Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1977.11.07490 BURLfNGAME, CALIFORNIA November 7, L977 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held onthe above date in the City HaII Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order at B:05 P.M. by Mayor A.C. rrBud'Harrison. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE F'LAG: Led by Charles F. Schwalm, Cj-ty Manager. ROLL CALL COUNCfL MEIIBERS COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES PRESENT: ABSENT: CROSBY , HARRI SON , MANGIN I , MARTIN AMSTRUP (excused, illness) The minutes of the regular meeting of October L7, L977, were approved and adopted. HEARING 1. APPEAL OF ROBERT AND SYLVIA PISANI FROM PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF OFF-STREET PARKING VARIANCE FOR APART}4ENT BUILDING, 5OO PENINSULA AVENUE Council had received letter of appeal from Mr. and Mrs. Pisani dated October 25, L977 setting forth reasons for variance, and detailing plans for a new variance, different from the one presented to the Planning Commission. City Plannerrs memo of November 2, L977 reviewed Planning Commission action; and the present significantly different proposal. I\4emo attached Planning Commission meeting minutes of September 28, L977 , documentation on the original variance application, and letters supporting denial of variance: October L2, 1977 from Mrs. Ross Smith, 15 Dwight Road; October 25, L977 from Mr. and Mrs. Phil Knight, 23 Drvight Road. Mayor Harrison acknowledged this documentation, but noted that the Council had before i-t a change of p1an. He noted that Planning Commission denied on the grounds that application failed to satisfy code requirements requisite to variance grants. City Attorney confirmed that variance was denied as not meeting the Iega1 requirements for the supporting ordinance. Mayor Harrison then questioned if this change in application still did not address itself to the conditions for a varj-ance. City Attorney replied that would be a Council decision, but this is a new proposal. City Planner detailed the new proposal, noting it is somewhat changed but still is a variance request, and the Planning Commission had denied the original proposal unanimously because they could not make a determination that conditions were met. Councilman Martin remarked the new proposal seems like a major change and questioned if it would be advisable to refer it back to the Planning Commission for a hearing. Councilman Nlangj-ni thought this should be done. Councilman Crosby moved that the new proposal for variance be referred back to the Planning Commission for a hearing. Second by Councilman Mangini, unanimously carried. 49L AMUSEMENT LICENSES RENEWALS f . COI.INTRY ROAD , 14 2 5 BURLINGAME AVENIJE Council received fetter of october 2l , l-977 from Chief of Police advising that the department had not experienced any police problems with this establishment and would approve renewal/continuance of the entertainment and dancing permit under the present operation and format. Councilman Crosby moved this permit be renewed for one year, second by Councilman Mangini, unanimously carried. 2. BLACK HORSE RESTAURANT AND COCKTAIL LOUNGE, 269 PRIMROSE ROAD Councj-lman Crosby moved this permit be aporoved for one year, second by Councilman Mangini, carried unanimously. 3. GOLDIE'S SALOON, 241 CALIFORNIA DRIVE Mayor Harrison acknowledged report of October 26, 1977 fromPolice Chief which attached Sergeantrs detailed list ofincidents occurring at this establishment. Police Chief recommended permit be issued for only 90 days, pending furtherreport, Mayor Harrison read list of incidents. Mr. ,f ame s M. Shea, 532 Alhambra, San Mateo, owner of Goldierssaloon, addressed Council. Mr. Shea stated he had received copy of this communication from the Police Department Saturday, November 5, 1977 by mai1. He had gone to the Police Department Monday, November 7, at 9:30 A.M. and had asked for copy of Pol-ice report on the various items. He had been j-nformed hecould not have this information because he was not one of thesuspects, nor was he j-nvolved in it. Mr. Shea addressed this list of incidents in detail as follows: February 22, 1977 - Petty Theft. Neither he nor his son, whohelps in running this business, knew anything of this. He asked for copy of report so that the person involved could beprevented from entering his bar again. l4ay 9,L977 - Battery. Mr. Shea had known of thisperson responsible had been barred from enteringin the future. incident and thethe establishment July 20, 1977 - Possession of narcotics. Mr. Shea said he had known nothing of this, which had j-nvolved an arrest by agents ofthe Alcoholic Beverage Control. He had gone to the Police Department the next ilay because it had involved an employee ofhis. l{e found that the person had been released, and he hadheard nothing further from the ABC. However, he had fired theperson j-nvo1ved, whether he was right or wrong, because he did notwant this type of thing in his establishment. For this reason,he took exception to the statement in the Police report that heapparently did not exercj-se the same control as the former owners. August 12, 19'17 - Fight. Iv1r.of this, and could not obtain had known nothing September 29, L977 - Suspect arrested for possession of concealedi,reapon. Mr. Shea said this involved a former employee of the bar,and he had no reason to suspect that he was carrying a weapon. He was glad when the arrest was made. Shea stated hePoIice report. Council received letter of October 2l , )-977 from Chief of Po1ice, Burlingame Police Department advising that the department hadnot experienced any pol-ice problems with this establishment and would approve the continuance of the entertainment permit under present management . 492 September 29, 1977 - Department of Alcoholic Beverage Contro] notification of the filing of charges by that agency against the establishment. Mr. shea reported that his attorney had filed a letter dated September 30, L977 to ABC. To date he had heard nothing of the matter. In surunation Mr. Shea stated that any police officers \4,ho kne$/ him would say he was conducting a better business than in thepast - when he has a problem he takes care of it. He stated he wished to go on record as saying that fimiting him to a 90 day permit was unwarrantedi however, he did think it would be difficult for the Council to vote against staff recorunendation . Mayor Harrison remarked on the fact that Mr. Shea had owned the establishment for \1< years, and there had been six ineidents in the last nine months. l4r. Shea responded that when he had taken over this establishment he had told the Pol-ice Department he was going to make some changes and he wanted their backing. Councilman Mangj-ni agreed with Mr. Shea's statement that Council would be supportive of staff. However, he thought that Mr. Shea had spoken honestly, and questioned why the 90 day permit would hurt hirh. Mr. Shea replied that if the Council decided on 90 days, it would be fine with him, but he did not think j-t right. Upon question from Councilman Crosby, PoIice Chief stated that it is against State and Federa] laws to release police reports except to an j-nterested party - a suspect. Councilman Crosby commented that Mr. Shea therefore, does not know what he j-s accused of. Police Chief replied he is not being accused of anything. The Police Department is simply stating what happened at the establishment. Councilman Martin was surprised that this man was being told his permit might be denied, and yet could not find out what was happening. City Attorney confirmed Police Chief's statement that Mr. Shea is denied by 1aw from getting details. Councilman Crosby asked if this was considered a hearing this evening. City Attorney saj-d it was, but added that it would take a court hearing for Mr. Shea to get copies of police reports. Councj-Iman Crosby comnented that if he was j-n business l-ike Mr. Shea and had these accusations, he would Iike to know exactly what they were. Polj-ce Chief remarketl he could appreciate this. Councilman Mangini moved this permit be approved for of 90 days, second by Councilman Crosby, unanimously COMMTIN I CATIONS 1. R. R. MTLLER, 1105 CITY COUNCIL TO APPEAL ADDITION TO RESIDENCE. a period carried. DUFFERIN A!'ENUE: REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF VARIANCE FOR Letter of October 31, 1977 from R. R. Mil-ler, 1105 Dufferin Avenue appealed this decision of the Planning Commission, and detailed reasons for approval of this variance, With Council concurrence, Mayor Harrison set hearing at the meeting of November 2l , L977. this appeal for 2. J.P.,JACK"DONLEY, AREA MANAGE R, LION EOR CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW SELF SERVICE OIL COMPANY, REOUEST OF GASOLINE TO CUSTOMERS Mr. Donley's letter of November 2, 1977 to Councj-l requested the rescinding of code Section 17.04.160 which prohibits the self-service of gasoline. Mr. Don1ey noted the benefits of self- service to the customer, the fact that it is used in most cities, and stated he had contacted both the City Attorney and the Fire Chief of Burtingame, neither of whom are opposed to this change. ) 493 Mayor Harrison read Mr. Donleyrs letter in full and requestedreport from Fire Chj-ef . Fire Chief reported to Council that he was not opposed to this, although there had been mixed feelings in the past. He commentedthat Burlingame and Belmont are the only two cities j-n this areathat do not have self-service. He requested that if Council does approve this code amendment they also rescind the requirementsof the same code section relating to automatic nozzles. Mayor Harrison comented that self-service stations might enablepeople to shop for a better price for gasoline. With Council concurrence he directed City Attorney to prepare legislation effecting these changes for Council considerationat a public hearing. 3. DR. REI'NOLDS SM]TH, PRESIDENT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SAN MATEO COI]NTY MOSQUITO ABATET4ENT DISTRICT, RECOMMENDING REAPPOINTMENT OF WILLIAM L. BRIGGS TO DISTRICT'S BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Dr. Smith's letter of October 18, 1977 \"iith this reeommendation was consid.ered by Cor:ncil. Mr. Briggrs term will expire on December 31, 1-977. With Council concurrence, Mayor Harrisondirected his reappointment for the two year term of .Tanuary l-, 1978 through Decenber 31, 1979. STAFF MEMORANDA 1. CITY MANAGER TRANSMITT]NG TRAET'IC, SAFETY, PARKING COMMISSION RE COMMEN DAT I ON TO INCREASE SPEED LIMIT ON PENINSULA AVENUE FROM25 TO 35 MPH. Letter of November 3, L977 from Chaj_rman of Traffic, Safety &Parking Commission advised City Manager of recommendation ofthat commission that the speed limit on the Burlingame side ofPeninsula Avenue be changed from twenty-five to thirty-five milesper hour. By end.orsement of November 3, L977 City Manager notedthat the speed limit on the San Mateo half of peninsula Avenue isthirty-five miles per hour. Council had no objections to this Mayor Harrison directed that Citylegislation for Council action. change. prepare appropriate proposed Attorney 2. CITY MANAGE R TRANSMITTING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATIONS RE STREET SWEEPER OPERATOR POSITION Memorand.um of November 2, 1977 from Director of public Worksnoted vacancy in Street Sweeper Operator position because ofpersonnel resignation. Director of public Works requested thatthis one vacant positj.on be eliminated, and a premium pay ratebe established for a maintenance worker who would be assignedto operating a street sweeper. Benefits derived woufd be: Itwould allow the City to train and develop its own street sweeperoperators. The premium pay goes with the machine and not withany individual or classification. The individual assigned tothe street sweeper would receive the premium pay only as long ashe was operatj-ng the sweeper. Assignrnents or reassignmentscould be made with a minimum amount of time, whereas considerabletime is required under the position classification system. By endorsement of Novenber 3, 1977 City Manager concurredin this recommendation. Councilman Mangini questioned if there would be anyin removing the man from the position. Director ofWorks i-ndicated there would not be. problem Public Councilman Crosby questioned how manyDirector of Public Works stated there positions there were. wou]d be two people. The 494 incumbent would remain in his classification until promoted oruntil he had left City service. At that time it would be recommended that that position be eliminated a1so, and filIed by premium pay maintenance worker. In response to question from Mayor Harrj-son, Director of Public works stated he anticipated no effect on the service. Councilman Martin questioned if premium pay would be on an hourly basis. Dj-rector of Public Works replied it would be more or less a monthly assignment. Replacement for sick leave or vacation would receive premium pay if replacing for more than a day or two. CONSENT CALENDAR }. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES, FREDERICA LEWIS Council received memo of october 25, 1977 from City Attorney recommending this claim be denied, as evidenced by letter of october 2l., 1977 from R. L. Kautz & Company, attached to memo. 3. CITY PLANNER: EIR-43E AND ADDENDUM REPORT DATED OCTOBER 2l-, ].977 FOR BAYSIDE REDE\IELOPMENT PROJECT City Planner's memo of November L, 1977 reported that Draft EIR 43E had been dj-stributed to Council in July, 1977 a d. Addendum Report had been mailed october 2l , 1977. Memo transmitted Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-77 approving and recommending EIR 43E and Addendum. Also transmitted was Draft list of adverse impacts. Cj-ty Planner specified that each significant effect identified by the EIR should be acknowledged by a finding along with lead agency policy decisions to mitigate or accept said impact. After adequate study and policy decisions to prepare findings that meet }egal requirements, the Final- EIR may be scheduled for public hearing. with Council concurrence, Mayor Harrison scheduled this EIR 43E for heari-ng on November 2l , L977. 4. CITY PLANNERT PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR RECLASS IFICAT ION OF BEN-SIMON PROPERTY, EL CAMINO REAL BETIiEEN SANCHE Z AND FOREST VIEW, EROM R-I TO R-3. Memo of october 3L, !977 from City Planner transmitted to Council Draft EIR and Addendum, EIR-48P, Planning Commission Resofution No. 14-77 Recommending Environmentaf Impact Report, EIR-48P a Re cl-ass i fication from R-I to R-3, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-77 RecoNnending Adoption of an ordinance Reclassifying 915 EI Camino Real from R-1 to R-3. With concurrence of Council, Mayor Harrison schedul-ed hearing on this item for November 21, 1977. WI THDRAWAL OF APPEAL Mayor Harrison noted letter of November 4, L977 from Carr, McC1e11an, fngersolf, Thompson & Horn, attorney for wurlitzer Properties, appealing on behalf of their clj-ent the Planning Commission decision of October 26, L97'1 on varj-ance for 320 Lang Road. He also noted letter of November 7, L977 from the same firm withdrawing this appeaf, which was accepted by the Councif. Councilman Crosby moved that one Civil Service position of Street Sweeper Operator be el-iminated, and that this position be fiIled by a maintenance worker who would receive premium pay while assigned as street sweeper operator. Second by Councilman Martin, carried unanimously. 495 2. PARCEL MAP - 33 PARK ROAD COMMISSION WITH CONDITIONS CONDOMINTUM, RECOMMENDE D BY PLANNING Memo of Novenber 2, 19'77 from Assistant City Engineer recornmend.edapproval of final map pending compliance with conditions oftentative map. Endorsement of November 3, lg77 from City Manager con curred., Mayor Harrison questioned if conditions had beenDirector of Public Works affirmed they had. met by this date. 3. PARCEL MAP - 320 LANG ROAD, RECOMMENDED BY PLANNTNG COMMISS ION Memo of November l, L977 from Assistant City Engineer noted bothtentative and final map had been approvea Uy tfre planning commission with no conditions. approval by cor:nci1 was iecommended.City Manager, by memo of November 2, tglt concurred in this recom-mendation. Councilman Crosby moved approval of consentby Counci lman Mangini, unanimously approved. calendar, second RESOLUT IONS I. RESO],UTTON NO. 9O-77'RESOLUTION OF NECES SITY - TOWNE TAXITT was introduced PUBLIC CONVENIENCE ANDby Councilman Manginiilman Crosby, unanimously esent. be necessary for revocation. Nordby, the latter hadall of the permits. who moved its adoption, second by Counccarried on ro11 call vote of members pr Pursuant to this matter, Councilman Martin noted there are sixtaxi permits for yellow Cab which are not presently being used.He asked if these could be automatically revoked. -He saii noreason for them if they are rmused. Mayor Harrison asked if Mr. Nordby coul_d be queried as to hisintentions for these permits. City Attorney replied a hearing wouldof these permits, and in contacting Mrstated he occasionally has need to use Cor:ncilman Crosby noted that Mr. Nordby had stated to him thatininc1ementweatherhehadusefora11ofthepermits councilman Martin asked that city Attorney exprore thi-s matterfurther. City Attorney affirmed he would. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 91-77 'IRXQUESTING THE DESIGNATTON OF ROUTEzso mo iNuunnarrNc pRorECTrvE MEASUREs THEREFORE " was introduced by Councilman Martin who moved itsadoption, second by Councilman Crosby, carried unanj_mously onro}l call vote of members present. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 92_77 ''AUTHORI ZING EXECUTI ON OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMEN T SIN-FAR PROPERTIES - PARKWooD coURT,' was introduced by CONVENTION CENTER Cor:ncilman Crosby who moved its adoption, second by CouncilmanMartj-n, carried on unanimous ro11 ciIl vote of memiers present T]NFINISHED BUSINESS Mayor Harrison reported he had contacted bond counsel and staffthis date and had been informed d.ocumentation would not be readyfor the tentative November 16 special meeting date. Mayor Harrisonsuggested that if material could be received by councii- uv trr. rstl,of November, special meeting could be schedul-ed for llovemLer 30,1977. ?here were no Cor:nci1 objections. l.{ayor Harrison setspecial meeting for consideration of the convention center forNovenlcer 30, 1977 - 496 BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION Reappointment of Commissioners Martha Benson, Aline H and Wi11a L. Sexton, whose terms expired l-0/7/77, was for Cor:ncil consideration. Lorenz, pre s ente d of the ir se rve d Councilman Martin stated that whife he had a great deal respect for Commissioners Lorenz and Sexton, he opposed reappointment as a matter of principle because they had more than two terms. Councilman Crosby moved that Commissioners Benson, Lorenz, and Sexton be reappointed for another term, seconal by Councilman Mangini, carried by voice vote, Councilman Martin dissenting. PARK AND R.ECREATION COMMISSION Reappointment of Conmissioners Charles J. Brickley, Jr., Robert f,eahy, and Celestino Romoli, whose terms expired l0/7/77 was considered by Council. Councilman Martin opposed reappointment of Commissioner Leahy, hTho has served more than t\"/o terms. Councilman Crosby moved that Commissioners Brickley, Leahy, and Ronpli be reappointed for another term, second by Councilman Mangini, carried by voice vote, Councilman Martin dissenting. NEW BUS INESS AIRPORT EIR Councilman Mangini questioned specifics of Council action on october 17, t977 regarding Airport EIR. He noted that Council had approved $I,000 tohrard retention of Counsel to represent gurlingame, Milfbrae and San Bruno in this matter. Councilman Martin replied the Point of the action was so that these three cities could be represented by expert counsef while the City Attorney was out of town for a short period of time. If a negatj-ve declaration were filed on the Airport blast fence, it must be appealed within ten days. The three cj-ties want an EIR filed. No\,/ that the City Attorney has returned, he can proceed with developing cost figure for an environmental attorney to represent these cj-ties in such hearings. City attorney stated he would have some information for Council by the next meeting. Councilman Martin requested that recent material prepared by the City of Millbrae Planner updating information on the Airport situati-on be ci-rculated to all Council members. Mayor Harrison questioned if ALUC had considered contacting naa regarding proposed landing and takeoff procedures, suggestingf there might be pressure that could be brought to bear. Councilman Martin stated that f'AA had control only within certain broad outl-ines, that in actuality it hail very Ij-ttle cont ro 1 . Councilman Mangini questioned why there would be objections to the fence if it is going to be raised with the intention of eliminating some of the noise and averting danger to people on the highway. Councifman Martin stated that with the raising of the blast fence, aircraft could take off immedj-ate1y against the freeway. Heavier and more aircraft could use Run\"/ay 1, with resultant increase in noise. Councilman Mangini cornrnented he could not see to noise as an issue. sa fe ty opposed Councj- lman Crosby was of the same opj-nion, quoting from Director of Airportsr letter of october 18, ]-977, "Any delay in installing the blast fence may constitute a safety hazard to automobiles on the Bayshore Ereeway. " ) Councilman Martin thought there was no safety factor involved 497 Mayor Harrison proclaimed November 17, 1977 as rlcreat Amerlcan Smokeout - A Day To Stop Smoking. " ACKNOWT,E DGMENTS 1. Letter of October 28, 1977 from Arthur Samuel-, 125 primrose Road relative to material he sent to Traffic, Safety and parking Commission. He stated it was not given to them, and theirdecision was mad.e without hj-s opportunity to j-nfluence it.Director of Public Works noted that decisions of this Commissionare only recommendations to Councj_I, and he would check thecommi-ssion to review this item before making a further recommendationto Council. 2. Letter of November 2, 1977Burlingame Chamber of Corunerce,William Hauser, Executive Vi ce 1977. from ,Joan c. Chase, President, announcing retirement of Mr.President, effective December 31, 3. Report of November 3,Entertainment Cente r.1977 from City Planner on Jilly's 4 . IUemo of Octobe r 3l- ,to material for Spring from Director of Recreation relativeof Recreation Brochure. 197'7 issue 5. City Planner sunrmary 7977 . of Pl-anning Commission meeting October 26, Counci lman Martin referred to ftems 10 and ff of this summary:Item 10, a variance from parking regulations to permit additionof 210 rooms to the existing Sheraton Hote1, and Item 11, aspecial permit to construct a building more than 35 feet inheight for the addition to the Sheraton Hotel. Both items hadbeen approved by the pJ-anning Commission. Councilman Martinstated he wanted both items brought before Councif for ahearing. He would like this hearing to be set foL some timeafter November 30, l.977, iLhe date of the special meeting on theConvention Center, since he thought the decision must b5 made onthe Convention Center before the varj"ance and special permitcould be properly be considered. Cor:nci lman Crosby questioned the reason for this. Councilman Martin replied he thought that the Ci.ty,s d.ecision onthe convention Center would have a considerable effect on itsdecision on the variance and special permit. He added that ifvariance and special permit are scheduled for the meeting of ,November 27, 1977, he would vote against them. t'/:;'7? Mayor.Harrison questj.oned if Council had any objections to con_sidering these items after the meeting of Novemier 30, L977.Hearing none, he decl-ared variance and special permit would bescheduled for hearing on December 5, t977. 6. Minutes of Beautification Commission, October 6; LibraryBoard.of Trustees Agenda, minutes and Librarian's reportiPlanning Commissj-on minutes, October 12; Traffic, Satety, parking Commission minutes, October 13; City Council study meet-ing minut6s,October 5, 7977 - Relati-ve to Beautification minules, Uay5rHarrison requested copy of the tetter from commissioner -perkins setting forth a series of eight ,,proposed Commission goals', asa. guide to ways and means to preserve the dead Lawns ind greenerywithin the City of Burlingame. 7. City Planner transmittal of November 3, !977 of NegativeDeclarations for: The Fisherman Restaurant Addition, iarianceand lot split - 1862 Ro]lins Road, Star Rent-A-Car. one way or another. PROCI,AMATION ( 498 Mayor Harrison acknowledged rece j-pt of letter from City of MilIbrae attaching copy of that City's Resolution No. 77-1f8 stating opposition to allowing civil supersonj-c aircraft landing rights at San Francisco International Airport. Letter requested Burlingame's support and adoptj-on of a similar resolution. There ,oere n6 Council objections to preparation of leqislation to this e f fect. OTHE R SST LANDING RIGHTS S. E. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HOOVER SCHOOL Mayor Harrison acknowledged letter of November L, L977 from City C16rk notj_fying Council of expiration of the terms of the following members of Lfris Commission: Arthur H. Blodgett, James J. Hamrock 'and Robert w. Johnson. He requested City Manager to contact these Corunissioners to see if they would be interested in serving another term. He announced reappointment would be consj-dered at the neeting of Decemlcer 5, 1977. h Mayor Harrison acknovrledged letter of November 3, 1977 from -;r3. sal1y Peter, President, Hoover PTA acknowledginq Councilrs efforts in directinq a Lraffic count and other safety measures at the school. Mrs. Peter requested an adult traffic guard at the Summit crossing in front of Hoover School. Mr. Lawrence Hickey, 1321 Montaro, addressed Councif as a parent who had children in Hoover School. He cited numerous instances of bad traffic conditions and urged Council's consideration of Mrs. Peter's request for crossing guard. Mayor Harrj-son reported he had met with the principal of Hoover School, Mrs. Peter, Chief Palmer anal Traffic Safety Sergeant. Whife Hoover School does not meet the warrants for a crossing guard, Mayor Harrison had a suggestion which he thought would not set a precident since the School Board is currently considering the future of some schools, and Hoover has 165 students. He had information from the Police Chief that a vacancy exists for a police officer, it is unfilIed, and there is money available. Minimum hours for a crossing guard are 4 per day. Mrs. Peter could suggest a person in the neighborhood who coul-d work 8:00 - 10:00 A.M. and be trained by the City. He suggested authoriz j-ng $l-,000 for a crossing gruard for two hours a day from now to the end of the school year. Councilman Crosby moved that $1 ,000 be authorized for a crossing guard at Hoover School, 2 hours a day, from now to the end of the school year in June, 1978. Second by Councilman Mangini, carried unanimously. A Mr. Sommer, 2840 Canyon Road, addressed Council regarding bad traffic conditions, and suggested that buttons be placed on the intersectj-ons preceding j-ntersections with the school a warning. Mayor Harrison asked if Director of Public Works would pursue this matter. Director of Public Works stated he investigate. AI RPO RT as would Sergei Juzehab, resident of Burlingame, airport noise directly related to cargo mo rn ing. compl aine d flights in to Council of the early Councilman Crosby suggested that Mr. wil-l-iam Hauser be given some sort of commendation for his services to the City. Council agreed. Mayor Harrison directed City Manager to prepare an acknowledgment of Mr. Hauser's services to the conmunity. C1 499 Councilman Martin stated that very shortly the Airport wiIlpublj-sh a list of airlines involved in their traffic, with timeof takeoff, i,reight, etc. He stated when this is published, heintends to publicize it and urge that offending airlines not be used. ACKNOWLE DGI\,IENT At this poj-nt, Mayor Harrison acknowledged the presence in the audj-ence of Mrs, Charlotte Johnson, former Mayor and Councilmanof Burlingame. ADJOURNMEN T Meeting adjourned at 9225 P.M. to Executive Session onpersonnel, and was reconvened shortly thereafter by Mayor Harrison. On motj-on of Councilman Crosby, second by Councilman Mangini, unanimous voice vote of members present (Councilman Amstrupabsent), Council concurred with the City Attorney's recommendationregarding disposition of the Keven Patchett case. Executive session adjourned at 9:35 P.M. Respectf ully submitted, C.//C,.r.-/,,-*,7./74( Rve Iyn"4I. Hill City Clerk I lu