HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1960.11.21#/q3
Ar
abo
Illor
Burllngerne, CallfornLa
Noveolb er 2I, 196 O
CALt TO ORDER
egular neetlng of the Btr:rllngame Clty Councll was held on tbe
ve given date. Meetlng ca11ed to ordor at 8:05 p.m., - Mayor
gan ln th6 Chah.
PLMGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At wond fron the Chair all ln the Councllthe Pledge of Alleglance to the FIag.
Chamber arose and gave
ROLL CALL
Prosent - Councl lnen: Blmd- Johns on-Lonenz-llorganAbsent - Councllmsn: Roc,th
Counc Ilnan Johnson noved ttat Councllman Rooth, absent because oflI1ness, be excused, seconded by Councllman Byrd.
MINUrES PREVIOUS LIEETINGS
The nlnutos of th€ prevloua rmetlng of Novor&o:r 7, 1960, subnlt tedto Councll rero unanlmously appr oved and adopted on notlon of
Councllman Johns on and seconded by Courcllman Byrd.
The ralnutes of the adJourned meetlng (l{ovember 7) of November I, 1960,subnltted to Councll rere unanlmously approved snd adopted on motlonof Councllnan Lonenz end seeonded by Counclloan Byrd.
PRESENCE OF STI'DEI{TS ACKXOTI/LEDGED
The Chalr, on behalf of the Clty Councll, acknowledged the proEoncoof and extended a nelcone to Glnl Scout lFoop No. 232, BurllngameIntermdlate School and to studerts of Burllngarre Htgh School.
HEARING
PROPOSED PAM(ING RESTBICTTON ON CALIFCRNIA DRIVE (PeIm to Bnoadway )
The Chafur annourced that thls was the tlme and the place schedulodby the Councll to con&rct e heanS.ng on a roquest tbat the Cltyprohlblt panklng on tbe nest slde of Callfenle Drlve from PaIm Driv eto Broadray betwoen 4 p.m. and 6 p.n.
A petltlon, beerlng the sl$latures of twenty-flve mercbants andproperty ownorrs, conductlng thefu r.espectlve buslnesses rlthLn thearea to be affected, was read ln pnotost to the p:roposal.
The Ctty Manager, ln neply to Councll lrqulnles, advlsed that th6
recorrnendatl on to place the nestrlctlon lnto effect, ras submittedby the Eealth, Sefety and. frafflc Commlsslon, partlculanLy ln vlewof the nestnlctlon curently ln effect prohlblting parkLng on
Ca1 tfonnla Dnlve south of Palm Dnlve.
Ilre Clty Managen furthen advlsed that a trafftc count falled tolndicate that a rno panklngr nestnlctlon Ls warranted.
There belng no propononts to ths proposal, tho Chafu lnvlted opponent sto address the Counc 11.
1[r. Edward^ 0rack, proprletor of tb6 Garden Shop, 1151 Caf lforrrla Drlvo,volced his pnotest, stetlng that the rostrlctlon would lmpose a hard-shlp upon the rerchsr ts ln the area.
A poII of the Councll lndlcated th6 unanlnous oplnlon that no actlon
should be taken on the recomrEndatlon at thls tlme.
Mayor Mo:rgan refenned brtefly to the forthc oming publtc hearlng
schedulod. by the Plannlng Commlsslon reletlvo to a plan proposod bythe Rapld Translt Syst6m, affectlng the anea along Cal lfornla Drlve
and to the leglslatlon before the Courrcll on thls occaslon concernlngthe sales tax, wheneby, 1n hls oplnlon, funds may be made avall.ablo
to wlden Callfornla Drlve.
r'/ */?4 z?e[/"1
ls8
The hea:rlng was thereafter declaned c oncl ud.od and on mot lon of
Counclloan B5rrd, seconded by Councllman Johns on and unanlmouslycarr"led, tho subJect rnattor was tabled.
COIO{UNICATI0NS
1. USE OF LOT AT LORTON AIID DONNEIJLI AVENI'ES
A coomunlcation from the Clty }danager, dated Novedber 18, 1960,ailvlged that tho suggestlon of Councl lnan BJnld, concerrrlng the
use of the vacent 1ot at Lorton and Donne]-ly Avenuos dlur.lng thethree rpeks pnlor to Chrlstmas has boEn lnvestlgated and the
orrner has lndlcated hls vl11lngneas to leass the pnoperty atthe rate of $1OO.OO for the three week perlod, condlt toural:(1) tnat the Clty vacatc (at no cost) should the property besold Ln tho lntorlm; (2) that the sum bs pald at tho ter.mlnetlonof the ttrreo reek pellod ard (3) that the own6n be held hs:rnless
flron 11ab11lty.
Councllman Byrd Eoved that the Clty Murager b6 authorlzed toobtain the use of the property and to exeeute an agreeront wlththe orner ln accordanco wlth stlpulated d.6ta11s. The motlon ras
seeonded by Councllman Johnson and unanlmously carr16d.
2. CANYON AREA AVAII.ABI,E FOR ACCBPTANCE
A comrnrnlcatLon from the Clty l{anagor, dat€d Novemb er 18, 1960,
advl,sed tlEt the pr.ob lem of en adequate Lngress and egress lntothe Canyon Area has been r:esolvod wlth the Trousdale ConEtlruction
Company offerlng to lnc!:6ase the wldth of the propos€d access.It raE the rocommendatl on of tho Clty Msnag€n that the Clty
Attcnney be authorlzed to pre pare the leglslatlon for Counclltsactlon to accept the deed to the }and.
Mayor Morgan advlsed that acqulsltlon of the Canyon Anea propenty
ls tho fulf 1}1rent of ono of the obJectlves of the Councll.
Councllnan Byrd noved tbt tb Clty Attorney be lnstructed to
p!:oparo approprlato IegI slatl on to accept the doed to the land,
seconded by Councllnan Johnson and unanlnoualy carried.
3. REPORT NE! COF'FE.SANDWICE DISPENSING TRUCKS
A Eemo to Councll, datod Novenb @ 18, 1960, firon the Clty Manegd,
ad.vlsed that vendors, tnavellng t tro ughout tho Cityr dlspenslng
coffee and gandwlches, are requlned to confo::m to pnovlslons of
Ordlnanc€ No. 456, regulatlng p6rsons sollclting ttt hln the Clty,
aalopted Docemb6r I, 1947.
the Clty Maneg€r was requested. to ascertaLn rrheth6r coffee-sandnl ch
dlspensLng trucks, c umantlJr opersting ln th€ Clty have obtalned
the requlred sollcltorrg llcense.
4. CLATM OF }IEI,EN L. RADAR REJECIED
A cornnunlcatlon to Counc11, dated Nov ondc er 18, 1960,a clalm has beon f 11ecl by He1en L. Radar ln tho amoun
fon allogod lnJurles sustalned as a result of a faI1
sldewalks.
advlsed t hatt of $lorooo,oo
upon the clty t s
Counclfnan Byrd moved that the Courcll concur rdth the rocoonendatr. onof the Clty Manager that tbe clalm be roJected and referned to theCltyts lnsu'ance carrler, seconded by Councllman Johnson and unar -
lmous ly cenrl ed.
5. PUBLIC EEARING RE: NAPID IEANSIT SYSTEM
A communlcation fron the Plenrrlng Consultant, dated Novernben 16, 1960,
advlsed that tbo Plarmlng CornmLsslon has seheduLed a pub1lc hearlng,
Saturday, Decersor 3, 1960, at 2 orclock, p.m., on the Rapld Transit
Systemts proposed plans for the Clty of Burllngame. Irhe merbelrs
of the Councll ard the cl.tlzenry were Lnvl-ted to attond.
#s
Councllman Byrd oxpnessed obJectlon to tbe pnoposed p1an, rhereby
the Clty wouid lose Ca.Ilfornla Drlve pnopenty that could be creatod
lnto a ttnue boulevandn and statod that he would profer to see the
tracks and related appurtenances lnstalled elsewhere than oa taxable
property wlthln the Clty of Btrllngame.
6. NAME CIIANGE TBAYSHOre HIGIIITAYN
A coomunlc at Lon from the Planning Commlsslon, dated Novembor 15, 1960,
advlsed tlat subsequont to c onslalenable study end revlew, tho
CommlssLon r:ecomrcnded that the name of Bayshone Hlghwaytr nemaln
as such.
tlcense Tax for theat Retall, Provlcllng
Collectlon and PaymeVlolatlons of the Pr
Councllman Byrd rnve
by Councllman Lorenz
?he subJoct was tabled for consLderatl.on at a futuro m6etlng.
RESOLUtTOTS
None
OBDINANCES - Conslderatlon thereof:
OEDINA}ICE NO. 722 NAn Ordlnance Addlng SectLon L22L.l2 to the
O::d lrrence Cotle of th€ Clty of Bur11r€8r6 and Pnovldlng for Stop Slgns
on Marco Polo Way at tho Intorsectlon of Davls Dntvet ras glven Lts
seconil readtng and on raotion of Councllman Jobns on, seconded by
CouncLlnan B5rrd, sald ondLnance passed lts second readlng and ,aa
adopted by the f ollowlng vote:
Ay6s3 Councllmen: Byrd - Johns on -Lor en z -Morganlloeg: Councllmon! Nono
Absent Councllmen: Rooth
ORDINAT{CE NO. 725 rAn Ord tnance Aaerlll ng the O:rdinance Code of theeIE - of-BnrlInga m By Atldtng Thereto e New Sectl ort L2D,.25 Llmlting
theParkLnS of Vehl.cles on Broedray B€tween Chula Vlsta Avenue ardCallfcrnla Drlven ras glven lts second readlng and on notlon of
Councl lman tonenz, seconded by Councl J.man Johnson, sald. onalLnance
passed lts second readlrg and was adopted. by the followlng vote;
Ayes: Councllren: B3rrdl -Johns on-Lorenz -MorganNoos! Councllnen! l{one
Absent Councll-men : Rooth
ONDINANCE NO. 724 ORDINANCE NO. 725 (Pentalnlng to Sale s Tax)
Mayor Morgan annouaced that 0rdlnanc6s l{o. ?24 antl I{o. 725, lntroducedat a prevlous reetlng and pe rtaLnlng to the establLshnent of a CltySales ard Uso Tax, was before the Corrncll for second read.lng and
adopt 1on.
fhe Chak acknorledged the pnesenoe of a largo gnoup of Bunllngamerosldonts lntsnested 1n th6 subJect and advlsed ttrat each p€re on
wo ultl be glvon an opportunlty to qpe ak on the lssue.
OFDINANCE NO ,724 nA n Ordlnenco Arrenal lng tts ordl nan ce Codo of tb.y Adtllng Artlclo 11B to Part fV and fnposlng aPrivllege of Se1llng Tanglble Personal hopentyf o:r Pormlts to RetalLers, Provldlng for tlrent of Such Tar and. Prov id lng Penaltles for
ovlslons Hereofr was glven lts second rsadlng.d the adoptLon of 0rdlnanco No. 724, secondsd
C y of Bur lngarc B
0n th6 questlon and 1n reply to the roquest of Mrs. Ea Fermel, 1540Bernal Av6nue, for an lnterpretatLon of tbe sales tax and how lt sha1laffect the CLty of Burllngame and to the lnquLry of Mr. B. B. ZacharLas,
1132 D nal<o Avenue, as to why the lssue ,as not submltted as a ,refen-
endum rreasune, the Chaltr advlsed that unden the prwlslons of tbeBradl€y-Burins Unifcarm One Cont Sal6s and Ua€ Tex, pnoposed fo:r adoptionby the San Mateo County Board of Supervlsors, the Colulty may levy andthereaften collect a one cent sales tax wlthln eacb cltf not travlnga loca1 seles tex end mey retaln, under lts terms, th6 entiro r€venue
dorlved from the saleg tax.
I
2€A
The Mayor contlnuod by Etatlr€ that as a nprotectlve neasurei
Ordlnancc No. 724 and Ordl na nce No. ?25, locally adrd.nlst€n€d,
was lntroduced at a pr"e vl ous rDetfug of the Council, slnllarto those ad.opted ln the Clty of l[Lllb!:ao, the Clty of Daly Clty
and others, wheneby tho County would not ahar:e ln the reverrue.
The Mayor advlsed tbat represontatives of tLo cltles tlthln the
County rEt on several occaslons rlth tb€ Boatd of Supervlscrsln an effont to rosolv€ the lssu€ on the portlon of revenuo to
be reeelved by the County antl the subseo.uent end final compromlsethat of th€ rev€nue collected w1 thln the lndivldual clty, the
County would recelve flve percent.
The Chal:: steted that the Cl t5r Attonney has advised the Counclltbt the entire pnoceeds fr.o m a sa.L es tax levy would be recelved
by tbe County lf th6 Clty rene to fall to anact a local salestax ordlnanco; lt therefor:e appeared. that the Clty of Burllnge.m
has nno recourso othen t tran to go along rlth the plan.r
For purposes of further 1nfonmatlsr, tho Chalr advLsod that undertho pnwlslons of a Br:adley-Burns Unlfo r!0 One Cont Sal-es ard UssTax, thc State Board of Equalizatlon 1s the doslgnated functl onlng
agoncy and the adopt ion of ttd.s ordlnance sus penda the parovlsl onsof the Cltyrg Ordlnances, No. 724 ana1 l{o. 725.
lfay or Morgan stated t ht hle statsaent s roro not lnterded todlscourage the voice d the people; that thene ls stlI1 rsuoh athlng as publlc oplnlonn and that ithere may be sone my alongthe I1ne the sales tax nay be stopped.n
l{rs. T. D. Osbortr€, 1tO4 Eanllton Lane, questloned why theproposed tax IIas not put to the vote of the peoplo.
The Chalr referred to petltlons clnculated on an occaglon somet1re ago requestlng the Boerd of Supervlsors to refEr the lsgueto the people and at rhlch tlme, lt was so lndlcated. ft rasthe suggestlon of the Chalr that cltlzens tf1I1 the Board of
Supen Lsorrs Chanbers at 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, Novordoer 22raat whlch tlm6 lt was antlclpatod tbat the Berd of Sup€rvlsors
would adopt the pnoposed Bradley -Burrrs Salog Tax Ordlnance andto remind the menbens of tbelr promlse to r6fer the Lssue to theelectorate.
A. B. Dlepenbnock, Jn., 145 Cresc€nt Avenue, qu€stloned whEtherthe Clty rs sales tax pnoposed to neduce the p:rope::ty tax and was
advlsed that the allocatlon of sales tax revenue has not been
resolved.
In reply to an lnqulry fron tbe audlence, the Clty Attorneyr ln
sone detallr outllned the blstory of the sales tax and of legls-latlon 1n latotr yea::s perndttlng a c ounty to lnpose a trrLfor n
sales and us€ tax wlthin the cLtles of Lts particular Jurlsdtctlonln an amount not to exceed one porcent and grant i.ng a corurty therlght to contract wlth the State Board of Equalization for thecolLectlon and romlttance to the c ounty of the rev€nue derlved
from the sales tax levy, less the cost fe the servLces.
D.C.tocbner, Economlcs teach€r and a rosldent of San Bruno, rLth
buslness Lnterests ln Burllngame, stat€d that tbo tax 1g unfalr,
whet ber lrposed by a clt;r or a county and suggested lnstead thatIand values be lncreased to provlde addlt lona] novonue.
Dbs. Allce Ealls, 5l7 Chapln Lane, questloned the rlght ofto place sales tax revenus 1n the Gen eraJ- Pund of, tbe Clty,than iearmar.t< i saLd rsvenuo for speclflc pur?oses.
C ounc lL
I.ath6:r
l[r. 1911114n Ro6se, goe Toyon Drlve, stated that the naJorlty of
those ln attendanco appeared to protest the lntroductlon of agales tax ln thLs clty but from the lnforrntlon obtained, lt
appo aned polntlees to appe an at the neetLng of the Board of
Supenvlson s to onter opposltlon.
2€{
RECESS
A receas ras declarod by the Chaln et 9:5O p.m.
CALt TO ONDER
The rneetlng was cal1od to ord6r by the Chalr at 1O:O5 p.n.
lih. Steve SengulnettL, 12O EIm Avenue, volced hls protost to so-
cal1ed ihldden taxesr - referrlng speclflcally to tho Cltyts S616r
Rent aI Tax anal r.e comnended that the sales tax ordlnance be adoptadwlth the revonuo Eo derlved, allocated as follors: 66 to neducethe propenty tax, +Oll to provlde f on capital lmprrove rpnts and. the
roraalnlng lOfi neserved ln the General Fr:nd of tbe Clty.
ConsLderabl€ reaporure lndlcatod that a maJelty of those ln atton-
dance favorod the suggestlon advenced. by ltn. Sangulnettl.
Councl lmn Byrd stated that he ras ln favor of the sales tax as theronly way to prwlde fon sa1any lncreases, equlpm€nt, etc.rn andthat ln hls oplnlon, nas @rch as posslble of the revonu€ should be
used to neduce the property tax.r
Councll.nan Johnson stated that wh1le she has conslstsrtly opposod.the sales tax, €very lndlcatlon polnts to the fact that th6 C ounty
1111 atlopt the Bnadley-Burns Untforn Ssles Tax and that she wouldvoto 1n fevor thereof to prevent the County from nocel vlng the
ontLre pnoceeds denlved from the sales tax Ievy.
Councilman Johnson furtbr stated tbat she was opposod to tbe entLreproceeds belng placed lnto the Goneral Fund of the Clty; that 1l
should be applled (1 ) to reduce the property tax; (2) provlde forcapltal Lmpnove rrcnts rrd (5) a sma11 porcentago placed lnto the
General Fru"rd.
Mayo:: Morgan suggested that wLth the ad.ded lovenue from the salestax, parklng metera, dog lLcense feos end gewen rental fees may beell mlnated.
Thene belng no furthe:r dlscusslon, the Chaln called for a ro11 callvote on the adoptlon of Ordlnancs No. 724, L\ttoduced for pessago onnotlon of Councllrmn BJrrd a rri seconded by Councl].man Lorenz. Thevoto nas recorded as follors:
Councllnan Lorenz stetedl that he was 1n favor of the sales tex atthe ratlo of appontlonrent of_ the pnoceeds as suggestod by aprevlous_ speaker, nanrely, SO\A tor" the noductlon of th6 propertytax, 4Ofi for capltal lrpnoveraents and 1@ for genenal fr:nd purposes.
Mayo:r !trorgan stated that 1n hls oplnlon, the sales tax ls ln6qultabl6
and clted an example lndlcatlng the lange property owner. denlvesgreater beneflts trnoney-wlsot ln pnopontton to the snall property
orn€r.
Councllman Byrd Etated that ln hls oplnlon, sales tax rev€nuo shouldbe applled to reduce the_outstandlng bonded lndebtodnos s of the clty,ln the estlnated sum of $75,5OO.OO ana eS* of the :renralnder allocat6d,to reduce the property tax.
Ay€s: Councll,rnen:
No6 s: Councl laon:
Abs€nt Coulcl loen:
B3rlrd-Johnsdr-Lorenz- ongan
Non6
Booth
!Jh. Bmce KLnkbrlde , 1229 Bur:llngame Avctue ' speaklng on the
subJect of added revonue to be dorlvgd flon a sales tax, atated.that sald ,revenue should be applled to reduce the pnoperty tax.
E. L. llebe?g, 4O7 OccLdentaL Avenue, statod that ths cLty should
take advsrtage provlded by the levylng of a sales tax to help
reducc the contlnued lncreasc ln the tax ?ato a:rd ln hls oplnloa,
the sales tax was a roasonable ono.
€€a
Cor:ncllman BSnrd moved that the tltle of Ordl nerE e No. 725, bo
amended by lnsertlng the wor:d naddlng' prlor to the word.s nAntlcle
lIC to Part IVr seconded by Councllrnan Johnson and unanl rnous 1y
carnl ed.
ORDINANCE I'iO. 725
OBDTNANCE NO. 725 , entltlod thoreafter rAn Ondlnanco Amenallng tho
Ortll.nance Code of tb Ctty of Burllngamo By Addlng Artlcle 1lC to
Par.t fV and Provldlag f or: the fmposltlon of an Excise Tax on tho
Storage, Use or Othen Consunrptlon of Tanglble Porsonal Pnopertyr
was glven its second neadlng and on motlon of Councllman Byrd,
seconded by Cor:ncllman Lorenz, sald ordlnence passod lts socond
neadlng and was adopted by the followlng vote:
Ayes : Counc 1lmon: B1z.d- Jotrnson-Loren z-Mor.ganNoesI Councllnen: None
Absent Councllmen: Rooth
ORDINANCE NO. 726 (Bradle y-Burne )
Conslderablo dlscusslon aroso pnlon to the lntroductlon of
ORDINANCE NO. 726 (Bnadley-Burns Unlform One Cent SaLeI and Use
Tax) on the allocatlon of tbe revenue fron the procoodn of tbe
sal,es tax.
The Clty Attorney advlssd that to rGet tho Januany 1, 1961,rdesdllnet lt rcu1d be deslrable for the Councll to nesolve the
Lssue on this occasLon.
CouncllEan Byrd and trlayor Ir{organ e ach erqrressed ths oplnlon thatan addlt lonal penlod of tlme ls necessary boforo e declslon ls
rendened on the a]"locatlon of the revenuo.
Several of thoso 1n the audlence, 1n addresslngi the Counc11,
urged that the cltlzens be gLven s oE€, assurance that an alloca-tlon would be nedo to substantlally reduce the property tax.
llr. Stevo Sanaulnet tL stated thet the cl.tL zens ane doslnous thetat least 54 6e allocated fon the reductlon of taxes end tho
retnlnder reserved 1n the Goneral Fund for capltal lmprovements
and tbat taxes tbat have been on the nbooks of the Clty for toolong a perlod of tlnen be elfualnated.
Mayor Mongan, ln response, advLsed thet the Council Ls unanlmousln ttrrat et least flfty pencent of tho sales tax r:evenue beapplled to reduce tbs p!:op6r.ty tax; however, the debate lLeswlthln t};re 4S proposod by sore aenbors of the Councll fontrcapltal lnpr.ovemonts. tr
Ttre Clty Maneger, ln rospons_s to Councll lnqulry, concurred wlth
the proposal to allocate 5@p to neduce the property tax and
advlsed that the Clty ls golng to have to iwonk on a capltalbudget.i The Clty Manager obsorvgd that the Clty of Bunllugarrrlll recelvs oore rov€nue per caplta than any othon Clty andthat the Councl l sball be placed ln the posLtlon of glvlngrgcnlous thought to Lts spordlng.n
Cotrncllmn Byrd thop€after moved tlst nat leest flfty perc€nt oftbo funds collected from the sales tax levy be used to neducethe p ayrent of city ob)-lga tl ons pald out of funds derlved fromreal and personal prop€rty taxes and tho bal-ance to be reserved
1n the General Fund fcr such uee as ruay bo detorndned by the
Councll at a later dat€. fh6 motlon was seconded by Ma yor lilorgan.
The noI1 call voto ras record.ed es follows:
Ayos: Councllmen: Byr.d-llorganNoes: Councllnen: Lorenz-Johnson
Absent Councllmen: Booth
_€ffi
Followlng further. dlscussLon a nd. at tbe suggestlon of the Chalr,
the Cott:cll unanlmously concunrod. to allocate 5S of the revenue
collected from the sales tax to roduce the property tax and a
declslon on the allocatlon of the renalnlng SM to be resolvedat a subsequont rneetl ng.
Councllman Blrrd theneupon 1
NO. 726 rAn Ordlnance Am6nd
ntnoduced f or f lr'st roadlns Om INANCElng the ordlnance code of tirffiT
Burllngame By Adtllng 1lD to Part fV and fBposlng a Clty Sales ard
Use Taxi Pr ovld 1ng for the Psrfc0tmanca by the stat6 Boaral of
Equallzatlon of AlI Funct lons Incldent to th6 Admlnlstnation,
Operatlon and Collectlon of the Sa1es and Use Tax Hereby fmposed,
Suspendlng tha Pnovlslons of Ordlnstces Nos. 724 ancl 725 Durlng
Such Tlme as Thls ordlnaneo ls Operatlve; and Provldlng Penaltles
fon Vlolatlons 1trereof . n
UNFIN]SHED BUSTNESS
Councllnan Byrd mwed that the Clty Attorney be autheLzed toEnter lnto a full settlengrt ln an anount not to oxceed $2r8O0.OO,ln the Super lo:: Court Actlon, Clty of Bulpllngarc vs. Elean or R.Carneln, 6t a1 , (l{o. 8505?) concernlng condematl on pnoceodlngsto acqulro a Dralnage easemert. The rmtl on tas second.ed by Counclhan
Lonenz end unanlrrcusly carrlod.
NE'!/V BUSINESS
1. EEALTII HAZAED TO BE TIfYESTIGAT@
The Clty Manager ras nequosted by the CounclL to agaln conf€r wLththe Penlnsula Eumane Soclety concernlng the dl,spositlon of catslnfestlng an area on Davls Courtl as neported to Councll byWllllan J. Logue, 14 Davls Court.
2. SUPERIOR COURT ACT]ON RE: CANNEIN SUIT
5. STNEET SWEEPTNG ON T{,AGNOLIA DRTVE
fn rosponse to a report fron th6 Chah concennlng the use of theBtroet sweoper on Magnolla Drlvo, the Clty Engineor advlsed that
he w ould lnvestlgate the conplalnts and also refer the matter tothe lle al th Depantnrnt.
CLAIMS
Clalns, l{os. 4486-4670, ln the total aEount of t2l5r916.39, dulyaudlted, rera appa oved fon peytont and ranrants drasn on the CltyTreasury ln theln respectlve amounts on notl on of Councllnan
Johnson, seconded by Councl lman Byntt and unanLcously carr'led.
PAI'ROI,IJ IVARRANTS
The unflnlshed ltems of (1) Donnelly Avenue dlsposltlon (2) Exten-slon Canolan Av6nue antl (5) Authorlty to Plannlng Advlsor (Resolu-
t!.on) rene held for actlon at the next regular metlng.
Payroll llarrant s, l{os. 8745 - 9169, Month of Octobon, 1960, lnthe total emount of $84,15O.OO, rere appr oved on motion of-
Councllnan Johnson aad seconded by Councilnan Lorenz.
ADJOURI{IEIVT
There belng no funther buslneas,
adJ our:ned at 12:15 a. .
the neetlng was regularly
Respectfully subnlt ted,
A
L. B. MORGAN, Ueyor
I]ERBER K. WHIIE, C ty Cle:rk
€B(