HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2021.03.11Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
City of Burlingame
Meeting Agenda
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Online Via Zoom7:00 PMThursday, March 11, 2021
On March 17, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of
the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow for local legislative bodies to conduct their meetings
telephonically or by other electronic means. Pursuant to the Shelter-in-Place Order issued by the San
Mateo County Health Officer on March 16, 2020 (which was then extended on March 31, 2020), the
statewide Shelter-in-Place Order issued by the Governor in Executive Order N-33-20 on March 19,
2020, and the CDC's social distancing guidelines which discourage large public gatherings, the Council
Chambers will not be open to the public for the March 11, 2021 meeting of the Burlingame Traffic
Safety and Parking Commission.
Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below.
Additionally, the meeting will be streamed live on Youtube and uploaded to the City's website after the
meeting.
Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame.org.
Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting or note that
your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda. The length of the emailed comment should
commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is
approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Traffic Safety
and Parking Commission for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00
p.m. on March 11, 2021. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time, but
cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 p.m.
deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission after the meeting.
Members of the public may comment on any action or study item appearing on the agenda at the time
it is called. Comments on other items should be made under agenda item #5. Provision of identifying
information is optional but assists in preparation of the minutes. All votes are unanimous unless
separately voted for the record.
1. Call To Order
To Join the Zoom Webinar Meeting (Note - the link below doesn't look like a hyperlink, but it is):
https://zoom.us/j/98029553198?pwd=bzNkN1dnbkI3QkdpS0xMaFVUWVp0QT09
Passcode: 864354
Or iPhone one-tap:
US: +16699006833,,98029553198#,,,,*864354# or +12532158782,,98029553198#,,,,*864354#
Or Telephone:
Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 205 6099 or
+1 301 715 8592
Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 3/10/2021
March 11, 2021Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission
Meeting Agenda
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
February 11, 2021 Meeting Minutesa.
Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to
suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from
acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The
Commission Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers.
5. Public Comments: Non-Agenda
6. Discussion/Action Items
Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only)a.
Oak Grove/Carolan Avenue Traffic Signal and Pedestrian Improvementsb.
PresentationAttachments:
7. Information Items
Engineering Division Reportsa.
Staff Report
Attachment 1
Attachments:
Police Department Reportsb.
Collision ReportAttachments:
Farmer's Marketc.
TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communicationsd.
8. Committee & Sub-Committee Reports
Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)a.
Broadway Issues (Israelit & Leigh)b.
Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 3/10/2021
March 11, 2021Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission
Meeting Agenda
School Traffic (Israelit & Wettan)c.
Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Wettan & Vacant)d.
9. Future Agenda Items
10. Adjournment
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at
650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public viewing at the City Clerk's office, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the
meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are
available on the site.
NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: April 8, 2021
Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 3/10/2021
1
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Thursday, February 11, 2021
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:05 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leigh, Israelit, Martos, Wettan
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) January 14, 2021 Meeting Minutes
Motion: To accept the January 14, 2021 Meeting Minutes as written.
M/S/C; Leigh/Israelit, 4/0/0
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA
None.
6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
a) Proclamation for Commissioner Jeff Londer
Former Commissioner Jeff Londer expressed his thoughts and appreciation of the Traffic
Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC). Mr. Londer spoke about the TSPC’s
achievements and accomplishments during his tenure and quoted Winston Churchill “so
much done, so much yet to be done.” Mr. Londer expressed his confidence that the
Commissioners and Councilmembers would maintain Burlingame as the “Jewel of the
Peninsula.” Mr. Londer thanked everyone and preceded to open the framed proclamation.
Chair Wettan and TSPC Commissioners read the proclamation out loud and celebrated
2
Mr. Londer. Chair Wettan stated Mayor Ann O’Brien Keighran, Councilmember Beach,
Councilmember Brownrigg, and former Mayor Terry Nagel were in attendance. Mayor
O’Brien thanked Mr. Londer for his service to the community and participation on the
TSPC. Mayor O’Brien stated that Councilmember Colson was not in attendance due to a
Peninsula Clean Energy meeting, but had asked Mayor O’Brien to congratulate Mr. Londer
for his accomplishments on her behalf. Councilmember Brownrigg thanked Mr. Londer for
his dedication, hard-work, and service to the City and community. Councilmember Beach
thanked Mr. Londer for his participation on the TSPC, as a B/PAC liaison, Envision
Burlingame, El Camino Real Taskforce, San Mateo County Citizens Advisory Committee,
and Citizens Environmental Council (CEC). Former Mayor Terry Nagel thanked Mr.
Londer for being a tireless volunteer and for his participation and passion on so many
committees. B/PAC Chair Lesley Beatty thanked Mr. Londer for being the B/PAC liaison
and for his support. CEC Lead Mike McCord thanked Mr. Londer for helping the CEC and
for his friendship.
Commissioner Leigh thanked Mr. Londer for his participation as the B/PAC liaison and
commitment to the community. Commissioner Leigh stated that she had “very big shoes
to fill” and that she was going to strive to do her best. Commissioner Israelit thanked Mr.
Londer for his TSPC guidance and stated that he would be missed. Vice-Chair Martos
stated that Mr. Londer is an intelligent leader and great mentor. Vice-Chair Martos also
thanked Mr. Londer for his guidance and for convincing him to join TSPC. Senior Civil
Engineer Andrew Wong thanked Mr. Londer for welcoming him to the TSPC and
congratulated him on his accomplishments on TSPC. Transportation Program Manager
Lisha Mai concurred with all the expressed sentiments and stated that she looked forward
to continuing open discussions with Mr. Londer. Chair Wettan thanked Bernadine (Mr.
Londer’s wife) for sharing her time with her husband with TSPC and other committees.
Chair Wettan spoke about Mr. Londer’s dedication and commitment to TSPC and to the
Burlingame community. Chair Wettan expressed that Mr. Londer made him a better
Commissioner and public servant. Chair Wettan expressed that Mr. Londer made “him a
better person, listener, citizen, and friend.”
b) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only)
B/PAC Chair Lesley Beatty stated that B/PAC discussed 2021 bike/pedestrian items and
stated that Transportation Program Manager Lisha Mai helped explain the budget
scenarios for projects. Ms. Beatty stated that the B/PAC was able to provide feedback on
projects and their priority level. Ms. Beatty stated that the B/PAC recommended that the
TSPC review the same budget spreadsheet and suggested adding an agenda item to next
month’s TSPC meeting to discuss the project/budget items. Chair Wettan concurred with
the B/PAC’s suggestion to add the TSPC agenda item.
c) Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal and Pedestrian Improvements
Mr. Wong stated that the Oak Grove/Carolan Avenue intersection traffic controls are
unique and challenging due to 3 stop controls and 1 free-moving control. Mr. Wong stated
3
that one option that could address these challenges could be a traffic signal, but stated
that a level-of-service balance would need to be achieved. Mr. Wong introduced W-Trans
Consultant Steve Fitzsimons who presented a PowerPoint presentation explaining
potential modifications to the Oak Grove Avenue traffic signal and the potential
signalization of Carolan Avenue. Mr. Fitzsimons presented the “No” Build Option, meaning
minor modifications would be made to the traffic control such as the installation of a
“countdown” pedestrian signal and the introduction of a flashing yellow arrow (FYA). Mr.
Fitzsimons presented the two build options and both include a new traffic signal at Carolan
Avenue. Mr. Fitzsimons stated that the intent of both build options is to improve safety and
will be compatible with Caltrain operations. Build Option 1 would be similar to California
Drive’s existing traffic signal operation, but would have a longer cycle due to multiple traffic
signal coordinations. Build Option 2 would introduce the FYA operation. Chair Wettan
asked for clarification regarding delays and providing north/east/west/south orientation
details. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified that the delay calculations were the overall average value.
Commissioner Leigh inquired about pedestrian delay. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified that the
Peak Hour Levels of Service chart only depicted motor vehicle delay. Mr. Fitzsimons
provided detailed traffic signal operation functions for the build options and incorporation
of FYA operation. Commissioner Israelit inquired about the FYA’s use and Mr. Fitzsimons
explained that the compelling reason to use the FYA was to distinguish from the green
arrow function meant to clear the traffic before the train approaches. Mr. Fitzsimons
explained that “no-turn on red” signs could be installed for Build Options 1 and 2 for
northbound California Drive and southbound Carolan Avenue to add additional rail safety.
Mr. Fitzsimons explained FYA’s and presented an educational video – “Drivers turning left
may proceed after yielding to oncoming traffic and pedestrians.” Mr. Fitzsimons
recommended having one police officer present on the first day of FYA signal operation
just in case traffic direction is needed, but stated that in past first FYA signal operations,
no police officer intervention was needed. Mr. Fitzsimons ended his presentation by
displaying the tentative project schedule and invited questions from TSPC.
Chair Wettan asked for clarification and comparison of Build Option 1 – Spilt Phase and
Build Option 2 – FYA. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified the differences between Build Option 1 and
2. Commissioner Leigh inquired if the SWITRS statistics were reviewed for the
intersections and also asked for the motor vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle collision rate.
Commissioner Leigh inquired about the reason for modifying the intersection. Mr.
Fitzsimons confirmed their firm had looked at SWITRS statistics and that 3 reported
pedestrian collisions had occurred in the past 10 years. Mr. Wong stated that over the past
5 years there had been 7 motor vehicle collisions. Commissioner Leigh stated that the
intersection was near Burlingame High School and inquired about pedestrian safety since
the proposed changes would increase pedestrian wait times. Commissioner Leigh stated
that the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan classified this area as a “Transit Pedestrian
Zone” and that this zone is meant to provide equal balance to all modes of transportation.
Commissioner Leigh stated that the proposed changes seemed to be intended to move
vehicular traffic faster. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified traffic signalization and pedestrian safety.
Commissioner Leigh stated that she did not support the proposed changes since there
had been no mortalities at this intersection and that it seemed to work well for the high
4
school students. Commissioner Israelit spoke about her work to bring this intersection to
the forefront of the priority list and past experience at the intersection. Commissioner
Israelit spoke about the FYA signal and expressed that the educational video was very
informative and clarified the use of FYA signals. Commissioner Israelit inquired about how
the backlog of cars would be alleviated. Mr. Fitzsimons stated that traffic signal timing
could be accommodated to alleviate a backlog of traffic, but Mr. Fitzsimons clarified that
he had not had a chance to view high school related traffic due COVID-19. Mr. Wong
spoke about different traffic signal timing plans to address the traffic backlog that occurs
in the daytime and evening. Vice-Chair Martos inquired if simulations or a “Monte Carlo”
simulation was run for the intersection. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified that modeling was
conducted comparing the different options, and levels-of-service (LOS) and cycle lengths
were reviewed. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified that a “Monte Carlo” simulation was not conducted
for safety and that he did not know of a similar model. Mr. Fitzsimons relayed his personal
experience as a parent and that as a parent he would feel better with a signalized
intersection. Vice-Chair Martos inquired about the 26 FYA signals that the firm had helped
design and asked about feedback and statistics for the installed FYA signals. Mr.
Fitzsimons stated that the City of Petaluma had conducted a follow-up survey and did not
find any alarming safety indicators. Mr. Fitzsimons stated that FYA signals provided
vehicular traffic 20-30 seconds more to turn.
Chair Wettan inquired about the peak hours of service and delay differences. Mr.
Fitzsimons clarified the traffic signal timing displayed on his presentation slides, and stated
that rail safety is always paramount. Chair Wettan inquired about the extended time for
east-west bound traffic movement. Mr. Fitzsimons confirmed that east-west bound traffic
have additional time allotted. Chair Wettan opened the agenda item for public comment.
Mr. Manito Velasco stated that he agreed with Mr. Fitzsimons statement that the safest
way to cross the intersection is when there is a walk signal and when left-turning traffic
has a red arrow. Mr. Velasco stated that the intersection currently has the safest
pedestrian crossing conditions and that there was no conflict. Mr. Velasco stated that the
FYA would create a conflict that does not exist, and that a driver would look for a gap to
turn which would be problematic. Mr. Velasco inquired about queueing and suggested a
video simulation to demonstrate queueing to the TSPC. Mr. Velasco stated that the
extended pedestrian delay to cross from the Oak Grove Market to Burlingame High School
would not be followed by high school students since it would be 60 or more seconds of
wait time. Mr. Velasco stated that he had concerns regarding queueing and users
compliance to the proposed signalization changes.
Chair Wettan inquired about the delay times and that they were not well-represented on
the visuals. Mr. Fitzsimons clarified the delay times for north and south Carolan Avenue.
Mr. Fitzsimons stated that he had looked into the queueing issue and that they could not
compare the queueing to existing conditions due to COVID-19 and spoke about other
modeling issues, but that he would inquire with the City of Petaluma regarding their FYA
signals and that he would provide their feedback at future TSPC meeting.
5
Commissioner Leigh stated that the FYA is the least safe option for pedestrians and that
she felt that the changes are being rushed for the future Broadway Grade Separation
project. Commissioner Leigh inquired about pedestrian traffic flow considerations and
stated it would bring anxious pedestrian behavior. Commissioner Leigh stated that more
time to review the proposed changes was needed and that there was not enough
emphasis on pedestrians. Commissioner Israelit stated that she would like to have more
detailed information presented regarding the proposed changes to avoid unintended
consequences, and requested additional information to be presented at March’s TSPC
meeting. Mr. Wong clarified that the project budget currently covers the design phase and
that additional funds would need to be requested for the construction phase, but that he
would look at the design phase budget regarding the additional presentation request.
Commissioner Israelit stated that more information is needed since this is an important
intersection, and stated that she supported the build options and not the “no build” option.
Vice-Chair Martos stated he did not believe the FYA signal was an improvement and
spoke about not hearing much dialogue regarding the queueing going westbound on Oak
Grove Avenue. Vice-Chair Martos stated that there should be more focus on alleviating
the queueing issue versus installing a new traffic signal at Carolan Avenue and Oak Grove
Avenue. Chair Wettan spoke about his personal experience with the intersection and
stated that it currently is an unsafe intersection, and emphasized the need to make
improvements to this intersection. Chair Wettan expressed concern about queueing,
providing sufficient feedback about the proposed changes to City Council, and potentially
upsetting some residents with the proposed changes. Chair W ettan inquired about a
safety trade-off between queueing and east-west safety with the FYA. Mr. Fitzsimons
clarified that the FYA provided additional caution cues to drivers and stated that he would
obtain feedback for FYA near schools. Chair Wettan inquired about the feasibility of
making changes if the FYA were installed or if the FYA were not installed. Mr. Wong
clarified that it would be easier to make changes if the FYA were installed and could be
un-wired if the decision was to discontinue the FYA. Additionally, Mr. Wong clarified that
the presentation was an update.
Commissioner Leigh inquired about other pedestrian improvements and their
incorporation into the project, and providing pedestrian priority. Chair Wettan clarified that
there would be a “no-turn on red” sign and inquired about its function. Mr. Wong clarified
that the “no-turn on red” sign would only be lit when the train approaches. Chair Wettan
expressed interest in having another presentation of the proposed changes. Mr. Wong
clarified that the goal was to bring more information to the TSPC in an upcoming meeting.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Engineering Division Reports
• Broadway and Burlingame Parklet Update – There are a total of 41 businesses
with parklets resulting in a loss of 84 parking spaces. There are two more parklets
in the queue which would bring the final total to 43 parklets with a loss of 88
parking spaces. Downtown has 34 businesses with parklets (16 on Burlingame
6
Avenue and 18 on side streets) and a loss of 67 parking spaces (27 on
Burlingame Avenue and 40 on side streets). Broadway has 7 businesses with
parklets with a loss of 17 parking spaces. Related to the parklet program, there
are currently 7 designated curbside pickup spaces located in the Downtown.
• Peninsula Overcrossing Update – On January 27, 2021 the City of San Mateo
and their project team made a presentation at a virtual community meeting. At the
meeting they provided a project update which included: historical background,
design alternatives, and a preliminary schedule for the project. Important dates to
note are the public meeting to review and comment on the environmental
document anticipated for late-2021/early-2022, and the Caltrans approval date
expected in summer 2022. The presentation can be found at the following link on
the City of San Mateo’s website under their Public Works’ “Current and Upcoming
Projects” tab:
https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/DocumentCenter/View/83278/Peninsula-
Interchange-Community-Mtg -Presentation---Jan-27-2021_012721-FINAL?bidId=
• Lyon-Hoag Traffic Calming Update – Contractor has completed approximately
85% of the work with the vertical components, including the installation of the
speed cushions still to come.
• California Drive Bicycle Facility RFP – The City received and reviewed six
proposals for the project. Staff narrowed the field down to two consultant teams,
and is currently in the process of making a final selection.
• Burlingame Station Pedestrian Improvements RFP – The City received and
reviewed five proposals for the project. Staff is currently in the process of making
a final selection.
• Hoover School Pedestrian Improvements (Summit Drive) – Project has
submitted the “request for authorization” package to Caltrans for approval. Once
we have received authorization, the next steps are to advertise and award the
project. Construction is anticipated for summer 2021.
• Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvements – Project in process of
advertising to perspective bidders. Once the construction contract has been
awarded, work is anticipated for later this year.
• Highland Avenue Garage Parking Restrictions – TSPC recommendation to be
presented to the City Council at their February 16, 2021 meeting.
7
• TSPC Priority List (revised February 2021):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 2/11/21: Item 7a
2 School Transportation and Safety Issues 1/14/21: Item 7a
3 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2/11/21: Item 7a
4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming/Controls 2/11/21: Item 7a
5 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (s/o Broadway) 12/10/20: Item 7a
6 Electric Vehicle Discussion with Planning 2/13/20: Item 6c
7 Downtown Parking and Access 2/11/21: Item 7a
8 Broadway Parking 2/11/21: Item 7a
9 Citywide Transportation Alternatives 12/12/19: Item 6b
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 12/10/20: Item 7a
2 Hoover School Update 12/10/20: Item 7a
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 2/11/21: Item 7a
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/11/19: Item 6b
5 California Roundabout 5/9/19: Item 7a
6 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 10/10/19: Item 7a
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 1/14/21: Item 7a
8 Rec Center Parking 3/12/20: Item 7a
9 Old Bayshore Corridor Study 12/12/19: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities 11/12/20: Item 7a
11 Broadway Grade Separation 6/11/20: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC
13 School Speed Limit Updates 6/13/19, Item 7a
14 School Safety Improvements 3/12/20: Item 7a
15 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 1/14/21: Item 7a
16 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 12/10/20: Item 7a
17 Broadway/California Update
2021 Agenda Item Action Status
1
Vice-Chair Martos inquired about the Peninsula Interchange Project and the closure of
the southbound on-ramp on Popular Avenue. Mr. Wong confirmed that the southbound
on-ramp would be closed due to the Peninsula Interchange Project. Commissioner Leigh
inquired about the reason for doing some striping work near the train station if the area
will be redesigned again. Commissioner Leigh inquired about the intersection work at
8
Bloomfield and Rollins Road and if a crosswalk was going to be installed. Mr. Wong
clarified that there were two crosswalk legs that could be used. Ms. Mai clarified that
striping work done near the train station were temporary improvements and clarified that
the intersection at Bloomfield Road and Rollins Road requires additional modification of
the handicap ramps in order to provide an additional crosswalk. Vice-Chair Martos
thanked staff and the consultant for successfully slowing down traffic from Rollins Road
onto Victoria Road.
Mr. Wong added that the hardened centerline on Trousdale Drive and California Drive
had been installed and stated that Ms. Mai had observed turning vehicles slowing down
before making the turn and that staff would continue monitoring the intersection.
Mr. Wong stated that the City Council would be interviewing candidates in March 2021
for TSPC’s vacancy.
Commissioner Leigh inquired about the lighting fixtures for the Broadway Street Lighting
Project. Mr. Wong clarified that he would follow-up with more information. Commissioner
Israelit inquired about funding for the new upcoming projects. Mr. Wong clarified that the
funds were coming from County and Federal grants.
b) Police Department Reports
Sergeant Perna stated that there were 13 collisions in January 2021 and stated that
several were on private property and were minor collisions. Sergeant Perna indicated
that two collisions did involve bicycles, one vehicle-bicycle incident at California Drive
and Burlingame Avenue and one bicycle-bicycle incident northbound on Carolan Avenue.
Chair Wettan inquired about two “other” collisions at El Camino Real and Floribunda
Avenue. Sergeant Perna clarified that one incident was a vehicle-bicycle collision and the
other incident was a scooter-vehicle non-collision. Chair Wettan inquired about a
California Drive and Oak Grove Avenue vehicle-vehicle collision. Sergeant Perna clarified
that the incident occurred going northbound on California Drive when the vehicle slowed
and the trailing vehicle swerved and hit a parked vehicle. Chair Wettan inquired about
the “hot map” progress. Sergeant Perna displayed the Google My Map bicycle and
pedestrian collision data and explained that the data exported was from 1/1/2017-
11/30/2020. Chair Wettan expressed interest in a vehicle collision map. Commissioner
Leigh inquired about fatal collisions at Oak Grove Avenue and California Drive. Sergeant
Perna clarified that there had not been a fatal collision at Oak Grove Avenue and
California Drive, but that there had been fatal collisions on El Camino Real. Sergeant
Perna summarized the requested changes to the Google My Map, to add 5 years of data,
to add vehicle collisions, and to add school symbols.
c) Farmer’s Market
No update.
9
d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications
Chair Wettan spoke about the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition presentation series.
Commissioner Israelit reiterated her previous communications regarding the convex
mirror and the Burlingame Plaza exit onto El Camino Real. Mr. Wong stated he had
relayed her communication about the exit of Burlingame Plaza onto El Camino Real to
Caltrans, but that he had not heard back and would check-in with Caltrans again. Mr.
Wong stated he would contact resident Andrea Pappajohn regarding the convex mirror
request, but that mirrors were not typically installed in the City right-of-way.
8. COMMISSION & SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)
No update.
b) Broadway Issues (Israelit & Leigh)
The Broadway Parking Subcommittee name was changed to Broadway Issues to
encompass other challenges that can be addressed by the Subcommittee. W ith the
confirmation that the Subcommittee would address items other than parking,
Commissioner Leigh volunteered to join the Subcommittee.
c) School Traffic (Israelit & Wettan)
No update.
d) Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Wettan)
No update.
9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
• Oak Grove Avenue & Carolan Avenue signal update
• 2021 B/PAC priority list
• Joint meeting with Planning Commission regarding EV charging reach codes
• El Camino Renewal Project update
• Peninsula Avenue Interchange Project update
10. ADJOURNMENT 10:28 p.m.
3/5/2021
1
OAK GROVE AVE
Traffic Signal Improvements near the Caltrain Crossing
1. Traffic Operations Study
•“No” Build (no change at Carolan Ave)
•Two Build Alternatives (with new signal at Carolan Ave)
•Pros and Cons
2. What is Flashing Yellow Arrow traffic signal operation?
3. Rail safety improvements
4. Schedule
AGENDA
3/5/2021
2
• Means traffic control will stay similar to what it is now
• The California/Oak Grove signal would be improved to upgrade pedestrian signals to the “countdown” type.
• The intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C in the weekday morning and evening peaks
• The current east-west split phasing (eastbound turns green while westbound has a red, then westbound turns green while eastbound has red) may be revised to Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) phasing
• In the AM Peak, LOS C would be the same and stopped delay would decrease slightly if the more efficient FYA phasing is installed
• In the PM Peak, the LOS would be the same if the FYA phasing is installed, however the delay would increase slightly
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
“NO” BUILD OPTION
3
Study Intersection Existing Condition “No” Build
Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS
AM Peak Hour
1. Oak Grove Ave/
California Dr
32.4 C 31.6 C
PM Peak Hour
1. Oak Grove Ave/
California Dr
23.3 C 25.1 C
PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
Existing Condition vs. “No” Build Alternative
4
3/5/2021
3
• Both build options
• Signalization at Carolan Avenue improves safety
• Compatible with Caltrain Operation
• Build Option 1:
• Similar operation to existing condition at California Drive but with longer cycle and stopped delay because of coordination delay
• Build Option 2:
• Uses Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) operation
• Slightly lower avg delays compared with Build Option 1
BUILD A NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT CAROLAN
TWO OPTIONS IDENTIFIED
Option 1 (East-West Split) and Option 2 (East-West with Flashing Yellow Arrows)
Study
Intersection
Existing Condition Option 1 – East-West Split Phase Option 2 – East-West with
Flashing Yellow Arrows
Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS
AM Peak Hour
1. Oak Grove
Ave/
California Dr
32.4 C 49.8 D 36.3 D
2. Oak Grove
Ave/
Carolan Ave
N/A* N/A* 32.0 C 30.1 C
PM Peak Hour
1. Oak Grove
Ave/
California Dr
23.3 C 33.0 C 25.8 C
2. Oak Grove
Ave/
Carolan Ave
N/A* N/A* 26.6 C 39.4 D
PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
Existing Volumes
6
3/5/2021
4
Study
Intersection
Existing Condition Option 1 – East-West Split Phase Option 2 – East-West with
Flashing Yellow Arrows
Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS Delay (sec.) LOS
AM Peak Hour
1. Oak Grove
Ave/
California Dr
37.2 D 58.9 E 40.5 D
2. Oak Grove
Ave/
Carolan Ave
N/A* N/A* 44.5 D 39.2 D
PM Peak Hour
1. Oak Grove
Ave/
California Dr
23.3 C 35.9 D 29.7** C
2. Oak Grove
Ave/
Carolan Ave
N/A* N/A* 28.2 C 27.0** C
PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
Future Volumes - 2030
7
8TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 1
Green Ball
Green Arrow
3/5/2021
5
9TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 1
Green Ball
Green Arrow
OR
10TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 1
Green Ball
Green Arrow
3/5/2021
6
11TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 1
Green Ball
Green Arrow
12TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 1
Green Ball
3/5/2021
7
13TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 1
Green Ball
14TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 2
Green Ball
Green Arrow
3/5/2021
8
15TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 2
Green Ball
Green Arrow
16TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 2
Green Ball
Green Arrow
3/5/2021
9
17TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 2
Green Ball
Green Arrow
Flashing Arrow
18TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 2
Green Ball
Flashing Arrow
3/5/2021
10
19TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS-OPTION 2
Green Ball
Flashing Arrow
20RAIL SAFETY-OPTIONS 1 AND 2
Green Ball
3/5/2021
11
QUEUE COMPARISON:
AM PEAK HOUR
21
“No” Build - Existing Traffic Control
Build
Option 1
Build
Option 2
QUEUE COMPARISON:
PM PEAK HOUR
22
“No” Build - Existing Traffic Control
Build
Option 1
Build
Option 2
3/5/2021
12
It’s simple! Just understand that a
Flashing Yellow Arrow means to first
YIELD to oncoming vehicles,
bicyclists, and pedestrians, then turn
left with caution.
WHAT IS FLASHING YELLOW ARROW?
23
FLASHING YELLOW ARROW EXPLAINED
24
3/5/2021
13
• Ralston Avenue and Tahoe Drive, Belmont (Installed 2019)
• Aladdin Avenue and Alvarado Street, San Leandro (2020)
• Oak Street and Masonic Avenue, San Francisco (2018)
• Stevens Creek Boulevard and Henry Avenue, Santa Clara (2018)
• W Ninth Street and Dutton Avenue, Santa Rosa (2013)
• Twelve locations in Petaluma (2017)
• Four locations in Windsor (2018)
• Ten locations in Rohnert Park (2020)
WHERE CAN I SEE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WITH FYA?
25
SCHEDULE
26
Pre-final design November 2020
TSPC February 2021
JPB/Caltrain Permit March 2021
PG&E Electrical Service
Final Design
March 2021
April 2021
Advertise June 2021
Award September 2021
Start Construction
Materials Procurement
Signal Installation
Testing & Approval
October 2021
January 2022
March 2022
April 2022
Signal Turn-on April 2022
1
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NO:
7.a
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 2021
To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
Date: March 11, 2021
From: Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer – (650) 558-7230
Subject: Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission receive a presentation by staff providing an update on
various Public Works – Engineering projects and activities.
BACKGROUND
• Lyon-Hoag Traffic Calming Update – Contractor is working on punch list items. Staff
has been receiving neighborhood feedback and will continue the monitoring phase of the
project.
• California Drive Bicycle Facility RFP – At the March 15 City Council meeting, Council
is expected to award the design contract to the engineering firm of Mark Thomas.
• Burlingame Station Pedestrian Improvements RFP – At the March 15 City Council
meeting, Council is expected to award the design contract to the engineering firm of
CSG Consultants.
• Hoover School Pedestrian Improvements (Summit Drive) – Project has submitted
the “request for authorization” package to Caltrans for approval. Once we have received
authorization, the next steps are to advertise and award the project. Construction is
anticipated for summer 2021.
• Broadway Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvements – Project in process of
advertising to perspective bidders. Once the construction contract has been awarded,
work is anticipated for later this year. Lighting is pedestrian scale streetlights (see
Attachment 1).
Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update March 11, 2021
2
• TSPC Priority List (revised March 2021):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 2/11/21: Item 7a
2 School Transportation and Safety Issues 1/14/21: Item 7a
3 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2/11/21: Item 7a
4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming/Controls 2/11/21: Item 7a
5 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (s/o Broadway) 12/10/20: Item 7a
6 Electric Vehicle Discussion with Planning 2/13/20: Item 6c
7 Downtown Parking and Access 2/11/21: Item 7a
8 Broadway Parking 2/11/21: Item 7a
9 Citywide Transportation Alternatives 12/12/19: Item 6b
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 12/10/20: Item 7a
2 Hoover School Update 12/10/20: Item 7a
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 2/11/21: Item 7a
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/11/19: Item 6b
5 California Roundabout 5/9/19: Item 7a
6 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 3/11/21: Item 6b
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 1/14/21: Item 7a
8 Rec Center Parking 3/12/20: Item 7a
9 Old Bayshore Corridor Study 12/12/19: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities 11/12/20: Item 7a
11 Broadway Grade Separation 6/11/20: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC
13 School Speed Limit Updates 6/13/19, Item 7a
14 School Safety Improvements 3/12/20: Item 7a
15 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 3/11//21: Item 7a
16 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 12/10/20: Item 7a
17 Broadway/California Update
2021 Agenda Item Action Status
1 Highland Garage Parking Restrictions Approved by Council February
16, 2021
DISCUSSION
Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety
and Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that
would typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City Capital
Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update March 11, 2021
3
Improvement Projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are
addressed as Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6).
Attachment 1
Case #Date Time Locale Road Type Speed
Limit
Minor
Injuries
Major
Injuries
DUI
Involved
Collision Type Caused By
Juv
Primary Collision
Factor
Hit & Run
Misd.
Hit & Run
Felony
Occurred On At Intersection Other Location Vehicle Involved With
BRM2100298 02/01/2021 2000 Intersection City Street 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22106 CVC F F CALIFORNIA DR BROADWAY Other motor vehicle
BRM2100326 02/04/2021 2136 Intersection City Street 35 3 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21453(a) CVC F F BROADWAY SR-82 Other motor vehicle
BRM2100332 02/05/2021 1407 Intersection City Street 25 1 0 F Vehicle-Pedestrian T 21954(a) CVC F F PALOMA AV GROVE AV Pedestrian
BRM2100333 02/05/2021 1404 Intersection City Street 25 1 0 F Bicycle-Object F F F BROADWAY CABRILLO AV Non-collision
BRM2100338 02/05/2021 2048 Intersection City Street 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21801(a) CVC F F SR-82 HILLSIDE DR Other motor vehicle
BRM2100355 02/08/2021 2215 Street City Street 25 0 0 T Vehicle-Vehicle F 23152(a) CVC F F TOYON DR ROLLINS RD Parked motor vehicle
BRM2100367 02/10/2021 803 Intersection Highway 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350 CVC F F STATE HIGHWAY 82 PENINSULA AV Other motor vehicle
BRM2100369 02/10/2021 921 Intersection Highway 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21804(a) CVC F F STATE HIGHWAY 82 ROSEDALE AV Other motor vehicle
BRM2100379 02/11/2021 1608 Intersection Ramp 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350 CVC F F BROADWAY 101 SB RAMP Other motor vehicle
BRM2100392 02/13/2021 838 Intersection Highway 35 1 0 F Vehicle-Motorcycle F 21802(A) CVC F F SR-82 SANCHEZ AVENUE Other motor vehicle
BRM2100410 02/15/2021 1800 Street City Street 25 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F unknown T F SANCHEZ AV SR-82 Other motor vehicle
BRM2100440 02/19/2021 1528 Street City Street 35 3 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 22350 CVC F F CALIFORNIA DR PENINSULA AV Other motor vehicle
BRM2100501 02/25/2021 1553 Intersection City Street 35 0 0 F Vehicle-Vehicle F 21658(a) CVC T F BROADWAY CAROLAN AV Other motor vehicle
13 Accidents