Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1975.07.07412 CALL TO ORI)ER Burl i ngame, Cal ifornla July 7, 1975 Burl ingame Clty Councl I was helduncll Chambers. The meetlng was cyor Irvl ng S. Amstrup. the aboYe ed to ankl ng the tlayor andthe Clty of Bur-f his llfe, Councll-o many peopl e knew PTEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: ROLL CALL 0n al I A regular meeting of thedate in the Clty Hall Coorder at 8:00 P.M. by l.ta p lc r pa th oftots strupf the who s I nl sd Ri n Counci I Counci I The ml nutes of mi tted to the C l,layor Ams t ru cates to pol scheduled fo some of the I'layor Am peop I e o I i n game man Mang and I ove l'lemb e r s Present: l'lemb e r Abse nt: Ams t ru p - C u s i c k - Ha rr I so n - l.l a n g I n i Crosby ( excused , vacation) theitv regular meetlng of June 16, 1975, prevlously sub-Councll, were approved and adopted. deferred to Councllman Manglni. InClty Councll, and all of the peopleo generously responded at thls momentated lt rras gratlfying to learn thaa as he did. HEAR I I{G I . APPEAL RE:I{EUFELD PORSCHE.AUDI INC., AUTo SALES t SERVICE Hayor Amstrup announced this was the timhearing on the appeal of James R. Teevanl0l9 Rol I i ns Road , from Pl anni ng Comml ssNuefeld for the property at I0l7-25 RoIl chedu'l ed to conduct a publ i cba Teevan Pa I nti ng, Inc.,grant of special permit to Road. 975, appeal i n9 Pl ann I ng Commlsslonajor problem wlth r{hich the speclalpermission to construct a twelve (12) slde of my bullding since this wouldn the side of my building. Thls much of which comes from thls exposure aced wlth the very dlfflcult declsionof applylng for a pole slgn--a type cal ly. " ty Pl anner d I scus sed the develop- equent appeal . First, theNeufel{ slte to verify someng's meetl ng. He stated that, 1975, show that the proJectet of open space betrreen Porsche-buildlng. Heasurements made thls 50 feet. Neufeld The by Pl anni ng es ,d I on I ns 13, I The mlicit thernis o ness,bef fJtat the theet{ sit h k d he cc ig feet b I oc woultotof aof s In hi decis permi The Pl a propose applica Commiss une ed " i mp nor hlch communl ca ti on oon, Mr. Teevan spresents me isigh fence along my company's nam severely damage my buslfreeway. Then I would epti ng a loss in busl nen that I am agal nst aes ss ortheti At Mayor Amstrup's I nvi tation, thment proposed by Neufeld and thePlanner explained that he went to measurements on his way to thls e Planning Commission mlnutes of Juarchitect stated there rould be 5Audl shorroom and the adJacent Te eveni ng reveal ed actual open spac e Cl subs the veni ne 92fe eYane of nner es re tant's d ion wi xplained that the location is ln an l.l-l Dlstrict,il sales and services requlrlng a speclal pernit.etalled site and development plans were approyedth conditlons, as was the slgn display. Led by l',ayne M. Swan, City PIanner. MII{UTES announced that the formal presentation of speclal certlfi-e department personnel trained as first-aid instructors,this _evenlng, Has cancel led due to absence from the clty ofrtlcipants. The (12 sig City Planner stated that t ) foot hlgh fence on t{eufeln. The Pl anner stated thet for a permit from the Pla ained from the Euilding DeP I speaks to the proposed twelve that wl I I screen Teevan's wal l ns were palnted prlor to the require- mmlsslon. A permlt should have been but was not. he appea d 's s i te wa I I s I g nni ng Co artment 413 the men obt The Planner advised that the proposed "net{ automobile ShowroOm" can be bullt to the side property line flfteen (15) back from-the.front propel.ty line. The trelve itZ) fo6t screen is proposed to be placed ln the area between the showroom and the Teevan bulldlng. In resDonse tO Councllman HarrlSon, and later ln the meetlng to I'layor nmstiui, tne Ct ty Pl anner expl ai ned that the. precl se. area of -open space UCiweei'Teevan's-property ani the proposed showroom is slgnlflcant because oi-oii-stieet pari(lnb reiulrements, lncluding adequate.back-up.space, and Uecirs.-of-ianitscaplng wtitch l{euf ei d wlll be requlred to provlde. councilman Harrison noted that Teevan apparently did not. obJect to a;;;; ai tne Planning commisslon hearing, accordlng-to the mlnutes' asked if Teevan was ioiiiied of the mee[lng. The Planner confirmed written notice was sent, they vrere not present. Declarlng the hearlng open, Mayor Arnstrup accorded the Prlvilege of fl oor to the aPPel I ants. the He that Parker s. Kelly, Attorney, 221 North san l,lateo Drlve, San I'lateo' repre- sented Mr. Teevan. ltilh'reipici to the notice of hearlng.dated May l5' ll".-fiffy'stated ne was iniolmeO by qlf.-Teevan that he dld not learn of ;it;;;isit-6i tt" inlinaea ience uirtll June I3., sone.time-after Mav 27' iiie Iaii if-irri itanning-Comrlssion meeting. Mr. Kelly.declared that ;i;;;;;ir; (i2i foaa feice will obscure Te6van's sien; that obspuction' and that only, ls Teevan's concern. Mr. Kelly referred to and dlscussed a serles of slx (6) enlarged photo- s;'iphi'oi aispray in-ttri councll chambers. showlng :I?9s.uI:,of reevan's ilii'ii6i ii-i.iirav iririic.-and total obseurlt, that will result lf iIi'r!rit ii twetr.'(i2i iiet ii allowed. 0ther- photosraphs illustrated iii.iii-ot-; a;; iio)'i6ot-ind a slx (6) foot fence' t'lr' Kellv stated. Mr- Teevan orefers tfrere-noi be a fenie at all except as would not block ii,. iii.-iir'i,ii-Lrtiei;;r ii itrere is to be a fence, he requests it be six (6) feet or less. Mr.Kellyreportedthatt'lr.TeeYanlsa.graduateil.!usllessadminls.iiitii.,'nii'uusi".il-it"ri"iiiing a palittng servlce. He has been ln ii'" oieient location-sinct tSZO wittr ttre sign that novr exists. Before ililti's.i;ie iilr-ii"rgi'i,-il,iii was a stmilir stsn on.the bulldl!e for i',i-iitiiri"sr,op wfirr'iiii".ing not as large as Tievan's but promlnent'. lli:.-iieji. iavlrttses'Uv-reini of his truiks, customer referrals, mallin9' t"ieofrone book and d["-itgni on-his bullding. He has a unique road setti n9 of which he rl shes to take adYantage. Rcpeatlng hls earlier comment that Mr. Teevan was not aware of the twelve iili-i;;i fence untii iiil. its approval bv. lh: rta11l19-cgmmlsslon' riil'Xiiii iiieO lf thire is an oiblnance yhlch precludes fences above ;i; i6i'ieei-rittout-Iieiiai permit; if. there t3 not, then the matter of iii,ipii'prioiiires cin-[i-iaa"iiseo -- whether the fence ls sufflclentlv i,ir'p6"iait io the apiircini,-oi-itrettrer it wlll lnterfere with TeeYan's iuiiriiiing. r,tr. k!tty maintatned that the latter was the slgaterpriority aia requesied', for that reason, there be no fence allowed except up to six (6) feet. There were no further speakers for the appellant. Mayor Amstrup lnvlted comments in opposltion to the appeal. no of bui Hugh F. C Neufeld P graphs do are si gns Teevan's onn ors olly, Attorney, 1450 Chapln Avenue: gl,tlingame.r.represented ;h;:Arai, tnc.' Mr. Connbllv stated that one thlng the phot0- i reieii, of *tictt the Clty- Councll ls probably. aware' .there'reiatlvily the same size 6n the front and southern slde of- ldi;;;'in."onli-rn-iront is snraller because the area is smaller' 411 Mr. Connol ly explalned he I ngenui ty ln.dvertlsing gues s that thls bulldlng any other bullding in the Mr. Connol ly noted thatthe protestant now seekson the bui lding wl thoutsign's legallty. had no partlcular critlclsm of the appellantrsh{s buslness, but lt would appear reasonable to contalns more slgn dlsplay per square foot than C I ty of Burl I ngame . he Clty Planner mentloned the slgn for whlch the protectlon of the City Councll was placedpermlt; thls ralses a questlon as to the t a Iith respect to ileufeld's operation, Mr. Connolly made the followingpoints: The automobile dealership to be malntalned on the property represents a $175,000 lnvestment. Aesthetlca of the property ls amatter of concern. Along the common property llne between Neufeld and Teevan there rlll be landscaplng. Uill Neufeld be faced ln the futurewith complaints to the Clty that the plantlngs are groring too hlgh? Landscaping alone would have the same effect as the fence, but the fence was made part of the.ppllcation because Clty staff and the Planning Commission rere ln agreement ln recommendlng that the fence be extendedalong that entire property llne. l,,l thout any dlsrespect to Mr. Teeyan,a high fence is essential ln an area not shoin in the photographs--the rear yard on the Teevan property ls fllled wlth equipment and paint cans. These do not match the aesthetlcs of a new automoblle dealershlp. Mr. Connol ly suggested to the C'l ty Councll that the appeal should bedenied lf for no other reason than that lt could be settlng a precedentfor future situatlons where new improvements ln the Clty could be changeddrastlcally or even dlscouraged to protect not only old-slgns, but signswhich, accordlng to the City Planner, were never authorized. I'lr. Connolly maintalned that the protestant has more than adequateidentlfication on the front and south nalls of his building, ihat progr sometimes creates interference with the wishes of others, but thisautomobile dealershlp represents excellent progress for the City. Thlsis the type of commerclal establlshment that enabled the City of Bur-lingame to maintaln an envlable tax base. tn conclusion, Mr. Connollyrequested the Clty Councll to deny the appeal. Councilman Harrlson asked if a photograph or drawing of the fence wasavallable. An archltect's renderlng was dlsplayed. Mr. Connollyadvlsed that the materlal wlll be redwood; the structure ls lntended asan aesthetic decorative devlce meant to harmonlze with 'l andscaping tobe pl aced in front. ess Counc I I man Mangi ni as ked Mr. Confeet would be acceptable. t'lr. C "yes" if the flgure were 11-112, posi ti on. He has asked for slxtained that the wal I sign J ars wment. This development represenproperty and a huge investment. y if a lesser height, ll-l/2 or l0lly responded the answer would bethat is not the appel I ant'sfeet or less. llr. Connolly maln-the aesthetlcs of the Neufeld develop-substantial lmprovement on the nol I onno but (6) ithts a There were no further comments from closed. the floor. The hearlng was declared Counci I man Cus i ck asked lf Teevan's slgn is I egal or The City Planner stated that a bulldlng permit, butfrom the Planning Commlsslon, was a requirement when pai nted. None was i ssued. There fol lowed a perlod of Council comment. Counci lman Cus i ck noted that the Pl arefer to questlons ralsed by Flre Insprinkler system and parklng spaces Pl anni ng Commission condltlons attacFire Inspector's requlrements. The were raised in a memorandum from the I ndi cated he would comply. nnlng Commlssion mlnutes of ilune 9spector Pearson concernlng flre doors,ln the area of rear exlti; however,o the use do not address the Pl anner exp'l al ned the questlons 0epartnent i the appl I cant non-conformI ng. not a slgn permlt the slgn was hed tCity Fl re 415 In response to an inqulry from Councllman Harrlson, it was the CityAttorney's oplnion that the Clty Councll could not abate the Teevansign because the only permit that ras lacklng ras c bulldlng permlt. A motion by Councllman Manginl to sustaln the actlon of the Plannlng Commlsslon in approving the speclal permlt to Neufeld Porsche-Audl , Inc.,l0l7-25 Rollins Road, for auto sales and servlce was seconded by Councilman Harrlson and unanlmously carrled on roll call. ln response to Mayor Amstrup, the Clty Planner conflrmed that landscaplngwill be subJect to approval of the Park 0irector. 2, SEISIT{IC SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAI{ l,layor Amstrup announced this nas the tlme and place scheduled, pursuant to published notlce, to conduct a publlc hearlng and to conslder the Selsmic Safety Element of the General Plan recommended by Plannlng Com- misslon Resolutlon No.9-75 "Approvlng The Selsmic Safety Element 0f The Burlingame General Plan." Oeclaring the hearing open, I'layor Amstrup lnvlted comments from thefloor, opponents and proponents. There were none. The hearlng was decl ared cl osed. Councll members were asked to comment. Councllman Cusick referred to Page 2l of the docunent, It earthquake preparatlons, (a) "Identlfy most vulnerable st em rucdlway of a Clty-wide butldlng lnspectlon ". She state 2, "Pre-tures, byt was her pol I cy would appear element of understanding thrt the Ctty Councll just recently adopted rrhereby there would be no Clty-wlde bulldlng lnspectlon.thls ls what the Clty will have lf the Council approves t the General Plan ln lts present form. Mayor Amstrup asked the Clty Planner t,o comment. He requested the Councll's attention to sub-paragraph B, Page 20, "Earthquake Response Planning." The articles reclted there place the requlrement for bulldlng inspection lnto better concept. He stated that, from the standpolnt-of vulirerable structures, these would be older buildlngs - pre 1933 - of masonry constructi on. Councilman Cuslck asked lf the reference to "Clty'wide inspectlon" can be s trl cken. Councilman Cuslck also noted that the landsllde map whlch follows Page 9 omits one of the most severe landsllde areas ln the Clty--the area across from Cuernavaca Park. Because of thls omlssion, she felt that accuracyof the entire document mlght be questionable. Further, Councllman Cuslck noted references to abatement of exlsting buildlngs and nsked for more proof that there are bulldlngs lnr,thls City that actually would be dangerous ln the event of an earthquake before the Clty undertakes a program of inspectlon and abatement of older buildlngs. The Director of Public Ilorks pointed out that, obviously' the older the buildtng, the more rlsk there may be because the building' ltself is deterioiatlng, and, because of architectural features -of such bulldlngs, overhangs, parapets, etc., there would be an added element of danger. Councllman Manglni asked for addltlonal lnformatlon on the statement "Advocate improved selsmlc safety programs for schools....", Page 4, Item 6. Al so, he I nd I cated that he had questl ons ln connection wl th Page 5, Paragraph B, "Factors Consldered," an! Page l4r-"V. Balanced RlskPoiicy." Fuither, wlth respect to updatlng of City's disaster prepared- ness plan, Pages 19, 20 and 26, he fel t he shou'l d be persona I I y assl gned l{ith Jack }{right to see that the plan is updated. Ill th Council concurrence, Mayor Amstrup declared the hearing contlnuedto the meeting of July 2l' 1975, to allow the Clty Planner tlme to pre- pare a response. aIt his 411) I. APPEAL HEARING SCHEDULED The appeal of Zina G, Baskett, ll24 Bernal Ayenue, dated June 24,1975' from Planning Commlsslon denial of speclal permlt for caretaker'squarters on her property was acknorrledged. A publlc hearlng before the City Council was scheduled for the regular meetlng on July 2l' 1975. Councilman Harrlson commented thls appears to be another case of a "mother-in-law" apartment on an R-l property. He asked lf the Clty Attorney would prepare leglslation to regulate property sales to theextent that a seller be requlred to make a buyer aware of zonlng andpermltted uses of a property. Mayor Amstrup recalled that the City approximately two to three years ago EOGART'S LOUN6E 26I CALIFORNIA DRIVE:ti on ras con nue tot e mee t o u ve Chief of Pollce by Lieutenant s T homas B. Councl. The I attempted Councl I was to do that s trong I y crl tl E*!ed. Councllman Cusick suggested that the buyer mlght be requlred to slgn a statement tha t he had read and u nders tood the R-l 0 i stri ct Regul atlons.If this r{ere done, a buyer could not come to the City for relief on aplea of ignorance of the law. The City Attorney's recommendation that the subject be held for discussionat a study meeting was accepted by the Clty Council. 2. CHAMBER OF COI.It,tERCE ALLOCATION I975.I976 The communicatlon on tht subject, dated June 24, 1975, signed by Davld H. Keyston, Presldent, and l{illlam F. Hauser, Executive VlcePresident, was referred to the City Councll Budget Commlttee for review and recommendatlon. 3. HERITAGE TREES Under date of July I,1975, the City I'lanager forwarded a memorandumfrom the Park Dlrector concernlng two nomlnatlons for Herltage Tree Status recommended by the Beautlfication Commlssion for Councll endorse- ment, as follows: l. Flowering Horse Chestnut, l52l Vancouver Avenue?, lleepi ng Bottl e Brush , 1025 Cabrl I I o Avenue Deslgnation of Herltage Tree Status for the trro trees was conflrmedunanlmously by the City Councll. AMUSEME'{T PERI.tITS l. ca th wh o asked for additional tlme to complete ln SHERATON INN. RENE}IAL OF ENTERTATNI'IENT DANCE PERI.IIT: u v r0m era or strom,e o ol i Consideration of this appl l-2l, 1975, at the request of Chase, Servl ces Dlvlslon, vestl gatlon of the appl I catl on. A I etterce, adv I sed n 2. date there have been no problems in connectlon wlth thls amusement permlt and there would be no objection to its renewal. 0n motlon of Councll- man Harrlson, second by Councllman Manginl, unanlmously carrled, thepermlt ras extended for an addltlonal !lx months. EXPIRATI0N 0F C0r'il.lISSI0r{ERS' TERl.lS, TRAFFIC SAFETY & PAR(It{G In a memorandum to the City l,lenager dated June 27,1975, the City advised that the terms of Harry S. Graham, Christlne L. Keatlng a Robert l{. Podesta wlll explre on August 6, I975. The Clty tlanage requested by Mayor Amstrup to determlne lf the Comrnlssloners arein reappo I ntmen t. Clerk dn r I L Rlght of l{ay for Storm Dra'ln: Under date of June ll, 1975, was nterested COMMUNICATIONS C I TY MANAGER MEI.IORANDUI'IS 0rvllle I. t{rlght, requested the Clty deeded to the City di tch purpoles. " 477 Attorney, San Franclsco! reprelentlng Grace J. Easton,of Burllngame to yacate a portlon of a rlght of nay by Ansel M. Easton, January 14, 1916, for "drainage For the City Councll's informatlon, the Clty Manager forwarded the recom- mendation of the Clty Attorney and the 0lrector of Publlc t{orks that theright of way be retained at the present time. The Clty t'lanager's recom- mendatlon that tlr. llrlght be lnformed the City does not rlsh to vacate was accepted on motlon of Councllman Manglnl, second by Councllnan Harrlson, unani mous ly carrl ed. Cha in Avenue Parkln 0 I 2, dum R. M. a te ay ro l.laterial f orwarded by the Ci tyto the Council study meeting to be The Clty Councll recelved copy of a memoran- m T.E. Moore, Traffic/Clvll Engineer to Davldson,lrector of Publlc l{orks, concernlng a proposed change ln on Chapln Avenue between Primrose Road and El Camlnoangl e of parki n from 45 degrees to 60 degrees. The Council also received memorandumsfrom the Dlrector of Public l{orks and the Clty t'lanager, both dated Ju'l y 3, recommendlng that the change be authorlzed because of resultant galn of 25 on-street parkl ng spaces. At Councilman Manglnl's request, the proposal was referred to frafflc. Safety & Parklng Commlssion for recommendatlon. Councilman Harrlson asked that Mr. Moore be commended for hls excellent report. Mayor Amstrup stated that the Clty parklng lot on Chapln Avenue nert tothe Burllngame Garden Center (Lot B-l) appears to be a prlvate lot for the exclusive uie of the Garden Center. He suggested, unless there can be public use of the lot, that Mr. Chlapelone be asked lf he would llketo purchase it. 3, Anza Paclfic Plan Property: for Bayslde Roadway Oevelopment Across City Manager on this subJect was referred held July 9, 1975. I RESOLUTIONS RES0LUTI0N N0. 45-T5 "Authorizin g Execution 0f Agreement Uith Enyirotech Corporation For Maintenance And 0peratlon 0f Burllngamel{ater Treatment Plant" was introduced by Councllman Harrison, whoIts adoption, second by Councllman Manglnl and unanlmously carriedrolI call of members present. tlaste- moved on 2 c wf ho moved its adoption, second by Councilman Harrlson, carried on ol lowi ng roll call: . RESOLUTION NO. 46.75 onventi on And Visltors AY ES : COUI{C I LMEN : N0ES: C0UNCILMEt{: ABSEI{T COUIICILMAN: ABSTAIN COUilCILMAil: "Authorizlng Execution 0f Agreement l{lth Bureau" nas lntroduced by Councilman I'langlni, Cusl ck-Harri son-Mangl nl l{one Cros by Amstrup (0n advlce of Clty Attorney, Mayor Amstrupabstained. He slgned the agreement for the conyentlon bureau as i ts presldent. ) 3. RES0LUTI0N 1{0. 47-75 "R esol utlon Authori zl ng Execu tl on 0f Contract l{l thPatrol For Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Particl-The Cal ifornla Highwaypation" was lntroduced by Councilman Harrlson, who moved lts adoptlon, second by Councllman Cusick, carrled unanlmously on roll call of memberspresent. Mayor Amstrup reported that the Southernrestaurant at Broadway ls belng used for been there for some tlme. He asked thatof the Clty's obJectlons. Pacl fl c rl ght of way behl nd thetruck storage. A tar truck has the Southern Paclflc be lnformed 4lE 4. RES0LUTI0N N0. 48-75 "Authorizin g Executlon 0f Agreement For 0olf Course Archl tectural Serv l ces " was l ntroduced by Counc ilman Mangl nl ' who moved its adoption, second by Councilman Harrison, unanimous'ly carrled on roll call of members present. For the beneflt of the audience, Mayor Amstrup announced that the Citywlll retaln Robert liluir Graves for the purpose of designing a proposed nlne-hole golf course ln the vlclnity of the current Clty dlsposal slte. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 49.75 "Approvlng Execution 0f Utlllty Agreement, 0rder-l ng The Vacation An Abandonment 0f An Easement, And Accepting-Paciflc" rras lntroduced by Councllman Har- rison, rho moved lts adoptlon, second by Councllman Manglnl and unani- mously carried on ro'l I call of members present. 6. RESOLUTI0N N0.50-75 "Authorlzing Execution 0f Sanltary SewerA9reffilingameHillsSewert'lalntenanceDlstrlctAnd The City 0f Burllngame" was introduced by Councllman Cuslck, who movedits adoption, second by Councllman Harrison and unanlmously carrled onroll call of members present. l{ew Easement Lands 0f Anza COUNCIL BUDGET COMI.IITTEE REPORT: man Cusick are in the process o budget nith department heads. $1.075 tax rate, whlch may be ris preliminary. Mayor Amstrup sary to wrlte into the budget a the same basls of services that service that may come under clorefuse, one of the more costly f He ed re I w seIt ouncil- 97s-1976 mmends aof thls be neces- proceed on area of garden d thehls partl cu- - announc.edMayor Amftiu[itfh?t he an discusslng the prel I mi nar stated that the budget r uced to $1.05; however, a ported further that lt l{l ?X lnflatlon clause just ere provlded Iast year. scrutl ny is the removal ems to the Clty. He info dcyl ecollll to 0ne of audience that publ lc reactlon to a possible modlflcatlon Ilar service will be welcome. UITFINISHED BUSINESS AB 625 Knox - Ba Area Pl annl n Agency): Councllman Cuslck asked that 0 c a T-fendl n oppos i tl on to thl s Blll 't e rment to the Senate Com- seconded by whl ch proposes reglo e an nal ty ounc ta government with a "super-mayor." She stated be charged with preparation of a reglonal plan bound. It was her positlon that any plan for from the lndlvidual cltles where there has from a body of 40 to 50 peoPle maklng the mlllionr of peopl e residlng ln the Bay this reglonal body wlllto whi ch cl ti es will be the Bay Area should come been community lnput, not deci slons that wll l affect Area. Councllman Harrl son askedBill. He expressed some oppose the legi slatlon. Councilman tlanginl suggested that clties are subiect to a form of regional goveniment a[-the present tlme. There ls not a great deal a cl[y can io without the appioval of ABAG as far as federal fundlng-ls.' conierned. He stated he failed to see the danger that Councilman Cusick envisioned, clting the Reglonal Solid I'laste Management Program as an example where theie ls ample opPortunity of lnput from the clties I nvol ved. Mayor Amstrup concurred with Councllman Cuslck, commentl ng he dld noi favor anbther reglonal agency wlth a dlrector who wi'l I control the liyes of everyone in the Bay Area. Councilman Cuslck moved that the City Councll wrl mltt€e on Local Government opposing AB 625. . Motl Mayor Ams trup. ROtt- CRUt AYES: Councllmen: Amstrup-Cuslck N0ES: Councllmen: Harrlson-Manglni ABSENT: Councl I man: Crosby liayo r Ams trup express I ng hl i f the c0ncern "super-mayor" provislon renains ln theln that area but, otherwise, dld not te on suggesteds s tand. that each member may wlsh to wrlte independently BURL'II{GA!.IE CIVIC ARTS COUNCIL PROPOSED PROGRAM September, I975 - $1250.00ras approved on motion of Councllman Manglni, al I aye volce vote. +19 - July, August, second by Councl I man Harrlson, BURLINGAI'tE September second by c 30 Co HAMBER 0F COMMERCE SERVICES REN0ERED - July I, 1975 through , 1975, $3,000.00, approved on motlon of Councilman Manglni 'uncilman Harrlson, all aye voice vote. AC KI{OII L E DGI.IEI{T S i'l i nutes Reports lll th respect to the last-mentloned, Councilmalf there is any interest in erecting wlndmlllpri Yate properties. Beautiflcatlon Commlsslon, May I and June 5, 1975 Llbrary Board, June 18, Trafflc, Safety & Parkin Plannlng, June 9 and June 23, Council Study Meeti ilune ll, Park & Recreation Commlsslon' June 10, I 9r ng 97s June l2, Notations, Ci ty Attorney Memorandums: C ngame vs. Garc i a ngame vs. John Vasey Ity of BurllIty of Burll i ndml I I s c U I'lunkdal e Bros., Inc., I6l6 regarding parking problems thei r of f I ce. uslck asked to be notl fi ed o generate power on Rol l I ns Road,ln front ofMi scel I aneous Correspondence: Strybing Arboretum Soclety o commendl ng Cl ty of Burl I ngam D epa rtme nt . nCst ,J and fGeo Draft o Interim f San Mateo County Translt Dlstrlct Transl t Plan. Petltlon filed by Salvatore Pantano, Pantano Realty' Belnont, signed by Burllngame resldents reguestlng Clty Councll to set 1975-76 tax rateto refiect decrease ln dlrect proportlon to increase ln assessed yaluatlon for 1975-76 oYer 1974a75. olden Gate Park n empl oyi ng a I ohn E. Bryan , Dl rector, !cape architect ln Park San Mateo County City Selectlon Commlttee report of meetlng, MaI 30, 1975. CAPTURE:The Clty Council heard a brlef presentatlon from Mlss Ann Marquart the activltles of CAPTURE, a county-wlde program directedoutl I ni ng toward citizens' involvement in crlme preventlon. ADJ0URNIiENT At 9:40 P.M Respectful ly subml tted, HERBERT K. I{HITE, CITY CLERK a By eput ty er City Planner, June |8, 1975, concernlng attendance at Bay Area Plannlng Dlrectors' Assoclation meetlng where AB 625" Knox, proposing a Bay Area Plannlng Agency, was dlscussed. Clty Planner report of Planning Commlsslon meetlng, June 23, 1975, San Mateo County l.losqui to Abatement Dlstrlct, AnnuaI Report, 1974.