Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1978.05.15153 BURLINGAME, May 15, CALIFORNIA L978 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City HaLL Council Chambers. Meeting called to order at 8:05 P.M. by Mayor William J. Crosby. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: Led by Evelyn H. Hill, Ctty Clerk. ROLL CALL MINUTES: Regular meeting of May L and adJourned regular meeting of May L0, 1978, approved and adopted. PRESENTATIONS I. ''MISS BURLINGAME,' Council Members Present : Council Members Absent : 2. JOSEPH A. ALIAMUS Ams t rup- Ba rt on-Cro sby -Mang ini -Mart in None Mr, Ray Kliewer, Executive Vice Pre s ident /l'lanage r , Burlingame Chambei of Commerce, introduced Miss Angelika SaLerno from BurLingame High School, named "Miss Burlingame" from a group of nine cindidates by the panel of judges at the Service Clubs Luncheon on May 15, 1978. Mayor Crosby called on Fire Chief Fred Fricke to introduce Mr. Allamus, invited by Councit to receive speciaL recognition for his years of involvement in community affairs. Chief Fricke, in presLnttng a procLamation titled "Comrnending And Recognizing Joe ALiamus ts-Over Forty Years of Llfe Saving And Emergency Service To The City Of BurLingame", expressed his personal satisfaction at the opportunity to publtcly recognize Mr. Aliamus's servlces. Responding, Mr. Aliamus spoke of the rewards he had experienced due to hts work. APPLICATION FOR AUCTION PERMIT In a communicatton dated May 2, L978, Mr. Vaughan Bigalow, dba CaLifornia Auction Services , 26752 Rabida Circle, Misston Viejo, applied for a permit to conduct an art auction at AirPort Marina Hotel on June Ll, 1978. Police Department report dated May lL, L978, made no objection to issuance of permit. On motion of Councilman Amstrup, second by CounclLman Mangini, alL aye voice vote, permit iras authorized. Councilman Amstrup noted that the auctloneer falled to supply an inventory of artlcles to be sold as requlred by Code. Ile asked that this be made available to Council at Lts regular meeting on June 5. BURLINGAME BAYFRONT REPORT I BASIC DATA AND ISSUES SEPTEMBER, 1977 BAYFRONT ALTERNATIVES MARCH, [978 PREPARED BY JOHN BLAYNEY ASSOCIATES Mayor Crosby announced that materlal received thus far from Blayney was referred to a sub-committee chaired by Councilman Amstrup for L54 revierd and recommendation. Committee consisted of two Council members, two members of Planni.ng Commission, t\do members ofTraffic, Safety, Parking Commission. The committee compLetedits review and submitted recommendations. Mayor Crosby asked Councilman Amstrup to initiate discussion. Councilman l'trart in decLared his intention of not participating in discussion nor decision on Bayfront zoning matters due to possible confLict of interest. Counc i study Presenpossib c ided inc lu s Iman A meetint, and Le connot toion of mstrup referred to the Lengthy discusslon at theg of l{a y L0. Because there were just four members Councilman Martin did not participate because offlict of interest, the remaining three members de- attempt to make a recommendation with respect to residentiaL uses. It was their position that thisdecision should be made by a majority of the Council . For that reason, the subject is before the Council at this time. Councilman Amstrup reported the committee made six recommendations: RECOMMENDATIONS OE THE BAYFRONT STUDY AREA SUBCOMMITTEE The Subcommittee consisting of CounciLman Irv Amstrup, Council- woman Gloria Barton, PLanning Commissloner Charles Mink, Plannlng Commissioner Tom Sine, Traffic, Safety & Parklng Commissioner Richard Foley and Traffic, Safety & Parking Commissioner Harry Graham, held two meetings; the first being Tuesday, April 11, 1978 and the Last being Wednesday, April L9, L978. At the conclusionof the second meeting, it was the consensus of the Subcommittee to recommend to the City CounciL, the following. L. The Subcommittee basicaLly preferred PLan 2 of the BlayneyReport. With the modifications that the floor area ratio for restaurants be limited to 0.L5 and the floor ratio for offices limited to 0.75. be 2. That an alternate plan be submitted to the City Council, showing approximately L9 acres of residentiaL concentrated betvreen Airport BouLevard and the City Lagoon and located on Parcel 17 and 18 as shown on the attached l'Iaps. That the residential have a density of about 25 units per acre and be limited in height to three or four stories over parking 3. That the master plan be changed to show all of the Anza area as water front commerc ial . 4. That the zoning on the Theatre be changed from ML 5. That the C4 zoning beditional use. Hyatt House, Sheraton HoteL and Drive-Into C4 zoning. amended to allow offices only as a con- 6. That specific uses other assigned to specific lots or the State lands only hotels, uses are allowed ' He noted that the City Council must decide shall Blayney be directed to pursue a mix of resldenttal' hoteLs, restaurants, office build- ing}, etc. If so, what type of residenEial, multiple high-rise, loro-rise, and where? Should residential be excLuded? Furthermore, are office buildings desirable? There appears to be a feeling held by some that they are not. These are the decisions to be made so the studies can proceed to a concLusion. Councilman Amstrup was not supportive of high-rise. If residential is to be a part of the study, he would prefer low-Level. than the residentlal area, not be parcels with the understanding that on restaurants and commercial recreat ion 155 CounciLwoman Barton commented thete appear to be a number of peopte who feel strongly about hlgh-rise buiLdtngs. That issuewill surface when public heatings are held. She thought thatresidential, per se, should be explored so that it can be in- cluded in the final teport. According to Blayney, office buildings create much more of a traffic problem than residentiaL, and the City realizes more revenue from restdential than officeuse. Also, Blayney lndicates some resldential wiLL create a more balanced communLty, She recommended thst the final report cover impacts of both Low and high rise dwellings. For the benefit of the press and the audience, Councilwoman Barton expLained that "iesidentiaLrr as discussed this evening refers only to condominiums. Councilman Mangint stated that the Council, along with decisions on land use mix, must determine who is going to complete the studies, in vtew of correspondence received from Mr. Blayney. Councilman Mangint favored a study of restdential both low and high rise, expLaining he was not committed to that type _of de- vel.opment, bul committed to studying the impact for good or bad on the City. If directlon is given to look at hlgh-rise, he could envlsion a bLend with existing three targe buildings in the area. This may not be feasible but should be considered. Mayor Crosby stated it is incumbent upon the Council to exPedite it's directiie to whomever wlll be doiirg the final rePort. - The question is not whether high or Low buildings, but is residentlal a proper use of Land along the Bay. The Chair announced a motion to be in order. Councilman Amstrup stated that the motlon shouLd include Location and quantity of residential use. Councilman Mangini asked about rezoning, should that be part of the directive. City Attorney expLained that zoning will follow after final recom- mendations have been received. Mayor Crosby asked lf it was necessary to decide at this time yes or no on residentlal. City Attorney considered that the Council rs prerogative. hc be expanded.k some exceptions where it might be PLan. Also, where could everybody accept residential . The Committee recognized a portion of the- arei south of Airport Boulevard from the end of Airport Parking parcel to the end of the Lagoon as the area they couLd aII accept to consider for residential . One of the Planning Commissioners made a very strong point of keeping the portion north of Airport Boul-evard in C-4 District. By so doing, they generally came to the concluston that the only area to be rezoned might be the Drive-In Theatle, presently zoned M-1, as the initial change in Anza territory. The auto auction would remain in C-4. Mayor Crosby recalLed that, other than the committeets recommend-ation, there has been some discussion about the auto auction being restdential . He asked the City Attorney if it was necessary to bethat speclfic about residentiaL sites. City Attorney reported this would help consultant and staff. Councilwoman Barton questioned paying for a teport if Council isto make the decisions. She felt that the Council should direct City Planner suggested the Committeers rePort mig PLanning Commission members of that Comrnlttee too to resiiientiaL. There was much discusslon about located and not be inconsietent with the General 156 consideration to dweLlings in the best possible places. Council has authorLty to accept or reject. CounciLman Amstrup commented that CounciL must face the simplefact that the experts are not going to tell Council anythingfurther at thts time. There must be a policy statement on whatit is that is to be studied. The consultants have stated where they think residential should be. Now, Council has to say wethink we should look at residential, we should Look at such and such an area. If there are other areas, conceivably, they will be identified. Without those instructions to whomever ls goingto do the work, how can the study proceed. This is a declsionto be made by this Council . Mayor C and L8 Parce L s iderat stud sec u Parc abou po rtto 3 City PLanner reported that total area in acres dwelling units per acre, maximum number of dwealL measurements of how quantity of residentia be determined. It may be better to specify cedwelling units and certain number of acres. 3 ro on 20io sby recaLled that the committee recommended parcels l7 "h.ecommended PLan 2 With ResidentiaL.rr He ihoughtan ideal Location for residential and requested con-n to it as well as t7 and L8. With respect to drive-in theatre parcel, Councilman Amstrup noted this will not be available for deveLopment for ten years. Most of the people on the Committee felt that the auto auction should be eliminated from residential consideration because itis cut off from the remalnder of the area, thereby detracting from a composite complex. Councilman Mangini considered the auction site a part of theyarit elsta ed0i rea Legally, if not geographically. He had concern abouty for people who might be living in a building on either L9 and 20 because they are somewhat isolated. He asked mount of acreage to be committed to residential and sup-the Committee's recommendation fox L9-20 acres as opposed ndicated by the consultant. CounciLwoman Barton asked if designation by Councll of certain areas will provide sufficient information. ,nt1ildrta2u umber of ng units are eveLopment canin number ofnits per net residential acre might be appLied to whatever area is decided upon to give some direction on density. Mayor Crosby referred to material submitted by Gilbert Rodli, Jr., 340 Lorton Avenue (I.{ay t2, 1978) prepared from Blayney report, comparing income to City over a span of years from non-residentialvs., residential (Plan 2.) ldayor asked the City Planner to comment. Planner stated it was his understanding that benefits and costs toCity of proposed mix of land use will be determined. Thls is a very significant factor when considering number of llving units and amount of acreage to be developed. i Following further discussion, there appeared to be a majority in agreement to proceed with a directive for preparation of an alter- nate plan encompassing residential Land use. Councilman Manginlts motion to instruct whoever undertakes the study to determine residentiaL impact on the bayfront recognize that residential in this instance concelns condominium buildingsonly, high-rise and low-level construction, and that the Locationto be studied shall consist of Parcels L4, L7 and 18 as shown on "Recommended PLan 2 l^Iith Residentialr', a total of 22.4 acres. Motion seconded by CounciLwoman Barton. Councilman Amstrup stated his intention of voting ".ro".sidered the directive not specific enough. Furthermore, ferred residential, if any, to be confined to one area, He con- he pre- not r57 expanded across the Boulevard. Motlon carrted on following roll call: Ayes3 Council Members Barton-Crosby-Mang inl Noes: Council Members Amstrup Abstain: CounciL Members Martln BLAYNEY COMPENSATION Mayor Crosby referred to correspondence on the above subject: Blayney Letlel! !{ April ?!glC l,tay l? fp qitj Manager, City Plinner to City M;nager, May 4 and City Manager 16, City Councl-l May 4, L978. City Manager, in response t contract provides for month performed and dlrect costscity ro pay within 30 days BLayney's biLLings are gett product to be delivered. BA. To complete contract wo by $6,927 (costs incurred bto a maximum of $41,927; or section (e) Proposed Bayfro contract maximum. o Mayor Croly billing incurred wiof rec e ipting ahead o layney hasrk providedy delay and , B. To cont PLan wit sby byrhi offw , explained that the consultant for roork n the preceding month,bllling. In actuatity,hat Clty cons idered ered t\,Io alternatives : ximum fee is increased duced Cicy part lc ipation) ete work through sub- o change in $35,000 off ma re mPlhn City Manager reported Blayney appears to be unwilling to arbitrate the- $6927. It was City Manager's recommendation thaE staff assume the work of items 20,2L and 22, subsection (f) of the contract. City Planner stated there is considerable work to be done by Blainey tf Council accepts his Alternative B, i.e., Items L5 through f9 of -ntayneyts work prbgram. These wiLL include the residential land use study authoxized by City Council, fiscal analysis, sources of financing, General PLan amendment text, Draft_ EIR of the Pro- posed Bayfront PLan. Planner stated these are all prelimtnary to adoptlon and implementation of final Bayfront PLan. Mayor Crosby recognized Mr. John Blayney. He stated his primary concern: Non-payment, as provided by contract for work performed in March. He stated City Planner declined to release Payment. Con- cerning statements about his unwillingness to negotiate' _BLayneystated-he is asking only to be paid as the contract provides. Neither of the two alternatives proposed will compensate for the amount of time expended on the project. He wants the work to be finalized, but there is a limit to what can be exPected when a job intended to take 3-t months becomes a 9 to 12 month job. The companyts records are avallable to City Staff. There followed a series of questions directed by CounciLman Martin concerning the request for an additional $6927 ar.d Blayney's re- sponses. In justlfying the increase, Mr. Blayney stated that cotrt- pleting the work of the contract is gotng to require more days than they wilt be paid for under normal billing rates. He pointed out that the contract provides that when the $35,000 is reached the consultant is to be paid addltional fees if time schedule is not adhered to. Councilman Mangint asked who wiLl assume resPonsibility for the additionaL work if the contract lgith Blayney ceases when the $35,000 maiim-um has been ibached. City Attorney asked about Length o through item 19. Blayney responde cannot devote [4 fult days to the due to interruptions. frd4 Pro ime required to c omp le te 5 days. He stated his staffject. There are time delays 158 Councilwoman Barton asked is it possible for staff to completethe work, She objected to releasing additional funds to ion-sultant fees. City Planner referredplete items 15 througtime, staff can do th beyond. CounciLman Amstrup preferred to Eerminate the contract at35,000, staff to continue from there. CounciLman Martin asked Blayney if he could finish throughitten 22 by JuLy I. The answer sras no. $ to 45 days indicated by Btayney to com-h 19, and felt that, given sufficient e work required to complete items 20 and dvised it is not necessary to refer to Planningis done as a courtesy) if it is the Council's hange zoning but uses only in the C-4 District. Citv At torne C omiri s s ion ( intent not t In response to Director of Public Works, Mr. Blayney was granted a period of 45 da complete the remainder of the $ork throug, Mr. Blayney requested a written statementis expected of him. HEARINGS Councilman Martin expressed some concern about time constraintsin connection with Urgency Ordinance No. lll3, due to exptre onJuly 6. It would appear that some action is required by- theCouncil to prevent reversion to the zoning existing prior toadoption of the urgency ordinances. David Keyston assured the CounciL there wouLd be no appltcationsfor building permits on the Lands of Anza. Director of Public Works suggested, if the Council were to con-sider directing the Planning Commission to expedite a hearing on zoning amendments to require a speciaL permit for office buildings,possibLy an ordinance to implement the amendments could be intro- duced in June by the Council with hearing and second reading atthe first meeting in July. Or, perhaps it could be an urgencyordinance. It was his impresston that an EIR would not be re-quired in this instance. Residential use could not be incLuded, because it would require a general plan amendment and zoning code amendments. mEeting to order at RECONVENE: FoLlowi ng L recess 0:05 p.m at 9:50 p.m., Mayor Crosby called There followed further discussion concerning expiration of the urgency ordinance and methods of implementing protective zoning controLs. ya butoc Councilwoman Barton moved to amend the Muntcipal Code by deletlng from Section 25,4L.020 Permitted Uses, (a), (b), (c), (d), and incLuding the four i,n 25.4L.025 Conditional Uses Requiring SpecialPermit. Motion seconded by Councilman Mangini, all aye ro11 call. Councilwoman Barton moved acceptance of Altetnative B proposed by John Blayney in hls letter of April 28 , L97I to City ivl,anager (maximum fee $35,000), remainder ltork, items 20 through 22, to be compLeted by staff. Second by Councilman Amstrup. Alt aye rollcall. Councllman Amstrup reiterated his opposition to high-rise identiaL on the bayfront. res- Council confirmed thatys (to June 30, 1978)h item 19. to from the City of what 1. CHANGE OF SIGN COPY, MILLS ESTATE PHARI.,IACY Under date of March 15, 1978, William A. Ojakian, 1818 EL Camino 159 ReaL, requested a hearing before City Council to appeal deniaL by Planning Department and Planning Commisslon of permit toalter copy on two signs for the above business. Hearing was scheduledfor May L5 meettng. Mayor Crosby acknowledged communications from Goorjian & McCabe, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, May 12 and City Attorney to City Council, May 10, 1978. City Attorney informed Council the issue is change of copy on two nonlconforming stgns due to change in the nature of the business. It was staffts poiition the permit coutd not be issued because of non-conformity and that apptlcation should be made for a sign ex- ception, The-appellant elected to appeaL staffrs interpretation to th! Planning Commission where staff determination was sustained. Declaring the hearing open, Mayor Crosby recognized PauI Goorjian, Attorney representing lti. o3akian. I'1r. Goorjian stated there appea1€to bE inferences in staff correspondence that he is attemPt- iir! to bypass proper procedure. This is not the case. Section 22:08.O3O- of ttre -Sign-Code, in his opinion, provides for precisely what his client is iequesting -- change in sign copy by the Person who is operating and will continue to .operate the business. Mr. Aram Ojai<ian esiablished the pharmacy/Liquor store- in 1965. Since his deith, the family has continued the business, but there is not a pharmacist ln the iamily and they cannot affod to emPloy one. Thiv wish to oDerate as a Liquor store. Because pharmacy functions wili cease, thi words "pharmacyt' and ttdrugs" must be removed from the building by State liw. City staff and Planning Comrnission hold that copy cann-ot be changed, that the signs must be removed. In response to Councilman Ma8ginl, City-Planner reported the three signs bn the building total 392 square feet. Far in excess of silnage allowed undei current ordinance. It was for thls reason that itaff recommended application for a sign except!9n. Citv AtEornev stated it was staff rs intent when the ordinance was dratted not io allow non-conforming signs to remain indefinitely, -but to provide for abatement when a business c hanged . owners hip and revised^copy was requested by a new ovrler. The condition that exists here was not anticipaled by staff. It was the City Atto,rneyrs position that the ordinancb should apply since atteraElons are being proposed to a non-conforming sign. In response to Mayor Crosby, there were no -comments pro or con from the floor. The hearing was declared closed. Mayor Crosby recalled he had misgivings and voled-agalnst the amended siln ordinance. IIe thought it created too much of a hardshtp on meichants. After looking at the sLgns on the building, he tended to approve the request. Councihooman Barton preferred that the applicant return to Planning Commission for a sign exception' Councilman l,lart in did not consider this a precedent setting situation. The owner is being forced by State law to change his sign copy, which, of itself, is an unusual circumstance. Councilman Mangini asked if the two signs at the rear were removed would square f6otage be in excess of Code. City Attorney confirmed it would . Mr. Goorjian agreed the tlro plastic signs,on the building exceed Code. This occirred Secause the bultding was and is in rather an isoLated area, a high crime area. The Large signs were tnstalled to Provideilluirinati6n at nlght. He consl-dered the roof sign and sign on face of building importint for safety reasons.,,He agreed to removal of painted wal.l sign and signs at back of building. On condition painted walI sign is removed, Councilman Amstrup agreed to vote in favor. Councilman Mangini moved to approve a change in copy on roof signby replacing "bRUGS" with "l,tILLS ESTATE" ii smaLtei'lerrers, re- moving "PHARMACY" from sign on building face and directing removalof painred wall sign "LIQU0R-BEER-WINE - CoCA C0LA" and 3x2 sign "MILLS ESTATE PHARI'{ACY & LIQUoRS" attached to back wall. Motion seconded by Councilman l"trartin carried unanimously on rolL ca11. 2. ANZA PARKING CORPORATION, 615 AIRPORT BOI,'LEVARD SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR AIRPORT PARKING FACILITY 7OT-8OI AIRPORT BOI,'LEVARD (TENTATIVE ADDRESS) This application approved with conditions by Planning Commisslonat a regular meeting on February 27, L978, was subsequently appealed by Councilman Amstrup. Council hearlng initiated on Iul,arch 20, and was continued pending del-ivery of Blayney report. Mayor Crosby reopened the hearing, requesting comment from City P Lanne r . Considering the amount of pending deveLopment in this generaL area, Planner suggested Council approve a permit for the acreage lyingto the east of Lot 4. Land exchange for Sheraton Hotel approximates 64,000 sq. ft. Neither specific shape nor location were specified. Nor have boundaries been determined for a potential connector road between Airport Boulevard and Bayshore Freeway. At Planning Com- mission meeting, staff recommended consideration to selection ofright-of-way. Commisston elected not to do that. Planner notedthat Council expressed a policy that there would be such a road. Perhaps this ts another concern for the parking lot develoPment. Comment ing that appltcant is asking for a l0-year interim Land use, Planner stated he was uncertain how Council would establlsh lnterim Land use policy r.rithin the concept of Blayneyrs proposed BayfrontpLan. He- suggested Council conslder approval for the parking-facility on a 10 acre parceL as the first stage and defer approval for remainder portion. Mr. David Keyston, Landowner, stated limitation of area would not make project viable for a t0-year period. At the rate lot is operating and growing, l0 acres would hamper its effectiveness as an interim Land use. Mayor Crosby asked Mr. Keyston did he say he would dedicate Land foi a road through the paiking site. Mr: Keyston replied he had said he might make a parcel available under certain conditions. However, to date, he has been unable to learn precise terms of the trade. Entrance to parking was changed so that a building would not be located where, in his opinion, alinement of the future road could be. It would appear that it uiLl be some time before that alinement is fixed. He stated Anza is being flexible with its plans to avoid interfering vrith either Sheraton Hotel trade or roadway. Mavor Crosby asked about total acreage in current proposal. Mr. Keyston resbonded L6-L acres. He agreed to PLanning - Commis s ion conditions Lxcept that he would prefer to have the 30 foot front setback removed- in the area that was originaLly proposed for Sheraton parking. This is not the State parcel_but adjacent to it. A paiking Layout simtlar to the one oPeratlng would be pre- ferable. Councilman l,Iangini asked about effect on total acreage shoutd access road ma[eriaLize. Mr. Keyston indicated a reduction to 13 acres considering SheraEon Erade- and acreage for road. In tesponse to Councilman Amstrup, Mr,. Keyston-said he owns Lot l' It is ieased to American International Rent-A-Car- There is a potentiaL buyer but sales option provldes there shall be no trans- fer of EiEle until September. 160 161 Councilman l,lartin asked if Mr. Keyston would consider reducing the 10 year optl-on. Ile responded there would be an excellent opportunity to do thls the minute he heard from Council its deiision on residential vs., office use' or if there were a proposal for hotel development. Councilman Martin asked were Planning Commission conditions acceptable. Mr. Keyston affirmed they were. He had asked for elimination of 112 aind understood that- 8, 9, and 12 of original conditions had been removed . City PLanner reported that Planning Commission minutes of February 27, L978, recite approved condiEions. Mr. Keyston questioned condition 6 requiring Plannilg Commisston approvil of Landscape plans, commenting that such plans are, nblmally reviewed by staff. He confirmed that existing billboard will be abated. Mavor Crosbv mentioned PLanner ts reference to a conditlon on rtlht-of-way for freeway access. Mr. Keyston stated,,as indicated to'staff, Aiza is commiited to donate to- city eventually a 20 I strip at the lower end of the property . If thls strip could be maintained and given an easement by City, he felt an option for right-of-way could be arranged. City Attorney commented if decisionthis would be a very expensive plece ition that the Land might better be condemnation. Concerning Sheraton trade, Mr. Keyston stated he was,willing to proceed aE soon as location is settled. He suggested-th1s coutd Le accomplished by subdivision map for L-| acres providing for dedicatiirn of street, return of strip into the proPerties with a grant of easement over it. City Attorney suggested consideration to a. condition whereby the property owner agrees to convey to City l-| acres of right-of-way in i:xchinge for city relinquishing its right to fee title to the 20 I bicycLe path and accepting an easement. is made to pursue right-of-way,of property. It was his pos- acquired by agreement than Councilman Amstrup asked about s Sheraton. city Attorneto decide location with stated he is awaiting r ion with his planning o us of Land ow he agreementfter partiesn from Robert ourse proj ec t CiEy by ovides for Citygn. City Manager raves in connect- ed Prsi G tatdrsatiofc y reporteln 30 day ec ommendan the gol Councilman l"{artin asked does City have assurance of when land con- veyance will occur with Sheraton. City Attorney responded no. Councilman Amstrup stated it was his understanding that the person who was to assume ownership of hotel !'ras to be principal in land trade. Mr. Keyston reported this has changed. Councilman l,Ia ng ini asked does agreement with Sheraton provide to City a choice of land. Mr. Keyston stated he favored the City having L-L acres adjacent to dump proPerty. Councilman Amstrup raised the issue of the access road never betng built. During eniuing discussion, Mr. Keyston advised he lntended ro deed the Lind to City by September 1. Clty Attorney stated City would not know about the access road by September 1. Councilman Martin suggested a condition allowing City not to make a decislo.n untll such time that Anza plans to build a Permanentstructure. Mr. Keyston noted that their buyer cannot sell portions of the parcel without coming to City for a permit to build. L62 Counctlman Martin stated this isfee. City Attorney stated that, acres at Cityrs option dedicatedright-of-uay is never used. Councilman Manginlrs motion to grant special permit Parktng Corporation for atrport parking facility was as follows: to be L-L acres dedicated inin effect, there wiII be L-\in fee to City by Anza tf to Anza c ondit ione d t. Developer agrees to assume all responsibility for flooding or storm drainage problems and to hold City harmless from any cLaimsarising from such problems. 2. Alt vehicle areas shall be paved with not Less than 2 inches of asphaltic concrete over 4 inches of base rock. 3. Parking spaces to be striped for standard 91x20' parking spaces. 4. There shall be no more than I,600 parking spaces. 5. Detailed landscape plan shal mission for approval to assure 9 acceptable plant materiats, irri establishment of landscaping. e submitted to Planning Com- 00 sq. ft. of landscaptng,ion systems uhere necessary and lb 8,0 Eat 6. There shall be no sign exceptions; abatement of existing blLL- board per Sec.25.4f.030 (d). 7. Overflow parking of rent-a-car agency vehicles and storage of other vehicles permitted. On street unloading or Loading of such vehictes not permitted. 8. Off-site parking and shuttle bus service for permitted. 9. There shall be no vehicle washing or serviceairport parking facility site except for washingat a wash rack acceptable to City Engineer. local employees 10. Airport parking permit is subject to the exchange provisl.onsof agreement between City and Sheraton. 1L. Anza Shareholders' Liquidating f.ee L-b acres (l00rwide x 650' Long of-way to Link Airport Boulevard wi fac ilit ies on theof shuttLe buses Trust shall dedicate to City in ) for future access road right-th Bayshore Freewa (Blunk &or an equalAssociates Preliminary Site PLan revised May 19, L978 amount of Land in this general area if right-of-way is not con- structed within l0 years of Septembex L, L978. In exchange City shall relinquish fee tltle to 20' bicycle Path easement on Anza lands. Motion seconded by Councilman Martin, carried unanimousLy on rotl caIL' v ) COMMUNICATIONS t. l,lRS. PETER SCHRAGER, L2t OCCIDENTAL AVENUE: RECOMMENDING MI'NICIPAL ELECTIONS TO BE HELD IN CONJI'NCTION WITH STATE PRIMARY I. ONE WATERFRONT OFFICE BUILDING 7OO AIRPORT BOI'LEVARD. In a communication dated April 28, L978, Mrs. Schrager recommended the above consolldation in the- City of Burlingame as a method of time and money savings to the City and lts citizens. Mayor_Crosby. announced that Mrs. S-hrager withdiew her request to Pursue it at the State Ieve I , t At the regular meeting of March 20 Environmental Impact Report (EIR), L978, City Council certified 45-P with conditions for this Pro- ELECTION STUDY AREA PERMITS 1_63 ject. Council also considered Study Area Permit filed by developer and, by motion unanimously carried, tabled permit awaiting Blayney Associates report. Mayor Crosby removed item from the table. He requested com- ment from City Planner. Latter referred to communicattonsreceived and transmitted to Council, i.e., May 3 letter fromCarl Holvick Company, I'[ay t0 from Cecil H. Wells, Jr., May llfrom Madrone Associates. He advised that project sponsor andhis associates were present and available for questioning. Mayor Crosby recognized Mr. WeIls who stated this applicationis the same type of permit the City Council addressed earlierthis evening tb protbct Ctty for airy office building development.This applicant has gone through all of the mechanics of submit-tals required by City. At this time, developer requests con-sideration to approval of a Study Area Permit. Also, Madrone Associates would be grateful for final action on EIR adequacy. City Planner, in response to Mayor Crosbyno problems with EIR. He recommended thathe three questions ratsed at hearing on EIR document. ,t EI reported there were copies of answers to R be added to final Councilman Martin recommended that action on permit be delayeduntil Blayney report is received, which will be shortly. Mr. Wells maintained that all of Blayneyts reports designatedthe subject area for office building use, as did Planning Com-mission at its study sessions. Concerning landscaping, Mr. Wells reported that developer is fully aware of its importance,not only from City requtrements, but from the standpoint ofrental success. He referred to Ftgure 3, EIR, where L8r797 sq.ft. of landscaping is indicated, almost half an acre. City Planner stated in Findings of Exhibit A (EIR) gested that detail- landscape plans be submitted atto Planning Commission. Planner reported a trade-onegotiated whereby landscaping can be increased on Boulevard frontage by providing one row of compactnet gain of 3 parking spaces and 3' additional land it was sug-a later dateff has beenAirport cars with a scaping. Mr. Wells stated developer has agreed to develop the area between lagoon and his building into a path area subject to revievl and approval of City staff. This represents quite an additional area beyond their property that they intend to improve. ALI of thisis part of EIR. Mr. Keyston addressed Council, stating it was his under Council had instructed the City Attorney to amend tl;re zto provide for special permit applications for office bin C-4 District. If that is done, this project will su developer will suffer. He has invested between $8000 t standing oning code uildingsffer, theo $I0,000to comply with EIR process. Project has been modified in every vray possible in an effort to comply with concerns and objectivesstated by City. Mr. Keyston considered there were extenuating circumstances here which could lead to consideration of this pro-ject at this time. Mayor Crosby commented there was no way of knowtng what the votemight be if the permit were considered now. He suggested itmight be wise to delay. Mr. Ke bJ,e4P v 1- ston stated it appears Blaration date of urgency ord yney report will not be f inal i-zed inance with the result developer must start over again under a new ordinance. Counc ordinance and is there a way t the project he developey Attorney noted appltcation started under prior ordinance.his.opinion, !t-would-be inappropriate to require appticant toty for a special permit. !il ll cirIn aPp lrrFc- new @*,ea-dAila&&-.il. . t64 Councilwoman Barton considered it would having the opportuni which City will pay Counc ilman Amstrup roished the property as a whole. deve lopment s . stated she had no objection to project but be stupidity on her part to approve before ty to read final installment of report for $35, ooo . to He read Blayneyts recommendations for opposed considering individual Mr. Keyston comnented there will be another office building in the bayfront area, unless there are to be 80 acres of resldential. City Attorney commented that Mr. Keyston raises a cautlon. Att6rney rec'ommended that, before tLe end of the urgency ordinance period irn July 6, City Counctt deny the permtt or, with- appLicant rs ionsent, continue it under the stuily area ptocess. IIe stated that Council can take those actions nolr or can table the application. Mr. Keyston commented this was the first time he ever felt that he had been treated unfairly by the City. Councilman Martinrs motion to table to the regular meeting of July 3 was seconded by Councilman AmstruP, carried unanimously on voice vote. 2, HANSEN-COLE DEVELOPMENT, L6OO-I638 GILBRETH ROAD At a regular meeting on April L7, L978, approved a Study Area Permit subject to easement on adjacent property. City CounciL unanimous Ly resoLution of L2 foot Mayor Crosby acknowledged communication dated May lL, 1978 from Cabak Associates, architects for project, advistng that easement has been acquired and wilL be recorded forthwith. Project will proceed in accordance with plan approved by City Council . L. City l,lanager: Chief of Police request placement motorcycLe. for purchase of re- Communication from Chief of Police to City }4anager, Ylay L2, 1978, requested permission to transfer $3550 from department salary account to capital outlay for purchase of replacement motorcycLe. Chief reported cycle is ln poor condition due to age and mileage. City l"{anager considered replacement proper at this tine from standpoint of economy and recommended approval. There was some objection on Council ts part to using funds earmarked for salary. Councilman Amstrupts recommendation that transfer be made from contingency fund, since general fund recelves Motor Vehicle in lieu monies from State was accepted. City Manager was authorized to proceed on that basis. RESOLUTIONS l. In memorandum dated l.lay 11, 1978, City l,Ianager reported that a new contract for furnishing of uniforms has been negotiated whereby City will save several thousand dollars over prior contract. He recommended approval of agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 26-78 Rental With Complete U "Authorizing Execution Of Contract For Uniform niform Rental" was lntroduced by Councilman Mangini, who moved adoption, second by CounciLwoman Barton, carried There were no objections from Council . Item was ordered removed from agenda . STAFF MEMORANDIJM L65 unanimously on rolL call. 2. In memorandum of May 10, 1978, Director of Public l,Iorks reported to City Manager on status of contract amendment to provide for a Bett Filter Press in connection with Solids Management Project. City Manager, in memorandum to Council , May 11, recommended approval and execution of amended con-tract as presented by Director of Public Works. RESOLUTION NO. 27-78 Engineeri.ng AgreemEnt ment Project ( SLudge) man Martin, who moved unanimously carried on transmitted comments on final report o prehensive Water Resources Management consideration to inclusion in resoLuti viously discussed by Council as areas under date of May 4, endorsed form of conditions of approval . 'rAuthorizing Execution 0f Amendment To For Design Of Belt Press-SoLids Manage- C-06-1267-L20" was introduced by Council- adoption, second by Councilman Amstrup,roll call. 3. BESOLUTIqN NO.28:ft "Recommending That Ox Mountain Refuse o i s p6TETTFRZ-ma-'ffi-r n- P r iv a t e ow ne rE h i p " wa s i n t r o d uc e d b y Councilman Amstrup, who moved adoption, second by Councilman Mangini, unanimously carried on rolI call. 4. Director of Public Works memorandum of May 4 to City ManagerfS P1a onof res an l4ateo County Com-n. Director suggestedfive conditions pre -concern. City Manager,olution Listing Cityrs RESOLUTIoN NO. 29-78 Ratif ytng, With Conditions, Ihe Adoption Of-The eornpreEensfiE Water Resources Management PLan Of San Mateo County" was introduced by Councilman Martin, who moved adoption, second by Councilwoman Barton, unantmously carried on ro 11 call. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 30-78 Ag reeme nt t rae Solids Management Fac ilit duced by Councilman Amstru v,roman Barton, unanimous Ly 'huthorizing Execution Of Joint Powersor Construction And Operation 0f Jointies (Sludge) C-LO-L267-120" was intro-p, who moved adoptlon, second by Council-carried on roll calL. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 3L-78 "Accepting Water System Improvements Job No.47:2" was antiotluc ed by Councllwoman Barton, who moved adoption, second by Councilman Amstrup, carried unanimously onroll call. ORDINANCES 1. Seqqnd Rqading 0RDINANCE No. 1126 "ordinance Amendi ng Section2s.12.0lroE Th e BurLingame Municipal Co de And The Zoning Maps Therein Incorporated By Reclassifying Lot 3, Block 2, Burl ingame Park No. 2 From First Restdential (n-I) Oistrict To Third Residential(R-3) Districr. " Declaring the hearing open, Mayor Crosby invited comments from thefloor. There were none. Hearing was declared closed. 0n motion of Councilman Amstrup, second by Councilwoman Barton, Ordinance No. 1126 passed its second reading and was unanimously adopted on roll call. 2. Introduction Memotandum of Ma y L0, 1978 from Associate Civil Engineei TiEnsm'itted to City Manager draft ordinance proposing toalter three section of Municipal Code dealing with Fees. CityManager, under date of May 11, recommended procedural changes pre- sented by Public Works . "Concerning Fees._For Sidewalks, Curbs, Driveways, oachment Permitsrr was introduced for first read- ORDINANCE NO. 1127 Excavations And Encring by Councilman Mangini. 166 UNFINISHED BUSINESS t. United Days Chairperson:y Manager reported that in-duties involved in thiscir andform@sfunction will be forthcoming. 2. Stop Sigq Middle of Slleet at Tqp of lfoqqdtle DriveiCoun@Ehis sifnls down afain.is a State sign, he asked Director of Public l,lorks Caltrans concerning some form of curb barrier. PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Crosby announced the following: 3. Aooointments to FiLL Commission Vacancies: Mavor Crosbyanno e established to conduct necessary intervie$s: Councilmen Amstrup and Martin, Library candidates, Mayor and Counc ilvJoman Barton, Beauttfication' Councilman Mang lni and Counc ih,,oman Barton, Traffic, Safety Park- ing Commission. Staff is to furnish applications to the members of the committees. SinCe t histo confer with Public Works Week, llay 2L-27, MunicipaL Clerks Week, May L4-20. Commending Reserve Officer Kevin Collopy, BurLingame Police Re- serve Unit, for His Performance in L977 and Designating Him Re- serve Officer of the Year. Recognizing Joe ALiamus rs Forty Years of.Life Savlng, and Service to the City of BurLingame. Commending Catholic Service Auxiliary of San Mateo County. APPROVALS I,larrants Nos. 002299 through 002630, duly audited, in the amount ot $477,13L.55, approved for payment on motion of Councilman Mangini second by Councilman Martin, all aye voice vote. Payroll, April, 1978, Check Nos. 2458 through 3t46 in.ttte of- $373,430.08, approved on motion of Councilman Mangini, by Councilman Martin, all aye voice vote. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Eme rge ncy Soc ia L amount second Communicatton undated from Larry R. Green, 623 Chestnut Avenue, San Bruno, suggesting that Shorebird Sanctuary between ,Benihanaof Tokyo restiirant ind Charlie Brown Restaurant be dedicated as a memoriil to Dr. Norman C. Fox, c onservat ionis t , who worked dil- igently to save the small marsh section. Mr. Green suggested an aiaitiirn to the existing sign roith the legend "Dr. Norman C. Fox Shorebird Sanctuary. " He also indicated that Sequola Chapter of Audobon would be hlppy to pay cost of alterations. Mayor Crosby referred communicatlon to Beautification Commission. Negative Declarations submitted by City Planner under date of May 15. City Manager memo of l'Iay 11: Progress on Crossing Guard Inter- section Analysis. City Attorney report May 8, on League City Attorneyrs Department Meeting I,Ia y 3 through 5th, San Diego . City Treasurer memorandum May 5 on suggested revisions to Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax. City Planner sumrnary of Planning Commission meeting May 8, 1978. Treasurer's report, Aprit 30, 1978, Minutes: Beautification Comuission April 6, Ptanning Commission Apxi,L 24, L978. ADJ0URNImNT: l2:30 A.M. Respectf ully submitted Eve yn ty er