HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2021.12.09Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
City of Burlingame
Meeting Agenda
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Online via Zoom7:00 PMThursday, December 9, 2021
On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 361, which allows a local agency to
meet remotely when: 1) The local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency; 2)
State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing;
or 3) Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health
or safety of attendees.
On November 15, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 142-2021 stating that the City
Council and Commissions will continue to meet remotely for at least thirty days for the following
reasons: 1) The City is still under a local state of emergency; 2) County Health Orders require that all
individuals in public spaces maintain social distancing and wear masks; and 3) The City can't maintain
social distancing requirements for the public, staff, Councilmembers, and Commissioners in their
meeting spaces.
Pursuant to Resolution Number 142-2021, the City Council Chambers will not be open to the public for
the December 9, 2021 Traffic Safety and Parking Commission.
Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below.
Additionally, the meeting will be streamed live on Youtube and uploaded to the City's website after the
meeting.
Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame.org.
Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting or note that
your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda. The length of the emailed comment should
commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is
approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Traffic Safety
and Parking Commission for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00
p.m. on November 10, 2021. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time, but
cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 p.m.
deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission after the meeting.
All votes are unanimous unless separately noted for the record.
Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 12/6/2021
December 9, 2021Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission
Meeting Agenda
1. Call To Order
To join the Zoom meeting (note - the link below doesn't look like a hyperlink, but it is):
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83540646591?pwd=RHE1LzlOQlg0cEpYSmdwSjhpRVFoUT09
Webinar ID: 835 4064 6591
Passcode: 809394
To join by telephone:
Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or
+1 929 205 6099
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
October 14, 2021 Meeting Minutesa.
Meeting MinutesAttachments:
November 10, 2021 Meeting Minutesb.
Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to
suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from
acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The
Commission Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers.
5. Public Comments: Non-Agenda
6. Discussion/Action Items
Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only)a.
Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvement Project Updateb.
PresentationAttachments:
Chair and Vice-Chair Nominationsc.
7. Information Items
Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 12/6/2021
December 9, 2021Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission
Meeting Agenda
Engineering Division Reportsa.
Staff ReportAttachments:
Police Department Reportsb.
Collision ReportAttachments:
Farmer's Marketc.
TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communicationsd.
8. Committee & Sub-Committee Reports
Downtown Parking (Martos)a.
Broadway Parking/Traffic Issues (Israelit & Leigh)b.
School Traffic (Israelit)c.
Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Rebelos)d.
Community Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Leigh & Rebelos)e.
9. Future Agenda Items
10. Adjournment
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at
650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public viewing at the City Clerk's office, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the
meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are
available on the site.
NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: January 13, 2022
Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 12/6/2021
1
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Thursday, October 14, 2021
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leigh, Israelit (arrived after item 6.a), Martos, Wettan
MEMBERS ABSENT: Rebelos
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Occurred after item 6.d)
a) August 12, 2021 Meeting Minutes
Motion: To accept the August 12, 2021 Meeting Minutes as submitted.
M/S/C; Leigh/Israelit, 3/1/1
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA
No public comments received.
6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
a) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only)
B/PAC Chair Leslie Beatty said they noticed with the street repaving project, that Garden
Drive was repaved but crosswalks were not added, which is near a number of schools.
Additionally, she said they wanted to highlight this as they thought as part of the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan, this type of crosswalk should be painted automatically as it
was prioritized in a pedestrian zone and it is near schools. Ms. Beatty inquired about the
City’s process for standard repaving projects in light of the work done as part of the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan. She stated this is an item of interest for B/PAC to discuss in
2
the future.
b) EV Progress Update
Sigalle Michael, the City’s Sustainability Coordinator, went through a presentation
regarding Burlingame’s EV Action Plan and overall progress. Ms. Michael stated that the
EV Action Plan aligns with state targets and indicated all new vehicles in California have
to be zero emission by 2035. She explained that the work occurring now is in anticipation
for future EV growth. Ms. Michael said the City is slowly electrifying its municipal fleet and
noted that some employees are currently driving hybrid City vehicles. Additionally, she
stated the plan prioritizes areas for public EV chargers and charging access to residents.
Ms. Michael shared the Plan goals by 2030 include 100 charging ports, 5,000 registered
EVs, and transitioning 10% of the municipal fleet to be EVs.
Ms. Michael noted that progress to date includes adoption of a reach code to require all
new development to have EV charging, streamlined permitting process, a curbside
charging pilot program to restart again as it was put on hold during the pandemic, a $300k
grant awarded from CALeVIP for the charging station project at the Library, and technical
assistance from Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), which will enable the City to easily and
quickly apply for grant opportunities in the future.
Specifically for multifamily buildings, which pose more of a challenge, Ms. Michael said
the City is educating residents about EV charging available in the neighborhood; requiring
multifamily buildings to offer charging access for all units (reach code); exploring offering
incentives for multifamily EV charging; looking into grant opportunities, partnerships, and
pilot efforts; engaging with property owners; and considering other e-mobility options such
as scooters and bikes.
In closing, Ms. Michael shared the link to the EV Action Plan and indicated it is meant to
be a working document:
https://www.burlingame.org/departments/sustainability/ev_charging_stations.php.
Commissioner Leigh inquired how the City is encouraging or putting in bike and scooter
charging abilities and asked how many charging stations are planned around the
Broadway/Carmelita area as there are a lot of old multifamily buildings in the vicinity. Ms.
Michael responded to say there are six fast charging stations near Broadway, which are
not heavily used. Ms. Michael stated she is looking into a postcard campaign to inform the
residents in the area. For bike and scooter charging, Ms. Michael said they can be charged
using a standard outlet.
Commissioner Israelit asked if the City has completed any kind of survey of residents to
find out how many people have an electric car or for those that plan to purchase one in
the future. She also asked if the City has looked at the ability to install chargers between
the curb and street, as many people do not use their garages for vehicle storage/charging
3
or could potentially be used to charge a second electric vehicle. Ms. Michael said the City
conducted a survey and received about 200 responses. She stated she would share the
survey with Mr. Wong who could then distribute it to the Commissioners. As for the
possibility of charging on the street, Ms. Michael said she has not heard of a private
curbside charging station but said she would look into it.
Vice-Chair Martos clarified the new reach code to require all new developments to provide
EV chargers is already in effect. He requested Ms. Michael to explain the requirement to
provide charging stations to all units in a multifamily building. Ms. Michael provided an
example, with 100 units, 10% or 10 spaces must have level 2 charging that is open to all
residents but each remaining parking spot (90) need to have one standard outlet.
Chair Wettan inquired about whether staff has talked to any landlords, particularly those
with older buildings. Ms. Michael said they have primarily focused on new development
but is something she is very much interested in doing. He asked if Ms. Michael has talked
to other cities in regards to the challenge of providing adequate charging stations to which
Ms. Michael said PCE has been engaging with property owners in other cities. Ms. Michael
said she was happy to reach out to the landlords but would need to obtain contact
information first. Chair Wettan asked about the permitting process to install EV chargers
for multifamily buildings and whether the process was streamlined for them—not just
homeowners. Based on communication with the Building Department, Ms. Michael said
she is not aware of any multifamily permits for EV chargers or the challenges they may
face but thought it would depend on the age of the building and the electric system. Chair
Wettan continued to ask clarifying questions and provide suggestions for engagement with
property owners before moving on to item 6.c.
No public comments were received for this item.
Vice-Chair Martos quickly confirmed with Ms. Michael that only new vehicles need to be
electric by 2030 and existing vehicles can still be gas powered.
c) Old Bayshore Highway Feasibility Update
Mr. Wong stated this item was presented to TSPC back in August and indicated as part
of the feedback received, the consultants are providing another update which reflects the
entire corridor. Mr. Wong stated the project is a feasibility study and with it they hope to
provide the developers with guidelines, as well as what we want the area to look like. He
said there is currently no funding to expand to final design but with this effort, the City will
be able to go after grant funding. Mr. Wong then turned it over to Brian Fletcher with
Callandar Associates and Jason Mansfield with BKF to lead the presentation.
Mr. Fletcher stated they are presenting the preferred alternative plan this evening that
includes more detail and they will use additional input from tonight’s meeting for the final
report, which will have general guidelines for the development of the corridor, and
ultimately be presented to City Council. After going over the process to date, including
4
outreach efforts, Mr. Fletcher reviewed the three alternatives considered, with the
preferred alternative being Alternative 2. He said Alternative 2 includes one lane in both
directions with a center turn lane. Mr. Fletcher said other basic concepts for Alternative 2
include center medians for additional landscaping where feasible, green infrastructure in
medians and planter strips, bus pull outs, vertical connections to the Bay Trail, and ways
to address Sea Level Rise. He then reviewed the entire corridor in more detail, with
identified lane configurations, locations of medians, gateway signs, and connection points.
For specific details, please refer to the presentation.
Chair Wettan requested Commissioner questions before opening the public comment
period.
Mr. Hutar, a resident of Burlingame and CEO of San Mateo County/Silicon Valley
Convention & Visitors Bureau, applauded the plan. He said making the north side of Old
Bayshore complimentary to what we have to the south is a win-win. Mr. Hutar felt that
making the Bay Trail a continuous and complete system would be paramount from a
visitor’s perspective. He stated the plan complements the overall vision and allows for
more micro mobility. Mr. Hutar then inquired about a feasible timeline, stating it has
become apparent that the corporate market will remain shuttered for a foreseeable period
of time and the sooner they see improvements for the leisure-oriented traveler, the better
it will be for hotel occupancy.
Lisa Kershner, a resident of Burlingame and General Manager of the SFO Marriott said
5
she had nothing but praise and conveyed her excitement. She stated it will be an
improvement for the visitors they hope will be returning to Burlingame very soon. Ms.
Kershner also stated that prior to the pandemic, they were very lucky to enjoy occupancies
over 90%. She said the attraction and appeal to Old Bayshore and the Bay Trail is very
important to visitors and residents. Ms. Kershner indicated she is all for everything that
has been presented and suggested the consideration of wayfinding for both residents and
visitors (how to get to downtown Burlingame, Broadway, BART, etc.). She explained the
Marriott maintains a little over 9 acres, including the Trail in front of their property, but there
is a lot of trash and dog waste on the Bay Trail, such as in the vicinity of the Elephant Bar.
Ms. Kershner said it can be messy and embarrassing and suggested plentiful trash bins
and dog waste stations in an effort to encourage cleanliness. Additionally, she suggested
mile markers along the Bay Trail for those walking and running. In closing she pointed out
the importance of safety at night and was happy about the lighting discussion, but
suggested lighting on the path too and the importance of clearly marked pedestrian
crossways.
Chair Wettan closed the public comment period.
Commissioner Israelit said she was really happy to see the vertical connections and felt it
will be an amazing improvement to the area. She thanked the consultants for doing such
a great job.
Commissioner Leigh shared a story about visitors from France and their experience
walking from the Hyatt to Downtown Broadway. She described them walking north on the
sidewalk along the Hyatt, then they ran past the Hwy 101 entrance, crossed Broadway
and made their way to Downtown. Commissioner Leigh stated this issue needs to be
addressed as people will walk the shortest route to their destination.
Vice-Chair Martos did not have any additional comments.
Chair Wettan said he felt this was one of the most thoughtful plans he has seen come
before the TSPC and he had very little questions. He closed by stating the plan was very
thoughtful and will be great for our City and hotels, which is an important part of our
economy.
d) Transportation Development Act Article 3 Grant Update
Mr. Wong went over a presentation regarding the recent Call for Projects for the
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Program. He provided the Commission
with an overview of the program, eligible projects, funding, schedule, and project selection
before going over the proposed project to submit for grant funding.
Mr. Wong indicated the area of focus for this Call for Projects will be quick-build
improvements in the area of Davis Drive, Trousdale Drive, and Murchison Drive.
6
He said for Murchison Drive, the proposal is to have a separated bikeway. For Trousdale
Drive, he stated the proposal is for a road diet and striping improvements. Mr. Wong
explained there are no improvements identified for Davis Drive, but the intent would be to
outreach the community for improvements on Davis Drive if awarded the grant funds. He
said the hope is that the Commission will provide a letter of support or suggest other
projects for the grant opportunity, keeping in mind the deadline to submit the application
is November 15.
Commissioner Leigh stated she was pleased with the three choices, as two are called out
in the Bike and Ped Plan, and the other is near a school.
Commissioner Israelit said she agreed with Commissioner Leigh in that the proposed
improvements sound great.
Vice-Chair Martos indicated he agreed with his fellow Commissioners. He then asked Mr.
Wong about the priority of the three locations and how we would rank/allocate funds
between the three locations. Mr. Wong explained they should be able to fund the quick-
build improvements at all three locations.
Chair Wettan stated Davis Drive overlaps the study they are doing related to BIS Safe
Routes to School and wondered if that would be the strongest opportunity by aligning
improvement strategies to alleviate the BIS situation.
Mr. Wong reiterated there is no concept for Davis Drive but they would outreach the school
and community for those improvements if awarded the grant. He also reminded the
Commission they would be requesting a letter of support from TSPC and B/PAC.
Commissioner Leigh confirmed that B/PAC would be happy to provide a letter of support
for the proposed projects.
Chair Wettan opened the public comment period.
B/PAC Chair Lesley Beatty provided the following email which was read for the record by
the Commission Secretary.
Hi,
Sorry to email this BPAC comment, I needed to jump off. The BPAC is supportive
of the bike lanes proposed for the 3 streets - Murchison, Trousdale and Davis. All
of these areas are very important with respect to schools, the Millbrae Caltrain
Station, and shopping centers. Davis was recently identified as a priority for bike
facilities in the BIS walk audit. BPAC thinks it's a smart proposal for this grant
application, assuming that we are talking about bike lanes on all 3 streets. We also
think that the designs are straightforward enough and we are far enough along
talking about them that Burlingame can present designs that are beyond the initial
concepts, which will enhance our chances of winning this grant. We will be happy
7
to write a letter of support for this project pending details.
Thanks,
Lesley
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Engineering Division Reports
• Broadway Grade Separation Project – Staff to provide the City Council a project
update at an upcoming meeting.
• Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvements – Contractor has started
project. Construction will not impact Broadway businesses during upcoming
holiday season.
• Highland Parking Garage Update – Garage ribbon cutting held on October 14,
2021 at 11 am. Chair Wettan and Vice-Chair Martos were present for the event.
Commissioner Leigh inquired about the details of the Broadway Pedestrian Street
Lighting Improvements Project to which Mr. Wong explained the majority of it is
replacement of streetlights, but it also includes some minimal sidewalk work as a result
of the streetlight replacements.
b) Police Department Reports
Sergeant Perna reviewed the Collision Report and noted there were 17 documented
collisions. He pointed out there was a vehicle/bicycle collision on Rollins Road. Sergeant
Perna stated there were no pedestrian-related collisions.
Commissioner Leigh requested the details surrounding the bicycle collision on Rollins
Road. Sergeant Perna said it appeared the driver did not provide enough space for the
bicyclist, which is a vehicle code violation. He explained they were both traveling
northbound and the bicyclist did not see or hear the vehicle approaching from the rear.
Chair Wettan inquired about the collisions on El Camino Real at Carmelita Avenue and
Oak Grove Avenue. Sergeant Perna said the collision at Carmelita Avenue was due to a
failure to yield, more specifically he shared the vehicle was traveling northbound on
Carmelita and made a left turn on to westbound Carmelita and hit the vehicle with the
right-of-way traveling southbound on Carmelita. For the accident at the intersection of El
Camino Real and Oak Grove Avenue, Sergeant Perna said the driver at fault was traveling
southbound on El Camino Real and turned left onto eastbound Oak Grove Avenue and
did not yield to the motorist traveling northbound.
8
c) Farmer’s Market
Chair Wettan indicated he has not yet reached out and has nothing to report this month.
d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications
Chair Wettan stated he has received a lot of low-grade complaints about items the
Commission is currently addressing—southbound California Drive north of Broadway and
current conditions surrounding BIS.
8. COMMISSION & SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)
Chair Wettan stated the subcommittee met up today at the Highland Parking Garage
Ribbon Cutting. He said downtown parking patterns are still TBD and inquired about
upcoming updates pertaining to the restaurant parklets.
b) Broadway Parking/Traffic Issues (Israelit & Leigh)
Commissioner Leigh inquired about how staff is doing with the recommendations that were
submitted back in May. Mr. Wong said they are well aware of the list, which has been
provided to the Traffic Engineer as well.
Commissioner Israelit asked Mr. Wong to remind them when TSPC would receive another
presentation regarding California Drive north of Broadway. Mr. Wong responded to say
the item would be brought back to TSPC next month.
c) School Traffic (Israelit & Wettan)
No update; discussed earlier as part of discussion item 6.d.
d) Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Rebelos & Wettan)
No update.
e) Community Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory (Leigh & Rebelos)
No update.
9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
• California Drive
• TDA Article 3 Grant
• AB43 – Local authority over speed limits
9
• BIS walk audit – next steps
• Former Commissioner Bush acknowledgement
10. ADJOURNMENT 9:50 p.m.
1
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Wednesday, November 10, 2021
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:05 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leigh, Israelit, Martos, Rebelos
MEMBERS ABSENT: Wettan
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) September 9, 2021 Meeting Minutes
Motion: To accept the September 9, 2021 Meeting Minutes as submitted.
M/S/C; Rebelos/Israelit, 3/1/1
b) October 14, 2021 Meeting Minutes (to be approved at the December TSPC meeting)
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA
No public comments received.
6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
a) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only)
Commissioner Leigh stated she thought B/PAC Chair Lesley Beatty would be unable to
make it to the meeting. Commissioner Leigh stated she happily went to see the new
parking garage on Highland and it was dark when she went. She stated she shared with
Ms. Beatty she observed there is a lot of space on the ground floor for a bike rack or two
and requested staff to consider the idea. Additionally, she felt staff should be considering
this for future parking lot projects as well.
2
Mr. Wong shared that Sigalle Michael also pointed out the lack of bike racks and staff has
identified a location to install one towards the Highland side.
Commissioner Rebelos said he is concerned about bike racks making bikes more
vulnerable and suggested bike lockers instead. Mr. Wong said bike racks are costly but
indicated staff would look into the suggestion.
b) California Drive Parking Update
Mr. Wong explained this item is to discuss parking north of Broadway and what to do about
the queuing on California Drive. He stated the purpose of this item is to gather additional
input before coming back to the TSPC with the final proposal. He then turned it over to
Transportation Engineer Michael Tsai to provide the presentation.
Michael Tsai provided a project overview of the proposed traffic lane reconfiguration and
stated the project area along California Drive is between Broadway and Juanita. This
evening, he stated the intent is to continue the discussion held at the February 2020 TSPC
meeting by addressing traffic concerns, presenting the concept design, and going over
parking impacts and solutions; to improve how the roadway is utilized; and to continue to
develop a facility that meets the needs of all modes of transportation.
Mr. Tsai shared the number one complaint in the area of focus is congestion and noted
the southbound traffic will extend past Mills in the afternoon peak. He explained the critical
point is approaching Broadway where the single lane diverts into three travel lanes—two
left-turn lanes and one through lane. Mr. Tsai indicated that staff noticed as cars approach
Broadway, the left-turn lane is underutilized and provided visuals of the approach to
Broadway to illustrate the capacity available, which appears to be due to the one through
lane backing up.
Mr. Tsai said staff took into consideration the comments received in the past from the
Commission and Subcommittee and came up with the proposed lane configuration below.
3
He explained the reconfiguration adds a travel lane to separate the left-turning vehicles and the
through vehicles to avoid the backlog of cars trying to go straight on California Drive. He indicated
by adding a travel lane, the City would have to remove parking of approximately 10 on-street
spaces. Mr. Tsai said the tradeoffs would be increased efficiency of existing signal capacity and
reduced congestion.
Per Mr. Tsai, previous feedback from TSPC and public outreach efforts included the traffic
congestion concerns, the importance of bike lane connectivity, the consideration of restricting left
turns onto Rhinette, the impact of parking removal to businesses, and the consideration of
modifying time restrictions in Parking Lot S. Additionally, Mr. Tsai shared the two-day parking
utilization study conducted with the consideration to modify Parking Lot S, which is still on the
table. Please see below for results of the parking utilization study.
In closing, Mr. Tsai went over the next steps, which include the incorporation of comments
received from tonight’s meeting, coming back to the TSPC with a draft report for official
consideration/a motion, and ultimately bringing this item to the City Council for consideration.
Vice-Chair Martos opened the public comment period.
Mr. Velasco stated he lives three blocks away and feels the main issue at this location is not the
parking, it is the signal on California at Broadway and Broadway/Carolan Avenue, which he felt
operates inefficiently. He clarified this is not a detection issue. Mr. Velasco said the signal is not
programmed optimally and has reached the end of its useful life. He felt money should be spent
at this location as opposed to the intersection of Oak Grove and Carolan. Additionally, Mr. Velasco
stated he is against the bike lane curbside as there will always be a car blocking the lane. Lastly,
he requested to obtain B/PAC feedback on this proposal.
Mr. Catlyn, who works at the corner of Juanita and Broadway, said he is speaking as a bicycle
commuter and as someone who works for different clients along this stretch of Broadway. He
4
indicated he has been hit in this area before, he has had to break quickly for cars encroaching in
the bike lane, and said it is a dangerous situation. Mr. Catlyn said he agreed with Mr. Velasco’s
comments and doesn’t think it’s a question of adding more lanes as he stated it doesn’t reduce
congestion. He mentioned options to address the signal and suggested better signage, and
possibly redirecting cars to the alternate freeway access in Millbrae. Additionally, Mr. Catlyn
stated the business have been hammered already with the removal of the lot across California
Drive. In closing, he said he has seen drivers in the bike lane and on the sidewalk so he
understands people feel quite passionate about this stretch of road but was unsure if the current
proposal was the right way to address the problem.
Vice-Chair Martos closed public comment.
Commissioner Rebelos inquired why there are so many cars on California Drive and where they
are coming from. Commissioner Leigh stated the afternoon peak is due to school traffic.
Commissioner Rebelos stated he avoids that intersection at all costs and said the bike lane is an
issue. He said he feels something is missing in the study and stated if traffic is due to the schools,
why are people trying to get to Highway 101 southbound. Commissioner Israelit clarified that the
traffic is also due to the hospital shift change at 3 pm and stated it has been consistent for years.
Commissioner Rebelos wondered if there was a way to redirect people to a more sensible route.
He then asked what it meant to modify Parking Lot S. Mr. Tsai clarified the intent is to modify the
parking hours.
In terms of the design, Commissioner Rebelos said he likes the design but would like to see some
separation between the bike lane and traffic lanes because he agrees that cars will park in the
bike lane given the businesses there. He said he would endorse this plan only because it is better
than the current configuration but would want to have some delineators or something to prevent
cars from double parking. Mr. Tsai responded to say that is still on the table and then reviewed
the lane widths. He explained the area is very tight but would see if there is an area to introduce
some raised delineation. He also shared the minimum width is 1.5 feet to do that, which has to
come from somewhere else. Mr. Tsai suggested to bring this idea to B/PAC for consideration and
feedback, and to the City’s designer. In his closing comments, Commissioner Rebelos said he
would love to find out if there is a way to put up signage at Trousdale near El Camino Real near
the various medical facilities to direct medical employees to Millbrae in order to access Highway
101.
Commissioner Leigh stated part of the problem is left-turn lane #2 because those drivers are
trying to access northbound Highway 101 and are required to dash over three lanes to access
the onramp. She suggested to look at the eastbound traffic on Broadway where it turns to three
lanes just before Rollins Road. Commissioner Leigh suggested the far right hand lane on
Broadway be converted to a right turn only onto Rollins Road in an effort help those turning left
from California Drive. Additionally, Commissioner Leigh felt Mr. Velasco’s public comment was
great in terms of looking at upgrading the traffic lights. She said she has also often thought that
the right-hand left-turn lane to turn east onto Broadway should be a straight-ahead and a left-turn
lane. Commissioner Leigh then said we are expanding the capacity of the roadway for a street
that is designated as a bike route. She went on to say this is our only north-south route in town
5
since El Camino cannot handle bikers and therefore we should prioritize bikers along California
Drive.
Commissioner Israelit said Parking Lot S never appears to be full and she does not feel the
businesses would be greatly harmed by taking away the on-street parking due to the availability
of parking on the side streets and in Parking Lot S. She said the City’s current plan does improve
bike safety by not having bikers weave through traffic to get to the dashed green spot and there
are no door zone concerns. Commissioner Israelit stated she has not witnessed double parking
but it would be an enforcement issue by the Police Department. As far as signal improvement,
she said it would be ideal and shared the City has attempted to improve the signal timing several
times, but still felt changing the lane configuration is planning for the future based on upcoming
development. Additionally, she did not think the lane changes would increase the number of
commuters on this road; it makes it a safer intersection.
Vice-Chair Martos confirmed with Mr. Wong that this concept would go to B/PAC for comments.
In regards to the dedicated southbound right-turn lane onto Broadway, he inquired about the
impacts. Mr. Wong explained that it would make the signal less effective; in order to make the
through and left turn lane he said you would have to split phase the signal. As a result, Mr. Wong
said they could not go simultaneously. He went on to say eventually there would be a signal
upgrade but until there is a hard timeline on the Grade Separation, they won’t install anything that
could potentially be removed. Vice-Chair Martos inquired about the timing of the spaces in Parking
Lot S. Mr. Wong stated they are mostly long-term spaces with a few short-term spaces. Mr. Wong
stated they could possibly promote it for employee parking in order to free up spaces closer or
consider additional short-term spaces in Parking Lot S to help with parking for the local
businesses.
Vice-Chair Martos stated he agrees with his colleagues in that this design is an improvement over
what we currently have—he said he never liked the crisscrossing of traffic with the bike lane. Vice-
Chair Martos indicated he has gone back and forth regarding the removal of parking and felt
making less long-term parking would assist with that, but also would like employees to have the
ability to use the long-term parking where the trailer was. Overall, he said he is in favor of the
concept design with the consideration of additional short-term parking in Lot S.
Mr. Wong thanked the Commission for their feedback and stated they would share it with the
Community B/PAC and ultimately come back to TSPC with a formalized plan for consideration.
Commissioner Israelit thanked staff and said how thankful she is for their efforts.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Engineering Division Reports
Mr. Wong provided an update on the following Public Works/Engineering projects.
• Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvements – Foundations are
6
currently being installed and the streetlights have been ordered (ETA late
February/early March). Construction will not impact Broadway businesses during
upcoming holiday season.
• Highland Parking Garage Update – Garage fully operational. Upper level parking
is not currently being utilized. Mr. Wong said they plan to do additional outreach
and will consider additional signage.
• Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Grant – Staff is on schedule
to submit the grant application by the November 15 deadline.
• Trousdale/Loyola Improvements – The work order for increased red-curbing has
been submitted which should assist with visibility.
Commissioner Leigh stated crosswalks are not high visibility leading to the new parking
garage, the stop signs are low visibility, and the street lights do not illuminate the
crosswalks. She said she also observed drivers behaving poorly and inquired with staff
about efforts to improve pedestrian visibility. Mr. Wong stated that particular location has
been identified for quick-build improvements, which staff is currently working on. He
explained the overhead lighting is not part of the quick-build improvements but they could
look into that. Commissioner Leigh clarified she would like the lighting redirected over the
crosswalks to illuminate the pedestrians.
TSPC Priority List (revised November 2021):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 5/13/21: Item 6b
2 School Transportation and Safety Issues 1/14/21: Item 7a
3 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 4/8/21: Item 7a
4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming/Controls 2/11/21: Item 7a
5 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (s/o Broadway) 10/14/21: Item 6c
6 Electric Vehicle Discussion with Planning 10/14/21: Item 6b
7 Downtown Parking and Access 10/14/21: Item 7a
8 Broadway Parking 2/11/21: Item 7a
9 Citywide Transportation Alternatives 10/14/21: Item 6b
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 4/8/21: Item 7a
2 Hoover School Update 8/12/21: Item 7a
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 7/8/21: Item 6c
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/11/19: Item 6b
5 California Roundabout 5/9/19: Item 7a
7
6 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 3/11/21: Item 6b
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 1/14/21: Item 7a
8 Rec Center Parking 3/12/20: Item 7a
9 Old Bayshore Corridor Study 10/14/21: Item 6c
10 Grant Opportunities 10/14/21: Item 6d
11 Broadway Grade Separation 8/12/21: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 5/13/21: Item 7a
13 School Speed Limit Updates 6/13/19, Item 7a
14 School Safety Improvements 3/12/20: Item 7a
15 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 8/12//21: Item 7a
16 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 12/10/20: Item 7a
17 Broadway/California Update 11/10/21: Item 6b
2021 Agenda Item Action Status
1 Highland Garage Parking Restrictions Approved by Council February
16, 2021
b) Police Department Reports
Sergeant Perna provided the Collision Report and stated there were 14 documented
collisions with seven of them on El Camino Real (ECR). He stated one of the collisions on
ECR was a double fatal collision that occurred around midnight on October 18. He
explained a vehicle traveling northbound on ECR lost control and struck a very large tree
on the east side of El Camino near Carmelita. Sergeant Perna said it was one of the worst
accidents he has seen in Burlingame. He also stated it was the first night of rainy weather
and although the investigation is ongoing, he stated speed was definitely a factor.
Sergeant Perna said the other collisions on ECR involved typical failure to yield/unsafe
turning movements. He stated there were no documented collisions this reporting period
with pedestrians or bicyclists.
Commissioner Israelit inquired if seatbelts were on in the fatal collision on ECR. Sergeant
Perna stated preliminary reports indicate seatbelts were not on. He also stated the vehicle
was a late 90’s sedan, which does not have the same safety features we have in newer
vehicles.
Commissioner Rebelos pointed out we have had two late-night collisions in Burlingame
over the last two months and he thought speed was a factor in both collisions. He
wondered if preliminary reports indicate if the vehicle was trying to avoid hitting another
car, did they have a red light, etc. Sergeant Perna explained another vehicle was involved
but they don’t feel it was the primary collision factor. Sergeant Perna also explained the
lights on ECR go from the timed lights to flashing amber at midnight and since the collision
occurred shortly after midnight, he stated there may have also been some confusion with
8
the lights. Commissioner Rebelos closed his comments to say he does not think the
collisions were avoidable at this point but he is concerned about the late night accidents.
c) Farmer’s Market
Vice-Chair Martos said they would consider TSPC presence at the Farmer’s Market next
year.
d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications
Commissioner Leigh stated she received an email from Manito Velasco regarding AB 43,
which provides the ability to reduce speed limits to 20 MPH in business zones.
Commissioner Leigh suggested the consideration to reduce the speed limit to 20 MPH
from Burlingame Avenue, south on California Drive all the way to Peninsula Avenue. She
said this would assist bikers and make the area more bike friendly.
Commissioner Rebelos stated the Skyline Terrace Apartments have installed 22 EV
charging stations and he just wanted to commend them for doing that.
8. COMMISSION & SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)
No new updates. With Commissioner Wettan being retired from TSPC, Vice-Chair Martos
said they would be reestablishing the committee.
b) Broadway Parking/Traffic Issues (Israelit & Leigh)
No new updates.
c) School Traffic (Israelit & Wettan)
No new updates.
d) Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Rebelos & Wettan)
No new updates.
e) Community Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory (Leigh & Rebelos)
No new updates. Commissioner Leigh just reiterated her desire for B/PAC to weigh in on
the proposed lane reconfiguration on California Drive north of Broadway.
9
9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
• Vote on new Chair and Vice-Chair
• AB 43 to reduce vehicle speeds
• Vehicle speed specifically on Trousdale at Loyola
• Time duration of parking for downtown businesses
10. ADJOURNMENT 8:36 p.m.
12/6/2021
1
Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting
Improvements Project
Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
December 9, 2021
PROJECT BACKGROUND
•In November 2016, the City submitted an application for funding under
the MTC’s One Bay Area Grant 2 (OBAG2) Transportation for Livable
Communities (TLC) Program for the pedestrian lighting improvements.
San Mateo County & the City Association of Governments (C/CAG)
awarded the City $720,000.
•Last of 3 OBAG2 Projects (Hoover Pedestrian Improvements, 2020
Federal Resurfacing).
•Project to remove and replace existing pedestrian street lights, install
new pedestrian street lights with new conduits and wiring along
Broadway between El Camino Real and Rollins Road.
•Project work would also include removal and replacement of asphalt
pavement and sidewalk for restoration purposes.
•Project was awarded to Bay Area Lightworks at the August 16, 2021
Council meeting.
12/6/2021
2
STREET LIGHT DETAIL
•Total of 42 new street lights
•22 existing locations
•20 new locations
•16 ECR to California
•4 California to Rollins
•Street light poles to match style of the
existing poles on Broadway Interchange
Project
•Existing LEDs were first generation, all
new lighting to be the latest generation
PHOTOMETRICS
EXISTING
DESIGNED
12/6/2021
3
PROJECT SCHEDULE
•December 2021: All new pole foundations installed
•Work to cease during holiday season
•March 2022: Poles to arrive
•April 2022: Installation of poles and wiring
•May 2022: All work anticipated to be completed
(weather permitting)
QUESTIONS
1
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NO:
7a.
MEETING DATE:
December 9, 2021
To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
Date: December 9, 2021
From: Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer – (650) 558-7230
Subject: Engineering Division Reports
RECOMMENDAT ION
Staff recommends that the Commission receive an update provided by staff on various Public
Works – Engineering projects and activities.
BACKGROUND
• Highland Parking Garage Update – Garage fully operational. Observations made
during the last week of November indicated over 200 spaces available.
• Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Grant – Staff submitted the grant
application by the November 15 deadline. Staff to present project to the San Mateo
County BPAC in January 2022.
TSPC Priority List (revised November 2021):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 5/13/21: Item 6b
2 School Transportation and Safety Issues 1/14/21: Item 7a
3 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 4/8/21: Item 7a
4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming/Controls 2/11/21: Item 7a
5 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (s/o Broadway) 10/14/21: Item 6c
6 Electric Vehicle Discussion with Planning 10/14/21: Item 6b
7 Downtown Parking and Access 10/14/21: Item 7a
8 Broadway Parking 2/11/21: Item 7a
9 Citywide Transportation Alternatives 10/14/21: Item 6b
Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports December 9, 2021
2
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 4/8/21: Item 7a
2 Hoover School Update 8/12/21: Item 7a
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 7/8/21: Item 6c
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/11/19: Item 6b
5 California Roundabout 5/9/19: Item 7a
6 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 3/11/21: Item 6b
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 1/14/21: Item 7a
8 Rec Center Parking 3/12/20: Item 7a
9 Old Bayshore Corridor Study 10/14/21: Item 6c
10 Grant Opportunities 10/14/21: Item 6d
11 Broadway Grade Separation 8/12/21: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 5/13/21: Item 7a
13 School Speed Limit Updates 6/13/19, Item 7a
14 School Safety Improvements 3/12/20: Item 7a
15 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 8/12//21: Item 7a
16 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 12/10/20: Item 7a
17 Broadway/California Update 11/10/21: Item 6b
2021 Agenda Item Action Status
1 Highland Garage Parking Restrictions Approved by Council February
16, 2021
DISCUSSION
Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety
and Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that
would typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City Capital
Improvement Projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are
addressed as Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6).
Case #Date Time Locale Speed
Limit
Minor
Injuries
Major
Injuries
DUI
Involved
Collision Type Caused By
Juve?
Primary Collision
Factor
Hit & Run
Misd.
Hit & Run
Felony
Occurred On At Intersection Other Location Vehicle Involved With
BRM2103207 11/24/2021 1531 Street 35 1 0 T Vehicle-Object F 23152(a) cvc F F AIRPORT BL BAYVIEW PL Fixed object
BRM2103029 11/04/2021 653 Street 30 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350 cvc T F BROADWAY CALIFORNIA DR Other motor vehicle
BRM2103051 11/06/2021 1800 Intersection 35 4 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21453(a) VC F F BROADWAY 101 S ONRAMP Other motor vehicle
BRM2103261 11/30/2021 820 Intersection 25 1 0 F Vehicle-Pedestrian F 21950(a) cvc F F CABRILLO AV EASTON DR Pedestrian
BRM2103043 11/05/2021 2013 Street 35 3 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350(A)F F CALIFORNIA DR TROUSDALE DR Other motor vehicle
BRM2103246 11/29/2021 942 Other 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Object F 22106 CVC F F CHAPIN AV SR-82 (EL CAMINO Fixed object
BRM2103275 11/30/2021 1518 Intersection 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21802(a) VC F F HIGHLAND AV HOWARD AV Other motor vehicle
BRM2103144 11/16/2021 1541 Intersection 25 0 0 T Vehicle-Vehicle F CVC23152(a)F F HOWARD AV CALIFORNIA DR Other motor vehicle
BRM2103049 11/06/2021 1232 Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Pedestrian F 21950(a) cvc F F LORTON AV HOWARD AV Pedestrian
BRM2103117 11/14/2021 1056 Intersection 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21801(a) CVC F F SR-82 (EL CAMINO HOWARD AV Other motor vehicle
BRM2103119 11/14/2021 1850 Street 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Object F 22350 VC F F SR-82 (EL CAMINO RAY DRIVE Other object
BRM2103177 11/20/2021 2034 Street 35 0 1 F Vehicle-Pedestrian F 21954(A) VC F F SR-82 (EL CAMINO RAY DR Pedestrian
BRM2103263 11/30/2021 1152 Intersection 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21801(A)CVC F F SR-82 (EL CAMINO CHAPIN AV Other motor vehicle
13 Accidents