Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 009-2018RESOLUTION NO. 009-2018 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ICF JONES & STOKES, INC. TO PERFORM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES RELATED TO THE PROPOSED VILLAGE AT BURLINGAME AND PUBLIC PARKING STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT OF PARKING LOTS F AND N WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by The Pacific Companies to construct a new 132 -unit residential apartment building at City of Burlingame Parking Lot F, and 384 -space parking garage at City of Burlingame Parking Lot N.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an environmental review of the project must occur prior to consideration of the proposed development at Parking Lots F and N by the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, ICF Jones & Stokes Inc. has submitted a proposal to conduct the required environmental review related to the proposed development at Parking Lots F and N; and WHEREAS, an agreement has been prepared incorporating the Scope of Services prepared by ICF Jones & Stokes Inc., and provides for compensation in the amount of $113,936, which was found to be adequate to provide the level of environmental review required for the proposed development at Parking Lots F and N, and the costs associated with the services to be provided by ICF Jones & Stokes Inc. are to be reimbursed by the applicant; and WHEREAS, because the agreement will authorize work in excess of $100,000, City Council approval is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with ICF Jones & Stokes Inc. for environmental review services related to the proposed 132 -unit residential apartment building at City of Burlingame Parking Lot F, and 384 -space parking garage at City of Burlingame Parking Lot N, consistent with the Scope of Work attached to this resolution, for a maximum cost of $113,936.00, as stated in the Scope of Work. 2. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the City Manager upon execution of the Professional Services Agreement. I I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certiN4hat the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on the 16th day of January, 2018, and as adopted thereafter by the following vote: 11 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BEACH, BROWNRIGG, COLSON, KEIGHRAN, ORTIZ NAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE City Clerk ♦sr ICF November 13, 2017 Kevin Gardiner Planning Manager 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 Subject: Proposal to Prepare Environmental Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project Dear Mr. Gardiner, ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. ('ICP') is pleased to submit this proposal for a Class 32 Exemption Checklist. ICF formed our team to help the City successfully and efficiently prepare an environmental document in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). We offer a team of highly skilled environmental professionals who will produce legally defensible and comprehensive CEQA documentation, allowing the project to be environmentally cleared and developed as expeditiously as possible. The Village at Burlingame Project (Project) includes two sites within the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Lot F and Lot N. These two lots include approximately 210 public parking spaces. Under the Project, Lot F would include a five -story public parking garage for 384 vehicles, resulting in a net increase of approximately 174 parking spaces. Lot N would include a residential building with 78 workforce units and 54 senior units, for a total of 132 affordable housing units. Parking for residents would be provided partially below grade in 149 stackable parking spaces. The ground floor would also include community space for the residents. A 6,750-sf public park would be accessible from Lorton Avenue. As demonstrated in our proposal, ICF has formed a team of expert internal staff and includes subconsultants (Hexagon [transportation/traffic], Edward L Pack [noise], and Ramboll [air quality]) to successfully and efficiently provide environmental services for the City. This submittal includes our scope of work, cost estimate, and tentative schedule for the Village at Burlingame Class 32 Exemption. ICF proposes to invoice costs monthly, on a time -and -materials basis. This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days, at which time ICF reserves the right to revise the contents or extend the validity date, if needed. We are excited to work with you on this important project and believe we are the best fit for your needs. ICF looks forward to negotiating mutually acceptable terms. To discuss further how ICF can assist you on this project, please feel free to contact Kirsten Chapman, our proposed Project Manager, at 415.537.1702 or kirsten.chapman@icf.com. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely,p �9w�t - �(� V'�.nee."1uh Trina L. Prince -Fisher Contracts Administrator 620 Folsom Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA +1.415.677.7100 +1.415.677.7177 fax icf.com \1/ **ICF Attachment A — Hexagon Scope of Work Attachment B — Edward L Pack Associates Scope of Work Attachment C — Ramboll Scope of Work Attachment D — Budget Attachment E — Schedule 620 Folsom Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA +1.415.677.7100 +1.415.677.7177 fax icf.com Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project A. Firm Profile Founded in 1969, ICF is a leading global professional services firm that provides consulting and implementation services addressing today's most complex management, technology, and policy challenges. Our work is primarily focused in four key markets: environment and infrastructure; energy and climate change; health, human services, and social programs; and homeland security and defense. Our environmental practice provides services in environmental planning, land use planning, regulatory compliance, regulatory implementation, natural resources, and supporting environmental review. Our full- time professional staff includes environmental compliance experts, land -use and natural resource planners, wildlife and fisheries biologists, plant and wetland biologists, watershed planners, restoration experts, archaeologists, architectural historians, community affairs experts, attorneys, engineers, and information technologists. With more than 4,500 employees on six continents, we combine passion for our work with industry and technical expertise to protect and improve the quality of life. ICF is a recognized leader in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance, having prepared thousands of environmental impact studies and related documents since the founding of the former Jones & Stokes. Bob Jones, one of the founders of Jones & Stokes, was instrumental in drafting the legislation that ultimately became CEQA in California. Shortly thereafter, Bob joined fellow biologist Jim Stokes to form Jones & Stokes, which rose to prominence in the fields of environmental planning and natural resources management. By the time it was acquired by ICF in 2008, Jones & Stokes was one of the most well-known and well-respected firms providing NEPA and CEQA compliance services in the Bay Area and throughout the west. Although we are able to draw expertise from all west coast offices, we will service the Project primarily by our San Francisco office. B. Key Personnel and Project Experience We offer unique advantages with our local knowledge on the San Francisco peninsula and experience with issues important to the City of Burlingame (City). This deep local knowledge and familiarity with the area and similar jurisdictions directly relates to enabling us to deliver high-quality environmental support. We understand the issues important to City staff as well as members of the public and, using our relevant experience on other local projects, can anticipate these needs and keep projects on schedule and budget. The ICF team will be led by Erin Efner (Project Director), Kirsten Chapman (Project Manager), and Alex Hunt (Deputy Project Manager). ICF will be supported by subconsultants Hexagon (transportation), Edward L Pack Associates (noise), and Ramboll (air quality). Key ICF staff prepared the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and the Burlingame Safeway Mixed -Use Development Project IS/MND while at previous firms. ICF recently prepared the Burlingame Point Project EIR Addendum and has extensive experience with residential projects throughout the peninsula and Bay Area. Our team is familiar with the local values and issues in the #*ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project Project area and have demonstrated exceptional project management skills on similar projects in the peninsula. We are eager to assist the City with this important Project. ICF has a long reputation as a leader in the preparation of documents on development, infrastructure, and transportation projects throughout the Bay Area. A list of relevant work is presented below. This is not an exhaustive list of projects completed by ICF on the peninsulafin the Bay Area; additional project information is available upon request. ■ Burlingame Point Project—City of Burlingame ■ 1300 EI Camino Real Project—City of Menlo Park ■ Middle Plaza Project at 500 EI Camino Real—City of Menlo Park ■ Various CEQA Streamlining Infill Projects—City of Oakland ■ 15888 Hesperian Blvd. Affordable Housing IS/MND—Mercy Housing California ■ Various Community Plan Exemptions --City of San Francisco ■ The Nueva School 2012 Master Plan Update IS/MND—Town of Hillsborough ■ City Place Santa Clara EIR—Related Santa Clara (Related), Santa Clara ■ SF Giants Mission Seawall Lot 337 Pier 48 EIR—Seawall Lot 337 Associates LLC C. Project Understanding and General Approach The Village at Burlingame Project (Project) includes two sites within the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Lot F and Lot N. These two lots are currently operated by the City and include approximately 210 public parking spaces. Under the Project, Lot N would include a five -story public parking garage for 384 vehicles, resulting in a net increase of approximately 174 parking spaces. Access to the garage would be located off both Highland Avenue and Lorton Avenue. Lot F would include a 137,459-sf residential building with 78 workforce units and 54 senior units, for a total of 132 affordable housing units. Parking for residents would be provided partially below grade in 149 stackable parking spaces. The ground floor would also include community space for the residents. A 6,750-sf public park would be accessible from Lorton Avenue. ICF has reviewed the information provided by the applicant. CEQA Guidelines Sections 15300 to 15333 includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and, as a result, are exempt from review under CEQA. Among the classes of projects that are exempt from CEQA review are those projects that are specifically identified as urban infill development. Based on CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, we understand that a Class 32 Infill Exemption is the required level of CEQA review forthe Project. This submittal includes our work scope, cost estimate, and tentative schedule for a Class 32 Infill Exemption. If it is determined, through the analysis process, that additional CEQA review is required (such as an Initial Study), a revised work scope and cost estimate will be prepared. \1/ -**ICF ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project D. Scope of Work Task 1. Kick -Off, Scoping, and Team Meeting The CEQA process will be initiated by discussing key issues, reviewing completed environmental documents, planning data collection, and refining the schedule for completion of individual tasks. At the outset of the CEQA process, ICF will meet with City staff and the applicant team (Project team). At this meeting, the Project team will: ■ Review the work scope for the document; ■ Discuss pertinent documents, materials, and technical studies developed by the applicant; ■ Review the Project schedule and milestones; and ■ Identify the roles of each team member. The Project initiation efforts will also include a review of the Specific Plan Standard Conditions of Approval (SCAs) for incorporation into the document. Following a review of all materials and provided technical studies, ICF, in coordination with the subconsultants, will provide a data needs list of any additional materials or information needed. At this time, any necessary refinement to the scope of work could be made. Deliverables ■ Revised schedule and work scope, if applicable ■ Memorandum of data requests for the applicant Task 2. Project Description Prior to starting the CEQA analysis, ICF will prepare the Project Description for the Exemption based on discussions with the applicant team, data needs responses, and review of the Project application, plan sets, and supplemental reports. A clear and accurate Project Description, which will be distributed to the subconsultants, is essential for a consistent Project analysis. Based on discussions with the team and on the applicants' application and plans, ICF will prepare a Project Description that will incorporate the following topics:' ■ Project Overview and Background ■ Project Site Location ■ Project Characteristics including: Site plan Development area and uses • Site access, circulation, and parking ' Assumes that data needs outlined in ICF's data request have been fulfilled. '*is_ ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project Amenities/Utilities ■ Phasing and Construction Scenario ■ Project Approvals and Entitlements Deliverables ■ ICF will submit electronic copies of the draft Project Description in Microsoft (MS) Word and Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). Task 3. Administrative Draft 1 Class 32 Infill Exemption California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15300 includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. To qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption, which applies to infill projects like the Project, the approval of the Project cannot result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality per CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. An IS/MND was prepared for the Downtown Specific Plan, which analyzed potential impacts of new infill development and included SCAB to mitigate potential environmental impacts. The SCAB for the Downtown Specific Plan have been found to substantially mitigate environmental effects of projects proposed in the area. As applicable, the SCAs are adopted as requirements of individual projects when approved by the City and are designed to avoid or substantially reduce a project's environmental effects. Because the SCAB are mandatory City requirements, the Exemption will assume that these SCAB will be imposed and implemented by the Project and will not be imposed as mitigation measures under CEQA. The Exemption would use the checklist in Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines in order to consider: (a) consistency with applicable general designation and zoning; (b) project location, size, and context; (c) endangered, rare, or threatened species; (d) impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; (e) utilities and public services. With the exception of 15332(d), a detailed analysis is not needed for these topics. The Project is consistent with existing land use regulations, located on a site smaller than five acres surrounded by urban uses, served by existing utilities and infrastructure, and developed as parking lots. Therefore, the Project site does not have value as habitat and is not expected to result in significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. It is not anticipated that the Project would result in any significant impacts on water quality because it is assumed that the Project would comply with regulations and SCAB that require specific measures for reducing potential impacts on hydrology and water quality, including the _♦1> #*ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project Construction General Permit, Municipal Regional Permit for stormwater discharges (including how the project relates to C.3 requirements), the City Code, and the California Building Code. Thus, in-depth analysis would only be required to analyze the Project's potential traffic, noise, and air quality impacts. Hexagon, Edward L Pack Associates, and Ramboll would prepare a stand-alone technical memorandum to analyze the Project's potential impacts related to traffic, noise, and air quality, respectively. ICF will review the memorandums and incorporate them into the Exemption. The scopes of work for the stand-alone technical memorandums are provided in Attachments A, B, and C. It should be noted that if the Project would require the implementation of mitigation measures to reduce any impacts to a less -than -significant level, the Project would not qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption and a IS/MND would likely be required. In addition to investigating the applicability of CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32), the Exemption will also assess whether any of the exceptions to qualify for the Class 32 categorical exemption for an Infill Project are present. The analysis would compare the criteria of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 (Exceptions) to the Project. Topics include location, cumulative impacts, significant effects, scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, and historical resources. ICF will use the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments to analyze the hazardous materials present on the site. Otherwise, none of the other topics will be evaluated in detail. Deliverables ■ Two (2) hard copies of Administrative Draft 1 Class 32 Infill Exemption Memorandum and technical memorandums ■ One (1) electronic copy of Administrative Draft 1 Class 32 Infill Exemption Memorandum and technical memorandums in MS Word/Adobe PDF Task 4. Administrative Drafts 2, Screencheck, and Final Class 32 Infill Exemption The purpose of this task is to prepare Administrative Draft 2, the Screencheck, and the Final of the Class 32 Infill Exemption for City staff review (if necessary). ICF will prepare each subsequent draft to respond to the City's comments on the previous drafts. Following, based on comments received from City staff, ICF will revise the draft Class 32 Infill Exemption as necessary. The scope of work assumes that the City will distribute the Notice of Exemption, which will be filed by the Project Sponsor. Deliverables ■ Two (2) hard copies of Administrative Draft 2 and Screencheck Draft of the Class 32 Infill Exemption Memorandum and technical memorandums ■ One (1) electronic copy of Administrative Draft 2 and Screencheck Draft of the Class 32 Infill Exemption Memorandum and technical memorandums in MS Word/Adobe PDF format "l/ ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project ■ Three (3) hardcopies of the Final Class 32 Infill Exemption Memorandum and technical memorandums ■ One (1) electronic copy of the Final Class 32 Infill Exemption Memorandum and technical memorandums in MS Word/Adobe PDF format Task 5. Project Management/Meetings The purpose of this task is to effectively manage the above tasks, maintain communication with City staff, and be available for regular meetings. The Project Manager will be responsible for project coordination activities, will maintain QA/QC requirements for document preparation, and will monitor schedule and performance for all work tasks. Project management subtasks also include maintaining internal communications among ICF staff with City staff and other team members through emails, frequent phone contact, and in-person meetings, as well as the preparation of all correspondence. The Project Manager will coordinate internal staff, subconsultants, project guidance, and analysis criteria. Team members will attend and participate in meetings on an as -needed basis. For purposes of the cost estimates, ICF has assumed one City staff and/or Project Sponsor face-to-face meetings and two phone conference calls. Additional meetings may be appropriate during the course of this effort, and will be invoiced on a time -and -materials basis. The total budget and schedule are included as Attachments D and E, respectively Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project ATTACHMENT A - HEXAGON SCOPE OF WORK Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Attachment A flIXAM TPANSPOPTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. November 6, 2017 Ms. Erin Efner ICF International 620 Folsom Street, 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 Re: Proposal to Prepare a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Report for the Proposed Village at Burlingame Residential Development in Burlingame, California Dear Ms. Efner: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a transportation impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed Village at Burlingame residential development. The project is located in downtown Burlingame on Park Road between Howard Avenue and Bayswater Avenue. The existing site is currently occupied by a City -owned surface parking lot, identified as Lot F. The proposed project would replace the existing Lot F with a five - story building that would include 101 one -bedroom units and 31 two-bedroom units, as well as a parking garage to serve the development. To replace the loss of public parking spaces in Lot F and provide additional public parking in the area, the project would replace the existing City - owned surface Lot N, located on Lorton Avenue between Howard Avenue and Bayswater Avenue, with a stand-alone 5 -story parking structure. This scope of services was developed by Hexagon staff based on our knowledge of City of Burlingame and San Mateo City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) transportation study requirements, as well as our past experience with preparing various traffic studies for projects within the City of Burlingame. Our proposed scope of work must be reviewed and approved by Burlingame staff prior to our commencement of the study. The Scope of Services provided below is therefore subject to change. We will inform you if the City requests additional work elements not included in our proposal that would affect the project schedule or budget. Note that our scope of work does not include an analysis of the proposed adjacent parking structure on City Lot N. Analysis of the proposed parking structure would, therefore, be considered additional services and would require additional time and budget. Scope of Services The purpose of the traffic study is to satisfy the requirements of the City of Burlingame and C/CAG and to determine the traffic impacts of the proposed residential development on key intersections in the vicinity of the site. The traffic analysis will include an analysis of weekday AM and PM peak -hour traffic conditions on the surrounding roadway network. The study will determine the traffic impacts of the proposed project at up to 12 intersections in the study area. The tasks to be included in the traffic analysis are: 1. Site Reconnaissance and Existing Conditions. The physical characteristics of the site and the surrounding roadway network will be reviewed to identify existing roadway cross- sections, intersection lane configurations, traffic control devices, and surrounding land uses. Observations of existing traffic conditions will be made to identify any operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of the calculated levels of service. 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 • San lose, California 95113 • phone 408.971.6100 • fax 408.971.6102 • www.hextrans.com Attachment A Ms. Erin Efner November 6, 2017 Page 2 of 4 2. Data Collection. New manual peak -hour turning movements counts will be conducted during the typical weekday peak commute hours (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM). Hexagon has up-to-date (less than two years old) traffic counts on file for nearby intersections on EI Camino Real, but new count data is not available for most of intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project site. New manual peak -hour turning movement counts will be conducted at up to 10 intersections during both the AM and PM peak hours (20 intersection counts total). In addition, new manual AM and PM peak -hour counts will be conducted at the existing Lot F driveways. 3. Evaluation of Existing Conditions. Existing traffic conditions will be evaluated based on existing traffic volumes at the study intersections. The existing traffic conditions at the key study intersections will be evaluated using the Synchro software, which employs the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for intersection analyses, and is the designated City of Burlingame and C/CAG level of service methodology. 4. Project Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment. Estimates of trips to be added to the surrounding roadway network by the proposed residential development will be based on the trip generation rates recommended by the Institute of Traffic Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The directional distribution of site -generated traffic will be forecast based on the projected areas to be served by the residential development as well as existing travel patterns, relative locations of complementary land uses, and information obtained from previous traffic studies conducted for developments in the study area, as available. The site -generated traffic will be assigned to the roadway network based on the trip generation and distribution pattern discussed above. 5. Evaluation of Existing Plus Project Conditions. Project -generated traffic will be added to the existing traffic volumes. Intersection levels of service under existing plus project conditions will be evaluated using the Synchro software. Intersection level of service calculations will be conducted to estimate existing plus project traffic conditions during the AM and PM peak hours after the completion of the proposed residential development. Intersection impacts associated with the development of the proposed residential development will be evaluated relative to existing conditions. The existing plus project conditions analysis will include reassignment of the existing Lot F trips to the future parking structure on Lot N. 6. Evaluation of Background Conditions. Background traffic volumes represent the existing volumes plus the projected volumes from approved developments that have not yet been constructed and occupied. Approved project trips and/or approved project information will be obtained from the City of Burlingame. In addition, roadway improvements associated with approved developments will be assumed as directed by City staff. Intersection levels of service under background conditions will be evaluated using the City methodology. Evaluation of Background Plus Project Conditions. Project -generated traffic will be added to the background condition traffic volumes. Intersection levels of service under background plus project conditions will be evaluated using the Synchro software. Intersection impacts associated with the proposed residential development will be evaluated relative to background conditions. The background plus project conditions analysis will include reassignment of the existing Lot F trips to the future parking structure on Lot N. Attachment A Ms. Erin Efner November 6, 2017 Page 3 of 4 8. Evaluation of Cumulative Conditions. Traffic volumes under cumulative no project conditions will either be obtained by applying a growth factor of 1 % per year to the existing traffic volumes (growth factor taken from the C/CAG travel demand forecast model) or another source as directed by City staff. Roadway improvements associated with volume forecasts will be assumed as directed by City staff. Project -generated traffic will then be added to the cumulative traffic volumes to derive cumulative plus project volumes. Intersection levels of service under cumulative conditions with and without the project will be evaluated using the Synchro software. Cumulative intersection impacts associated with the proposed project will be evaluated relative to cumulative no project conditions. 9. Site Access, On -Site Circulation, and Parking. A review of the project site plan will be performed to determine the overall adequacy of site access and on-site circulation in accordance with generally accepted traffic engineering standards. This will include a quantitative analysis of the anticipated traffic volumes at the site's driveway, as well as a qualitative analysis of the proposed site circulation and parking layout. The site plan review will consider driveway location and dimensions, sight distance, truck access, pedestrian access and circulation, and vehicle queuing. Parking supply will be evaluated relative to the City of Burlingame parking requirements. 10. Signal Warrant Analysis. The need for future signalization at selected unsignalized study intersections near the project site will be evaluated on the basis of the Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3 — Part B) in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The warrant will be evaluated using peak -hour volumes for all study scenarios. 11. Evaluation of Vehicle Queuing. For selected locations where the project would add a significant number of left -turning vehicles (e.g., more than 10 trips per left -turn lane), the adequacy of existing and/or planned storage at turn pockets will be assessed by means of comparison with expected maximum vehicle queues. Vehicle queues will be estimated using a Poisson probability distribution. 12. Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities. A qualitative analysis of the project's effect on transit services in the area and on bicycle and pedestrian circulation in the study area will be included in the traffic report. The traffic study will identify any deficiencies due to the project and will recommend improvements if necessary. 13. Description of Impacts and Recommendations. Based on the results of the intersection level of service analysis, impacts of the site -generated traffic will be identified and described. Recommendations will be formulated that identify the locations and types of improvements or modifications necessary to mitigate significant near-term or long-range project impacts, if any. Improvements could include street widenings, lane additions, changes in lane usage, or modifications to existing traffic signals. 14. Reports and Meetings. Our findings and recommendations will be summarized in a draft TIA report. Hexagon Transportation Consultants will respond to editorial comments on the draft report and prepare a final report. This proposal does not include attendance at any meetings. Meetings with the project team and/or City staff, as well as appearances or presentations at neighborhood meetings or public hearings, shall be considered additional services and will be billed separately on a time and materials basis. Attachment A !\ Ms. Erin Efner November 6, 2017 \� Page 4 of 4 Additional Services Any work not specifically referenced in the above Scope of Work—for example analyzing a modified project description or project alternative, analyzing different phases of development, conducting additional counts of any kind, analyzing more than 15 intersections, analyzing roadway segments or freeway segments, analyzing the proposed new parking structure, developing a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program, drawing conceptual plans for mitigation measures, or attending any meetings— shall be considered additional services. Additional services will require additional budget and additional time. Time of Performance Barring any unforeseen delays, a draft traffic report will be submitted approximately four weeks after: (1) authorization to proceed, (2) City approval of our proposed scope of work, (3) receipt of background project data (ATI), and (4) receipt of all new count data. Overall, we estimate a draft traffic report will be delivered to you in approximately ten weeks. Note that this schedule is subject to the responsiveness of City staff to our requests for information. The final traffic report will be delivered one week after receipt of all review comments. We are ready to start work immediately upon authorization and are prepared to sign your standard contract agreement. Cost of Services The total fee for the Scope of Services (Tasks 1 through 14) rendered under this agreement is quoted for a lump sum amount of $40,000, which includes $5,000 for data collection (i.e., traffic counts). Billings will be conducted monthly, on a percent complete basis' This price quote is good for 30 days and assumes all project -related activities will be completed within one year. Extended project schedules may require additional budget for project administration. We look forward to working with you on this project and appreciate your consideration of Hexagon Transportation Consultants for this assignment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. Sincerely, HEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Gary K. Black President Brian Jackson Senior Associate 41v V Rueben R. Rodriguez Engineer Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project ATTACHMENT B - EDWARD L PACK ASSOCIATES SCOPE OF WORK _♦Os_ ICP Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the reshictions on the title page of this proposal. Attachment B EDWARD L. PACK ASSOCIATES. INC. 1975 HAMILTON AVENUE Acoustical Consultants TEL: 408-371-1195 SUITE 26 FAX: 408-371-1196 SAN JOSE, CA 95125 w .packassociates.com November 6, 2017 Ms. Erin Efner ICF 620 Folsom Street 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 Subject: Proposal to Perform a Noise Assessment Study for the Planned "The Villages at Burlingame" Multi -family and Parking Structure Development, Park Road and Lorton Avenue, Burlingame Dear Ms. Efner: We are pleased with the opportunity to submit this proposal to perform a noise assessment study for the planned "The Villages at Burlingame" multi -family and parking structure development along Park Road and Lorton Avenue in Burlingame. Upon review of the building plans, we propose the following scope -of -work: 1) Conduct on-site noise level measurements of the existing ambient noise environment at residential properties adjacent to the south of the proposed parking structure. 2) Determine the noise levels at the adjacent residences generated by the parking structure. Determine the noise levels at the adjacent residences generated by roof -top mechanical equipment at the residential portion of the project. Determine the project -generated noise levels from demolition and construction of the project. Determine the effect of project traffic noise on the existing noise environment. 3) Calculate the Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) and evaluate the noise exposure impacts against the standard of the City of Burlingame Noise Element and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 4) Develop noise mitigation measures, as necessary, to achieve compliance with the standards. ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS Attachment B -2- 5) Prepare and submit a report including our findings and recommendations. The above work tasks will require 18 man-hours of engineering labor and our fee is Not - to -Exceed $4,500.00. Terms of payment are: Due & Payable upon completion of the report. Required attendance at meetings, presentations or other required services beyond the above described scope -of -work will be billed on a time and materials basis at $250.00/hr. portal to portal. Public testimony, meetings or engineering commencing after 6:00 p.m. or on weekends will be billed on a time and materials basis at $300.00/hr. Judicial/expert witness testimony is billed at $300.00/hr. This proposal can be made a contract by affixing an authorized signature and date of acceptance in the spaces below and returning one copy to us. A Purchase Order or Consultant Service Agreement may also be submitted. Thank you for considering us for this project and we look forward to working with you. Respectfully Submitted, EDWARD L. PACK ASSOC., INC. Jeffrey K. Pack President ACCEPTANCE: Signature: Print Name: P.O. #: IDF: THE VILLAGES AT BURLINGAME Title: Date: Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project ATTACHMENT C - RAMBOLL SCOPE OF WORK Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Attachment C ENVIRON Via Electronic Mail Erin Efner ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. 620 Folsom Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94107 erin.efner@icfi.com PROPOSAL FOR AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS FOR THE VILLAGE AT BURLINGAME ON PARK ROAD, BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA Dear Ms. Efner: November 9, 2017 Ramboll Environ US Corporation ("Ramboll Environ," formerly ENVIRON International Corporation)is pleased to present this proposal to ICF Jones & Stokes ("ICF') to analyse air quality impacts of the construction and operation of the Ramboll Environ 9 9 (�� Village at Burlingame on Park Road in Burlingame, California Project" or the California Street Suite lzoo Suite "Site"). This proposal provides our understanding of the Project, regulatory San Francisco, CA 94111 background, and a description of the scope of work proposed, along with the cost USA estimate. T +1415 796 1950 PR03ECT UNDERSTANDING F +1415 398 5812 www. ramboil-environ.com We understand that the proposed Project, as currently designed, includes the following elements: • Demolition of parking lot "F" (105 spaces) and parking lot "N" (94 spaces); • Construction of a five -level, 305 space parking structure on parking lot "N"; • Construction of a five story, 132 unit residential apartment building on lot "F", with 78 units for affordable workforce housing and 54 of the units for affordable senior housing; • Construction of an underground parking structure for the residential building; and • 6,750 square foot public park/open space. REGULATORY BACKGROUND Ramboll Environ understands this Project is pursuing a Class 32 exemption for infill projects. Projects that qualify for a Class 32 exemption do not require analyses of greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts, so this scope does not address GHG emissions. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Guidelines ("Guidelines")' provide recommended procedures for evaluating potential air quality (AQ) impacts during the environmental review process consistent with ' BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, May 2017 1/7 Attachment C ENVIRON CEQA requirements.,The analyses we propose herein and methods to perform the analysis is consistent with recommendations in the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines. PROPOSED TECHNICAL APPROACH Ramboll Environ proposes to conduct the following technical analyses to estimate emissions and health risk impacts from construction of the Project. Ramboll Environ will use the most up-to-date tools and methods to assess Project impacts. Individual tasks are described in detail below. Operational Emissions Estimation In its CEQA Guidelines, BAAQMD provides screening level sizes for land use projects in Table 3-1. As stated in the guidelines, "If the project meets the screening criteria in Table 3-1, the project would not result in the generation of operational -related criteria air pollutants and/or precursors that exceed the Thresholds of Significance." The screening level size for operational criteria air pollutants (CAPs) for mid -rise apartmentsz is 494 dwelling units. The Project is 132 dwelling units, so it meets the screening criteria and additional analysis of operational CAP emissions is not required. Table 3-1 of the CEQA Guidelines does not provide screening levels for parking structures. However, parking structures do not generate mobile trips and only emit CAPs from area sources such as architectural coating, consumer products and landscaping. The parking structure is smaller in square footage than the apartment building. Because the apartment building meets the screening criteria with a large buffer and the parking structure is expected to have much lower emissions than the apartment building, we assume additional analysis of operational CAP emissions from the parking structure is not required. Thus, analysis of operational emissions will not be conducted, but the screening comparison will be documented in our technical documentation. Task 1. Project Construction Emissions BAAQMD also provides screening level sizes for construction emissions. The screening level size for construction criteria pollutants for mid -rise apartments is 240 dwelling units. The Project is 132 dwelling units, so it meets the screening criteria and additional analysis of construction criteria pollutant emissions is not required. However, as discussed in Task 2, a construction health risk assessment is needed and construction toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions are needed to perform that assessment. Thus, Ramboll Environ will estimate TAC and PM2.s emissions from construction, but not CAPs. For cost estimation purposes, Ramboll Environ assumes all construction equipment will be diesel fired and the only TAC from construction will be diesel particulate matter (DPM). If gasoline, propane, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), or other equipment types are proposed, a supplemental cost estimate can be prepared at that time to incorporate corresponding TAC and PM2.5 emissions associated with such equipment, and the resulting risk. Ramboll Environ proposes to use CalEEMod® (California Emissions Estimator Model), or equivalent methods, for the development of the construction -related DPM and PM2.5 emissions inventory.3 CalEEMod® was developed by Ramboll Environ in collaboration with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for use in developing emission inventories suitable for CEQA analysis, l According to the CalEEMod User's Guide, "Mid -rise apartments are units located in rental buildings that have between 3 and 10 levels." The Project is 5 levels, so would be considered a mid -rise apartment. 3 Software and User's Guide available publically at www.caleemod.com. Version 2016.3.2. 2/7 Attachment C ENVIRON The model is publically available and employs widely accepted calculation methodologies for emission estimates combined with appropriate default data if site-specific information is not available. We will provide a data request for Project -specific data. If such data are not available, default assumptions specific for the Project size and type in consideration can be used when available. However, the default data may overestimate construction activity, particularly for the parking structure. The type of data we will request includes: 1. Equipment details and usage specific to all phases of construction, including the availability of Tier 4 equipment and line power to the site. Due to the proximity of other residences, construction impacts are unlikely to be below thresholds without some Tier 4 equipment;4 2. Total material imported and exported (in either tons of debris or cubic yards) for the site preparation and grading phases or equivalent hauling trips required; and 3. Tons of debris generated for the demolition phase or equivalent hauling trips required. For purposes of this cost estimate, Ramboll Environ assumes one CalEEMod® run, or set of equivalent calculations, will be required. Should additional runs, or rounds of calculations, be required due to refined data beyond the initial data collection or the incorporation of mitigation measures, a supplemental cost estimate can be prepared at that time. This task is estimated to cost $8,000, which includes a kick-off call with the Project Sponsor, the preparation of a data request, one CalEEMod@ run (or set of equivalent calculations), and one conference call with ICF and the Project Sponsor. Task 2. HRA Methodology and Risk Results Both the residential building and parking structure are surrounded by residential and other sensitive locations. Thus, the impact of health impact of the construction of the Project needs to be analysed. This task includes estimating health risks based on emissions from Project construction. Ramboll Environ will base the health risk assessment (HRA) on the total exhaust PM10 (assuming all exhaust PM10 from construction equipment is DPM) and PM2.s emissions from exhaust attributable to onsite equipment during the construction of the Project. As mentioned above, Ramboll Environ assumes all construction equipment will be diesel or electric. For construction emissions, potential receptors evaluated will include offsite sensitive receptors, including nearby residents, childcare centers, and schools. Ramboll Environ will order an offsite receptor report from Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) to identify sensitive receptors nearby the Project to be included in the evaluation. The EDR report will be supplemented by manual checks to identify nearby residential areas. For purposes of this proposal, Ramboll Environ assumes there will not be any early occupancy of residential units during construction on any part of the site. To estimate ambient air concentrations of DPM and PM2.5 from diesel exhaust from onsite construction activity, Ramboll Environ will use the most recent version of the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency regulatory air dispersion model (AERMOD). We will use meteorological data collected at San Francisco International Airport. The most recent five-year period available in model ready format will be used (2012-2016). The estimated annual concentration of PM2.5 at the maximum offsite receptor will be compared with the proposed BAAQMD CEQA threshold for PM2.5 from a single source. The maximum annual 4 In particular, appropriate default data for the additional excavation required for an underground parking structure is not available in CalEEMod®. 3/7 Attachment C ENVIRON concentration of DPM at the various types of offsite sensitive receptors will be used to estimate excess lifetime cancer risks and noncancer hazard index (HI). Estimated cancer risks and noncancer HI will be calculated according to the current BAAQMD Guidance and using default BAAQMD and California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) exposure assumptions. Ramboll Environ will use the most recent OEHHA Guidelines released in March 2015, which include refinements of the assumptions and methodologies relating to children. If the construction risk thresholds are exceeded, Ramboll Environ can discuss potential mitigation scenarios. If evaluation of mitigation scenarios is needed, Ramboll Environ can provide an additional cost estimate for this effort. We assume construction of the parking structure and residential building will be completed before residents move into the residential building. If construction will be phased and residents will be present as construction continues, an additional cost estimate can be provided. This task is estimated to cost $15,000, which includes a sensitive receptor search, modeling using AERMOD and BAAQMD-processed meteorological data, one round of health risk calculations using the new OEHHA Guidance, and one conference call with ICF and the Project Sponsor. Task 3. Cumulative Analysis The BAAQMD recommends performing a cumulative analysis of offsite sources on the maximum individual sensitive receptor from construction. The cumulative HRA will evaluate the health impact of offsite sources on the individual who is maximally exposed from the construction activity. The offsite sources include permitted stationary sources and nearby roadways. Caltrain is about 1,000 feet away from the Project. Due to the distance from the Project and the plans to electrify Caltrain locomotives, we expect this source to have minimal cumulative impact. Therefore, we do not propose to analyze it. If an analysis of the health impact of Caltrain is needed, Ramboll Environ can provide an additional cost estimate for this effort. In accordance with BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, Ramboll Environ will evaluate the health impact of all sources within 1,000 feet of the Project on the maximally exposed offsite sensitive receptor identified in the construction HRA. The BAAQMD provides tools with conservative estimates of impacts from certain offsite sources, including a stationary source tool,b highway screening tool,6 and roadway screening tool.? Ramboll Environ will use these tools and other screening methods, as discussed below, to evaluate each of the sources within 1,000 feet of the Project. The impacts from each source, including the construction of the Project, will be added together and compared against thresholds. In 2015, the Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessments (OEHHA) released new guidance on how to evaluate cancer risk. The BAAQMD screening tools were developed under the old guidance. Thus, Ramboll Environ will use scaling factors approved by BAAQMD to convert risks from the screen tools to be consistent with new guidance. In 2015, the California Supreme Court held that CEQA does not require an analysis of the impact of the surrounding community on new residents. Thus, we assume an analysis of off-site sources on new residents of the Project is not required. However, if this analysis is required by the City of Burlingame for approvals, we can prepare this analysis under a separate scope. s BAAQMD.2012. San Mateo County stationary Source Screening Analysis Tool. Available at: http://www. baagmd.gov/pla ns -a nd-climate/california-environmenta I-quality-act-cega/cega-tools. 6 BAAQMD. 2011. San Mateo County Highway Screening Analysis Tool. Available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california -environmental-quality-act-ceqa/ceqa -tools. 7 BAAQMD. 2015. Roadway Screening Analysis Calculator. Available at: http://www. baagmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-quality-act-cega/cega-tools. 4/7 Attachment C ENVIRON Task 3a. Roadway Air Toxics Analysis The Project is within 1,000 feet of EI Camino Real, which is a major roadway. Vehicles on the roadway emit TACs from the combustion of fuel and thus must be evaluated in an offsite risk evaluation. Ramboll Environ proposes to use the BAAQMD screening tools to estimate the health impact from all roadways with over 10,000 vehicles per day within 1,000 feet of the Project. The health impact will be evaluated at the maximally exposed offsite sensitive receptor identified in the construction HRA. Ramboll Environ will work with the City of Burlingame to obtain traffic volumes for nearby roadways. As discussed above, the cancer risk found in the tool will be scaled to account for the new OEHHA guidance. Task 3b. Stationary Source Air Toxics Analysis Permitted stationary sources can emit TACs through their operations. Ramboll Environ will use BAAQMD's tool with risks from permitted stationary sources to evaluate impact of other sources within 1,000 feet of the Project. Where appropriate, Ramboll Environ will use the distance multiplier to take into account the dispersion with distance from the source and will use refined values from BAAQMD where available. As discussed above, the cancer risk found in the tool will be scaled to account for the new OEHHA guidance. Task 3 is estimated to cost $3,000. Task 4. Documentation Ramboll Environ will communicate the preliminary results of the analysis to ICF and the Project Sponsor via conference call prior to drafting final documentation. At your direction, we will prepare documentation of our analysis. This documentation can take two forms: 1. Annotated tables and figures summarizing the results of the analysis and the methodologies used. 2. A technical memorandum with annotated tables and figures summarizing the results of the analysis and the methodologies used. Supporting documentation for the calculations and assumptions will be discussed in the report. The form of documentation is dependent on cost and amount of documentation needed. Both forms will be prepared as a stand-alone documents; therefore, all aspects of the analyses will be presented. References will be made to the original source documents from which environmental data and information are derived; the data that forms the basis of the calculations will be presented. All key assumptions and descriptions of methodologies will be presented. The figures and tables will be in PDF format. For cost estimation purposes, we assume one iteration of client review and that comments will be editorial in nature. Annotated tables and figures (Option 1) is estimated to cost $5,000 and the technical memorandum (Option 2) is estimated to cost an additional $5,000. COST ESTIMATE The following table describes the cost estimates and scope for each task. 5/7 Attachment C ENVIRON Table 1: Task List and Cost Estimates Task Description Estimated Cost 1 1 Project Construction Emissions - Kick-off call - Preparation of Data Request - One CalEEMod® Run (or set of equivalent calculations) $$,000 - One conference call 2 HRA Methodology and Risk Results - Sensitive receptor search - AERMOD modeling, with BAAQMD-processed meteorological data - Health risk calculations using new OEHHA Guidance $15,000 - One conference call 3 Cumulative Analysis - Roadway Air Toxics Analysis $3,000 - Stationary Source Air Toxics Analysis 4 Documentation - - One conference call to discuss draft results - Preparation of annotated tables and figures $5,000 - $10,000 - Preparation of technical memorandum (optional - $5,000) Total $31,000 - $36,000 The cost estimate for the proposed work is approximately $31,000 and $36,000 if the technical memorandum is desired. Ramboll Environ will conduct this work on a time -and -material basis in accordance with our General Terms and Conditions shown in Attachment A and rates shown in Attachment B. This represents our best estimate of the expected cost to complete the evaluation, and is based on the assumptions described above. Ramboll Environ will not exceed the cost estimate listed here without prior authorization from you. We will work with all parties to deliver the work products on a mutually agreed upon schedule. 6/7 ENVIRON CLOSING Attachment C Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this matter. We look forward to working with you to complete this assignment. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact us at your convenience. Yours sincerely, //Shari Beth Libicki// Shari Libicki, PhD Principal D +1 415 796 1933 slibicki@ramboll.com Attachments: //Sarah Manzano// Sarah Manzano Senior Consultant D +1 415 426 5011 smanzano@ramboll.com A: General Terms and Conditions 3: Rates Authorization to Proceed with Scope of Work for up to $36,000 for the Air Quality Analysis for Village at Burlingame: Accepted and Agreed to: Name: Signature: Title: Date: 7/7 Attachment C ATTACHMENT A GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Ramboll Environ Attachment C ENVIRON GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Ramboll Environ US Corporation, a Virginia corporation, ("Ramboll Environ") agrees to provide professional services under the following General Terms and Conditions: 1. Fees: Ramboll Environ bills for its services on a time and materials basis using standard hourly rates. If requested, we will provide an estimate of the fees for a particular task, and we will not exceed that estimate without prior Client approval. For deposition and testimony we charge premium hourly rates. In certain circumstances we will undertake an assignment on a fixed fee basis if the requirements can be clearly defined. 2. Invoicina: Ramboll Environ bills its clients on a monthly basis using a standard invoice format. This format provides for a description of work performed and a summary of professional fees, expenses, and communication and reproduction charges. For more detailed invoicing requests, Ramboll Environ reserves the right to charge for invoice preparation time by staff members. 3. Payment: Ramboll Environ invoices are payable UPON RECEIPT. Ramboll Environ reserves the right to assess a late charge of 1.5 percent per month for any amounts not paid within 30 days of the receipt date. Ramboll Environ also reserves the right to stop work or withhold work product if invoices remain unpaid for more than 60 days past the receipt date. If Ramboll Environ's work relates to a business transaction, Ramboll Environ shall be paid in a timely fashion, without regard to whether or when the transaction closes. If Ramboll Environ legal counsel determines that Ramboll Environ is required to take legal action to obtain payment for unpaid invoices and Ramboll Environ prevails in court, Client agrees to pay all of Ramboll Environ's costs associated with the legal action, including reasonable legal fees. 4. Subcontractors: Ramboll Environ has a policy that its Clients should directly retain other contractors whose services are required in connection with field services for a project (e.g., drillers, analytical laboratories, transporters). As a service to you, we will advise you with respect to selecting other such contractors and will assist you in coordinating and monitoring their performance. In no event will we assume any liability or responsibility for the work performed by other contractors you may hire. When Ramboll Environ engages a subcontractor on behalf of the Client, the expenses incurred, including rental of special equipment necessary for the work, will be billed as they are incurred, at cost plus 15 percent. By engaging us to perform these services, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold Ramboll Environ, its directors, officers, employees, and other agents harmless from and against any claims, demands, judgment, obligations, liabilities and costs (including reasonable attorneys' and expert fees) relating in any way to the performance or non-performance of work by another contractor, except claims for personal injury or property damage to the extent caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Ramboll Environs' employees. S. Reimbursable Expenses: Project -related expenses including travel, priority mail, and overnight delivery, outside reproduction and courier services will be billed at cost plus 15 percent. The use of company-owned cars, trucks, and vans will be charged at $125 per day. The use of company-owned equipment and protective clothing will be billed in accordance with our standard fee schedule. 6. Access and Information: Client agrees to grant or obtain for Ramboll Environ reasonable access to any sites to be investigated as part of Ramboll Environ's scope of work. Client also agrees to indicate to Ramboll Environ the boundary lines of the site and the location of any underground 1/4 Attachment C Ramboll Environ's General Terms and Conditions structures, including tanks, piping, water, telephone, electric, gas, sewer, and other utility lines. Client agrees to notify Ramboll Environ of any hazardous site conditions or hazardous materials, about which Client has knowledge and to which Ramboll Environ's employees or contractors may be exposed while performing services on behalf of Client, including providing copies of relevant Material Safety Data Sheets. Client also shall make available to Ramboll Environ all information within its control necessary to allow Ramboll Environ to perform its services and agrees to comply with reasonable requests by Ramboll Environ for clarification or additional information. Client shall be responsible for the accuracy of this information. Ramboll Environ shall not be responsible for any damage to underground structures or utilities to the extent such damage was caused by incomplete or inaccurate information provided to us by the client or other party. Client agrees to make Ramboll Environ aware of any unsafe conditions at any project site about which Client has knowledge. 7. Reportina Reauirements: Client may be required under federal, state or local statutes or regulations to report the results of Ramboll Environ's services to appropriate regulatory agencies. Ramboll Environ is not responsible for advising Client about its reporting obligations and Client agrees that it shall be responsible for all reporting, unless Ramboll Environ has an independent duty to report under applicable law. In those situations, Ramboll Environ will provide Client with advance notice that Ramboll Environ believes that it has an obligation to report as well as the substance of the report it intends to make. 8. RCRA Comoliance: Client shall be responsible for complying with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et. seq. ("RCRA") and its implementing regulations in connection with Ramboll Environ's work under this Agreement. Client may request Ramboll Environ's assistance in meeting its RCRA and other similar waste management obligations, including analytical testing to assist Client in proper characterization of waste, identifying potential transporters and disposal facilities for waste (provided that Client shall make the final selection of both the transporter and disposal facility), entering into subcontracts or purchase order arrangements with the transporters and/or disposal facilities selected by Client, and preparing manifests for the Client's approval and execution. Client agrees that, by virtue of providing these services, Ramboll Environ shall not be deemed a "generator" or a party who "arranges" for the "transportation," "treatment" or "disposal" of any "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substance" (as those terms are defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act or "CERCLA", 42 U.S.C. Section 9601). Client agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Ramboll Environ, its directors, officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, judgments, obligations, liabilities, any costs (including reasonable attorneys' and expert fees) relating to: (1) Ramboll Environ's work in assisting Client with its RCRA obligations; and (2) the transportation, treatment, and disposal of hazardous substances or hazardous waste generated by the field activities conducted for Client. 9. Confidentiality: We treat all information obtained from Clients as confidential, unless such information is previously known to us, comes into the public domain through no fault of ours, or is furnished to us by a third party who is under no obligation to keep the information confidential. If we are subpoenaed to disclose confidential information obtained from you or about our work for you, we will give you reasonable notice and the opportunity to object before releasing any confidential information. 10. Independent Contractor: Client agrees that Ramboll Environ is acting as an independent contractor and shall retain responsibility for and control over the means for performing its services. 2/4 Attachment C Ramboll Environ's General Terms and Conditions Nothing in these Terms and Conditions shall be construed to make Ramboll Environ or any of its officers, employees or agents, an employee or agent of Client. 11. Standard of Care: In performing services, we agree to exercise professional judgment, made on the basis of the information available to us, and to use the same degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised in similar circumstances by reputable consultants performing comparable services in the same geographic area. This standard of care shall be judged as of the time the services are rendered, and not according to later standards. Ramboll Environ makes no other warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to its services. Estimates of cost, recommendations and opinions are made on the basis of our experience and professional judgment; they are not guarantees. Reasonable people may disagree on matters involving professional judgment and, accordingly, a difference of opinion on a question of professional judgment shall not excuse a Client from paying for services rendered. Client recognizes that there may be hazardous conditions at sites to be investigated as part of Ramboll Environ's work. Client acknowledges that Ramboll Environ has neither created nor contributed to the existence of any hazardous, toxic or otherwise dangerous substance or condition at the site(s) which are covered by Ramboll Environ's work. Client also recognizes that some investigative procedures may carry the risk of release or dispersal of pre-existing contamination, even when exercising due care. Client releases Ramboll Environ from any claim (including claims under CERCLA or state law) that it is an 'operator" of any site where it performs work for Client or a "generator" or a party who "arranges" for the "transportation," "treatment" or "disposal" of any "hazardous substance" (as those terms are defined in CERCLA), by virtue of its work for Client at any site. 12. Insurance: Ramboll Environ shall maintain the following insurance coverage while it performs the work described in Exhibit "A:" (1) statutory Workers Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage; (2) General Liability for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 aggregate; (3) Automobile Liability with $1,000,000 combined single limit; and (4) Professional Liability and Contractor's Pollution Liability with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. If Client desires additional insurance or special endorsements, premiums associated with that coverage would be considered a reimbursable expense. Upon request, we will provide you with a certificate of insurance. 13. Third Parties: Ramboll Environ's services are solely for Client's benefit and may not be relied upon by any third party without Ramboll Environ's express written consent. Any use or dissemination of Ramboll Environ work products (including Ramboll Environ reports), without the written consent of Ramboll Environ, shall be at Client's risk and Client shall indemnify and defend Ramboll Environ from any and all claims, demands, judgments, liabilities and costs (including reasonable attorneys' and expert fees), related to the unauthorized use or dissemination of Ramboll Environ's work. Client also agrees to be solely responsible for and to defend, indemnify, and hold Ramboll Environ harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, judgments, liabilities and costs (including reasonable attorneys' and expert fees), asserted by third parties arising out of or in any way related to our performance or non-performance of services, except for claims of personal injury or property damage to the extent caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Ramboll Environ's employees. 14. Limitation of Liability: Ramboll Environ shall be liable only for direct damages that result from Ramboll Environ's negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of its services. UNDER NO 3/4 Attachment C Ramboll Environ's General Terms and Conditions CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL RAMBOLL ENVIRON BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, OR FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE CLIENT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER LAW OR CONTRACT. Ramboll Environ shall not be liable for and Client shall indemnify Ramboll Environ from and against all claims, demands, liabilities and costs (including attorneys' and expert fees) arising out of or in any way related to our performance or non- performance of services, including all on-site activities except to the extent caused by Ramboll Environ's negligence or willful misconduct. In no event shall our liability exceed the amount paid to us by you for our professional services (net of reimbursable expenses) and Client specifically releases Ramboll Environ for any damages, claims, liabilities and costs in excess of that amount. 15. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ten (10) days written notice to the other. If Client terminates the Agreement, Client agrees to pay Ramboll Environ for all services performed until the effective date of the termination. Client's obligations under Paragraphs 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 20 shall survive termination of this Agreement and/or completion of the services hereunder. 16. Disputes: All disputes under this Agreement shall be resolved by binding arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. If our personnel or documents are subpoenaed for depositions or court appearance in any dispute related to the project (except disputes between Ramboll Environ and Client related to our services), Client agrees to reimburse us at our then current billing rates for responding to those subpoenas, including out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses. 17. Scope of Agreement: Once Client has signed Ramboll Environ's proposal, that proposal and these Terms and Conditions shall constitute the complete and exclusive Agreement between the parties and will supersede all prior or contemporaneous agreements, whether written or oral. No provision of these Terms and Conditions may be waived, altered or modified except in writing and signed by Ramboll Environ. Client may use standard business forms, such as purchase orders, for convenience only; any provision on those forms that conflict with these Terms and Conditions shall not apply. 18. Nonsolicitation: Both Ramboll Environ and Client agree during the term of this Agreement and for 12 months following its termination for any reason, neither party will solicit for employment, or hire as an employee or contractor, any personnel of the other party involved in the performance of services hereunder. 19. Force Mafeure: Ramboll Environ shall not be liable in any way because of any delay or failure in performance hereunder due to unforeseen circumstances or causes beyond its control, including without limitation strike, lockout, embargo, riot, war, act of terrorism, fire, act of God, accident, failure or breakdown of components necessary to order completion, subcontractor or supplier non- performance, inability to obtain labor, materials or manufacturing facilities, or compliance with any law, regulation or order. 20. Intellectual Property. If Ramboll Environ delivers a written product to the Client, Ramboll Environ hereby grants to Client a perpetual, nonexclusive, royalty -free license to copy, modify and otherwise utilize the product in connection with the Client project for which the Services were provided. Ramboll Environ retains all intellectual property rights. REVISION - May 2015 4/4 Attachment C ATTACHMENT A Ramboll Environ Attachment C ENVIRON Ramboll Environ US Corporation 2017 Rate Structure Ramboll Environ will bill monthly for the actual time and expenses incurred on the client's behalf in performance of the contracted effort. Labor will be billed at the fixed hourly rates indicated below. Materials and supplies, travel, and any other direct costs will be billed at actual cost plus a handling charge (G&A) of 15%. Any subcontracted effort will be billed at actual cost plus a handling charge of 15%. Ramboll Environ does not directly charge for in house copies or normal phone company charges. Labor Category Rates Principal $320 Principal Consultant $320 Sr. Managing Consultant $275 Managing Consultant $245 Senior Consultant 2 $220 Senior Consultant 1 $185 Consultant 3 $175 Consultant 2 $160 Consultant 1 $115 Drafting $110 Support $85 This document is PROPRIETARY to Ramboll Environ. It is being made available for the recipient's proposal evaluation and/or contract administration purposes only. No right is granted to the recipient to use, disclose, or reproduce any information presented herein without Ramboll Environ's express written permission. Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project ATTACHMENT D - BUDGET ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal. Attachment D. Cost Estimate for the Village at Burlingame Project Class 32 Exemption Date pnnmtl 11/138017 7:10 AM Approved by Fi arce ( sh ) 6. Attach Budi Consulting start Subcontractor Chapman E rdl Employee Name Ether H Hum RobertsD Rome HatcherS Send MethleSJ Hexagon LPeck Ranboll Deputy "de, PNject broad Rated Command Rod, Director Manager Manager Hazards Hydrology Air Quality Noise Pmtlmlion Trans Noise At Quality Labor Classficabo 6r Consuk Sr ConSuM 3r Consuh Mng Map Assoc Direct Task a Pmj Dir II II 1 Couple Consul Consul 11 Asst ConsuB SUMb1a1 Subtotal Labor Total Expenses Total Priv Task t.rock-0R, 3coping. and_T__e_a_m M..Uaq 21 4 _ 61_________ ________ :___________:_______ $1,846 ______: ____ ___ ____________ __ $0 .._...- . __ §1_,_8_/_6__ Tash 2. Pmled Description ...................... ...... .........6 __ 2_� _..__ 8�, ......................r..........,......... .,,_,.... 2 . $1 528 _....$11.2... .........:........:....................................... .. §1,528 lass Task 3. Admin Drafi lCless 32 Exemption ....................................................................................y_...._..._;.__....-4 fi ; : 14 j 32: 8 4 : 4: ..........{. 2' 2 {------------- 8 §11166 ............... E4o.0o0 $4,500 : 536,000 $00,508 Task4. Austin Drug 2,Screentllech. Flnal .. Task ............... 2 j 10 j _ 26 1 2 �... 2 1 : .........__..._....1...................$3 1 4 56,846 ........._...._....1................__..............._..._. EO §R,644 5....jest..._.. oprour Task S. Pro'eG MenagemeMMeeBnps 4: 12: 4: 33.. 53332 1 fa 53,332 Total hours 14 42 76 10 6 5 3 10 ICF E&P 2017 Billing Rates §235 $158 $124 $130 $175 $208 $112 $110 Subtata6 53,290 $8,838 §9424 $1,300 $1,050 $1,040 §338 $1,540 524.616 $Io,000 §4,500 W6,000 $80,500 $105,116 Direct Expenses 523.02 ReproduNons $500 523.04 Postage and Delivery $100 523.05 Treat. Auto, in id. Mileage at eunenl IRS rate (.535fmpe) $100 Me* u on all non -labor costs and subcantmdgrs: 10% $8,120 Olred e e e subtotal ns $8,820 Total priee $113.936 Date pnnmtl 11/138017 7:10 AM Approved by Fi arce ( sh ) 6. Attach Budi Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Village at Burlingame Project ATTACHMENT E - SCHEDULE _NI/_ **ICF Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal.