HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1966.03.21Burlingame, California
March 21, 1966
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the
above given date. Ueeting called to order at 8:15 p.m-, I{ayor
Crosby in the Chair.
At hrord from the Chair, a1I
the Pledge of Allegiance to
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent :
the council Chanbe r arose and gave
Flag.
in
the
Councilmen Crosby-Diederichsen-George-Johnson-Martin.
Councilmen None
MINUTE S
Ihe minutes of the regular meeting of March 7, 1966, subtoitted
previously to Council, were approved and adopted.
HEARINGS
(a) APPEAL VARIANCE RE: BoARD AIiID RooM TOR
FOUR AI{BULATORY PERSONS (Mrs . Nancy Lazar)
Irlayor Crosby announced that this was the tine and place scheduled to
conduct a public hearing on an appeal from the decision of the Planning
commission in approving a variance to pennit !{rs. Nancy Lazar to
supply room and board for four ambulatory persons in her home at
922 Capuchino Avenue, Located in an R-2 Zone.
Ground rules to include statements from opponents, proponents and
Council, were outlined by the Chair.
Conununications from litrs. Fred Azevedo, 945 Paloma Avenue and April
Associates, 1212 Broadway, (s. & L. Zachariassen, Paloma Avenue
property owners) and a petition bearing the names of Donald W. Nahr*rold.
1O09 Paloma Avenue, David Heinrichs, 927 Capuchino Avenue, Mr. and Urs.
G. F. Bueckle, 926 capuchino Avenue, Mrs. s. A. Pay, 918 Capuchino
Avenue, Bud Rodgers, 925 Capuchino Avenue, Jean S. Jones, 1417 Sanchez
Avenue, E. J. Cartet, 949 Laguna Avenue, 1.1r. and Mrs. Arthur R. Ttromson,
957 Laguna Avenue and lliss Naida C. Thomson, 957 Laguna Avenue,
addressed to Council for consideration on this occasion, were acknowledged.
The City Planner, at the request of Council, advised that the matter
came before the Planning Conmission upon a request for a variance to
enlarge the subject dwelling to accorunodate six adbulatory-aged persons,
an increase of three currently being provided room and board; that sub-
sequent to an inspection of the premises by the Fire Inspector and
conferences with Mrs. Lazat, the number of persons thereafter was
reduced to four-
fhe city Planner further advised that homes for the aged. nursing or
convalescent tromes require a "special permit" in a-4 zones; R-I District
regulations limit the "letting of rooms " to three persons, requiring
the applicant in this instance to apply for a variance; and that at the
conclusion of the hearing before the Planning Comrnission, the variance
applieation was approved.
356
PLEDGE OF AITEG IANCE
357
Requesting cornments from proponents, the Chair recognized llrs. Isabel
Wolfe, licensed social worker, S.rn !{ateo County Pub1ic Ilealth & Welfare
Department, who spoke on behalf of the Senior citizens of San Mateo
County, and particularly on the shortage of housing facilities to
acconunodate elderly persons, stating that a home of this type would be
an asset to the conununity.
Mrs. Whitehead, a licensed social worker for San Mateo county, stated
that the particular service should be expanded to assure room, board
and care to elderly people, pointing out that a "licensed home " some-
times provides the only home wherein these people may be cared for.
The communication
hearing were read
and
and
the petition acknowledged at the opening of the
entered as protests to the granting of the variance.
that a
site ' "
Ur. Donald Nahrrdold, 3034 Hillside Drive and or^rner of property located
at IOO9 Paloma Avenue, the appellant, in responEe to the Chair, added
to his htritten objections, stating that the property ohrne rs within the
area have cbserved the changres occur-bg in the neighborhood i mode rn
duplexes are replacing the old dwellings and in his opinion, a "morepleasant location other than on a dead-end streetr should be investigated
to accommodate the service.
There being no further comments from proponents or opponents, Councilman
Johnson initiated Council discussion, conunenting first that some of the
paragraphs within the petition are statements of "opinion; " the reference
that a "variance" is permanent "rezoning" is erroneous; a "variance"granted to an individual is not "transferrablet " and the location of a
home on a dead-end street, insofar as hazards are concerned, is not a
unique situation in the city of Burlingarne, according to the Fire Chief.
Councilman Johnson concurred with the statements of the social workers
that the service of caring for elderly persons is an important occupation.
Inquiries directed to Irlrs. Wolfe by Councilman Diederichsen advised that
homes for the aged are licensed by the State as well as by the Countyt
regular inspections are conducted prior to the issuance of the license
and at intervals throughout the year; and that in instances where ctrildren
reside in the hotne, the applicant for the service is so notified.
councilman ceorge comnented on his personal experience in washington,D.c.,
where his services included "housing for the aged' and stated that he
could find no objection to the proposed use of the property nor would
the service result in a depreciation of property.
Councilman Martin referred to the motion recorded in the minutes of the
Planning Conunission "approving the variance" and questioned \rhether it
vras intended that the variance "run r.rith the property" or rdith the "person."
PLanning Commissioner Brauner and PLanning corunissioner Pierce, in
attendance, stated that it rras their personal opinion that the motion
intended that the variance be applied to !trs. Lazar.
In reply to Council inquiries, the City Attorney confirmed
"variance can be granted to a 'person' or to a 'specified
and the motion should be clarified for future reference.
A point was raised by urs. c. F. Bueckle.
that the property had been recently placed
as a "good business investment. "
Capuchino Avenue. in
the market and advertised
926
on
Following a discussion, clarifying the term "variance" and that a
personal variance would remove doubt that the property could be sold
for the purposes of conducting a business, councilman ltartin moved
that the findings of the Planning Conunission be upheld, with a
358
modification stipulating that the variance be granted to l{rs. Nancy
Lazar exclusively. The motion was seconded by Couacilman George and
unanimously carried.
(b) APPEAL RE: VARIATiICES 1'o ALPHA LAND coltTPANY
LESS THAN LEGAI T'RONT SETBACKS-II{ILLS ESTATE NO. 25
Mayor Crosby announced that this rdas the time and place scheduled to
conduct a public hearing on an action of the Planning Conmission
permitting variances to the Alpha Land Company to establish less
than legal front setbacks in tlills Estate No. 25 and appealed by
Council on an initiative motion.
The city Planner, at the request of the Chair, advised that the error
in the front setbacks affecting five properties facing Skyline Bou1e-
vard in I.lills Estate No. 25, the extension of the driveways beyond
the easements and the unauthorized removal of trees from the City's
"green tree belt" was discovered by the Park Superintendent during a
routine inspection of the trees in the area.
continuing, the City Planner stated that an application for variances
was submitted thereafter by cyrus iI. l1cMil].an. Attorney, representing
the Alpha Land Company, the subdivider, and at the conclusion of a
hearing before the Planning comnission, the applicant agreed to:(1) remove the paving in driveways to conform to the easementsi(2) replace trees that had been removed and (3) place iron pipe markers
to distinguish City from private property.
lfhe Chair recognized Mr. tr{clr{illan, Attorney, representing the Alpha
Land Company interests, vrho stated that three of the variances vary
from less than two feet to a few inches (Lots 37,38,41) and two
(Lots 39 and 4O) with setbadcs of only 6.75 feet; that a genuine hard-
sh ip does exist, in that homes were occupied without prior knorledge
of the violation of setbacl< requirements, and that the violations
occurred through construction errors cdlltritted by the previous sub-
divider and unnoticed by a City building inspection, thereafter,
inadvertently affecting the new subdivider, the Alpha Land company.
ur. Mclrtillan advised that Mr. ilohn t. criffin, E <ecutive Vice-Preaident
of Alpha Land Company, in attendance, assures that his company only
removed two trees for a driveway construction and that the remainder
of the "missing" trees were removed under prior ornership; that the
applicant is willing, however, to replace the trees and has conferred
with the Park Superintendent on the type of teees his department prefers.
In reply to Council inquiries, the Park Superintendent stated that at
this time he was unable to determine the nuriber of trees or the cost
to purchase and repJ.ant the area, other than the maintenance thereof
would be expensive; that the trees that exist no\^, are on fifteen foot
centers vrith twelve to fifteen trees missing on one particular lot;
and to the reference that a "hedge of trees" between 1556 and 1554
Skyline Boulevard, confirmed that a number have been removed.
Councilman l4artin questioned Mr. ucuillan with respect to a "basic
proposal" the Alpha Land Company may submit to council and in repIy,
Mr. Mclr{i-I1an stated that to require the removal- of pavement in the
driveway areas \^rould create a hardship on the part of the property
owners and in his opinion, it would serve no useful purpose to the
city, the trees will be replaced and rnonuments installed to establish
a common boundary betr,reen City and private property.
Councilman lrtartin, at some
status of the property if
continued to be permitted
the erection of a fence to
area.
Iength, expressed his concern on the future
an encroachment upon City property is
and a council, in the future, may require
protect the city's forty foot "green belt'
359
Councilman ceorge also expressed his concern, pointing out that an
ctuner, in placing the property on the market, may not receive a "fairrate" on the initial purchase and the possibility that a "severe change "
may occur in the area in the future justifies that the issue be
immediately resolved.
Mr. Griffin, Vice-President, Alpha Land Company, the applicant, in
addressing Council, suggested that the company purchase the eight foot
three inch setback differences to acquire the necessary fifteen foot
property setbacks.
Mr. Griffin, stating his objection to the erection of a fence and
comnenting on the value of the forty foot tree strip to the property
o$rners as a "buffer" betrreen property and highway, further suggested
that to protect the City's "green belt" area, a covenant be placed
within property deeds to that effect with a guar:rntee by the Citythat a fence wiLl not be erected.
Councilman llartinr s statement that it is the responsibility of the
Alpha Land Company to find an equitaSle solution to the issue was
replied to by Ur. Mcl*lillan t^rho repeated his previous offer to (1) re-
plaee trees and to (2) place markers to protect the City's property,
stating "that is the offer unless Council can suggest something else
that can be reasonably conplied with by the Alpha Land Cotnpany. "
Following a discussion among members of Council on the extent of
the obligation of the A1pha Land Company to protect the riqhts of the
property owner and in addition to compensate the City for encroachmentviolations, the Ctrair declared a recess at 1O:05 p.n.
CAJ.L ?O ORDER
llhe neeting hras reconvened by the Chair at 1O:I5 p.m.
HEARING AIPIIA LAND CO!4PA}IY CONTINI'ED
Itlr. Mclrtillan advised Council
purchase that portion of the
requirernents.
of the willingness of the applicant to
land (easements) to conform to ordinance
During the discussion that ensued, Irtr. ttlcltliIlan, in reply to Councilinquiry to quote a price for the exdrange of property, suggested the
purdrase be considered on the basis of g2.OO per foot.
Councilman Georqe stated that the sum of
parceL, in his opinion, ivas an equitable
$1s,oo0.oo - $3,ooo.00 per
re stitut ion.
In reply to Councilman Diedericihsen, the City Attorney advised that the
property in question is "public land;" if the City owns "fee title"it may 1e9a11y negotiate a sale without advertising said sa1e.
!lr. ritclrti 1l an, in reply to councilman ceorge I s proposal, stated that
the sum of $15,0O0.OO is "out of the question" when spealing in termsof easements only.
Councilman Martil pointed out that the gJ.5,OOO.OO does not include theplanting of trees and that tl.e proposal is, in fact, an indemnity
rectifying a.n error.
Councilman Johnson, Councilman Di.ederichsen and Dlayor Crosby, individually
stated a preference that an exact sqJuare footage of property involved
be first determined.
To the Chair's inquiry, the City Engineer suggested that the Nolte Company,
the orignal engineers establishing the property corners, be requested to
survey the lots to accurately determine the square footage.
360
A counter
in behalf
offer in the amount
of I'1r. Grif f in.
of $1,500.00 vras proposed by Mr. ltcMif1an
fhe City Planner, in reply to Council inquiries, explained variable
circumstances that may justify a greater compensation in an exctrange
of property and suggested that the hearing be continued to the next
regular meeting of Council, with the Alpha Land Conpany, in the
interim, obtai-ning .rn appraisal of the property.
Councilman I{arti.n, to clarify the implication ofstaff as a party to the "error" invited comments
Inspector.
a member of the City's
from the Building
fhe Building lnspector advised that when making a
inspection, his Office relies upon the contractor
correct property corner markers and that the Code
f rom further responsibility.
"site foundation"
to indicate the
releases the City
In further reply to Council inguiry, the Building Inspector confirmedthat a review of the plot plans for the homes indicated that the
setbacks were correctly narked.
llhe public hearing r^ras thereafter continued to the next regular meeting
of Council, with a reguest that the Alpha Land Company obtain an
appraisal and an accurate survey to determine the square footage of
drivevays and to prepare a written offer to submit to Councj.l.
COMMIJNI CATIONS
1. AI{ETID}IENT TO FIRE PREVEMPION CODE
REGULATING TANK VEIIICLE DELIVERIES
A communication frorn the City l.tanager, dated lhrch L7, L966, referred
to a recotnmendation from the Fire Chief, concerning an amendment to
the Fire Prevention ordinance to permit truck and trailer units to
make gasoline deliveries to service stations.
lItre Fire Chief, in his conmunication to the city uanager, under date
of ltlarch 4, L966, advised that the City of Burl ingarne is the only city
on the Peninsula limiting the delivery of gasoline from a tank truck
and trailer combination to bulk plants exclusively and that a survey,
indicating "no unusual conditions in the City" to create additional
hazards, justifies a change in code reguirements.
Council concurred with the
"AI{ENDING SEETION L7 .O4.34O
VEIICLES " vras introduced by
recommendations and an ORD INANCE NO. 840A
OF THE I{T'NICIPAL CODE REGUI,ATITiIG TAIIK
Councilman ilohnson for first readinq.
2. CITY LIMIT SIGN ON SKYLINE BOT'LEVARD
A corununication from the city llanager, dated Mardt L7, L966, referred
Council to letters received with respect to relocating the "Burlingame"
City Limit sign on Skyline Boulevard and the reluctance of the State
Division of Highways to relocate said sign by reason of a state-rride
policy.
The City lilanager advised that the Director of Public works has stated
that by the city's annexation of the western half of the Skyline
Boulevard, the state Highway Department will relocate the City Limit
s ign.
Acting upon the advice of the city Attorney that a motion to initiate
action would be proper on this occasion, Councilman ltlartin moved that
proceedings be conrnenced to annex the qresterly one-ha1f of Skyline
Boulevard, between ttargarita Avenue and Trousdale Drive, Ihe motion
was seconded by Councilman Johnson and unani.ruously carried.
361
3. CHURCH SIGN REQUEST APPROVED
A corununication frm the City llanager, dated uay L7, 1966, advised
that permission has been requested by the Episcopal Churdr of the
Ascension, to instal.I church directional signs at the following
intersections: (1) trousdale and Loyola; (2) Frontera and Loyola;(3) Skyline and Trousdale.
fhe City Manager, advising that the signs proposed do not violate code
requirements, recomnended that approval be authorized by Council.
Councilrnan afohnson moved that Council concur with the reconunendation
of the City ltanager, seconded by Councilman Diederichsen and unanimously
adopted.
A memo from the city Manager, dated l.{arch 17, 1966, advised that the
Cresap, llcCormick & Paget Salary Survey is nearing conpletion and in
compliance with the contract agreement, shall be subtnitted to Council
by April 5, 1966.
Tlhe City l{anager, in a verbal report, advised that the salary consultants
are desirous of meeting with Council at the next study meeting on April 6.
Councilman }lartin noted that warrants have been issued to the sa1ary
survey firm prior to receipt of its report and the City llanager was
requested to withhold final payment until the completed survey is
sutmitted to Council.
4. (b)PURCITASE STATE LAIID (11 ACRES)
A memo from the City ltanager, dated l.tarch 17, 1966, advised that the
sale of eleven acres of State land (bayfront properties) approved by
the State's Excess Land Department, shall be considered by the State
Highway Commission at its meeting, April 2O, 1966, with the City
possibly acquiring legaL title and ownership prior to April 30, 1966.
Tlhe report was acknowl,edged and placed on file.
4. (c) PRoGRESS REPoRT To WATER OUATIIY BoARD
A memo from the City uanager, dated March 17, 1966, advised that Ur. John
Jenks' report on sehrage disposal system corrections should be availableprior to April 15, 1966 ancl a required progress report thereafter
sulxnitted to the Water Quality Control Board.
lfhe City Manager further advised that in addition to the foregoing
report, the Board also requires a firm and detailed time schedule by
l,[ay 15, 1966, setting forth major steps necessary to cotnply with its
requirements .
T?le City Uanager verbally reported that it may be possible for Councilto take appropriate action on Ur. Jenks' report at an adjourned meeting
wednesday, April 6, 1966.
A co[Eounication from the Regional Planning Commi.ssion, San Uateo County,
dated ltardr 8, 1966, submitting final recommendations from the Bayfront
Conunittee on bayfront deveLopment and conservation, was acknowledged.
Councilman Diederichsen reported on his attendance at the general
meeting of the Regional Planning Commission on tlarch L7, 1966, at the
San Bruno City HaIl and on which occasion, the Bayfront Cotnmittee's
reconmendations, No. 1 th rough No. 8, were approved unhesitatingly.
4. (a) SALARY SURVSY
5. REGIONAL PI,ANNING COM!,1f SSION
BAYFRONT COMMITTEE REPORT
362
Reporting further that recommendation No. 9 (Outer Bay Freeway)
opposed by the County of San Mateo and the Cities of San Bruno
and South San Francisco, s/as amended, Councilman Diederichsen for
Council information read the compromiaed version adopted thereafter.
RESOLUTIONS
A comnunication was acl<nor^rledged from the Board of Supervisors, Countyof Los Angeles, dated March 11, 1966, requesting endorsement and
adoption of a si.rnilar resolution enacted by that body to oppose a
constitutional initiative pertaining to legalizing the manufacture,
sale, purchase. possession and transportation of marijuana from
appearing on the state election balIot.
Councilman Johnson, recommending that Council endorse the action,
introduced for passage a Resolution entitled "Opposing Proposed
Constitutional Amendment sponsored by 'T1he Anonymou s Cornnittee for
the Abolition of the Prohibition against l.tarijuana. "' ftrere being
no second to the motion, the subject was tabled.
FAIR EI*{PI.OYHENT PRACTICE
A corrnunication from the Technical Advisory Conunittee on Testi-ng
(TACT) an advisory corurittee to the California Fair Enplo)rment Practice
Commission, dated lrlarch L4, L966, requesting the City to become aparticipant in a current study of California ernployment practices in
the hiring of minorities, hras referred to the C.ity Attorney.
Ttre resignation was accepted with regret and
to write a letter to IrIr. Dippel on behalf of
his services.
A conununication was acknowledged from the Easter Seal Society, dated
Irlarch 1, 1966, requesting the issuance of a resolution or a proclamation
naming a one week period during the Easter SeaI Drive ending April 1O,
1965, as "Easter Seal" Week.
COM}II SS IONER RES IGNAT f ON
A conununication was read from !1r. Roland w. Dippel, 1336 cortez Avenue,
dated ltarch 7, L966, submitting his resignation as a membe r of the
Ilealth, Safety & Traffic Conmission.
the City Clerk requested
Council, acknowledging
DIRECTIONAI SIGNS IN BUSINESS AREAS
A memo from the City Manager, dated llarch 17, 1966, advised receipt of
an adverse reply from the state Division of Hi.ghways to the request of
the Federal Sign and Signal corporation to "overhang" business district
directional signs at Burlingame Avenue and Broadway and that it htas the
recomnendation of his office that the existing signs be rePlaced with
new at the same locations.
Ihe city llanager v/as authorized to proceed at his discretion.
PROCI,AUATIOI{S
Uayor Crosby issued the following proclamations:
"CAIICER COMTROL ITiONTII IN BURLIIiIGAII{E" April I to 30, 1966;
"PAII NTERICAN DAY" April 14 and "PAN NIIERICA}I WEEK" April 10 to 16, 1966.
E,ASTER SEAL DRITiIE
363
OUT OF STATE INSPECTION TOUR
A memo from the City Uanager, dated l{ardl 17, 1966, advised that the
Pire Chief, in addition to nine other Bay Area Fire Chiefs, has been
invited by ceneral llotors Corporation to inspect diesel engine factories
tocated in Detroit and Indianapolis for a period of three days, with
no financial obligation on the part of the city.
Council authorized the Fire Chief to accept the invitation to the
out-of-state tour.
A communication fron the county of san uateo, dated It{arch 15, 1966,
notifying Council of a special meeti-ng of the west Bay Rapid Transit
Authority, Doran's Supper Club, Belmont, Friday, Ir{arch 25, 1966,
8:0O p.m., for the purpose of receiving and acting upon the resignation
of the Honorable ltlallace Benson as a Director, vras acknowledged.
llayor Crosby and Councilman l{artin announced their intention to attend.
ANNUAL '' COMMI'NITY VEHICLE SAI'ETY-CHECK "
A cqtnunication from the State Department of tlotor Vehicles, dated
March 18, 1966, announcing that !{r. P. W. Hones, ceneral lilotors Corp-
oration, 1825 Trousdale Drive, is available to assist northern California
conuunities in conducting a Vehicle Safety-Check was referred to the
San Mateo County Safety Council.
A communication from the Pub1ic Utilities Conunission, dated March 16,
1966, advised that the Southern Pacific Company has announced its
intention to discontinue the sale of tickets at Broadway, effective
at the close of business, Friday, April 15. 1966 and any opposition
to the proposal may be transmitted to the Commission.
council indicated no objection and the coururunication was received for
filing.
A report to Council frqn the city PLanner, dated lr{arch
coneerning radio transmission tower installations, was
and the subject referred to a council study meeting.
15, 1966,
acknowledged
The City Planner, in reply to an inquiry from Councilman Diederichsen,
stated that the city of Burlingame has no provision either within the
Zoning code or the Building Code and as suggested by Councilman
Diederictrsen, his Office would obtain a copy of applicable ordinances
in effect in the city of San Francisco.
The City Engineer advised that his
Overpass "Model" on display at the
office anticipates having the Broadway
next meeting of Council, April 4.
Mr. Hugh Connol1y, President, Burlingame Chamber of Comnerce, in
attendance, stated that plans are in progress to place the "model"
in stores within the Cityi s business distriets and was advised by
Council that it may be available for store display after the April 6,
Council Study Meeting.
WEST BAY TRANSIT MEETING
TICKET SAIE DISCONTI}IUANCE AT BROADWAY
RADIO TRANSUI SSION TOWERS
OVERPASS "},IODEL" TO BE AVAILABLE
364
RECREAT ION CENTER PARKWAY COII{PI,AINT
Councilman !{artin reported a complaint received from the SeniorCitizens concerning the condition of a parkway strip in the area ofthe Recreation Center area. The City t{anager was requested to 1ocatea space that may provide an appropriate area to the group when steppingfrom automobiles.
MOTION TO APPOINT ATTORNEY TO ACT FOR CITY
A motion sras introduced by Councilman llartin, seconded by Councilrnan
George and unanimously carried, appointing Cyrus J. Mclr{illan, Attorney,
to represent the City of Burlingarne in actions filed with respect tothe Pringle Constructi.on Conpanyr s "Skyline" project variance.
fhe study meeting of April 6, L966,
to the selection of members to fill
to give consideration
City Commissions.
was scheduled
vacancies on
COI,IPLAINT RE: CLUB "SO-HO"
Councilman Diederichsen reported his receipt of a complaint concerning
the operation of the Club So'Ho on Broadway, wherein it is alleged
that dancing is being permitted several evenings a week and alcoholic
beverages, brought in from the outside, are being consumed on the
premises. the issue was referred to the Chief of Police for investigation.
CITY ENGINEERING STAFF COMMSIDED
Councilman ilohnson, reporting on an undesirable condition created by
a faulty drainage in her neighborhood, commended the City Engineer
and members of his staff for the prompt attention given to correct
the nuisance.
NEW STREET LIGHTING PROGRAI,I
Ihe city Engineer, in reply to an inquiry from Councilman Diederichsen,
reported that the Pacific Gas and Electric Company has commenced a
program within the city to replace incandescent lamps with mercury
vapor lamps to provide a more adequate illurnination.
At the request of Councilman Martin, the city Engineer advised that
he hrould confer with the Pacific cas and Electric Company on the
attachment of an appropriate shield on the light standard in his
neighborhood.
STUDEbIT GOVE RN},IENT DAY
Councilman Johnson announced that the annual
was scheduled for Tuesday, April 19, 1966.
"Student covernment Day"
tlhe 6hair adcnowledged receipt of minutes from the Health, safety &
Traffic Commission and the City Improvement Committee and monthly
reports from the Fire and Police Departments.
CLAIMS
warrants, llonth of llarch, 1966, Nos. 5869 - 6052, in the total anount
of $L44,615.01, duly audited, were apProved for payment on motion of
councilman tlartin, seconded by Councilman George and unani.mously
carried.
CO!,IMI SS ION APPO INT}.IENTS
ACKNOWLEDG},IENTS
365
PAYROLL
Payroll warrants, Month February, 1966, Nos. 7912 - 8396, in the total
anount of $123,399.03, r.rere approved on motion of Councilman Martin,
seconded by Councilman George and unanimously carried.
ADJOURNMENT
llhe meeting was regularly adjourned at 1I:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
HERBERT K.ITE, City Clerk
APPROVED:
ilrta.;4.0^"!,*
WILLIAi/T J. CRObBY, UAYO{/