HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1976.10.04210
BURL I NGAME ,
0ctober
CAL I FORN IA
4, 1976
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the
above date i n the Ci ty Hal l Counci I Chambers. The meeti ng wascalled to order at 8:25 P.M. by Mayor Victor A, Mangini after
an executive session commencing at 7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: Led b y Al fred J.Palmer,
Pol i ce Lieutenant.
ROLL CALL
Counci I
Counci I
Members
Members
Present:
Absent:
Crosby,
Ams trup
Harri son, Mangi ni , Marti n- Busi ness (excused)
MINUTES
The mi nutes of the regular meeti ng of September 20, 1976 were
approved and adopted after change in next to I ast paragraph,
Page 6 of draft mi nutes , "He stated his understandi ng was thatthe Counci I woul d authori ze one Commissioner goi ng to the Planning
Commission portion of the Conference. " Change "authori ze " to
"discuss".
REVIEI'J OF HEARING SCHEDULE
At this point Counci I di scussed schedul i ng of vari ous heari ngs
since there will be no other regul ar meeti ng in 0ctober.
I. PROPOSED FORMULA FOR DETERMINING CONTRIBUTION TO PROVIDE
OFF-STREET PARKING, BURLINGAME AVENUE OFF-STREET PARKING DISTRICT.
Scheduling of this hearing was confirmed for the meeting of
November l, I976.
?. t^lILLIAM KIRCHEN APPEATING PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BEDROOM USE OF A FORMER GARAGE
VANCOUVER AVENUE.
DEN IAL OF
AT 1520
This hearing was confirmed for the meeting of November 'l , I976.
3. GEORGE DERUGIN APPEALING DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION ON
SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE EXISTING ACCESSORY BUILDING AS LIBRARY/
RECREATION ROOM/6UEST QUARTERS AT I52I CABRILLO AVENUE.
Counci I had recei ved I etter of October 4,
appeal i ng this deci s i on. Heari ng on this
November I5.
.l976 from Mr. Derugi n
appeal was set for
4, COUNCIL APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF SPECIAL
PERMIT TO USE PORTION OF PROPERTY AI 2828 TROUSDALE DRIVE FOR
CHURCH PURP0SES 8Y THE C0NGREGATI0N 0F JEH0VAH'S l',IITNESSES
Councilman Martin stated he and Councilman Amstrup wished to
appeal this special permit for purposes of discussion and hearing.
The Councilman cmphasized he wished to see all the information
presen ted as a compl ete package at one ti me, noti ng parti cul arl y
the absence of a parcel map for this proposed project. This
hearing was set for the meeting of December 6, 1976.
STAFF MEMORANDA
l.
AND
CITY MANAGER TRANSMITTING REPORT OF EXISTING VACANCY ON PARK
RECREATION COMMISSION
2LL
By I etter of September 15, .|976 Burl i ngame Park. and.-Recreati on
Commission Chairman, Charles J. Brickley, informed City.Manager
oi vacancy on this iommission brought about-by resignation of
John 0iteiry. City Manager's endoisement of September 29,1976
confirmed this vacancy to the City Council.
Mayor Mangini noted applications were on file for this
Commisslon for-Council review and, with Council concurrence'
directed City Manager to publicize this vacancy for the purpose
of obtai ni ng more appl i cants.
Councilman Harrison commented on the commendable job done
l8 year old commission member in recent years, He requested
this commission vacancy publicity indicate an opportunity
8, 19, and 20 year old people to appl y. He stated he
like to see ybung people involved with City government.
Mayor Mangini announced that
apply for this Commission, and setfor recei pt of appl i cati ons.
anyone l8 years or older could
a deadl i ne of December I, 1976
by an
thatfor I
would
2. PROPOSED LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
OFFICE BUILDING IN SACRAMENTO
PERMANENT HEADQUARTERS
City Manager's memo of
report on thi s proposed con
benefi ts , time schedul e f or
assessment table for ci ti es
Burl i ngame's share woul d be
amount to obtai n a discount
a period of three years. I
faci I i ti es woul d be more ecthe rental of headquarters
tember 30, .I976 transmi tted
ction, coveri ng background,ti ati on of constructi on , and
popul ation. Ci ty Manager noted
707.50 whi ch coul d be pai d in one
10% or paid in installments over
proposed constructi on of these
i cal to Cal i forni a ci ti es than
the League.
noting that in terms of nextthe contribution were in toto
expl ai ned the League ' s purpose
Sep
struini
by
$4,oft is
onomfor
Mayor Mangini favored this construction project and requested
Cou nc i i commen t.
Counci l man Harri son concurred,year's budge 101 would be saved if
For the benefi t of the audi ence hein this proposed constructi on.
Leagu
i n f a
aye v
Councilman Crosby moved that the Council's delegate to the
e of Cal i forni a Cl ti es conventi on be i nstructed to vote
vor of thi s proposal. Second by Counci Iman Harri son , all
oi ce vote.
3. CITY PLANNER: HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM
City Manager's memo of September 30, 1976 noted Council
direction that HCDA funds for 1977-78 are to be used for loans
to City residents in housing rehabilitation. l,ilemo transmitted
extensive report by City Planner on seminar attended on this
subject, and indicated the necessity for a public hearing sothat the Ci ty's I oan program coul d be i ncl uded i n County
appl i cati on for HCDA funds . Ci ty Pl anner's report a lso presented
guidelines for implementing the program and suggestions from
ci ti es whi ch are currently i nvol ved in housi ng rehabil itation.
Separate City Planner memo presented time table for Cityaction to obtain funding and a loan policy program for Bur'l ingame.
City Planner briefly reviewed purpose of program and emphasizedthat a hearing must be held for Council input and establishmentof eligibility requirements in Burlingame before sending applicationto CountJ, Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the County applicatlon.
taF.F.rr-,FrF-ffi -,r--rirr
Mayor Mangini set hearing for November I, 1976.
4. REP0RTS 0F F0RMER FIRE CHIEF M00RBY: 0FFICE 0F EMERGENCY
SERVICES J
2r2
repo
Eme r
22,
emer
meet
the
off i
pers
OES
memo of September 30, I976 City Manager transmitted
.0, fo"r."'Fire Chief Reginald Moorby on Office of
,-l""riCes. Al so transmi tted was I etter of September"rrom the former Chief relative to the purchase of an
v communications van. City Manager suggested study
iiiiuiiion on this subiect since-the report indicated-o.ii.ti,".t-it'outd be ielieved of responsibili!y of this
na tne position should be the responsibility of one.
eoortinq directlv to the City Manager; in the meantime'
tontinie to funttion under the existing arrangement.
Byrt f
genc
197 6
ce a
on r
wi I I
genc
i ng
F i re
Mayor Mangini set this item for discussion at the next
Counci I studY meeti ng.
5. RECORDING OF STUDY MEETING MINUTES
City Manager's memo of September 29, 1976 transmitted
communicition irom City Attorney suggesting that complete
mi nutes be taken of Coinci I study meeti ngs because of di recti on
to staff and consensus of Councii at these meetings on sometimes
very detai I ed matters . Present method of notetaki ng by the
City Manager, who must also participate in the meeting, does not
allow for. detailed minutes'
City Manager suggested that Mrs. Anne Keatin
to City Attorney, would be abie to take minutes o
t,Ji th C-ounci I concurrence , Mayor Mangi ni di rected
for this method of taking study meeting minutes.
I'f
a
secretary
these meeti ngs.tri al peri od
6, CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF
BURLINGAME SIGN AT MURCHISON AND
PUBLIC l,l0RKS: liELC0ME T0
EL CAMINO REAL.
By memo of September 24, 1976 transmitted by City Manager'
City Eirgineer reporied that this sign was in a condition so
detlrioiated as to preclude refurbishing. He attached report from
Building Inspector to this effect, and recommended that Council
make a deterhination as to whether a new sign be constructed.
City Manager recommended this information be forwarded to the
Li ons Club,
Ci ty Engi neer tol d Counci I he woul d i nvesti gate further
and repoit on a plan for rebuilding the sign at the next regular
Councii meeting. In response to question from Councilman Har-
ri son, he stated he woul d work wi th Lions Club in this endeavor.
7. CITY MANAGER: RAT EXTERMINATION PROGRAM.
At th
C i ty Manag
$900.00; b
mai 1i ng at
be del i ver
suggested
e Mayoer on
Councilman Crosby questioned sending information
water bills. He was informed by the Ctty Manager that
method woul d cos t almost as much as bul k mailing' and
could not be sent at one time because water bills are
cyc les .
r's request Councilman Crosby read memo from
thi s subject whi ch estimated cos t of bai t atiling of noti ces at $1 ,000.00; and first class
0.00. At the time of notieermailing, bai t would
distribution locations and a ten-day period was
e pickup of bait.
ul k ma
$l,30ed tofor th
City Manager noted Councilman Amstrup's interest in
program ind noied suggested expenditure of money would be
irorthwh i I e in combatti ng this heal th prob I em. He stated
ments had been made for l2-13 locations in the City where
coul d be pi cked up. This i ncl udes fi re stations, school s,
loeations on City'properties. He estimated an approximate
publ i c response.
Replying to the Mayor's question on publicity' the
Manager suggested a newspaper adverti sement and flyers
to school s for children to take home.
th i s
arrange-
bai t
and
407
City
i ssued
out wi th
thi s
noti cesput out in ?
2L3
Councilman Harrison stated he considered the $1,000 forbulk mailing would be worthwhile to combat this situation, and
urged immediate action before future inclement weather woulddeteri orate the poi son.
Councilman Harrison moved that the Council authorize bulkmailing for this project and the starting of the drive immediately.
Second by Councilman Crosby, all aye voice vote.
Ci ty Manager stated thatlist of pickup Iocations and
RESOLUTIONS
I etter sent rrould have
times for pi ckup.
a compl ete
1. RESOLUTION NO. 77.76 'URGIIG IMMEDIATE ACTION BY THE DEPARTMENT
OF T T(AN5PUKIAIUN ANU IHL I'IETROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE U.S. IOl AND STATE ROUTE 92 INTERCHANGE
NECESSITATED BY ITS EXISTING DETERI0RATI0N" was introduced by
Councilman Harrison who moved its adoption. Second by CouncilmanMartin, ali aye roll call vote of members present.
?. RESOLUTION NO. 78-76 "AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FORMUNIffiTH GEoRGE s. NOLTE AND ASSOCIATES.. was
introduced for adoption by Councilman Martin, second by Counciiman
Crosby, al1 aye roll call vote of members present.
Mayor Mangini questioned if the scope of this contract wouldinclude investigation of number of City owned weils and theircontrol and use in an emergency situation.
The City Engineer repl i ed the contract does not cover this.
He stated there was a survey of wells eristent that was doneseveral years ago. He considered that if the City is desirousof control I i ng these wei ls, the Civil Defense ordi nance shoul dbe examined to see if it trould provide for control . He statedhis department could survey the wells again to see if they are
operati ve.
GREEMENT BETl,lEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
FOR THE MILLBRAE BOULEVARO AND OLD BAYSHORE HIGHIIAY SIGNALIZATIONPR0JECT' tvas i ntroduced for adopti on by Counci I man Harri son,
second by Counciiman Martin, all aye roll call vote of memberspresent,
Councilman Crosby questioned how the City originaliy becameinvolved in this project. The City Engineer explained this wasa joint project among Millbrae, Burlingame, and S.F. Airport toinstall signals at the junction of Mi i lbrae Boul evard and 0ld
Bayshore Highway. A joint powers agreement provided that
Burlingame pay l/3 of the total cost which is approximately
$34,000.00. Burlingame had applied for gas tax funds which will
cover 2/3 of Burlingame's approximate cost of $1.l,000.00. t,thilethis project is located in Millbrae, Burlingame does gain fromit since our industrial and commercial traffic uses it as muchas the Broadway exit and overpass,
4. RESOLUTION NO. BO-76 'AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PROGRAMSUPPffiER AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSP0RATI0N DATED DECEMBER I, 1975" was introduced by Council-
man Crosby, second by Councilman Harrison, all aye roll callvote of members present. Mayor Mangini commented on this project
whi ch wil I repl ace s tri pi ng on certa i n streets wi th refl ectorbuttons, e limi nati ng fu ture stri pi ng.
ORDINANCES - SECOND READING
A
I. ORDINANCE NO. IO88 "REGULATING THE
RABBTTS-TX'D-TR-OF'TB-I--T I NG THE KE E P I N G O F
KEEP I NG
HORSES,
OF POULTRY AND
MULE, C0t^ls, SHEEP,I
Mayor Mangini requested City Manager to direct Civil DefenseAssistant to examine the ordinance for provisions of City control.
3. RESOLUTION NO.79-T6 "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
2L4
G0ATS AND EX0TIC ANIMALS." was given it second reading'
Mavor Manqini decl ared the heari ng open ' There were no
commenti from Ihe floor and the hearing was declared closed on
;;;i;;-of councilman Harrison second by crosby'. The.ordinance
;;;;;; its second t.uding and was unanimouslv adopted on rol'l
cal I of members Present.
z.ORDINANCENO.lOBg'AUTHORIZINGCERTAINCITYOFFICIALSTO
o eieili-sl]ET'fiffim-I-[rx.fL H I sroRY I N FoRMAT I 0N " was s i ve n i ts
;;;;;a re.ai ng. oecl ari ng the heari ng open , Mavor llg1sl1l .invited comments from the floor. There were none' lhe hearlng
wii J"cfared closed on motion of Councilman Crosby,.second by
Corniiiirin Harrison.-ine-orainance passed its second reading and
wii unanimously adopted on roll call of members present'
I NTRODUCT ION OF :
ORDINANCE IO9I "AN ORDINANCE
REDEVELOPMENT GE Ic Y TO FUNCTION
DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE
FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME..WAS
Counci I man CrosbY.
,ORDINANCE MAKING SPEED LIMIT ON OCCIDENTAL
i ntroduced for fi rst reading by Counci I man
,DECLARING THE NEED FOR A
IN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
introduced for first reading bY
For the benefit of the audience, Mayor Mangini.explained
tnat pissige of thi s ordi nance was a requi red step . i n. the-process
i6*i.l-iii6mplishment of the convention Center Proiect' The
miio" .orr.nled that the Citv-fe9ls it has.enough -t!:t!:,?nduiiances on the development 6t tnis proiect so that it will be
protected.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
I. ADVERTISING FOR BIDS HIDENING OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AT ENTRANCL
City Engineer's memo of 0ctober I' J9Z6 requested that
Ci ty iou-nci I -authori ze the obtai ni ng of bi ds for this project '
At the request of Mayor Mangini,-City.Engineer 19y!9we!
oroqress on this proi ect approved by Counci I earl i er this year 'Il-it.i"o ft ans aha ipeci fi i:ati ons are now compl eted I0I- !hg
wideninq of Ai rport Bbul evard at the i ntersecti on wi th 0ld Bayshore 'i"i-[t.'i.itliiiiion-oi a Bite Path and Iandscaping. 0r'i sinalpiini nur"-ueen changed to use_city owned street I i ghts i nstead
bt p.o, & E. street I i ghts. Also, a maior entrance structure 'ii Li-iuio-ioi-uy Rnza-Pacific 9p to $s'000, has been chansed to
i-.iipi. ent"anii, sign. In addi ii on , the archi tect i s recommendi ng
the rLmoval of three eucalyptus trees' The City Engineer.com-
*entea that if advertising-?or bids were authorized, a b'id summary
,.iiii-Ui irailaUie for-Coincil for the meeting of November 'l , I976.
0n the Mayor's question regarding cost, the City Engineer
reoorted the c6nstruition cost would be $71'000' with other
.o!it ir.n as engi neeri ng, I andscapi ng, i nspecti on maki ng a.
i;i;i ai $85,900; Fundin6 will be from gas tax funds and bike
path f unds.
Counci Iman Harri son vvas concerned wi th the I oss of the
trees,-ina queitionea-ii ifre more modest sign would be attractive'
The City Engineer reported the tree removal was to
the new dime-nsio; of the iign, trees would be replaced'
inir ie" sign structure l{as of excel I ent desi9n'
Councilman Harrison moved that bids be obtained for this
projeii, second by Councilman Crosby, all aye voice vote'
bal ance
and the
2, EIR PROPOSALS FOR OVER/UNDERPASS
City Engineer reported receipt of five proposals for EIR
I. ORDINANCE NO. IO9O
A \, EN-U-E-FERtrAN'ETT-I a s
l'larrison.
r
preparati on from: Del Davi s & Associ ates ' DeLeuw Cather '
Reimer & Associut.r,-in-ui.onmental Impact Planning.Corporation'
and H.K.s., Inc. rivl"ii;;;-;;;; emphasized as biine of particular
ii,ir"i:iin." in this rii:'-ii" table, noise impact'.visual
illillti]"lit;;r;;ir.i.ira economics ind transoortation impact.
i;';;;;rii;ii;;-*iih'c;iv-Pi;"nii-una Associate civil Ensineer
;;;;;-e.iermined three iirms could be recommended:
The City Engineer noted qurlifications for each firm'and
s tated he had pr6posal s for Counci 1 inspection'
Counci lman Harri son ques ti oned time I i mi tati ons for choi ce
of firms since Councii-na,i not had a chance to study-proposal s '
in.'ii;i Engir...-i ndi cated a 3-5 month peri od for EIR prepara-
ti on and review.
Cather
Corporation
Inc.
Counci lmen CrosbY and Martin
time to studY ProPosals before ma
Mayor Mangi ni announced this
at the next +t+Qrrneeting.
SALARY NEGOTIATIONS
,000.00- l8,000.00
,500 . 00
,450 .00
h i ndi cated theY wanted
thi s choi ce.
subject woul d be considered
$14
$l s
$7?
DeLeuwt.I.P.
H.K.S.
bot
king
Mayor Mangi ni announced that the Burl i ngame Fi refi thters and
tne ciii-couniir nuo come to an agreement on wage negotiations.
0nthissubiect,theMayorthenreadletterfromCouncilman
Amstrup JateA OcioU.i 4, 197-6 which-in part stated, "As Burlingame's
a;dgd lf,ul"man, I have made successful efforts to help keep the
iiiiis-iinancei in stable condition by a "hold- the-line"
phiiosophy in these frustrati ng times of ri si ng costs- ' 'iloldinq'tire Iine does n0t preciude equitable cost-of-living in-
.i.is.i for our empl oyees,' whom I cons i der among the best in
iiiy-government. 'But- it does preclude excessive, unreasonable
aeminis which eventually could lead to disastrous breakdown
of our present financial solvency"'
councilman Martin stated the agreement with the Firefighters
had been reached without either his or Councilman Amstrup's
concurrence, and went on to say he considered this contract
excessi ve i n cost over i ts two year peri od. He poi nted out
that no such i ncreases have been gi ven in the pri vate sector of
business, and there is a limit as to how far the taxpayer can go'
He siated that while police and fire departments are rather
di fferent and cities must have them, he woul d Iike to poi nt out
io other employees that when the limit is reached' it is going
to mean a rbAuition in service and a reduction in personnel.
He stated the firefighters' increase is the highest in the.-
County, and wished to make it clear to taxpayers that he did
not v-oie for it because he sympathized with them. He noted
iomments from safety departmlnt personnel that they had supported
him in the I ast el ecti on, and stated he had thought thei r support
had been because of his abi I ities as a Counci Iman, not because
of advantages which he coul d gi ve them. He repeated that it
is time th6 taxpayers were considered as well as the employees'
Counci lman Harri son vo i ced appreci ati on of Counci I man Marti n's
attempts to keep the budget under control , and the aptness of
some bf his remirks . He- added that the enti re Counci I is concerned
with the welfare of the taxpayer. However, he noted that
Burlingame, over a period oi years, has had the highest level of
servicE from employees; and it was the desire of the maiority of
the Council to ilf fect an equitable settlement. He expressed
hope that wi th this settl ement good servi ces woul d conti nue,
moiaie would again be high, and the task before the City could be
resumed. He moved the acceptance of the memorandum of agreement
between the City of Burl'ingame and Fire Fighters Association.6
2L5
2L6
wi th
his
an e
CounciIman Crosby seconded the motion. He stated he agreedCouncilman Harrison,s remarks, and voiced confidence iiown abilities as a Counci I man in effecti ng what he cons i deredqui table settlement. He did not thi nk ne!oti at i ons shoul drolonged, noting that discussion has been'going on since June,has created dissention among City departments. He disapprovedhis type of situation, and iepeated he considered the sbltte-to be equi tabl e.
bep
andof t
ment
Mayor Mangi ni chave been all that tequitable, Designat
negoti ati ons; and he
ag reemen t di d somethhowever, that peop leresources were not a
emphasi zed he wouldfuture and not go on
J.
the
that whi Ie the agreement may
i ghters wanted, he did considedures had been fol I owed in thered that Counci I in effecti ngthe City as a whole. He addede wel I advi sed to remember thaas they had been in the past.
see negoti a ti ons expedi ted in
-hal f year.
omme n ted
he f i ref
ed proce
conside
notr it
se
this
t
i ng f or
might bs I arge
I i ke tofor one
He
the
The motion Iras approved on the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: CROSBY, HARRISON, MANGININAYES: COUNCILMEN: MARTINABSENT: C0UNC I Lt'lEN : AMSTRUP
BROADI.IAY D I SCOTHETQUE
0ctober 1, 1976 from Frank
wi th negative comments onthe Broadway area.
Mayor Mangi ni requested Ci tyto staff for i nvesti gati on.
Ilanager to refer this matter
OX MOUNTAIN DISPOSAL SITE
Council had received copy of communication to County Boardof Supervisors dated September 21 , 1976 from "Mid Peninsula CitiesStudy Group" advising of their unanimous vote to request theBoard of Supervi sors to i nvesti gate possi bl e County ownershi pof this site.
Counci I had recei ved I etter of
Pagl iaro Jr,, 1337 Drake Avenue,effect of thi s establ i shment on
0n l,'layor Mangini's question, the Cityfurther information had been received, butby the date of the study meeting.
Manager stated no
mi ght be avai I able
CROSSING GUARDS
In response
conf i rmed the re
on this subject.
to ques ti on from Mayor Mangi ni ,would be a meeting in his office Ci ty i'lanager
on 0ctober'l 3
PR()CLAMATIONS
Mayor Mangini proclaimed 0ctober 3 through 9, 1976 as "FirePrevention Week"; and 0ctober I0 through .l6, 1976 as "InternationalAlpha Delta Kappa lJeek". 0n behalf of the American CancerSociety, he proclairned November i8, 1976 as "A Day to Stop Smoking".
ACKNOt^JLEDGUENTS
Report of John Maddux, Audi tor.
Ci ty Attorney report: League Bri efi ng on Legi sl ati veImpiementation. Mayor Mangini commended this excellent effort.
Fi nai Summary Report for San Mateo County Transi t Devel opmentProject, Councilman Martin cal led attention to cover
I etter of September I4, 1976 which transmi ts this report
and requests i nput and questions on this proposed extens i on
I
2
3
NEI^I BUSINESS
of BART, He suggested Counci I take excepti on, as in thepast, to the I ocation of the storage yard in Burl i ngame,
l{i th Counci I concurrence Mayor Mangi ni i nstructed Ci ty
Manager to inform thi s agency of Counci I objections.
Pol i ce Departmen t Consol idated Monthly Report, August , 1976.
217
4
5
6
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes September 14, I976.
Planning Commission minutes of September 27, 1976. Mayor
Mangi ni noted di scussion in these mi nutes of tapi ng study
session portion and s tated this would be cons i dered at
Counci I study session.
FROM THE FLOOR
Thene were no comments from the audience.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeti ng regul arly adj ou rned at 9:30 P.M.
Respectful ly submi tted,
ill
Y ERKIc
yn
c
e
T
8.
.1