HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1976.08.16183
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
August 16, 1976
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held
above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting
cal I ed to order at B: I I P. M. by Mayor Mangi ni .
on
wa
the
s
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: LEd B y Jerome F. Coleman, City
Council Members Present:
Council Members Absent:
MINUTES
The minutes of the re
and adopted wi th the
Busi ness " paragraph sresolution by Supervi
Harbor District for t
Supervi sors. He statof LAFC0. "
Amstrup-Harri son-Mangi ni -Mqrti n
Crosby - Vacation (excused)
ular meeting of August 2, 1976 were approved
ol l owi ng correcti on: Page I 6 - under "New
oul d read; "Counci lman Harri son referred to
or Royer supporting maintenance of the
e next meeting of the County Board of
d he would abstain from voting, as a member
g
f
h
s
h
e
PRESENTATIONS
I. CAST FROM RECREATION DEPARTMENT PRODUCTION "PURE IMAGINATION. "
Mayor Mangini introduced Mr. AlIan Chriest, director of Young
Peopl e's Theatre for the Burl i ngame Recreati on Department. Mr.
Chriest introduced some members of the cast who gave an enjoyable
short performance. He announced times for the regular production
during the coming weekend.
2. MR. A.M. GARCIA, CHAIRMAN, SISTER CITY COMMITTEE: GIFT T0 CITY
OF BURLINGAME FROM MAYOR OF CUERNAVACA.
ti me
Bi cen
wi th
Burl i
Ci ty
Gar
Sisnial
ands
me.
tha
ci a rter C
pl aq
ome c
Mayo
n ked
Mr.
the
tenah
nga
and
eported on his recent visit to Cuernavaca at whichity Association presented the Mayor with aue. The Mayor had then presented the Association
lock as a symbol of friendship for the City of
r Mangini accepted the clock on behalf of the
Mr. Garci a for hi s work on the Si ster Ci ty program.
3 MR. ARNOLD FEENER, NOISE ABATEMENT OFFICER, SAN FRANCISCO
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
pl
ou
7
es
ed
w
int
70;ot
noi
ate
Mr.Feener ex
i ng
and
hed
se r
law
I}B
ained methods oft-that the State
s-.ddE in 1916.ired level of 65
noi s
had
e measurements for the
established a limit oflevel is to be reduced
He expl ai ned vari ous
Ai rpgp,t, po
S0SeSin 19
grhdual ly t
methods of
wi th the St
uction and stated the Airport.i-s,=in compliance
i th a noi se measurement of 75 ldljr=-
Counci I man Harri son ask
noise level down. Mr. Feene
noise attenuation such as th
replacement of old engines wpatterns over i ndustri al and
change of runway direction.
erecti on of "bl ast fences " ,the I ate ni ght hours unl ess
added that efforts are being
what was bei ngeplied there aretrofitting of
new; devel opmey areas rathere Airport is in
attempts to core is a type of
de to get the F
one to get the
several methods
i rcraft ; thet of new flight
han residential;
esti gati ng thetrol flights duri
emergency. He
A and the Ai rportot located when
edrrer
d
e
a
nt
v
n
A
n
of
i th
ba
Th
and
the
mato measure noise at points where monitors are
compl ai nts are recei ved.
ng
Attorney.
ROLL CALL
I
184
Counci I man Harri son ques t i oned what act i on is takethese meas uremen ts are fou nd to be above the acceptabi eand l,lr. Feener replied that had not yet happened.'
n when
level;
Councilman Martin stated one of his concerns is 747 frethat take off at 2:00 A.M. several tims a week. Takeoff istime because they are bound for Tolyo which has a curfew. H
i denti fi ed one as bel ongi ng to the Flyi ng Ti ger Airline andwhat was being done about them. Mr. Feener itated they havebeen asked_to adjust their schedule, commenting the aiiportnot control the air nor the fl i 9ht routes.
ig
at
e
hters
this
questioned
does
Councilman Martln noted the Airport has just agreed toexpansion of the FIying Tiger terminal , and suggestid one of thecondi ti ons mi ght be no fl i ghts iike this. He suggested that ifpublicity were given to non-cooperative airlines,-ttrey might wishto cooperate rather than lose their customers. Mr. Feenei statedthis wouid be a management policy and not in his area as a NoiseAbatement 0ffi cer.
Councilman Martin suggested Mr. Feener take his comments asa Councilman and a member of ALUC back to management,
_ ^Mayor Mangini questioned if any citizen from Burlingame couldask for a noise measurement in his area, and Mr. Feener verified this.
Mayor Mangini thanked Mr. Feener for his presentation.
HEAR I NGS
APPEAL OF MAUREEN C.
DENIAL OF SIDE YARD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AND KENNETH
VARIANCE AT
OF .'ULY 6
FROM PLANNING COMMISSION
DRIVE (CONTINUED FROM
TOPPING
I725 HUNT
r976)
In addition to material previously submitted at the JUly 6meeti ng, the Counci I had recei ved peti li on approvi ng varianc! wi thapproximately 300 res i dents' signatures; chronol ogi ial sequence ofevents dated July 10, 1976 from Mrs . Topping, al ong wi th herrebuttals dated July 20, 1976 i memo to Council irom City planner,
memo to Counci I from Ci ty Attorney, and pl anni ng Commi ssi on mi nutesof May 24, 1976.
Bef ore open i ng
comments from staf f
mi ght have,
Mrs. Mau reen To
si gnatures to the pe
door in the front ofback. Accordi ng toa step in the ri ght
She had nothi ng more
publ i c meeti ng, Mayor Mangi ni asked foreouncil relative to any new information they
thefor
The City Pianner told Council he had visited the site sincelast Counci I heari ng and had taken photogra ph s which he presented
Counci I revi ew.
Councilman Martln stated he had visitod the site on Sunday,August l5 and I ooke/6t the structure.
Mayor Mangini stated he had driven by.
Councilman Amstrup stated he was quite familiar with the sitesince it was in his nei ghborhood.
Councilman Harrison noted he had visited the site beforc thehearing of iluly 6,1976.
The City Attorney indicated he had received no new evidence.
Mayor Mangi ni then cal I ed upon Mrs. Toppi ng to appear.
pprit
he
dit
ing presented the Council with ten moretion, and stated she had suggested putting a
he s tructu re and el iminating the door in ther, the Fire Inspector had considered this wasrecti on, and he woul d gi ve it consideration.o add.
L,
I
the
and
185
Mr, Ken Topping aCded that the door could be taken off the
back of the structure, making a clear passageway to the rear, and
discussed the use of sheet rock in the structure for fire safety.
Mayor Mangini requested opinion from the Fire Chief on the
proposed door opening. The Fire Chief stated he had discussed
wi th the Fi re Inspector the Toppi ngs ' proposal to cut a door, Inhis opinion this type of access would be an advantage over the
way it is now for dragging hose, but for proceeding with laddersit would still be an obstacle. He added it would not contributeto the spread of fire from that house to the next one,
Mr, Leonard Benedict, speaking as representative of
odd voters who signed the petition, read from a prepared
supporti ng the vari ance.
the 300
statement
There were no other comments and the public hearing was
dec I ared cl osed.
Mayor Mangini questioned if the structure had to be so close
to the fence to act as a windbreal. Mr. Topping affirmed it was
necessary because of the prevalence and violence of the wind.
Councilman Amstrup remarled it was difficult for him to
understand that a contractor such as Mr. Toppi ng did not know a
building permit must be secured. Mr. TopPing stated that was an
issue that he did not wi3h to explore because it involved a City
employee. He spoke of various contacts with City staff, and the
fact that this matter seemed unimportant in comparison with other
problems at the time. tlhen it was too late, he filed for variance.
Mayor Mangi ni noted the 4 x 4 in the stud wal I of the structure
which would make it possible to put a wall there and cut down the
extension into the side yard. The building would then conform to
code, Mr. Toppi ng agreed this coul d be done , but it woul d defeat
the purpose of a windbrealt. He offered the comprOmise of cutting
a door in the front which would effect a passage for fire equipment.
Councilman Amstrup agreed there was a wind problem in this area'
0n question from Mayor Mangini,
even with this compromise a variance
s tructure in the si de yard.
equipment building on the site. Mr.
was legal at the time the pool was buthe mai n obj ecti ve was to stop the wi
the City Attorney stated that
woul d still be needed for a
i ng affi rmed the I ocati on
and even at that time
Councilman Martin raised the question of a one-hour fire wall
necessary for thl s structure thi s near the property I i ne. The
Fire Chief stated it would be necessary to have 5/8" sheet rock on
each side of the wall. Counci lman Marti n di scussed at I ength wi th
Mr, Topping how this compromise could be effected with the proper
bui I di ng materi al to get a one-hour wall. Mr. Toppi ng agreed to
make these structural changes for the fi re wal l, addi ng that the
pump for the swimming pool could also be useful for the Fire DePartment.
Mayor Mangini raised the question of relocation of this pool
Toppiit,
nd.
Councilman Harrison noted that the struct0!e was an iilegalbuilding; that it had been duly presented to the Planning Commissionfor a variance which was denied. He considered remarks containedin Mr. Benedict's statement referring to Council's responsibilityto the voters as an attempt at intimidation. The Councilman
again noted that four conditions were necessary to grant a variance,
and in his opinion, these conditions were not met. For this reason
he woul d vote agai nst approval
+
Councilman Harrison reminded Mr. Topping that all four
conditions for a variance must be met.
the C
holdi
mutua
l,Jhile Counci lman Marti n was i ncl i ned to go al ong wi th the factthat the bui I di ng was illegal to begi n with, he poi nted out that
most swimming pool contractors specify their pool equipment should
be on the same I evel as the pool . He suggested that Mr. Toppi ng's
compromise was a basically workable one. tlith regard to the four
conditions for a variance, he Euggested that it depends upon thepoint of view as to whether or not these are being met.
the subject of compromi se, Mayor Mangi ni poi nted out that
has this ordi nance and peopl e who are charged wi th up-it. As far as he was concerned, unless this compromise was
agreeable to everyone, he would be inclined to sustainthe Planning Commission. He asked the City Planner if thls com-
promise had been offered to the Planning Commission at their hearing.
The City Planner told Councii this proposal had not been offeredto the Planning Commission. llhi1e he had suggested to the Toppingsthat they consider all options, he had first heard of this idea
th i s af ternoon.
Councilman Amstrup noted the reference to the will of the people
in the presentation by Mr. Benedict, and pointed out that some ofthe signatures on the petition were obtained not near the site, butin front of Petrini's market. He emphasized that most citizens get
legal permits for work which they want to do. In this situation,this requirement was completely ignored, and the City is offered a
compromise. He questioned the integrity of this type of rule making.
The Councilman s tated thi s s tructure s tarted out illegalIy and itis still illegal from every aspect.
0nitv
ngllv
Mr. Benedict was given permission to speak,that only 9 s i gnatures r{ere obtai ned in froet of
Councilman Harrison moved that the Planning
be sustained. Second by Counci lman Amstrup andfol I owi ng rol I cal I vote:
and tol d Counci IPetrinirs.
Commission deci s i on
carri ed on the
AYES: COUNCILMEN: AMSTRUP, HARRISON, MANGININAYES: COUNCILMEN: MARTIN
ABSENT: C0UNCILMEN: CR0SBY
2. RESOLUTION NO. 63-76 'FIXING ASSESSMENT FOR I{EED AI{D RUBBISH
ffiangini declared the pubiic hearing openon this subject, There was no comment from the audience and the
publ i c heari ng was decl ared cl osed.
RES0LUTI0N N0. 63-76 was introduced by Counci I man Harri son who
second, al I aye voi ce votemoved i ts adoption. Counci lman Amstrupof members present.
City Council had received memo of August 12, 1976 from CityManager regarding adoption of operating budget which reflected Cutsand increases in operating and capltal improvements budgets with anet decrease of $42,940 in the operati ng budget and a net decreaseof $5,000 in the capi tal improvements budget. Counci I had alsoreceived August l6 memo from City l'lanager proposing a reducedtax rate since general tax revenues wi 'l I no I onger subsi di ze waterand sewer operations and capital improvements.
Mayor Mangi ni requested report from Budget Chai rman Amstrup.
Councilman Amstrup reviewed his memo of August 16, 1976 to
Counci I members, He recommended revi ew of Publ i c l,lorks and Fi re
Department budget proposals not previously considered. He recommendedalso not establishing the tax rate until later this month becasse of
some ci rcumstances whi ch i ndi cated a del ay, I ack of uti I i ty rol l
assessed values, still unan swered questi ons on water funds , absenceof full Council, evaluation of assessed value report from County.
186
CONSIDERATION TO OPERATING BUDGET
4
187
The Councilman suggested a tax rate reduction of at Ieast
50, possible with a "hold the line" budgetary approach,.and made
seveial suggestions for Counci l cons i derati on. 0ne of these was
for C o u n c i i -
d e t e rm i n a t i o n of whether or not the Civic Arts Counci I
was to be funded. He suggested that a special meeting on the
budget be he ld next week.
by
of
be
Mayor Mangini agreed that forthcoming information as noted
CounLilman Amstrup could have great impact; and with concurrence
Council members airnounced that a special budget meeting would
held next week.
The Budget Chalrman requested report on the Fire Department budget.
n this department, noting that there
i ncrease for the posi tions of two
alarm helper. The budget does not
ncrease now being negotiated by Fire
at the budget proPosed bY the Fire
admi ni strati vely control I abl e to a
o Iuxury items, onl y necessi ties for
Mayor Mangi ni reporteis money in the budget for
mechani c hel pers and one f
i ncl ude a provision for anpersonnel. He recommended
Chi ef be accepted si nce it
certai n degree and contai n
the departmen t to functi on
do
an
i reyi
th
issn
Budget Chai rman Amstrup reviewed the Publ i c Works- 0ep
budget. -Under Storm Drains fund, he noted the funds alloc
rodEnt control, and conslderation to making this a city wi
a
a
dt
h
T
I
rtmentted fore program
her.
i ncreasedat a
i s f or
hi s
he. Inyear f or
2%
not
546 ,000
e%.
'tn
He
$z,
$4,
the
mon
not
order not to drive the rodents out of one area into
also commented that l.,ater Department office expense
000 because of raise in postal rates ' He pointed ou
923 figure for addressing equipment for this departm
purchase of equipment that is on a three year lease
ey is to pay for the lease. !'later utilities operati
ed shoul d be charged wi th l/2 accoun t cl erk i nstead
s same department, he noted an increase of 5Z over Ier purchase from San Franci sco. This was predicated
rease in usage and 5X increase in costs. The latter
ano
hastt
ent
ons
of
thi
wat
i nc
occ
t0
ast
on
di
ur. l,Jater punchase budget item should be reduced from
t512,750, and anticipated revenue lowered to reflect th
d
$
e
He noted an increase of $2'000 in the water utility equipment
maintenance fund transferred from the construction fund, discon-
tinued effective July I, I9r6. In this department he recommended
approval of purchase of nater meters and tank level sensing valve.
He recommended reducins by $12,000 the budgeted special departmental
expense of $48,500. He recommended deletion of Item No. 2, 9as
operated compactor in the amount of
However, after Counci I questioni ng
Eng i neer that thi s was needed for e
i ncl ude i t, He recommended reduci n
from 4 to 2 for trial purposes.
In the sewer rental fund he recommended
inspection contract for updatlng the system.
remarked that cons i deri ng the cost of labor,
savi ng in the I ong run.
,500 for this department,
conflrmati on from the City
ci ent operation, he agreed to
tem No. 5, 4 steel pl ates ,
the item of TV
Counci lman Marti nthis woul d be a
7 ,466,00 fromhis covers pro
co ) .
$l
andffigI
Councilman Amstrup recommended a reduction of
"Contri buti ons to other agenci es " in this fund.rate cost of pumpi ng to outfal I in Sou th San Franc
$(r
is
The Counci Iman poi nted out to the publ ic that the Counci I has
now held public meetings on every department in the city, and a
5C decrease in tax rate is anticipated. He praised Council membersfor their efforts on this bud.get, and commented it appears that
Burlingame is the only local agency that will cut the tax rate.
The budget chairman stated he was in agreement with these
fi ndi ngs.
Mayor Mangini, questioned, however, if the Fire sinking fund
was reduced to-$l5,Odo or to $10,000. City Manager confirmed the
fi gure at $10,000.
tB8
Counci I man Marti n no ted the inclusion of overhau I of l95l
stake truck $l,000.00 for Publ i c tllorks Street Mai ntenance.
suggested Counci I con s i der replacing this old truck i nsteadov6ihaulinq it. The decision ias to-freeze the $1000 until
pros & cons of repair vs, replacement were resolved.
This.report, dated July 20, 1976 and prepared over the
si gnaturq,6f l,4auri ce A. Garbel I , President, M.A.G. Consul tants
was recohmended for intensive reading by Councilman Martin.
noted it was qui te techni cal but wel I worth the effort for a
He
of
the
2
Councilman Amstrup ended the budget session with the notationthat the tax rate would be established at the special meeting.
Mayor 14angini compiimented the Councilman on his good job withthe budget.
COMMUNICATIONS
I. REqUEST FROM VINCENT RUMOLO,1757 ESCALANTE }IAY, FOB CABLE TV.
Mr. Rumolo's letter of August 6, 1976 requested Counci l
approval of cable T.V. installation in Burl i ngame in order to getbetter reception in some areas of the City where even extensive
antennas do not work well. The City Manager was requested by the
chai r to forward an appropniate response.
BURLINGAi.IE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RE: PLANNING FOR POLICE STATION
AND OFF STREET PARKING
Letter of August 4, 1976 from Joan Chase, President of the
Burlingame Chamber of Commerce, commended Council for theirindication of priorities for police station and downtown parking.
The Chamber offered its services on the citizens' committee and
assistance with publicity of the plans. Letter referred to City
I'lanager for reply.
M.A.G. C0NSULTANTS, INC.,: MEM0RANDUt4 ENTITLED "AVIATI0N N0ISE
IN NORTHERN SAN MATEO COUNTY. A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE
CURRENT STATUS AND NEEDED ACTION."
, Inc.,
He
better
undergtandi ng of probl ems regardi ng ai rcraft noi se i n the area;further, the memorandum addresses a lu6ber of items ignored by
ai rport s taf f .
STAFF MEi,IORANDA
City Manager memorandum of August 12. 1976 transmitted report
from San Mateo City Manager which stated that San Mateo Council
ved the location of the sol id waste col lection-transfer statione Tower Road Site, and construction and operation was preferred
e private sector. City Manager memo recommended that thist be accepted and that a I etter be authori zed requesti ng San
and Foster City to join in a request to the County fornation of the Tower Road Site.
!{i th concurrence of City Council, the City ltlanager was directedto write such a letter. Councilman Martin suggested inclusion of
statement that Burl ingame prefers private sector construction and
operation.
BURLINGAME AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION DISTRICT LOANED CONSTRUCTION
FUND BALANCE.
Memorandum of July 30, 1976 from the Finance Director recommendedthat the amou nt of $5,294.73, carri ed for the past several years inthe above inactive fund be transferred to the General Fund, thus
reducing surcharges on business I icense fees by that amount. This
woul d cl ose out the constructi on fund.
3
appr0at thby th
repor
Mateo
desig
2
b
I. ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER STATION SITE REPORT
City Manager al so recommended that this transfer be made.
189
There was Council concurrence. However, Councilman Martin
suggested thi s acti on be del ayed unti I the consul tants recommendati ons
have been received on finance department structure. There may be
other funds recommended to be closed out.
Mayor Mangini announced no action would be taken at the present
time.
3. ABAND0NED DRMI'IAYS
By memorandum of August ll, 1976 City Manager requestedpolicy decision on accomplishing the closure of abandoned driveways.
He recommended that monies for this work come from the contingentfund. City Manager's memo transmitted report from Assoeiate Civil
Engineer of August ll, 1976 giving location of abandoned driveways,
costs for their closure, and several options for the City.
t.li th concurrence of Counci I , Mayor Mangi ni stated thi s matter
would be considered at the September study meeting.
4. PROGRESS REPORT CONSULTANT FEES FOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT STUDY
City Manager memo of August 1?, 1976 informed Council that
request for proposals on this study had been sent to the firms of:
Booz , AI Ien & Hami I ton ; Haskins & Sells; Hughes , Hei ss & Associates;
Peat, l,larwi ck & Mitchell. In his memo, the City Manager requested
authori zati on to recrui t a fi nance di rector to fi I I the vacancy
that will occur September l.
I
ovid
ghes
tche
agr
pr
Hu
Mi
he
As
of
n another report dated August 13, 1976, the City Manager
ed fees to be charged by the consultants. He considered, Heiss & Associates well-qualified' also Peat, Marwick &ll. The City Treasurer, responding to Mayor Mangini, stated
eed with the City Manager's indorsement of Hughes' Heiss &
ates but he slightly favored Peat, Marwick & Mitchell because
i r experti se i n accounti ng and audi ti ng as wel I as management.
5. POLICE STATION PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSALS
socl
the
A motion by Councilman Harrison to retain Peat, Marwick &
Mitchell to perform Finance Department study only (annual audit
not included) in accordance wi th the i nd i cated fee of $.l4,400 -
$l5,500 was seconded by Councilran Martin, all aye voice vote of
members present.
In a
requested
memorandum dated August 12, 1976, the City Manager
Counci I approval of:
Johnson-Gumbi nger/Dellol f addi ti onalat a cost not to exceed $18,000 inletter of August 12, 1976
Approval withheld. Fee considered
i nvol ved. Ci ty Manager di rected toto the Counci l.
archi tectural servi ces
accordance wi th thei r
too high for
renegotiate
?Proposal from Stone & Youngberg , l,luni cl pa I Fi nanci ng
Consul tants , for a Central Busi ness Study for fi nanci ng
purposes , cost not to exceed $5,000.
Retai n Attorney Kenneth I . Jones for consu lti ng servi cesin connection with financing acquisition of more parking.
Items 2 and 3 to be delayed until Item 4 res6lved.
Proposal from Architect AIbert Kahl for feasibility study(l ) of a combi ned pol i ce and parki ng faci I i ty wi th com-mercial rental areas on a site consisting of one or moreof the parcels nort occupied by the police station, postoffi ce, Parki ng Lot E, Schaffer Ti re Company, Jenkel -
3
4
1
work
and report
7
190
Under da te of August
copy of letter dated Augus
Trustee, Anza Shareholdersof the oi ant and odors ema
refl ecti ng adversel y on th
Manager's recommendati on t
seek to hold them in materif complaints on odor continue
The City Manager reported that
Ci ty's pos i ti on,
park i ng facility
and fi nanced on
1976, the City Manager forwarded
, 1976, signed by David H. KeYston'
qu i dati ng Trust, concerni ng operati on
ng therefrom that create a situation
ti re bay front areas. The Ci tY
the opeiator be warned the City wilI
breach of their contract to operate
was concurred in by the Council.
Mr. Keyston has been informed of the
Davidson, (2) If above not feasible, can a
with commercial rental areas be constructed
one or more of the parcel s.
City Manager to proceed with Mr. Kahl.
Councilman Harrison referred to the Architect's suggestion
that the addi ti onal studies be undertaken in col I aborati on
with staff and a Council committee in order to speed the
pl anni ng process. Mayor Mangi ni announced he and Counci lman
Marti n will represent the Counci l.
5, I,IASTE DISPOSAL TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS
12rt ll' Li
natie en
hatial
CONSENT CALENDAR
l. ANNUAL SIDEliALK SALE--BURLINGAME AVENUE MERCHANTS: Saturdav,
August 21 , 1976
?. Parcel [!l Combi ni ng Two Lots on northwesterly
recommended by PI anning
presented on moti on of
Harri son, all aye voice
RESOLUTIONS
( r eTs-
Dwi ght -enI Peninsula Avenue,
Consent Cal endar accepted as
Marti n , second by Counci I man
members present.
corner of
Commission.
Counci I man
vote of
I. RESOLUTION NO. 64-76 "AC
197 6 ) Items I and 3 throug
i ntroduced by
by Counc i I man
2. RESOLUTION N0.65-76
Councilman Amstrup, who moved adoption, seco
Harrison, all aye voice vote of members pres
cept i ng lrleed Abatement P rog ram5 ( Robco Enterpri ses , Inc. )" w as
nd
ent.
"Approvi ng Awardi ng of Contract By Ci ty
i on 0f Traffi c Si gnal s At Bayshoreue" was i ntroduced by Counci l man Marti n,
d by Counci lman Harri son, al I aye voi ce
h
0f Mi I I brae For Cons truct
Hi ghway And Mi I I brae Aven
who moved adoption, secon
vote of members present.
I
9
i
ORDINANCES
. 0RDINANCE N0. .l082 "0rdinance Amending Provisions of Chapter
,04 0f the Burl i ngame Mun ici pal Code Relating To 0ogs " was gi ven
ts second readi ng. Decl ari ng the heari ng open, Mayor Mangini
invited comments from the floor. There were none. The hearing
was decl ared cl osed. The 0rdi nance passed i ts second readi ng and
was unanimously adopted on rol l calI of members present.
2. 0RDINANCE N0. 1083 "0rdinance Al I owi ng C-2 Permi tted Use
Areas" was introduced for firstAs Cbndi ti onal U ses In Certai n C-l
readi ng by Counci lman Harri son.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
l. Annexation Fees : In response to
as
Mangi ni, the Ci ty Manager
The City Attorney has
Mayor
ye t .reporte ere as een no action
i nformati on for the Council.
2. Low Spots in Bicycle PLths In response to comments from Counci l -
man Fmstiup, the Diiector of Pu blic I'lorks reported that the
the contractor, Anza Pac Iconstruction i nspector has i nformed
Cityific
,s
191
3. Alarm System at l.Iastewater T reatment PI ant: Councilman Martin
recaTTecfa recent irrcTile rif at the pl ant that resu I ted in someflooding. The report furnished the Council mentioned an alarm
that must be activated by plant employees. He indicated some
concern in this area and requested the Director of Public !lorks to
investigate the possibllity of improving this situation. Thelatter recounted measure3 that have been taken to date and advisedthat a compl ete report shoul d be avai I able to the Counci I abou t
the end of September.
NEI^I BUSINESS
l Appeal Hearing Scheduled: Councilman Amstrup requested CounciI
review oT The ipecial peimit granted August 9'1976 by the
Planning Commission to 01af Flodin, .l404 Balboa Avenue , in
connection with an existing accessory building to be used as
rumpus room, He considered this precedent-setting. Mayor
Manglni announced the matter will be heard by the Council atregular meeting on September 7, 1976.
APPROVALS
Corporati on , that the fau I tywill be accepted and payment
l,larrants : Nos , 3437 throu gh 3735 in the
duly audited, were approved for payment
Harri son, second by Counci lman Mangi ni ,
4. Mi nutes - Park and
Commissr-Tn, Augu s t 9,
areas must be corrected before the work
authorized.
a
the
amount of
on moti on
al l aye vo
73,126.24,
Counci I mane vote.
$4ofic
Payrol I I July, 1976 Checks Nos. I9944
were approved on motion o f Counci Iman
man Amstrup, all aye voice vote.
AC KN OI.IL ED GM E NT S
I. Bikeways Committee - Communication from Regional Planning
Committee, July 13, 1976. City Planner and Traffi c Engi neer to
through 20689, $339 ,610.06Harri son, second by Counci l -
Recreation Commission, August 10, Planning
Study Meeting Notations, August 4, 1976.
Respectf ul Iy submi tted,
comp.l ete questionnaire and return to Bi keways Committee.
2. Keith C, Sorenson, District Attorney, coqmendation to Police
Inspector J. Eldredge for professional 'and@
3. Staff Reports: City Manager/Finance Director, August 12,1976,
"Actual Use Report-Federal Revenue Shari ng. "Di rector of Recreati on
"Fal I Program Informati on , "August 9, 1976.
e 7/.JlLL
Ftrelrn
CITY CL
E,' FTTT
Enx
ADJ0URNMENT: 10.45 P.M.
9,