HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1967.09.051ee
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At rrord froo the Chatr, all ln the Councll Chanber arose and gave
the Pledge of Alleglance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
CALL IO ORDER
A regular neetlng of
Councl-l ootion at th
the above glven date
--Hayor Diederlchaen
Present - Councilmen:Absent - Councilmen:
(a)BURLINGAME SHORE IAND COMPANY RE:
Burllngaroe, Californla
Septenber 5, L967
the Burllngaoe Clty Council scheduled bye regular Beetlng of Auguet 21, ras held on. Ttre E€eting ras called to order 8t 8:[5 p.E.ln the Chair.
Crosby- Dieder Lchsen-George -Johns on-l,la r t ln
None
MINT'TES
The nlnutee of the oeetLng of August 2L,L967, aubmltted to Councllprevlously were approved and adogted.
HEARINGS
A letter wag read from Cyrus J. l{cHlllan, Attorney, representlnt theBurllngare Shore Land Company, dated August 4, L967, requestlng thecontlnuatlon of the hearing on the appllcatlon for approval of a
propoeed devlatlon in contraet, from the Councll Eeettng of Auguat 7th
-to August 21st and statlng that the addltlonal period of tloe *11[enable hls cllent to prepare nodifled plans and to subnlt pertlnentdeta. (Re-scheduled by Council to Septenber 5)
Letters rere algo acknonledged and read fron the Broadway-BurllngaueArea lGrchants Assoclation, dated August 31, [967, oppoelng theproposed corerclal usage of the subJect property and froo Mrg.
Feusta Blooqulst, t3l6 Gapuchlno Avenue, dated Septeuber 3, 1967,favorlng a ner shopplng center.
l,lr. Robert Thoupson i.dentif ied hlnself as the Attorney representlng,the Burllngare Shore Land Conpany and epokeanan on thts occaslon.
Recalllng that when previous plans were filed a numbe r of obJectlons
were voiced. Ur. Thompson stated that since that presentatLon, pleng
have been revlsed; rlth reference to the cost thus far ln the de-velopent, the.project englneer has prepared a trcost euuoary'r ln-dlcatlng that $268,617.00 hae been expended by the appltcant (flledwlth City Clerk;) that in additlon, hle cllent has granted an
easeoent and has dedlcated Industrial Way (Cadillac Way) and tenfeet of his property required to widen the Bayshore, to the Clty,
thereby completely perfornlng that portion of his ortglnal contract.
Contlnulng, Mr. fironpson advtsed that on the 23rd of September, a
"fLnancial deadlLne" w111 be reached, nhereln the appllcant Eay
have to forfeit the property and Counctl ls requeeted to approvethe proposed plan, in principle, to perolt hls cllent to procesa
-the neceaaary appllcatlons before the Plannlng Comission and the
flnancing agency.
Mr. Thoopson sumarlzed the obJectiona entered prevtoualy and the
current revlslons ln the plan:
l. Elininat ion of co"n'prc lal area entirely: Financlally notfeasible. Flnanctng wll1 be considered stilctly on a "combLnatlonrlbagls of comercial and apartment areea. Hr. Ttrompson flled wtth
185
the Cily Clerk, a comralcatlon from Norris, Beggs & Slupson,ftnanclere, dated September 5, L967, addressed Eo the deiretopersln reply to thelr recent lnqulrles, stattng that 'rshould theco-"'erclal areaa be reduced to approxlnately 70,000 square feet'tit wae thelr roplnton that rhlle- such nodification wodld oake theloan Lese attractLve froo the lenderg I standpolnt, the proJect
Ls sufflclently clo8e to the requirementa of the lender- so aa toenable u8 to reconmnd the loan.rr
2. Excege corn'erclal area: ftre current plan propoees elLghtlyover 58,000 feet:
3. Insufflclent perklng spaces: Plans have been re-arranged toprovide 43 spaces under the bulldlng, L37 covered spaces ana 88uncovered spaces: and
4. Iocatlon of corercial bulldlngs: Three plana have been pre-pared frm shlch Counctl uay Eelect ln lts oplnton, the Eostapproprlate.
Mr. ftrompson advieed that sooe of the corerclal usee wouLd be lndlqqct c@p€tltlon wlth a corerclal area currently experlenclngdlfficulties; honever, it he8 been the developere' hope to attract
tenants who rould brlng ner buslness to the area for the benefltof all; comrnlcatlonB have been recelved fron two interested retallcorpanlee, Safeway Storee, Inc. and Grodlns of Gallforola (ftledwith Clty Clerk) that tf the project rere conflrmed, would occupy
approxlmately one-half of ttp proposed shopplng center.
l{r. Edrlo Il. delfolf, Archltect for the proJeet rae tnvlted by l{r.
Thompson to descrlbe the reviotons ln the propoeed plans.
Dlsplaylng dlagrams, l{r. det{olf explalned (1) the locatcomrcial unltE, the apertrent untts, the reaerved areto exlatlng prop€rty boundary llnes; (2) three eets of
B.and C, indlcatlng the square footages ln the total la
coverage and (3) a drarlng of the overell proJect wlth
tnpoaed overlays to lndicate dlverstfied plans.
Hr. det'lolf, in reply to lnqulrles fr@ Councll, advlsed that the
garage parking spaces wlll be depreaeed to a depth of approxloatelyfour feet and the undeveloped area wlll be landscaped, lrlth soe
paving added.
In reply to further Councll lnqulrles, Mr. Ttroopaon indicated
there rould be no obJection to permttt tng the undeveloped area toreraln in lts present R-4 zonlng; that although the lending atency
would prefer corn'*rclal development excluelvely, the appllcatlonfor a loan will lnclude both aparto€nt and corerclal usage andthat upon approval thereof constructlon on both unlts would c@-
menc e s i.uul taneoua Ly.
Coune lloan George and Counc llmon Mart in spoke of their preference
for apartment developnent Btatlng thelr intentlon however, ln vlertof cLrcumstsnces, to conslder only a combtned epartment and com-
merclal developoent; each corented tndlvidual [y on the number of
propoaala that have been euboltted to Councll since the lntttalpreaentatlon ln 1953.
To Mr. ltrompson I e co'-pent that lf Councll wi.l1 approve the plan lnprlnclple and to hlg aseurance that the loan appltcation wl1l be
baaed on a dual apartnent and corerctal proJect, Counc llnan Martin
expressed concern that the appllcant w1[1 appear before Councllin the future lnslstlng that the "reualnder of the proJect has to
be corercial.tt
lon of thca tn relation
Schemee, A.,
nd areageveral super-
Wlth reference tcant is currentlto request a mod
flnanc ial lmpoa e
conS truct 10n.
o the terDs of the contract under rhtch the appll-y bound and the necesslty to appear before Counclllflcatlon therefor, l,lr. Thompeon spoke on thelbillty to proceed rrlth the hlgh-rlse apartrEnt
186
Ttrrough lnquirles froo the Chalr and from Councllnan Crosby, theClty Attorney advlaed that the applicant cannot be coopelled to
obtaln a loan for funde that are not avallable; that rrith respectto the undeveloped area, it wlll rena tn ln the R-4 zone claesifl-
catLon, the unanaperable question, holever, Le 'ltuhat becmes ofthe parcel;tt and that the t'weakne88" in the contract contloueS topersiet ln that the reserved property nay be eold.
Councilrun George, acknowledglng that the appllcaut h8s cmpliedwith provislons of the contract, atated that hls concern was that
'rcondltlons" should flrst be stlpulated and studied by Btaff before
an actlon is taken by Counctl.
Mr. Ttroopson suggested that Councll approve the plan ln prlnciple
and conditlonal upon construction belng c oooenced sinultaneouely
and that pernits therefor, run with the land.
The Clty Attorney advised, ln reply to Councilnan liartlnre lnquiry
concernlng an "actlon to approve ln prlnclple,tt that s one quallf l--catlons rould be requtred; that the subJect contract, affectlng zonedland and requested by the developer, ls an unlque experlence ln theClty; that wtth the change in clrcr.mstances, the developer cannotproceed wlth the proJect until Council consente to Eodlfy the con-
trac t .
Counclloan Mart in stated he would conglder a nodlflcatlon of thecontract if Councll rdaa not restrlcted to a partlcular plan.
Mr. Thoopson, tn replying to Councll lnqulriee, repeated hls requeetthat Councll lndicate approval in princlple to place the developersln a poaltlon to process appllcatione for a 'rolxed usegett and to
approach the lender wlth more aaaurance.
Folloring further dtecueslon, the Chair lnvited co@nts from thogeln attendance. Ilearlng none, the Chalr requested the pleasure ofCouncll.
Councllman Croeby ooved that Counc ll conglder a modlftcatlon of thecontract for thle proJect. Ttre motlon wag seconded by Councllnanl,brtln and unanlmously adopted upon RolL Ca11.
RECESS
A recese wag declared by the Chalr at 9:45 p.n.
CAI.L TO OP.DER
The Eeetlng rae called to order by Uayor Diederlchsen at 10:00 p.E.
HEARItreS (Contlnued)
(b)APPEAL PIOIIIBO CONSTRUCTION CO.
RE : DIR_T HA]ITTE TEEMIT
A comnnlcatlon dated Auguet 7, L967, nas read fro Luther M. Carr,Attorney representlnt the Plonbo Constructlon Company, appeal lngthe declsion of the Clty Manager ln denylng a dlrt haullng pernlt
over Trousdale Avenue and El Camino ReaI, flIed by the Ploobo Con-structlon Company.
A corr"unlcation from the P ionbo Constructlon Goopany, dated August 7,
1967, confirntng the eppeal, descrtbed the reasons for the removalof the -atertal through areaa indlcated on an acc@panying sketch.
A conmunlcation fr@ the Clty Manager, dated Augue t 3, L967, to the
Pioobo Constructlon Coupany, set forth reaaons denylng the earth
haullng pemlt.
The Chalr recognlzed Mr. Luther H. Carr, Attorney, representlng theappellant, who opened his preeentetlon by Btatlng thet the oatteris before Council as the result of an actlon taken by the StateDtvislon of ltlghways and that he wae appearl-ng ln behalf of a re-
putabl.e flrrn, wllllng to cooply with condltlone set by Council.
18?
Ilr. Carr stated that a contract has been awarded to hts clienteto renove excess dlrt fron a seven and one-half nile freerray; dlrtfrou "cuts" ln the area of the new Crystal Sprlngs Brldge w-111 be
depoelted on alrport prop€rtles; that the appeal therefore ls toroute the dlrt through the City for the benefit of a ffeesay and to
f111 and to expand alrport facllities; dirt has to be carrLed bytruck and lt le requested that three hundred thousand yarda beperEltted to be routed down Trouedale Drlve; that the latter rrtreet
was lald-out for the purpose of truck travel and 1g the sefest and
most deEtrable atreet on the peninsulag and that routing dlrt fronhl-llsldes to loelands ls beconlng lncreaeingly dlfflcult by reasonthat Dost of the cltles have enacted prohtbttlve ordlnances.
Continulng, Mr. Carr advlsed that the State Dlvl8ion of Hlghways has
declared Crystel Sprlnga Road a prohibltive street and referred to
other prohibltlve etreeta 10 surroundlng clties; posstble alternate
routes ln South San Franctsco and Woodslde Road into Reduood Ctty
would force hls cliente to travel a ficenty nlle or a forty-fourmile diatance ln couparlson t9ith the proposed 5.7 nlle route.
Mr. Carr further advl.sed that it ls proposed to take a portlon of
the surplue oaterlal accuoulated ln back of San Mateo and Htlls-
borough over the L9th Avenue Freeway.
In reply to lieyor Diederlchsen, eoncerning applicatlons to othercltles, Mr. Carr advl8ed that no foroal applleation has been eub-Eitted; Millbrae hae infomally lndlcated lt rould perBlt travel
only aLong the Lorer route of Mlllbrae Avenue; Hlllsborough has
glvCn noti.ce that Ghateau Drtve ls a prohibltlve street; therefore,
there is no other route between lllckey Boulevard to the north aod
Woodside Road to the South.
Mr. Carr, in reply to Councllnan liartin, stated that 700,000 yls the total haul; 4001000 yarda proposed to be routed through
L9th Avenue Fgeeray and 3001000 yards on Trousdale Drlve.
The City Manager atated, ln reply to CouncilEan George, that the
proposed dlrt haul ls one of naJor proportions, affectlng the con-uunlty, and, ln hls oplnlon, the publlc should be extended theprivllege of belng lnforued, hls reason therefore in denylng theappllcatlon.
Ur. l.t. Schwartz, General Superintendent, Pioobo Constructlon Coopany,ln replylng to inqulrles from Mr. George K. Crandall , 2606 ?roua-
dale Drlve and to l{r. Wllllam Caplan, 270[ Arguello Boulevard,
described the areas from whtch three sources of surplus '"rterial lsto be removed frm the Juntpero Serra Freeway project, brlefly ex-plalnlng freeway constructlon procedure, the dlfflculties that wlll
be experlenced ln haullng the oaterial over the 19th Avenue Freeway,
currently undergolng oaJor construction work that origlnally wag
scheduled for completlon thls year but fom present lndicatlons,wlll not be completed until next year.
Mr. Irvlng Amatrup, 2708 trousdale Drive, Mr. J. Goldnan, 2808
Trousdale Drlve, Mr. Herman Fltzgerald, 3080 Arugello Drlve and Mr.H. E. AldrLdge, 2657 l,brtlnez Drlve, each spoke indlvidually on
the hazards of dirt haultng, including posslble inJury to chlldren
traveltng to and from the three schools ln the area, truck danageto the street and the deterloratlon of houes becauee of dust debris
from trucks .
A comnnicatlon was read from Mr. and Mrs. Ove M. wittstock, 262L
Trouedale Drlve, protesting the grantlng of "any dlrt hauls on
Trousdale Drtve. rl
ards
the
the Clty Attorney, anewerLng Councll inquiries, advlsed that theClty can requlre haulerg to uae an alternate route; however, repeateddirt haullng denlale by cltles rna y result in regulatlone and controls
belng wlthdrawn froo local Jurladlctlon and placed in the State
Vehicle Code; that the Clty'8 ordinance designates ltnlted truckroutes, wlth a perolt requlred for vehicleg in excegs of elght tons.
A cornnent from Hr. George Wells that the closlng of TrousdaleDrlve to the dlrt haul would force the contractor to use the lgth
Avenue Freeway wa8 enswered by the Clty Attoroey who advlsed thatthe City "cannot prohlblt the use of Trouedale Drlve but lt canregulat6 lt."
Mr. Caplan referred to "Flndi.nge Prior to Grantlng Permltrr statlngthat ln his opinlon, the daEage to the atreet and the periodtc
"patchwork" of pavenent, the schoole and echool crosalngs hazards
and the length of Trousdale Drive, can be classlfled ao "lnJurlousto the publlc health, aafety and welfare.rr
Mr. Carr, in a brlef rebuttal, advised that hls cllent w1ll operatewlth the utmost tn safety equlpment; that ln thle modern day ofttprogre8s" the extenslon of the Freeway and the Alrport lmprove -
nente wlll beneflt the City aa a whole.
Mr. Schwartz, ln reply to the Chalr, advleed that ulth the total
700,000 yarda of oaterlel to be renoved, hte c oopany was of the
oplnlon that approxlnately one-half could be routed along 19th
Avenue.
In further co@nts, Mr. Schwartz advlscd that when the State de-
slgned thts partlcular portlon of the Skyllne Freerey, and ln con-
ference wlth the City of San Uateo, the Latter wae glven asrurencethat the nateri.al would not be routed do$n Crystel Springe Road.
In replylng to Councllnan Martln, concernlng the posetblllty ofhaullng "emptieet on Crystal Sprlnge Road, r. Carr euggested thattems of the contract be lnvestlgated.
RECESS
A recegs rres thereefter declared by thc Chair at 12:00 uldnlght topernlt Mr. Schrartz to obteln e copy of the contrect.
CAI.L TO ORDER
The Eeetlng ua8 recorn ened at 12:10 a.o. with the hearlng contlnued
and the regular order of buslness conducted pendLng the arrlval ofMr. Schwartz.
COHMI'NICATIONS
1. SOUTTIERN PACIFIC GOMPAI{Y RE:
TERMIMTION PARKIIIG AREA I,EASE
A comrnlcation fron the Clty Manager, dated Auguet 31, 1967, advieedthat the Southern Paclflc Coopany has announced a ner pollcy affect-tng lte vacant property adJacent to ratlroad depots used throughoutthe Penln8ula by comrnters for a1l day parklng and the intentlonto terotnate leaeeg therefor on September 30, 1967, to lnltlate
an loproverent program.
The City Manager further advleed that the posltlon of the Clty of
Burllngare is unlque in that theClty oens an abuttlag strtp of landto the eeat and the San Francisco llater DepartrEnt osns a strlp to
the weat of the Southern Paclflc Company, necessltatlng an ena1y81sof horr the proposed program wl1l be placed in effect ln the local
area .
A co""qrnicat ion wa8 acknorledged frou the Southern Paciflc Coopany,
dated August 3I , 1957, settlng forth ln soue detail , the proposed
upgradlng of the lots and the eatabllshnent of a unlform chargeof thirty-five cents per day to accomodate all day parkers.
the Clty Attorrrey, answering Councll'nen Martin, conflrmed that
the ordl.nance code stlpulatas thst lt Ls "unlawful to block astreet for longer than flve mlnute8" and a cri.uLnal charge nay befiled againat an englneer in vlolatlon.
188
18s
In further reply to Gounclluan l.lartin, the City Attorney conflrmed
aleo that the code provldes for the reooval of unattended vehlcles
upon aoy mrnlclpal parking Lot.
The Clty Planner, for the lnfomatlon of Councll, stated that the
Southern Paciflc Coopany's proposal to provide parklng faclllttee
and to lmpose a fee r11l create zonlng probleros; that there le aCity requlrerent whereby an operator of a prlvate parklng Lot mustobtain a use permlt through Plannlng Comisslon proces8es and sug-
geeted that Councll explore the subject ln detail .
Follorlng further dlacugslon wherein Counclloan Martln suggested
the poaslblllty of amend tng the ordinance code to requlre the pre-
sence of a pald attendant at the publlc parklng lot, the aubJectmatter wae referred to the next Btudy meeting of Council for further
cons lderat lon .
2. PROPOSED UPDATIT{G OF M)LTE REBORT
A com-untcatlon fron the City lianager, dated August 31, 1967,
advtsed thet an tnvestigatlon complylng wlth a request from the
County Englneer concernLng the vtews of the Ctty of Burllngae on
the proposal to update the Nolte report indlcates:.(1) that thecost of updatlng le not knon, but nay approxinate $50,000.00 to
$70,000.00, or one-half of the cost af the original study and (2)
a8 the orlginal cost hras pald by the County, lt can be aasurned lt
would pay for the propoaed updatlng.
Ttre CIty Manager Btated that the uain concern of the City relatlveto the Nolte report ls thet Broadway overpaas I however, it sas re-
c o"-,ended that the County be notlfled that the proposed updatlng,of beneflt to the Clty as a whole, is merited and the cost should
be assuoed by the County of San ldateo.
Counctl concurred and the Ctty Manager was authorized to so notlfy
the Offlce of the County Englneer.
4. CALIFORNIA DRIVE "SHRIEBERYIi coSTS
A mmo fron the Clty l,ianager, dated August 31, L967, advleed, as
requested by Councll, that the cogt of trL@ing shrubbery along
Callfornta Drlve ae an aftemath of scorchlng in a resurfaclng
prograo has been prepared by the Park Superintendent in the aoountof $700.00. Accoupanylng recorde lncludlng 1966 and 1967 tabula-tlons of coat $ere acknolrledged and reviewed by Councll.
In reply to Council lnqulrles, the Clty Attorney advised that the
contractual agreenent rrlth relatlon to this partlcular type of
daoage stlpulated restoratlon of trees pennnently danaged wlth no
reference to shrubS.
Follorlng a brief dlscusslon, Councllnan Msrtin moved that
be flled by the Ci-ty agalnst the contractor Ln the amount o
seconded by Councthoan Crosby and unanlmously cerrled.
The Clty l,lenager advlsed that the Nolte report recorended a four-
lane undlvlded street elth a grade separatlon at the SouthernPaclflc Rallroad; at the present time, houever, the Ctty of San
Mateo 18 thinklng mre ly ln terma of wldenlng Penl.nsutr a Avenue .
A comnnicatlon dated August 28, L957, was read fro the San MeteoCity Englneer, advletng that the San Uateo Clty Councll has under
dlscuasion, a proJect whereby that City nould wlden the Boutherly
slde of Penlneula Avenue frm El Camlno Real to the Bayshore Free-
way, provldlng tro Lanes of traffic eastbound rrith left-turn chan-
nellzatlon at najor tnCereectlons. It was requested that the
acf$laln
700.00,
4. PENII{SUIA AVENI'E WI DENING PROJECT
A comrnlcation f rom the City Manager, dated Auguet 31 , 1967 , re-
ferred to an lnqulry froo the Clty Engloeer, Clty of San lrateo,
concernlng a tioe the Clty of Burl lngame wlIl be in a posltlon to
wlden the northerly slde of Peninsula Avenue to accomdate another
lane of lres tbound trafftc.
19(}
that the Burltngae Clty Councll lndtcate its future plana for
Penl-naula Avenue.
The Ctty Englneer advleed that the Clty of San Uateo has forrardeda set of the tentative plans at his request and that hls offlcewill revlew the plans closely to deter lne the feaslbtllty and
the extent of the plan and it8 effect on the Clty of Burltngare.
In reply to inqutrles frm Councll, the Clty Englneer advised th8ta full report rrtll be oade aval.lable to Councll at tt8 next study
EEetlng.
5. IAGUM ?ENNIS COURT PROJECT
A comrnlcation from the Clty Englneer, dated Auguat 31, 1967,
advised that the contractlng flrm of Ualott Peterson-Cruody hasBatlsfactorlly conpleted the reeurfacing for the tennls courta on
Laguna Avenue and lt waa the recorendatlon of hlg office thatthe Project be accepted foroally.
A memo frm the Clty I'Ianage r footnoted on the com'runlcation con-
curred.
RESOLUTION NO. 50-67 'rAcceptlng Tennle Court ReEurfaclng - Lagunaffi14" wai inEroduced for paesage on o6tton 6f
Counciloan Johnson and geconded by Counc llnan Crosby.
A RoIl Call vote was recorded as follows:
Ayee: Counclloen: Crosby-Diederlchsen-Johnson
Noes : Counctlen: George-Martln
In casting the dlssentlng votea, Councllmrn Martin and Counc Ilnan
George reafflrrned thelr prevlousLy stated poltcy to vote "noY onleglelatlon suboltted to Council subsequent to the cloaing of the
Agenda.
Mr. Carr referred to the contract made avallable by Mr. Schwartz,stating that the deslgnatlon of 'rRoute No. 92tt ln the contrectrefers to Cry8tal Sprlnge Road.
From Page No. 18 of the subject contract, Mr. Carr quoted that ttit
ls antlclpated that Route No. 92 will be conetructed and avallablefor haullng exeeas dlrt by October of L967.1'
Follontng dtscueslon on the point that lt has been detemined thatthe 19th Avenue Freeway *i11 not be coopleted untll next year,
Counc lLnan Martln, referring to excerpts Inthe oplnlon that the contractor has not ful
"he cin or he cannot dorr under the teroe ofeffort should be nade to obtaln the ansrrers
the contract; expreseed
1y lnvesttgated what
the contract and an
Council concurred with the recomnendation of Counciloan l,lartln
that lrore lnforoation be made available by the State Divislon of
Hlghways and that Counc il offer lts aeslstance to the appllcant byeolicitlng the support of leglstators ln expedlting the coopletlonof the 19th Avenue Freelrey.
Counclloan Johnson thereafter moved that the eubject oatter be
continued to the next meetlng of Council on Septeober 18, aeconded
by Counclloan Crosby and unanimou6ly carrled.
ITEARING CONTINUED
PIOUBO CONSTRUCTION CO. DIRT }IAUL APPEAL
COMMUNICATIOI{S (Contlnued)
6. STATEMEM FOR DISTRIBUTION T0 VOTERS
SETER BOI{D EEETION ocmBER l0 Lt57
A meoo from the Clty Manager, dated August 3L, L967, subnlttedfor Council approval, a wrLtten statement to be distrlbuted rith
sauple ballots and oailed to the electorate eltgible to vote tn
191
the forthcomlng Sener Bond Speclal Electlon on October 10, 1967,entltled rrArgurents ln Favor of Meaaure. "
Council. unanloouely authorlzed the flllng of the srltten argurrent,
concludlng ntth th6 fotlorlng endorgernE: "Burllngam Citizensr
Co"rmlttee for tYeg t on Sewage Bond - Duncan Beardaley, Chalroan, D.
Wayne Guthrie, Co-chafuman. "
7. WATER RESOT'RCES SI'T'DY
A cm.rnlcation from the County Engtneer, dated Augus t 28, L957,
advleed that the Callfornla D,epertoent of llater Resourcea fe ln-
terested ln a cooperattve study prograo of ground t ater reaourcesin San liateo County and each clty ls requested to tndicate whether
there ls an interest in the proposed prograD and to share Ln the
incuobent costs.
Folloulng a brlef diecusslon, the Clty Uanager raa requeeted tonotify the County Englneer that the Clty of Burltngare ls not Ln-
terested ln particlpatlng ln the study progran proposed.
A comrnlcatlon from the BurllryeE Art Soclety, dated Auguat 28,
1967, requested perillsslon to exhlblt palntlnge 9! the north endof Park Road on Saturday, Septeober 30, from 10:00 a.o. to 6:00 p.n.
Hayor DiederLchsen announced that I telephone call froo tlada Stephens,
representing the Art soclety wlthdrew the request.
8. ART EXHIBIT DISPIAY WII1TDRAWN
9.FIML MAP ''AMA AIRPORT PARK T NO. 4"
IO. PROPOSED ADDI TO ZO NING CODE
l,Ir. Cyrus J. ltcMlllan, Attorrrey, represeltlng the Anza Paclfic
Corpoiatlon, referred to prlor mlnutes of Counc lL approvlng the
tenlatlve oap of Anza Alrport Park Unit No. 4 and to minutes of a
study oeettng on February 1, 1967 and to a regular oeetlng on
Febrirary 6, whereln rlght-of-way prlvlleges uere extended to usecity property for haullng purposes; that utth the condltlonal
approval of the flnal nap of the subdlvlston by the Plannlng Com-
mlsalon, the Eatter of the roadway ls one of lesue.
Counc llnan Hartin recalled that a revocable perutt ras approvedfor a perlod I'not to exceed aeven year8."
The City Planner, referrlng to hls letter to Councll on the aubJect,
under date of August 29, L967, explalned that actton cannot be
taken on the flnal Eap unttl plane, speciftcatlone and relatlve
EEtters are prepared and aubnttted; and that the one lmportant
question that Eust be resolved ie to dete rnl.ne and act upon a per-.rnent ueana of acceaa.
Conaiderable diecussion arose thereafter on the Bubject of the
roadway, lncludlng an approprlate locatlon to leaat lnterfere wlth
the proposed park developnent by the City tn the future.
Mr. Ilav ld Keyston, one of the developers of the Anza Alrport Sub-dlvision, in a review of the nap with Councll , advieed that the
southern area of the aubdlvislon is developed to a greater degree
and expressed wllllngneas to conslder Counctloan Martln's sug-gestlon to extend f tll.ing operatlons on the southernly portlon of
the property.*
A recomendation fron the Plannlng Co'rn'lagton concernlng the adop-tlon of an ordlnance regulating the constructlon of high-rlee
apartr[eot bulldlngs wag referred for Councll conslderation at the
next regular Eeetlng on Septeuber 18.
RESOLUTIONS
None* Mr. Keyston rraa tnvited to rleet slth Councll ln a 6tudy aesslon on
September 20, at 8:00 p.u.
1912
At the requeat of Counc llnan George, ln behalf of the Clty Ioprove -uent Comhlctee, Councll approved the proposed placing of a banner
acroga Burlingane Avenue, to dlsplay a request for a "Yes" vote onthe Seser Bonds at a apecial electlon to be held ln the clty on
October [0, 1967.
PIANNI}re CO}OIISSION RESIGMTION
The resignatlon of R. J. Eduarde, L429 Palm Drive, ag a member ofthe Plannlng Comlsslon rras accepted and a co'.""un1cat1on ras dl-rected to be for*rarded to t{r. Edrards, acknonledglng his serviceto the Ctty of Burltngaoe.
ORDI}IANCES
None
SE}'ER BOND DISPIAY
COMT{ISSION EXPIMTIONS
A oemo froo the Clty Clerk, dated August 31, 1967, announced ex- .piratlon of terms of members aervlng on the Health, Safety &Trafflc Gmlseion, the Library Board, the Park Co-"'l ssion and the
Recreatlon Couolsslon. Ttre subJect was held for conslderation atthe next Councll study meetlng.
CIAII.T DENIED
A clalm agalnat the City, flled by Jaoes J. and Bernlce M. Volk,
2844 Rtvera Drlve, ln the suu of 950,000.00 for alleged hillalde
danage to property, waa denled and referred to the Cltyrs insur-
ance carrler on Eotion of Councllman }lartln, seconded by Councll-
nan Johnson and carrled unanimoue Ly.
ADJOURNMENT
Ttre neetlng wae regularly adJourned at 2:15 a.n., Ln respect to the
Demory of foroer City Councllman, I{llltau Itrandloe.
ReepectfuLly submltted,
,
APPROVED:
U.q-&a</.**