HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1966.06.06405
Burlingame, California
June 6, 1956
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the abovedate. Meeting ca11ed to order at 8:15 p.m., Mayor ceorge in the Chair.
At kord from the Chair, all in the Council Charnber arose and gave the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present - Councilmen:
Absent - Councilmen:
Diederich sen-ceo rge-Johnson-Martin .
Crosby (arrived 8:45 p.m., prior conmitment) .
The minutes of the meetings of !!ay 16 and l4ay 26, 1966, previously sub-
mitted to council, were approved and adopted.
Uayor ceorge announced that public hearings scheduled for this date
r{rould be postponed until later in the meeting, a\daiting Councilman Crosby,
detained by another appointment.
COMMI'NICATIONS
1 BURLINGAIT{E SCIIOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CONTROLS.
A cornrnun icat ion from the City ltlanager dated June 2, L965, submitted a
Ietter dated May 31, 1966, from i{r. ceorge v. White, superintendent,
Burlingame School District, reguesting adult traffic Auards or pedestrian-
actuated sigmals at two locations: Arundel Road and Howard Avenue
(Washington Schoo1 ) and Ashton and Trousdale Drives (Franklin School).
The DiEtrict Superintendent' s letter stated that "raajor problems of
vehicular traffic and pupil safety exist, " citing traffic count.s on
Hovrard Avenue and Trousdale Drive during given periods.
Tihe city Manager, in reply to l.tayor ceorge, reconunended that the subject
be held for the next study meetingr in the meantime, cost comparisons
and an analysis to determine whether the intersections are suitable for
signals will be made.
councilman ttartin requested the city l{anager to investigate also where
the responsibility for traffic controls would lie, with the City or the
Sdrool District, in the event of unification.
Council concurred with the city uanager's recommendation, referring the
subject to the study meeting of July 5, L956.
2. DA}ICE PERMI? APPROVED COCKTAII, IOI'NGE I{YATT MMATRE BUILDING.
A cormunication frorn the city Manager dated June 2, 1966, sub&itted a
request from consolidated ceneral corporation, william A. Eotmann,
President, 1310 Bayshore llighway, Burl ingame, dated lt{ay 26, L966, for
reissuance of a dance permit for the cocktail lounge in the Hyatt
Theatre building, fornerly known as the Backstage Bar.
lrhe City llanager's comnunication advised that Health, Police and Fire
Departments have approved the application and reconnended Council
approval as required by code.
PLEDGE OF AII.EGIA}ICE
MINUTES
406
on a motion introduced by Councilman ilohnson, seconded by councilman
uartin and unanimously carried, the permit was authorized.
3. STATE COLLEGE IN EDGEWOOD HILI,,S AREA REDWOOD CITY ET{DORSED .
A cornraunication frcm the city t{anager dated June 2, L966, transroitted a
letter from the City of Redwood City requesting support of a site in
the Edgewood Hil1s area for construction of a four-year state college.
RESOLUTION NO. 39-66 "SUPPORTING THE EDGEI{OOD HILLS AREA AS TIIE SITE FOR
THE I,CATION OF A STATE CILLEGE FOR TIIE SAI{ MATEO-SANTA CIARA ARE.A., WAS
i.ntroduced for passage by Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman
Johnson, and carried on the following ro11 call:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent
Councilmen :
Councilmen :
Councilrnen:
Diederichsen, ceorge, Johnaon, Martin.
None.
crosby.
4 . BURLINGAI{E CIIAITIBER OF COl{lilERCE RE: BROADWAY OVERPASS !'ODE!.
A conununication dated Uay 20, 1966, from the Burlingame Chanber of
Commerce, sigmed by Hugh F. Connolly, President, concerning the
Broadway Overpass, was acknowledged and referred to Councilman Uartin,
Council's liaison in the overpass studies, for conment.
Councilnan Martin reported that the Chanber is opposed to the atructure
represented in the model, summarizing the reasons which were noted in
the conununication. Pointing out that the letter pre-dates Council'sinitial public hearing, that there were revisions in the desigm between
the date of the letter and the hearing, and further inadequacies uncovered
during the course of the hearing, councilman t{artj-n suggested that the
Chamber may be in the position of pre-judging.
Iitr. Connolly advised that the objections were directed to the model,
that any revisions would be considered and a new recormnendation submitted.
He stated that through inadvertence the letter lras not available at the
t ime of the hearing.
Councilman Johnson supported the Chamberr s action as a
be he1pful, advising that she was in attendance at the
Directors meeting when the subject was diecussed.
Uayor ceorge, concurring with Councilman !!artin,rely on the cooperation and good judgment of the
but in the present instance it vrould appear that
in advance of the public hearing.
sincere effort to
Board of
stated that council must
Chambe r of Commerce,
a conclusion was reached
Councilman Diederichsen stated that the model $ras prepared as a startingpoint, with the unanimous consent of Council, that the subject will be
explored thoroughly to assure a proper structure for the conmunity and
objected to any attempt to create an impression that Council, at thispoint, is f ixed in its ideas on any p).an.
5 . BROADWAY-BURLINGAIT{E AREA IIIERCHANTS ASSOCIATION COMIT{I'NICATIONS .
CoflEnunications dated June 2, 1966, from the
Merchants Association were acknovrledged and
for conment.
(Councilman Crosby arrived. )
Broadway-Bur1 ingame Area
referred to Council,man tlartin
A. PROPOSED BROADWAY OVERPASS.
A letter dated June 2, L966, s igmed by Don Nahrarold, President,
Alfred Kaufmann and Robert Higgins, Broaduray Overpa6s Corurittee, request-
ing the City to Furnish certain material was read, Councilman Uartin
conmenting as follows:
107
(1.) fte contract bet$reen the City and York and Dady is available forpublic examination; copies may be furnished at cost upon arrangementwith the City Clerk, pertinent preliminary data concerning the contractof employment and the extent and scope of the study would be includedin the minutes of the City Council meetings which are public documents.
(2.) fihe City Attorney advises that corespondence and data between the
City and the State Division of Highways are not public documents and
not necessarily available to the general public.
Councilman lt{artin explained that any correspondence between the State
agencies presumalrly would be available in the San Franci€co Division
Office. Ee offered to make available to the uerchanta Association a copy
in his possession of the report from san Francieco to the ltighway Division
headquarters in Sacrannento.
ur. Robert Higgins ad<nonledged and expressed appreciation for council's
cooperation.
b OFFICIAL SPOKESI,IEN DES IGNATED .
A letter dated June 2, L965, signed by Don Nahlr^rold, President, requested
the city Council to recognize alfred Kaufmann and Robert Higgins, the
official spokesmen for the Broadrray-Burlinqame Area uerchants Association.
6 . RETI REI.{ENT RESIDENCE - TIIE LESLEY FOIJNDATION.
A conmunication from the City Planner dated June 1, 1966, advised that
follorrring a public hearing on }{ay 23, L966, the Planning Cottutiss ion
voted to approve "in principle" a residential building for elderly people
proposed to be constructed by Ihe Lesley Foundation on Almer Road, but
withheld final action on the request for a hei.ght variance pending an
opportunity for the applicant and the city council to discuss possible
approaches for payments in lieu of taxes to cover the costs of normal
city services wlrich the building would enjoy.
I'he city Attorney, in reply to councilman uartin's inquiry whether a
variance does exist as a result of the Planning Commission'a action,
advised in the negative, stating the proposed uEe vras approved in principle
on1y.
Follor*ing a period of Council comment, during r*h ich the presence of
Mr. A. J. watson, representing Ttre Lesley Foundation. was acknowledged,
t'{ayor ceorge announced that a special study meeting would be held at
8:00 p.m., on June 14, L966, to discuss the subject of in lieu palrments 'an offi.cial action to be taken at the regular Council meeting of ilune 2O.
Mayor George spoke of his peraonal experience with the preparation of
Federal regulations applicable to housing proposed by the applicants,
stating that when the particular section was written there was no mention
of "charges per head nor in lieu" and requested a thorough investigation
by the City Attorney.
RECESS A recess was declared at 9:15 p.m.
- fhe meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m.
COMMT NICATIONS (continued )
7. KAY ELLIS APPEAL RE: 124 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE.
A corununication from Kay E1lis, 124 occidental Avenue, aurlingarne, filed
in the Office of the city clerk on June 3, 1966, appealing the decision
of the Planning corrElission denying a variance for carport construction
was adcnowledged and a public hearing before the city council scheduled
for the regular meeting of June 20, L966.
CALL TO ORDER
408
HEARINGS
I. RECLASSIFICATION PORAION OF IOT 5 BIOCK 13 ?OWN OF BURLINGAIT{E.
l.layor ceorge announced that this was the time and place scheduled by
Council, and in conformance with published notice, to conduct a pr:blic
hearing on the appJ.ication of ilones-Minto Ford Sales, 101 California Drive,
for a reclassification from R-4 District (Fourth Residential) (Uulti-
Farnily) to C-2 District (Service Business) of a portion of Lot 6,
Blod< 13, T@rn of Burlingame Subdivision.
A communication dated lltay 9, 1966, from the Planning Commission, signed
by Everett K. Kindig, Chairman, and John J. Brauner, Secretary, was
read, advising that folloring a public hearing on April 25, 1966, the
Commission voted to reconunend to the Council that the application be
approved .
Itlayor ceorge declared the hearing open, setting
include statements by the proponents, opponents
forth ground rules to
and Council.
a
is
to
:the City Clerk, in reply to the Chair, reported no communicationa onfile, other than the applicantr s letter of transmittal.
Proponents were invited to comment.
I{r. Janes Minto explained that the business has gror*n to the extentthat lack of space is creating operating and parking problems, the
present site is inadequate to accomodate the nolaral daily flow of
automobiles th rough the service department and there is the constant
problem of finding space to park the cars; approval of the reclassifi-
cation will permit the lot to be used wi.th comnercial land inmediately
adjoining for expanding service and parking facilities.
Mr. Daniel lrlinto, 55 w. 5th Avenue, San [ateo, owner of seven properties
in the area of the subject property, stated that he was aware of problems
of parking and objections raised by persons in the ne ighborhood becauseof congestion created by on-street parking. He advised that the automo-
bile business is growing rapidly and "it is an absolute muEt that
additional land be provided"; he urged approval of the application to
return the property to its original commercial classification.
The re were no further conments in favor. Opponents r*ere invited to speak.
Mrs. F. J. Leipzig, orrrner of apartment properties at 19-21 Highland Avenue,
objected strongly to traffic and parking on Highland Avenue resulting
from the applicant's autonobile storage lot at Peninsula and Highland
Avenues, explaining that apartment properties are penalized because
of the large conveyor trucks used for hauling the automobiles parking
on the residential street.
llhe re were no further conxments from the audience.
In reply to inquiries frqn Councilman Crosby and Councilman Diederichsen, .-
the City Planner advised that the lot occupied by Jones-!{into Company
at Peninsula and Highland Avenues is zoned C-2; the west side of Eighland
Avenue is zoned R-4i the lot which is the subject of the application t^ras
zoned C-2 in 1954 when the new zoning ordinance lsas adopted but sub-
sequently reclassified to R-4.
In reply to Councilman Johnson, !{r. James l,tinto agreed that there is
problem at Peninsula and Eighland Avenues; because Peninsula Avenue
heavily traveled, the Police Department requires the conveyor trucks
park on Highland Avenue where the traffic is less.
fhe conununication reported conditions in the property which were recog-
nized by the Commission in recornmending the reclass ification.
40{)
Councilman lt{artin questioned whether the trucks could not be unloadedin the commercial area on Bayswater Avenue thereby eliminating the use
of the residential street.
ltr. into expreEsed his desire to cooperate explaining that the purpose
of the reclassification is to provide space for parking and storager he
requested Council to consider a loading zone on Peninsula Avenue to
permit truck parking.
llhe request was referred to the City Manager for investigation and reportto council.
*rere were no further sP€akers favoring or proteating the application.
fhe hearing was declared closed.
ORDINATICE NO. 84I "AIiI ORDINAI{CE AIIENDING SECTION 25.12.010 OT' TIIE
I{I'NICIPAL CIDE DIVIDING TTIE CIry OF BURLINGAI{E INTO DISTRICTS BY
RECLASSUYING A PORTION OT I'T 6, BI,OCK 13, SUPPLEITENTATCT ltAP TO IIAP
NO. 1OF IIIIE TOWN OF BURLINGN,IE, FRO}I A FOURTII RESIDENTIAL (MI'LTI-FAI{ILY)
(R-4) DrsrRrcr ro A sEcoriD colrMERcrAr (sERvrcE Busn{Ess) (c-2) DrsrRrsp,
was introduced for first reading by councilman l.{artin.
Councilman l,lartin explained that the dlange in zoning to C-2 will require
a change to Fire zone I and thereafter introduced for first reading
oRDTNAIICE NO 842 "AN ORDINATICE AI.{ENDTNG SEqTTONS I8.04.01O, I8.O4.O2O,
Ar{D 18.04.030 OF IIIE BURLINGAIIIE IIII'NICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR TIIE
ESTABLISHUE{T OF FIRE ZONES BY VIITIIDRAWING A PORSION OF ICT 6, BIOCK 13,
SITPPLEITENTARY lrAP TO IrtAP NO. 1 OF TIiE TOIIN OF BURLINGAI.{8, FROM FIRE
ZONE II, INCLI'DING IT IN FIRE ZONE L."
2. SPECIAI PERIIIT T'OR HOTEL LANDS OF BURLINGA}IE SHORE LA}ID COII{PANY.
Mayor George announced that at a regular meeting of the Planning Com-
mission on uay 23, L966, a permit was granted for hotel consturction
on lands owned by Burlingarne Shore Land Company, the City Council noted
that the grant was unconditional and on lilay 26, L966, acted to suspend
the perDit for the purpose of, first, determining whether or not the
pemit should be granted and, secondly, if granted, on $rhat conditions,
and scheduled this time and place to conduct a public hearing.
In reply to the Chair, the city Clerk advised that with the exception
of the applicant'6 Ietter of transmittal there waE no corespondence
on file.
Declaring the hearing open, Mayor George invited I|1r. oscar Person to
proeeed in behalf of the proponents.
Mr. Person stated that the Planning commission indicated approval of
the construcbion but queations were raised relating the project to
plans presently before the City council for the Broadway Overpass.
llr. Person requeated permission to introduce a suggested plan Prepared
by the firm of wilsey, Ham and Blair, retained by Pacific Air Conuaerce
center, Anza Pacific corporation and the group interested in the hotel,
to prepare a design for Broad!,ray which would conserve valuable land
for future private developurent, including the hotel site.
Nr.Keith Dellahray, Transportation Engineer with wilsey, HaIn and Blair,
posted large scaled drawings designated " Broadway Alternate Plan 'A',"
"Broadrray-oak Grove Alternate Plan 'B"' and an artist's rendering of
the hotel site.
Plans prepared by Edward E. deWolf, Architect, were filed.
470
Irlayor George informed lilr. Person that council was concerned primarily
with the permit for the hotel; acknowledging that reconstruction of
the Broadhray Overpass hras extremely important to the hotel site,
l{ayor ceorge informed the proponents that the City has retained the firm
ofYork and Dady to prepare a plan to solve existing problems, that
public hearings are in progress and that Council cannot be placed in
the position of considering competiti.ve engineering proposalE simul-
taneously.
Ii1r. Person stated it would appear fron published information that it
nay be eight to ten years before the State will release funds on the
plan being considered by the City and construction possibly require
an additional two to three years. He stated that the wilsey, Eatn &
Blair plan can be accomplished in mudr less time, will resolve traffic
difficulties in the area and permit private oh,ners to proceed to
develop their lands.
In reply
Pl anning
approved
to CounciLman l.{artin's inquiry concerning
Conuniss ion, the city Planner advised that
the hotel on a vote of four to three with
the action of the
the commission
no cpnditions.
Councilman Uartin suggested, to expedite the hearing without becoming
involved in details of the overpass at this time, that Council stipulate
that it is possible that an overpass can be designed and built which
will not disturb the proposed hotel site.
!1r. Person advised that Stoneston Development Company and Burlingaare
Shore Land Company have combined for the purposes of the hotel
construction, that plans are in the preliminary stage, pending the
City's approval of the use, that 325 to 350 rooms are tentatively
proposed, plus convention facilities accornrodating 1100 to 12O0 persons.
Ir{ayor George invited conments
special pernrit.
from the audience in favor of the
It!r. alohn cockcroft. 1345 Howard Avenue, stated that it would be remiss
on the City's part to withhold use of any property on the supposition
of a future public use. IIe requested a favorable decision on the
application, stating that if another use does becqne necessary for the
land then it must be acquired, but the City should not attempt
acquisition at this time by not approving, or delaying approval, of the
proposed use.
Opponents were invited to speak.
Hr. Ariades Luppi, 1948 P1aya, San lilateo, owner of property on Bayshore
Ilighway, protested that the Wilsey, Ham & Blair s cheme involves a
portion of his property.
No further comments were heard from the audience.
CounciL was i.nvited to comment.
Councilman Crosby requeated the City Planner to review conditions in
the property relevant to the proposed hotel.
fhe City Planner referred to a memorandun dated Deceniber 27, L965, to
the Planning Comnission from his office, noting the follohring: Posaible
irnprovements to provide better access to Bayshore Highway could eliminate
access to the hotel site; there are no pe rmanent street improvements
on the property frontage t exi.sting sewerage and hrater lines are
insufficient to service the project; traffic movements generated by
the hotel would make existing traffic difficulties intolerable'.
fte City Planner stated that the Commission discussed these matterswith the applicants but there was no conclusion readred because of the
Corunission's concern with the overpass and its relation to tbe proposed
use.
471
Councilman Diederichsen cotunented that the overpass must be considered
independently of the hotel, and since Council should be concerned
primarily with the application for special permit, there should be a
determination concerning conditions and the applicant's obligation to
conply.
Councilman Johnson stated her position that the hotel project and the
overpass were interrelated, that the question of the overpass was the
reason the application remained at the Planning Commission leve1 for
so m.rny months. Councilman Johnson i.nquired if the proponentsr plans
for the overpass meet State requ!.rements, and referring to conunents
that there may be a delay of eight to ten years in accomplishing the
plan whidr the City is presently debating, inquired whether there would be
time saved in the alternate sctreme of Wilsey, Itam & Blair.
Councilman Johnson ad<nohrledged that the proposed hotel would be a wel come
addition to the corununity but, at this time, must b€ evaluated in
relation to other matters pending before Council.
ttr. Dellaway, in reply to llayor ceorge, advised that the design has been
submitted to the state Division of Highways inforrnally but no formal
comnitment has been received.
ltre City Planner reported that, with the City Engineer, he questions
several aspects of the plan which would appear to be unaccepta.ble to the
State, theae \rere mentioned briefly for Council information.
Councilman uartin referred to the architect's drawings for the hotel,
raising a question concerning parking.
Ii{r. dewolf, upon exauination, advised that the drawings before Council
did not incl.ude recent changes in the parking layout.
RECESS A recess was declared at 10:55 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER lfhe meeting reconvened at 11 :1O p.m.
In reply to Councilman Martin's inquiry concerning the property's present
zoning. the city Planner reported it is unclassified; however, in view of
other similar properties in the same area recently classified Itt-l (Light
Industrial), it would appear that the subject property should conform.
In reply to further inquiries frora Councilman ltartin, the City Planner
stated that the code provides that hotels may be constructed in C-I
zoning with no special requirements but, assrmring an M-l classi.fication,
the proposed use will require a special permit. 1!he City Planner advised
further that the special requirement provision was included in the M-l
District regulations since it was the intent of the City that the area
be primarily industrial and that any use
-
comnercial in nature require
a special permit.
fihe City Attorney replied in the affirmative to Councilman lr{artini s
inquiries titlether, in a special permit request, it is Council's privilege
to examine any and a1l phaees of the proposed use and require certain
conditiong to be meti further, should council deny the perrrit, the
applicant is enjoined from filing a similar applieation for the property
for one year.
Councilman Crosby stated that he was informed by Planning Conunissioner
Frank Cistulli, during the recess, that the report of the Codnission's
action on the special permit, reflected in the mi.nutes, appeared to be
incomplete.
HEARING CONTINUED
Comnissioner Cistul1i, upon recognition by Uayor George, stated that
it r.ras his recollection of the Commission meeting of Uay 23, L966,
that all of the conditions pertinent to the application hre re reviewed
and there was discussion between the connission and the proponents
relating to such conditions.
Itre City Planner, City Engineer and City Attorney, in response to
Councilman Uartin conf irmed that the Commission's motion was uncon-ditional, that the conditions were discussed but there was no action
taken.
Comnent ing that Council does not contemplate depriving the applicant
the use of his land, Councilman l.tartin discussed problems facing the
City in attempting to resolve the matter of an overpass, pointing outthat the applicant has the right to industrial use of his property,
but since there is some question of the ultimate use of the land,
Council has the lega1 right to withhold approval of the proposed
special use.
Following further discussion, Councilman llartin introduced a motionto deny the Special Permit with the stipulation that the City Council
may reopen the subject on its own motion at a later date. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried unanirnously on ro11 call .
PLANNING COMI4ISSION TO CONSIDER ZONING UNCI,ASS IF I ED LANDS.
A motion introduced by Councilman Nartin, seconded by Councilman
Diederichsen and unanimously carried directed the Planning Commissionto proceed with public hearings for the purpose of considering and
recommending to Council zoning class if ications. to be attached to all
lands presently unclassif ied.
HEARINGS (continued )
3 . I,]NIFORM PLI'UBING CODE.
I{ayor ceorge announeed that Ordinance No. 840 adopting L964 Uniform
Pluibing Code was introduced for first reading at the meeting of f,tay 16,
1966, and a public hearing scheduled for the present meeting.
Ttle City Attorney, upon recognition by the Chair, advised that some
minor amendments were made since the ordinance's introduction a6 follows:
Sec. 18.12.130, last sentence amended to read: "The drain shall be
taken to the exterior of the building"; and
Sec. 18.12.4OO, Section 1402, Line 1, "De1ete "sewer system" and
substitute "storm drain"; Line 3, Delete "sewers" and substitute
"storm drains. "
On a motion introduced by Councilman Crosby, seconded by Councilman
Johnson, and unanjrnously carried, the amendrnents vrere approved and
adopted.
llayor ceorge thereafter declared the hearing open.
Upon determination htr the Chair that there qrere no comrnunications on
file, nor comnents favoring or protesting from the audience, the
hearing was declared closed.
ORDITiIAIICE NO. 840 "ADOPTING BY REPERENCE ITNIFORIT{ PLIrIr{BING CODE , 1964
EDI?ION WITII A!.{ENDME}ITS, AND AI.IEND ING CHAPTER 18 . 2 OF fHE MITNICIPAI
coDE oF THE CIIY OF BT RLTNGAME AIID ESTABLISHING RILES. REGULATIONS
NiID STEIIDARDS FOR THE INSTAIIATION OF PLT'I{BING FIXTURES AND APPIJIA}ICES,'I
as amended, was scheduled for second reading on June 20, L966.
472
473
RESOLUTIONS None.
ORDINANCES Introduction of:
ORDINA}ICE NO. 843 " AIiI ORDINANCE OF TI{E CIIY OF BT'RLINGA!4E REGI'I"AT ING
TRUCK TRAPPIC, PRESCRIBII{G ?RUCK TRAE'PIC ROUTES, WEIGIIT TIITITS ON CERTAIN
S?REETS IN IIIE cIlY OF BURLINGAIT{E, ESTABLISHING PRoVISIONS rOR LIilITED
TRUCK TRAFFIC ROI,'TES At{D FOR ISSUA}ICE OF PERI4ITS FOR HAT'LING EARIII AIID
I,IATERIAI IN EI(CESS OF TIIE LII,IITS OTTIERWISE PRESCRIBED IN T*IIS ORDINAIICE.
MAKING ATiTY VIOLATION IIEREOF A UISDEMEANOR ATiID FTXING PENALTIES FOR SUCE
VIOLATION" was introduced for first reading by Councilman llartin.
Ttre City Attorney advised that in compliance with provisions
California Vehicle Code, notice of public hearing must be pub
sixty days prior to the date of the hearing.
of
li
the
shed
council concurred with the city Attorney's recomnendation to schedule
the public hearing for the meeting of August 15, 1956.
I'NFINISHM BUSINESS
COT'NCIL COMMENTS:
t. In reply to Councilman crosby, the city anager reported that the
Park superintendent is arrangJ.ng for benches at cuernavaca Park for the
Babe Ruth League teams.
2. In reply to Councilman Diederichsen, the city Engineer advised that
underground conduits will be installed and traffic signals at Oak Grove
and Carolan Avenue s relocated when the street construction is completed.
3. In reply to Councilman Diederichsen, the City Manager advised that
llausser Electric company will install the e.I ectrical systems for the
aew directional sigms.
4. Councilman l.tartin referred to the Parking Comnission minutes of
l4ay 26, 1966, concerning a survey of certain of the dorrttown area parking
1ots, and requested the City Manager to investigate and report to Council .
5. Councilman l{artin directed the city Engineer's attention to chucikholes
on the north side of llillside Drive between Bernal and Vancouver Avenues,
and llillside Drive east of La Mesa Drive.
6. Councilman Diederidrsen requested that the installation of a reflector
sign on the west side of Bayshore Boulevard r'rtrere the right-of-way narrowa
be investigated.
1. Councilman Crosby, in behal f of !1r. Albert S. Borwitz, extended an
invitation to Council to opening ceremonies of the Babe Ruth League on
Sunday, June 12, Washington Park, ttelve noon.
2. Uayor ceorge, in reply to Ur. William Caplan, 2701 Arguello Drive,
advised there would be no atudy meeting on the proposed ?ruck Ordinanceprior to the public hearing August 15th.
3. Councilman Diederichsen reported his recent attendance at the League
of California Cities Mayor's Conference.
ACKNOWLEDGUNMS
Ihe Chair admonledged minutes of the Library Board, May lEthr Parking
Conrmission. Uay 26th; and Planning Conunission, May 23, L966.
NEW BUSINESS
474
ADJOURN},IEIflT
The meeting was regularly adj ourned at 12:05 a.m.
Respectfully subrnitted,
HERBERT K. ViHI"E, CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
EDWARD D. GEO
AJ-*^4 )\2.----i