HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1975.01.063l I
Burlingame, California
January 6, 1975
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was
rfate in the City HaII Council Chaml:ers. The meet'ing
order at B:10 P.[1. by lulayor William J. Crosby.
held on the above
was called to
L- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG:Lecl by Gerald A. Nordstrom, Chief
of Police.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent :
Councilmen:
Councilmen:
Ams trup-Crosby-Cus ick-Harr i son-Mangini
l{one
MINUTIIS
The minutesto the City
of the meeting of December
Council, were approved and
L6, L974, previously submitted
adopted.
HEARING
SIGN DISPLAY pRO SKI & SPORTS, 1247 BROADWAY (PERMIT DENIED WING SIGNS)
i.:Iayor Crosby announced this was the time and place scheduled to conduct
a public heiring ancl to consider the appeal of l,lessrs. Steve and
l,eit Aeat.ie from Planning Commissi-on refusal to issue a permit for the
sign display as it. exists on the builcling at L247 Broaclway.
Declaring the hearing open, Mayor Crosby requested the City Planner
to review circumstances pertj-nent to the appeal. The latter explained
that approximately one year ago the Building Inspector noticed new
painted- signs on Lhe front of the building, one sign 4'x27' over the
lecold-stoiy winclows, and two smaller wing signs, one at each end of
the building measuring 4'xI4' and 2-L/2 rx14 | , extending out from the
builcling walt toward the street. Because there was sign area in excess
of 32 square feet, Planning Commission approval was required. When
the Building Inspector determined there had not been such approval, the
owner of ttre Uusiness was asked to make application to the Commission.
On January 28, t974, the Commission unanimously approved the si-gn on
the front waII and ordered the side fins painted out. The Planner
showed a sli<le of the building to clarify location of the signs to be
obliterated and. a<lvised that the signs remained in place despite
noti.ce from Planning and Building Departments. Subsequently, a civil
action was initiated bY the CitY.
T5e City ALtorney explained that 1,1r. Beatie represented himself in
court. Judge Uiller-thought that Mr. Beatie should reapply to the City,
because of tfre lapse of time. Application was made to the Planning
Commission. After a hearing on November 25, the Commission again
refused t,he permit for the two smaller signs.
The City Planner informed the Council that Mr. Beatie told the Commission
a year lgo that there was a misunderstanding when arrangements were made
with the sign company, that the center sign was much larger than.he
anticipatedl ana Lfral it was not intended that the side fins be included.
I\,layor Crosby recognized Mr. Len Beatie who explained that the building
is recessecl-from Lhe street, four feet on one side and a little over
two feet on the other, in fact, is the only recessed building on
Broadway. Eastbound traffic is not alerted to the signs until lme-diately in front of the building, Coming west, the small sign facing
that direction can be seen approximately a half block away. Furthermore,
t.he exist,ing display, including the wing signs, is identical except for
copy to McClellan Hardrvare signs that were on the building for years.
The old signs were replaced with new but square footage exceeded present
code. Mr. Beatie nentioned that, when his display was rejected a year
d9o, the Cornmission, dt the same meeting, approved Beardsley's display..
/,
3t2
Beardsley's application was heard early in the meeting, his close to
L2:30 A.M., and he was appalled that the approach could be so dis-similar in the two applicat,ions. He advised that copy has been painted
out on the two signs within the past two weeks; "tennis" remains on
the west fin but will be deleted if the Council desires.
In response to Councilmen Amstrup and Cusick, 1,1r. Beatie reported that
an appeal was not filed a year ago for the reason that he was ah/ay
f rom the city and his son did not understand tr|noce,5ure.
Councilman Harrison pointed out there was
signs in violation and that almost a full
Planning Commission directed removal.
no effort made to remove the
year has lapsed since the
theMiller's
two
The
oaintedt-
In response to Mayor Crosby, the City Attorney confirmed that the
appeal before the Council is concerned with the recent action of
Planning Commission aL its meeting on November 25 when, Et Judge
suggestion, Mr. Beatie again attempted to obtain a permit for the
small signs.
Mayor Crosby asked the Planner to elaborate on the modifications.
Council was informed that Mr. Beatie offered to have the borders
out on both signs and the lower half of the wording on the right
wing.
The City Attorney mentioned that the signs will remain if City Council
overrules Planning Commission; if City Council sustains Commission,
he and Mr. Beatie will appear in court on Friday, January 10.
Councilman Mangini asked if the signs as they exist are in violation of
the orrlinance. The City Planner stated that Planning Commission must
approve a sign if larger than 32 sguare feet. A year dgor the Commision
approvea the sign on Lhe front wall of the building (4feet x 2lfeel, 108
s(uare feet) on condit,ion that side fins be painted out. On November 25
in tris presentation to the Commission, Mr. Beat,ie proposed modifications
which vrere not accepted.
iltr. Beatie reported borders
suitable equipment to reach
not been removed because of lack of
height.
havethat
t{ayor Crosby invited
hearing was declared
In response to Councilman Amstrup, the City AttorneY clarified that
Mr. geltie holds a permit from Planning Commission for the center
si-gn grantecl a year ago. Planning Commission action on Novernber 25,L974,
by-reison of two tie votes, vras, in effect, a denial of permit for
two wing signs.
Harri-son to sustain Planning Commission denial
by Councilman Amstrup and unanimously carried on
COi'1MUNICATIONS
}. APPEAL TIEARING SCHEDULED : ROOE SIGN SHERATON fNN
Acknowledgment was ma<le of a communication dated December 31, L974,
from Philip Wasserstrom, Architect, appealing the decision of the
Planning Commission at its meeting on December 30, L974, in
denying a permit for upper building sign at the new Sheraton Inn,
Lt77 Airport Boulevard. Mr. Rudy Rausch, General Manager, repre-
sentecl Sheraton. He was inf ormed by I'tayor Crosby that the appeal
will be heard by the Council at it,s regular meeting of January 20,L975-
2. TYUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
Under clate of December 31, L974, the City I'[anager forwarded original
ancl duplicate original of Automatic Fire Aid Agreement to be executed
between t5e cities of San Mateo and Burlingame. Councilman Mangini
raised the question of whether City of Burlingame personnel would or
,
comments
closed.
from the floor. There were none. The
A motion by Councilman
of permit was seconded
roll ca1I.
vrould not respond if City of San Mateo personnel were on strike.
Chief i{oorby state<l that, presumably, Burlingame's men would respond
in a mutual aid situation if they were asked to do so. Chief I{oorby
mentioned further that Burlingamers concept will vary from what
San I'Iateo has with Hillsborough and Foster City, but response will
stil1 be pursuant to Burlingame's running card assignment system.
RESOLUTION NO. 1-75 "Authorizing Execution Of Agreement For Automatic
Aid In Fire Fighting" was introduced by Councilman Amstrup who movedits adoption, second by Councilman Harrison and unanimously carried on
roll caII.
3. POSTING OF GASOLINE PRICES BY FILLING STATIONS
In a communication dated December L7, L974, Jean Fassler, Chairman,
San ivlateo County Board of Supervisors, advised that 10 cities have
responded indicating willingness to consider adopting an ordinance
whereby prices of gasoline will be displayed at service stations.
A copy of the County's proposed ordinance was furnished for the
Council' s information.
313
confirmed
2U,
The City Attorney reported that
recoflrmendation from the Councilof Weights and Measures will be
cities.
the Board of Supervisors has requested
of },tayors, and that the County Director
the enforcing agent- at no cost to the
During a brief period of Council comment, Mayor Crosby, Councilman
Amstrup and Councilman Cusick indicated opposition to the adoption of
such ordinance because it appeared to be discriminatory. Councilman
Harrison and Councilman Mangini were in favor. Councilman Harrison
stated there has been some discussion to the effect that shoppers
can enter and leave a store at will. A person would be far less embar-
rassed in that situation than driving out of a gas station.
4. PRIMROStr ROAD ONE-WAY
In a communication dated December 13, 1974, Harry S. Graham, Jr.,
Chairman, Health, Safety c Traffic Commission, advised that a recom-
mendation to restrict traffic on Primrose Road, from the intersec-
tion of Bayswater Avenue and El Camino ReaI to Howard Avenue, to
one-way, northbound, was approved by the Commission on a vote of
f j-ve to one at. its December 12 meeting.
In an addendum to the communication, the City Manager advised that
the State should be consulted on their traffic signal timing before any
action is taken. Alsor ES the City will shortly have a traffic
engineer, he should review a change such as this to be sure by solving
one problem others are not created, and alternatives should be explored.
The City Manager was authorized to communicate with the State Traffic
Engineer.
5. S}iNITARY S}IWER COLLECTION SYSTEM STUDY
In a communication dated January 2, L975, the Director of Public Inlorks
reported on proposals submitted by consulting engineers in connection
witir the above study. His recommendation that the firm of Metcalf &
Iicidy, Inc., Palo A1to, be retained to perform the work at a cost not to
exceed $25,000.00 was concurred in by the City Manager in an addendum
to the communication.
Councilman Cusick referred to the statement on Page 4, seconcl paragraph
under Phase I of }Ietcalf & Eddy's proposal: "Planning and zoning mapsrvj-ll be reviewed to determine where growth and changing land use will
affect future sewage flows, to the year 2000." She asked if the general
plan or zoning code will be used. The Director of Public Works respon-
cied that the consultant will be shown both and that the City Council'sfeelings with respect to the subject of growth and land use will be
communicated to him.
In response to Councilman Mangini, the Director of Public Works
tliat the agreement will recite a maximum cost of $25,000.00.
BAYSWATER TO HOWARD AVENUE
3l,t
6. PONDING rN GUTTER, L424 DE SOTO AVENUE
Aokrrowledgment was made of a communication dated December 18, L974,
from tlr. George D. McConnell of the above address requesting gutter
repair work to correct a hazardous conclition that occurs during the
rainy season. A memorandum from the Director of Public Works,
dated January 2, 1975, reported that the City's Construction Inspector
visited the location and confirms that a ponding situation exists.
Repairs should be made on a priority basis.
In commenting on the subject, the Director of Public Works explained
there has been a great deal more sidewalk work this year than antici-
pateci; budget allocation is used to repair conditions considered
hazardous to the public. This property is on the project list, but
it is doubtful that gutter work will be done this year.
I{ayor Crosby requested. t,he City Manager to inform }1r. McConnell
the Department of Public Works is aware of the problem and that
work will be scheduled on the established priority basis.
thatgutter
Councilman t{angini reported that ponding conditions exist
Burlingame Avenue and Stanley Road, Burlingame Avenue and
and in a section of Oak Grove Avenue.
also at
East Lane
7 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP IIOWARD AVE}iUE AND CTARENDON ROAD
In a communication dated January 2, L975, the Director of Public Works
aclvisecl that the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 for approval of
the above map. His recommendation that the map be approved by the
City Council, subject to conditions relative to water and sanitary
sewer servj-ce, was concurred in by the City l,lanager in an addendum to
the communication.
In response to Counc j.lman I'langini,
reportecl the owner intencls to build
one at a time, oD the proPertY.
the Director of Public Works
three single-family dwellings,
A motion by Councilman Harrison to approve the tentative parel map
being a reiubd,ivision of Lot.s LZ ancl 13, Block 32, Lyon and Hoag
Subdivision (Assessor's Parcel l.lumber 029-27 4'230) , on the conrlit'ion
that water and sanitary service be provided by the developer to
parcels B and C, was seconded by Councilman Cusick and unanimously
carried on voice vote.
B. REQU EST FOR STOP SIGN, SEQUOIA AVENUB AND CLARICE LANE
Unoer date of December 31, L974, the City Manager forwarded a comtnuni-
caLion from Mrs. Ljubica Blagdon, 2OL5 Clarice Lane, requesting a
stop sign at t.he intersection of Sequoia Avenue and Clarice Lane.
The City ltanager's recommenclation that the letter be referred to
I{ealthr-Safety & Traffic Commission and PoIice Department for
evaluatj.o., a.r.i report, Mrs. Blagdon to be so notified, was accepted
by the City Council.
9. PAR'TICIPATION UNDER I{OUSING AND COMFIUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT
Material on the above subject forwarded by the City Manager
date of December 31, L974, was acknowledged and referred to
City Council st,udy meeting to be held on January 15, L975.
2 . RIISOLUTION NO . 3-7 5
under
the
RESOLUTIONS
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2-? 5 "Resolution Of Intention To Approve An
itmen tween The Board of Administration of The
Public Employees' Retirement System And The City Council Of The
City Of nirrlingame" (One-ha1f continuance for miscellaneous members)
was introduced by Councilman Nlangini who moved its adoption, seconcl
by Councilman Halrison and unanimously approved on ro11 ca1l.
Serv ces O pec a oun
"AuthorizLng Execution of Agreement For
sel Re. Case Of State Of California vs.4
County of San Mateo, Westbay Community Associates, City Of Burlingame,
Et A1.'was introduced by Councilman Harrison who moved its adoption,
second by Councilman Amstrup and unanimously carried on roll caII.
ORDINA}TCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. L027 "Establishing A Legal Department" was given
Harrison, second by
second reading and was
I ts second reading. On mot ion of Councilman
Councilman lulangini, said Ordinance passed its
unanimously adopted on roll ca1I.
2. ORDINANCB NO. IO2B "An Ordinance Of The City Council Of The City
ng An Amendment To The Contract Between Theoftsurlingame AuthorizCity Council And The Board Of Administration Of The California Public
Employees' Retirement System" (identification and communication
personnel in the Police Department) was introduced for first reading
by Councilman Mangini.
APPEAL HEARING SCHEDULED
A letter dated January 3, L975, was received from I.{r. and Mrs.Edward
S. Goet,ze, 2200 Poppy Drive, requesting a hearing before the City
Council for the purpose of appealing an action by the Planning Com-
mission on Monday, December 30, L974, in denying a variance for
a carport rebuilt on the property in October, 1974, to replace an
older carport which was accidentally demolishecl. The hearing was
scheduled for the meeting on January 20 , 1975, the City l,lanager to
inform the petitioners accordingly.
31 5
Councilman Cusick commented on the outstanding
the city. Mr. Doug Beetlestone, President, Chamber
that Mr. Dale Perkins, Art Consultant, Burlingame
responsible.
CHAI,IBER Of' COMMERCE: Quarterly report of expenditures, January 1
@975, in an arnount of $3,000.00, approved on
motion of Councilman Mangini, second by Councilman llarrison and unani-
mously carried on voice vote.
CHILDREN'S ART WORK:
clisplays t,hroughoutof Commerce, advised
School District, is
UNFINIS}IED BUSINESS
1. 911 Ernergency Phone |lr4lilrer, Councilman Mangini, Council repre-
sentative to Area 911 Committee, reporte d there will be a meeting on
January L6. He asked if it was the Council's desire that he inform
the Committee that Burlingame agreed to participate in Plan II B,
reserving the option to Burlingame to operate its own 911 system.
Fire Chief Moorby expressed a desire to address the Council at its
January 15 study meeting on the subject. He explained that he and
the Chief of Police have ideas on what is best for the City of
Burlingame, and that he has asked the area coordinator for this
district to prepare a plan for Burlingame which, hopefully, will be
ready by the time of the study meeting.
Council indicating no objection, Mayor Crosby requested the City
l.lanager to place the subject on the study meeting agenda.
2. Code Amendments To Title 25 Zoning: Councilman llangini reported
that i:e and Councilman Harrison met with Mr. Dav id Keyston and
Jir. Robert Brown during the course of their review of the proposed
amendments. He and Councilman Harrison, in their capacity as
the Council suLr-committee appointed to review the amendments,
recommend acceptance of Environmental Impact Report 30-P as sub-
mitted to the Council, with the exception that Sections 25.42.055
and 25.42.070, proposed to be added to Tit1e 25, be referred to
tire Planning Commission with instructions that input be sought
from j-nterested parties.
3. "Hoover Trail"i In response to Councilman Mangini, the City
Attorney reported there was no appeal filed with the Council from
Planning Commission approval of a detached garage to be construct"t:
3l ri
attempting
back and fo
on the property in front of the proposed dwelling.
4. Amendments To Si n Code: Councilman Amstrup reported that he and
Counc Iman Cus c 1 study committee on sign code amendments,
request that amortization be mad
study meeting on JanuarY 15.
e a subject of discussion at the
5. Shuttle Buses To Parki Area: At Councilman AmstruP 's request,nts tocity in
oyeesarea on
Ir'lr. Doug Bee s agr canv ass some of the mercha
ascertain if they would be willing to cooperate with the
to implement a bus route that would carry emPI
rth between Burlingame Avenue and the Parking
California Drive.
6. Avis Car Sales: The CitY Planner asked that this subject be
study meeting.placed on the agenda o
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
f the January 15
I. Announcement of Open House at the newly remodeled Easton Branch
Library, Sunday, January 26, L975, from 2:00 to 5:00 P'M'
Z. Vern L. Caikins, 8OA Linden Avenue, Burlingame, communication
of December 3, Lg/ 4, expressing interest in serving as a member at
Iarge on the San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors.
3. R.W. Bailey, zBLg arguello Drive, December 12, lgTA,regarding
tratric control situation on Trousdale Drive.
4. Mrs. Donald M. Teixeira, 1601 Granada Drive: December L9, L974,
concerning Trousdale traffic control; December 27 opposing plans-for
golf course at Bayfront Park, and requesting improverirents in Burlingame
Plaza to accommodate pedestrians.
5. Schedule of Planning Commission Meetings, L975'
The City planner st,ated that the Commission adopted the idea of joint
meetingi on two of the three 5th Mondays with the City Council to
explor6 amendment of zoning map and review of general pIan.
Councilman Cusick comrnented that the Planning Commission stated it
would report to the city council in January on amendments to the
General PIan. It appears now that it wiII be March or later before
the Council will irave the Commission's reconmendations. Following
a period of discussion, there was agreement by the council that the
Pllnning Commission be informed that this is a mat,ter of highest
priority.
PROCLAI\4ATIONS
Mayor Crosby proclaimed January, L975, SALUTE TO I{OMEN OF ACHIEVEMENT
IN AVIATIOW AND AEROSPACE SCIENCE MONTH, ANd
6. William C. McGowan, Jx.1 14OI Vancouver Avenue, letter of
Jirrrr.ty 1, Lg75, conmenting on widening of EI Camino Real at Broadway
lopposla) , and request,ing consideration to City purchase of lloover
Trail. "i. -r,l"tropolitan Transportation Commission announcement, December 9,1974,
"Formulation Of A Uinoiity Citizens Advisory Committee."
B. Minutes: Beautification commission, December L2,
iealth, Safety i fraffic, December 12, Park & Recreation, December 10'
P1anning, December 9 and December 30, L974'
JanuarY L9-25 JAYCEE WEEK.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:15 P
ffiIA;Eative to property acquisition.
.Pl. to an Executive
RespectfullY submitted,
rt K.
CIerk
APPROVED:
L
WILLIAIV1 J. CROSBY,MAYOR
City