Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - TSP - 2022.02.101 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Approved Minutes Regular Meeting of Thursday, February 10, 2022 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:03 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Israelit, Leigh, Martos, Ng, Rebelos MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) January 13, 2022 Meeting Minutes Motion: To accept the January 13, 2022 Meeting Minutes as submitted. M/S/C; Leigh/Israelit, 5/0/0 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA No public comments received. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS a) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only) No B/PAC update; reserved comments for the item related to bike boulevards (originally 6.c). b) TSPC Proclamation for Howard Wettan Former Chair/Commissioner Howard Wettan was presented with a Proclamation signed 2 by Mayor Ortiz and TSPC Chair Martos for his service on the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission. Kind words were shared of Mr. Wettan’s dedication to the TSPC for approximately 10 years. Prior to moving on to the next agenda item, the Commission decided to change the order based on the number of public comments Motion: Move to switch on our agenda this evening 6.d (Multi-Way and One-Way Stop Recommendations at Various Locations) with 6.c (Bike Boulevards) to respect the public that is here tonight. M/S/C; Leigh/Israelit, 5/0/0 c) Multi-Way and One-Way Stop Recommendations at Various Locations Transportation Engineer Michael Tsai provided a presentation regarding proposed stop sign locations at the following intersections: 1. Sanchez Avenue and Paloma Avenue (Multi-Way Stop); 2. Davis Drive and Marco Polo Way (Multi-Way Stop); 3. Oak Grove Avenue and Ansel Road (Multi-Way Stop); 4. Howard Avenue and Victoria Road (Multi-Way Stop); 5. Hunt Drive and Alcazar Drive (Multi-Way Stop); and 6. Winchester Drive and Corbitt Drive (One-Way Stop). Additionally, Mr. Tsai went over the methodology used from the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and the data gathered and considerations for each of the locations identified above. (Please see the presentation for more details.) Chair Martos gave the Commissioner’s an opportunity to ask clarifying questions before opening it up for the following public comments. Mr. Christian stated he is in favor of the permanent stop controls at the intersection at Sanchez Avenue and Paloma Avenue. Mr. Velasco stated he requested stop controls at Sanchez Avenue and Paloma Avenue in 2015 and wanted to ensure that the stop controls become permanent. He said he feels that the improvements at this location are the best safety improvements in the City since the pandemic. Mr. Velasco stated the improvements have made the corridor more walkable and bikeable and expressed his appreciation. He also shared that he is happy to see that Oak Grove Avenue and Ansel Avenue are being considered for an all-way stop. He then asked about crosswalks being installed as part of this effort and stated he is confused about the City’s crosswalk policy. Specifically, Mr. Velasco said he has requested a crosswalk near BIS near Clarice Lane and Sequoia Avenue but was told that there needed to be 20 people an hour crossing at that location to paint a crosswalk. He 3 requested clarification from the City on the crosswalk policy. Mr. Tsai clarified that the City’s goal is to paint crosswalks on all four legs whenever possible. Peter Gum on Winchester Drive stated he is neutral about the concept at Winchester Drive and Corbitt Drive because if we quell the traffic on Corbitt, the inbound traffic from Rollins going to the high school will possibly double. Judy Gum stated they already have speeding problems on their street and shared that Augustine Chou assisted them with their concerns 18 years ago. Peter Gum said if the stop sign is installed on Corbitt Drive, he would love for staff to consider how to quell traffic on Winchester. Judy Gum suggested an additional stop sign, speed bumps, or valley gutter to assist with speeding concerns. She explained they lost a cat to someone speeding on their street, there are a number of children in the area, and the current speeding problem will only increase. Michael Idio on Davis Drive stated he is in favor of the stop signs at Davis Drive and Marco Polo, but his concern is the exact location of the stop signs and the egress for particular residential driveways. He suggested alternative stop sign placement to avoid conflicts with driveways. Mr. Idio indicated he also has a video he can share with the Commission and staff, if interested, of a vehicle/pedestrian accident in front of his home. Xiaoshan Min on Davis Drive expressed the common goal to increase safety but indicated he is not in favor of the stop signs at Davis Drive and Marco Polo because of the driveway conflict. He said he felt it would be a challenge and unsafe to exit the driveway during morning rush hour. Secondly, he stated the stop sign would create a longer delay on Davis Drive. Alternatively, he requested speed humps and/or high visibility crosswalks as opposed to stop signs. Lastly, he suggested some targeted police enforcement during the busy morning and afternoon hours. Mr. Jui resides on Davis Drive and agreed with his neighbor’s comments in that he felt other traffic calming measures would work better for Davis Drive and Marco Polo Way. Specifically, he felt speed bumps would help to slow down the speeding vehicles and targeted enforcement would be an ideal approach. Michael Idio spoke again to convey he was not in favor of speed bumps to slow down traffic and would like to see stop signs installed. He explained his proposal would not put a stop sign in front of his neighbor’s driveway. The following public comment emails were read for the record. Thank you for your support of the pilot stop sign at the intersection of Sanchez Avenue and Paloma. The stop sign has made the neighborhood much safer for families traveling around the neighborhood as well as the McKinley Elementary School. Please approve making it a permanent feature in the neighborhood. Thanks, 4 Kathy Kleinbaum I support making the current 4-way stop sign at Sanchez Avenue and Paloma Avenue permanent. I live near the intersection and the trail stop sign that has been in place since 2020 has been very successful in increasing the safety at this intersection both for pedestrians and for cars. The stop sign is particularly important given that many children and families cross the street here on their way to Paloma Park and/or McKinley Elementary. Thanks very much for your consideration. – Dave Umezaki The stop signs at Sanchez have made a huge positive difference in my life. Please keep them, as they are essential for walking to school. Cars race down Sanchez, and now we have a chance of crossing safely, particularly with kids. Thank you, Readey Family I saw the notice about the upcoming meeting to discuss making this stop sign permanent (Sanchez and Paloma). I would like to voice my support of the sign. Will this email suffice? Thank you, Julia Jones I just want to STRONGLY voice my support for this 4 way stop (Sanchez and Paloma). I live a couple houses down Paloma from it (and unfortunately have had a fender bender here before the sign went up) and have noticed a marked difference in the sped cars travel and the increased safety for pedestrians. Now we need one at Paloma and Carmelita as that corner is even worse. Please make this sign permanent! Thank you, Nancy Kerns I reside on the 800 block of Acacia, about 2.5 blocks from the intersection of Sanchez and Paloma. I strongly recommend making the stop sign at this intersection permanent. It has made traveling in this area so much easier and safer, both as a pedestrian and a motorist. McKinley Elementary School is 3 short blocks from this intersection, and many children and their parents cross at the intersection every school day on their way to McKinley. It is especially important for their sakes that the stop sign remain. Our neighborhood streets are not up to being used as traffic shortcuts between El Camino Real and California because of their narrowness and heavy use of street parking. The stop sign discourages this use. These streets are already carrying heavy traffic due to the increase in construction, delivery service and ride hailing traffic. Visibility at Sanchez and Paloma is difficult and until the stop sign was installed, Sanchez in particular, was heavily traveled as a cut through making this intersection very difficult to get thru safely whether on foot or by auto. 5 Thank you so much. Scot Rohrer I reside on the 800 block of Acacia, about 2.5 blocks from the intersection of Sanchez and Paloma. I strongly recommend making the stop sign at this intersection permanent. It has made traveling in this area so much easier and safer, both as a pedestrian and a motorist. McKinley Elementary School is 3 short blocks from this intersection, and many children and their parents cross at the intersection every school day on their way to McKinley. It is especially important for their sakes that the stop sign remain. Thank you so much. Anne Scanlan-Rohrer I've lived in the 900 block of Paloma Ave for eight and a half years and frequently drive through the Paloma/Sanchez intersection. Visibility around parked cars is quite poor. Before the installation of a 4-way stop there it was extremely dangerous. Thank you for the installation and I most strongly support a recommendation to retain a 4-way stop. Sincerely, Mark Meyerson I am Kathryn Smith and live on the corner of Marco Polo and Davis Drive. I have discussed the flow of traffic with a few neighbors and we wish to express our concerns and solutions. Negative impact to the traffic flow - 4 way stop sign - eliminating residential parking spaces - modify signage that would create a driveway blockage or ease of egress. Creating solutions by - adding a crossing guard - BIS establish a traffic Best Practices - BIS educate parents for traffic patterns to enhance flow - add zebra stripes on Marco Polo where existing stop signs appear for pedestrians - extend red sidewalk markings on Marco Polo North (BIS parents park cars for after school pick up which narrows the street and is adverse to traffic flow) Discussion with homeowners at 1811 Davis Drive, 1900 Davis Drive, 1908 Davis Drive and 1912 Davis Drive. Informal morning traffic overview 02/10/2022 Thursday morning Davis Drive-west bound to BIS 8:00-8:03 total 3 cars 8:03-8:09 15 8:09-8:15 25 8:15-8;26 87 6 8:26-8:30 16 Marco Polo - south going north 18 cars Marco Polo - north at the stop sign 55 I observed a flow of traffic with driver courtesy 55% turned right on Marco Polo from Davis Drive 44% proceeded straight up Davis Drive to BIS Less than 15 school children walking to school 6 bike riders Observed a pause with the flow of traffic when pedestrians crossed Marco Polo on the north side of Davis Drive. No pedestrians crossed Davis Drive. Thank you. Kathryn Smith Hello, my name is Amit and I own the property at 1675 Hunt Drive. I read and was also contacted by John about the proposed three way stop sign on Hunt Drive by the park. My opinion is that a stop sign there is really not necessary. My office window looks out to exactly where you want to put the stop signs and so I watch the traffic all day. There are very few cars passing and I have never witnessed anyone speeding, having an accident or having to make a sudden stop. Happy to provide more feedback on this. Thank you for returning my phone call regarding the proposed Corbitt Drive stop sign. Per our conversation, after polling a couple of nearby residents, we all felt that a stop sign at that location would be a good idea and a street safety improvement. Sincerely, Phillip De Rosa After thoughtful and thorough discussions on each of the locations, and considerations of public comments received, the Commission made the following motions. The Commission also requested that the proposed multiway stop be revisited at Marco Polo Way and Davis Drive at the conclusion of the Burlingame Intermediate School circulation plan. Victoria Road and Howard Avenue (Multi-Way Stop) No opposition was received. Chair Martos recused himself for this vote due to the proximity to his residence. Motion: Move we approve the stop sign at Victoria Road and Howard Avenue. M/S/C; Leigh/Ng, 4/0/1 7 Sanchez Avenue and Paloma Avenue (Multi-Way Stop) No opposition was received. Motion: Move we approve the stop sign by making it permanent at Sanchez Avenue and Paloma Avenue M/S/C; Leigh/Isrealit, 5/0/0 Winchester Drive and Corbitt Drive (One-Way Stop) Commissioner Rebelos requested that staff continue to track the intersection of Winchester Drive and Corbitt Drive as he stated he noticed Winchester Drive is a cut through to Bayshore. Commissioner Leigh concurred with Commissioner Rebelos’ request for staff to circle back to the Commission regarding this particular location. She also said she would like to take it one step further as it would be great to have speed humps on Winchester Drive. Additionally, Vice-Chair Israelit stated her desire to look into other traffic calming measures on Winchester Drive. Motion: Move we approve a one-way stop at Corbitt Drive and Winchester Drive. M/S/C; Leigh/Isrealit, 5/0/0 Davis Drive and Marco Polo Way (Multi-Way Stop) Vice-Chair Israelit stated she has reservations about the proposed stop controls at this location for several reasons—it’s a very complicated intersection and she does not want to approve stop signs when they do not know what the crosswalks will look like and where the stop signs will be placed. She felt strongly a more detailed study with design options is warranted. The other concern she shared is the intersection is part of the overall BIS school safety audit and they have not defined the preferred traffic pattern or safety flows. Commissioner Ng inquired about temporary measures to improve the intersection. Commissioner Rebelos stated he is in favor of the four-way stop (and would like to see it approved tonight) but requested that staff come back to the Commission with the design before installation. He said Marco Polo Way is a cut through from Ray Drive to Trousdale and with various proposed construction projects in the area, people will use that cut- through more frequently. Commissioner Leigh said she would also like to approve the four-way stop signs tonight with the condition that staff return to the Commission with the design (or with design options). She also recognized residents in the area that voiced concerns with placement of the stop signs. 8 Chair Martos stated he is in favor of studying this location further and is not in favor of approving a four-way stop at this time. Commissioner Leigh made a motion to approve the four-way stop with the condition that staff bring plans and design options for the Commission to consider. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Rebelos but the motion ultimately failed. No further motions were made. Oak Grove Avenue and Ansel Road (Multi-Way Stop) Vice-Chair Israelit stated she wanted to be sure that if they have to do traffic calming on Oak Grove Avenue, that installing a stop sign would be the best and safest way to protect pedestrians walking to schools. Commissioner Leigh indicated that this intersection is of interest to B/PAC and said any assistance they can provide to the students to cross the street would be great. Commissioner Rebelos stated the stop sign installation makes sense to him and explained Oak Grove Avenue is a cut-through to El Camino Real and California Drive. He said he fully supports the stop sign. Chair Martos shared feedback he obtained from a resident regarding speeding and cut- through traffic. Vice-Chair Israelit thanked staff for their insights and stated she now supports the installation of a stop sign at Ansel Road. Commissioner Ng echoed his support for moving forward with the stop sign installation. Motion: Move to approve the stop sign at Oak Grove and Ansel Road. M/S/C; Ng/Rebelos, 5/0/0 Hunt Drive and Alcazar Drive (Multi-Way Stop) Chair Martos clarified this location currently has no stop controls and the proposal is to install three stop signs. Commissioner Ng stated the vertical slope in the area makes the stop controls long overdue and it is something he fully supports. He also noted they redid the playground, which has drawn more families to the area. Commissioner Rebelos said he does have concerns with visibility and based on the hill there, odd intersection, and the fact there is a park there. He said he is in full support of 9 the multiway stop. Chair Martos indicated he supports a stop sign on Alcazar Drive but is not convinced a stop sign is needed on Hunt Drive just due to the volume. He is of the opinion they should modify the proposal to place one stop control on Alcazar Drive. Motion: Move that we follow staff’s recommendation and put in a multiway stop at Hunt Drive and Alcazar Drive. M/S/C; Leigh/Ng, 3/1/1 Mr. Tsai thanked the Commission for their feedback and stated staff would return to the Commission with a design for Marco Polo and Davis Drive. d) Burlingame Bike Boulevards Mr. Wong introduced the project consultants John Pulliam and Devin Schmidt from Kimley-Horn. He explained the purpose of tonight’s presentation is to identify bike boulevard routes, which was part of the overall Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. He stated the consultants are tasked to provide options and said the goal is to receive the presentation and provide feedback—no specific support for any particular route is required as this is the first cut. Additionally, Mr. Wong shared that this presentation would be provided to City Council next month as well for their feedback. John Pulliam went through the presentation, which included quick-build bike improvements on Carmelita, Grove, Paloma, Mills, and Capuchino Avenues. The presentation included existing conditions, project objectives, historical feedback, and proposed improvements. (Please see presentation for details.) Vice-Chair Israelit thanked the consultants and stated the presentation was very easy to understand. She stated that she did not think the increased parking restriction on Carmelita will be popular and said it adds a hardship for those that live east of El Camino Real. She also said they saw success with the Lyon Hoag traffic calming measures and was happy to see similar elements in this presentation. However, Vice-Chair Israelit said she does not like the idea of speed cushions and felt they are overkill when there are other effective traffic calming measures such as “bump outs.” Commissioner Rebelos asked if there has been any outreach to residents on Carmelita Avenue between El Camino Real and California Drive and also inquired about any other streets in Burlingame with the same parking restriction. Mr. Wong stated that Carmelita Avenue is the only one with the exception of southbound California Drive (which is meant to assist with street sweeping). He also said he believed there was a survey put out but it did not include parking restrictions. Mr. Wong explained public outreach would be part of the process after options were narrowed down. 10 Commissioner Ng stated ideally with a blank slate, you can separate bicyclists, traffic, and pedestrians. He stated he likes that some of the designs presented keep that in mind. Commissioner Ng said it becomes sketchy when you have existing shared spaces and you place the burden on others, which can increase tensions. He agreed the backlash for removing parking would be significant. Commissioner Leigh said she participated in this evening’s B/PAC meeting and stated that most of the proposed routes are on their plan. She went on to define a bike boulevard as a street designed and designated to give bikes priority. Commissioner Leigh explained that B/PAC’s preferences included less improvements/changes than proposed. Specifically, she explained that B/PAC did not want any parking removed (they prefer full time parking on both sides of the eastern part Carmelita Avenue) or any lane shifts for the bike lanes. Commissioner Leigh indicated that B/PAC would also like to see the following improvements: • Stop signs at Paloma Avenue and Carmelita Avenue; • Instead of speed cushions/humps, raised crosswalks across all the streets that cross Carmelita Avenue; • Label school crossing as such and traffic calming at Paloma Avenue and Oak Grove Avenue; • Bicycle button at Broadway and Paloma Avenue; • Stop signs at Chula Vista, Capuchino, and Laguna; • Speed cushions (one per block) on Mills Avenue, Grove Avenue, and the upper portion of Carmelita Avenue; and • Sharrows only on Mills Avenue, Paloma Avenue, and Capuchino Avenue. Chair Martos stated all of his concerns were addressed by the B/PAC comments shared by Commissioner Leigh. The following comments provided via email were read into the record from B/PAC Chair Lesley Beatty and B/PAC member Manito Velasco. Lesley Beatty: I'm sorry that I had to leave before this item was addressed. BPAC is very excited to see the first bike boulevard designs for Burlingame. We know what we will decide here will set the standard for all the bike boulevards identified on the bike/ped master plan. In all cases, we prefer the options that focus on the most important issues: 1) traffic calming the high volume streets as deployed through the use of speed cushions and 2) adding stop signs or other controls at dangerous intersections. Although these options do not actually prioritize bike traffic over car traffic as bike boulevards are supposed to do, they do slow cars down, which is critical. Specifically, we prefer the following features: • Carmelita East: Neither of the options will suffice. We would like raised crosswalks at all intersections. 11 • 4 way stop sign at Paloma and Carmelita and the removal entirely of parking restrictions. • Carmelita West + Grove: one speed cushion per block + hi viz crosswalks. Grove is not heavily used by bikes and doesn’t need bike facilities. • Mills Ave: one speed cushion per block + hi viz crosswalks + sharrows. • Paloma: sharrows + bike crosswalk signal at Broadway + traffic calming at Paloma and Oak Grove. • Capuchino: sharrows. Manito Velasco: Thank you for hearing this item. And thank you for the City and the City Council for dedicating $70,000 from the City’s general fund towards this consultant study. I remember the consultant made a presentation at BPAC back in September. The BPAC slide said the consultant “revised concepts to address comments raised by BPAC.” What specific changes were made? Tonight’s presentation is basically the same. I live on Capuchino. And so am very familiar with Paloma, Mills, Grove and Carmelita. There was a slide about 7 slides in titled “Typical Intersection Improvement” shows the intersection of Lincoln and Capuchino that shows a painted/plastic bollard bulb at that intersection. I am against this because that intersection is already very tight that even regular drivers have a tough time turning here. If you do this, Recology and UPS/FedEX trucks will no longer be able turn into our block. I’m also opposed to ‘bike slots’ that not only remove parking, but also forces bicyclists unnecessarily off to the side, instead of traveling in a straight line. These ‘bike slots’ will also narrow the entry that will also make it impossible for garbage trucks to turn here. The Carmelita proposals are likewise flawed. I’ll echo the comment earlier tonight and what I’ve heard BPAC advise staff and the consultant back in September – we need an all-way stop at Paloma and Carmelita. It’s hard to fathom the intersection of two bike boulevards not have that level of safety control. Lastly I hope the Commission would do a walking or biking audit before endorsing this plan. In order to see these proposals on site rather than on a screen. I think that worked well at BIS when Commissioners Israelit and Wettan joined staff, the public and the consultant to see the problems and solutions firsthand. Some of what’s being proposed doesn’t make sense. Chair Martos said he would not be in favor of increasing the parking restriction on Carmelita and he likes B/PAC’s recommendations to remove the parking restrictions completely. He also said he is not in favor of the painted bulbouts and plastic bollards. Chair Martos suggested using speed cushions sparingly. He said he was unsure about the stop sign requests from B/PAC, but that is something that can be considered after another go at this plan once the recommendations have been incorporated. Vice-Chair Israelit stated she strongly disagreed with B/PAC’s request to remove the current 12 parking restriction on Carmelita Avenue. Commissioner Leigh clarified that B/PAC would like the speed cushions to go across the entire roadway to the curb/gutter and they prefer one per block. She also explained that by allowing parking on both sides of Carmelita Avenue, it would slow down the vehicular traffic. Chair Martos thanked the consultants for their presentation, time, and efforts. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a) Engineering Division Reports • Highland Parking Garage Update – Staff has placed signs at two of the City’s near- capacity lots informing drivers of the new parking garage location and rates. Staff working to inform all Downtown businesses of the location and availability within the new parking garage. • Murchison Drive, Trousdale Drive, and Davis Drive Bicycle Route Project Update – Staff presented the project to San Mateo County BPAC as part of City’s TDA Article 3 Grant Application. Grant could provide $400K towards designing and constructing the improvements as identified in the City’s Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP). • Burlingame Pedestrian Safe Routes and Mobility Improvement Project Update – Staff working to initiate grant-funded ($200K) “quick-build” project to enhance pedestrian safety and access near schools and transit. These quick-build improvements include high-visibility crosswalks, advanced pavement markings, striped bulb-outs, red-curbing, or rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) at various locations throughout the City. All project locations were identified in the City’s BPMP. Commissioner Leigh asked if TSPC and B/PAC would have an opportunity to review the conceptual plans and make suggestions. Mr. Wong indicated he would be bringing the item to the Commission for review and feedback, and B/PAC would also have an opportunity to provide feedback. TSPC Priority List (revised January 2022): TSPC Led Effort 1 Broadway/Carmelita Bike/Ped TSPC Study 2 BIS School Safety Improvements 3 Pedestrian Safety at California/Burlingame Ave 4 Lorton Corridor TSPC Study (Roundabout to Howard) 5 SB California Lane Configuration (Bike Mobility) 6 Bike\Ped Plan Priorities 2/10/22: Item 6b 13 7 Parking Garage Usage 2/10/22: Item 7a 8 Downtown Parking and Access 9 Broadway Parking 10 School Transportation and Safety Issues Staff Updates 1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2 Downtown Parking Strategies 3 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 5 Bike\Ped Plan Implementation 6 Chapin Avenue Green Streets Project 7 Old Bayshore Corridor Study (n/o Broadway) 8 Grant Opportunities 9 Broadway Grade Separation 10 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 11 School Speed Limit Updates 12 School Safety Improvements 13 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 14 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 15 Broadway/California Update 2022 Agenda Item Action Status 1 Various Stop Signs b) Police Department Reports Sergeant Perna reported 10 documented collisions for this period, which is the lowest they have seen in a while (one of the collisions was a courtesy report for the City of Millbrae). He stated there was no pedestrian collisions and only one bicycle collision. Sergeant Perna explained the collision with the bicyclist was on Willow Avenue and Newhall Avenue; the bicyclist was southbound on Newhall and made a left on Willow and struck a parked vehicle from the rear. Sergeant Perna also pointed out the collision on El Camino Real and Rosedale, which involved a vehicle changing lanes. Sergeant Perna shared the heat map of collisions and the changes he made to the data layers. Chair Martos requested to review the heat map in more detail individually. Vice-Chair Israelit stated the new layer with the recent collisions was very helpful. 14 c) Farmer’s Market No update. d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications Chair Martos stated they will have an upcoming Brown Act refresher training, with the date to be determined. Chair Martos also reminded the Commissioner’s about the Form 700 requirement. Mr. Wong stated that the preference is to complete the Form online and instructions would be forthcoming. Vice-Chair Israelit stated she had a communication with a resident regarding speeding on Adeline Drive, but suggested they discuss it another time. Mr. Wong said he would discuss targeted enforcement with Sergeant Perna as a start. Chair Martos stated he met with the Mayor and shared the TSPC priority list. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS a) Burlingame Avenue Safety and Access (Leigh & Martos) Chair Martos stated he met with Commissioner Leigh and they came up with a list of ideas with the intent to prioritize the list, share it with Mr. Wong, and bring items to the Commission as necessary. b) Community Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Leigh & Rebelos) No update. Vice-Chair Israelit suggested a BIS safety audit committee to help move that effort along. Vice-Chair Israelit and Commissioner Ng volunteered for the committee. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS • Status of projects previously presented to the Commission. • Proclamation for former Commissioner Chris Bush. 10. ADJOURNMENT 10:30 p.m.