HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 051-2022DocuSign Envelope ID: 8D2B0002-A064-4BF6-89F8-17797318CDF7
RESOLUTION NO. 051-2022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AUTHORIZING THE REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC)
Section 99200 et sec ., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency
for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation
planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised,
entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects," which delineates
procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of "TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of TDA
Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the
San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA
Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for the
exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City of Burlingame declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA
Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the
project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City
of Burlingame to carry out the project; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City of Burlingame attests to the accuracy of and makes the findings in
Attachment A to this resolution; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying
supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation
planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of San Mateo County for
submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.
Ricardo Ortiz, Mayor
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8D2B0002-A064-4BF6-89F8-17797318CDF7
I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of
May, 2022, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BEACH, BROWNRIGG, COLSON, O'BRIEN KEIGHRAN, ORTIZ
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Auaff�,, 4,wl-S4ea e,
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8D2B0002-A064-4BF6-89F8-17797318CDF7
RESOLUTION NO.
Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2022-23
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding
Findings
Page 1 of 2
1. That the City of Burlingame is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3
funds, nor is the City of Burlingame legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in
"Attachment B" of this resolution.
2. That the City of Burlingame has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s)
described in Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent
matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant
to the successful completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects
described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule
that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of
funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or final design and
engineering or quick build project; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to
motorized traffic and/or Class IV separated bikeway; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class lI
bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for
the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of
TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of Burlingame within the
prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a
detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted
comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets
and Highways Code section 2370 et SeMc .) or responds to an immediate community need, such as a
quick -build project.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8D2B0002-A064-4BF6-89F8-17797318CDF7
Findings
Page 2 of 2
9. That any project described in Attachment B bicycle project meets the mandatory minimum safety
design criteria published in the California Highway Design Manual or is in a National Association of
City and Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidance or similar best practices document.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be completed in the allocated time (fiscal year of
allocation plus two additional fiscal years).
11. That the City of Burlingame agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and
facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8D2B0002-A064-4BF6-89F8-17797318CDF7
RESOLUTION NO.
Attachment B
Page 1 of 1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2022-23 Applicant: Citv of Burlinaame
Contact person: Andrew Wong, Senior Engineer
Mailing Address: 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010
E-Mail Address: awong(c_)burlingame.org Telephone: 650-558-7237
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available): Art Morimoto, Assistant Director of Public Works
E-Mail Address: amorimoto(a.burlingame.org Telephone: 650-558-7230
Project Title (Short Description): Murchison Drive, Trousdale Drive, and Davis Drive Bicycle Route Project
Amount of claim: $400.000
Description of Overall Project:
The project includes the implementation of approximately 1.3 miles of bicycle facilities along Murchison Drive, Trousdale Drive, and Davis Drive.
The project aims to support Safe Routes to School, enhance connectivity, and improve safety and comfort for people of varying ages and
abilities.
Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW are ineligible uses of TDA funds.)
Grant funding will only be utilized for the construction phase of the project.
Project Budget and Schedule
Project Phase
TDA 3
Other Funds
Total Cost
Estimated Completion
(month/year)
Bike/Ped Plan
-
ENV
-
PA&ED
-
PS&E
165,000
165,000
Feb-23
ROW
-
CON
400,000
460,000
May-23
Total Cost
400,000
625,000
1,025,000
Sep-23
Project Eligibility:
YES?/NO?
A.
Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is
Yes
anticipated).
B.
Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page.
No
C.
For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Yes
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet via: http://www.dot.cg.gov).
D.
Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation).
Yes
E.
Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
No
include construction).
F.
Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
Yes
year)
G.
Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
Yes