Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1964.01.06380 Burlingame, California January 6, J-964 CAIL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlinganre City Council was held on the above given date. l.teeting called to order at 8:00 p.m., - Uayor ilohnson in the Chair. PLEDGE OF AIIEGIANCE At word from the Chair, aII in the Council Chamber arose the Pledge of Allegiance to the FIag. and gave ROLL CAIL Pre sent Absent Councilmen: Councilmen : Cro sby-Diederich sen-George-ilohnson-Martin. None . Ihe minutes of the previous meeting of December 16, 1963, submitted to Council, were unanirnously approved and adopted upon motion by Councilman George and seconded by Councilman Crosby. BIDS (a) Bids received for the City of Burlingame's Sidewalk Repair Program (.Iob No. 63-25) and opened at 1O:00 a.m., on this day, in compliance with notification to bidders, vrere summarized and announced as follows:- TOTAL S1,}{ Lowrie Paving Company Paving Co. Peltier Casey Co. Engineer's Estimate $20,018.00 A recornmendation from the City Engineer that a contract for the proposed program of sidewalk repair be awarded to the lowest respon- sible bidder, the Lowrie Paving Conpany, was concurred in by Council. Trhe City Attorney advised that a resolution awarding contract to the selected bidder would be prepared for Council action prior to the termination of the Council meeting on this date. Mayor Johnson announced that this was the time and place scheduled for a hearing on the Investigation Act report prepared by the City Engineer and on the report of the Engineer prepared pursuant to the Irlunicipal Improvement Act of 1913 with respect to the proposed CALIFORT{EA DRIVE STREET LIGHTING pToject. The Chair further announced order following: that the hearing would proceed in the Kunz A. B. TI. E. $Ls,2L2.25 16, 617 . 00 17,011 . o0 18 , 906. 50 Engineer on bids received at 1O:OO a.m-, and the effect of the bids on the assessment; I Report from City ,January 6, L964, It{IIIUTES S IDEWA],K REPAIRS CALIFORNIA DRIVE STREET IIGHTING PROJECT 381 3 2. Ihe reading by the City Engineer of his Investigation Act Report, Report by the City Clerk as of notices of hearing; to publication, posting and mailing 4. Declaration that the hearing is open; 5 6 7 Reading of written protests i Hearing of oral protests and communications; written or oral endorsements; Electric Corp. Russ Street, San Francisco 8. The closing or continuance of the hearing; and 9. Council action. BIDS (b)CAI,IFORNIA DRIVE STREET LIGHTING PROJECT Ttle City Engineer advised that sealed proposals for the lighting improvement received at 10:OO a.m., on this date, in accordance with legal notification, were opened. surnmarized and declared as follows: TOTAI BID Ensco 175 $1r,0s6.40 Kennedy Electric Co. 84 Beacon Street, So. San Francisco 1I,480.16 Bergsen Electric Co. 208 E. crand Ave., So. San Francisco L2,4A7.5O Ecco-Phoenix corp. 913 Washington Street, San Carlos t2 ,725.44 Safe Electric Company 850 Old County Road, Belmont 12, 758.00 R. Flatland Company 367 Bayshore BIvd., San Francisco 14,360.00 Central Electric Company 610 Tttird Street, San Francisco L4,63t.92 Abbott Electric Corporation 85 Federal Street, San Francisco L4,947 .OO Steiny & Iilitchell Cory)any 126O Pennsylvania Avenue, San Francisco 15,175.00 Bay Area Electric Corporation 1652 taurel street, san carlos 15, 500 - 90 Maples Electric P. O. Box 535, Dos Palos Engineer's estirnate $ls, s2r. s0 15,845.50 382 Reporting on the effect of the bids on the proposed street lighting district assessment, the City Engineer advised that the bid of the lowest responsible bidder is approximately 94,500.00 bel-ow the estimate of the Engineer, indicating that the individual assessments against the properties may be reduced approxJmately twenty-five percent, or a reduction from an estimated $7.00 per lineal foot to approximately 95.25 per lineal foot. Ihe City Engineer read his report under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code except as to the map and the assessed valuations and true valuations of; and assessments and estimated assessments upon each parcel of 1and, as required by law. The City C1erk advised that his Office has on file, affidavits of mailing of the notices of the Division 4 report hearing and affidavits of publication of the Notice of Improvement and the Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals and the affidavit of mailing notice to property owners, and that the Council has jurisdiction therefor to proceed with the hearing. Mayor ilohnson declared the hearing open and requested that the City C1erk read written protests received. The Chair called for oral protests and communications. I'lrs. Gladys Costa, representing the owner of the property at 6 California Drive under lease by Metcalf-!1ayer, stated that she wished to protest the project. Requesting written or oral endorsements, Kenneth I. Jones of Wilson, Harzfeld, Jones and l{orton, presented letters and petitions whic}r had been transmitted to his Office by the City C1erk at the tirne the project was referred to his Office and requested that the communi- cations be fiLed officially with the city Clerk at this time as a representation of the support for the project. The cormnunications were thereupon read by the City Clerk. Itlr. H. A. Heinrichs, addressing new owner of the premises at 85 approval to the project. the Council, advised California Drive and that he entered is the his In response to an inquiry from Attorney ,Jones, the City Engineer stated in connection vrith Mr. Rudd's statement concerning the installation of privately-owned lightj.ng, that the proposed lighting facilities would be owned. maintained and operated by the City of Burlingame at the expense of the latter and that the maintenance obligation would therefore not be assumed by the property ovrners. IIe further stated that he had used the front footage method in spreading the assessment to determine the benefits ina smuch as this practice was most conunon and, in his opinion, most equitable for this particular proj ect. Ihere being no further the hearing closed. testimony or comnents, the Chair declared In reply to a question from Councilrnan llartin, the city E:ngineer reported that the percentage of legal written protests was L3.19% and if the oral protest is considered, the total protest is less than twenty percent. T'he pro j ect eactr member and testjrnony was discussed and reviewed by the council; thereafter indicating his willingness to proceed. A written protest received from R. E. Rudd, 50 California Drive, was read by the City Clerk and placed on file. 383 Resolutions appropriate to proceeding with the CALIFORNIA DRIVE STREET LIGITTING PROiIECT, prepared by the attorneys for the District, were submitted and action taken by Council as follows: RES0LUTION NO. t-64 "A Resolution of Determination, Under Divislon 4ffiighways Code, to Proceed With iroceedings for Improvements" was introduced for passage upon Eotion of CouncilmanMartin, seconded by Councilman Crosby and unanimously carried. RESOLUTI0N NO. 2-64 "A Resolution Overruli ng Protests on Resolution of Int ent i-tn-To;fz:-6frr was introduced for passage upon motion of CouncilmanDiederichsen, seconded by CounciLman Geoige and uiranlmous ly carried RESOLUTION NO. 3-64 'rA Resolution and O Conflrming the Assessment and Ordering Councilman George, who moved its passag and unanimous ly carried. RESOLUTION N0. 4-64 "A Resolution of Award of Contractrr (Emsco Elec tricof CounciLman Crosby,Corp.) llas lntroduced for passage upon motion seconded by Counc i lulan George and unanimous ly adopted. Mr. James Minto, Chairmaa, Auto Dealersr Con'mittee, in attendance, thanked Council for its fores ightedness , adding that the improvement would benefit the City of Burlingame considerably. Councilman Martin suggested that Mr. Minto convey to the automobiledealers the continued interest of Council in retaining their businessin the City of Burlingame. Mr. Minto, acknowledging the cooments of Councilman Martin, and speakingin behalf of the greater percentage of the automobi-Le dealers, spoke on the pleasure of the industry by its long establishment on "automobilerow" on California Drive in the City of Burlingame. 2. A. R. CARPENIER VARIANCE (El Camino Real and Willow Avenue. ) rder Adopting Engineerrs Report, the Work" was introduced bye, seconded by Counciknan Crosby Mayor Johnson announced that this qra s the tlme and place to continuehearing on the application of A. R. Carpenter for a variance to erect an addltion to an existing apartment building at the southwest cornerof EI Camino ReaL and WiLLow Avenue. 2 A comunication to Council, dated December 27, 1963, from the City Planner, related hearings before the Planning Conmission wtrerein the Cortmisslon approved, with s ome changes and subject to fire and buildlng code requirements, the request for variances, the subsequent hearings before Council on an appeal by a property owne r ln the noticed area,the submission of a complete revision in the proposed building plans by Mr. Carpenter, the applicant, and the referral to the Planning Comulssion for advice and recomendation. The City Planner advised that as noro proposed, all requirements forvariances are removed with the exception of che use of the R-l lot forparking and Landscaping purposes; the number of parking spaces iscorrect for the total number of units and the rear yard setbacks meetthe code. Councilman Crosbyrs suggestion that a portion of Willow Avenue bewidened to provide a holding lane was studied and proved to be aparticularly difficu[t mntter because of the location of a power and telephone pole in the planting strip and the existence of exceedinglyLarge eucalyptus trees at the north and south sides of the street. Continuing, the City Planner advised that cosapplicant from the Pacific Gas and Electric C Company and estimates received for street widimate sum of $6,100.00, were in the opinion oa burden to provide a holding lane in additio because of the eucalyptus trees, would not aI t figures obtained by theoopany, the Pacific Telephoneening, in the total approx-f the applicant, too costlyn to his bullding costs andleviate the access problem. 384 It was the recormendation of the Planning Corrmission that the presentplan be approved, but because of the cost of removing the pole-and theproblem of the trees, no recomnendation on the proposed chinges inthe street was submitted. There being no coments from proponents either verbally or receivedin rrriting, the Chair invited opponents to speak. Mr. James E. Carroll, 848 Wa lnut Avenue, Vi-ce-President Suburban ProEective Association of Burli-ngame, stated that his organi-zationcontinues to object to changlng R-l zoned lots to an R-3 classifi-cation; that a precedent may be established and that owners shouldbe assured of their property rights. Mr. Carroll commented on the increased traffic hazards that shallresult, the applicantrs failure to compLy with requirements necessaryto the granting of a variance and, speaking as an individual taxpayer, voiced his objection to the Cityrs participation in an expendlture to widen Willow Avenue . There being no further connents from opponents, the Chair referred to members of the Council. Replying to inquiries of Councilnan l.Iartin with respect to resub-divisions and variances, the City Planner advised that if the subjectproperty had proceeded on a resubdivislon basis and the R-l zoned lot were combined with the R-3 zoned Lot, the use permitted in the lesserrestricted portion would have extended to Ehe entire Lot; in theinstance of the applicantrs request, however, the Planning Cotmissionpreferred the variance method. ConsiderabLe discussion arose on the hazardous entry created by the exceedingly Large eucalyptus trees aE south sides of Willow Avenue and the El Camino Real. to rh El Camino Real e north and plan, stating rime concern upon the ed by the Councilman George, reporting on his personal visitation to the area stated his reluctance to approve a variance under the hazardous conditions that prevail and suggested that the costs subnitted by the utility companies be further investigated and efforts expendedto provide a "holding Lane." Councilman Crosby, eoncurring v/ith statements mode by Councilman George, c or',-ented that in his opinion, the City has a responsibilityto possibly widen Willow Avenue. Councilnr,an Marthat in his op and that his a widening of WiCity Planner a sedfp ent Par riin PP 11 nd n comuEnded the appllcant on his propoion, however, the traffic problem is o rovaL of the variance would be conting ow Avenue as indicated on a sketch pre reviewed by the City Council. Following further discussion, Mr. A. R. Carpenter, the applicant, .replied to points raised by Council, stating that a "holiIi-ng lane" would not alleviate Ehe access problem and advised that his plan provides parking spaces for the units proposed and no "on street parking" shall be necessary. Mr. Carpenter spoke on the cost estirnates received butility companies, particularly referring to the $4,by the TeLephone Company, who have advised that thecurrently being used as a main feeder for the area apalr of underground cabLe. v 5 him from the 00.00 quotedtility pole isd includes 520 Mr. Carpenter stated that he cannot economicall construction and improvement costs but rlEly conswith the Clty. u n add furtherder "sharing hise costrrv ]. to rh The heari.ng was thereafter declared closed and the Chair requested the pleasure of the Council. Councilman George moved that the varlance be approved upon the condition that the applicant proceed with appropriate Eeasures to provide a "holding 1ane" on Willow Avenue. Ihe motion was seconded by Councilman l.lartin and unanimously carried. Council concurred with a suggestion made by the City Planner thatthe City Manager notify the Pacific Te lephone Company that it isin the interest of the public that Willow Avenue be widened as pro- posed and that its cooperation is respectfully solicited. RECESS 38s advis ed he A recess was declared by the Chair at 9:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Council reconvened at 9:40 p.m. COMMI'NICATIONS I. PROPOSED DELETION PARCELS FROM PARKING DISTRICTS A cornmunication from the City Manager, dated January 2, L964,that the Parking Co"'mission has recomended the deletion of tfollowing parcels from the Parking District: l. Parcels 6E and lE Lorton enue . being one-half of the Howard Buick property on subject property is the vacant portion and it is anticipated that said parcel will be taken by the Federal authoritiesfor Post Office usage ; 2. ParceL 4A , a Lot owned by the City adjacent to the Library. The elEy las received a $41,000.00 credit for the property currentlywithin the Parking District; 3. Parcel 3A, a srne 11 land- locked parcel abutting Parcel 4A; (Steinbeck) 4. Parcel 54, designated the "Donnelly Houserr orrned by A. Griffith; 5. A Wa lkwa arcel , ten feet in width from Burlingame Avenue to the ac e s to the south of Burlingame Avenue, west oftParn8 Primrose Road. The City Manager advised that the actual acquisitional costs are estimated to be $200,000 in excess of the original estioate and the recommended deletions will defray a portion of the increased costs. Mr. Kenneth I. Jones, Attorney, representing the Burlingame Area Off- Street Parking District No. l, advised that only Parcel 5-A (Donnelly House) of the parcels reco'r'-ended for deletion is in the process of emlnent domain and in some detail, explained the legal procedure and the necessity to schedule a public hearing if Council elects to delete the property. Mr. Jones further advisedthe City shall be required fees and court costs. that if this particular parcel is deleted,to assume th- property owner's attorneyts Mr. Theodore T. Blumberg, member and Chairnan of the Parking Commission, advised Councll of the analyzaEion and study made of the District by the Cotn'nission in view of the excess in acqulsitional costs andparticularly to the selection of lots that may be deleted without materially "harming" the District as a whole and to parking lots that must be retained within the specific location of a 'rcontributor'r to the District. It thereafter rras recomended by the Parking Comuission that condemnation suits on the subject property be released. Ur. Roger Duncan, owne r of property adjacent to the Library on Primrose Road and elsewhere wlthin the City, protested the eLimination of parking lots on the north side of Burlingame Avenue. Mr. Duncan, in referring to a petition bearing the signatures of sixty- eight business rnen and women on the north side of Burlingame Avenue, concurring with his objection, was advised to file the petitiofls at the time a public hearirrg is scheduled. 386 Following further discussion, Counc i lman Martin recorpnended thatpublic hearings be conducted on a "reLated Lots" basis and suggestedthat only Lots 3A, 4A and 5A be considered at a forthcoming hearing. Council concurred and the regular meeting of Council, February 3, 1964, was selected as a public hearing date in whlch to consider thedeletion of Lots 3A, 4A and 54 from the Off-Street Parking District. 2. PROPOSED ORDIMNCE REGI,'I,ATING PARKING LOTS A cormunication dated January 2, L964, was read from Ezra E. Stevens, Managernent Services Agency, L25 Primrose Road, protesting the recommended rrNo Limit Parking on Primrose Road iouth of Eoward Avenue. " A comunication was read from the City Manager, dated January 2, 1964,advising that the Parking Comnission has recomended that an ordinance be enacted prohibiting more than two hours parking on core area off-street parking lots during the liEitation hours between 9:30 a.m., and 6 p.m. Council concurred with the recomendation and the CiEyAttorney was directed to prepare legislation for introduction at theregular meeting, January 20, L964. 3. PROPOSED 'ILIFTING'I OF PARKING LIMITATIONS A communieation from the City Manager, dated January 2, L964, was read advising that the parking Cornmi ssion has recomended unrestricEedparking be permitted between the hours from 6 a.m., to 2 a.m., onLorton Avenue, Park Road and Primrose Road, south of Howard Avenueto the City Linits on a temporary basis until Easter or until neruparking lots are constructed in the area south of Howard Avenue. Mr. Theodore Blumberg emphasized that the recomendation was proposed only as a temporary tneasure to restrict parking in the downtown core areas until tero new parking lots shall becone avaitable south of Howard Avenue . At the conclusion of a brief discussion on the subject, Council concurred that the recomnendation of the Parking Coumission to temporarily permit unrestricted parking in the areas recomended was reasonable and should be effected. 4. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT WORK PARKING DISTRICT LOTS A cosmunication from the City Manager, dated Janua ry 3, L964, notified Council that the firm of Wilsey, Ham and Blalr, Engineers of lJork, through Mr. R. L. Smart, Project Manager, has advised that the Lowrie Paving Company has completed all work on its contract for the improvements on Parking Lots D, E, J, L and N, in full compliance wich plans and specifications. Council concurred $/ith the recomne the contract be accepted and counc Passag e RESOLUTION N0. 5-64 "Acce PBurlingame AvEnue AiEi6:Ff;Street ndation of the City Manager that ilman Crosby introduced forting Parking Lot Improvements for Parking Districtrr (Lowrie PavingCo.) seconded by Counc i knan Diederichsen and unanlnous ly adopted upon Roll Call. 5. DIRECTIONAL SIGN EPISCOPAL CHURCH APPROVED Council concurred vrith Ehe reco@endation. 6. BROADWAY PARKING PETITION A cormunication from the City Manager, dated Januaty 2, L964, advisedthat the Reverend Edward L. Key of the Episcopal Church of the Ascension has requested permission to erect a small directionaL si.gn at the intersection of Sebastian Way and Las Piedras Drive. The City Manager advised that the sign is small, attractive and complies with ordl-nance requirements and recomended that the request be approved . A comuni.cation from the City Manager, dated January 2, L964, referred to a petition bearing the signatures of fourteen merchants on Broadway requesting stricter parking regulations on parking lots and on several access streets off Broadway to imProve the status of the Present parking situation. Council concurred wi petitioners be invit Comnission to presen the suggestion by the City Manager that the to attend the next ueeting of the Parking evidence to justify their requests. 387 ger, dated December 16, ea Goverrrment s has on of the position of the1l moratorium and tidelandatlon has been advised that(l) there be no moratoriumt be a moratorium, thefined as the a lignment of ready existing diked areasion of Bay Area Governmentsy front deve Lopment plans Health Bay Tri- rh edt 7. ACQUISITI ON OF PARCEL FOR WATER PI.'MPS A comrnication from the City Manager ' dated January 3, L964, advised that che Cfor two ad on Trousdaa transferthe intend ity Engineer has reported that additional ProPerty is_needed ditional lrater pumps at the City's existing pumplng plant le Drive at Ashton Drive and that his office has negotiated of a small parcel from the Burlingame School District for ed purpose with the City assuming atl costs of the transfer. The City Manager further advised that documents shall be prepared by the office of the Dlstrlct Attorney, reviewed by the City Attorney and thereafter shall be presented to Council for action. 8. APPROVAL OF MILLS ESTATE NO. 25 WITHHELD Action on the acceptance of the final map of Mills Estate No. 25, as reconmended by the Planning Coumi.s sion, was withheLd pending receiptof approprlate documents from Eichler Homes, Inc. A cormunication nas read from the County !funa L963, advising that the Association of Bay Ar requested the County to inform its organizati County with respect to its proposal of bay fi development in general and in turn the Associ "it is the stated policy of this County that on bay Land development, and (2) if there mrswesterly limits r^rithin San llateo County be dethe proposed outer bayshore freeway or the a1as the case nay be, and that (3) the Associat assume the responsibility for coordinating bawithin the various counties and that no state agency or state comission be created to engage ln this activity.rr A further cosrnunication on the subject was read from the Association of Bay Area Governments, dated December L6, L963, reporting on the urgencyof establishing a "Regional Policy Regarding Bay Fill and Shoreline Development" and the schedullng of a special meeting of the Associationthe laEter part of January or the early part of February. The City Planner voiced his objection to Council on the County Managerrs statement that "the westerly llmits within San Mateo County be defined as the alignment of the proiosed outer bayshore freeway" aivising thatthe City of Burl iogarne does not extend to that point and, therefore, woul,d have no jurisdiction. The City Planner stated that in his opinionthe County l,l,anagerrs plan would be "destructive to the City of Burlingane." Councilman Martin referred to a memorandum from ABAG re: "The Need for an Francisco Bay and aive "courses of action" ounc ilman Martin that submitted to Council fseffc ies a Regional Policy regarding the Preservation o Balanced Development of its Shoreline r " and th proposed Eherein. It was the recomendation o copies of the memorandum be reproduced and copfor study prior to taking action. ?he City Clerk was requested to place the subject matter on the Council Agenda, January 20, L964. LO. PUBLIC I^IORKS OFFICE COMMENDED Mayor Johnson acknowledged a corn'nunication received from Mrs. Carol Echman, coumending the proEpt response of the Public Works DepartEentto her request that a street light be placed on Azalea Drive. TL. PUBLIC HEALTH ENGIMER REPORT Council acknowledged a re Engineer, dated December rt from Eugene M. Howell, Public , 1963, on neetlngs of the South po 23 9. SHORELINE PI.ANNING SAN FRANCISCO BAY 3€.-Q County Sewerage Coo.nittee and a proposed study on a solution tothe problem of pollution in the Soulh Bay are! of the County.C-ouncil was requested to submit suggestions and recommendationsthe South Bay Tri-County Sewerage eomrlttee. RESOLUTIONS to RESOLUTION NO. 6-64 "Ur ging ththe metter of Mass Transit inmation Calling the 1964 Extrao was introduced for passage onby Councilman George and carrivote, re-stated his previous oimediate action. RESOLUTION NO. 7-64 ''UrProviding for the Estab County in his Proc lamatof the Legislature" was moved its passage, secocarried upon Roll CalI. RESOLUTION NO. 8-64 "AwardiLowrie Pa motion of unanimous e Governor to Include Legislation onthe County of San Mateo in his Prbcla-rdinary Session of the Legislature" motion of Councilman Crosby, secondeded. Councilnan Martin, casting a "no"bjection that the issue required no ging the Governor to Inc lude Legislatioalishment of a State College in San Mateoion Calllng the 1964 Extraordinary Session introduced by Counc ilman Diederichsen, who nded by Councilnan George and unanimously A Resolution pertaining to the execution of a contract with E. L. Norberg (Corporation Yard facilities) was held for action at thenext regular meeting of Council , January 20, L964. ving Company,$ts, Councilman Crosby, seconded by Councilman George andIy adopted upon Roll Call. RESOLUTION N0. 9-64 'rAuthorizi ng SettlDiaatiaETo. I'fKenneth R. Ford prope introduced for passage upon motion of by Councilman Diederichsen and unanimo ng Contract for SidewaLk Street Repair" 2L7.25, was introduced for passage on ement of Parcel 3F Parkingrty) - ($34,500.00) was Counc ilman I"Lartin, secondedusly adopted upon Roll Call . Dis andfor Die RESOLUTION NO. l0-64 "Authorizi ng Settlement of Parcel 4F Parking RESOLUTION NO. tT-64 '' FiictTo. I' (Margaret Lee Cunningham, Sandra Jean Cunningham Nancy Lee Cunningham property) - ($34,500.00) was introduced passage upon motion of Councilman l'trartin, seconded by Councilman derichsen and unanimously adopted upon RoLl Cal-l. str E o.Jo Authorizing Settlemen and Emma Perin proper of Parcel 5C Parking ) - ($37,500.00) was Passage, seconded opted upon Roll CalI. ttyts ad introduced by Councilrnan Martin who moved i. by Councilman Diederichsen and unanimous ly ORDIMNCES - Introduction thereof: ORDIMNCE NO. 790 "Authorizi ng an Amendment to the Contrac the C-ty of Burllngame and the BoarCalifornia State Employees Retireme d of Administration ofnt Systemrr (Retirement t Between theprior to February l, 1954) was introduced by Councilman Crosby and given its first reading . ORDIMNCE N0. 791 'rAmendithe l94l OritinanCe Code oDirection of Traffic on C Diederichsen and given its first reading. UMINISIIED BUSINESS I. CALIFORNIA DRIVE DRAINAGE ANNOUNCEMENTS ng Ordinance No. 474 and Section L229.t off the City of Burlingame Controllingity Hall Lane" was introduced by Councilman At the request of Councilman Martin, the City Engineer rsas directedto file a report and an estimate of cost to improve drainage con-ditions on California Drive in the area betlreen Bayswater Av enue and Howard Avenue , Mayor Johnson reported on her attendance at San Mateo County Develop,ment Association and Bureau on the subject of the Progress of the a joint meeting of the the Governmenta I Research College of San Mateo . 389 The Council-Connnission Annua I Dinner Meeting was announced as being scheduled for the evening of Thursday, January 23, L964, Hyatt House and the Auxiliaries Annua 1 Dinner t'leeting scheduled for the eveningof Thursday, February 20, L964, at Kim's. Mayor Johnson further announced the regular meeting of the BurlingameSister City Comittee, January 8, L964, and the North County Councilof lffxs, January 9, L964. COMMISS ION APPOINTMENTS The City llanager vra s requested to instruct the llealth, Safety andTraffic Cormission to submit copies of its minutes in more detall. ADJOURNMEttT The City Manager was requested to schedule interviews with prospective candidates to serve as members on the Civil Service Co"rmission, Monday, January L3, L964, comencing at 7 zL5 p.m., Conference Room, Office of the City Engineer. REFERENCE TO HXALTH SAFEfi & TRAFFIC COMMISSION MINUTES. The meetlng was regularly adjourned thereafter at 1l:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, APPROVED: /)L*kT\/r-/-.il*,"/