HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1979.06.18372
BURLINGAI\,IE, CALIFORNIA
June 18, 1979
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the
above date in the City HaIl Council- Chambers. Meeting was ca11ed
to order at B:09 P.M. by Mayor Irving S. Amstrup.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA,NCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Charles F. Schwalm, City Manager.
ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
}4INUTES
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
AMSTRUP, BARTON,
MANGINI (Excused,
CROSBY, MARTIN
vacation)
The minutes of the regular meeting of June 4, and the study and
adjourned regular meeting of June 6, 1979 were approved and
adopted.
HEARING
1. REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF 18'HEIGHT LIMIT, LOT L, MILLS CANYON
COURT BY MR. SHOWKI K. JADALLAH, OWNER
Mr. Jadallahrs communication of June 11, L979 requested this
hearing be rescheduled for Council meeti-ng of July 2, L979.
had no objection and Mayor Amstrup so ordered.
Council
CORRESPONDENCE
JA}.TES E. BLACK, SUPERINTENDENT,
SALE OF PERSHING SCHOOL LOTS.
BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT RE
This item considered out of agenda order because of large number
of people in audience interested.
Mayor Amstrup read in ful1 letter of June 12, L979 from James E.
Black, Superintendent, Burlingame School Dj-strict, announcing
Schoo1 Board's interest in pursuing sale of lots with Burlingame
City Council's representatives and the appointment of Mr. Herman
Fitzgerald and Dr. Donald Kay as representatives to meet with the
City.
Mayor Amstrup announced School Board's price of approximatellz
$85,000 per lot, and Cityrs intention to discuss with the School
Board.
Ms. Carol Clark, L543 Cypress, presented Council with an additionalpetition, containj-ng 200 signatures, asking City to buy lots for
plalzground. She went on to read statement from Heather Sterner,
1561 Ralston, suggesting methods of City purchase.
Mrs. Dorothy Cusick, former Councilwoman, l7L6 Ralston, thanked
Council for their decision to meet with School Board, and emphasized
need for playground. She suggested sale of unused City-owned lots
to finance purchase, and stated it was not necessary to improve
these two lots - merely leave them fenced and asphalted.
Mayor Amstrup announced his appointment of Councilwoman Barton
and Councilman Crosby as a connrnittee to meet with Dr. Kay and Mr.
Fitzgerald, with a report back to Council.
Council-man Martin noted the probable effect of the Gann amendment
Dry,O'D
and asked that interestedIot maintenance.
group suggest how City can pay cost of
Mr. Edw. Larios, 1536 Barroilhet, urged this purchase for
youngsters even if City must sacrifice.
Mr. Ed Taylor, 701 Burlingame Avenue, suggested lots could be
maj-ntained by volunteer labor.
Mayor Amstrup stated report of committee to Council would receive
advance publicity.
PRESENTATION
1. MR. HUGH PAGE, TREASURER, CTA CREDIT UNION: SIDEWALK OBSTRUCTIONS,
}4AGNOLIA AVENUE
Letter of June 6, 1979 from Mr. Ilugh Page, Tlreasurer, California
Teachers' Association, 1825 Magnolia Avenue, stated the Association's
concerns with the deplorable condition of sidewal-ks on Magnolia
Avenue because of use as permanent storage areas by Petrini's and
Longs.
Mr. Page addressed Council citing ordinance prohibiting blockage of
sidewalks. He said debris bins are on Magnolia a1so, one of which
takes up one of the premanent parking places. They are an attractive
nuisance and a hazard. Debris on sidewal-ks constitutes a health
hazard and vehicles block the street.
Area merchants have given up on this long-Iasting situation, and he
urged definite Cit.y action.
Council discussed at length, considering warnings and/or punitive
action. It was decided the Pol-ice Department should immediately
start citation program against blockage of the street; and the City
Attorney should obtain injunction for health hazard on the state of
the sidewalks.
HEARING
APPEALS OF SPECIAL
AVBNUE AND SPECIAL
CAROLAN AVENUE
PERMIT TO ARATA PONTIAC,/HONDA AT
PERMIT TO MIKE HARVEY OLDSMOBILE
1016 CAROLAN
AT IOOB
Mayor Amstrup announced there would be separate hearings on each of
these two appeals.
Council-man Martin stated he would not participate in either hearing
because of possible conflict of interest. Appeal on Arata Pontiac
Honda: Special Permit to erate an au
S ac a Caro an nue: Assistant City Planner
rev s memo o June 18, L979 which detailed progress of this
special permit application to its approval by the Planning Commj-ssion
witfr five conditions. Citizens group had appealed this special permit.
Mayor Amstrup opened public hearing on this appeal.
Following citizens spoke
noise from loudspeakers:
in opposit:-on, both objecting to potential
SoI Bechtold, 1010 Toyon
Goldie Farley, 1015 Toyon
Council discussed with David Arata and his attorney, Paul Kelly,
different methods of eliminating this noise. Mr. Arata at length
stated there was no necessity for an outside paging system.
Mr. Roy
driving
rvould be
Damonte, 1001 Toyon, \{as concerned about parking, test
on Toyon, and car carriers. Mr. Kelly informed Council
no car carriers at this location cars are received at
there
San
rwtr@FlI'.n
.ArAr}l-, _ rJdbl!&-*, au- d
S'O AD't
Mateo site on woodside way. There is access onto carolan fromthe site, and no necessity to use Toyon for testing. In re-sponse to Council question he responded they definitely would beencouraged to test cars on North Carolan. He stated his clientagreed to conditions regarding no auto carriers and no outsidecall system.
Councilman Crosby moved that Planning Commission action on thisspecial permit be upheld subject to five condi-tions of PlanningCommission and in addition the conditions that there be no loadingor unl-oading of vehicles from auto transports at this locationand that an outside pagj-ng system not be used. second by Council-woman Barton, carried on unanimous ro11 ca1l vote, councilmanMangini absent, Councilman Martin abstaining.
Appeal on l.Iike Harvey Oldsmobite:Special permit to operate a
ty anner rev F ort l_on o f his memo of June 18, 1979 whichdeals with this special i-,ermit approved by Planning Commission butexcluding the body shop. Appea 1 is by Mike Harvey Otdsmobile.Assistant City planner read co nditions of this a pproval, and statedthat Mike Harvey had met with area calleviate their concerns about thishis letter of June 14, 1979 to the C
Mayor Amstrup opened public hearing.
itizens in an attempt toproject. This is reviewed inity Council.
Mr. Michael R. Harvey addressed council. He reported on hismeeting with area citizens, stating their main concerns had beennoise from the body shop and fumes from the paint shop. To mitigatethese problems, painting would be done in booths as required byOSHA, the paint booths would be placed on the East portion of lfre bodyshop next to the residentlal area to buffer noise. Also as a noisebuffer he would erect a 100' long cinder block wa11 8 ' high on theresidential- side. Landscaping would be placed there as a furtherbuffer. He guaranteed that there would be no off roading oftrucks at that site, and there wourd not be a paging sysfem eitheron Carolan or Rollins Road. He would agree to restiiclion of theuse of Toyon.
tfr. following_citizens spoke J-n opposition to the project, statingthe wall should be longer, should be higher, the aiea- should havebeen rezoned to residential, residents had received insufficientnotice of property sa1e, businesses such as Teevan painting alreadyharass neighborhood by traffic, noise and clutter:
Sol Bechtold, 1010 Toyon
Roy Damonte, 1001 ToyonUnidentified woman, area resident
Mary Crocker, l02J- ToyonGoldie Farley, 1016 Toyon
At conclusion of public hearing, Mr. Harvey reiterated his desireto cooperate with the neighborhood, and stated his present bodyshop on California Drive is not practical because it is too smattand difficult to control-
Tlere were no further
closed.comments, and the public hearing was declared
council questioned Mr. Harvey closely on proposal details. Heassured them that if the noise was unacceptable after the bodyshop was in, he would rectify. He noted that possibly theneighborhood j-s anticipating something that will not Lake placethat the noise will not be a problem. He added the presenl bodyshop which backs up to residential property has not caused a problem.At request of Council- he pointed out the exact map location of thewal1.
Councilwoman Barton
with the first five
this special permit be approvedof the Planning Commission and with
moved that
conditions
r i//-Ll! -u&&xiLa,gl.'!a cl..r;t^J.-
375
the
6.
7.
B.
o
following
that the
on-site
that an ,
that the
that
from
side
conditions pertaining to the body shop:
six months to assessspecial permit be reviewed in
noise conditions;
outside paging system not be used;
easterly rear door remain sealed;
a cement block waIl be erected, 100'
the easterly corner of the body shop
property line toward Rollins Road;
long and
building
B' high,
along the
10.
11.
that the paint booth be located within the easterly half of
the building to act as a buffer between the body shop and the
adjacent single family homes;
that additional landscaping be installed along the easterly
property line to screen the residential areai
12. that l,like Harvey take every ef fort
vehicles bY his emPloYees on ToYon
to prevent the testing of
Drive
13. that there be no loading or unloading of vehicles from auto
transports at this location.
Councilman Crosby seconded the motion, carried on unanimous ro11
call vote, Councilman Mangini absent, Councilman Martin abstaining.
RECESS
A short recess was declared at 10:00 P.M. after which the meeting
reconvened.
CORRESPONDENCE
1. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATTON OF
RETROACTIVE PAY.
FrRE FTGHTERS, LOCAL lB72 RE
Letter of June I0, L979 from International Association of Fire
Fighters, Local No. L872, requested pay raise retroactive to JuIy
l, LTTB because of the recent declaration by the State Supreme
Court that the State surplus contingency 1aw governing L978 pay
raises was unconstitutional.
Mayor Amstrup noted City Attorney's recoflrmendation that the Union
meet and confer with the City Manager on this item, So ordered.
AI.'IUSEMENT LICENSE RENEWALS
1. ELECTRONIC GAMES AT RI}4RIDER SKATE PARK
Report of June 7, l-979 from Services Bureau of
Department stated this use had not caused any
merrded renewal of amusement license.
Burlingame PoIice
problem and recom-
Councilwoman Barton moved this amusement license be renewed for one
year, second by Councj-Iman Crosby, all aye vote of members present.
2. ? DISCO,1316 BROADWAY
Report of June 12, lgTg frorn Police Services Bureau stated the
business seems to be well run at this time and management was
cooperative. It was recommended permit be issued for one year,
6 months if business returns to use of alcohol.
Councilman Crosby moved amusement license be renewed for one year,
six months if buiiness returns to the use of aIcohol, second by
Councilman Martin, carried on unanimous vote of members present.
STAFF I4EMORANDUM
1. CITY MANAGER: CABLE TELEVISION
City Manager's memo of June L4, L979 attached data on cable tele-
ffi i. qqsffi rsrryreEr-llur 1@ir lr.-,-arqF)rf rl
376
vision and its muni-cipal regulation. City Man4gga noted thetrend is now toward a more deregulated basic ordinance andfranchise agreement. He recommended this be discussed at thenext study meeting. He could a arrange a presentation by some-one familiar with the subject. council agieed to discuss atthe July study meeting.
2.CITY MANAGER: AMERICAN LEGION BUILDING BURLINGA}IE AVENUE
City Manager's memo of June 14,1979 from Burlingame Lions CIubacquisi-tion and restoration ofAvenue. This would be at theirconsideration of a 1ease.
Council agreed to
3. CfTY MANAGER:
L979 attached letter of June 7outlining their proposal forthis building at 990 Burlingamecost, and they reguested City
Memo of May 30, 7979 from Director of public lrrorks informedCouncil that the Traffic, safety and parking commission recom-mended the i-nstallation of a gtop sign on the northeasterly cornerof the intersection of Barroilhel and cypress. The city of sanMateo was to be informed for possible coordination in iistallinga stop sign at this intersection for traffic going east onBarroilhet- Public l{orks Director recommenaed agiinst the in-stallation of the additional signs because of th; accident potentialfor a three-way stop at a four-*ay intersection. By endorsement ofJune L4, l-979 City Manager concuried in recornmendation of publici{orks Director.
discuss this matter at the July study meeting.
STOP SIGNS, BARROILHET /CYPRESS
Barton suggested this item be tabled until the cityconsiders it on its upcoming agenda. Council con_
Councilwomanof San Mateocurred.
4. CfTY MANAGER: AMENDMEIIT TO CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER AGREEIVIENT
Letter of June 11, 1979 from san Mateo operational Area civilDefense and Disaster organization recommended as an al-ternative tothe agreement with the cities that the Lg7g-ao uuJgef include thecountyrs share of $50,000 but in subsequent years frris be elim-inated as a requirement for the county-and the g50,oo0 be split upamong cities and county on a proporti6nate basis. Council decidedtheir positi-on would be not to amend the contract now, but consideramending it next year sj-nce the amendment would affect the 1980-g1funding. city l4anager stated he would so inform the county.
5. CfTY ATTORNEY: PARKING OF' CAMPERS, TRAILERS AND RECREATI9NVEHICLES
Ci-ty Attorney's memo of June 12, lgTgsubject and listed Council options.sideration at a study meeting.
di-scussed some issues of thisHe suggested thorough con-
He
Mayor Amstrup set this subject for the next study session.,
FOXMALL - PARKING CONTRIBUTION
Mayor Amstrup asked agenda interruption for this consideration.quoted 6/L8/79 letter from Ted Farrey Jr. which stated, ,,v,Ie havedecided to accept the Council's offei for a one time contributionof $25,000 to the parking district. trve wirl agree to submit aparcel map to change the two_building sites in[.o one. The pay-ments would be made . : 912,500 aiter one year and $12,5b0-after the second year. "
City Attorney stated it was I{r. Farleyrs understanding that witha parcel map there would be no restrictions on the wal-ls on whathad been the property line. He could do with the back portion thesame as the front portion. City Attorney asked that Council's in-tent be cl-arified. Did they want to condition parcel map? rn
C) l-) l-1ot I
response to question from Councilman Crosby, City Attorney
confirmed that combinj-ng parcels would al-Iow Mr. Farley full
use of the building without restrictions as to wal1 openings.
Councilman Martin objected that in this case Mr. Farley would
have fuII use of the building for \ parking contribution. Hepreferred permit for rvall opening which would give City control
of rear of building. Discussion was deferred pending return ofMr. Farley to meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. LIABILITY CLAIYIS: GUY YOUNG A}ID JANE NIERI.
City Attorney's memos of June 8 and 13,
from R. L. Kautz & Company on Guy Young
City Attorney recommended denial of both
2. PARCEL MAP; 1016 CAROLAN AVENUE
Assistant City Engineer's merno
approval of this tentative and
1979 attached reports
and Jane Nieri respectively.
claims.
3. CONDOMINIU}4 PARCEL MAP, 735 EL CAMII{O
Assistant City Engineer's memo of June B, 1979 recontmended approval
of this tentative condo subdivision map with three conditions.
4. RESOLUTIONS
a. RESOLUTION NO. 40-79 "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH
ENVIROTECH CORPORATION FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF
WASTEWATEB. TREATMENT PLANT,'
b. RESOLUTION NO. 4I-7 9 ''RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
DEEDS AND APPROVING EOR}4S OE NOTES IOOS-1020 CAROLAN
AVENUE. City Attorney noted correction on amount of notes
as $272,OOO each and monthly payments as $3,824.19 for each.
c. RESOLUTION NO. 42-79 "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
I^TORKERS' COMPENSATION ADMINI
MC DONALD & COMPANY''
STRATION AGREEMENT VIITH GATES,
d. RESOLUTTON NO. 43-79 ''AMENDING AND ADOPTING FINAL OPERATING
of June 11, 1979 recommended
final parcel map with no condi-tions.
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET CITY OF BURLINGAME, FISCAL
JUNE 30, L979."
AND CAPITAL
YEAR ENDING
f
BURLINGAIVIE
905 "
SLUDGE PUMP]NG STATION AND FORCE I,IAIN
Councilman Martin moved approval of the consent calendar,
Councilwoman Barton, carried on unanimous vote of members
Councilman l{artin abstaining on Items 2 and 4b.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 44-79 ''RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WATER SYSTEIU
IMPROVEMENTS
RNSOLUTION NO.
JOB NO.802"
45-79 ''RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS - MILLBRAE
JOB NO.
second by
present,
ORD]NANCES SECOND READING - HEARING
I. ORDINANCE NO. 1150'' ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING TWO-HOUR PARKING
LII,{ITMAGE ROAD OF EL CAMINO REAL FROM TROUSDALE
DRIVE TO MURCHISON DRTVE. ,'
Mayor Amstrup opened public hearing. There was no response and the
public hearing was declared closed.
Ordinance No. 1150 passed its second readj-ng and was adopted on
motion of Councilman Crosby, second by Councilman Martin, carried
on unanj-mous roll call vote of members present. Mayor Amstrup
asked that staff notify people in thj-s neighborhood.
2. ORDINANCE NO. I15I ''ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT FEES
FOR ROAD IMPROVE},TE}trTS''
ffiY!z
L-
378
Mayor Amstrup opened public hearing. There was no response and
the public hearing was declared closed.
3. ORDINANCE NO. 1152 "ALLOWING GASOLINE STORAGE FACILITIES IN
CERTAIN ZONES,'
As originally written, this ordinance prohibited the installation
of gasoline storage tanks in residential zones, permitted them in
the industrial zones, and made them subject to a conditional use
permit in the commercial zones.
Council discussed at length the pros and cons of this application
in the residential zone, notably the fact that private residences
are al-lowed storage of diesel fuel, and could need storage of
gasoline for such uses as powering of gasoline generators. Fire
Chief reported on hazards of gasoline storage tanks and basic
concerns with those i-n residential areas. After considerable dis-
cussion Councj-I concurred on allowing gasoline storage tanks as a
conditional use in commercial and residential zones.
Ordinance No. 1152 passed its second reading and was adopted as
amended on motion of Councilman Crosby, second by Councilrnan
Martin, carried on unanimous roll call vote of members present.
Ordinance 1151 passed its second reading
motion of Councilwoman Barton, second by
imous ro11 call vote of members present.
4. ORDINANCE NO. 1153 ''ORDINANCE PROVIDING
rN rffiRCrAL zoNES"
Mayor Amstrup opened public hearing on
no response and the public hearing was
and was adopted on
Council-man Crosby, unan-
FOR COMPACT CAR SPACES
this ordi-nance. There was
declared closed.
Ordinance No. 1153 passes its second reading and was adopted on
motion of Councilman l4artin, second by Councilman Crosby, carried
on unanimous ro11 call vote of members present.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
REVENUE SHARING HEARING
Recej-pt of letter from Center for Independence of the Disabled,Inc.
was acknowledged requesting smal1 amount of Revenue Sharing funds
from Peninsula cities to fj-nance operation.
City Manager reported this could
hearing on Revenue Sharing.
be heard at the required public
FOX MALL
Mr. Farley returned to meeting and discussion resumed on this
subject. Mayor Amstrup suggested development of new parking formula
since he thought present formula is not being utilized. Council
discussed at some length.
For Mr. Farley's benefit City Attorney reviewed Council's previous
di-scussion. Mr. Farley stated there would be no wall openings at
the back of the building and that he had already cancelled all
services for two buildings and planned for just one. In response
to staff and Council questions, he agreed that approval of the
parcel map could be conditioned upon the wall's remaining at the
rear portion of the building and the understanding that the only
opening would be at the front end of the property.
Councilman Crosby moved that contribution of $25r000 to the
Parking District as outlined in Ted Farley's letter of June 18, 1979
be accepted, and that parcel map be prepared and submitted by Mr.
Far1ey, approval Lo be conditioned upon a wa11 remaining on the
former property line in the second story rear of the building, and
that the only opening on the second fl-oor along the former property
I1ne would be at the front of the building. Second by Councilwoman
Barton, carried on following ro11 call vote:
379
AYES: BARTON, CROSBY, MARTIN
NAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: AMSTRUP (For reasons previously stated)
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MANGINI
Councilman Martin made the point thatthe Fox Ma1I was granted by a vote of
man Crosby and he voted no.
orj-ginal permit for
2 on which Council-
the3-
2
NEW BUSINESS
TENNIS LIGHTS AND JUVENILES
In response to complaint of May 17, L979 from Donald J. Roberts,
Burlingame citizen, of the firm of Winingham, Roberts and Rogie,
City Manager's memo of June 13, L979 to Council explained that
replacement of tennis lights by a more energy-efficient systemwill be a budget item. He reported that Washington Park is a
gathering place for young persons, they are going to gather
some place, and police Department has been instructed to give
area more surveillance.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1 Letter of June 11, L979 from Senator Foran re sales tax.
Letter of June 6, L979 from Shriners Hospitals.
Memo of June 13, 1979 from Finance Director re L978-79 Audit.
Reports: Treasurer I s lrlay 31, Police and Fire Departments,
May, L979.
3
4
5. Minutes: Park & Recreation Commission, June '7, Planning
Commission, June 11, 1979.
6. Negative Declarations from Assistant City Planner.
Mayor Amstrup announced that at Council of Mayors meeting
Councilman l{artin was re-elected as representative to ABAG from
San Mateo County. Councilman Mangini was appointed to Criminal
Justice Council.
APPROVALS
WARRANTS
Warrant Nos. 1760 through 2003, duly audited, in the amount of
$648,764.52 approved for payment on motion of Mayor Amstrup,
second by Councj-Iman Martin, carried on unanimous vote of members
present.
PAYROLL
Payroll for May, 1979, Check Nos. 10506 through 11104, total
amount of $338,139.48, approved for payment on motion of Mayor
Amstrup, second by Councilman Martin, carried on unanimous vote
of members present.
FROM THE FLOOR
AFSCME LOCAL 2L9O
Mr. George Popyack, Directing Business Agent, AFSCIIE Local 21-90,
representing certain Burlingame City Employees, addressed
Council on matter he stated was not meet and confer. He
saj-d he had requested to be on agenda. Main points of
Mr. Popyack's presentation:
380
I. Renegotiate
At the time the Employees Association memo of under-
standing was before the Council, AFSCIIE had completed
the process of petitioning and was waiting for certi-
fication. Under National Labor Relations Act negotiation
should stop untj-I certification is over. Employees
Association was unable to provi-de majority of employee
vote but memo of understanding was ratified by City.
Because of this AFSCME asks City to instruct staff
to begin negotiations.
2 Long Term Disability
Employees Association negoti-ated for this program in
1974. Benefits were to be 2/3 of salary after 60 day
waiting period, premium estimated at certain percentage
of salary. This Apri1, City contracted for new program
which reduces benefit to 504 of salary after 120 day
wait. This is violation of agreement. AFSCME asks
City to instruct staff to restore original benefit
leveI.
3. Civil Servj-ce Rules and Regulations
Union has a problem of representing employees under
a vague set of rules and regulations that seem to be
based on Department Heads' interpretations. AFSCME
needs clear set of Civil Service rules. Representative
has attempted to meet with Civil Service Commission
unsuccessfully. Asks that City and staff negotiate
clear document.
City Attorney stated that the Civil Service Commission has
very l-imited jurisdiction and does not make the ru1es.
Chairman of this commission had asked that Union's request
be put in letter so that they would know proper jurisdictj-on.
He added that the matter of union certj-fication and long
term disability had been considered thoroughly, with the
legal opinion that City was correct in its actions.
City Ivlanager amplified: In negotiations for long term
disability the controlling factor was percentage ofsalary, not a specific plan. He confirmed his understanding
that the City was legally correct in its dealings with
union certification. He had written union that the City
was through with meeting and conferring for this year. To
Council he added that his interpretation with relation to
the Fire Fighters Union was that he would meet and consult
with them - not meet and confer.
After considerable discussion, Council concurred with the
City Attorney's opinion that memo of understanding and
Iong term disability handling was legal and proper; and asked
that union representative submit written proposal on
Civil Service Rules and Regulations specifying items which
are not wanted and offering substitutes.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting regularly adjourned at J-1-z45 P.M
6(;.zJ.il-uyn H. Hill
CIerk
,^ZWy,
City