Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1975.07.2142U CALL TO OROER A regul ar meeting o date ln the City tla order at 8:00 P.M. Eurl i ngame, CalIfornla July 2l, 1975 the Burl i ngame C i ty Counci I was Counci I Chambers. The meeti ng Mayor Irving S. Amstrup. hel d on the above was cal I ed tofll by PLEOGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: LEd by l,,ayne l'1 . Swan, Clty Planner Counci I Councl l Members Members Present: Absent : Ams tru p -C u s i c k - Ha rri s on-Ma n g i n I Crosby (excused, vacatlon) MINUTES The mi nutesto the Clty of the regular meeting Counci I , were a p pro ved of July 7, 1975, previously submitted and adopted. HEAR I NGS In introducing the hearlng, l,layor Amstrup requested the City Planner to summarlze proceedlngs before the Plannlng Commission. The Plannerreported that the Commission conducted a public hearing to considerMrs. Baskett's applicatlon for special permit to contlnue accessoryllving quarters in an existlng building Iocated behind the principrl resldence at the Bernal Avenue address. The Commlssion voted 5 to Ito deny, I member dlssented, I member absent. The applicatlon forspeclal permit has been brought to the Clty Council on the appeal ofI'lrs, Baskett from Planning Commlssion decision. Mayor Amstrup acknowbdged materlal filed wlth the City Councll: l. By appel lant this evenlng just prlor to the meeting: Appraisal sheet of the BernaI Avenue property from Office of the San Mateo County Assessor showlng accessory structure.Petitlon with 37 slgnatures, residents wlthin general area ofthe property, reclting as follows "l{e, the underslgned, have no obJectlon whatsoever to have a caretaker llve on the premlses of Mrs. Baskett'sresidence at ll24 Bernal Avenue, Burlingame; in view of the fact thatthis property has been used ln this manner for over 25 years, we see no reason why lt is belng questioned at thls time. |le are very much opposedto the harassment being lmposed rupon property owners in the past andpresent regarding the use of thelr property." Copy of appellant's letter to Plannlng Commlsslon dated June 2,1975. 2. City Planner memorandum of July 17,'1975 to City Councll with 7 attachment,s. 3. Communl cati ons from Mr. anddated July 3, 1975, and f rom !,1r.July 6, 1975, supporting appeal. A. Skel l i nger, I132 Bernal Avenue, Mrs . John H. Ross, I l2l Bernal , !,lrs. a nd Followlng an announcement of ground rules, Mayor Amstrup declared the hearing open to the proponents of the appeal. Upon recognltion by the Chair. f'lrs. Baskett declared there are indlca-tlons -- statementi made at the Planning Commisslon meetings, subse-quent newspaper artlcles and comments this evenlng -- that she lnitiatedthe actlon to obtain caretaker's quarters; She stated thls ls not soi her appllcatlon for speclal permit was filed with the Plannlng Commlssionafter receipt of a letter from the City Attorney, inspectlon of herproperty by City staff and advice from the Assistant Clty Planner thatthe cottage cannot be used as a dwelling unless approved by the City. I ROLL CALL l.APPEAL OF ZII{A G. BASKETT RELATIVE TO CARETAKER'S qUARTERS, I I24 BERNAL AVENUE 121 tlrs. Baskett stated the requlred appllcatlon was flled, the fee paid; she then found herself invdlved in a public hearing before the Planning Commlsslon, an experlence for whlch she was totally unprepared. She advlsed thit a peimit was granted for a church school on an R-l property immedlately foliowing denlil of her appllcatlon. l,lrs. Baskett expressed inability io comprehind the basls for the Commisslon's actions' to understa-nd why hbr R-l property should be treated dlfferently than the church property. Mrs. Baskett reported that a building permlt was issued in septeq!ber' l.?47' for the accessory building, ldentifled by the county assesSor as a -raoIo shop," that she icquired Ihe property three years ago. prlmarily because oi-ifie separate ltiing quarte;s wtrerL her son llved when he was attendlng school. After he movid'to hls own home ln another city, she arranged for i woman to live in the unlt as a caretaker rent free for providlng certa i n serv i ces. She stated it was iust recentl y she I earned that the unit can be occupied only by a member of the famlly. Hrs. Baskett mentioned she is under c disabllity. She experlenced loss of resul t of the newspaper publ i ci ty fol meeting. She stated lt appears thatfor conditions on the property over w not build the accessory structure' sh she responslble for the glassed-in po without a permlt according to a membe nstant sedatl on because of a phys i ca I rivacy and felt harassed as a owi nq the Pl annl ng Commi ssi on ne City is attemPting to Punish her ich shl had no control - she dld dld not add the bathroomr nor wa! ch ln the house, aPParentlY bulltof the Pl anni ng Commlssion. o p It h er r Counci lman Harrl son as ked if there repl i ed not as such , nor ls there Councilman Harri3on asked lf food Mrs. Baskett offered to remove the th ere . ls a k{tchen ln the unl t. Mrs . Baskett a slnk as such, there is a stove.ls oreoared and eaten there. stive' i f it ls crl ti cal that it not be councllman Hanglni asked Mrs. Baskett lf the accessory buildtng was aiiiussea wlth-the realtor. She stat€d it was described to her as a ; mo i tr e r - t n - I aw " uni t. Councllman Manglni asked lf the realtor had offered to-fJrcnar. the property. Mrs. Baskett stated that an offer was made to buv'it back if sire i+as irnhappy wlth recent developments. Further, in ."ipons.-io Councilman Mangihi, t'lrs. Baskett confirmed she receiYed no rent from the caretaker. Mrs. Baskett informed the Clty Council who recently sold his home, that a unlt bedroom and bath can contlnue ts livingof the family. Mayor Amstrup invlted comments from the floor in support of the appeal. t{illlam Lobdell, ll39 Bernal Avenue, informed the Clty Councll that Mrs. Easkett is considered a flne neighbor maintalning her property exceptional ly well. He stated that Mis . Baskett is ln poor heal th and it t! lmportint to her that someone be on the property_ln case of emer- gency; aiso, she can traYel knowlng that her property ls guarded agalnst Ires-passers. t'tr. Lobde l I offered the comment that he can appreciate this'need for security after livlng in the neighborhood lot ?3 years'. He felt it yas grossly unfalr that-the Plannlng commlssion would -permita church shool in an it- l Dlstrict but deny Mrs. Baskett the beneflt of a caretaker-companlon. He stated that more and more the cltlzens of Burllngame appeir to be searching for opportunltles to "tell on" thelr neighbors. It was his oplnion "thls is a mlserable vray to run a city.'l Mayor Amstrup stated that the laws of the clty apply equally to all of thL resldents. In tlrs. Baskett's case, there are zoning regulatlons that must be enforced. They cannot be clrcumvented by Clty Council 'Planni ng Comml sslon or staff. In response to the Mayor's lnqulry, there were no further comments from the fl6or. The heari ng rras decl ared cl osed. Councllman Manglnl asked llrs. Bassett hot{ the Asslstant City Planner _/ that she over the quarters I earned from a nelghbor, garage cons i sti ng offor the excl usive use ,L).) learned of the accessory dwelling. She explained that the letter senther by the City Attorney showed that copies t{ent to Building, plannlng and Fire Departments. The City Attorney reported he learned of severilbuildlng and zonlng matters requlrlng attentlon whi le revlewlng flles I nheri ted from hls predecessor. 99u!c!lman l,langinl asked how long the ordinance has been in effect pro-hibitlng a second dwelllng unlt on an R-l lot. The City Attorneyreplied.since 1941. Councllman Manglni asked if the City has authorltyto requlre a realtor to inform a prospective buyer of poisible lllegal- cond i ti ons in a property. Mayor-Amstrup recalled that the Clty Council attempted to enact suchIegislation two to three years ago -but community oipositlon rras sovehement that the effort was abandoned. Mayor Amstrup informed theaudlence that there are on-9oing studles whCreby the Councll hopes toiryplement some form of contiol ilthout requlrin-g actual physicai lnspec-!t9l .gf a property. He stated lt is unfortunat6 tnat prbpirttes witirbuilding and zoning violations contlnue to be sold to irnlirformed buyersbut, for the present, the clty has no authorlty to regulate ln thls-area. the Ye. two. s e arage Counci I man Cus i ck as ked thenursery school was permi ttedThe Attorney responded this ct I ls ty Attorney to explain why the churchn an R-l Dlstrlct by the Planning Commlslon.a permi tted use wlth a special permlt resldence on an R-l property is not.from the Commissioni a second councllman cusick stated that the city cannot legally grant t'lrs. Baskettthe use that she seeks because of state law. she as-kei the clty AttorneyI9 grpt1fJ.. .The Attorney quoted from the Munlcipal Code, Sectlirn 25.28.b80"0nly one.buildlng deslgned or used as a resldenie for one family shailbe erected' located or maintalned on one lot." The Attorney explalnidthat where there are unrel ated peopl e living in separate quirters on an R-'lproperty this constitutes two families on a-slnqle-famlly'lot. Further-more, the State code was amended to prohiblt usi variancLs. A usevarlance rould have the effect of turnlng thls property lnto anotherzone; this cannot be done. councilman-Manginl aded about connecting the accessory buildlng tomain dwelling. l',lrs. Baskett lndicated ihe cost would- Ue prohiSlt.i She mentioned the posslbillty of a canopy arrangement Joihing theThe City Attorney,, respondlng to Councliman t'tan!lnl,reIorted-he wanot certain lt would be legal to join the buildings in this mannerwhen two units are connected, this is a duplex Anilting. 0n l.lrs.property, this would be a duplex dwelling in an R-l zoie, two famillying in turo houses. .Further, in respoise to Councilman manglnl ,City Attorney.confirmed that a member bf ttrs. Baskett's famii,i maioccupy the unit. He reported, too, that the people adjacent io tiBaskett^property were informed they cannot use tire room over the-toxaept for the famlly and there is to be no cooking. Baskett's I I es the councilman Manglni asked if there was room in the main dwe'l llng for thecaretaker. Mrs. Baskett indlcated willlngness to consider thl; but feltit a'l udicrous arrangement when suitable ieparate living guirters wereavailable. In response to^an Jnquiry from Mayor Amstrup concerning a drawing beforethe City Council showlng a tub, rLfrlgeratoi, slnk and-stove in Iheaccessory building, the City Attorney reported the drawlng rras preparedby the Assistant Clty PIanner. In expressing sympathy for l,lrs. Baskett, Councilman Harrison statedit was his impression there were many parallel uses on R-l lots through-out the City.of Eurlingame. For thii reason, he suggested at the lasiCouncil meetlng that the City not attempt to inspeci-all of the housesin. Burl i ngame, but, as an al ternative, requi re a sel I er or hls agent tomake the buyer aware of zonlng and permitted uses, the intent being toprotect the consumer, or purchaser. Councllman Harrison stated thitcouncl lman cuslck offered an al ternative recommendatlon that the buyer berequired to sign a statement that he is aware of zonlng regulations.Both of these suggestions were referred to the Clty At[orniy. .3 4as Councilman Harrison referred to a discusslon at the last Clty Council iluai meeting concerning amortlzation 9f- 2 !llegal apartment bulldlngs that have existed for some time in an R-l 0lstrict. He asked the City Attorney if a similar form of anortlzatlon might be applled to the-Baskett iroperty. The City Attorney stated the Councll may mate that decistoh .i i lt-desires. He stated the other propertles that were discussed have more problems of legallty than the Baskett property from tris-iianapoint. Couhctlman Harris6n ex-plained he was primarlly concerned with bein! fair and attempting to reach a compromise. councllman cusick asked lf lt |{as not true that the clty was aware in 1969 of condltlons ln the Baskett property. she stated that ras one of the consideratlons in the other 2 properties where amortlzatlon was discussed; it would appear, then, that lt would be fair to assume tfrii-imoriization couli'be irranged for Mrs. Baskett slnce the Clty was aware of the illegal use of the property as far back as 1969 ' councilman Harrlson announced he suggested amortizatlon because Citi tnew of the zonlng vlolatlon ln-1969 but fatled to follow l{i th abatement. the through Mayor Amstrup stated he, too somethl ng similar haPPe ned u al ter the axiom of "let the the opi nl on that deferrl ng aIt must be recognlzed therethat Planning Commisslon andof an R-l lot, and that amor should be taken now. sympath i zed wi th Mrs . Bas kett because en- hL purchased hls home, but thls did not uver beware." Mayor Amstrup expressed dicislon for 2 yelrs accomplished nothlng. re laws to be e-nforced to correct lllegalities. staff are of the oplnlon this is duplex use ization will simply deI ay aa a ctl on that h b a t counci lman Harrison suggested that amortlzatlon will be a declsive iition. A tlme certaii'will be named when the use of the cottage by a nonrelative must cease; thls is not an attempt to delay nor to provide in opportunity for the appllcation to be reconsldered. councilman Manginl asked lr|$,as intended that each case would be Judgedinaiviiuiiti-oi its merlts 6nd was he proposing.2-year amortlzation ln the Baskett case. Councilman Harrison conflrmed this was so. Mayor Amstrup protested this will create. a p re c e d e n t - b I n d I n g upon the ciiy. Amortizition was considered for the Newlands Avenue property beciuse the City was very deflnitely at fault. As far as the Baskett orooertv. he stited he wis not certaln of the tlme that the Clty knew 6f tne iitegat dwelling. It must be recognized there are laws to be uoniia; the-Councll hai commlted itself ln the past to preservatlon oi tne residential character of this Clty; amortlzatlon here wll l severcly hamper staff ln attemptlng to rld the City of illegal un'l ts. Councilman Cuslck stated there appeared to be agreement at the study meeting durlng the discussion on the Newlands Avenue-property that the prisent oiner would not now be burdened with an lllegal .property.had the City pursued action when the violations were flrst discovered. Similarly, Mrs. Baskett would not be burdened with an lllegal use on her propLrty 1f the City had moved to abate in 1969' Councllman Cusick stated there are other propertles 'ln the Clty trith illegal llvtng quarters. t,llhen the Clty Council is lnformed of these' abatement can de initlated. The Baskett property ls a dlfferent matter. The Clty knew about it but dld nothing for 6 years. l,llth respect to Newlands Avenue, Mayor Amstrup City Attorney indicates some uncertainty about abatement because this is a very old vlolatlon. pointed out that the adequately def endi ng Councilman Harrlson moved that use of the accessory structure or cottage on the property at 1124 Bernal Avenue as living quarters by other than a family member cease as of July 21 ,1977, or upon sale the property, whichever comes flrst. Motion seconded by Councilman Followlng roll call was recordedl AYES: Councll l'lembers Cusick and Harrlson N0ES: Council Members Amstrup and l'langl ni ABSENT: Counci I Member Crosby of Cusick. + Mayor Amstrup announced that the tie vote has the effect of upholdlng the Pl anni ng Commission declslon. Councllman Mangini moved to uphold the declslon of the Planning Commlssionin denying the appllcatlon for special permit for caretaker's quartersin an accessory structure on the property at ll24 Bernal Avenue. Motlon seconded by Mayor Amstrup and carrled unanlmously on roll call of members present. The City Attorney advised that a resolution wlll be prepared for the Ci ty Councl I 's consideratlon. RECONVENE:Following a recess at 9i00 P.M 9:13 P.M. the Chair reconvened the meeti ng at HEARI NGS (cont. ) ?. SEISMIC SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE 6ENERAL PLAN Mayor Amstrup announced that the public portion of the hearlng wasinitiated and concluded at the meetlng of July l, 1975. The subject was continued on the agenda to this present meeting for the City Plannerto amend the document as requested by the City Council on JuIy 7, Stating it was his understanding there were stlll some questions aboutthe language, Mayor Amstrup asked for comments from the Councll. Counci lman Cus ick advised there were several places where she wouldprefer mi nor amendments, most i nvol vi ng a si ngl e word. Counci lman Mangi nl reported that Emergency Services has conferred provi ded data relatlve to the Cit asked that Mr. trlri ght be furnishe Element when aval I abl e. ht of the City's 0fflce ofAssistant Ci ty PI anner and suppl y. Counci lman tlanginiof the fi nal Selsmic Sa fe ty Jack llrig wi th they's wa terd a copy Followlng are the amendments requested by Counci lman Cusick and accepted by the Clty Council: l. P those o earthqu2. P " bal anc agefm ake age ed 4, #9 to read: l'tany older commercial structures, especially asonry construction, may be hazardous ln a moderate to severe 4 (Major Recommendations) #l to read:ri sk" policy......Consider devel o ln a ouake coul d co I I aose'4. Pase 2l (a) lo ship to thei r ef f ect5. Page 25 #l to r #3 to read: Establish procedures that could be used t o reduce seismic risk in exi sti ng buildl n9s.3. Page l2 - Masonry Bui I di ngs , I ast sentence to read:A severe read: Consider vulnerable structures ln relation- on emergency operat'lons. (footnote to remain)ead: Conslder devel opilg a "balanced rlsk"6. Page 26 #9 to read: eon,faar-afeating a qualified #10 to read: eonsider ejtabllshing procedures #3 to read: ConsilGr placlng fault RESOLUTION NO. 5I.75 "Adopting The Seismic Safety Element 0f The Burl ingame GeneraT Plan As Amended" ras introduced by Councllman Harrison, who moved its adoption, second by Councllman Harrison, unanimously car-ried on roll call of member! present. The City Attorney advlsed he wlll lnsert "As Amended" ln Paragraph 2, Page 2 of the Resol utlon ln the proper pl ace. COI'IMUNICATIONS I. SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Under date of July 16, 1975, the Clty Planner forwarded supplementary lnformatlon about Sources of Emergency l,later Supplles. It was the Planner's recommendation that the Element be scheduled for revietr at the August 6 study meetlng and publlc hearlng at the regular meetlng on August 18.,- ,125 Flayor Amstrup announced that the Council Budget Committee is contemplatlng a special study meeting for the Council and department heads; the public will be encouraged to attend. The meeting has been tentatively scheduledfor August 6. !.lith respect to the Safety Element, the Mayor recommended that the Council, between now and the regular meeting on August 4, review the Element and make notations of revisions considered desirable or necessary. At the August 4 meeting the Element can be reviewed generally and a public hearing scheduled for a later date. There were no obiections to the procedure from the Councll. The City Planner distributed coples of the Draft San Mateo County Seismlc Safety/Safety El ement. 2. SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS N BURLINGAME PLAZA AREA A communication dated July 16, 1975, from Steve J. t'lusich and Marcia 7. Tarbell on behalf of Burlingame Plaza 0wners presented a list of 5 improve- ments'borely needed to alleviate problems in the area surrounding thePlaza." The communication v{as held for review at a study meeting. 3. REQUEST F0R ENACTMENT 0F HANDBILL qRDIN_ANC_E Acknowledgment was made of a letter dated July 2,1975, from Mr. and Mrs, C.A. |'leismann, 1432 Vancouver Avenue, requestinq the Council's consideration to leglslation that will control distribution of sales advertising "throw away" papers. The letter was referred to the City Attorney for research and report at a study meetlng. 4.HAPTN ENU PAR N Under date of July 17, 1975, the City Manager forwarded a communlcation from Arnold H. Rodman, Chairman, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commlssion con- curring with the Traffic Engineer's plan for Chapin Avenue, taking the number of additlonal stalls on the westerly end and converting to long- term parking. In an addendum to the communlcation, the City Manager recom- mended that any Iong-term parking on the street be metered in conformancewith the policy applicable to other all-day parking stalls in the commer- ci al area. The Director of Traffi c Di rector converted to londelivery to the The City Attorney consideration. Public [,lorks reported that the Traffic Englneer have recommended that ?5 spaces on the westerlyg-term. The memorandum was not prepared in time Counci I at thi s eveni ng's meeti ng. and end befor was requested to prepare I egi sl ation for the Counci I 's CONSENT CALENOAR I. PARCEL MAPS Fi nal ParcelLots 16, 17, Park Uni t No. Tentati ve Parcel Map bei ng Easton Addition No. 2 (lOZ condi ti ons by the Pl anni ng a resubdivision of Lots 7 and 8, BIock 18,I and 1029 El Camino Real), approved with Commissioni and Map I8 6, of 533 Ai rport Boul evard, and I9 of Block 7 and Lot approved by the Pl anni ng being a resubdivision ofI of Block 10, Anza Airport Commi ss i on. 0n motion of Councilman Harrison, second by Councilman Cusick, the City Counci I unanimously approved the above maps subject to identical con-ditions imposed by the Planning Commission on the Parcel Map for theproperty at l02l and 1029 El Camino ReaI. ?. ENVIRONMENTAL IHPACT REPORT - SAI'I FRANCISCO AIRPORT EXPANSION A recommendation from the Clty |4anager under date of July 17, 1975, that an additional copy of this voluminous document be purchased for Planning Department usein preparatlon of the City of Burlingame Noise Elementof the General Pl an recei ved Counci I endorsement. ,/ 426 3. OEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAI{ Analysis and tabulation of eight proposals was forwarded by the City I'lanager under date of JuIy 17 , 1975. Hi s recommendation that the materlal be held for review at a study meeting was concurred in by the Ci ty Counci I . 4. PA&KUtq 0_F IRAILERS AND oTHER_qqU_LlXEXr The letter from Dale dated July I 5, 1975, Council by the City study meeti ng. RESOLUT I ONS he following roll call: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: N0ES: C0UNC I L MEMBERS : ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER: ABSTAIN COUNCIL MEMBER: 2, RESOLUTION NO. 53.75 "Authorl z I ng Perkl ns , Chai rman, Beauti fi cati on Commi ssion, the above subject was forwarded to the Clty ger wlth a comment it be reviewed at the next Ams trup-Harrl son -Mangi ni None Crosby Cus i ck Execution 0f Agreement For J. on Mana The City Manager informed the Councll that the Trafflc/Civil Engineer is doing an extensive study, also Traffic, Safety & Parking Commlssion has been asked to comment. I{hen their input ls available, the Beautlfi- cation Commission letter can be answered. 5. PAVING OF DIRT PAT H I N hIASH I NGTON PAR K A request from Richard T. Perry, 601 Concord l,lay, dated July l0 ' 1975for black-top in the dirt path (350 feet) in t{ashington Park extendlng from the northwest corner of the tennis courts to the paved path near the southwest corner of the basket-ball court (northeast of the Ameri canJuly l5,project. Mayor Amwill be Leg 197 Co s tru cons ion Hall) was forwarded by the City Manager under date of 5, with the comment that this wou'ld be a desirable q[or unci lmen Harri son and Mangi ni i ndi cated concurrencel--p, Chairman of the Council Budget Commlttee, announced lt i dered i n on-goi ng budget studl es . . RES0LUTI0N N0. 52-75 "Authorizing Execution 0f Agreement tlith eeltesForPre.ArchltecturaIFacllityPlanningPolice Station)" was introduced by Councilman Harrison, who moved ts adoption, second by Councllman Mangini and declared carried on I R ( it Bi centenni al Acti vl tl es " was moved its adoption, second bY ried on roll call of members present. i ntroduced by Councilman l'| Counci lman Harri son, angi ni and unanimousl whoy car- MEMORANOUI'I OF UNDERSTANDING ASS OCIATION OF POLIC E AND FIRE ADMINISTRATORS 0n moti on of Counci I man Mangi ni , mously carried on voice vote of authorlzed to sign the agreement Councilman Mangini commented he compensated for thelr overtlme, time off. second by Counci I man Harri son , unani - members present, the Ci ty Manager Hasfor the City. would prefer that administrators not be neither overtime pay nor compensatory UNFINISHED BUSINESS AMUSEMENT PERI,IIT BOGART'S LOUNGE, 261 CALIFORNIA DRIVE The application of Robert P. Selna, dated June 25,1975, for permit to offer amusement in the form of black-iack, dice, roulette, etc., using play money that can be exchanged for stuffed animal prizes,_ was [resented tb the City Council at the regular meet!ng on JuIy 7, and continued to this present meetlng to allow the Police Department addi tional time to complete i ts investigation. 7 427 Mayor Amstrup dated July 17, concl uded wi th to the i ssuanc Mayor Amstrup asked if the responded "yes. " Counci lman l'langi ni suggested returns from vacation when a Attorney confirmed that the wledged the detailed rePort from , si6ned by Lieutenant James A. statiment "The police department the Iicense." ac kno 1975 theeof the Chief of Cl ark. The re has no obJect Pollceport lon Mayor Amstrup invited comment from Counci lman Harri son stated, if the upon a condition that there be no gimes for food, beverage or cash. The City Attorney stated that the ov{ner would this *ele done, with resultant revocation of of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. the Ci ty Counci I . permi t i s transfer o It b owi n unc I roved, he would ay money won inapp plf insist the be gul I ty of I i cense under a crime if regul ati ons games have been implemented. Mr. Selna Mayor Amstrup commented this is another situation of disregard forgi'tt reqriationi. The City of Burlingame llunicipal !ode requires Cou-ncil-app.orii'of i perrit for amusiments of thls kind. He expressed reluctance to'.ncir.igi-ttris pirticrrlar activity, -not because of the operiior but the patrons. ie'declared hls intentlon of voting against the permi t. Councilman Manginl suggested the perm the date the operation started. Foll that the starting date was July l,-Coof the permit toi 3 months from JulY by the City Council. Motion seconded approved for 3 months from advice from the CitY Attorney man Manginl moved aPProval 75, renewal subiect to review ouncilman Harrison. l9yC Councilman Cusick asked if there ts. an age limit. that Bogart's is a cocktall lounge where minors are Mr. Selia stated he had been informed by Clty staff are not illegal in any sense of the word. A ro,ll call vote b,as recorded as follows: AYES: C0UHCIL MEMBERS: Harri son-Mangi ni N0ES: C0UNCIL MEMBERS: Amstrup-Cusick ABS ENT C0U NC I L I'lEl'lB ERS : Cros by e g I I t b The City Attorney advised that the Council has denied the application for amusement permtt by its action. Mr. Selna reapply after Council will be present. cant may reapply. Mr. Sel na advi sed not al I owed entrY.that the games Counci I man The Ci tythat f ul I appli Cro s by NEI.I BUSINESS I . NOTIF ICATION OF PROPERTY USE The City Attorney asked if the City Councll wished him to undertake preparaiion of legislation relative to propertl uses-recommended by Couhcilmen Cusick-and Harrison as the result of the Baskett situation. Mayor Amstrup suggested that the two Council members meet with the Attorney to discuss their ideas. l{hen a proposal is in form to be pre- sented to the Council, this can be done at a study meeting. 2. HERITAGE TREE ORDINANCE Counci lman Cusick stated member of the Counci I tomission. She asked that provi si on. The reques t thi s I egi sl ati o appeal a decisl the ordinance b was referred to n makes no provision for on of the Beautificatione amended to include such the City Attorney. a Com- a { 425 3. SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT Counci lman Cusick stated that the airport has not installed noisemonitoring equipment mandated by the State in 1968. She asked thatthe Councll authorize letters to every jurlsdictional body concernedrequesting they not certify the Envlronmental Impact Report untilthe requ i rements have been sati sfi ed . The City Planner reported went to the Mills Estates where the equipment was toto withhold action at thisinvestigate further. that he and the some months ago be installed. time unti I he Chi ef Bui ldi ng Inspectorto check the I ocations He requested the City Council has had the opportunity to 4. RECR AT D E PARTMENT Councilman Mangini reported he has received a letter concerning certainfunctions of the Recreation Department whtch appear to require attentlon. He asked that copies be furnished the City Council and approprlate membersof s taff. COMMENOAT I ONS Councilman Harrison recommended that Lois Gast of the Recreation Depart- ment be formally recognized for her excellent report on this yearrsArt In The Park. Mayor Amstrup announced that a resolution was sent to Judge Frank B. Blum, Judge of the Superior Court, San Mateo County, on the occasion of his retirement, commending him on behalf of the City of Burlingame for his many years of service. OVERSIZED HEDGE The Council heard a report from Henry B. t.lllkinson, l?39 Bernal Avenue, concernin been perm g i tted to grow to a hel a hedge on his neighbor's property at l24l Bernal that has Mr. I.ll I k i nson stated the hedge Ii ht that represents a pub I I c nu i sance .nterferes with Iight and sunshlne onhis property. He stated he was lnformed by the City's Park Directorthat the hedge has been classifled "Distlnctive Tree" and cannot be pruned without the City's approval. Mr. tlilkinson appealed to theCity Council to investigate and to determine if he has the right to askfor the hedge to be trimmed. Mayor Amstrup requested the City Hanager to lnvestigate and report to the Ci ty Counci I . PEN INSULA BANK PARKI I{G In response to an inquiry from iilayor Amstrup concernin? parking spaces against the wall of the Peninsula Nat the Di rector of Publ i c t'lorks advi sed these were i nvest It was determined that I space is entirely within the the other, 75% within bank property. In accordance wi agreement wlth the bank, these are legally bank parkin so designated at the bank's request. Ii the status of onal Bank building,gated recently. ank property; h the City's spaces and were i bt g SPECIAL PARKING COMMITTEE:Mayor Amstrup announced the next meetingto explore Broadway parking.will be held in TRAFFIC, SAFETY early August & PARKING COMMISSION Mayor Amstrup announced that Robert Podesta and Harry Graham have been reappointed by the City Councll. The City Manager was requested to write Miss Christine Keatlng, student member of the Commission, who has reslgned because of her impending marriage and move to another city, extendlng the Council's good wishes and appreciatlon for her service on the Commission. ,i 42t\ ACKN0I'ILEDGMENTS l. City Planner report of Plannlng Commission2. Pol lce and Flre Departments' Monthly Repor3. Minutes: Park & Recreation Commlssion, JuTraffic, Safety & Parklng, July 10, I975. Council Study I'leeting Notatlons' July 9' I975. -4. Mrs. Carroll iownshend Fugltt, Jr., lSll Sebastlan Drlve' 'l etter of of July 3, 1975, express{Dg appreciatlon for stop sign at Sebas ti an/Mari posa i ntersect l on.5. M1s. A. Hansen, 'l etter of July ll, I97S, concerni ng Beauti fi cati onCommission denlal of request to remove Bunya Bunyi tree from herproperty at 1540 Newlands Avenue.6. Copy of San Mateo County ordinance adopted July 1,1975, requiringposting of prices of motor vehicle fuels.7. Blingum Inn Teen club, Eurl ingame Recreation Department semi-AnnualFinanclal Report January l - June 30, 1975. APPROVALS 0n motion of Councilman Cusick, second by !99, !935 through 10,000 and 3005 through$462.734.43, duly audited were unanimously meetlng July 14, I975. ts , June, 1975.ly 8, Counci l man Harri son, l,larrants 3100 in the amount of approved for payment. Nos. 10345 through ll,080Payrol I for the month of June, 1975, Checksin the amount of $315,056.75 was approved. ADJ0URNMENT: At l0:20 P.t4. Respectful ly subml tted, HERBERT K. UHITE, CITY CLERK gV 6.r.2r..,-ri,1J/./ZDeputy Aity TTeF- /o