Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 2020.01.13 - 7A, DocuSign Envelope D: DEA78943-1992-462$.840A-BECD93E45D97 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: COMMUNIW DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2021-167765 10:30 am 12l0gl21 Rl Fee: NO FEE Count of Pages 4 Recorded in Official Records CountY of San Mateo Mark Church t1tilll r1iu,llffiuqXfinfi t[fl[1[[ry up Resof ution No. 2020-01.13-Ta 2225 DAVIS DRIVE APN 025-192-010 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy ofthe document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. October 2021 &,rrru hrl,it,tr UUft,E Date: Kevin Gardiner, AICP, Community 4( RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a first and second s at 2225 Davis Drive. zoned R-1. Jeffrev Walker & Anqela Fano. propertv owners. APN: 025-192-010. WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on January 13. 2020, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the lnitial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (eX1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50 percent of the floor area of the structures before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the statf report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. lt is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. ,.b** Chairman t,'?r,t*rnNES Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th dav of Januarv, 2020. by the following vote: 2225 DAVIS DR - RESO 2020{t1.13-7a AYES: COiIAROTO, GAUL, LOffiS, SARGENT, TERRONES, TSE NOES: NONE ABSENT NONE RECUSED: NONE Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 2225 Davis Drive Effective January 23, 2020 Page 1 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the planning Division date stamped December 19,2019, sheets A1 through A8; that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYl or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private properly, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration pro.iects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 4 5 2 I 7 6. o EXHIBIT "A" 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11 12 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built isshown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 2225 Davis Drive Effective Jan uary 23, 2020 THE FOLLOWNG CONDITIONS SHALL BE TUIET DURING THE BUILDTNG INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: ------------------------------ --IEIGGMP SHINGLE TORE—N ----------- o E>RMGE ERE A�,� ^. MArGry EZIsrI. ^ �,n'i(li � �AVE RAGE(E)GRADE I _ OF Guae PANED NTOOORarvO OwmON' PR EL=995 pyE NEO SIOEUGrvrs TO REMAIN EIGrvr E ..GEIEIGNT rE SS ' PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION DEGRHNES UEL_=s9, TWR—E IIi%,-R_ II UEXISTING FRONT ELEVATION As ��SfO ARCy�T v P� REN. 1f3,2021 R W U Z W � a z U) woo W >0o � J N 0 Q U)U� W ¢W� J nc9z Nza Q N J Q D /1 m V Z Q LL oremei amm e� Ngafw EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1' 4' V 2' T 8' SCNE: 114'=1'Jr Iw To�IE) wocE � h zr-z• ur(E� 455E0 Aq�yr� h m-r TO'RGDMP EMANHNGLE HEN MI31I2J21 Y 9lEOFDAUFo� (E)oa N\ED BOARD µ .EuEY 7FN. FLR. \ aT i, REMAIN 2 To(E)Fin �FLa w _— — ——--- a. U T'O"(El—TE I T �(q�paT.NrE NAN (E) Y Z AREATD ED 00000 o a o0000 ro (LE"I l- - ---- — z u o 00000 ; 00000 TO.(El- LL -(E) NRIGNFASGIATO REMAIN �UN"/I � LL J TRUE D—E. LIGHT O N Q W WINO0-00RS N N () LWL PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION Q W N A6 Y pQo J n(Dz Nza Q N J Q 2 J D 1 m To�IE) wocE V h zr z Z o�lE� o E� Q RIDGE h Tr- o.lE LL I vn yr NN�aw ii aisol�xHv Too(E� —_ __ iiW To. (E) IF N_ FLa a• AREATO HE �� ALTEHEH .... I I WWmm I 0000o EXISTING AND o000o PROPOSED n-0, �FLR o0000 - ELEVATIONS 00000 00000 To.(E)sua SCNE: 114'=1'd EXISTING SIDE ELEVATION A6 A6 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- AREATOBE 4•�,r ALTERED i o_IE----------------- I �TO_(E)wocE \ - I T�a IEY IwocE \.. w I W II I I 1 \ l I \ AToY EonoOM� rri. .F r —TERTORETo MA I wNDowsaooORs I EMAETE li --- I No I��FN�F11a ---------------- -- - ----------- '-- - -- �— oFCURR (E)BRIc FASCIATO REMAIN �-A� EL ,uo_44 GE AN)GRAOE - cEAT FRoW1ANDRAOE DECD PRO EL =OR PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION EL.=ss., 4 T_OY IE)PIAIE T o IE) Era Fla AREATOBE ALTERED \ EXISTING REAR ELEVATION MACU TDR Ex sT NGTl �5E0 Aq�y TF RAINFED BOARD MD onM a ATGR NoaC 9193a ISTNG � qEN MI31I2J21 Y 9TEDFCAUFOP? TO BE) FIN LLI 1>a1nTE Z Lu C) a _ z (n W U o J To. (E] 1Zuo r W LL O O Q N a)U� W Q W N J n(Dz Nz(L Q N J Q D /1 V m Z Q LL psnw fle»B9 Nog]w T_ ))EIw�FL- EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1' 4' T.O_IE)Z-' p�, SCNE: W_ 1, I� 2n g , BE TO EIaDDE EN hzn,r rnn.D. ExisnNG PAINTED I—RD AND "ENI III - ,r-r J. "TINGEx sr Nc wN_aDooNa PAINTED PIASIE -� O MA Cry T E11t T -FiA NO 1(EI EiN o- (E) RN Ez TO,� - -� I PEE1P"a N AIN II. To-cEl�,r,�aA ,eoE DMDeD � crvr /I ------ To�tElsu�D vaNDowsa000Ns—�--- u,ENEE_ U PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION To -(Ell n 1E11t UEXISTING SIDE ELEVATION as L LI U Z L LI � Q z w >O o _o � J N 0 Q W ry U)U� W ¢w� J nc9z Nza Q N J Q D /1 m V Z Q LL EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1' 4' V 2' T 8' SCNE: 114'=1'Jr