HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1973.04.094:i7
Burlingame, California
Aprit 9, 1973
CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned meeting of the Burlingame city Council, from its meeting of
March 14, 1973, was called to order on the above date at 8:10 p.m. by
uayor victor A. Mangini.
PIEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At the Chairrs invitation, councilman crosby letl the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
ROIL CA],L
Present :
Absent :
councilmen:
councilmen:
Amstrup-Crosby-Cusick- Mangini-Martin
None
PURPOSE OF MEETING
l'layor Mangini announced that this was the second in a series of hearings called
by the Council to gather public reaction to the Burlingame Avenue Area Parking
Study preparced by De Leuw, Cather & Company. Mayor Mangini then relinquished
the Chair to Councilman Martin, Council liaison in matters of off-street parking.
Chairman Martin stated that the topic of discuss.ion will be "Inprovenent ALterna-
tives," the first 10 items in Table 7, Page 35 of the report, \rherein the consultants
propose restriping and conversion of some lots to provide long-term parking. The
consultants find there is a surplus of 355 short-term spaces and a deficiency in
long-term of approxirately 381 spaces.
The city Engineer reported engineering feasibility studies were made and his
assistant, Robert Davidson, is prepared to project transparencies on a screen if
the council desires.
CONSUI,TAMSI PROPOSA],S
ICrI L: CONVERT TO LONG-TERM. Gain 17 IrT spaces. (Rear of Wel1s Fargo Bank on
Prjrrose Road, between Ho\rard and Burlingame Avenues. Presently 2-hour.)
City Engineer indicated no problems frcm an engineering standpoint. Proposal will
not alter location or number of spaces. Eor the benefit of persons absent from
the initial hearing on the consultants I recommendations, the Chair announced that
the consensus of the audience on that occasion appeared to be that "all day'r lots
on the perimeter of the Parking distriet probatrly should be metered, that rrshopper"
or core lots not be metered and, for the present, on-stneet meter fees not be
changed. As yet, the councj-I has made no decision on any changes.
Fo1lolring an announcement of ground rules, the Chair invited colunents from the
floor.
Lawrence Puunan, 1547 Cypress Avenue, stated that the Chandcer of Corunerce has
not taken a definite position on the phase of the study no}, being considered by
the council, except that the chamber disagrees with the consultants' findings
that there is a surplus of short-term parking. If short-term on-street spaces on
the perimeter of the District were included, these should be discounted because
shoppers, for the most part, will not walk any distance but tend to Iook for parking
that they consider convenient. He stated that short-term on-street spaces tlro
to three blocks avray from t}Ie shops may not be beneficial to eithen shoppers or
merchants .
Councilman Amstrup asked about ownership of the allel.way adjacent to the parking
1ot. The City Engj.neer advised it is city-owned but the parking areas at the
rear of the buildings that front on Burlingame Avenue ar.e privately owned.
,138
Councilman Crosby stated he was not convinced there is an overage of short-term
spaces nor that Lot L should be converted. He stated he has attempted to park
there on numerous occasions without success, and suggested that long-term use
may have resulted because the two-hour lfuiit is not enforced. Iihen the metelc
maid patrol is initiated and overtime parkers cited, there will probably be a
significant change in the turnoverc factor.
Earry S. Graham, in business at l2L2 eurLingame Lane, stated he j-s aware from
percsonal experience of a defi.ciency in employee parking. Furthermore, the 1ot
adjacent to the post office is fiu-ed to near capacity by 9:00 orclock in the
morning, and something must be done to move all-day parkers out of sholt-term
Iots .
Councilman Cusick commented that the survey was made during the surnmer when business
is normally slow and also during the period of construction on the Avenue, rrhich
kept people away. Eor these reasons, she felt the indicated surplus of short-teEn
spaces may be inaccurate. She suggested that Lot L should be the last to be
metereal because there wj-lI be the usual influx of shoppers prior to school opening
and during the holiday season.
CONVERT CHAPIN AVENUE CURB TO LONG-TERM. cain 30 LT spaces .
The City Engineer reported there is currently 2-hour urunetened parking and that
it has been his position for some tilne that a portion of the street could be
considered for long-term parking.
John Chiapelone, in business at 1427 Chapin Avenue, stated his operation is very
much dependent upon in and out traffic. During the peak season, daiLy transactions
vrill run as high as 2OO and, on the average, custouers spend no more than half
an hour on the premises and some, less than 15 minutes. There are six spaces
and two driveways in front of their area but these are not always available to
their customers because new construction on the street has brought in increased
traffic and parking. He stated that h.is business, the beauty shop across the
street, the new savings and loan and the new bank proposed for the corner of
El Camino and Chapin are all representative of the type of operation that creates
customer traffic, and despite parking areas that may be available, there wil,l be
an increase in on-strceet parking.
In response to Chairman MaItinrs inquiry concerning short-term lots on the street,
l,Ir. Chiapelone stated that Lot B-1 and one-half of Lot B axe short-tern and there
is a constant flow of in and out traffic on B-1.
Councilman Crosby recalled there lras sone discussion about parking in the center
of Chapin Avenue. l,trc. Chiapelone rejected the idea as "suicide aIley," Traffic
Director Robert Quinn calleal it irlpractical and the City Engineer felt there would
be a ped.estrian hazard. In response to Chairman Mar.tin, Sergeant Quinn stated
there probably would be spaces for 80 to 85 cars.
Chairman Martin suggested considerati-on to converting one-half of the curb spaces
to long-te.rm, not necessarily all on one side of the street. I'Ir. Chiapelone
stated he !rculd not want spaces 50 feet either way from t}Ie front of his shop to
be changed and that he was reasonably certain that other merchants on the street
would have the same opinion about their frontage spaces.
LOI B- I, CHAPIN AVENUE RESTRIPE, CONVERT TO LONG-TERM. cairl 18 LT spaces.
The City Engineer stated that the report shows Lot B. Thls is incorrect, the
reference should be to Lot B-1. He stated there are 10 spaces existing, the
consultants show 8 new spaces as the result of restriping but they failed to
consider a private driveway that must remain open. His department computes a
net gain of 6. Cost of restriping hrould approxirate S9OO.OO per space ox, for
16 spaces, about 95500. OO.
1412 CHAPIN AVENUE
Consultants report property is for sale and recomnend city acquire for develotrmentto provide 15 spaces.
J;19
John Cockcroft, local realtor, reported he had been infomed that the property
was sold to a business man on ChaPin Avenue.
CONVERI DONMLLY CURB TO LONG-TERM. Gain 18 LT spaces
There were no obj ections to this proposal.
PORIION TO LONG-TERI'ILCrI K RESTRIPE AND CONVERT
to Saferray)
Gain 20 LT spaces. (adjacent
The consultants state that lO new long-term spaces can be added by restriping
rrith mostly 90 degree parking and that 10 more spaces could be converted to
long-term with minjrnun effect on customer parking.
The City Engineer reported this is a two-hour lot with 59 spaces. His department
finds that by good parking and good circulation there can be a gain of 5 spaces.
(This does not take into consideration the consultants' reconmendation of con-
verting 10 spaces to long-term. ) Restniping woulal net a total of 64 spaces at
a cost of approximately $11,0OO.O0, The City Engineer conmented this appears to
be rather a costly project to gain just 5 spaces.
Mr. Davidson discussed the slitle on this Iot, explaining that the city-owned
allel^ray is 20 feet in width. The cousultants alid not show this in their relrort.
Because they anticipated using private areas beyond the cityrs right of way, their
cqnputations are not correct. Mr. Davialson showed the boundary between city-
owned and private parcels and mentioned that the private ovners have a right of
access over the city lot to their parking.
Chairman Martin explained that provision was made in all of the lots for a driveway
to serrvice adjacent private parking when the Parking District was established and
this access cannot be encunbered. Chairman Martin conmented that, in lieu of
restrj-ping at a cost of $1I,000.00, 20 of the existing 59 spaces could be convercted
to Long-term, the only cost would be for meters.
LOI A RESTRIPE. Gain 20 LT spaces ( North line of Donne1ly, extends through to
tibrary Iot.
Referring to the slide, 1"1r. Davidson explained the difference between the cityrs
and the consultants' computations. The city requires that an automobile space
be 20 feet in length and dr.iveways 24 feeL in width. In one area of the consultants I
proposal the length of the space would be neduced to 15 feet because of a driveway.
A smalI car can park in 15 feet rrithout disturbing vehicle movements but the city
has tended alray from smalL-car spaces because of the motoristsr proclivity to park
in any space that j-s available. He stated that, rather than delete a whole row
of parking, the engineering department agreed that 60 degree spaces in some areas
lrou1d be feasible to net a total of 1o4 spaces.
cain 8 LT spaces (west of El Camino between Burlingane andLCTI H RESTR]PE.
Ralston Avenues. )
The City Engineer reported the consultants suggest a total of 77 spaces, his
depa-rtment computes 74. The 77 spaces probably could be accomplished, and the
city's criteria for driveway and stall djrensions preserved, by reducing the
rridth of two planters on the Ralston Avenue frontage. Ee stated that total cost
would be $II,000.00 for 5 atlditional spaces. councilman cusick asked if spaces
next to landscaping could be reserved for smal1 cars. The City Engineer indicated
no objection, except that policing becomes a problan.
LC,I C RESTRIPE. Gain approximately 20 LT spaces (South line of Donnelty, adjacent
to crocker Bank
The consultants recomnend restriping to 90 degree parking to gain 20 spaces
total of 89.
for a
tl,.f
The City Engineer noted that the report shows I1I spaces can be acquired. (Exhibit 4,
Appendjr A) Presently, there are 90 spaces. After thorough study, the engineering
department finds that, \rith proper circulation, proper aisle width and stall width,
14 spaces can be added for a total of LO4, at an approximate cost of St60o.0o
per space, or about $22,OO0.OO.
440
Mr. Davidson showed a slide of the lot and identified location of the driveway
off Primrose Road that is maintained to pxovide access at the rea.r to properties
fronting on Burtingame Avenue. He stated that Smith & Heller and Erniers Liquors
buildings extend to the property line, their rea.r doors open directly on the
drivevray. Several buildings are back of the property line rrith smal-I private parking
areas betvreen the buildings and the driveway. Here, too, are rear doors that
provide pedestrian access from the city parking lot to the Avenue. The consultants
propose parking in this driveway area and if access is to be maintained to the
private properties at least 8 of these spaces should be euillnated. Douglas
Beetlestone, representing Levlz Bros., pointed out that the lot is actually classified
as a shopper lot and it was his understanding spaces would not be changed from 60
to 90 degree in short-term lots, because of difficulty in parking-
Chairman Martin suggested to the City Engineer that further studies be made to
determine j-f a combination of 60 and 90 alegree spaces would be feasible. If the
driveway should be used for parking, the better arrangement might be long-term
because a delivery truck could btock access to the spaces. He recommended consideration
to 90 degree spaces on the perimeter and 60 degree in the center of the lot.
R-ESTRTPE LOI F, cain 21 LT spaces. (Eastercly line of Park Road betvreen Howard and
er
The city Engineer stated this proposal is acceptable from an engineering standpoint.
The Council indicated no objection nor did the audience.
1,OI J RESTRIPE. Gain 19 LT spaces (Formerly City Ha11 site)
The City Engineer reported engineering cotrrputations show a gain of 13 spaces for a
total of 82, as opposed to the consultants I figures of 19 or a total of 88. He
stated the cost hrould be approxirately $32,5OO.OO, which appears to be excessive
and that he was opposed to 90 degree spaces on short-term 1ots.
There were cc,trments frcm the audience and frc,n council members indicating opposition
to the suggestion.
l4r. Beetlestone recorEnended consideration to a turn-around within the Iot in the
vicinity of the landscaped area where the cupola is located. l,Irc. Davidson discussed
the slide on this lot, pointing out some spaces that should be deleted frsr the
consultants' proposal.
EXPANSIOII OF LO'I E Gain 41 LT spaces (Park Road to lorton Avenue, bet$reen BurLingane
and Howard Avenues) .
The Chair referred to the consultants I ccmnents that surface expansion of this lot
lrou1d be desirable if construction of additional parking levels were to be considered,
expansion to involve acquj-sition of Post Office empl-oyee parking lot and present
Jenkel-Davidson buildj-ng.
Ha-rry S. Graham agreed that the Post office tot should be used for short-termparking. He requested that Council consider methods of abating the unsightly
garage structure at the rearc of the Jenkel-Davidson building. Frank Ingersol]-
thought that surface expansion !.as far too costly and irnpractical. He agreed that
an attsnpt should be made to have the garage removed, as suggested by Mr. craham.
SUMMARY
The Chair stated the consensus appeaxs to be:
1. No changes in lot L for the present.
2- Possibility of some long-term spaces on Chapin Avenue, but not imrediately.
3. No reaction pro or con to conversion of DonnelJ-y Avenue curb to Long-term.
4- Some reluctance to restri-ping Lot B-1. Net space gain 16 not 18.
5. I-ot K should not be restriped to 90 degree because it is a shopper 1ot. Net
space gain 15 not 20.
Frank fngerso11, attorney, 216 Park Road, suggested that perhaps landscaped areas
could be reduced and the playground eliminated.
6
7
8
-+11
Restrj-pe Lot A. Net gain 14 spaces not 20.
Restripe Iot H. Net gain 5 spaces not 8.
lot c. Restriping questionable because of 90 alegree situation on a shopper
Iot. The city Engineer anal Mr. Davidson to investigate possibility of
converting some spaces to 90 degree for long-term and the balance of the
spaces to remain at 60 degree, also new patterns of circulation should be
studied.
Lot F. Consultants I rectrmendation satisfactory.
Iot J, No changes for the present. Net space gain 13 not 19.
I.ot E. As the report indicates, expansion depends upon eventual alouble-decking.
1412 Chapin Avenue. The status of this property is unknoun,
q
r0.
11.
12.
SHORT-TERM PARKING, HCI.,ARD AVENUE
The council heard a report fron rrank lngerso11 and John Cockcroft that people
in business on Howard Avenue feel there is insufficient short-term parking. In
the blocks frorn Prim-rose to Lorton Avenues, the merchants believe they are not
getting fuII benefit from the parkj-ng lots and that some short-term spaces should
be made avail.able on Lots G, F. and N. The lots are filled to capacity with
little if any turnove!.
Representatj-ves fron Security Pacific Bank and Peninsula National Bank asked for
increased parking, both short-term anal Iong-term. Expanded green curb zones
was suggested as a method of increasing custorner parki-ng.
tll. Cockcroft stated that a change in on-street meters from long to short-term
plobably lrou1d not be too helpfuli the merchants seem to be more interested in
off-street parking, especj-a1ly those lrho have rea.r exits that are adjacent to
the parking lots.
l4r, Ingersoll agreed with a staternent made earlier by Mr. Putman that the con-
sultants I find.j-ngs of a surplus of short-term spaces is a fallacy. He stated
that inErealiate consideration shouLd be given to double-decking and suggested
lots F, K, A, and H. He suggested that if structures above ground were objec-
tionable in certain areas, subterr.rnean expansion night be feasj-ble.
counciLman Amstrup asked about the number of spaces that would be available if
t}le city lrere to join with Southern Pacific in tleveloping an improved parking
area.
chairman Martj-n reported he has talked informaUy with representatives of Southern
Pacj-fj-c company about jolnt use of their parking 1ot and they seemed wi11in9 to
listen. He asked the City Engineer if an estimate could be prepared on total
spaces if the tlro arreas curently being used for parking, the strip leased by
the city fron san Francisco and the southern Pacific 1ot, were conbined. He
suggested a breakdotn sh@ring nunber of spaces betlreetl Burlingame Avenue and
Bellevue and fron Bellevue north to oak crove.
In response to Mayor Mangini, Sergeant Quinn reporteal that both sides of the
railway right of way south fr@ the depot at Burlingame Avenue is leased to
Arata Pontiac. Councilman Mangini suggested that a parking structure might be
feasible j-n the area of the cityrs and Southern Pacificrs all clay Iots.
Councilman Crosby stated that it appears there may not be sufficient gain in
long-term spaces by restriping and that parking decks r.rilI be the solution.
1,1r. Ingersoll reported that Kenneth Jones has had experience in parking districts
where attrractive decked parking was created. He stated he will attenpt to get
pictures and mone information fron Mr. Jones and report to Council Iater.
Councilmar cusick asked the City Engineer to make a study on cost of metering
Iots G, F, antl N.
With Councit concurrence, Chairman Martin announced that the next meetj-ng rrill
be heltl on wednesday, May 2, at 8:OO p.m. at which time the topic of discussion
412
}rill be future gronth and development in the do[rntown business area. The
Planning comnj-ssion is to be invited.
ADJOURNMET{I
The meeting thereafter adjourned at 1I:15 p.m., to reconvene on wednesalay, May 2,
1973, at 8:00 p.n., in the Council Chalnbers.
ReS u11y submitte
H erbert
City Clerk
te
APPROVED
Victor A., Mayor