HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PR - 2021.05.20R C1TfY
ti o� `ls
Rvoawreo
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
APPROVED Meeting Minutes
Regular Meeting on Thursday, May 20, 2021
1. CALL TO ORDER
The duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called
to order by Vice -Chair Holzman at 7:00 pm via Zoom meeting.
2. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Milne, Holzman, Chang, Matthews (left at 8:20 pm), Lee
Ardito & Pappaj ohn
Parks & Recreation Director Glomstad, Recreation Manager
Acquisti, Recreation Coordinators Sanchez, Recording
Secretary Helley
Rachel Visscher, Karen Verpeet, Erica Strohmeier, Will
Johnson and various members of the public to comment on
Item 7a.
Commissioner Matthews made a motion to approve the April minutes. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Milne and was approved. 5-0-2 (Ardito & Pappajohn absent).
4. CORRESPONDENCE
None
5. PRESENTATION — 410 AIRPORT BLVD. PROJECT
Presenting the project at 410 Airport Blvd is Rachel Visscher and Karen Verpeet with HT Harvey &
Associates, Erica Strohmeier with Sera Architects, and Will Johnson with The Sphere Institute. Ms.
Visscher presented background on the project. In 2017, The Sphere Institute, next door to the property, is
a health policy research non-profit organization, and they submitted a park project application to the State
Lands Commission. In 2019, Sphere was awarded a short-term lease on the property, which extends to
2023. During which time, Sphere will maintain the site in its current condition and ensure public safety,
design a park project, complete the CEQA planning process, acquire funding, and apply for a long-term
lease of approximately 49 years. The design process is expected to take two years. The goals include
connecting communities to the bay and provide amenities for recreation; to restore tidal marsh and marsh
uplands transition zone habitats, and demonstrating a nature -based approach to sea -level rise resiliency with
a focus on educational programming. The proposed design includes walking/bike trails, picnic and fishing
area, boardwalks, an overlook grove, lawn, and kitesurfing rigging area with mow curb, a universal kayak
launch, a natural tidal marsh area, and a one-way parallel parking area, and an educational center with
restrooms and a small over the counter shop. The full presentation can be viewed on the video for the
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
meeting here at minute 3:50:
https://burlin.am�eca.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip id=1077
Commissioner Lee liked the idea of the development and asked what the cost of the project was and who
was funding it. Mr. Johnson stated three grants had been received for the planning costs from the EPA, the
State Wildlife Conservation Board, and the Measure AA San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority totally
$1.5 million. Total construction costs will be approximately $20 million for which grant funding is
available, and there will be fundraising as well.
Commissioner Milne thanked the group for the presentation and appreciated the parking lot concept that
won't feel like a parking lot. He asked when the construction would conclude. Karen noted the project
would be approximately three construction seasons. They will know more after the design phase. Milne
also inquired if the education center would be open to the public or have permanent exhibits. Rachel noted
the center would have various uses, rental options, open to the public, and a small over-the-counter cafe.
Vice -Chair Holzman appreciated the well -thought-out approach to the project and thanked the presenters
for the informative presentation of the project.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
7. OLD BUSINESS
a. Expansion of Pickleball Court Options
Recreation Coordinator Sanchez introduced himself and provided background on the item. At the
April 15, 2021, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, staff presented various options to
enhance the pickleball opportunities throughout Burlingame. At the presentation, there was general
support for a majority of the concepts from the Commissioners. As a result, staff surveyed the
pickleball community to obtain data on which options were most supported. Additionally, staff
engaged in research on the potential fiscal impact of the various options and the operational shifts
each would require. Sanchez noted that staff has also continued to receive correspondence from
the community on a desire for more pickleball options in Burlingame.
While there were many pickleball players who do like to play as much as possible, the survey
results demonstrated that most people play a few times a week, around two hours per day. While
most respondents favored weekday mornings, 37% did express weekend time being their
preference.
When evaluating additional outdoor blacktop location preferences, the overall ranking is as
follows (1 being the highest preference):
1. Village Park
2. Pershing Park
3. Cuernavaca Park
4. Victoria Park
Considering the cost of stripping a court for pickleball, staff recommends selecting two blacktop
locations that could accommodate the addition of six pickleball courts. The courts could serve as
alternative locations where members of the public could bring their own pickleball equipment and
play when drop -in pickleball is not offered, including weekends.
2
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
Sanchez reported that staff gathered information regarding the interest in playing indoor pickleball
at The Burlingamer, an indoor sports facility that the Burlingame Soccer Club (BSC) operates.
65% of respondents expressed they were interested in playing at The Burlingame once or twice a
week, while another 25% mentioned they would be interested in playing three or four days per
week. Considering these responses, staff suggest pickleball could occur at The Burlingamer on
Monday and, Wednesday mornings, from 9 am —12 pm. A majority of respondents mentioned that
they would like to have flexibility in the payment options, preferring the flexibility for daily drop -
in fees and weekly/monthly memberships. Following the survey results, staff spoke with BSC
leadership and the cost of operating at the facility was quoted at $50 per hour by the BSC Board.
Based off operational costs and projected participants, The Burlingamer would offer pickleball for
a daily drop -in fee of $7 and "punch card" system where players could pay for multiple dates in
advance and use at their convenience during the scheduled times. BSC leadership expressed a clear
desire to help build on the interest of pickleball in town and mentioned they understand it does
take time for new programs to gain popularity. Should The Burlingamer prove to be a popular
location, BSC staff would be free to expand to Fridays and weekends if desired.
In an effort to confirm that the location works well for pickleball, staff plans to host drop -in
pickleball at The Burlingamer on Wednesday, May 26. Staff will invite the pickleball community
to tour the venue and provide an opportunity to have a trial of pickleball at the indoor location.
Based off the response to that experience, staff will work with BSC leadership to acquire the
necessary equipment, add pickleball lines to The Burlingamer floor and market the program. Once
the program begins, BSC leadership will manage indoor pickleball. Opportunities exist for
continued partnerships, including offering pickleball lessons, tournaments and leagues.
Sanchez noted that staff initially recommended adding two pickleball courts on one tennis court.
However, when hearing about the safety concerns from the players and a desire to make the courts
available for pickleball without the public transporting nets, staff recommends that two
Washington park tennis courts be lined to have one pickleball court each.
A net has been purchased and tested a ConVert aNet tennis net adjuster that lowers the tennis court
net to the appropriate pickleball height. With these available to pickleball players, tennis courts
could be adjusted for pickleball. As a fee -based program, staff could set up and break down all
five locations during the reserved time; the Washington Park Sports Court (3) and Washington
Tennis Courts 3 and 4. This would take place on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 10 am — 1 pm.
Staff recommends reinstituting the $5 drop -in fee for these days. If approved, staff will formulate
operational plan to collect revenue.
The tennis courts could also be used for pickleball at other times; however, pickleball players
would need to supply their own conversion system. Pickleball players would have the same access
to the courts that tennis players have. Courts could be used in a first come -first -serve capacity, or
members of the public could pay to reserve a court for a fee. If the addition of pickleball on the
tennis courts results in significant queues, staff will install racquet racks that indicate who is next
in line for a court. Staff can also install a timer system that will allow for a ninety -minute count to
begin as soon as someone starts to wait for a court occupied by other drop -in users.
3
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
As with past practices, there are times when the courts would not be available for drop -in use. This
includes tennis camps, tennis lessons and USTA Team Matches. These events typically take place
on weekday mornings.
Sanchez recommends the Parks and Recreation Commission provide direction on the following
recommendations: Adding pickleball courts at: Village Park (3); Pershing Park (3); Washington
Park Tennis Courts #3 and #4 (2).
He also recommended to shift the pickleball operations from the Washington Park sport court on
Mondays and Wednesdays to The Burlingamer; and to reinstate a fee based drop -in pickleball at
Washington Park on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Vice -Chair opened public comments and ask that any correspondence on the item be read into the
minutes.
Correspondence via email was received by the following:
Mark Kelley: "I travel around the country and there are indoor and outdoor places to play pickle
ball almost everywhere I go. I am surprised that in Burlingame there are hardly any options. Pickle
ball is only going to grow in popularity. With SFO and hotels so close, a lot of travelers like me
love playing while away from home. We don't leave home without our paddle. Pickle ball is so
much more social than and not as intimidating as tennis. Pickle ball is the future for many towns
and cities. People will get out of their hotel rooms and play pickleball, then go shopping in down
town Burlingame. Sounds like good revenue for Burlingame."
Kristine Jacobson: "The tennis courts in Burlingame are already pretty severely impacted and I
would not be interested in the option that lines the tennis courts and further reduces availability."
Janet Chan Fricke via Juanita Lucero: "It occurs to me that there is a rush by the Burl Rec to
make this a fee -based activity. While I completely understand the business side and I might be
missing something here, there isn't any president to charge players for open play in a public park.
Tennis and Basketball don't pay extra fees for open play, so why pickleball should be singled
out? While asphalt surface might be acceptable to beginners (and some locals) as an overflow
stopgap, the more accomplished players (bulk of the community) will gravitate to the better
developed and frequented venues that do not impose fees beyond the property taxes we all pay. If
Burlingame starts off with the wrong assumptions, the master strategy might find disappointment.
Players will go where they want to play and find the best experience. I am also opposed paying a
fee for pickleball in a public park. If it was a truly dedicated pickleball court(s) that would be
different. Local Bay Area public parks (Stern Grove, Presidio Wall, Louis Sutter and Foster City)
do not require a fee to play. Here's a recent photo taken on 5/10/21 of "Hill Recreation Area" in
Novato with 6 new dedicated pickleball courts open to non-residents without any fees. One thing
that has not been addressed is the fact that while pickleball players are on overcrowded courts
every Monday and Wednesday, the tennis courts are empty. This video,
https://photos.app.aoo.al/mm45ZNh71EgAUx8S9, was taken on May 5, at 11:00, but the situation
is like this every time I look in the courts during pickleball playing time on Mondays and
Wednesdays."
4
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
Joanne Stenberg: "As a longtime resident of Burlingame I discourage the use of Pershing Park
for a Pickle Ball court. Pershing Park is a little jewel of beauty and tranquility in our neighborhood
which attracts families with young children who come from all over Burlingame to enjoy the
playground, the beautiful grounds and the safe, quiet, calm of the area. It was closed during Covid
and now the stream of strollers has begun and the playground is full of happy children and adults
every day and all day. Over the years the two blocks of Howard Avenue west of El Camino Real
has become a main artery for traffic from Hillsborough and Burlingame Hills going to El Camino
and the freeways and to downtown Burlingame. Many people park on Howard for dining and
shopping. There is no parking on the north side of street except for Sundays. Parking is limited to
2 hours parking on the south side. Sunday parking on these 2 blocks is jammed. Opening this park
to Pickle Ball games will attract more people and cars than this area can accommodate. The
peaceful, safe atmosphere of the Park that attracts young families will be gone. Please do not let
this happen to this unique lovely space which we all treasure."
Brian Roche: "My name is Brian Roche and I live at 1557 Newlands Ave. I just want to let you
know we strongly are against adding any pickle ball courts to Pershing Park. I've looked out at
Pershing Park for the last 16 years. We are quite happy not changing that. Pershing Park is a park
for families with young kids Sicklebill does not fall into that category. Pickle ball is noisy plus
will attract more mature people and teens and probably scare away the young families that
currently frequent the park. We currently have issues with teens hanging out in the park well after
dark we really don't want to add to that. Also pickle ball is so noisy plus cheering from players for
that reason alone it really should not be considered for this location due to the close proximity to
people's residences. Plus, all the additional traffic and parking issues. For parking the City needs
to add 2-hour parking on Crescent Ave in front of the park over to Howard Ave. What's happening
is people are parking their cars in the morning and getting picked up by someone else and returning
in the evening. These cars are taking up available parking spaces for Park users. What is then
happening they are parking on Newlands Avenue on both sides of the street? I have also seen
people just drop construction trucks in the evening driver gets picked up by somebody else and
they leave the truck overnight. This happens quite regularly. As a resident of this area and I also
speak for a few of my neighbors we are happy not to change the existing character of Pershing
Park. By adding pickle ball courts, it would totally change Pershing Park from been such a nice
quite family friendly kids park and would become an overcrowded very noisy very busy park. It's
really not the right location for Pickle ball courts so please be considerate to the residents who will
be mostly impacted by this decision."
Kathy & Irvine Holmes: "As a resident across the street from the Park, I oppose the installation
of Pickle ball courts for the many reasons enumerated by my neighbors in their letter. The park
is already very heavily used and parking is a joke making it difficult for residents already. This
will only add to the inconvenience and traffic to a very heavily used area. I am emailing regarding
our strong opposition to the possibility Pickleball Court(s) at Pershing Park. We are very opposed
to putting Pickleball court(s) at Pershing Park due to the decreased safety, negative impact on
children, and overcrowding to the entire Burlingame Park neighborhood. We have owned our
home on Crescent Avenue Burlingame, directly across from Pershing Park for 27 years. It has
always been a wonderful neighborhood park, ideally suited for young families. Here are the
reasons, we believe Pickleball courts at Pershing Park would be a very bad idea, and have a
negative impact on:
5
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
1). Safety to the neighborhood - Pickleball, a high demand sport with few available courts, would
attract people from all over Burlingame and beyond. Our quiet hamlet and local Pershing Park
would become a more highly trafficked area by adults from all over. Pershing Park is one block
off El Camino, where there is a public bus stop. In the past, neighbors have lobbied not to have a
bathroom put in the park due to the potential of the bathroom used by homeless in the
area. Because of the proximity to Burlingame Avenue, and the exposure to crowds outside
Burlingame, it has been a neighborhood goal to keep this park low profile and safer.
2). Play space for children - We see every day (because our front porch looks out on the park),
the Pershing Park blacktop used with great frequency by children for bike riding, kickball games,
basketball, and games of imagination. It is a very friendly and safe park for young children, and
there are not as many play areas in the neighborhood for children. Young Burlingame children
need this dedicated space in Pershing Park!
3). Park age demographics would shift from children to adults: The vast majority of Pickleball
players are adults. We enjoy playing Pickleball and go to Foster City (which is convenient due to
the large # of courts). Our experience playing is that 95% of the Pickleball players are adults, with
very few families or children playing. Pickleball courts at Pershing Park would cause more adults
to hang out there, which would have a negative impact on the young children focus and safety.
4). Lack of Parking: There is not nearly enough current parking for people who come to Pershing
Park, particularly in the summer. The parking space in front of our house on Crescent is always
used by park attendees, because the Burlingame Police Dept. has been asked, but will not put a
two-hour parking signs on Crescent. This drives much traffic to Crescent Avenue. Currently,
many people from Safeway and other retail outlets come to park all day on Crescent Avenue,
because it is the only non "Two Hour Parking" street in the surrounding area. Pickleball would
bring several more cars daily in front of our overcrowded street, Crescent Avenue.
5). Pershing Park is too small for a Pickleball Court(s): Pershing Park is much smaller than
Village or Washington Park, which could accommodate Pickleball Courts with relatively little
impact. The available space is much, much smaller than Village or Washington
Park: Washington Park can handle several Pickleball courts, as can Village Park and
Cuernavaca. One or two of the Burlingame tennis courts near the High School could also be turned
into Pickleball courts.
6). Basketball courts are enjoyed and needed in our neighborhood: Our family and another
Pershing Park neighbor were responsible for asking for the basketball courts at Pershing over two
decades ago. These basketball courts are used all the time by children, young people and
families. The next most local basketball courts are at Washington Park. A Pershing Park
Pickleball court would take away one or more basketball courts, not to mention the tennis
backboard, which are all used.
Thank you for hearing our real concerns about Pickleball court(s) in our neighborhood at Pershing
Park."
Evan Krasts: "I live at 1548 Newlands Ave, adjacent to Pershing Park. I'd like to thank you for
the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposal to add pickleball courts to Pershing Park. I
6
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
am submitting the attached letter co -signed by 16 nearby residents in firm opposition to adding
any pickleball courts to the park. We believe adding courts will unfairly impact nearby residents,
change the character of the park for the worse, and be out of step with the goals laid out in the
2020 Parks Master Plan. We urge you to find another, more appropriate location."
Comments from those in attendance:
Kathy Schmidt thanked the commission for the opportunity to speak. She lives around the corner
form Pershing Park. We have a special community and a special park. The idea of having a
pickleball court given the popularity of it here within our neighborhood would bring in a lot of
traffic which is a concern of our neighborhood both in terms of the impact to parking and to safety.
Howard Ave is a thoroughfare for Hillsborough and the corner of Crescent and Howard is already
a dangerous corner that has been improved by signage. People are drawn to this park because of
the nature of the park mostly used by families and young children.
Evan Krasts read the letter that was submitted with 16 signatures from Pershing Park neighbors.
"We, as residents living near Pershing Park, have significant concerns with the proposal of adding
pickleball courts to Pershing Park. Pershing Park is a small neighborhood park, closely surrounded
by homes. As such, it is not suitable for a feature like a pickleball court. Pickleball is a noisy sport.
The hard paddle and ball produce a sharp, repetitive sound during gameplay. Cheers and shouts
from players add to the overall noise level. Combined with pickleball's growing popularity, this
could mean a constant stream of noise in the neighborhood throughout any given day. It is well
documented that placing courts in residential areas often draws complaints and even lawsuits from
residents who are impacted. A bit of online research on noise abatement indicates that courts within
350 feet of residences often require noise abatement. Courts within 150 feet require careful noise
abatement. This not only reflects that noise is indeed a problem, but suggests that significant noise
abatement would be required at Pershing Park, as there are several homes within 150 feet of the
blacktop area. Any noise abatement structure would be unsightly and change the character of the
park in a negative way. The Burlingame Parks Master Plan adopted in 2020, defines Pershing Park
as part of a "Park Cluster" designed to serve local, residential neighborhoods. The park's
description on Burlingame.org describes the park as "designed to serve families with young
children... for informal play experiences for individuals and small groups". Neither of these
descriptions is consistent with the installation of pickleball courts for regular use by the broader
community. This is much better suited to one of the "Recreation Hubs" envisioned in the Parks
Plan. Finally, in the April 15 PRC meeting minutes, Recreation Coordinator Sanchez correctly
noted that there is "quite a slope" on the Pershing Park blacktop, making it a less -than -ideal option
to begin with. In conclusion, we understand the desire for pickleball courts in Burlingame, but
believe that Pershing Park is not a good location due to significant noise impacts on residents and
the impact it will have on the character of the park itself. If the park is already considered a less
than ideal physical location for a court, we wonder why it is even under consideration. We strongly
oppose putting any pickleball courts at Pershing Park. Thank you, Shawna and Evan Krasts (1548
Newlands Ave.) Diane Russell and Ward Supplee (1546 Newlands Ave.) Duncan and Amy
Grenier (1575 Newlands Ave.) David and Katherine Gerster (1540 Newlands Ave.) Rachel Perkel
(112 Crescent Ave.)
Laura and Mark Gschwind (1553 Newlands Ave.) Barbara and Terry Freethy (125 Crescent Ave.)
Wenjing Zhang and Yuanming Shan (146 Crescent Ave.) Kathy Schmidt (1512 Howard Ave.)
Brian and Adele Roche (1557 Newlands Ave.)"
7
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
Orla stated her opposition to adding pickleball courts to Pershing Park. She would like to maintain
the nature of the park as it is.
Adrienne Leigh thanked staff and Commission for bringing this item onto the agenda. She
requested that the drop -in days at Washington Park not be changed as they are popular. She also
noted the USTA has been promoting the use of blended lines on courts for pickleball use. She
agreed with striping all four courts at Washington Park courts. She is in favor of fees for seniors,
resident, non-resident etc. She feels Saturday & Sunday play times would much appreciated by
those who cannot play during the week.
Carlo lives across the street from the blacktop at Pershing Park and that due to noise and traffic
the addition of pickleball courts would not be a good idea.
Elaine McPherson has lived near Pershing Park since 1969 and has been very involved in the
development and changes of the park over the years. We hope it will continue to be a family park,
please try to keep it that way.
Jack thanked Recreation Sanchez for all his work and Commissioners Milne and Pappajohn for
coming out to see what pickleball is all about with the pros and cons. Regarding putting pickleball
lines on tennis courts, he agrees with putting two courts on each side of the tennis net. The eight -
foot limitation is only enforced during tournaments. Typically, four to six feet is plenty of ground
behind the baseline. We could accommodate more players this way. He really wants to support
the weekend option of play time.
Vice Chair Holzman closed public comment and opened Commission discussion.
Commissioner Milne asked if we put down pickleball lines with less than eight feet of space would
that be a liability for the city. Glomstad noted the issue would have to be run by the risk manager
in the City Attorney's office. Milne noted he is leaning toward lining all the courts at Washington
and the blacktop at Village Park. He also would like to develop the Burlingamer option, in addition
to facilitating the option of renting strap kits for users once we are back to normal renting of
equipment. Milne stated once we line the blacktop at Village we would quickly find out if users
are using the surface to play. It may turn out the surface it not optimal and would get very little
use and that would determine if we line other blacktop surfaces in the city. Milne also noted this
does not have to be our only pass at the resolution for this issue.
Commissioner Lee is also in favor of lining all the courts at Washington Park. And due to no
comments of opposition for the Village Park option, she recommends lining the blacktop there as
well and to notice the neighborhoods around Victoria and Cuernavaca Parks and see what the
comments are and feels the parks are fairly noisy and would be interested to hear their input.
Commissioner Chang noted he had visited nearby cities to see what their pickleball situations were
and he saw the momentum of the increasing popularity pickleball at most courts he visited. He
also noted the game is louder that tennis and could see noise complaint issues in the smaller
neighborhoods. Chang said he would not say that the lack of response for Village Park would
mean they are okay with a court at the park as there are a lot of shared similarities between the two
8
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
parks such as lack of parking, closeness to residential, and blacktops. Village Park is similar to
that of Pershing Park and they would have the same issues as stated by neighbors for Pershing
Park here tonight.
Commissioner Holzman felt we can do this in phases and conduct more research. She likes the
idea of the Burlingamer for windy days, wintertime and the noise. Holzman would like to revisit
the weekend opportunities. Glomstad noted if there is an addition of pickleball courts at
Washington Park tennis courts then this will provide the weekend opportunities.
Commissioners agreed that the game of pickleball is louder than tennis and this would be impactful
on tennis courts that are in small neighborhoods.
MOTION: Commissioner Milne made a motion to add pickleball lines on all four tennis
courts at Washington Park. The motion was seconded by Commission Chang and was
approved. 4-0-3 (Ardito, Matthews & Pappajohn absent).
MOTION: Commissioner Milne made a motion to put one court of pickleball lines on the
blacktop at Village Park. The motion was seconded by Commission Lee and failed to pass.
2-2-3 (Ardito, Matthews & Pappajohn absent).
MOTION: Commissioner Milne made a motion to reinstate the pickleball drop -in
fee/program of $5 at Washington Park on Monday and Wednesdays with the option to
expand if the program becomes popular. The motion was seconded by Commission Chang
and was approved. 4-0-3 (Ardito, Matthews & Pappajohn absent).
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
9. STAFF AND COMMISSIONER REPORTS
a) Parks & Recreation Department Reports
Director Glomstad reported a new event, called Gallery on the Green will take place on June 5
from 1 Oam to 1 pm at the front of Washington Park. It highlights the Department's contract artists,
however, any artist can participate by reaching out to the Department Recreation Coordinators.
The Concert in the Park series resumes on Friday evenings from 6-8 pm with the first concert on
June 18 featuring the band The Sun Kings, a Beatles tribute band. Upcoming will be a Craft Market
which will take the place of Art on the Avenue. The event will run from 10 am to 6pm on the
Saturday and Sunday following each concert.
b) Commissioners Reports
Commissioner Milne — Reported he tried playing pickleball and found it fun. He recommends it.
Commissioner Lee — Reported she is on the Burlingame Community Center Capital Campaign
which has raised approximately $800,000 to date. Donations to the fund will have the opportunity
to name rooms in the new facility or purchase a tile for the surrounding patio.
9
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes May 20, 2021
Commissioner Chang — No report.
Commissioner Holzman — Reported the 80's themed Night Under the Stars event was a fun time.
10. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Fenced in off -leash area at Ray Park
11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:42 pm.
The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday,
June 17, 2021, at 7:00 pm via zoom webinar.
Respectfully submitted,
Joleen Helley
Recording Secretary
10
Parks & Recreation Commission
APPROVED Minutes
May 20, 2021