HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1975.11.17482
Burl i ngame , Ca1 i forni a
i{ovember 17, 1975
CALL TO ORDER
A regu'l ar meeting of the Burlingame City Council was
date in the Ci ty Hal I Counci I Chambers . The meeti ng
order at 8:05 P. i,l . by l'1ayor Irving S. Amstrup.
hel d on the above
was cal I ed to
PLEOGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: Led by Jerome F. Coleman, City Attorney.
ROLL CALL
Council
Counci l
l.lemoers
i,lembers
Present:
Absent:
Amstrup-Crosby-Cusi ck-Harri son-ltlang i ni
llone
;.III'{UTES
Tne mi nutes of the regul ar meeti ng of llovember 3, 1975, previously sub-mitted to the City Council, were approved and adopted.
AUCTIOi'I PERi4 IT APPROVED
Under date of [,lovember 5, 1975, S. Ashman, President, Golden StateAuctioneers, Inc., I35 l.lillow Road, Danvil le, made application for apermit to hold an auction on the premises at ?20 California Drive,formerly the location of Snowman Ski Shop, Inc., on Saturday, November 22,
commencing at 1l:00 A.M. for approximately two (2) hours. An inventorydf merchandi se, fi xtures and equi pment to be sol d was filed.
A Ietter dated November 5, 1975, s i gned by Lieutenant Thomas B. ChaseforGeraldA'Nordstrom,chiefofPolice,offerednoobjectionto
granti ng of the permi t. I
Counci lman Harri son moved to authori ze i ssuance of the requi red I i cense,the sal e to be conducted as outl i ned in the appl i cant's I etter of
November 5, i4otion seconded by Councilman 14angini, all aye voice vote.
HEAR I NGS
APPEAL OF JOHNRE: PLANNING
&EqurtElllENTs
F. DEVINE,
c0r,li'1 ISSI0N
FOR R-1 LOT
I34B DE SOTO AVENUE
DENIAL OF VARIANCE FROM AVERAGE t,lIDTH
The appeal of John F. Devine was acknowledged by the City Council atits meeting of November 3, 1975 and referred to the present meeting for
publ i c heari ng.
In a communication addressed to the City Council dated November 13, 1975,
the City Planner provided background including references to two prior
applications made in 1972 by Mr, Devine to resubdivide the property.
At the Chai r's inv
recent proposal.
in width by I20 fe
the P'l anni ng Comm iParcel A wi th 6547
ilec lari ng the
expl ai ned the
it
Th
et
SS
s
ati on, the Ci ty Pl anner revi ewed i'4r. Devi ne's moste Pl anner expl ai ned that the property is 10C f eetin depth. A tentati ve parcel map was submi tted toion dividing the property into two parcels -
quare feet, site of the Devi ne residence, and
Parcel ll with 5453 square feet where a slngle-family dwelling could be
bui I t. Because Parcel B fai I ed to satisfy the code requirement thatlots must have an average width of not less than 50 feet, th
Commission requested a concurrent variance application. As
Parcel B is 50 feet wi de at the street, that wi dth continues
approx i ma te I y 36 to the rear where it n arrows to 43.49 feet.
have I and area in excess of the requ i red 5000 square feet.
Commission chose not to approve the resubdivision on a voteto two (2) on both vari ance appl i cati on and parce l map (one
e Pl anni ng
proposed,to a poi nt
Both parcel s
The Pl anni ngof four (4)
member absent )
nearr ng open,property was
Mayor Amstrup recogni zed llr. Devi ne, who
purchased as an i nvestment wi th the i dea of
I
x o
eventually dividing it into two Iots, building a new home for his
family and selling the existing dwelling as a method of accurnulating
reserves for the chi ldren's educati on,
iteferring to statements in the Planner's written report, Councilman 14an-gini asked 1.1r. Devine had he at any time agreed to reduce the size of
the present building. t4r. Devine stated he had made no such commitment
in writing but had applied for and obtained a permit in August,1972, to
demol i sh part of the building and re-establ i sh a new exteri or wal I androofing. He stated the work was never done because of strong objections
by t1rs. ilevine, her insistence that the dining room would be ruined.
In response to the Chair's inquiry, there were no further comments from
the fl oor sustai ni ng or opposi ng the appeal , The heari ng was dec I ared
cl osed.
Counci I di scussion fol I owed.
Councilman Harrison inquired about dimensions of the two parcels. The
Planner referred to the copy of the map showing 50 feet at street
frontage for both parcel s. He stated that Parcel A is a I egal I ot.
Because of the jog in the new parcel Iine to accomodate that portion of
the exi sti ng bui I di ng that proj ects i nto the side setback , wi dth
dimension of Parcel B narrows for a distance of 84.02 feet to the rear
property I i ne, thus bri ngi ng average width of the total parcel bel ow
the requ i red 50 feet.
Counci lman Cus i ck referred to the parcel map requesti ng the Ci ty Pl anner
to comment on the overhang in the area where the house protrudes into the
side yard. The Pl anner i denti fi ed the bui I di ng wall, expl al ni ng an
overhang is permitted for a distance not to exceed 50% of the required
side yard.
r,layor Amstrup asked the distance from the new parcel line to building if
thi protrusibn were removed. The Planner advised about seven (7) feet-
Further, in response to i'layor Amstrup, the Planner confirmed it would be
necessary to remodel the entire side of the building in that section to
strai ghten the new pa rce I line and give each parcel 50 fee t wi dth fron t
and rear.
Councilman i4angini referred to discussion in the Planning Commission
minutes of 0ctober 'l 4 concerning a building permit for installation of
windows. The Planner stated Mr. Devine had a building permit for demolition
of part of the bui ldi ng. Further, in response to Counci lman [langini 'the' PI anner agreed that if the remodel i ng had been done there would be
two (2) 50 foot lots. The remodeling was not done, there was no action
on that bui I di ng permit,
Councilman Harrison referred to a comment in the same minutes by one of
the commi ssi oners objecti ng to a 1972 gerrymandered I ot. The Ci ty
Planner explained the initial application by Mr,Devine in that year
proposed a lot 42 feet wide, a straight line from the street to the rear.
There was strong nei ghborhood oppos i ti on to this plan.
The Ci ty Pl anner i nformed the Counci I there i s another gerrymanderi ng ,opportunity. It is possible to jog behind the building, obtain a 50 foot
lot and obvi ate the need for a variance. Counci I man Crosby noted this
would pl ace the new Iot line in the mi ddl e of the other lot.
Councilman Harrison queried iS staff saying that it.thE Council denies
the application and upholds Planning Commission, I'lr. Devine can file
anothi:i map satisfying all requirements? The City Attorney elplained
the requirement for an average width of 50 feet can be fulfilled'
llhether this woul d be a saleable lot is questi onabl e, but it is also
questi onab l e that the PI anni ng Commi ssi on woul d have di screti on to deny
a parcel map becau se a lot I ooks s tra nge .
Councilman Crosby asked Mr. Devine to amplify his earlier explanationfor not proceeding with the demolitdon project. Mr. Devine stated
that l,1rs. Devine oujected for the reason that there are six (6) bedrooms'
three (3) baths , a I arge Iiving room plus al coYe; to have I ess than a
functional dining room in a home of this size would depreciate property-
.()
value. Councilman Crosby asked I'lr. Devine to explain his reasons for
taking out the building permit in the first place. I'lr. Devine stated
he i ntended to remodel , his wi fe objected, and that, actual Iy, he
obtained the permit before moving his family into the home,
Counci lman Harri son moved to sustain the deci s i on of the Pl ann i ng Com-
mission, to deny the appeal. l"loti on seconded by Councilman Cusick. **
0n the question, Councilman 14angini asked the City Attorney, in view
of statements just made concerning possibility of another iog in the
parcel line, can Mr. Devine return to the Planning Commission and
request a variance. in lot width requirements? The City Attorney
explained that 14r, Devine has the right to present a new parcel map'
It would be the responsibility of the Commission to decide if the lot
pattern woul d be compati bl e wi th exi sti ng patterns in the nei ghborhood.
A vari ance woul d not be required.
**iulotion carried unanimously on roll call
I
2 C0DE AMEIIDMEitTS T0 TITLE 25 Z0NING
FACILITIES FOR THE ELDERLY IN R.3
TO PROVIDE FOR GROUP RESIDENTIAL
ZORE
llayor Amstrup announced this was the time and place sbbeduled pursuant
to publ i shed noti ce to conduct a publ i c heari ng for the purpose of
considering two amendments to the i4unicipal Code as follows:l. Add to Title 25 Zoning, Section 25.08.325 Definitions "Groupresidential faci li ti es for the elder1y. A resi dence for elderly persons
60 years of age or over in good heal th and not bedfast, which res i dence
prov i de s cential i zed di ni ng faci l i ties and rel ated living servi ces. "
2. Section 25.32.030 Conditional uses requiring a special permit add
"4. Group res i denti al facilities for the elder1y. "
In a communication dated 0ctober 30, .l975, the City Planner forwardedfor the Council's information these items: Planning Commission Reso-
lution l5-75 "Reconmending The Adoption 0f An 0rdinance Adding Group
Resi denti a l Facilities For The El derl y In R-3 Zones, " Draft 0rdi nance
Adding Section 25.08,325 and Amending Section ?5.32.030 of the Bur-
lingame Ilunicipal Code to AIlow Group Residential Facilities for the
El derly in R-3 Zones, and mi nutes of the 0ctober 14, i975 PI anni ng Com-
mission meeti ng, i tem 5, Code Amendments to Title 25 Zoning.
Responding to t4ayor Amstrup, the City Planner explained that, by reason
of the code amendments, a proposal for this type of facility in R-3
District will require application for a special permit, a public hearing
and environmental impact assessment. 14ayor Amstrup asked about an
agreement the City Council had with the developer of Casa Amigo con-
cerning sanitary sewer improvements. The City Attorney stated the
Casa Amigo proiect must start anew. A permit under the new ordinance is
required, t{hen the use was approved ear'l ier this year, it was not
allowed in R-3.
In response to the Chair's invitation, there were no comments from the
fl oor pro or con. The heari ng was declared cl osed.
0RDINANCE N0. 1050 "0rdinance Adding Section 25.08.325 And Amending
Section 25.32.030 0f The Burlingame I'lun i ci pal Code To A11ow Group
Residential Facilities For The Elderly In R-3 Zones" was gi ven its
second reading. 0n motion of Councilman Harrison, second by Council-
man 14angi ni , sai d 0rdi nance passed its second readi ng and was unani-
mously adopted on roi I cal I
COi.I14UNICATIONS
l. r'I0RTHPARK, BIJRLINGAI'IE'COMPLAINT OF NOISE PROBLEMS AT CAR l.lASH
In a communication dated ilovember I2, 1975, Elayne Cudmore, l"!anager'
informed the City Council that approximately 30 apartments involving
75 NorthPark resi dents are affected by the dai'l y noi se emanati ng from
he corner of Broadway and Carolan Avenue. AIso,
ts are unab I e to keep the wi ndows and bal cony doors
i I i ty i s i n use and, ouer the past several years ,
ve been forced to move. t!s. Cudmore expressed the
probl em can be recti fi ed if the operators i nstal I eda
the car wash a
NorthPark res i
ope n when the
many residents
opi ni on that t
tt
den
fac
ha
he
t\
.{81"r
a proper cover,
In response to i"layor Amstrup, the
busi ness operates under a speci a1
i n ;,1arch , 1972 .
Ci ty I'lanager confi rmed that the
permi t granted by the Ci ty Counci I
Council members agreed with I'layor Amstrup's recommendation that staff
be di rected to confer wi th the operators on measures th at are availableto them for noise control. l.layor Amstrup suggested, too, that Council
mi ght consi der revocati on of the use permi t if s taff 's effort s are
unsuccessful.
2. COi4I,I ISS ION APPOI NTMENTS
'In a memorandum dated November I3, 1975, the City l"lanager reported thatl.lrs. Gloria H. Barton and Clarence Rusch of Beautification Commission,I,lrs. irlildred B. Grens and John 0'Leary of Park and Recreation Commission,
and Victor T. Subbotin of Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, arewilling to serve another term. Hith Council concurrence, l"layor Amstruh
confirmed reappointment of all for the full term.
Under date of iiovember 13, 1975, the City Manager forvlarded a report
from the Park Director that the Beautification Commission at a regular
meeting on i{ovember 6, 1975 approved Heritage Grove status of 40
i,lexi can fan palms on Carol and East Carol Avenues. The City Manager
expl ai ned that the nomination requi res approval of the Ci ty Counci I.
Counci lman Crosby, res i dent of Caroi Avenue, inquired of the City
Engi neer abou t removal of debri s that falls from the palm trees especially
during a period of strong winds. He commented that the street resembles
an oostacle course at times. The Ci ty Engineer stated that compl aints
are directed to the Park Department, ordi nari ly, but that Publ ic,tlorks
crews will remove branches and other I i tter found in the streets,
Counci lman Crosby's motion confi rmi ng Heri tage Grove status of the
llexican fan palms on Carol and East Carol Avenues as recommended b
the Beautification Commission was seconded by Councilman f'langini,
aye voi ce vo te,
val l
RESOLUTIONS
l. RES0LUTI0N N0. S2-75 "Authori zi ng Executi on 0f Agreeme n t For
Archi tectural Servi ces -Fi re Sta ti on No. 3" was i ntroduced by Council-
man I'langini, who moved i-ts adoption, second by Councilman Harrison,
c a r r i e d
-
u n a n i mo u s 1 y on rol I cail. (Al bert H. KahI , Archi tect. )
ORDIi,IANCES
Second readi ng:
.l . 0RDIIIANCE N0. l05l "Repealing Two-Hour Parking Limitations 0n
Fl ori bunda Avenue Between Cal i forni a Drive And Pri mrose Road, "
The Ci ty Engi neer, at the
b lock of F I ori bu nda has
Ci ty Counci I re cen tl y atrial bas i s. It was fe
sary and that it might
allowed to park on the
from resi dents. .Staf fto unl'imi ted parking.
The 0rdi nance (title
moti on of Councilman
0rdi nance passed its
cal I .
Chai r's request, expl ai ned that this part i cul ar
two-hour parki ng limit. Staff came to the
ing permi ssi on to shroud exi sti ng signs on athat iimited parki ng was not absol utely neces-
of benefit to the residents if they ttere
reet all day. The test rai sed no objections
w asks that the s tree t be rai sed from two - hou r
a
skIt
be
st
no
In response to Mayor Amstrup's inquiry, there were no comments from the
fioor.
reci ted above ) was gi ven its second read i
Harrison, second by Councilman l'!angini, sa
second reading and was unanimously adopte
ng.
idd on
0n
ro I l
3. HERITAGE GROVE DESIGNATIONS
4Eri
2. 0RDIHANCE N0. 1052 "Establ ishing Highland Avenue Between Cal ifornia
ort valfna- ttowarZ- Avenue As.A 0ne-}.lay -Street. "
At the Chai r's request, the Ci ty Engi neer expl ai ned that this change
was recommended in the traffic surveillance study by George S. l'lolte ' Inc.
General ly speaki ng, this is the area of Hi ghl and Avenue adj acent to the
bus depoi, presenIly a two-way street. There is a great dea] of conflict
for northbound trafiic coming out on to California Drive at an odd angle
thus creating a difficult situation. The recommendation is to desig-
nate Hi ghl and Avenue a one-way street southbound away from Cal i forni a -tDri ve toward Howard. A new bus stop is anti ci pated on Cal i forni a at
Howard in front of Arata Pontiac where northbound buses will stop. i
There were no comments frqn the floor in response to the Chair's inquiry.
In response to Councilman Crosby' the City Engineer confirmed that
Greyhoirnd has been made aware of the change also Arata Pontiac.
Greyhound had no objecti on , Arata peopl e were somewhat di spl eased.
The 0rdi nance (title reci ted above ) was gi ven its second read i ng .
motion of Councilman Cusick, second by Councilman l'langini said
0rd i nance passed its second read i ng and was unanimously adopted on
cal I .
ORD I NANC ES
0n
rol I
I ntroduc ti o n of :
I.ORDINANCE NO. IO53 "Addi ng Chapter 12.10 To
eoAe To-TrovTde For Issuance 0f Encroachmentfor first reading by Councilman Crosby.
The Burl i ngame IluniciPal
Perrnits" was i ntroduced
i,layor Amstrup expl ai ned that the Ci ty Counci I agreed
encroachment permi t procedures to the Ci ty Engi neer
el imi nati ng some unnecessary steps.
Counci lman Cusi ck stated that nowhere doe s the 0rdi nance say that the
permit is revocable, Following a brief discussion, the City Attorney
idvi sed that the appropri ate l airguage wi ll be added to the 0rdi nance
in time for the second read i ng.
Addi ng Chapter 13.54 To The
Skateboards" was i ntroduced for
to
as a
allocate
method of
2. 0RDINANCE N0. 1054 "An 0rdinance
Burl ngame r un crpa ode Concerni ngfi rst readi ng by Counci I man Harrl son.
Mayor Amstrup asked is there any place where "retail commercial district"
is speci fi cal ly desi gnated so tha t there wi lI be no ques ti on of the
area to which this 0rdiSaaoe applies. The City Attorney explained the
term is synonymous with C-l as shown on the zoning map.
3. 0RDIilANCE N0. l055 "Adding Chapter lB.l0 Controlling Sandblasting
And OEFEF-SffiTTarTypes 0f Exterior Building Cleaning" was introduced
for fi rst readi ng by Counci lman Mangini .
Councilman Crosby asked is there an appreciable amount of sandblastingin this city. The City Engineer confirmed there is and there are rnany
compl ai nts.
Ui'lF I i'l I SHtri BUS I NESS
I. PRIMROSE LANES AMUSE14ENT PERMIT DENIED
l'iayor Amstrup announced that consideration of this application was
continued from the meeting of l,lovember 3 to the present time to allowI'lr. Thomas Henderson, President, Primrose 14anagement Corporation, timeto prepare a response to statements in the Police Department reportof 0ctober 30, 1975.
j'lr. Henderson, upon recognition by the Chair, informed the Council he
had no comments.g
487
Counci lman Harri son moved to deny the appl i cati on for an amusement
iicense for public dancing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Cusick.
0n the question, Councilman Crosby asked if the problems recited in the
Police tiepartment report were corrected. Lieutenant Chase stated !!"y
were to hi i knowl ed9e. Counci I man Crosby commented the pri nci pal di f-
ficulty appeared to have been with one employee. .14r. Henderson stated
the employee had been with the company for two (2) years and that he
(llendeison) refused to convict a person before proven guilty.
1 I The motion to deny carried unanimously on roll call.
2. 'dIRI.iG F0R CHRISTI'IAS DEC0RATI0NS 0N BURLINGAI4E AVENUE
i'layor Amstrup announced that the request of the Chamber of Commerce for
fi nanci al assi stance to hel p defray costs of new el ectri cal wi ri ng f or
the Chr.i stmas decorations was discussed at the study meeting. He
stated his first reaction was to help the merchants. However, on
iearning that nothing has been done for Broadway or the Plaza' he had
second Ihoughts and (uesti ons now how the expendi ture of ci ty funds
can be justified.
crisis, commenting there has
Burl i ngame Ave nu e or Broadway
Counci lma n Harri son di scussed the energy
not been an el ectri cal di sp l ay on ei therat Chri stmas for the past two years.
Counci lman i'langini stated hecrisis as vJith the i dea that
area and i gnori ng the others.
Counci I man Crosby recal I ed i t
the new wi ri ng would be one-h
he was not too concerned wi th
si tuation for the reason tha tof the hol i day season and add
merchants shou I d receive some
was not as concernedthe Council would be
wi th the eaergy
hel pi ng one commercial
wasalf
the
the
to
f i n
establ i shed at the study meeti ng that
the wattage of the old. He explained
energy cri si s in this parti cu lar
decorations contri bute to the spi ri t
the warmth of the city. He felt the
anci al aid from the city.
r4ayor Amstrup agreed that the merchants did extremely-we
the funds. He itated he was informed by one member of t
he, personally, had no intention of asking the city for
also, there were others of the opinion that electricity
to a pi eas i ng display.
II in soliciting
he group that
f urther ass i stance i
was not vital
reported
Regu-
Councilman Harrison moved to deny the request, second by Councilman Cusick,
carried on following roll call:
Council Members Aye: Amstrup-Cusick-Harrison-14angini
Council 14embers No : Crosby
Counci I Members Absent: None
3. SUPERSON IC TRANSPORTS
Counci I man llangini, methat the members voted
requ i ri ng all SST' s Ialations on noi se.
mb
iond
his right to light and sunshine because of uncontrol l ed plantings
neighbor's property. He asked that he be granted the opportunity
er of Airport Land Use Committee (ALUC),
phold San Francisco Airport Commission in'ing in this area to meet Federal Aviation
iIENRY iJ. l^JILKINSON, 1239 BERNAL AVENUE
i'IEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY
COMPLAINT RE PLANTINGS ON
Just prior to the meeting, l'lr, t.Iilkinson submitted a written request-to
oe heird by the City Counci l. Upon recognition by the Chair, l'lr. '"lilkinsonrecal I ed hl s appearance before the Ci ty Counci I at the meeti ng of
July 21, I975, regarding a hedge on the neighbor's property. l'1r' l'lilkinson
referred to correspondence received from city staff concerning this growth'
described by the Park Director as "Distinctive Trees" of the specie
Pittosporum eugeniodes. 14r, !Jilkinson protested he is being deprived of
on theof aprivate
heir
onpublic hearing as a method of informing the citizens that trees
property can grow to such heights to deprive adjoining owners of t
468
rights to enjoyment of their property.
During a period of discussion, the City Attorney responded tinquiry on procedure, suggesti ng that the Counci I may make a
thi s evening or reque s t staff to investigate fu rthe r. The reto be a consensus to return the matter to staff to prepare a
report.
o Council
decision
appeared
comp)ete
i4r. l.lilkinson raised a question also about the lack of covered parking
on the property at l24l Bernal Avenue where there is neither garage norcarport. At the Chai r's request, 14r. Wi I ki nson agreed to submi t a
wri tte n statement.
iIEl,{ BUSIi,IESS
I . DEFERRED COMPENSATION
A memorandum from the City i.lanager dated November 14, 1975, informed
the City Council that the Fire Union and Civil Service Employee.Association
se I ected Grasberger & Associ ates, Pol ice and Fi re Admi ni strators chose
:1ike Chandler & Associates and Central Bank. In an oral report, the
Ci ty 14anager advi sed the Police Associ ati on voted for Grasberger.
2. APPEAL HEARING SCHEDULED
Acknowledgment was made of a communication dated I'lovember 13, 1975, from
Fred Harvey, An AI4FAC Company, appealing Planning Commission denial ofa sign permit for Airport 14arina Hotel at its meeting of November I0.
A heari ng befo re the Ci ty Counc i l was schedu led for the regul ar meetingof December I, I975.
FURTHER COMMENT ON I.IIRING FOR CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS BURLINGAME AVEIIUE
i.lr. Harry
pe rmi tted
purchase
S.
toir.
Graham, local merchant, asked if city employees will be
i nstal l the wi ri ng if the merchants raise the money to
There appeared to be no objecti on on the Counci I 's part,
is
to
IIAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENT
I'layor Amstrup announced his intention of seeking re-eiection to theCity Council in l'1arch, 1976 because of a conviction that government
becomi ng more compl i cated and that hi s experi ence woul d I end i tsel f
maintaining an even keel as far as the City of Burlingame financial
structure.
APPROVALS
I,JARRANTS Nos. 769 through I l1 7 i n
were -approved f or payment on moti on
Counci lman Harri son , all aye voi ce
PAYR0LL Checks Nos. |3238 through 13934, 0ctober,
S3TT,T5'4.77 approved on motion of Counci I man Cusick
man Harri son, all aye voi ce vote.
the amount of $407,918,36, duly audited,of Councilman Cusick, second by
vote.
'I 975, i n the amount of
, second by Counci i -
San
on an
i4anager
ACKNOI.lLEDGI'lENTS
Communi cati onsI:--foa;l Tgency Formation Commission Fire Protection Study for
i4ateo County. Counci I man Harri son commended Fi re Chi ef l,loorby
excel lent analysi s of the study in his memorandum to the City
dated Se p tember 24, 1975,
2. City Attorney report of November
property at I25 Park Road. referred to
fair market val ue of
udy meeti ng. ^con ce rn r ng Eur rr ngame
4, 197
Decemerl and
5, on
ber st
4
5
m
Road,Comments of John Horgan, 47i Cumb
venue mal l. City Planner report of Planning Commission meeting November I0, I975.. Minutes: Park & Recreation Commission, November ll, Planning Com-ission,0ctober 28, Synopsis of Department Head i'leeting, November 12, 1975.
0PERATING BUDGET: Mayor Amstrup asked that the Budget Commi ttee report
48f)
be made a part of the fi nal operati ng budget. Counci I man Cusick had
questions about certain iterns. l"layor Amstrup requested that the
suDject be pursued further at the study meeti ng on De cembe r 3, and that
the Fi nance li rector be i nvi ted.
GOLF COURSE
Councilman Crosby referred to Park & Recreation Commission minutes of
i,lovenber 1l, .|975, wherein the Commission discussed the advantages of
Plan E over L, the'Council's first choice. Mayor Amstrup explainedthat L, selected by the City Council, does not represent the total
development, that is a porti on and can be expanded Iater.
ADJ0URNI'1ENT: lleeting regularly adjourned at 9:20 P.M.
Respectful ly submi tted,
HERBERT K. I.IHITE, CITY CLERK
By
eput erkCity C
7,