Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2020.11.12Traffic Safety and Parking Commission City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, November 12, 2020 On March 17, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow for local legislative bodies to conduct their meetings telephonically or by other electronic means. Pursuant to the Shelter-in-Place Order issued by the San Mateo County Health Officer on March 16, 2020 (which was then extended on March 31, 2020), the statewide Shelter-in-Place Order issued by the Governor in Executive Order N-33-20 on March 19, 2020, and the CDC's social distancing guidelines which discourage large public gatherings, the Council Chambers will not be open to the public for the November 12, 2020 meeting of the Burlingame Traffic Safety and Parking Commission. Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below. Additionally, the meeting will be streamed live on Youtube and uploaded to the City's website after the meeting. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame.org. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda. The length of the emailed comment should commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 12, 2020. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time, but cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 p.m. deadline which are not read into the record will be provided to the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission after the meeting. Members of the public may comment on any action or study item appearing on the agenda at the time it is called. Comments on other items should be made under agenda item #5. Provision of identifying information is optional but assists in preparation of the minutes. All votes are unanimous unless separately voted for the record. Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 11/9/2020 November 12, 2020Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting Agenda 1. Call To Order To Join the Zoom Meeting (Note - the link below doesn't look like a hyperlink, but it is): https://zoom.us/j/94196391714?pwd=NnpDMTRDMTlRdzZYTC81UUhXYVRuUT09 Meeting ID: 941 9639 1714 Passcode: 262757 One tap mobile +16699006833,,94196391714#,,,,,,0#,,262757# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,94196391714#,,,,,,0#,,262757# US (Tacoma) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) Meeting ID: 941 9639 1714 Passcode: 262757 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad7JfJE54T 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes October 8, 2020 Meeting Minutesa. October 8, 2020 Meeting MinutesAttachments: Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. The Commission Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 5. Public Comments: Non-Agenda 6. Discussion/Action Items Community B/PAC Update (Informational Only Item)a. Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 11/9/2020 November 12, 2020Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting Agenda Review of Proposed Parking Time Restriction Options for the New Parking Garage on Lot N b. Staff Report Presentation Attachments: Consideration of Increasing the Frequency of the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meetings Discussion c. Staff ReportAttachments: 7. Information Items Engineering Division Reportsa. Staff ReportAttachments: Police Department Reportsb. Farmer's Marketc. TSPC Chair/Commissioner's Communicationsd. 8. Committee & Sub-Committee Reports Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)a. Broadway Parking (Bush & Israelit)b. School Traffic (Israelit & Wettan)c. Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Londer & Wettan)d. 9. Future Agenda Items 10. Adjournment NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public viewing on the City's website as City Hall is still closed to the public. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: December 10, 2020 Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 11/9/2020 1 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of Thursday, October 8, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:03 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Bush, Londer, Martos, Wettan MEMBERS ABSENT: Israelit 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) August 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes Motion: To accept the August 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes as written. M/S/C; Londer/Bush, 4/0/0 b) September 10, 2020 Meeting Minutes Motion: To accept the September 10, 2020 Meeting Minutes as written. M/S/C; Londer/Wettan, 3/0/1 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA Adrienne Leigh said hello to the Commission and spoke about having concluded a B/PAC meeting before the Commission meeting. Madeline Frechette spoke about two recent bike/motor vehicle collisions and acknowledged that some B/PAC members know the affected parties. Ms. Frechette stated her friend was hit while using the southbound bike lane on California Drive. A car going northbound in the left turn lane to turn onto Trousdale Drive did not yield and hit the bicyclist. Ms. Frechette stated that this location had previous collisions and stated that the City does not take immediate action despite multiple collisions. Ms. Frechette stated she would like TSPC to figure out a policy or City action to make quick improvements to prevent people getting hurt and make these locations safer. 2 Manito Velasco stated that the location Madeline Frechette mentioned has had 4 injured bicyclists since 2012. Mr. Velasco stated it is not a new phenomenon and that he had encountered it himself. Mr. Velasco stated that the 4 reported serious collisions did not account for the near misses, and that collisions are a lagging indicator of a problem. Mr. Velasco stated if an intersection has zero collisions, it does not mean that it is safe. He said that it just means that the collisions have not been reported or they have not occurred. In this case, Mr. Velasco stated that there is a collision pattern and that he hoped the City would take an immediate action to figure out what is wrong and to try to fix it. Mr. Velasco stated another immediate safety concern was Airport Blvd and Beach Road by the Facebook campus. Mr. Velasco stated Airport Blvd had been reconfigured around the buildings and is now curvier, but that there is an intersection that was previously used by families to go from Burlingame to Coyote Point. Mr. Velasco stated that the new T-intersection is now blind due to the reconfiguration and stated that he has seen near misses in the last two months. Mr. Velasco said he saw a potential for more conflicts once construction is completed. Mr. Velasco acknowledged that there are zero collisions for this intersection, but stated there is potential for collisions and requested TSPC recommend a treatment for this intersection before somebody got hurt. Commissioner Martos asked for clarification regarding the T-intersection. Mr. Velasco clarified the location of the T-intersection at Airport Blvd and Beach Road and stated that it was on the border between the City of Burlingame and City of San Mateo. Christopher D. Beall stated he joined B/PAC after he was hit by a motor vehicle in 2018 on Airport Blvd and wanted to speak about the collision on California Drive and Trousdale Drive. He stated that the bicyclist was a friend and was hit by the car going 25 mph and was thrown 30 feet, but did not sustain serious injuries. Mr. Beall emphasized that California Drive is vital to the City of Burlingame and connects multiple transportation hubs together and is lacking protected bike lanes. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS a) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only) B/PAC Chair Leslie Beatty acknowledged that B/PAC had discussed the collisions. An intersection noted was Oak Grove Avenue and Laguna Avenue where a car ran the stop sign, while a bicyclist was on Laguna Avenue. Ms. Beatty referenced that many homeowners on Laguna Avenue have signs that say, “Drive like you children live here” and “slow down.” She stated that this was another area of concern and stated that this area was an extension of California Drive bike facility. Ms. Beatty stated that the neighbors had been asking for slow streets and traffic calming measures. Ms. Beatty informed that the B/PAC was eagerly awaiting feedback regarding their input into the Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan and stated that they had not heard back yet. Commissioner Londer said he thought the B/PAC meeting had gone well and acknowledged the presence of a new City staff member, Transportation Program Manager Lisha Mai. Commissioner Londer expressed that with Lisha’s presence maybe there would be improved communication and expressed concerns about recent bicyclist/motor vehicle collisions. Commissioner Bush stated that addressing collisions should be brought as a future agenda item and should be encompassed in the Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan. 3 Commissioner Bush also expressed that he too is anxiously awaiting the completion of the Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan. Commissioner Martos also expressed concern regarding recent collisions and was interested in viewing more data. Commissioner Martos said he would like to see a compilation of City data related to bicycle and motor vehicle collisions going back to 2012. Vice Chair Wettan concurred with Commissioner Martos and stated he would like to see a compilation of hotspot data. Vice Chair Wettan acknowledged the additional work involved in data compilation and asked if B/PAC and the Commission would volunteer time if needed to put together data. Traffic Sergeant David Perna stated the reports were available and could be provided to B/PAC or await direction from TSPC on how to proceed. Vice Chair Wettan stated that he agreed with a review of intersection collision data and a creating process to analyze and discuss hotspot intersections. He spoke about remembering a bike collision on Trousdale Drive a few years ago and recognized reoccurring collisions merit taking another look at the intersection(s). He expressed excitement regarding viewing the upcoming Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan. Adrienne Leigh stated that it was easy to obtain the data on pedestrian and bicycle collisions for the past five years of incidents via the statewide incident reporting system. Ms. Leigh stated repeat pedestrian collisions were near pedestrian generators (i.e.: train station, BHS, shopping areas) and again stated that it was easy to print out the report. b) Parking Garage Update Mr. Wong confirmed that the parking facility was anticipated to be open by late winter/early spring. Mr. Wong stated that the deadline for the Request for Proposals (RFP) for wayfinding systems for the parking garage and Lots C and Y was extended. Sustainability Coordinator Sigalle Michael presented an EV Charging Stations Highland Parking Structure PowerPoint presentation. She stated that California State Code requires that 6% of the parking spaces be equipped with EV charging stations. Following California State Code, the parking garage will have 23 EV charging stations on various levels with 2 ADA spaces. Ms. Michael stated that the City issued an RFP for the EV charging stations and that Powerflex was selected. Powerflex had local experience, provided the lowest cost option, and can charge various types of electric cars including Teslas. Ms. Michael spoke about LCSF credits (low carbon standard fuel credits) and how the credits allow Powerflex the capability of providing the lowest cost option by participating in the carbon market. Powerflex had no network fees or transaction fees, and additionally they provided the lowest charge cost. The charge cost is set to only recover PG&E electricity costs. Ms. Michael stated Powerflex has power sharing across their chargers and are able figure out how much power to give a car over a period of time. Powerflex will be applying for a grant for a super-fast charger on behalf of the City. Powerflex also provides an easy payment system App. Ms. Michael emphasized that the parking garage will be open 24 hours and expected to see high EV charging station usage during the day. Ms. Michael stated that the EV chargers should be functional by March 2021 when the parking garage opens to the public. She stated that depending on the experience with Powerflex, it was possible to implement similar EV charging stations for the future Community Center parking garage. Ms. Michael stated that the City will have ownership over the Powerflex charging stations as opposed to the EVgo charging stations. Ms. Michael expressed that lessons were learned through the EVgo charging station experience and hoped that these new 4 Powerflex charging stations would be more frequently used. Commissioner Londer thanked Ms. Michael for the presentation. He expressed that he was glad that the new charging stations can charge Teslas, that the parking garage will be open 24 hours, and that there was a time restriction for turnover. Commissioner Londer wondered if there were additional spaces that had been pre-wired to allow for future EV charging stations. Ms. Michael clarified that no additional spaces were pre-wired in the Highland Parking Garage, but spoke about the City’s modification of reach codes for residential parking lots that will require conduits to each parking space for future developments. Ms. Michael clarified that Powerflex believed additional charging stations could be added in the future with power sharing. Ms. Michael spoke about City Hall’s EV charger continuous usage, and Mr. Wong concurred that he too has observed various electric vehicles charging at the station. Commissioner Martos inquired about solar power panels on the parking garage. Ms. Michael acknowledged that the solar power panels were considered, but unfortunately were not in the budget. Commissioner Martos inquired if the Recreation Center would have solar power panels. Ms. Michael confirmed the Recreation Center is meant to have solar power panels and that the City was looking into how to pay for solar with the intention of the Recreation Center being net zero. Commissioner Martos inquired about the cost of the EV chargers and acknowledged that the cost would be attractive to electric car drivers. Commissioner Martos wondered if rates were going to be structured to encourage periphery parking. Mr. Wong acknowledged that rates and cost structure will be discussed. Mr. Wong spoke about parking meter credit card minimum transaction charges that will be addressed in conjunction with the discussion about rates. Commissioner Bush inquired about if an adapter for Tesla is needed. Ms. Michael clarified that Teslas are already equipped with a level 2 adapter. Commissioner Bush inquired about the charging station spacing reasoning since various charging stations at various parking levels eliminates convenience. Ms. Michael asked Mr. Wong if charging cost would vary based on level and Mr. Wong confirmed that various levels would indeed have different cost structures. Ms. Michael stated that this was the largest installation of EV chargers and that City staff is also interested in how the EV charging stations in the parking garage will go. Commissioner Bush stated that the City has 3 charging station vendors which requires the user to install various Apps needed to use the various charging stations, and inquired about creating future charging station consistency. Ms. Michael clarified that other Powerflex benefits outweighed the App inconvenience and that users would establish a new habit to dedicate to one charging station. Vice Chair Wettan emphasized the importance of a new state mandate that will only allow electric vehicles sales after 2035. Ms. Michael spoke again about new City reach codes for every new home and renovations that will require one level 2 charger and one charging plug. She also stated that for multifamily residential developments 10% of parking spots will need to be level 2 charging stations and that remaining parking spots will need to have access to a charging plug. She also stated that commercial developments will also have a 10% charging station requirement. Vice Chair Wettan stated that this discussion should be a future agenda item to revisit EV charging in residential buildings and spoke about personal experience with limited EV charging access. Vice Chair Wettan spoke about 5 having a future expansion plan for EV charging stations for the parking garage and stated that this was the number one issue. He also inquired about having to pay for charging and for the parking spot. Ms. Michael confirmed that users would be required to pay for charging and the parking space. Mr. Wong confirmed the same dual payment is required at the train station charging stations. Vice Chair Wettan asked if there were any up front installation costs. Ms. Michael confirmed that it came out to $2,800 per charger and that the total contract price was $65,000. Vice Chair Wettan asked about EVgo’s contract duration and possible replacement. Ms. Michael clarified that EVgo has a 10 year contract with the City and were also benefiting from the LCSF credits. Vice Chair Wettan and Ms. Michael spoke about the adapter challenge with EVgo charging stations. Mr. Wong clarified that the parking fees are built into the charger. Mr. Wong spoke about the decreased complexity of installing more charging stations since the devices are wall mounted. Vice Chair Wettan emphasized that electric charging will change in the upcoming 5 to 10 years. Ms. Michael mentioned that Peninsula Clean Energy has a $1,000 rebate for the purchase of an electric vehicle. c) Parklet and Street Closure Update Mr. Wong stated that the Broadway full street closures were still occurring and start at 4:00 pm on Saturday thru 10 pm on Sunday. Mr. Wong stated that the Broadway BID likes the street closures flexibility of expanding past the expanse of a parklet. Mr. Wong expressed that Broadway is starting to prepare for wet weather and that they appreciated the parklet option. Mr. Wong spoke about exploring side street parklets and reaching out to businesses. Mr. Wong reported that Downtown Burlingame has 34 businesses that have submitted an application for a parklet or have installed a parklet. Many businesses have requested more space, but space is limited. Mr. Wong stated over 250 barriers have been placed and that 70 on-street parking spaces had been impacted. Mr. Wong stated that businesses have requested curbside pick-up parking and that Copenhagen was one of the first businesses to request a curbside pick-up parking sign/space. Commissioner Londer expressed that the parklets/street closure were a good thing and hoped that the weather would hold. Commissioner Martos inquired about the cost of a parklet application. Mr. Wong stated that there are no associated fees at this time. Commissioner Martos noted that in the evening some parklets are not being used and provided the idea to permit restaurants to use the empty parklet and to share the space. Mr. Wong stated that parklet space sharing was already occurring. Mr. Wong provided the example of Sixto’s Restaurant and Delfina Pizzeria parklet space sharing. Vice Chair Wettan shared his personal experience about dining with his daughters on Broadway and expressed that it was a nice experience. Vice Chair Wettan inquired if for the winter the parklets are allowed to have a heat lamp. Mr. Wong spoke about an ongoing discussion amongst City officials regarding heat lamps. Vice Chair Wettan spoke about multiple cars getting through the Broadway street closures via Laguna Avenue and spoke about the need for clear signage, especially at night. Mr. Wong thanked Vice Chair Wettan for the information and Mr. Wong confirmed that he would reach out to the Corporation Yard staff to address the issue. Vice Chair Wettan spoke about speaking to the restaurants about the Broadway street closures negative impact on takeout and stated the need to 6 explore a way for easy takeout. Mr. Wong acknowledged the idea to allow takeout parking in nearby Broadway City parking lots. Christopher D. Beall spoke about the impact on Chula Vista Avenue due to the Broadway street closures. He spoke about the increased speeds on Chula Vista Avenue and the need for additional traffic calming. Mr. Wong acknowledged that City staff could look at additional signage and coordinate with Burlingame Police Department to place the radar trail on Chula Vista Avenue. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a) Engineering Division Reports  TFCA Grant Update – Staff was not successful in obtaining the TFCA grant for the Lyon-Hoag Traffic Calming Improvements or the Video Detection Upgrade on the City’s SMART Corridor Intersections projects. However, the TA grant was submitted, and involves California Drive and the east side of the Burlingame Train Station.  Lyon-Hoag Traffic Calming Improvements Update – Phase 1 of the Lyon- Hoag and Adjacent Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvements Project is currently being advertised. Improvements are scheduled for construction starting November 2020 with anticipated completion by the end of the year. Phase 1 includes quick build improvements such as striping of centerlines, edge lines, high visibility crosswalks, striped medians, trial traffic circles, trial bulbouts, modular trial speed cushions, and street signs. Quick builds are aimed to quickly delivery pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements unlike major capital project that can take longer to design, bid, and construct. They are reversible, adjustable traffic safety enhancements intended to be evaluated and reviewed within an initial period of 2 to 4 years after construction to help determine design and plan for mid- term modifications and long-term designs.  Federal Resurfacing Project Update – The work along California Drive has been substantially completed with resurfacing, signage, traffic loops, and the installation of new pedestrian ramps. Ramps are currently being installed along Broadway. Trousdale Drive has been paved with striping improvements to come. Cadillac Way and Highland Avenue were paved during the first weekend in October to minimized impacts to adjacent businesses. The project is approximately 50% complete and is scheduled to be substantially completed by the end of November. This assumes no weather delays or other unforeseen conditions.  Village at Burlingame Update – The parking garage is anticipated to be completed late winter or early spring 2021. The completion date for the workforce housing project (Village at Burlingame) has not been determined as there was a redesign of the foundation of the building. Currently, no new date has been set. 7  300 Burlingame Point Update – The roadway is now open to the public, but has not been accepted by the City. Due to PG&E issues, the traffic signals are scheduled to be operational sometime in mid-November 2020. Staff anticipates the new roadway to be accepted at the December 7th, City Council meeting.  IPS Meter Installation Update – Due to SIP, meter production was delayed and staff has only recently received all equipment. Conversion of the existing 475 coin- only meters with IPS smart parking meters is scheduled for end October at the following locations. Downtown Burlingame Avenue City Parking Lots  Lot A-3  Lot B-1  Lot C  Lot D  Lot J  Lot K  Lot L  Lot M  Lot O  Lot V Broadway Area City Parking Lots and On-Street Parking  Lot P  Lot Q  Lot R  Lot Y  Lot S  Capuchino Avenue  Paloma Avenue  Laguna Avenue  Chula Vista Avenue Commissioner Londer inquired about the redesign of the Village at Burlingame housing foundation. Mr. Wong stated he would inquire further with City staff regarding the redesign of the foundation.  TSPC Priority List (revised October 2020): TSPC Led Effort 1 Downtown Parking and Access 10/8/20: Item 6c 2 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8/13/20: Item 6b 3 School Traffic and Safety Issues 3/12/20: Item 7a 4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming 10/8/20: Item 7a 5 Broadway Parking 10/8/20: Item 6c 6 Citywide Transportation Alternatives 2/13/20: Item 6c 7 Bay Trail Improvements 8 Electric Vehicles 10/8/20: Item 6b 9 Bike Share Feedback 12/12/19: Item 6b Staff Update via Report 1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2/13/20: Item 7a 2 Hoover School Update 10/8/20: Item 7a 8 3 Downtown Parking Strategies 10/8/20: Item 7a 4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/11/19: Item 6b 5 California Roundabout 5/9/19: Item 7a 6 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 10/10/19: Item 7a 7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8/13/20: Item 6b 8 Rec Center Parking 3/12/20: Item 7a 9 Old Bayshore Corridor Study 12/12/19: Item 7a 10 Grant Opportunities 10/8/20: Item 7a 11 Broadway Grade Separation 6/11/20: Item 7a 12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 13 School Speed Limit Updates 6/13/19, Item 7a 14 School Safety Improvements 3/12/20: Item 7a 15 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 10/8/20: Item 7a 16 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 10/8/20: Item 7a 17 Broadway/California Update 2020 Agenda Item Action Status 1 Council Direction Regarding Improving Short-Term Parking in the Burlingame Avenue Downtown Area Poles and SMART meter have been installed and are currently being programmed. b) Police Department Reports The collision report was distributed prior to the meeting as part of the agenda packet. Sergeant Perna stated there were 24 collisions for the month of September. Sergeant Perna listed the collisions: above referenced collision on California Drive and Trousdale Drive, fatal collision on California Drive in front of Putnam, and 9 injury collisions. Sergeant Perna spoke about the California Drive and Trousdale Drive collision and confirmed that the motorist was at fault due to a failure to yield. He spoke about the report stating the motorist did not see the bicyclist. He stated that sun could have been a factor, but was not documented in the collision report. Sergeant Perna confirmed that the data could be provided to B/PAC and Commission for review. Sergeant Perna and Vice Chair Wettan spoke about the logistics of the collision. Vice Chair Wettan spoke about another hotspot at Hillside Drive and El Camino Real and how the sun can be a factor. Vice Chair Wettan inquired about the California Drive fatality. Sergeant Perna spoke about the fatality being related to street resurfacing, and that the collision occurred between a street sweeper and a motorcycle. Vice Chair Wettan spoke about another hotspot at El Camino Real and Rosedale. Vice Chair Wettan and Sergeant Perna spoke about a parked car collision on Broadway and that the location was the Walgreens parking lot. Sergeant Perna relayed again that collision information can be provided. Commissioner Londer noticed that many collisions were driver error and inquired if citations were issued at each occurrence. Sergeant Perna stated that it was on a case 9 by case basis and citations are not given at each occurrence. Commissioner Martos inquired about collision report listing at Howard Avenue and California Drive since it was not listed as a fatality or major accident. Sergeant Perna clarified that the data fields were reduced and that he was going to speak about the fatality. Ms. Leigh inquired about whether or not the drivers of the 2 bicycle collisions were cited. Sergeant Perna confirmed that neither driver was cited and acknowledged Ms. Leigh’s inquiry. c) Farmer’s Market Commissioner Londer stated he had all the materials for the TSPC to be a part of the Farmer’s Market again and that anyone was more than welcome to take them. d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications Commissioner Londer stated that this meeting maybe he last meeting. He stated that he enjoyed serving on the Commission and that he had learned a lot, but mostly importantly cherished the friends he made and community members he had met. Commissioner Londer stated that he would be around and would still be involved in community activities. Commissioner Londer stated that he was certain this was his last meeting unless the City Council had not appointed a new commissioner. Commissioner Martos stated that at the intersection of Howard Avenue and Bloomfield Road there was a lanyard that said “yield to pedestrians” and that political stickers were placed on the sign. Commissioner Martos suggested having City staff clean up or replace the sign. Commissioner Martos expressed his sentiment regarding work ing with Commissioner Londer and described him as knowledgeable, patient, and insightful. Commissioner Martos stated that Commissioner Londer had helped him along the way on TSPC and that he had enjoyed working with him. Commissioner Martos expressed his admiration for Commissioner Londer and emphasized his service. Commissioner Londer confirmed he had been on the TSPC for 12 years. Vice Chair Wettan stated he had a communication regarding a Burlingame Hills Association email regarding a hedge and stated maybe it would be a future agenda item. Vice Chair Wettan expressed that he was at a loss of words and was sad to hear the news regarding Commissioner Londer’s departure from the TSPC. Vice Chair Wettan stated that Commissioner Londer is friend and mentor, and emphasized that he is a better person for having served with Commissioner Londer. Vice Chair Wettan talked about Commissioner Londer’s service, taking counts of school intersections and the selfless nature of his service. Vice Chair Wettan thanked Commissioner Londer for his service, friendship, and mentorship and stated that he deserved the break, but that he hoped Commissioner Londer would visit the TSPC again. Commissioner Londer thanked everyone for their kind words and friendship, and thanked Stephanie and wished her well with her delivery. 10 8. COMMISSION & SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan) No update. b) Broadway Parking (Bush & Israelit) No update. c) School Traffic (Israelit & Londer) No update. d) Citywide Transportation Alternatives (Londer & Wettan) No update. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS  Burlingame Hills Association Hedge Item  Joint Meeting with Planning Commission regarding EV Charging Stations and Reach Codes  Bike/Ped Collision Traffic Data Review  Oak Grove Avenue and Carolan Avenue Intersection  Broadway Parking Rates  Highland Parking Garage Rates 10. ADJOURNMENT 9:12 p.m. 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO: 6.b MEETING DATE: November 12, 2020 To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Date: November 12, 2020 From: Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer – (650) 558-7230 Subject: Review of Proposed Parking Time Restriction Options for the New Parking Garage on Lot N RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) review and provide feedback regarding the parking time restriction options for the new parking garage being built at Lot N. BACKGROUND The Village at Burlingame affordable workforce housing development, which is currently under construction includes 132 senior and workforce housing units on Parking Lot F and a new 368- space public parking garage on parking Lot N. Lots F and N were previously designated as long-term, 10-hour, “pay-and-display” parking, and were typically utilized primarily by employees that work in the downtown area. The current project schedule calls for completion of the parking garage in the Spring of 2021. Previously on Lot F there were 100-spaces and 105-spaces in Lot N. The new parking garage provides an additional 162-spaces to the overall downtown parking inventory. The parking space breakdown by level is as follows: LEVEL STANDARD SPACES EV SPACES ACCESSIBLE SPACES TOTAL SPACES Ground Floor 48 8 8 64 2nd Floor 68 8 0 76 3rd Floor 69 7 0 76 4th Floor 74 0 0 74 5th Floor 78 0 0 78 TOTALS 337 23 8 368 Item 6.b – Review of Proposed Parking Time Restriction Options November 12, 2020 for the New Parking Garage on Lot N 2 DISCUSSION Prior to the opening of the parking garage, new parking restrictions and rates must be approved by the City Council. Prior to Council action, the TSPC should be part of the process; by reviewing the options and providing a preferred option for Council consideration. The parking garage project will introduce 23 electric vehicle (EV) spaces spread out between the first three levels. The EV spaces have Level 2 chargers capable of providing a full charge to most EVs in four-hours. Due to this charging period, the EV spaces should have a minimum restriction of four-hours. In addition to the standard parking rates, the EV spaces incur charging fees, estimated to be between $0.15 and $0.30 kW/Hour. Staff is proposing two separate options for the parking restriction associated with the new garage. Option A: Dedicate the upper three levels to long-term parking and short-term on the lower two levels. This would offset the parking loss from both Lots F and N (206) by providing 214 standard spaces and seven electric vehicle spaces, while increasing the short-term parking inventory in the downtown by 123 standard spaces, 8 accessible spaces, and introduce 16 EV spaces. The parking rates would be similar to the existing rates in the downtown, where the long-term parking is $3.00 for the 10-hour period and $1.00 per hour for the short-term parking. The EV spaces would have a 4-hour restriction on the lower two levels, and 10-hours on the 3rd level. Option B: Would dedicate the entire garage to long-term parking and EV charging spaces. As part of this option, the TSPC along with staff would review the other long-term parking lots and on-street spaces to determine which could be converted to short-term parking. With this option, all parking rates in the garage would be $3.00 for the 10-hour period including the EV spaces with the additional electricity charging related fees. Staff recommends that the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission discuss the matter, obtain public feedback, and make recommendations of preferred option with a vote. Attachments:  Presentation Review of Proposed Parking Time Restriction Options for the New Parking Garage on Lot N Traffic Safety and Parking Commission November 12 , 2020 Parking Lot F: 100 spaces Parking Lot N: 106 spaces Garage Parking Distribution LEVEL STANDARD SPACES EV SPACES ACCESSIBLE SPACES TOTAL SPACES Ground Floor 48 8 8 64 2nd Floor 68 8 0 76 3rd Floor 69 7 0 76 4th Floor 74 0 0 74 5th Floor 78 0 0 78 TOTALS 337 23 8 368 Downtown Parking Map Parking Restriction Options Option A: Dedicate the upper three levels to long-term parking and short-term to the lower two levels. This would offset the parking loss from both Lots F and N (206) by providing 214 standard spaces and seven electric vehicle spaces, while increasing the short-term parking inventory in the downtown by 116 standard spaces, 8 accessible spaces, and introduce 16 EV spaces. The parking rates would similar to the existing rates in the downtown, where the long-term parking is $3.00 for the 10-hour period and $1.00 per hour for the short-term parking. The EV spaces would have a 4-hour restriction on the lower two levels, and 10-hours on the 3rd level. Option B: Devote the entire garage to long-term parking and EV charging spaces. As part of this option, TSPC along with staff would review the other long-term parking lots and spaces to determine which could be converted to short-term parking. With Option B, all parking rates in the garage would be $3.00 for the 10-hour period including the EV spaces with the additional charging related fees. Questions & Feedback 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO: 6.c MEETING DATE: November 12, 2020 To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Date: November 12, 2020 From: Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer – (650) 558-7230 Subject: Consideration of Increasing the Frequency of the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meetings RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) review and discuss the information presented in this staff report to consider increasing the frequency of the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) meetings from the current schedule of once a month to twice a month or to hold special meetings on an as-needed basis; and provide direction to staff accordingly. BACKGROUND Currently, the TSPC meets every second Thursday of each month to discuss traffic circulation, traffic calming, bike and pedestrian concerns, and parking related matters. The role of the TSPC has historically been to serve as an initial venue for the City to receive public comments, concerns, and inquiries for issues related to traffic and pedestrian safety and parking related matters. DISCUSSION Recently, the City Council requested staff to include an item on their agenda to discuss the possibility of increasing the frequency of the TSPC meetings from the current schedule of once a month to twice a month in order to help facilitate timely input by the TSPC and to expedite other ongoing transportation, traffic safety, and parking issues heard by the Commission on a regular basis. At the September 10, 2020 TSPC meeting, the TSPC touched on the subject regarding an additional meeting. The TSPC commented that special as-needed meetings would be “ideal” and that “they didn’t feel the need to meet more often than the current schedule”. Staff recommends that the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission discuss the matter, obtain public feedback, and make recommendations of the preferred option with a vote. 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO: 7.a MEETING DATE: November 12, 2020 To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Date: November 12, 2020 From: Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer – (650) 558-7230 Subject: Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission receive a presentation by staff providing an update on various Public Works – Engineering projects and activities. BACKGROUND  San Mateo County Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Grant Update – At their November 5th meeting, the San Mateo County Transportation Authority Board approved both the California Drive and Caltrain Station Improvement project. The total grant award for both of these project was $1.4 million dollars.  Lyon-Hoag Traffic Calming Improvements Update – Bids were opened on October 27, 2020. The City received a total of three bids, with Sierra Traffic Markings, Inc. being selected for the project. Improvements in Phase 1 are consistent with approved Lyon Hoag and Adjacent Neighborhood Traffic Calming Studies and Recommendations Report. They include:  Trial striped traffic circles and/or median islands at nine intersections  Trial speed cushions at eight locations  Trial striped bulbouts at six intersections  High visibility crosswalks enhancement at 23 locations  Additional curb marking, signage, and striping at various locations  Widening existing 4’ bike lane to a 5’ Class II bike lane on Howard Avenue  Federal Resurfacing Project Update – Project is currently working on Broadway with completion anticipated for before Thanksgiving. After paving Broadway, the focus will be on punchlist and close out procedures. 2020 Resurfacing project is underway with near completion of the concrete work. Project will then proceed with digouts and paving.  300 Burlingame Point Update – Acceptance of the roadway may take place sometime after City Council approval scheduled for December 7th meeting. Occupancy of the Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update November 12, 2020 2 buildings will occur as early as January 2021.  2020 Sidewalk Program– Staff had a pre-construction on November 3rd to begin the project. The contractor Golden Bay Construction will not be starting until December 2020, but have provided submittals for review. The main areas of work are the north side of Easton Drive from Balboa to Vancouver, Bayview Place at Airport Boulevard, and the area is surrounded by Alvarado, Hillside, El Camino Real, and Adeline.  IPS Meter Installation Update – As of November 2nd, the meter contractor and Parking Enforcement, converted 514 parking meters. The remaining 50+ meters are anticipated to be converted before the end of the year.  TSPC Priority List (revised November 2020): TSPC Led Effort 1 Downtown Parking and Access 11/12/20: Item 6b 2 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8/13/20: Item 6b 3 School Traffic and Safety Issues 3/12/20: Item 7a 4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming 11/12/20: Item 7a 5 Broadway Parking 10/8/20: Item 6c 6 Citywide Transportation Alternatives 2/13/20: Item 6c 7 Bay Trail Improvements 8 Electric Vehicles 11/12/20: Item 6b 9 Bike Share Feedback 12/12/19: Item 6b Staff Update via Report 1 Caltrans’ ECR Corridor 2/13/20: Item 7a 2 Hoover School Update 10/8/20: Item 7a 3 Downtown Parking Strategies 11/12/20: Item 6b 4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/11/19: Item 6b 5 California Roundabout 5/9/19: Item 7a 6 Oak Grove/Carolan Traffic Signal 10/10/19: Item 7a 7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8/13/20: Item 6b 8 Rec Center Parking 3/12/20: Item 7a 9 Old Bayshore Corridor Study 12/12/19: Item 7a 10 Grant Opportunities 11/12/20: Item 7a 11 Broadway Grade Separation 6/11/20: Item 7a 12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 13 School Speed Limit Updates 6/13/19, Item 7a 14 School Safety Improvements 3/12/20: Item 7a 15 Lyon-Hoag Neighborhood Traffic Calming 11/12/20: Item 7a 16 300 Burlingame Point Traffic Impacts 11/12/20: Item 7a 17 Broadway/California Update Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update November 12, 2020 3 2020 Agenda Item Action Status 1 Council Direction Regarding Improving Short-Term Parking in the Burlingame Avenue Downtown Area Poles and SMART meter have been installed and are currently being programmed. DISCUSSION Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that would typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City Capital Improvement Projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are addressed as Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6).