The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMin - CC - 1968.06.1742P- Burlingarae, Cali fornia ilune 17, 1968 CAL.L TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on ttre above given date. Meeting ca1led to order at 8:10 p.m., - llayor irohnaon in the Chair. PIJDGE OF ALI.EGIAIICE At word from the Chair. all in the Council Chanber arose and gave the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROIJL CAIJT Prerant - Counci Lnan : Crosby-Di ed e ri chsen-George-ilohnaon-lrlartinebsent - CounciLnen s None MINT,TES Tle MinuteE of the regular rDeeting of alune 3 and the adJ ourned meeting of June 5, 1968, suhnitted previotrsly to council, rrere approved and adopted. BIDS (1) S850.O0O lrrrNrcrPArr rUPRO\TEHENT BOTIDS OF 1968, FIRST' DIVISION Sealed proposals for the $850,000.00 city of Burlingame, l,tunicipal Inprovement Bonds of 1968, First Division, opened in conformancewith publi ahed notice of said sale, vrere declared ae follors: BIDDE R INTEREST RATES Bank of America San Francieco, califolnia (Premium $77 .00) EEtimated Net Int.Cost 9308,473 .00or 4.O?4% crocker-Clti zens National Bank 1 llontgmery Street San Erancisco, California Estinated Net Int. cost $323,235.00ot 4.26994% Wells Fargo Bank 454 California street San Pranci sco, Cali fornia (Premiurn $1.00)Bstinated Net Int. Cost $327,702.50or 4.3289* Blyth & Co., Inc. 2100 Russ Building San Franci sco, california $I0O,00O par value6?[- 7/L/6e - 7/Ln2 $ 25,000 par value 4.60% - 7/Ln3 $725,0OO par value4%-7/Ln4-7/L/80 $125,00O par value6t-7/L/6e-7/Ln3 $ 30,000 par value 4.6O?L - 7/t/74 S245,0O0 par value 4.10x - 7n/as-7/Ln7 $450,0O0 par value4.2@L-7/Lne-7/L/8o $125,000 par value6*-7/L/6e-7/L/73 $ 60 , 000 Inr value4.1o*-74n4-7/L/75 9655,000 par value4.25E6-7/L/76-7/L/8o $125,O00 par value6%-7/L/69-1973 $ 3O,0O0 par value 4.50* - 7/t/74 $395,0OO prr value A.Lq%-7/L,/85-L97A $300,000 par value4.15%-7/L/7e-1980 Eatimated Net rnt. cost 9319,935.00ot 4.22635'* 328 BIDDER United california Bank 600 So. Spring Stt. IoB Angeles, Callfornia (Prorrri um $113.00)B8tinated Net Int. cost $325,074.50or 4.29424% Kidder, Peabody & Co. 100 Bush Street san Francisco, california E8tinrated Net Int.or 4.2891* Cost $324,690.00 ltre Bank of Cali fornia 4OO californl.a st. san Francigco, california Ir{r. Robert Haight, representing the llorton and Llmch, bond coungellors, and aumarization of bide received, the noet favorable, in an e stimatedor at the rate of 4.074%. INTEREST R,ATE $ 25,000 par valuee* - 7/L/6e $100,00Opar value5*-7/L/7O-1973 $ 30,000 par value 4-3/4% - 7/Ln4 $695,000 par value4-L/4*-7/Lns - r98o $85O,0O0 par value6*-7/L/6e-7/Ln34.2OA-7/L/?4-7/L/8O 985O,O00 par value 696-1969-1973 s.so% - 19744.10* - 19764.2@t-1976-1980 legal fim of Wilson, ironeg advi sed that in a verificationthe Bank of Anerica suboi ttednet intereat cost of $308,473.00 Estimated Net Int. cost $326,820.O0or 4.317376 Certified checks ae bid deposits accompani ed the foregoing. RtsSoIJufIOn llo. 42-68 "Awardi ng liale of Bonds, City of Burlingame,llunicipal Improveoent Bonds of 1968, tirst Division, $850,000-(Bank of lnerica) wae thereafter introduced for passage on Dotlonof CounciLnan George, seconded by counci lnan Crosby and unaninously adoPted upon RoII call. 12' TORIIDRAIN IIiIPR(I'EIIEIITS PARX DBPT. TO OAI( GROVE AVB. Elds received and opened in copllance with bid advertiaenent for Stormdrain Inprovenent8, Park Depart[ent to Oak Grove Avenue, were declared ee follors: BIDDER TO(IAI, BID Eackett Bros., Inc.Falrley Construction Co. Iowrie Paving Co. Bragato Paving Co. iranas Engineering constructionIndustrial Electric cmpany Ivenrick & Associates llccuire & HestorA. J. Edward I Bngineer's Estiroate $11,958.00 A cmunication frqo the City Engineer, dated atune 11, 1968, recmended that the project be awarded to Hackett Brothers, Inc., tlountain Vis, the 16rest responsible bidder in ttre aruount of 912, 640.00. A me!0o frm ttre City Uanager, dated ilune 12, 1968, footnoted onthe cmunication, advi sed that the proj ect was included in thecurrent budget a8 a Park Departnent Capi tal Improvement itern andthat he concurred with the recmendation of the City Engineer. 912,540.OO 13,886.OO 14,028.00 14, 154. OO 14, 23O.0O L5,.7 52.20 16, 512.0O L?,478.OO 18, 160.00 88{t I RtsSOLIIIION NO. 43-68 nAwardi ng Contract for Stormdrain Improvements -Park Department carage to Oak crove Avenue - ilob No. 68-9" (Eackett Broa., Inc. $12,640.00) was introduced \l Counci lnan Crosby who moved itE paasage, eeconded by Counci Lman ceorge and unaninously adopted upon Roll CalI. COMI,tt NICATIONS FRAM- SI,IOOK.GARD CORPORATION UILI.S ESTATE NO. 27 FIIiIAI, PIANS tlayor ifohnaon referred to a cquunication received frcr! tllr. stan Schtpp, proj ect manager, on behalf of Fram- Snook-Gard Corporation, dated l.lay 29. L958. requesting that the matter of the tentative and record maps for the Uills Estate #2? Subdivision, be an item on the irune 17 Agenda. Ihe Chair further referred to a cwnunication frorn tlre City Pl.anner, dated ltay 28, 1968, reporting the action of the Planning Cmiesionat itE regrular meeting of Uay 27, Ln connection qrith the Eulrjectsubdivision and a cqununication, dated irune 13, 1968, signed byHarry Srookler, Fram-Sook-card Corporation and ry Stan Schupp,Project. llanager, requesting Council approval of the Tentative and Record l{aps for the I.{ilIE Estate No. 27 Srrbd ivi si on contingent upon aeveral conditions. Trhe Chair invited cwnent.E frqn the Floor. ttr. WiUian Caplan, 2701 Arguello Drive, Etated that three problcmsghould be considered; firat, the lirnitation with reapect to heightto confom with neighboring propertiee; the developers have agreedto a height of not nore than eighteen feet a.bove the average curbgrade; hci,rever, it is merely a "prdllise' or a "covenant' and maxinun protection should be extended to the property otmera byincluding the height linitation in the public workg' varianceg. In cqfinenting on the latter's point, the ci.ty Attorney suggestedthat the City refrain frm being placed in a position to 'policeiresgrictions irnposed, adviEing tlrat such procedure has not beenthe policy in other subdivisions within the City. A brief diseussion follored wherein l!lr. Schupp, the nroject engineer,referred to hi8 cmunication of irune 13, agreeing to a buildingheight of not more than eighteen feet. l{r. Caplan, in continuing his cdutenta, stated that the second problemis that of the resubdivision itselfi the propoEed nine lot Eub-diviEion is satisfactorv, but the property cirners are concerned thatat sqne future date, the larger plrcels may be Eubdivided to createadditional building lote and therefor a prohibitive provlsion shouldbe included in the co\renants i that ttrirdly, soil reports ehould bealso included in the covenantE in order that future ownera may bealerted to possible trouble. 1Ihe City Planner advised, in reply to an inquiry frm llayor ilohnaon,that the City's interest in solely in one covenant, wherein it iathe obligation of the property cf,rrnerg to maintain the surface atorm-water channel when located on their property and that this particular covenant is included in the deed restrictions of other Mills EEtate Subdivisions. Counci toan lliartin directed inquiries-tosetting forth the conditions on the map becme a part of a reeorded deed and to there would be objectlon, both the City engineer replied in the negative. the City Attorney concerningin order ttrat they maya specific question urhether Attorney and the project Tlhe City Planner stated, in reply to Counci lman Uartin, that the subdivider r,rill install water lines and landscape all of the area on the northerly section of the street right-of-way, with Cityforces to maintain said area. e.2,5 RFplies frcnr the project engineer revealed that councllman artin wag referring to a nap ottrer ttran ttre latest anended drarrings. Obeerving that the dateE and identiftring narke were not included on the nap, Counciln n ltartin atated ttrat he wotrld defer acting on the subdivieion naps on this occasion. Folloring digcussLon, the subJect matter waE continued !o ttre regular Deeting of Council on inrly 1. fhe City lrlanager waa requested bry Counci lnan Martin to invite the Superintendent of Parks to be present at that tine. 2. T.IISCEI,IAIIEOUS STREETS RESURFACI}re JOB COII{PI..ETE A cmunication frd the city Engineer, dated June L2. L968, advisedthat the Bragato Paving Cqnpany has satisfactorily cmpleted the "Resurfacing of lriscellaneous city streetsn contract, in the final contract price of $10,627.24 and recmended that the contract befonlally accepted. A memo frm the city uanager, dated irune 12, 1968, footnoted on the cmrunj.cation, consurred with tfie reconanend- ation. RESOLUTION NO 44-68 r.Accepting Reaurfacing of Uiscellaneous Streeta - Job No. 68-6 Bragato Paving Co.) was introduced for passage on motion of Counci lnan Crostryz, seconded by councilman llartin and unanimously adopted upon RoIl call. 3. FAI NTI ASSOCIATI RE T A cmunication fr@ the city llanager, dated arune 13, 1968, referredto a proposed Fair and convention Aesociation 1968-1969 Brdgetto be applied in a county-wide progralo for the prqrotion of touri sm,of which the city of &rlinganre is a particiPating neraber. counci lman Ittartin requested the city l{anager to subnit a reportdefining 'profeasional servicee (contractual) - under the caption "Publicity and Prmotion. ' (he informative report wag thereafter ackncfttledged and placed onfile. 4. HIR,N'I WAI,IGR & SONS, INC. RE: STORACE DISTIIJED BEVERAGE SPIRITS A cqmunication fro ttre ci ty ltanager, dated itune 13, 1968, advisedthat Eiran tlhlker & sons, Inc., RollinE Road, Burlingane, is requesting permission to Etore distilled beverage EpiritE in excese of the aggre-gate storage pennissible \rithout approval frm Council; that in cqrpliance with code regui rement 8, the Fire Chief has investigatedthe prenises and has sutrlitted a favorable report. It was t]re recqmendation of the Fire Chief, concurred with b1z the office of the city tlanqer, that council consider the application and grant the requested permission. Ttre Fire Chief, at the request of the Chair, related his department's conferences with the conpany botJr prior to and upon its locationto thiE city and reported in sqlle detail, the er<ceptional featuresof the plant's operation that will exeeed ttre code requirementsfor a fire protection systen. A motion to grant approval to lliram Walker & Sona, Inc., requeatto store beverage Epirits at its &rrlingame location in excess ofthe total aggregate set forth in the Code, rraa introdueed b!7 counci l tn l llartin, aeconded W counci lnan George and unanimouslyearried. counci lman llartin questioned the location of the fire alart boxes and the conEtruction of a tiliber and gravel acceaa to the canyon area. BIIMi 5. UIIIJI'IY EAStsI,IENT STJRVEY A memo from the city lrlanager, dated ilune 13, 1968, adviged that aspreviously requegted b!, Council, the city Engineer has subritted an eatimate of approximately $3,OO0.00 to engage Uro additional employees for a period of three monttrs during the sumrer to initiatea proltram of evaluating tlre City's utility eaaenents and a].leyhrays. Counci lman ceorve moved that the Office of the Citsy Engineer be authorized to cquence a utility easement and aIle! ray survey b1z engaging two additional employees for a period of three monthE. Tthe motion waE seconded by Counci lman llartin and unanimously carried. 6. A comuni cEt i on was ackncrrledged frql the lfobi L OiI Corporation, dated irune 10, 1968, advising that in the proceas of purchasingproperty located on the OId Bayshore Higlnvay and Broadlray, a titlereport indicated that access rights to portionE of the parcel were paEsed from the State of california to the city of Burlingane and it was therefor requeEted that a quit claim be executed b!, the Cityto relinquish its access righte. fhe City Attorney advised, in a verbal report, that there is scmequeEtion concerning the 'accesE righte " of ttre City and suggegtedthat the subj ect be continued to the regular meeting of iluly l,pending a research t4l his Office. Council ttrereafter concurred. 7.gT EIIDORSEII{EIIT RE i'I,DICIAIJ UERIT PIAN" A ccrununication frotn the California iludicial lterit Plan Coutrittee,dated ilune 4, 1968, requesting Counci I endorsement of a SenateConstitutional Amendment concerning "Californiars arudicial Selectionllerit PIan' was acknopledged with Council concurring to withhold an action. 8. {II'NIPERO SERRA FREEI{AY HEARING A cmunication \ras received frm the California Bighway Corigsion, dated .fune 10, 1968, ackncnrledging an invitation frqtr the San Hateo County Board of Superwisors to attend a hearing on ifune 20, withrespect to the ifunipero Serra Free\ray and advising of a directiveissued, \z a motion adopted !V tlre State Eighway Cqmission, thatrepreaentatives frcn the State ttighway &rgineer'a Office attendthie and all future meetings when ansrrers are desired on the iEsueof the Presay. 9. DIVISION OF IiIGHVIAY RBPORT RE3 .,I,ITIPERO SERRA FRAEWAY RIDGE ROTITE A corununication from the Division of Highways, dated ilune ll, 1968, referred to a copy of a report as the result of an engineering studyof the ridge route location of a portion of the ilunipero Serra Free\,ray, as preferred try the City and County of San Francisco. Ttre foregoing cmuni(tions fro the California Eiglray cmis8ion and from the Division of Eighways were ackn€rrledged with cmentE withheld. 10. : TR,AIISFER OF TN(ICAB PERIIITS REQVE ST An application of the Bel-ttlateo Enterprii-eea, Inc., for the iEsuanceof Taxieab Permits norr held by the Burlingane Checker cab cmpany,suhitted through F. Eershel Campbell, Attorney, dated ifune 12, 1968. was acknourledged and the subject matter thereafter held for a public hearing before council on l{onday, iruly 1, 1968, at 8:00 p.m. 8eB 827 RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 45-68 'Accepting Prelirninary tilaster PIan Bayside ffi for passage on motion of counci lman llartin, geconded tlll Counci lman Diet]erichsen and unanimously adoPted upon Roll Call. ORDINAI{CE S - Consideration thereof: ORDINATICE NO. 881 -An ordinance Mding Chapter 8.13 'l,lilk' To the Regulating the Siale of llilk in the city oftiunicipa:L calc and Brlingarae'was before counci I for second reading. A c@unication frqn lrlrs. w. o. Peteraon, 1135 Drake Avenue, dated tlay 16, 1968, protested the banning of the sale of 'pasteurizedmarket nilk. ' councilman uartin advised that he hag wittrdrawn his previous object-tion to the ordinance aE proposed upon infonnation Council has received from the county Director of Health that the distributionof market nilk ls illegal. Irpon motion of Councilnan croattrz, geconded by Councilnan G€orge, said ordinance passed its eecond reading and was adopted by thefolloring Roll call vote: AyeE s counci lmen s Crosby-Diedericheen-George-alohnson-Uargin NoeE! Councilmen: NoneAbsent Counci lmen None RECE SS A recess was declared lvy tlre Chair at 9:25 p.n. CAI& TO ORDER fhe neeting was reconvened at 9:4O p.m. I'I{FINISHAD B'SIXESS CITYIIAIIAGER REPORT ON PROPERTY AD.'ACEIIT CALIFOR}iIIA DRTVE A meolo was acknorledged frm the City lilanager, dated ilune 13, 1968, advising thrt the city of &rrlingame has a revocable penrit forthe fifty-foot strip onned by the San Francisco water Department, running frqn Oak Grove Avenue to Broadr^ray t twenty-Eeven feet has been used for the widening of Cali foraia Drive and the remaining footage used for landscaping and off-etreet parking near the Broadway railroad station. the city ltanager advised that the aaseE$rent records indicate, hci^rever.that the City orns a trrenty-five foot strip running fron Oak Grove Avenue to Broadvray and north of Broadray abutting and adj acent to San FranciEco's etrip of land; and ttrat for clarification purposeshis Office has reguested a Litigation Title Report. 2. RECTOR-CADIIJAC REVOCABIE PERII1IT Reference uas nade to a cdmunlcation addreaaed to Council underdate of arune 13, 1968, frm Rector Cadillac, offering to purchse,rather tlran leaee frqr the CIty, a certain Bection of property adjacent to its holdings between Cadillac Way and Broadway. Councillnan George reported that since receiving the cmnunication,the Clty llanager has received, follodng a converEation rrith the agenc]r, a paynent for the use of the property under terms of arevocable permit and a representative of the company has signedthe lease. counci fulan George expressed t]re opinion that it would be unr.ri seto relinquish propertieE omed by the City. 1. 328 RESOLUTION NO. 46-68 "Authorizi ng Execution of leaEe By antl Between @andRectorCadi1lac,aCa1iforniacorPoration"was introduced for passage upon motion of Councilman Crosh1t, Eeconded \z Councilman ceorge and unaninously adopted upon Roll caU. REIJOCATION OF GAR,AGEffi !,layor arohnson invited the city Planner to report on developments concerning tlr. P. A. Campanile's reguest to raove a detached garage fro its preaent location at l34l Colurnbus Avenue to a separate property. lhe City Planner advised that the ten foot utility easement, thepoint in question, has been confirmed as being onned by the applicant,the application for a variance is before Council for menberg toeither approve or reject the requeat to construct a garage on an adj oining "landlocked' lot. It \.ras the recormendation of the City Planner that Council approvethe aclion taken by the Planning cormission, with the addedcondition that the driveway area be conatructed according to atandardsset tryz the Office of the City Engineer. Ihe City Engineer Etated that his Office would insist that the water meter be relocated to the Eide of the property at the expenae of theomer and that the pernit be worded so aa to require the c,hrner to aasume all costs for damages to existing utilities during the construction of the garage. counci lman tilartin expressed concern ttrat a precedent may be egtablishedty permitting the construction of a garage on a lot not contiguouEto the main property and suggested that in this inatance a reEub-division of the property loay be appropriate. ltte City Planner concurred, advising ttrat his Office would prepare aworkable plan. Folloring further discussion, a motion was introduced by Counci lraanllartin that the action of the Planning Cqmission be upheld and thatttre variance be approved subj ect to the follo,ring condlions: (f) theten foot utility easettent strip be added to parcel one or to parcel t\ro of tlre property orned hl!, the applicant; (2) the crrner grant tothe City a "publie utility easement " over tJre ten foot strip; (3) the driveray area be constructed in ccmpliance \rith Etandarda setby the Office of the City Engineer; (4) the water meter be relocatedto the Eide of the property at the expenEe of the oamer and (5) *re owner be held liable for darnage s that may occur to existing utilitiesduring ttre construction of the garage. Trhe motion w;s seconded councilnan Diederichsen and unanirnously carried. DWISION OF' IIIGHI{AYS PRESENTATION Mayor arohnson recognized Mr. L€o Trombatore, who identified hirnself as a Deputy District Engineer, Division of Highways. lit!. Troidbatore displayed artist ' s renditions of both the "fibdi fied Adopted Routo " of the ilunipero Serra Freelray, paralleling theexisting eanada Road and indieating the propsed interehange with the it. Arthur Younger Freerray, and the proposed City and County of San Francisco-favored "Ridge Route" betrreen Ral8ton Avenue and Raltmundo Drive. Explaining that the nivision of Ilighway is conducting a progtran toacquaint the nine cities within San t{ateo County with the two laeicroutes under dLscussion, Mr. Trqobatore atated that of the forty-six miles of the Freeway either under conatruction or nearingccmpletion, four miles of the route remain in controversy. 3. 329 ur. Trqdbatole, referrlng to statements contained within a rePort fron the County Regional Planning Board as "not factual" clarified the misrepreaented information and the position taken by ttre State Division of Highways. Polloring a brief period of que8tiona and anstrters, liayor Johnson in behalf of Council, expressed qrpreciation to I{r. Trombatore for his appearance and his rePort. T NFINISHED BUSINESS (continued ) 3 AIIZA AI RPORT PARI(S NOS 4 &5 trlr. qfrus iI. frbfrti llan, representing the gubdivider of Anza Ai rport Parks No. 4 and No. 5, advised that \rith the cooperation of membersof the City's staff, three agreements have been prepared for the consideration of council: (1) "Access to lands of the Anza Pacific Airport Park No. 4 Subdivi sion' and (3) "tmProvernent on Final Acceptance of Anza Airport Park No. 5 Subdivision. " I{ith reference to Councll's request at the adj ourned meeting on ilune 5, 1968, that ttre subdivider post a bond in the amount of $40O,0OO.0O, l{r. f,tct{i llan advised that a bond preniumpayroent in tslre amount of $4,500.00 vill be requj.red; t}at by reaaon of theposting previously of contractors' bonds and that funds for theproject have been pledged, the subdivider is offering to contributethe sun of $3,000.00 to the city in lieu of posting a gubdivider's bond. Ihe City Attorney, in reply to council inquiries, atated that hisoffice was infomed of the offer too late to preprre an opinionfor transmittal to Council and rec@ended that a decieion be postponed to the regular neeting of ituly 1. Follorring a brief discuggion, Council deferred action on the offerof the subdivider and on the agreements suhitted, until the next regular meeting. ITEW BUSINESS 1. APPOINTI{BNT CONSULTAYT To confirm a rec@rendation [ade at a prior study meeting, counci lman crosbtT moved that ur. Ray Eolt be enplolted as a Library consultantIn the study of the renovation of ttre l,ibfary and ttrat the City Attorney prepare an appropriate contract. fhe motLon was seconded \z Counci lman Irllrtin and unaninously carried. 2. BAY ARE.A REGIOIIAL V'ATER QUAI,ITY CONTROL II{EETITiIG A cmunication was read fr6 ilr. Willian C. Weber, Vice-Ittayor, Cityof San ttateo, dated ,June 13, 1968, extending an invitation to council,to the City l.lanager and to the City Engineer to attend a Bay Area Regional Water Ouality Control meeting in the San Mateo City Council Chanbers on t'hursday, ifune 20, 1968. fhe City Engineer advised ttrat lltr. John irenkE, consulting Engineer and he would be in attendance. litr. Weber \rae requested to be notifiedof the number of persons .planning to attend a Echeduled 5:45 p.n. dinner. 3. DEIIONSTRATION OF ].AW ENE'O(EI,IENT HE LI COPTER A cmunication frdr the Chief of Police, city of San carlos, extended an invitation to menberE of the San Uateo County Iaw Enforcement Association and members of the City Council toparticipate in scheduled helicopter demonatration rides as a meanE of learning more about the capability of helicopters for law enforcement use. tir. Cyrus iI. HcMillan, Civil Service ComiEsioner, volunteered to accept the invitation and the city clerk iras instructed to notifythe Chief of PoLice. 4. CO}iT3RATUIATORY COUI(t,NICATION A conmuni cati on waE read frqn the Garden Study Club of the Peninsula, dated irune 11, 1968, congratulating Council on the Sixtieht Anniversary of the City's incorporation and cmending the Chanberof ccrMerce upon the proposed "Burlingame Avenue Revitalization' proj ect. tlayor irohnsonof the Garden stated that a reply has been forvarded to the mernberahip Study Club. 5 GI'N "TIh{-INS, A cmunication wae read frqn ll{rs. Robert B. 211er, 33o Bloonfield ltoad, urging Council to follcrrr the suggestion of l,layor toEeph Aliotoof San Francisco by reguesting that all regidents of hrrlingame "turn in their guns - with no questions asked" and suggesting alaothat the [ayof of Burlingame be an "elected office" poation. PROCIAI'ATIONS Itiayor irohnson ieeued the follorring proclaroatione: ifune 23 - ifun e 29, L968 - 'Burglary Prevention lfeek' and the Year 1968 - 'Euman nights Year.' coMttlssloN vAcAncIEs STUDY MEETIIiIG SCTIEDUI,ED Tuesday, iluly 9, 1968, waa scheduled as the next counci I study neeting. RECI.ASSIFICATI ON SURVEY Counci lnan Martin, referring to a Council policy on rrage reviews and reclassification surveys, requested, vrl,th councll concurring,that the city l{anager confer with che State Peraonnel. Board onttre scheduling of a "Reclasaification Survey. " ACKNOhII,EDGE}/IENT S lhe City trhnager was requested to place the subject of a Recreation Coruai sEion and Park Cmission" on the agenda study. The Chair acknci.rledged receipt of Minutee fron ttre Health, and Traffic Cquni ssicr and the Park Cmission and reportgPolice Department and the Librarian. 'cornbinedfor council safetyfrqtr the ANNOT'NCEMENTS ftre Chair announced the folloning: 1. A Council neeting hrith the city HaU architects, Saturday, June22, 1968, at 9:OO a.m. 2. San lilateo County Council of llayors meeting on irune 29, and 3. North county council of Cities, Ihursday, inrly 11, 1968. 3AO Namea were requested to be subrdtted b1l the regular meeting of July I,for positions to fill vacancieg on the various cdmisrlons. 381 MRRANTS llarrants, I'tonth of ilune, 1968, Nos. 751-935, in the total amount of $L45,822.47, duly audited, rrere approved for payment on motionof Counci lnan CroEby and seconded blt Counci lman Diederichsen. PAYROLL Payroll gfarrants, ltontlr of tlay, 1968, Nos. 8760-9357, in the amountof $L67,A22.47, were approved on motion of counci lman crosbt, and seconded b!, Counci lman Georqe. ADi'OI'RNUENT Tlhere being no further tranaaction of business, the meeting rrag regularly adj ourned at J.1r2O p.n. Respectfully subritted, IIERBERf K., cIT:r CLERX APPROVED! cEARIrryrE JOEITSON, TAYOR QUffiM"*) ,r/