The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMin - CC - 1978.03.20fi7 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA N.TARCH 20, 1978 A regular meettng of the Burllngame Clty Counctl was held on the above date tn the City Hall Counctl Chambers. The meettng was called to order 8t 8:40 P.M. by Mayor Wm. J. Crosby after an ex- ecutive session concerntng personnel . CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO IIIE FLAG Led by Thomas B ROLL CALL COI,'NCIL }IEMBERS PRESENT: COI,'NCIL MS{BERS ABSENT: MINUTES Chase, Potice Lieutenant. AI{STRUP' BARTON, CROSBY,MANCINI,I"I,ARTIN NONE The mtnutes of the regular meeting of March 6, 1978 were approved and adopted after the-followlng: Page 5, draft mtnutes, parag-raph 6, change I'The Counctl had wanted the agreement on this Iot. . ." to 'tThe-Council had wanted the agreemenE on a lot. . ." Councllman Marttn commented on the sentence, ttHe (Mr. McMlllan) satd at no tlme rdas any obJectton ralsed to tts belng in C-4.'r The Councilman stated that a-t th6 same time there was no statement that tt should be tn c-4. -it. poi"i r.i th;t c-4 was netther approved norlilTs-ilproved. The mlnutes of the special meettng of l'{arch L4, L978 were approved and adopted. HEARINGS 1. ONE WATERFROM OFFICE REPORT 45P BUILDING PROJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT llayor Crosby announced Council conslderatton of this EIR and requested report from the Clty Planner. The Ctty Planner reviewed State EIR guidellnes which-requtre City flndlng-s on the adverse lmpacts and thetr proposed mitigatlon. He directed CounciL attention to Exhibtt A of Planntng Commisston Resolution /il-78 whtch llsts these adverse impacts with mttigations. He reported that Cectl Wells of the Regency Development Company and Ms. N6na Dennis of I'dadrone Associates, EIR consultants, lrere present to answer questions. Mayor Crosby declared meettng open to public comment on this EIR. ThLre was nirne, and thq pubtic hearlng was declared closed. Counctl dtscussion followed. Councilman l-{art tn declared his concern wtth several items on Exhiblt A: ll7: "Storm water lunoff from paved surfaces Pollutes the Bay.rr He reminded Council that the Envtronmental t'tanagement Plan, whtch may be tmplemented, specLfically prohtbtts Bay pollution, and questioned mttigatton proiosed of dialnage system tmprovements to city. desigl standards. - He suggested that every large parklng area on the Bayfront come up wlth a spEiiftc solutlon tb this dralnage problem and noted a recent project aipllcation whleh proposed asphalt pavtng combined wlth rock drain system and filter material for dralnage and polLutant en- trapment. 108 /I3: Vehicular traffic increases turning movements on and off Atrport Boulevard with mitigation of urodifytng existing island on Airport Boulevard. The EIR does not address the question of whether or notthis mitigation will be adequate a year or so from nou. il4: Additional congestion at intersecttons, with mitigatton ofsignalization and revtslon of traffic controls, with proJect sponsorto pay an equitable share. /18: Increases demand fot local communlty services an sumption, with finding that the project sponsor shalfor an equitable share of costs to provlde offsite c ments necessary to serve development of thls area.includlng traffic controLs, access roads, water dist pumps for sanitary sewer pumplng statton and pubtic ciL vrh Councilman Martin asked if the EI ment impacts that may be developereplied that the Planning Commissimpacts. Director of Public Work ddresseytheC foundtated t detb aPi Therlb saf nergy con-e resPonsibletal tmprove- se llsted as utton system,ety equlpment. dh irP depifi area, but in Lnteracting wtth staff,at an evatuatton of impacts of vartolng on the Clty services. Also, the envtronmental management plan had cothat the findings (Exhibtt A) are no but are a means of lnterpreting thethe EIR. vai s e- be Coun everplieatA hts s pec a l read been p re Por tthe ti mightifav .64 an though w 1t hinto themit in man Martin questioned if staff had included in thls iteming they thought was needed. Director of Public Works re-e thought it was covered adequately, raentioning that the signalort Boulevard has been committed by another developer, and that artment had not included tn the capital improvement programc developer contrlbutions because these $ere not known. Radb tonss daitv 1r he lI the capital improve-. The City Plannerdid cover all the major EIR does not address address any speciflc type of storm hrater trthe treatment of storm run off ts not necesis speclfic ln the areas of water improvene Anza atea. Councilman t'lartin stated he did not think the enough on the drainage and vehicular traffic. Ms. Dennis responded to some of thesthat the principal concern of the EL one butlding wlthtn a master plan. lt would be inadequate with respect report was complete e comments. she pointed out R was to identify the impact of the major developmen does not a ress any Mr. Davi t impacts as far ss strfuture ehtran-ce o:Ff tE eets are conce'rned. It e Freeway. It does noteatment. He suggested thatsary, and stated the EIRnt and sevrer system in the havey haveht theall of ought it servlce se FAR ls0. Hes totallyts prloror a Per- They realized at the outaet thatto the total butLdout of that they felt that they had arrived us systems required by the build- EIR was wrttten before the draft me from ABAG. She went on to sayt guoted dtrectly from the EIR impacts which are ldentifted in Councilman Manglnl was concerned with the costs of necessary improve- ments in the aiea, such as sewage, flre proEection, and trafftc slg- nals, and suggested an assessment district of Landowners tn the area, so that thesi charges could be dlstributed equally. Ms. Dennis agreed this was a good idea, but remarked that the manner ln whlch these costs are allocated necessartly becomesa Local dectston. d Keyston addressed Council, protesting that there been a series of three assessment dtstrlcts and the d for I00% by the developers ln hts area. He thoug indicated that the present appltcant should pay forins for all of the systems that h,ere put in. He th appropriate for an appLicant_ !o pay for addlttonaLiairie were necessary but tn thls parttcular case th no City revtew is requlred until the FAR is over l. the Blayney report was based on 1.0; thts Ptoject i he existing zohtng and would have requtred no perm! mergency oidinanci. This applicant ftrst applted f uly, 1977, a long time ago. a! dt t e J o ave problemsh o Councilman Amstrup remarked that the Ctty is going vrlth sevrage if offtce butldings keep belng added, there will be traffic problems. t an f course 109 Mayor Crosby noted that he had a meettng wlth thePublic Works and Mr. Wells of Regency tn regard to asked staff to report on lt. Director of sewage, and Director of Publ town comes lnto under the Freer^raof course, ts alplant so lt hasof the Freeway. an approxiruate c ic Works stated that the selrage for most of thethe maln pumptng station and ls pumped acrossthe sewage treatment plant. The Anza area,y on the same side as the sewage treatment plantffect on the extstlng Lines on the other side to eadoe vI n However, Larger pumps wtll have to be installed atost of $18,000. Counc ilman l,langint acknowledged had put considerable money tnto develop there wlll be more denr,anoff and sower. If this ts not pClty wlll have to pay for it. that developers ln the Anza areaIt, but he thought as proJects ds for flre protection, storm run-aid by the areats developers, the Mr. Keyston replied that the systems the developers have alreadypaid for were designed for full development of the area. Two new pumps would be requlred for the pumping station. He would have afull report on thts at the ttme of the Blayney report. Councilman l,trart in pointed out figures for returns to the Clty had used the normal tax rate plus the tax rate for the ReclamationDistrlct. He thought thls should be corrected as misleadtng. In response to questlocertification of thisfactual content. If c destred they could be rom l,layor Crosby, City Attorney satd that would mean that Council agrees wlth its ges as suggested in thls meeting were ed by addendum. nf ElR han add Councllman }r,artln suggested the Council could act on the resolution subJect to the changes betng rnade. He speclfied it should bestipulated speclfically what would be done about the vehicular ln- crease on Airport Boulevard, there should be statement of what should be done to take care of waste water pollutton of the Bay, and thematter of lncome to the City should be corrected. The questlon aboutcapital ioprovement Bitigation had recetved confirmatton that staff $ras satisfied. Ms. Dennts addressed Council on these comments, making the point that the EIR was not specific in areas of mtttgatton because the respons-ibility of the consultant is not necessartly to ledesign, which is the provtnce of the englneering destgner, but rather, to point out areas where additlonal work needs to be done. Mayor Crosby pointed out that tt appears addttlonal crlteria are necessary, and he thought it would be sufficient if the project englneer came up wlth tt. He considered that Ms. Dennis had correctlystated her role, but these questions*louLd be answered. Mr. Cecil Wells, Regency Development Company, commented on several areas of draft EIR and addendum which he thought sufficiently answered Councllts concern. Howeve!, Council dld not agree. There was more dlscuss ion. RESOLUTION N0. 14-78 was introduced by Councilman Amstrup who moved ffitostaffaPPtovaiofmorespeciftcirtt1gationonthe following items of Exhibtt A: 3. Vehicular traffic l-ncreases turntng movements on and off Alrport Boulevard. 5. Water florir for fire protectLon. 7. Storm water runoff from paved surfaces pollutes the Bay. Also wlth the provision thls certtftcation is to certify the adequacyof the EIR and does not commlt or obltgate the Counctl to the approvalof the project therein identifled. 110 Motlon seconded by Councllman l"langini, carried on unantmous ro11 call vote . Mayor Crosby, after receivtng confirmation from City Attorneythat this, while not a noticed public hearing, would be ariate time for comment, announced Council conslderati.on o area permlt for One Waterfront Bullding. pf proP- study The City Planner revlewed thls project for a four story and glass office buildtng, noting that if "scheme A" a3were developed, the butlding would not be 50t in heightwould stlLl'be'a discretionEry action. The same conEltiwere included tn Exhtbit A of Resolurion L4-78 are ftndtwould apply to this particular building. He added thatwith Addendum and other tnformatton provides additlonal dHe touched on the fact that there are no costs developedcapitat _tmprovements tn thls area; but noted these i.mprowould add vaLue to thls property. When costs are devilo may be some reason to establtsh an assessment distlict fcovery of City costs. Councilman Amstrup suggested thatuntil after the Blayney report hadAprll 1. Mr. Keyston protested thappllcant after his 9 months workexpense. He agatn reviewed projec FAR, and density, and the fact thathis particular use for this area. concrete P b roposed ut ons that ngs thst the EIR etalL.for vement s ped thereor re- Counctlman llarttn statereport may be changed wparticular proJect wasand the fact that the dstitute a reason for th man Amstrup, stating heheld over untll the BLa Councilman Amstrup addesarlLy penaLized by wai compliance with zoning,he Blayney report recommends r review by the Ctty the Blayneyto usage. He noted that this reasons for the BLayney report,ad spent money dld not con-pprove. He agreed with CounctL-e study area permtt should beis approved by Council.project wouLd not be unneces-April l. the permit be deLayed tdered by CounciL onas unfair to theject and constderable there was nothing incom-of how the Council tleated on thisif Counc iL tabled for una nlmou s ly actlon on be ls ont ls tt en cons ac t ionthe pro d that aftelth regard one of the evelopers he City to a thought thyney reportd that thettng untll Mr. WeLLs pointed out that by the tlme Council and Planntng Commission review the report a great deat of ttme could be-con-suned. He asked for a time Llmit as to the decision by Counctland PLanntng Commisston for acceptance. He protested the time andmoney aLready spent on developing an acceptable project. Councll- man Martin stated the time Limit would be the expirition of theemergency ordinance, July 6, 1978. He added this ordinance couldnot be renewed. CounclLman Manglni remarked he thoughtpattbLe with this bullding, regardlessthe BLayney report. CounciLman Martln stated that if this permit lrere approved and the BLayney report eLiminated such usage, thts butlding wouLd then stlLLbe permitted. He noEed this ls a 3-acre parcel - a key piece ofland - and Councll should not make mistakes v,ith it. Councilman Barton sald she felt that stnce there is going to be areport on thls area, Councll should wai.t on thts permlt. Mayor Crosby considered there was a consensus of CounctLpolnt and thought it should be put over. He questloned wished to conslder at the next regular meeting. Councilman llartln suggested the ltem be dropped from the Agendaand called up Later when Council knows how lt ts going to developthis study area. Councllman Amstrup moved this study area permlt beLater consideratlon, second by Councilman Mangtnt,carrled. 111 At va! rea bed sPa He act not 1n recrht Mavor Crosby opened publtc heartng on thts gPpeal ' Mr' Nick Gener' iZiT-ri-c.ri";'R;;i innouncea he 6as availabiL for questions. There vrere no other commenis, and the publtc hearlng was declared closed' Councilman Barton questioned the- Present non-conformity of this oioo"rir, The Cttv iia"".r confiimed that there are ti,ro residential [;ii;i;A; o"--o"e-ii,t and the rea: buildlng does not have the requtred slde or rear yards ' t stated he had visited the ProPerty and thought.the d be a great imProvement. He spoke of. Mr. Gener's operate with th;: City in agreelng to these 7 con- to erantinq vartances on non-conforming seE a preiedent and questioned the RECESS After a short recess at 9:55 P.M., Counctl reconvened' 2.APPEALoFMR.NICKGENERFRoMPLANNINGC0MMISSIoNDENIALoF VARIANCE L457 -L45 9 EL CAMINO REAL Councilman Mangin modification ooul wilLingness to co dltions. Counctlman Barton obj ected properties because lt would pa rking . In resp va rlous man sta possibl Attornenotificunit pr Mayor Crosby noted each variance must stand on its owa rnerits ' The b-iti-pir"""i coramented that there would be no addttional untts, and ;;;'" p;;ki"g spaces. Flve parktng gpaces for three unlts would satlshv the"paiktne requireirents.- Iir response to question from I'{,ayor trosby'he tnlicaded r,rhere these f ive sPaces would be ' councilman Amstrup stated thst the Planntng commtssion had.disap- oio"ea of modlficitton to this non-conforming ProPerty, and he thought they should be upheld. the reouest of Mavor Crosby, the CiEy Planner reviewed this i;;";-;;;li".tio"'for entai[,ement of a studio aPartment.at the i-Uv ""iio.ing three garage sPaces and converttng them into. two i""ilr"-""a-"-t-Etr,,-"o"EtruEtin! a carPort to covei three parking ;;;-;"a provictin[ an oPen par[ing spice in front of a duplex' t.a ii."'"*itted Eo Couicit-^Planning' Commisston documentat1on of i;; ;;-ihi;-variance-ittd copy of slte plan' The Citv.Planner "a--ttr.t-Ui, Gener had commitled hlmseti to seven _spee lftc . ac t ions i.a!I-i-"""o*fiist itti" "aiia"ce and his memo of March 14, 1978 ".*."a"a ihat bouncii give close consideration to approval of s appeal . onse to comments from Councllman l'Iart tn, Mr. Gener agreed to-structural tntertor modiftcations of his pLan' The Councll- ted he had another concern - that in the future lt might be e to convert thts back unlt into two unlts. The Ctty v stated resolution couLd be prepared aad recorded for itio" i" event of sale of property that this ls only a three- oPe rty . Councilman l'langtni moved that thls varialce be granted, with understanding fhat there be only three living untts and with seven stipulitions agreed to in the Ctty Planner's memo of 3 second by- Councilman I'lartin. tt/t stioned whv Cltv Planner"had recommended Council on to apprirval -of variance. The City Planner re- e varlairie is dented the Clty will still have an lem, there will be less desliabte living- -sPace, and s been commenced ln the rear building will be sub- he he 417 8, I"trayor Crosby queglve cons lderat iplied that lf th enforcement prob the work that haject to legislat improved livingof sidewalk, cur to remove it. If the vartance is approved ce and parking will result along with construction nd gutter as specified tn Mr. Gener's agreement. lon spaba councllman Amstrup and Barton questioned if the work already done by i,lr. Gener had beeir illegal, C{ty Planner replied that the variance LLz application itself was a result of enforcement of violations tothe buiLding codes. councilman Martin commented lhat while he did not approve ofpeople- doing work without a butldtng permlt, he was concernedwith the appearance of El Camino. epiroval-of this varlance wttlnot only improve the site, but the city will gain better unltsand better parking. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES : COIINCILMEN : CROSBYTMANGINI,I'{ARTIN NAYES:C AMSTRUP , BARTON The city Attorney stated he would prepare a resolution to berecorded. 3. APPEAL OF COUNCILMAN IRVING S. AMSTRUP FROM PLANNING COMMISSION GRANT OF SPECIAL PERMIT TO ANZA PARKING CORPORATION FOR AIRPORT PARKING FACILITY 7OL-8OT AIRPORT BOT'LEVARD Mayor Crosby announced that letter of March 9, L978 fKeyston, Trustee, Anza Shareholders I Liquidating Trusquested appeal hearing be delayed to meeting of Aprildisposition of Sheraton parking. He stated that thiswould be put over to this first Council meeting in Ap rom David H.t , 3 had re- pending pea LariP 1 COMI"IUNICATI0NS Council received letter of March 15, 1978 from Mr. Ojakian appealingthis l'larch 13, 1978 denial- by the Planning Commission. Mr. Ojakian reguested hearing on lday 15, L978. City Attorney advised this date was specified because this involves an estate and one of the prin-cipals is now out of town. With concurrence of Council Mayor Crosby set this hearing for Mayt5, L978. 2. NA?ALIE 2829 }{ARIPOSA DRIVE STING CONSIDERATION TO AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY. ERVATION OF TREES A VATE Ms. Rothschild submitted wtth her Letter of February 27 , L978 copyof an ordinance from the ctty of Sausalito for the preservatlon oftrees and views from private property and asked that Councll con-sider enactment of a similar ordinance ln Burlingame. She requestedthat she be informed of an appropriate study meetlng when this could be discussed. Mayor Crosby set this matter for consideration at the April study meeting. STAFF MEMORANDA I . CITY MANAGER: REQUEST FOR CROSSING GUARD EL CA},IINO REAL AND RAy DRM/RoSEDALE, !E'S. LANA SCo'TT-. _ _ City Managerts memo of ldarch 16,. t978 attached the traffic surveyof ill Camino Real and Ray Drive/Rosedale, with the comment that warrants are not met for an adult crossing guard. Hiring of one isnot recommended by the City l'lanager I s of f ice or the Traf f ic , Safety and Parking Commission. With concurrence of CounciL, ldayor Crosby announced this matter would be considered at the next Council meeting, and Mrs. Scott could be notified. r--.-: -*4L- " -ilr-rll,{,& t. WILLIAM A. OJAKIAN APPEALING PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF PERMIT FO5. CIIANGE II COPY. TWO SIGNS AT MILLS ESTATE PHAR}4ACJ,ISL8 EI Camino 113 2. CITY MANAGER: POLICE DEPARTI'IENT EQUIPMENT Memo of March 8, L978 fromtransfer of excess budgeted log!ca1 stress evaluator (P had been planned f.ox L978-7it is possible to purchase Police Chtef \rent on to desdetector" and lts value in sidered it much more effect Department has been using t and for screentng of poltceresults. They have been pa machine and service at a co Department has an experienc detectlve division, who cou Purchase of the PSE would tto outstde sources. ce Chlef requested approvaL of ds to allow purchase of psycho- Purchase of this equipment dget at a cost of $4,500, but $3,575 at the present time. Thee the use of this 'Volce Ltetronlc lie detection. He con- than the polygraph. The Police SE since L975 for crtme detectionicer candldates vrlth excellent outstde sources for the use off $75.-$150 pe! test. The Poltceertified examlner working in thedminister tests with the machtne.fore save the Ctty money now paLd Poli fun sE). 9bufor crtb e lec ive hePoff yingst o ed clda he re Ctty I'lanager t s cover memo for3/16/78 advtsed Council that this equipment would pay for ltself in approximately three years. Inadditlon the City could provide its own scheduling. He con- sidered thls purchase justified from the standpoint of efficiency and cost. In the following Counctl dlscussion Police Lteutenant Chase ver-ified the effectlve us of this equipment and the fact that its use from other agencles often involves long walts. In responseto othe! questtons he explained tt has less chance of error than the polygraph because its use is not dependent upon the operator who asks questtons but is an interpretation of lnvotuntary muscle tremors in the voice. The greatest problem is the qualtfied interpretatton of the tapes that come off the machlne an Setgeant Eldredge ts a quallfied examtner. Few cities t area have thls equtpment, and Lt. Chase verified there w requests for lts use from other local governments and pr must be established. There was Councll suggestion thatthis equipment could be reimbursed by the charges made t cities for its use. After more discussLon, Counctl concluded that thls expendlture would result ln increased efficiency for the PoLtce Department. Councllman Amstrup moved that funds be transferred for purchase of this equtpment, second by Councllman Barton, carried unanimously. 3. CITY }IANAGER: REQUEST FROM PRIVATE PARTY TO RENT SURPLUS SPACE d Poltcen the cost ofo other iLL beiorittes 1OL6 CAROLAN AVENUE. Council recetved letter of 2/28178 from l'larv tn Taylor, 14L5 Capuchino Avenue requesttng permtsslon to rent Poltion of space in-building on thls -Clty-owned property. Mr. Taylor-projected a rental of one year, but would agree to lease revocable at one month rs notice'. He would use space for boatbutlding, would share the butlding with ctty tnterests such as storage, and would pay uttltttes and other costs related to his use of the building. Clty Managerts endolsement of l,larch 16, 1978 recommended this rental be-authorized on a month-to-month basts, and suggested a rental of $150.00 per month. He stated this reotal would not interfere wlth any Clty use. In response to Council questl-ons, the Clty Attorney conftrmed that rental of this space would not cause Ctty problems and that a lease agreement could 6e drawn up excludlng the City ftom any llablltty from this use. There were no Councll objecttons to thls month-to-month rental . Mayor Crosby dlrected thls lease be arranged. LL1 RESOLUTIONS T. RESOLUTION NO. L5-78 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH SAN FRANCISCO T MOTEL COMPANY This subject was continued from Council meettngs of February 2L and March 6, L978, In response to Mayor Crosby, the City Attorney reviewed his memoof March L6, f978 which presents drafts of two alternate proposalsfor posslble incLusion in the agreement relative to the parking ad-jacent to the Sheraton Hotel. His comments follow. The city-owned land proposed for parking is approximately 64r000Sf or L.47 acres. It has a value of approximately $5.00 per SF,as does the Anza land proposed for trade. The An2a lands- average an elevation of below street level, and since the trade is to befor filled Land, Council should determine the elevation to whichit should be filled. Also, the area for the proposed hotel parkingcontains part of a proposed putting green. this'green coutd'be relocated. One of the proposals is for a lease by the Sheraton of the parking area for a certain term of years at an 8% rental based on the $5.00SF evaluation. The Ctty would have a two year period to exercisean option to have Sheraton purchase for the City an equival-entportion of land from Anza. The other proposal is for a straight trade of the parking area owned by the City for an equivalent portion of filled Anza landwithin lots I through 4 , Aaza Airport Paxk 1f2. Lot llL ts approx-imately the same size as the parking area, but an equivalent amount could be obtained by a 70t stiip of-Lots Lr2r3 and 4 along the west edge of the dump. The City Attorney stated he considered the ideaof a trade a good one. It would give the City a maintained parkinglot, and the cost of about $1.00 SF of installing it would be borneby the developer. He added this parking lot is beyond BCDC limits, In response to questions from Councilman Mangini, City Attorneystated that since this would be a trade of City property rather thana sale, there is no conflict with the Government code. Also if thehotel were sold the parking area would be included. However, tf the Sheraton wished, the land could be reconveyed to the City f,or usefor City purposes. Councilman Amstrup spoke of the Cityrs moral obligatton to help theapplicant come up with a parking area since the variance has beengranted. He noted the hotel parking area site was being consideredby the City, in any event, for a parking area for Little League and the golf course. The use of the site would be to the advantage ofboth the City and the Sheraton. He did not particularly approve the idea of the 70 | strip and questioned the arei of Lot ifl-. Staff in- formed him it was 671000 SF. He suggested the possibllity of a tradefor Land along the lagoon. On the subject of leasing, he noted thata long term lease would give the City about $21000 a month. Mayorthe S devel would $64,0 Crosby received confirmation from staff that the cost of paving heraton parking site would be approximately $64 r000 which the oper would pay. IIe approved the idea of a trade, since the City be gaining a paved tot for joint use, its maintenance, and the 00 for its development. Councilman Martin asked who would fill the Anza lot. Cyrus McMillan, attorney for the Sheraton, stated that the Sheraton would pay for thefitl, but it must know to what elevation. In response to the Council- mants further question, the City Attorney stated there is no cross easement contemplated for the City on the Sheraton parking - the joint use is contemplated in the agreement. Councilman Martin remarked he assumed the $64,000 figure included curb and gutter. He noted the advantage to the Sheraton of having this parking site so close to the d!.J- -., ,.L',.1,& Lls hotel rather than the site previou if the swap sufficiently coveled tcited the fact that the Clty ls ge the developer is paylng $64,000 fo whlch the Ctty has Jolnt use and t tncome from the 210 rooms. He con many advantages. Councilman l1a rt ILet the developeof Land for the The Clty Attorneat least want th considered, and wondered advantage. Mr. McMtllananelopiywidth s1y hisrrird he std ng evecir ere qual amount of land, ng a parking stte onlI get additlonale Clty sras getting In answer to Councilman Mangtnlts questlon about how this site would affect the existing btke path, staff replted the path would have to be relocated. Councilman Martln remarked he had problems wlth the tdea of a Lease and would prefer a straight trade of land. Mr. McMtllan stated that was his preference also. The Counctlman then spec-ified that the agreement should include the wordlng that the slte traded to the City should be filled to provide gravity drainageto City speclflcatlons. Councilman Aostrup questioned if the City wanted to declde on Lot lll or tf another locatlon would be better. He suggested a location be found for a soccer ftetd. n suggested that Councll go on with the agreement,r get started, and have staff research the Locatlon trade since Councll ts not sure where it wants it.y satd that for purposes of the agreement he would e subdivision indicated. Mr. McMlllan told Council that this would be acceptable to him if the agreement could be drafted. If Council would approve the res-olutton tonight, the agreement could be drafted, the City to designate wlthln 30 days a certaln area wtthin any property i.n Anza Atrport Park that Anza Trust ovJns. councllman Barton suggested the city get a waterfront area for recreational purposes. Mayor Cr meet ing ,meeting. suSg drafo sby the ested that if the resolutlon rrere approved at thist agreement mlght be avallable by the next study There was further Council dtscussion about the Sheraton parking slte. Mr. McMlllan agreed that lt would be landscaped and ltghted. The Director of Pu6[ic Works stated that the go[f course architect knowsof this project and will be consulted in any planntng. The Ctty Attorney summarlzed that the paragraph in the agreementrelatlng to the land trade would specify that: t. The City site shall be filled to an elevation sufficlent to provide gravity drainage to the street. 2. The City site shall be withln Anza Alrport Park. 3. The City site locatton shall be determtned wlthin 30 days. 4. The Sheraton parking slte shalL be landscaped and tlghted. ffiICS, INCORPORATED FOR WASTE WATER RECLAMATION STUDY" vras tntroduced by Councllman Mangini who moved its adoption, second by Councllman l'lartin, unanimously carrled onroLl calL. RESOLUTION N0. 15-78 w as Lntroduced by Councilman Amstrup who moved provlsions stlpulated at this meeting, secondits adoption with the by Councilman Mangini, carrted on unanimous ro11 calt vote. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 15-78 ''RESOLUTION AUTI{ORIZING EXECUTION OF 3. RESoLUTIoN No. 17-.78 ITAUTHORIzING ExEcUTToN oF AGREEMENT I^IITH RESOURCES ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FACILITIES" wasintroduced by Councj-1man Mangini who moved its adoption, second by Councilman Martin, unanimously carried on roIl ca1l. LL6 ORDINANCE - SECOND READING - HEARING I. ORDINANCE NO. It24 ''ESTABLISHING A THIRTY FIVE MILE PER HOUR ffi AVENUE BETWEEN CALIFORNIA DRIVE AND IIIJMBOLDT ROAD AND A THIRTY MILE PER IIOUR SPEED LIMIT ON PENINST'LA AVENUE BETWEEN EL cAMrNo REAL AND CALTFoRNTA DRrvE" was presented for Council consideration and hearing. Mayor Crosby opened the meeting to publlc comment. There was none and the public hearing was declared closed. ORDINANCE NO. LI24 passed its second reading and was adopted on motion of Councilman Amstrup, second by Counc ilman Mangini, unanlmousLy carrled on ro11 cal1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ENCORE THEATRE COOLIDGE SCHOOL Councilman l,Iang int questioned status of these two items. The City Attorney replted nothing further had been heard from the Enc'ore, and -Coolhlge School ittt te considered at the Aprtl study meeting. AIRPORT BOULEVARD Councitman Arnstrup questloned when somethlng woutd be done about cleaning up Airport Boulevard. Director of Publtc Works reported he had iiisiussed this with Mr. Keyston who had agreed to take care of it, ABAG Counc i lma question n Martln reported on ABAG personn at previous CounclL meeting. He had 116 people. As of this l,la rc udget effective July l, 1978 the 0 - 80 people, and the budget wil 00,000. He added that ABAG does such as BASSA and lfIC. l in response toaid that as of March, they have 95. Under ersonneL will be drop to $2,500,000ll the planntng for L977 they the new b between 7 from $3,1 agenc le s e s h pI a Mayor Crosby noted cttizen suggestion that parklng-be put under- neith the neu butlding on the Fox theatre site. Ctty Planner noted the great exFense thts would tnvolve. SAI{TRANS Counctlman Martin noted mention in Trafflc, Safety, Parklng minutes that Samtrans was changing its routes. He suggested Council should be informed of iheie changes so that inquiries coutd be answered. Clty l'lanager stated he would tnvestigate. Councilman Manglni noted statement in these mtnutes that there could be an in(uiry as to whether Burlingame is receiving its share of funds and service. NEW BUSINESS CETA Counctlman llart !n questioned progress and cost of CETA employee palntlng of recreadlon bulldlng and grandstand. APPROVALS Councllman Martin questioned the followlng warrants: Mayor Crosby said he had received comPlaints from Diamond Jlmts a iraterfrorf restaurant, about the tltteted state of a nearby public access area. It was suggested that.garbage receptacLes te tnstalled. Director of Publlc Works said he would lnvestlgate' DOWNTOWN PARKING LL7 Warrant No. 1582, Pump Repalr Servtce Co., $1,104.73. oi.:-PuEfic Works explatned thts was budgeted maintenance statLon on llitten Road. Frectorfor pump l,/arrant No. 159 7 the Clty should check. , typewriter rentat, $31 .80. He questioned whyrent typewr!ters. City l'{,anage r stated he would !'larrant 1631 , Burlingame Htllsborough Ltttle League, $150.00.Poltce Chief state d CounclL had prevtously authorized funds from Warrant No. 1783 , Brock Rtddle, expenses of Park & Rec. Con- tEnailn, F45.62. City tlanager will check. 1. WARRANT NOS. f527 thtough 1956, duly audited, in the amountof $598,866.36 were approved for payment on motion of Counctlman l"trangini, second by Counctlman Amstrup, all aye votce vote. 2. PAYROLL, February, L978, Check Nos. 106[ throught 1759 tn the amount of $371,961.16, approved on motion of Councllman l'trangini, second by Counctlman Amstrup, all aye volce vote. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS L2. City Planner, sumsnry of Planning Commlsslon neeting l'Iarch L3, 1978. the yearly btcycle auctton to be put tnto the Youth fund. Warrant No. 1740, Snappy Foto Shops, photos for varlous depts., i2:24.44. City l4anager wtll check. 13. Reports: Fire Departnent and Poltce Department month of February, 1978. Treasirrerrs report, February, 1978. 14. Mtnutes: Planning Commlsslon, February 27; Txaffi,c, Saf,ety Parking Commtssion, I'larch 9, 1978. l. Letter of. 3/L0/78 from P.G.E. regardtng 1978 allocatton for undergrounding tn Burlingame. 2. Letter of February 28, L978 from Regency Development Company commending Ctty Planner on hls assistance. 3. Lettet of l,Iarch 10, L978 from Burllngame Recreatlon Department regarding matettal to be placed ln thts department's summer brochure. 4. Memo of t,Iarch 7, 1978 from Ctty Attorney regardlng Chamber of Commerce and Board of Realtors resionses to- pro[osed Susiness ttcense ordlnance. 5. Report from San Mateo County Conventton & Visitors Bureau. 6. Letter from Reglonal Plannlng Commtttee of March 10, 1978 regarding posstble change in Ctty representation. 7. Letter of 3/L6178 from David Milltcan, former Finance Director, advising he will not be able to attend Jarvts-Gann information meeting. 8. Letter of 3/L3178 from Don Kallstrom, former employee, coromendtng City. 9. Memo from Clty l,lanager advtstng date of jotnt meettng on the Blayney Report as Saturday, Aprll 1' 1978. 10. Letter of l,larch 13' 1978 from Nat Landes, member of Executive Board of ABAG advising of hts vacation of the posttion and recom- mendlng Councilman llarttn for the posltion. 11. Negative Declarattons, Clty Planner 118 15. Communication from Dtrector He ath of San Franc isco International Airpoat 10:00 P.M. out o rt attaching If the Alrport. Comment loas ma ist o n r fli d hts starting e that the ng beforenext step should be a llst of fllghts ln the eveni 10 :00 P .M. Letter of March L4, L978 from City Clerk advised of reappoint- ment dates of Planning Commisstoners Jules L. Francard and Ruth E. Jacobs . Memo of t'larch 16, 1978 f rom City l"lanager ad- vlsed of vacancies on Beauttfication Commission, Library Board' and Traffic, Safety and Parking Commlssion. Mayor Crosby directed that time llmit for applicattons on these 3 Last commissions be 30 days, and asked press to publlcize. He asked City Manage! to contact Planning Commissioners to see lf they wished another term. VACANCIES ON COMMISSIONS ADJOURNMENT Meeting regularly adJourned at ll:40 P.M. RespectfulLy, {i&*'{r:kc Ctty Clerk I i, I