HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1974.08.192.31
Burlingame, California
August L9, L97 4
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG:Led by James A. Clark, Acting Chief
of Police.
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Burlingane City Council was called to order on
the above date at 8:05 P.M., Mayor Willian J. Crosby presiding.
Present:
Absent :
Councilmen:
Counci lman :
Ams trup-Crosby-Cus ick-l'lang iniHarrison (excused, vacation)
The minutes of the adjourned meeting of July 24 and the regular meetingof August 5, L974, previously submitted to the city council, vrere
aPProved and adopted.
BIDS: EL CAMINO REAL BEAUTIFICATION
HIGHIIAY ROAD -- DUPFERIN AVENUE
Contractors' bids for the above project, opened on Wednesday,
August L4, L974, at 2:00 P.M., in accordance rrith public notice, were
declared as follorrs:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
$16,005.00
17,953.00
18,375.00
24,825.O0
34,495.00
Engineer's Estimate $21,460.00
In a corununication dated August 15, 1974, the Director of Public works
recommended award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder,
Asphalt Paving company. The City Manager concurred in the recommen-dation in an addendum to the communication.
Councilman llmstrup recalled that work items for the project submittedto the council for approval included a paved walkr.ray adjacent to
EI Camino Real roadvray northerly from the bus stop. He pointed outthis section was recently blacktopped by the state, which,may,nirke the
walkrray superfluous. If it is part of the contract, perhaps it should
be deleted.
The Assistant City Engineer confirmed it is in the contract. He
expLained that the state was concerned with the shoulder and paved there.
The rralkway eraa to lie to the rear of and adjacent to the shoulder.Further, the state has requested relocation of the shelter for bus
patrons approximately 100 feet northerly so buses stopped for passengers
not obstruct the travel lane. He suggested that some redesign of the
r,alkway at the southerly end may be necessary and should be investigated.
In response to Councilman Mangini, the Assistant City Engineer reportedthat bids were based on quantities, if less quantities, less cost.
The City Attorney stated that the City Engineer may modify the extentof work to be performed by the contractor and adjust costs accordingly.
Mayor Crosby thereafter directed the City llanager to confer with
engineering and park departments. The City Manager confirmed that the
walkrray situation will be clarified before the contract is signed.
MINUTES
Asphalt Paving Company
Anza Engineering Corporation
Bay Area Paving company
Lowrie Paving CompanyB. Fontana & Sons
6)', !)Aa, Z
RESOLUTION NO. 46-74 "Awarding contract EI Camino Real Beautification
@ And Dufferin Avenue, Job No. 74-7" (Asphalt
Paving comPany, $16r005.00) was introduced by councilman Mangini, who
moved its adoption, second by Councilman AmstruP and unanimously
carried on ro11 call of members Present.
HEARING
WEED AND RUBBISH ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS
I. PARK PLAZA TOWERS - PAC IFIC WESTERN CONTRACTORS, INC., DEVELOPERS
Mayor Crosby announced this was the time and pJ.ace scheduled, Pursuant
to- published notice, to consider the rePort filed by the Superintendent
of Streets and to hear public reaction to assessments recited thereln
for weed and rubbish abatement on private properties.
Declaring the hearing open, the Chair invited comments from the floor.
There r,rere none. The hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 47-74 rFixing AsseEsment For Weed And Rubbish Abatement,
ffi by councilman AmstruP, who moved its adoption,
second by Councilman Mangini and unanimously carried on roll call of
members present.
A letter from Pacific !{estern contractors, Inc., 475 EI Camino Real ,Millbrae, dated April 15, 1974, signed by ttarry J. Riskas, President,
and Robert u. Chuich, Project Manager, requested the City Council's
consideration to floor plan changes in Park Plaza Tolrers Condominium
Apartments, the subject of an agreement for Special Permit between
the City of Burlingame and Pacific Western Contractors, Inc., dated
E ebruary 20, L973.
The letter stated that the changes are brought about by buyers who
wj.shed to have the particular units involved changed from vertical
townhouse plans to horizontal plans; also. the townhouse unit on the
first flooi has been divided providing the first floor level of the
unit as cornmon area of the building, and the second floor portion of
the unit changed to a one-bedroom condominium unit. The letter
stated furthei that the changes have not influenced parking require-
ments established by the city; number of units has not been changed,
but there is one less bedroom count than Previously.
The Council had before it the comPlete set of
william Kubach Associates, Inc., (accepted by
February, 1973) rrith overlays Provided by the
drawings prepared bY
the city Council
developer showing changes .
Mayor crosby recognized Mr. Church who offered a graphic disPlay i1lus-
triting verlical townhouse designs Permitted or agreed uPon in the
contract with the city. Mayor Crosby asked Mr. Church if the changes
have been completed. He ansrrered yes, explaining it was assumed there
would be no objection because no additional rooms resulted.
Mayor Crosby asked chief Building Inspector John calwell if he had been
aw-are of thl changes. He ansrrered no, adding that the contractor should
have informed the-building department and that he, as the chief
building inspector, lras distresaed that this had not been done.
Mayor croaby asked Mr. Calwell if he objected to the changes- He
aniwered nol for the reason that making horizontal units in place of
vertical had no effect on building area.
councilman Amstrup asked Mr. calr,relI to comment on length of time
required to make iuch changes. He was unable to answer, exPlaining
thit an ingpector does not carry a set of Plans and would be unarrare
of design changes until after sheetrock was installed.
Councilman AmstruP asked Mr. church how long the changes were in
process. He stated the unita were sold in May-and have just been
tinalized as to layouts to the buyers. Councilman llmstrup suggested
COMMUNICATIONS
,
there would appear to hEve been ample time to consult with the buildinginspector. Mr. Church responded there was an internal probLem due toa time lag betvreen their sales organization and construction department.
Councilman Amstrup read from the minutes of the City Council meetingof February 5, 1973, as follows: rrThe City Attorney advised that ifthe building permit is granted on specific plans, the building must be
constructed in accordance with such p).ans; Iawfully, the builder can
make no alterations or additions to the plans except as approved bythe city. rr Mr. Church reported that area has not been increased, thatthe only change is in a stain ay within the units not in structuralparts of the building, nor have there been significant architecturalor structural changes in the particular units. (Councilman ilmstrup
mentioned that the developer violated the contract in removing a red-
wood tree from the site that was to have been preserved. )
Councilman Mangini referred to the sentence in Pacific llesternrs letterof August 15, 1974, "However, we do have one less bedroom count thanpreviously permitted. " He asked Mr. Church to conment. The latter
stated that the original design contemplated 88 bedrooms, there are
now 87. Councilman Mangini asked about the landscaping plan.Mr. Church stated that in a meeting with the Director of Public Works
approximately three rreeks ago it was agreed that landscaping would
be completed prior to occupancy but that he was not certain the finalplan had been delivered to the Park Director. Councilman Mangini
mentioned that staff has found it necessary to bring problems involvingthree ongoing developments to the City Council rrithin the past tt o
r,reekE. He asked if the Council might consider procedural guidelinesto staff whereby discretionary decisions could be made at that leve1
when 1ot lines, structure, density, parking, etc., are not affected
by plan modifications.
Councilman Cusick referred to the overlays on sheets A5A and A6A
nquired if there rrere rooms in the area originally shown ascase. Mr. church reported there are closets that can be usedtorage, or perhaps a hobby room. Councilman Cusick stated thatcale indicates an area of about 10 feet by 12 feet, adeguate for
a bedroom. Mr. Church explained there is neither natural light Dorair and that health codes lrould prohibit sleeping room use.
Councilman Cusick asked if parking requirements will be affected by
reason of the rooms that can be used as bedrooms.
.) r).)")
and istairfor sthe s
The City Attorney commented iroom. Holrever, if the plansthat is as far as the city ca
s possible to use any room as a bed-el rooms for the purpose intended,
o.
ri
labng
Mr. church stated that if the Council elected to consider storage
rooms "bedrooms " there would remain 2-L/2 spaces in excess of reguiredparking for the building.
Councilman Anstrup stated the issue is not one of better procedure,
the clty has its procedures. Developers must be made to understand that
the City Council expects compliance with rules and that offenders will
be dealt rrith severely.
Councilman Cusick felt that utter contempt had been shown the CltyCouncil. The pLan for this project lras not approved hurriedly, the
Council spent many hours with the developer and finally authorized thebuilding permit for a certain set of plans. She stated that the
CounciL took a firm stand on the plans and Ehould be egually firm norr.
It was ltayor Crosbyrs position that redesigning unite from horizontalto vertical did not represent a major change. Hordever, the developererred in making changes before consulting lrith the city.
Councilman Mangini commented there is no question that the Council
has been treated shabbily. He suggested a fining system for deviation
from accepted plans, stated it would be very difflcult for him to say
"tear it out and start over again," and asked the City Attorney for
counsel on alternatives.
2;i1
To set the matter in context, the City Attorney reviewed proceedings
before the City Council, which extended over three meetings, on the
application for special permit to exceed height limitations imposed
by the Council. The special permit was granted uPon conditions
including a specific design plan consisting of six sheets identified
by number. The conditions were reduced to writing in an express
agreement. The agreenrent has been breached. Ihe City Attorney
stated no one nho obtains a building permit can deviate from the
approved plan on file in the office of the building inspector with-
out permisEion of the city, lrhether it comes from the building
inspector or elsewhere. No one engaged in business of developing
land, constructing buildings, should be perrnitted to come before the
City Council and state that a sale was made and we agsumed the
changes would be all right. People who build buildings and do
not adhere to the plans for whj.ch the building permit was issued
are in violation of the Uniform Building Code. The City Attorney
stated that the city Council can grant relief or not as it sees fit.
The applicants brought this upon themsefves.
Further from the City Attorney: At the time the application was heard
and the special permit issued, the City Council was concerned with
height, density, parking. This is one reason why the design sheets
were incorporated into the agreement. The City Council finds now
that modifications performed by the developer were interior only,
the site p1.an is not changed, nor are exterior dimensions, building
height, dCnsity, assuming there still remains 44 units as agreed.
Having regard for the number of people, nurnber of automobiles,traffic, etc., it should not make any great difference lrhether a
bedroom is upstairs over a living room or alongside. There is rePre-
sentation of one bedroom less and no additional parking sPaces
required. It is not unusual as buildingE Progress and prospective
puichasers appear to find it would be advisable frorn the builder'E
point of vierd to make modifications. The county recorderrs office
advises that modifications are frequently made with resPect to condo-
minium maps. No revised map comes into that office for recording
without the cityrs prior approval .
It was the City Attorney's conclusion that the modifications in the
units will not affect structure, neighborhood, density, etc., that
it would be difficult to determine t hat staff procedures can be
developed when there is a contract which is breached, an approved
building plan on file with the building insPector and then departed
from. The fault is not with procedure but with aPPlicants who aPPear
before the City Council, the Council performs in good faith, the
applicants violate that faith.
Thomas w. sine, member of the Planning Commlssion, stated that condo-
miniums are sonething new in the construction picture, and when they
come up for sale many people request changes in interior fixtures
so that their dwelling will not be exactly the same as the neighborsr.
consequently, people will buy with the understanding that certain
partiaions wifl ue changed, a door removed, etc. He stated he has
Leen called in several hundred times in the courEe of his business to
arrive at a cost for prospective buyers lrhere such changes are contem-plated. This is nothing unusual. However, a sketch of the floor plan
lhen revised should be iurned over to the building department. This
cleatrs the air for everyone.
RECONVENE:toEer at Sollowing a rece5s at 9:00 P.M., the meeting lras called
9:10 P.M.
PARK PI.AZA TOIIERS (CONt. )
Mayor crosby announced that the Council recognizes the.possibility of
a deadtock if the matter erere voted on tonight. In fairness to
everyone, it is the Council's decision to continue to the meeting on
September 3, L974, when a full Council is expected.
2.WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
3. PETITION - STOP SIGNS tINDEN,/LARKSPUR, LINDEN,/},{O RRELL INTERSECTIONS
A memorandum dated August L5, L974, from the Assistant City Engineer
to the City Manager reported that Plans and specifications are ready
for the neit phaie of Ltris project. An addendum to the cornmunication
from the City Manager stated it is proposed to advertise for bids for
the council'i consideration. There were no objections from the Council.
Mayor Crosby asked that Council be furnished detail as to locations of
planned improvements.
Acting Chief of Police C1ark, responding to Mayor Crosby, stated that
the last traffic count, June 19, 1974, showed 68 vehicles during a
24-hour period north and southbound through the intersection of Linden
and Morrell . warrants for a stop sign require 50 cars Per hour through
an intersection as a guideline. As to vehicle count asPect, Linden/
Morrell intersection would not qualify.
In response to Councilman AmstruP, ur. C1ark confirmed this inter-
section would be used by children walking toward carolan on their way
to school.
Councilman Mangini agked about yield signs. Mr. clark stated that
Sergeant O'Brien recommended this be given consideration, and that he
(Ctark) agreed. He reported two obstructions, a hedge over legal
height and a bush, that tend to cut down visibility through the inter-
section .
Mayor Crosby asked Mr. Clark to comment on residents' charges that
the traffic counter device was moved, resulting in an inaccurate
count. Mr. Clark stated he was not an are of that, but the traffic
count was so far below criteria it would be unimportant if haLf the
cars were missed. He advised that statisticg over a two-yearperiod, L973-74, reveal 22 accidents, indicating situations of exces-
sive speed. A speed survey will require a great deal of time dedi-
cated to that intersection, to be fair, eight to ten hours in each
direction, but it wouLd be t orth the effort.
Councilman Cusick stated it'.tppears that none of the intersections in
this area bave defined crosswalks. To give some Protection to children
going to and from school , she asked that crosslra1ks be Painted at
Linden,/Morrell and Linden,/t arkspur as quickly as possible.
John Calr,rell ,1635 Morrell Avenue, stated he has called the Police DePart-
ment on four or five occasions betlreen l0:00 P.M. and 1:00 A.tl.
because of Eotorists "burnLng rubber." In response to an inquiry from
Mayor Crosby, Mr. Ca1wel1 stated he thought a stop sign would heLP to
curtail noise and speed.
carl caither, 900 Linden Avenue, explained that traffic volume has
increased through thi
Larkspur and llorrell
days of fewer cars, i
people feel that yiel
sa
aretsds
rea since the large apartment complex was built.
used as thoroughfares. While there are some
eems that one-third are going too fast. The
iqns would not deter rate of travel, but that
22\it
The petition with three and one-half sheets of signatures and a diagram
attached recited as follows :
t'we the undersigned of this Petltion feel that it is a vital neces-
sity to post STOP signs at the intersections of LINDEN and LARKSPUR
and LINDEN and'-!i6nRELl, as indicated by diagran.
It is the Burlingame Police DePartmentrs contention that the8e
intersections do not have enough traffic to lrarrant SToP signs. we
are nots that concerned about the arnount of traffic but lrith the SPEED
with which these cari 90 through these intersections. Not only ii6EF-
this fast traffic endanger other motorists, but it is also a grave
danqer to our chi ldren t ---because of this threat to lives, we want
sToi signs at Ene-Fittersections. "
2;j ri
four-way stops ab.i tinden,/l,arkspur would help a great deal. Also, they
recognize it may be difficult to place yield or stop signs at Linden,/Morrell because of the zLgzag. Mr. Gaither commented there are always
speeders on l,lorreI1.
Mayor Crosby announced that staff will be directed to paint crosswalks
at the two intersections (Linden,/Larkspur r Linden,/tnlorrell) , and a
speed survey made with report and recommendation back to the Council.
4 STATE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH {OPR)RE: GENERAL PI,AN GUIDELINES
A communication from the above agency asked for comments on General
PIan Guidelines adopted in September, 1973, by the California Council
on Intergovernmental Relations (CIR), comments to be compiled by OPR
for consideration by CIR at a meeting on September 26, L974.
The City Planner informed the Council that he sent a personal Letter
responding from an individual point of view, not from the city. He
reported that OPR sent the reguest for comment to all legislative
bodies.
5
Acknowledgrment was made of a communication from the City Clerk advising
that the terms of Library Board Trustees Mrs. Edith Cohendet and
Mrs. Genevieve M. PheLan have expired. In an addendum to the communi-
cation, the City Manager stated that the trus Ees are subject to
reappointment ii the City Council so desires, and they are willing to
serve. The reappointments lrere confirmed by lrtayor Crosby with Council
approval.
6. POSSIBLE ACQU ISITIOT.I OF OPEN SPACE
A communication from the City llanager dated August 15, L974, advised
that the State of California intends to dispose of:-as excess land
a 3.3 acre parceJ. located in the county with access to Skyline Boule-
vard. A sile sketch accompanied the communication. The City l'lanager's
recommendation that purchase price be investigated, then a closer look
made at desirability of acquiring the property, tdas accepted by the
City Council.
7. ATTORNEY APPLICANTS
In response to the City Managerfs memorandum of August 15, L974, the
City Council agreed to meet at 7:00 P.l{. on August 27 to interview
applicants prior to the study meeting scheduled for that date.
8. BE.AUTIFICAT ION COMI,IISSION RECOMI,IENDATIONS
Under date of August 13, L974, the City Manager transmitted communica-
tions from Dale ierkins, Chairman, Beautification Commission,
offering the conunission's reconunendations on l. Motif for Burlingame
and 2. Regulation of Parking in Front Setback Area. Item 1 was
referred to the City Council study meeting for consideration, Item 2
to the Planning Department for study and report.
9. CHANGES IN CONSTRUCTION PI.ANS,!{EDICAt BUILDING,1828 EL CAMINO
In a communication dated August 15, L974 to the City Manager, the--
City planner stated that pr5ject plans accepted.by the City Council
wheir it adopted E.I.R. tZ-s have been changed without knowledge
and coneent of the Council--leaseable office sPace is under construc-
tion at a Location previously indicated for parking: Attached to
the planner's memo was a communication from the project architect,
Edward H. de WoIf, itemizing physical changes to the job since th9
plans were approved by the Uuifaing department, and a sketch showing
relocation of two parking sPaces.
In an addendum to the Planner's communicationr the City Manager stated
LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENTS
.):7))
that changes made in the project appear to be minor; but if changes are
to be made, ovrners should be warned to be aware to inform the city
beforehand so evaLuation can be made.
Mayor crosby recognized Mr. de WoLf. He stated the changes were
initituted for thiee reasons! fire and safety, Prevention-of. crime,
traffic. He referred to the sketch shot/'ing enlargement or tne area
;;;;;1y occupied by two Parking sPaces, which were relocated across
it" .isi*""r, and "i"ita trrat tfre lrimary Ieg99n for this PartLcular
aiea is safeiy, Providing a guard lhe Possibility of near total
surveillance 6f lff areai of-the property through closed circuit TV.
i. r"ia that in 35 years of dlesi.gning . lui taings he was. not aware there
;;"-;-;d;ii.^."t tir gre citv of Burrilsame, or anv other citv for
init ^.t€.r, to bring ctrange'oraers bef6re the city,. -In this situation,
it was felt that the-chan96s were improvements which did not affect
piril"g. There were 167 6paces when- the project started and there are
still 157.
The City Planner stated there is adequate Parking, -but they created the
"".a-ioi more parking by atltling considerably more f}oor area'
InresponsetoMayorCrosby,theChief,ButlclinglnsPectorrePorted'asfar as he was "or,c"tt"a. tiris area is carl Snyder's personal office'
andthathehas"'"dt"gonittostoPfurtherworkuntiltheCity
councLl makes a decision.
Council,man l{angini stated this appears to be a simllar case to the one
Dresented earlier. i.-""gg.tt"a- it migfrt be Prudent to hold thls off
iii-.-'i"ir-a;il;ii to get-i definitive-pernit. He reiterated comments
nade earlier that stafi be directed to tell builders changes cannot
be made in agreed-to Plans without aPProval of the city'
Fo1lowing a brief period of Council coDment, Mayor crosby announced a
continuaice to the meeting of septernber 3 when a full council is
expected .
RESOLUTIONS
1. PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DISTRICT
OLD BAYSHORE HIGHWAY - BURLWAY ROAD SOUTH
2. RESOLUTION NO. 48-74
Salary Rates o f Emp 1o
counciLman cueick pointed out that the district includes both sides of
i"iirii n".a. srre-oUiecied to tni" money belng allocated.to dead-end
roads-rrhen it could b6 used on other toori impoitant streets in the city'
ThecityAttorneystatedthatinaletterdatedJunel'L974'from;.c.-;-i. to the- city -i"gi"".r delineating the area to be. undergrounded
It"".-p"itions of e"irriy Road were- included. He Etated it !,ras his
recollection tne fetlEi-iia g" to the City Council and, aPParently, it
is contemplated by it.-."gi"6.ring department that Burlway be included.
The city Manager stated it was his impression that the city was
concentiating only on main thoroughfaies. His reconnendation that
."iion be poitponld and the subje-t pursued at a study meeting was
concurred ln bY the CitY Council .
"Amending Resolution No. 26-74 of June 3, 1974:
yees" (Fo1ice Dispatcher-Clerk) was intro-
ir,
-rt" moved its aioption, second by Council-
y approved on ro11 call of member s present'duced by Councilman Amstru
man Mangini and unanimouEl
3.
ad
REsoLUTIoNNo.4g-T4,,AuthorizingExecutionofJointPowersffiing The crimi;al Justice council of san llateo
;;";at; rras introduce6 ly councilman -AmstruP, t'ho-moved. its
option, -iecond by c""""ii^ii, Mangini and carrild on following roll call:
elas:'coutlcrr.,MEN: llmstruP-crosby-Mangini
NOES: COUNCILIiiEN: None
ABSENT COUNCIIfiAN: Harrison
ABSTAIN COUNCIL!,IAN 3 CusfcX (poor copy of agreement, unable to read)
23u
ORDINANCES
t. ORDINANCE NO. 1016 "An Amendment To Contract Between The Board
Of Administration Publ ic EmpJ.oyeesr Retirement System And The
City council of The city Of Burlingame" (retiree benefit) was
introduced for first reading by Councilman AmstruP.
2. oRDINANCE No. 1017 "Amending Section 13.08.040 (d) (Green curb
introduced forUtikfnfs) 6:E-flre BurI i ngame Municipal Code" wasfirst reading by Councilman Mangini.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
I. RESoLUTIoN NO. 50-74 "Approving rnParcel Map, Being A subd 1Vl,S10nLot 2, Block 50, As shorrn On MaP
BurJ.ingame No. 4" Recorded In Booofficial Records of San Mateo cou
duced by Councilman Amstup, tho moved
councilman Mangini and declared carrie
AYES: COUNCILT,EN. AmEtrup-Crosby-Mangini
NOES 3 COUNCILMEN: NONE
ABSENT COUNCILMAN: Harrison
ABSTAIN COUNCILIIAN : Cusick
communicationE:
inal Parcel Map Entitled
Of Lots 3,4 And A Portion ofof Easton Addition Tok 4 of Maps At Paqe 57 of
nty, California" was intro-its adoption, second by
d on the following ro11 call:
1. Progreas report, August L4, L974, from t'lrs. Donald M. Teixeira,
Acting Program Chairman, Burlingame civic Arts Council.
2. Jaak R. chappell, District superintendent, Burlingame school
District, suggesting that city Council consider elimination of
parking on one side of each street bounding Coolidge.School to
meet residents' complaints. (Letter of August 8, 1974)
3. Health, safety & Traffic Commission, August L4, L974 connents
on traffic element, Anza Pacific Master PIan.
4. Peninsula Humane Society, August L2, L974, submitting formula
spelling out measures neceslary to assure effective animal control .- Councilman llmstruP advised that the Peninsul'a Humane society
is attempting to implernent a standard 1a!, for all cities in the
county. -tte itated that the subject was discussed at the last
council of Mayors meeting but action vras held over for further
study .It was the consenaus of the City Council that [tayor crosby
support animal control legislation if presented at the next Council
of Mayors meeting.
5. Reports of monthly activities, Police and Flre DePartments '6. Minutes: Beautification Cornmission, August 1
Health, safety & Traffic Cormission, August 8, 1974.
APPROVALS
WARRANTS Nos. 5752 through 7047, $408,408.74, duly audited, were
Approved' for payment on motion of Councilman Cugick, second by Council-
man Amstrup and unanimously carried.
PAYROIJL Ju1y, 19?4, Checks Nos. 2255 through 2994, $286,720.28
approt ed on notion of councilman Cusick, second by Councilman AmstruP
and unanimously carried.
ADJOURNIi1ENT: Meeting regularly adjourned at I0:45 P.!{.
Respectfully submitted :
Her
APPROVEO:
,L
WiII amJ crosby Mayor
t t€,ty er
ACKNOWLEDGIIENTS