HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1974.02.19L21
Burlingame,
F ebruary
California
r9, L974
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of
on the above date at
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG:Led by Charles F. Schwalm, City
Manager.
ROLL CALL
the Burlingame City Council was calIed to order
8:15 p.m., Mayor R.D. Martin presiding.
tuns trup-Cro sby-Cus ick-Mang ini-Mart i n
None
the passing of
Herbert K. White.
Present:
Absent :
Councilmen:
Councilmen:
MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of February 4t L974, previously submitted
to members, were approved and adopted followingr a correction under
the title "HEARING.i' In the eighth paragraph, second line, change
"Mrs. Nolan" to'Mrs. McGavin."
with deep regret, Mayor Martin announced
Mrs. Florence White, wife of City C1erk,
COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
Mayor Mart,in announced that the Council has confirmed the following:
To Health, Safety & Traffic Commission, Arnold H. Rodman,
905 Morrell Avenue, and Miss Christine Lee Keating, 2J-08 Easton Drive;
to Planning Commission, Ju1es "Boots" Francard, LL29 Juanita Avenue,
who served the City for many years as Park Director prior to his
retirement.
COMMISSIONER RESIGNATION :
In a letter dated February 11, 1974, Mr. Elbert E. Huntley,
482 Marin Drive, informed the Council of his resignation from the
Hea1th, Safety & Traffic Commission for personal reasons after
serving for s6me eleven years. In accepting the resignation,
the Chiir requested the City Manager to acknowledge the communi-
cation on belalf of the Council, ind to thank Mr. Huntley for his
years of faithful service in the City's interests.
INTRODUCTION OF CANDIDATES, MUNICIPAL ELECTION
The Chair acknowledged the presence of Adolph "Bud" Harrison,
376 Lexington Way and Harry S. Graham, 1555 Alturas Drive, candidates
with Mayor Mart,in and Vice-i,Iayor Crosby for the City Council in the
March 5, L974, election. Mr. Ilarrison complimented the Council on
its innovative appointment of the first l8-year old to a City com-
mission. He reported that Miss Christine Keating, new appointee to
Health, Safety A Traffic Commission, is a student in one of his
government classes at Burlingame High School.
HEARING (continued from meeting of September L7, 1973)
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: Resubdivision of Lot 8, Viewland Estates
and Portion of Lands of Kilbourne. Florin Rhoads, proponent.
Mayor Martin announced his intention of not participating in this
continued hearing because of comments that have been made inferring
he is opposed to the resubdivision. Deferring to Mayor Pro Tempore
Crosby, the Mayor joined the audience.
Mayor Pro Tempore Crosby explained that the application was heard
init,ially by the Council at its meeting on September L7, 1973, and
$ras returned to the Planning Commission for further review and report
after lengthy discussion. The Council was furnished copies of the
minutes of the Commission's meeting on November 26, 1973, wherer or
l2s
a vote of 6 to I (one member abstaining), the foLlowing motion was
approved: "The Planning Commission reports to the City Councj.l
that it was aware of the circumstances and facts when it voted onthe parcel map at a previous meeting."
In response to the Chair's request for background review, the City
Planner stated that the Planning Conunission initially considered the
map at a hearing on July 23, L973, where it was approved on a vote
of 4 to 3; subsequently, one member, $rho voted in favor, resigned,
leaving a remainder vote of '3 for and 3 against. As requested by
the Council, the Comnission reviewed the conditions of the map
and, as recited in the minutes (11/26/73), it was the Commission'sposition that it fu1ly understood that a new 1ot line would be
added to create two parcels and, a1so, there was a piece of anotherproperty to be subdivided to give access to Parcel B over a common
driveway and easement serving Viewland Estates Subdivi.sion. The
Planner stated that Parce1 B, the 1ot to be created by the resub-
division, is on a steep downward slope, and encumbered with ease-
ments. A dwelling here would, of necessity, be sited back of the
easements that cross the narrow entryvray.
The City Engineer recalled that the Council, in a prior action,
approved abandonment of one sanitary se$rer easement and accepted a
substi.tute easement in another location to accommodate the proposed
Iot. He stated that with the sewer, and installation of lateral
and water servj.ce facilities, the parcel map complies with require-
ments of the applicable subdivision ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tempore Crosby stated
meeting indj.cated there were no
ment .
that the
prob Iems
Fire Chiefof concern
an earlier
his depart-
at
to
Declaring the hearing open, the Chair invited the proponents to
comment .
Mr. Edward R. Johnston, l-535 La Mesa Drive, a principal in the
development of Viewland Estates, addressed his comments to the
issue of public utility easements on the property, pointi.ng out that
all throughout the city sanitary sevrers and water mains lie within
the public street right of $ray. There is no difference between this
situation r"rhere motorists drive over underground installations and
at Viewland Estates hrhere there will be vehicles travelling over a
combination public utility easement and common driveway.
The Chair pointed out that structures are not permitted over public
utility easements. Mr. Johnston stated that a sewer easement on aportion of one side of Parcel B is a private, not dedicated, easement.
Mr. Rhoads explained he has been working with several members ofCity staff on this proposed resubdivision for a period of at least
5 years,, that he has the support of many of his neighbors, and that
a group]is present at this meeting to endorse his application.
In response to inquiries from Councilman Cusick, Mr. Rhoads reported
that Parcel A is owned by Thomas A. Leutzinger, that he (Rhoads)
purchased the area designated Parcel B about five years ago and
that, physically, the area was in the same condition then as now.
Councilman I{mstrup asked why the corunon 1o! l-ine betvreen Parcels A
and B should not be straight, rather than the unusual meandering
line shown on the map. Mr. Rhoads explained that the existing power
pole easement dictated the course of this boundary; furthermore,
because he does not own Parcel A, he had no authority to place the
lj.ne there, nor would there be any particular advantage. Buildable
area would not be increased because the line would then be in the
center of the pole easement.
Councilman Mangini noted that in September, 1973, when the Council
held the initial hearing on the map, Councilman Amstrup raised the
same questi.on on the boundary line and Mr. Rhoads explained that
straightening the line would reduce the area of Parcel A and, perhaps,
preclude future resubdivision except by variance. Mr. Rhoads, in
anshrer to Councilman Mangini, stated that the power pole easement was
inadvertently omitted from his corunents at the last meeting.
I2tr
In response to Councilman cusick, Mr, Rhoads stated the possibility
of future resubdivision of Parcel A is extremely remote. The City
Planner reported that Parcel A has lega] street frontage on La Mesai
however, a buildi.ng permit would not issue for development of therear section unless an approved parcel map r^ra s on file with the City.
Councj.lman Mangini advised he visited the property and spoke withMr. Rhoads. The issue of the 2-L/2 fee|'. proposed to be taken from
Lot I and added to Parcel B for purposes of access was discussed.Mr. Rhoads pointed out that he owns both properties and that neither
will be adversely affected by reason of this small exchange.
Reference was made to a statement in the Planning Commission minutes
of November 26, 1973, concerning deposit of construction waste on
this land some years ago. Mr. Johnston refuted this, explainingthat Viewland Estates Land has solid rock 4 to 10 feet below surface,
that there was no construction debris, but less than 2 feet of soil,
placed there about 20 years ago and this should have no bearing on
the current proposal.
Mayor Pro Tempore Crosby noted that the Planning Commission minutes
(LL/26/73') contain a statement to the effect that this land was
never intended to be developed. Mr. Rhoads stated this is not cor-
rect.. Parcel B was never a part of ViewLand Estates Subdivision
and was not discussed when the subdivision map \,/a s approved.
Apparently, the reference is to the lot in the subdivision that
borders Mi1ls Canyon, a very large lot, partially fiIled. It is
recognized that to attempt to resubdivide here would not be an accept-
able land use.
With reference to Parcel B, Mr. Rhoads stated it would be foolish to
attempt to build here unless there were an engineered foundation.
There were no further
declared closed.
comments from the floor. The hearing was
A motj.on introduced by Councilman Cusick to approve the Tentative
Parcel Map of a resubdivision of portion of Lands of Kilbourne and
Lot 8, Viewland Estates, prepared by Peter Royce, c.E., dated
June 6, L973, on the condition that any building foundation shall go
to bedrock, was seconded by Councilman Mangini and carrj-ed. on unanimous
vote of Councj,lmen Anstrup, Crosby, Cusick, I"langini. (Mayor Martin
did not particj.pate in discussion, nor vote. )
RECONVENE
Following a
at 9: l0 p.m.
recess at 9:00 p.m., Mayor Martin reconvened the meeting
HEARINGS (cont. )
2. AIRPORT MARINA HOTEL ADDITION: At the request of the
in a l3, L974, the hearing on
matter was continued to the meeting of l,larch 18, 1974.
proponentsthis
3. AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO ZONING CODE
(a) Environmental Impact Report On Code Amendment
Height Limitations In R-I District - EIR-25P
Section 25 .28 .07 0
time and place scheduled to
adoption of the above-
ordinance No. 1002 Amending section 25.28.070 Of The Municipal
eoae -EeguEtEffieight of Structures In R-l- (First Residential)
Districts
Mayor Martin announced that
conduct a public hearing and
cited ordinance.
this vras theto consider
Mayor Martin acknowledged receipt o
No. 1-74 "Recommending Amendment Of
Distrlct. "
Planning Commission Resolution
The Height Limitations In R-1
f
127
The City Planner, invited by the chair to initiate the discussion,
explained, first, that new guidelines that became effective
December L7, L973, require that the Council shall "certify" an
E.I.R. He stated that an E.I.R. is required on an amendment to
the zoning ordinance regardless of the extent of the amendment.
In this instance, it is a report focusing gp-secondary effects
resulting from a code amendment i therefore i""- - is not the exten-
sive report on physical environment in this type of E.I.R.
The City Planner read the following from the latest guidelines
furnished by the Department of Resources: "An EIR on projects
such as the adoption or amendment of a comprehensive zoning ordinance
or a loca1 general plan should focus on the secondary effects that
can be expected to follow from the adoption, but the EIR need not
be as detailed as an EIR on the specific constructions projects
that might follow. "
Declaring the hearing open, the Chair invited co[unents from the
floor. ihere were none. The hearing was declared closed.
on a motion introduced by Councilman Amstrup, second by Councilman
Cusick, Environmental Impact Report 25P On Code Amendment - section
25.28.070 - Height L,imitations In R-I District, was unanimously
certified.
Amending .section 25.28.070 of The Municipal Code
structures In R-1 (First Residential) Districts"ORDINANCE NO. 1OO2 ''
Regulating Height of
was given its second reading. 'on motion of CounciLman Amstrup,
second by CounciJ.man Crosby and unanimousLy carried on ro11 call,
said Ordinance passed its second reading and was adopted.
(b) Envirorunental Impact Report For The Proposed Zoning Code
Amendment To Add ChaPter 25.72 Downbown Parking District
Regulations - EIR 26-P
ordinance No. IO03 Arnending Municipal Code By Adding Chapter
25.72 (Burlingame Avenue
Regulations) Regulating
District.
Area Off-Street Parking District
Building And Structures Within The
i,layor Martin announced that
to conduct a public hearing
cited ordinance.
this was the time and place
and to consider adoption of
schedu 1edthe above-
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2-74 "Recommendj.ng Code Amendment
Chapter 25.72 Downtown Parking District Requlations" was acknowledged.
For the benefit of the aud.Lence, the Chair explained that the J-egis-
Iation provides, in part, as follows:
"The following uses are permitted with a permit from the City
Council:
1. Buildings and structures that e*ceed thirty-five(35) feet in height.
2. Structures that cover more than seventy-five (75)
percent of the total ]ot. area.
3. Buildings that have a gross floor area of more than
15,000 square feet. "
At the time such projects are presented for approval of a special
use permit, the City council will have the opportunity of imposing
such off-street parking requirements consj.dered reasonable as a
condition to the use,
Declaring the hearing open, the Chair invited cornments from the
floor. There were none. The hearing was declared closed.
on a motion introduced by Councilman AmstruP, second by Council-
man Crosby, Envirorunental ImPact Report 26P For The ProPosed
Zoning code Amendment To Add chapter 25.72 Downtown Parking Dis-
trict Regulations, was unanimously certified'
12U
In a conununication dated January 2L, 1974, Vincent J. Russo,
President, The Distillery, An Eating And Drinking Establishment,
27)- EL Camino Real , San Bruno, requested approval of a dance
and entertainment permit for a new restaurant "The aggplant"
to be located at 1310 o1d Bayshore Highway, premises formerly
occupiecl by uenny's Restaurant. The communication stated that
a bo-naf ide- restaurant will be operated in the new location,
somewhat on the order of the Distilfery, which has been operating
in San Bruno for over 20 years. f'acitities at the Eggplant will
accoNnodate 120 for clining and approximately 75 in the bar and
lounge.
Fire and Police Department reports, dated February 14 and 15,1974,
respectively, recommended issuance of the permit.
A motion introduced by Councilman Mangini to follow customary Pro-
cedure by approving the dance Permit for a period of 6 months,
renewal beyond that time subject to reco[unendation from staff,
was secondad by Councilman Arnstrup and unanimously carried.
1. Dance Permit Approved Eggplant Restaurant
2. Burling ame Sister-City Association
In a co[ununication dated February 5, L974, Mr. Bill Garcia,
Burlingame Sister-City Chairman, reported on the Sister-Cities
Conference held in Thousand oaks, California, January 25-27,
ancl of his election to the conference board of directors. The
communication advised that the June 2 conference of California
cities will be held in Burlingame at the Airport Marina Hotel
May 3L through June 2,l-974, opening session at 10:00 a.m.,
June 1. An invitation was extentled to the Council to attend
thi,s session.
Additionalty, in his communication, Mr. Garcia asked the Council's
approval to BuElingamets Sister-City Corunittee soliciting contri-
Uulions from individuals and firms in Burlingame to be used j-n
fostering a community youth piogram.
In a related communication, dateat February L4, L974, the City
Manager submitted a statement for membership dues in t!9 United
States,/t',texico sister-cities Associations , Inc. , for !97 4 in :the
amount of $60.00. Also, Burlingame has been invited to join
"sister Cities International" at an annual fee of $I50.00, member-
ship year to start at the beginning of any month.
rollovring corunents from the city Attorney, the Council voiced no
objection to the fund-raising mentioned in Mr. Garcia's letter.
On a motion introduced by Councilman Crosby, second by Council-
man Mangini, and unanimously carried, the City Manager was
directe6 to authorize issuance of warrants for $60.00 membership
dues to u.s.,/Mexico sister cities Association, rnc., and $150.00,
annual membership in Sister Cities International .
Councilman Mangini noted that the Sister Cities conference in
June will overlap Burlingame Days celebration. He asked that
Ms. Joan Chase, Chairlady of this event, be informed.
3. Youth Art Month
In response to a request from the Beautification Commission, dated
ORDINANCE NO. 1003 "Amending The Municipal Code Of The City Of
Eurlffigam-E-y--E-d-dTng chapter 25.72 (Burlingame Avenue Area off-Street Parking District Regulations) Regulating Buildings And
Structures Within The District" rras given its second reading.
On motion of CounciLman Amstrup, second by Councilman Cusick,said ordinance passed its second reading and was unanimously
adopted .
COMMUNICATIONS
I {)€)
February LL, 197 4, signed by
Council unanimously endorsed,'YOUTH ART MONTH . ''
Clarence E. Rusch, chairman, the
a resolution proclaiming March, 1974,
4. Arbor Daf
Under date of February 14, L974, the City Manager forwarded a
communication from Clarence E. Rusch, Chairman, Beautification Com-
mission, advising that plans have been compLeted to commemorate
Arbor Day on March 7, 1974. The communication stated that pine
seedlings will be made avaiLable to all elementary school chil-
dren, together with leaflets describing their care.
A resolution submitted by the Commission "Commemorating the
anniversary of the birth of tuther Burbank on March 7, L974,
that March 7, 1974, be set apart and proclaimed "CoNSERVATIoN,
BIRD and ARBoR DAY"and March 7 'l-4, 1974, be set apart and pro-
cl-aimed "CONSERVATION WEEK" in the City of Burlingame" was unani-
mously endorsed by the Council.
Amendment to PERS contract
Fire Cadets
Exclude Crossing Guards andq
In compliance with discussion at the
February 6, 1974, and in response to
City l,lanager dated February 14, L974,
ing action:
Council study meeting on
a communication from the
the Council took the foLlow-
RESoLUTION No. 9-74 Resolution of Intention To Approve An Amend-
ment To Contract Between The Boar d of Administration of The Pub1ic
Employees' Retirement system And The City Council Of The City of
Burlingame (Exclusion of Fire Cadets And Crossing Guards Hired on
or After May I, 1974) was introduced by Councilman Crosby, who moved
its adoption, second by Councilman AnstruP, and unanimously car-
ried on ro11 ca1l.
6. Recreation Buildinqr Improvements
A recofiunendation from the City Manager under date of Eebruary 14,
1974, that Kingsford Jones, architect, be directed to prepare
detailed working drawings and specifications for the award of
contract for construction at the Recreation Center, in accordance
with the discussion at the february study meeting, was accepted
on motion of Councilman Crosby, second by CounciJ.man Mangini and
unanimously carried.
7. Approval of Bus Op eration Agreement
In a cornmunication dated February 14, J-974, the City Manager
reported that he and Mr. Wayne swan, city P1anner, interviewed
the applicants for operation of the Burlingame bus system.
Attached to the communication was "Evaluation Of Contract Operator
Proposals" prepared by the City Planner and a form of agreement
to be executed with Aj.rportransit, Inc.. It was the City Manager's
reconunendation that the agreement be executed for the reasons
that Airportransit is located in Burlingame, has the space to
store and r,rash the buses and space for fueling facilities, whereas
the other applicant does not. Additionally, Airportransit pro-
posal was fully in accord with the City's specificationsi the
other applicant made changes to his own advantage.
In response to the Mayor's inquiry of the City Manager and the
City Planner r4rhether they were satisfied that this was the best
arrangement for the City, both replied in the affirmative.
Councilman Cusick referred to page 9, Paragraph 12, concerning
basic rate of compensation. She asked for ctarification when, for
example, there is a holiday on a \^reekd.ay and the minimum hours of
operation recited in this paragraph do not accrue. The City
Attorney indicated no objection to the Mayor's suggestion that the
1i0
language be modified to read "Mondays through Fridays, legaIholidays excepted. "
Councilman Mangini asked about "Farebox collections are to be
made every ot,her dayr" page 4, second paragraph. The City
Planner explained t,hat it is intended that the operator willdeposit farebox revenue with the City every other day. Further,in response to Councilman Mangini, the Planner stated that
"Fares" and sale of multiple-ride ticket books have not yet
been finalized.
Councilman Amstrup raised the quest.ion of bus service on Sunday.It was pointed out that if the demand is there, the contract
can be amended to provide for the service.
Councilman Crosby asked the City Manager to investigate the
feasibility of the City making some arrangement whereby the
operator will provide for storage of propane that can be made
available for Police Department vehicles, if this becomes neces-
sary.
In response to Councilman Cusickrs question regarding controlled
distribution of the fuel, the City Planner stated that the
operator will be the only one authorized to release the fuel,
and the tanks will be metered.
RESOLUTION NO. 10-74 "Authorizi ng Execution Of Agreement By And
urlingame And Airportransit, Inc.; For The
Operation Of The Burlingame Transit System" was introduced by
Councilman Crosby, who moved its adoption, second by Councilman
Mangini and unanimously carried on roll caII.
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 1001 (cont,inued from mee ting of February 4 , L97 4')
FrotIaIng Eor stop sign for vehicles traveling easterly on
Trousdale Drive approaching intersection of l{agnolia Avenue was
continued to t,he meeting of March 18, L974, to allow for further
study on traffic signal installation in lieu of a stop sign.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
an'Broadwa Parki1.
men
4.rhi
De Leuw Cather &
t was
t:Acknowledg-
ruary 14.
Streets:
o enue a
With Council concurrence, the Chair announced that a public hearing
will be held at a special meeting on Tuesday, March 26, L974.
2. Memorial Tree In Memory Of A. Woods Giberson: A recommendation
f rom the tseautification Commission that this memoria I be implemented
was forwarded to the Council by the City Manager under date of
February 14. It was the City Managerrs position that the thought
behind t,he request was laudable but contra to established policy.
His recommendation that the policy and the reason therefor be
communicated to the Commission was approved by the Council.
3 . Bicentenniql Cornmuqlt11PrqAlgqi Under date of February L4 , 3.g7 4 ,the City Manager recommended that BurI ingame defer, temporarily,joining this program for the reason that it would appear best that
the activities be done on a county-wide basis. His suggestion that
the Council endorse the efforts of the San lt{ateo County Bicen-
tennial Committee was approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 1I-74 "Endorsing The Efforts Of The San Mateo County
e,'.wasintroducedbyCounci1manMangini,who
moved its adoption, second by Councilman Crosby and unanimously
carried on ro11 catl. (Copy of resolution to be sent to Committee.)
o a memo rom e ty Manager a
of els Parish Senate est For One-
s reques or one-way a c nort on
Our
one-way southbound on Cortez Avenue between Hillside and Easton
Drives, forwarded by the City Manager under date of February L4,
131
was refered to Hea1th, Safety & Traffic Commission for consideration
at its March meeting with subsequent report to the Council.
UNFINISI{ED BUSINESS
1. SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (AB 2901 and SB 1519)
Councilman Amstrup reported on his attendance at a meeting on Friday,
February 15, L974, at the request of the City Manager, where two
members of the County Board of Supervisors, Assemblyman Dixon Arnett,
the County l"lanager, and city rePresentatives discussed the legislation
pending in Sacramento. He reported that j-t appears at this time that
the measure wiLL not be on the June ballot and referred to a lengthy
communication from Jean Fassler, Board of supervisors Chairman, dated
February L5, 7974, wherein fj.ve amendments suggested by legislative
comlittee members were detailed. Councilman Amstrup stated that
two of the amendments are deemed to be " non-negotiable . " They
concern a provision for binding arbitration to be $/ritten into the
act, repla-ing "meet and confer" negotiations in the current version,
and the deletion of a motor vehicle in-lieu tax as a source of
revenue for the district.
Councilman Arnstrup stated there will be a meeting held by the Board
of Supervisors in the City of San Mateo City Hall on Thursday,
February 21; the public is encouraged to attend. Councilman Amstrup
stated it is shocking that legislators in Sacramento can take
this arbitrary stand that they are better able to judge what is
best for the peopte, than the people themselves.
i.s lation on a rtment bui Idi n conversions to condominium:
response to Counc man C us1 ck, t eC ty Attorney stated he wi If
o some further research and make a
egulating such conversions.
report to the Council on
NEW BUSINESS
1. I'IILLBRAE REQUEST TO USE BURLINGAME CITY DUI'IP
Acknowledgment rrras made of a communication dated February 19, 1974,
from Arthur Lepore, Mayor, City of Mi1lbrae, concerning a recent
change in pol1cy at Burlingame's d j-sposal area resulting in Millbrae
residents being denied use of the facility. He asked the Council's
consideration to allo$ring the City of Millbrae continued use for an
additional 6 monthsi in the meantime, efforts will be made to develop
a substitute arrangement.
The Council agreed to extend the privilege to Millbrae residents for
a period of 3 months, to June L, L974. The City Manager \^Ias
requested to so inform the City Manager of Millbrae. It hras pointed
out there will need to be some form of identification for Millbrae
users.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1. Announcement of San Mateo County Manpower Workshop, sponsored
by San Mateo County Economic opportunity Commission and San Mateo
County Manpower progrErm operators, wednesday, February 27,1974,
from 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., Ha1l of Justice, Redwood City.
2
I
dr
2. City of South San Francisco concerning development of a
paramedic unj.t referred to City Manager for transmittal toHealth, Safety & Traffic Commission and the Fire Department
review and report to the Council.
fu11
for
3. Announcement of testimonial dinner honoring Harland Minshew
on the occasion of his retirement as a member of the City Council
of the City of Pacifica, to be held March I, 1974, Nick's Restaurant,
Pacifica, 7:00 p.m.
L:i2
4. Report from Beautification Commission concerning landscaping
on EI Camino ReaI between Highway Road and Dufferin Avenue
referred to March study meeting.
5. Memo from Office of the City Manager concerning date of
Auxiliary-Crossing Guards dinner. The Council confirmed the
date as Saturday, March 16, L974, the place, Beardsley's.
6. Communication from Mills High School Booster Club endorsing
stop signs on Trousdale Drj-ve.
Commendation from Elinor Junge, SecretarY, Two By Fours
Square Dance Clubrto police and fire personnel for assistance
during a recent incident at one of their gatherings. City
Manager was request,ed to forward copy to Po1ice and Fire Depart-
ment,s.Mr. Louis Starr, L675 Escalante Way, reguesting enforcement
of lease Iaw.
7. Police and Fire Departments' monthly activity reports.
Minutes: Burlingame Civic Arts Council, January 15,
Beautification Commission, February '7, P1anning, January 28,
and notes from Council Study Meeting, February 6, L974.
EAGLE SCOUT AWARD
en prepare t,o
Mayor Martin announced that a resolution has
presented to Gregory D. Pike of Troop 131
for attaining the Boy Scouts' Eagle Award.
REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE
reCently elected chairman o f
Committee.
WARRANTS: Numbers 5207 through 5453 in the amount of $227,590,49,
affited,wereapprovedforpaymentonmotionofCounci1manCusick, second by Councilman Mangini and unanimously carried.
PAYROLL: Checks, Numbers L9409 through 20098, January, 19'14,
ffi-Efamount of $257 1723.74, were approved on motion of Councilman
Cusj.ck, second by Councilman Amstrup and unanimously carried.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeti.ng was regularly adjourned at 10:45 p.m., in respect to
the memory of Mrs.-Florence White, wife of City Clerk, Herbert K.White-
Respectfully submitted,
yn .H
Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED:
R;D. MARTIN, MAYOR
Mayor Martin reported he was
the. $3n r$Bteo County Regional Planning