.Likewise,remedial treatments,like a medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Treatment,pruning,and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist’s services such as property boundaries,property ownership,site lines,disputes between neighbors,landlord-tenant matters,etc.Arborists cannot take such issues into account unless complete and accurate information is given to the arborist.The person hiring the arborist accepts full responsibility for authorizing the recommended treatment or remedial measures. Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled.To live near a tree is to accept some degree of risk.The only way to eliminate all risks is to eliminate all trees. Arborist:David Beckham David Beckham Date:July,27th,2023 Kielty Arborist Services LLC 11 Form + One ▪ Design & Planning ▪ 4843 Silver Springs Drive▪ Park City ▪ UT ▪ 84098 ▪ (415) 819.0304 ▪ tim@formonedesign.com Inspiration for Addition/Remodel of House (its inspiration is the existing house) Color Scheme Windsor-one trim + accents + siding Restoration Hardware Light (Lombard Lamp) Or a more period light fixture (Confirming) 740 Fairfield Road – Burlingame, Calif. – Finish Board 07/25/2023 740 Fairfield Road 300’ noticing APN: 029-042-100 DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #______________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #__________________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial______________________________________________ NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings_____________________________________________________________________ Review Code________ Reviewer________________________ Date_______________ Page 1 of 13 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) 740 Fairfield Road P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Santa Mateo *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad San Mateo, Calif. Date 2021 *c. Address 740 Fairfield Road City Burlingame Zip 94010 d. UTM: Zone mE/ mN *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Parcel Number 029-042-100 *P3a. Description: The property at 740 Fairfield Road (APN 029-042-100) contains a 1.5 story, single-family home. The subject building is located west of downtown Burlingame, in the Burlingame Terrace neighborhood, on the east side of Fairfield Road between Palm Drive and El Camino Real on a rectangular .2-acre parcel (Figure 1). The building, set back from all property lines, has a rectangular footprint and is designed in the Craftsman style. The wood-frame building is clad in wood clapboard siding and is capped with a cross-gable roof with asphalt shingles. The roof features flared eaves, simple wood fascia boards, exposed rafter tails, and knee braces. An exterior brick chimney is located at the north façade, and an interior brick chimney is within the northeast quadrant of the building. Most windows are original wood windows set in original tapered wood frames, either with divided-lite double-hung or casement sashes. The primary (west) façade features a projecting full-width front porch that is covered by a gabled roof at the north (left) end and an open pergola at the south (right) end. The porch has a concrete landing, brick steps at all exterior edges, and square columns clad in clapboard with brick-clad bases. The north end of the porch is capped by a flared gable roof and features clapboard siding in the gable end and a narrow horizontal seven-lite wood window. A wood pergola to the south (right) of the porch has beams that extend underneath the gable end of the porch (Figure 2). The primary entrance is centered on the primary façade and features a partially glazed wood door and is covered by a wood-frame screen door (Figure 3). The entrance is flanked by two tripartite window arrangements with 22-lite transoms, each tripartite window includes a fixed square window between vertically oriented fixed windows (Figure 4). Beneath each tripartite window is a denticulated wood planter box. A pair of nine-lite casement windows are in the dormer over the pergola on the south of the porch (Figure 5). (Continued on page 2) *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2: Single-Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) View of primary (west) façade, May 9, 2023. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both Ca. 1913 (Original water tap record). *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Martella (Trustee) 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame CA, 94010 *P8. Recorded by: Page & Turnbull, Inc. 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 *P9. Date Recorded: June 1, 2023 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive *P11. Report Citation: None *Attachments: None Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (list) P5a. Photo State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 2 of 12 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 511 Washington Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date March 31, 2022 Continuation Update DPR 523L *P3a. Description (Continued) Figure 1. Aerial view of 740 Fairfield Road, outlined in red. Source: Google Maps, 2023, edited by Page & Turnbull. Figure 2. View of the pergola at the south end of the porch, looking northeast. Figure 3. Front door at the primary (west) façade, looking east. Note the tapered surround on the windows and the front door. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L Figure 4. Tripartite windows with divided-lite transoms at the primary façade, looking east. Figure 5. Detail view of the dormer window above the pergola on the primary façade, looking east. The south façade is set back approximately 32 feet from the property line, and features, from west (left) to east (right), an angled bay window with a hipped roof, a casement window with a textured pane, an angled bay window with a shed roof, a square bay window, and a horizontal band of fixed and sliding windows at the rear sunroom addition (Figure 6 and Figure 7). The angled bay window at the west end has a central eight-over-one double-hung window flanked by four-over-one double-hung windows (Figure 8). The angled bay window does not have an opening in its center section, which is flanked by casement windows with textured glass panes (Figure 9). The square bay window has a pair of one-over-one double-hung windows, and no openings on its sides. In the gable end of the south façade is a pair of eight-lite casement windows, with a wood lattice vent occupying the peak (Figure 11). The horizontal band of windows at the rear sunroom addition consists of, from west to east, a divided-lite fixed window and two divided-lite sliding windows over panels of vertical wood siding (Figure 10). Figure 6. Oblique view of the south façade, looking northeast. Figure 7. View of the east half of the south façade, looking north. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L Figure 8. Detail view of the angled bay window at south façade, looking north. Figure 9. Detail view of the angled bay window at south façade, looking north. Figure 10. Detail view of the southeast corner of the rear sunroom addition, looking north. Figure 11. Detail view of the casement windows within the gable end of the south façade. The rear (east) façade of the building faces the rear yard and features a one-story addition with a low-pitched shed roof. A rear door is centered in the east façade accessed via wood steps with a wood railing and small landing (Figure 13). The south (left) end of the rear addition has two sets of paired two-lite casement windows and a pair of smaller two-lite casement windows to the north (right) separated by a small panel of vertical wood siding. Panels of vertical wood siding are beneath the casement windows (Figure 12). To the north (right) of the rear door is a pair of two six-lite casement windows. A single casement window is located in the gable end of the rear façade (Figure 14). A door to a crawlspace lies under at the north end of the rear façade. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 5 of 13 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L Figure 12. Oblique view of the rear façade, looking west. Figure 13. Detail view of rear entrance landing, looking northwest. Figure 14. Detail view of casement windows at north end at rear façade, looking west. Figure 15. Detail view of gable end at rear façade, looking west. The north façade is set back approximately 13 feet from the property line and features, from east (left) to west (right), a pair of four- lite casement windows, an external brick chimney, a one-over-one double-hung window, a fan vent, a tripartite window consisting of four-over-one double-hung windows flanking a central ten-over-one double-hung window, and two 12-lite casement windows (Figure 16 through Figure 18). Between the fan vent and the tripartite window, the north façade projects outward several feet. This projection extends west from the tripartite window to the northwest corner of the building. Within the gable end of the north façade is a pair of eight-lite casement windows (Figure 19). Above the casement windows, a wood lattice vent occupies the peak of the gable end. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 6 of 13 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L Figure 16. Oblique view of north façade, looking south. Figure 17. Detail view of double hung window and fan vent on north façade, looking southeast. Figure 18. Oblique view of north façade, looking southwest. Figure 19. Detail view of casement windows in gable end on north façade. A dirt driveway extends from the street to the west along the north property line and ends parallel to the rear façade. A sho rt firewood rack and wood utility shed lie along the north property line in the rear yard. DPR 523B (9/2013) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #__________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#______________________________________________ BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 6 of 13 *NRHP Status Code 6Z *Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road B1. Historic name: B2. Common name: B3. Original Use: Single-family residence B4. Present use: Single-family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) According to water tap records provided by the Burlingame Historical Society, the subject building was built by ca. 1913 by an unknown builder for an unknown original owner (Figure 20).1 Sanborn Map Company fire insurance maps and aerial photographs indicate that the footprint was unchanged between 1921 and 1949 (Figure 21 through Figure 23). Since construction the building has undergone one major alteration, the extension and enclosure of the rear porch. (Continued on page 7.) *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: ____________________________ *B8. Related Features: None B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme Residential Development Area Burlingame Terrace Period of Significance N/A Property Type Single-Family Residential Applicable Criteria N/A Historic Context – City of Burlingame: The lands that would become the City of Burlingame were initially part of Rancho San Mateo, a Mexican-era land grant given to Cayetano Arena by Governor Pio Pico in 1845. Over the next four decades, the lands passed through the hands of several prominent San Francisco businessmen, including William Howard (purchased 1848) and William C. Ralston (purchased 1856). In 1866, Ralston sold over 1,000 acres to Anson Burlingame, the U.S. Minister to China. Following Burlingame's death in 1870, the land reverted to Ralston and eventually to Ralston's business partner, William Sharon. Very little formal development occurre d during this period, with most of the land used for dairy and stock farm operations. In 1893 , William Sharon's trustee, Francis G. Newlands, proposed the development of the Burlingame Country Club as an exclusive semi-rustic destination for wealthy San Franciscans. A railroad depot was constructed in 1894, concurrent with small -scale subdivisions in the vicinity of Burlingame Avenue. During this time, El Camino Real acted as a de facto dividing line between large country estates to the west and the small vi llage of Burlingame to the east. The latter developed almost exclusively to serve the needs of wealthy estate owners. Burlingame began to develop in earnest with the arrival of an electric streetcar line between San Mateo and San Francisco in 1903. However, the 1 906 Earthquake and Fires had a far more dramatic impact on the area. Hundreds of San Franciscans who had lost their homes be gan relocating to Burlingame, which boomed with the construction of new residences and businesses. Over the next two years, the village's population grew from 200 to 1,000 people. (Continued on page 9.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: N/A *B12. References: Refer to Continuation Sheet, page 13 B13. Remarks: None *B14. Evaluator: Walker Shores & Hannah Simonson, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date of Evaluation: June 1, 2023 1 The earliest dated record of the subject building is the 1913 water tap record. However, these records begin in 1913, so it is possible that the building is older than 1913. Source: San Mateo County Assessor's Office, 2023. Property shaded red. Edited by Page & Turnbull. (This space reserved for official comments.) State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L *B6. Construction History (continued): No major alterations are described in the permit record, and the only observed exterior alterations are the extension and enclosure of the rear porch sometime between 1949 and 2003, and the demolition of the original detached garage sometime between 1959 and 2003 (Figure 21). In 1999, Don and Mary Martella, then the owner and occupants, submitted the property to the American Bungalow Registry and received a certificate of registration.2 The American Bungalow Registry is a privately funded archive of bungalow style residences administered by the American Bungalow magazine, and has no bearing on local, state or federal historic status. Figure 20. Ca. 1913 photograph of the north side of Fairfield Road, subject building at red arrow. Source: Burlingame Historical Society. Figure 21. 1941 aerial photograph. Note the full-length porch at the east façade and the nonextant detached garage at the top right corner of the lot. Source: University of Santa Barbara Library, FrameFinder, Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C- 6660, Frame 355. 2 Certificate of Registration 0010405, American Bungalow Registry, 1999. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L *B10. Significance: Historic Context (continued) Burlingame Terrace Neighborhood In 1908, Burlingame incorporated as a city, and in 1910, annexed the adjacent town of Easton to the north. The following year, t he Burlingame Country Club area was also annexed. By 1920, Burlingame's population had increased to 4,107. The subject property was constructed in the Burlingame Terrace neighborhood, within the original city limits of Burlingame. Burlingame Terrace was surveyed and subdivided in 1905 by D. Bromfield for Charles W. Smith.3 Originally, Burlingame Terrace was bounded by California Avenue to the east, Oak Grove Avenue to the south, the County Road (El Camino Real) to the west, and Edgehill Drive to the north (including those parcels on the north side of Edgehill Drive );.However, today the name Burlingame Terrace refers to all the residential properties west of Oak Grove Avenue between California Avenue and El Camino Real to Broadway, despite the fact that the land between Sanchez Avenue and Broadway was originally part of the Easton Addition in 1910. By 1906, the Stuart & MacVicar reality firm began advertising lots for sale in San Francisco newspapers.4 By 1908, the unsold lots were owned by the Market Street Bank, which became defunct that same year.5 During the liquidation of the bank’s assets, the remaining unsold Burlingame Terrace lots were sold to a Chicago real estate syndicate. In 1910, real estate firm Lyon & Hoag purchased the unsold Burlingame Terrace lots and quickly began marketing the properties through brochures and newspaper advertisements.6 The town of Burlingame experienced a residential building boom in the early 1920s and into the 1930s.Sanborn Map Company fire insurance maps from 1921 and 1949 indicate that Burlingame Terrace developed over a period of about 50 years, with generally one-story detached single-family residences constructed in the early years of the twentieth century The neighborhood was nearly completely built out by the 1940s (Figure 22 and Figure 23). 740 Fairfield Road was constructed in the 1910s, during the early period of development of Burlingame Terrace, prior to the boom starting in the 1920s. By 1960, nearly all of the approximately 320 lots in Burlingame Terrace were developed. Most of the residences in the neighborhood are some variation of the Craftsman, Co lonial Revival, or other revival styles, although many of the early houses have been renovated or replaced with new construction. Figure 22. Detail from 1921 Sanborn Insurance Company Map for Burlingame, showing the gradual residential development near the subject parcel in the early 20th century. Subject parcel outlined red. Source: San Francisco Public Library. Edited by Page & Turnbull. 3 D Bromfield, “Map of Burlingame Terrace: San Mateo County, Cal.,” October 1905. 4 “Burlingame Real Estate,” The San Francisco Call, July 26, 1906, 11. 5 “Grand Jury to Dig Into Bank Failures,” The San Francisco Examiner, August 15, 1908, 2. 6 “Burlingame Terrace Sold,” The San Francisco Call, December 4, 1909, 16. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L Figure 23. Detail from 1949 Sanborn Insurance Company Map for Burlingame, showing the near complete residential development near the subject parcel in the mid-20th century. Subject parcel outlined red. Source: San Francisco Public Library. Edited by Page & Turnbull. Craftsman Style The Craftsman bungalow building typology developed in California in early 1900s, and as historian Virginia Savage McAlester notes, “was the dominant style for smaller houses built throughout the country during the period from about 1905 until the early 1920s.”7 The bungalow typology retained popularity through the mid-1920s, but fell out of favor by the early 1930s.8 Bungalows rendered in modest interpretations of the Craftsman style were often referred to as “California Bungalows,” and provided hybridized examples of the influence of the Arts & Crafts and Prairie styles which gained popularity during the first two decades of the 20th century.9 In some cases, the typology also took cues from Japanese architecture and Swiss chalets. The term bungalow, however, is derived from the Hindustani word, bangla, meaning low house for travelers with surrounding porches.10 Elaborate one-off homes of the wealthy, such as the Gamble House in Pasadena, represent high style examples while rows of more modest bungalows are found throughout California. Bungalows were built throughout the United States by builder-contractors between the 1890s and 1920s and were often constructed according to plans provided in plan books or mail order catalogs and monthly journals such as those published by Sears, Roebuck & Co. or Aladdin Homes.11 The popularity of the Bungalow during the early 20th century was evident as it became the first type to be built in quantity by builder -contractors. The bungalow typology was typically rendered in wood-clad, shingle-clad, and stucco-clad variations in the Bay Area. Beyond variations in cladding depending on the favored aesthetic of a builder-contractor or prospective owner, bungalows typically featured a front porch (sometimes with a stoop containing a staircase), tapered columns, many windows to provide abundant light and air circulation, gabled roof forms with wide, overhanging eaves, and exposed roof frame components including purlins, rafters, and beams. Gable vents were also common to the typology. 740 Fairfield Road expresses the Craftsman style through its low-pitched, cross-gable roof; exposed rafter tails; flared eaves; knee braces; and front porch and pergola. 740 Fairfield Road – Ownership & Occupancy History 740 Fairfield Road was originally constructed by an unknown builder by 1913. In 1913, the property was owned by Earl Hermine Swing (1887-1960), a stenographer and secretary, who moved out of the building in 1937. The building was vacant for two years until it was purchased by Joseph H. Hart, a local physician who rented 740 Fairfield Road to a variety of occupants. These occupants included Don Reid, an attorney, and Augusta Reid in 1939; and Clarence Melzer, a salesman, his wife, Ida, and his 7 Virginia Savage McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses: The Definitive Guide to Identifying and Understanding America’s Domestic Architecture (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), 568. 8 McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses, 568. 9 McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses, 578. 10 Lester Walker, American Homes: The Landmark Illustrated Encyclopedia of Domestic Architecture (New York: Black Dog & Levanthal Publishers, 1996), 186. 11 Walker, American Homes, 185. See also, Mike Jackson, “Assembly Required: A Brief History of 20th-Century Kit House Designs,” Architect, accessed online May 10, 2023, https://www.architectmagazine.com/practice/assembly-required-a-brief-history-of-20th-century-kit-house-designs_o. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L daughter, Barbara, between 1940 and 1955. Hart sold the property in 1949 to an unknown owner and then, in 1961, it was purchased by Raymond Hardy (1905-1978), a credit manager for American Can Co., who had already been living in the house with his family since 1956. In 1968, the property was bought by John Asquith, a supervisor at American Airlines and, in 1969, it was purchased by Don Martella (1924-2022), a gardener, and Mary Martella (1926-2004). After Mary Martella died in 2004, Don Martella lived at the subject property until his death in 2022 when ownership passed to his estate trustee, Paul Martella. The following table outlines the ownership and occupancy history of 740 Fairfield Road, compiled from water tap and ownership index records on file at the Burlingame Historical Society, Burlingame city directories, building permits, Ancestry.com, and other available resources. Evaluation The property at 740 Fairfield Road is not currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The property is not listed in the most recent published version of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for San Mateo County, last updated in 2022, indicating that no record of a previous survey or evaluation affiliated with the State of California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) is on file. The City of Burlingame has a Historic Register that was created in 2020; 740 Fairfield Road is not listed on the local Historic Register. In order for a property to be considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and/or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), the property must possess historic significance and retain integrity to convey that significance. Criterion A/1 (Events) 740 Fairfield Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register and/or California Register under Criterion A/1 (Events) for its association with any events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. The subject building is among the oldest homes in the Burlingame Terrace, but does not stand out as a first, only, or unique example of the early development of the neighborhood such that it would rise to the level of significance required for listing in the National Register or California Register . No significant events are known to have taken place at the subject building that would allow the building to ris e to the level of significance necessary to be individually eligible for the National Register and/or California Register under Criterion A/1. Table 1. Ownership and Occupancy History at 740 Fairfield Road Years Known Occupants (Known Owners in Bold) Occupation (if listed), or [Relation to Head of Household] 1913-1937 Earl H. Swing Stenographer, secretary 1939-1946 Joseph S. Hart (owner only) Physician 1939 Don C. Reid Augusta Reid Attorney [Wife] 1940-1955 Clarence W. Melzer Ida Melzer Barbara Melzer Salesman, S. M. Investment Co. [Wife] [Child] 1956-1961 Raymond Hardy Dorothy Hardy Ronald R. Hardy Betty Hardy Ronald Hardy Janis Hardy Credit Manager, American Can Co. [Wife of Raymond Hardy] Salesman, Ideal Roller [son of Raymond Hardy] [Wife of Ronald R. Hardy] Employee, Memorial Mills Hospital [son of Raymond Hardy] [Wife of Ronald Hardy] 1961-1968 Raymond Hardy Dorothy Hardy Ronald R. Hardy Betty Hardy Ronald Hardy Janis Hardy Credit Manager, American Can Co. [Wife of Raymond Hardy] Salesman, Ideal Roller [Wife of Ronald R. Hardy] Employee, Memorial Mills Hospital [son of Raymond] [Wife of Ronald Hardy] 1968 John Asquith Charlene Asquith Supervisor, American Airlines [Wife] 1969-2022 Donald Martella Mary Martella Gardener; retired 2004 [Wife] 2022-2023 Paul Martella (Trustee) (Not listed) State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L Criterion B/2 (Persons) 740 Fairfield Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register and/or California Register under Criterion B/2 (Persons) as a property associated with the life of a person important to local, state, or national history . Neither the first known owner Earl Swing nor longtime owners or occupants Donald Martella or Raymond Hardy, nor any other resident or owner of the subject property, appear to have made a significant impact on local, state, or national history such that the building could be found significant under Criterion B/2. Criterion C/3 (Architecture) 740 Fairfield Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register and/or California Register under Criterion 3 (Architecture) as a building that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. No known architect or builder is associated with the design, and the building does not possess high artistic values. While the residence is largely intact, the residence is a modest and typical expression of the Craftsman style and lacks the features and ornaments of more elaborate examples in the style that might make it stand out amongst numerous other examples of Craftsman bungalows locally and regionally. This residence does not stand out as distinctive amongst the many Craftsman style residences built in the region during this period. As such, the property does not rise to the level of significance for individual eligibility for listing in the National Register and/or California Register under Criterion C/3. Criterion D/4 (Information Potential) The property at 740 Fairfield Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register and/or California Register under Criterion D/4 (Informational Potential) as a building or property that has the potential to provide information important to the prehistory or history of the City of Burlingame, state, or nation. The "potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of California" typically relates to archeological resources, rather than built resources. When Criterion D/4 does relate to built resources, it is relevant for cases when the building itself is the principal source of important construction -related information. The subject property does not feature construction or material types, or embody engineering practices that would, with additional study, provide important information. Evaluation of this property was limited to age-eligible resources above ground and did not involve survey or evaluation of the subject property for the purposes of archaeological information. Conclusion The property at 740 Fairfield Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. As such, California Historical Resource Status Code (CHRSC) of “6Z” has been assigned to the property, meaning “Found ineligible for National Register, California Register, or Local Design ation through survey evaluation.”12 This conclusion does not address whether 740 Fairfield Road would qualify as a contributor to a potential historic district. Additional research and evaluation of Burlingame Terrace and its surrounding neighborhoods would need to be done to assess the neighborhood's eligibility as a historic district. 12 California State Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation, Technical Assistance Bulletin #8: User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource Inventory Directory, Sacramento, November 2004. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 13 of 13 Resource Name or # 740 Fairfield Road *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 1, 2023 Continuation Update DPR 523L *B12. References: Brechin, Gray. Imperial San Francisco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999. Bromfield, D. “Map of Burlingame Terrace: San Mateo County, Cal.” October 1905. Accessed via the San Mateo County Parcel Viewer, May 10, 2023. California State Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation. Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD), San Mateo County, updated March 2020. _____. Technical Assistance Bulletin #8: User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource Inventory Directory, Sacramento, November 2004. Certificate of Registration #0010405. American Bungalow Registry. 1999. McAlester, Virginia Savage. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013. Sanborn Map Company. Insurance Maps of Burlingame, California. New York, NY: Sanborn Map Company, Sheet 23, 1921. _____. Insurance Maps of Burlingame, California. New York, NY: Sanborn Map Company, Sheet 23, 1946. San Francisco Call, The. San Francisco, CA. Various issues. San Francisco Examiner, The. San Francisco, CA. August 15, 1908. San Mateo County Directories, 1925-present, collections of Ancestry.com and the Burlingame Public Library. Walker, Lester. American Homes: The Landmark Illustrated Encyclopedia of Domestic Architecture. New York: Black Dog & Levanthal Publishers, 1996. SITETITLE PAGE See DetailsT1.0APPLICABLE CODESREFERENCE SYMBOLSBUILDING DATACONSULTANTSDESIGNER FORM + ONE DESIGN CONTACT: TIM RADUENZ 4843 SILVER SPRINGS DR. PARK CITY, UT. 84098 P: 415.819.0304 E: tim@formonedesign.comOWNERS MR. ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010SURVEY SAVIOR P. MICALLEF LAND SURVEYING 421 WILDWOOD DR. S. SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94080 P: 805.709.2423MR. ARJUN DUTT740 FAIRFIELD ROADBURLINGVIEW, CA. 94010T1.0GNCGSWSW2AR1AR2FAR1OF1A1.0A1.1PH1PH2A2.0A2.1A2.2A3.0A3.1A3.2A4.0A5.0A9.0G2.0TITLE PAGEGENERAL NOTESCAL GREENCONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICESSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT DETAILSARBORIST REPORTARBORIST REPORT (CONT)EXISTING / PROPOSED FARTOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYPROPOSED SITE PLAN / PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANDRAINAGE PLAN / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCEXISTING HOME PHOTOSPROPOSED HOME RENDERSARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSEXISTING + PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANEXISTING + PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLANEXISTING + PROPOSED ROOF PLANEXISTING + PROPOSED FRONT / REAR ELEVATIONEXISTING + PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATIONEXISTING + PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATIONPROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSFINISH, APPLIANCE, AND DOOR + WINDOW SCHEDULESPROPOSED GARAGE PLANSFIXTURE OR EQUIPMENT SYMBOL T.W. 12.0 T.P 15.6 T.C 14.0 78 92203BED RM.CDABSheet numberMATCH LINE, SHADED SIDE ISCONSIDEREDNumber indicates color and / or materialEXISTING CONTOURSNEW OR FINISHED CONTOURSTOP OF PAVEMENTTOP OF WALLTOP OF CURBSETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINEREVISION SYMBOLSCloud around revisionWORK, CONTROL, OR DATUM POINTCOLOR / MATERIAL SYMBOLROOM REFERENCEEXT. DOOR & WINDOW SYMBOLIndicates door & window numberINTERIOR DOOR SYMBOLIndicates door numberRoom nameRoom numberNumber indicated elevation, wall sectionor detailBLDG & WALL SECTION REFERENCEArrow indicates direction of viewLetter indicates building sectionSheet numberINTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCEArrow indicates direction of viewLetter indicates building elevationSheet numberDETAIL REFERENCENumber indicates wall sectionEXTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCEArrow indicates direction of viewSheet numberTITLE SYMBOLSSheet numberGRID LINE REFERENCEEXTERIOR FINISHESWALL FINISH: (N) WOOD SIDINGROOF: CLASS A, ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLESWINDOWS: (E) WOOD CLAD WINDOWS(N) TO MATCH SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQ.Particle Bd.Prefabricate(d)Plate (line)PlasterPlywoodPanel(ing)Paint(ed)PairPre CastPressure TreatedQuarry TileRiserRadiusReinforceRelocateRemoveRequiredResilentRough OpeingRedwoodSee Struct. Dwg.ShelfSheathingSimilarSealerSpecificationSquareStandardStainless SteelSuspendedSymmetricalTreadTowel BarTemperedTougue & GrooveThroughTop of SurfaceToilet PaperDispenserTypicalUnless OtherwiseNotedUnfinishedVerticalVert. GrainWhite BrothersWoodWindowWrought IronWith (out)WaterproofWater ResistantWainscotPBDPFBPLPLASPLYWDPNLPNTPRPRCSTPTQTRRADREINFRELOREMOREQDRESILRORWDSSDSHSHRSIMSLRSPECSQSLDS. STLSUSPSYMTTBTEMPT>HRUTOSTPDTYPUONMECHUNFVERTVGWBWDWDWWIW/OWPWRWSCT&d@CO#ABABVACACOUSADHADJAGGALAPAPXBDBELBLKBMBOTBRKBSBTWNCABCEMCERCICLGCLKGCLRCMUCNTRCOLCOMPOCONCCONNCONSTCONTCPTDBLDEMODFDIADIAGDNDRDSDRAEAELELECENCLEQEQPTEW(EX)AndPennyAngleAtCenter lineDia. or roundPerpendicularPound or No.Anchor BoltAboveAsphalt Conc.AcousticalAdhesiveAdjustableAggregrateAluminumAccess PanelApproximateBoardBelowBlock(ing)BeamBottomBrickBoth SidesBetweenCabinetCementCeramicCast IronCeilingCaulkingClearConc. Mas. UnitCounterColumnCompositionConcreteConnect(ion)ConstructionContinuousCarpetDoubleDemolishDouglas FirDiameterDiagonalDownDoorDown SpoutDrawerEachElevationElectricalEnclosureEqualEquipmentEach WayExistingEXHEXPEXPOEXTFBOFDNFINFLFLASHFLOURFLXFOCFOFFOXFOFPLFTGFURRFUTGAGALVGBGIGLGRGYPHBDHDHDRHWDHORINTINSULJSTJTLAMLTLVRMASMCMECHMEMBMFRMIRMNTMTLNICNTSO/OCOPNGOPPPPARExhaustExpansionExposedExteriorFurinshed byOwnerFoundationFinishFloor (line)FlashingFluorescentFlexiableFace of Conc.Face of Fin.Face of StudFinished OpeningFireplaceFootingFurringFutureGaugeGalvanizedGrab BarGrab IronGlass/GlazingGrade (Ground)GypsumHard BoardHeavy DutyHeaderHardwareHorizontalInteriorInsulationJoistJointLaminateLightLouverMasonryMedicine CabinetMechanicalMembraneManufacturerMirrorMount(ed)MetalNot inContractNot to ScaleOverOn CenterOpeningOppositePlasticParallelSHEET INDEXELECT/MECH SYMBOLSABBREVIATIONSSCOPE OF WORKVICINITY MAPMATERIAL SYMBOLSDuplex convenience outlet & plateFloor convenience outletGFI duplex convenience outletFourplex outletDuplex conv. outlet, 1/2 hot, 1/2 switched220V amerage as per equipmentGFI/W.P. weatherproof outletFlush mounted floor & ceiling outletJunction boxTelevision outletTelephone outlet & plateFlood lightCeiling fixtureWall lightPorclein recepticle w/ pull chainIndirect cove lightingRecessed ceiling can lights4" recessed low voltage w/ directional trimRecessed ceiling lightWaterproof ceiling fan/light & plateRecessed waterproof exterior up lightSingle pole switch3 way switchSwitch w/ dimmerDoor activated switchMotion detectorTimer (switch)Vacancy sensor w/ dimmer "manual on"Vacancy sensor "manual on"Weatherproof switchCountertop air switchDoorbell pushbuttonChimeSmoke detectorThermostatSpecial outletInstant start florescent lightLandscape lightElectrical panel boardExistingDelete existingReplace existingGas outletHose bibCeiling/floor supply registerCeiling/floor return registerWall diffuserT.V./Computer OutletCentral vacuum inletAutomatic garage door switchAlarm control keypadRE DEE 36" ETC CH T SD CSM S D 3S S FAN S JSSTSV/DSVSWP GFI220vWP G HB4 x 12 CDFD4 x 12 CDFDCvGAMECHANICAL + ELECTRIC DRAWINGSMECH. + ELECT PLANSMECH. + ELECT. CUTSHEETSTITLE-24TITLE-24 CONT.STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS-ME2.0ME3.0ME4.0ME4.1- Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING form:029-042-100: 9,288 SQ. FT. LOT AREA:DEFERRED SUBMITALSCAL GREEN BUILDING MEASURE1. A MINIMUM OF 65% OF THE NON- HAZARDOUS CONSTRUCTION + DEMOLITION WASTER GENERATED AT THE SITE WILL BEDIVERTED TO AN OFFSITE RECYCLE, DIVERSION, OR SALVAGE FACILITY PER CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDINANCE + 2022 CGC §4.4082. AN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING OCCUPANT OR OWNER. 2022 CGC §4.410.13. UPON REQUEST, VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CODE MAY INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS, BUILDER OR INSTALLER CERTIFICATION, INSPECTION REPORTS, OR OTHER METHODS ACCEPTABLE TO THEBUILDING DIVISION THAT WILL SHOW SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE 2022 CODE REQUIREMENT. 2022 CGC §703.14. AT TIME OF ROUGH INSTALLATION, DURING STORAGE ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, AND UNTIL FINAL STARTUP OF THEHEATING, COOLING & VENTILATING EQUIPMENT, ALL DUCT AND OTHER RELATED AIR DISTRIBUTION COMPONENTS OPENINGS WILLBE COVERED W/ TAPE, PLASTIC, SHEET METALS, OR OTHER METHODS ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY TO REDUCE THEAMOUNT OF WATER, DUST, OR DEBRIS THAT MAY ENTER THE SYSTEM. (CGC 4.504.1).(*) = FUTURE BUILDING SHEETSGravel / Rock fillPrecast concreteBituminous pavingPlywoodRigid insulationEarthWoodSteelStone VeneerConcrete BlockGypsum boardConcreteBrick VeneerBatt insulationMetal LathMarble / tileExisting constructionWood frame constructionMetalSand/ Mortar/ PlasterExisting const. removed(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)CONSTRUCTION HOURS1. NO PERSON SHALL ERECT (INCLUDING EXCAVATION AND GRADING), DEMOLISH, ALTEROR REPAIR ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE OTHER THAN BETWEEN THE HOURS LISTEDBELOW.CAL GREEN BUILDING CODE CHECKLIST: Single Family to be attached to jobsite building set2022 California Plumbing Code2022 California Mechanical Code2022 California Electric Code2022 California Energy Code CITY OF BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE2022 California Fire Code2022 California Green Building Standards Code2022 California Residential Code2022 California Building CodeCONSTRUCTION HOURSWEEKDAYS:SATURDAYS:SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS:8:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M.9:00 A.M. - 6:00 P.M.NO WORK ALLOWEDHIDDEN CONDITION NOTES1. Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issuedfor these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning commission.1. FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR REMODEL OF EXISTING 2-STORY HOME2. FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO REAR OF EXISTING HOME1. FIRE SPRINKLER PLANCONSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED TO WEEKDAYSAND NON-CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8:00 A.M. AND 5:00 P.M.(SEE CITY OF BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 13.04.100 FOR DETAILS)APN #:TITLE 24 RICK ROCKLEWITZ NRG COMPLIANCE INC. PO BOX 3777 SANTA ROSA, CA 95402 PHONE:707-237-6957STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TBDDUE BEFORE ISSUANCE:1. RECYCLING + WASTE REDUCTION FORM (CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE)2. SEWER BACKWATER PROTECTION CERTIFICATE (CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE)3. STORM WATER CONSTRUCTION POLLUTION PREVENTION PERMIT (CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE)4. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL TEST (CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE)ZONING :R1USE OF BUILDING:RESIDENTIALOCCUPANCY:R3TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-BNUMBER OF (E) STORIES: 1 1/2NUMBER OF (E) DWELLINGS: 1PARKING: 1-COVERED2-UNCOVEREDSPRINKLERED:(E) NOSPRINKLERS WILL BEADDED, UNDER SEP. PERMITFIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES:(E) FAR:(E) 1ST FLOOR -(E) 2ND FLOOR -TOTAL -1,536 SQ. FT.681 SQ. FT.2,217 SQ. FT.(N) FAR:(N) 1ST FLOOR -312 SQ. FT.TOTAL -3,313 SQ. FT.(E) LOT COVERAGE:(E) 1ST FLOOR -(E) COVERED PORCH -TOTAL -1,536 SQ. FT.192 SQ. FT.1,753 SQ. FT.(N) LOT COVERAGE:TOTAL -2,586 SQ. FT.(N) REAR DECK -252 SQ. FT.WALL DEMO CALCS:(E) GARAGE -0 SQ. FT.(E) 1ST FLOOR -(E) 2ND FLOOR -1,536 SQ. FT.681 SQ. FT.(N) GARAGE -294 SQ. FT.(E) REAR DECK -25 SQ. FT.(E) 1ST FLOOR -(E) COVERED PORCH -1,536 SQ. FT.192 SQ. FT.(N) GARAGE -294 SQ. FT.1. AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE HOUSE, UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. FIRE SPRINKLERCONTRACTOR WILL BE PROVIDED THE AMP AND WILL BE INCLUDED IN THEIR SEPERATE SUBMITTAL.2. APPROVED NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN SUCH A POSITION AS TO BE PLAINLY VISIBLEAND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST W/ THEIR BACKGROUND.3. PROVIDE A BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE-USC APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY FOR FIRE LINE. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALLENSURE THE DOUBLE VALVE ASSEMBLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY A SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH APPROVED CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SCHEDULING WATER DEPARTMENT FINAL.4. A SCHEMATIC OF THE DOMESTIC/FIRE PROTECTION WATER LINE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN/CIVIL DRAWINGS PAGE OF THE BUILDINGPLANS. THIS SCHEMATIC SHALL DETAIL THE LINE FROM THE WATER METER TO STRUCTURE AND INDICIATE THE LOCATION OF THE DOUBLEBACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE ON THE FIRE PROTECTION LINE AFTER THE SPLIT BETWEEN DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION LINES.5. FIRE FLOW SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE APPENDIX IIIA. FIRE FLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS LESS THAN 3,600SQ. FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED AT 1,000 GPM UNLESS PROTECTED BY AN AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, THEN IT MAY BEREDUCED BY 50%6. MIN. 1" WATER METER REQUIRED.(E) TOTAL WALLS -(E) WALLS TO REMAIN -20' - 0" / 168' - 9" = 11.85% WALLS TO BE REMOVED168' - 9"148' - 9"TOTAL WALLS TO BE DEMO'D20' - 0"(N) 2ND FLOOR -490 SQ. FT.(N) 1ST FLOOR -312 SQ. FT.RECEIVEDCITY OF BURLINGAMECDD-PLANNING DIVISIONSEP 21 2023 MECHANICAL NOTES:1. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIAMECHANICAL CODE (CMC) AND ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL,STATE AND LOCAL CODES.2. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR TO ACCEPT SOLERESPONSIBILITY FOR PROPER DESIGN AND INSTALLATIONOF MECHANICAL SYSTEM. SEE MECHANICAL DWGS. BYOTHER FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION.3. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITHGENERAL CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND INSTALLSUITABLE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PER TITLE 24. MECH.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY AND DETERMINE SIZE ANDCONFIGURATION OF DUCTS AND REGISTER. SEE SHEETINDEX FOR LOCATION OF TITLE 24 CONFORMANCEWORKSHEETS AND ENERGY COMPLIANCE NOTES WITHINTHIS SET. HVAC DUCTS LOCATED IN ATTIC SPACE SHALLBE PLACED AS CLOSE TO PERIMETER AS POSSIBLE SO ASNOT TO INTERFERE WITH USEABLE ATTIC STORAGESPACE.4. MECHANICAL LAYOUT SHOWN IS SCHEMATIC AND ISSHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY.5. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY TO GAS FIREDAPPLIANCES BY COMBUSTION AIR DUCTS PER (CMC) &CPC. VERIFY DUCT SIZE WITH MANUFACTURER'SSPECIFICATIONS.6. FURNACES OR BOILERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PERMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL MEET THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE(CMC)7. PER CMC, COMBUSTION AIR DUCTS FROM THE ATTICSHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE UPPER AND LOWER 12INCHES OF THE ENCLOSURE. DUCTS SHALL BE SEPARATEAND SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED.8. APPLIANCES DESIGNED TO BE FIXED IN POSITION SHALLBE SECURELY FASTENED IN PLACE. SUPPORTS FORAPPLIANCES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TOSUSTAIN VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOADS AS REQUIREDBY CMC. WATER HEATERS TO BE SECURED WITH AMINIMUM OF 2 STRAPS, ONE EACH TO BE LOCATED IN THEUPPER AND LOWER THIRD OF THE UNIT.9. UNDERCUT ALL INTERIOR DOORS (AS APPROPRIATE)FOR AIR RETURN CIRCULATION TO VENTS, TYPICAL OFINTERIOR CONDITIONED SPACES.10. VERIFY ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITH OWNER PRIORTO INSTALLATION.11. ALL FIXTURES TO BE SELECTED (OR APPROVED) BYOWNER.12. EXHAUST FANS IN LAUNDRY AND BATHROOMS MUSTCONNECT DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE AND PROVIDE AMINIMUM OF 5 AIR CHANGES PER HOUR. EXHAUST FANVENTS MUST TERMINATE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM ANYOPENINGS INTO THE BUILDING AND BE PROVIDED WITHBACKDRAFT DAMPERS.13. AT NEW FORCED AIR FURNACE INSTALLATIONSPROVIDE 3' MIN. WORKING SPACE ALONG EACH SIDE (WITHA TOTAL OF AT LEAST 12" ON BOTH SIDES COMBINED),BACK AND TOP OF FURNACE.14. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL LISTEDEQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE FIELDINSPECTOR AT TIME OF INSPECTION.PLUMBING NOTES:1. VERIFY ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITH OWNER PRIORTO INSTALLATION.2. ALL FIXTURES TO BE SELECTED AND (OR APPROVED) BYOWNERS.3. ALL NEW WATER CLOSETS SHALL BE 1.28GALLON/FLUSH MAXIMUM.4. NO DISHWASHER MACHINE SHALL BE DIRECTLYCONNECTED TO A DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR FOOD DISPOSERWITHOUT THE USE OF AN APPROVED AIR GAP FITTING ONTHE DISCHARGE SIDE OF THE DISHWASHING MACHINE.LISTED AIR-GAPS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE FLOODLEVEL MARKING AT OR ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL OF SINK ORDRAINBOARD, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER5. (E) ON-DEMAND SYSTEM, CONFIRM WITH OWNERELECTRICAL NOTES:1. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIAELECTRIC CODE (CEC) AND ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL,STATE, AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES.2. PER CEC, ALL ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES INSTALLEDAT CRAWL SPACES AT OR BELOW GRADE, ANDOUTDOORS SHALL HAVE GROUND-FAULTCIRCUIT-INTERRUPTER (G.F.C.I.) PROTECTION. ALLRECEPTACLES LOCATED IN BATHROOMS SHALL HAVEGROUND-FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER (G.F.C.I.)PROTECTION.3. SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CBC. ADETECTOR SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EACH SLEEPINGROOM AND AT A POINT CENTRALLY LOCATED IN THECORRIDOR OR AREA GIVING ACCESS TO ROOMS USEDFOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. A DETECTOR SHALL BEINSTALLED ON EACH LEVEL OF A MULTI-STORYDWELLING, INCLUDING BASEMENT LEVELS. INSPLIT-LEVEL OR MULTI-LEVEL FLOORS, A SMOKEDETECTOR SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UPPER LEVEL,OR ON BOTH LEVELS IF THE LOWER LEVEL CONTAINSSLEEPING AREAS. WHERE THE CEILING HEIGHT OF AROOM OPEN TO THE HALLWAY SERVING THE BEDROOMSEXCEEDS THAT OF THE HALLWAY BY 24 INCHES, SMOKEDETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE HALLWAY AND INTHE ADJACENT ROOM. DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED MANUFACTURER'SINSTRUCTIONS. WHEN THE VALUATION OF AN ADDITIONOR REPAIR EXCEEDS $1,000.00, OR WHEN ONE OR MORESLEEPING ROOMS ARE ADDED OR CREATED IN ANEXISTING DWELLING, THE ENTIRE DWELLING SHALL BEPROVIDED WITH SMOKE DETECTORS LOCATED ASREQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS. IN NEWCONSTRUCTION, REQUIRED SMOKE DETECTORS SHALLRECEIVE THEIR PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDINGWIRING WHEN SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM ACOMMERCIAL SOURCE AND SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH ABATTERY BACKUP. THE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A SIGNALWHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW. WIRING SHALL BEPERMANENT AND WITHOUT A DISCONNECTING SWITCHOTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED FOR OVER CURRENTPROTECTION. SMOKE DETECTORS MAY BE SOLELYBATTERY OPERATED WHEN INSTALLED IN EXISTINGBUILDINGS, OR IN BUILDINGS WITHOUT COMMERCIALPOWER, OR IN BUILDINGS WHICH UNDERGO ALTERATION,REPAIRS, OR ADDITIONS REGULATED AS OUTLINEDABOVE.4. TELEPHONE OUTLETS TO BE PREWIRED BYSUBCONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ASREQUIRED. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL TELEPHONEOUTLETS WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5. ELECTRICAL OPENINGS (SWITCHES, RECEPTACLES,ETC.) ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF FIRE RATED WALLS SHALLBE MAINTAINED AT LEAST 24 INCHES APART.6. PER CEC, RECEPTACLE SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 12FEET MEASURED HORIZONTALLY ALONG THE WALL.7. PER CEC, AT LEAST ONE WALL SWITCH-CONTROLLEDLIGHTING OUTLET SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EVERYHABITABLE ROOM; IN BATHROOMS, HALLWAYS,STAIRWAYS, ATTACHED GARAGES, AND DETACHEDGARAGES WITH ELECTRICAL POWER, AND OUTDOORENTRANCES OR EXITS.8. PER CEC, LIGHTING FIXTURES LOCATED WITHINCLOTHES CLOSETS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE WALLABOVE THE DOOR OR ON THE CEILING. CLEARANCESSHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:A. SURFACE MOUNTED INCANDESCENT FIXTURES - 12"B. SURFACE MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FIXTURES - 6" 9.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDINGNECESSARY TEMPORARY POWER.10. VERIFY ANY AND ALL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ANDSWITCHES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFROUGH ELECTRICAL.11. ALL ELECTRICAL HANGING FIXTURES TO BE SELECTEDAND PURCHASED BY OWNER. VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONSWITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.13. ALL INCANDESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURES RECESSEDINTO INSULATED AREAS SHALL BE APPROVED FOR ZEROCLEARANCE INSULATION COVER PER 2022 CALIFORNIAENERGY CODE AND RATED IC OR APPROVED EQUALMEETING UL RATING OR OTHER TESTING /RATINGLABORATORIES RECOGNIZED BY THE ICC.14. THIS DRAWING IS FOR LAYOUT PURPOSES ONLY. NEWELECTRICAL SHALL BE DESIGN-BUILD. NEW ELECTRICALWORK SHALL BE DESIGNED AND BUILT IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE AND APPLICABLECODES, STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR BUILDINGLIFE SAFETY, EMERGENCY, EGRESS AND NIGHT LIGHTING.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOROBTAINING SEPARATE PERMIT. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORTO PROVIDE COMPLETE DESIGN-BUILD ELECTRICALSYSTEM AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE (NEW) SERVICESHOWN (SCHEMATICALLY) ON THE DRAWINGS.GENERAL NOTES:ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY W/ THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CA.BUILDING CODE AND ALL OTHER CODES ANDREQUIREMENTS, IN THEIR MOST RECENT EDITIONINCLUDING THE FOLLOWING:2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE2. THE INTENTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ISTO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT FACILITIESAND TRANSPORTATION NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE ANDPROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK IN AN ACCEPTABLEINDUSTRY'S STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN ANYREQUIRED PERMITS FOR THIS OR HER WORK.3.THE MIN. ACCEPTABLE QUALITY OF MATERIALS,WORKMANSHIP, AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION SHALLMEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERION: CONFORM TO THEAMERICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE STANDARDS WHERE SUCHSTANDARDS EXISTS.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL ADDITIONALELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND FIRE PROTECTION WORKREQUIRED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMISSIONOF BID TO REVIEW SCOPE OF WORK, DEMOLITION, ETC.6. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFYALL DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TOSTARTING WORK. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BEREPORTED TO THE DESIGNER FOR REVIEW.7. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED, (U.O.N.)8. DIMENSIONS NOTED CLEAR (CLR.) ARE NOT ADJUSTABLEWITHOUTAPPROVAL FROM THE DESIGNER.9. SAFETY MEASURES: AT ALL TIMES THE CONTRACTORSHALL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FORCONDITIONS OF THE JOB SITE INCLUDING SAFETY OFPERSONS AND PROPERTY.10. CUTTING AND DEMOLITION SHALL BE DONE BYMETHODS, WHICH WILL AND WILL NOT JEOPARDIZESTRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION ANDWILL NOT DAMAGE PORTIONS TO REMAIN.11. CONTRACTORS SHALL REMOVE, CUT, CAP, AND REPAIR,AS NECESSARY, ANY UTILITES. INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO: ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ANDFIRE SPRINKLERS, WHERE PARTITIONS ARE SCHEDULEDFOR DEMOLITION OR ARE NO LONGER OPERATIONAL OR INSERVICE. ALL OTHER EXISTING UTILITES ARE TO REMAINFULLY OPERATIONAL.12. IN GENERAL, THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TORETAIN ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROMTHE PROJECT. ANY ITEMS OR MATERIAL NOT DESIRED BYTHE OWNER ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE BY THECONTRACTOR AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.13.CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY DUSTPROTECTION AND/OR BARRICADING REQUIRED TOPROTECT ADJACENT SPACES AND EXISTING FINISHES.CONTRACTOR OS RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR ANYDAMAGES CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR OR THEIRSUB-CONTRACTORS.14. PATCH AND REPAIR ANY DAMAGES TO FLOORS,WALLS, CEILINGS, HARDWARE, FIXTURES, WINDOWS,ETC. AS A RESULT OF THE DEMOLITION PROCESS.MATCH EXISTING ADJACENT FINISHES AS CLOSELY ASPOSSIBLE.15. IF ANY QUESTIONS ARISE TO THE INSTALLATION OFANY MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT, OR WITH THECONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCLARIFY THE QUESTIONS W/ THE DESIGNER BEFOREPROCEEDING. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE W/OTHE DESIGNERS AND OR OWNERS APPROVAL.16. TOTAL THICKNESS OF NEW WALLS SHALLMATCHTHAT OF ADJACENT WALLS.17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DO ALL CUTTING, FITTING,OR PATCHING OF WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TOMAKE ITS PARTS FIT TOGETHER PROPERLY AND SHALLNOT ENDANGER ANY OTHER WORK BY CUTTING,EXCAVATION, OR OTHERWISE ALTERING THE TOTALWORK OR ANY PART OF IT. ALL PATCHING REPAIRING,AND REPLACING OF MATERIALS AND SURFACES, CUTOR DAMAGE IN EXECUTION OF WORK, SHALL BE DONEW/ APPLICABLE MATERIALS SO THAT SURFACESREPLACED WILL, UPON COMPLETION, MATCHSURROUNDING SIMILAR SURFACES.18. ALL WORK SHALL BE SCHEDULED AND PERFORMEDSO AS NOT TO DISTURB ANY OTHER TENANTS IN THEBUILDING. ANY WORK THAT WILL DISTURB ANOTHERTENANT, ABOVE OR BELOW, OR IN THE FLOOR , SHALLBE PERFORMED MOST EXPEDITIOUSLY AND THEDISTURBED TENANT SHALL HAVE FULL USE OF THEPREMISE.19. ALL TRADES SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR,EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND PERFORM ALLNECESSARY, INDICATED, REASONABLY INFERRED ORREQUIRED BY ANY CODE W/ JURISDICTION TOCOMPLETE THEIR SCOPE OF WORK FOR A COMPLETEAND PROPER FINISHED JOB. ANY CUSTOMARY ANDNECESSARY ITEMS WHICH ARE REASONABLY IMPLIEDAND REQUIRED TO COMPLETE PROPERLY THE WORKOUTLINED SHALL BE FURNISHED, EVEN IF NOTSPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ORMENTIONED IN THE SPECIFICATION.20. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLCONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP, DURING AND FINAL.21. THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ART (ADA) ISSUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND POSSIBLY CONTRADICTORYINTERPRETATIONS. THESE PLANS AND ANYACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS ("PLANS") REPRESENTTHE DESIGNER'S OPINION REGARDING ITSINTERPRETATION OF THE ADA AS IT APPLIES TO THESUBJECT PROJECT. IT IS NOT IN ANY WAY A WARRANTYOR GUARANTEE THAT SAID PLANS COMPLY WITH ANYOR ALL POSSIBLE INTERPRETATIONS OF THE ADA BYOTHERS. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formGeneral Notes See DetailsGN Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formCal Green See DetailsCGGREEN BUILDING MEASURE:1. A MINIMUM OF 65% OF THE NON- HAZARDOUS CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITIONWASTER GENERATED AT THE SITE WILL BE DIVERTED TO AN OFFSITE RECYCLE,DIVERSION, OR SALVAGE FACILITY PER CITY OF BURLINGAME AND 2022 CGC §4.4082. AN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDINGOCCUPANT OR OWNER. 2022 CGC §4.410.13. UPON REQUEST, VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CODE MAY INCLUDECONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, BUILDER OR INSTALLERCERTIFICATION, INSPECTION REPORTS, OR OTHER METHODS ACCEPTABLE TO THEBUILDING DIVISION THAT WILL SHOW SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE 2022CODE REQUIREMENT. 2022 CGC §703.14. AT TIME OF ROUGH INSTALLATION, DURING STORAGE ON THE CONSTRUCTIONSITE, AND UNTIL FINAL STARTUP OF THE HEATING, COOLING & VENTILATINGEQUIPMENT, ALL DUCT AND OTHER RELATED AIR DISTRIBUTION COMPONENTSOPENINGS WILL BE COVERED W/ TAPE, PLASTIC, SHEET METALS, OR OTHERMETHODS ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OFWATER, DUST, OR DEBRIS THAT MAY ENTER THE SYSTEM. (CGC 4.504.1).CAL GREEN SITE DEVELOPMENT:1. PROJECTS THAT DISTURB LESS THAN 1 ACRE SHALL DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT APLAN TO MANAGE STORM WATER DRAINAGE (DURING CONSTRUCTION). A BMPPAGE IS SUFFICIENT. 2022 CGC 4.106.22. PLANS SHALL INDICATE HOW GRADING + PAVING WILL PREVENT SURFACEWATER FLOWS FROM ENTERING BUILDINGS. EXCEPTION: PROJECTS THAT DO NOTALTER THE DRAINAGE PATH. 2022 CGC 4.106.33. ELECTRICAL VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING, PARKING SPACES: COMPLY W/ RELEVANTSECTIONS 2022 CGC 4.106.4GENERAL NOTES:1. PROVIDE 30" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH, (15" ON BOTH SIDES FROM CENTERLINE OF W.C.) AND 24"CLEARANCE IN FRONT OF THE W.C. PER CPC 402.5.2. PROVIDE MIN. SHOWER AREA - 1,024 SQ. IN., CAPABLE OF ENCOMPASSING A 30" CIRCLE.SEE PLANS PER CPC 408.6.3. TEMPERED GLAZING, TYP. AT ALL DOORS AND REQUIRED BY CODE.4. PROVIDE DEVICES TO ABSORB HIGH PRESSURES RESULTING FROM THE WASHER ANDDISHWASHER, ETC., PER CPC5. EXHAUST VENT FOR DRYER SHALL TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING ANDSHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A DRAFT DAMPER AND SHALL BE RIGID METAL DUCT WITHSMOOTH INTERIOR SURFACES PER CMC SECT. 504.ME4.0/4.1..SW / A1.0 CG#2A1.0 CG#3A2.0, PLUMB.NOTESA1.0 #8ME2.0 #47T1.0 CG#1T1.0T1.0ME2.0 #48A2.0 POL.CTRL. #7A2.0 POL.CTRL. #1A2.0 POL.CTRL. #6A2.0 POL.CTRL. #2A2.0 POL.CTRL. #3A2.0 POL.CTRL. #4A2.0 POL.CTRL. #5A2.0 #20A2.0 #21ME2.0 #49ME2.0 #51T1.0 CG#3TIM RADUENZ4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVEPARK CITY, UT. 8409807.14.23740 FAIRFIELD ROAD Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formSee DetailsSWBMP'S & Pollution Prevention Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formSee DetailsSW2Stormwater Management DetailsSW2Scale: N.A.2SOAKAGE TRENCHSW2Scale: N.A.1DRYWELL (RECOMMENDED DETAIL)SW2Scale: N.A.3STRAW ROLL DETAIL.... Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formArborist Report See DetailsAR1Scale: NAAR1ARBORIST REPORT Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formArborist Report (Cont.)See DetailsAR2Scale: NAAR21ARBORIST REPORT COVERED PORCH(N) LIBRARYK-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS (N) BATH-1K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS (E) BED-1(E) BATH-2(N) CLT-2LSM 45(N) KITCHEN(N) FAMILY(N) OFFICE-1(E) LIVINGUNCOVERED PORCH(E) DINING(N) PTRY(N) DECKDRIVEWAY(N) PWDELEC.(N)W.H.FURNACE(N)A.1,536 SQ. FT.B.312 SQ. FT.CP.192 SQ. FT.BMC 25.30.070(B)(4)DECK:252 SQ. FT.(E) BED-2(E) HALL(E) BED-3(N) BATH-3K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS (N) CLT(N) LAUN.(N) OFFICE-2K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS (N) M. BATH(N) M. CLT(N) M. BEDK-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS D.681 SQ. FT.E. 28 SQ. FT.F.462 SQ. FT.TERRACEDRIVEWAY1-STALL GARAGEG.294SQ. FT.DECK:Floor Area Calc.See DetailsFARLOCATIONAREAFAR APN: 029-042-100LOT SIZE:9,288 SQ. FT.MAX ALLOWABLE FAR:FAR = LOT SIZE X 32% + 1,100 = LIVEABLE SQ. FT.(PLUS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL 400 SQ. FT. FOR DETACHEDGARAGE AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES)9,288 SQ. FT. X 32% + 1,100 = 4,072 SQ. FT.MAX ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE:LC = LOT SIZE X 40% = ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE9,288 SQ. FT. X 40% = 3,715 SQ. FT. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formDETAILS:MAX LC = 3,715MAX FAR = 4,0722,586 SQ. FT.3,313 SQ. FT.FAR TOTAL:LC TOTAL:1ST FLR LOT COVERAGEAB1,536312SQ. FT.:1,536312SQ. FT.:REMARKS:EXISTINGADDITIONCOMPLETE FAR:2ND FLRD681-GARG294294 A2.2Scale: 1/4 = 1'-0"3PROPOSED FAR CALC.FIRST FLOORA2.2Scale: 1/4 = 1'-0"2PROPOSED FAR CALC.SECOND FLOORA2.2Scale: 1/4 = 1'-0"1PROPOSED FAR CALC.GARAGESUBTOTAL:1,8482,292SUBTOTAL:1,171-EXISTING(E) GARAGE**SUBTOTAL:294294CP192-(E) COVERED PORCH*E28-F462-ADDITION (DORMER)ADDITION* BMC 25.30.060(C)(2)(b): COVERED PORCHES OR DECKS ON THE FIRST FLOOR TOTALING 200 SQ. FT. OR LESS WHICHFACE A STREET AND ARE NOT LOCATED ON THE REAR OF THE DWELLING.** BMC TABLE 25.10-4: INTERIOR LOTS WITH DETACHED GARAGE - FLOOR AREA RATIO CALC SHALL BE 32% PLUS 1,100SQ. FT., PLUS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL 400 SQ. FT. FOR DETACHED GARAGE AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.DECK252 N 51°56'00" E 132.00' N 53°18'00" E 130.90'S 36°09'32" E 47.72'S 51°27'20" W 130.89' S 49°32'00" W 129.00'N 34°00'00" W 52.82'N 36°48'00" W 14.70'OHEOHEOHE(E) CONCRETE SIDEWALKPROTECTSSSSSSSS(N) PAVERDRIVEWAY(E) CONC. CURBPROTECTSEWERCLEANOUTRIDGEEL=113.35'(E) 34" OAKPROTECT(E) COVERED PORCHPROTECT(E) 22" TREEPROTECTN 36°54'16" W 24.00'(E) HEDGEPROTECT(E) BRICK PROTECT 1"=10'F A I R F I E L D R O A D( 5 0 ' R / W )(E) KITCHCHIMNEYREMOVE(E) GAS METER(E) 2 STORY HOUSEF.F. EL = 92.85'(N) GARAGE(294 SQ.FT.)FIRST FLR. ADDITION(E) HEDGEPROTECT88.2688.7589.3689.0389.3590.0390.3089.6289.9690.1889.4889.6889.9890.6490.6690.8090.76111.33106.6490.8390.9290.9891.5891.6391.3791.1790.7891.3791.2691.1291.0591.3091.1690.5890.7090.8690.1889.9489.8389.7989.6889.6990.0589.9589.8089.80(E) FLAGSTONE PROTECT (N) ELEC METER(N) DECK7'-4"30'-1"29'-11"(E) 4' WD. FENCEREMOVE(E) 4' WD. GATEREMOVE(E) UNCOVEREDPORCHPROTECT2'-3"14'-0"55'-5"2'-2"21'-0"12'-11"62'-0"4'-6"30'-10"(E) 6' WD. FENCEPROTECT(E) 6' WD. FENCEPROTECT(E) 6' WD. FENCEPROTECT15' FRONT SETBACK15' REAR SETBACK7' SIDE SETBACK 7' SIDE SETBACK (E) LAWNPROTECT(E) LAWNPROTECT(E) LAWNPROTECT(E) 6' GATEPROTECT(N) PROPOSED15 GAL. OAK12'-5"29'-2 1/2"28'-9"PARKING SPOT #1 PARKING SPOT #2PARKING SPOT #3 10'-0"18'-0"9'-0"18'-0"9'-0"18'-0"89.2391.3790.9789.2389.48DUE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK, ALL CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK FRONTING SITEMUST BE REPLACAED, PLUG ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS ANDINSTALL A NEW 4" LATERAL AND WYE TO MAIN, ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITYWATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRE LINE ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARDPROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATION, AND ANY OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORKS WITHINCITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THESE ITEMS.1'-6"1'-6"(E)D.S.(E)D.S.(E)D.S.(N)D.S.(N)D.S.(N)D.S.(E) WATER METERPROTECT(E) 4" SEWER LINESECOND FLR.ADDITIONSECOND FLR.ADDITION(E) SECONDFLR.(E) FIRSTFLR.(E) FIRST / SECONDFLR.5'-0" 20'-3"3'-1" 18'-10"15'-4" 28'-6"(N) PROPOSED15 GAL. OAK(N) PROPOSED15 GAL. OAK31'-1"1415 PALM DR.732 FAIRFIELD RD.728 FAIRFIELD RD. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formSite Plan See DetailsA1.0A1.0Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED SITE PLANGENERAL NOTES & SCOPE1. PROTECT ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION,CONSULT ARBORIST AS REQUIRED.2. NO EXISTING TREES OVER 48" IN CIRCUMFERENCE AT 54" FROM BASE OF TREEMAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT A PROTECTED TREE PERMIT FROM THE PARKSDIVISION. NO TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED FOR THIS PROJECT.3. WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE NOT REQUIRED SINCELANDSCAPE WILL NOT BE REHABILITATED AS NOTED ON PLANS.4. A PLAN HAS BEEN DEVELOPED, AND WILL BE IMPLEMENTED, TO MANAGE STORMWATER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CGC 4.106.2 & CGC 4.106.35. ALL SPRINKLER DRAINAGE SHALL BE PLACED INTO LANDSCAPING AREAS.CAL GREEN SITE DEVELOPMENT1. PROJECTS THAT DISTURB LESS THAN 1 ACRE SHALL DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT APLAN TO MANAGE STORM WATER DRAINAGE (DURING CONSTRUCTION). A BMPPAGE IS SUFFICIENT. 2022 CGC 4.106.22. PLANS SHALL INDICATE HOW GRADING + PAVING WILL PREVENT SURFACE WATERFLOWS FROM ENTERING BUILDINGS. EXCEPTION: PROJECTS THAT DO NOT ALTERTHE DRAINAGE PATH. 2022 CGC 4.106.33. ELECTRICAL VEHICLE (EV( CHARGING, PARKING SPACES: COMPLY W/ RELEVANTSECTIONS 2022 CGC 4.106.4PUBLIC WORKS NOTES1. A REMOVE/REPLACE UTILITES ENCHROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO (1)REPLACE ALL CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK FRONTING SITE, (2) PLUGALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS AND INSTALL A NEW 4"LATERAL, (3) ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FORSERVICES OF FIRE LINE ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER =CITY STANDARDPROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATION. (4) AND OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITYWORKS WITHIN CITY'S RIGHT-OF WAY.2. ALL WATER LINES CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRELINE PROTECTION ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD PROCEDURES ANDMATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. CONTACT THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT FORCONNECTION FEES. IF REQUIRED, ALL FIRE SERVICES AND SERVICES 2" AND OVERWILL BE INSTALLED BY BUILDER. ALL UNDERGROUND FIRE SERVICE CONNECTIONSSHALL BE SUBMITTED AS SEPARATE UNDERGROUND FIRE SERVICE PERMIT FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL.3. THERE WILL BE NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES SUCH AS RETAINING WALLS,FENCES, COLUMNS, MAILBOX, ETC. PROPOSED BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE ANDINTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.STORMWATER CHECKLIST NOTES1. DIRECT ROOF RUNOFF INTO CISTERNS OR RAIN BARRELS AND USE RAINWATERFOR IRRIGATION OR OTHER NON-POTABLE USE.2. DIRECT RUNOFF FROM SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, AND/OR PATIOS ONTOVEGETATED AREAS.3. DIRECT RUNOFF FROM DRIVEWAYS AND/OR UNCOVERED PARKING LOTS ONTOVEGETATED AREAS.4. CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS AND/OR PATIOS WITH PERMEABLESURFACES.5. USE MICOR-DETENTION, INCLUDING DISTRIBUTED LANDSCAPE-BASEDDETENTION.6. PROTECT SENSITIVE AREAS, INCLUDING WETLAND AND RIPARIAN AREAS, ANDMINIMIZE CHANGES TO THE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY.7. MARK ON SITE INLETS WITH THE WORDS "NO DUMPING! FLOWS TO BAY" OREQUIVALENT.8. (A.) RETAIN EXISTING VEGETATION AS PRACTICABLE (B) SELECT DIVERSESPECIES APPROPRIATE TO THE SITE. INCLUDE PLANTS THAT ARE PEST- AND/ORDISEASE-RESISTANT, DROUGHT-TOLERANT, AND/OR ATTRACT BENEFICIAL INSECTS.(C) MINIMIZE USE OF PESTICIDES AND QUICK -RELEASE FERTILIZERS.9. DESIGN FOR DISCHARGE OF FIRE SPRINKLERS TEST WATER TO LANDSCAPE ORSANITARY SEWER.10. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS TO STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS UNTILPERMANENT EROSION CONTROLS ARE ESTABLISHED.11. DELINEATE WITH FIELD MARKERS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: CLEARING LIMITS,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSITIVE OR CRITICAL AREAS,BUFFER ZONES, TREES TOBE PROTECTED AND RETAINED, DRAINAGE COURSES.12. PROVIDE NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS OR ATTACHEMENTS DESCRIBING THEFOLLOWING: (A) CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROLS, INCLUDE INSPECTION FREQUENCY; (B) METHODS ANDSCHEDULE FOR GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILLING, CLEARING OF VEGETATION , ANDSTORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED OR CLEARED MATERIAL, (C)SPECIFICATIONS FOR VEGETATIVE COVER & MULCH, INCLUDE METHODS ANDSCHEDULES FOR PLANTING AND FERTILIZATION (D) PROVISIONS FOR TEMPORARYAND OR PERMANENT IRRIGATION13. PERFORM CLEARING AND EARTH MOVING ACTIVITIES ONLY DURING DRYWEATHER14. USE SEDIMENT CONTROLS OF FILTRATION TO REMOVE SEDIMENT WHENDEWATERING AND OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS.15. PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS IN VICINITY OF SITE USING SEDIMENTCONTROLS (E.G. BERMS, SOCKS, FIBER ROLLS OR FILTERS)16. TRAP SEDIMENT ON-SITE, USING BMP'S SUCH AS SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS,EARTHEN DIKES OR BERMS, SILT FENCES, CHECK DAMS, COMPOST BLANKETS ORJUTE MATS, COVERS FOR SOIL STOCK PILES, ETC.17. DIVERT ON-SITE RUNOFF AROUND EXPOSED AREAS; DIVERT OFF-STE RUNOFFAROUND THE SITE (E.G SWALES AND DIKES)18. PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND UNDISTURBED AREAS FROMCONSTRUCTION IMPACTS USING VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENTBARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES,MULCHING OR OTHER MEASURES AS APPROPRIATE.19. LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES AND STABILIZE DESIGNATED ACCESSPOINTS.20. NO CLEANING, FUELING OR MAINTAINING VEHICLES ON-SITE, EXCEPT IN ADESIGNATED AREA WHERE WASHWATER IS CONTAINED AND TREATED.21. STORE, HANDLE AND DISPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS/WASTESPROPERLY TO PREVENT CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL TRAIN AND PROVIDE INSTRUCTION TO ALLEMPLOYEES/SUBCONTRACTORS RE: CONSTRUCTION BMP'S.23. CONTROL AND PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF ALL POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS,INCLUDING PAVEMENT CUTTINGWASTES,PAINTS,CONCRETE, PETROLEUMPRODUCTS,CHEMICALS,WASHWATEROR SEDIMENTS, RINSE WATER FROMARCHITECTURAL COPPER, AND NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES TO STORMDRAINS AND WATERCOURSES. S 34°00'00" E105.00'N 51°56'00" E 132.00' N 53°18'00" E 130.90'S 36°09'32" E 47.72'S 51°27'20" W 130.89' S 49°32'00" W 129.00'N 34°00'00" W 52.82'N 36°48'00" W 14.70'OHEOHEOHE(E) CONCRETE SIDEWALKPROTECTSSSSSSSSUTILITY(N) PAVERDRIVEWAY(E) CONC. CURBPROTECTSEWERCLEANOUTRIDGEEL=113.35'(E) 34" OAKPROTECTCOVERED PORCHPROTECT(E) 22" TREEPROTECTN 36°54'16" W 24.00'(E) HEDGEPROTECT1"=10'F A I R F I E L D R O A D( 5 0 ' R / W )(E) KITCHCHIMNEYREMOVE(E) GASMETER(E) 2 STORY HOUSEF.F. EL = 92.85'88.2688.7589.3689.0389.3590.0390.3089.6289.9690.1889.4889.6889.9890.6490.6690.8090.7690.97111.33106.6490.9290.9891.5891.6391.3791.1790.7891.3791.2691.1291.0591.3091.1690.5890.7090.8690.1889.9489.8389.7989.6889.6990.0589.9589.8089.8091.45(N) ELECMETER(N) DECK7'-4"30'-1"29'-11"(E) 4' WD. FENCEREPLACE(E) 4' WD. GATEREPLACEUNCOVERED PORCHPROTECT2'-3"14'-0"55'-5"2'-2"21'-0"12'-11"62'-0"4'-6"30'-10"(E) 6' WD. FENCEPROTECT(E) 6' WD. FENCEPROTECT(E) 6' WD. FENCEPROTECT15' FRONT SETBACK15' REAR SETBACK7' SIDE SETBACK 7' SIDE SETBACK (E) LAWNPROTECT(E) LAWNPROTECT(E) LAWNPROTECT(E) 6' GATEPROTECT(E)D.S.(E)D.S.(E)D.S.(N)D.S.(N)D.S.(N)D.S.(N) SCUPPER(N) GARAGE(294 SQ.FT.)8'-8"SEWERCLEANOUT(E) WATER METERPROTECT(E) 4" SEWER LINE(N) PROPOSED15 GAL. OAK(N) PROPOSED15 GAL. OAK(N) PROPOSED15 GAL. OAKFIRST FLR. ADDITIONSECOND FLR.ADDITIONSECOND FLR.ADDITION(E) SECONDFLR.(E) FIRST / SECONDFLR.(E) FIRSTFLR.1415 PALM DR.732 FAIRFIELD RD.728 FAIRFIELD RD. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formDrainage Plan / Impervious Surface See DetailsA1.1A1.1Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN / IMPERVIOUS SURFACEIMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCS1: 1,835 SQ. FT.(E) HOUSE + FRONT PORCHS2: 312 SQ. FT.(N) ADDITIONS3: 438 SQ. FT.(N) GARAGETOTAL: 2,585 SQ. FT. 2,585 SQ. FT. (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA) / 9,288 SQ. FT. (LOT SIZE)= 27.83%IF POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA IS GREATER THAN 40%OF TOTAL LOT SIZE, MITIGATION OF THE ADDITIONAL STORMRUNOFF IN EXCESS OF 40% TOTAL LOT SIZE MUST BE ADDRESSED.IF POST-CONSTRUCTION IS MORE THAN 60%, THIS WILL TRIGGER AREASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL STORM DRAIN FEE FOR THEPARCEL.PERMEABLE PAVER DETAIL Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting Home Photos See DetailsPH1 Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formProposed Home Renders See DetailsPH2 DN3RDN3R DN3RPORCHDN6RLOWWLFBOX15'-0 1/2"17'-0"LIVING13'-1"17'-0"DINING2'-4 1/2"3'-5 1/2"CLO7'-6 1/2"2'-4 1/2"CLO4'-4 1/2"12'-0"13'-4"BDRM7'-7 1/2"BATH8'-11 1/2"6'-11"6'-1" 5'-2"STAIRS3'-5"10'-9 1/2"12'-2 1/2"KITCHEN12'-2"13'-0 1/2"BDRM6'-1"HALL3'-0"4'-10 1/2"CLO3'-0 1/2" 9'-4"9'-4 1/2"NOOK9'-3 1/2"9'-1 1/2"WORKSHOP9'-4"7'-4 1/2"LAUNDRY5'-7 1/2"2'-5"CLO6'-1 1/2"2'-5"CLO5'-0"2'-10"CLOTRNSM ABVWINDOW BOXTRNSM ABVWINDOW BOXBLT-IN/LOW WLHEARTHBLT-IN/CAB(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)30'-1"22'-0"52'-1"9'-6"3'-3 1/2"2'-0"26'-11"2'-3 1/2"31'-2 1/2"30'-1"9'-6"52'-0 1/2" 12'-7" 9'-6 1/2"3'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 7'-7 1/2"2'-7 1/2"8'-0 1/2"2'-4" 9'-7"20'-7 1/2"(E)(E)A3.01A3.11A3.21A3.31(E) GAS METER(E) ELEC.METERDN3RDN3R DN3RCOVERED PORCH(N) LIBRARYTRNSM ABVWINDOW BOXTRNSM ABVWINDOW BOXBLT-IN/LOW WL(E)(E) / (R)(E)(E)(N) 6/0CASED(N) WD.(N) 2/6K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS (TEMP.)(N) BATH-1(N) TILEK-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS 5/0 FREE STANDING TUB (N) 2/6(E) BED-1(N) WD.(E) BATH-2(N) TILE(N) 2/6(POCKET)(N) CLT-2(N) WD.DBL. HANG.24" BASE24" D.W.36" BASE 36" REF.(N) 5/0(N)5/0LSM 45(N) 7/6(N) 16/0TEMP.(N) KITCHEN(N) WD.(N) FAMILY(N) WD.(N) OFFICE-1(N) WD.16'-11 1/2" ADDITION 13'-2 1/2"5"19'-0"3 1/2"9'-0"6"3 1/2" 6'-6" 20'-0" ADDITION(E) LIVING(N) WD.(N) WD.18x18QUEEN - 60x8018x18(N) 1/6TEMP.(TEMP.)36" RANGE 5"12'-0"4 1/2"5'-5 1/2"3 1/2"11'-0"4 1/2"12'-1" 2'-9"2'-8 1/2"4'-8 1/2"41'-11 1/2" 5 1/2"15'-3 1/2"7 1/2"13'-3 1/2"5 1/2"14'-11 1/2"29'-2 1/2"45'-0 1/2"36x36SHOWER ON/OFFUNCOVERED PORCH(E)(N)(N)2/8PKT.3 0 x 3 0 G2.0230x30(E) DINING(N) 2/0OPTION: PKT DR(N) 1/6(N) 3/0A3.02A3.12A3.22A3.32(N) PTRY(N) WD.(N)2/04'-0" x 8'-6" ISLAND3'-6"4'-0"3'-6"2'-0"(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(E) / (R)(N) 2/0TEMP.(R) 2/6UP54" VANITY 33" VANITY 18" BASE18" BASE24" BASE24" BASE24" BASE24" BASE18" T / R18" BASE18" BASE18" BASE18" BASE18" BASE18" BASE(N) 10/0 CASED3'-8 1/2"8'-6"5'-1"36x8830x3030x3024x48(E) GAS METERPROTECT(N) PROPOSEDELEC. METER(N) DECK(N) TREX100101102103104105106107SECOND FLOOR LINESECOND FLOOR LINEDRIVEWAYPAVERS, TBSA4.01A4.01A4.02A4.02EXISTINGEGRESS -3'-6" x 4'-6"EXISTINGEGRESS -3'-0" x 4'-6"(N) ADDRESS LETTERS1/2" STROKE BY 4" HIGH (MIN.)EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDNUMBERS AND ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN SUCH A POSITION ASTO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. SAID NUMBERS SHALLCONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUNDS, SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1/2" STROKE BY 4" HIGH, AND SHALL BEEITHER INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED IN ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS, OR REPAIR OFEXISTING CONSTRUCTION. THE POWER OF SUCH ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT BE NORMALLY SWITCHABLE. CITY OFBURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE 18.08.010. 2022 CBC 502.1(N)(N)(N) PWD(N) TILE3 1/2"3'-1 1/2"3 1/2"3'-7"ADJ. SHELVESBOOKCASE24x36 CRWLSPCACCESSELEC.(N)W.H.FURNACE(N)(N) FURNACE AND W.H.IN CRAWLSPACEBUILT-IN HUTCH Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting + Proposed 1st Flr Plan See DetailsA2.0A2.02PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLANA2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"1EXISTING 1ST FLOOR PLAN1. ALL EXTERIOR 2X6 WALLS: R-21 BATT INSULATION, OR MIN. BY TITLE-242. ALL EXTERIOR 2X4 WALLS: R-15 BATT INSULATIONOR MIN. BY TITLE-243. ALL CEILINGS TO RECEIVE R-32 MIN. INSULATIONOR MIN. BY TITLE-244. ALL UNDER FLOOR TO RECEIVE R-19 BAT INSULATION5. ALL BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, TO RECEIVE SOUND BATT, INSULATION, TYPICAL.6. CEILING INSULATION, MIN. R-30 INSULATION REQUIRED.7. BUILDING ENVELOPE INSULATION: PER CLIMATE ZONE: 3 TABLE 150.1-A, & B8. BUILDING ENVELOPE INSULATION: WALLS, ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE, MEETSTANDARDS IN TABLE 150.1-A & B9. QUALITY INSULATION INSTALLATION INSPECTION (QII) IS REQUIRED BY A THIRD PARTY.INSULATION:(See Title-24 For Min.)GENERAL BUILDING NOTES:1. REDUCED U-FACTOR (0.30) FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE WINDOWS 2022 CAL ENERGY CODE §150.1 (C)3 A2. PROVIDE LIGHTING AT ALL EXT. LANDINGS PER 2022 CRC 303.8 OR 2022 CBC 1008.2 AND 2022 CBC1205.43. ALL ROOMS TO MEET NATURAL LIGHTING + VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS WILL MEET 2022 CRC R303RELATED CODE REQUIREMENTS: (EGRESS)1. EGRESS WINDOWS SHALL HAVE A MIN. NET CLEAR OPERABLE AREA OF 5.7 SQUARE FEET.2. THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR WIDTH DIMENSION SHALL BE 20"3. THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT DIMENSION SHALL BE 24"RELATED CODE REQUIREMENTS: (BATHS) (CONT.):PLUMBING:- SHOWER MUST BE PROVIDED W/ TEMPERATURE CONTROL (ANIT-SCALD) TYPE VALVE. TOILETS MUST HAVE A MIN. CLEARSPACE OF 30" WIDE, & 24" CLEAR SPACE IN FRONT. IF NEW, TOILETS MUST BE WATER CONSERVING 1.28 GALLON. SHOWERDOORS SHALL OPEN OUTWARD AND SHALL BE A MIN. 22" WIDE, THE SHOWERHEAD CANNOT DISCHARGE DIRECTLY ATENTRANCE. ALL SHOWER COMPARTMENTS, REGARDLESS OF SHAPE,MUST BE CAPABLE OF ENCOMPASSING A 30" CIRCLE. JOB-FORMED SHOWER PAN LINER MUST SLOPE 14" PER FOOT TO WEEPHOLES IN DRAIN, AND BE INSPECTED UNDER TEST PRIOR TO COVERING.RELATED CODE REQUIREMENTS: (BATHS) (CONT.):BUILDING:- SHOWER WALL SHALL BE FINISHED TO A HEIGHT 72" A/ THE DRAIN INLET W/ MATERIAL THAT IS NOT AFFECTED BYMOISTURE. GREEN BD. CANNOT BE USED AS A BACKER FOR MASTIC TILE WHERE IT WILL BE EXPOSED TO SPLASHINGWATER & IS NOT ALLOWED ON CLGS.CEMENT BOARD WITH A MOISTURE BARRIER & CORROSION-RESISTANT FASTENERS IS AN APPROPRIATE BACKINGMATERIAL IN WET LOCATIONS. MIN. CEILING HEIGHT FOR ALL BATHROOMS IS 7'-0". SAFETY GLAZING IS REQUIRED FORWINDOWS IN TUB OR SHOWER LOCATIONS WHERE THE BOTTOM EDGE OF GLASS IS LESS THAN 5'-0" ABOVE THEDRAIN. AS PART OF REMODEL SMOKE DETECTORS WILL BE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS, ADJOINING HALL, & AT EACHLEVEL PER THE BUILDING CODE.RELATED CODE REQUIREMENTS: (BATHS)(CONT.)ELECTRICAL:- IT IS REQUIRED TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE RECEPTACLE WITHIN 3-FEET OF THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF EACH BASIN, THISRECEPTACLE AND ANY OTHERS LOCATED WITHIN THE BATHROOM MUST BE GFCI PROTECTED.- A SEPARATE 20-AMP CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO SUPPLY BATHROOM OUTLETS ONLY, OR A SINGLE BATHROOM.- LIGHTING WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE HIGH EFFICACY OR CONTROLLED BY A MANUAL ON OCCUPANTSENSOR SWITCH. (TYPICALLY HIGH EFFICACY LIGHT FIXTURES ARE PIN BASE FLUORESCENT WITH ELECTRONICBALLAST.MECHANICAL:- A FAN CONNECTED TO THE OUTSIDE CAN BE PROVIDED, FAN EXHAUST SHOULD BE 3-FEET FROM BUILDINGOPENINGS AND PROPERTY LINES. BE INSPECTED UNDER TEST PRIOR TO COVERING.GENERAL NOTES:1. PROVIDE 30" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH, 15" ON BOTH SIDES FROM CENTERLINE OF W.C.) AND 24" CLEARANCE IN FRONT OFTHE W.C. PER CPC 402.52. PROVIDE MIN. SHOWER AREA - 1024 SQ. INCHES, CAPABLE OF ENCOMPASSING A 30" CIRCLE. SEE PLANS PER CPC408.63. TEMPERED GLAZING, TYP. AT ALL DOORS AND REQUIRED BY CODE4. PROVIDE DEVICES TO ABSORB HIGH PRESSURES RESULTING FROM THE WASHER & DISHWASHER, ETC., PER CPC5. FLOORS, SLAB PERIMETER NR, RAISED R-19, CONCRETE RAISED U-FACTOR 0.2696. EXHAUST VENT FOR DRYER SHALL TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH ADRAFT DAMPER AND SHALL BE RIGID METAL DUCT WITH SMOOTH INTERIOR SURFACES PER CMC SECT. 504.7. VERIFY ALL FINISH FLOOR CALL-OUTS W/ OWNERS, TYP.8. SUB- PANEL ELECT., VERIFY LOCATION.9. WALLS, ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE, MUST MEET STANDARDS IN TABLE 150.1-A, OR B.10. ALL SHOWER WALLS TO BE WATERPROOF TO 72" ABOVE DRAIN INLET, WALL FINISHES TO BE OF SMOOTH HARDNONABSORBENT SURFACE, PER CRC R307.2 (CEMENT BASED)11. QUALITY INSULATION INSTALLATION INSPECTION (QII) IS REQ'D BY A THIRD PARTY.12. NA13. WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS AT ALL APPLIANCES THAT HAVE QUICK-ACTING VALVES (I.E.) DISHWASHERS HOTWATER LINE AND THE HOT/COLD LINES OF THE CLOTHES WASHER) 2022 CPC 609.10.14. CONTROL VALVE FOR SHOWER OR TUB/SHOWER SHALL BE OF THE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATICMIXING VALVE TYPE, PER CPC 420.0.15. THRESHOLD FOR IN-SWING DOORS SHALL BE 7.75" MAX. AND 7" MAX. FOR OUTSWING DOORS.16. (E) GAS METER LOCATION, PG&E, TYPICAL 36" FROM OPERABLE WINDOWS.17. (E) ELECTRICAL METER LOCATION18. MAX. DROP FROM TOP OF THRESHOLD TO THE EXT. LANDING AT ALL SLIDING AND IN-SWINGING DOORS SHALL BELIMITED TO 7.75", AND NOT MORE THAN 1.5" LOWER THAN THRESHOLD FOR OUTSWING DRS. PER 2022 CRC R311.319. (N) STAIRS TO HAVE MAX. RISER HEIGHT OF 7.75" AND A MIN. TREAD DEPTH OF 10" PER CRC R311.7.4.20. A CAPILLARY BREAK WILL BE INSTALLED IF A SLAB ON GRADE FOUNDATION SYSTEM IS USED. THE USE OF A 4"THICK BASE OF 1/2" OR LARGER CLEAN AGGREGATE UNDER A 6 MIL VAPOR RETARDER WITH JOINT LAPPED NOT LESSTHAN 6" WILL BE PROVIDED UNLESS AND ENGINEERED DESIGN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THEBUILDING DIVISION . 2022 CGC §4.505.2 AND CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC) §R5O6.2.321. BUILDING MATERIALS WITH VISIBLE SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE WILL NOT BE INSTALLED. WALL AND FLOORFRAMING WILL NOT BE ENCLOSED WHEN THE FRAMING MEMBERS EXCEED 19% MOISTURE CONTENT. MOISTURECONTENT WILL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINISH MATERIAL BEING APPLIED. 2022 CGC §4.505.322. NA23. ANY GAS FIREPLACE WILL BE DIRECT-VENT SEALED-COMBUSTIBLE TYPE 2022 CGC §4.503.124. NEW MANDATORY U-FACTOR (0.58) FOR FENESTRATION AND SKYLIGHTS §150.0B25. WALLS WITH 2X6 AND LARGER FRAMING REQUIRE R-19 INSULATION§150.0(C)226. ANY WOOD STOVE OR PELLET STOVE WILL COMPLY WITH US EPA PHASE II EMISSION LIMITS 2022 CGC §4.503.127. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR A SINGLE LINE DRAWING OF THEEXISTING AND NEW GAS LINES AND INDICATE THE DISTANCE FROM THE METER TO EACH GAS FIRED APPLIANCEPRIOR TO INSTALLATION. INCLUDE THE SIZE OF THE GAS PIPE TO EACH APPLIANCE AND BTU RATING OF EACHAPPLIANCE. GAS PIP SIZING WILL BE SIZED PER TABLE 1216.2(1) IN THE 2022 CPC. NOTE: ANY INSTALLATION OF NEWGAS PIPING PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK APPROVAL IS AT THE RISK OF THE CONTRACTORS RISK.28. HOT WATER PIPING INSULATION §150.0 (j)2 A ii29. LIGHTING - NEW MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR INDOOR ROOMS §150.0 (K)30. RADIANT BARRIER REQUIRED IN CLIMATE ZONE 3 §150.0 (C) 231. REDUCE U-FACTOR (0.30) AND SHGC (0.20) FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE WINDOWS §150.1 (C) 3 A32. ADHESIVES, SEALANTS AND CAULKS USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL FOLLOW LOCAL AND REGIONAL AIRPOLLUTION OR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS 2022 §4.504.2.133. ANNULAR SPACES AROUND PIPES, ELECTRIC CABLES, CONDUITS OR OTHER OPENINGS IN SOLE/BOTTOM PLATESAT EXTERIOR WALL WILL BE RODENT-PROOFED BY CLOSING SUCH OPENINGS WITH CEMENT MORTAR, CONCRETE,MASONRY OR SIMILAR METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY. 2022 CGC § 4.406.134. ROOF EAVES SHALL NOT PROJECT WITHIN 2" OF THE PROPERTY LINE WHERE SETBACK IS 4' PER 2022 CRC § TABLER302.1 (1) OR 2022 CBC TABLE 705.2. ALL ROOF PROJECTIONS WHICH PROJECT BEYOND THE POINT WHERE FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE REQUIRED WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE- RATEDCONSTRUCTION PER 2022 CRC § R302.1 (1) OR 2022 CBC § 705.2.35. EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS LESS THAN 5' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE WILL BE BUILT OF ONE-HOUR FIRE-RATEDCONSTRUCTION. 2022 CRC TABLE R302.1 (1) § OR 2022 CBC, TABLE 602.36. REQUIRED: NON-COMPLIANT PLUMBING FIXTURES TO BE REPLACED BY WATER-CONSERVING PLUMBINGFIXTURES WHEN A PROPERTY IS UNDERGOING ALTERATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS.37. PLUMBING - INDOOR WATER USE:-THE EFFECTIVE FLUSH VOLUME OF WATER CLOSETS WILL NOT EXCEED 1.28 GAL/FLUSH (2019 CGC - 4.303.1.1) FORDUAL FLUSH TOILETS AVERAGE TWO REDUCED FLUSHES WITH ONE FULL FLUSH- THE EFFECTIVE FLUSH VOLUME OF URINALS WILL NOT EXCEED 0.125 GAL/FLUSH (2022 CGC - 4.303.1.2- MAX. FLOW RATE FOR SHOWERS SHALL BE 1.8 GPM, @ 80 PSI (2022 4.303.1.3- MAX. FLOW RATE FOR LAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL BE 1.2 GPM, @ 60 PSI (2022 CGC 4.303.1.4.1)- MAX. FLOW RATE FOR KITCHEN FAUCETS SHALL BE 1.8 GPM, @ 60 PSI, CAN TEMPORARILY INCREASE TO 2.2 GPM,BUT MUST DEFAULT BACK TO MAX. FLOW RATE OF 1.8 GPM (2022 CGC 4.303.1.4.4).POLLUTANT CONTROL NOTES:1. PAINTS + COATINGS WILL COMPLY WITH VOC LIMITS PER 2022 CGC §4.504.2.22. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED THAT VERIFIES COMPLIANCE WITH VOC FINISH MATERIALS. 2022 CGC§4.504.2.43. CARPET SYSTEM INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING INTERIOR WILL MEET THE TESTING + PRODUCTREQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE. 2022 CGC §4.504.34. WHERE RESILIENT FLOORING IS INSTALLED, AT LEAST 80% OF THE FLOOR AREA RECEIVING RESILIENTFLOORING WILL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2022 CGC§4.504.45. HARDWOOD PLYWOOD, PARTICLEBOARD, + MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD COMPOSITE WOODPRODUCTS USED ON THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING WILL COMPLY WITH THE LOWFORMALDEHYDE EMISSION STANDARDS. 2022 CGC §4.504.56. AEROSOL PAINTS + COATINGS SHALL MEET THE PRODUCT-WEIGHTED MIR LIMITS FOR ROC ANDCOMPLY W/ PERCENT VOC BY WEIGHT OF PRODUCT LIMITS, REGULATION 8, RULE 49. PER 2022 CGC4.504.2.37. ADHESIVES, SEALANTS, + CAULKS USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL FOLLOW LOCAL + REGIONAL AIRPOLLUTION OR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 2022 CGC §4.504.2.1Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" BLDG LNRSD DN16R SKL RSD14'-6 1/2"14'-2"BDRM13'-1"13'-3"BDRM4'-2"CLO 3'-7"CLO 8'-11 1/2"8'-8"BATH10'-11"10'-9 1/2"STORAGE5'-0 1/2"2'-4"CLOCRAWLSPACE(NOT MEASURED)CRAWLSPACE(NOT MEASURED)6'-2 1/2"14'-11 1/2"HALL(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)15'-1 1/2"20'-8 1/2"5'-1"40'-11"30'-1"30'-1"19'-3"10'-10 1/2"20'-3 1/2"20'-7 1/2" 40'-11"A3.01A3.11A3.21A3.31DN16R(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)FIRST FLOOR OUTLINE BELOW(N) 2/6(E) BED-2(N) WD.(N)2/6DBL. HANG. DBL. HANG.(E) HALL(N) WD.(E) BED-3(N) WD.(N) 2/0TEMP.(N) BATH-3(N) TILEK-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS48" VANITYLIN. CAB.(N)2/6(N) 2/6PKT.OPTION:SWING DRSHELVES (N)2/6CASEDOPTION:PKT DRARMOIRE(N) CLT(N) WD.18x18QUEEN - 60x8018x18(N) 2/6(N)2/6PKT.STACKEDW / D(N) LAUN.(N) TILE(N)2/6PKT.(N) 2/6PKT.(E)TWIN - 38x7518x18(N) 2/0ATTIC ACCESS(N) 3/0(N) OFFICE-2(N) WD.SHOWER(N) 2/4K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS 60" DBL. VANITY (N) M. BATH(N) TILE(N)2/6(N)2/6(N) M. CLT(N) WD.24 X 18KING 78 X 8024 X 18(N) M. BED(N) WD.(N) 2/0(N) 2/0(N) 5/0(N) 5/0TEMP.(N)4/018" LIN. CAB.5' TUBOPTION: PKT DR(N) 2/0TEMP.TEMPON / OFFK-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASSSHELVES +EXTENDEDCOUNTER5/0 FREE STANDING TUBA3.02A3.12A3.22A3.323'-6 1/2" 5 1/2" 2'-7 1/2"15'-1 1/2"7'-11" 3 1/2" 5'-3 1/2" 3 1/2" 1'-0" 3 1/2" 7'-0"6"3'-0" 21'-9"22'-7"17'-7 1/2"2'-8 1/2"5 1/2"8'-6"3 1/2"7'-3 1/2"8'-2"2'-8 1/2"30'-1"2'-5"6"6'-0"6"18'-2 1/2"6"1'-1 1/2"28'-1"13'-5 1/2"6'-5 1/2"8'-2 1/2" 3 1/2" 13'-10 1/2" 6"19'-11"22'-10"(N) 2/6EGR.(N) 3/0FALSE(N) 3/0FALSE(N) 3/0FALSE200201202203204205206207208209210211FIRST FLOOR LINEFIRST FLOOR LINEA4.01A4.01A4.02A4.02EXISTING EGRESS -2'-8" x 2'-8"EXISTING EGRESS - 4'-0" x 3'-8"24x36 ATTICACCESS(E) SECOND FLOOR LINE(E) SECOND FLOOR LINE Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting + Proposed 2nd Flr Plan See DetailsA2.1A2.12PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLANA2.11EXISTING 2ND FLOOR PLANScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS K-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASSK-108-3ANTIQUEFAUCETBRASS (N) SLOPE123(N) SLOPE123(N) RIDGE (N) SLOPE 12 6 (N) SLOPE 12 6 (N) SLOPE 12 6 (N) SLOPE 12 6 (N) RIDGE(N ) VALLEY(E) RIDGE(N) SLOPE 12 4 (N) SLOPE 12 4 (E) SLOPE126(E) SLOPE126(UNCOVERED PORCH)(E) SLOPE 12 9 (E) SLOPE 12 9 (E) SLOPE 12 9 (E) SLOPE 12 9 (N) SLOPE126(N) SLOPE126(N) RIDGE (N) VALLEY(N) VALLEY(N) VALLEY(N) VALLEY(N ) VALLEYEPDM OR EQUAL(N) FLAT ROOFCLASS A: FIRE RATED(N) ASPHALT ROOFCLASS A: FIRE RATED(N) ASPHALT ROOFCLASS A: FIRE RATED(E) ASPHALT ROOFCLASS A: FIRE RATEDVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENTVENT2% SLOPE, TYP.(E)D.S.(E)D.S.(E)D.S.(N)D.S.(N)D.S.(N)D.S. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting / Proposed Roof Plans See DetailsA2.2GENERAL NOTES:1. (EXISTING) (OGEE) G.S.M. GUTTERS AND 3" G.S.M. DOWNSPOUTS (MATCHEXISTING AS REQUIRED), LINE ALL VALLEYS WITH G.S.M., AT LEAST 20" WIDE WITH1/4" EDGE TURNED OVER AND FASTENED WITH CLEATS. LAP JOINTS AT LEAST 4",BUT DO NOT SOLDER.2. ROOFING MATERIAL TO BE ASPHALT SHINGLES BY CERTAINTEED OR EQ. (CLASS'A') OVER 1 LAYER OF 15# FELT PAPER OVER 5/8" PLYWOOD OR PER STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. MIN. 40 YEAR WARRANTY SHINGLES. (CONFIRM COLOR WITH OWNER)3. WHEN INSULATION IS INSTALLED IN ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES WHERECEILINGS ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE UNDERSIDE OF ROOF RAFTERS, AMINIMUM AIR SPACE OF 1" MUST BE PROVIDED, INSULATION BAFFLE NEEDED.4. FLASHINGS AND COUNTER FLASHINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 0.016-INCH (28GAUGE) CORROSION RESISTANT METAL, AND VALLEY FLASHING.5. AT THE JUNCTURE OF THE ROOF AND VERTICAL SURFACES, FLASHING ANDCOUNTER FLASHINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 0.019-INCH (26 GAUGE).6. TRUSSES (IF USED) ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM 6" HEEL. VERIFY WITH DESIGNER.7. TERMINATION OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3'-0"FROM PROPERTY LINES OR ANY OPENING INTO THE BUILDING (I.E.) DRYERS, BATHAND UTILITY FANS, ETC., MUST BE 3'-0" AWAY FROM DOORS, WINDOWS, OPENINGSKYLIGHTS OR ATTIC VENTS, PER CODE.8. (IF USED) THE TRUSS PLAN AND THE TRUSS CALC. SHALL BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD BEFORE SUBMITTING TO THE BUILDINGDEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. TRUSS PLANS SHALL BEWET SIGNED AND WET STAMPED BY TRUSS DESIGN ENGINEER.9. (IF REQUIRED) FURNACE LOCATED IN ATTIC SPACE SHALL BE LISTED FOR ATTICLOCATION AND PROVIDED WITH 24" WIDE SOLID FLOORING ACCESS WAY AND 30"WORKING SPACE AT CONTROLS.10. ATTIC VENTILATION AT CALIFORNIA FRAMING TO RECEIVE LOW PROFILE VENTSOR OPENINGS IN THE ROOF SHEATHING BELOW.11. (AS REQUIRED) ALL TRUSS / RAFTER BLOCKING SHALL RECEIVE 2" DIAMETERHOLES IN EVERY BLOCK, TYPICAL FOR EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF AIR FLOW.12. ATTIC IS GETTING NEW INSULATION, VERIFY (E) FANS / VENTS MEET CURRENTCODE.PLUMBING + HVAC NOTE:1. GROUP ALL EXHAUST FLUES TOGETHER WHEN POSSIBLE AND LOCATE ONROOFS SLOPING TO THE REAR OF THE HOUSE, TYP. VERIFY LOCATION WITHDESIGNER.PHOTOVOLTAIC NOTE:1. -VENTILATION CALC:SQ. FT. OF (N) ROOF: 1,386 SQ. FT.(N) 1,386 / 150 - 9.24 SQ. FT. OF VENTILATION IN (N) ROOF(N) ROOF VENTS (13 ea. x .75 SQ. FT.):TOTAL VENTILATION INSTALLED:9.75 SQ. FT.9.75 SQ. FT.A2.2Scale: 1/4 = 1'-0"2PROPOSED ROOF PLAN FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-2" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.8'-9"11"7'-4"92.85'101.60'102.52'109.85'RIDGE114.56'4'-8 1/2"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"D.H.E. LEFT SIDE89.94'3'-6 1/2"5'-10"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'12'-0"45°7'-6"D.H.E. RIGHT SIDE89.94'(E) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINESPLIT PROPERTY - SEE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY 12'-0"45°(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TYP.(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGWRAPPED COLUMN(E) WOOD/CLAD WINDOWS +DOORS (REPLACE AS NECESSARY,VERIFY IN FIELD)(E) BRICK COLUMN BASE(E) PERGOLA STRUCTURE (PROTECT)(E) CHIMNEY (REMOVE)(E) WINDOW PLANTER (PROTECT)FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-9" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.9'-0"11"7'-4"92.85'101.85'102.77'110.10'RIDGE115.10'5'-0"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"D.H.E. LEFT SIDE89.94'3'-6 1/2"5'-3"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'12'-0"45°7'-6"D.H.E. RIGHT SIDE89.94'(E) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE 12'-0"45°(E) (E)(E)(E)(E)(E) (E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) DRIVEWAY(N)(N)126(E) 7'-4" @ NARROWEST30'-1" EXISTING (PROTECT)29'-11"NEW DORMEREXISTING DORMER (EXTEND ROOF)(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(N) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH (E)(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGWRAPPED COLUMN(E) WOOD/CLAD WINDOWS +DOORS (REPLACE AS NECESSARY,VERIFY IN FIELD)(E) BRICK COLUMN BASE(E) PERGOLA STRUCTURE (PROTECT)(E) WINDOW PLANTER (PROTECT)(N) SIERRA-PACIFIC WOOD/CLADWDS. + DRS., SIMULATED DIVIDEDLITES, PUTTY SDL(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) SIDE YARDFALSE WINDOWS2'-8"2'-8"EXISTING EGRESS7406"2'-6"(N) ADDRESS LETTERS1/2" STROKE BY 4" HIGH (MIN.)EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDNUMBERS AND ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN SUCH A POSITION ASTO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. SAID NUMBERS SHALLCONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUNDS, SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1/2" STROKE BY 4" HIGH, AND SHALL BEEITHER INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED IN ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS, OR REPAIR OFEXISTING CONSTRUCTION. THE POWER OF SUCH ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT BE NORMALLY SWITCHABLE. CITY OFBURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE 18.08.010. 2022 CBC 502.1(N) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGTO MATCH (E) SIDING(N) Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting + Proposed Elevations See DetailsA3.0A3.01EXISTING FRONT ELEVATIONA3.02PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-2" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.8'-9"11"7'-4"92.85'101.60'102.52'109.85'RIDGE114.56'4'-8 1/2"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"D.H.E. LEFT SIDE89.94'3'-6 1/2" 5'-10" 30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'12'-0"45°7'-6"D.H.E. RIGHT SIDE89.94'(E) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINESPLIT PROPERTY - SEE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY12'-0"45°(E) CHIMNEY (REMOVE)(E) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT, TYP.(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) WOOD/CLAD WINDOWS +DOORSFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-9" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.9'-0"11"7'-4"92.85'RIDGE5'-0"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"D.H.E. LEFT SIDE89.94'3'-6 1/2" 5'-3" 30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'12'-0"45° 7'-6"D.H.E. RIGHT SIDE89.94'(E) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINESPLIT PROPERTY - SEE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY12'-0"45°(N)(N)(N)(N)(N)EGR.(E) DRIVEWAY12612'-6"29'-2 1/2"28'-9"(N) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING10" SIDING ON LOWER PART OF HOUSE,8" SIDING ON UPPER PART OF HOUSE(N) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH (E)(N) SIERRA-PACIFIC WOOD/CLADWDS. + DRS., SIMULATED DIVIDEDLITES, PUTTY SDL(N) WOOD DECK, AND STAIRS(N) WOOD AND STEEL RAILING101.85'102.77'110.10'115.10'(E) SIDE YARDTEMP.TEMP.(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting + Proposed Elevations See DetailsA3.1A3.11EXISTING REAR ELEVATIONA3.12PROPOSED REAR ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" OPEN TOBEYONDGRADE/TYPFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-2" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.8'-9"11"7'-4"92.85'101.60'102.52'109.85'RIDGE114.56'4'-8 1/2"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"2'-6"5'-10"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TYP.(E) WOOD/CLAD WINDOWS +DOORS(E) CHIMNEY (REMOVE)(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGWRAPPED COLUMN(E) BRICK COLUMN BASEOPEN TOBEYONDGRADE/TYPFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-9" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.9'-0"11"7'-4"92.85'RIDGE5'-0"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"2'-6"5'-3"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'(N)(N)(N)FALSE WINDOW(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(N)126129124(E)(E)(E)(N)(N)(N)(N)(N)ADDITIONEXISTING HOMEADDITION(N) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING10" SIDING ON LOWER PART OF HOUSE,8" SIDING ON UPPER PART OF HOUSE(N) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH (E)(N) SIERRA-PACIFIC WOOD/CLADWDS. + DRS., SIMULATED DIVIDEDLITES, PUTTY SDL(N) EPDM FLAT ROOF(N) WOOD DECK, AND STAIRS(N) WOOD AND STEEL RAILING(N) ARCHITECTURAL WOOD DETAILTO MATCH (E) DETAILS, TYP.(E)(E)(E)(E)101.85'102.77'110.10'115.10'TEMP.EXISTING EGRESS4'-0"3'-8"(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(N) WOOD BRACKET DETAILS, TYP. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting + Proposed Elevations See DetailsA3.2A3.21EXISTING LEFT ELEVATIONA3.22PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" OPEN TOBEYONDGRADE/TYPFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-2" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.8'-9"11"7'-4"92.85'101.60'102.52'109.85'RIDGE114.56'4'-8 1/2"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"2'-6"5'-10"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TYP.(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGWRAPPED COLUMN(E) WOOD/CLAD WINDOWS +DOORS (REPLACE AS NECESSARY,VERIFY IN FIELD)(E) BRICK COLUMN BASEOPEN TOBEYONDGRADE/TYPFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-9" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.9'-0"11"7'-4"92.85'RIDGE5'-0"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"2'-6"5'-3"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'(N)(N)(N)(N)(N)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(R)(R)(E)(N)126129FLAT ROOF(N)(N)SCUPPEREXISTING HOMEADDITIONADDITION(E)(E)(E)(N) (N)(N) (N)(E)124(E) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(N) ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH (E)(E) COLUMN, PAINTED TO MATCHSIDING(E) WOOD/CLAD WINDOWS +DOORS (REPLACE AS NECESSARY,VERIFY IN FIELD)(E) BRICK COLUMN BASE(N) SIERRA-PACIFIC WOOD/CLADWDS. + DRS., SIMULATED DIVIDEDLITES, PUTTY SDL(E)(E)(E)(E)101.85'102.77'110.10'115.10'(N)TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.EXISTING EGRESSEXISTING EGRESS3'-0"4'-6"3'-6"4'-6"(N) HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING10" SIDING ON LOWER PART OF HOUSE,8" SIDING ON UPPER PART OF HOUSE Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formExisting + Proposed Elevations See DetailsA3.3A3.31EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATIONA3.32PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-9" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.9'-0"11"7'-4"92.85'RIDGE5'-0"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"D.H.E. LEFT SIDE89.94'3'-6 1/2"5'-3"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'12'-0"45°7'-6"D.H.E. RIGHT SIDE89.94'(E) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE 12'-0"45°(E) DRIVEWAY 11'-10"101.85'102.77'110.10'115.10'(N) KITCHEN(N) FAMILY RMBEYOND(E) BED-2(E) CRAWLSPACE(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) FLOOR JOISTS - SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS28'-1 1/2"29'-10 1/2"(N) M. BATH(N) M. BED(N) FLOOR JOISTS - SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS(E) SIDE YARDTYP. ROOF / CLG ASSEMBLY:ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT ROOFING SYS.;UNDERLAYMENT;ICE + WATER MEMBRANE @ EAVES;PLYWD. ROOF SHEATHING;ROOF RAFTERS PER STRUC.;1" MIN. AIR SPACE;MIN. R-41 BATT INSULATION OR EQUAL SYS.;5/8" GYPSUM @ CEILINGSTYP. EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY:WD. SIDING;BLDG PPR;FIRE RATED OSB SHEATHING BY LP-FLAMEBLOCK;2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C.;MIN. R-22 BATT INSULATION OR EQUAL SYS.;12" GYPSUM WALLBD.;(58" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM WALLBD. @ CEILINGS)TYP. INTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY:12" GYPSUM WALLBD.;2x STUDS @ 16" O.C.;12" GYPSUM WALLBD.;(58" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM WALLBD. @ CEILINGS)TYP. FLOOR ASSEMBLY:WOOD OR TILE SYS.;PLYWD. SHEATHING;FLOOR JOISTS PER STRUC.;MIN. R-30 BATT. INSUL. OR EQUAL SYS.FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.24'-9" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTFIRST FLR. T.O.P.SECOND FLR. SUB. FLR.SECOND FLR. T.O.P.9'-0"11"7'-4"92.85'RIDGE5'-0"MAX BUILDING HEIGHT120.39'30'-0"2'-6"5'-3"30'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHTAVERAGE T.O.C.90.37'101.85'102.77'110.10'115.10'(N)(E)(E)(E) CRAWLSPACE(N) CRAWLSPACE(N) FAMILY(N) KITCHEN(E) DINING(E) LIVING(E)(E)(E)(E) BED-4(E) ATTIC(N) CLT(N) M. CLT(N) M. BATH W.C.(N) M. BATH126124 Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formProposed Building Sections See DetailsA4.0A4.01PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION 1Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"A4.02PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION 2Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 1/4" MAX.3/4" MIN.10" MIN.7 3/4" MAX.10"1 1/4"11" PREFERREDNOTES ON HANDRAILS:1. THE HANDRAIL SHALL TERMINATE AT A POSTOR NEWEL ON BOTH ENDS, 2016 CRC R311.734"-38" MAX.HANDRAIL5/8" 3 1/2" 4 3/4"2 x4MIN. R-13 (SOUND BATT) @ALL BATHROOMS/LAUNDRY5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BD.TYPCIAL THROUGHOUT HOUSESMOOTH FINISH OR MATCH EXISTING CONDITION2x4 STUD WALL @16" O.C. S.S.D.STAGGER JOINTS EACH SIDE(LOAD BEARING ONLY)NOTES:SEE WWW.GPGYPSUM.COM FORTECHNICAL SPEC'S3/4"5/8"1/2"5 1/2"7 3/8"2 x 6R-21 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATIONFOR 2x6 WALLS, TYPICAL. IF TITLE-24 SHOWSLOWER MINIMUMS,FOLLOW MORE STRINGENT VALUES.APA RATED SHEATHING EXPOSURE 112" PLYWOOD OR OSBSTUCCO (PAINT)MIN. 2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C.58" DENSARMOR PLUS FIREGUARD, ORTOUGHROCK FIREGUARD GYPSUM BD.APPLIED VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLYTO STUDS W/ 1-7/8" 6D COATED NAILS 7"O.C. STAGGER JOINTS EACH SIDEBENJAMIN OBDYKE (HYDRO-GAP)ICC - ES REPORT ESR-3394 WALL SIDINGUNDERLAYMENT, OR APPROVED EQUALNOTES:A. VISIT GRACECONSTRUCTION.COM FOR THE MOST CURRENT DETAILS, INSTALLATION VIDEO AND PRODUCT DATA SHEETSB. REMOVE RIPCORD® FROM GRACE VYCOR PLUS FOR EASE OF INSTALLATIONC. IF APPLICABLE, LEAVE RELEASE PAPER ON LOWER HALF OF SILL FLASHING UNTIL FUTURE TIE-IN WITH WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIERD. FOR CONCRETE, MASONRY OR WHERE ADHESION IS MARGINAL, USE PERM-A-BARRIER® WB PRIMER TO PROMOTE VYCOR ADHESIONE. CHECK LOCAL BUILDING CODES FOR WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER REQUIREMENTS AND INSTALL GRACE VYCOR PLUS WITH WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER TO FORM WATER-SHEDDING LAPSF. INSTALL WINDOW PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND USE APPROPRIATE SEALANT FOR WINDOW AND WOOD BUCKG. DETAIL ALSO RELEVANT FOR GRACE VYCOR V40 AND VYCOR BUTYLEXTERIOR WALLSILL PLATE(SEE VCRDET-106 FOR OPTIONS)GRACEVYCOR PLUS123MECHANICALLY FASTEN AS NECESSARY IN CORNERSTHROUGH GRACE VYCOR PLUSWINDOW WITH NAILING FLANGE(SET IN SEALANT EXCEPT ALONGSILL FLANGE)GRACEVYCOR PLUSGRACE VYCORNER™ ORCORNER PATCH RECOMMENDED(SEE VCRDET-507 OR VCRDET-504 FOR OPTIONS)GRADE LINESTANDARD BRICKMOULD, TYP.STANDARDBRICKMOULD, TYP.SIDINGAS PERELEVATIONSREGGIO STANDARDVENT W/ INSECTSCREEN BEHIND (BLK.ALUM. SCREEN &VENT)REGGIO STANDARDVENT W/ INSECTSCREEN BEHIND (BLK.ALUM. SCREEN &VENT)1'-4"VERIFY W/ REGGIOCUT SECTIONELEVATIONSIDING FINISHCLRAILINGSTRINGER PER STRUCTURAL58" GYP. BD., TYP.2x STUD WALL TYP.SUB-FLR PER STRUCT.EPOXIED TO STRINGER TYP.J. BLUM HANDRAIL12" X 112" STEEL34" TYP. @ STAIRS, AND 42" @ GUARDRAIL 2"J. BLUM W.I.SPINDLE 42" HSO THAT A 4" SPHERECAN NOT PASS THROUGHMIN. 12" TYP. X GYP BD.WD. FLOOR(V.I.F.)J. BLUM COLLAR(VERIFY SELECTION W/OWNERS/DESIGNER)STUCCO, PAINTED5"LARGE WD. SILLREDWOOD (PAINT)SIERRA PACIFIC ALUM.WINDOWS (CLAD) ORMARVING.S.M. WINDOWFLASHING(PAINTED TO MATCHTRIM)4 1/2"1.5" QUARTER RND.REDWOOD. (PAINT)2 x 65/4 x 4 Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formSee DetailsA5.0Building Details A5.0Scale: N.A.1WINDOW FLASHING DETAIL2022 CRC R311.7.8A5.0Scale: 3" = 1'-0"2STAIR RAILING DETAILA5.0Scale: 3" = 1'-0"3EXTERIOR WALL DETAILA5.0Scale: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"4TYPICAL WINDOW DETAILA5.0Scale: 3" = 1'-0"6INTERIOR STAIR DETAILA5.0Scale: 3" = 1'-0"7INTERIOR WALL DETAILSSIERRA PACIFIC OR MARVIN OR EQUALA5.0Scale: 3" = 1'-0"5EXT. WALL VENT DETAIL2022 CRC R311.7.8 V.I.F.7'-0"A.1-3/8" SOLID COREPAINT GRADESQ. CORNER 3.5"HINGES TYP. (EMTEK)DOOR HEIGHTS:(VERIFY) FOR COST3'-0"4'-0"100A.2'-6"2'-6"2'-6"1'-6"4'-6" 6'-1 1/2"7'-6"101B.4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"16'-0"4'-0"8'-0"102C.TEMP.2'-6"2'-6"5'-0"5'-6"103D.1042'-0"3'-0"105E.TEMP.1'-6"2'-0"106F.TEMP.1072'-0"2'-0"200G.TEMP.201FALSE208TEMP.2'-6"2'-6"5'-0"3'-6"202H.TEMP.203I.2'-6"3'-6"2042'-0"3'-6"205J.2062'-0"2'-0"4'-0"2'-0"207K.3'-0"2'-0"209L.FALSE210FALSE211EGR. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formSchedules See DetailsA9.0 ROOM FLOORING REMARKSWALLSPAINT CEILING MILLWORK CROWNPAINT SPECS.ROOM FINISH SCHEDULEROOM FINISH SCHEDULEA9.0Scale: NA1SAFETY GLAZING NOTES (CRC R308.4)A. ALL SLIDING + SWINGING GLASS DOORS TO HAVE SAFETY GLAZING.B. GLAZING IN SHOWER/TUB/SAUNA ROOMS LESS THAN 60" ABOVE THESTANDING SURFACE AND LESS THAN 60" MEASURED HORIZONTIALLYFROM THE WATER'S EDGE OF A BATHTUB, HOT TUB, SPA, WHIRLPOOL ORSWIMMING POOL.C. GLAZING WITHIN A 24" ARC OF A DOOR THAT IS LESS THAN 60" ABOVETHE FLOOR.D. GLAZING WHERE THE EXPOSED AREA IS GREATER THAN 9 SQ. FT.,BOTTOM IS LESS THAN 18" AND AT LEAST 36" ABOVE THE FLOOR, ANDADJACENT TO WALKING SURFACES.E. WITHIN 60" OF THE BOTTOM TREAD OF A STAIRWAY AND LESS THAN 36"ABOVE THE FLOORF. GLAZING IN GUARDS & RAILINGS.G. GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS, AND RAMPS WITHIN 36"HORIZONTALLY OF THE WALKINGSURFACE LESS THAN 36" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR.EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS LOCATION DOORSDOOR SIZEWxHMATERIALSCOREEXT. FIN. INT.FIN.DETAILSHEADJAMB TRIMSILLREMARKSHDWR.TYPE FIN.NOTESTYPEGLASSSYM.HARDWARE FINISH SPECIFICATION:ENTRY DOOR HARDWARE: (BY OWNER) AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTORWINDOW HARDWARE: WHITE, TYP. (VERIFY W/ OWNER)1. WOOD/CLAD SIERRA PACIFIC WINDOWS+ DOORS, WITH TRUE S.D.L 3/4"MUNTIN BARS W/ SPACER BAR BETWEEN THE WINDOW PANES + MUNTINBARS ADHERED TO THE INTERIOR + EXTERIOR OF THE WINDOWS.2. EGRESS PER CODE3. DOOR BY SIMPSON OR EQUAL, VERIFY DESIGN WITH OWNER &DESIGNER4. VERIFY OPENING SIZE W/ CONTRACTOR5. PRIVACY GLASS, OPTION BY LOCAL ARTISAN6. DOOR BY SIMPSON FIBERGLASS DOOR OR EQ.7. OVERHEAD DOOR (SHOP DRAWING REQUIRED, VERIFY SIDE MOUNTMOTOR IN FIELD8. TRANSOM ABOVE UNIT TO BE LEADED WINDOW MADE BY LOCALARTISAN.9. FALSE WINDOW, FOR AESTHETICS ONLY10. NA11. (*) FIELD MEASUREEXT. DOORS & WINDOWS SCHEDULE A9.0Scale: NA21. NEW MANDATORY U-FACTOR (0.58) FOR FENESTRATION + SKYLIGHTS§150.0 (q)2. REDUCED U-FACTOR (0.30) AND SHGC (0.20) FOR HIGH PERFORMANCEWINDOWS 2022 CAL ENERGY CODE §150.1 (c)3 A3. FENESTRATION MAX U-FACTOR 0.30. NO SHGC REQUIREMENT. PERTABLE 150.1-A & B4. MAX TOTAL AREA, 20%, NO MAX FOR WEST FACING AREA. PER TABLE150.1-A & B5. DOOR MAX U-FACTOR 0.20 PER TABLE 150.1-A & BCAL. GREEN REQUIREMENTSCAL GREEN NOTES:1. PAINTS AND COATINGS WILL COMPLY WITH VOC LIMITS PER CGC §4.504.2.22. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED THAT VERIFIES COMPLIANCE WITH VOC FINISHMATERIALS. 2022 CGC §4.504.2.43. CARPET SYSTEM INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING INTERIOR WILL MEET THE TESTINGAND PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THE 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDINGCODE. 2022 CGC §4.504.34. WHERE RESILIENT FLOORING IS INSTALLED, AT LEAST 80% OF THE FLOOR AREARECEIVING RESILIENT FLOORING WILL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA GREENBUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2022 CGC §4.504.45. HARDWOOD PLYWOOD, PARTICLEBOARD, AND MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARDCOMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS USED ON THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THEBUILDING WILL COMPLY WITH THE LOW FORMALDEHYDE EMISSION STANDARDS.2022 CGC §4.504.56. AEROSOL PAINTS AND COATINGS SHALL MEET THE PRODUCT-WEIGHTED MIRLIMITS FOR ROC AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS PER CGC 4.504.2.37. ADHESIVES, SEALANTS AND CAULKS USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL FOLLOWLOCAL AND REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION OR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS2022 CGC §4.504.2.18. NEW MANDATORY U-FACTOR (0.58) FOR FENESTRATION + SKYLIGHTS §150.0 (q)9. REDUCED U-FACTOR (0.30) FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE WINDOWS 2022 CALENERGY CODE §150.1 (c)3 A10. MAX. TOTAL AREA, 20%, NO MAX. FOR WEST FACING AREA, TABLE 150.1-A, AND B11. DOOR MAX. U-FACTOR 0.20, TABLE 150.1-A, AND B1ST FLR TBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBS(E) LIVING (N) WOOD100ANOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADCASEMENTLO E(N) KITCHEN3'-0" x 4'-0"INTERIORS:MAIN ROOMS:AURA, NATURA (GREEN OPTION), REGAL SELECT, OR APPROVED EQ.CEILINGS:WATERBORNE CEILING PAINT, OR APPROVED EQ.BATHROOMS:AURA BATH AND SPA, OR APPROVED EQ.EXTERIORS:(HOUSE) - AURA, REGAL SELECT, OR APPROVED EQ.EXT. DOORS & WINDOWS ELEVATIONS A9.04Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"INT. DOORS ELEVATIONS A9.05Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" ROOM APPLIANCE TYPE FINISH REMARKSAPPLIANCE SCHEDULENOTE: ALLOWANCE AND INSTALLED BY ALLOWANCE, CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE BLOCKING / ROUGH-IN AS NEEDED PER SPEC. SHEETS MANUF. MODEL #KITCHEN(N) RANGE(N) DISHWASHER(N) DISPOSALT.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D., MIN. 100 CFM, VENT TO EXTERIOR PER CODET.B.D.APPLIANCE SCHEDULEA9.0Scale: NA3(N) VENT HOODT.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.FIRST FLOORSECOND FLOOR (N) REFRIGERATORT.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.(N) PWD(E) DINING(N) KITCHEN(N) PTRY(N) FAMILY(N) OFFICE-1(E) BED-1(N) CLT-1(N) BATH-1(E) BED-2(N) CLT-2(E) BATH-21ST FLR (N) TILE(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) TILE(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) TILETBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBS(E) BED-3 (N) WOOD(N) CLT-3(E) BED-4(N) CLT-4(E) HALL(N) CLT(N) BATH-3(N) LAUN(N) OFFICE-2(N) M. BED(N) M. CLT(N) M. BATH(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) TILE(N) TILE(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) WOOD(N) TILETBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBSTBS TBS PAINT (TBS) TBS2ND FLR101102103104105106107(N) FAMILY(N) OFFICE(E) BATH-2(N) FAMILY(N) OFFICE(E) BATH-2(E) BATH-1200201202203204205206207208209210211(N) BATH-3(N) M. BATH(N) M. BED(N) OFFICE-2(E) HALL(N) DORMER(E) BED-4(N) M. BATH(N) M. BED(N) M. BED(N) M. BED(N) DORMERANOTE # 1, 9TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADFIXEDLO E3'-0" x 4'-0"BNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADDBL HUNGLO E7'-6" x 6'-1 1/2"CNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADBIFOLDLO E (T)16'-0" x 8'-0"DNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADCASEMENTLO E5'-0" x 5'-6"DNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADCASEMENTLO E5'-0" x 5'-6"ENOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADFIXEDLO E (T)2'-0" x 3'-0"FNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADAWNINGLO E (T)1'-6" x 2'-0"FNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADAWNINGLO E1'-6" x 2'-0"GNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADAWNINGLO E (T)2'-0" x 2'-0"GNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADAWNINGLO E (T)2'-0" x 2'-0"HNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADCASEMENTLO E (T)5'-0" x 3'-6"HNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADCASEMENTLO E5'-0" x 3'-6"INOTE # 1, 2TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADCASEMENTLO E2'-6" x 3'-6"JNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADCASEMENTLO E2'-0" x 3'-6"JNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADCASEMENTLO E2'-0" x 3'-6"KNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADAWNINGLO E4'-0" x 2'-0"LNOTE # 1, 9TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADAWNINGLO E3'-0" x 2'-0"LNOTE # 1, 9TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINECLADAWNINGLO E3'-0" x 2'-0"LNOTE # 1TBDSTD.SEE DETAILSPRIMEDPINE CLADAWNINGLO E3'-0" x 2'-0"LAUNDRY(N) STACKED W/DT.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D.T.B.D. 2'-0"10'-0"2'-0"16/0 O.H. DR0016/021'-0"G2.03G2.02G2.04G2.05G2.06G2.0614'-0"21'-0"1-HR FIRE RATED WALL1-HR FIRE RATED WALL30x30TEMP.ATTIC LADDERVAULTED (OPTION FOR OWNERS)PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE(N) EV CHARGERPER CODE(N) 200A ELECT.PANELPER CODE13'-5"20'-5"002TEMP.TERRACETILE / STONEDRIVEWAYPAVERS, TBS1-STALL GARAGECONCRETE2'-3 1/2"2'-1 1/2"1'-6"1'-6"3 1/2"3 1/2"18" GARAGE SETBACK18" GARAGE SETBACK FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.89.73'(E) GRADE89.23'FIRST FLR. T.O.P.97.73'6"8'-0"15' HEIGHT LIMIT104.23'4'-3 1/2" 15'-0"RIDGE102.02'2'-2 1/2" (E) LOT LINE 126TEMP.(E) 6' WD. FENCE (E) 6' WD. FENCEARCHITECTURAL WOOD DETAIL TOMATCH DETAIL ON (E) HOUSEARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES W/ GRACEUNDERLAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH(E) HOUSE10" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) LOT LINE126 (E) 6' WD. FENCEFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.89.73'(E) GRADE89.23'FIRST FLR. T.O.P.97.73'6"8'-0"15' HEIGHT LIMIT104.23'4'-3 1/2" 15'-0"RIDGE102.02'2'-2 1/2"1-HR FIRE RATED WALLARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES W/ GRACEUNDERLAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH(E) HOUSE10" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) LOT LINE (E) 6' WD. FENCEFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.89.73'(E) GRADE89.23'FIRST FLR. T.O.P.97.73'6"8'-0"15' HEIGHT LIMIT104.23'4'-3 1/2" 15'-0"RIDGE102.02'2'-2 1/2"DRIVEWAY1-HR FIRE RATED WALLD.S.ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES W/ GRACEUNDERLAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH(E) HOUSE10" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING(E) LOT LINE(E) 6' WD. FENCEDRIVEWAYFIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.89.73'(E) GRADE89.23'FIRST FLR. T.O.P.97.73'6"8'-0"15' HEIGHT LIMIT104.23'4'-3 1/2" 15'-0"RIDGE102.02'2'-2 1/2"TEMP.D.S.ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES W/ GRACEUNDERLAYMENT TYP., TO MATCH(E) HOUSE10" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGSIERRA-PACIFIC WOOD/CLAD DR.FIRST FLR. SUB. FLR.89.73'(E) GRADE89.23'FIRST FLR. T.O.P.97.73'6"8'-0"15' HEIGHT LIMIT104.23'4'-3 1/2" 15'-0"RIDGE102.02'2'-2 1/2" (E) LOT LINE 126(E) 6' WD. FENCE (E) 6' WD. FENCESTORAGE TRUSSES BEYONDARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTSHINGLES GRACE UNDER-LAYMENTTYP., TO MATCH (E) HOUSECONC. PAD THICKNESS6" W/ MIN. 4 MIL. VAPORBARRIERPRE-FAB TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.(PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES ANDSTORAGE TRUSSES)R-15 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATIONFOR 2x4 WALLS, TYP.1-STALL GARAGEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEG.S.M. OGEE GUTTERSLOPE126ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESCLASS A: FIRE RATEDSLOPE126D.S.,TYP. Sheet Scale:All drawings & Specifications provided as instruments of service are the property of the Designer whether the project is executed or not.It is unlawful for any person, without the written consent of the Designer. To duplicate or make copies of these documents,partly or in whole, for use for other projects & buildings. Rev.: 001002003004005006 Description :Date : Revisions4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE E-mail: TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM Ph: 415.819.0304Park City, UT 84098Arjun Dutt 740 Fairfield Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Title : Project : Date :09.15.23Drawn :TIM RADUENZ23_12Job No. : Owner : APN#: 029-042-100 Contractor : PLANNING SET Zoning: R1 BUILDING SET ARJUN DUTT 740 FAIRFIELD ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 oneDESIGN PLANNING formProposed Garage Plans See DetailsG2.0G2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED GARAGE PLANG2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONG2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"3PROPOSED REAR ELEVATIONG2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"4PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATIONG2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"5PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATIONG2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"6PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONG2.0Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"7PROPOSED ROOF PLAN