Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1970.02.028Ie Burlingame, California February 2, L97O REGUIAR IIEETING A regular meeting of the BurliDgame City Council was held on the above given date. fhe meeting waa called to order at 8:1O p.m., by Uayor R. D. llartin. 1. At rrord fronr ttre Chair, all in the councll CharaberE arose andgave the Pledge of Allegiance to ttre Flag. 2. Upon bU CaIl, those preaent t ere: Councilmen: Angtrup-Crosb'lr- arotrnson-lilartin. 3. llle Minutes of the regular meeting of aranuary L9, L97O. Eulmittedto Council memberg previously, rrere approved and adopted. BUI I.DING-ZONING CODES VIOIATIONS ItIOMP SON PROPERIY.27O 1 I,IARTPOSA DRIVE Itayor t{artin recalled that the City Planner had notified Colrncil, atitE last regular meeting, of an action taken by the Planning Cmrissionin denying a variance reguest to provide legal status to an e<isting i11e9a1 building construction on the property of Nr. wiUian dhopson, 2701 ltariposa Drivei that the City Planner had not coneideredr,lr. ttrdrpson's verbal pronise to retnove the illegal structure by March 15, 1970, a valid contract and was directed thereafter by Councilto request the presence of l,tr. fihqnpaon to meet with Council on this date. A copy of the cGmunication addressed to Ur. Ihompson by the City Planner under date of iranuary 22, L97O, rms refeEed to by Council. Tte City Planner, requested by the Chair to c@ent furttrer, confimedthe ltarcih 15, 1970 date, atating that there Ehould be s@e definitiveaction taken by council hcrrever, to guarantee the reeooval of thestructure. Ihe City Attorney concurred with the Etatements of the City Planner, adding that a court action would be initiated if necessary, shouldttre orner fail to comply with a directive iEsued by Council. ur. vrillian ttropson tdentifled hinself as being the oqrner of 2701 uariposa Drive ald dtated:that he originally constructed a one wall "lean-to-1anai' because of the advantage it served in the use of the swimning poolr that over a period of years he continued the conEtruction by enclosing the lanai to provide a recreation room for his children and their friend s. Mr. lhqtrpson atated that he was hopeful that he would not be requiredto remove the structure in its entiretyt that it is an excellent windbreaker and ttrat he would prefer to reconatruct the room to conform to fire and building codes. ltre city Planner, in reply to inguiries frm the Chair, when the variance was denied by the Planning cqurisEion, was advised of his right of appeal to Council. stated thatthe applicant At the request of Council, a blackboard sketch was prepared by the City Planner, outlining a portion of the principle building, theaddition of a conplete atructure attached to the principle building and indicating construction extended into the rear and the sideproperty lines. llhe city Planner advised that violationE exist in both zoning andbuilding codesr that the building addition, joined to the original buiEding and extending to the side and rear proPerty lines is inviolation of side setback and rear yard zoning requirements; the xa atructure is erected on an inproper foundation, the exterior wall on the property line is not constructed of one-hour fire resistantmaterial and a windo,v has been installed in the wall that is adjacentto the adjoining property. citing other existing violations, the city Planner advised that nobuilding permits were applied for with respect to any phaEe of construction or electrical w"iring. A series of inquirie!, rrere directed thereafter by 'Itrqrpson, rrho acknahrledged t}rat he was a\,tare that were required and that through negligence, he hadfor them; confirming also, that he is a buildingoffices in another city, specializing in interiorpartitionE, walls and decorations. the Chair to Mr.building permitsfailed to apply contractor, withfini shings, Mr. Itrompson questioned whether he would be permitted to retain onewalI and the roof of the lanai as a windbreak if the remainder ofthe structure vrere removed. Mayor Martin, in reply, stated that the entire structure frqn its inception has been illegally conatructed and if ttre violations \rere permitted to continue, a precedent may be established. It vra I the recmrendation of the Chair that Mr. Trhompson eitsher re- construct his addition in fu1l compliance wi th building code require- ments or failing to do so, that he remove the entire strucutre on or before the 15th day of March, 1970. !!r. thqnpson, in reply to the Chair, advised that he would doubtlesEstart removing the accessory strucutre by ltarch 1, 1970. A motion was thereafter introduced by councilman crosby authorizingthe city Attorney to initiate an action against Mr. Trhqripson if thestructure is not removed ty March 15, 1970. fhe motion was seeonded by counci lman Johnson and unanimously carried. t{ayor !{artin announced the continuation of a hearing on the recmnendationof the Planning Coruri ssion proposing the adoption of an ordinanceproviding off-street parking for all land uses within the city of Burlingarne, action having been deferred pending a rePort fron the city Planner on his investigation of the adequacy of parking spaces proposed for apartmentE, as requeEted by Counei 1. ltre Chair requested a verbal clarification fron the city Planner relativeto hi8 written report on the apartment building survey. t.he city Planner advised that trro general areas where the greatest concentration d apartnents occur - Bayshore Boulevard and the blocke between Broadrray and Carmelita Avenue on Chula ViEta, Iaguna, Paloma and Capuchino Avenues rrere aelected to be surveyed and to determine whether a larger number of garage spaces are reguired than thoEeproposed; that all on-street parking permits \rere investigated, aEwell ae the buildings thenaelves, and wherein it was indicated that one permi t was issued for each unit within the apartment buildings. In reply to Mayor llartin's inquiry whether ttris was basically theratio proposed in the ne$, ordinance, the City Planner advised dn the af firmative. Irhe hearing was declared closed by the Chair. ORDINANCE No 911 "An Ordinance Amending Sec. 25.7O.01O, 25.70.020, and Sec. 25.70.050 and 25.7O I Off-Street Parking'5-70-O 0 and Addingof the Burlingalne Municipal code' tas introduced by Counci lman Crosby and given itE first reading. HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDITiIANCE RE: OFF-STREET PARKING FOR IAI{ID USES 2t+, COMMT'NICATIONS 1. CATIIEDRAL RESTAURAN? DANCE PERMIT APP ROVED A comlunication was acknorledged from ur. and !lrs. J. D. Irlenzie, ohrners of the Cathedral Restaurant, 1425 Burlingane Avenue, dated itanuary 15, 1970, requesting a dance permit to be used in the operation of the restaurant. A meoo frcn the city uanager, dated February 2, reporta received from the Police, the Health and each indicating approval. 1970, referred to the Fire Departmenta, A report fron the Fire Inspector advised that a structure at the rearof the property should be completely constructed and that the ovrner has given assurance that the project shall be complete wiltrin fifteen days. The City Planner, reading from a report prepared by the BuildingInspector, follonring an inspection of the subject premises, regueatedthat a definite cormitment regarding the completion be sub|nitted bythe applicant. I{r. I{enzie, in attendance, Etated that the construction will be completeby uarch 1, 1970. Inguiries were directed to the applicant by Council concerning the hours of dancing, the number of evenings dancing will be permitted and the type of music. l.{r. It{enzie advised that only br1, experience would he be in a positionto answeri that he would agree to engage a group featuring no morethan five instruments and dancing would be restricted to five nightsa week, from ltlednesday through Sunday. A suggestion fronr the Chair that a tenporary sixty day licenge be approved initially, rraE concurred in tqz llr. Ittenzie. Councilman Johnaon reported on her personal visitation to the restaurant and her favorabl.e impression with respect to its operation. A motion was thereafter introduced by counci lman Johnson tttat the dancepermit be granted for sixty days and renevred automatically if no probleme arise. Ehe motion was seconded \l Counci lman Amstrup and unanimously carried. Mr. Menzie was advised by t}te Chair to appear before Council prior tothe sixty day period at which time Council shall consider issuing a per:manent license. 2. P RITIIROSE IANE S DANCE PERIIIT Action on a requeat from Mr. Robert L. Chri sman, owner of Primrose Ianea, 1340 How'ard Avenue, in a communi cation to CounciL dated January 29, L97O. for a dance permit to be used in the operation ofthe cocktail lounge, t/ras temporarily withheld pending receipt ofreportg frqn the Fire, Health and Folice Departments. 3. PUTTER COCKTAIL I'['!NGE DANCE PERI.,IIT APPIJICATION A cc[finunication received from lt{r. alerold A. Rosenberg, dated ilanuary 23,' L9?O, identifying himself as the new orner of "IhePutter Cocktail Iounge " requested ttre continuation of a dance permi tgranted to the previous owner. Council acknourledged favorable reports received frsn the Eealth, theFire and Police Departments and a motion introduced by councilman Crosby, Eeconded by councilman ilohnson and unanimously carried, granted the applicant the continuation of the dance permit. ?.7,5i A cqmunication received frcm the City llanager, dated January 28, L9?O, advised that it was the recornnendation of hig Office and the Police Department that the yield signs be removed and that stop signs beinstalled at the northeast and southwest corners of Hale Drive atthe intersection of Colunbus Avenue. An accompanying survey reportfrqr the Police Departnent, subsequent to an investigation, indicatedthat the two{^ray stop sign is qrarranted. tlhe City Attorney lras requested to prepare the legislation necessary. ltayor Martin auggested that the stop signs be ordered and installedimedlately and that the yield sign be relocated to the Hillside Iane area. 5. RECREATION CEMTER CONTRAC? PROIECT I{ORK ORDER CHANGE A memo from the City Manager, dated January 29, L97O, advised thatMr. KingEford Jones, Architect, Recreation center Addition and Alter-ations, has requeEted a change order to extend and re-route a waterline in the area of the Crafts Store Room Addition, in the total amount of $506. oo . A motion authorizing ttre issuance of a change order as outlined bry the Architect, was introduced by Counci lman croEby, seconded bv councilman arohnson and unanimously carried. 6 BLTJE CITIP STAIIiP CICMPAT{Y A corununication was received fron the City Planner, advising that the Planning CotnisEion has approved a parcel nap dividing the acreageof Dore on Rollins Road, north of Broadr,eay, and a building on theproperty for a BIue Chip Stamp redenption centeri that in the studyof tle proposal, it \,raE revealed that in addition to depriving acceEsto other tenaDts, it \rould also effect the safety services of theCity; a request therefore has been suhrit,ted to tJre legal or.nrer, UrB. Kathleen ltt. Dore, that a public access easement be granted tothe City of Burlingame. the City Attorney questioned wtether an executed "grant of easement "frqn Mrs. Dore has been received. the City Clerk having advised that his Office has not received the executed docunent, an action by Counci 1 was withheld pending recej.ptof the exeeuted Grant of Easement. 7. PRIOPOSED STREET }IA!{B CIIANGE OI,D BAYSHORts HIGHMY 1!o AIRPORT BIJVD. A cmnunieation was acknc*'rledged frqn tie City Planner, dated Januae 29, 197O, reporting on the public hearings conducted by the Planning Cdnni ssion follcrring the referral by Council of a proposal to changethe name of (Old) Bayshore llighway to Airport Blvd. Tihe Report frqn the City Planner advised that the Corfinission, in itsdeliberationg, did not reach a consensusi voteE on first and second choiceE indicated diversified reccmnendations; on an alternate vote, Comrisaionerg recotEnended that a dividing line be established and that otre atreet name frc[tr the Hof,ard Johnson conrplex site northerly touillbrae Avenue be selected and that the nane of nold Bayshore Highway "be retained for the remaining portion of the street.. A cqnmunication from llr. I€onard C. Ithldo, representing the East of Bayahore Improv€unent Association, dated aranuary 30, 1970, relatedin considerable detail, the reasons for desiring the change in street nameE alr originally requested by the Improvetnent AEsociation. 4-TOP STGN INSTALI.,ATION CO!UI'[BT,S AVENT,E - IIAI,E DRIVE e16 A revienr of those reasons to substantiate the regueat for the name change to "Airport B1vd. " included the follcnring: (1) the current confusion in giving traffic directions, \l reason of the t]rree 'Bayshores " - "Bayshore BIvd., " "Bayshore Freeway' and 'Bayshore Highway; " (21 the proximity to the airport of the three rnajorhotels in Burlingamei (3) the added confusion in names of citystreets on the continuous major road from the Peninsula Overpass to the Airport - "Nrport BIvd., " "Broadway Extension, " "Bayshore Highway " -and the "Old Bayshore Highway,' and (4) the great maj ority ofproperty oulerE \,ri th frontage on Bayshore llighway desiring thestreet name change. lhe comnunication, referring to the opposition from a minority ofoffice tenanta rrithin the area, stated that the Associat,ion "takegthe pogition that tenants are the probl€m of the landlord and notthe problero of the Association or the City" and concl.uded with the recorunendation that council authorize the name drange, co bec@eeffective prior to January 15, 1971. Ihe Chair referred to the City Planner for ccfiment. lhe City Planner advised that during Planning Ccru[ission discussions,it was never indicated at any tirne, that ttre entire street be changedto Air?ort Blvd.; consideration should be given, hc,rever, to namingthe road along the Bayside Park and the wastffater Treatment Plant and the short strip designated on the map as the "extension of Broadvray r " and that insofar as recotntrending whettrer the street should be either Airport BIvd. or Old Bayshore Highway, he wae un- prepared to state. A cmruni d,ion was ackncnrledged frqr the City of lrlillbrae, expressing no preference in the street name change for the short distance the roadhray effects that City. fhe Clty Planner, in ansnering Counci lman Crosby's inquiries, adviEedthat it rras apparent frqn the reaction of the Planning cmisaionthat the street name change to "Ai rport Blvd.' was not acceptable; adding that the Chai rman of the Planning Cmaission indicated thathe favored the selection of one name for the entire street, otherthan "Airport Blvd. " Councilman Anstrup questioned the length of time in which oil companies may change their maps and to whi ch inguiry both the City Engineer and the City Planner estimated approximately trro years. Ihe Chair thereafter invited those in the audienee intereated in the subj ect to speak. !tr. Robert crey, Vice-President, Consolidated Test and Equipment, Inc., 1330 Bayshore Eighway, a tenant in a building within the area underdiscussion, debated the reasons set forth in the corununication fromI{r. Waldo, stating thtt the many tenants, wi th their busineEs invest- menta in Burlingame have a valid-voice in what is being proposed. ur. crey referred to a petition originalty filed in behalf of one hundred-twenty five tenants opposing the street name change as cqnparedwith approximately t\,renty- f i ve property ortners supporting the proposal and urged that the subject be held open in order that those in opposition may be heard. l.{r. A. Ames, 1501 Cortez Avenue, conmented on t}re traffic problemg in the area of his service station in South San F rancisco and the confusion in that city ty naming a street nAirport Boulevard " which doeE not provide a direct access to the airport. Mr. David Xeyston, Arrza Pacific cory. developer, spoke in defense ofthe re-naming of the street, stating that the road is being more corrnonly traversed as a route to the airport and that in attracting new tenantE, it would be desirable to associate the property withits proximity to ttte airport. 2T? M!. KeyEton added that in a discussion with the Postmaster. thelatter haa stated that mail would contLnue to be delivered to both neur and old addresaes for an unlimited period of time. Follcnring a brief rebuttal betr.reen Ur. Grey and Mr. Keyston, Mr. Greyreiterated his plea that council listen to the affected tenants. Mayor Uartin stated the opinion that the nost persuaEive argumentaginst naming tlre street "Air?ort Bhrd." was a stateoent made relat,iveto the traffic problems in another City by naning a street rAirport Boulevard " without direct access to the airport, and expressed hishesltancy in naming a roadr{ray within the radius of a park, "AirportBlvd . " Councilman Crosby, ccrmrenting upon the confusion existing because ofthe several names designating the one thoroughfare, expressed the opinion that one name should be selected. counci Lman Johnson coneurred. Counci Iman Amgtrup referred to the requeEt that tenants be given theopportunity to voice their opinions and recqrunended that the privilege be extended to both proponents and opponents prior to coutrci 1 di sposi tion. Tlhe City Attorney referred Council to a recently adopted ordinancerelating to procedure for re-naming streets, advising that ttre ordinance shal1 becor[e effective on Friday, February 6, 1970. A public hearing on the proposed street name eras thereafter scheduledby Council to be conducted on llonday, Uarch 2, 1970, rri th noti ficationof public hearing mailed to property ovrners of record and to tenantsaffected by the proposal. 7. FEDERAL "TOPICS" PROGRN{ A cq nunication rras received from the State of California, Departnentof Public works, dated ifanuae 23, 1970, advising that the City of Brrlingame shall receive an apportionment of $43,529.OO. representingite share in california's 1969-1970 fiscal year allocation of federal TOPICS funds. None ORDIIiIANCES - Consideration thereof : ORDINANCE NO. 910 "An Ordinance Addi ng Sec. 25.?O.O4O to 25.7O.O42to Chapter 25.12 rDistrictsr of the Burlingane titunicipal Code and Regulating the Uses of UnclaEsified Iands " was given its second reading. Counci lman ilohnson moved that the Ordinance be adopted, seconded tryz Counci lman A&strup. On the question, and in reply to the Chair's inguiry, the city planner advised ttrat the ordinance does not reelassify lands autoitraticallybut provides a control therefor. A Roll CaLl vote on ORDINANCE NO. 9L0 was declared as follorrrs: Ayes: Couneilmen: Amstrup-Crosby-rohnson-MartinNoes: Councilmen: None Absent Councilmen s None tlhe City Engineer advi sed, in a verbal report to Council, that hisOffice has forrrarded a preliminary application to the State for fundsto be expended on the Broadway Overpass project; the County of Sanllateo, serving the cities as the coordinating agent, will initiate acounty-rride study to determine that there is a traffic and safetyneedi and the allocation, to be duplicated the next fiscal year, isan unqualified grant to the city of Burlinqarne. RESOUTIIONS 21e UNFINISHED BT'SINESS 1. EMPI'YER-EMPIOYEE REIATIONS RESOLUTION RE: RULES-REGUIAIIONS A mesro frm the City l.Ianager, dated iranuary 29. L97O. referred to aresolution and supplernental rules and regulations for efilployer- employee relations under the ne!$, State 1aw, forwarded to councilfor revienr by the City Attorney some months prior. Tlhe City !{anager advised that he and t}re City Attorney have ttroroughly reviewed the material and recorunend that the information containedtherein be for*r:arded to city employee organizations for consultation \.ri th respect to its provisions. counci 1 concured $ri th the recornmendation . 2. REPORT RE: BLTIGIJI1 INN TEEN cIIrB FIrllD S A memo from ttre City Uanager, dated January 29, L97O, advised thatas reguested by Council, his Office questioned the Recreation Department concerning the Blingum Inn Teen Club fund balance indicated onlaEt month's repoEt and was advised tttat the club is accumulating funds to refurbish the teen lounge when the Recreation Center ia reconstructed . A.memo from the City Attorney, dated January 23, L97O, referred Councilto his memorandum entitled "Disclosure of Asgets" dated ,fanuary 7, 1970, distributed to council and other city officials. the City Attorney advised that nqlination papers and ttre nqninee'gcertificate of Acceptance may be filed with the city clerk from ifanuary 29 to February 19 (Noon) 1970, and that any person rrho aeeka norrination or election to a municipal office must disclose hisfinancial interests by filing a Statement of Financial Interestswithin ten days after filing Nonination papersi that the statute isnot clear with respect to the office in which the statement is to befiled and that the League of California Cities has recqmrended filingin the Office of the county clerk. lhe City Attorney advised that the City clerk hag been furni shed 'rstatement of Investlent" forns frm a printing agency, qualified in eleetion procedure; hcturever, his Office shall ascertain fron the county Clerk whether the form is acceptable. 2. CITY OF CARI{EL OPPOSITION DI SCI.oSI.IRE OT ASSETS IAW Ehe City Attorney referred Council to a ccnmunication received frqnthe city of carmel, dated January 30, 1970, accomlnnied by a resolution adopted by that City opposing the "Disclosure of Assets IaL n and reguesting that the city of Burlingame join with other cities ininitiating a Iegal action against the measure by contributing the sumof $200.o0. Ihe City Attorney advised that his Office is submitting no recomenda-tion to Council to participate in the proposed litigation. A discussion arose on the obj ectionable features of AB 325, regarding the disclosure of assets and its effect on city officials, con- cluding with the reconnnendation from tJ:e Chair that the city Attorney comrunicate vrith the legal department of the League of californiacities notifying that agency of the city council'E endorsernent of itsposition in opposing the n€!v, statute. NEW BUSINESS 1. DISCIOSSRE OT ASSETS . CANDIDATES ACKNOWI.,EDGEIIENTS lrayor li,tartin acknorledged submi ssion of the follcr'ring : 1. A conununication from the Volunteer Bureau of San Mateo county, announcing the third Annual can Do conference workshop at t'lills High School, !,!illbrae, on Saturday, Ilarch 14, wherein ways will be exploredin whi ch studenta may become involved in volunteer service withsocial, educational or governmental agencies of the conununi ty. Uayor [artin advised that the Fire Departnent has been interested inthis field and requested the city Manager to ascertain whether othercity departnents wish to participate. 2. A Bay Area Air Pollution control District "Fact Sheet" brochure, concerning the history and organization of the District. 3. A request from an organization, Focus on Young Children, for a proclamation designating lrtarch I through ltlarch 7, 197O as "Early Chi ldhood Education Week - " Ihe city lilanager waE reguegted to sulani t a report to Council on the functions of this Association. 4 . An acknor,rledgement f rcm Assembllman Paul N. McCloskey, iIr. , in rerrponse to Council's adoption of a Resolution urging ttre "cqnpletionof the Acquisition of Point Reyes lsational Seashore " and giving assurance that he will support the legislative neasurei 5. A cqflnunication frqn Assembllman llccloskey, requeating information on the City's disposition of "abandoned cars. " the Chair advisedthat he has replied to the letter frqr Mr; uccloskey. 6. A cfilplaint from a citizen concerning police behavior involvinghis son. Itre Ctrai r stated that the name would be withheld pending a report from the City Manager. ?. Annual Burfingame Planning cdmission report for the year 1969; a quarterly report frorn the San Uateo County Eealth DePartnentt and mtnutea from the Library Board, ifanuary 20. L97O, the PJ.anning canuai s si on, January 26, L9?O and the Park and Recreation cm[ission, ilanuary 13, 1970. ANNOT'NCEMENTS An Institute on Iabor Relations for city officials at the Biltmore Hotel, in Los Angeles, tlarch 18-20, L97O. Mayor Martin recommendedthat a mernber of Council consider attending the institute. A I€ague of california Cities llayors and Council Inatitute at theStatler-Hilton, in los Angeles, ltaY 22, Lg'lO. ACTION COI'NIY COI'NCIL OF MAYORS I{ayor !{artin referred to the recent meeting of the Council of llayorsof San l{ateo county and advised that resolutions were adopted by the menibers, (1) urging the elindnation of level railroad crossings and the construction of separation crossings in San l{ateo Countywithin the next five years and (2) on providing lodging for foreign students. lhe Chair further reported that a discussion alao rras held on a proposalto elect supervisors by district and on the proposed San ttateo County Refuse Disposal and Park Project. concernir€r the latter subj ect, the city uanager was requested toascertain fror ttre Scavenger CqsPany the status of the City of Burlingame relative to refuEe disposal. STUDY MEE TING CHANGE Ihe scheduled study meeting on Vlednesday, February 4, I.9?O, was changedto Saturday morning, February 7, at IO:OO a.m. n9 220 HOWARD AVENT'E P IAYG ROUND PARK In reply to councilnan. crosb,y, the city l{anager advised t}rat an appraisal will be received shortly on lots in the area of the Ecnrard Avenue playground park for report to CounciL a! the study meeting. COUNCILMAN GE RECOGNITION councilman Amstrup recormnended that the minutes of tfie various conmissions, eulogizing the later Counci lman ceorgre, be for,rardedto MrE. Alice ceorge. ACCESS ROAD PI.AZA AREA the city lrlanager, in reply to Mayor l{artin, advi sed that the petition fron merchants reguesting a maximum tr^ro-hour parking linit for an adj acent access road in ttre area of the Burlingame Plaza, referred by Council to ttre Parking Cqmission, is under study hy the Comission. GA1E (DENING ON CORTEZ AVENT'E Mr. eichard Minderman, 1508 cortez Avenue, addressed Council to referto his petition obj ecting to the opening of the gate entering Ray Park from the 15OO block on Cortez Avenue and to request the statugof his plea that it remain locked. DEDICATION NEW CfNT ITATL counci lman irohnson, council liaison, new City Hall, suggested that Council consider formulating plans for ttre dedication of the ne$r CityHall. Ihe qhair advised tE, the subj ect would be diEcussed at the ne><t study meeting. SPECIAI., EIJCTION AIINOUNCEi{ENT Hayor uartin announced that a special electj.on wotrld be conducted in conjunction with the It{unicipal Election, April 14, 1970, to electa councj.lman for a remaining taro year term. ADJOURNIIENT The rneeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. to meet on wednesday, February 4, L97O, at 6:15 o'clock, p.m. -/,lclrt+*<L4)hHERBtsRT I(: WI1IIE CIIY CI,ERX APPROVED /t- 'F... z- -- MAYOR Mayor l{artin advised that t}re subject has been referred to the Health,Sfety & fraffic Cornmi ssion and suggested that Mr. ltinderman attend the next regular meeting of the Cornnission on Wednesday, February 11.