HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 2020.08.24 - 7ADocusign Envelope lD: 301444CE4FFA-41CC-8220-C106381OBFA5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAIVIE
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
2021-167813
1037 am12l0gl21Rl Fee: NO FEE
Counl of Pagea 4
Rocordod ln Official Recordg
County of San Mateo
Mark Church
AeBessor-county Clerk-Recorder
I lur I r illil ilr flil ltil till ilil lil |lil ]1il ]il ult til | | til lll*$R0003184491$*
Resolution No. 2020-08.24-7 a
137 COSTA RICAAVENUE
028-316-040
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true and conect copy ofthe
document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my
office.
october 25 2021
buiw hrl,iw.r
Date:
Kevin Gardiner, AICP, Community Development oirector
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECoRDED MAIL TOI
t{
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW,
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn
Review for a remodel and two-storv addition to the rear of an existino two- storv sinqle family dwellinq
at 137 Costa RicaAvenue, Zoned R-1, Sudbodh N. and Teial P. Gupta. propertvowners. APN: 028-
316-040;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Auqust
24, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that
1. On the basis of the lnitial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence
that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical
exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (eX1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions
to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result
in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby
approved.
2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording
of said meeting.
3. lt is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution
the County of San Mateo.
recorded in the official records of
t,T. s,CflM tN Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th dav of Auoust. 2020 by the following vote:
137 GOSTA RIGAAVE - RESO 2020-{18.24-7a
AYES: COilAROTO, GAUL, LOffiS
SARGENT, SCHTID, TERRONES, TSE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT NONE
REGUSED: NOlilE
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review
137 Costa Rica Avenue
Effective September 3, 2020
Page '1
1
2
4
5
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped July 7,2020, sheets A1- A1 1;
that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the right side setback at
3 -6" where 4'-0" is required per code and measuring 48 -1" in length, shall not be removed
during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming
length are removed during construction, either an application for a Side Setback Variance will
be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review
Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements;
that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the front setback at 22'-4"
where 24'-10" is the block average and required per code and measuring 35'-11" in length,
shall not be removed during construction, if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the
existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a
Front Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an
application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with
current setback requirements;
that the floor plans and structural plans will include the following note for the existing
nonconforming walls and foundation along the right side and the front: "Existing
nonconforming wall and foundation to remain. No modifications to studs or foundation shall
occu/';
that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof
height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning
Division or Planning Commission review (FYl or amendment to be determined by Planning
staff);
that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer (s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving
on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval
adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of
all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all
conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed
without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
b
7
8
o
EXHIBIT'A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review
137 Costa Rica Avenue
Effective September 3, 2020
Page 2
10.that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition
of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
11 that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification
that the architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown
on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with
approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing
inspection shall be scheduled;
13 that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
14 that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been build
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flies shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;