HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1980.08.18g2
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
August 18, 1980
CALL TO ORDBR
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Councj-1 was held on the
above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. l4eeting was calledto order at B:00 P.M. by Mayor Martin.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE F'LAG
Led by Thomas B. Chase, Acting Police Chief.
ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
I\TIbIUTES
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF
BIARRITZ CONDOMINIUMS,
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND CONDOMINIUM MAP,
1299 EL CAMINO REAL
PRESENT : AMSTRUP, BARTON, CROSBY, MANGINI ,I{ARTIN
ABSENT: NONE
The minutes of the regular meeting of August 4,1980 were ap-
proved and adopted.
HEARING
Mayor Martin noted receipt of letter of 8/L2/80 from owner Jean
Gorostiague asking for postponement of this hearing because
neither he nor the other principal could be present at tonight'smeeting. Mayor Martin set date of hearing for Septemlcer 2, 1980.
PRESENTATION: MEMBERS OF BURLINGAME SOCCER CLUB CONCERNING
ADDITIONAL SOCCER FIELD LIGHTS.
I4ayor Martin noted that this matter has been referred to the Park
and Recreation Commission for consideration, and no action could
be taken until their recommendation. However, presentation could
be made if members wished.
Mr. Jim Murray, Vice-President of Burlingame Soccer C1ub, addressed
Counci-l briefly, asking for their serious consideration of more
adequate lighting for soccer fields at Bayside Park. He noted
that with the onset of winter teams would have to practice in semi-
darkness; and added that soccer is the only sport in Burlingame
that does not have its own lights.
STAFF MEMORANDA
1. CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: ''I{ATERLINE PROJECT
UNDER REFUSE AREA. ''
City Engineer reviewed his memo of August 13, I9B0
por+-ed the major break of a 16" water line througll
the dump. He presented three alternatives:
1. Relocation of this line with L2" on Airport Boulevard as planned -for the future. Cost: Around $200,000. This link serving Anza
area would be missing for several months, but normal operations could
be supplied to Anza area by 6" 1ine. rf there were a major fj-re
volume and pressure would be short.
2. Placj-ng liner within existing pipe under the high fill area.
Cost: $30,000 if done with City forces.
3. Locate break, excavate
$50,000.
which he re-
the 1andfill in
area and make repairs. Cost $15,000
93
City Manager's memo of 8/14/80 recommendedpermanentalong Airport Boulevard.replacement
Fire Chief i-ndi-cated he had
and the new line would be a
discussed subject with City Engineercorrective measure.
in response to Council question about property owners' sharing incost of new 1ine, cj-ty Engineer reported the original 1G', line wasput in under an assessment district and it would not be fair toassess owners again.
Council discussed and decided the best measurebe relocation of the existing 1ine.
in the long run would
councilman Amstrup moved that the existing 16" line under thefill area be replaced with 12" line along Airport Boulevard,by Councilwoman Barton, carried on unanimous vote.
California Drive between Burlingame Avenue and Oakto logical breaking place in accordance with fundsable from P.G.E.
land-
second
2. UNDERGROUNDING COMMITTEE RECOMENDATIONS
City Manager memo of 8/L3/80 reported that Utility Undergrounding
Committee had recommended two locations for next undergrounding:
1. Donnelly Avenue between Prj-mrose Road and Lorton.
2 Gro\ze ravail-
He recommended that
ment of underground
necessary legislation be prepared for establish-utility districts, with public hearing.
Council briefly discussed undergrounding location, and fact thatthese sites were chosen to help complete work on downtown area.
Mayor Martin directed that approprj-ate legislation be prepared.
3. CITY MANAGER: "CATV FRAItrCHfSE"
City lrlanager merno of August 13, 1980 recommended that hearing datebe set for six applicants' oral presentations and attached letterof July 28, 1980 from CATV consultant Page suggesting selectionprocess.
Council agreed on the date of September 23, at 8:00 p.t{. for thishearj-ng, with the Council study meeting scheduled for September
t7 , 1980.
council noted recent publicity generated by cable terevisj-on
companies regarding "meetings" and asked that press emphasize thatthese are not City sponsored meetings but insti-gated by TV companies.
4. RESUEST FOR GARBAGE COLLECTION RATE INCREASE , BFI.
Memo of 8/14/80 from City Manager reviewed request for rate in-crease of 26.82 from B.F.I., and reported that meetings of CityFinance Directors had resulted in a difference with Redwoo<l CiLywhich is recommending a higher rate than these cities wish to con-sider. Memo attached report of 8/L2/80 from I'inance Director on
meetj-ng of 7/3L/80 which detailed the two different positions taken.
City Manager informed Council further meetings would be hel.d byCity representatives with subsequent reports to Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT, 2 BAYSWATER AVENUE
Memo
this
of July
special
28, 1980 from Public Works Department recommended
encroachment permit for small brick rva11.
2 LIABILITY CLAIM, JERRY BUCKLEY
Memo of August 13, 1980 from City Attorney recommended denial of
g4
this claim for false arrest since review of facts does not in-dicate liability.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 5O-80 ''ACCEPTING DEED OF EASEMENT OF SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT. "
4. SPECIAL ENCROACIIMENT PERMIT FOX MALL 1419 BURLINGAME AVENUE
Memo of July 25, 1980 from Public Works Department recommended thisspecial encroachment permit for two debris boxes at rear of FoxMaII.
Councilman Mangini moved approval of consent calendar, second by
Councilman Amstrup, carried unanimously.
APPROVALS
WARRANTS
Warrant Nos. 6296
$809, 385.05, were
Crosby, second by
6550, duly audited, in thefor payment on motion_af,by councilman Amstrup/'8$t
amount of
Councilmanried unanimously.
through
approved
Council
PAYROLL
Payroll for Ju1y, 1980, Check Nos. 19642 through 20301 in the
amount of $419,853.52 approved for payment on motion of council-
man Crosby, second by Councilman Amstrup, approved unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
COUNCIL COMMISSION JOINT MEETINGS
In memo of August 14, t9B0 to Council, Mavor l,Iartin suggested dateson which varj-ous commissj-ons could meet with Council in response tothej-r requests. These Commissions are: Civil Service; Traffic,Safety, and Parking; Library; Planning; Park and Recreation; andBeautification. Council had no objections to dates. However, in
response to suggestions, it was agreed that several commissionsshare meetings because of their related interests. These arePlanning and Traffic, Safety, Parking; and Beautification and Parkand Recreation. City Attorney and City Manager will attend meetingof Civil Service Commission and other meetings will be attended byappropriate staff members. City Manager was directed to revise
schedules for these joint Council Commission meetings.
COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS
Memo to Councj-l from Mayor Martin dated 8/14/80 suggested Council
teams for interview of applicants for the following commissions:
Park and Recreation; Planriing; Library; Traffic, Safety e Parking;Civil Service; Beautification.
Council- discussed at some lenqth interview of the 15-20 applicantsfor Planning Commissi-on, with some feeling these should be public
interviews wj-th fulI Council because of commission importance.
Mayor Martin suggested applicants I difficulty in handling public
interviews by a fuII Councilr ErS well as great amount of Council
ti-me involved.
It was decided that each Councilmember would submit to the inter-
viewing team questions which he considered important for interviewing
Planning Commj-ssion applicants. Mayor Martin asked that thesequestions be transmitted to Councilmembers Barton and Crosby by
August 25, 1980.
ADELINE MARKET
In response to question from Councilwoman Barton, City Manager
stated he would again check housekeeping.
EMINENT DOMAIN
City Attorney reported eminent domain action had been filed onpolice station site.
.>ryffi
95
NEW BUSINESS
Councilman Amstrup reminded Councilmembers of Budget Special
Meeting on August 20 at 7:30 P.M.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1. Letter of August 4, 1980 from Michael R. Nave transmittingreply of Vince Muzzi to City offer for his property.
2. Copy of letter of 8/6/80 from City Attorney to George Popyack,
AFSCME representatj-ve, regard.ing controversy over the use of 2,4-D.
City attorney stated City use had been stopped pending resolutionof the situation, and he reported on meeting among staff, union
representative, and health officials as a preliminary step in thisgrievance procedure. Subsequently, report had been prepared by
staff, sent to Union, and if unsatisfactory to Union, wi11.be ap-
pealed to City Manager. Some Council members voiced concern ofsafety of this pesticide and asked that the above report be cir-
culated to Council for i-nformation.
3. Memo of 8/12/80 from City Manager attaching report which in-dicates City is down 7.2% in population (a loss of approximately
2,000 citizens) and up 11.08 in housing units. Council discussedquestionable aspects of these census figures, wj-th City Planner
reporting possible validity because of loss of child population
from the City.
4. Letter of August 6, 1980 from Board of Supervisors urging
referendum measure on SB 200, Peripheral Canal project.
Letter of August 7, 1980 from City of Sacramento urging boycott
1980 Congress of Cities at Atlanta, Georgia because this state
not ratified the Equa1 Rights Amendment.
6. Letter of August 11,
Drive re RV ordinance.
1980 from Mrs. Frank Tomaselli, 801 Acacia
5.
of
has
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
MRS
Letter of JuIy 31, 1980 from R. J. Hanna re newspaper throwaways.
Police Department Report, July, 1980.
Treasurer's Report, July 31, 1980.
San Mateo County Convention e Visitors Bureau Report July, 1980.
Planning Commission Minutes, August 11, 1980.
ALINE LORENZ
Mayor Martin asked for one minute of silence
passing of Mrs. Aline Lorenz, long active in
"Woman of the Year. "
in respect toCity affairs,the
and 1980's
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at
of Wednesday, Augrust 20,
9:00 P.M. to the special budget meeting
1980.
7/ 7/JL
yn Hill
City Clerk