HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1980.12.01-lL4L
BLIRLII.IGAME,
December
CALIFORNIA
l, 1980
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held
above date in the City HalI Council Chambers. Meeting wasto order at 8:10 P. M. by Mayor Martin.
on the
ca11ed
PLEDGE OF ALI,EGTANCE
Led by John R
ROLL CAI,L
Yost, City Planner.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: AMSTRUP,BARTON,CROSBY,I\,LANGINI,MARTIN
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: NONE
MINUTES
Minutes of the studyof November 17, 1980
HEARINGS
1. SPECIAL
APPEALED BY
PERMIT - DANCE PROGRAM AT HOOVER SCHOOL.
CLAUDIA A. BAKER, 2856 ADELINE DRIVE
meeting of November 12 and the regular meetino
were aoproved and adopted.
DENIAL
City Planner reviewed his staff report of l2/L/80 w-1th attached
documentation. Planning Commission had denied becar:se of concern
over traffic and parkinq. He emphasized that this aoplication is
consistent with neighborhood guidelines for school leases, and such
use of this facility by 8 students and two staff members would
generate only 16 vehicular trips per day, not a significant increase
over the trvo other uses approved. Site parking would not be over-
crowded b1z this usei and if traffic problems developed, permit
could be subject to review and correction in five months, dt which
time the two other permits expire.
Mayor Irlartin declared public hearing open.
Claudia Baker reviewed her letter of L1/26/80 to Council, which
centered on traffic and mitigation for its presumed smal1 impact.
She pledged to work with existing tenants to solve problems if
they arose.
The follor,uing people addressed Council in favor of this specialpermit, citing such things as excellence of dance program, MS.
Bakerrs integrity and teaching ability, unavailabilitv of this type
of program in surrounding cities, value of recreational. programs
in neighborhoods
Mrs. Kristine Cannon, 1304 Bernal; Ms. Ann Mori, Peninsula Sports
Center; Frank Pagliaro, L337 Drake; Mrs. Carolyn Root, L407 Montera;
Mrs. Jane Prewett, 297 3 Arguello; Ms. Kathy Peterson, teacher,
United Methodist Church School.
PubIic hearing was declared closed.
In response to Council question, James E. B1ack, Superintendent of
Burlingame Elementary School District, stated that the School Board
would not consider any other tenants for that building unless
traffic conditions were satisfactorv. Council briefly discussed
the Hudnick easement. One of the conditions of the Planning Com-
mission motj-on was that no parking be allowed on this easement on thenorth side of the school.
Councilwoman Barton moved that the denial of the Planning Commission
be overruled and the special oermit be approved with the ten Planninq
Commission conditions and the additional condition that the permit
I'
t L42
expire in five months, the same time as the two other permits for
this school; second by Councilman Crosby, carried unanimously.
2. INTERTELEPHON OFFICE PROJECT - 7OO AIRPORT BOULEVARD.
a. FINAL ENVTRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR 53P
Because of possible conflict of interesL, Mayor Martin vacated his
seat on the dais and Vice-Mayor Mangini conducted this hearinq.
City Planner reviewed comprehensive staff report of 12/1/80 which
covered both EIR and variance. In detailing their proqress through
Planning Commission hearj-ng, he particularly noted that while
applicant's parking Plan A met code, apolicant wanted PIan B with
parking shortfall of 202; and Planning Commission motion to approve
a lesser variance of 10? had failed. Basic to this variance ap-plication was the premise that some mandated oarking space could
be converted into landscapirg, to be returned to parking if need
arose. City Planner presented three issues for Council consideration:
Are legal requirements for variance met? Is 202 variance excessive?
Practical aspects of converting landscaping to parking?
Vice-It{ayor Mangini opened public hearinq.
HE
Frank Pagliaro | 1337 Drake, crj-ticized EIR on qrounds it did not
address sufficiently the potential traffic problems of the area.
spoke of State meeting he attended where it was stated that four
lane highway planned for the area would have to qo throuqh Bayside
Park, and that City would have to pay LAe" of the cost.
Staff informed Council that the wideninq of Airport Boulevard to four
lanesr pLoposed as a mitigation measure even though traffic has not
reached Leve1 D, is currently being studied and consultants will
forward EIR to all agencies. Several alternative routes are beinq
suggested, some of which skirL Bayside Park.
City is already assessing developers for future developrnent of road-
ways. EIR for present oroject states that oroject will not resultin any significant traffic impact.
Council discussed at some length, and went on record as opposing any
alignment of four-lane roadway throuqh Bayside Park.
In response to question from Councilman Amstrup regarding State
drainage ditches in Anza, Director of Public l{orks stated the State
had agreed to notify the City before they do any other work, and
they would also fence off the rest area near the freeway.
RESOLUTION NO. 74-BO ''RESOLUTION CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE INTERTELEPHON OFFICE
DEVELOPMENT - 7OO AIRPORT BOULEVARD, BURLINGAME . EIR 53P,' WAS
introduced by Councilman Amstrup rvho moved its adoption, second by
Councilwoman Barton, carri-ed unanimously.
b. DENIAL
GROUP
OF PARKIIVG VARIANCE. APPEALED BY RA.ISER ARCHITECTURAL
Vice-Mayor Mangini opened public hearing on this subject.
Joseph Kent, Director of Architecture, Raiser Construction Company,
presented series of slides illustrating proposed project and also
showing large vacant areas at peak hours in narking lots of large
buildinqs in the Anza area. These were in support of his argument
that City mandated standards for parking space are excessivei part
of parkinq areas cou1c1 better be used for more project landscaping
which, if necessary, could be converted to parking. He pointed
out landscaping is more expensive than parking but the developer
wishes to add to the aesthetics and quality of the area. He sug-
gested that any building in excess of 100,000 SF be judged by
different criteria since parking use seems to be less than re-
quired, and asked for a 10q5 parking variance.
There were no further remarks and public hearing was declared closed.
143
Council became j-nvolved in lengthy discussion concernin,gr
mechanics of changing parking to landscaoing and vice versa;
"spi1lover" of parking from adjoinino DroDerties; increasing
uses of compact cars; effect of different uses on parkinq usage.In response to cluestion from Vice-Mavor l4anqini-, Mr. Kent agreedthat if Raiser were given the 102 oarking variance landscaping
would be converted to parking if the City deemed it necessary.L. C. Waldo of the Purdy Company told Council his building parking
Iot has eleven sDaces vacant continuallv. He approved more land-
scapinq and less oarking.
In response to question from Councilman Amstrup, John Raiser of
Raiser Construction stated that this svstem of landscaping/oarking
was not used at the Seabreeze building because the idea developed
1ater.
Councilmembers at length approved the concept of trading parking
for landscapinq except Councilman Amstrup who was concerned withfuture effects of this precedent.
Councilwoman Barton moved to grant the 102 variance on parkingwith the condition that if more parking is needed in the future
it can be reclaimed from landscapirg, second by Councilman Crosby,carried on the following ro11 call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:BARTO\], C ROSBY, MANGIN I
AMSTRUP. (rules should be uniform for allNAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
proj ects )
RECESS
There was a short recess at 9:45 P.M. after which meeting reconvened.
APPEAL
1. DENIAL OF
EL CAMINO, BY
PARKTNG VARIANCE
THE REV. .-IOHN T.
FOR CHRTST CHURCH, F'AIRFIELD AND
CAHOON JR.
Mayor Amstrup set hearing for this appeal for the meeting of
December 15, 1980
RENTALS
Mr. Peter Bozovich , 1403 Floribunda #9 , addressed Council, askinqfor their help in resolving a larqe rent increase in his apartment
owned by G. I,'I. llilliams Companv, Belrnont. He pointed out that
despite Cit17 contribution of $900,000 to the taxoayers to lowerthe tax rate, landlords do not hesitate to raise rents. He added
that rent raises are often aided by subsidization of tenants whichis another burden on the taxpayers. As a former State employee he
is unable to get a rent subsidy, and thus is in an economic bind.
Mayor I{artin voiced the sympathv of Council, but reminded Mr.
Bozovich that the voters of the City had rejected a rent control
ordinance in the past. He asked that City AttornelT contact San
Mateo County officials to see if l,tr. Bozovich could qualify for arent subsidy or possibly be aided in finding another apartm.ent.
STAFF MTEMORA}JDA
1. ACTING CITY MANAGER
ON PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
- TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSALS OF CONSTTLTANTS
SYSTEM
Mayor Martin requested this be held until City Manager returnsthat he can review material and make suggestion to Council atspecial meeting of December 10, 1980.
CONSENT CALENDAR
SO
the
1 ORDINANCE
REGARDING
1190 INTRODUCTTON - ''REMOVING DL]TIES OF CITY CLERK
PLANNING COMMISSlON AND CI\ZIL SERVICE COMMTSSION.''
', L44
I
2. RESOLUTIONS
a. RESOLUTIOI] 75-80 - AUTHORIZING DFSTRUCTIO}I OF CERTAI}I
RECORDS, DOCUIVIENTS AND PAPERS,'
b
d
RESOLUTIOI.I 76_80''AUTHORIZING ACCEPTA}]CE
SrATE_EMrrrS-oR Sslen sysrEM EVALUATToN
OF FEDERAL AND
STUDY''
c. RESOLUTION 77-80 "RESOLUTION CONCURRING IN COUNTYWIDE
EXPENDITURE PLAN UNDER THE STATE SOLID I,{ASTE MANAGEMENT
Aer. "
RESOLUTION NO. 78-80 ''AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
TEO, HILLSBOROUGH AND MILLBRAE FOR
JOTNT USE OF AIP" TRUCK BY I'IRE DEPARTMENTS''
TENTATTVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BURIINGAME CO}4}4UNICATIONS
DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY OF BURLINGA}IE
3
4 REQUEST OF NOVEMBER 13,
$5,OOO ADVANCE TO JPAAC
19BO FROM JPAAC CONTROLLEP. FOR
TREASURY.
5. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR 7244 BELI,EVUE
Memo of tl/25/80 from City Engineer recommended aoproval for this
tentative condominium map.
Councj-lman Crosby moved approval of the consent calendar, second
by Councilman l4angini, carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor Martin confirmed that the
would be soIely for the purpose
special meeting of December 10
of cable television discussion.
NEI^] BUSINESS
COMMI S S ION APPOINTIVIENTS
Mayor Martin announced that the committee of Councilmembers Barton
and tutanqini had suggested the following candidates for the Civil
Service Commission: Nannette E. Giomi, Lawrence H. Putman and
MarthaBenson. Councilman Amstruo rnoved that these people be ap-
pointed to the Civil Service Commission, second by Councilman
Mangini, carried unanimously.
Mayor Martin announced that Councilmembers Amstrup and Mangini had
suggested as candidates for the Park and Recreation Commission
Brian l,tay and Shelley S. Graham. Councilman }(angini moved that they
be appointed to the bark and Recreation Commission, second by Council-
man Amstrup, carried unanimouslv.
JUNIOR CHA.}'IBER OF CO},TMERCE
Ir{ayor Martin commended this organization for the Thanksgiving dinner
which it organized and served to senior citizens. He requested
Acting City Manager to write letter of anpreciation-
ACKNOI.trLEDGMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
Letter dated ll/7/80 from Mr. and lr{rs. R. J. Miedel , L707
Toledo Avenuer r€ airport noise.
Communication from Jim T'{ager, Northpark Tenants Committee,
no date.
Letter re noise control regulations at airport from Ed
Arnold, 2L3 Anita Road, dated November 21, 1980-
Letter from Office of Revenue Sharing re City Compliance
dated LL/I9/80.Letter from David B. williams 1438 Laguna Avenue, dated
tL/19/80 re Broadway overpass. Mayor I'{artin requested that
Director of Public Works write l4r. Williams explaininq that
this is a Caltrans problem.
city Planner - Negative declarations including Bayfront
Hotel, 620 Airport Boulevard.
Minutes: Park and Recreation Commission, 1'l/201 Planninq
Commission, LL/24; Beautification Commission' LL/6/80 '
7.
145
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was regularly adjourned at 10:17 P.14. in memorY of
Jules "Boots" Francard, and a minute of silence observed.
E-"*a.-- z/ llicEvelyn ttl-HLLL
City C1erk
-ffi I
I
_l