Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 2020.11.16CITY BURLINGmE q $AaiEo JLkE � BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Approved Minutes Regular Meeting on November 16, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date online at 7:00pm. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Beach. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, O'Brien Keighran, Ortiz MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. 5. UPCOMING EVENTS Mayor Beach reviewed the upcoming events taking place in the city. 6. PRESENTATIONS There were no presentations. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT Millbrae Councilmember Wayne Lee thanked the City, Council, and staff for the support they had lent him during his time on the Millbrae Council. (Comment submitted via publiccomment&burlin a�g). Adrienne Leigh discussed two of the grants the City received for traffic improvements (one for the bike lanes on California Drive, the other for improvements east of the train station). She voiced concern about the oak Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes tree on one of the islands east of the train station and asked that it be protected. She congratulated the City on receiving the grants. Mayor Beach and Councilmember Brownrigg thanked Millbrae Councilmember Wayne Lee for his kind words and thanked him for his service. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Beach asked her colleagues and members of the public if they would like to pull any item off the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Colson pulled 8g. Councilmember Brownrigg pulled 8f. Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to adopt 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 8e, and 8h; seconded by Councilmember Colson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 2, 2020 City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve of the City Council Meeting Minutes for November 2, 2020. b. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 25.39 RRMU (NORTH ROLLINS ROAD MIXED USE) DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND CHAPTER 25.40 NBMU (NORTH BURLINGAME MIXED USE) DISTRICT REGULATIONS OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE CDD Gardiner requested Council adopt Ordinance Number 1988 and Resolution Number 141-2020. c. ADOPTION OF A SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 6.56 TO TITLE 6 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING CHAPTER 4.09 UNIFORM TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX CDD Gardiner requested Council adopt Ordinance Number 1989, Resolution Number 142-2020, and Resolution Number 143-2020. d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP (PM 19-01), SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 6, MAP OF CORBITT RANCH SUBDIVISION AT 737 LINDEN AVENUE DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 144-2020. e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO PUMP REPAIR SERVICE COMPANY, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $167,352 FOR THE TROUSDALE PUMP REHABILITATION PROJECT PHASE 2, CITY PROJECT NO.86140 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 2 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 145-2020. f. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATUS OF IMPACT FEES COLLECTED AS OF JUNE 30, 2020, PURSUANT TO THE MITIGATION FEE ACT (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66000 ET SEW, AND MAKING REQUIRED FINDINGS RELATED TO THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Councilmember Brownrigg commented that he appreciated the thorough staff report. He explained that the staff report concerned the different fees that the City levies on different types of developments and how much is in each fund balance. He expressed that it would be helpful in future reports to understand the total amount of fees that are assessed on a development. He noted that this would be difficult since there are many different types of units that are built (studios, townhouses, two -bedrooms, etc.). Councilmember Brownrigg stated that having a sense of the gross fees Burlingame is levying on new housing units would be useful. CDD Gardiner mentioned that staff could certainly do that. He added that when the City established residential impact fees, staff conducted such an analysis in order to ensure the feasibility of future projects. Councilmember Colson clarified that Councilmember Brownrigg's suggestion was not for single-family homes, but for multi -family residential units. Councilmember Brownrigg affirmed that it was for new multi- family units, and that it should be a universal fee so that developers can see the total burden being put on them. Mayor Beach commented that it would be important to review the City's impact fees on developers against what other communities have instituted. She noted that she wanted to ensure that Burlingame remained competitive. She continued that it has been a while since Burlingame holistically looked at these fees and that the City should consider undertaking this review in the near future. Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. Liz Sculley suggested implementing a childcare development fee to help mitigate and offset the need for more childcare facilities in the city. (Comment submitted via publiccomment(&burlin ag me.org) Mayor Beach closed public comment. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 146-2020; seconded by Councilmember Brownrigg. The motion was approved unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. g. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE BURLINGAME — MILLBRAE — SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SEA LEVEL RISE PROTECTION PROJECT UNDER Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes FEMA'S (FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION), BRIC (BUILDING RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITIES) PROGRAM Mayor Beach thanked Councilmember Colson for her work on this grant. Councilmember Colson recognized staff for their help in working expeditiously on the BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities) Grant. She also thanked DPW Murtuza and the Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District CEO Len Materman. Councilmember Colson explained that she and City staff participated in a productive meeting with the Food and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District, Millbrae, and SFO about the vulnerable areas north of Broadway. Councilmember Colson explained that the submission date for the grant was December 3 and requested that her colleagues write letters of support. She stated that they are hoping for $300,000 in grant funds for the next step, and another $200,000 after that. Councilmember Brownrigg thanked Mr. Materman and Councilmember Colson for their hard work. He asked why the grant was targeting areas north of Broadway and not the entire length of Burlingame. Mr. Materman explained that this is due to their analysis showing that Reaches 1 and 2 of Burlingame are most at risk. He further explained that due to the limited funds available, they had to narrow the scope of the project, but that they hope to expand in the future. Councilmember Colson emphasized the importance of the project. She explained that there will be more work to do once they hear back about the grant. Mayor Beach opened the item up to public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Colson made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 147-2020; seconded by Councilmember Brownrigg. The motion was approved unanimously by toll call vote, 5-0. h. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT, PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 Finance Director Augustine requested Council accept the Quarterly Investment Report, period ending September 30, 2020. 9. PUBLIC HEARING a. REQUEST FOR A FINDING OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (PCN) PURSUANT TO SECTION 23958.4 OF THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL CODE, RELATED TO A REQUEST FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF -SALE OF BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES PERMIT ISSUED THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD (ABC) TO PERMIT THE 4 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR OFF -SITE CONSUMPTION AT A GAS STATION MINI -MART AT 1100 BROADWAY CDD Gardiner stated that A&A Gas at 1100 Broadway submitted a request to the City for a finding of public convenience and necessity ("PCN"). He explained that A&A Gas was zoned C-1 in the Broadway Commercial Area. CDD Gardiner stated that A&A Gas is situated within Census Tract 6051, and that under ABC regulations, this census tract is allowed one license. He explained that because the number of licenses within the census tract exceeds the maximum permitted by ABC, the agency's rules require the applicant to seek a "finding of public convenience and necessity" from the City before the agency will complete processing of the license. CDD Gardiner stated that the Burlingame Police Department reviewed A&A Gas' request for approval of the ABC license. He explained that the Police Department supported a finding of "public convenience and necessity" based on the following findings: • 1100 Broadway is located in a commercial business district with no parks or schools in the area; • A&A Gas provides a variety of other grocery and sundry items to serve residents and visitors; • Police -related calls for service at A&A Gas have been minimal. CDD Gardiner stated that although the Police Department supports a finding of public convenience and necessity, Chief Matteucci recommended that five conditions be forwarded to ABC for its consideration prior to issuance of the license: 1. The licensee(s) shall be responsible for maintaining, free of litter, the area in front of and adjacent to the premises over which they have control. 2. Graffiti shall be removed from the premises and all parking lots under the control of the licensee(s) within seventy-two (72) hours of application. If the graffiti occurs on a Friday or weekend day, or on a holiday, the licensee(s) shall remove the graffiti within seventy-two (72) hours following the beginning of the next weekday. 3. The exterior of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the premises. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. 4. Electronic video surveillance shall be maintained at the premises, minimally covering the entrances and exits. Footage shall be maintained for at least 30 days. 5. Loitering (loitering is defined as "to stand idly about; linger aimlessly without lawful business") is prohibited on any sidewalks or property adjacent to the licensed premises under the control of the licensee(s). Mayor Beach opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran stated that this was a straightforward PCN request. She agreed with all the conditions that the Police Department recommended. 5 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 148-2020; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote 5-0. 10 STAFF REPORTS a. CONSIDERAITON OF TWO APPOINTMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION City Manager Goldman stated that there were two vacancies on the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission ("TSPC") due to the expiration of Jeff Londer and Lynn Israelit's terms. She noted that Commissioner Londer elected not to reapply, thus extending the application deadline. She stated that the City received five applications, and that the City Council interviewed all five applicants on November 9, 2020. The applicants were Adrienne Leigh, Lynn Israelit, Christopher D Beall, Manito Velasco, and John Allan. City Manager Goldman stated that the Council would be appointing two people to serve three-year terms ending in November of 2023. Mayor Beach thanked Commissioner Londer for his years of service to the City. Mayor Beach opened up the item for public comment. No one spoke. City Clerk Hassel -Shearer asked that Council Zoom chat their votes to her. City Clerk Hassel -Shearer read their ballots. During the first round of voting, a majority was reached for Lynn Israelit and Adrienne Leigh. Congratulations to Lynn Israelit on being re -appointed, and congratulations to Adrienne Leigh on her appointment. Councilmember Colson thanked the Councilmembers for handling the meeting as she was unable to attend and wanted to thank all of those that applied. She noted that she was able to watch the recording of the interviews. The Council thanked Commissioner Londer for his 12 years of service and for all he has done for the community. b. CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING THE FREQUENCY OF TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION MEETINGS DPW Murtuza explained that staff recommend that Council discuss whether to increase the frequency of Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission meetings from once a month to twice a month. 6 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes DPW Murtuza stated that TSPC meetings are typically staffed by Senior Civil Engineer Andrew Wong, who is responsible for the technical work that occurs prior to the meetings, and Management Assistant Stephanie Brewer, who performs administrative duties such as publishing agendas and transcribing meeting minutes. He added that the Police Department's Traffic Sergeant also attends the meetings in order to provide reference and guidance regarding traffic enforcement and violation matters. DPW Murtuza reviewed TSPC-related staff duties: • Receive and respond to all public inquiries. • Conduct necessary field surveys, data collection, traffic studies, and warrant analysis work to aid with preparation of staff reports. • Conduct neighborhood meetings with affected residents and businesses prior to the TSPC meetings on an as -needed basis. • Prepare staff reports and supporting documents including the preparation of PowerPoint presentations and visual aids. • Review and approve transcribed meeting minutes for TSPC distribution. • Coordinate with the TSPC Chair and Vice Chair in developing, preparing, and finalizing the meeting agenda materials. • Provide technical support and attend TSPC subcommittee meetings that are held by TSPC subcommittees outside of regular meetings. DPW Murtuza explained that it currently takes an average of 62 to 85 hours of staff time to prepare for the monthly TSPC meeting. When there have been controversial items on the agenda, it has taken more than 100 hours of staff time to prepare for the meeting. He added that staff also has to manage Capital Improvement Program projects design, administer construction contracts, review traffic control plans for encroachment permits, conduct plan checks of private development projects, review event permits, coordinate with local schools on traffic issues, address traffic safety problems that typically do not go to the TSPC, and represent the City on regional transportation projects and with regional agencies. DPW Murtuza stated that the addition of a second regular monthly TSPC meeting would require more staff time for the preparation of the meeting. He stated that this additional work would severely impact current staff s capacity to handle other ongoing projects and responsibilities. DPW Murtuza stated that the need for a second monthly meeting may not be as essential as originally considered since much of the work involved in traffic inquiries and concerns is typically addressed by staff as part of their daily duties. He explained that in many situations, public inquiries and concerns that are presented at the monthly TSPC meeting are redirected to staff for response or action. He added that in many instances, public inquiries and concerns regarding traffic/bike/pedestrian safety matters get addressed by staff before being brought to the TSPC to avoid delays. 7 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes DPW Murtuza concluded that staff believes the need for additional TSPC meetings can be handled through special meetings or ad -hoc subcommittee meetings on an as -needed basis. Additionally, at the September 10, 2020 TSPC meeting, as part of a discussion on a separate item (item 9), the Commission touched on the subject of additional meetings. The TSPC commented that special as -needed meetings would be "ideal" and that "they didn't feel the need to meet more often than the current schedule". He stated that at the November 12 TSPC meeting, members voted 4-1 in favor of recommending meetings once a month and additional TSPC meetings on a special or ad -hoc basis. Mayor Beach asked if there were any questions for staff. There were none. Mayor Beach opened the item for public comment. There were no comments. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that over the last couple of years, he has been inundated with public comments and questions about approving traffic safety projects. He explained that these questions and comments should be addressed by the Commissioners and not the Councilmembers. Councilmember Brownrigg voiced concern about how the process was currently set up. He explained that while he believes that the Public Works Department is working hard, and he thinks highly of staff, there needed to be more opportunities for public input on traffic safety projects. Councilmember Ortiz stated he had a hard time seeing how there is enough benefit in the added meetings to offset the cost and staff time. He believed the ad -hoc meetings would be enough. He added that he was against moving to two meetings per month for TSPC. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran concurred with Councilmember Ortiz. She explained that the City can continue to utilize subcommittees as they have in the past. She suggested that staff push for more subcommittee meetings when there is more public interest in certain projects. Councilmember Colson stated that she was concerned that adding an additional meeting per month will overburden the commissioners. She voiced support instead for defining the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission's agenda each year and instituting more regular joint meetings with Council. Mayor Beach concurred with Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran and Councilmember Colson. She agreed that the City makes good use of ad -hoc committees. She stated that TSPC does a good job reviewing projects and vetting higher -level projects for Council. Council agreed that TSPC should continue to meet once a month with ad -hoc meetings as needed. c. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SIERRA TRAFFIC MARKINGS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $270,584.30 FOR THE LYON HOAG NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1, CITY PROJECT NO.85950, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 8 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes DPW Murtuza recommended Council approve the resolution to award a construction contract to Sierra Traffic Markings, Inc for Phase One of the Lyon Hoag Traffic Calming Improvements Project. He noted that traffic in the Lyon Hoag and adjacent neighborhoods has been a longstanding concern. He explained that staff has been working for the last couple of years with the residents of the neighborhoods to get their input and devise strategies. He stated that as a result, staff developed a traffic calming solution and recommendation plan. He explained that this staff report was for the first phase of that plan. DPW Murtuza stated that Phase 1 includes: • Trial striped traffic circles and/or median islands at nine intersections • Trial speed cushions at eight locations • High visibility crosswalk enhancements at 23 locations • Additional curb marking, signage, and striping at various locations • Widening existing four -foot bike lane to a five-foot Class II bike lane on Howard Avenue • Trial striped bulbouts at six intersections DPW Murtuza stated that Phase 1 improvements are aimed at quickly delivering near -term pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic calming improvements, unlike major capital projects that can take longer to design, bid, and construct. He explained that the Phase 1 improvements are reversible, adjustable traffic safety enhancements intended to be evaluated and reviewed within an initial period of two to three years after construction to help design and plan for mid-term modifications and long-term designs. DPW Murtuza stated that Sierra Traffic Markings, Inc.'s bid was 2 1 % lower than the engineer's estimate. Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 149-2020; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TOWN OF ATHERTON'S WITHDRAWAL FROM MEMBERSHIP IN THE SOUTH BAYSIDE WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Finance Director Augustine explained that Burlingame is one of 12-member agencies that comprise the Joint Powers Authority ("JPA") known as RethinkWaste, or the South Bayside Waste Management Authority ("SBWMA"). Finance Director Augustine explained that on June 29, 2020, Atherton formally notified SBWMA of its intent to withdraw effective December 31, 2020. In response, the SBWMA Board held a special meeting on August 20, 2020, and determined that to liquidate in full its proportion of any existing debts, obligations, and liabilities incurred, earned, or expected to be earned by the date of withdrawal (December 31, 2020), Atherton would be required to pay approximately $2,203,016. She explained that the actual amount is subject to determination on the date of defeasance, which must occur before December 31, 2020. Atherton needs 10 of the 12 members to vote in favor of withdrawal. 9 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Colson commented that she hoped that Council and citizens understood the benefits of collaborating with other cities and that there is great value in the JPA structure. She stated that she was disappointed in her Atherton colleagues for deciding to withdraw from the JPA. She thanked the other members of the SBWMA and Councilmember Brownrigg for the work they do on the JPA. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran commented that JPAs are a collaborative effort and a good negotiating tool. She stated that she hoped that moving forward, other cities wouldn't pull out of the SBWMA. Councilmember Ortiz concurred with Councilmember Colson and Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran. He commented that the JPA is about strength in numbers. However, Atherton has made their choice, and the City will go along with it. Mayor Beach concurred with everything said. Councilmember Brownrigg thanked his fellow Councilmembers for their universal view on the matter. He stated that he was sorry to see Atherton leave the SBWMA. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 150-2020; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SHASTA COUNTY TO PURCHASE RULE 20A CREDITS AND DISCUSSION OF PURCHASING RULE 20A CREDITS FROM MARIPOSA COUNTY FOR UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING WORK ON EL CAMINO REAL City Manager Goldman explained that on October 19, the City Council authorized staff to purchase Rule 20A credits from the City of Saratoga at a discounted rate of $.30 per credit. Once this purchase, which is in process, has been completed, the City will have approximately $10.5 million in Rule 20A credits. She explained that the estimated cost to underground the overhead utilities on El Camino Real is $25 million to $30 million. She stated that over the past several weeks, City staff have corresponded with the County Executive Officer and other staff from Shasta County regarding their interest in selling Rule 20A credits to the City. The Shasta County Board of Supervisors discussed the matter at their November 3 Board meeting and gave direction to staff to negotiate a deal with the City of Burlingame. She noted that the price matches the Saratoga price of $.30 per credit, or $7,5000,000 in credits at a cost of $2,225,000. City Manager Goldman explained that the City also has an opportunity to purchase credits from Mariposa County, though at a higher price. The County Administrative Officer for Mariposa County recently responded to staff s offer to purchase the County's credits with a counter offer of approximately $.34 per credit, or $1,150,000 for their $3,376,937 in Rule 20A credits. She noted that the Mariposa County Board of Supervisors gave the County Administrative Officer the authority to offer this price. She added that the City received the Mariposa County offer before it received the Shasta County offer. 10 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes City Manager Goldman explained that when the Mariposa County offer was received, the City Council subcommittee of Mayor Beach and Councilmember Brownrigg recommended bringing this matter to the City Council for discussion, rather than approval, as the price is higher than that paid for the Saratoga credits. She stated that the City now has an opportunity to acquire a significant number of credits at a lower price. City Manager Goldman stated that given this turn of events, and the fact that DPW Murtuza believes that the City should not acquire more than $18 million in credits (the approximate amount the City will have if the Shasta County purchase goes through) until the El Camino Real project advances further, staff recommends rejecting the Mariposa County offer at this time. City Manager Goldman recommended adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Colson asked if the City still needs an additional $10 million to underground the utility lines, how will the City close the funding gap. City Manager Goldman stated that there were various options that staff was exploring including discussions with Caltrans and potential Rule 20A credit changes. Councilmember Colson stated that she wanted to make sure that there was a plan in place to close the funding gap. City Manager Goldman responded that there are a few different ways to close the funding gap, but is not sure which one(s) the City will pursue yet. She stated that since the project is in the early stages, she didn't want the City to overspend on credits and have to look for other ways to spend the credits later. Councilmember Colson agreed and stated she was glad the staff went back and negotiated for $.30 per credit and expressed support for having the City keep as close to $.30 per credit as possible. Councilmember Colson asked if it was possible to underground sections of the utilities. City Manager Goldman stated that it is possible to phase the project. She added that her preference would be to start south and work north. This is because the southern portion of El Camino Real has more trees. DPW Murtuza stated that the $18 million in credits will allow the City to leverage more credits in the future. He explained that a proposed CPUC rule change would allocate more credits to projects that are large and need additional credits. Councilmember Ortiz asked how the long the credits will last once purchased and when the project would start. DPW Murtuza answered that Rule 20A credits are good for 10 years and will expire for projects that are not active. He stated that the project is looking to start in the 2023-2024 timeframe if all goes well with the current schedule. Councilmember Ortiz asked what an active project is. DPW Murtuza explained that since Council identified El Camino Real as an undergrounding district, this gives the project an active status. Working on the project on a regular basis with PG&E and Caltrans keeps it in its active status as well. Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. 11 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes City Manager Goldman stated that the City had received numerous letters from the El Camino Real Task Force in support of the project. Mayor Beach closed public comment. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 151-2020; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no reports. 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS There were no future agenda items. 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlin-ag me.org. 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Beach adjourned the meeting at 8:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk 12 Burlingame City Council November 16, 2020 Approved Minutes