Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 2021.03.08 - 8C' DocuSig n' Envelope I D : : 1. 4427 6C:-21 6E-4AF9-ACA5- 1 AO 1 E3oABSD E RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: COMMUNIry DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2021-166095 l:43 pm 'l2l\3l21 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of Pages 4 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Mark Church r mr I r rilflmi]flifl I ilil ilfliilfi i]ilillfl fiiiili]rl r r irr rn* $ R 0 0 0 3 1 I2 3 i-3 s"f-' { Resolution No. 2021-03.08-8c 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE APN 025-243-010 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and conect copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. October 2021 &r^^*'t" hthu.r $3LJffiLl[tfl(3AMEi}ALITORI< tA b.rUNE Date: Kevin Gardiner, AICP, Communig Development RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review (Maior Renovation) for a first and second storv addition to an existinq sinole family dwellin.q and new detached oaraoe at 1151 Rosedale Avenue, zoned R-1. Sapphire Huev. propertv owner, A,pNt 025-243-010; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 8, 2021, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the lnitial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (eX1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. lt is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be the County of San Mateo. in the official records of irperson :TS 0Ft+4[D Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoi Planning Commission held '!151 ROSEDALEAVE - RESO 2021-G.08{cAYES: COilAROTO, GAUL, Slneem, SCHiIID, TERROI{ES, TSENOES: NONE ABSET{T: LOFTTS RECUSED: NONE ng resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of theon the 8th dav of March. 2021 by the following vote: t, EXHIBIT "A" Conditions ofApprovalfor Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1r 5'l Rosedale Avenue Effective March 18, 2021 Page 'l 2 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Ptanning Division date stamped March 1, 2021, sheets A through l, CG-1, andA.1 through t; that any changes to building materials, exterior tinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYl or amendment to be determined by planning staff); that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to lhis permiti that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private propedy, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality ftranagement District; that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 3. 4 5 6 7 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requjrements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; L that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burtingame; THE FOLLOW|NG CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by theproject architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; EXHIBIT ..A" 11. 12 13 14 that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certificatron documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1{ 5l Rosedale Avenue Effective March 18, 2021 Page 2 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: E C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.plnELEVATIONS TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SET 1 1 2 2 312'-0"8'-0 3/4"2'-11"2'11" 1'2'-0"3'-6"(N) WOOD FENCE TO MATCH (E) (N) G.I. FASCIA o/ 2x8 FASCIA (PAINTED) (N) COLUMNS (N) CONC. STEPS T.O.C. EL 22.41 T.O. PORCH EL. 22.97 AVERAGE T.O.C. 19.46' T.O.C. EL. 23.61' T.O.C. EL. 21.41 T.O. (E) RIDGE LINE T.O. (E) RIDGE LINE (E) WOOD PROPERTY LINE FENCE TO REMAIN (N) COLUMNS 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.02.12: Typical Door and Window Trim 3.02.13: Trim around vent 3.02.13: Trim around vent F.F. F.F. T.O.P. T.O.P. FF. EL. 23.57 MAX. HEIGHT 30'-0" 45 o PROPERTY LINE(N) SILL HT. 5.833 SQ. FT. EL. 47.82'2'-3"5.833 SQ. FT.2'-0"min.2'-3"2'-0"min.SILL HT.9'-0 3/4"8'-0 3/4"12 5 BEDROOM #3 MASTER BEDROOM 1'-0" 1'-0" STONE VENEER TYP. ALUMINUM CLAD-WOOD SLIMULATE TRUE DIVIDED LITES WINDOWS, TYP. LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL WALL SCOUNCE (MAX. 40 WATT) LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL WALL SCONCE (MAX. 40 WATT) 2x8 FASCIA (PAINTED) 4x8 BRACKETS PAINTED, TYP. DECORATIVE CHIMNEY CAP T.O.C. EL 21.83 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 1 1/2" 3.02.14: Typical Window 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 3.02.14: Typical Window G.I. FLASHING 2x4 PAINTED WINDOW TRIMS TYP. 2x4 PAINTED WINDOW TRIMS TYP. 2x4 PAINTED WINDOW TRIMS TYP. 2x4 PAINTED WINDOW TRIMS TYP.7'-6 1/4"3'-6"1'-4"11'-6"3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 3.02.12: Typical Door and Window Trim F.F. WRAP 6x6 POST w/ 2x TRIM(PAINTED) 2x8 FASCIA EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE BEYOND STONE VENEER WRAP 6x8 BEAM w/ 2x TRIM (PAINTED) WOOD BEAM (PAINTED) WRAP 6x6 POST w/ 2x TRIM (PAINTED) 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.12.01: Typical Roofing (PAINT FASCIA GUTTER TO MATCH FASCIA) Notes 3 Structure 3.02.11 Typical Exterior Wall 6" Shiplap siding w/ 5" exposure (painted) o/ grade 'D' building paper and 1/2" plywood sheathing. (S.S.D.) o/ 2x studs @ 16" o.c. w/ R15 insulation, fill all cavities. 3.02.12 Typical Door and Window Trim 2X4 Door and window trim (painted) 3.02.13 Trim around vent Typ. Trim around vent to match window trims. 3.02.14 Typical Window Aluminum Clad-Wood with Simulated True Divided Lites 3.08.04 G.I. FASCIA GUTTER G.I. Fascia w/ approved means to prevent accumuation of leaves and debris o/ 2x8 fascia (painted), to match existing 3.12.01 Typical Roofing Comp. shingles roofing (Class'A') install as per mfr's instructions o/ roof felt and 1/2" plywood sheathing. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FRONT ELEVATION (ROSEDALE AVENUE) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"3 WINDOW DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 ELEVATION AT FRONT ENTRY SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"5 TYPICAL EAVE DETAIL MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: F C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.plnELEVATIONS TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SET 1 12'-0"7'-0"LINE OF (E) STRUCTURE AVERAGE POINT OF DEPARTURE 22.27' 45o MAX. HEIGHT 30'-0"8'-0 3/4"9'-0 3/4"t.o.p. t.o.p. f.f. f.f. (N) 1 1 38'-0 3/4"6'-0"PROPOSED EXISTING 7'-6"12'7'-6"9'-0 3/4"LINE OF (E) STRICTURE LINE OF (E) COVERED PORCH TO BE REMOVED AVERAGE T.O. CURB EL. 19.46'EL. 20.68'T.O.CURB EL. 19.55' AVERAGE POINT OF DEPARTURE 22.27' (N) 12 5 12 5 12 2PROPOSED NEW PORCH SLAB F.F. EL. 23.57'T.O.PORCH F.F. 22.97' 30'-0" MAX. HEIGHT (N)(N)(N)PROPOSEDREMOVE (E) STEPS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION (WESTMOOR RD)SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EXISTING LEFT SIDE ELEVATION (WESTMOOR RD) MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: G C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.pln ELEVATIONS TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SET 1 1 2 2GUEST ROOM BEDROOM #2 2'-11" T.O. (E) RIDGE T.O. (E) RIDGE 3.05.01: Egress Window OBSCURE GLASS (TEMP'D) OBSCURE GLASS (TEMP'D) 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall STAIR LANDING WDW SILL 7'-0"(N) (N) SILL HT F.F.2'-3"F.F. SILL HT. 5.33 SQ. FT. (N) 4'-0"2'-3"2'-0"min.2'-8"2'-0"min.5.8 SQ. FT. 2x4 WINDOW TRIM PAINTED TO MATCH FASCIA, TYP. 2x4 DOOR TRIM PAINTED TO MATCH FASCIA, TYP. TYPICAL ALUM. CLAD-WOOD WINDOWS w/ SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES G.I. FASCIA GUTTER o/ 2x8 FASCIA (PAINTED), TYP. 1 1 2 2GUEST ROOM BEDROOM #2 2'-11" T.O. (E) RIDGE T.O. (E) RIDGE 3.05.01: Egress Window OBSCURE GLASS (TEMP'D) OBSCURE GLASS (TEMP'D) 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall STAIR LANDING WDW SILL 7'-0"(N) (N) SILL HT F.F.2'-3"F.F. SILL HT. 5.33 SQ. FT. (N) 4'-0"2'-3"2'-0"min.2'-8"2'-0"min.5.8 SQ. FT. 2x4 WINDOW TRIM PAINTED TO MATCH FASCIA, TYP. 2x4 DOOR TRIM PAINTED TO MATCH FASCIA, TYP. TYPICAL ALUM. CLAD-WOOD WINDOWS w/ SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES G.I. FASCIA GUTTER o/ 2x8 FASCIA (PAINTED), TYP. Notes 3 Structure 3.02.11 Typical Exterior Wall 6" Shiplap siding w/ 5" exposure (painted) o/ grade 'D' building paper and 1/2" plywood sheathing. (S.S.D.) o/ 2x studs @ 16" o.c. w/ R15 insulation, fill all cavities. 3.05.01 Egress Window Required egress window,max sill ht. 44", min. width 20". min. ht. 24". Net opening not less than 5.7 sq. ft. (Exception: Grade floor or below grade opening shall have a net clear opening of not less than 5 sq. ft.) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 REAR ELEVATION NEIGHBOR 'S HOUSE MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: I C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.plnSECTIONS TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SET8'-0 3/4"9'-0 3/4"(E) T.O. RIDGE TO BE REMOVED 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall T.O.G. 20.58' MASTER CLOSET BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.F. 23.57' T.O.C. WESTMOOR AVE. 19.55'9'-0 3/4"8'-0 3/4"(E) FOOTING TO REMAIN 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP BD. @ CEILING TYP. 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall (N) PORCH SLAB TYP. ROOFING COMP. SHINGLES (HEAVY GRADE ) o/ ROOF FELT AND 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING 12 5 12 5 LIVING ROOM BEDROOM BATH F.F. EL. 23.57' T.O.C. AT WESTMOOR RD. EL. 19.55'4.02'F.F. EL. 23.57' T.O.C. AT ROSEDALE AVE. EL. 19.55'7'-0"property line30'-0" MAX HEIGHT 3.02.12: Typical Door and Window Trim 3'-6"8'-0"3/4" 3.02.11: Typical Exterior Wall 5.01.01: 5/8 GYP. BD. COMP. SHINGLES (CLASS 'A' o/ 15# ROOF FELT AND 1x T&G DECKING G.I. FLASHING 2x8 FASCIA (PAINTED) WOOD BEAM 2x RAFTERS @ 24" o.c. WOOD BEAM 6x6 POST WRAP w/ 2x TRIM STONE VENEER 6x6 KING POST w/ 2x TRIM WRAP 6x8 BEAM w/ 2xTRIM Notes 3 Structure 3.02.11 Typical Exterior Wall 6" Shiplap siding w/ 5" exposure (painted) o/ grade 'D' building paper and 1/2" plywood sheathing. (S.S.D.) o/ 2x studs @ 16" o.c. w/ R15 insulation, fill all cavities. 3.02.12 Typical Door and Window Trim 2X4 Door and window trim (painted) 3.12.01 Typical Roofing Comp. shingles roofing (Class'A') install as per mfr's instructions o/ roof felt and 1/2" plywood sheathing. 5 Interior 5.01.01 5/8 GYP. BD. 5/8" Gyp Bd. Type 'X' gyp. bd. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"3 SECTION MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: H C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.plnROOF PLAN TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SET1'1'1'1'1'2'1'2'1'2'1' 1' 1'2'2'1'22'1'1'1'2'2'1'2'2'2'1'2'-9"FIRST FLOOR BLDG. LINE TYP. SECOND FLOOR BLDG. LINE, TYP. ROOF LINE ROOF LINE ROOF LINE D/S D/S D/S D/S D/S D/SD/S DS DS SECOND FLOOR BLDG. LINE LINE OF (E) FRONT PORCH LINE OF (E) GARAGE TO BE REMOVED (E) ROOF LINE AT (E) GARAGE TO BE REMOVED D/S D/S ROOF LINE D/S D/S 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.12.01: Typical Roofing 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.08.04: G.I. FASCIA GUTTER 3.12.01: Typical Roofing SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 3:12RIDGE RIDGE LINE OF (E) RIDGE TO BE REMOVED LINE OF (E) RIDGE TO BE REMOVED SLOPE 5:12 SLOPE 5:12 SLOPE 5:12 SLOPE 5:12SLOPE 5:12RIDGERIDGERIDGERIDGERIDGESLOPE 5:12 SLOPE 5:12 SLOPE 5:12 SLOPE 5:12 VALLEYVALLEYV A L L E Y V A L L E Y Notes 3 Structure 3.08.04 G.I. FASCIA GUTTER G.I. Fascia w/ approved means to prevent accumuation of leaves and debris o/ 2x8 fascia (painted), to match existing 3.12.01 Typical Roofing Comp. shingles roofing (Class'A') install as per mfr's instructions o/ roof felt and 1/2" plywood sheathing. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: A C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.plnSITE PLAN TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SET N1 1 1 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 2 NEW CONC. WALK (R) CONC. DRIVEWAY 7'-6" 10'20'4'10'-9" (N) 6'-0" HIGH WOOD FENCE w/ 1'-0" TRELLIS ABOVE (E) CURB (E) CURB (E) 6' HIGH WOOD FENCE TO BE REMOVEDEL. 19.58 EL 19.33 EL 23.61 EL 21.16 EL. 24.16 (E) FIRE HYRANT (E) FIRE HYRANT (E) STORAGE SHED TO BE REMOVED (E) CONC. WALK EL 22.41EL 21.83 EL 24.15 (N) 6' HIGH WOOD FENCE AND GATE (E) 42" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCEAVERAGE T.O.C. EL. 19.46' EL 21.41 EL 24.37 EL 24.95 (E) FRUIT TREE TO BE REMOVED (E) FRUIT TREE TO BE REMOVED (E) WATER METER REMOVE (E) 42" HIGH WOOD FENCE (E) 42" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE (E) WOOD PROPERTY LINE FENCE TO REMAIN (N) 6'-0" HIGH w/ 1'-0" TRELLIS ABOVE WOOD FENCE TOTAL 7'-0" HIGH MAX. SHADED AREA INDICATES (E) STRUCTURE (E) NON-FRUIT NON-NUT TREE (E) HEDGES TO REMAIN (E) WOOD CHIP MULCH LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN (N) LIQUID AMBER 15 GAL. (N) 6'-0" HIGH WOOD FENCE (E) LAWN F.F. EL. 23.57 F.F. EL. 22.97 (E) NON-FRUIT NON-NUT TREE EL. 20.68 (E) SHURBS 105' 65'35'35'31.42'3 1 . 4 2 '25'25'(E) 40'-3" +/-(E) 32'-2" +/-(E) 16'-1" +/-(E) 20'-6" +/-(E) CONC.SIDEWALK(E) CONC. SIDEWALK (E) DRIVEWAY ROSEDALE AVENUEWESTMOOR ROADEL CAMINO REAL6'-0"SETBACK15'-0" SETBACK 15'-0" SETBACK11'-3"10'-2"2nd FLSETBACK2nd FLSETBACK 21'-3"35'-3" (E) 37'-6" DS DS DS DS DS DS RELOCATE GAS METER (E) SEWER CLEANOUT(E) 'DRIP' IRRIGATION THIS AREA (E) TIME SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT (E) LAWN (E) CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS NOTE: EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN REMOVE PORTION OF (E) 6' HIGH WOOD FENCE (N) 8'-0" HIGH WOOD FENCE) DS DS DS (E) CONC. WALK TO BE REMOVED ADD (N) GROUND COVER TO MATCH (E) DS DS (N) 3/0 GATE 20' Project Address: 1151 Rosedale Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-010 Description: Request for Design Review for a new single-family dwelling with an attached garage. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0401- 0450/sb_407_bill_20091011_chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 2) Place the following information on the first page of the plans. “Construction Hours” Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No Work Allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 18.07.110 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 3) Acknowledge that this project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, “when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures.” This building must comply with the 2019 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020. Note: that at the time of the building permit submittal, you will need to submit an erosion control plan and stipulate on the drawing the removal and replacement of sidewalk, curb, gutter, sewer lateral, and water line to the Public Works Department. 4) Acknowledge that due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. Project Comments – Planning Application City of Burlingame Planning Division (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments 2 3. Lot Coverage (Code Section 25.26.065) 40% x 5,594 SF = 2,238 SF maximum allowed Existing Proposed Allowed/Required Lot Coverage: 1,386 SF 24.7% 1,846 SF 32.9% 2,238 SF 40%  The proposed project complies with lot coverage regulations, calculations are attached. 4. Floor Area Ratio (Code Section 25.26.070) (0.32 x 5,594 SF) + 900 SF = 2,690 SF maximum allowed (0.48 FAR) Existing Proposed Allowed/Required Floor Area Ratio: 1,232 SF 0.22 FAR 2,690 SF 0.48 FAR 2,690 SF 0.48 FAR  The proposed project complies with floor area ratio regulations, calculations are attached. 5. Building Height (Code Section 25.26.060) Average top of curb: (19.58’ + 19.33’)/2 = 19.46’ Existing: 19.46’ + 18.4’ = 37.86’ (18’-5” above average top of curb) Proposed: 19.46’ + 28.36’ = 47.82’ (29’-6” above average top of curb) Allowed: 19.46’ + 30.0’ = 49.46’ (30’-0" above average top of curb)  The proposed project complies with building height regulations. Project Address: 1151 Rosedale Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-010 Description: Request for Design Review for a new single-family dwelling with an attached garage. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 3) Acknowledge that this project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, “when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures.” This building must comply with the 2019 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020. Note: that at the time of the building permit submittal, you will need to submit an erosion control plan and stipulate on the drawing the removal and replacement of sidewalk, curb, gutter, sewer lateral, and water line to the Public Works Department. 4) Acknowledge that due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 5) Acknowledge that when you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review, that a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application will be provided. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawings specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2019 California Residential Code 2019 CRC § R310 or CBC 1030. Note: The area labeled “Guest Room” is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. Project Comments – Planning Application GENERAL NOTESPROJECT DATASHEET INDEX SCOPE OF WORK 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1' = 1'-0"2 CONSTRUCTION HOURS 3 AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK · No guarantee for quality of construction is implied or intended by the architectural documents and the contractor shall assume full responsibility for any or all construction deficiencies. · The developer and/or general contractor shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the Architect from any action initiated by the initial owner or any subsequent owners for construction deficiencies, modifications or such conditions which may be beyond the control of the Architect. · All dimensions shown take precedence over scaled dimensions. · Contractor shall coordinate with owner prior to ordering any fixtures, equipment, cabinetry, etc. for owner's approval. · Sheet metal contractor shall provide owner with heating duct & register location prior to installation for owner's approval. · All dimensions to face of stud unless otherwise noted. · Electrical contractor to verify with owner type and locations of all electrical fixtures, outlets, switches and subpanels prior to installation. · Plumbing contractor to verify with owner type and locations of all plumbing fixtures, faucets, etc. prior to installation. - General contractor shall contact the City of Los Altos regarding the requirements for the construction waste management plan. · All work shall comply with applicable codes and trade standards which govern each phase of work, including, but not limited to: 2019 California Residential Code (CRC), 2019 California Building Code 2019 California Plumbing Code (CPC), 2019 California Mechanical Code (CMC), 2019 California Electrical Code (CEC), 2019 California Energy Code, 2019 California Green Building Standards 2019 California Fire Code (CFC) and all other applicable Municiple and Town ordinances and regulations . · The contractor shall carefully inspect all excavation work for compliance to requirements of the prevailing building code. Should any conditions appear questionable due to excessive dampness, granular composition, sluffing, softness or other defect, the contractor shall contact the engineer or designer. · All information pertaining to the site shall be, and shall remain, the owner's responsibility. This information shall include legal description, deed restrictions, easements, site survey, topographic survey, position of existing improvements, soils report and all related data. Theses documents have been prepared on the information available to the designer. · It is the responsibility of the contractor and all subcontractors to check and verify all dimensions and conditions indicated on these drawings and make known any discrepancies prior to commencing their work. · These drawings are intended for use in a negotiated construction contract and, therefore, may not specifically detail or specify materials and/or manufacturers. The contractor shall provide all samples and/or cuts as required to assist owner or his agent in making material selections. APN: 025243010 ZONING: R1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB OCCUPANCIY: R3/U LOT SIZE: 5,594 SQ. FT. SQUARE FOOTAGE: EXISTING SQ. FT. = 1,242.75 SQ. FT. PROPOSED: EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL FIRST FLOOR 987.0 491.3 1,478.3 SECOND FLOOR 0 980.17 980.17 TOTAL 2458.47 S.F. GARAGE (DETACHED) 223 S.F. TOTAL 2681.47 S.F. F.A.R.: 32% + 900 SQ. FT. 5,594 X .32 = 1,790.08 900 400 (for detached garage) 3,098.08 MAX. ALLOWED COVERAGE: 40% 5,594 x .40 = 2,2376 S.F. EXISTING COVERAGE = EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL RESIDENCE = 987 S.F. 491.3 1,478.3 S.F. (E) GARAGE= -255.57 (N) ONE CAR GARAGE 223 223 S.F. COVERED PORCH = 150 S.F. 44.33 194.33 (N) BACK PORCH 21 STORAGE = -100 S.F. TOTAL 1,493 S.F. 1,916.63 S.F. MAX. HEIGHT = 30' OR 2 1/2 STORIES A COVER SHEET A.1 EXISTING SITE PLAN B PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN C PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN D EXISTING FLOOR PLAN E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS F EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS G EXITERIOR ELEVATIONS H ROOF PLAN I BUILDING SECTIONS CG-1 CAL GREEN -ADDITION TO FIRST FLOOR -NEW DRIVEWAY AND CONC . WALKWAY AT NEW DETACHED GARAGE -REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. PROVIDE NEW LANDSCAPING MATCH EXISTING -NEW EXTERIOR STEPS TO EXISTING FRONT PORCH -NEW ROOF OVER EXISTING FRONT PORCH -REMOVE EXISTING FIREPLACE PROVIDE NEW GAS FIREPLACE -NEW ONE CAR GARAGE AND ONE OPEN PARKING -NEW KITCHEN -NEW BATH AND POWDER ROOM AT FIRST FLOOR -NEW SECOND FLOOR -NEW INTERIOR STAIRS -REPLACEMENT OF ALL CURB. GUTTER, DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK FRONTING SITE, PLUG ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS AND INSTALL NEW 4" LATERAL, ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRE LINE ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATIONS, ANY OTHER INDERGROUND UTILITY WORK WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY -GRADING PERMIT, IF REQUIRED,WILL BE OBTAINED FROM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - - -20'-6"20'-0"20'-6"21'-2"20'-6"21'-0"20'-6" 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-6" 20'-6" 20'-6" 21'-10" 20'-6" 20'-6" 20'-6" 225'-4" divided by 11 equal 20'-5" average front setabck20'-0"20'-6"20'-0"20'-6"20'-6" MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 SHEET TITLE OWNER: PROJECT NO: TRANS BURLINGAME MODEL FILE: revised for design review 5A.pln COPYRIGHT: A.1 C:\Users\tk\Desktop\herny III burlingame\comments from planning commision\APPRVD DESIGN\revised for design review 5A.plnEXISTING SITE PLAN TRANS RESIDENCE ADDITION/ ALTERATION FOR: 1151 ROSEDALE AVE. BURLINGAME, CA. 924 JUDAH STREET SAN RANCISCO, CA. warren9250@yahoo.com (415) 531-1878 WH DRAFTING AND DESIGN 2-2-2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SAPPHIRE HUEY 1151 ROSEDALE AVENUE BURLINGAME, CA. 6-29-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 8-20-2020 PLANNING RESPONSE 2-9-2021 CITY DESIGN CONSULTANT APPROVED SETN(E) CONC. DRIVEWAY(E) 27'-5"(E) 36'-0"(E) 11'-0 (E) 23'-3"(E) CURB (E) CURB (E) WOOD FENCE TO BE REMOVEDEL. 19.58 EL 19.33 EL 23.61 EL 21.16 EL. 24.16 (E) FIRE HYRANT (E) STORAGE SHED TO BE REMOVED (E) CONC. WALK EL 22.41EL 21.83 EL 24.15 (N) WOOD FENCE AND GATE (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE (E) WOOD FENCE AVERAGE T.O.C. EL. 19.46' EL 21.41 EL 24.37 EL 24.95 (E) FRUIT TREE (E) FRUIT TREE (E) FIRE HYRANT SHADED AREA INDICATES (E) STRUCTURE (E) NON-FRUIT NON-NUT TREE (E) HEDGES TO REMAIN (E) WOOD CHIP MULCH LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN (E) LAWN (E) NON-FRUIT NON-NUT TREE (E) SHURBS 105' 65'35'35'31.42'3 1 . 4 2 '25'25'(E) 40'-3" +/-(E) 32'-2" +/-(E) 16'-1" +/-(E) 20'-6" +/-(E) 11'-3"(E) CONC.SIDEWALK(E) CONC. SIDEWALK (E) DRIVEWAY ROSEDALE AVENUEWESTMOOR ROADEL CAMINO REAL4'-0"SETBACK15'-0" SETBACK 15'-0" SETBACK(E) W/H(E) FAU(E) W(E) D NOTE: -NO (E) TREES TO BE REMOVED -NO NEW LANDSCAPING (E) 37'-6" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN