Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 2021.09.07 - Regular MeetingCITY 0 BURLINGAME �9ATEG JYNE � BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Approved Minutes Regular City Council Meeting on September 7, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date via Zoom Webinar at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG The pledge of allegiance was led by Councilmember Brownrigg. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, O'Brien Keighran, Ortiz MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(2)(e)(3): FIFTEEN CLAIMS City Attorney Guina reported that Council approved settlement of pending litigation in relation to the Washington Park tree claims. He continued that there was a settlement reached with both the Wu claimants and the Ng claimants for $35 million. He continued that $32.5 million is to be paid to the Wu claimants and $2.5 million to the Ng claimants. He stated that the settlement was approved by a 5-0 vote, with a motion made by Vice Mayor Ortiz and seconded by Councilmember Beach. 5. UPCOMING EVENTS Mayor O'Brien Keighran reviewed upcoming events in the city. 6. PRESENTATIONS There were no presentations. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA There were no public comments. 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from the Consent Calendar. Mayor O'Brien Keighran pulled item 8j and Councilmember Brownrigg pulled item 8f from the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Ortiz made a motion to adopt items 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 8e, 8g, 8h, 8i, 8k, and 81 from the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilmember Colson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE AUGUST 16, 2021 CLOSED SESSION City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the August 16, 2021 Closed Session. b. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE AUGUST 16, 2021 REGULAR MEETING City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the August 16, 2021 Regular Meeting. c. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE AUGUST 31, 2021 CLOSED SESSION City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the August 31, 2021 Closed Session. d. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 & 15.08 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE SEWER CAPACITY CHARGES AND INTRODUCE WATER CAPACITY CHARGES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (CEOA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEOA GUIDELINES SECTION 15378, 15601(B)(3)) Public Works Director Murtuza requested Council adopt Ordinances 1995 and 1996. e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SECOND REVISED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY AND 2 THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATION City Manager Goldman requested Council adopt Resolution Number 107-2021 f. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE VICTORIA PARK PLAYGROUND RENOVATION, CITY PROJECT NO.84730, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO RE -ADVERTISE THE PROJECT Councilmember Brownrigg asked if the City cancels a bid and reissues it, will staff make it easy for individuals to update their bids. City Attorney Guina replied in the affirmative. Mayor O'Brien Keighran opened the item for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 108-2021; seconded by Vice Mayor Ortiz. The motion passed by roll call vote, 5-0. g. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SWA GROUP FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN SERVICES FOR A TOWN SQUARE ON CITY PARKING LOT E IN THE AMOUNT OF $104,900; TRANSFERRING $105,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND; AND APPROPRIATING $105,004 IN THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND FOR THE AGREEMENT AND RELATED ACTIVITIES CDD Gardiner requested Council adopt Resolution Number 109-2021. h. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF THE 410 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT CDD Gardiner requested Council adopt Resolution Number 110-2021. i. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT, PERIOD ENDING DUNE 30, 2021 Finance Director Yu -Scott requested Council accept the Quarterly Investment Report for the period ending June 30, 2021. j. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SEND A LETTER TO MILLS -PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER IN FAVOR OF REOPENING THE MACK E. MICKELSON ARTHRITIS AND REHABILITATION CENTER THERAPEUTIC POOL AT THE MILLS HEALTH CENTER Mayor O'Brien Keighran stated she pulled this item because she received various phone calls and emails about this item. She wanted to give the public a chance to comment on this specific item. 3 Mayor O'Brien Keighran opened the item up for public comment. Ginnie Plato, a member of the advocacy group that is trying to save the therapy pool, spoke in favor of keeping the pool open for those that need it. She commented that the people that benefit from the Mickelson Center Pool are mainly the disabled and elderly. Mayor O'Brien Keighran closed public comment. Councilmember Colson commented that she appreciates that the Mayor agendized this item. She mentioned that it lines up well with the advocacy work the City has done on age -friendly cities. She continued that many of the people that benefit from the pool are elderly and that it is very difficult for them to advocate for the pool. She mentioned she might reach out to people on the board about keeping the pool open. Councilmember Colson made a motion to send a letter of support of reopening the Mack E. Mickelson Arthritis and Rehabilitation Center Therapeutic Pool at the Mills Health Center; seconded by Councilmember Beach. The motion passed by roll call vote, 5-0. k. OPEN NOMINATION PERIOD TO FILL VACANCY (BURLINGAME REPRESENTATIVE) ON THE SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES City Manager Goldman requested Council open the nomination period to fill one vacancy on the San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees. 1. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR PLAN CHECK AND BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $50,000 TO COVER EXPECTED EXPENSES RELATED TO BUILDING PERMIT ARCHIVING AND PERMIT TECHNICIAN SERVICES CDD Gardiner requested Council adopt Resolution Number 111-2021. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING THE 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ADOPTING THE 2020 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN DPW Murtuza stated that Senior Civil Engineer Kevin Okada and EKI consultant Tyler Colyer helped prepare the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP). He reiterated that the UWMP and WSCP are living documents that provide a snapshot of water supply conditions and water supply demand projections for the future. He continued that they are prepared based on 4 the best available information including the City's General Plan. He stated that the plans meet all the requirements from the State Water Resource Board as well as the State Water Code. DPW Murtuza stated that there are a number of issues when talking about the UWMP that are associated with water supply, such as growth in housing, population, and employment. He commented that the goal for tonight's meeting is to review the plan and consider its approval. He commented that the UWMP should be a framework for future policy decisions in relation to water and future development. Mr. Colyer noted that preparation for the UWMP started in June 2020 and that preliminary findings were presented to the City Council at a Study Session on May 17, 2021. He continued that the deadline for adopting the UWMP was early July, but the City pushed back adoption of the UWMP to make sure that the latest supply allocation information was included and to provide adequate time for review. He mentioned that there are no penalties for submitting plans late, but it can affect state grants. Mr. Colyer gave an overview of the 2020 UWMP. He stated that the UWMP is required to be updated every 5 years. He added that the UWMP is important because: • It is a State -mandated water supply and demand planning document • It is a key document that articulates long-term water planning strategy to the public and promotes the "value of water" • It provides a foundation for Water Supply Assessments • It offers a framework to discuss water shortage contingency planning Mr. Colyer reiterated that the UWMP is a living document and should be updated as new information becomes available to the City. He explained what's new in the 2020 UWMP: • Lay Description • Energy Analysis • Drought Risk Assessment ("DRA") • Five Consecutive Dry -Year Water Reliability Assessment • Separate Water Shortage Contingency Plan ("WSCP") • Seismic Risk Mr. Colyer highlighted that the Drought Risk Assessment looks at water demands compared to supplies over the next five-year period. Mr. Colyer elaborated on the City's water usage over the last five years. He explained that water demand increased 12.87% between 2016 and 2020. He stated that single family homes make up 40% of the City's total water demand. He mentioned that the single-family residential usage includes indoor and outdoor usage. He continued that 2016 was a low point for water usage in the City's recent past. Mr. Colyer stated that one metric that the City needs to comply with is SB X7-7; the Water Conservation Act of 2009, which aims to reduce State water usage by 2020. This regulation establishes baselines and compliance targets for each urban water supplier. He explained that for Burlingame, it is 135 gallons per capita per day. He stated that the 2020 per capita per day usage in Burlingame was 107. He noted that the 5 per capita water use has rebounded slightly since the 2016 drought, but that Burlingame has done a good job at conserving water. Mr. Colyer reviewed the projected demands. He explained that projections account for future population, employment growth (based on 2019 General Plan), and passive conservation savings. He stated that total water demands are projected to increase 35% from 2020 to 2045. He continued that residential per capita demand is projected to decrease from 66 gallons per capita per day in 2020 to 59 gallons per capita per day in 2045. He explained that this is mainly due to more multi -family units being built as well as passive conservation savings. Mr. Colyer explained that the normal year supplies are sufficient to meet projected demands. He stated that the City receives its water supply from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission ("SFPUC"). He stated that the SFPUC provided Burlingame with water reliability projections for normal and dry years. He noted that for normal years, the SFPUC will be able to meet the City's water obligation of 5.23 million gallons per day (equivalent to 1,909 million gallons per year). He commented that in 2045, Burlingame's projected demand is 90% of its individual supply guarantee. Mr. Colyer reviewed the impact of the Bay Delta Plan Phase I. He explained that the SFPUC is projecting impacts to their wholesale customers' water supply during the dry years. He explained that the State Water Resources Control Board SWRCB) established water quality objectives to protect beneficial uses of water in the Bay -Delta. He continued that the Bay Delta Plan requires 40% of unimpaired flow to be released every year into Lower Tuolumne River from February through June. He stated that the releases would require 40% to 50% rationing. He noted that the SFPUC is exploring alternative strategies to reduce the impacts of Bay Delta Plan supply cutbacks. Mr. Colyer explained that Burlingame is 100% reliant on the SFPUC Regional Water System for potable water. He continued that the SFPUC provided multiple reliability projections under the Bay Delta scenario, none of which meet their contractual Level of Service Goals. He noted that there are two agreements that dictate how water gets divvied up for Burlingame, but neither are applicable for cutbacks greater than 20%, so those would need to be renegotiated in the future. Mr. Colyer gave an overview of the projected water shortfalls in dry years. He explained that Burlingame is projected to have shortfalls of up to 52% in 2040 if there are multiple dry years in a row. He noted that these estimates are based on the available data now, and that impacts could be reduced via implementation of water saving strategies. He discussed the actions that the City has taken in the past to reduce water usage including: • Implementing water conservation programs • Updating the water shortage contingency plan • Coordinating with other Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) member agencies and SFPUC • Evaluating recycled water alternatives • Advocating for alternative water supply and voluntary settlement through BAWSCA and SFPUC 2 Mr. Colyer moved on to the Water Shortage Contingency Plan ("WSCP"). He noted that the WSCP is a standalone document attached as an appendix to the UWMP and that it does need to be passed separately from the UWMP. He explained that the WSCP articulates what is required of its customers at each stage of a drought. He noted that the State requires certain elements in the WSCP including: 1. Water supply reliability analysis 2. Annual assessment procedures 3. Six standard shortage stages 4. Shortage response actions 5. Communication protocols 6. Compliance and enforcement 7. Legal authorities 8. Financial consequences 9. Monitoring and reporting 10. WSCP refinement procedures He noted that the most important elements of the WSCP are shortage response actions and the six standard shortage stages. He explained that the Drought Plan Water Shortage Levels are dictated by legislative requirement and are very prescriptive: Shortage Level Percent Shortage Range Shortage Response Action 1 Up to 10% • Declaration by the City Council based on the City's review of available water purchases from SFPUC or based on the determination that the SWRCB (or any other governing authority) has required a mandatory reduction in water use due to water supply shortages or emergency. • Includes implementation of restrictions on end uses as well as agency actions. 2 Up to 20% 3 Up to 30% 4 Up to 40% 5 Up to 50% 6 Greater than 50% Mr. Colyer reviewed the basis for selection of drought response actions at each level of drought and water shortage. He stated that the actions are: • Reduce outdoor water use • Focus on a few simple actions to make messaging, enforcement, and compliance easier • Provide flexibility to customers in meeting savings objectives • Consider drought rate structure during Level 3 • Consider account -level water use budgets by sector during Levels 4, 5, and 6 • Perform continuous public outreach and assessment of water use • Quantitatively assesses using Drought Response Tool 7 Mr. Colyer noted that under normal conditions, the City is able to adequately provide water to its customers, but that there are some uncertainties in the plan. He stated that because of these uncertainties, the City can adopt a new UWMP more frequently than the minimum of every five years. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked how potential housing legislation, SB9 and SB 10, affect the plan and if the City can ask for an addendum to the plan that incorporates new numbers. Mr. Colyer responded that the plan can be updated by the City more frequently than the 5 years required by the State. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if by submitting the UWMP, the City will be eligible for water grants. Mr. Colyer responded in the affirmative. Mayor O'Brien Keighran stated that the City is currently doing a good job of conserving water. She asked if the City's efforts would be rewarded because the City is doing a better job of conserving than others. BAWSCA CEO Nicole Sandkulla responded that when BAWSCA creates a formula, all members have to agree to it. She added that historically, there has been some disparity between BAWSCA members in usage levels, but that as restrictions have been implemented, the usage has become more homogenous. She commented that BAWSCA will be looking to the State for guidance later this year. DPW Murtuza added that staff participates on the technical advisory meetings at BAWSCA and that the City will work with the member agencies to come up with something that is fair. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked about the potential for Burlingame to partner with other cities for new water sources. DPW Murtuza stated that the City is working with Millbrae on the potential to utilize recycled water. Additionally, he explained that the City of San Mateo is looking at a joint project with SFPUC about treating water and sending it to the Crystal Springs Reservoir. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if the City could sell water in the future. DPW Murtuza replied in the affirmative. He stated that the City currently has water transfer agreements with the Town of Hillsborough, Millbrae, and Cal Water. He explained that Burlingame has the ability to inter -transfer water between these agencies when needed. He noted that it happens infrequently, but that staff will make sure that it is feasible and that all needs can be met before it is done. Ms. Sandkulla discussed the City of San Mateo's project and noted that Redwood City is also participating. She added that there is a similar project in the East Bay with the Union Sanitary District and Alameda Water District looking at the advanced treatment of wastewater for potable use. She commented that BAWSCA is also supporting the SFPUC's conversation with expanding the Los Vaqueros Reservoir in Contra Costa County. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked about water supply demand in relation to the Bay Delta Project being approved versus not being approved. Mr. Colyer responded that the without the Bay Delta Plan, the impact on the water supply during drought years would be smaller. Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the 13% increase in Burlingame residents' water usage. DPW Murtuza responded that the 13% increase refers to the City's overall consumption since the drought. He noted that the bar chart later in the plan shows the per capita consumption. 8 Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he has more thoughts on the discrepancy between the charts and wants to know more about water usage. Councilmember Brownrigg asked about how much water life sciences businesses use in relation to other commercial uses. DPW Murtuza responded that biotechnology companies do tend to use a lot more water compared to other commercial uses. He noted that there are various technologies in use by biotech companies to recycle water on site, thus reducing demand. Councilmember Brownrigg suggested that as the City considers operating guidelines for biotechnology companies, they could stipulate that a certain percentage of water must be recycled. Councilmember Brownrigg asked why the San Francisco City and County Supervisors censured the SFPUC and their position on the Bay Delta Plan. Ms. Sandkulla responded that San Francisco's action were taken a couple of months ago, and it was following one of the many legal actions the SFPUC has taken to protect their water rights against the State Board. She noted that the action didn't go anywhere, and the Supervisors do not control the SFPUC. She explained that the San Francisco Supervisors expressed their concerns about the Bay Delta Plan and encouraged resolution. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if there were any provisions in the Bay Delta Plan that addressed more water flow if there was a sustained drought. Ms. Sandkulla responded that there are no provisions for a sustained drought. She continued that in the current plan, there is a range of flow (30-50%) that the State Board can lower to if deemed necessary. Councilmember Colson asked about the reduction numbers in relation to potential growth in the city. She wanted clarification on if it is a per capita reduction or total gross reduction for the city. Mr. Colyer responded that the overall number is what really matters. Councilmember Colson thanked Ms. Sandkulla for coming to the meeting as there are a lot of agencies in BAWSCA. She acknowledged Joe Baylock's email regarding the UWMP. Councilmember Colson asked if it would make sense to apply new recycled water code into the work the City is doing along the Bayfront for the Sea Level Rise Resiliency work. DPW Murtuza responded that the City is addressing the water usage along the Bayfront and mentioned that the Facebook campus will be using recycled water. Councilmember Beach commented that single family homes account for around 40% of water usage and thinks there is room to work on reduction there. She asked if there is value in looking at other cities' demands and seeing how those demands impact Burlingame. DPW Murtuza replied in the affirmative but noted that it is outside the scope of the UWMP. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if ABAG has worked with any of the other agencies weighing in on the potential water shortage and dry years. Ms. Sandkulla responded that BAWSCA sent a detailed comment letter to ABAG identifying the significant impacts on water reliability and the impacts that increased growth will have on supply. 9 Mayor O'Brien Keighran opened the item up to public comment. Joe Baylock voiced concern about water shortage during drought years. Jennifer Pfaff discussed the need to create recycled water requirements for large development projects. Mayor O'Brien Keighran closed public comment. Mr. Colyer commented that the numbers in the UWMP are consistent with what SFPUC provided to the City. He explained that in a normal year, SFPUC has stated that they can maintain a 20% cutback. He noted that during a dry year, if the Bay Delta Plan is approved, you will see changes in water availability from year to year. Vice Mayor Ortiz thanked staff for all the work that was put into this. He commented that this plan will probably be amended sooner than five years with all that is going on with development and water usage. He noted that the City will have to get a lot more creative going forward as this topic is not easy to address. Councilmember Brownrigg commented that he believes it is a mistake to think of this issue as housing versus fisheries as he thinks the issue is on the farming side. He voiced concern that the Council was only hearing from one side about the Bay Delta Plan and that he would like to hear from its supporters. Councilmember Colson commented that this plan isn't between just one or two things but a myriad of State mandates such as water conservation, housing, food production, transit, and more. She continued that it is very difficult to make all the issues work with the State -level mandates. She noted that the City will have to be very adaptable and flexible going forward as more information becomes available. She thanked everyone for all their hard work on the UWMP. Councilmember Beach thanked everyone for all their work on the UWMP. She echoed both Councilmember Colson and Councilmember Brownrigg's comments. She stated that it would be great to create a dashboard to help the community visualize the water usage and what needs to be done collectively to promote conservation. Mayor O'Brien Keighran noted that the report is a living document and is worried about the notion of consecutive dry years. She hoped that all would work together on shaping policy and direction for local agencies. Councilmember Beach made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 112-2021; seconded by Vice Mayor Ortiz. The motion passed by roll call vote, 5-0. Councilmember Colson made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 113-2021; seconded by Vice -Mayor Ortiz. The motion passed by roll call vote, 5-0. 10 b. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.39 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW OFF -PREMISES MASSAGE BUSINESSES (CEOA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEOA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15378,15061(B)(3)) ACA Spansail explained that many neighboring cities allow off premise massage practices. He noted that Burlingame Police Chief did not express any law enforcement concerns about off premise massage practices as long as the practitioners are California Massage Therapy Council certified. He continued that the research was presented to Council in May, and Council asked staff to bring back an ordinance. ACA Spansail explained the ordinance amends the municipal code to allow for off premise massage businesses to operate. He stated that under the proposed ordinance, a person operating an off -premises massage business would need to obtain a certificate of registration from the Police Department. The certificate of registration would be valid for two years and would confirm the applicant has a current state certification, CAMTC-issued identification card, and a valid business license. He added that the proposed ordinance also requires a practitioner to keep a comprehensive record of all treatments. ACA Spansail stated the proposed ordinance would allow off -premise massage businesses to operate pretty much the exact same way and with the same requirements as current on -premise businesses. Councilmember Brownrigg voiced concern over the safety of the workers. He asked if other cities have a way for people to report abuse or concerns in regards to the workers. ACA Spansail responded that staff can look into setting something like that up. He continued that staff believes that this ordinance will assist in keeping practitioners safe as it would make the practice of off -premise massages legal. Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. City Clerk Hassel - Shearer read the title. Vice Mayor Ortiz waived further reading and introduced the ordinance; seconded by Councilmember Brownrigg. The motion passed by roll call vote, 5-0. Mayor O'Brien Keighran opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Councilmember Colson asked if there were any rules or regulations that restricted the number of massage parlors or if the only restriction was zoning. ACA Spansail responded that there is a distance requirement that gives guidance on how close massage parlors can be to one another. Councilmember Colson mentioned that some massage businesses approached various Councilmembers about the topic and wanted to work with the City on making off -premise massages safe for both workers and patrons. Vice Mayor Ortiz shared Councilmember Brownrigg's concerns about the need to make it easier for workers to report abuse. He stated that he is in favor of the proposed ordinance. 11 Mayor O'Brien Keighran thanked the merchants that came to her asking to put this item on the agenda. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to bring the proposed ordinance back for a second reading; seconded by Councilmember Beach. The motion passed by roll call vote, 5-0. 10. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS There were no staff reports. 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Council reviewed their committee appointments. 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS There were no future agenda items. 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlin-a�g. 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor O'Brien Keighran adjourned the meeting at 8:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk 12