HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1979.03.14313
BURLINGAME, CALIEORNIA
CITY COUNCIL STUDY MEETING
March l-4 , 7979
PRESENT:
COI'NCILMEMBERS AMSTRUP, BARTON, CROSBY, MANGINI , MARTIN
STAFE: SCHWALM, COLEMAN, YOST, ARGYRES, WAGNER, FRICKE
M a yor Amstrup convened a City Council Study Meeting in the
Burlingame City Hatl Council Chambers at 8:05 p.m. on March 14,
tg7g. He explained to the public atteniling the meeting the pur-
pose of the ;tudy meeting is for council study and discussion of
items on the agenda, and that is is not a meeting for public
participation except at Council's express invitation for comments'
He noted that a communj-cation from the Tri-County Apartment
Association had announced there woul-d be public input at the study
meeting. That statement was in error.
1. PROHIBITING DOGS IN ANY CITY PARK
The Park and Recreatj-on Commission requested Council consider an
ordinance prohibiting dogs in City parks because the two most re-
cent ordininces for control of defecation are not enforceable'
Principally in Washington and Ray Park animal defecation inter-
feres with-sports programs and with gardening equipment' The
recommendation is bas6d on the assumption that any dog in a park,
whether leashed or not, wi]1 defecate, and enforcement of the
ordinances requires observation, whereas banning all dogs. from
parks could result in easier enforcement of the code provisj-ons'
bouncil commented that prohibiting dogs in parks would merely move
the problem to the streets, sidewalks and lawns. The City Manager
,"= hir""t.d to implement Council suggestions that the main
entrances to the parks be posted with notices of the city ordinances
relating to the leashed animals and removal of defecationi that
advisor! notices be distributed by Park Department personnel to
dog ownlrs when observed in the parks; and that a similar notice
be printed in the next Recreation Department bullelin'
2. STUDY AND DISCUSSION OF FUTURE RENT CONTROLS
Mayor Amstrup stateal councilmembers have received. extensive reports
anl pubtications concerning rent control , and he assured those
memblrs of the public pres6nt at the meeting that every communication
received had been circulated to all the councilmembers '
councilman Mangini conmented on the economic conditions and pressures
upon both rent6rs and property owners. History of rent control- in-
dicates j-t is unsucceslfu1. He recommended a report to Council from
a coalition of renters, property owners and real- estate people as a
guiae to possible actj-on-. bouncilmembers Crosby and Barton concurred
in the re-commendation. Councilman Martin did not object to the
suggestion, but stated he felt city action would not be effective;
thii county,/state action would be preferable. He considered the pro-
blem more basic than dialogue betv/een landlord and tenant and re-
lated to such things as baiic setup of income tax' He suggested
working through l-egislators.
MR. PHILLIP RAFELLO addressed council on beha]f of the county Housing
coalition. He urged council to conduct a public hearing and stated
the Housing Coaliiion is prepared to show that rent stabilization is
a workable prospect and to show that many people, both young and old,
are unable to afford increased rents they are being charged'
MS. MADELINE O'CONNOR said that she \,ras present at the earlier dis-
cussion of this matter and she recalled a cornmitment to a public
hearing. on behalf of the renters she said they would be willing to
meet ii dialogue, but the understanding was there would be a public
314
meeting to present their contention that rent controls can be
made to work.
MR. SUKHZIT CHAHAL, a resident of Burlingame who owns a fj-veunit piece of property, described the problems of a recentinvestor in rental property and the expenses of maintenancewhich resulted in a negative cash flow. He compared the costof ownership of a condominium with the lower cost of rental forthe same sized unit in Burlingame. His experience with rentcontrol in cj-ties throughout the world was that it was not satis-factory. MR. JULIAN GARROW of 1775 Marco PoIo said, though many
areas in the East had problems, the problems existed before rent
control , and that in the Town of lrvington, New Jersey, rent
control had worked, giving a fair return to the owner and pro-
tection to the renter. His experience was that legislation was
required to provide leverage for tenants.
MR. TIMOTHY HAYES of 1103 Paloma sympathized with theof tenants' long run economic outlook.
prospects
MR. BOB CARSAGE pointed out that Burl-ingame is a choiceidential area and rental costs necessarily reftect thatEe fe1t, however, there should be protection for senior
res-fact.
citizens.
After discussion it i"ras the unanimous decision of Council thatthe question of rent control be submitted to a comnittee forreview and recommendation to Council. Mayor Amstrup requestedall persons interested in serving upon such a committee to sub-mit thein names and. addresses.
RECESS
Following the recess Mayor Amstrup announced that record.s in-dicate that a public meeting on the issue would be he1d, and thattherefore such a meeting for public expression to Council wouldbe announced and held following the meeting of the committee.
3. OLD LEGION HALL BUILDING
Mr. Schwalm reported that rehabilitation of the old Legion HallBuilding is estimated to cost between $50,000 anal $60,000. Nofunds for this purpose are available. It idas his recommendationthat.publicj-ty through the newspapers be requested in an attemptto find an organization j-nterested in the refurbishing. Councit-
man Mangini requested that a time limit of five months be set forthe submission of proposa.Is.
4. LARGER STUDY MEETING ROOM
Mayor Amstrup reviewed past discussions on the desirabitity of alarger room for study meetj-ngs, lncluding the suggestion for useof the present Water Office. Councilman Martin pointed out thatthe Water Office would result in a long narrow room, and suggesteda combination of part of that space plus part of the Manager'sOffice anteroom. Council-man Mangini called attention to themeeting room in the basement of the Library. Another suggestion
was the remodeling of council chambers to provide a study tablearea. Councilwoman Barton commented that the reason the studymeetings were moved to the council chambers in recent months wasthe nature of the discussions which drew large public attendance;therefore, it was her feeling that in any event the councit
chambers would have been used. Mayor Amstrup reported that manycouncils conduct study meetings prior to regular sessions.
Mayor Amstrup urged further consideration of possibilities which
would assure more effective communication between councilmembers
and staff at study sessions.
31s
5. RECLASS IFICATION IN THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT
In response to Mr. wagner's request for reclass i fication of
an employee in the Recreation Department to stenographer-clerk
from receptionist-dupl icating machj-ne operator, Council re-
quested that Mr. Schwalm and he determine a classification
distinguishable from that of stenographer-c lerk for the employees
at the Recreation Department whose duties inc]ude operation of
the duplicating equipment, to avoid problems in future salary
survey studies.
6. SERVICE CHARGES
7. OTHER
Burlingame Plaza Service Road: Mayor Amstrup reported having
@bout large trucks and rigs parked
overnight and weekends on the service road at Ef Camino Real
and Burlingame Plaza. In response to the suggestion of posting
parkj-ng limits, Councilman Martin suggested an attempt to pro-
vide parking space for such equipment at a less objectionable
site. Staff was directed to investigate such an alternate
parking area.
8. BAYF'RONT LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
(Councilman Martin withdrew from participation in the meeting.)
Mr. Yost revi-ewed previous council acti.on and staff reports and
referred to the Progress Report of February L4, 19'79. With re-
spect to traffic generations in the western, central and easterly
sections of the Anza area, further testings of the co-efficients
and consuftation t/ith Mr. Drachman resulted in the recornmendation
for further improvements at the Coyote Point end. These involve
the geometrics of coming off the freeway and looping to enter
the Anza area, and a plan to provide a southbound entry to the
freeway with a slip into the freeway from Humboldt north of
Peninsula Avenue, similar to the slip at the eucalyptus grove
for northbound freeway traffic. There j-s a recommendation for
a second left turn lane in front of the Ramada Inn for northbound
Airport Boulevard traffic turning left onto the f ree\"/ay. New
calculations on the proposetl changes are expected from Mr.
Drachman next week. It .is expected the proposed improvements to
the plan witl test out to the D Leve1. The proposed changes are
estimated to increase the cost of the road improvements from
$I,500,000 to $2,000,000.placing about one block of 1
This will include the cost of dis-
andowners on Humboldt Road.
In response to Mayor AmstruP's question regarding proposed project
rating-s, Mr. Yost explained that the suggestion is that the Planning
Commiision act as a review board and prepare a report in the form
of a recommendation which would go to Council for certification or
modification. Mayor Amstrup and Councilwoman Barton questioned
procedure when two projects are rated equally and the percentage
;Ilocation alIows for only one. Mr. Yost said he thought the
Iikelihood of a tie between buildings of the same character is re-
mote because of the many differing factors that would be involved
in the evaluation. The point system will make it apparent to in-
tended developers t hat criteria matter to the City and which matter
the most. Councilwoman Barton questioned the percentage limj-tation
on development. Mr. Yost responded that it was hoped the table
would include a reserve fund which could be invaded for exceptional
projects, and that unused portions of the quotas of previous years
would also be available. The proposed six month review period is
recommended because (1) it enables that time for the initial
assessment and study, time to prepare the negative declaratj-on and
Discussion of charges for services such as lock-outs, pumping
and covering of roofs by the Fire Department and tree planting
by the Park Department $ras deferred to a later meeting because
Council did not have sufficient information,
316
get it and drawings started in circulation through the Clearing
House and to get necessary work on the project completed beforeit comes before Council for evaluation; (2) it is felt the dev-
eloper will have more definitive information as to deadline,
and competj-tion will be generated for better quality projects;
and (3) traffic build-up can be monitored more efficiently tonote significant increment.
Mr. Yost stated that Mr. Kirkup is working on estimates for
construction of the road work, and that work will be started as
soon as possible. It is hoped that development charges will be
ready for assessment in time for the Sea Breeze Plaza Project
now before staff.
Councilwoman Barton referred to Mr. David Keystonrs letter of
March 14th. Mr. Yost said it would be studied by staff and
comments submitted. Mr. Keyston conunented that the present. road
capacity would permit a 50? to 60? buildout at the present time
and he would take issue to the suggestion of a L4Z per year
building quota. Mr. Yost caIled attention to a proposed pro-
vision for adjustment to match the final road improvement con-struction. Mr. Keyston stated that his letter included an offerto advance sums against development charges to expedite road
improvements so that everything except the parking lot anddrive-in theater may be developed as quickly as possible. Mr.
Yost agreed that an aggressive road improvement program wouldsolve many problems in the Anza area. Mr. Kirkup could advise
how quickly CalTrans will proceed if funds are available.
Mayor Amstrup ca1led attention to the fact that he had been
advised that the transfer station will not be completed untilnext June. He questioned its effect on the Cityrs plan to closethe dump in Dec. and upon plans for the Anza area. He suggestedthat after recei-pt of the Drachman report and the estimate oftime and cost for road improvements there be another meetj-ng ofCouncil to consider this land development.
The meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
6J*-7/-7L/zEvelyn/ H. Hill
City Clerk
IIfI
I
t
I
I
I