Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2020.09.21CITY v 0 ticow � � rPORATED Monday, September 21, 2020 City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda - Final City Council 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers On March 17, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow for local legislative bodies to conduct their meetings telephonically or by other electronic means. Pursuant to the Governor's Executive Order N-33-20 issued on March 19, 2020, and the CDC's social distancing guidelines which discourage large public gatherings, the Council Chambers will not be open to the public for the September 21, 2020 City Council Meeting. Members of the public may view the meeting by logging into the Zoom meeting listed below. Additionally, the meeting will be streamed live on YouTube and uploaded to the City's website after the meeting. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame.org. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting, or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda or is on the Consent Calendar. The length of the emailed comment should be commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed for verbal comments, which is approximately 250-300 words. To ensure that your comment is received and read to the City Council for the appropriate agenda item, please submit your email no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 21, 2020. The City will make every effort to read emails received after that time, but cannot guarantee such emails will be read into the record. Any emails received after the 5:00 p.m. deadline which are not read into the record, will be provided to the City Council after the meeting. All votes are unanimous unless separately noted for the record. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 911712020 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final September 21, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m. - Online To Join the Zoom Meeting (note that the link below doesn't look like a hyperlink, but it is) https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89560601331 ? pwd=ZTJaSGhoWUROTOovUitnZHVhdzhuZz09 Meeting ID: 895 6060 1331 Passcode:145138 One tap mobile +16699006833„89560601331# US (San Jose) +13462487799„89560601331# US (Houston) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 929 436 2866 US (New York) Meeting ID: 895 6060 1331 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdlRAe8bMM 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION 5. UPCOMING EVENTS 6. PRESENTATIONS 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA Members of the public may speak about any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Council agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the City Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 911712020 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final September 21, 2020 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consent calendar items are usually approved in a single motion, unless pulled for separate discussion. Any member of the public wishing to comment on an item listed here may do so by submitting a speaker slip for that item in advance of the Council's consideration of the consent calendar. a. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes for September 8, 2020 Attachments: Meeting Minutes b. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with Wilsey Ham in the Amount of $351,545 for Design Services for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Water Main Replacement Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Professional Services Agreement Project Location Map C. Adoption of a Resolution Providing a Tolling of Existing Development Entitlements Attachments: Staff Report d. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Send a Letter to the Governor Requesting Consideration of Organized Hotel Meetings of Up to 50 Persons Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Draft Letter Draft September 9, 2020 ED Subcommittee Minutes 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Public Comment) City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 911712020 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final September 21, 2020 a. Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code (Donnelly Avenue Commercial District) and Consideration of an Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to Allow Multifamily Residential Uses Above the First Floor on Properties Located North of Donnelly Avenue that have Sole Frontage on Donnelly Avenue; Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Design Review, Conditional Use Permit for Building Height; Condominium Permit; and Lot Combination for a Proposed Fourteen (14) Unit Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development to be Located at 1214-1220 Donnelly Avani is Attachments: Staff Report Proposed Ordinance Map of Planning Areas - Downtown Specific Plan Figure 1 - Map of Properties Included in Amendment Resolution - General Plan/Downtown Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A - Chapter 3 - Planning Areas Exhibit B - Table 3-1 Planning Area Land Uses Resolution - CEQA Resolution - Entitlements Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - August 10, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report - August 10, 2020 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Project Materials Project Plans 10. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS (Public Comment) a. Adoption of a Resolution Suspending CUP Timelines for 778 Burlway During Evaluation of an Alternative Development Plan Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Enterprise Letter October 2016 CUP Conditions of Approval b. Review of the FY 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summarv: and Adoption of a Resolution Amending the Operating Budget to Reflect Receipt of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) in FY 2020-21 Attachments: Staff Report Resolution City of Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 911712020 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final September 21, 2020 C. Adoption of an Ordinance Addina Chapter 6.10. "Minimum Waae" to Title 6. "Business Licenses and Regulations," of the Burlingame Municipal Code Attachments: Staff Report Proposed Ordinance September 8, 2020 Staff Report 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmembers report on committees and activities and make announcements. a. Mayor Beach's Committee Report Attachments: Committee Report 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlingame.org. 14. ADJOURNMENT Notice: Any attendees who require special assistance or a disability -related modification accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, or other writings that may be distributed at the meeting, should contact Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk, by 10:00 a.m. on Monday, September 21, 2020 at (650) 558-7203 or at mhasselshearer@burlingame.org. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting, the materials related to it, and your ability to comment. NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 5, 2020 VIEW REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ONLINE www.burlingame.org/video Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection via www.burlingame.org or by emailing the City Clerk at mhasselshearer@burlingame.org. If you are unable to obtain information via the City's website or through email, contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-7203. City of Burlingame Page 5 Printed on 911712020 Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 CITY C BURLINGAME q $Anreo� u[b,e BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting on September 8, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date online at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Beach. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, O'Brien Keighran, Ortiz MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. 5. UPCOMING EVENTS Mayor Beach reviewed the upcoming events taking place in the city. 6. PRESENTATIONS There were no presentations. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT Manito Velasco discussed the Lyon Hoag traffic calming project. He asked for more information about the plan and when solutions would be implemented. (comment submitted via publiccomment(d),burlin ag me.org). Peter Comaroto discussed his concerns with the ADU permitting process. He asked that the City review this process to make it easier and quicker. 1 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Beach asked her colleagues and members of the public if they would like to pull any item off the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Brownrigg pulled 8b and 8h. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran made a motion to adopt items 8a, 8c, 8d, 8e, 8f, and 8g; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 17, 2020 City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve of the City Council Meeting Minutes for August 17, 2020. b. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIG FOR PREPARATION OF AN UPDATE OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE Councilmember Brownrigg stated that the staff report notes that staff expects it to take nine months to review the zoning ordinance. He asked if the timeline could be compressed. He discussed the importance of getting the zone ordinance completed so that construction and development could move forward. CDD Gardiner stated that the timeline is based on the experiences of other cities. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that there are a lot of important changes in the General Plan. He asked how staff will ensure that the zoning ordinance doesn't undercut what was done in the General Plan. CDD Gardiner stated that staff will need to track changes against the General Plan. Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 113-2020; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. c. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A $792,524 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE 2020 SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM, CITY PROJECT NO.85960, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 114-2020. d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A $478,740 CONTRACT TO DUKE'S ROOT CONTROL, INC., FOR THE SANITARY SEWER ROOT CONTROL PROGRAM, CITY PROJECT NO. 86110 2 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 115-2020. e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE FY 2019-20 CITYWIDE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT BY RANGER PIPELINES, INC., CITY PROJECT NO.85570 DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 116-2020. f. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILSEY HAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $157,223 FOR THE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE 1740 ROLLINS ROAD SEWAGE PUMP STATION EFFLUENT FORCE MAIN UPGRADES PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 117-2020. g. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A ONE-YEAR SERVICE ORDER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES FROM THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY Finance Director Augustine requested Council adopt Resolution Number 118-2020. h. OPEN NOMINATION PERIOD TO FILL TWO VACANCIES ON THE TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Councilmember Brownrigg stated that previously, he discussed expanding the number of meetings for Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission from one per month to two. He noted that Council has yet to discuss this issue. However, because the City would be seeking applications for the two vacancies, he thought it was important to include this information in the application. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative. Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran made a motion to open the nomination period to fill the two vacancies on the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission; seconded by Councilmember Colson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 9. PUBLIC HEARING a. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A LOCAL MINIMUM WAGE IN BURLINGAME City Manager Goldman stated that the minimum wage in California has increased each year since 2017. She discussed the following chart that shows the current minimum wage and the future minimum wage for all areas in California without local minimum wage ordinances. Date Minimum Wage for Employers with 25 Employees or Fewer Minimum Wage for Employees with 26 Employees or More January 1, 2020 $12.00/hour $13.00/hour January 1, 2021 $13.00/hour $14.00/hour January 1, 2022 $14.00/hour $15.00/hour January 1, 2023 $15.00/hour City Manager Goldman explained that after the State minimum wage reaches $15 an hour for all employees, the rate will be adjusted annually (beginning January 1, 2024) for inflation based on CPI. She added that the State minimum wage cannot be lowered, even if there is a negative CPI, and the highest increase allowed in any one year is 3.5%. City Manager Goldman stated that the City Council held a study session on February 3, 2020, to discuss whether it wished to accelerate the increase in the minimum wage through adoption of a local ordinance. She explained that the Council heard from a number of speakers and indicated their interest in considering a local minimum wage ordinance that would be effective January 1, 2021. The January 1, 2021 effective date is one year in advance of the State reaching $15 an hour for employers with 26 or more employees. She stated that the Council directed staff to use the City of San Mateo's minimum wage ordinance as a model. City Manager Goldman stated that cities are permitted by law to enact their own minimum wage ordinances, and many in the Bay Area have elected to do so, often with the increase occurring over several years. She discussed the following chart that shows the minimum wage for all San Mateo County cities that have a local minimum wage ordinance. 4 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 city 2020 Minimum Wage 2021 Minimum Wage 2022 Minimum Wage Daly City $13.75 $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (up to 3.5% East Palo Alto State minimum wage $15.00 $15.00 + CPI no limit Half Moon Bay State minimum wage $15.00 $15.00 + CPI no limit Menlo Park $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (up to 3%) 2021 rate + CPI (up to 3% San Carlos State minimum wage $15.00 + CPI (up to 2021 rate + CPI (up to 3.5%) 3.5% South San Francisco $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (no limit) 2021 rate + CPI (no limit Redwood City $15.38 $15.38 + CPI (no limit) 2021 rate + CPI (no limit San Mateo $15.38 $15.38 + CPI (no limit) 2021 rate + CPI (no limit Belmont $15.00 $15.90 $15.90 + CPI (up to 3.5% City Manager Goldman noted that the above chart is sorted by what the minimum wage will be in 2021. She stated that the total combined population in the nine cities represented in the chart is approximately 65% of the County's population. She explained that the minimum wage in these cities applies to all adults and minors who work two or more hours per week. She added that employees classified as "Learners", as defined by the California Industrial Welfare Commission Order Number 4-2011, can be paid no less than 85% of the minimum wage for the first 160 hours of employment. Thereafter, the employees must be paid the minimum wage. Tips and other benefits may not be considered as an offset to the minimum wage. City Manager Goldman explained that several cities in the Bay Area, including Redwood City and San Mateo, participate in a joint contract with the City of San Jose's Office of Equality Assurance to provide enforcement for the local minimum wage ordinance. She noted that cities do this because they are too small to take on this duty themselves. She explained that she was able to talk to someone from the Equality Assurance Office who told her that they are under contract with ten cities. She stated that the City would pay San Jose approximately $13,500 annually to enforce their minimum wage ordinance. She noted that staff recommends that if the City adopts a minimum wage ordinance, that the City contract with San Jose. City Manager Goldman stated that at the February study session, it was discussed that Millbrae was considering adopting a minimum wage ordinance. However, staff has been unable to find any information as to discussions about a local minimum wage ordinance in Millbrae. City Manager Goldman noted that there are several cities in Santa Clara County that have adopted local minimum wage ordinances including: Cupertino, Los Altos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale. She added that all of these cities include a CPI escalator. 5 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 City Manager Goldman stated that San Mateo County doesn't have a minimum wage ordinance for unincorporated areas. Instead, San Mateo County has a living wage ordinance that sets the minimum that contractors must pay employees working under County contracts. The current wage as of July 1, is $17.19 and it will increase by CPI on July 1, 2021. She noted that the program is set to sunset on June 30, 2022. City Manager Goldman stated that the City and County of San Francisco has both a local minimum wage ordinance and a minimum compensation ordinance. The local minimum wage in San Francisco increased from $15.59 to $16.07 on July 1. The minimum compensation ordinance covers most City service contractors and tenants at the San Francisco International Airport. Under the minimum compensation ordinance, employers must provide their employees with no less than the minimum compensation wage rate, which increased from $17.66 per hour to $18.24 per hour for for -profit employers. The rate for non-profit and public entity employers remains $16.50 per hour. City Manager Goldman reviewed key portions of the proposed ordinance: • Minimum wage is set at $15 per hour starting in January 2021 for Burlingame businesses • Business owners do not have to pay first -degree relatives the increased minimum wage, but all other requirements of relevant State law continue to apply City Manager Goldman stated that at the February study session, Mayor Beach noted that she reached out to members of the Burlingame business community, including retailers and restauranteurs, to seek their input regarding a local minimum wage ordinance. She explained that from August 20 to September 1, staff conducted a non -scientific local minimum wage survey via SurveyMonkey. She noted that the City took a survey that Alameda previously used and added to it questions staff obtained from Redwood City. She stated that the survey was put in the City's eNews twice, posted on Nextdoor, sent directly to the Chamber of Commerce and BIDS for distribution, and shared with hoteliers and Burlingame Talks Shop attendees. City Manager Goldman stated that the City received 200 responses to the survey, with 173 respondents living in Burlingame, and 59 owning a business in Burlingame. She noted that some respondents living in Burlingame also own a business in Burlingame. She explained that among those who checked that they were residents, 125 responded that they were strongly or somewhat in favor of an increase in the minimum wage, while 46 were somewhat or strongly against an increase. She added that among business owners, 30 were strongly or somewhat in favor of an increase in the minimum wage, while 29 were somewhat or strongly opposed to an increase. City Manager Goldman reviewed questions that Councilmembers asked at the February study session: 1. Impacts on Child Care City Manager Goldman stated that a Councilmember expressed concern about the impact of a higher minimum wage on child care providers in Burlingame and whether child care would become unaffordable. She explained that in 2017, First 5 San Mateo County and the Child Care Partnership Council ("CCPC") conducted a study of early childhood education workforce compensation practices in center -based programs within San Mateo County. She noted that according to CCPC's flyer, the lowest -paid employees in these 6 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 programs were, on average, making more than $15 per hour at the time of the survey. She added that she didn't have data about home -based child care providers. 2. Business Closures in Local Cities with a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance City Manager Goldman stated that a Councilmember asked whether San Mateo County cities with local minimum wage ordinances had any data with respect to businesses closing or reducing full-time employees to part-time status as a result of the higher minimum wage. She explained that staff reached out to Belmont, Menlo Park, Redwood City, San Mateo, and South San Francisco, all of which have a 2020 minimum wage of $15 per hour or above. She stated that the cities of Belmont, Redwood City, and San Mateo responded that some of their businesses warned about closures and reduction of hours prior to the passage of the ordinance. However, the cities had no data to indicate that the minimum wage increase actually led to business closures or employees' hours being cut. The City of San Mateo noted that prior to the pandemic, many of their businesses were paying a higher wage due to the competitive labor market. Menlo Park responded that they received a number of complaints from restaurants and two merchants in the early stages of implementation, but no complaints since then. 3. Exemptions for Family Members and Babysitters City Manager Goldman stated that a Councilmember asked whether there could be exemptions made for family members and babysitters. She noted that the answer is yes and that the proposed ordinance exempts family members of business owners. She explained that the minimum wage requirement applies to people who meet the definition of "employee" under the State labor code: most people providing ad hoc services, such as babysitters, and independent contractors would be exempt from the minimum wage requirement. City Manager Goldman reviewed the fiscal impact of the proposed ordinance. She noted that the fiscal impact was hard for the City to determine as most City staff make more than the minimum wage. Those that make minimum wage are casual employees that were furloughed as a result of COVID. She discussed Parks and Recreation's previous practice of increasing program fees to compensate for increases to minimum wage. However, she noted that the Council could choose to subsidize the cost increases through General Fund support. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if currently there are positions in the City that make less than $15 per hour. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative but stated that currently most of these positions are vacant due to COVID. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked how many City staffers who make less than $15 per hour were furloughed. HR Director Morrison stated that she would need to get back to Council with this information. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if there were any current City staffers that make less than $15 per hour. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative and stated that there are a few. She added that the minimum wage increase would cause a roll -up issue. She explained that the City would need to increase 7 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 other wages that are above minimum wage to maintain the difference in wages among classifications in a series. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked for a cost analysis that would show the effects on personnel costs if the minimum wage was increased. Councilmember Colson asked City Attorney Kane to explain Section 6.10.060, entitled Waiver through Collective Bargaining. City Attorney Kane stated that per Council's direction, the City modeled the proposed ordinance off of the City of San Mateo's ordinance. She explained that this section was a part of the City of San Mateo's adopted ordinance. She noted that the basic idea is that represented employees can establish a lower wage through union bargaining. She added that there are conditions under which a collective bargaining unit can divert from a minimum wage ordinance. Councilmember Colson asked if this only applies to the City employee unions or would it apply to any and all unions. City Attorney Kane replied that it applied to all unions. Councilmember Colson asked if she was correct that what this means is that if for example, AFSCME negotiated with the City to not furlough staff due to COVID in exchange for lower wages, then this would be okay. City Attorney Kane replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Colson noted that a majority of the emails she received on the minimum wage ordinance came from union representatives. She explained that she found it odd that the minimum wage ordinance included a union exemption. She stated that this section should be removed from the ordinance. Councilmember Brownrigg concurred with Councilmember Colson. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked what the threshold was to require employers to provide benefits to their staff. City Attorney Kane replied that she didn't know the answer but that it would be under the labor code. She stated that she knew that after a certain number of hours worked, you are required to provide sick leave, and there is also a threshold for the provision of health insurance. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if the ordinance was adopted and employers decreased staff hours, could employees lose their benefits. HR Director Morrison stated that she would need to get back to Council with this information. Mayor Beach asked the City Clerk to read the title of the ordinance. City Clerk Hassel -Shearer read the title. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to waive further reading and open the public hearing; seconded by Mayor Beach. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. Laura Hinz discussed the City's survey and the overwhelming community support to increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour. She asked that the Council adopt the proposed ordinance. 8 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 San Mateo Central Labor Council and the San Mateo Building and Construction Trades Council representative Erin Chazer urged the City to pass the minimum wage ordinance. Get Healthy San Mateo County representative Erika Rincon stated that the pandemic and the economic downturn exacerbated the economic vulnerabilities faced by low income workers. She noted that the San Mateo County unemployment rate rose from 2.7% to 9.2% due to the pandemic. She urged the Council to pass the minimum wage ordinance. San Mateo Labor Council representative Julie Lind discussed the economic impacts of COVID. She asked the Council to adopt the ordinance. Councilmember Colson asked if Ms. Lind supports the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section of the proposed ordinance. Ms. Lind stated that it was previously introduced in other cities and supported by lower paid workers, so that they could agree to take a lower hourly rate in exchange for healthcare benefits. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if this is an important provision to have in the ordinance. Ms. Lind stated that she isn't wedded to it. Dave Mauro urged the Council to adopt the proposed ordinance. (comment submitted via publiccomment(d),burlin ag me.org). Tom Paine voiced his support for the proposed ordinance. He noted that the community can pay more for goods in exchange for the higher minimum wage. (comment submitted via publiccomment(ckburlin ag_me org). Former Mayor Terry Nagel discussed the cost of living that has increased far more than wages. She asked the Council to adopt the ordinance. Mike Dunham voiced his support for the proposed ordinance. He noted that there is a need to increase the minimum wage to be competitive with other cities. Alisa Ferrari asked that if the City adopts the proposed ordinance, that employees' tips be included in their hourly rate. (comment submitted via publiccommentkburlingame.org). Kimberly Rosales voiced her support for the proposed ordinance. She discussed the hard working community members that work more than one job to ensure that their children get to go to school in Burlingame. She noted that this increase would assist them. (comment submitted via publiccomment(d),burlin a�g). Kathleen Wong asked questions about how the proposed minimum wage increase would affect tipped employees. (comment submitted via publiccomment(&burlin ag me.org). Rayna asked the Council to adopt the proposed ordinance. 9 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 David Fleishman stated that while the minimum wage increase doesn't come close to meeting the need, it is a start. He asked that the Council adopt the proposed ordinance. John Kevranian voiced his support for the proposed ordinance. (comment submitted via Zoom chat). Michael stated that increasing minimum wage could hurt restaurants as it would be a 15% increase to their budget. He asked that Council delay passage of the ordinance. (comment submitted via Zoom chat). Nicole Fernandez urged the Council to adopt the ordinance. Sandra Lang stated that she didn't think the increase was enough but urged Council to adopt the ordinance. Laurie Tanjuatco urged the Council to adopt the ordinance. (comment submitted via publiccommentkburlin am�e.org). Jackie voiced support for the minimum wage increase and noted that $15 per hour is not a living wage in Burlingame. (comment submitted via publiccomment(&burlingame.org). Raymond Larios voiced support for the minimum wage ordinance. (comment submitted via publiccomment@burlin am�e.org). Bob Bear encouraged the Council to adopt the ordinance. Mike McCord voiced his support for the ordinance and noted that it is not a living wage. (comment submitted via publiccomment@burlin ag me.org). Susan Castner-Paine voiced support for passing the minimum wage ordinance. (comment submitted via publiccommentgburlin am�e.org). Alexander Melendrez voiced his support for the minimum wage increase. Kris Cannon voiced support for the minimum wage increase. Kathleen voiced concern about raising the minimum wage as a blanket ordinance. She discussed tipped employees and asked that they be exempted from the ordinance. (comment submitted via Zoom chat). Mayor Beach closed public comment. Councilmember Ortiz stated that Council has been discussing this item for a long time. He noted that the City received a lot of feedback from the community. He stated that most workers in Burlingame are already at or near $15 per hour. He explained that this will be taken care of in a few years by the State, therefore 10 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 what the City would be doing is bridging the gap until this happens. He noted that the increase will not have a huge impact and is mostly symbolic. Councilmember Ortiz stated that COVID has had a large impact on businesses. He noted that many local businesses are close to bankruptcy. Therefore, he voiced concern about adding another burden on the businesses during this difficult time. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that this is a hard issue. He noted that there are a number of small businesses that are struggling as a result of COVID. He explained that for some businesses, this could lead to issues. He stated that the difference between $14 per hour and $15 per hour is about $2,000 a year. He explained that it isn't a huge financial hit, but it is an impact. He discussed the work the City had done to support local businesses during the pandemic. He stated that there are no good times to raise costs for a small business. Councilmember Brownrigg discussed average wage rates across the United States. He noted that in 50 years, the average wage rate has grown from $20.25 per hour to $22.75 per hour. He stated that meanwhile, housing and other costs have increased dramatically. Therefore, he felt that the City needed to increase the minimum wage. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran stated that while the proposed ordinance had good intentions, the timing is off. She explained that when reviewing the surveys, people should focus on what the businesses are saying as they will be responsible for the pay increase. She noted that the survey results showed that 30 businessowners were in favor of the minimum wage ordinance and 29 strongly opposed. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran discussed the pandemic and how it has affected businesses. She explained that adopting the ordinance would exacerbate problems for those businesses that are already in trouble. She noted that it is unknown how long the pandemic will last, and therefore this is the wrong time to adopt a minimum wage ordinance. She stated that if businesses are forced to cut costs, it would most likely be the lowest paid workers that would lose their jobs. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran discussed tipped employees. She voiced concern that increasing the wages of tipped employees that make between $25 to $30 per hour from tips could hurt restauranteurs. She discussed the potential of employers cutting the hours of tipped employees, which could lead to tipped employees losing benefits. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran stated that while this is a difficult decision, you can't dismiss the businesses that are struggling. She recommended that the City help businesses get through the pandemic, and once they are back on their feet, Council could reevaluate the minimum wage increase. Councilmember Colson stated that this is an unfortunate time to consider a well-meaning initiative. She explained that she was concerned about the small businesses that will experience financial stress due to the increase in minimum wage. She discussed her experience running a small business. She noted that she would not have been able to pass on the increase to customers and instead would have had to cut pay of some 11 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 of the higher paid employees. She stated that running a small business is often a balancing act and that this could tip the scale too much. Councilmember Colson stated that many small business owners have taken out lines of debt in order to stay open and keep their staff employed. She voiced concern that this ordinance could cause the City to lose its small businesses. Councilmember Colson thanked all the businesses in the community that were paying more than $15 per hour. She stated that corporate America can afford to pay much higher wages than the mom and pop shops. She explained that Burlingame is proud of their mom and pop shops, and this could end them. Councilmember Colson noted that she was not comfortable with the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section of the proposed ordinance. She stated that unions should not be exempt from the minimum wage ordinance. Councilmember Colson stated that she would also support removing tipped employees from the minimum wage ordinance. She explained that their total compensation is higher than minimum wage. She noted that if you raised tipped employees' wages, then the increase would be deducted from a restaurant's back of the house costs. Mayor Beach thanked members of the public for participating on this issue. She stated that increasing the minimum wage is the right thing to do. She explained that there is a huge wage gap between the rich and the poor in the Bay Area and that it is growing. Mayor Beach discussed the pandemic and stated that she felt it was important to act now on a minimum wage increase. She explained that it is the lowest wage employees that are on the front line keeping the economy going. Mayor Beach noted that the City is one of the few remaining locations in San Mateo County that is following the State minimum wage. She explained that between Santa Clara County, San Mateo County, and San Francisco County by 2021, 84% of the population will be at $15 per hour or higher. She stated that the City shouldn't feel comfortable having the same minimum wage as Modesto and Clear Lake, two of the poorer cities in the state. Mayor Beach stated that the community told the City in the survey that they support the increase in minimum wage and will pay the cost of that. She explained that she knew businesses were hurting as a result of the pandemic, and that is why the Council spent the majority of the past six months focused on assisting businesses. Therefore, she felt that it was important to recognize that the low wage workers are also in need of assistance. Mayor Beach stated that she has talked to industry experts and restauranteurs about increasing the minimum wage. She noted that while restauranteurs didn't love the idea, they believe it is the right thing to do. She stated that a modest price increase of cost at restaurants can help offset the minimum wage increase. She 12 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 noted that she believed that the community would rise to the occasion to support local businesses and employees. Mayor Beach discussed tipped employees. She noted that she heard from restauranteurs that at high end restaurants, tipped employees can make $40 to $45 per hour. She explained that in the Bay Area, a wage of $30 per hour equates to an annual income of less than $60,000, which would qualify for very low-income housing. She stated that this wasn't something to celebrate and that the City needs to recognize that many low wage workers work more than one job. Mayor Beach stated that the City has spent a lot of time this past year discussing diversity, inclusion, race relations, and Black Lives Matter. She explained that the data shows that disproportionately people of color are working in the lowest wage service jobs. She discussed a graph in the Joint Venture Silicon Valley 2020 Index Report that shows per capita income by race and ethnicity in Silicon Valley. She stated that the graph shows the 2018 average income of the following ethnicities: • African American: $40,000 • Latinx: under $30,000, and • Caucasian: $82,000 Mayor Beach stated that the 2020 Index Report also discusses self-sufficiency standards. She noted that self- sufficiency standard means that you don't need public or non-profit assistance. She stated that the report found that 45% of African American households live below the self-sufficiency standard in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. She noted that the number increases to 57% for Latinx and 73% for single mothers. Mayor Beach stated that the minimum wage ordinance would make a huge difference for the lowest wage workers. She explained that 12.3% of students in Burlingame School District qualify for free or reduced lunch. She noted that a family of four can get a reduced lunch if the household income is less than $48,000, and you get a free lunch if the household income is less than $34,000. She noted that in the high school, 14% qualify for free or reduced lunches. Mayor Beach noted that this could be a hassle for businesses, but she felt that customer costs could be increased to make up the difference. She explained that this is a huge opportunity for the City to help the lowest wage workers. Councilmember Ortiz stated that he would be in favor of the ordinance if the City carved out an exception for tipped employees or factored their tips into their wage. Mayor Beach asked the City Attorney if the City is able to legally exempt tipped employees. City Attorney Kane stated that she hadn't analyzed this exception and would need to get back to Council on this issue. San Mateo Labor Council representative Julie Lind stated that tip credits are illegal in a wage ordinance at the State level. She noted that they aren't included in any local ordinance. 13 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 Councilmember Brownrigg stated that tracking tip credit would be very difficult even if it was legal. He noted that if restaurants want to be more even-handed with their tips, there are ways for them to do this. He asked his colleagues if there was a way to tweak the ordinance so that the Council would unanimously support it. Councilmember Ortiz stated that he believed the timing of the ordinance was off but would vote in favor. Councilmember Colson stated that she would not support the ordinance with the collective bargaining exemption. She noted that she also has very strong concerns that businesses that are run by women and people of color will be strongly impacted by the passage of the minimum wage ordinance. She explained that potentially 29 businesses could close as a result of the ordinance. She noted that this meant that employees would also lose their job. Councilmember Ortiz asked if Councilmember Colson's fear was that unions would use the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section to negotiate lower wages for their members. Councilmember Colson replied in the affirmative. She stated that the collective bargaining exception allows an individual to state that they will take lower wages for better healthcare. She noted that she has no issue with this, but if this is allowed, then the private sector should be allowed to negotiate this deal as well. Mayor Beach stated that Councilmember Brownrigg, Councilmember Ortiz, and herself were all okay with removing this section. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran discussed tipped employees. She noted that nail and hair salon employees are also tipped. She stated that Burlingame is lucky because it has a number businesses owned by people of color. She explained that she would hate to see this change due to the increase in minimum wage. She stressed that the timing of the ordinance was off and that she couldn't support it. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that it is valid to be concerned about how small businesses would be affected by the minimum wage ordinance. However, he explained that enough people are paying their staff over $15 per hour and minimum wage ordinances have been adopted in neighboring cities, that he is comfortable adopting a minimum wage ordinance. He asked if Councilmember Colson would vote in favor of the ordinance if the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section was removed. Councilmember Colson stated that if that section was removed, she would have another month to consider it and talk to business owners. She noted that she spent the day on the phone with women and POC business owners and discussed their concerns about the ordinance. She voiced concern about the 29 businesses that stated that they were strongly against the minimum wage ordinance. She stated that she didn't think this was the right time for the ordinance and didn't think she could support it. Mayor Beach stated that she agreed that businesses will have to make some hard decisions but the businesses have the choice to absorb that cost or pass it along to their customers. 14 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 Councilmember Colson noted that as a former small business owner there are certain costs that can't be passed along to customers in order to stay in business. Mayor Beach asked Councilmember Brownrigg if he would like to make a motion to bring back the ordinance for adoption without the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section. Councilmember Brownrigg asked what the timeline extension for adoption of the ordinance would be if Council voted to remove the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section. He explained that he was concerned about the lead time for business owners to prepare themselves for the minimum wage increase. City Manager Goldman stated that the ordinance would need to be reintroduced. She noted that staff might not be able to bring it back for re -introduction at the next meeting due to noticing requirements. Therefore, the reintroduction might not happen until the first meeting in October. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if he was correct that the City could adopt the ordinance as is and later amend the ordinance to remove the Waiver through Collective Bargaining section. City Attorney Kane replied in the affirmative. She noted that she could draft the amendment right away. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to bring back the ordinance for adoption. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that his reasoning for adopting the ordinance as is, is that he didn't believe a union would ask for less than minimum wage for its members. He noted that in light of the importance of signaling to the business community the cost for 2021, he felt it was important to adopt the ordinance as is and amend that section later. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed by roll call vote, 3-2 (Councilmember Colson and Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran voted against). City Attorney Kane stated that the proposed ordinance would come back for a second reading at the September 21 meeting. She added that staff would process an amendment to remove the union exemption right away. 10. STAFF REPORTS There were no staff reports. 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no committee reports. 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 15 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 09/21/2020 There were no future agenda items. 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlin ag me.org. 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Beach adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk 16 Burlingame City Council September 8, 2020 Unapproved Minutes BURLINGAME AGENDA NO: 8b STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 21, 2020 p To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 21, 2020 From: Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with Wilsey Ham in the Amount of $351,545 for Design Services for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Water Main Replacement Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing a professional services agreement with Wilsey Ham for professional engineering design services related to the Burlingame Park Subdivision Water Main Replacement Project, City Project No. 84892, in the amount of $351,545, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND The City's Water System Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has identified the existing potable water mains in the Burlingame Park Subdivision as one of the high priority projects to replace aging potable water mains. This is the third phase of a four -phased project to replace approximately 6,300 linear feet of four -inch, six-inch, and twelve -inch cast iron water mains with new polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and ductile iron pipes. The existing cast iron pipes were installed approximately 90 years ago and have served beyond their intended service life. The Burlingame Park Subdivision Water Main Improvement Project will focus on water infrastructure improvements on Costa Rica Avenue, Occidental Avenue, Chapin Lane, Pepper Avenue, Elm Avenue, and Ralston Avenue. The new water infrastructure will improve the water flow capacity in the water mains thereby improving the water volume and pressure to the community. ni-qri i.qsinm On August 15, 2017, staff issued a Request for Proposals to a list of qualified engineering firms for improvements along El Camino Real between Sanchez Avenue and Barroilhet Avenue, and adjacent subdivisions. The City received eight proposals from qualified firms. After a comprehensive review and ranking of the proposals, the consulting firm of Wilsey Ham was selected as the top-ranking firm for this phase because of their high understanding of the overall project, project approach, and quality of proposal. 1 Resolution Approving a Professional Services Agreement with Wilsey Ham September 21, 2020 for the Burlingame Park Water Main Improvements, City Project No. 84892 Staff has negotiated the scope of professional services for the project with Wilsey Ham in the amount of $351,545. The following is a brief outline of the scope of professional design services, which is described in detail in Exhibit A of the attached Professional Services Agreement. • Perform pre -design investigation, including field surveying, potholing, and utility location to prepare project base map. • Prepare 35% design submittal, including preliminary horizontal layout of the pipeline alignments, design memo, and preliminary engineer's estimate. • Prepare 50% design submittal, including preliminary pipeline alignments, construction details, draft specifications, coordination with Hillsborough, pothole plan, and preliminary engineer's estimate. • Prepare 95% design submittal, including coordination with the City, updating pipeline plan and profiles to 95% completion, preparing a draft bid package, and updating the engineer's estimate. • Complete and submit 100% design, including addressing City comments, finalizing specifications, finalizing cost estimate, completing 100% contract documents, and performing a quality assurance and quality control review of the contract documents. • Provide bidding assistance, including attending a pre -bid meeting, answering contractor questions, and preparing addenda. • Perform project management functions, including attending meetings, site visits, and agency coordination. • Prepare plan sheets from City GIS base mapping to show the 20 service replacements and addresses, water infrastructure, curbs, property lines, and background satellite imagery. • Prepare a table of addresses for replacements and details for service replacements to be included in the detail sheets. The project construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2022 and be completed by spring of 2023. FISCAL IMPACT The following are the estimated costs relative to the project development: Consultant Design Services $351,545 Contingency (15%) $52,732 Staff Administration $20,723 Total $425,000 There are adequate funds available in the FY 2020-21 Water Enterprise Fund to complete the project. Exhibits: • Resolution • Professional Services Agreement • Project Location Map 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILSEY HAM FOR THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT CITY PROJECT NO. 84892 RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California which FINDS, ORDERS and DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager is authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is instructed to attest such signature. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21 st day of September, 2020 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES WITH WILSEY HAM BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT .11 VA U:teal x01 9 Z low -I, THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 2020, by and between the City of Burlingame, State of California, herein called the "City", and Wilsey Ham engaged in providing Professional Engineering Design Services herein called the "Consultant". RECITALS A. The City is considering conducting activities for consultant engineering services for professional design services for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Water Main Replacement Project, City Project No. 84892. B. The City desires to engage a professional engineering consultant to provide professional engineering design services because of Consultant's experience and qualifications to perform the desired work, described in Exhibit A. C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide professional engineering services such as pre -design investigation, compiling the plans, specifications and estimate, bid services, service line replacements, and as detailed in "Scope of Services" of the attached Exhibit A of this agreement. 2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement with completion of all work by May 31, 2023. 3. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Page 1 of 8 Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business license. 4. Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. 5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant. 6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed 351 545; and payment shall be based upon City approval of each task. Billing shall include current period and cumulative expenditures to date and shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications, documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review, even if only in partial or draft form. 7. Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the City. Page 2 of 8 8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under this Agreement shall be Brandon Davis, Supervising Engineer. 9. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the City. 10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to: To City: Kevin Okada, Senior Engineer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 To Consultant: Brandon Davis, Supervising Engineer Wilsey Ham 3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100 San Mateo, CA 94403 or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to City. 11. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing. Page 3 of 8 12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and shall, at the City's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion, sever any such employment relationship. 13. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act. 14. Insurance. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance: Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage in a form at least as broad as ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001. ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her Page 4 of 8 and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. iii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) each claim/aggregate sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement. iv. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. B. General and Automobile Liability Policies: The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or used by the Consultant. The endorsement providing this additional insured coverage shall be equal to or broader than ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 and must cover joint negligence, completed operations, and the acts of subcontractors. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions. ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be endorsed to be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurances maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Page 5 of 8 iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. C. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law. Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees. D. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by mail, has been given to the City (10 days for non-payment of premium). Current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City Clerk. E. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A-:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California. F. Verification of Coverage: Upon execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on forms approved by the City. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before any work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 15. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City, its officers, employees, authorized agents and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, that may at any time arise, result from, relate to, or be set up because of damages to property Page 6 of 8 or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant. This provision shall not apply if the damage or injury is caused by the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers. 16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo. 18. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination. 19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Consultant. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party. Page 7 of 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1). City of Burlingame By Lisa K. Goldman City Manager Approved as to form: City Attorney — Kathleen Kane ATTEST: City Clerk — Meaghan Hassel -Shearer "Consultant" Wilsey Ham Print Name: Title: Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Mr. Kevin Okada, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 WILSEY:E HAM Engineering, Surveying & Planning Re: Proposal for Professional Engineering Design Services for the Burlingame Park Subdivisions Water Main Improvements - City Project 84892 Dear Mr. Okada, On behalf of Wilsey Ham, I am pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Burlingame for design of the water main projects referenced above. We are confident that we have a very good understanding of the scope of work and have a proposed project approach that is cost effective while providing the essential information to minimize change orders. Wilsey Ham has an experienced and responsive staff that will provide a high quality of service to the City. Proposed Design Team I will serve as the Supervising Engineer for our project team, providing input on design issues and playing a major role in the quality control reviews. I have the ultimate responsibility to the City to ensure that the City is happy with our services and work products. Cameron Leitch will serve as our Project Manager/Project Engineer. In this capacity, he will guide all of the day-to-day aspects of the project. As the Project Engineer for many of the recent Water and Sewer Projects, he has a very good understanding of the City's design standards and project development process. Cameron will be our primary contact with the City. Darrin Mock is proposed as our Assistant Project Engineer, supporting the design and preparation of the construction drawings and bid documents. Darrin is the Assistant Project Engineer who worked on the last several Water Main Improvement Projects. Ron Cameron will direct all of our survey and mapping efforts. In this capacity, he will work closely with our Engineering Department to ensure that the base sheets have all of the necessary information for an accurate design. Project Understanding The City has issued an RFP for the design of Water Main Improvements along El Camino Real from Sanchez Avenue to Barroilhet Avenue and within the Glenwood Park, Burlingame Heights, Burlingame Terrace and Burlingame Park Subdivisions; totaling almost five miles of roadway. The project is programmed to be designed and constructed in four phases over Multiple years. The construction of improvements may be extended into future years if there is not sufficient budget to construct all of the improvements in the program year. Wilsey Ham is currently working on the design for the El Camino Real and Glenwood Park Areas. It is our understanding that the City would like to begin design of the Burlingame Heights ■ Main:650.349.2151 Fax:650.345.4921 ■ 3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100, San Mateo, CA 94403 wilseyham.com EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Kevin Okada, P.E. Page 2 and Burlingame Park Subdivisions Water Main Improvements. This includes the streets shown in blue on the attached map. To better understand the scope of the project, we have walked the full length of each street to observe and photograph the site conditions. We have also reviewed the City's GIS maps showing the approximate water, sewer and storm drain locations. From our observations, we have identified some design constraints in each phase of the project that will need to be properly addressed to achieve a successful project. Our staff has also prepared a preliminary layout for the new water mains in each project phase to assist us in developing our scope of work and to illustrate our initial design thoughts. A summary of our observations and comments on the alignments are shown below. The alignments are included at the end of this proposal for your information. The alignments will need to be adjusted once the utility locations are surveyed and we have a more accurate understanding of the site constraints. Phase 2 - Burlingame Park Subdivisions Phase 2 covers an area with several short street segments bounded by the City of Hillsborough, the City of San Mateo and Occidental Ave. It also includes Costa Rica Ave., Willow Ave., Palm Dr. and a segment of Edgehill Dr. See attached map. All of the streets in this area are tree lined and the residential properties are upscale. Electric service to this area appears to be predominantly from overhead electric lines. Remnants of utility markings indicate a large San Francisco Water District (SFPUC) water line on Occidental, Pepper, and through the intersection of Looking down Elm on border of Hillsborough. Walnut and Willow that will need to be carefully located by the utility location contractor to determine the extent that these lines may impact the future water main alignment. From the record information, Willow Ave. is significantly more congested with underground utilities than other streets. Preliminary Alignment Thoughts The best alignments for the new main on Pepper and Occidental appear to be on the opposite side of the street from the SFPUC mains. The alignment of the new City water main will need to EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Kevin Okada, P.E. Page 3 be sufficiently far away to provide continued protection/support of the existing 60" mains during the trenching of the new line. On Ralston, staying to the north along the existing water line and staying east of the existing water main on Chapin appears to provide sufficient clearance to the sanitary sewer. Along Barroilhet and Elm, staying to the north and west respectively minimizes the encroachment into San Mateo and Hillsborough, although the need for early and detailed coordination with these two cities is important in developing a final location. All new alignments discussed above are contingent upon the location of PG&E gas facilities and the accurate location of all utilities. Service Line Replacements The State has notified the City to begin replacement of select aging water services. To accomplish this the City plans to incorporate replacement of older service lines in areas where there is no current plan to update the mains into the Water CIP. The City's current approach is to replace 60 of these services with this project. The location of these 60 services will be determined as the project develops; however, for the purposes of this proposal we assume the service replacements will be grouped together by location and relatively local to each other as opposed to select random replacements throughout different, separated parts of the City. Project Approach and Scope of Services In light of our project understanding, the RFP requirements and our site observations, Wilsey Ham proposes the following Project Approach and detailed Scope of Services for each task. Task 1 - Pre -Design Investigation — Survey, Utility Locates, Potholing, Base Mapping The surveys to prepare the base mapping will be prepared by ground surveys due to the tree canopies and need to pick up utility markings. The ground surveys will be performed after the utility locator marks the utility locations for water, gas, electric and communications. Sewer and storm drain manholes will be located and dipped to verify the invert elevations. To minimize costs, the surveyors will shoot the curbs, pavement crown elevations, edge of sidewalk and all visible utility structures and markings. Driveways will be approximately shown for reference using Google Earth imagery and field observations and tree locations will be field coordinated by our engineering staff. All potholing will be performed after City comments on 50% design are received and after the City has approved the proposed water main alignments and pothole plan. We have also included a 10-day supplemental survey budget to be used during the 95% Phase to collect potholes and to obtain additional/supplemental information that may be needed as the design evolves. The scope of work in this task is detailed below along with our assumptions. 1. Attend a project kickoff meeting at City Hall. 2. Perform records research and collect record utility maps 3. Perform a survey traverse using GPS, install control points. Reduce data and compute survey control. 4. Perform utility location and mark streets for gas, electric, communications and water. 5. Perform topographic surveys and base mapping at 1" = 20" using ground surveys. The base maps will be planimetric on 24" x 36" sheets. EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Kevin Okada, P.E. Page 4 6. Add approximate right of way lines to mapping from record information. 7. Add topography and utility locates to create base maps. 8. Preform Quality Assurance/Quality Control review. 9. Pothole utilities at potential conflict areas per the approved potholing plan during the 95% design stage. We have assumed 4 days of potholing (approximately 24 potholes) with cold patch asphalt to be performed on the same day. 10. Perform supplemental topographic survey (at 95% design stage) to pick up utility potholes and design information. Deliverable: Project topographic base map Task 2 - 35% Plans, Specifications and Estimate We will focus on determining the best alignment of the new water mains during this task. Many factors will influence our recommendation including avoidance of conflicts with existing utility facilities, simplicity of layout, minimization of costs, and constructability. If there are alignment options, we will show them both for the City's consideration. A cost estimate will be prepared to get an early idea if the entire extent of the main can be constructed within the City's budget. The scope of work in this task is detailed below. 1. Layout horizontal locations of water mains and main connection stubs to side streets on the topographic base sheets. 2. Perform a site visit to review site conditions. 3. Prepare a project title sheet and project notes. 4. Prepare a preliminary construction cost estimate. 5. Submit the 35% plans, estimate and Basis of Design Memorandum package to City for their review. 6. Attend a job walk with the City to review the site discuss their comments and required revisions. 7. Revise and resubmit the plans and estimate to reflect the revised layouts. Deliverables: 2 sets of 35% Plans and the preliminary estimate. Task 3 - 50% Plans, Specifications and Estimate This task involves the advancement of the plans, specifications and estimate in the phases described above. A potholing plan will be proposed to accompany the 50% PS&E submittal so that we can identify any conflicts early in the 95% design phase before the expending too much budget. We will perform an initial quality control review during this phase to make sure the plans and specifications are well coordinated. The scope of work in this task is detailed below. 1. Prepare plan view sheets (no profiles at 50%). 2. Perform a site visit to review design issues. 3. Coordinate with outside utility companies and City of Hillsborough. 4. Develop the title sheet and notes sheet. 5. Prepare detail sheets. EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Kevin Okada, P.E. Page 5 6. Update the construction cost estimate and make phasing modifications in the event that the estimated project cost exceeds the budget. 7. Prepare list of technical specifications based on the City's standard water specifications. 8. Coordinate design/progress with City. 9. Prepare pothole plan. 10. Perform a QA/QC review and make associated revisions. 11. Submit the 50% PS&E package to City for their review. 12. Attend a meeting with the City to discuss their comments and desired revisions. Deliverables: 2 sets of the 50% Plans, specifications, estimate and pothole plan Task 4 - 95% Plans, Specifications and Estimate This task involves the development of the plans, specifications and estimate with all of the information needed to construct the project. All design issues will be resolved and utility conflicts will be checked by potholing. The estimate will be detailed with individual bid items to provide the City with the flexibility during construction to make changes as desired while paying for only competitively bid unit prices. We will perform an internal quality control review during this phase to make sure the plans and specifications are well coordinated. The scope of work in this task is: 1. Incorporate 50% Design Comments from City. 2. Advance design to 95% level of completion. 3. Prepare profile views. 4. Site visits as needed to review design issues. 5. Coordinate with utility companies and City of Hillsborough. 6. Update the construction cost estimate/bid schedule. 7. Prepare technical specifications. 8. Coordinate design/progress with City. 9. Prepare contract book "Front End", including Invitation, General and Special Provisions. 10. Perform a QA/QC review and make revisions as necessary. 11. Submit the 95% plans, specifications and estimate package to City for their review. 12. Attend a meeting with the City to discuss their comments and desired revisions. Deliverables: 2 sets of the 95% Plans, specifications, and estimate Task 5 - 100% Plans, Specifications and Estimate This task will focus on incorporating the City's review comments on the 95% PS&E, and performing our final quality control review. The 100% PS&E package will be bid ready after completion of this task. The scope of work in this task is detailed below. 1. Perform the final revisions to the plans, specifications and estimate to address the City's review comments and perform final quality control review. 2. Re -submit final package to City for approval. 3. Coordinate design/progress with City. EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Kevin Okada, P.E. Page 6 Deliverables: 2 sets of the 100% Plans, specifications, estimate and bid package for reproduction of the bid sets Task 6 - Bid Services Wilsey Ham will provide assistance during the bidding process to ensure that questions from contractors are answered. If changes or additional information is necessary as a result of contractor inquiries, bid addenda will be issued as required to clarify the design intent. The scope of work in this task is detailed below. 1. Attend the pre -bid meeting and answer contractor questions. 2. Respond to contractor Question's & issue bid addenda as necessary. Deliverables: Bid addenda as necessary Task 7 — Service Line Replacements (up to 60) Task 7 includes: 1. Prepare plan sheets from City GIS base mapping to show the 60 service replacements and addresses, water infrastructure, curbs, property lines and background satellite imagery. 2. Prepare a table of addresses for replacements and details for service replacements to be included in the details sheets. Deliverables: Additional plan sheets, details and bid items to be incorporated into the PS&E. Assumptions and Exclusions The following assumptions and exclusions were made in the preparation of this proposal in effort to define our scope of work. 1. The RFP identified the required diameter for each new water main, so we understand that water system modeling is not required in our scope of work. 2. The desired pipe material is specified as either PVC or ductile iron. From our experience working on City water projects, we are familiar with the typical applications for each pipe material and the standard corrosion protection measures implemented by the City when ductile iron pipe is used. Therefore, we have not included any services for corrosion investigations or design. 3. We have included a reasonable amount of potholing budget for each project. If through the design process it is agreed by the City that additional potholing should be conducted, additional fees will be required. 4. Only those tasks specifically described herein are included in this proposal. Any other requested work will be performed on a time and materials basis. Fee and Schedule Wilsey Ham's fee for the foregoing described Scope of Services is estimated to be approximately $351,545 on a time and materials basis in accordance with the attached Charge Rate Fee Schedule. We will not exceed this amount without your prior authorization. Work can EXHIBIT A August 4, 2020 Kevin Okada, P.E. Page 7 be completed on a mutually agreed upon schedule. The time of performance will commence upon execution of this agreement and will end June 30, 2022. Authorization You may authorize Wilsey Ham to proceed in accordance with this proposal and the City of Burlingame's Contract Provisions by returning a City standard contract. Work will commence upon receipt of a City purchase order and a Notice to Proceed. We appreciate the opportunity to participate on your project. Very truly yours, WILSEY HAM A California Corporation Brandon Davis Supervising Engineer RCE: C61024 Attached: Fee Estimate 2020 Charge Rate Fee Schedule Preliminary Alignment Layouts ,Fo,^ vJ O Q O ^^L W W LL N IM DO ICT co ci .O L a` �U E N 0) .1-1 CN L Q D E N m Q) > 00 O p � L CL U E .0 C L L a as E cm C Ir 00 V I N CDv CD O CD N O N O M a7 h 00 (D N M 7 O 00 M� M O O 00 h (D Q m K V V 00 V I.- O N N I- 00 N Cl) O W O J O M N rx = N O V M V O W O O O t` N (O w w O V O O N_ V M O V V I,- M V V Q 7 00 M M M (D M V r c0 Ci Ln O W N to O M O O (fl O M I- M O N O 00 (N V M M I- O w CDN M CO M N (fl a) Ili W O (O 00 N O r M O N co Ln r ° N O O N M M N d7 Q) N co N r N � N M (O "t N O M 7 N N "t CO N N— O LO r Q J N (O 7 O 7 CD (0 (O CD (O N N O M Ih O M (O "t O O O N_ 0)O � h co a)7 F= p MV N O (O Cl) O Itc0 (fl 00 ao V N O ao N N N I.- CO O O V M I- co O 00 If) N N "I M Cl) h O O N M W M N O O M W (fl to 00 N O P- M ao N 00 Cl! O Q N 6) m M M NM n N co Ln V No It N -It(O N O LO J O O O O O O O (O O (O O Jco w Q co (O (fl N (O co M M O O (O If) N O N N (O N W U W N O X m W co (O O 00 (O (O co Z F (O I— M j O 00 N N O V U U Z O U U Z WW = N 00 00 N C`O') O U K >-r W W 00 O 00 (0CDO� N a> N 7 (/) O N O N CO CO U V V O N 7 00 N O V N V (D O N V O _ K w O Z Z L W U N 7 V O N I— (O 00 00 I- N r O (O O (O 7 N 7 N (D (D N I— O M V 00 (0 LLI e» oc oc — 7 cc N V Il M (fl oc V O) O (O N N LO M N 6) N U N M N V N O V M M 00 N 00 00 00 00 O N co N 00 Z = w Q r I" z U cn U N V O N V M 7 N w (fl M N O N M O M N 7 O O O O N 7 (O Cl) O 7 (O m Z i2 Q Ws N N oc O CC V co V N (O M 00 N N Cl! N V M V N 7 N U Q V N N N V V 00 N V M O N N 00 V N M Co V 00 00 -It N N O O N Cl) N N O K K w = LD w Z Z g O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U IZ es 00 O O O O 00 V V V 00 00 O O 000000000 ocO N Cl! V 7 (O M O 0000000000000 00 (O O N N W 7 V Cl! C 7 (D Cl! N LO V N— M V N M V O N (7 U V N 00 w N (O 00 N N N 7 O V N N O V 00 N N M M Z > = � In L N N (D 7 7 (D M V CD (D CD coCl) 00 ) (D CD 00 ) (O co O N Cl) O M W U' N p_ Z e» 0) -It w -ItM 00 -It -It 00 V P- P- V M h 7 V (D M co N N 6) -It -It C) N N 00 V 7 O lr 6) N 00 -It I-. N co 00 N h 7 (O N (D W W U _ _ _ O) co N (D J N N N N Cl) co U 0- (D N v N v N 00 N 00 Cl) Cl) az w .Q 00 z Ln Lr) U y °) 0 ° d m -° r r a N O 1 m a U _ N V 7 P U U �U�`` N c o W 'O M d' y c d ❑ � V a3 -00 UU Cl) Y d o O N> " w X a i '06 2 0 0 O t U C a >, O- O 7 m L 47 w .U. � a Z a) -° y to 3 co cl £ ° w 0- cu U o cc,: C7 w m> U a) m c c 3 wo -C N o > aTi o> w e co d 3 B E a ��t._y° w a)-1 O a) 5 i V O w- a) E wr R 'y :. L (n (6 O US C > a�6i �cn� m w� c� ° N sa La>>�-w N.� 0 3a w U C T c= 0 2 i a c M Z w 7 3 N C O❑ O .(.6 C L .� w a) a) a) (n o o a> o U Oi CO a) O- E a3 O) N N E >� W Mr Y_ � a7 > pig d Cn O r ❑ U N U a � � L_ U (L C G a�i o°° o o E U o a) _ a > E. >� U _ a co a° U' 3 O _ O a) U L O_ N Q 7- 0 _ E> C� 7 .Z 7 N a j a O a) 0_ (E U O_ Cl E a 't O> 'O a) Q) N � 7 U 0— p co Q p 0<to0acn I (>E W CD 2 o a v0Y�UD o M-t(7) U)��0 o 0M0-UoMM000-�cn� N CO V (O (D r W 6) � N CO V (O (Dt` W N M V (O (D r W 6) (n U) N M EXHIBIT A 'm'^ vJ O 0- 0 ^^L _ W LL �N�. VLC�� I W IM W .O L �U c N CD_ .L CD O z3 E N 00 O p >1 L 4- CL U E _ w (O O O (D to Ln M O N V O� 00 (O LO (D M (3) LO Ln O (N Q m K O N V V N N O O CD n 00 N N N M Cl) Q J D r r r H == 2 00 N 00 N O O V O CO M I- M (O M P� (O Lo Q f� V O CO O N CO I-W r M O) It N o0 O- W N M O N V� W M I- O O N O M N N Ln f� M OD Co -i 7 Ln 0 J .iN N N MI- M V M O) N- - f- N - Ln Ln 'IT (D- ( H a Cl) .» 00 N 00 N O O O O M (D (o 1- 00 (D M f-- (D O� O F 2 p M N ONO_ O W N co O 00 M M O N V N W O (No OF 3 co N N N Cl) I- M V Cl) 0) CO N 'IT- V Ln V LO co J - N J O O Ln Ln O Ln Ln O O O O O O W co 0 LO Lf) N N Ln LO N f'- � Ln Ln O O O Cl) Ln co oofa mW F Ln co Z F co M to � Z O U U Z W = M OU W W N LO a�» N LO N � U) M N V O V (O O O V V N V w W = M (D N N N N V OZ Z 9 W N V O V to -It to O't 'IT N N V (o W O WW i» M W� co M M f� M r- r N N to V r r o0 M W V M (o M N M co N N (o N (ID 00 CO CD O N N N M M N N CO N N N (D N 00 LO Z W = N V w C7 00 00 CO N N N 7 00 7 CD V N M M Ln co N It CD Ln o N 00 7 CD -It CD Ln 00 CD V V N N V O O O O tq N U)Z .n Co f� N V ai l 00 (D M ItIl- CD Cl) V 7 M 00_ M Cl) N Q W co M r N CO N - CO C V co � O O N N 00 M N CO N M N N CO N Cl) to 0) It LO O w W = 00 N LO W z g 000 000000000 Coco c o o o o 0 0 N U)W e> O O O O O O O O O O O 00 V (o N N CO V (o V 7 CD O 7 O O O O 7 (D O O O O (D N O 00 O O 00 N O O O O V CO M M M V N W C6 Ln O M 0 'o(O O 'IT M 00 W N O- N N CD (0 (0 Cl) V Il- N N (o (oOW Z > _ D Q N (7 00 O N M 7 V to O Cl) CD 00 00 M N (o cc 00 W N a Z e> M co M O 00 W V O N M N 00 (D r- r 7 V N N 00 Cl) Cl) m Cl) O M (D 00 CO Ln V 7 V V O_ U) W U) N V (o Q> K V V K N N N N N N az w 0) 0) M N O F L It 0 Z U OF E d (D ° N rn W Ott to N o m c d � rno-0o U) mo a p E N c:, " o s o E m Y o> _ U) o o « d V J N LR N .0 N c o Q H p :2 U) C \° > >, m V v) N N C £ o f0 N gm N �' N o o d N2Y m� mi0 4) p o ° w g v H m a o FA Q Q m N a3i W .N N .N °tS m c U f0 W N> t o :p f0 d CL c a LO .� W L.o E W d >, W m-o y:d N Q d o n o o> W. W OL m o d a c v = o o (D OtS m oa )FU 0)= c Oti o NaLLU ' d a J @ IL 00_ C` C` c` U '3 "2 a tom) U N M O @ (6 M N ����oa���a��- a o.=��� (A C ��o70 d(1) Ln ID� rnSQaa0DCLoma02 o —(L(n0 o mQU o N(n0 o a N co V Ln O r W M a N CO a N a N U) U) U) U) L n 3 d o c d U 0 (D CA a 3 c d � 3 Y C coo 0 7 E c LL m m m m c A (U > rn 6 N L U L a o f0 0 N U C L m N f0 N a O o � N No c 6 N v- � -o E (h Y c E W CO D m N a) 'a c co O` N T 0 L N a a > a > o c E > D N E E N o � E o o t2_ m a m a -' o m o a �00 N Cl) V EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A WILSEYNE HAM Engineering, Surveying & Planning 2020 Charge Rate Fee Schedule I. Charge Rate Fee Schedule The compensation of Wilsey Ham for work done will be on the basis of an hourly charge rate, plus incurred expenses and will be the sum of all the items set forth below: A. Personnel Services Principal Engineer/Surveyor $241 Per Hr Designer/Technician II $152 Per Hr Supervising Eng/Surveyor 223 Per Hr Designer/Technician 1 140 Per Hr Managing Engineer/Surveyor 213 Per Hr Cad Operator/Drafter 11 126 Per Hr Senior Engineer/Project Mgr. 200 Per Hr Designer/Technician 115 Per Hr Associate Engineer/Surveyor 190 Per Hr Administrative Assistant 84 Per Hr Engineer II 179 Per Hr Technical Assistant 71 Per Hr Engineer 1 168 Per Hr 2 Person Survey Crew 257 Per Hr Assistant Engineer 152 Per Hr Contract Personnel 2x Invoice Junior Engineer 140 Per Hr Outside Survey Specialist 179 Per Hr Senior Designer 156 Per Hr Effective through December 31, 2020 and subject to revision annually thereafter. B. Reimbursable Expenses Travel & Transportation Expenses: a) Reimbursement for actual travel and subsistence expenses paid to oron behalf of employees on business connected with the project, plus a handling charge of 15%. b) Fifty-seven cents ($0.57) per mile, or the current rate allowable set by the Internal Revenue Service for use of company passenger vehicles, and eighteen dollars ($18.00) per hour for use of vehicles carrying field survey equipment and supplies or used for field inspection and supervision. 2. Miscellaneous Expenses: a) The cost of materials, supplies, reproduction work, agency filing fees, and other services, including communication expenses, plus a handling charge of 15%. C. Outside Services a) Invoice cost of services and expenses charged to Wilsey Ham by outside consultants, professional, or technical firms engaged in connection with the order, plus 15% handling charge. Table 20172 EXHIBIT I 0) C U) Q 75 0 0 N O N C6 >J W H C9 z O 0 z Q tr m n Q W m J_ H a 1= co a� C= m O —— �I / w-- \ I \ I w w � / I I I I I I I \ / I I \ � w / w - - _ w T w \ w — / w w LEGEND EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING STORM ®RAIN LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE N0. DATE ISSUE / REVISION DESCRIPTION Project Mgr.: WILSEY HE HAM CITY OF BURLINGAME Project Eng.: SAN MATEO COUNTY Engineering, Surveying &Planning Designer: Checked By: 3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100 SOUTH EL CAMINO AREA Drawn By: San Mateo, CA 94403 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 650.349.2151 PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENTS BY BY DATE wilsemam.com WH PROJ. NO. 140-XXX REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CITY OF BURLINGAME STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN. THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE UNDERSIGNED ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THAT MAY EXIST ON THESE PLANS. ART MORIMOTO ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE R.C.E. N0. 42634 EXPIRES 03-31-2012 DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: SHEET CALIFORNIA DESIGN: DATE: DRAWN: DATE: CP # CHECKED: DATE: 1 EXHIBIT A Aft W W EL CAMINO REAL I _ 00 I 3 1 I I I I I I I \ I � I I I W / � \ I T \U) w \ a I 0 — — — — z I U 7> Q- C) CV \ / OD APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY: p JEFF PETERSON DATE p \ \ / \ \ / R.C.E. N0. 4EXPIRES 06-30-11 ZQ \ \ WILSEY HAM ENGINEERS m / / \ \ / / / / \ REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CITY OF BURLINGAME STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE Q / \ / \ / \ \ INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN. THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE UNDERSIGNED ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS w � / \ / \ / THAT MAY EXIST ON THESE PLANS. ART MORIMOTO DATE co \ / / R.C.E. NO. 42634 ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR EXPIRES 03-31 —2012 Project Mgr.: CITY OF BURLINGAME DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: SHEET LEGEND WILSEYOOF&HAM Project Eng.: Engineering, Surveying & Planning SAN MATED COUNTY CALIFORNIA E EXISTING WATER LINE Designer: co Checked By: WILSEY HAM ENGINEERS 3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100 R. DATE R.C.E. N0. EXPIRES EXISTING STORM ®RAIN LINE Drawn By: San Mateo, CA 94403 DESIGN: DATE: CD EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE 650.349.2151 DRAWN: DATE: NO. DATE ISSUE / REVISION DESCRIPTION BY BY DATE wilseLDam.com WH PROJ. NO. 140-059 CP # CHECKED: DATE: EXHIBIT A M LEGEND I I I I I I � Of / PHASING KEY w w EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE I I I — I I I I I I I PHASE 1 — EL CAMINO REAL (5300LE) PHASE 2 e I BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISIONS (6300LE) PHASE 3 — GLENWOOD PARK SUBDIVISION AND NEIGHBORHOOD (6720LF) PHASE 4 — BURLINGAME TERRACE AND BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISIONS (6600LE) I � I I I I I I I I I II 1 I I \ I I \ \I I I 111 I � i � I I I I I I I ,w I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ _ I I — I I I I _ _ LLSBOROVGH Project Mgr.: WILSEY0000HAM CITY OF BURLINGAME Project Eng.: SAN MATEO COUNTY Engineering, Surveying &Planning Designer: Checked By: 3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100 SOUTH EL CAMINO AREA Drawn By: San Mateo, CA 94403 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 650.349.2151 PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENTS NO. DATE ISSUE / REVISION DESCRIPTION BY BY DATE wilseLDam.com WH PROJ. NO. 140—XXX E r / I r I I I I REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CITY OF BURLINGAME STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN. THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE UNDERSIGNED ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THAT MAY EXIST ON THESE PLANS. ART MORIMOTO ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE R.C.E. N0. 42634 EXPIRES 03-31 -2012 DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: SHEET CALIFORNIA DESIGN: DATE: DRAWN: DATE: CP # CHECKED: DATE: I PROJECT LOCATION MAP BURLINGAME PARK SJBQIVSION WATER MAID REPLACEME14T PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 84892 CITY OF HILLSBOROUGH Burlingame Park Subdivision ®' ® City Limits SPN � of c�� �P �v ci�v o `� STAFF REPORT APORA< To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 21, 2020 AGENDA ITEM NO: 8c MEETING DATE: September 21, 2020 From: Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 Subject Adoption of a Resolution Providing a Tolling of Existing Development Entitlements RECOMMENDATION Staff proposes that the City Council adopt a resolution tolling existing planning and building entitlements for a period of one year in recognition of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND While the City Hall facility is closed, Community Development Department staff continues to process applications. Starting on May 11, 2020, staff resumed processing new applications as well as previously submitted applications. However, between March 17, 2020, and May 10, 2020, the Community Development Department was not accepting new applications for most Planning or Building permits, including permit renewals. The City has made substantial efforts to keep projects moving through the planning, design, and construction phases even as the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated public health orders materially complicate those processes. The City's Community Development functions are up and running, with staff predominately working from home. Despite these efforts, COVID-19's effects on both City and external processes make delays unavoidable for projects of all types and sizes. Economic fallout from COVID-19 may also impact project proponents' ability to carry out their projects for an indeterminate period. While the City cannot ameliorate all the negative effects that COVID-19 will have on development projects, for some entitlement types, there are options for tolling deadlines such that entitlements will not expire as a result of pandemic -induced delays. On June 1, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution extending planning and building development entitlements (permits) that had expired or would be expiring between March 17, 2020 (the first day of the shelter in place order in San Mateo County) and September 30, 2020. The resolution extended previously approved entitlements through December 31, 2020. The September 30th timeframe was an optimistic estimate of when construction operations might begin to normalize, based on the trends and information on the pandemic at the time. When the resolution was adopted, however, it was with the understanding that the timelines could be 1 Tolling of Existing Development Entitlements and Permits September 21, 2020 revisited at a later date depending on the status of the pandemic through the summer. Given that the pandemic continues to be an enduring challenge, staff is recommending a further extension of permit timelines. DISCUSSION While the previous resolution adopted on June 1st provided extensions to permit timelines, since that time staff has done further research and has determined that a better mechanism would be a "tolling" of timelines. In particular, some types of permits such as Tentative Parcel and Subdivision Maps have limitations under State law regarding the number of times and/or duration of extensions, some of which cannot be exceeded by local action. The proposed resolution would toll all planning and building development entitlements (permits) for a period of one year upon adoption. Staff recognizes that a fundamental question facing the Council as it considers entitlement tolling is how to balance project proponents' need for certainty with City and neighborhood interests to keep projects moving. However, in light of the massive uncertainty facing the development industry, the City's interests in keeping projects moving, and the time and expense that would otherwise be incurred in providing individual extensions to projects, a blanket one-year tolling would be the most efficient and effective option. It recognizes the hardships posed by the pandemic but still provides projects the opportunity to make reasonable progress in a realistic timeframe. FISCAL IMPACT None. Exhibit: • Resolution 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME TOLLING ALL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS THROUGH SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 WHEREAS, on March 3, 2020, the Health Officer of the County of San Mateo declared a Local Health Emergency Regarding Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19); and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, via Resolution No. 33-2020, the City Council of the City of Burlingame ("City Council") determined that a local emergency exists in the City of Burlingame ("City"); and WHEREAS, these conditions warrant and necessitate measures to mitigate adverse economic effects that may be experienced by businesses and property owners during this emergency; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares that the global health emergency caused by the COVID-19 outbreak is delaying the start and completion of construction of land development projects, and the land use approvals for these projects are at risk of expiring; and WHEREAS, because the processing, approval, and issuance of land use entitlements represent a substantial investment of money, time, and effort toward the successful completion of these projects, expiration of these entitlements represents a significant loss for the owners and the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to protect against this potential loss and preserve development opportunities by granting additional time to the term of these entitlements; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2020, the City Council extended through December 31, 2020 development entitlements (Planning and Building) that expired or will be expiring between March 17, 2020 and September 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, COVID-19 remains a threat, and further efforts are needed to control the spread of the virus, which have implications on the timely start and completion of construction of land development projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: The City Council resolves that timelines for valid, unexpired development entitlements (Planning and Building) are tolled through September 21, 2021, at which point timelines shall resume according to the terms of the respective entitlements. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on the 21 st day of September 2020, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: 1 RESOLUTION NO. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk I BURLINGAMESTAFF • R Avovw To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 21, 2020 AGENDA NO: 8d MEETING DATE: September 21, 2020 From: Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 Joseph Sanfilippo, Economic Development & Housing Specialist — (650) 558- 7264 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Send a Letter to the Governor Requesting Consideration of Organized Hotel Meetings of Up to 50 Persons RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to send a letter to Governor Newsom on behalf of the City's hoteliers requesting consideration of allowing organized meetings for up to 50 persons. BACKGROUND The City Council's Economic Development Subcommittee (comprised of Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran and Councilmember Ricardo Ortiz) convened with Burlingame's hoteliers and the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (SMCCVB) on September 9, 2020. During that meeting, the hoteliers described the dramatic reduction in occupancy rates they have faced, with rates falling from nearly 90% in the previous year, to approximately 20% currently (draft meeting minutes attached). As San Mateo County progresses on the State's Blueprint for a Safer Economy tier list, these occupancy rates will increase, albeit at a much slower rate than previously anticipated. Given Burlingame's proximity to the San Francisco International Airport, Burlingame hotels have traditionally served corporate travelers and hosted corporate events. As the State currently prohibits gatherings, the sector is suffering. At the subcommittee meeting, the hoteliers requested that the City Council send a letter to the Governor requesting that organized gatherings of up to 50 people be permitted. DISCUSSION The hoteliers are confident that they can provide a safe experience and will follow all State guidance for social distancing, face coverings, frequent cleanings, and prohibition of shared food and drink. In addition, all gatherings would only accept registered attendees in an effort to minimize community spread and assist with local contact tracing efforts. The request would be in keeping with the standards for places of worship, which are currently permitted to host gatherings for 25% of their maximum capacity, or 100 people (whichever is less). 1 Letter to Governor Newsom: Hotel Gatherings up to 50 Persons September 21, 2020 Given that the City's budget is historically bolstered by transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues, the unprecedented downturn in travel and leisure spending is likely to pose difficulties in the future. Being able to safely host meetings of up to 50 persons would presumably allow hotels to increase occupancy. The resolution and draft letter to the Governor requesting consideration of organized hotel meetings of up to 50 persons are attached. FISCAL IMPACT None. Exhibits: • Resolution • Draft Letter • Draft September 9, 2020 ED Subcommittee Minutes 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SEND A LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF ORGANIZED HOTEL MEETINGS OF UP TO 50 PERSONS WHEREAS, on September 9, 2020, the Economic Development Subcommittee of the City Council convened with Burlingame's hoteliers and the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (SMCCVB); and WHEREAS, during that meeting, the hoteliers described the dramatic reduction in occupancy rates they have faced, with rates falling from nearly 90% in the previous year, to approximately 20% currently; and WHEREAS, as San Mateo County progresses on the State's Blueprint for a Safer Economy tier list, these occupancy rates will increase, albeit at a much slower rate than previously anticipated; and WHEREAS, given Burlingame's proximity to the San Francisco International Airport, Burlingame hotels have traditionally served corporate travelers and hosted corporate events; and WHEREAS, on behalf of the City's hoteliers, the City Council requests that the State allow hotels to host organized gatherings of up to 50 people, following all State guidance for social distancing, face coverings, frequent cleanings, and prohibition of shared food and drink; and WHEREAS, the threshold of 50 persons would be in keeping with the standards for places of worship, which are currently permitted to host gatherings for 25% of their maximum capacity, or 100 people (whichever is less); and WHRERAS, allowing such gatherings would help the hotel and lodging industry recover from the impacts of the economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RESOLVES THAT: The Mayor is authorized to send a letter to Governor Newsom requesting that the State consider permitting safely organized gatherings of up to 50 people to assist the hotel and lodging industry. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21s' day of September, 2020, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk Emily Beach, Mayor Ann O'Brien Keighran, Vice Mayor Ricardo Ortiz Michael Brownrigg Donna Colson September 22, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom 130310th Street, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 The City of Burlingame CITY HALL — 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 RE: State Blueprint for a Safer Economy (Hotels and Lodging) Request for Consideration Dear Governor Newsom: TEL: (650) 558-7200 FAX: (650) 566-9282 I am writing on behalf of the Burlingame City Council to request that the State reconsider its strict prohibition on hotel gatherings. Specifically, we hope that the State will allow gatherings of up to 50 people for organized meetings to alleviate the hardships facing our hotel and lodging industry. The City Council's Economic Development Subcommittee (presently comprised of Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran and Councilmember Ricardo Ortiz) convened with Burlingame's hoteliers and the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (SMCCVB) on September 9, 2020. During that meeting, the hoteliers described the dramatic reduction in occupancy rates they have faced, with rates falling from nearly 90% in the previous year, to approximately 20% currently. As San Mateo County progresses on the State's Blueprint for a Safer Economy tier list, these occupancy rates will increase, albeit at a much slower rate than previously anticipated. Given Burlingame's proximity to the San Francisco International Airport, Burlingame hotels have traditionally served corporate travelers and hosted corporate events. As the State currently prohibits gatherings, this once -thriving sector is suffering. On behalf of the City's hoteliers, the City Council therefore requests that organized gatherings of up to 50 people be permitted. The City's hotel and lodging industry is committed to providing a safe experience and will follow all State guidance for social distancing, face coverings, frequent cleanings, and prohibition of shared food and drink. In addition, all gatherings will only accept registered attendees in an effort to minimize community spread and assist with local contact tracing efforts. We believe this would be in keeping with the standards for places of worship, which are currently permitted to host gatherings for 25% of their maximum capacity, or 100 people (whichever is less). Governor Gavin Newsom September 22, 2020 Page 2 While this request is made on behalf of the City's hoteliers, it is also an important consideration for the City's fiscal health. Burlingame's smart budgeting in the past has allowed the City to prevent layoffs of staff and continue to provide exceptional service to Burlingame residents and businesses. However, as the City's budget is historically bolstered by transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues, the unprecedented downturn in travel and leisure spending is likely to pose difficulties in the future. The adopted budget for fiscal year 2020-21 projects a nearly 50% decline in TOT compared to FY 2018-19 revenues. For the reasons described above, the City of Burlingame is requesting that you consider permitting safely organized gatherings of up to 50 people to assist the hotel and lodging industry. Sincerely, Emily Beach Mayor cc: State Senator Jerry Hill State Assembly Member Kevin Mullin John Hutar, President and CEO, San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau :1 Register online with the City of Burlingame to receive regular City updates at www.Burlingame.org :1 City Council Economic Development Subcommittee MINUTES (DRAFT) Conference Room A City Hall, 501 Primrose Road — Burlingame, California Wednesday, September 9, 2020 — 8:15 a.m. ATTENDANCE Members Present: Vice Mayor Ann O'Brien Keighran, Councilmember Ricardo Ortiz Members Absent: None Staff Present: City Manager (CM) Lisa Goldman, Community Development Director (CDD) Kevin Gardiner, Economic Development Specialist (EDS) Joseph Sanfilippo, Senior Civil Engineer (SCE) Andy Wong, Streets, Storm Drains and Sewers Division Manager (SDSDM) Michael Heathcote, Parks and Recreation Director (PRD) Margaret Glomstad, Finance Director (FD) Carol Augustine Members of the Public Present: John Kevranian (President of Broadway Business Improvement District), Georgette Naylor (Burlingame SFO/Chamber of Commerce), Amanda Williams (Pizzeria Delfina), Jana Gage, Kevin Kretsch (Hyatt Regency SFO), Lisa Kershner (San Francisco Airport Marriott Waterfront), John Hutar (CEO of San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau), Fettah Aydin (Embassy Suites) READ AND APPROVE MINUTES FROM AUGUST 12 MEETING Approved. DISCUSSION ITEMS Review of Street Closures on Broadway and Burlingame Avenue CM Goldman introduced the topic. Public Works staff noted that there are no problems with the overall the Broadway closure. (The closure of the 1100 block was discussed later.) SDSDM Heathcote noted that the Burlingame Avenue closure has ended, and parklets are anticipated to be available by Saturday evening for all interested merchants on Burlingame Avenue. There are 15 merchants with their Encroachment Permit paperwork completed, with more to potentially come. Public Works staff has marked out spaces for parklets. Vice Mayor O'Brien questioned how parklets were being measured. SCE Wong noted a preference for consistency, allowing approximately 300 feet per business. This is equivalent to two parallel parking spaces or three angled parking spaces. CM Goldman noted a difficulty with several merchants (Pizzeria Delfina and the nearby retailers) having limited space due to street frontage. SCE Wong explained the challenges facing nearby merchants for restaurants with limited store frontage and an issue with a nearby bulbout for building out a more robust parklet. City Council Economic Development Subcommittee — Minutes September 9, 2020 (DRAFT) Amanda Williams (Pizzeria Delfina) mentioned a preference to combine the two parklets for Pizzeria Delfina and Sixto's Cantina, and SCE Wong noted that this is possible for staff to do. SDSDM Heathcote noted that one barrier could be placed in the midpoint of the combined parklet, providing a formal delineation. Ms. Williams mentioned that they will likely build a parklet with a small barrier to minimize the space taken up by the barrier. Vice Mayor O'Brien advocated for a compromise to be made between the restaurants and the Public Works Department to complete the parklet; a consensus was reached during the meeting. a) 1100 Block of Broadway CM Goldman introduced the topic, noting that the restaurants on that block have not been utilizing it to its fullest extent. EDS Sanfilippo mentioned a survey distributed to the 15 merchants on the block, gauging their opinions on the block closure. Two were in favor, two were opposed to the closure. SDSDM Heathcote noted that there are concerns with delivery trucks turning onto Laguna Avenue, should the block be open, as the street is very narrow, and there have been collisions in the area in the past. John Kevranian (President of the Broadway BID) noted that business is great for several merchants on the block, and he advocated to continue the closure without changes. He also noted that many merchants on the 1100 block are not open on Saturday and Sunday. Vice Mayor O'Brien advocated for additional outreach to the merchants to get a better sampling, but she nonetheless supported continuing the closure without modifications. Forecast Discussion with Hoteliers EDS Sanfilippo introduced the topic, followed by a brief presentation by John Hutar (CEO of the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (SMCCVB)). The analysis presented by Mr. Hutar showed a large drop in revenue across all geographic areas in the U.S., with nearly 80% of business lost in the Bay Area. San Mateo County occupancy grew to 40% in July, but the coastside properties are disproportionately successful compared to the Bayside properties. Due to the recent CZU fires, marketing has been shifted towards Bayside properties to promote refuge and leisure travel, but occupancy is still low. He noted that April was the month with the most number of hotels closed (25% of the total inventory); only 11 % are now closed. The overall U.S. travel and hospitality market is down 52%, with CBRE's 2021 projections showing 48% growth next year. The SMCCVB will host a webinar with CBRE on October 7 with more advanced data. CBRE speculates the 58% drop in San Francisco hotel travel will ramp up to 60% growth in 2021, though Mr. Hutar expressed caution in this optimism. PA City Council Economic Development Subcommittee — Minutes September 9, 2020 (DRAFT) Mr. Hutar noted that Burlingame hotels are particularly suited for group travel and events, and small meetings (up to 50) may be an opportunity to gain some of this market back. He also hoped to avoid losing crew travel to other hotel districts with competitive rates. Vice Mayor O'Brien expressed dismay that the County is still on the widespread purple tier of the State's Blueprint for a Safer Economy, noting that gatherings will likely be difficult until the County is moved to a less restrictive tier. Mr. Hutar noted a call with Cal Travel implied that the State may soon allow smaller group meetings and events to occur throughout the state, though this discussion is quite preliminary. The Subcommittee expressed interest in sending a letter to the Governor's Office to advocate for this change. Kevin Kretsch (Hyatt SFO) mentioned a great need for conventioneers and noted a pivot in marketing to leisure has shown an increase in business, albeit at a reduced rate. He noted a need to highlight outdoor amenities, particularly the Bayfront and Downtown businesses. He also commended his fellow hoteliers for their exceptional sanitation standards and improvements. Lisa Kershner (Marriott) hoped to identify other ways to beautify the Bayfront to attract both leisure travelers and airline crews. She mentioned several suggestions: 1) Bike -sharing stations on the Bayfront 2) Introduction of art programs along the Bay Trail or other options Ms. Kershner noted that the SMCCVB and the hoteliers are happy to lead the charge in beautifying the area with some of the above suggestions. She also mentioned an issue with trash on the Bayfront and requested the City's assistance in reaching out to other property owners along the Bay Trail for their assistance. Councilmember Ortiz queried what form the art projects would take. Ms. Kershner noted that several art pieces would be placed every quarter mile with a description of the art, a QR code, etc. She mentioned that fundraising was required to commission and install the art on a similar project she had worked on in Oakland, and it was successful. CM Goldman noted that this would have to be spearheaded by the private hoteliers, and she is unsure if the art installation would be an issue with be a Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC). She also mentioned potential opportunities to contact Oculus for help with the bike -sharing initiative. Oculus is expected to begin occupancy of their office development in Q1 2021. Councilmember Ortiz suggested that bike stations be installed near the Millbrae BART station and at the Oculus development. Fettah Aydin (Embassy Suites) noted that bike -sharing was successful when previously implemented. Mr. Kevranian mentioned that a similar bike -sharing station would be of interest on Broadway, even though it would requiring taking away some parking spaces. Mr. Hutar mentioned a webinar for hybrid meetings that the SMCCVB is hosting next week that may present additional opportunities to gain some business for the Bayfront hotels that are generally at 20% occupancy or less. 9 City Council Economic Development Subcommittee — Minutes September 9, 2020 (DRAFT) SDSDM Heathcote noted that Bay Trail maintenance is the responsibility of private property owners, though City staff have recently cleaned up problem areas that were posing a health hazard. Mr. Kevranian asked Mr. Hutar how the business districts can help the hoteliers. Mr. Hutar suggested that "staycation marketing" may be effective. Ms. Kershner suggested a combination of the districts' marketing efforts. Mr. Aydin noted that the downtown districts are already a major attraction. Mr. Kretsch suggested a flyer of businesses that are open with hours of operation from the BIDs and Chamber. Ms. Kershner noted that delivery options should also be noted on the list for guests that are hesitant to venture into the City proper. Vice Mayor O'Brien suggested pictures of the districts to highlight that business is still successful in Burlingame. Councilmember Ortiz questioned whether the lower tiers allowed for smaller gatherings, and Mr. Hutar noted that there is not clear guidance stated in the Blueprint. CM Goldman noted that the red tier allowed for cultural, religious or ceremonial gatherings of 25% occupancy or 100 persons, whichever is fewer. Future Agenda Topics There will be discussion of other jurisdictions capping commission fees from delivery companies (such as DoorDash, Grubhub, etc.) The Subcommittee will examine the City of South San Francisco's recent adoption as a model. Several applicants for the Fagade Improvement grant have requested an extension to their fagade improvement implementations previously approved in late March and early April. All of them have noted reduced revenue from the COVID-19 pandemic as the cause for the request. As the approval terms revoke the approved funding at the expiration date of October 31, the item will be brought to the Subcommittee to formally request an extension for applicants that have not completed their improvements. Miscellaneous Discussion All discussion was related to the agenda items. Action Items The Broadway closure will remain unchanged, and Burlingame Avenue parklets will be implemented beginning Saturday, September 12. CDD Gardiner will reach out to BCDC to see if there are any regulations regarding installing art along the Bay Trail and follow-up with Lisa Kershner. El City Council Economic Development Subcommittee — Minutes September 9, 2020 (DRAFT) • EDS Sanfilippo will contact the City's Code Enforcement for additional enforcement of property maintenance along the Bay Trail. The City will attempt to identify the property owners to connect a joint venture of beautification and parking sharing. • EDS Sanfilippo, SCE Wong and Sustainability Coordinator Sigalle Michael will research bike - sharing companies and forward the information to John Hutar for disbursement to the hoteliers. • EDS Sanfilippo and CDD Gardiner will draft a staff report for the City Council authorizing the Mayor to send a letter to the Governor's Office advocating that the hotels be allowed to host small gatherings with masks and social distancing in place.. • The SMCCVB, Chamber, and BIDs will contact each other for joint marketing opportunities. Mr. Hutar will send marketing to CM Goldman for inclusion in the eNews. FUTURE AGENDA TOPICS • October 14, 2020- Request for extension of approvals for Fagade Improvement Program; Discussion of commission fee caps for delivery companies PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no further public comments. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:42 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Joseph Sanfilippo Economic Development Specialist •1 BUR— IN�AAGENDA NO: 9a STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 21, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 21, 2020 From: Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager — (650) 558-7256 Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7204 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code (Donnelly Avenue Commercial District) and Consideration of an Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to Allow Multifamily Residential Uses Above the First Floor on Properties Located North of Donnelly Avenue that have Sole Frontage on Donnelly Avenue; Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Design Review, Conditional Use Permit for Building Height; Condominium Permit; and Lot Combination for a Proposed Fourteen (14) Unit Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development to be Located at 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue RECOMMENDATION The City Council should: Introduce the following ordinance by title only, waiving further reading: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Amending Title 25 (Zoning Code) - Section 25.36.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue as a permitted use in the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District". 2. Conduct a public hearing and consider all public testimony related to the Ordinance; an Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Design Review; Conditional Use Permit for Building Height; Condominium Permit; and Lot Combination for a new fourteen (14) unit mixed use commercial/residential development. 3. Following conclusion of the public hearing, provide direction to staff regarding any desired changes to the Ordinance and related project entitlements. 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue — New Mixed Use Development September 21, 2020 4. Direct staff to place adoption of the proposed Ordinance and resolutions memorializing the City Council's action related to all project entitlements on the October 5, 2020 regular meeting agenda of the City Council. BACKGROUND Project Description: An application has been submitted for construction of a new three-story mixed use commercial/residential development at 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue. The project site is zoned DAC (Donnelly Avenue Commercial) and is located on the north side of Donnelly Avenue, between Lorton Avenue and Primrose Road. The project consists of 4,704 SF of commercial use on the ground floor and 14 residential condominium units on the second and third floors. Parking for 23 vehicles will be provided in an enclosed garage located behind the commercial space. Application Elements: ■ Mitigated Negative Declaration: A determination that with mitigation measures there will be no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; ■ Amendment to the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District and Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located on the north side of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, mixed use commercial/residential building with at -grade parking (C.S. 25.36.045, 25.57.010 (c)(1) and Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan); ■ Conditional Use Permit for building height (43'-10" to top of parapet and 54'-Y to top of stairway enclosure proposed, where a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building exceed 35-0"; 55-0" maximum building height allowed) (C.S. 25.36.055); ■ Condominium Permit for 14 residential condominium units (each unit to be privately owned) (C.S. 26.30.020); and ■ Lot Combination to combine three existing lots (1214, 1218, and 1220 Donnelly Avenue) into one lot. A copy of the August 10, 2020 Planning Commission staff report is attached and provides a full discussion and analysis of the proposed project, including conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission on August 10, 2020. DISCUSSION Currently, the Donnelly Avenue Area within the Downtown Specific Plan (see attached Map of Planning Areas) and the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) zoning regulations do not permit residential uses of any type. With this application, the applicant is requesting that the City Council consider amending the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District zoning regulations and the 2 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue — New Mixed Use Development September 21, 2020 Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor only on those properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue (see attached Figure 1). This would include the project site (three lots), two public parking lots, and one lot east of the project site. The rationale for this rather limited amendment is that the Donnelly Avenue -facing properties are adjacent to multifamily residential land uses to the rear on the north side of that block (facing Bellevue Avenue), and as such would be compatible with the adjacent residential uses. Staff would note that multifamily residential uses are permitted by right in the Bayswater Mixed Use (BMU), Howard Mixed Use (HMU), and California Drive Auto Row (CAR) Districts, and with a Conditional Use Permit in the Myrtle Mixed Use (MMU) District. The proposed code amendment language is consistent with these other downtown districts, except that it would allow multifamily residential use above the first floor in order to maintain the importance of keeping a commercial presence on the ground floor. Planning Commission Action: On August 10, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project, including the amendment to the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District and Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area). The Commission voted 6-0-0-1 to recommend approval of the applicant's requests for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amendment to the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District and Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area), Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Condominium Permit, and Lot Combination. Since the City Council is the final decision -making body regarding the request to amend the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District and Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area), the Planning Commission's action was in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. In its discussion, the Planning Commission asked the architect and developer to consider relocating the landscape planters back to the rear edge of the common open space (located on the podium level) to provide an additional buffer to the properties behind the project. The Commission noted that this change could be reviewed at the staff level. City Council Action: In reviewing the Planning Commission recommendations and making a determination on the requested action, the City Council should consider the following findings regarding the project entitlements: Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Donnelly Avenue Commercial District: In acting on the request to amend the Downtown Specific Plan and DAC District zoning regulations to allow residential use above the first floor, only on those properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue, the City Council should consider consistency with the policies of the General Plan, in particular the Land Use Element of the Downtown Specific Plan, and the DAC Zoning District. In making its findings, the Council may choose to consider: Consistency with Downtown Specific Plan Policy LU-6.1, which encourages allowing housing in the Howard Avenue area as well as on the periphery of Downtown; and • Consistency with Downtown Specific Plan Goal/Policy LU-3 that it ensures a sensitive 3 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue — New Mixed Use Development September 21, 2020 transition between the existing abutting residential areas and the downtown area. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review in mixed use districts is detailed in Code Section 25.57.030 (g) and requires the proposed project to be reviewed for the following considerations: (1) Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial, industrial, and mixed use areas; and (2) Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; and (3) On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; and (4) Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; and (5) Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structures in the immediate area; and (6) Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit for building height, the City Council must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020, a-c): (a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame General Plan and the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance; (c) The Planning Commission (or in this instance, City Council) may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Criteria for Permitting a Condominium: The following condominium standards shall apply to all land and structures proposed as part of a condominium project and shall be evaluated and processed pursuant to the procedural requirements set forth for conditional use permits in Title 25 of the Burlingame Municipal Code. No condominium project or portion thereof shall be approved or conditionally approved in whole or in part unless the planning commission, or city council upon appeal or review, has reviewed the following on the basis of their effect on: !r 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue — New Mixed Use Development September 21, 2020 (a) Sound community planning; the economic, ecological, social and aesthetic qualities of the community; and on public health, safety and general welfare; (b) The overall impact on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources; and (c) Conformity with the general plan and density permitted by zoning regulations. FISCAL IMPACT None. Exhibits: • Ordinance — Amending Title 25 (Zoning Code) — Code Section 25.36.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code, Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) Zoning District • Map of Planning Areas in Downtown Specific Plan • Figure 1: Map of Properties Included in Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment • Resolution - Amendment to Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) • Resolution — CEQA • Resolution — Project Entitlements • Planning Commission Minutes — August 10, 2020 • Planning Commission Staff Report — August 10, 2020 • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) • Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) • Project Materials • Project Plans 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING TITLE 25 (ZONING CODE) — CODE SECTION 25.36.020 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR ON PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF DONNELLY AVENUE THAT HAVE SOLE FRONTAGE ON DONNELLY AVENUE AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE DONNELLY AVENUE COMMERCIAL (DAC) DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Burlingame hereby ordains as follows: Division 1. Factual Background WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, John Britton filed an application with the City of Burlingame Community Development Department — Planning Division requesting approval of the following requests: ■ Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, mixed use commercial/residential building with at -grade parking (C.S. 25.36.045, 25.57.010 (c)(1) and Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan); ■ Conditional Use Permit for building height (43'-10" to top of parapet and 54'-3" to top of stairway enclosure proposed, where a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building exceed 35'-0"; 55-0" maximum building height allowed) (C.S. 25.36.055); ■ Condominium Permit for 14 residential condominium units (each unit to be privately owned) (C.S. 26.30.020); and ■ Lot Combination to combine three existing lots (1214, 1218 and 1220 Donnelly Avenue) into one lot; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning amendment would allow multifamily residential uses, including live/work, above the first floor in the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District, limited to properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; as reflected in the amendment to Title 25, Code Section 25.36.020; and WHEREAS, after considering all written and oral testimony presented at the August 10, 2020 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 6-0-0-1 to recommend to the City Council adoption of an ordinance amending Title 25 (Zoning Code) - Section 25.36.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code, to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; and ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, at its regular meeting of September 21, 2020 the Burlingame City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation to amend Title 25 (Zoning Code) - Section 25.36.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code, to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue, and following conclusion of the public hearing and consideration of all written and oral testimony provided during the hearing, introduced the ordinance, by title only, waiving further reading. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Division 2. Burlingame Municipal Code Section 25.36.020 is amended and shall be enacted as follows: Chapter 25.36 DAC (DONNELLY AVENUE COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT REGULATIONS 25.36.020 Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in the DAC District: (a) Retail uses which achieve contiguous, pedestrian -oriented, retail frontage such as drug, liquor, variety stores, paint and hardware, apparel, accessory, stationery, florists, household furnishings, and furniture; (b) Personal services, such as barber and beauty shops, photographic studios, shoe repair and laundry and dry cleaning services which do not include on -site processing; (c) Business services, such as printing services, mailing services and post office box services; (d) Grocery stores and markets; (e) Travel agencies; (f) Government agencies; (g) Offices, including health services and real estate, with parking as required by Chapter 25.70; (h) Financial institutions; (i) Hotels. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 0) Above the first floor only: (1) Multifamily residential uses, including live/work, on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue, with an average maximum unit size of one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) square feet. Average maximum unit size is defined as the maximum value allowed when averaging the square footage of gross floor areas of all residential units in a project. Division 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Division 4: This Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933, published, and circulated in the City of Burlingame, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of September, 2020, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2020, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk 3 1'1 iB 1100AA �17B 18 27 17A ►,,� 25 , 26 24A �_ 14A PP-MAN7A_MM 23A �iA, kW2 B 28B 28A 24B+� 33 32B = 32A I 'I � 2 B�22Br2+,1 30B 31 3 A ROOM 3-4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN/DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DONNELLY AVENUE AREA) TO ALLOW MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR ON PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF DONNELLY AVENUE THAT HAVE SOLE FRONTAGE ON DONNELLY AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: WHEREAS, the change to allow residential uses above the first floor is consistent with Goal/Policy LU-6.1 of the Downtown Specific Plan which encourages allowing housing in the Howard Avenue area as well as on the periphery of Downtown; and WHEREAS, the change to allow residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue is consistent with the adjacent high density multifamily residential land use designation for the abutting properties to the north and will not alter the land use patterns in the area; and WHEREAS, the change to allow residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue is consistent with Goal/Policy LU-3 of the Downtown Specific Plan in that it ensures a sensitive transition between the existing abutting residential areas and the downtown area; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.4 — Donnelly Avenue Area, of the Downtown Specific Plan has been amended to show that residential uses are allowed above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue, as shown on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Table 3-1 of the Downtown Specific Plan has been amended to show that residential uses are allowed above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue, as shown on the attached Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, following a duly noticed public hearing on September 21, 2020, the City Council considered the Planning Commission's August 10, 2020 recommendation in support of amending the City's General Plan/Downtown Specific Plan to allow multifamily residential uses above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the amendments to Chapter 3 — Land Use of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan as described herein. The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to make any other edits in the Downtown Specific Plan if they are deemed necessary in order to be consistent with the amendments to Chapter 3 as described herein. RESOLUTION NO. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5t" day of October, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk 3.0 Land Use 3.3 PLANNING AREAS 333 CHAPIN AVENUE AREA The Chapin Avenue area consists of properties on either side of Downtown Burlingame is divided into a series of Planning Areas, as identified Chapin Avenue and is bounded by Primrose Road to its east and in the Planning Areas Map (Figure 3-2). Upon implementation of the plan, each El Camino Real to its west. Chapin Avenue is characterized by a planning area or district will provide for a different mix of uses and intensities concentration of financial and real estate offices. Office uses are as described below. To allow finer grain distinctions, each area is further divided allowed on the ground floor of the Chapin Avenue area. into blocks which are numbered on the map. 33.1 BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 33.4 DONNELLY AVENUE AREA The Donnelly Avenue area consists of properties on either side The Burlingame Avenue area is the commercial and retail heart of of Donnelly Avenue between Primrose Road and LortonAvenue. Downtown Burlingame. Burlingame Avenue features a mixture of Ground floor retail use is allowed but not required. Existing residential restaurants, national retail stores, and many locally based retailers. The uses may remain and be improved, but new residential uses are not eastern end of Burlingame Avenue area near the train station has a allowed, except that new residential uses may be allowed above the concentration of restaurants and is active during both day and evening first floor and only on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue hours, while the western end towards El Camino Real provides more that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue. retail and is less active. Ground floor retail or personal service use is required in the Burlingame Avenue area. Office uses are allowed on the upper levels in commercial areas. Existing residential uses on upper floors may remain and be improved, but there should not be new residential uses within the Burlingame Avenue Commercial District. 3.3.2 HOWARD AVENUE MIXED USE DISTRICT The Howard Avenue Area is the area to the south of Burlingame Avenue and consists of a mix of uses, including retail and office along Howard Avenue, and multifamily residential uses between Howard and Peninsula Avenues. Burlingame Avenue and Howard Avenue together form the "Burlingame commercial" area. Ground floor retail use is encouraged, and housing is allowed on the upper levels above commercial uses. The interceding side streets --Lorton Avenue, Park Road, Primrose Road and Highland Avenue --will act as connector streets with the commercial uses along those streets strengthening the relationship between Burlingame Avenue and Howard Avenue. 33.5 CALIFORNIA DRIVE MIXED USE DISTRICT The Auto Row area is the area along California Drive between Burlingame and Peninsula Avenues. Automobile -related uses dominate in this area. Auto showrooms, hotel or retail uses are permitted on the ground floor, and housing, offices or hotel uses can be allowed on upper floors. Non -auto uses should be carefully considered to ensure compatibility with the area's traditional focus on automobile businesses; retail, personal and business services, and hotels require a conditional use permit, as do commercial uses greater than 5,000 square feet. 3.3.6 NORTH CALIFORNIA DRIVE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT The North California Drive Commercial District is the area along the west side of California Drive north of Bellevue Avenue to Oak Grove Avenue. Service Commercial uses dominate in this area. Retail or hotel uses are permitted on the ground floor whereas offices or hotel uses can be allowed on upper floors. 3- 3.0 Land Use 3.4 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Table 3-1 summarizes the uses allowed for each planning area. TABLE 3-1— PLANNING AREA LAND USES Land Uses Burlingame Howard Chapin Donnelly California North Myrtle Anita R-3 R-4 Base R-4 Bayswater Avenue Avenue Avenue Avenue Drive/ Auto California Road Mixed Road District District Incentive Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use Area Area Row Drive Use Area Area District Area District Commercial District 1 Retail Downtown Retail P P P P C P P Corner Store Retail C C C Personal Services P P P P C P P P Business Services P P P P C P P P 2 Residential P/ U P' P/U C P P P P P 3 Civic, Quasi -Civic, P P P P P P P P P P P P Cultural 41 Office P/U P/U P P P/U P P C 5 Service Commercial P P P P C for non - auto > 6,000 sq ft 6 Lodging/Hotel P P P P C P 7 Live/Work P/U P P C P P = Permitted C = Permitted with Conditions /G = Ground F1oorOnly /U = Upper Floors Only ' Residential use permitted only on upper floors and only on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING A FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE (DONNELLY AVENUE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DONNELLY AVENUE AREA), DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND LOT COMBINATION FOR A NEW THREE-STORY, 14-UNIT MIXED USE COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 1214-1220 DONNELLY AVENUE WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this council, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, per Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-607- P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5t" day of October, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND LOT COMBINATION FOR A NEW THREE-STORY, 14-UNIT MIXED USE COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 1214-1220 DONNELLY AVENUE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS: 029-151-150, 029-151-160 AND 029-151-170) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, John Britton filed an application with the City of Burlingame Community Development Department — Planning Division requesting approval of the following requests: ■ Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District to allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, mixed use commercial/residential building with at -grade parking (C.S. 25.36.045, 25.57.010 (c)(1) and Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan); ■ Conditional Use Permit for building height (43'-10" to top of parapet and 54'-3" to top of stairway enclosure proposed, where a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building exceed 35-0"; 55'-0" maximum building height allowed) (C.S. 25.36.055); ■ Condominium Permit for 14 residential condominium units (each unit to be privately owned) (C.S. 26.30.020); and ■ Lot Merger to combine three existing lots (1214, 1218 and 1220 Donnelly Avenue) into one lot; and WHEREAS, on October 9, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing (environmental scoping session and design review study meeting) to review a 14- unit mixed use commercial/residential development and to identify subjects to be analyzed in the project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). At that time direction was provided to the applicant regarding issues to be addressed in the project IS/MND; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing (design review study meeting) to review changes made to the project in response to the Planning Commission's direction and comments previously provided to the applicant; and RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, an IS/MND was prepared to analyze project impacts; said IS/MND was circulated for public review and comment commencing on May 15, 2020 and concluding on June 15, 2020; and WHEREAS, on August 10, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and voted 6-0-0-1 to recommend approval of the applicant's requests for Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Condominium Permit, and Lot Combination; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2020, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider all project entitlements, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and oral testimony presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, as a result of the oral and written testimony presented at the September 21, 2020 public hearing, as well as the analysis in the staff report, the City Council hereby makes the following findings relative to each aspect of the project application: Design Review Findings: ■ That the project is consistent with the diverse architectural styles of existing residential and commercial buildings in the area characterized by simple massing, an articulated fagade with windows, entry doors and awnings on the ground floor, and articulated walls and fenestration on the upper floors, including covered balconies, substantial recesses and varied architectural features throughout the building; the project mediates between existing buildings in the area ranging from one to three stories in height and a six -story office building at the corner of Donnelly Avenue and Primrose Road, is well articulated, and embraces the street and the pedestrian realm; ■ That the architectural style is compatible with adjacent neighborhoods and the City as a whole, and that human scale is provided at the street level by incorporating several entry elements and canvas awnings along the front of the building, and on the upper levels individual balconies provide residential scale and character; ■ That parking for the project does not dominate the street frontage because the garage has been located behind the ground floor building fagade with one driveway access to the garage measuring 18 feet in width, or 12.2% of the frontage along Primrose Road; ■ That the building is characterized by a single contemporary architectural style and its design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north with well -articulated massing and a variety of architectural elements, textures and colors; 4 RESOLUTION NO. ■ That the building is compatible with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development in that the exterior building materials include cement plaster siding (smooth steel troweled finish), Hardie "Reveal" panel system and trim (along blind wall on east elevation), smooth lap siding and exposed concrete or concrete block at the blind walls, decorative metal guardrails, decorative foam relief panels, and metal clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites on the upper floor residential units; aluminum window sashes, painted wood entry doors, canvas awnings and a painted metal garage door on the ground floor; and varying architectural elements, including Spanish barrel clay roof tiles with foam eave brackets/corbels, a wood trellis along the front fagade, and articulated parapets with ornamental metal trim along the upper portion of the building; and ■ That site features such as low stucco walls and entry gates, a variety of landscaping and hardscape along the front of the building, and pedestrian circulation will enrich the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Conditional Use Permit Findings ■ That the proposed three-story building, measuring 43'-10" to the top of the building parapet and 54'-Y to the top of the stairway enclosure, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience, since it is well articulated with substantial recesses and will be compatible with buildings in the area that are one to six stories in height; ■ That the proposed mixed use commercial/residential use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; and ■ That reasonable conditions are proposed to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Condominium Permit Findings: ■ That the 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential development is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial buildings in the neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north, and will not have a significant impact on public health, safety and general welfare; ■ That based on the environmental analysis, it was determined that the proposed project would have no adverse environmental impacts (with mitigations for utilities) on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources; and 3 RESOLUTION NO. ■ That this application incudes a request for Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to allow residential use above the first floor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT the applications for Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Condominium Permit and Lot Combination are hereby granted, subject to the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 9, 2020, sheets A0.0 through A4.3, C-1 through C-3 and L1.1 through L2.2; 2. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 3. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall apply for a tentative and final condominium map with the Public Works, Engineering Division for processing in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 6. that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 7. that a Klaus TrendVario 4200 parking lift system, or an equivalent parking lift system, shall be installed, with the following conditions: a. the parking lifts shall be properly illuminated to provide safety for easy loading and unloading, while not causing excessive glare. rd RESOLUTION NO. b. signage shall be installed explaining the proper use of the lifts and emergency contact information for lift maintenance or problems. C. the final design of the parking lifts shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 8. that if the City determines that the structure interferes with City communications in the City, the property owner shall permit public safety communications equipment and a wireless access point for City communications to be located on the structure in a location to be agreed upon by the City and the property owner. The applicant shall provide an electrical supply source for use by the equipment. The applicant shall permit authorized representatives of the City to gain access to the equipment location for purposes of installation, maintenance, adjustment, and repair upon reasonable notice to the property owner or owner's successor in interest. This access and location agreement shall be recorded in terms that convey the intent and meaning of this condition; 9. that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal Code; 10. that the project applicant and its construction contractor(s) shall develop a construction management plan for review and approval by the City of Burlingame. The plan must include at least the following items and requirements to reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic and parking congestion during construction: a. A construction parking plan to provide worker parking off site and generally off neighborhood streets, with shuttles or other transportation as needed to transport workers to the site; b. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes; C. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would minimize impacts on motor vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, circulation and safety, and specifically to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible on streets in the project area; d. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures would occur; e. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for haul routes so that any damage and debris attributable to the haul trucks can be identified and corrected by the project applicant; and f. Designation of a readily available contact person for construction activities who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding traffic or 5 RESOLUTION NO. parking. This coordinator would determine the cause of the complaint and, where necessary, would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. 11. that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on -site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 12. that the applicant shall submit a Construction Noise Control Plan. This plan would include measures such as: ■ Using smaller equipment with lower horsepower or reducing the hourly utilization rate of equipment used on the site to reduce noise levels at 50 feet to the allowable level. ■ Locating construction equipment as far as feasible from noise -sensitive uses. ■ Requiring that all construction equipment powered by gasoline or diesel engines have sound control devices that are at least as effective as those originally provided by the manufacturer and that all equipment be operated and maintained to minimize noise generation. ■ Prohibiting gasoline or diesel engines from having unmuffled exhaust systems. ■ Not idling inactive construction equipment for prolonged periods (i.e., more than 5 minutes). ■ Constructing a solid plywood barrier around the construction site and adjacent to operational businesses, residences, or other noise -sensitive land uses. ■ Using temporary noise control blanket barriers. ■ Monitoring the effectiveness of noise attenuation measures by taking noise measurements. ■ Using "quiet" gasoline -powered compressors or electrically powered compressors and electric rather than gasoline- or diesel -powered forklifts for small lifting. 13. that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off -site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 14. that during construction, the applicant shall provide fencing (with a fabric screen or mesh) around the project site to ensure that all construction equipment, materials and debris is kept on site; 15. that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of- way shall be prohibited; X RESOLUTION NO. 16. that if construction is done during the wet season (October 1 through April 30), that prior to October 1 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of- way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 17. that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 18. that this project shall comply with the state -mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 19. that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 20. that this proposal shall comply with all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance adopted by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street trees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist; 21. that the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Burlingame Parks Division regarding the planting of five (5) street trees along Donnelly Avenue; 22. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 23. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 24. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 25. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 26. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; 7 RESOLUTION NO. The following conditions shall be met during the Building Inspection process prior to the inspections noted in each condition: 27. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 28. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the Building Division; 29. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Division; 30. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 31. that the maximum elevation to the top roof parapet shall not exceed elevation 143.90', as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Donnelly Avenue (100.34') for a maximum height not to exceed 43'-10" to the top of the parapet; the garage finished floor elevation shall be elevation 100.34'; the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor who shall provide certification of that height to the Building Division; Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; The following conditions of approval are from Downtown Specific Plan: 32. the project sponsor shall implement all appropriate control measures from the most currently adopted air quality plan at the time of project construction; 33. the project sponsor shall implement the following Greenhouse Gas reduction measures during construction activities: a. Alternative -Fueled (e.g., biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles/equipment shall make up at least 15 percent of the fleet. b. Use at least 10 percent local building materials. C. Recycle at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials. 34. the project sponsor shall provide adequate secure bicycle parking in the plan area at a minimum ratio of 1 bicycle spot for every 20 vehicle spots; 8 RESOLUTION NO. 35. the condominium management shall post and update information on alternate modes of transportation for the area (i.e. bus/shuttle schedules and stop locations, maps); 36. the project sponsor shall incorporate commercial energy efficiency measures such that energy efficiency is increased to 15% beyond 2008 title 24 standards for electricity and natural gas; 37. the project sponsor shall incorporate recycling measures and incentives such that a solid waste diversion rate of 75% is achieved upon occupation of each phase of plan development; 38. the project sponsor shall incorporate residential water efficiency measures such that water consumption is decreased by a minimum of 10 percent over current standard water demand factors; 39. that construction shall avoid the March 15 through August 31 avian nesting period to the extent feasible, as determined by staff. If it is not feasible to avoid the nesting period, a survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no earlier than 7 days prior to construction. The area surveyed shall include all clearing/construction areas, as well as areas within 250 ft. of the boundaries of these areas, or as otherwise determined by the biologist. In the event that an active nest is discovered, clearing/construction shall be postponed within 250 ft. of the nest, until the young have fledged (left the nest), the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts; 40. that for projects within the Plan Area that require excavation, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (and Phase II sampling, where appropriate) would be required. If the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment determines that remediation is required, the project sponsor would be required to implement all remediation and abatement work in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or other jurisdictional agency; 41. the following practices shall be incorporated into the construction documents to be implemented by the project contractor. a. Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. Such separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures: - Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site; - Use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound barriers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors; - Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and - Minimize backing movements of equipment. 9 RESOLUTION NO. b. Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible. C. Impact equipment (e.g., jack hammers and pavement breakers) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically -powered tools. Compressed air exhaust silencers shall be used on other equipment. Other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment, shall be used whenever feasible. 42. the project sponsor shall incorporate the following practice into the construction documents to be implemented by construction contractors: The project sponsor shall require that loaded trucks and other vibration -generating equipment avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent compatible with project construction goals; 43. that if the project increases sewer flows to the sanitary sewer system, the project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to determine if improvements to public sanitary sewer infrastructure are needed. If improvements are needed, the following shall apply: ■ that prior to issuance of a building permit, the project sponsor shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 44. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the development plans shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, then the following shall apply: ■ that prior to issuance of a building permit the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. 45. that if evidence of an archeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity ("midden"), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction -related earth -moving activities, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame shall be notified. The project sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The City of Burlingame shall consult with the archeologist to assess the significance of the find. 10 RESOLUTION NO. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less -than significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-J) form and filed with the NWIC; 46. that should a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature be identified at the project construction site during any phase of construction, the project manager shall cease all construction activities at the site of the discovery and immediately notify the City of Burlingame. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified paleontologist to provide an evaluation of the find and to prescribe mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources or geologic features is carried out. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementing any additional mitigation measures prescribed by the paleontologist and approved by the City; and 47. that if human remains are discovered at any project construction site during any phase of construction, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame and the County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project sponsor shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City of Burlingame shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The project sponsor shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City of Burlingame, before the resumption of ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. Mitigation Measures from Initial Study Aesthetics 48. The project developer shall install low -profile, low -intensity lighting directed downward to minimize light and glare. Exterior lighting shall be low mounted, downward casting, and shielded. In general, the light footprint shall not extend beyond the periphery the property. Implementation of exterior lighting fixtures on all buildings shall also comply with the standard California Building Code (Title 24, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) to reduce the lateral spreading of light to surrounding uses, consistent with City Municipal Code 18.16.030 that requires that all new exterior lighting for residential developments be 11 RESOLUTION NO. designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the light element is kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. In addition, lighting fixtures would not be located more than nine feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls would not be floodlit; and only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward would be used, except for illuminated street numbers required by the fire department. Air Quality 49. During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust. Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less -than -significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following BMPs that are required of all projects: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. C. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations (CCRj). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 12 RESOLUTION NO. 50. The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would achieve a fleet -wide average 20- percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. One feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: a. All diesel -powered off -road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 3 engines that include CARB- certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF)12 or equivalent. Alternatively, equipment that meets U. S. EPA Tier 4 standards for particulate matter or the use of equipment that includes electric or alternatively -fueled equipment (i.e., non- diesel) would meet this requirement. Biological Resources 51. Activities related to the project, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and construction and demolition shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 31) if feasible. If construction will commence during the breeding season, then a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre -construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer for raptors and 150-foot buffer for passerines where access can be authorized. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in San Mateo County. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (which is dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the avian biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed, and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. Cultural Resources 52. In the event Native American or other archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the discovered materials and workers shall avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. If an archaeological site is encountered in any stage of development, a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine whether the resource qualifies as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource. In the event that it does qualify, the archaeologist will prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan to be 13 RESOLUTION NO. implemented prior to or during site construction. The archaeologist shall also prepare a written report of the finding, file it with the appropriate agency, and arrange for curation of recovered materials. 53. In the event that human remains are discovered during project construction, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. The county coroner shall be informed to evaluate the nature of the remains. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Lead Agency shall work with the Native American Heritage Commission and the applicant to develop an agreement for treating or disposing of the human remains. Geology and Soils 54. Project design and construction shall adhere to Title 18, Chapter 18.28 of the City Municipal Code, and demonstrate compliance with all design standards applicable to the California Building Code Zone 4 would ensure maximum practicable protection available to users of the buildings and associated infrastructure. 55. Foundations of the project will be reinforced to tolerate differential soil movement. The project may be supported on a reinforced concrete mat foundation bearing on a properly prepared and compacted soil subgrade and a non -expansive fill section. Alternately, the project may be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation bearing on stiff native soils. Implementation of a reinforced foundation would reduce the potential for damage caused by liquefaction. 56. Project design and construction, including excavation activities, shall comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies the safety requirement to be fulfilled for site work. This would include prevention of subsidence and pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. 57. The applicant shall prepare a monitoring program to determine the effects of construction on nearby improvements, including the monitoring of cracking and vertical movement of adjacent structures, and nearby streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements. As necessary, inclinometers or other instrumentation shall be installed as part of the shoring system to closely monitor lateral movement. The program shall include a pre -construction survey including photographs and installation of monitoring points for existing site improvements. 58. A discovery of a paleontological specimen during any phase of the project shall result in a work stoppage in the vicinity of the find until it can be evaluated by a professional paleontologist. Should loss or damage be detected, additional protective measures or further action (e.g., resource removal), as determined by a professional paleontologist, shall be implemented to mitigate the impact. 14 RESOLUTION NO. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 59. The contractor shall comply with Title 8, California Code of Regulations/Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements that cover construction work where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes the proper removal and disposal of peeling paint, and appropriate sampling of painted building surfaces for lead prior to disturbance of the paint and disposal of the paint or painted materials. 60. The applicant shall contract a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct an asbestos survey prior to disturbing potential asbestos containing building materials and following the Consultant's recommendations for proper handling and disposal. 61. Workers handling demolition and renovation activities at the project site will be trained in the safe handling and disposal of any containments with which they are handling or disposing of on the project site. Noise 62. Prior to the issuance of building permits, mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City's 60 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime requirements at the property lines of surrounding noise sensitive uses. Section 5.2.5.8 of the City of Burlingame DSP includes a provision for rooftop equipment: Mixed -use buildings with a residential component should exhibit rooflines and architectural character consistent with the Downtown commercial character. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building and screened for noise. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City's noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line -of - sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. 63. As required under Section 9.9.20 of the City of Burlingame DSP, loaded truck and other vibration -generating equipment shall avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent possible to still meet construction goals. Additionally, the following measures would be implemented during construction: a. Operating equipment on the construction site shall be placed as far as possible from vibration -sensitive receptors. b. Smaller equipment shall be used to the extent feasible to minimize vibration levels below the limits. 15 RESOLUTION NO. C. Use of vibratory rollers, tampers, and impact tools near sensitive areas shall be avoided to the extent feasible. d. Neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site shall be notified of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels during project construction activities. e. If heavy construction is proposed within 12 feet of commercial structures and/or 18 feet of residential structures, a construction vibration -monitoring plan shall be implemented prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities located within these setbacks. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks: f. The contractor shall conduct a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for structures located within 25 feet of construction. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating construction activities located within 25 feet of the structure. The surveys shall include internal and external crack monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of the structure. g. The contractor shall conduct a post -survey on the structure where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities. h. The contractor shall designate a person responsible for registering and investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site. The results of any vibration monitoring shall be summarized and submitted in a report shortly after substantial completion of each phase identified in the project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration certificates, and graphics as required to clearly identify vibration - monitoring locations. An explanation of all events that exceeded vibration limits will be included together with proper documentation supporting any such claims. Utilities and Service Systems 64. The project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to improve the public sanitary sewer infrastructure. Prior to issuance of a building permit, project sponsors shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for 16 RESOLUTION NO. implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 65. Prior to issuance of a building permit, development plans for projects proposed in the Plan Area, shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5t" day of October, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 17 Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk CITY ryc�l 11 o� - 9 aPORATE Monday, August 10, 2020 City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Online e. 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue, zoned DAC - Application for Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning Code to allow a multi -family residential use, Conditional Use Permit for building height, Condominium Permit and Lot Merger for construction of a new three-story, 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential building (John Britton, applicant; Britton Trust, property owner; Gary Gee Architects, Inc., architect;) (309 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Staff Report 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Attachments 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - MMRP 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Materials Binder 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Plans All Commissioners have visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Tse opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak and Gary Gee, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Was at the site today looking and noticed that there are power poles and power lines running across the back of the property now. Was wondering if there is a plan to deal with that. (Gee: The plan is to keep the power pole there. It is shown on sheet A 2.1, there is a little notch in the garage and it was on our survey. We realized the power pole was there in some of the buildings along the back, so we made provisions to keep that power pole there.) Will it be within grabbing range if you're standing at the railing? (Gee: We could survey the height of that and we can coordinate for some of those to be relocated. Thank you for bringing that up.) > Noticed that the mail area in the lobby is dedicated just for mail. Have you considered, as this project evolves, the change to lockers and the need for package delivery which seems to be so much more a part of multifamily buildings now? (Gee: We have considered it, we have a locked room off the lobby. Behind the elevator, there's a utility room that is locked with a keypad or fob to allow deliveries of packages. It's around the corner, no one sees it and it's a secured room. That's what we plan to do with it.) > There's a rather large three-story downspout on the front wall by the stairway. Any thought of internalizing or maybe going around the corner on the minor wall? (Gee: There's flexibility to relocate that around the corner. We could try to incorporate that around the side wall. We can accommodate that request.) City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 911412020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 10, 2020 > Am concerned with the change in the location of the planters that were previously along the rear wall. Understand that by putting the planters along the rear wall, you need to have a more solid wall that creates a taller railing, and therefore a taller wall to the rear yards. But it sounds like your team is now more familiar with what's happening on the neighboring side of those properties. Doesn't the planter you had before create a buffer so people on the patio are three or four feet away from that wall? (Gee: That was original intent. That's why we put the planters there to keep the people away from the edge. During the last hearing, there was concern expressed about the height of that wall, so we removed it to lower the height. Most of the aerial views we saw in the back of those buildings are concrete or asphalt, and a lot of the things that are being stored there are used construction materials. It's not really that much of an active open space or lawn area that you might envision some people using. It's more concrete back there along the wooden fence.) > Honestly, I didn't have as much of a concern with the height of the walls because there was a buffer created with those planters that kept the users up on the patio away from that guardrail. Now, there's a metal guardrail and it's less solid. People are going to lean on that rail while having their conversation, and they're looming over what could be some rear yards in the future. Understand what you're saying that right now they are paved areas and carports and fully recognize that this is a minor detail that we're picking at. Generally, this is something that you might think a little further on and talk to the developer a little bit more. But if that were the case, the change to the planter location could come back to us as an FYI, as a revision or even just administrative revision that is worked through with staff. It's not a major piece of the project, but it is a detail that is going to be important to making that patio space comfortable for the users and for the neighbors. (Gee: I appreciate your input. That was a dilemma we faced because originally we were trying to keep it away from the edge. That's why we had the planter there. The feedback I got from the Commission in the last presentation was that they felt that wall looked too massive. We didn't show a lot of the detail that was there in the landscaping. After taking inventory, we started to realize the wall is not as high, and we proceeded with removing the planter and adding the metal railing so it looks shorter.) > Was wondering if there is a hybrid approach of a wall that has landscaping growing over it, to help soften that view from the north side. It would also work as a sound buffer and a visual barrier from both sides. > The building has come a long way, I really do like the project. But maybe you can strip away some of the detail or the trees and the awning. The ground floor is really great. Looking at the second and third floor, especially the tower, it's a blank wall with a few windows put in it. There was a suggestion for some Juliet balconies or some metal work somewhere. Having recessed the windows is going to be great. In the arch openings you have added those fake downspouts, which is a good touch. But don't know if there's an opportunity to recess that wall a couple of inches to emulate a railing on the upper floor. The stair tower is really striking. In the previous meetings, we talked about a Juliet balcony or enlarging the windows, this could still take one more pass. The renderings make it look great, but you're focusing on the first floor and it's all in one plane as you go up, even in the center. There's some articulation with the beam or the columns as they approach each level and there's the recesses, but there are a couple of blank flat spots on the front of the building that can use a little more articulation. Public Comments: > There were no public comments. Chair Tse closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > Really appreciate the changes that have been made. They are subtle but critical. Really like the idea of changing the stucco color on the center mass along the facade, it adds to the architecture. > In regards to the added detailing that has been done, it helps a lot with the scale. Seeing the stair tower as a calm solid that is reminiscent of the Casa Baywood architecture, which is so striking in some of its very plain and substantive pieces of its facade. Not bothered by that solid because it's a simple piece to the facade that bookends, at least on that one side, this overall facade that has a lot of City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 911412020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 10, 2020 articulation and things going on. It's a stairwell, so you expect to see some peek-a-boo windows into those landings. > In terms of a piece of utility, that long downspout will have more details to it, there would be brackets and attachments. It could actually be an ornamental piece. Can take it to the interior and will be more serviceable once it gets to the inside. > The main concern, which is minor and not a deal -breaker, is to get the landscaping right along the back patio. Would ask for the architect to revisit that with the developer. If they wanted to bring those planters back along that backside, they could work that through with staff. Would leave it to staff as to whether or not that would need to come back as an FYI. Otherwise, the project is approvable at this point and should move forward. > I like the stairwell, could have some detail there, but do agree that with so much going on with all the other surfaces, we do want to be careful not to make every surface a feature wall. Not having seen this the first time, would also agree that having those planters at the patio on the back may give a little buffer. Appreciate that you listened to the Commission and you made an effort towards it, but would rather be seated closer to the building rather than actually using the space right up against the railing and looking at the neighbors' stuff and/or being seen. It would be more comfortable as an outdoor space to be closer to the building and take advantage of shade opportunities that the building creates, and make it a nice place to be because we're hoping that people will use it and not just have it as just an open space. > We are looking at two dimensional drawings, renderings and want to see this move forward. In the process of building this project and detailing it out, would like to ask the developer and the architect to look at the building as it's going up. If you feel that it looks a little blank or a little plain, don't be shy about coming back and asking about additional ornamentation because it's a big enough project and appreciate that you put a lot of work into it. This doesn't necessarily need to be the final decision on all the small fine details. So if you see something as you're building it that you like, please come forward or try something out that might add to the articulation on the front. > It's such a beautiful project and you've made such great strides. You've done some great work and appreciate the changes. > Would also like to see a little bit of a buffer along the rear wall. We don't know what those properties to the rear might eventually do, and it might preserve some space between some common areas there. Like the idea of the planters, but overall, this is a great project. So thank you for all your hard work. > Would prefer the planters along the rear as well. Like the suggestion about looking at some kind of hanging landscaping that might grow over the edge that might help soften that too. > Thank you so much for working through these rounds of discussions with us and carefully listening to all of our comments. This street side on Donnelly Avenue is going to add liveliness to the street. I like the articulation in and around of all these openings and am excited to see this project built. Commissioner Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to recommend approval of the application to City Council. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Sargent, Comaroto, Terrones, Tse, Gaul, and Schmid Absent: 1 - Loftis City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 911412020 City of Burlingame Item No. 8e New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development Regular Action Item Address: 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Meeting Date: August 10, 2020 Request: Application for Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning Code to allow a multi -family residential use, Conditional Use Permit for building height, Condominium Permit and Lot Merger for construction of a new three-story, 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential development. Applicant: John Britton APN: 029-151-150, -160 and -170 Architect: Gary Gee Architects, Inc. Lot Area: 15,706 SF (combined lots) Property Owner: Britton Trust General Plan: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Donnelly Avenue Area Zoning: DAC Adjacent Development: Public parking lot, retail and multifamily residential. Design Review Study Meeting (October 28, 2019): On October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a design review study meeting to review changes made to the proposed project. Please refer to the attached October 28, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes fora complete list of comments and concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. The architect submitted a response letter, dated July 7, 2020, and revised plans, date stamped July 9, 2020, to address the Commission's comments. Please refer to the applicant's letter for a detailed discussion of the changes made to the project since the design review study meeting. Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study Meeting (October 9, 2018): On October 9, 2018, the Planning Commission held an environmental scoping and design review study meeting to review the proposed project. Please refer to the attached October 9, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes for a complete list of comments and concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and the public. The architect submitted a response letter dated October 22, 2019, and revised plans and materials packet date stamped October 15, 2019, to address the Commission's comments. Please refer to the applicant's letter for a detailed discussion of the changes made to the project since the initial design review study meeting. Background: On November 23, 2013, a fire destroyed the existing structure at 1218 Donnelly Avenue (containing two residential units). In February of 2015, a demolition permit was issued to demolish the existing building at 1218 Donnelly Avenue, as well as an existing single story building (containing one residential unit) at the rear of the site. The fire also spread to a portion of the building at 1214 Donnelly Avenue (previously containing residential and office uses). The structures at 1220 Donnelly Avenue (containing three residential units in the front building and one residential unit in the rear building) were not damaged by the fire. The structure at 1214 Donnelly Avenue (referred to as the "Gates House") was identified as a potentially historic property in the Draft Inventory of Historic Places prepared in conjunction with the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property, which concluded that 1214 Donnelly Avenue was not architecturally significant, but that it was eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 1 (Events) for its association with early settlement patterns in the town of Burlingame, and Criterion 2 (Persons) for its association with original owner and long-time occupant George W. Gates (the third stationmaster for the Burlingame railroad station). The structure at 1214 Donnelly Avenue remained vacant and exposed to the elements since the date of the fire, though the site was secured with a fence as required by the City. Concerned with the damage the building sustained from the fire and exposure to the elements for several years, the property owner contacted the Community Development Department to explore the possibility of demolishing the structure in advance of a new development being approved for the site. New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Based on the Chief Building Official's assessment of the condition of the structure, and his finding that the structure was substandard, unsafe, contained evidence of illicit activities, and could not be reasonably rebuilt, issuance of a Demolition Permit was warranted in order to mitigate the impacts upon the public health and safety. A Demolition Permit was issued in May 2018 and the structure was demolished shortly thereafter. As noted in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project (attached), because the Gates House was demolished in 2018, there are no longer any potentially historic resources on the project site and therefore there were no mitigations to require any commemoration of either early settlement patterns in the town or of George W. Gates on the site. At this time, the applicant has declined to include a commemoration of either early settlement patterns in the town or of George W . Gates, as the environmental review did not identify it as a mitigation. Project Summary: The project site is located midblock on Donnelly Avenue between Primrose Road and Lorton Avenue. The project site consists of three separate lots (1214, 1218 and 1220 Donnelly Avenue) which would be combined into one lot for the proposed project. The site is surrounded by multifamily residential buildings to the north, retail buildings and parking lots to the south, public parking lots to the west and retail buildings to the east. The proposal includes construction of a new three-story mixed use commercial/residential development consisting of a commercial use on the ground floor and 14 residential condominium units on the second and third floors. All existing buildings remaining on the lots would be demolished to build the proposed development. Parking for 23 vehicles will be provided in an enclosed garage located behind the commercial space. The ground floor will consist of approximately 4,704 SF of commercial space, which can be configured as one or two tenant spaces with storefront entrances on Donnelly Avenue. The ground floor will also contain an entry court and lobby providing pedestrian access to the residential units on the second and third floors. The remainder of the ground floor will contain rooms for utilities, resident bicycle storage, trash/recycling containers and general storage. The second and third floors will contain 12, 2-bedroom units and 2, 1-bedroom units for a total of 14 residential units. Each unit will contain a living/dining area, kitchen, one or two bathrooms, laundry closet and one or two bedrooms. The residential units range from 528 SF to 1,040 SF in area, with an average unit size of 913 SF. In the zoning districts within the Downtown Specific Plan, the average maximum unit size permitted is 1,250 SF. The common open space required for the residential units is provided on the podium level (second floor) above the garage at the rear of the site. The following applications required for this project ■ Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District to allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, mixed use commercial/residential building with at - grade parking (C.S. 25.36.045, 25.57.010 (c)(1) and Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan); ■ Conditional Use Permit for building height (43'-10" to top of parapet and 54'-Y to top of stairway enclosure proposed, where a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building exceed 35'-0"; 55'-0" maximum building height allowed) (C.S. 25.36.055); ■ Condominium Permit for 14 residential condominium units (each unit to be privately owned) (C.S. 26.30.020); and ■ Lot Merger to combine three existing lots (1214, 1218 and 1220 Donnelly Avenue) into one lot. 2 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Design Review: Design Review is required for new mixed use building pursuant to Code Sections 25.36.045 and 25.57.010 (c) (1). Design Review was instituted for commercial projects in 2001 with the adoption of the Commercial Design Guidebook. The project is located within the boundaries of the Burlingame Downtown Special Plan and therefore subject to Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan (Design & Character). Section 5.2 (pages 5-3 through 5-12) provides design guidelines specifically for commercial and mixed use areas within the Downtown Specific Plan area. Section 5.4 (pages 5-22 through 5-26) provides more general design guidelines that apply to all areas of the downtown. The relevant pages of the plan have been included as an attachment for convenience of commissioners. The proposed exterior facades will consist of a variety of materials including cement plaster siding (smooth steel troweled finish), Hardie "Reveal" panel system and trim (along blind wall on east elevation), smooth lap siding and exposed concrete or concrete block at the blind walls, decorative metal guardrails, decorative foam relief panels, and metal clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites on the upper floor residential units. The ground floor treatment will include aluminum window sashes, painted wood entry doors, canvas awnings and a painted metal garage door. The upper edge of the building will consist of varying architectural elements, including Spanish barrel clay roof tiles with foam eave brackets/corbels, a wood trellis along the front fagade, and articulated parapets with ornamental metal trim. Details of the architectural elements are provided on sheet A3.1 a, as well as in the materials binder (separate attachment). Building Height: The Donnelly Avenue Commercial District states that no building shall exceed a height of 55-0" and that a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building which exceeds 35-0" in height. As measured from average top of curb level, the proposed height will be 43'-10" to the top of the building parapet and 54'-Y to the top of the stairway enclosure (the stair enclosure on the roof extends more than 10'-0" above the top of parapet and therefore is counted as part of the building height). Off -Street Parking: The proposed project consists of 4,704 SF of commercial space on the ground floor and 14 residential units on the second and third floors. Retail, personal service and food establishment uses located on the ground floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan are exempt from vehicle parking requirements as set forth in code section 25.70.090 (a). The subject property is located within the parking sector; therefore no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed commercial use on the ground floor. The commercial tenant has not yet been determined. Off-street parking is required for the residential units on the upper floors. For residential uses within the Downtown Specific Plan, the proposed project is required to provide 20 parking spaces for the residents of the units (1.5 spaces for each two -bedroom unit and 1 space for each 1-bedroom unit) and an area for a service/delivery vehicle, for a total of 21 parking spaces. There is no guest parking required on -site for properties located within the Downtown Specific Plan. The at -grade garage, located behind the commercial space, provides a total of 23 parking spaces (21 spaces in a puzzle stacker, one disabled -accessible space and one service/delivery vehicle space). Access to the garage would be from Donnelly Avenue by way of an 18'-0" wide driveway at the west end of the property. Twenty-one parking spaces would be provided by way of a puzzle car stacker system. A puzzle stacker is a mechanical parking option that provides independent access to all cars parked on the system. The puzzle stacker to be installed is a KlausTrendVario 4200 (see attached specifications) and is able to accommodate passenger cars and medium size vans and SUVs. The Municipal Code does not include specifications for parking lift systems, so the City currently does not have a standard mechanism for review and approval. However, as a policy the Downtown Specific Plan encourages "creative approaches" to providing on -site parking including vehicle puzzle stackers. Puzzle stackers could be considered "creative approaches" to providing the required on -site parking, and therefore be consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan. To date, the City has approved several commercial and residential projects with parking lift systems including puzzle stackers. 3 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Common and Private Open Space: There is a total of 2,695 SF (192.5 SF/unit) of common open space proposed for the residential condominium units where 1,400 SF (100 SF/unit) is required. The common open space is provided on the podium level at the rear of the building. Of the required common open space, a minimum of 50% must be in soft landscaping (700 SF); 710 SF of the provided common open space is proposed to be landscaped and therefore is in compliance. There is 87 SF to 338 SF in private open space per unit (75 SF/unit is the minimum required) provided in balconies. Landscaping: Proposed landscaping throughout the site is shown on the Planting Plans (see sheets L1.1 through L2.2). A variety of plants and shrubs are proposed along the front of the building, as well as on the podium level at the rear of the building within the common open space. Permeable and brick pavers along the building frontage provide walkways to the commercial and residential components of the building and seating areas for the ground floor commercial spaces. Four existing trees, located at the front of the property at 1214 Donnelly Avenue, are proposed to be removed. One of the three trees, a 20-inch diameter Brisbane box, qualifies as a protected size tree. The applicant will be required to apply for and obtain a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division in order to remove this tree. The applicant provided a Tree Survey, prepared by SBCA Tree Consulting and dated April 1, 2016, to identify the trees within the project property that are subject to the City's Reforestation Ordinance (see attached). The survey provides tree protection measures for the existing street tree which was to remain at the time the survey was prepared. However, in consultation with the City Arborist it was determined that this street tree should be replaced (see below). There is one existing street tree, a Sycamore/London plane tree, along Donnelly Avenue in front of the project property. The Parks Division is requiring that this existing street tree be replaced by five new 36-inch box street trees to achieve uniformity along the project frontage (see Planting Plan, sheet 1-1.1). This space intentionally left blank. 4 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Table 1 - Compliance with DAC Regulations Lot Area: I b, fUb 51- Flans date stamped: July y, 2U2U Proposed Allowed/Required Land Use. Lot Size. - Street Frontage: Setbacks and Build -to -line: Front (Donnelly Avenue): Left Side Setback: Right Side Setback: Rear Setback: 4,704 SF commercial space on ground floor 14 residential units on upper floors' 15,706 SF (combined) 146.94 feet varies from 3'-5" to 11'-11" 75% of the of building is located within 10' of the front property line) Building Height: I 43'-10" to top of parapet 2 54'-3" to top of stair enclosure 2 Ground Floor Ceiling Height: Off -Street Parking: Private Open Space. Common Open Space: SF Landscaped: 15'-0" 21 spaces in puzzle stacker 1 disabled -accessible space 1 service/delivery space 23 spaces 87 SF — 338 SF/unit 2,695 SF 710 SF (50.7% of required) commercial use allowed as a permitted use 5,000 SF minimum 50'-0" minimum no minimum required at least 60% of building must be located at front property line or no more than 10' from the front property line) no minimum required no minimum required no minimum required ....................................................................... 55'-0" maximum >35'-0" with CUP ....................................................................... 15'-0" minimum 12, 2 bdrm units x 1.5 = 18 spaces 2, 1 bdrm units x 1 = 2 spaces service/delivery space = 1 21 spaces 75 SF per unit 1,400 SF 700 SF (50% of required) Amendmentto the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial Districtto allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue 2 Conditional Use Permit for building height (43'-10" to top of parapet and 54'-3" to top of stairway enclosure proposed, where a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building exceed 35'-0"). General Plan and Zoning: The General Plan designates the site as Downtown Specific Plan. In 2010 the City Council adopted the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan, which serves as an element of the General Plan. W ithin the Downtown Specific Plan, the site is located in the Donnelly Avenue Area and is described as follows: The Donnelly Avenue area consists of properties on either side of Donnelly Avenue between Primrose Road and Lorton Avenue. Ground floor retail use is allowed but not required. Existing residential uses may remain and be improved, but new residential uses are not allowed. Currently, the Donnelly Avenue Area within the Downtown Specific Plan and the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) zoning regulations do not permit residential uses of any type. 5 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue With this application, the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission consider amending the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) and DAC zoning regulations to allow residential use above the first floor, only on those properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue (see highlighted properties in the map below). This would include the project site (three lots) and two public parking lots. One rationale for this rather limited amendment is that the Donnelly Avenue facing properties are adjacent to primarily multifamily residential land uses to the rear on the north side of that block (facing Bellevue Avenue), and as such would be compatible with the adjacent residential uses. The property at 1210-1212 Donnelly Avenue was not included because based on its substandard lot size (4,132 SF) and lot width (41.29'), it would be difficult to develop the site with a mixed use residential building given that parking for residential uses is required to be provided onsite (whereas commercial and office uses are either exempt or may be provided through payment of in -lieu fees). The Downtown Specific Plan includes various Goals and Policies to guide growth and development in Downtown Burlingame. The proposed mixed use development, which includes residential units above ground floor commercial space, is consistent with Policy LU-6.1, which encourages allowing housing in the Howard Avenue area as well as on the periphery of Downtown. The table on the following pages shows how the proposed project meets these Goals and Policies. This space intentionally left blank. A New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue GOAL/POLICY PROJECT PROPOSED Goal LU-3: Ensure sensitive transitions between the The proposed three-story mixed use existing adjacent residential areas and the downtown commercial/residential development provides a sensitive area. transition between the commercial Downtown area and residential neighborhood to the north. Goal LU-6: Promote diversity in housing type and The proposed mixed use development provides housing affordability within the Downtown area. within the Downtown area in a mix of 1 and 2-bedroom units. Goal LU-6.1: Allow housing in the Howard Avenue The proposed mixed use development, located on the area as well as on the periphery. periphery of the Downtown area, includes residential units above ground floor commercial space. Policy P-1.2: Devote less land for parking Less land is devoted for parking by using a puzzle car Downtown while accommodating increased demand stacker system. by using the land more efficiently with decked or underground parking. Policy P-1.3: Conceal parking areas through the The parking for the project does not dominate the street use of attractively designed above- or below -ground frontage and has been concealed by locating it behind parking structures. the ground floor building fagade with one driveway access to the garage. Policy C-2.6: Consider the needs of pedestrian, Secured bicycle storage for commercial and residential bicycles, and people with disabilities. tenants is provided on the ground floor. Policy S-1.3: Streetscapes should reflect An existing street tree, a Sycamore/London plane tree, Burlingame's destination as a "tree city." Trees will be replaced with five new 36-inch box street trees to should be planted throughout the downtown as an achieve uniformity along the project frontage, as integral part of the streetscape, and mature streets required by the Parks Division. trees should be persevered whenever possible. Policy D-1.1 The project is consistent with the diverse architectural Ensure that new construction fits into the context styles of existing commercial and residential buildings and scale of the existing downtown. in the area characterized by simple massing, an articulated fagade with windows, entry doors and awnings on the ground floor, and articulated walls and fenestration on the upper floors, including covered balconies, substantial recesses and varied architectural features throughout the building; the project mediates between existing buildings in the area ranging from one to three stories in height and a six -story office building at the corner of Donnelly Avenue and Primrose Road, is well articulated, and embraces the street and the pedestrian realm. The building is characterized by a single contemporary architectural style and its design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north with well -articulated massing and a variety of architectural elements and textures. New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue GOAL/POLICY PROJECT PROPOSED Policy D-1.2: Require design review for all new The proposed project is subject to the design review downtown buildings and for changes to existing process. downtown buildings, and integrate historic review into the design review process. Policy D-3.1: Ensure that new development is appropriate to Burlingame with respect to size and design. Policy D-3.2: Evaluate development in the Downtown Area that is proposed to be taller than surrounding structures (i.e. over 40 feet) for potential to create new shadows or shade on public and/or quasi -public open spaces and major pedestrian routes. Affordable (Below -Market Rate) Units: The City's previous Inclusionary Housing Ordinance has been replaced by a Density Bonus Ordinance consistent with State Law. The Density Bonus Ordinance is discretionary, and projects are not obligated to provide affordable units unless they seek to utilize development standard incentives offered by the ordinance. The applicant has not chosen to apply any of the development standard incentives offered by the Density Bonus Ordinance and therefore is not providing any affordable units as part of the project. Commercial and Residential Linkage Fees: Commercial linkage fees are required for those projects that contain more than 5,000 SF of commercial space. Because the proposed project contains 4,704 SF of commercial space, payment of the commercial linkage fees are not required for this project. Since this application was deemed complete prior to adoption of the residential linkage fees, payment of these fees are not required for this project. Public Facilities Impact Fee: The purpose of public facilities impact fee is to provide funding for necessary maintenance and improvements created by development projects. Public facilities impact fees are based on the uses, the number of dwelling units, and the amount of square footage to be located on the property after completion of the development project. New development that, through demolition or conversion, will eliminate existing development is entitled to a fee credit offset if the existing development is a lawful use under this title, including a nonconforming use. Based on the proposed mixed use commercial/residential development (4,704 SF of commercial space and 14 residential units) and providing a credit for the existing 9,500 SF of office and seven residential units, payment of the public facilities impact fee is not required since the amount forthe proposed project was calculated to be less than the amount for the existing uses. Environmental Review: On October 9, 2019 the Planning Commission held an Environmental Scoping meeting where staff requested the Planning Commission to provide comments on any potential environmental effects to be considered in the CEQA document. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the project was prepared and determined that there were no environmental impacts that were identified that could not be mitigated to less than significant levels. The 30-day public review period occurred from May 15, 2020 to June 15, 2020 and no comments were received. Based on the environmental analysis, it was determined that the proposed project would have no adverse New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue environmental impacts on the environmental in the areas of agriculture and forestry services, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation and wildfire. Although the environmental analysis did find that the project could have a significant effect in the areas of aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems, mitigations measures were identified to reduce adverse impacts to acceptable levels. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND-607P) is attached for reference. The mitigation measures in the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval (in italics). Findings for a Mitigated Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Suggested Findings for Mitigated Negative Declaration: In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the environmental analysis in the Initial Study was conducted to determine if there were any project -specific effects that are peculiar to the project or its site. Based on the environmental analysis, it was determined that the proposed project would have no adverse environmental impacts on the environmental in the areas of agriculture and forestry services, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation and wildfire. Although the environmental analysis did find that the project could have a significant effect in the areas of aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems, mitigations measures were identified to reduce adverse impacts to acceptable levels. Therefore, based on the Initial Study there will be no significant environmental effects as a result of this project. Findings for Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District: In acting on the request to amend the Downtown Specific Plan and DAC District zoning regulations to allow residential use above the first floor, only on those properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue, the Planning Commission should state the reasons such action is appropriate. The Commission must state why the changes are consistent with the policies of the General Plan, in particular the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and the DAC Zoning District. Suggested Findings forAmendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District: That the proposed mixed use development, which includes residential units above ground floor commercial space, is consistent with Policy LU-6.1, which encourages allowing housing in the Howard Avenue area as well as on the periphery of Downtown; that the Donnelly Avenue facing properties are adjacent to primarily multifamily residential land uses to the rear on the north side of that block (facing Bellevue Avenue), and as such would be compatible with the adjacent residential uses. For these reasons, the Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue) and DonnellyAvenue Commercial District may be found to be consistent with the policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and DAC Zoning District. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review in mixed use districts is detailed in Code Section 25.57.030 (g) and requires the proposed project to be reviewed by the Planning Commission for the following considerations: (1) Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial, industrial and mixed use areas; and 9 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue (2) Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; and (3) On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; and (4) Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; and (5) Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structures in the immediate area; and (6) Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Suggested Findings for Design Review: The project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's criteria for design review based on the following: that the project is consistent with the diverse architectural styles of existing residential and commercial buildings in the area characterized by simple massing, an articulated fagade with windows, entry doors and awnings on the ground floor, and articulated walls and fenestration on the upper floors, including covered balconies, substantial recesses and varied architectural features throughout the building; the project mediates between existing buildings in the area ranging from one to three stories in height and a six -story office building at the corner of Donnelly Avenue and Primrose Road, is well articulated, and embraces the street and the pedestrian realm; ■ that the architectural style is compatible with adjacent neighborhoods and the City as a whole, and that human scale is provided at the street level by incorporating several entry elements and canvas awnings along the front of the building, and on the upper levels individual balconies provide residential scale and character; ■ that parking for the project does not dominate the street frontage because the garage has been located behind the ground floor building fagade with one driveway access to the garage measuring 18 feet in width, or 12.2% of the frontage along Primrose Road; ■ that the building is characterized by a single contemporary architectural style and its design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north with well -articulated massing and a variety of architectural elements, textures and colors; ■ that the building is compatible with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development in that the exterior building materials include cement plaster siding (smooth steel troweled finish), Hardie "Reveal" panel system and trim (along blind wall on east elevation), smooth lap siding and exposed concrete or concrete block at the blind walls, decorative metal guardrails, decorative foam relief panels, and metal clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites on the upper floor residential units; aluminum window sashes, painted wood entry doors, canvas awnings and a painted metal garage door on the ground floor; and varying architectural elements, including Spanish barrel clay roof tiles with foam eave brackets/corbels, a wood trellis along the front fagade, and articulated parapets with ornamental metal trim along the upper portion of the building; and 10 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue that site features such as low stucco walls and entry gates, a variety of landscaping and hardscape along the front of the building, and pedestrian circulation will enrich the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit for building height, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020, a-c): (a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) The planning commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Suggested Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: The project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's criteria for design review based on the following: that the proposed three-story building, measuring 43'-10" to the top of the building parapet and 54'-Y to the top of the stairway enclosure, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience, since it is well articulated with substantial recesses and will be compatible with buildings in the area that are one to six stories in height; that the proposed mixed use commercial/residential use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; that reasonable conditions are proposed to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Criteria for Permitting a Condominium: The following condominium standards shall apply to all land and structures proposed as a part of a condominium project and shall be evaluated and processed pursuant to the procedural requirements set forth for conditional use permits in Title 25 of this code. No condominium projector portion thereof shall be approved or conditionally approved in whole or in part unless the planning commission, or city council upon appeal or review, has reviewed the following on the basis of their effect on: (a) Sound community planning; the economic, ecological, social and aesthetic qualities of the community; and on public health, safety and general welfare; (b) The overall impact on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources; and (c) Conformity with the general plan and density permitted by zoning regulations. 11 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Suggested Findings for Permitting a Condominium: ■ that the 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential development is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial buildings in the neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north, and will not have a significant impact on public health, safety and general welfare; ■ that based on the environmental analysis, it was determined that the proposed project would have no adverse environmental impacts (with mitigations for utilities) on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources; and ■ that this application incudes a request for Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to allow residential use above the first floor. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action to recommend the following items should be taken separately by resolution including the conditions representing mitigation for the Mitigated Negative Declaration (in italics below) and any conditions from the staff report and/or that the commissioners may add. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial District to allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue. 3. Design Review. 4. Conditional Use Permit for building height. 5. Condominium Permit. 6. Lot Merger. Since the City Council is the final decision -making body regarding the request for Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Donnelly Avenue Commercial District, the Planning Commission's action should be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council, since the entire application will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Please note that the conditions below include mitigation measures taken from the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study (shown in italics). If the Commission determines that these conditions do not adequately address any potential significant impacts on the environment, then an Environmental Impact Report would need to be prepared for this project. The mitigations will be recorded with the property and constitute the mitigation monitoring plan for this project. At the public hearing the following mitigation measures and conditions should be considered: Please note that the conditions below include mitigation measures taken from the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study (shown in italics). If the Commission determines that these conditions do not adequately address any potential significant impacts on the environment, then an Environmental Impact Report would need to be prepared for this project. The mitigations will be recorded with the property and constitute the mitigation monitoring plan for this project. At the public hearing the following mitigation measures and conditions should be considered: 12 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 9, 2020, sheets A0.0 through A4.3, C-1 through C-3 and 1-1.1 through L2.2; 2. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 3. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall apply for a tentative and final condominium map with the Public Works, Engineering Division for processing in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 6. that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 7. that a Klaus TrendVario 4200 parking lift system, or an equivalent parking lift system, shall be installed, with the following conditions: a. the parking lifts shall be properly illuminated to provide safety for easy loading and unloading, while not causing excessive glare. b. signage shall be installed explaining the proper use of the lifts and emergency contact information for lift maintenance or problems. C. the final design of the parking lifts shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 8. that if the City determines that the structure interferes with City communications in the City, the property owner shall permit public safety communications equipment and a wireless access point for City communications to be located on the structure in a location to be agreed upon by the City and the property owner. The applicant shall provide an electrical supply source for use by the equipment. The applicant shall permit authorized representatives of the City to gain access to the equipment location for purposes of installation, maintenance, adjustment, and repair upon reasonable notice to the property owner or owner's successor in interest. This access and location agreement shall be recorded in terms that convey the intent and meaning of this condition; 9. that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal Code; 13 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue 10. that the project applicant and its construction contractor(s) shall develop a construction management plan for review and approval by the City of Burlingame. The plan must include at least the following items and requirements to reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic and parking congestion during construction: a. A construction parking plan to provide worker parking off site and generally off neighborhood streets, with shuttles or other transportation as needed to transport workers to the site; b. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes; C. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would minimize impacts on motor vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, circulation and safety, and specifically to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible on streets in the project area; d. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures would occur; e. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for haul routes so that any damage and debris attributable to the haul trucks can be identified and corrected by the project applicant; and Designation of a readily available contact person for construction activities who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding traffic or parking. This coordinator would determine the cause of the complaint and, where necessary, would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. 11. that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on -site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 12. that the applicant shall submit a Construction Noise Control Plan. This plan would include measures such as: ■ Using smaller equipment with lower horsepower or reducing the hourly utilization rate of equipment used on the site to reduce noise levels at 50 feet to the allowable level. ■ Locating construction equipment as far as feasible from noise -sensitive uses. ■ Requiring that all construction equipment powered by gasoline or diesel engines have sound control devices that are at least as effective as those originally provided by the manufacturer and that all equipment be operated and maintained to minimize noise generation. ■ Prohibiting gasoline or diesel engines from having unmuffled exhaust systems. ■ Not idling inactive construction equipment for prolonged periods (i.e., more than 5 minutes). ■ Constructing a solid plywood barrier around the construction site and adjacent to operational businesses, residences, or other noise -sensitive land uses. ■ Using temporary noise control blanket barriers. ■ Monitoring the effectiveness of noise attenuation measures by taking noise measurements. ■ Using "quiet' gasoline -powered compressors or electrically powered compressors and electric rather than gasoline- or diesel -powered forklifts for small lifting. 14 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue 13. that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off -site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 14. that during construction, the applicant shall provide fencing (with a fabric screen or mesh) around the project site to ensure that all construction equipment, materials and debris is kept on site; 15. that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited; 16. that if construction is done during the wet season (October 1 through April 30), that priorto October 1 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 17. that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 18. that this project shall comply with the state -mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 19. that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 20. that this proposal shall comply with all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance adopted by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street trees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist; 21. that the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Burlingame Parks Division regarding the planting of five (5) street trees along Donnelly Avenue; 22. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 23. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 24. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 25. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 26. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; 15 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue The following conditions shall be met during the Building Inspection process prior to the inspections noted in each condition: 27. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 28. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the Building Division; 29. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Division; 30. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 31. that the maximum elevation to the top roof parapet shall not exceed elevation 143.90', as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Donnelly Avenue (100.34') for a maximum height not to exceed 43'-10" to the top of the parapet; the garage finished floor elevation shall be elevation 100.34'; the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor who shall provide certification of that height to the Building Division; Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; The following conditions of approval are from Downtown Specific Plan: 32. the project sponsor shall implement all appropriate control measures from the most currently adopted air quality plan at the time of project construction; 33. the project sponsor shall implement the following Greenhouse Gas reduction measures during construction activities: a. Alternative -Fueled (e.g., biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles/equipment shall make up at least 15 percent of the fleet. b. Use at least 10 percent local building materials. C. Recycle at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials. 34. the project sponsor shall provide adequate secure bicycle parking in the plan area at a minimum ratio of 1 bicycle spot for every 20 vehicle spots; 35. the condominium management shall post and update information on alternate modes of transportation for the area (i.e. bus/shuttle schedules and stop locations, maps); 36. the project sponsor shall incorporate commercial energy efficiency measures such that energy efficiency is increased to 15% beyond 2008 title 24 standards for electricity and natural gas; 16 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue 37. the project sponsor shall incorporate recycling measures and incentives such that a solid waste diversion rate of 75% is achieved upon occupation of each phase of plan development; 38. the project sponsor shall incorporate residential water efficiency measures such that water consumption is decreased by a minimum of 10 percent over current standard water demand factors; 39. that construction shall avoid the March 15 through August 31 avian nesting period to the extent feasible, as determined by staff. If it is not feasible to avoid the nesting period, a survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no earlier than 7 days prior to construction. The area surveyed shall include all clearing/construction areas, as well as areas within 250 ft. of the boundaries of these areas, or as otherwise determined by the biologist. In the event that an active nest is discovered, clearing/construction shall be postponed within 250 ft. of the nest, until the young have fledged (left the nest), the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts; 40. that for projects within the Plan Area that require excavation, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (and Phase 11 sampling, where appropriate) would be required. If the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment determines that remediation is required, the project sponsorwould be required to implement all remediation and abatement work in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or other jurisdictional agency; 41. the following practices shall be incorporated into the construction documents to be implemented by the project contractor. a. Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. Such separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures: Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site; - Use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound barriers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors; Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and Minimize backing movements of equipment. b. Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible. C. Impact equipment (e.g., jack hammers and pavement breakers) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically -powered tools. Compressed air exhaust silencers shall be used on other equipment. Other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment, shall be used whenever feasible. 42. the project sponsor shall incorporate the following practice into the construction documents to be implemented by construction contractors: The project sponsor shall require that loaded trucks and other vibration -generating equipment avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent compatible with project construction goals; 43. that if the project increases sewer flows to the sanitary sewer system, the project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to determine if improvements to public sanitary sewer infrastructure are needed. If improvements are needed, the following shall apply: that prior to issuance of a building permit, the project sponsor shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer 17 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 44. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the development plans shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, then the following shall apply: that prior to issuance of a building permit the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. 45. that if evidence of an archeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity ("midden"), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction -related earth -moving activities, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame shall be notified. The project sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The City of Burlingame shall consult with the archeologist to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less -than significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-J) form and filed with the NWIC; 46. that should a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature be identified at the project construction site during any phase of construction, the project manager shall cease all construction activities at the site of the discovery and immediately notify the City of Burlingame. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified paleontologist to provide an evaluation of the find and to prescribe mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources or geologic features is carried out. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementing any additional mitigation measures prescribed by the paleontologist and approved by the City; and 47. that if human remains are discovered at any project construction site during any phase of construction, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame and the County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project sponsor shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City of Burlingame shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The project sponsor shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City of Burlingame, before the resumption of ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. IN New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Mitigation Measures from Initial Study Aesthetics 48. The project developer shall install low -profile, low -intensity lighting directed downward to minimize light and glare. Exterior lighting shall be low mounted, downward casting, and shielded. In general, the light footprint shall not extend beyond the periphery the property. Implementation of exterior lighting fixtures on all buildings shall also comply with the standard California Building Code (Title 24, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) to reduce the lateral spreading of light to surrounding uses, consistent with City Municipal Code 18.16.030 that requires that all new exterior lighting for residential developments be designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the light element is kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. In addition, lighting fixtures would not be located more than nine feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls would not be floodlit; and only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward would be used, except forilluminated street numbers required by the fire department. Air Quality 49. During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust. Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less -than -significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following BMPs that are required of all projects: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. C. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations (CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 50. The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would achieve a fleet -wide average 20- percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. One feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: a. All diesel -powered off -road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more 19 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 3 engines that include CARB- certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF)12 or equivalent. Alternatively, equipment that meets U. S. EPA Tier 4 standards for particulate matter or the use of equipment that includes electric or alternatively -fueled equipment (i.e., non- diesel) would meet this requirement. Biological Resources 51. Activities related to the project, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and construction and demolition shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 31) if feasible. If construction will commence during the breeding season, then a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre -construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer for raptors and 150-foot buffer for passerines where access can be authorized. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in San Mateo County. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (which is dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the avian biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed, and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. Cultural Resources 52. In the event Native American or other archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the discovered materials and workers shall avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. If an archaeological site is encountered in any stage of development, a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine whether the resource qualifies as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource. In the event that it does qualify, the archaeologist will prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan to be implemented prior to or during site construction. The archaeologist shall also prepare a written report of the finding, file it with the appropriate agency, and arrange for curation of recovered materials. 53. In the event that human remains are discovered during project construction, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. The county coroner shall be informed to evaluate the nature of the remains. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Lead Agency shall work with the Native American Heritage Commission and the applicant to develop an agreement for treating or disposing of the human remains. New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Geology and Soils 54. Project design and construction shall adhere to Title 18, Chapter 18.28 of the City Municipal Code, and demonstrate compliance with all design standards applicable to the California Building Code Zone 4 would ensure maximum practicable protection available to users of the buildings and associated infrastructure. 55. Foundations of the project will be reinforced to tolerate differential soil movement. The project may be supported on a reinforced concrete mat foundation bearing on a properly prepared and compacted soil subgrade and a non -expansive fill section. Alternately, the project may be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation bearing on stiff native soils. Implementation of a reinforced foundation would reduce the potential for damage caused by liquefaction. 56. Project design and construction, including excavation activities, shall comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies the safety requirement to be fulfilled for site work. This would include prevention of subsidence and pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. 57. The applicant shall prepare a monitoring program to determine the effects of construction on nearby improvements, including the monitoring of cracking and vertical movement of adjacent structures, and nearby streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements. As necessary, inclinometers or other instrumentation shall be installed as part of the shoring system to closely monitor lateral movement. The program shall include a pre -construction survey including photographs and installation of monitoring points for existing site improvements. 58. A discovery of a paleontological specimen during any phase of the project shall result in a work stoppage in the vicinity of the find until it can be evaluated by a professional paleontologist. Should loss or damage be detected, additional protective measures or further action (e.g., resource removal), as determined by a professional paleontologist, shall be implemented to mitigate the impact. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 59. The contractorshall comply with Title 8, California Code of Regulations/Occupational Safetyand Health Administration requirements that cover construction work where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes the proper removal and disposal of peeling paint, and appropriate sampling of painted building surfaces for lead prior to disturbance of the paint and disposal of the paint or painted materials. 60. The applicant shall contract a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct an asbestos survey prior to disturbing potential asbestos containing building materials and following the Consultant's recommendations for proper handling and disposal. 61. Workers handling demolition and renovation activities at the project site will be trained in the safe handling and disposal of any containments with which they are handling or disposing of on the project site. Noise 62. Prior to the issuance of building permits, mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City's 60 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime requirements at the property lines of surrounding noise sensitive uses. Section 5.2.5.8 of the City of Burlingame DSP includes a provision for rooftop equipment: 21 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Mixed -use buildings with a residential component should exhibit rooflines and architectural character consistent with the Downtown commercial character. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building and screened for noise. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City's noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line -of- sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. 63. As required under Section 9.9.20 of the City of Burlingame DSP, loaded truck and other vibration - generating equipment shall avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent possible to still meet construction goals. Additionally, the following measures would be implemented during construction: a. Operating equipment on the construction site shall be placed as far as possible from vibration - sensitive receptors. b. Smaller equipment shall be used to the extent feasible to minimize vibration levels below the limits. C. Use of vibratory rollers, tampers, and impact tools near sensitive areas shall be avoided to the extent feasible. d. Neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site shall be notified of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels during project construction activities. e. If heavy construction is proposed within 12 feet of commercial structures and/or 18 feet of residential structures, a construction vibration -monitoring plan shall be implemented prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities located within these setbacks. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks: The contractor shall conduct a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for structures located within 25 feet of construction. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating construction activities located within 25 feet of the structure. The surveys shall include internal and external crack monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of the structure. g. The contractor shall conduct a post -survey on the structure where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities. h. The contractor shall designate a person responsible for registering and investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site. The results of any vibration monitoring shall be summarized and submitted in a report shortly after substantial completion of each phase identified in the project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration certificates, and graphics as required to clearly identify vibration- monitoring locations. An explanation of all events that 22 New Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Development 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue exceeded vibration limits will be included together with proper documentation supporting any such claims. Utilities and Service Systems 64. The project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to improve the public sanitary sewer infrastructure. Prior to issuance of a building permit, project sponsors shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 65. Prior to issuance of a building permit, development plans for projects proposed in the Plan Area, shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible forimplementation of the plan including installation of new watermains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, orothermeasures as determined by the Fire Marshal. Ruben Hurin Planning Manager c. John Britton, applicant Gary Gee Architects, Inc., architect Attachments: Applicant's Response Letter, dated July 7, 2020 October 28, 019 Planning Commission Minutes October 9, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated October 22, 2019 Letter Submitted by Jennifer Pfaff, dated October 9, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission Letters of Explanation, dated March 8, 2016 and April 11, 2016 Conditional Use Permit Application Klaus TrendVario 4200 Specifications Tree Survey, prepared by SBCA Tree Consulting, dated April 1, 2016 Downtown Specific Plan Applicable Design Guidelines Planning Commission Resolutions (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed July 31, 2020 Area Map Separate Attachments: Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study and Appendices, dated June 2020 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), dated June 2020 Materials Binder 23 Architecture/Planning/Interi ors 98 Brady Street San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com July 7, 2020 Mr. Ruben Hurin, Planner Planning Division/Community Development City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, 2nd Floor Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: 1214 Donnelly Avenue Burlingame, CA APN: 029-151-150, -160 and -170 Dear Mr. Hurin: tE' C E !V 1 i U L -- 9 2+ 20 :;ITY OF SU*,9UNGAME Attached are one-half size architectural drawings 32 sheets dated 6-17-20 on revised sheets. This letter is to outline the design changes to the proposed mixed -use building: DONNELLY AVENUE: ORNAMENTAL METAL PROJECTIONS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT WINDOWS A. These ornamental metal projections reinforce the commercial base of the building and add more detail to the first floor cement plaster wall. B. The awnings and metal projections strengthen the look of the commercial first floor base of the building with three dimensional elements projecting out from the cement plaster wall. C. These ornamental metal projections can also serve as signs or decorative banners projecting out from the building. 2. DONNELLY AVENUE: DECORATIVE CLAY SPOUTS INSERTED AT THE SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR BALCONIES A. Several decorative non-functional clay spouts have been inserted at the second and third floor balconies. B. The addition of these spouts provides detail and visual interests to the balconies walls. C. These balcony walls no longer look blank without any details or elements. 3. DONNELLY AVENUE: BREAK-UP MASSING OF BUILDINGS A. The central bay massing color was changed to include an earth tone color. This change in color further differentiates the central massing of the building and adds to creating an image of separated buildings. 4. NORTH REAR WALL DESIGN REVISIONS A. The Y-6" high deck wall has been removed and replaced with an open metal railing. B. Cement plaster expansion joints have been inserted to breakup the plaster wall. C. The second floor rear open terrace landscape planters against the north property line wall were removed. 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE, JULY 7, 2020 PAGE 2 OF 2 D. Our office field photographed the north property line conditions and found existing landscaping and a tree adjacent to the northwest and northeast adjoining properties. E. Architectural drawing sheet A3.2 East Elevation shows the large bamboo plants against the northeast fence at approximately 22 feet in height with an existing 6'-3" high fence to remain. F. Architectural drawing sheet A3.4 West Elevation shows the large ivy planting over the roof of the existing building and over the city owned parking lot cyclone fence. G. There is a tree against the northwest corner of the property that is approximately 32 feet in height. H. Architectural drawing sheet A3.3 North Elevation shows the 22 foot high bamboo tree at the northeast corner, fence at north property line, 55 foot wide one-story carport and existing ivy landscaping and 32 foot high tree at the northwest corner. I. Because there is already existing landscaping, carports and fencing along the property line of the adjoining properties, the height of this wall is screened by these conditions. 5. CONCLUSIONS OF DESIGN REVISIONS • The design changes to the Donnelly Avenue fagade have strengthen the appearance of the first floor commercial presence and use. • The addition of the metal projections at the first floor between the commercial storefront windows further add building detail and three dimensional projections to the awning at this base of the building. • The addition of the clay spouts add visual interests and detail to the cement plaster balcony walls at the second and third floors. • The removal of the terrace planters and 3'-6" high wall and replacing them with a metal railing has lower the profile of the north rear wall. • The adjoining north, northeast and northwest properties existing landscaping, fence and carport on the adjoining north properties further screen the garage level north wall. Gary Gee, AIA cc: John Britton PA14-022\1214DonnellyPlanningRHurin7-7-20 Cityof Burlingame BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 F I� Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Monday, October 28, 2019 7:00 PM Council Chambers d. 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue, zoned DAC - Design Review Study for an Application for Environmental Review, Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning Code to allow a multi -family residential use, Conditional Use Permit for building height, Condominium Permit and Lot Merger for construction of a new three-story, 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential building (John Britton, applicant; Britton Trust, property owner; Gary Gee Architects, Inc., architect;) (182 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Staff Report 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Attachments 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Materials Binder 1214-1220 Donnelly Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. > There were no questions of staff. Chair Comaroto opened the public hearing. Gary Gee and Mark Hudak, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Is Hardie plank proposed on the east elevation because of the existing building that's there? (Gee: Correct. Haven't been able to approach the owner and have been reluctant to put scaffolding on the roof because of liability, so we thought of using the 4x8 Hardie panels, want to keep reveals as thin as possible.) > Wouldn't you need to get on the roof to install the panels? (Gee: Think we're going to try and put the panels on the finished walls and then raise them.) > Appreciate the lightwells on the west elevation. Have you thought about putting a clear story window in the bedrooms? This would let light in and give the blank walls relief, don't think there are any plans to develop that public parking lot. (Gee: We can look into that, will need to check with the fire department about their requirements for property line windows.) > Like the project and think it's great to be developing this downtown, but front elevation seems heavier and bulkier than previous design. On front elevation, could you look at adding recesses in those plastered facades along the left side of the building, above and below the arched openings. > Like the project the way it sits generally, think it's quieted down and more definitive in terms of its style. Mentioned Casa Baywood as an iconic piece of architecture, this has that simplicity to it and substantive architecture, but had similar reaction to some of the blank pieces. > Recall that there was concern with the inserted pots because there's the issue of who is going to maintain them and are they going to be dead plants or dirt. Think there's a possibility for some simple articulation, maybe something over that one large blank element or maybe it's just a simple opening in the City of Burlingame Page I Printed on 81612020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 28, 2019 railings up on that third floor where you had the inserted pots before. (Gee: Blade signs hung off wrought iron brackets were taken out.) > Think showing the signs could help, helps with the identity for the commercial spaces and gives articulation. > Would suggest doing something at least along that third floor balcony, something there to help with the blankness. > Think you have something dynamic in the garage entry, the playful sculpted opening piece offsets the blankness you have in the facade above the garage entry. > In support of what you're doing on the east and west elevations, the addition of the light well really helps. > Should revisit a few parts and pieces, think it can happen in step with this project moving forward, not requiring wholesale revisions that's going to have us reconsider the environmental assessment. > Did you look at moving away from the rear property line to get some planting area? Proposing an 18 -foot tall wall against the back property line. (Gee: Originally when we worked with civil engineer on the stormwater management plan, planters at rear were designated for that use. May be able to remove some of the planters, so height of wall would be reduced by 4 feet.) > Asking if you could move the building so you have enough room to plant something in the ground. The thought of having an 18-foot high blank wall against your property line is not very nice. Wondered if there was a way to reconfigure the parking so you can shift the wall in to get 18 inches or a couple of feet to plant against the property line, between the wall and the property line. There may be fluff in the parking garage that would allow you to do that. (Gee: Think we're using a 25-foot backup for the 90-degree parking, may be able to get a four inch planning strip there.) > Green screen is not reliable, you'll see a lot of metal grid systems with no green on them, sometimes they work really well and sometimes they don't, but it seems to me that something ought to happen against that wall, uneasy about approving a project that puts a harsh back wall against another property. > Concerned about people standing in the gathering space and looking down from 18-feet into the backyards and back windows of residences, think a tree like a Lombardy Poplar would go a long way toward relieving the harshness and hiding the people on the roof looking down into the backyards. > Concerned about large blank wall on the east elevation, we're going to see that wall for many years, it's going to be really impactful. Something other than a big, blank painted 4 x 8 gridded wall should be considered there. > We have had some success with other developers working with the Historical Society. Agree with Russ Cohen's letter, would be a real miss if all we got was an 8.5 x 11 plaque. It's unfortunate what happened with this property, so we have to do something to capture what we have lost. We've had real success, whether it's a mural or something that identifies this property as somehow connecting back to what it used to be. (Gee: In terms of murals, we have done that before too, sometimes the murals can be done in a shrink wrap material that can be taken off later and serviced.) > Project has developed nicely, good enhancements have made to the design. > Because building has one finish, one color across the majority of the exterior of this building, should consider some kind of a horizontal break, whether it's a change in color, some change of material, or something to create a little bit more of a pedestrian level experience for this fairly tall structure on a narrow street. Think a horizontal break across that lower level, at that commercial level would help. > Stair tower looks like it could also benefit from some added detail and embellishment, perhaps some windows, looks like there's opportunity for some added decoration or architectural treatment. ( Gee: Those windows have been recessed and they have a round top on them too. In some of the more traditional towers, including bell towers and mission towers, they have recessed windows that are deep and don't have many fussy details. There's something that may can be enhanced. Looking at it as a single plane it may look simple, but if you look at it as a two or three -plane element, there are things happening on each side as a composition.) > Want to see something outside the windows in stair tower, perhaps a wrought iron detail or Juliette balcony, it's the tallest part of the development and at the street level. Could also look at enlarging the windows. Public Comments: City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 81612020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 28, 2019 Jennifer Pfaff- Really care about the way the Downtown Specific Plan was carried through. Liked the previous design, appreciate the suggestion for added embellishment in blank areas. In favor of the direction staff gave regarding parcels chosen to be included in rezoning because it's such a narrow street, to include those properties only facing Donnelly Avenue, keeps intact main street which is Lorton Avenue, the old retail zone. A few years ago, we weren't looking at parking being provided in vehicle stacking systems, limits on parking limited the size of projects, so buildings weren't going to be 55 or 60 feet tall because there was no parking that could be accommodated there. Now, we're looking at different types of projects with vehicle stackers. Concerned that that there is no rear setback requirement. While this project is set back from the rear property line, at least the housing portion of it is, it doesn't mean the next project will be. Density bonus allows more density for a benefit, like a reduced setback, if you don't have a setback that you're dealing with, there is nothing you have to trade. Think we need to be carefully looking at rear setback requirements with this amendment moving forward. Chair Comaroto closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > Appreciate the quieting down of the project. Easier to peel project back to its bare minimum and add things back that makes sense; don't disagree with many of the comments that it's the final solution, it's some where in the middle. Think it's probably closer to this end than to the other end because typically good urban buildings are pretty quiet. Appreciate the changes made to the project. > Concerned with 18-foot wall along rear of site, would have problems supporting that without some sort of mitigation. Seems too late to have a setback now, but it's certainly not too late to mitigate the proposed infringement on the neighbors. > Like suggestion that you use that large blank wall on east elevation to address the concerns noted by the Historical Society. > Renderings make the stair tower look much larger than it looks in the elevations, seems much narrower on the building elevations than it appears on the rendering, may be a perspective issue. Stair tower is a nice element, still seems very blocky, but that may be a trick of the perspective. In support of the project and like where the project is going with vibrant retail on the ground floor and residential above, think we need both. > Think it would help if there's a way to bring in that rear wall and create planting along there, don't think that's a substantive change that couldn't happen in parallel with the project moving forward. > In regards to the architecture, like where it has gone. Feel for the architect in that we provided direction to strip everything away and he did that, think it's a function of being consistent with the type of architecture that it is now, and just adding a few details that really make it sing. > Agree that there's something about that stair tower that's quiet and substantive, that element is reminiscent of the Casa Baywood architecture. Think maybe some additional articulation can happen there, but don't think it should go too far because that gives nice relief, particularly with the roof form and the way it goes up and over on that side elevation. Think it is very simple and looking at that side, with the stepped arched windows, it reminds me of that Spanish Revival style that is very substantive and has that sort of tower element with a few simple windows that look out, which I think is the way it should be to give relief to the rest of the plane where you want to have balconies and windows. > Like the direction the architecture was going and think the environmental assessment could and should move forward. Don't have an issue with the rest of the entitlements moving forward. > In regards to the Special Permit for height, it's not a 54-foot building, it's more of a 43-foot building because the only element at 54 feet is the stair tower, which we noted is a narrow piece. Think it's a nice piece of articulation for what is still just a 3-story building, and about 43 feet tall. Think this project in this location would be good for our downtown area, and good for Donnelly Avenue. > Think that revisions can move forward with some articulation of the building itself in terms of how it approaches the neighbor. > In regards to the overlook to the neighbors, think it's important to note that because they've worked in the planters on that second floor area in the open space, there are a few spaces where you can get to City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 81612020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 28, 2019 that guardrail, but there's a lot of spaces, particularly where the benches are, where you have planters separating you from that wall that overlooks the neighbors. Think with articulation on that back facade and getting plantings in that area would work better. > Maybe the whole wall doesn't need to step in, but perhaps some three foot by three foot cut-outs with some vertical element can be planted and grown there to break it up. > Think something needs to be done on the big blank walls on both the east and west elevations. > Look at addressing mass on stair tower by making the windows slightly larger, or adding grids to provide some detail. There is no motion for this item. The application will return for action once the environmental review has been completed. City of Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 81612020 Cityof Burlingame BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 F I� Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Tuesday, October 9, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers C. 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue, zoned DAC - Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study for an Application for Environmental Review, Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning Code to allow a multi -family residential use, Design Review, Conditional Use Permit for building height, Condominium Permit and Lot Merger for construction of a new three-story, 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential building (John Britton, applicant; Britton Trust, property owner; Gary Gee Architects, Inc., architect;) (317 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. • In looking at the DAC zoning district and the proposed rezoning, why wouldn't we allow for residential uses above the first floor on the other properties in this area? (Hurin: Thought was to maintain the primary retail uses along the Lorton Avenue and Primrose Road frontages. Staff considered inner block as a starting point, but could consider extending the area if the Planning Commission provides that direction.) • A mixed use project on one of those properties would still have a retail/commercial use on the ground floor, but could allow for some additional residential units above the first floor in the downtown area if the area were extended to include the corner lots. • Have now seen several applications with automated puzzle stackers and lifts. Have any been built yet? (Hurin: Yes, have been installed in the commercial building at 240 Lorton Avenue and the multifamily residential building at 1225 Floribunda Avenue.) Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Gary Gee, project architect, and Mark Hudak, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: • Is the driveway into garage required to be 18 feet wide? (Gee: Code requires a minimum driveway width of 18 feet wide. We are proposing 25'-6" because we have a walkway for the second means of egress.) • Is the driveway width required to be 18 feet wide for parking areas with less than 30 cars? (Hurin: 18 foot wide driveway is the minimum required for parking areas with more than 30 vehicles; the minimum driveway width for parking areas with less than 30 vehicles is 12 feet.) • Since 18 foot wide driveway is not required, could revisit reducing driveway width to get more retail frontage. • How will trash and recycling work? Assuming commercial spaces would take their garbage out through the garage and take containers to the trash/recycling room in the garage, is that correct? (Gee: That is correct. Tenant on left side can use the means of egress corridor.) • Residential units would bring garbage down into the garage, correct? (Gee: Yes, that is correct.) • Is there a way to enliven the stairway entry? There is an ornamental arched door into the stairway, but perhaps add sidelights or windows into the first floor landing. Trying to find a way to encourage people to use stairs instead of the elevator. If door was more attractive and one felt more comfortable with City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 1012312019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 9, 2018 sidelights and windows into the stairwell, it would make people excited and comfortable to use stairs because it wouldn't feel like a utility stair. (Gee: See what you're saying; area was getting crowded with utility rooms, bicycle parking, and stairs to rear required by Fire Dept., so was trying to keep stairs and elevator in certain locations.) • Like direction project is going in terms of architecture, but it feels a little southwest. With the ornamental tiles, false overflow drains, and canvas awnings, it doesn't have the timber loggias typically seen on Spanish style buildings. (Gee: Unique to have a mixed use building facing south, so you can have overhanging and upper patios; there is a certain richness with the colors and fabric, wanted to give building character with different colored canvas awnings.) • With the buildings' exposure to strong morning east light, are you confident canvas will hold up? (Gee: Will not be using a classic canvas awning, will be talking to canvas consultant to find right material to hold up to the elements.) • If third floor patios had tiled -roof timbered loggias, might be more Spanish revival. But also like the dynamic of flexibility of patios being able to be open to the sky with the canvas awning. (Gee: Open patios also help massing drop at the front of the building because building is set back. Is more of a hacienda style at the top of building rather than mission style, but has details on the lower portion of the building. Was focusing on how dynamic we can make the pedestrian level work with the storefronts.) • What material will be used for spandrel panels under glazing in recess adjacent to stairway? (Gee: Looking at using cementitious covered dense foam panels, looks like wood, could do a wood pattern type of panel.) • For awnings on third floor, can you explain how you would take them off and put them back on? (Gee: Can be fastened with metal rings or similar system to make it easy to install and remove.) • Have you considered using a mechanical system for the awnings? (Gee: Concerned with exposure to elements for the mechanical system.) • Concerned with using Hardie siding along sides of building and the flatness of those elevations. ( Gee: Can install stucco on left side wall, but Cal/OSHA requires scaffolding which would encroach onto the City's public parking lot; feel it would be difficult to obtain City's permission. On other projects, have installed flat, smooth lap Hardie siding before walls are stood up. Can be done on both side walls.) • On a project like this, will be necessary to work with all adjacent property owners. • Concerned about rear wall, appears to be 18 feet tall up against a 6 foot tall fence. Something needs to be done to articulate the rear wall, step it back, and make it more attractive and less impactful on neighbors. (Gee: 18 feet wall height includes a X-6" tall planter at outer edge of wall.) • How was this design chosen? Don't see a precedent in Downtown Burlingame. (Gee: One building that influenced design is the Burlingame Train Station, which is more of an adobe style. Have adobe features in proposed building with curved walls and deep, recessed windows. Don't want to copy a building or style. Want to take elements of a building and put it in an interpretation here. Client wanted to design a building with richness and elegance. • Have you seen letter from Russ Cohen? (Hudak: Yes, worked with the Historical Society to save some aspects of the building and will continue to work with the Historical Society to come up with an appropriate way to memorialize The Gates House.) • Hudak: This is somewhat a dead area in the downtown commercial zone because of the presence of City parking lots immediately to the left of the building and across the street. So need to have something lively and attractive in order to get the area activated. Instead of requesting a zoning change, could have proposed a traditional mixed use building with retail at ground level and office above, but were encouraged to do housing, believe it's justified and worth it. Think that the inclusion of residential portion is consistent with the way in which the Downtown Specific Plan is evolving; Downtown Specific Plan initially envisioned residential on the periphery, but City Council has wanted to bring residential uses very close to Burlingame Avenue, which is reflected in recently approved projects; think this project is consistent with that. Only a portion of the block is affected with the rezoning because the City controls the two parking lots, so won 't have more residential above the first floor unless the City decides to redevelop those lots. However, might be a good idea to extend rezoning further to other sites. • How far back is third floor set back at front? (Gee: 8 feet.) Public Comments: City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 1012312019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 9, 2018 • Speaker (no name provided): Very little has been said about destruction of another historic building on that street, sad to see that we're losing a lot of history. Was really heartbreaking to see what happened to the Gates House, was left to rot and be destroyed without having a public hearing. Concerned about request to amend the Downtown Specific Plan. There is good reason why you don't want to mix residential with entertainment uses. Should adhere to uses allowed in Downtown Specific Plan. • Jennifer Pfaff.- Reason why more buildings are not being saved is because we don't have many policies in place that are realistic for developers or owners of historical properties to share some advantage of having a historical property. When worked on Downtown Specific Plan there was a thought about where we wanted to have housing, specifically not in the core, not on Lorton or Burlingame Avenues, or Primrose Road. Reason was to keep historic core intact, because once you open it up to residential, the only way to develop those is by merging lots and demolishing buildings. Goal was to keep downtown uncongested and to mainly focus on Howard Avenue and south of Howard Avenue. This street is somewhat problematic because it has two dead ends, it was a service street from its origin, is very congested and very hard to get in and out of. Agree with letter from Mark Hudak that we did not at the time consider what a 55 foot tall building would do in a narrow area like this. Commend architect on design of proposed project compared to original schematic designs. Appreciate comments from Mr. Hudak about working with the Historical Society throughout the process and acknowledging the history of the street and the Gates House. Agree with allowing housing on section that abuts residential uses behind, makes sense and there is logic to it. However, allowed building height should be reduced from 55 to 45 feet, allowed by a conditional use permit. Also would like to see a 20-foot rear setback to reduce impacts on residents to rear of site. Concerned that a 55-foot tall building can be built with no rear setback requirement. Need to look at full picture, including building height and setbacks expected from an R-3 or R-4 zoned lot. • Alex Podell: Family developed 1218 Burlingame Avenue, which includes Pottery Barn and Banana Republic. Project looks great, in favor of allowing residential and mixed use projects in downtown. Requests that there be construction management plan and a condition that prohibits construction workers from parking on their parking lot. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: • What is allowed under the current zoning? (Hurin: Typical uses allowed in the DAC zoning district include retail stores, personal services businesses, food establishments and offices. There are no side or rear setback requirements; at least 60% of the first floor front wall of the building is required to be at or within 10 feet of the front property line.) • The amendment to the zoning request is only to allow residential uses in this area, not change the development standards, such as building height and setbacks, correct? (Hurin: Yes, request is to allow residential uses above the first floor. However, the speaker under public comments is requesting that you also consider reducing the maximum allowed building height and increase the rear setback requirement.) • If this were only a residential project, would there still be no side and rear setback requirement? (Hurin: Yes, that would be correct in the DAC zoning district.) • Love the idea of mixed use on this site. • Appreciate exuberance of the architecture. However, feels like architecture is trying too hard, there is too much of everything. • Building itself doesn't do a good job at being an urban neighbor, there's a lot about the building that says 'look at me". Good urban architecture is much more laid back than what is proposed, it tends to fade into the background. • Feels like there are too many points of failure on the project; one example are the embedded pots and how landscaping in them will be maintained. City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 1012312019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 9, 2018 • Find metal ironwork to be pale and feels spindly. • Concerned about canvas, will flap in wind and fray and will not be replaced once it's taken down. At some points, awnings at commercial and residential portions of the building will be a disaster. • Project has lots of details that are so specific that it can't be any other possible way. It's too much like Disneyland and Santa Barbara. Burlingame is neither of these. What's beautiful about the town is that it's honest, and this project is trying too hard to fit in. • Uses are good and ground floor retail will be good for that street. • Design needs to crank itself back some, don't see this building in Burlingame, it's just trying too hard. Building feels like you're pasting things onto it. • Design is so highly specific, that it feels like it's forcing itself on the community, should be more reserved. • In support of amendment to Downtown Specific Plan and DAC zoning district as proposed, don't think it should extend to the entire frontage along Donnelly Avenue. Would feel boxed in if there were taller buildings on corners. • Design is overstated and overbearing, needs to be toned down. • Concerned about west and east elevations, more so with the west elevation abutting public parking lot. Will be prominent face of the building, needs to be looked at again. • Excited by this project, great place for mixed use project, fits in well and is a nice transition between the downtown and residential districts. • Rear setbacks help transition into existing multifamily residential to rear. • Like design, is supportable as proposed. • Understand construction limitations at side property lines. However, design of blind walls needs to be addressed, particularly with the wall next to the parking lot. This wall will be highly visible, as proposed doesn't fit in. • Agree that zoning amendment should only apply to the central portion of the street. • Details are a bit too southwest. • Feel like design was recycled for use here. • Not quite sure how this design fits here in light of the historical building that existed on the site. • Also am concerned with the left side wall that abuts the parking lot, will be very visible as you come up the street from Primrose Road, design needs to be revisited. • This is a thoughtful design with regards to the overall program and floor plans. • Like that you've addressed s-curve in street and how you've set back the front face of the building. • Like overall design, but am concerned about maintenance of canvas awnings. • In support of changes to plan to allow residential use above ground floor. • Like width of driveway as proposed, allows more comfortable space for vehicles entering and existing the garage, would not want to see it reduced. • Accept logic that amendment should be focused on lots that abut existing residential use to north. • Excited about project and mixed use nature, agree with comments that design needs more restraint. • Encourage looking at Casa Baywood on El Camino Real in San Mateo, not overly done in terms of details, has some timber loggias, and feels substantive. Feels like simple Spanish Revival building that we've seen. • Architect should have license to do some interpretations, doesn't need to look like it came out of the 1920's in terms of Spanish Revival. But if design leads to the building feeling busy, then perhaps detailing needs to be revisited. • Appreciate that building has been stepped back at the rear, has almost 20 feet of relief where it's 18 feet in height abutting the adjacent property. • Typical to have blank walls abutting an adjacent property line, but doesn't mean they have to be entirely stark and blank, can have some relief, detail or texturing. Should revisit what can be done to these walls. • Concerned about 18 foot tall blank wall at the rear property line abutting residential properties. • There are two simple solutions for side walls, if upper floors were stepped in could place scaffolding on first floor of building; secondly you could work with the City to lease a portion or entire parking lot for use during construction. Both walls need to have some articulation that would carry design of building all the way around; don't see buildings built up against this building in the future. City of Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 1012312019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 9, 2018 • Like bringing retail use to this area, would help to expand downtown shopping area. • Concerned with architectural style, struggling with how this fits in. Massing is right and building steps back nicely, but don't think the style fits in with downtown area based on the design guidelines. As a Design Review Study/Environmental Scoping item, there is no action from the Planning Commission. The application will return as an Action Item with the environmental review at a later date. City of Burlingame Page 5 Printed on 1012312019 Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com October 22, 2019 Mr. Ruben Hurin, Planner Planning Division/Community Development City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, 2nd Floor Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: 1214 Donnelly Avenue Burlingame, CA APN: 029-151-150, -160 and -170 Dear Mr. Hurin: R E C ZE I 1V E D 0 C, 2 2 2019 CITY OF BURLIR GAME CQD-PI.-AI'11 ING Dill. This letter is to outline the design changes to the proposed mixed -use building: 1. STAIR TOWER ENTRY DOOR HAS MORE DETAIL A. The previous drawings did not clearly indicate this door and its details. This door on Sheets A2.1, A3.1 and detail 49 on A3.la now shows the "applied 1/4" raised painted decorated relief on the door face. 2. REMOVE CANVAS AWNINGS AT THIRD LEVEL, CLAY POT PLANTERS AND CLAY DECORATIVE OVERFLOW SPOUTS A. The canvas awnings at the third level decks and windows have been removed. See Sheets A3.1, A3.1 a and A3.3. B. All integral clay pot planters have been removed from all building walls. See Sheets A3.1, A3.la and A3.3. C. All clay decorative overflow spouts have been removed. See Sheets A3.1, A3.la and A3.3. 3. ALL PAINTED METAL DECK RAILINGS ARE VERTICALLY ORIENTED WITH A HORIZONTAL CAP RAIL All the painted metal deck railings previously not having a horizontal cap rail were change to include such a cap rail. See Sheets A3.1, A3.la and A3.3. 4. RESIDENTIAL ENTRY AT STREET IS NOW A RECTANGULAR ARCHWAY WITH A PAINTED METAL GATE A. The previous curved archway at the residential street entry has been removed. B. A new rectangular archway with a metal gate has been located at the residential sidewalk entry area. See Sheets A2.1, A3.1 and A3.1 a. C. This new rectangular archway entry is V-10" deep in depth. D. The new metal gate pattern at the residential sideway entry and recessed utility patio now complement the deck metal rails. 1214 DONNELLY STREET, OCTOBER 22, 2019 PAGE 2 OF 2 5. EAST PROPERTY LINE WALL NOW HAS A PAINTED 4'X 8' CEMENT PANEL FINISH A. The east property line wall finish is now James Hardie "Reveal" panel system and trim. See Sheet A3.2 B. The expansion joints are now visible on the east property line wall. C. This cement panel system complements the cement plaster finish at the street and rear facades. 6. WEST PROPERTY LINE WALL NOW HAS A RECESSED LIGHT WELL AND CEMENT PLASTER FINISH A. A 2' 6"x 12' recessed light well is now located at the west property line wall. B. This light well divides the massing along the west property line wall and creates visual interests to this side of the building. See Sheet A2.2, A2.3, A2.4 and A3.4. C. The west property line wall is now finished with cement plaster. This material complements the same material used at the front and rear facades. 7. COMMERCIAL WINDOW AWNINGS NOW HAS HORIZONTAL TRIM WITH PASTEL COLOR A. The projecting commercial picture window awnings now have a horizontal trim and pastel color. The previous curved trim and stripped contracting colors have been removed. See Sheet A3.1 and A3.1 a. 8. A NEW MATERIALS BINDER WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS A. A revised materials binder was submitted with the revised architectural drawings to reflect all the changes outlined in this letter. 9. A HISTORIC PLAQUE DESIGN WILL BE SUBMITTED A. Attached is our proposed historical interpretive plaque to be located at the southeast corner of the building attached to the stormwater transition box cement plaster wall. Our office is now consulting with a sign maker as to the materials and mounting of a historic plaque. The sign making company shop drawing will be submitted shortly. Very truly yours, (;�E Gary Gee, AIA cc: John Britton PA 14-022\ 12141)onne11yP1anningRHurin 10-22-19 Comments with regard to 1214-1220 Donnelly: OCT -- 9 2018 INCLUDE HISTORIC NOD TO STORY OF DONNELLY AVENUE CITY OF BURLINGAME CIDD-P NING DI`V • As some of you may be aware, the George W. Gates family home and the other two adjacent properties in question represent the last of a handful of homes that were moved to Donnelly Avenue, formerly an unpaved service road leading to John Donnelly's home, a century ago to make room for the developing Burlingame Avenue commercial district. My duty and privilege as representing the education -based, Burlingame Historical Society is to make sure for the public record that whatever is developed on these parcels includes a meaningful nod to the Donnelly Avenue area's history and to the Gates family for their contributions to this city's development. We do have some ideas, but time and scope this evening are inadequate for this kind of detailed discussion. ZONING: •I want to acknowledge the effort made from Kevin and Bill regarding the scope and limits of the area amendment being proposed; I think the boundaries have been thoughtfully conceived to avoid "spot zoning" and there is method and logic used in aligning the proposed residential zoning with like -zoning of the R4 parcels to the rear, facing Bellevue, while also keeping the retail emphasis of the 300 block of Lorton intact. *Mark Hudak. Richard Terrones, and I were all part of the Advisory Board that worked for nearly 3 years to create the DSAP. As a point of reference, the emphasis for residential zoning was to keep it out of the core, so as to prevent congestion in the retail zone; in particular the residential development would be emphasized on Howard Avenue and south of Howard. Donnelly has continues to maintain remnants of its original anatomy as a service road, and has limited throughput on both ends. I am in agreement that it does not make sense to allow heights of 55', technically up to 65,' as currently in our code, in this area. Nobody who was on the advisory, nor Council, could have foreseen a decade ago that theoretical parking requirements for maximum heights could one day be achieved without digging out a big hole, but instead with the development of puzzle and automated parking mechanisms. So the once hard to achieve, built out heights are frequently becoming a reality. For some areas including this one, this is not appropriate. Remember that whatever is ultimately decided regarding the amendment will apply not only to this project, but to the other parcels to the west included in this amendment. Furthermore, if this applicant for whatever reason, decides to sell these undeveloped parcels, a future owner could built them out to 55ft. potentially without any design review, because of the new residential streamlining regulations from the State. That is why we have to be so careful making a thoughtful amendment that does not cherry pick, but considers all aspects that may negatively impact neighbors on Bellevue. So, I would suggest adding to the proposed amendment verbiage that includes a reduction in height for all uses, from 55ft cup, to 45ft -- similar to other areas of transition within the downtown specific area plan. In addition to height, a typical R3 and R4 parcel development traditionally respects a 15 ft. rear setback for the first two floors, and a 20 ft. rear setback for any additional floors. This has been a time tested respectful setback over many decades. In this regard, Mr. Gee's podium roof garden on top of the parking garage, though 18 ft. above neighboring properties, is set back generously, and in fact at 197' is a mere 5 " short of the typical R-4 required setback of 20ft. So I ask, why not include the same 20 ft. rear setback requirement that is in keeping with the residential properties to the rear. If office were developed adjacent existing residential, it, too, should maintain the setback so that adjacent residences have breathing room. In short, my suggestion for this particular zoning amendment --with an eye to the future where there is little design control on residential properties, is to add more teeth by reducing the maximum allowable height to 45 ft. with a CUP, and include rear setbacks consistent with R-3 and R-4 development standards. Similar amendments have been made in the Bayswater Mixed Use area where disparate zoning has caused friction between neighbors. Why not be proactive in this case? Jennifer Pfaff Oct. 9, 2018 Item 9C Study item 1214-1220 Donnelly COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD + BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 9 f: 650.696.3790 - www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION es-66-tc Type of application: ❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Parcel #: Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: I�L14 rvNQEl^'� 0A1FWUE APPLICANT Name: : ©w 1"�� Address: 1$0s - City/State/Zip4 7*n5CD) A4141 Phone: 4V5'.1-274T, 45*7 E-mail: t N46i ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: 6vkFtl(e�m 7*41-- rmcr-1✓ )1NC* Address, I 59050*41f I&T' City/State/Zip:' '+���CA1 Phone: AMP. NOS. 66$1 E-mail: c T'" ' cam Burlingame Business License #: PROPERTY OWNER Name: Sammt 1'`usT Address: M14►Eo'I City/State/Zip: Sj*j F C e0.,eA"03 Phone: Als.-1 ►�� E-mail: t 1� brt�� Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part nning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action f the a(Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: remouSH NEW MIYeppoE R5Ut4DUA AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: l here ertify best of my knowledge and bel' Applicant's signature: I am aware of the proposed oplicatio ark Commission. �� Property owner's signature: %k i9w > Aq!�,s suiwiioc�p- vgriev Elm 4 5F ► P �nr natty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the Date: hereby aut i the above applicant to submit t , Is ap cation to the Planning Date: Date submitted: S: jHANDOUTS`PCApptication.doc March 8, 2016 Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 REUEIVE(m)"' Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www,garygee.com IVIMI ea nv 1 L: �(19� rv— CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE PROJECT LETTER OF EXPLANATION EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing site is three (3) parcels with three (3) separate structures. There was a fire that damaged the two (2) east structures. The center building at 1214 Donnelly Avenue was demolished due to the extensive fire damage. The project sponsor plans to demolish the remaining two wood frame two-story office buildings and build one mixed -use building. PROPOSED NEW BUILDING: The proposed new mixed -use building will have ground floor commercial or retail use with second and third floor residential units. There will be twelve (12) two -bedroom two bath and two (2) one bedroom one bath residential units. There are twenty-four (24) parking spaces on the ground floor grade located in the rear of the site. One (1) surface ADA parking space and twenty-three (23) mechanical lift parking system spaces. The ground floor commercial spaces have not been pre -leased and their uses are undetermined. There are 15 foot ceilings in these commercial spaces. There is a 2,712 Sq.Ft, common area open deck for the residential units on the second floor at the rear of the building. All residential units have attached decks and have access to this second floor common open space area. BUILDING DESIGN: The design elements of the building capture the Spanish style architecture and design similar to the Burlingame train station and other traditional Spanish style buildings commonly associated with a pedestrian shopping "Paseo". The street fagade is vertically divided into smaller modules to reduce the building massing at the street fagade. Various windows sizes are designed to enhance the pedestrian experience along the street fagade and create smaller window proportions at the upper two (2) floors. Cement plaster walls with plaster trim molding and clay tile roof accent the larger visible finishes on the building. 1 4% Mark D. Hudak Direct Phone; (650) 696-2573 rnhudak9carr-mcclellan,corn IVED April 11, 2016 Kevin Gardiner MAY 16 2016 Planning Manager CITY OF BURLINGAME City of Burlingame CDD-PLANNING DIV. 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Redevelopment of 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue Dear Mr, Gardiner: Our office is working with John Britton on the redevelopment of the fire -damaged properties at 1214-1220 Donnelly Avenue. These properties are located within the area covered by the Downtown Specific Plan and in the Donnelly Avenue Commercial District. Prior to the fire, the properties had a mix of office and residential uses. The applicant is proposing to merge the three existing lots and build a single new building, with retail on the first floor and two levels of residential units above. The project would have Code -compliant parking on -site. Under the current zoning regime (Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 25.36), the ground floor retail use is permitted but the residential use is not. We believe that a mixed use project with residential units above the first floor would be consistent with the goals of the Downtown Specific Plan and would be appropriate on this side of Donnelly Avenue, Accordingly, John is requesting an amendment to the General Plan and Chapter 25.36 to allow this type of development on the Northwest side of Donnelly Avenue. The factors that would justify this zoning change include: 1. Historic use of the Properties. Prior to the fire, these properties included residential units above the first floor. The units co -existed with other uses nearby including retail shops, personal service, food establishments, and offices. 2. Consistency With Downtown Specific Plan Goals, One of the primary objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan is to encourage new residential units Carr McClellan P.C. 216 Park Road, Burlingame, CA94010 T (650) 342-9600 F(650)342-7685 carr-mcclellan.com April 11, 2016 Kevin Gardiner within easy walking distance of the core retail areas along the Burlingame Avenue corridor. The hope was that the additional residents would support the retail and restaurant uses along the Avenue without adding too much traffic. This goal is incorporated in Land Use Goal LU-6 (allowing residential uses along Howard Avenue and peripheral areas). The proposed units will be within easy walking distance of the restaurants and shops on Lorton Avenue, Primrose Road, and Burlingame Avenue as well as public facilities such as the train station and the library. This is an ideal location for residential uses. 3. Transition to R-4 Zone. The 1300 block of Bellevue Avenue backs up to the Northwest side of Donnelly Avenue and is zoned R-4 (multi -family residential). The predominant use is two- and three-story residential buildings that look over the rear boundaries of the properties along Donnelly. Under current zoning, a mixed use retail and office building in the Donnelly Avenue District could be as high as 55 feet with a conditional use permit, per Section 25.36,055. Such a building would loom over the existing residential buildings on Bellevue. In contrast, a three-story mixed use building with retail and residential would be very compatible with the Bellevue buildings and provide a good buffer between those uses and the more intense uses that could develop elsewhere in the commercial area. The simplest method for implementing a zoning change would be a residential overlay for properties fronting on the Northwest side of Donnelly Avenue. This would affect a limited number of properties (including the City's own parking lots) and would not involve other properties within the Donnelly Avenue District that do not share the same characteristics as this subarea. The office building at 350 Primrose may be subject to this overlay, but as a practical matter, it is unlikely to be redeveloped in the foreseeable future, John and I would be happy to meet with you to discuss the benefits of this request and alternatives for implementing it if the Planning Commission agrees with the general approach. In the meantime, please contact me if you have any questions or need further information. Page 2 April 11, 2016 Kevin Gardiner Sincerely, Mark D. Hudak MDH:mh cc: Client 04050-00001\iMaii�igc-\7320491,1 Page 3 City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P (650) 558-7250 • F (650) 696-3790 • www.burlin ac ame org CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. See attached. 2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? See attached. 3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? See attached. Rev 06.2007 Handouts\Conditional Use Permit App.doc 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE: CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 1 of 3 CU APPLICATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEEDING 35 FEET 03-21-2016 1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. The current height limit for this site is 55 feet. The height of the proposed new building will be 40'-10" to the roof plane and 54'-2" to the roof of the stair penthouse (see sheet A3.1). Any proposed building exceeding 35' in height requires a Conditional Use Application. A. Public Health The proposed building height will not have any impact to public health. The additional 5'- 10"roof height above 35' does not create a health hazard to the existing site or adjacent properties. B. Public Safety The proposed additional building height of 5'-10" above 35' does not create any public safety issues to the existing site or adjacent properties. The additional building height does not create any hazards to attract or generate crime or increase demand on the city public safety services. C. General Welfare The additional proposed building height of 5'-10" above the 35' allows a new mixed -use building which will provide ground floor commercial street activity on Donnelly Avenue and provide fourteen (14) new housing units within walking distance to the downtown shopping area and public transit system. These types of uses contribute to the general welfare of the city and create a vibrant pedestrian friendly environment in the downtown area. D. Convenience The proposed additional building height of 5'-10" above 35' allows a more efficient mixed -use building to be located at this site with ground floor commercial use and two (2) floors of residential uses above. The ground floor commercial uses enhances the pedestrian shopping of the downtown commercial activities, and the upper floor residential uses allows residents to live and shop within the downtown shopping district without using their cars for transportation. Many of the local shopping services will serve the residents of this new building. ■ MAY 16 2016 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE: CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 2 of 3 CU APPLICATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEEDING 35 FEET 03-21-2016 2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? The zoning for this site is DAC (Donnelly Avenue Commercial). The general plan designation is for offices. The proposed building height of 5'-10" above 35' complies with the DAC zoning for this site by providing ground floor commercial/retail use. This type of use enhances the commercial/retail/restaurant types of uses concentrated around the central Burlingame downtown neighborhood. The proposed mixed -use building will allow both ground floor commercial activity and upper floor residential uses to co -exist in a centrally located downtown site. Although the general plan designation is for offices, this type of use needs to be updated and does reflect the most optimal mixed -use designation that is ideal for this neighborhood block. Allowing a mixed -use at this will create new housing opportunities above the ground floor commercial/retail uses. This type of zoning will encourage residents to live and work within the downtown area without use of a personal car. Residents living in the downtown area also bring evening pedestrian traffic to the sidewalks and enhance the downtown living experience. 3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? A. The proposed project will be sensitive to the existing adjacent east building and the pedestrian oriented businesses along the Donnelly and Lorton Avenue street frontages. 1. The proposed building additional building height of 5'-10" above the 35' will complement the existing Donnelly Avenue block face and adjacent structures. The new building height is concentrated towards the Donnelly Avenue fagade. The ground floor has 100% lot coverage to enclose the off-street parking and emphasize the ground floor pedestrian oriented commercial use. The upper two (2) residential stories are located towards the Donnelly Avenue fagade with 19' and 25' rear yards from the north property line. 2. The Donnelly Avenue fagade is setback at the northeast and southeast building corners to soften the massing at each end of the building along the street fagade. This massing is setback to give building relief at the street face and soften the intersection of the new building adjacent to the northeast commercial building. 3. The building fagade is divided into three (3) horizontal layers. a. The ground floor commercial space has a 15' ceiling. There are large windows to enhance the commercial/retail exposure to the street fagade and bring visual interests to the Donnelly Avenue pedestrian oriented experience. 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE: CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 3 of 3 CU APPLICATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEEDING 35 FEET 03-21-2016 b. The second residential level has deep set south facing decks at the street elevation. These deep set decks create massing relief for the Donnelly Avenue fagade and soften the building mass at the street face. Larger decks without overhead covers appear at the southeast and southwest corners of the street fagade. This further reduces the mass at the Donnelly Avenue street fagade. c. The third residential level, which is the portion of the new building above 35', has been setback at different modules to create outdoor decks. There are sloping clay tile roofs to add roofline character to the building. The setback decks and sloping roofs lower the street massing profile of the building and create visual variety and interests. 4. There is a City of Burlingame public parking lot on the adjacent southwest lot that occupies 100% of the lot. The proposed building area above 35' in height has been setback at the northwest and southwest corners. This creates another massing setback at the front and rear of the building corners adjacent to the city parking lot, thus reducing the building massing appearance from the city parking lot. The southwest property line will have no window openings. B. The proposed building will create a higher and more diverse use on the existing site. 1. The new building replaces underutilized existing residential buildings. The new ground floor commercial and upper residential floors will strengthen the ground floor pedestrian oriented commercial presence and increase visual variety to this site and along the Donnelly Avenue street frontage. C. The new building design embraces a Spanish style structure. 1. The proposed building emulates the historical outdoor shopping "Paseo" commonly seen on State Street in Santa Barbara. These intimate Paseo buildings have high ground floor commercial/retail spaces with individual entries. Second floor offices are located on the second floor with smaller scaled windows. Any third floor spaces are setback with sloped clay tile roofs to reduce the building profile and height, and create outdoor decks overlooking the shopping street or interior block Paseo walkway. The proposed new building incorporates many of these detailed elements. 1214 DONNELLY AVE: CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 03-08-2016 Page 1 of 2 1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. The proposed new building will have the following primary uses: A. Commercial/Retail on the ground floor. This type of use will be a continuation of the existing uses along the Donnelly and Lorton Avenues. These adjacent streets have commercial and retail frontages whose business cater to local residents and persons who work in the downtown area. B. Residential use on the second and third floors. This type of use allows people to live and work in downtown Burlingame. Residents of this building will patronize the downtown Burlingame businesses both during the day and evening hours. This.creates a more efficient living environment for a population living, working and patronizing businesses in the central business district. C. This is a new mixed -use building. The proposed building offers a mixed -use profile for persons whom may not need a vehicle to commute to work since it offers both an ideal location for residents whom wish to live, work and experience a downtown environment. D. Fully Sprinkle New Building. The proposed new building will be fully sprinkle and have an automatic alarm system installed. E. Commercial and Residential uses contain inside the proposed new building. All proposed uses are enclosed within the building and no major outdoor activity is proposed. These types of proposed uses will not have any detrimental or injurious to adjacent properties, improvements, public health, safety and general welfare or convenience. 2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? The proposed uses comply with the intention of the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance by allowing the ground floor commercial/retail and as a primary use. The Burlingame Zoning Ordinance will need to be modified to allow residential use in the "DAC" of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan Zoning District. This modification will create a mixed -use zoning. Mixed -use zoning in Downtown Burlingame will create new housing opportunities above the ground floor commercial/retail use. This type of zoning will encourage residents to live and work within the downtown area without use of a personal car. Residents living in the downtown area also bring evening pedestrian traffic to the sidewalks and enhance the downtown living experience. RECEIVED MAY 16 2016 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 1214 DONNELLY AVE.: CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 03-08-2016 Page 2 of 2 3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? A. The proposed project will be sensitive to the existing adjacent east building and the pedestrian oriented businesses along the Donnelly and Lorton Avenue street frontages. 1. The proposed building facade is set back at the northeast and southwest building corners to soften the massing at each end of the building along the street fagade. This massing is modulated to give the building relief at the street face and soften the intersection of the new building against the adjacent northeast commercial building. 2. The building fagade is divided into three (3) horizontal layers. a. The ground floor commercial space has a 15' ceiling. There are large windows to enhance the commercial/retail exposure to the street facade and bring visual interests to the Donnelly Avenue pedestrian oriented experience. b. The second and third residential levels have been setback at different modules to create outdoor patios and decks.. There are sloping clay tile roofs to add roofline character to the building. The recessed decks and sloping roofs lower the street massing profile of the building and create visual variety and interest. 3. There is a City of Burlingame public parking lot on the adjacent southwest lot. The southwest property line wall will have architectural features and no window openings. 4. The proposed building has located a common area deck on the second floor rear property line area. This creates another massing setback at the rear of the building along with the setback at the front of the building. These massing setbacks allow the building facade to continue from the front and rear facades along the setback walls. This creates more property line wall fagade elements and building details to be expressed. B. The proposed building will create a higher and more diverse use on the existing site. 1. The new building replaces underutilized existing residential buildings that were converted to commercial uses. The new uses will provide a more efficient building use and a variety of new uses to this site and along the Donnelly Avenue commercial street frontage. C. The new building design embraces a Spanish style structure. 1. The proposed building emulates the historical outdoor shopping "Paseo" commonly seen on State Street in Santa Barbara. These intimate Paseo buildings have high ground floor commercial/retail spaces with individual entries. Second floor spaces will have smaller scaled windows. Any third floor spaces are setback with sloped clay tile roofs to reduce the building profile and height, and create outdoor decks overlooking the shopping street or interior block Paseo walkway. The proposed new building incorporates many of these detailed elements, Page 1 of 6 Standard Type 4200 formally called the P210 ^i— 101, t —4' 9� Detail X door dimensions V 4" see page 2 Free s ace 1� I�1 I I I� t Ic rn O N W a o a, I N Rail details see page 3 3 3'-11 " 9'-10" 17'- 11 " for vehicles up to 16'- 4" long I 1 18' - 7" for vehicles up to17' long } Compact Type 4200 WWN4 Excl usive Type 4200 GF Notes 1 If height H is larger, vehicles with the maximum height specified for the GF can be parked on the UF, otherwise there will be free space available on the ceiling. 2 In order to meet the minimum finished dimensions the tolerances specified must be met, they may be up to 1" greater than specified. 3 Tolerances for the evenness of thefloor must be strictly complied with. Product Data t E TrendVario CONFORMITY 4200 • tkin9 space 1g�aXiet 5be U1p9pyaeat a \atedatel \oads Number of parking spaces: min. 3 to max. 29 vehicles Dimensions: 2 All space requirements are minimum finished dimensions. Tolerances for space requirements +1 0" - �• ® 10'-10" •• 11'-4" •� 12'-2" 12'-6" •• 13'-4" 14'-5" S ui to bl a for: Standard passenger car, station wagon/ Van. Height and length according to contur. ®10'-10"4'-11"4'-11" �11'-4" 4'-11" 5'-9q o •• 12'-2" 5,-7" 5,-7" _ •• 12'-6" 5,-9" 5'-9" •• �13'-4„ 5,-9„ 6,-7„ •� ®14'-5" 6'-9" 6'-9"_ 6'-3„ ma x. 4400 / 5720 l bs ETRA -- ... max.1100/1430lbs Standard passenger car _5'-3" +-Z_Z,. 4• _ 9.. a 3= 6. 13' 3'-1 •• 4' -1 •• 16'-4",(171 4 On the version without door, a 4" wide yellow -black markings compliant to ISO 3864 must be applied by the customer to the edge of the platform in the access area to mark the danger zone in compliance with DIN EN 14 010 5 Potential equalization from foundation grounding connection to system(provided by the customer). 6 Maximum load of 5,720lbs optional. General notes If sprinklers are required make sure to provide the necessary RE d^i iE IV E D the planning stage. MAY 16 2016 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. leff+ kq4'VtVke' OutsI* Vwv .& , cam, Standard station wagon/Van/SUV** 5'-3" 1• a m is, 6. 13' m 3'-3" 4'-i" 16'-4" (17' Standard passenger car, station wagon / Van/ SUV are vehicles without any sports options such as spoilers, low -profile tyres etc. Make suretoobserve the weijltsandcirrensions! o (KILAUS] multibarkina Klaus Multiparking GmbH E 2170 Dwight Way_ Berkeley, CA 94705 5 Phone 925-284-2092 0 Fax 925-284-3365 E-Mail sales@parklift.com Internet www.parklift.com v IKILAvs multiparking Design Guide Cars Parked Number of bays Usable Platform Width Grid Width Overall width cm ft inches cm ft cm ft inches Small Platforms 3 2 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 520 17.06 204 12/16 5 3 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 770 25.26 303 2/16 7 4 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1020 33.46 401 9/16 9 5 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1270 41.67 500 11 6 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1520 49.87 598 7/16 13 7 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1770 58.07 696 14/16 15 8 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2020 66.27 795 4/16 17 9 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2270 74.48 89311/16 19 10 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2520 82.68 992 2/16 21 11 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2770 90.88 1090 9/16 23 12 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3020 99.08 1189 25 13 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3270 107.28 1287 6/16 27 14 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3520 115.49 1385 13/16 29 15 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3770 123.69 1484 4116 Medium Platforms 3 2 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 540 17.72 212 10/16 5 3 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 800 26.25 314 15/16 7 4 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1060 34.78 417 5/16 9 5 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1320 43.31 519 11 /16 11 6 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1580 51.84 622 1 /16 13 7 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1840 60.37 724 7/16 15 8 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2100 68.90 826 12/16 17 9 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2360 77.43 929 2/16 19 10 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2620 85.96 1031 8/16 21 11 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2880 94.49 1133 14/16 23 12 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3140 103.02 1236 4/16 25 13 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3400 111.55 1338 9/16 27 14 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3660 120.08 1440 15/16 29 15 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3920 128.61 1543 5/16 Large Platforms 3 2 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 560 18.37 220 8/16 5 3 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1 830 27.23 326 12/16 7 4 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1100 36.09 433 1 /16 9 5 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1370 44.95 539 6/16 11 6 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1640 1 53.81 645 11 /16 13 7 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1910 1 62.66 751 15/16 FRXzAvs multiparking 15 8 250 8.20 98 7/16 1 270 8.86 2180 1 71.52 858 4/16 17 9 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2450 80.38 964 9/16 19 10 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2720 89.24 1070 14/16 21 11 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2990 98.10 1177 3/16 23 12 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 3260 106.96 1283 7/16 25 13 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 3530 115.81 1389 12/16 27 14 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 3800 124.67 1496 1/16 29 15 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 4070 133.53 1602 6/16 ALLOWABLE COLUMN SPACING -aA Use for preliminary layout. Pior to finalizing design contact Klaus for a job specific layout drawing. 1 RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB 4" V.3" W �F— B1 62 —I Bs B2 RB RB RB RB RB RB RB R8 RB RB 63 B2 —I Bl B4 —� 4" ;- 4" Max Clear RB Column Bi B2 B3 B4 Platform Width 230 W-2-1/2" 8" 16' - 5" 241- 7" 16' - 9" 24' - 11" 240 8'-6-3/8" 16" 17' - 1" 251- 7" 17' - 5" 25'- 11" 250 8'-10-3/8" 24" 17' - 9" 261- 7" 181- 1" 26' - 11" The column widths shown are the maximum width's allowed for each model. The columns may be spaced every two or three bays or a combination of every two or every three bays. On the ends of the machine the column is optional if there is a concrete wall present. Otherwise the end columns should be offset so that their edge lines up with the last platforms outside RB dimension line shown above in order to allow better access to the end platforms. Please note that the machine requires an additional 4 inches at each end beyond the RB grid dimensions. The illustrated maximum approach angles must not be exceeded_ Exceeding these slopes will cause maneuvering problems and will restrict car sizes on the parking system. Maximum decending slope of 3% Maximum accending slope of 5% 4" RB 12 2 �2 Empty space! I. 3 free r Moving direction Descendingto iI 4 �� 6 entrance level Upper floor (standard: Hold -to -run - device) j 5 �' 7 Entrance level Ground floor r Transverse repositioning e.g. for parking space No. 4: Check first that all doors are closed, then select No. 4 on operating panel. 1 2 4 � 3 — 5 For driving the vehicle off platform No. 4 the ground floor parking platforms are shifted to the left. M" 1 2 4 1 2 3 5 3 5 4�`^ The empty space is now below the vehicle The vehicle on platform No. 4 which shall be driven off the platform. can now be driven off the platform. The platform No. 4 will be lowered. W Dependent upon the structural conditions of the garage, several different options are available for installation of the rails: When executing the carriageway, according to raw bottom Exact evenness of the carriageway: floor combined with a cement screed or When executing the carriageway with recesses for the rails: - When exact evenness of the carriageway has successfully been accomplished, the rails may be dowelled onto it - The set-up of the rails amounts to i" (height of floor screed 1-1/2") - After the rails have eventually been laid, the area under the rails must be topped up with concrete by the customer N N 2} 3�/8" E Direction of parking 2-3/8' Direction of parking Rul ning o a z 8 T o Q top edge of finished Guide rail Running } 1 top edge rail Guide rail of Finished a floor floor `* 3'-11" 9'-10" l Y-11� �2'_7° 4 9110' 2'-7" 1 -4" I' 4" 12'-6" IS GENERAL DISCRIPTION The Klaus Automat P210 provides independent access to all cars parked on the system. Each individual parking bay must be accessible from the drive aisle. The drive aisle shall comply with local regulations, but is typically 24' wide. The parking spaces are arranged on two levels. The upper level parking spaces move vertically. The lower parking spaces move horizontally (left and right) to allow upper level cars to come up or down to driveway level and be driven off the platforms. The lower level of the machine includes one less car than the upper to enable the lower cars to move left and right to create the vacant space. Consequently, a unit of three parking spaces (1 on the ground floor , 2 on the upper floor) is the smallest unit available for this parking system and can go up to 15 lifts or 29 cars for the larger units. TECHNICAL DATA e-OF APPLICATION.D CONTROL This parking system is suitable for self parking by owners, renters, regular Numerous sound control features are standard. The hydraulic power unit is mounted employees or anyone that can be trained on the system. The public may not park on on rubber pads. Steel hydraulic lines are mounted with rubber pipe supports. A this system without a valet. rubber hose isolates the power unit from the steel hydraulic lines. ENVIRONMENTAL• • Environmental conditions or the systems: Temperature range 14° to 104° F. The Sound tests at the front of the machine show about 67dB to 69dB (A system must be installed indoors. If lifting or lowering times are specified, they refer weighting) noise levels (speech at i foot is 68db). to an environmental temperature of 72' F and with system set up directly next to the hydraulic unit. At lower temperatures or with longer hydraulic lines, these times In multifamily podium construction, normally no special construction for sound is increase. performed. For residential or wood fame construction, placement of the power unit The machine comes standard with manual doors and 2 keys per parking space. The key is inserted into a user control box centrally placed on the system. Electric doors are available. Infrared control transmitters are available. Standard space numbering is left to right with the empty space located in the first bay on the left The empty space can be moved to another bay or even outside the normal machine if needed. The numbering sequence planned will be shown on the shop drawings and approved by the client. The sprinklers may be mounted at the front and rear of each level if needed. The hydraulic power unit is normally installed against the back wall on a metal bracket with rubber sound insulation. It consists of an electric motor, hydraulic motor and hydraulic oil reservoir in one unit The hydraulic oil is biodegradable and environmentally friendly. The motor is a 3 phase 208 volt 4.0 KW. It is possible to use single phase power if needed. The power unit has a pressure gage and a pressure relief valve. The platforms are galvanized and the steel framing members are powder coated. The platforms should be cleaned annually to maximize their life. To maintain safe and reliable operation of the machine, it must be serviced twice per year. To machine has a complete one year parts and labor warranty. Klaus provides extended warranties. is critical. Klaus designers will assist with power unit placement and other sound issues. The machine has steel framing and is anchor bolted to the concrete garage slab with wedge anchors. The framework consists of steel columns and beams on a grid patter. The machines steel columns are connected to the building at the rear wall and to a steel tube at the front of the machine. The tube steel is typically 10" x 10"and also provides seismic bracing as well as support for the gates. This tube steel and associated concrete columns are supplied and installed by the customer. Please refer to the Automat P210 Bracing Details drawing and Merkle engineering report for details. The platforms for the upper and lower cars consist of steel platforms that ride up and down the steel columns. The platforms for the cars at the driveway level run left -right on steel rails. The upper and lower platforms are constructed with tvv steel side members, three steel cross members, ribbed steel platform material which runs from side member to side member and one wheel stop. The platform is solid and does not allow oil or water to drip onto the lower cars. The lifting mechanism for the upper platforms consists of a hydraulic cylinder which raises the rear of the platform. The front of the platform is raised via a chain which runs on chain sprockets. There are safety switches that stop the machine in the event the chain goes loose for any reason. The platforms are suspended at the 4 comers and are guided along the front support columns. The lower platforms are moved via an electric motor located on each platform. The motor drives a sprocket that runs along a chain at grade level. The platform runs on steel guide rails and can be moved manually without power by releasing the brake on the electric motor. The machine includes several safety devices which include chain monitoring systems, and safety locks for the upper platforms. When a user is inside the machine all platforms are mechanically protected against lowering. 1. The pit and surrounding walls, columns and beams to provide support for the 5. Klaus will prepare shop drawings showing the location of all components. machine are provided by the customer. 6. The customer must close off the left and right sides of the machine with a wall or 2. All pit drainage is provided by the customer. fence. The fence must be & high and the lower 5 feet must have no openings greater 3. General lighting in the garage is provided by the customer. Klaus will supply than 112" inch. lighting within the machine. The lighting will be connected to the machine control 7. The customer must provide a 30 amp 3 phase 208 V (or 240 V single phase) circuit box and will be activated when the doors are open. and fused disconnect for each machine and power must be available before installation 4. Klaus will supply design assistance and will confirm in writing that the proposed begins machine will fit in the space provided 8. Klaus provides all control wiring and conduit. The Klaus company reserves the right in the course of technical progress to use newer or other technologies, sytems, processes, procedures or standards in the fullfrlknent of their obligations other than those originally offered provided the customer derives no disadvantage from their doing so. SBCA TREE CONS'VLTIXG Steve Batchelder, Consulting Arborist 1534 Rose Street, Crockett, CA 94525 WC ISA Certified Arborist #228 CUFC Certified Urban Forester # 134 Calif. Contractor Lic. (C-27) 533675 Phone (510) 787-3075, Fax (510) 787-3065 E-mail: steve@sbcatree.com Date: April 1, 2016 To: John Britton W.J. Britton & Co. 1345 Mission St San Francisco, CA 94105 Subject: Tree Survey for Development Project Location: 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame PARCELS: 029-151-150, 029-151-160, 029-151-170 Assignment: Arborists were requested to identify trees within the parcels that are subject to City of Burlingame Tree Ordinance. Arborist Qualifications: Arborists Steve Batchelder and Molly Batchelder are both certified as arborists by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Introduction The following arborist report provides information regarding two Protected Trees associated with a development permit. One is located on a parcel designated to be developed. The other is a City street tree. Appendix material Appendix 1: Tree Location Map Appendix 2. Tree Protection Guidelines Summary The City street tree, a London Plane (Platanus x hispanica syn. Platanus x acerifolia) located in the sidewalk in front of parcel 029-151-150, will be protected during construction activities. Only one tree, located within parcel 029-151-150 where the structure is located, qualifies as a City Protected Tree. This tree is proposed for removal to accommodate the site development plans. Three additional trees identified on the site did not qualify as protected trees. 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame 4-1-16 W.J. Britton Co. 2 of 4 City of Burlingame Tree Ordinance (f) "Protected tree" means: (1) Any tree with a circumference of forty-eight (48) inches or more when measured fifty- four (54) inches above natural grade; or (2) A tree or stand of trees so designated by the city council based upon findings that it is unique and of importance to the public due to its unusual appearance, location, historical significance or other factor; or (3) A stand of trees in which the director has determined each tree is dependent upon the others for survival. Tree Descriptions 1. City Street Tree —London Plane (Platanus x hispanica) DBH'— 21.5" Health — Fair to Good. Structure — Good This tree will require protection during site demolition and construction activities. See: Tree Protection Guidelines in Appendix 2. 2. Site Tree — Brisbane Box (Lophostemon confertus) DBH — 20" Health — Good Structure — Fair to Good, multi branching Spread — 35' This tree will be removed to accommodate the project design. Recommendations Pre -Demolition and Pre -Construction Meetings — Critical to the success of any tree protection plan is informing the contractors of the requirements. All tree protection measures must be in place prior to the beginning of activities. Submitted by: Steve Batchelder, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist WE 228A CaUFC Certified Urban Forester #138 Calif. Contractor Lic. (C-27) 533675 1 DBH — Diameter at Breast Height or measured at 4.5' above soil grade SBCA Tree Consulting - ? t Phone (510) 787-3075 1534 Rose St. Crockett, CA 94525 _ , �i - Fax (510) 787-3065 steve@sbcatree.com www.sbcatree.com 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame W.J. Britton Co. 4-1-16 3 of 4 Photo Supplement Photo 1. Photo to the right shows the 20 inch diameter Brisbane Box tree #2. This tree will be removed to accommodate the proposed development project. Photo 2. Photo to the right shows the City street tree #1 that will require protection during the proposed construction project. Tree protection requires that the current fencing and sidewalk remain in place for the duration of the project. The lower 10 feet of the tree will require protection from mechanical injury. SBCA Tree Consulting 1534 Rose St. Crockett, CA 94525 steve@sbcatree.com Phone (510) 787-3075 �i - Fax (510) 787-3065 www.sbcatree.com 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame W.J. Britton Co. 4-1-16 4of4 Photo 3. Photo to the right shows the two African Fern Pines (Afrocarpus gracilior). The trees have diameters of 4" and 5" and do not qualify as protected trees. Photo 4. Photo shows the Japanese Maple tree that will also be removed. The tree has a diameter of 8.5" when measured at 2' above soil grade, also not a protected tree. End SBCA Tree Consulting Phone (510) 787-3075 1534 Rose St. Crockett, CA 94525 Fax (510) 787-3065 steve@sbcatree.com �i - www.sbcatree.com s �Q - Y9'u?L �ua3d t01' _ woos I it a K yH'90L H�F(jQlpl --T, TT';-- ------------ ----------------------------- o`------r o .� ao N 3 a� U 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame W.J Britton & Co 4/1/2016 1of3 Tree Preservation Guidelines The tree protection is for the City of Burlingame owned London Plane tree located in the sidewalk in front of 1214 Donnelly Avenue. The focus of the tree protection will be the following: 1. Pre -Construction Meeting - Contractors must attend a pre -construction meeting with project arborist with all tree protection measures inspected and approved. 2. Fencing Remains in Place - Current fencing along the sidewalk is to remain in place for the duration if the project. 3. Excavation within (RPZ)'- All excavation, trenching or sidewalk repairs within 22 feet of the London Plane tree shall be under the direct supervision of project arborist. 4. Preliminary Investigation and Root Pruning - Excavation along the property boundary, immediately behind the sidewalk is to be preceded by exploratory excavation (hand, air spade or Ditchwitch) with any necessary root pruning undertaken prior to the use of equipment. PRE -CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES These activities should be undertaken prior to initiation of construction activity. In addition to modifications to the project design to reduce tree impacts, all steps that improve the health of trees prior to construction will greatly improve the chance of survival. Timing of Root Loss — Root loss that occurs in late fall season is preferable to cutting tree roots in the spring. Pruning activities are best undertaken in mid to late summer or winter. Pruning both the canopy and roots at the same time should be avoided if possible. Design — The design must be consistent with the requirements of the trees. Where possible, the project design should allow for roots to occupy the soil behind the sidewalk. Graphic description showing under sidewalk pavement treatments have been provided in appendices. Such treatments allow tree roots to access the available soil with minimal potential for sidewalk pavement displacement. Designate Tree Root Protection Zone —The tree Root Protection Zone (RPZ) designates an area surrounding a tree or grouping of trees that is to be fenced off from all access until designated by a certified arborist. The RPZ is commonly defined as one (1) foot radial distance for every one (1) inch in tree diameter (DBH). Arborist can modify the RPZ distance from the base of the tree based upon site conditions and the level of root presence. An arborist should monitor all grading and trenching activity that is within twice the distance of the RPZ. 1 RPZ is the tree root protection zone. Determined to be one radial foot from the base of the tree for every one inch in tree diameter (DBH). SBCA Tree Consulting Phone (510) 787-3075 1534 Rose St. Crockett, CA 94525 VOM�i - Fax (510) 787-3065 steve@sbcatree.com www.sbcatree.com 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame W.J Britton & Co 4/1/2016 2of3 Tree Root Protection Zone Fencing — In this situation, the current fencing will suffice as long as it remains in place for 22 feet to either side of the tree. Until decisions are finalized regarding excavation activities occurring within the project site and 22 feet from the London Plane tree, soil protections must be in place as the area cannot be saved. Root Protection and Root Pruning — Root protection measures must be in place prior to the beginning of construction activities. This includes the use of mulch, trenching plates and/or plywood to reduce construction related soil compaction. Necessary root pruning is best accomplished prior to the beginning of construction activities and preferably in the late fall season. After being exposed by hand or air excavation, roots are pruned under arborist supervision. Construction activities are then free to occur outside of the root pruning boundary. Supplemental Irrigation — Arborist will designate supplemental irrigation based upon the level of root loss, soil conditions, tree health and time of year. Mulchin>; — Use of four to six inches of organic mulch (wood chips are best) on soil surface will reduce soil compaction and evaporative soil moisture loss. Recommended material is wood chips generated from tree trimming. Fresh redwood, incense cedar and walnut chips are not acceptable, nor is palm generated mulch. Pruning — No pruning is likely to be required. All pruning must comply with ANSI A300 Pruning Standards. Pruning must be minimized, particularly when root loss occurs. Pruning prior to construction should include: Necessary Clearance Pruning, Deadwood Removal and Safety Pruning. TREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION The level of arborist monitoring of the project can be quite variable, depending upon the degree of encroachment into root systems and the early levels of contractor compliance with the tree protection guidelines. Pre -Construction Meeting with all Construction Personnel — It is important that construction crew understands the tree protection requirements. All personnel working on site should be provided an orientation to tree preservation measures and rules by the arborist assigned to monitor tree preservation. Observe Fenced RPZ — This area is off limits to all personnel, equipment, materials storage, or any other activities. Fencing may be relocated only under arborist supervision. WORK ACTIVITIES OCCURING WITHIN THE DESIGNATED RPZ Arborist Supervision —All activities occurring inside of the designated RPZ must be approved and an arborist must be present to supervise tree protection and root pruning activities. In addition to root pruning within the project limits it includes sidewalk replacement or repair. SBCA Tree Consulting Phone (510) 787-3075 1534 Rose St. Crockett, CA 94525 Fax (510) 787-3065 steve@sbcatree.com www.sbcatree.com 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame 4/1/2016 W.J Britton & Co 3 of 3 Trunk and Scaffold Protection — To protect the base of the tree from mechanical injury, the trunk is protected up to 10 feet. Protection can be vertical boards strapped to the outer side of the tree and wrapped with orange plastic construction fencing or use of straw waddles likewise wrapped with orange plastic fencing. Soil Moisture Control — If root pruning must occur, supplemental irrigation is required. Open trenches with exposed roots require minimum three layers of damp burlap or other acceptable covering at all times. Project arborist will determine the amount of supplemental watering required. Required Method of Trenching Within Critical Root Zone — Carefully hand excavation or tunneling shall be the accepted method for installing underground utilities. The Air Spade can also be used much more efficiently when a large amount of such trenching must be undertaken. Arborist is to supervise any such activity. POST CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION Arborist is to certify that the tree has been protected and cared for during the course of construction activities. Monitoring Tree Health — Regular visual inspection of trees will aid in assessing where further mitigation is required. Tree decline should be recorded and referenced against pre -construction health assessment. Leaf and stem insects and fungal pathogens are a sign of poor tree health (low energy reserves). Monitoring of Soil Moisture — It is important that significant changes in soil moisture levels within tree root zones be identified early, prior to visible evidence of tree decline. Moisture should be monitored by visual inspection using a soil probe or through the use of tensiometers placed at key locations. Supplemental irrigation is best provided during middle and late spring. In cases where trees have suffered root loss, supplemental irrigation will be required for a number of years in the area where roots were severed. Mitigation of Soil Compaction —The level and depth of soil compaction must be assessed and mitigated as necessary. Mitigation of soil compaction in areas where roots are present must minimize root loss. Tools most suitable to mitigate soil compaction are the water jet or air spade. Pest Management Program — Healthy trees do not generally have serious pest problems. Stressed trees are attractive hosts to pathogens, which can contribute to decline and eventual death. Pest management is prescribed when monitoring indicates a need and tree health is marginal. 4001 SBCA Tree Consulting Phone (510) 787-3075 1534 Rose St. Crockett, CA 94525 Vom Fax (510) 787-3065 steve@sbcatree.com www.sbcatree.com O w 'O C1 U C1 sa C1 'O o ° R' u (U34 p 'a .a 71rl ' o - mo E W ul a) a 0 - u , o F -q � d O 4-4•� -d y w bA w 'O U p O U A A p y u O u° u y 0 U cd "c u u V) U 7 uO (U°� "d 'J W U y,a � O4-4 +' v 'O d V u�' u n O r, O En o w t" W A � °' >� u cd 44 0~ u i" bVo y (Uo u �o lu W U 4-4 �4 C7 y �, -o w r b�° ° � ry ua - V. ao U o U w r u '� p u U ch Q C. cV u'i cV u'i O w U cd �cd W H A N u•i u O x u� u bA m $n., � u U U O ° . bA j-E M , g �x �° � �� ro u7� r � u� n c� ` V m a� • -, V -CO W O b 75 ¢, C OU uO n r V ' gy m V V O � '� A. 4-4 � U O V >4 � ° d ' d � � -o � � GU u -U U w .- m -o �, • ` 4 ClU o °� ° O ao y V U u p, o U -d u an Q, U u u o a•ai�"., vi O V V N O 'd � U': B V NV U V bA Cu °O A. 4� bA v V N 44 'dubjD—V O ^. -a N N G� � 'O 'O bA m v O� b!J ' v V O O N ° O 7". c� u O Q" 7� U m° CV ^d a°. 'O cn d V V V ° C" O o o ° v 70 � -°4-1 U w A� v bA u x +' 'U p O � � O A� u u ��� U—� u14 o o� Q u° V v A, V x (; �� rd u B U O B e v A. I� C� O u H A. �+i Z v � v'y v v L•v �"•� •� A s. bA N vi 0 ON C7 w EA 2) v U > i J N a/ fl_ O Q U J -u �bA u O O ICI C �4 y O U s4 w p U u u ¢ Ov C ' s U, O w w II u O u O ''O ''O a. O U b�A .� vi U N � y y O U c`aU w y4 O N Or u a �� 5 I . U ; O U V O y' A, d D U °� O U bo B rMl y d � b!J O� aJ - O_ U Q a I� w V -d M 4-4 14 �; O V „ bA�o U � bo U O ^a n U ,,, O U •'" v' U U bA U O4-4 O p s a L." A, ' U U O i+ m U s a O U cd U �� U o O U "d m t%p bA bA rl w w B" u -C O -� U O N O vU M b�0 O �"+ O �"+ �" � U O N sa N U O C), � v � N � � "O 'O � . � �bA v ++ N U yUG O � � � .� � D � � \ R N r� U u d N �" •�' •U O O N x �n r. x N �U+ N bA1-4 U A" O. N "3 ,�+" �--i N 'J cd rn sa S.i" sa M N 4."1-4 O .� '1 O v a� v A. 4-4 A, 'd x x o " -� r.USA B p bA c '� o o y „° o 4-4 '° aA - v y° m y x � w u v Q° v w U U O s cd U v,+ '+�- v, N cd •� v, «i py C U u O C m 4-4��" p O % is U U ++ V 'u y x o o x o a p. x x u 4-4 c, �, ul . O bA A, U A� v U II� � w .0 1-4 °o o -moo w �° Mom U any 4.4 x uo o x m' o � x -d w y 1-4 U N O O v p v O V y y O O bA•� O lz� x Q Bu � N V w N ❑ F x� M w u o, t V y O d ° v O w 7 '�' pq � U n "ubt p 0 5 O 0 0 -d ° � ° o°� U 1-4 ° U, U U u p M � t -5 -d U� coo (u� ° � o D U '� 'O " 3 v 'O cad y ;-4 y ++ N O II •s! Q r. ^p U U '� "d O �, U U M y p M y O U U O cn cd 14 U /�1 cad U N •14 � O � H � f. 'y ;..a U. U s� o � 'o Q.+ U u `� A-i,� L". O o u t o ao "M, H" 1o0 -C _° o o u U o M U U b ao -o -d u bA -o bA o a� p -d . O v 4-4 O t" O p ^� ¢•; v v v O +'� v v c� 4-4—0x v O O O y, N cd U O -d 'd cd :� ya S. "• U "m —C O D' �. o -.0 O u O 4.1 ° bA .d O � C v cd is -d O 5J cd y V 3 '+7 L". O v y �' U O U U A4 u ° v ??�Im ., bA bhp cd u u ,� R u b" •� O y4 n 'O r..0 m � S" v y -0 ^O "d u v N u U=. 'O ice, . U �p v 1-4 �. C". D bA bA U O° 11 U r O U '� N bA � —C Ur. ' w bA O �Sr" r.M y Q u m u M ? u u rd A, 'O d u ON N O O v O O N °� � O' U 'p u O� U s a � Sri W; u� u U Q H vi W w u-C '� Vn vv 0 mo 0 0 0 •d 4 1 y U b0 U y4 (U c G N v C) U U U d N bA ;-4 �, O A C v N U � u 14 �. v b.0 0 �� 'd N a ya v � u U bA - 'd a A, 0 5 a� Ate, - 0 U S'. `n p cd rn +� v' ' is v' U N a� j A� p u u U A. O � O ° v y m -� O W U fi � r. v� •.•, N 4 1 cad U ..O �"� U 'O bA �+��, ° ° �S". R, La" w u 0 v" -. U R' 41 • N bA S"i p A.+ S"r �' N Nm vU, U- m vi 44 ' U �' a i; U 1-4 0 0 - p, o o o U N N° Q O O N• .y. v 5 O 7d sa u; u A" O x U � u O N N bA oa ¢ ^M bJJ V 4-4 Q 141 8O ° p V � 0 � Q D a� V O � u O u a N R. V V (u cVd n p o� •�rl A o u U cn U ° o V -d 4-4 rl ao�°a ro U u -'� W �H-o.0 4-4 U o bio r. -d bA n r O N `� sa O V O N U A, 0 N r u p u 'O u N N O r U Q O 1-4 N O U 1-4 0 w u r. V u 'o u 0 v ��u •bA 'O U w f.' w � O .0 o N V ° Q" V �c "O w O d �, a+ .0 V V ' to ;•4 O '++ 'ia V" bA m �b�0 1 O O Q -C 'C) O O i" bA C) O rl bA O A. v� V .0 •� bA +� 14 c� V O + V O �c O ' �. •5 V V A, V Q 44 N A4 is GC V U M v � N w O O d n � — vi -,:IL'i '0 � (M(n � V Z A, H f1. CO 0 V V '= r. u Im w i-r C) y 'M'O d c� V '� � O •u Vn- U cn B° o A, r3 o o V o 'sa a� ° O to bA V O u Q a1 O H cWn C ��r u. U n `� w O �b�0 O 4-4 R O A, /� '� a� O p 5 81 Ate, rl N N H �' N u 7:1N u C� � M H au y� N u u w J �n I� 'O - -C y 4 O �n ^� w �n M A.. vi I .. _ _won SAIXU -T�jjnq 4 L— o3su• • 1 0 cn �J � O W M =- .o 4 � N smauz � laaz�s O Q N O r' 0 v w en M. M U �n y Ki N vi bA A• -d N y O r.� O 1-4 n y O ~ a4 `''' A+ p En u � bA C N D pU ( O J., r� c� U r•. ,� U O 'ZI �4 cd N O U O Q" 5C U 'O U O A, n ' Q UAL. w� 0 s a � U x" `n vi 4-4 u O U 'S"i �" �' U '� y bA O U O 'd O U O N O i C. m r. U O- Q "O n m u U O OU U p p v Q s+ O O N Q 14 S" r U 00 U U o o U B �a -o boo -- -o cn d � -U U R. S1. Cl U M 0 4-4 Cl U y Q a -c cn '� bA bA . ;-4 lj p H -C • O 'O . 'O 'O . � y U v) Z , � (U � O W C, p. 7o C 5, p. 05 O B N N V P � E O_ Ln 4 UJ Q U1 N N N N �C C Q N N VY1 N E O_ Ln 4 UJ Q U1 N N N N �C C Q N N VY1 N u �-Z5 o + 'U U X ;-444 u N V L'' O C, d by O ° bap p ay R a4 O a� O H § l ll 44 4c M U u • rj U ti p CZ - S, . U N V O u , s XbA u M vi q ^C O h �0 iy O V n.1-4 o Q .m U .� U cAd" "d O w �• V •�•w 4-4 -d 4.1 o a� o o �° o u c �• S" V O O0 c� 4-4 O Sr" pU a� bb H °O N 44 ° O cad a� N �¢+ 'd U N y y O w O 4m a d u U 0 44 w0 cl 464 o OQv 4-4 o v o R. O C O� O jl O V u u bA O � •� O O cd t." bA •4 -C A.. w o ° (Uu 'd O A Cl O U 44 O U •� O 5C ur, u O R. (UO u 'O u y O � 'O s v 44 y O 1-4 A. B � o c� y' c bbp � bbA bbA �4 V o U U C)a to a� ti � p 4-4 WsJ O u(U CL4 "d . C/)14,^. w a� Il �c V U N �j C. C. U '-cj m Q l y y W to cd v u � — R 1 m U m N :j a U 'd to NbiD �— O O4 v • y-y + py s�-i v A yv M:3 v O p v v A, ua u. X� v 4. '- 7� v w C �" �" v � ems, ) — cd O v I p y O 00 O v rd N c� v u v s,E3 !i °� Q"�� °�' Cd N cn ' bhp 4 S," A, O fn v V " vn +V�-4 V w o U ,n 4-4 v 1-4M u b1A In O 4 I� U O U p °+�' � PQ � O O +(° AO � Vi� U � U,dOU bf 4-4 O � u m , O bA bUp r. n v v cd O O Q CA, O x U U O4 A, O u m d rd s, A, U ... m RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING A FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DONNELLY AVENUE AREA) AND DONNELLY AVENUE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND LOT MERGER FOR A NEW THREE-STORY, 14-UNIT MIXED USE COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 1214-1220 DONNELLY AVENUE WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, per Mitigated Negative Declaration ND- 607-P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chair I, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10t" day of August, 2020 by the following vote: Secretary RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DONNELLY AVENUE AREA) AND DONNELLY AVENUE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND LOT MERGER FOR A NEW THREE-STORY, 14-UNIT MIXED USE COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 1214-1220 DONNELLY AVENUE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS: 029-151-150, 029-151-160 AND 029-151-170) WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, John Britton filed an application with the City of Burlingame Community Development Department — Planning Division requesting approval of the following requests: ■ Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) District to allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue; ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, mixed use commercial/residential building with at -grade parking (C.S. 25.36.045, 25.57.010 (c)(1) and Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan); ■ Conditional Use Permit for building height (43'-10" to top of parapet and 54'-3" to top of stairway enclosure proposed, where a Conditional Use Permit is required for any building exceed 35-0"; 55-0" maximum building height allowed) (C.S. 25.36.055); ■ Condominium Permit for 14 residential condominium units (each unit to be privately owned) (C.S. 26.30.020); and ■ Lot Merger to combine three existing lots (1214, 1218 and 1220 Donnelly Avenue) into one lot; and WHEREAS, on October 9, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing (environmental scoping session and design review study meeting) to review a 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential development and to identify subjects to be analyzed in the project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). At that time direction was provided to the applicant regarding issues to be addressed in the project IS/MND; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019 the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing (design review study meeting) to review changes made to the project in response to the Planning Commission's direction and comments previously provided to the applicant; and WHEREAS, an IS/MND was prepared to analyze project impacts; said IS/MND was circulated for public review and comment commencing on May 15, 2020 and concluding on June 15, 2020; and Following consideration of all information contained in the August 10, 2020 staff report to the Planning Commission regarding the project, all written correspondence, and all public comments received at the public hearing, the Commission recommends approval of the new 14- unit mixed use commercial/residential development based on the following findings regarding the project entitlements: RESOLUTION NO. Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Donnelly Avenue Commercial District Findings: That the proposed mixed use development, which includes residential units above ground floor commercial space, is consistent with Policy LU-6.1, which encourages allowing housing in the Howard Avenue area as well as on the periphery of Downtown; that the Donnelly Avenue facing properties are adjacent to primarily multifamily residential land uses to the rear on the north side of that block (facing Bellevue Avenue), and as such would be compatible with the adjacent residential uses. For these reasons, the Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue) and Donnelly Avenue Commercial District may be found to be consistent with the policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and DAC Zoning District. Design Review Findings: That the project is consistent with the diverse architectural styles of existing residential and commercial buildings in the area characterized by simple massing, an articulated fagade with windows, entry doors and awnings on the ground floor, and articulated walls and fenestration on the upper floors, including covered balconies, substantial recesses and varied architectural features throughout the building; the project mediates between existing buildings in the area ranging from one to three stories in height and a six -story office building at the corner of Donnelly Avenue and Primrose Road, is well articulated, and embraces the street and the pedestrian realm; That the architectural style is compatible with adjacent neighborhoods and the City as a whole, and that human scale is provided at the street level by incorporating several entry elements and canvas awnings along the front of the building, and on the upper levels individual balconies provide residential scale and character; That parking for the project does not dominate the street frontage because the garage has been located behind the ground floor building fagade with one driveway access to the garage measuring 18 feet in width, or 12.2% of the frontage along Primrose Road; That the building is characterized by a single contemporary architectural style and its design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north with well -articulated massing and a variety of architectural elements, textures and colors; That the building is compatible with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development in that the exterior building materials include cement plaster siding (smooth steel troweled finish), Hardie "Reveal" panel system and trim (along blind wall on east elevation), smooth lap siding and exposed concrete or concrete block at the blind walls, decorative metal guardrails, decorative foam relief panels, and metal clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites on the upper floor residential units; aluminum window sashes, painted wood entry doors, canvas awnings and a painted metal garage door on the ground floor; and varying architectural elements, including Spanish barrel clay roof tiles with foam eave brackets/corbels, a wood trellis along the front fagade, and articulated parapets with ornamental metal trim along the upper portion of the building; and 4 RESOLUTION NO. That site features such as low stucco walls and entry gates, a variety of landscaping and hardscape along the front of the building, and pedestrian circulation will enrich the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Conditional Use Permit Findings That the proposed three-story building, measuring 43'-10" to the top of the building parapet and 54'-3" to the top of the stairway enclosure, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience, since it is well articulated with substantial recesses and will be compatible with buildings in the area that are one to six stories in height; That the proposed mixed use commercial/residential use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; and That reasonable conditions are proposed to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Condominium Permit Findings: That the 14-unit mixed use commercial/residential development is compatible with the surrounding development by exhibiting thoughtful massing, character and pedestrian scale, and successfully creates a good transition between the existing commercial buildings in the neighborhood and the residential neighborhood to the north, and will not have a significant impact on public health, safety and general welfare; That based on the environmental analysis, it was determined that the proposed project would have no adverse environmental impacts (with mitigations for utilities) on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources; and That this application incudes a request for Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan (Donnelly Avenue Area) to allow residential use above the first floor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, that the applications for Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Donnelly Avenue Commercial District to allow a multi -family residential use, Conditional Use Permit for building height, Condominium Permit and Lot Merger are hereby granted, subject to the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 9, 2020, sheets A0.0 through A4.3, C-1 through C-3 and L1.1 through L2.2; 2. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 3 RESOLUTION NO. 3. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall apply for a tentative and final condominium map with the Public Works, Engineering Division for processing in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 6. that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 7. that a Klaus TrendVario 4200 parking lift system, or an equivalent parking lift system, shall be installed, with the following conditions: a. the parking lifts shall be properly illuminated to provide safety for easy loading and unloading, while not causing excessive glare. b. signage shall be installed explaining the proper use of the lifts and emergency contact information for lift maintenance or problems. C. the final design of the parking lifts shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 8. that if the City determines that the structure interferes with City communications in the City, the property owner shall permit public safety communications equipment and a wireless access point for City communications to be located on the structure in a location to be agreed upon by the City and the property owner. The applicant shall provide an electrical supply source for use by the equipment. The applicant shall permit authorized representatives of the City to gain access to the equipment location for purposes of installation, maintenance, adjustment, and repair upon reasonable notice to the property owner or owner's successor in interest. This access and location agreement shall be recorded in terms that convey the intent and meaning of this condition; 9. that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal Code; 10. that the project applicant and its construction contractor(s) shall develop a construction management plan for review and approval by the City of Burlingame. The plan must include at least the following items and requirements to reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic and parking congestion during construction: a. A construction parking plan to provide worker parking off site and generally off neighborhood streets, with shuttles or other transportation as needed to transport workers to the site; 4 RESOLUTION NO. b. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes; C. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would minimize impacts on motor vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, circulation and safety, and specifically to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible on streets in the project area; d. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures would occur; e. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for haul routes so that any damage and debris attributable to the haul trucks can be identified and corrected by the project applicant; and Designation of a readily available contact person for construction activities who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding traffic or parking. This coordinator would determine the cause of the complaint and, where necessary, would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. 11. that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on -site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 12. that the applicant shall submit a Construction Noise Control Plan. This plan would include measures such as: ■ Using smaller equipment with lower horsepower or reducing the hourly utilization rate of equipment used on the site to reduce noise levels at 50 feet to the allowable level. ■ Locating construction equipment as far as feasible from noise -sensitive uses. ■ Requiring that all construction equipment powered by gasoline or diesel engines have sound control devices that are at least as effective as those originally provided by the manufacturer and that all equipment be operated and maintained to minimize noise generation. ■ Prohibiting gasoline or diesel engines from having unmuffled exhaust systems. • Not idling inactive construction equipment for prolonged periods (i.e., more than 5 minutes). ■ Constructing a solid plywood barrier around the construction site and adjacent to operational businesses, residences, or other noise -sensitive land uses. ■ Using temporary noise control blanket barriers. ■ Monitoring the effectiveness of noise attenuation measures by taking noise measurements. ■ Using "quiet" gasoline -powered compressors or electrically powered compressors and electric rather than gasoline- or diesel -powered forklifts for small lifting. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 13. that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off -site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 14. that during construction, the applicant shall provide fencing (with a fabric screen or mesh) around the project site to ensure that all construction equipment, materials and debris is kept on site; 15. that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of- way shall be prohibited; 16. that if construction is done during the wet season (October 1 through April 30), that prior to October 1 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of- way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 17. that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 18. that this project shall comply with the state -mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 19. that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 20. that this proposal shall comply with all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance adopted by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street trees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist; 21. that the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Burlingame Parks Division regarding the planting of five (5) street trees along Donnelly Avenue; 22. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 23. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 24. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; X RESOLUTION NO. 25. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 26. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; The following conditions shall be met during the Building Inspection process prior to the inspections noted in each condition: 27. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 28. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the Building Division; 29. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Division; 30. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 31. that the maximum elevation to the top roof parapet shall not exceed elevation 143.90', as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Donnelly Avenue (100.34') for a maximum height not to exceed 43'-10" to the top of the parapet; the garage finished floor elevation shall be elevation 100.34'; the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor who shall provide certification of that height to the Building Division; Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; The following conditions of approval are from Downtown Specific Plan: 32. the project sponsor shall implement all appropriate control measures from the most currently adopted air quality plan at the time of project construction; 33. the project sponsor shall implement the following Greenhouse Gas reduction measures during construction activities: a. Alternative -Fueled (e.g., biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles/equipment shall make up at least 15 percent of the fleet. b. Use at least 10 percent local building materials. C. Recycle at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials. 34. the project sponsor shall provide adequate secure bicycle parking in the plan area at a minimum ratio of 1 bicycle spot for every 20 vehicle spots; 7 RESOLUTION NO. 35. the condominium management shall post and update information on alternate modes of transportation for the area (i.e. bus/shuttle schedules and stop locations, maps); 36. the project sponsor shall incorporate commercial energy efficiency measures such that energy efficiency is increased to 15% beyond 2008 title 24 standards for electricity and natural gas; 37. the project sponsor shall incorporate recycling measures and incentives such that a solid waste diversion rate of 75% is achieved upon occupation of each phase of plan development; 38. the project sponsor shall incorporate residential water efficiency measures such that water consumption is decreased by a minimum of 10 percent over current standard water demand factors; 39. that construction shall avoid the March 15 through August 31 avian nesting period to the extent feasible, as determined by staff. If it is not feasible to avoid the nesting period, a survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no earlier than 7 days prior to construction. The area surveyed shall include all clearing/construction areas, as well as areas within 250 ft. of the boundaries of these areas, or as otherwise determined by the biologist. In the event that an active nest is discovered, clearing/construction shall be postponed within 250 ft. of the nest, until the young have fledged (left the nest), the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts; 40. that for projects within the Plan Area that require excavation, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (and Phase 11 sampling, where appropriate) would be required. If the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment determines that remediation is required, the project sponsor would be required to implement all remediation and abatement work in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or other jurisdictional agency; 41. the following practices shall be incorporated into the construction documents to be implemented by the project contractor. a. Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. Such separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures: Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site; - Use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound barriers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors; Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and Minimize backing movements of equipment. b. Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible. C. Impact equipment (e.g., jack hammers and pavement breakers) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically -powered tools. Compressed air exhaust silencers shall be used on other equipment. Other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment, shall be used whenever feasible. Fn RESOLUTION NO. 42. the project sponsor shall incorporate the following practice into the construction documents to be implemented by construction contractors: The project sponsor shall require that loaded trucks and other vibration -generating equipment avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent compatible with project construction goals; 43. that if the project increases sewer flows to the sanitary sewer system, the project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to determine if improvements to public sanitary sewer infrastructure are needed. If improvements are needed, the following shall apply: that prior to issuance of a building permit, the project sponsor shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 44. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the development plans shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, then the following shall apply: that prior to issuance of a building permit the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. 45. that if evidence of an archeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity ("midden"), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction -related earth -moving activities, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame shall be notified. The project sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The City of Burlingame shall consult with the archeologist to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less -than significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-J) form and filed with the NWIC; 46. that should a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature be identified at the project construction site during any phase of construction, the project manager shall cease all construction activities at the site of the discovery and immediately notify the City of Burlingame. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified paleontologist to provide an evaluation of the find and to prescribe mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources or geologic features is carried out. The project 9 RESOLUTION NO. sponsor shall be responsible for implementing any additional mitigation measures prescribed by the paleontologist and approved by the City; and 47. that if human remains are discovered at any project construction site during any phase of construction, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame and the County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project sponsor shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City of Burlingame shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The project sponsor shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City of Burlingame, before the resumption of ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. Mitigation Measures from Initial Study Aesthetics 48. The project developer shall install low -profile, low -intensity lighting directed downward to minimize light and glare. Exterior lighting shall be low mounted, downward casting, and shielded. In general, the light footprint shall not extend beyond the periphery the property. Implementation of exterior lighting fixtures on all buildings shall also comply with the standard California Building Code (Title 24, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) to reduce the lateral spreading of light to surrounding uses, consistent with City Municipal Code 18.16.030 that requires that all new exterior lighting for residential developments be designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the light element is kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. In addition, lighting fixtures would not be located more than nine feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls would not be floodlit; and only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward would be used, except for illuminated street numbers required by the fire department. Air Quality 49. During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust. Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less -than -significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following BMPs that are required of all projects: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. 10 RESOLUTION NO. C. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 50. The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would achieve a fleet -wide average 20- percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. One feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: a. All diesel -powered off -road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 3 engines that include CARB- certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF)12 or equivalent. Alternatively, equipment that meets U. S. EPA Tier 4 standards for particulate matter or the use of equipment that includes electric or alternatively -fueled equipment (i.e., non- diesel) would meet this requirement. Biological Resources 51. Activities related to the project, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and construction and demolition shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 31) if feasible. If construction will commence during the breeding season, then a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre -construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer for raptors and 150-foot buffer for passerines where access can be authorized. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in San Mateo County. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (which is dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the avian biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed, and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. 11 RESOLUTION NO. Cultural Resources 52. In the event Native American or other archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the discovered materials and workers shall avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. If an archaeological site is encountered in any stage of development, a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine whether the resource qualifies as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource. In the event that it does qualify, the archaeologist will prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan to be implemented prior to or during site construction. The archaeologist shall also prepare a written report of the finding, file it with the appropriate agency, and arrange for curation of recovered materials. 53. In the event that human remains are discovered during project construction, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. The county coroner shall be informed to evaluate the nature of the remains. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Lead Agency shall work with the Native American Heritage Commission and the applicant to develop an agreement for treating or disposing of the human remains. Geology and Soils 54. Project design and construction shall adhere to Title 18, Chapter 18.28 of the City Municipal Code, and demonstrate compliance with all design standards applicable to the California Building Code Zone 4 would ensure maximum practicable protection available to users of the buildings and associated infrastructure. 55. Foundations of the project will be reinforced to tolerate differential soil movement. The project may be supported on a reinforced concrete mat foundation bearing on a properly prepared and compacted soil subgrade and a non -expansive fill section. Alternately, the project may be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation bearing on stiff native soils. Implementation of a reinforced foundation would reduce the potential for damage caused by liquefaction. 56. Project design and construction, including excavation activities, shall comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies the safety requirement to be fulfilled for site work. This would include prevention of subsidence and pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. 57. The applicant shall prepare a monitoring program to determine the effects of construction on nearby improvements, including the monitoring of cracking and vertical movement of adjacent structures, and nearby streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements. As necessary, inclinometers or other instrumentation shall be installed as part of the shoring system to closely monitor lateral movement. The program shall include a pre -construction survey including photographs and installation of monitoring points for existing site improvements. 58. A discovery of a paleontological specimen during any phase of the project shall result in a work stoppage in the vicinity of the find until it can be evaluated by a professional paleontologist. Should loss or damage be detected, additional protective measures or 12 RESOLUTION NO. further action (e.g., resource removal), as determined by a professional paleontologist, shall be implemented to mitigate the impact. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 59. The contractor shall comply with Title 8, California Code of Regulations/Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements that cover construction work where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes the proper removal and disposal of peeling paint, and appropriate sampling of painted building surfaces for lead prior to disturbance of the paint and disposal of the paint or painted materials. 60. The applicant shall contract a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct an asbestos survey prior to disturbing potential asbestos containing building materials and following the Consultant's recommendations for proper handling and disposal. 61. Workers handling demolition and renovation activities at the project site will be trained in the safe handling and disposal of any containments with which they are handling or disposing of on the project site. Noise 62. Prior to the issuance of building permits, mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City's 60 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime requirements at the property lines of surrounding noise sensitive uses. Section 5.2.5.8 of the City of Burlingame DSP includes a provision for rooftop equipment: Mixed -use buildings with a residential component should exhibit rooflines and architectural character consistent with the Downtown commercial character. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building and screened for noise. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City's noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line -of - sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. 63. As required under Section 9.9.20 of the City of Burlingame DSP, loaded truck and other vibration -generating equipment shall avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent possible to still meet construction goals. Additionally, the following measures would be implemented during construction: a. Operating equipment on the construction site shall be placed as far as possible from vibration -sensitive receptors. b. Smaller equipment shall be used to the extent feasible to minimize vibration levels below the limits. C. Use of vibratory rollers, tampers, and impact tools near sensitive areas shall be avoided to the extent feasible. 13 RESOLUTION NO. d. Neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site shall be notified of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels during project construction activities. e. If heavy construction is proposed within 12 feet of commercial structures and/or 18 feet of residential structures, a construction vibration -monitoring plan shall be implemented prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities located within these setbacks. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks: The contractor shall conduct a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for structures located within 25 feet of construction. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating construction activities located within 25 feet of the structure. The surveys shall include internal and external crack monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of the structure. g. The contractor shall conduct a post -survey on the structure where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities. h. The contractor shall designate a person responsible for registering and investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site. The results of any vibration monitoring shall be summarized and submitted in a report shortly after substantial completion of each phase identified in the project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration certificates, and graphics as required to clearly identify vibration - monitoring locations. An explanation of all events that exceeded vibration limits will be included together with proper documentation supporting any such claims. Utilities and Service Systems 64. The project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to improve the public sanitary sewer infrastructure. Prior to issuance of a building permit, project sponsors shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 65. Prior to issuance of a building permit, development plans for projects proposed in the Plan Area, shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall 14 RESOLUTION NO. be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. Chair I, , Secretary of the Burlingame Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 1011 day of August, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 15 Secretary CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 www.burlin ame.org Protect Site: 1214-120 Donnelly Ave., zoned DAC The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following virtual public hearing via Zoom on Monday, August 10, 2020 at 7:00 P.M. You may access the meeting online at www.zoom.us/ioin or by phone at (669) 900-6833: Meeting ID: 816 4866 0897 Password: 006217 Description: Application for Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review , Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning Code to allow a multi -family residential use, Conditional Use Permit for building height, Condominium Permit and Lot Merger for construction of a new three-story, I4-unit mixed use commercial/residential building. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to: publiccomment6EOurlingame.org. Mailed: July 31, 2020 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame - Public Hearing Notice If you have any questions about this application or would like to schedule an appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please send an email to planningdept(@burlineame.org or call (650) 558-7250. Individuals who require special assistance or a disability -related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Division at planninedept(@burlineame.org or (650) 558-7250 by 10 am on the day of the meeting. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director (Please refer to other side) 0 'QCW Z W � �G 3 N }� N O w J L LV G ni. W Q o Z U, T O O�.A U) N T Q T b �„ 4 N Z CR q�v NOd T Lii Q f*Q T� i� A �Y N r o�m, e, 1s t i 4 w � g'f ^M1d w i c aqW e 4 �S a A ia��y i M1bP c N � y0 A4�(� q` q�ri �t�66 i'ii $TCC y¢q e� ., gtlqu �>y �b� sii !i Ftiy Gy 4Q tl 3 M aNrt 911. h� Cf A � •a.,tee•.a � e5i '' 75, p Aix aY1 A� q^ 'j P q�� F r��b ApR ,L 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for the City of Burlingame CITY 0 QPORATED Prepared by Circlepoint 46 S First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 eci rclepoi nt June 2020 This page intentionally left blank. City of Burlingame 1214 Donnelly Avenue Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) City File No: ND-607-P Prepared for: City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (650) 558-7250 Prepared by: Circlepoint 46 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113 June 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214 Donnelly Avenue 1214 Donnelly Avenue Project MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Division 13, Public Resources Code City of Burlingame Community Development Department Planning Division 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (650) 558-7250 1. Project Description The project site encompasses three parcels with addresses of 1214, 1218, and 1220 Donnelly Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 029-151-150, -160, and -170), referred to collectively in this document as 1214 Donnelly Avenue. 1214 Donnelly Avenue is in the southern portion of Burlingame, San Mateo County, California. The project site is located within the downtown area of Burlingame and within walking distance of the Burlingame Caltrain Station. The 0.36-acre project site is predominantly flat. The site has frontage on Donnelly Avenue, and the western, northern, and eastern property lines are adjacent to surrounding development. The project site is within the "Donnelly Avenue Area" of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The Donnelly Avenue Area consists of properties on either side of Donnelly Avenue between Primrose Road and Lorton Avenue. The project site is in the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) zoning district, which the DSP designates primarily for retail and office uses. Existing residential uses may remain and be improved, but the zoning district regulations do not allow new residential uses (Zoning Code Section 25.36.020). Accordingly, one of the project approvals required will be an Amendment to the DSP and DAC District to allow for residential use (with a conditional use permit) on properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue and that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue. In November of 2013, a fire destroyed the existing structure at 1218 Donnelly Avenue. In February of 2015, a demolition permit was issued to demolish the existing building at 1218 Donnelly Avenue, as well as an existing single -story building at the rear of the site. The fire also spread to a portion of the building at 1214 Donnelly Avenue, commonly known as the "Gates House." The structures at 1220 Donnelly Avenue were not damaged by the fire. 1214 Donnelly Avenue is vacant following demolition of the Gates House in 2018. The majority of the site is covered in concrete. 1218 Donnelly Avenue contains the foundation of the building that was destroyed by the 2013 fire. 1220 Donnelly Avenue contains a two-story residential structure at the front of the lot and a detached accessory residential structure at the rear of the lot. The two-story structure includes three residential units, and the accessory structure contains one residential unit. The front of the lot at 1220 Donnelly Avenue is used for informal parking by occupants of the residential building. There are four existing trees located at the 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration front of the property at 1214 Donnelly Avenue. One of these trees, a 20-inch Brisbane box, qualifies as a protected size tree. Aside from these trees and some minimal landscaping, the three parcels are paved. There is one existing London plane tree with a diameter of 21.5-inches located in the planter strip within the right-of-way in front of 1214 Donnelly Avenue. The project would include demolition of the existing structures on site and construction of a new three-story, 43-foot 10-inch tall mixed -use building containing commercial and multi -family uses totaling 35,075 gross square feet. Commercial uses totaling 4,704 gross square feet would be located on the ground floor, with two levels of residential uses above. The building would include 14 residential units, including 12 two -bedroom units and 2 one -bedroom units. The project plans are included in Appendix A of this initial study (IS)/mitigated negative declaration (MND). 2. Determination An MND, City File No. ND-607-P, is proposed by the City of Burlingame for the project. An IS and supporting documents have been prepared to determine if the project would result in potentially significant or significant impacts to the environment (Exhibit A, Initial Study). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is included as Exhibit B. The public review period occurred from May 15, 2020 to June 15, 2020 and no comment letters were received. On the basis of the IS and the whole record, it has been determined that the proposed action, with the incorporation of the mitigation measures described below, will not have a significant impact on the environment. Because no public comments were received, no changes have been made to the conclusions of the IS nor the determination of an MND. The 18 mitigation measures that have been identified are listed in Table 1 below. The supporting technical reports that constitute the record of proceedings upon which a determination is made are available for review at www.burlingame.org/1214donnelIV. Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact Aesthetics Mitigation Measure AES-1: The project developer Less than Significant shall install low -profile, low -intensity lighting directed with Mitigation downward to minimize light and glare. Exterior Incorporated lighting shall be low mounted, downward casting, and shielded. In general, the light footprint shall not extend beyond the periphery the property. Implementation of exterior lighting fixtures on all buildings shall also comply with the standard California Building Code (Title 24, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) to reduce the lateral spreading of light to surrounding uses, consistent with Burlingame Municipal Code Section 18.16.030 that requires that all new exterior lighting for residential developments be designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the light element is Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. In addition, lighting fixtures would not be located more than nine feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls would not be floodlit; and only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward would be used, except for illuminated street numbers required by the fire department. Air Quality Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Note that the Envision Less than Significant Burlingame 2040 General Plan Policy HP-3.11 Dust with Mitigation Abatement and Policy HP-3.12 Construction Best Incorporated Practices requires that projects apply BAAQMD- recommended best management practices to control dust from construction projects. During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust. Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less -than -significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following best management practices that are required of all projects: 1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. 2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. 3. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. 4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). 5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. 6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. 8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Air Quality Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Selection of equipment Less than Significant during construction to minimize emissions. Such with Mitigation equipment selection would include the following: Incorporated The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would achieve a fleet -wide average 20- percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. One feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: ■ All diesel -powered off -road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 3 engines that include CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF)12 or equivalent. Alternatively, equipment that meets U.S. EPA Tier 4 standards for particulate matter or the use of equipment that includes electric or alternatively -fueled -iv- Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact equipment (i.e., non -diesel) would meet this requirement. Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 13I0-1: Activities related to the Less than Significant project, including, but not limited to, vegetation with Mitigation removal, ground disturbance, and construction and Incorporated demolition shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 31) if feasible. If construction will commence during the breeding season, then a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre -construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer for raptors and 150-foot buffer for passerines where access can be authorized. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in San Mateo County. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (which is dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the avian biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed, and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-1: In the event Native Less than Significant American or other archaeological resources are with Mitigation encountered during construction, work shall be incorporated halted within 100 feet of the discovered materials and workers shall avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. -v- 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact If an archaeological site is encountered in any stage of development, a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine whether the resource qualifies as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource. In the event that it does qualify, the archaeologist will prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan to be implemented prior to or during site construction. The archaeologist shall also prepare a written report of the finding, file it with the appropriate agency, and arrange for curation of recovered materials. Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-2: In the event that human Less than Significant remains are discovered during project construction, with Mitigation there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of incorporated the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. The county coroner shall be informed to evaluate the nature of the remains. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Lead Agency shall work with the Native American Heritage Commission and the applicant to develop an agreement for treating or disposing of the human remains. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Project design and Less than Significant construction shall adhere to Title 18, Chapter 18.28 of with Mitigation the Burlingame Municipal Code, and demonstrate incorporated compliance with all design standards applicable to the California Building Code Zone 4 would ensure maximum practicable protection available to users of the buildings and associated infrastructure. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-2: Foundations of the Less than Significant project will be reinforced to tolerate differential soil with Mitigation movement. The project may be supported on a incorporated reinforced concrete mat foundation bearing on a properly prepared and compacted soil subgrade and a non -expansive fill section. Alternately, the project may be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation bearing on stiff native soils. Implementation of a reinforced foundation would reduce the potential for damage caused by liquefaction. -vi- Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-3: Project design and Less than Significant construction, including excavation activities, shall with Mitigation comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies incorporated the safety requirement to be fulfilled for site work. This would include prevention of subsidence and pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-4: The applicant shall Less than Significant prepare a monitoring program to determine the with Mitigation effects of construction on nearby improvements, incorporated including the monitoring of cracking and vertical movement of adjacent structures, and nearby streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements. As necessary, inclinometers or other instrumentation shall be installed as part of the shoring system to closely monitor lateral movement. The program shall include a pre -construction survey including photographs and installation of monitoring points for existing site improvements. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-5: A discovery of a Less than Significant paleontological specimen during any phase of the with Mitigation project shall result in a work stoppage in the vicinity incorporated of the find until it can be evaluated by a professional paleontologist. Should loss or damage be detected, additional protective measures or further action (e.g., resource removal), as determined by a professional paleontologist, shall be implemented to mitigate the impact. Hazards and Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: The contractor shall Less than Significant Hazardous Materials comply with Title 8, California Code of with Mitigation Regulations/Occupational Safety and Health incorporated Administration (OSHA) requirements that cover construction work where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes the proper removal and disposal of peeling paint, and appropriate sampling of painted building surfaces for lead prior to disturbance of the paint and disposal of the paint or painted materials. -vii- 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact Hazards and Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: The applicant shall Less than Significant Hazardous Materials contract a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct with Mitigation an asbestos survey prior to disturbing potential incorporated asbestos containing building materials and following the Consultant's recommendations for proper handling and disposal. Hazards and Mitigation Measure HAZ-3: Workers handling Less than Significant Hazardous Materials demolition and renovation activities at the project with Mitigation site will be trained in the safe handling and disposal incorporated of any containments with which they are handling or disposing of on the project site. Noise Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Prior to the issuance of Less than Significant building permits, mechanical equipment shall be with Mitigation selected and designed to reduce impacts on incorporated surrounding uses to meet the City's 60 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime requirements at the property lines of surrounding noise sensitive uses. Section 5.2.5.8 of the City of Burlingame DSP includes a provision for rooftop equipment: Mixed -use buildings with a residential component should exhibit rooflines and architectural character consistent with the Downtown commercial character. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building and screened for noise. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City's noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line -of - sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. Noise Mitigation Measure NOI-2: As required under Section Less than Significant 9.9.20 of the City of Burlingame DSP, loaded truck with Mitigation and other vibration -generating equipment shall avoid incorporated areas of the project site that are located near existing -viii- Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact residential uses to the maximum extent possible to still meet construction goals. Additionally, the following measures would be implemented during construction: ■ Operating equipment on the construction site shall be placed as far as possible from vibration -sensitive receptors. • Smaller equipment shall be used to the extent feasible to minimize vibration levels below the limits. ■ Use of vibratory rollers, tampers, and impact tools near sensitive areas shall be avoided to the extent feasible. ■ Neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site shall be notified of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels during project construction activities. ■ If heavy construction is proposed within 12 feet of commercial structures and/or 18 feet of residential structures, a construction vibration -monitoring plan shall be implemented prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities located within these setbacks. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks: ■ The contractor shall conduct a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for structures located within 25 feet of construction. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating construction activities located within 25 feet of the structure. The surveys shall include internal and external crack monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact elements in the interior and exterior of the structure. ■ The contractor shall conduct a post -survey on the structure where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities. ■ The contractor shall designate a person responsible for registering and investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site. ■ The results of any vibration monitoring shall be summarized and submitted in a report shortly after substantial completion of each phase identified in the project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration certificates, and graphics as required to clearly identify vibration - monitoring locations. An explanation of all events that exceeded vibration limits will be included together with proper documentation supporting any such claims. Tribal Cultural See Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-2 Less than Significant Resources with Mitigation incorporated Utilities and Service Mitigation Measure UTIL-1: The project sponsor shall Less than Significant Systems coordinate with the City Engineer to improve the with Mitigation public sanitary sewer infrastructure. Prior to issuance incorporated of a building permit, project sponsors shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. -x- Mitigated Negative Declaration 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Factor Environmental Impact Utilities and Service Mitigation Measure UTIL-2: Prior to issuance of a Less than Significant Systems building permit, development plans for projects with Mitigation proposed in the Plan Area, shall be reviewed by the incorporated Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. Kevin Gardiner, City of Burlingame Date Community Development Director 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue City of Burlingame 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE PROJECT Initial Study Prepared for: City of Burlingame Community Development Department 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Prepared by: Circlepoint 46 S First Street San Jose, CA 95113 May 2020 *.4iI I--jk/-1 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study This page intentionally left blank. Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue TABLE OF CONTENTS Initial Study and Environmental Checklist Form............................................................................. iv Environmental Factors Potentially Affected....................................................................................v Determination................................................................................................................................. vi ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................... 1 Environmental Impact Checklist.................................................................................................... 13 1 Aesthetics.......................................................................................................................... 13 2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources.................................................................................. 17 3 Air Quality.......................................................................................................................... 19 4 Biological Resources.......................................................................................................... 32 5 Cultural Resources............................................................................................................. 38 6 Energy................................................................................................................................41 7 Geology and Soils.............................................................................................................. 44 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................ 49 9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..................................................................................... 54 10 Hydrology and Water Quality........................................................................................ 59 11 Land Use and Planning.................................................................................................. 64 12 Mineral Resources......................................................................................................... 66 13 Noise..............................................................................................................................67 14 Population and Housing................................................................................................ 80 15 Public Services............................................................................................................... 82 16 Recreation..................................................................................................................... 85 17 Transportation...............................................................................................................86 18 Tribal Cultural Resources............................................................................................... 92 19 Utilities and Service Systems......................................................................................... 94 20 Wildfire..........................................................................................................................98 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance............................................................................ 100 References................................................................................................................................... 102 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance........................................................................... 21 Table 2 Construction Emissions................................................................................................. 23 Table 3 Operational Emissions................................................................................................... 24 Table 4 Construction Risk Impacts at the Offsite Residential MEI............................................. 27 Table 5 Impacts from Combined Sources at Off -Site Project MEI............................................. 29 Table 6 Community Risk Impact to New Project Residences..................................................... 31 Table 7 Project Operational Annual Energy Demand................................................................ 42 Table 8 Estimated Construction GHG Emissions........................................................................ 52 Table 9 Combined Annual GHG Emissions................................................................................. 52 Table 10 Environmental Concerns Near the Project Site ......................................................... 55 Table 11 Outdoor Noise Level Planning Criteria...................................................................... 68 Table 12 Maximum Allowable Noise Levels from Construction Equipment ............................ 69 Table 13 Project Noise Monitoring Results.............................................................................. 71 Table 14 Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment at Various Distances .......................... 76 Table 15 Trip Generation Summary......................................................................................... 88 Table 16 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................... 89 Table 17 Near -Term Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service ................................................ 89 Table 18 Near -Term Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service ............................ 90 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map.................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2 Project Site and Surrounding Location........................................................................ 4 Figure 3 Downtown Specific Plan Land Use Map...................................................................... 5 Figure4 Zoning Map.................................................................................................................. 6 Figure5 Project Site Plan........................................................................................................... 9 Figure 6 Southern Elevation.................................................................................................... 10 Figure 7 Project Rendering— Northeast.................................................................................. 11 Figure 8 Off Site Sensitive Receptors...................................................................................... 28 Figure 9 Noise Measurement Locations.................................................................................. 72 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Figure 10 Comprehensive Airport Land Use.............................................................................. 79 LIST OF APPENDICES A Project Plans B California Historical Resources Information System Records Search C Geotechnical Investigation D Phase I Environmental Site Assessment E Transportation Impact Analysis 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) 1. Project Title 2. Lead Agency 3. Contact Person and Phone Number 4. Project Location 5. San Mateo County Parcel Number 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address 7. General Plan Designation 8. Zoning 9. Description of Project 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting 1214 Donnelly Avenue City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager Telephone: (650) 558-7256 E-Mail: rhurin@burlingame.org 1214 Donnelly Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 APN 029-151-150 APN 029-151-160 APN 029-151-170 Britton Trust 1345 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Donnelly Avenue Area Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) See project description below Retail (northeast and south), multi -family residential (north), parking lots (west and south) iv Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ® Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Energy ❑ Geology and Soils ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Land Use and Planning el . - ❑ Public Services ❑ Transportation ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Recreation ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Wildfire v 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial Study: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to bythe project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Kevin Gardiner Date Community Development Director vi Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Burlingame (City) has received an application for construction of a new, three-story mixed -use commercial/residential building at 1214 Donnelly Avenue (project). The City is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and questions on the project should be directed to Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager, 650-558-7256. The project sponsor is Britton Trust, 1345 Mission Street, San Francisco, California 94103. Project Location and Setting The project site encompasses three parcels with addresses of 1214, 1218, and 1220 Donnelly Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 029-151-150, -160, and -170), referred to collectively in this document as 1214 Donnelly Avenue. 1214 Donnelly Avenue is in the southern portion of Burlingame, San Mateo County, California (Figure 1). The project site is located within the downtown area of Burlingame and within walking distance of the Burlingame Caltrain Station. The 0.36-acre project site is predominantly flat. The site has frontage on Donnelly Avenue, and the western, northern, and eastern property lines are adjacent to surrounding development. The project site is bordered by a one-story retail building to the northeast, a multi -family residential building to the north, and a City -owned parking lot to the west (Figure 2). Across Donnelly Avenue from the project site are City -owned parking lots associated with Burlingame Avenue retail, as well as a salon and a tea house. General Plan The City completed the process of updating its General Plan in 2019. The Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan update was certified by the City Council in January 2019, concurrent with adoption of the updated General Plan. However, the project application was received by the City, deemed complete, and determined to be subject to CEQA prior to the General Plan update. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060, which provides direction to CEQA lead agencies on when formal CEQA review shall begin, this analysis evaluates the project against the prior General Plan land use map. Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan and Zoning The project site is within the "Donnelly Avenue Area" of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The City adopted the DSP in 2010, which guides growth, development, and building design in the Downtown area. The DSP provides goals and policies organized by topic area, including land use, parking, traffic and circulation, open space, and design for both the streetscape and new development. The project site is in the Donnelly Avenue Commercial (DAC) zoning district, which the DSP designates primarily for retail and office uses. Existing residential uses may remain and be improved, but the zoning district regulations do not allow new residential uses (Zoning Code Section 25.36.020). Accordingly, one of the project approvals required will be an Amendment to 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study the DSP and DAC District to allow for residential use (with a conditional use permit). Land use and zoning for the project site and vicinity are shown on Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. e >v w ' w MIL - - 4*1. a Y + 4� V � Oa : y Bellevue • \ �' t ue Avenue elly Avenue t PIA ro C a Donn elly Avenue — I�' 1 r 177=� VVdJ. San Franasco r_ D. " � tf :. Burlingame Aven cx F Burlingame - - 1214 Donnelly Ave. - Figure 1 1214 Donnelly Avenuenue, Burlingame, CA ik Legend Project Site .1 Source: Google Earth Pro, 2019 Ajuk7 %;j 0 L'ia . W-JCoO'"-J v-J"V r -- + L 4L r 0 200 50 100 FEET Project Site and Surrounding Land Use Map 15A i� _.�27 17A ►�� 2_ 26 28B 28A 33 14A 14B 23B 30B 31 59 30A w 32B 32A © G Project Site Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan - Land Use Map 1214 Donnelly Avenue, Burlingame, CA P Legend Multi -Family Residential Donnelly Avenue Commercial Burlingame Avenue Commercial Chapin Avenue Commercial Howard Mixed Use Automobile Uses Myrtle Road Mixed Use Bayswater Avenue Mixed Use California Drive Auto Row Not to Scale Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Project Background 1214 Donnelly Avenue previously contained a two-story residential building commonly known as the "Gates House" that was identified as a potentially historic property in the Inventory of Historic Resources completed for the DSP. A historic resource evaluation prepared in 2014 confirmed that the structure was eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 1 (Events), for its association with early settlement patterns in the Town of Burlingame, and Criterion 2 (Persons), for its association with the original owner and long-time occupant, George W. Gates. The building sustained major damage in November 2013 because of a fire at an adjacent structure at 1218 Donnelly Avenue, and was subsequently demolished in early 2018. The building at 1218 Donnelly Avenue was demolished in 2015. The existing structures at 1220 Donnelly Avenue were not damaged by the fire and currently remain on the site. Site Conditions 1214 Donnelly Avenue is vacant following demolition of the Gates House in 2018. Most of the site is covered in concrete. 1218 Donnelly Avenue contains the foundation of the building which was destroyed by the 2013 fire. 1220 Donnelly Avenue contains a two-story residential structure at the front of the lot and a detached accessory residential structure at the rear of the lot. The two-story structure includes three residential units, and the accessory structure contains one residential unit. The front of the lot at 1220 Donnelly Avenue is used for informal parking by occupants of the residential building. There are four existing trees located at the front of the property at 1214 Donnelly Avenue. One of these trees, a 20-inch Brisbane box, qualifies as a protected size tree. Aside from these trees and some minimal landscaping, the three parcels are paved. There is one existing London plane tree with a diameter of 21.5 inches located in the planter strip within the right-of-way in front of 1214 Donnelly Avenue. The parcels are currently accessed from Donnelly Avenue via four curb cuts, some of which are blocked by perimeter fencing around the lots. Project Characteristics The project would include demolition of the existing structures on site and construction of a new three story, 43-foot 10-inch tall mixed -use building containing commercial and multi -family uses totaling 35,075 gross square feet. Commercial uses totaling 4,704 gross square feet would be located on the ground floor, with two levels of residential uses above. The building would include 14 residential units, including 12 two -bedroom units and 2 one -bedroom units. The proposed site plan and elevations are shown on Figure 5, Figure 6, and Figure 7. The project would require combining the three existing parcels into one parcel. The building frontage along Donnelly Avenue would have a varied setback ranging from approximately 12 feet (for the parking garage entrance) to approximately 2 feet from the property line. The varied setbacks would be a function of the building's massing, which is broken into several components and would present a varied fagade to the street (Figure 6). New hardscaping installed at the ground level along the sidewalk would be predominantly permeable 7 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study pavers. Soft landscaping at the ground level would be provided around the residential entry court. Street trees would be planted along the entire site frontage. Each residential unit would include a private balcony, meeting the City's requirements for private open space as outlined in the DSP and municipal code. The project would also include one common open space at the rear of the building on the second floor; this 2,695 square foot space would be open to all residents. Transportation and Parking Like most sites Downtown, the project site is accessible by multiple forms of transportation. The project site is 0.2 miles from the Burlingame Caltrain Station, and is also accessible from SamTrans lines 397/ECR along El Camino Real and lines 292 and 46 near the Caltrain station. Bicycle routes along Primrose Road and California Drive connect Donnelly Avenue to Downtown areas and the rest of the City. The project would include 22 parking spaces for residents, with 21 stacked parking spaces and one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible parking space. There would also be one service/delivery vehicle space provided. Parking would be in a ground level parking garage. Vehicle access to the parking garage would be provided via a garage door along the southern end of the site connecting to Donnelly Avenue. The 22 parking spaces would provide a parking ratio of 1 space per one -bedroom unit and 1.5 spaces per two -bedroom unit, consistent with DSP and zoning requirements. As Donnelly Avenue is within the Parking Sector established by the DSP, pedestrian -oriented ground floor commercial and retail uses are exempt from parking requirements. Bicycle parking would be provided consistent with guidelines provided in the Circulation and Parking chapter of the DSP (1 bicycle parking space required for each 20 vehicle parking spaces). Short-term bicycle parking would be provided via a two -bike rack installed on the sidewalk, and lift -assist bicycle racks with capacity for eight bicycles would be installed in a secured room between the residential lobby and parking garage. Bicycle parking would be accessible for residents and commercial visitors. M. 1214 Donnelly Avenue Project LOT wre wro arc marixc xsxoexrwL mall ix2s oexrwL � marl xmoexrwi � manic xeaoexnu {�J NAFRRAE 1214 DONNELLV AVENUE : L= DONNEL- AVENUE (50' WIDE) L Project Site Plan LOT 14 marxawxcaxreuaoixu Source: Gary Gee Architects, Inc. 2019 1214 Donnelly Avenue Project F+A Elevation (Donnelly Avenue) Source: Gary Gee Architects, Inc. 2019 00 A Figure 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Trees and Landscaping The project would require removal of five trees, one of which is a street tree (London plane tree). One of the four trees on the subject property, a 20-inch Brisbane box, qualifies as a protected size tree. A Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division will be required in order to remove this tree. A variety of plants and shrubs would be planted at ground level around the residential entry court, as well as on the podium level at the rear of the building within the common open space. This landscaping is anticipated to include varieties of drought - tolerant plantings such as agave, aloe, and rush varieties. The podium level outdoor common space would be landscaped with a mix of shrubs and perennial grasses. Permeable and brick pavers along the building frontage provide walkways to the commercial and residential components of the building and seating areas for the ground floor commercial spaces. The project would require removal of one street tree, a London plane tree, which would be replaced with five new street trees (anticipated to be ginkgo biloba). Construction Project construction would begin in late 2020 and last approximately 17 months. Construction would be completed in one phase, and would include typical activities such as site grading, excavation for building foundations, concrete work, framing, and interior and exterior architectural coatings. Typical construction equipment such as backhoes, heavy duty trucks, and excavators would be used at the project site. No pile driving is anticipated. Construction would require removal of approximately 1 ton of pavement and 1,165 cubic yards of demolition material and excavated soil (cut) from the site. The project would require lateral connections to sanitary sewer and electrical lines which exist in the public right-of-way along Donnelly Avenue, along with new connections to water and gas lines. Approvals The project requires the following approvals from the City: ■ Amendment to the DSP to allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue within the Donnelly Avenue Area. ■ Amendment to the Zoning Code (DAC District) to allow residential use above the first floor on properties located north of Donnelly Avenue that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue in the DAC district. ■ Design Review for construction of a new mixed -use commercial/residential building. ■ Conditional Use Permit to exceed 35-foot building height. ■ Condominium Permit for 14 residential condominium units. ■ Lot merger to combine three existing parcels into one parcel. 12 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST Aesthetics Less Than Significant or Significant Issues Potentially Impact with Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section Significant Mitigation Less than 21099, would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ® ❑ which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Setting The City is located within San Mateo County, east of the Santa Cruz Mountains and west of the San Francisco Bay (Bay). The City is surrounded by the City of Millbrae to the northwest, the Bay to the east, the City of San Mateo to the southeast, and the Town of Hillsborough to the southwest. Most of the City is located on gently sloping valley floor and is a highly developed, urban/suburban area. The western portions of the City are located on foothills rising to the Santa Cruz Mountains that offer scenic views of the Santa Cruz Mountains, the Bay, and the East Bay Hills. The project site is located within the Donnelly Avenue Area of the DSP in the DAC zoning district. The project site is in the northern portion of the downtown area, within walking distance of the Burlingame Caltrain station. The surrounding area consists of retail uses and associated parking lots to the west, south, and east. To the northeast, the project site is bordered by a multi -family residential building. The project site comprises three parcels: 1214, 1218, and 1220 Donnelly Avenue. Both 1214 and 1218 Donnelly Avenue were affected by a 2013 fire, leaving no remaining structures on 1214 Donnelly and only an accessory structure no longer in use and the foundation of the house destroyed in the fire at 1218 Donnelly Avenue. Undamaged by the fire, 1220 Donnelly Avenue contains a two-story residential structure at the front of the lot and a detached accessory residential structure at the rear of the lot. The two-story structure includes 13 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study three residential units, and the accessory structure contains one residential unit. The front of the lot at 1220 Donnelly Avenue is used for informal parking by occupants of the residential building. The project includes removing all existing structures on the site and redeveloping the site with a three story, 43-foot 10-inch tall mixed -use building containing commercial and multi -family uses totaling 35,075 gross square feet. Discussion a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (No Impact) According to the City General Plan, important vistas include the hillside leading to the Skyline Ridge as seen from the Bay plain, and the Bay as seen from the hillside. The project would not impact either scenic resource. Public views of the foothills rising to the Santa Cruz Mountains are obscured by existing development and landscaping in the project vicinity. The new development would be 43 feet 10 inches (three stories) tall at its highest point. This would not exceed the 55-foot height limit allowed within the DAC district. Given the above, no impact to a scenic vista would occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (No Impact) The area surrounding the project is fully developed. No rock outcroppings, historic buildings, or other scenic resources are visible from the project site. Views of trees located on adjacent properties may be obstructed with implementation of the project. However, five new street trees would be planted with implementation of the project, thereby improving views over current conditions. The intent of the California Scenic Highway Program is to protect and enhance California's natural beauty and to protect the social and economic values provided by the state's scenic resources. State scenic highways are officially designated by Scenic Highways Advisory Committee. According the General Plan Scenic Roads and Highways Element, the project is not located near a state scenic highway. Therefore, no impact would occur. c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? (Less than Significant) Construction As described above, existing visual quality on the project site is low due to the 2013 fire, which necessitated the demolition of buildings located at 1214 and 1218 Donnelly Avenue. Construction of the project would involve further demolition, earthmoving operations, and grading activities. Temporary fencing, construction equipment, construction vehicles, staging 14 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue areas, and associated construction debris would be visible on the project site for the duration of construction (approximately 17 months). The visual character and quality of the site would change for a temporary period of time, depending on the work and equipment used. However, the visual effects of construction activities would be similar to other types of development and construction that typically occur within the area and would be temporary in nature. Operation The project would change the existing character of the project site by removing the remaining structures left undamaged by the 2013 fire (none of which exceed two stories in height) and redeveloping the site with a three-story mixed -use structure. At a height of 43 feet 10 inches', the new building would be taller than the structures immediately surrounding it. However, it would be shorter than —or comparable to —other nearby buildings such as the Anderson Yazdi Hwang Minton and Horn building located at 350 Primrose Road and the office building located at 345 Lorton Avenue. The new mixed -use building would require an application to the Planning Commission for Design Review. Because the project would include residential and commercial uses (mixed -use project), the project would be reviewed for compliance with the design guidelines in the DSP, which offer guidance on appropriate design based for commercial and mixed -use projects within the DSP area. The exterior facades would consist of a variety of materials including cement plaster siding (smooth steel troweled finish), Hardie "Reveal" panel system and trim (along blind wall on east elevation), smooth lap siding and exposed concrete or concrete block at the blind walls, decorative metal guardrails, decorative foam relief panels, and metal clad wood windows with simulated true divided lights on the upper floor residential units. The ground floor treatment would include aluminum window sashes, painted wood entry doors, canvas awnings and a painted metal garage door. The upper edge of the building would consist of varying architectural elements, including Spanish barrel clay roof tiles with foam eave brackets/corbels, a wood trellis along the front fagade, and articulated parapets with ornamental metal trim. This design would complement both the surrounding commercial uses and the residential uses to the north. Due to damage sustained during the previously mentioned 2013 fire, both 1214 and 1218 Donnelly Avenue are currently vacant or mostly vacant lots. Implementation of the project would thus improve the visual character of the project site over existing conditions. As such, the project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and the impact would be less than significant. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The project site is located within a developed and urbanized area. Streetlights, exterior commercial lighting, and vehicular lights exist in the surrounding area and along adjacent 1 Measured to top of parapet wall per Burlingame Municipal Code section 25.08.340. Mechanical equipment on the roof would be up to 52 feet in height, and the top of the elevator shaft/roof access staircase would be 54 feet 3 inches in height. 15 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study corridors. The new building would contribute additional sources of light; however, exterior lighting shall be designed and installed to comply with existing regulations to reduce light pollution. Glass surfaces on the proposed structure would also result in increased sunlight reflection, ambient light, and glare beyond existing conditions. This is considered a potentially significant impact. The following mitigation measure is anticipated to reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure AES-1: The project developer shall install low -profile, low -intensity lighting directed downward to minimize light and glare. Exterior lighting shall be low mounted, downward casting, and shielded. In general, the light footprint shall not extend beyond the periphery the property. Implementation of exterior lighting fixtures on all buildings shall also comply with the standard California Building Code (Title 24, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) to reduce the lateral spreading of light to surrounding uses, consistent with Burlingame Municipal Code Section 18.16.030 that requires that all new exterior lighting for residential developments be designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the light element is kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. In addition, lighting fixtures would not be located more than nine feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls would not be floodlit; and only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward would be used, except for illuminated street numbers required by the fire department. 16 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources Issues Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning for , or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zones Timberland Projection (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land of conversion of forest land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Setting Significant or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Less than Significant El No Impact El V\JI El V\J El❑El V\JI The project site comprises three parcels, all of which contained residential structures until a 2013 fire damaged homes on 1214 and 1218 Donnelly Avenue, rendering both parcels largely vacant. The existing parcel at 1220 Donnelly Avenue contains a two-story residential structure at the front of the lot and a detached accessory residential structure at the rear of the lot. The State of California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) designates the project site and its immediate surroundings as Urban and Built Up Land. There is no FMMP designated Important, Unique, or Prime Farmland, and no land protected under the Williamson Act in the vicinity of the project.2 There are no agricultural resources z Department of Conservation. 2016. Williamson Act/Land Conservation Act. Williamson Act Status Reports: San Mateo County. 17 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study located on or near the project site. There is no forest land on or near the project site, as the project site is located within and surrounded by urban and built up land.' Discussion a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (No Impact) and b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (No Impact) and c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zones Timberland Projection (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? (No Impact) and d) Result in the loss of forest land of conversion of forest land to non -forest use? (No Impact) and e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? (No Impact) There are no active agricultural lands, lands under a Williamson Act contract, forest lands, or timberlands on or adjacent to the project site. The project site is not designated for agricultural or forest uses in the General Plan Land Use Map; therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural or forest uses. Consequently, the project would not result in farmland or forest land conversion. Therefore, no impact would occur. 3 Department of Conservation. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder. 18 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 3 Air Quality Issues Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Setting Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Significant Mitigation Less than Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Federal, state, and regional agencies regulate air quality, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). EPA and CARB have adopted ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants, which include tropospheric ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SOA particulate matter, and lead. Ambient air quality standards also regulate reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) because they are precursors to ozone formation. Particulate matter standards include regulations for particles with a diameter of 10 micrometers or less (PM1o) and particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less (PM2.5). The project site, and City, are located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). As the local air quality management agency, BAAQMD is required to monitor air pollutant levels to ensure that state and federal air quality standards are met and —if they are not met —to develop strategies to meet the standards. Depending on whether or not the standards are met or exceeded, the SFBAAB is classified as being in "attainment" or "nonattainment." Under state law, air districts are required to prepare a plan for air quality improvement for pollutants for which the district is in non-compliance. The SFBAAB is designated as non -attainment for ground -level ozone and PM2.5 under both federal and state standards, and non -attainment for PM10 under the more stringent state standards imposed by the California Clean Air Act which allows California to enact stricter air pollution standards than the federal government. Therefore, the SFBAAB does not meet the ambient air 19 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study quality standards for these air pollutants (BAAQMD 2017). The highest ozone levels in the SFBAAB occur in the eastern and southern inland valleys that are downwind of air pollutant sources. High ozone levels can aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduce lung function, and increase coughing and chest discomfort. Elevated concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 are the result of both regional and localized emissions. High particulate matter levels can aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduce lung function, increase mortality (e.g., lung cancer), and result in reduced lung function growth in children. Air Quality Management The Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan (2017 Plan) presents strategies to improve Bay Area air quality and protect public health as well as the climate. The legal impetus for the 2017 Plan was to update the 2010 Clean Air Plan, and to comply with state air quality planning requirements as codified in the California Health & Safety Code. Although steady progress in reducing ozone levels in the Bay Area has been made, the region continues to be designated as non -attainment for both the one -hour and eight -hour state ozone standards as noted previously. In addition, emissions of ozone precursors in the Bay Area contribute to air quality problems in neighboring air basins. Under these circumstances, state law requires the 2017 Plan to include all feasible measures to reduce emissions of ozone precursors and reduce transport of ozone precursors to neighboring air basins (BAAQMD 2017). In 2006, the EPA tightened the national 24-hour PM2.5 standard regarding short-term exposure to fine particulate matter from 65 µg/m3 (micro -grams per cubic meter) to 35 µg/m3. Based on air quality monitoring data for years 2006 to 2008 showing that the region was slightly above the standard, EPA designated the Bay Area as non -attainment for the 24-hour national standard in December 2008. This triggered the requirement for the Bay Area to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal to demonstrate how the region would attain the standard. However, data for both the 2008 to 2010 and the 2009 to 2011 cycles showed that Bay Area PM2.5 levels currently meet the standard. On October 29, 2012, the EPA issued a proposed rule -making to determine that the Bay Area now attains the 24-hour PM2.5 national standard. Based on this, the Bay Area is required to prepare an abbreviated SIP submittal which includes an emission inventory for primary (directly -emitted) PM2.5i as well as precursor pollutants that contribute to formation of secondary PM in the atmosphere; and amendments to the BAAQMD New Source Review (NSR) to address PM2.5 (adopted December 2012). However, key SIP requirements to demonstrate how a region will achieve the standard (i.e., the requirement to develop a plan to attain the standard) will be suspended as long as monitoring data continues to show that the Bay Area attains the standard. In addition to preparing the "abbreviated" SIP submittal, the BAAQMD has prepared a report entitled "Understanding Particulate Matter: Protecting Public Health in the San Francisco Bay Area" (BAAQMD 2012). The report helps to guide the BAAQMD's on -going efforts to analyze and reduce PM in the Bay Area in order to better protect public health. The Bay Area will continue to be designated as "non -attainment" for the national 24-hour PM2.5 standard until such time as the BAAQMD elects to submit a "redesignation request" and a "maintenance plan" to the EPA, and the EPA approves the proposed redesignation. 20 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Air Emissions Thresholds This analysis uses the BAAQMD's May 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines to evaluate air quality. The May 2017 Guidelines include revisions made to the 2010 Guidelines, addressing the California Supreme Court's 2015 opinion in the California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 62 Cal. 4th 369 (BAAQMD 2017). Therefore, the numeric thresholds in the May 2017 BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines were used for this analysis to determine whether the impacts of the project exceed the thresholds identified in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The BAAQMD has developed screening criteria to provide lead agencies and project applicants with a conservative indication of whether a project could result in potentially significant air quality impacts. If all the screening criteria are met by a project, then the lead agency or applicant would not need to perform a detailed air quality assessment of their project's air pollutant emissions. For projects that exceed the screening criteria, BAAQMD provides significance thresholds for construction and operational -related criteria air pollutant and precursor emissions. Table 1 presents the significance thresholds being used for the purposes of this analysis. ° These represent the levels at which a project's individual emissions of criteria air pollutants or precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SFBAAB's existing air quality conditions. Table 1 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance Construction Operational Thresholds Thresholds Pollutant/Precursor Average Daily Maximum Annual Average Daily Emissions (pounds per Emissions (tons per Emissions (pounds per day) year) day) ROG 54 10 54 NOx 54 10 54 PMlo 82 (exhaust) 15 82 PM2.5 54 (exhaust) 10 54 Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019 Notes: NOx = oxides of nitrogen; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less; PMlo = respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers or less; ROG = reactive organic gases In addition, a significant air quality impact would occur if the project design or project construction does not incorporate control measures recommended by the BAAQMD to control n Note the thresholds for PM10 and PM2.5 apply to construction exhaust emissions only. 21 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study emissions during construction (as listed in Table 8-1 of the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines). Sensitive Receptors There are groups of people that are more affected by air pollution than others. CARB has identified the following persons who are most likely to be affected by air pollution: children under 16, the elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. These groups are classified as sensitive receptors. Locations that may contain a high concentration of these sensitive population groups include residential areas, hospitals, daycare facilities, elder care facilities, elementary schools, and parks. The closest off -site sensitive receptors are multi -family residences located adjacent to the project site to the northwest along Bellevue Ave. Additional single- and multi -family residences are located approximately 150 feet from the project site. Toxic Air Contaminants Emissions of toxic air contaminants (TACs) can have significant health impacts at the local level. The thresholds from BAAQMD's 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines are intended to apply to projects that would site new permitted or non -permitted sources in proximity to receptors and for projects that would site new sensitive receptors near permitted or non -permitted sources of TAC or PM2.5 emissions. However, for future residents of the site, the California Supreme Court in California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District concluded that agencies under CEQA are not required to analyze the impact of existing environmental conditions on a project's future users or residents (reverse CEQA). Therefore, the anticipated exposure of future residents to existing sources of TAC emissions on the project site is provided in this IS/MND for informational purposes given that the City has elected to disclose such impacts. TACs for new residents near highways and stationary sources, the BAAQMD recommends a risk and hazard screening using BAAQMD's screening tools if the project would subject residents to an excess cancer risk level. In accordance with the BAAQMD, if impacts due to emissions of TACs or PM2.5 from siting a new receptor would exceed any of the thresholds listed below, the project would result in a significant impact: ■ Non-compliance with a Community Risk Reduction Plan ■ An excess cancer risk level of more than 10 in one million, or a non -cancer (i.e., chronic or acute) hazard index greater than 1.0 from any individual source would be a significant cumulatively considerable contribution ■ An incremental increase of greater than 0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) annual average PM2.5from any individual source would be a significant cumulatively considerable contribution A project would result in a cumulatively considerable impact if the sum of past, present, and foreseeable future sources within a 1,000-foot radius from the fence line of a source, or from 22 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue the location of a receptor, plus the contribution from the project, would exceed any of the following thresholds: ■ Non-compliance with a Community Risk Reduction Plan ■ An excess cancer risk level of more than 100 in one million, which is one order of magnitude higher than the threshold for an individual source, or a chronic non -cancer hazard index (from all local sources) greater than 10.0 0.8 µg/m3 annual average PM2.5 A screening health risk analysis is provided below under letter d to address whether the project would or would not exceed the above -mentioned thresholds. Discussion a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Less than Significant) The most recent and applicable adopted air quality plan is the 2017 Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a significant impact if it would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2017 Plan (BAAQMD 2017). The 2017 Plan includes control measures that are intended to reduce Bay Area air pollutant emissions either directly or indirectly. Plans must show consistency with the control measures listed within the 2017 Plan. At the project - level, there are no consistency measures or thresholds. The proposed project would not conflict with the latest 2017 Plan planning efforts for two reasons. Firstly, the project would be considered transit -oriented urban infill because the project site is located approximately 0.2 miles from the Burlingame Caltrain Station and 0.3 miles from the SamTrans bus stop at El Camino Real and Burlingame Avenue. Secondly, the project would generate emissions well below the BAAQMD thresholds. Table 2 summarizes the estimated maximum daily emissions of pollutants during construction on the project site. Table 3 summarizes the estimated average daily emissions and maximum annual emissions of project during operation. As shown in these tables, the BAAQMD thresholds would not be exceeded. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. Table 2 Construction Emissions Emissions (pounds/day) Year ROG NOx CO SOX (exhaust) (exhaust) 2020 5.9 6.8 5.4 0.2 0.2 0.02 Maximum Daily Emissions 23 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Emissions (pounds/day) Year ROG NOx CO sox (exhaust) (exhaust) 2021 0.2 1.1 1.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 Maximum Daily Emissions Maximum 5.9 6.8 5.4 0.2 0.2 0.02 Daily Emissions BAAQM D 54 54 -- 54 82 -- Thresholds (average daily emissions) Threshold No No N/A No No N/A Exceeded? Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2020 Table 3 Operational Emissions Sources Estimated Emissions ROG NOx CO PMlo PM2.S Sox Average Daily Emissions (lb/day) Area 0.5 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile 0.4 0.9 3.4 1.1 0.3 0.0 Total 0.9 1.0 4.6 1.1 0.3 0.0 Emissions BAAQM D 54 54 -- 54 82 -- Thresholds Threshold No No N/A No No N/A Exceeded? 24 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Sources Estimated Emissions ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Sox Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year) Area 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 Total 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 Emissions BAAQMD 10 10 -- 10 15 - Thresholds Threshold No No N/A No No N/A Exceeded? Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2020 b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. (Less than Significant with Mitigation incorporated) BAAQMD sets screening thresholds based on project size to determine whether modeling is required to determine project impacts. Projects that fall below these screening thresholds are generally considered to have less than significant impacts under CEQA. For mid -rise apartments, the BAAQMD's operational criteria pollutant screening size is 494 dwelling units and the construction -related screening size is 240 units. The construction screening size for commercial retail/strip mall is 277,000-sf and the operational screening size is 99,000-sf. The proposed project involves construction of 14 dwelling units and 4,704-sf of retail space and is therefore below the screening criteria. Nonetheless, this analysis quantifies emissions associated with the project and compares them to BAAQMD's numeric significance thresholds for informational purposes. Construction Emissions Construction of the project would generate temporary construction emissions and Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC). Construction emissions associated with the project are summarized in Tables 2, above. As shown in Table 2, BAAQMD criteria pollutant thresholds would not be exceeded during construction. Therefore, impacts from criteria pollution emissions would be less than significant. 25 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Project construction would also generate fugitive dust in the form of PM10 and PM2.5. The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations regarding construction emission control measures. The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines consider impacts to be less than significant if best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to reduce these emissions. Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would require implementation of BAAQMD-recommended BMPs. Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Note that the Envision Burlingame 2040 General Plan Policy HP-3.11 Dust Abatement and Policy HP-3.12 Construction Best Practices requires that projects apply BAAQMD-recommended BMPs to control dust from construction projects. During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust. Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less - than -significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following BMPs that are required of all projects: 1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. 2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. 3. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. 4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). 5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. 6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. 8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 26 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue With implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, this impact would be less than significant. Operational Emissions The operational screening size for mid -rise apartments is 494 dwelling units and for commercial retail/strip malls is 99,000-sf. The project would comprise 14 dwelling units and 4,704-sf of retail, which are well below these operational screening thresholds. As shown in Table 3, above, operational emissions would be below the BAAQMD significance thresholds. Therefore, impacts from project operation would be less than significant. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less than Significant with mitigation incorporated) Sensitive Receptors Project impacts related to increased community risk can occur either by introducing a new source of TACs during construction and operation to sensitive receptors or by introducing new sensitive receptors, such as a new residential use, to an existing source of TACs. Project construction could affect sensitive receptors temporarily by generating dust and equipment exhaust, but the operation of the project is not expected to be a source of TAC. However, the project would introduce new residents that are sensitive receptors. An assessment was conducted to find the maximally exposed individuals (MEI) due to construction near the project site. The results found that the second floor of the adjacent multi- family residence to the northwest of the project site would be the most exposed. Figure 8 shows the location of off -site sensitive receptors near the project site. The maximum cancer risk from construction for these individuals exceeds the BAAQMD single source thresholds as seen in Table 4 below. Therefore, the project would require mitigation measures to have a less than significant impact. Table 4 Construction Risk Impacts at the Offsite Residential MEI Source Cancer Risk' Annual PM2.52 Hazard (per million) (µg/rn3) Index2 Project Construction Unmitigated 12.2 (infant) 0.05 0.01 Mitigated 1.6 (infant) 0.01 <0.01 BAAQMD Single -Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >1.0 Exceeds Threshold? Unmitigated Yes No No Mitigated No No No Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019 27 1214 Donnelly Ave, Burlingame, CA 557 500 V] C a d 557600 55771E0 5W80 7-7 +�. ' Al A r i • ,. ' r 10 1 � �• b �, �a �� Legend 0 Receptors Construction ME1 �r�^ : , f'• ,' Project Site y.!1-.�+ni . k^ f,, '•�! _ .ERE. G,ai n ` v1a utars O rA 4� V a d 55151D0 557600 557700 5518DD UTM - Easting (meters} Off -Site Sensitive Receptors and Maximum TAC Impacts Source: Wing worth&Rodkin, 2019 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue In addition to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, Mitigation Measure AQ-2 would also need to be incorporated to bring project construction under the significance threshold. Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Selection of equipment during construction to minimize emissions. Such equipment selection would include the following: The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment used onsite to construct the project would achieve a fleet -wide average 20-percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. One feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: All diesel -powered off -road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 3 engines that include CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) 12 or equivalent. Alternatively, equipment that meets U.S. EPA Tier 4 standards for particulate matter or the use of equipment that includes electric or alternatively fueled equipment (i.e., non -diesel) would meet this requirement. Community health risks located within 1,000 feet of the project site were found to include rail lines, highways, busy surface streets, and stationary sources. The project area includes a Caltrain rail line that passes through the project influence area and that traffic on California Drive has an average daily traffic (ADT) that exceeds 10,000 vehicles, which may have a potentially significant effect on a proposed project. All other roadways are assumed to have an ADT less than 10,000 vehicles. There were also four stationary sources found within 1,000 feet of the project site that may influence community health. The risk values for potential community health risks in addition to construction risks are shown in Table S. Table 5 Impacts from Combined Sources at Off -Site Project MEI Source Cancer Risk (per Annual PM2.5 Hazard Index million) (µg/m) Single -Source Risk Project Construction Unmitigated 12.2 (infant) 0.05 0.01 1.6 (infant) 0.01 <0.01 Mitigated BAAQMD Single -Source Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >1.0 Cumulative -Source Risks Caltrain Rail Line at 600 feet south <7.3 <0.01 - California Drive (east -west) at 350 feet south, 1.4 0.05 <0.03 ADT 16,825 29 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Source Cancer Risk (per Annual PM2.5 Hazard Index million) (µg/m) Plant #14468 (Generator) at 740 feet 4.7 0.01 <0.01 Plant #14474 (Generator) at 650 feet 3.3 <0.01 <0.01 Plant #13454 (Generator) at 970 feet 0.8 <0.01 <0.01 Plant #11731 (Soil Vapor Extractor) at 950 feet 0.5 -- <0.01 Combined Sources <30.2 <0.14 <0.08 Unmitigated Mitigated <19.6 <0.10 <0.08 BAAQMD Cumulative Source Threshold >100 >0.8 >10.0 Exceed Cumulative Thresholds? No No No Unmitigated Mitigated No No No Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019 With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2, the project construction's single -source risks would no longer exceed the significance threshold. Therefore, the mitigated cancer risks for the project would have a less than significant impact on sensitive receptors. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people? (Less than Significant) The project does not include construction of new highways or roads which could be considered a new permitted or non -permitted source of TAC or PM2.5 in proximity to receptors. In addition, the project does not include construction of new stationary sources, such as refineries, power plants, back-up diesel generators, or cement kilns, which could be considered a new permitted or non -permitted source of TAC or PM2.5 in proximity to receptors. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact related to being a source of substantial pollutant concentrations to existing receptors in the project vicinity. Future Resident (New Receptor) Impacts A health risk assessment was completed to assess the impact that existing TAC sources would have on the new proposed sensitive receptors that the project would introduce. The health risk results from rail line, local roadways, stationary sources, and the combined community health risk at the project site are provided in Table 6. 30 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 6 Community Risk Impact to New Project Residences Cancer Risk Annual PM2.5 Hazard Source (per million) (µg/m3) Index Caltrain Rail Line at 500 feet south <9.2 <0.02 -- California Drive (east -west) at 230 feet south, ADT 16,825 2.1 0.07 <0.03 Plant #14468 (Generator) at 610 feet 6.0 0.01 <0.01 Plant #14474 (Generator) at 705 feet 3.3 <0.01 <0.01 Plant #13454 (Generator) at 970 feet 0.8 <0.01 <0.01 Plant #11731 (Soil Vapor Extractor) at 820 feet 0.6 -- <0.01 BAAQMD Single -Source Threshold >10.0 >0.3 >0.1 Exceed Threshold? No No No Cumulative Total <22.0 <0.12 <0.19 BAAQMD Cumulative Source Threshold >100 >0.8 >10.0 Exceed Threshold? No No No Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019 Table 6 shows that Cancer Risk, Annual PM2.5, and Hazard Index do not exceed the BAAQMD single -source or cumulative -source threshold and therefore impacts would be less than significant. 31 n 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Biological Resources Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ® ❑ directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) or state -protected wetlands, through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Setting Topography on the project site is generally flat and ranges between 32 to 33 feet above mean sea level. The project site currently consists of an empty paved lot (1214 and 1218 Donnelly Ave) and a two-story residential building with a separate one-story garage (1220 Donnelly Avenue). Ruderal vegetation has been regularly mowed at the 1214 and 1218 addresses. Several trees are present on or adjacent to the site. There is a cluster of trees and shrubs near the sidewalk but within the project area at 1214 Donnelly Avenue. If any of these trees exceed 48 inches in circumference, when measured at 54 inches above natural grade, they qualify as protected trees 32 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue under the City tree ordinance. One street tree, a sycamore (Platanus sp.), is present opposite the stand of trees at 1214 Donnelly Avenue. The site is bound by paved parking lots to the southwest and east, residential buildings to the northwest, and commercial businesses to the northeast and south. Ralston creek is located approximately 560 feet northwest of the project site. Regulatory Setting Federal and State Regulatory authority over biological resources is shared by federal, state, and local agencies under a variety of laws, ordinances, regulations, and statutes. Primary authority for biological resources lies within the land use control and planning authority of local jurisdictions (in this instance, the City). The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is a trustee agency for biological resources throughout the State under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has direct jurisdiction under the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC). Under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), the CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), respectively, have direct regulatory authority over species formally listed as threatened or endangered (and listed as rare for CDFW). Native and/or migratory bird species are protected under the CFGC Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3511. Statutes within the Clean Water Act (CWA), CFGC, and California Code of Regulations (CCR) protect wetlands and riparian habitat. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has regulatory authority over wetlands and waters of the United States under Section 404 of the CWA. The State Water Resources Control Board and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) ensure water quality protection in California pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and Section 13263 of the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The CDFW regulates waters of the State under the CFGC Section 1600 et seq. Special status species are those plants and animals: 1) listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing as Threatened or Endangered by the USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under the FESA; 2) listed or proposed for listing as Rare, Threatened, or Endangered by the CDFW under the CESA; 3) recognized as California Species of Special Concern (CSSC) by the CDFW; 4) afforded protection under CFGC; and 5) occurring on Lists 1 and 2 of the CDFW California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) system. Methods Literature Review and Desktop Biological Evaluation A desktop review was conducted of agency databases, relevant literature, aerial photos, and site photos for baseline information on special status species and other sensitive biological resources occurring or potentially occurring at the project site and in the immediate surrounding area. The following sources were reviewed for background information: 33 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study ■ CDFW California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) (CDFW 2019a) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS) (CDFW 2019b) ■ CDFW Special Animals List (CDFW 2019c) and Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (CDFW 2019d) ■ CNPS Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (CNPS 2019) ■ USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC; USFWS 2019a) ■ USFWS Critical Habitat Portal (USFWS 2019b) ■ USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI; USFWS 2019c) ■ City of Burlingame Municipal Code (Burlingame 2019) Qualified biologists conducted a review of the CNDDB (CDFW 2019a) for recorded occurrences of special status plant and wildlife taxa in the region. For this review, the search included all occurrences within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle encompassing the project site (San Mateo), and the eight surrounding quadrangles (San Francisco South, Hunters Point, San Leandro, Montara Mountain, Redwood Point, Half Moon Bay, Woodside, and Palo Alto). The results of the background literature review were compiled into a list of regionally occurring special status plants and animals and evaluated each species for potential to occur based on habitat conditions and proximity to known occurrences. Review of the NWI (USFWS 2019c) and the National Hydrography Datasets (USGS 2019) provided information on potential aquatic resources, including jurisdictional waters of the United States or waters of the State. Discussion a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) Special Status Plants A review of agency databases for known special status plant occurrences within the six USGS quadrangles containing and surrounding the project site identified 73 special status plant species (CDFW 2019a; CNPS 2019; USFWS 2019a). All the reported species have specific habitat requirements (e.g., soil type, elevation, aspect, etc.). The existing conditions (previously developed and currently disturbed) and the lack of native vegetation communities or suitable ecological conditions on the site preclude the potential for rare plants to occur within the site. Because construction activities are limited to previously disturbed, developed, and landscaped areas with ornamental vegetation, impacts to special status plant species are not expected. Special Status Wildlife The review of the resource agency databases for known special status animal occurrences within the six USGS quadrangles containing and surrounding the project site identified 51 special status animal species (CDFW 2019a; CDFW 2019c; USFWS 2019a). This list was reviewed and 34 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue refined according to the potential for species to occur on the project site based on the presence and quality of habitats within the project site. The site is fully developed and has no natural or native vegetation communities that would support special status animal species. All 51 species were excluded from potentially occurring on the project site based on a lack of suitable habitat conditions and the isolation of the site from natural habitat in the region. The site is not considered viable to support federal or state listed species or other special status wildlife. Although vegetation communities observed in the project site are sparse, the site could be used by species of migratory birds that utilize trees, shrubs or man-made structures as nesting habitat. Native bird nests are protected by CFGC Section 3503. The nesting season generally extends from February 1st through August 31st in California but can vary based upon annual climatic conditions. Thus, construction activities could result in the mortality or injury of birds or their nests during vegetation removal, or disturbance -related nest abandonment. Impacts to most non -listed bird species through nest destruction or abandonment would not be considered a significant impact under CEQA; however, loss of active nests or mortality would be a violation of CFGC code. Impacts to special status birds would be significant under CEQA if those impacts would jeopardize the viability of a local or regional population. Therefore, the following mitigation measure would be required to avoid or reduce the proposed project's potentially significant impacts to special status wildlife and avoid violations of the CFGC that protects nesting migratory birds. Mitigation Measure 131O-1: Activities related to the project, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and construction and demolition shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 31) if feasible. If construction will commence during the breeding season, then a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre -construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer for raptors and 150- foot buffer for passerines where access can be authorized. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in San Mateo County. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (which is dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the avian biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed, and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would ensure protection of nesting birds that may be on site during construction activities and the impact would be less than significant. 35 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (No Impact) The review of the resource agency databases for sensitive natural communities within the nine USGS quadrangles containing and surrounding the project site identified five sensitive natural communities: northern coastal salt marsh, northern maritime chaparral, serpentine bunchgrass, valley needlegrass grassland, and valley oak woodland. Based on a review of aerial imagery, project site photographs and information on biological resources within the project region, none of these sensitive natural communities are present within the study area. Therefore, no impact would occur. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) or state - protected wetlands, through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (No Impact) Based on a review of aerial imagery, project site photographs and information on biological resources within the project region, no vegetated wetlands or potentially jurisdictional features occur within the project area. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or waters would occur. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (No Impact) The project area consists of developed and disturbed areas with primarily ornamental vegetation. Land use in the vicinity is primarily residential or commercial with no connectivity to natural habitats and is therefore not expected to support wildlife movement. No impacts to wildlife movement corridors would occur. e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Less than Significant) The project is designed to be in accordance with all local ordinances. If tree removal or trimming is necessary, the project will comply with the City tree ordinance and obtain necessary permits. Street trees may only be removed or trimmed with a permit from the City Parks and Recreation Director. For trees on private property, protected trees require a permit for removal or trimming of more than 1/3 of a tree's mass. A protected tree is defined as greater than 48 inches in circumference when measured at 54 inches above natural grade (Burlingame Municipal Code 11.06). If street trees or protected trees will be impacted by this project, appropriate permits will be obtained. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. 36 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (No Impact) There are no habitat conservation plans, natural community conservation plans, or other similar plans that govern activities on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with a habitat conservation plan and no impact would occur. 37 rJ 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Cultural Resources Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the El El® ❑ significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the El® ❑ ❑ significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those El® ❑ ❑ interred outside of formal cemeteries? Setting The structure located at 1214 Donnelly Avenue —commonly known as the "Gates House" —was identified as a potentially historic property in the Draft Inventory of Historic Places prepared in conjunction with the Burlingame DSP. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property, which concluded that 1214 Donnelly Avenue was not architecturally significant, but that it was eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 1 (Events) for its association with early settlement patterns in the town of Burlingame, and Criterion 2 (Persons) for its association with original owner and long-time occupant George W Gates (the third stationmaster for the Burlingame railroad station. On November 23, 2013, a fire destroyed the existing structure at 1218 Donnelly Avenue (containing two residential units). In February of 2015, a demolition permit was issued to demolish the existing building at 1218 Donnelly Avenue, as well as an existing single -story building (containing one residential unit) at the rear of the site. The fire also spread to a portion of the building at 1214 Donnelly Avenue (previously containing residential and office uses). The structures at 1220 Donnelly Avenue (containing three residential units in the front building and one residential unit in the rear building) were not damaged by the fire. The structure at 1214 Donnelly Avenue remained vacant and exposed to the elements since the date of the fire, though the site was secured with a fence as required by the City. Concerned with the damage the building sustained from the fire and exposure to the elements for several years, the property owner contacted the Community Development Department to explore the possibility of demolishing the structure in advance of a new development being approved for the site. Based on the Chief Building Official's assessment of the condition of the structure, and his finding that the structure was substandard, unsafe, contained evidence of illicit activities, and could not be reasonably rebuilt, issuance of a Demolition Permit was warranted in order to mitigate the impacts upon the public health and safety. A Demolition Permit was issued in May 2018 and the structure was demolished shortly thereafter. 38 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue A cultural records search for the project site was conducted through the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) in October 2018 (see Appendix B). The results of this records search are discussed below. Discussion a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? (Less than Significant) The existing structures on the project site that are proposed for demolition were developed between the 1920s and 1950s. There are 23 structures within the Burlingame DSP are that were identified as potentially eligible for the California Register of Historic Places (CRHP) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The project site is included in the Burlingame DSP IS/NMD list of historical structures. 1214 Donnelly Avenue was once a two-story home to George W. Gates but was converted from a single-family house to commercial uses. The Gates home was demolished in 2018 and the site is currently vacant. Therefore, there are no longer any potentially historic resources on the project site. The impact would be less than significant. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? (Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The proposed project area contains no recorded archaeological resources. Native American resources in this part of San Mateo County have been found in areas marginal to the San Francisco Bayshore, and inland near intermittent and perennial watercourses. The project site and surrounding area is in an alluvial valley approximately 0.5 mile from the historic Bayshore margins. Given these factors, there is a moderate potential for unrecorded Native American resources in the proposed project area. Based on a review of historical literature and maps the CHRIS search also concluded that there is a moderate potential for unrecorded historic -period archaeological resources in the project area. Given the moderate possibility for unrecorded archaeological and Native American resources in the proposed project area, this is considered a potentially significant impact. However, implementation of the Mitigation Measure CUL-1 below would reduce this potentially significant impact to less than significant. Mitigation Measure CUL-1: In the event Native American or other archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the discovered materials and workers shall avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. If an archaeological site is encountered in any stage of development, a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine whether the resource qualifies as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource. In the event that it does qualify, the archaeologist will prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan to be implemented prior to or during site construction. The archaeologist shall also 39 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study prepare a written report of the finding, file it with the appropriate agency, and arrange for curation of recovered materials. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) It is possible that unmarked burials may be unearthed during project construction. This is considered a potentially significant impact. If human remains are uncovered, the project applicant would comply with the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 regarding human remains, and the California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 regarding the treatment of Native American human remains. Furthermore, implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would reduce the potential impact to less than significant. Mitigation Measure CUL-2: In the event that human remains are discovered during project construction, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. The county coroner shall be informed to evaluate the nature of the remains. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Lead Agency shall work with the Native American Heritage Commission and the applicant to develop an agreement for treating or disposing of the human remains. 40 31 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Energy Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Result in potentially significant environmental ❑ impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan El El® ❑ for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Setting Electricity and Natural Gas In 2017, California's total statewide electricity consumption was approximately 288,614 gigawatt-hours (GWh). Total natural gas consumption in 2017 was approximately 12,571 million therms statewide. In 2030, it is estimated that Californians will consume up to 354,209 GWh of electricity and 14,190 million therms of natural gas (California Energy Commission (CEC) 2018a). With the projected increase in electricity comes an increase in the need to clean energy sources such as solar, wind, geothermal, hydroelectricity, and biomass. California's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is among the most ambitious energy policies in the nation, requiring utilities to produce 33 percent of their retail electricity from clean, renewable sources by 2020 and 50 percent by 2030. Increasing California's renewable supplies will diminish the state's dependence on fossil fuels for electric power generation. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) will provide electricity and natural gas to the project site. Petroleum Gasoline demand is projected to decline each year through 2030 due to greater numbers of zero -emission vehicles and increasing fuel economy, with forecasted 2030 gasoline demand of up to 12.7 billion gallons; diesel demand is projected to increase modestly, following economic growth, to approximately 4.7 billion gallons in 2030 (CEC 2017). Discussion a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? (Less than Significant) Construction Energy Demand 41 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study The construction of the project would require temporary use of energy for the manufacture and transportation of building materials, preparation and grading of the project site, and construction of the project including infrastructure. As such, this energy use would be typical of similar construction projects and would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Furthermore, this energy usage would be temporary in duration. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Operational Energy Demand Operation of the project would require energy use in the form of electricity, natural gas, and gasoline consumption. Natural gas and electricity would be used for heating and cooling systems, lighting, appliances, water use, and the overall operation of the project. Gasoline consumption would be attributed to vehicular travel from residents and guests traveling to and from the project site. There would also be indirect electricity usage associated with transporting water to the project and wastewater produced by the project. CaIEEMod was used to compute air pollutant emissions associated with the operation of the project. Table 7 shows the modeled annual operational energy demand of the project. Table 7 Project Operational Annual Energy Demand 2022 2030 Demand in Demand in Energy Usage Estimated Demand MM Btu MM Btu Source Construction 50,634 HP hrs Construction CalEEMod VMT and EMFAC2007 67,176 mi of worker VMT 723 MM Btu in 2020-21 average fuel economy of 12,508 mi of truck VMT 25.5 mpg in 2022 Natural Gas 144 144 CaIEEMod 143,864 kBtu Electricity 144,212 kWh 136 136 CaIEEMod Vehicle Travel (gasoline, 481,522 CaIEEMod VMT and diesel and annual miles travelled EMFAC2007 average fuel electric 2,204 1,950 economy of 25.5 mpg in vehicles) Consumption of 19,338 2022 and 28.15 mpg in gallons (2022) And 2030. 17,106 gallons (2030) of gasoline Total Usage 2,484 2,230 Sources: Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. CaIEEMod modeling, EMFAC2017 1 gallon of gasoline = 114,000 Btu = 0.114 MM Btu MM Btu = one million British thermal units, VMT = vehicle miles travelled 42 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue The project's energy demand is estimated to be 2,484-MM Btu in its first year of operation (assumed to be 2022). As diesel and gasoline powered vehicles become more efficient in the future and a greater portion of vehicles is composed of electric powered vehicles, energy demand will be reduced. CalEEMod does not account for these improvements, resulting in a conservative estimation of operational energy demand. While project operation would involve the consumption of fuel, natural gas, and electricity, the project would become more energy efficient in the future. In addition, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) has sufficient supplies to serve the project. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? (Less than Significant) SB 100 mandates 100 percent clean electricity for California by 2045. Because the project would be powered by the existing electricity grid, the project would eventually be powered by renewable energy mandated by SB 100 and would not conflict with this statewide plan. Additionally, the project would be subject to energy efficiency standards pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 24 requirements. The increase in future energy efficiency, in addition to Title 24 requirements will ensure the project would not conflict with or obstruct state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. 43 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 7 Geology and Soils Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ❑ ❑ delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ topsoil? c) Be located on geologic unit or soil that is ® ❑ unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ® ❑ Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ® ❑ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Setting Burlingame is in the Coast Ranges geomorphic province, in eastern San Mateo County, adjacent to the San Francisco Bay. Qualified geotechnical engineers completed a preliminary geotechnical 44 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue investigation for the project in August 2016 and determined that the project site is suitable to support mixed -use and residential development with incorporation of development recommendations outlined in the report (see Appendix Q. According to the geotechnical investigation report, soils found on the project site generally comprise stiff to hard lean clay, clayey silt, and sandy silt. The site is underlain Pleistocene -age alluvial fan and fluvial deposits. The Bay Area is a seismically active area and is subject to the effects of future earthquakes. Most of Burlingame, including the downtown area, is essentially flat (less than one percent slope) and is underlain by geologic materials consisting mostly of dense clay and clayey sand alluvial fan deposits dating 1.6 million to 10,000 years. These soils tend toward general stability and have a low infiltration rate (less than 0.2 inches per hour). Surface conditions at the exploration locations generally consists of exposed soils where residential structures at 1218 and 1220 Donnelly Avenue have been removed. One two-story residential building is still standing at 1214 Donnelly Avenue and features a patch of native grass and a tree in front of the building. Concrete driveways, parking spaces, and exterior flatwork separate the lots from Donnelly Avenue. No bedrock outcrops were encountered, as expected for the mapped geological unit dominating the site. Based on review of the existing topographic maps, the site is generally flat. Discussion a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (No Impact) Four historically active faults are located within 15.5 miles of the project site: ■ San Andreas Fault (approximately 2.8 miles west) ■ San Gregorio Fault (approximately 9.7 miles northeast) ■ Monte Vista -Shannon Fault (approximately 11 miles southeast) ■ Hayward Fault (approximately 15.4 miles east) The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (1972) and the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act (1990) direct the State Geologist to delineate regulatory zones to assist cities and counties in preventing the construction of buildings used for human occupancy on the surface trace of active faults. According to the California Department of Conservation, the project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is Burlingame affected by Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. Additionally, no known surface expressions of fault traces cross the site. The geotechnical investigation further confirmed that there are no indications of active faults at the project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. 45 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) As discussed under 6 a) i), the project site is located near historically active faults; as such, there is potential for development within the sphere to be subject to strong seismic ground shaking, including the project site. The intensity of earthquake ground motions would depend on the characteristics of the generating fault, distance to the fault and rupture zone, earthquake magnitude, earthquake duration, and site -specific geologic conditions. The San Andreas Fault is the closest active fault to the project site, located approximately 2.8 miles to the southwest. Numerous active and potentially active Bay Area faults are capable of producing moderate to major earthquakes that could cause severe ground shaking at the site in the future. As stated in the Burlingame DSP IS/MND, Burlingame soils are reasonably stable under seismic conditions. Given this, implementation of the project would expose people and structures to strong seismic ground shaking if an earthquake were to occur in the area. Adherence to Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would reduce the potential impact to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Project design and construction shall adhere to Title 18, Chapter 18.28 of the Burlingame Municipal Code, and demonstrate compliance with all design standards applicable to the California Building Code Zone 4 would ensure maximum practicable protection available to users of the buildings and associated infrastructure. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) Some potential for seismic -related ground failure exists given that the project site is located in a seismically active region. The project site is flat and is underlain predominately by stiff to hard lean clay, clayey silt, and sandy silt. Portions of the granular and silty soils may be susceptible to liquefaction during strong seismic shaking. Total ground surface settlement that could occur as a result of liquefaction could result in approximately 0.25 inch of settlement. Adherence to Mitigation Measure GEO-2 would reduce this potential impact to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure GEO-2: Foundations of the project will be reinforced to tolerate differential soil movement. The project may be supported on a reinforced concrete mat foundation bearing on a properly prepared and compacted soil subgrade and a non - expansive fill section. Alternately, the project may be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation bearing on stiff native soils. Implementation of a reinforced foundation would reduce the potential for damage caused by liquefaction. iv) Landslides? (No Impact) Downtown Burlingame is relatively flat, without steep or unstable slopes, and does not have an irregular surface. As such, natural slope instability does not affect the project site. Landslides are not considered a hazard in the area. Therefore, no impact would occur. 46 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Less than Significant) The project site comprises two vacant lots and one two-story residential building located at 1214 Donnelly Avenue. All existing structures on the site would be demolished and removed as part of the project and 14,715 square feet of the 15,706 square feet project site would be developed. Construction activities would be required to comply with the provisions in Appendix J of the 2007 California Building Code (CBC) regarding grading, excavating, and earthwork construction. Soil erosion after construction would be controlled by implementation of approved landscape and irrigation plans, as needed. After construction, the site would be covered with 13,968 square feet of impervious surfaces and 1,641 acres of pervious surface resulting from landscaping. Conformance to the City grading standards and the County Stormwater Management Plan would prevent substantial erosion through the implementation of practices including the following: ■ All excavation and grading work will be scheduled in dry weather months or construction sites will be weatherized. ■ Stockpiles and excavated soils will be covered with secured tarps or plastic sheeting. ■ Ditches will be installed, if necessary, to divert runoff around excavations and graded areas. These practices would minimize erosion and topsoil loss. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. c) Be located on geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) As previously discussed, the project site is not located in an area with high susceptibility to landslide effects, but the project site may be susceptible to liquefaction due to underlying granular and silty soils. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2, the foundation would be reinforced to withstand potential liquefaction and the impact would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994, as it may be revised), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The geotechnical report concluded that surface soils on the project site have low plasticity and a low potential for expansion. The project design and construction, including excavation activities, would be required to comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies the safety requirements to be fulfilled for site work and protection of adjacent properties from damage during excavation (Mitigation Measure GEO-3). This would include the prevention of subsidence or pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. The project would also be required to adhere to Chapter 18 of the CBC as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-1, which sets forth building construction standards including, but limited to, expansive soils. Additionally, 47 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study the geotechnical report includes recommendations for site work, grading, building foundations (to the adjacent properties), flatwork, retaining walls, and pavements. Adherence to Mitigation Measures GEO-1, GEO-3, and GEO-4 would reduce the impact to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure GEO-3: Project design and construction, including excavation activities, shall comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies the safety requirement to be fulfilled for site work. This would include prevention of subsidence and pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. Mitigation Measure GEO-4: The applicant shall prepare a monitoring program to determine the effects of construction on nearby improvements, including the monitoring of cracking and vertical movement of adjacent structures, and nearby streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements. As necessary, inclinometers or other instrumentation shall be installed as part of the shoring system to closely monitor lateral movement. The program shall include a pre -construction survey including photographs and installation of monitoring points for existing site improvements. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? (No Impact) The project site would dispose of wastewater using existing wastewater infrastructure operated by the City. No aspect of the project would entail any new use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, no related impact would occur. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) No known paleontological resources have been recorded at the project site or within the vicinity. The site consists of three parcels: 1214 Donnelly Avenue is vacant and covered in concrete following demolition of the Gates House in 2018 ; 1218 Donnelly Avenue contains an accessory structure at the rear of the lot that is no longer in use, and the foundation of the building which was destroyed by the 2013 fire; 1220 Donnelly Avenue contains a two-story residential structure at the front of the lot and a detached accessory residential structure at the rear of the lot. Given this, the probability of encountering paleontological resources is low. However, construction activities could potentially destroy unknown paleontological resources. This would be a potentially significant impact. In the event that paleontological resources are discovered during site development, implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-5 would mitigate this potentially significant impact to less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure GEO-5: A discovery of a paleontological specimen during any phase of the project shall result in a work stoppage in the vicinity of the find until it can be evaluated by a professional paleontologist. Should loss or damage be detected, additional protective measures or further action (e.g., resource removal), as determined by a professional paleontologist, shall be implemented to mitigate the impact. 48 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Setting Atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs) absorb and re -emit the majority of outgoing infrared radiation (i.e., heat energy) from the Earth's surface. This natural phenomenon, known as the greenhouse effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. CO2 and water vapor are the most abundant GHGs, but others also include methane (CHA nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These GHGs are released into the atmosphere through a variety of natural processes and human activities. The EPA, CARB, and the BAAQMD regulate greenhouse gas emissions within the SFBAAB. Thresholds The vast majority of individual projects do not generate sufficient GHG emissions to directly influence climate change. However, physical changes caused by a project can contribute incrementally to cumulative effects that are significant, even if individual changes resulting from a project are limited. The issue of climate change typically involves an analysis of whether a project's contribution towards an impact would be cumulatively considerable. "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064[h][1]). According to the CEQA Guidelines, projects can tier off of a qualified GHG reduction plan, which allows for project -level evaluation of GHG emissions through the comparison of the project's consistency with the GHG reduction policies included in a qualified GHG reduction plan. This approach is considered by the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) in their white paper, Beyond Newhall and 2020, to be the most defensible approach presently available under CEQA to determine the significance of a project's GHG emissions (AEP 2016). The City adopted the Burlingame Climate Action Plan in September 2019 with the goal of reducing the City's GHG emissions to 130,150 MT CO2e by 2030 (City of Burlingame 2019). However, the Burlingame Climate Action Plan is not a qualified GHG reduction plan, although the City conforms to the state GHG reduction target for 2050 (that GHG emissions would be reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels) set forth in Executive Order (EO) S-03-05. The City's 49 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study goals are in line with the States goals and SB 32, which establishes an interim statewide GHG emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 GHG levels by 2030. The construction and operation of all new buildings in the City are required to comply with energy efficiency standards included in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. Title 24 identifies specific energy efficiency requirements for building construction and systems operations that are intended to ensure efficient energy usage over the long-term life of the building. BAAQMD identifies screening criteria for the sizes of land use projects that could result in significant GHG emissions in the 2017 update to the CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Projects smaller than 87 dwelling units for "Apartment Mid Rise and 19,000-sf for "Strip Mall" are expected to have less than significant impacts with respect to operational GHG emissions. The proposed project involves 14 dwelling units and 4,705-sf of retail space, both of which are far below the screening level and therefore would be expected to have less than significant impacts on operational GHG emissions. However, emissions estimates are discussed below for informational purposes. Methods Construction Emissions Construction of the project would generate temporary GHG emissions primarily due to the operation of construction equipment and truck trips. Site preparation and grading typically generate the greatest amount of emissions due to the use of grading equipment and soil hauling. Although construction activity is addressed in this analysis, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) does not discuss whether the suggested threshold approaches adequately address impacts from temporary construction activity. As stated in the CEQA and Climate Change white paper, "more study is needed to make this assessment or to develop separate thresholds for construction activity" (CAPCOA 2008). Additionally, BAAQMD does not have specific quantitative thresholds for construction activity. Therefore, although topically mentioned in this analysis and estimated in CaIEEMod, construction activity is not included in the total emissions calculations. Operational Emissions CalEEMod provides operational emissions of CO2, N20, and CH4. Emissions from energy use include electricity and natural gas use. The emissions factors for natural gas combustion are based on EPA's AP-42 (Compilation of Air Pollutant Emissions Factors) and the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR). Electricity emissions are calculated by multiplying the energy use times the carbon intensity of the utility district per kilowatt hour (CAPCOA 2016). The default electricity consumption values in CalEEMod include the CEC-sponsored California Commercial End Use Survey (CEUS) and Residential Appliance Saturation Survey (RASS) studies. Although CalEEMod incorporates compliance with 2013 Title 24 standards, adjustments were made to the model to account for 2016 Title 24 standards, which exceed 2013 standards by 28 percent. The project would be required to comply with 2016 CALGreen Building Standards, which include the most recent Title 24 standards. 50 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Emissions associated with area sources, including consumer products, landscape maintenance, and architectural coating were calculated in CaIEEMod and utilize standard emission rates from CARB, U.S. EPA, and emission factor values provided by the local air district (CAPCOA 2016). Emissions from waste generation were also calculated in CaIEEMod and are based on the International Panel on Climate Change's methods for quantifying GHG emissions from solid waste using the degradable organic content of waste (CaIEEMod User Guide 2016). Waste disposal rates by land use and overall composition of municipal solid waste in California was primarily based on data provided by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Emissions from water and wastewater usage calculated in CaIEEMod were based on the default electricity intensity from the CEC's 2006 Refining Estimates of Water -Related Energy Use in California using the average values for Northern and Southern California. For mobile sources, CO2 and CH4 emissions were quantified in CaIEEMod. Because CaIEEMod does not calculate N2O emissions from mobile sources, N2O emissions were quantified using the California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol (CCAR 2009) direct emissions factors for mobile combustion. Estimates of vehicle trips associated with the proposed development are based on trip generation rates from the project traffic study (W-Trans 2020), which developed trip generation rates based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers 10th Edition Trip Generation Manual. The estimate of total daily trips was calculated and extrapolated to derive total annual mileage in CaIEEMod. Emission rates for N2O emissions were based on the vehicle mix output generated by CaIEEMod and the emission factors found in the California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol. Although the project would be required to comply with 2016 CALGreen Building Standards, the specific sustainability features, aside from compliance with the 2016 Title 24 standards that would be applied to the project are not known to the level of detail required for applying additional reductions in CaIEEMod. Thus, the analysis excludes these sustainability features and is a conservative analysis of operational emissions. Discussion a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less than Significant) GHG emissions associated with development of the proposed project would occur during construction activities, consisting primarily of GHG emissions from equipment exhaust and construction worker and vendor trips. There would also be long-term operational GHG emissions associated with increased vehicular traffic within the project vicinity, energy and water usage, and solid waste disposal. Emissions for the proposed project are discussed in detail below. Construction Construction of the project would generate temporary GHG emissions primarily due to the operation of construction equipment and truck trips. On site operation of construction 51 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study equipment, vendor and hauling truck trips, and worker trips typically generate the greatest amount of emissions. Neither BAAQMD nor the City has an adopted threshold of significance for construction related GHG emissions. Emissions generated by construction of the proposed project are estimated at 706 MT of CO2e. Although discussed for informational purposes in this analysis and estimated in CalEEMod, construction activity is not included in the total emissions calculations. Table 8 shows the estimated construction GHG emissions for each year of construction for informational purposes. Table 8 Estimated Construction GHG Emissions Construction Year Project Emissions Mt/yr Construction Year' 2020 45 2021 26 2022 Total 71 Total Amortized over 30 Years Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2020 Operation The proposed project includes 14 dwelling units and 4,704-sf of retail, which would be below the respective operational 2020 GHG screening sizes (i.e., project is 16% of residential land use and 25% of the retail land use screening sizes). As shown in Table 9 below, combined annual GHG emissions would be below the BAAQMD threshold. Therefore, the GHG emissions for the proposed project would have a less -than -significant impact under CEQA. If the project were to start operation beyond 2020, then it is assumed that GHG emissions would remain below the significance threshold since emissions decrease over time due to improvements in vehicle emissions and use of cleaner energy. Table 9 Combined Annual GHG Emissions Emission Source Annual Emissions (MT of CO2e) Operational Area 1 Energy 27 Mobile 176 Solid Waste 6 52 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Emission Source Annual Emissions (MT of CO2e) Water 2 Mobile CO2 and CH4 __ N20 -- Total 211 BAAQMD Threshold 1,100 Exceeds Threshold? No Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2020 b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less than Significant) The project would be subject to the most recent requirements under rule making developed at the state and local level regarding GHG emissions and would be subject to local policies that may affect emissions of GHGs. These include the BAAQMD May 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines for GHG emissions, the Burlingame DSP, and the Burlingame Climate Action Plan. These regulations identify emissions levels (1,100 MT of CO2e per year) for which the project would not be expected to substantially conflict with existing California legislation adopted to reduce statewide GHG emissions. This BAAQMD annual emissions threshold was designed to capture 90 percent of all emissions associated with projects in the SFBAAB so that a considerable reduction in emissions from new projects would be achieved. The project would implement emissions reduction strategies and BMPs as required by the 2016 CALGreen Building Standards. Because the project would implement water and energy efficient measures and would not exceed the applicable threshold (1,100 MT of CO2e per year), project implementation would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, and impacts would be less than significant. 53 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Issues Would the project: Significant or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ® ❑ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ® ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous ® ❑ or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list ❑ ❑ ❑ of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ ❑ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically ❑ interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or ❑ indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Setting The project site encompasses three parcels with addresses of 1214, 1218, and 1220 Donnelly Avenue, referred to collectively in this document as 1214 Donnelly Avenue. The 0.36-acre project site is predominantly flat. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted by ProTech in September 2016 to identify and evaluate any potential hazards to human health in the vicinity of the project site (see Appendix D). The existing structures on the project site proposed for demolition include the following: 54 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue ■ Foundation of fire damaged former residential unit that was converted to office spaces (1214 Donnelly) ■ Occupied four -unit residential complex (in two buildings) and a detached two -car garage (1220 Donnelly) The 2016 Phase I ESA found no "Recognized Environmental Concerns" (RECs), no "Controlled Recognized Environmental Concerns" (CRECs) and no "Historical Recognized Environmental Concerns" (HREC) in connection with the property. Table 10 lists all active listed sites located within one eighth of a mile of the project site. Table 10 Environmental Concerns Near the Project Site Name Address Distance from Listing Status Project Site (mi) Lorton Place Owners Association 345 Lorton Avenue 0.025 LUST Closed RGA Listed Kirkbride Property 307 Lorton Avenue 0.058 LUST LUST Closed RGA Listed Sabatini Trust 361 California 0.059 LUST LUST Closed Gerritson Property 1229 Burlingame Avenue 0.072 RGA Listed LUST RGA Kim Mills Texaco Listed (former) 401 California 0.073 LUST LUST Closed N/A 345 California Drive 0.075 EDR Hist Listed Cleaners EDR Hist Listed Primrose Cleaners Cleaners Gates Globe Cleaners 339 Primrose Road 0.084 Dry Listed cleaners The Wine Shop 337 Primrose Road 0.084 EDR Listed Cleaners Burlingame High Certified School 400 Carolan Avenue 0.117 DEED O&M Source: Phase I ESA 2016 55 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Discussion a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Less than Significant) Implementation of the project would construct a new 35,075-square-foot commercial and multi- family building including a ground -level parking garage. This would involve demolition of the existing structures on site, including the foundations of buildings which were destroyed in a 2013 fire at 1214 and 1218 Donnelly Avenue, as well as a two-story residential structure and a detached accessory residential structure at 1220 Donnelly Avenue. During construction of the project, paint, building material finishing products, and automotive oil would be used. However, such materials would be used temporarily and typically do not generate hazardous air pollutant emissions or pose a long-term threat to human health or the environment. Improper disposal could increase risk of exposure for nearby residents through direct contact or by adversely affecting soil, groundwater, or other surface waters. However, any hazardous materials transportation, use, and disposal as part of the project would be subject to federal and state hazardous materials laws and regulations. Primary federal laws pertaining to hazardous materials and wastes include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). RCRA includes procedures and requirements for managing hazardous materials and for cleanup of hazardous materials releases. CERCLA delineates the liability for contamination between current property owners and others. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act regulates the transport of hazardous materials. The federal government delegates enforcement authority to the states. With adherence to such regulations regarding the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) According to the Phase I ESA, no documented hazardous material use or storage is associated with the project site. While no contamination is recorded on the project site, asbestos - containing materials, lead based paint, and lead containing materials could be encountered during construction given the age of the existing structures. Demolition of these structures could expose construction workers, or others, to asbestos and lead -based paint products, if present. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ 1 through HAZ-3 would reduce impacts associated with demolition and construction to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: The contractor shall comply with Title 8, California Code of Regulations/Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements that cover construction work where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes the proper removal and disposal of peeling paint, and appropriate sampling of painted 56 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue building surfaces for lead prior to disturbance of the paint and disposal of the paint or painted materials. Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: The applicant shall contract a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct an asbestos survey prior to disturbing potential asbestos containing building materials and following the Consultant's recommendations for proper handling and disposal. Mitigation Measure HAZ-3: Workers handling demolition and renovation activities at the project site will be trained in the safe handling and disposal of any containments with which they are handling or disposing of on the project site. Operation The project would connect to the existing municipal services, which would not use the extraction of groundwater for supply. With implementation of the above -mentioned mitigation measures, impacts associated with reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be reduced to a less - than -significant level. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) Burlingame High School is the nearest school to the project site, approximately 0.19 miles northeast. There are no other schools within one -quarter mile of the project site. During construction, demolition of the existing building would potentially involve the handling and disposal of hazardous waste products, including asbestos, lead, motor and transmission oils, etc. Most of these substances are typically found within commercial sites. Additionally, the excavation and grading associated with construction activities at the project site could result in encountering potentially contaminated soils, soil vapors, and groundwater. Handling of such substances would be regulated by federal and state hazardous materials laws that would minimize the risk of exposure to nearby land uses, including schools. Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3 would further reduce potential risk of exposure to nearby land uses. During operation, the project would be used for residential and commercial uses. Common chemicals and materials used at the site would be typical of such uses and would not be considered hazardous. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (No Impact) According to a review of all applicable federal, state, and local databases related to hazardous material and/or cleanup listings completed as part of the Phase I ESA, the property at 1214 57 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Donnelly Avenue is not included on the Cortese list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Therefore, no impact would occur. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? (No Impact) San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the project site; however, the project site does not fall within any of the airport's "safety compatibility zones" and is, therefore, not considered as being within an area of potential danger involving the operation of SFO (C/CAG 2012). Therefore, no impact would occur. There are no private airstrips within the project vicinity. Therefore, there would be no safety hazard impacts to people residing or working in the project area due to operations at private airstrips. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than Significant) The project would be located on previously developed commercial and residential land. Access points to the site would be constructed connecting to Donnelly Avenue to ensure proper access for emergency vehicles. The City does not have an established evacuation plan. However, the proposed project would adhere to the guidelines established within the Safety Element of the General Plan. Additionally, the Safety Operations Plan between the City of Burlingame and Town of Hillsborough would be implemented in the case of an emergency, and the project would comply with procedures determined by the Safety Operations Plan, if such an event arose (City of Hillsborough 2007). Furthermore, the project plans would be subject to review and approval by the City and the Fire Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Therefore, the project would not conflict with and adopted emergency response or evacuation plan and the impact would be less than significant. g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? (No Impact) The project site and surrounding vicinity are entirely developed. The area does not contain, nor is it adjacent to, wildlands. Accordingly, implementation of the project would not result in the exposure of people or structures to significant loss, injury, or death involving fire. No impact would occur. 58 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 10 Hydrology and Water Quality Issues Would the project: Significant or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ® ❑ discharge requirements? or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in substantial erosion or siltation El El® ❑ on- or off -site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount El El® ❑ of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; iii) Create or contribute runoff water which El El® ❑ would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? or iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? ® ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk ® ❑ release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a ❑ ❑ ❑ water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Setting San Mateo County is within the San Francisco Bay portion of the Coast Range Geologic Province. Annual average precipitation in San Mateo County is reported at approximately 19.6 inches. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) monitor water quality in the Bay Area. These agencies oversee the implementation of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater discharge permits. 59 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study The City participates in the San Mateo Countywide Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP) and is required to implement Low Impact Development (LID) BMPs under Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) (Provision C.3.b.). LID practices include source control BMPs, site design BMPs, and stormwater treatment BMPs on site or at a joint stormwater treatment facility. Burlingame Water Division of the Public Works Department, which purchases treated water from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, provides potable water to the project site. Approximately 85 percent of the water supply comes from the Hetch Hetchy watershed in the Sierra Nevada Mountains and approximately 15 percent comes from local watersheds. The project area does not contain any natural surface drainage. Stormwater runoff is entirely contained within a storm drainage system that utilizes Burlingame Creek, Ralston Creek, and Terrace Creek for drainage purposes. Each of these waterways are located within 0.5 mile of the project site. The project site does not include any surface waters; the nearest body of surface water to the subject property is the San Francisco Bay, located approximately one mile east of the project site. Groundwater is estimated to be present at a depth of 14 feet below grade. Fluctuations in the level of ground water can occur due to variations in rainfall, landscaping, underground drainage patterns, and other factors. It is also possible that perched ground water conditions could develop in the soils during and after significant rainfall or due to landscape watering at the property and the upslope areas. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the project site is located within Zone B (500-year floodplain), which is an area subject to inundation by a 0.2 percent annual chance flood event. Discussion a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? (Less than Significant) Construction of the project would include typical activities such as site grading, excavation for building foundations, concrete work, framing, and interior and exterior architectural coatings. The maximum depth of these activities would be approximately 2 feet 6 inches below ground surface. Groundwater depth is estimated at 14 feet. Fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation practice, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made. Furthermore, watering conditions of nearby properties can produce varying groundwater conditions. Perched groundwater and seeps from the adjacent properties may be encountered during excavations during construction activities. Construction activities also have the potential to result in runoff that contains sediment and other pollutants that could degrade water quality if not properly controlled. Sources of pollution associated with construction include chemical substances from construction materials and hazardous or toxic materials, such as fuels. Because the project would disturb less than one acre of soil during construction, the project would not be subject to a State NPDES General Construction Permit. We Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Implementation of the project would result in approximately 1,641 square feet of pervious area throughout the project site and 13,968 square feet of impervious area. Under existing conditions, there is approximately 973 square feet of pervious on the project site and 14,636 square feet of impervious surfaces. Construction and operation of the project would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? (No Impact) The project site is partially paved and developed and does not directly contribute to groundwater recharge. The project does not include plans to use groundwater resources for future uses. Because there is no plan to create water wells on the site and the site would continue to receive municipal water from the City of Burlingame Water Division of Public Works, the project would not substantially deplete groundwater. Therefore, no impact would occur. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site; (Less than Significant) There are no natural drainage features within downtown Burlingame. The existing drainage pattern entails the use of lined channels, culverts, and underground pipes, all of which eventually drain into the San Francisco Bay. Project construction would involve ground disturbing activities. Because the project size is below the 1-acre threshold (0.36 acre in total), project construction would not be subject to the NPDES General Construction Permit. Implementation of the project would include the construction of a new on site stormwater drainage system to collect and convey stormwater runoff. The existing stormwater system would be redesigned to accommodate the new building and comply with the City's stormwater requirements. The construction of new drainage is included in the overall construction footprint and construction equipment assumptions for the project. As described under question "a" above, the project would increase the amount of pervious surface on the project site by approximately 668 square feet. With the construction of new drainage and stormwater infrastructure, the project would help offset the amount of stormwater runoff by lessening the stormwater volume entering the City's storm drains and larger stormwater conveyance system. No new water -intensive activities are proposed that would contribute substantial additional runoff that could exceed the capacity of stormwater drainage systems in the area. Additionally, with compliance to state and local regulations and the implementation of BMPs, impacts to drainage patterns and surface runoff, resulting in erosion or siltation would be minimized. As such, the project would not contribute substantial amounts of sediment to storm drain systems or alter existing drainage patterns to the extent that would result in flooding on -or off -site. The impact would be less than significant. 61 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; (Less than Significant) and iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Less than Significant) Implementation of the project would include the construction of a new on site stormwater drainage system to collect and convey stormwater runoff. This system would comply with all City stormwater regulations and would utilize BMPs such as bioretention flow through planters located on the north and south sides of the project, permeable pavers located along Donnelly Avenue, and stormwater media filters. These stormwater management improvements would ensure that drainage and surface runoff in the area would not be substantially increased such that flooding would result. Additionally, this system would treat stormwater runoff prior to draining into the local stormwater drainage system such that the project would not be an additional source of polluted runoff. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? (Less than Significant) According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Project site is categorized by FEMA as Zone X (500-year floodplain), which is an area subject to inundation by a 0.2 percent annual chance flood event. As described above, flooding risks associated with the project would be further reduced with implementation of a stormwater drainage system that would meet all City requirements. Given the low risk of flooding on the project site and the inclusion of a stormwater drainage system in the project design, the potential to impede or redirect flood flows would be low and the impact would be less than significant. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? (Less than Significant) The closest dam to the project site is Crystal Springs Dam, located approximately four miles southwest of the project site. Due to the distance if the dam to the project site, it does not pose extensive safety hazards to the project; the four mile distance would significantly reduce the velocity of moving water, and consequently any possible impacts in the unforeseen incidence of dam failure would not expose people or structures within the project vicinity to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death. Additionally, in 2016 the dam underwent completed renovations to enhance the safety of the structure in the event of a major earthquake. Implementation of the project would not significantly change the existing conditions or expose people or structures to significant risk due to failure of a levee or a dam. Therefore, the impacts due to development in Flood Hazard Areas would be less than significant. Tsunamis are large ocean waves generated by earthquakes and can be damaging to lowland coastal areas. The project site is approximately 10 miles away from the Pacific coast, and the risk of damage due to a tsunami is low. According to the Burlingame DSP IS/MND, downtown Burlingame is located 25 feet above sea level, and any large wave would have dissipated to less 62 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue than 18 feet by the time it reaches the City. Large earthquakes can also generate oscillating waves in enclosed bodies of water (seiche), such as bays, lakes, and reservoirs. The project site is located approximately one mile west of the San Francisco Bay, and three miles northeast of the Crystal Springs Reservoir. Since the project site is not located in the immediate vicinity of any bays, lakes, or reservoirs, the probability of a seiche from either the San Francisco Bay or the Crystal Springs Reservoir having enough momentum to affect the property site is low. Furthermore, as no steep slopes are in close proximity to the project site, the possibility of inundation by landslides or mudflows would be remote. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? (No impact) Because the project would disturb less than one acre of soil during construction, the project would not be subject to a State NPDES General Construction Permit. All the groundwater basins within San Mateo County are designated as very low priority basins and thus, a sustainable groundwater management plan is not required for these basins. Therefore, the project would not conflict with a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan and no impact would occur. 63 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 11 Land Use and Planning Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Setting The project site is within the "Donnelly Avenue Area" of the Burlingame DSP (see Figure 3), which designates the area primarily for retail and office uses and is zoned DAC (Donnelly Avenue Commercial). 5 Existing residential uses may remain and be improved, but the zoning district regulations do not allow new residential uses. The project proposes to amend the DSP and DAC zoning regulations to allow residential uses above the first floor, only on those properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue and that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue. Discussion a) Physically divide an established community? (No Impact) As previously discussed, the project would replace an existing multi -family residential building and develop two existing vacant or mostly vacant lots. The mixed -use project would include commercial uses on the ground floor that would be consistent with surrounding restaurant and retail uses while the residential uses on the second and third stories would be consistent with the multi -family residential uses to the northwest. Given this, the project would not result in physical division of an established community; therefore, no impact would occur. 5 As noted in the Project Description, the City completed the process of updating its General Plan in 2019. The Final EIR for the General Plan update was certified in January 2019, at the same time the updated General Plan was adopted by the City Council. However, the project application was received by the City, deemed complete, and determined to be subject to CEQA prior to the General Plan update. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060, which provides direction to CEQA lead agencies on when formal CEQA review shall begin, this analysis evaluates the project against the prior General Plan land use map. However as a matter of reference, the updated General Plan did not make any changes to the exiting Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). 64 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Less than Significant) As previously discussed, the "Donnelly Avenue Area" of the DSP and current zoning on the project site (DAC) do not allow new residential uses. Therefore, required project approvals include amendments to the DSP and DAC zoning regulations to allow for residential use (above the first floor, only on those properties within the DAC zone that lie north of Donnelly Avenue and that have sole frontage on Donnelly Avenue) with a Conditional Use Permit. The DSP includes various Goals and Policies to guide growth and development in Downtown Burlingame. The proposed mixed -use development, which includes residential units above ground floor commercial space, is consistent with Policy LU-6.1, which encourages allowing housing in the Howard Avenue area as well as on the periphery of Downtown. With the approval of amendments to the DSP and DAC zoning regulations and procurement of a Conditional Use Permit, the project would not conflict with any applicable land use plans or policies, and the impact would be less than significant. According to the Burlingame DSP IS/MND, the site is not part of or near an existing Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or any other local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, no impact would occur. 65 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 12 Mineral Resources Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known El El El U�11 mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally El El El V\J important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Setting The California Geological Survey (CGS) is responsible under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMARA) for classifying land into Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs) based on the known or inferred mineral resource potential of that land. Based upon available data, the project site and area surrounding the project limits have been classified as MRZ-1, which is defined as "areas where geologic information indicates no significant mineral deposits are present" (DOC 2000). This finding is reflected in the San Mateo County General Plan Mineral Resources map (San Mateo County 1986). Discussion a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (No Impact) and b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? (No Impact) The project site is currently developed and not used for mineral recovery activities. Moreover, no known mineral resources exist within the project site or surrounding area, as indicated by the Mineral Resource Zones and Resource Sectors San Francisco and San Mateo Counties Maps (CGS 2013) and the San Mateo County General Plan (San Mateo County 1986). Implementation of the project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value to the region and residents of the state, nor of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, no impact would occur. Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 13 Noise Issues Would the project result in: Significant or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact a) Generation of a substantial temporary or El® ❑ ❑ permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration El® ❑ ❑ or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a El El® ❑ private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Setting Noise is defined as unwanted sound that disturbs human activity. Environmental noise levels typically fluctuate over time, and different types of noise descriptors are used to account for this variability. Noise level measurements include intensity, frequency, and duration, as well as time of occurrence. Noise level (or volume) is generally measured in decibels (dB) using the A - weighted sound pressure level (dBA). The A -weighting scale is an adjustment to the actual sound power levels to be consistent with that of human hearing response, which is most sensitive to frequencies around 4,000 Hertz (about the highest note on a piano) and less sensitive to low frequencies (below 100 Hertz). Because of the logarithmic scale of the decibel unit, sound levels cannot be added or subtracted arithmetically. If a sound's physical intensity is doubled, the sound level increases by three dBA, regardless of the initial sound level. For example, 60 dBA plus 60 dBA equals 63 dBA. Where ambient noise levels are high in comparison to a new noise source, the change in noise level would be less than three dBA. For example, when 70 dBA ambient noise levels are combined with a 60 dBA noise source, the resulting noise level equals 70.4 dBA. The time period in which noise occurs is important since noise that occurs at night tends to be more disturbing than that which occurs during the day. Community noise is usually measured using Day -Night Average Level (Ldn), which is the 24-hour average noise level with a 10-dBA penalty for noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours, or Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is the 24-hour average noise level with a 5 dBA penalty for noise occurring from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and a 10 dBA penalty for noise occurring from 67 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Noise levels described by Ldn and CNEL typically do not differ by more than one dBA. In practice, CNEL and Ldn are often used interchangeably. Noise that is experienced at any receptor can be attenuated by distance or the presence of noise barriers or intervening terrain. Sound from a single source (i.e., a point source) radiates uniformly outward as it travels away from the source in a spherical pattern. The sound level attenuates (or drops off) at a rate of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance. A large object or barrier in the path between a noise source and a receptor can substantially attenuate noise levels at the receptor. The amount of attenuation provided by this shielding depends on the size of the object, proximity to the noise source and receptor, surface weight, solidity, and the frequency content of the noise source. Natural terrain features (such as hills and dense woods) and human -made features (such as buildings and walls) can significantly reduce noise levels. Walls are often constructed between a source and a receptor specifically to reduce noise. A barrier that breaks the line of sight between a source and a receptor will typically result in at least five dBA of noise reduction. The manner in which buildings in California are constructed generally provides a reduction of exterior -to -interior noise levels of approximately 25 dBA with closed windows (Federal Transit Administration [FTA] 2006). Regulatory Setting The Burlingame General Plan Noise Element includes goals and policies related to noise to guide development and to protect citizens from the harmful and irritating effects of excessive noise. The element establishes land use compatibility categories of new uses within the on -site noise environment, as shown in Table 11. For residential uses the City considers noise levels less than 60 dBA CNEL acceptable. Table 11 Outdoor Noise Level Planning Criteria Maximum Outdoor Noise Levels (dBA) Land Use Categories CNEL Public, Quasi -Public and Residential: 60 Schools, Hospitals, Libraries, Auditoriums, Intensively Used Parks and Playgrounds, Public Buildings, Single -Family Homes, Multi -Family Apartments and Condominiums, Mobile Home Parks Passively Used Open Space: 45 Wilderness -Type Parks, Nature or Contemplation Areas of Public Parks Commercial: 65 M Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Maximum Outdoor Noise Levels (dBA) Land Use Categories CNEL Shopping Centers, Self -Generative Business, Commercial Districts, Offices, Banks, Clinics, Hotels and Motels Industrial: 75 Non -Manufacturing Industry, Transportation, Communications, Utilities, Manufacturing Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019 Note: These criteria may be invoked for the following purposes: a. To determine the suitability of development on lands considered as receptors to which the standards apply b. To determine the suitability of building types arid proposed construction materials to be applied to the site The City's General Plan Noise Element also provides allowable limits for construction equipment, as shown in Table 12. The General Plan also states that no construction noise may be emitted past the property line so as to result in a noise level increase of more than 5 dBA Lmax above ambient Lmax noise levels. Furthermore, the General Plan provides guidelines for determining whether significant acoustical impacts from a project would occur. Table 12 Maximum Allowable Noise Levels from Construction Equipment Equipment Peak Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet Earthmoving Front loaders 75 Backhoes 75 Dozers 75 Tractors 75 Scrapers 80 Graders 75 Trucks 75 Pavers 80 Materials Handling WE 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Equipment Peak Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet Concrete mixers 75 Concrete pumps 75 Cranes 75 Derricks 75 Stationary Pumps 75 Generators 75 Compressors 75 Impact Pile drivers 95 Jackhammers 75 Rock drills 80 Pneumatic tools 80 Other Saws 75 Vibrators 75 Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019. The City of Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 18.07.110 states that the allowable hours of construction in the City are between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is allowed on Sundays and holidays. Project Site Noise Environment The primary source of noise in the project area is motor vehicles (e.g., automobiles, buses, trucks) along local roadways. Secondary sources of noise are overhead aircraft associated with SFO and rail noise from the nearby Caltrain tracks. Motor vehicle noise is characterized by a high number of individual events, which often create sustained noise levels. Ambient noise levels would be expected to be highest during the daytime and rush hour unless congestion slows speeds substantially. 70 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue To determine ambient noise levels in the project site vicinity, two long-term noise measurements and one short-term noise measurement were taken beginning on November 12, 2019 and concluding on November 14, 2019 (see Figure 9). Table 13 below shows the location of the long-term and short-term on site noise measurements. Noise Measurement (NM) 1 was taken along Donnelly Avenue, NM 2 was taken along Bellevue Avenue, and NM 3 was a short- term noise measurement taken at the rear of 1215 Belleview Avenue. Noise measurement results are shown in Table 13. Table 13 Project Noise Monitoring Results Approximate Measurement Measurement Sample Distance to Leq[15] Lmax Location Location Times Primary Noise (dBA) (dBA) Source 1 Along Donnelly 12:00 a.m. — 18 feet 65 95 Avenue 11:59 p.m. 2 Along Bellevue 12:00 a.m. — 18 feet 60 82.5 Avenue 11:59 p.m. 3 Rear of 1215 12:10 p.m. — 60 feet 48 62 Bellevue Avenue 12:20 p.m. Source: Illingworth & Rodkin 2019. 71 LT- ire T Ulm A0, loAft Figure ^ Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Discussion a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The project would demolish the existing structure and construct a new three-story mixed -use building containing commercial and multi -family uses on the project site. A significant noise impact would occur if the project would generate a temporary or permanent noise level increase over ambient noise levels and would exceed applicable noise standards presented in the General Plan or Municipal Code at existing noise sensitive receptors around the project site. Temporary Construction Noise A significant temporary noise impact would occur if construction -related noise would be more than five dBA above ambient noise levels, occur outside of the hours specified in the Municipal Code, or occur without the inclusion of BMPs. Project construction would expose existing noise sensitive land uses to a temporary increase in ambient noise levels. Noise impacts from construction depend on the construction equipment, timing and duration of noise -generating activities, and distance between construction and noise -sensitive areas. Construction noise impacts primarily result when construction occurs during noise sensitive times (e.g., early morning, evening, or nighttime), construction occurs in areas adjoining noise -sensitive land, or when construction lasts over extended periods of time. Construction would occur during allowable (daytime) hours and is expected to take approximately 17 months beginning in late 2020. Construction activities generate the most noise when heavy equipment is used. Table 12 establishes standards for construction equipment within the City. Impact equipment is not planned for project construction and —as shown in Table 12—maximum allowable noise levels from non -impact construction equipment range from 75 to 80 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. The center of the project site is approximately 60 feet from residential land uses and 70 feet from commercial and office uses. At these distances, the maximum noise levels from construction would be in the range of 72 to 78 dBA Lmax. These maximum levels would be similar in level to maximum noise levels generated by existing ambient traffic but could occasionally exceed ambient Lmax noise levels by five dBA or more when construction is located adjacent to shared property lines. Without the introduction of BMPs, construction would have a significant impact on temporary increases in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project. Therefore, all applicable construction BMPs listed in Section 8.9.19 of the DSP would be implemented during construction. These measures would include the following: ■ Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. ■ Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site. 73 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study ■ Use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound barriers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors. ■ Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community. ■ Minimize backing movements of equipment. ■ Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible. Construction activities for the proposed project would include the following additional BMPs to reduce noise from construction activities near sensitive land uses: ■ In compliance with Chapter 18.07.110 of the Municipal Code, construction activities, including truck traffic coming to and from the construction site for any purpose, shall be limited to the hours between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. (no construction is allowed on Sundays and Holidays), in accordance with the City's Municipal Code, unless permission is granted with a development permit or other planning approval. ■ Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. ■ Avoid the use of circular saws, miter/chop saws, and radial arm saws near the adjoining noise -sensitive receptors. Where feasible, shield saws with a solid screen with material having a minimum surface density of 2 Ibs/ft2 (e.g., such as %" plywood). ■ Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines should be strictly prohibited. ■ Control noise from construction workers' radios to a point where they are not audible at existing residences bordering the project site. ■ Maintain smooth vehicle pathways for trucks and equipment accessing the site and avoid local residential neighborhoods as much as possible. ■ During final grading, substitute graders for bulldozers, where feasible. Wheeled heavy equipment are quieter than track equipment and should be used where feasible. ■ During interior construction, locate noise -generating equipment within the building to break the line -of -sight to the adjoining receptors. ■ The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction plan identifying the schedule for major noise -generating construction activities. The construction plan shall identify a procedure for coordination with adjacent residential land uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize noise disturbance. ■ Designate a "disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g. bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site and include it in the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule. Implementation of the BMPs described above would reduce construction noise levels, limit construction hours, and minimize disruption and annoyance. Therefore, temporary construction noise impacts would be less than significant. 74 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Permanent Noise Level Increase A significant noise increase would occur if the project would increase noise levels at noise - sensitive receptors by three dBA CNEL or more where ambient noise levels exceed the "normally acceptable" noise level standard. For example, a significant impact would occur if traffic due to the project would permanently increase ambient levels by three dBA CNEL, which is equivalent to a permanent doubling of traffic in the project area. Permanent project noise increase is expected to be less than one dBA CNEL along all roadways in the project area. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Operational Noise Levels in Excess of Standards Noise generating loading and unloading activities are limited to between 7:00am and 10:00 pm on weekdays and 8:00 am and 10:00 pm on weekends and holidays under Chapter 10.40.039 of the City's Municipal Code. The commercial retail component of the project would include truck deliveries. Based on the size of the proposed commercial use, deliveries would not be expected more than once or twice per week and would take place during allowable hours. With the number and size of existing commercial uses in the project area, one or two truck deliveries would not be expected to measurably increase noise levels in the project vicinity, and therefore would have a less than significant impact. Mixed -use buildings typically include various mechanical equipment such as air -conditioners, exhaust fans, chillers, pumps, and air handling systems. A mechanical room and exhaust shafts will be located on the rooftop, a trash and recycling room will be located in the rear of the first floor, and utility rooms will be located on the first floor and rooftop. The mechanical and utility rooms will be completely enclosed, and equipment located indoors would not be anticipated to generate substantial noise at off -site locations. It is not currently known where HVAC systems will be located. However, due to the potential proximity of noise generating equipment to neighboring land uses, there is a potentially significant impact. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1 would be required. Mitigation Measure N0I-1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City's 60 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime requirements at the property lines of surrounding noise sensitive uses. Section 5.2.5.8 of the City of Burlingame DSP includes a provision for rooftop equipment: Mixed -use buildings with a residential component should exhibit rooflines and architectural character consistent with the Downtown commercial character. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building and screened for noise. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City's noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, selection of equipment that emits low 75 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line -of -sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1 this impact would be less than significant. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) Vibration from project construction could be perceptible at existing structures near the project site when heavy construction is located along property lines. While the City does not specify a construction vibration limit, the California Department of Transportation (DOT) recommends a vibration limit of 0.5 in/sec peak particle velocity (PPV) for new residential and modern/commercial structures, 0.3 in/sec PPV for older residential structures, and a conservative limit of 0.25 in/sec PPV for historic and some old buildings. The closest structure to the project site is a commercial structure located approximately five feet from the site boundary. There are also multi -family residential structures located approximately 10 feet from the site boundary. Table 14 presents vibration levels from construction equipment at the reference distance of 25 feet and levels calculated at various distances representing nearby buildings. Table 14 Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment at Various Distances PPV at 25 ft. PPV at 5 ft. PPV at 10 ft. PPV at 65 ft. Equipment (in/sec) (in/sec) (in/sec) (in/sec) Clam shovel drop 0.202 1.186 0.553 0.071 In soil 0.008 0.047 0.022 0.003 Hydromill (slurry wall) In rock 0.017 0.100 0.047 0.006 Vibratory Roller 0.21 1.233 0.575 0.073 Hoe Ram 0.089 0.523 0.244 0.031 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.523 0.244 0.031 Caisson drilling 0.089 0.523 0.244 0.031 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.446 0.208 0.027 Jackhammer 0.035 0.206 0.096 0.012 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.018 0.008 0.001 76 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, United States Department of Transportation, Office of Planning and Environment, Federal Transit Administration, October 2018 as modified by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., November 2019. As indicated in Table 14, equipment such as clam shovel drops, and vibratory rollers would exceed the 0.5 in/sec PPV and 0.3 in/sec PPV maximum vibration levels. At these levels, structural damage at nearby buildings would be possible. Therefore, Mitigation Measure N0I-2 would be required. Mitigation Measure N0I-2: As required under Section 9.9.20 of the City of Burlingame DSP, loaded truck and other vibration -generating equipment shall avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent possible to still meet construction goals. Additionally, the following measures would be implemented during construction: ■ Operating equipment on the construction site shall be placed as far as possible from vibration -sensitive receptors. ■ Smaller equipment shall be used to the extent feasible to minimize vibration levels below the limits. ■ Use of vibratory rollers, tampers, and impact tools near sensitive areas shall be avoided to the extent feasible. ■ Neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site shall be notified of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels during project construction activities. ■ If heavy construction is proposed within 12 feet of commercial structures and/or 18 feet of residential structures, a construction vibration -monitoring plan shall be implemented prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities located within these setbacks. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks: ■ The contractor shall conduct a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for structures located within 25 feet of construction. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating construction activities located within 25 feet of the structure. The surveys shall include internal and external crack monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of the structure. ■ The contractor shall conduct a post -survey on the structure where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities. ■ The contractor shall designate a person responsible for registering and investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site. 77 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study The results of any vibration monitoring shall be summarized and submitted in a report shortly after substantial completion of each phase identified in the project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration certificates, and graphics as required to clearly identify vibration -monitoring locations. An explanation of all events that exceeded vibration limits will be included together with proper documentation supporting any such claims. Implementation of the measures included in Mitigation Measure N0I-2 would reduce the impact to a less -than -significant level. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Less than Significant) The closest airport to the project site is SFO located approximately 2.1 miles northwest. The project site lies outside the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan boundaries for SFO that indicate that aircraft noise levels of 65 dBA CNEL or less are considered compatible with residential land uses as shown in Figure 10. While aircraft -related noise is audible at the project site, it does not substantially contribute to ambient noise levels. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. 78 1214 Donnelly Ave, Burlingame, CA I ~ ' ��• .�' �� •� j ' ---- Alrpari P1aP.17y ea Orga,y — Almr.n Ror.f con tour . r� 4R Gr30f1 - Nlrnlclprl Flo unO.r, III r, �►� � ''' 4 NO15€ SEH9171YE FA CIL ITrES 1i ti 9 I BR[S BANE Q N..plul �c.ryhpeRl o . C L s� _� �, 3 Plana! Wpnhlp 1. ' •'\ ' __ �.,y �} H11tprIC &[rUC1 Yr.. d.owe g/y' ''v !• `•1 •f.jj 'ti �+ �.. �..� GENERALIZED —EXI,I STIPtG LANO USE �� r-. II •� �• , `•• / r' i multi-Fo-17 Ae.10en[ieI iey pll .^. .•� ,SOUTH SAN FRANCISCd-'�' •• I ''i11l�� ti ,� y _ � : �.o• i 1uou.trl.I PI PYM1IIG i r i Mlrad Va. ••�r �+ i Open SpatelR.cr.a7i001Preaerr.11en _ - �' y :ML '' ► } i PerilGel! En er.elE emele ry 1 x r5y 5:'�' , 5y� San FrallcisC W.— „ ^7_ Ve—IlUnk— O ('r••..... �: � 3 r CNEL - C—uniq Kalif E.rn.:ani Lem ! \ , . i dO — D.C10.1 .= �S 1 1 ti• 4 t.f R 'I ? 0 2m7 • ��''•� � - 'i � ten« l �•' aet ••v [[agg .,' it.• -'--.� ..._.._ tllsn. zw F.F1 ,I • S"g �� � f - L�r.. Pmnn ep .n6 6olie lny"D p.rlmannt�, 4o i zq ESA A� 0-20 tn: 0- 21)14 .l. 14 t j: SAH}I3R • No ; San Francisco International Alrpor. . � �, yo�'-�'��y �,: r� f `� -• NHS y� ._ PACIFICA 4*7 a® M I L LtB+ A E , r' f ♦ \i 41 r • i + '� sy& BUR LAIN, . UNINCORPORATED + i �•�:. `�• r.:rfr-ram - 2019 Noise Exposure Map :�:. �� ,-•-wr �.�'�� '.:ram r.,,, �.,<.r,�...em ��'' :.� . , �. ,.,y r• Lr MILLS60 } $.•'' SAN MATE iRd F"��"' rc'� •' e� i .^t # I FOSTER CITY i' Comprehensive Airport Land Use Source: Wing worth&Rodkin, 2019 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 14 Population and Housing Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Setting According to the California Department of Finance (DOF) the population of Burlingame in 2018 was 30,345, slightly declining 0.09 percent by 2019 to 30,317. Jobs in the City are expected to increase by 6,340 between 2010 and 2030. While population has been relatively stable in recent years, the 2019 General Plan anticipates a population of approximately 36,600 by 2040 due to areas of the city being reclassified or upzoned to allow additional residential development. Discussion a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Less than significant) The DOF estimates that the current population of Burlingame is 30,317 (DOF 2019) with 13,120 housing units and an average of 2.40 persons per household (DOF 2019). Existing residences on the project site include 4 total units and approximately 10 existing residents within the project site (4 units x 2.40 persons per household). The project is expected to add approximately 30 residents and 12 commercial employees. Considering the replacement of existing residences, the project would result in a net population growth of 20 residents. The introduction of 20 additional residents and 12 new employees to the area would not constitute substantial population growth. Furthermore, the project site is completely urbanized and would not require the extension of roads or infrastructure into previously undeveloped areas. Finally, the project would require amendments to the DSP and the Zoning Code to allow the proposed residential units. With the approval of these changes, project -related growth would be accounted for in the relevant local planning documents. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. Me Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Less than significant) The project would replace two largely vacant lots and 4 residential units. These units would be replaced with 14 new housing units, which would result in a net increase of 10 units to the City's housing stock. For context, Burlingame has added an average of approximately 11 new units per year since 2010 (DOF 2018). No additional replacement housing would be required. Additionally, removal of existing residential units would not displace a substantial number of people that would trigger the construction of replacement housing elsewhere in the region. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. 81 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 15 Public Services Issues Would the project: Significant or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services?: i) Fire protection ❑ ❑ ❑ ii) Police protection ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Schools El El® ❑ iv) Parks El El® ❑ v) Other public facilities El El® ❑ Setting The Central County Fire Department (CCFD) provides fire protection services for Burlingame, Millbrae, and Hillsborough. Currently, the department operates six Engine Companies and one Truck Company out of six fire stations, with two stations in each city. CCFD's daily staffing consists of seven captains, seven firefighter/paramedics, eight firefighters, and one battalion chief on duty to provide fire, emergency medical services (EMS), and rescue services to approximately 70,000 residents and visitors. The closest fire station is located 0.4-mile northwest of the project site at 799 California Drive. This station houses a fire engine, fire truck, and a battalion chief with a total of seven employees. CCFD's general standard for emergency response times is seven minutes; however, a realistic average response time for the project site would be significantly less due to the proximity of the fire station (Reed 2020. The Burlingame Police Department (BPD) provides emergency services to the City. BPD has one police station located at 1111 Trousdale Drive. The BPD employs 70 total employees, including 40 sworn officers. The average emergency response time as of February 2018 was 4 minutes and 37 seconds (Kiely 2020. Burlingame contains five neighborhood schools that serve Kindergarten through grade 5 (K-5), one middle school for grades 6 through 8, and one high school. Of these, McKinley Elementary School and Burlingame High School, in the San Mateo Union High School District, would serve the project. 82 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Discussion a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services?: i) Fire protection (No Impact) According to the Central County Fire Department, the introduction of a mixed -use building containing 14 residential units at 1214 Donnelly Avenue would not require the construction of new or expanded fire facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Therefore, there would be no impact (Reed 2020). ii) Police protection (No Impact) The new development proposed would not result in a substantial population increase on -site. The BPD would continue to serve the project site, and no additional staff, facilities, or equipment would be needed as a result of project implementation (Kiely 2020. Therefore, no impact to police protection services would occur. iii) Schools (Less than Significant) Introduction of 14 new housing units would contribute to increased enrollment at nearby schools. Burlingame School District uses a generation rate of 0.2 new students per housing unit for elementary schools. Therefore, the project would be expected to generate approximately 3 new students. McKinley Elementary School is currently slightly under capacity with an enrollment of 563 and a capacity of 583. Development of the project alone would not cause the necessity for expanded schools; however, taken with the addition of other developments, it is possible that additional classrooms would be needed (Hellier 2020). San Mateo Unified High School District (SMUHSD) serves Burlingame's High School, which has approximately 1,529 students (SMUHSD 2019). The State of California has determined that housing units yield approximately 0.7 students per unit, resulting in about 613 to 862 new students added to the Burlingame School District (BSD) and/or the SMUHSD under the DSP by 2030. According to the BSD, the school district has not been at capacity and, as district policy, would not turn away students as long as they show proof of residency in the City. The BSD specifies that if the closest schools to Downtown Burlingame were at capacity, the students would be accommodated at another neighborhood school that is not at capacity (City of Burlingame, 2010). Under Section 65996 of the State Government Code, payment of school impact fees established by SB 50 is deemed to constitute full and complete mitigation for school impacts from development. Developers would be required to pay school impact fees commensurate with the project size at the time of building permit issuance. Fulfillment of this requirement would mitigate the development of residential uses' impacts to schools to a less -than -significant level. 83 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study iv) Parks (Less than Significant) The City's Parks and Recreation Department manages the following facilities: ■ Alpine Park Paloma Playground ■ Bayside Fields ' Pershing Park ■ Bayside Dog Exercise Park ' Ray Park ■ Community Garden at Bayside Fields Shorebird Sanctuary - Natural Marsh ■ Cuernavaca Park ' Trenton Playground ■ Heritage Park ' Victoria Park ■ "J" Lot Playground ' Village Park ■ Laguna Park ' Washington Park ■ Mills Canyon Wildlife Area ' Burlingame Golf Center ■ Murray Field ' Burlingame Aquatic Center The project does not include new park space, but it is located approximately 0.3 mile from Washington Park. The project would result in 20 net new residents and would yield increased tax revenue, which would contribute to the improvement of local recreational facilities. Additionally, the DSP contains open space policies that envision new public parks, open spaces, and landscaped areas that would help maintain access to parks and recreation facilities in the planning area. Therefore, no additional parks would be required and impacts to parks would be less than significant. and v) Other Public facilities (Less than Significant) The proposed project could create a potential increase in the demand for other public facilities such as libraries, childcare centers and hospitals. However, the new development would result in an expanded tax base that would provide support for the increased need for other public facilities. Therefore, the impacts to other public facilities would be less than significant. 84 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue 16 Recreation Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Significant Mitigation Less than Issues Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Setting Burlingame has approximately 20 recreation sites that consist of 14 parks and open space, 12 playgrounds, a community garden, bocce ball courts, soccer fields, a golf range, a recreation center, and an aquatic center (Burlingame Parks and Recreation Foundation 2018). Washington Park (18.9 acres) is located approximately 0.32 miles northeast of the project site. Pershing Park (1.1 acres) is located approximately 0.45 miles south of the project site. Discussion a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Less than Significant) and b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Less than Significant) The project would create 14 new housing units and may result in approximately 20 net new residents. This small increase in population would have a minimal impact on existing neighborhood parks and recreational facilities. To further minimize impacts from new residents, the City will collect Development Impact Fees as part of the entitlement process. A portion of these fees will be dedicated directly to the Parks and Recreation Department, allowing Burlingame to implement public improvement, public services, and community amenities at the City parks; therefore, this impact would be less than significant. 85 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 17 Transportation Issues Would the project: Significant or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Setting W-Trans prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project in February 2020 (see Appendix E). The TIA estimates the expected trip generation potential for the proposed project and analyzes the project's potential impacts at proposed access points and on alternative modes of transportation. The study area for transportation/traffic includes the following intersections: ■ California Drive/Broadway ■ El Camino Real/Chapin Avenue ■ California Drive/Lorton Avenue -Bellevue Avenue ■ Primrose Road/Donnelly Avenue ■ Lorton Avenue/Donnelly Avenue ■ El Camino Real/Burlingame Avenue ■ California Drive/Burlingame Avenue ■ California Drive/Peninsula Avenue The project site is located in the DSP Area, which has continuous sidewalks provided in the Downtown area and to surrounding residential neighborhoods. The City also has Class III bicycle routes for shared use with motor vehicles within the same travel lane on a street or highway, along Primrose Road, Chapin Avenue, and California Drive. The San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) provides regional and local fixed -route bus transit. Routes near the project site provide direct service to Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) stations and Caltrain stations, in addition to cities along the peninsula from Palo Alto to San Francisco. SamTrans Routes 46, 292, 397, ECR, and ECR Rapid provide access near the project M. Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue site. Routes 46 and 242 are located 0.13 miles from the project site and Routes 397, ECR, and ECR Rapid are located 0.27 miles from the site. The project is also located 0.18 miles southwest of the Burlingame Caltrain station. Discussion a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? (Less than Significant) Roadway Facilities The project would result in the development of three parcels of land along Donnelly Avenue. The development would result in seven new a.m. trips and 22 new p.m. trips while degrading study intersection operations by 1.4 seconds or less. Therefore, the impact to roadway facilities would be less than significant. Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signal phases, curb ramps, curb extensions, and various streetscape amenities such as lighting, benches, etc. The project includes widening the existing sidewalk and providing several access points from the sidewalk. Trees are proposed to be planted between the sidewalk and roadway, providing shade and separation for pedestrians from the roadway, therefore, impacts to pedestrian facilities would be less than significant. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle parking is proposed on the project site including the addition of publicly available bicycle parking spaces and private enclosed bicycle parking spaces. There are no proposed changes to roadway bicycle facilities; therefore, impacts to bicycle facilities would be less than significant. Transit Facilities SamTrans provides fixed -service bus routes near the project site and the Burlingame Caltrain Station is located within a quarter mile of the project site. The project would primarily involve off-street improvements. As there are no fixed routes serving Donnelly Avenue, transit impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? (Less than significant) CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b) specifies the use of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as a metric for determining transportation impacts. VMT analysis will become mandatory in July 2020. Because the City has not specifically adopted VMT methodology, conventional traffic analysis (delay -based — level of service) is used for the purposes of CEQA analysis. However, a VMT analysis is also included for informational purposes. Operating conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods were evaluated to capture the highest potential impacts for the proposed project as well as the highest volumes on the local 87 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study transportation network. Morning peak hours occur between 7:00 and 9:00 am while evening peak hours are between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. After deductions are considered for the existing land use, the project would be expected to generate 242 new trips daily, including seven during the morning peak hours and 22 during the evening peak hours. The trip generation summary, which shows the increase in traffic associated with the project compared to existing volumes can be found in Table 15. Table 15 Trip Generation Summary Land Use Units Daily AM Peak PM Peak Rate Rate Hour Out Rate Hour Out Trips Trips In Trips In Existing 9.44 -38 0.74 -3 -1 -2 0.99 -4 -2 -2 Single -Family Units -4 dul Proposed Condominiums 14 du l 7.32 102 10.46 6 1 5 10.56 8 5 3 Commercial Retail 4.704 ksf 137.75 178 10.94 4 3 1 13.81 18 9 9 Total 242 7 3 4 22 12 10 Note: du = dwelling unit; ksf = 1,000 square feet Level of Service (LOS) is used to rank traffic operation on various types of facilities based on traffic volumes and roadway capacity using a series of letter designations ranging from A to F. Generally, LOS A represents free flow conditions and LOS F represents forced flow or breakdown conditions. The threshold used to determine whether project -related impacts at signalized intersections would be considered adverse according to the City General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report is if additional traffic associated with the project would: ■ Degrade the AM or PM peak hour from an acceptable LOS D (55 seconds/vehicle) or better under Existing or No Project Conditions to an unacceptable LOS E or worse under Project Conditions except when LOS E is determined by the City of Burlingame as acceptable due to costs of mitigation or when there would be other unacceptable impacts; or ■ Degrade the AM or PM peak hour operating at LOS E or F under Existing or No Project Conditions by increasing the delay per vehicle by five (5) seconds or more. The project site is near El Camino Real (State Route 82), which is a corridor in the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and has an operational threshold of LOS E or better throughout the City. Under existing conditions, all intersections in the project area are operating at LOS C or better. Table 16 shows the existing peak hour intersection LOS. M.- Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Table 16 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. California Dr/Broadway 23.5 6.1 C A 25.5 8.3 C A 2. El Camino Real/Chapin Ave 3. California Dr/Lorton Ave -Bellevue Ave 3.0 A 3.1 A 4. Primrose Rd/Donnelly Ave 2.3 - 4.3 - 11.1 8 14.8 8 Westbound Approach 5. Lorton Ave/Donnelly Ave 2.9 - 3.9 - 9.9 A 12.7 8 Eastbound Approach 6. El Camino Real/Burlingame Ave 4.8 A 6.1 A 7. California Dr/Burlingame Ave 9.0 A 10.7 B 8. California Dr/Peninsula Ave 8.4 A 9.2 A Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; Results for minor approaches to two-way stop -controlled intersections are indicated in italics Near -Term traffic volumes were developed from nearby approved and proposed projects in the City of Burlingame, in addition to a five-year growth factor applied to the Existing volumes based on anticipated growth from the City/County Association of Governments 2040 Travel Forecast Model. As shown in Table 17, all eight study intersections would be expected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better under these conditions. Table 17 Near -Term Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. California Dr/Broadway 38.8 D 36.5 D 2. El Camino Real/Chapin Ave 6.1 A 8.4 A 3. California Dr/Lorton Ave -Bellevue Ave 3.5 A 3.7 A 4. Primrose Rd/Donnelly Ave 2.3 - 4.4 - 11.2 8 15.1 C Westbound Approach m 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Study Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 5. Lorton Ave/Donnelly Ave 2.6 - 3.6 - 10.2 8 13.6 8 Eastbound Approach 6. El Camino Real/Burlingame Ave 5.0 A 6.3 A 7. California Dr/Burlingame Ave 9.3 A 11.0 B 8. California Dr/Peninsula Ave 9.4 A 10.7 B Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; Results for minor approaches to two-way stop -controlled intersections are indicated in italics Near -term traffic volumes with the addition of project -generated traffic are shown in Table 18. Both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours delay are expected to increase slightly for California Drive/Broadway, Primrose Road/Donnelly Avenue westbound approach, and Lorton Avenue/Donnelly Avenue with the implementation of the project. However, the LOS grade for these intersections would not be affected. Because the eight study intersections are expected to continue operating acceptably at the same LOS with implementation of the project, this impact would be less than significant. Table 18 Near -Term Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. California Dr/Broadway 39.0 D 37.9 D 2. El Camino Real/Chapin Ave 6.1 A 8.4 A 3. California Dr/Lorton Ave -Bellevue Ave 3.5 A 3.7 A 4. Primrose Rd/Donnelly Ave 2.3 - 4.5 - 11.2 8 15.4 C Westbound Approach 5. Lorton Ave/Donnelly Ave 2.7 - 3.8 - 10.3 8 13.9 8 Eastbound Approach 6. El Camino Real/Burlingame Ave 5.0 A 6.3 A 7. California Dr/Burlingame Ave 9.4 A 11.0 B 0 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Study Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 8. California Dr/Peninsula Ave 10.7 Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; Results for minor approaches to two-way stop -controlled intersections are indicated in italics Informational VMT Analysis VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel associated with a project. VMT is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts under CEQA. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) states that land use projects would have a significant impact if the project would result in VMT exceeding an applicable significance threshold. The City has not yet adopted an applicable threshold of significance regarding VMT analysis, but generally, projects within one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high - quality transit corridor should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact under CEQA. The project site is located within a quarter mile of the Burlingame Caltrain Station and within half a mile of El Camino Real, which has frequent transit service. A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis indicates that the project would contribute 13.43 VMT per capita, which is greater than the citywide average of 8.18 VMT per capita. However, given the project's proximity to the Burlingame Caltrain Station and the small size of the commercial land use, VMT impacts would likely be minimal. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Less than Significant) The project would reconstruct an existing driveway and modify the sidewalk and curb to eliminate several other driveways. There are no other proposed changes to vehicle infrastructure and any other site improvements would need to be built to current design standards. Therefore, the impact related to an increase in hazards due to design features would be less than significant. The project proposes a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The surrounding area already contains both land use types, therefore, the impact with regard to incompatible uses would be less than significant. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Less than Significant) Emergency access would be provided via Donnelly Avenue. The project would not impact emergency access on Donnelly Avenue or nearby streets. Therefore, the impact on emergency access would be less than significant. 91 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 18 Tribal Cultural Resources Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California ❑ Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? ii. A resource determined by the lead ❑ agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Setting ❑ ❑ No Impact III ❑� Information in this section was incorporated from a Sacred Lands File search completed for the project site and a CHRIS records search both conducted in October 2018. Discussion i. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? (No Impact) As stated above in Section 5, Cultural Resources, according to a CHRIS records search completed in October 2018, there are no recorded historic resources present on the project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. 92 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue ii. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) A Sacred Lands File search was requested on October 3, 2018. The Sacred Lands File, operated by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), is a confidential set of records containing places of religious or social significance to Native Americans. A response from the NAHC was received on October 10, 2018. This response indicated that no Native American cultural sites had previously been identified on the project site. The NAHC recommended that the City consult with five tribes associated with the region. Accordingly, on October 30, 2019, the City sent letters to the following five Native American tribes: Coastanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe, Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area, Ohlone Indian Tribe, and Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Coastanoan. The letters contained information about the project; an inquiry for any unrecorded Native American cultural resources or other areas of concern within or adjacent to the project site; and a solicitation of comments, questions, or concerns with regard to the project. To date, no responses have been received. The tribes that were identified and contacted by the City will be given a copy of the IS/MND to ensure that they have the opportunity to comment on the project during the public circulation period. In accordance with Section 21080.3.1 of the California Public Resources Code and AB 52, the City of Burlingame has provided a written notice to Native American tribes to request consultation for project within the City. To date, the City has not received any requests from regional tribes to be included on the AB 52 list. In addition to tribal consultation, implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would ensure any previously unidentified Native American archeological resources or remains encountered during construction are handled appropriately. With implementation of these mitigation measures, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. 93 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 19 Utilities and Service Systems Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant a) Require or result in the relocation or ❑ construction of new or expanded water, wastewater or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to ❑ serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater ❑ treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ No Impact ❑� ❑� ❑� d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Setting The Burlingame Public Works Department administers the City's water system. According to the DSP IS/MND, the City receives its water supply from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) which obtains 85 percent of its water supply from Hetch Hetchy Reservoir and 15 percent from local watersheds. The City also uses well water and recycled water for supplying non -potable water used for irrigation. According to the City of Burlingame 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, the City's average water demand is 3.99 million gallons per day (mgd), or 76 percent of the City's 5.23 mgd allotted supply (City of Burlingame 2016). Between 2011 and 2015, an average of 41 percent of water consumption came from single-family residential uses, 17 percent by multi -family residential uses, 13 percent by industrial uses, 12 percent from commercial uses, 5 percent from irrigation uses, and 5 percent from institutional uses. The City's Public Works Department services the project site's water and wastewater system. Wastewater flows are carried to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) at 1103 Airport Boulevard, which serves the entire City as well as approximately one-third of the Town of 94 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Hillsborough. According to the DSP IS/MND, average daily flow through the WWTP is 3.2 mgd, or 58 percent of the facility's 5.5 mgd capacity. Average dry weather flow (ADFW) and planned and new residential developments are projected to increase to 4.4 mgd by 2020 (City of Burlingame 2010). Burlingame's stormwater system conveys runoff from upstream residential tributary areas through the Downtown area and east towards the San Francisco Bay. The Street and Sewer Division of the Burlingame Department of Public Works maintains the stormwater infrastructure within the City. The aging downtown system is exceeding design capacity, which makes the downtown area prone to flooding during large storm events. Aside from some minimal landscaping, the project site is paved and drains to curbside gutters along Donnelly Avenue that empty to a stormwater drain line along Myrtle Road. Recology San Mateo (Recology) provides solid waste, recycling, and organic materials collection, transportation, and disposal services to the City. Recology hauls recyclables and organic solid waste to the Shoreway Environmental Center in San Carlos for sorting. The solid waste and recyclables are processed and sent to the appropriate facility. Solid waste is sent to the Ox Mountain Landfill in Half Moon Bay. This facility has a maximum throughput of 3,598 tons per day and has a remaining capacity of 22,180,000 cubic yards (as of October 2018). Ox Mountain Landfill is estimated to cease operations by January 2034.E The Burlingame Public Works Department provides water and wastewater service to the project site. The project site is connected to the City's utility infrastructure which would all be removed during demolition. The Project would implement a 2-inch water and fire service line, 10-inch sanitary sewer line, 15-inch storm drain, 2-inch gas line, and overhead electrical line. The project would comply with the 2019 California Building Code, 2019 California Mechanical Code, 2019 California Electrical Code, and 2019 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889, as well as the 2019 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Discussion a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) and b) Have enough water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) and c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected e CalRecycle, 2018(https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/41-AA-0002/Detail) 95 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The project site is currently developed with a two-story structure and detached accessory residential structure. With implementation of the project, wastewater generated on the project site would continue to originate from residential and commercial uses and no industrial wastewater would be generated by the project. As a result, no specific changes to the wastewater treatment plan would be required to treat these flows. The project would increase water demand and wastewater generation because the square footage of the building would increase, and the number of housing units would increase from 3 residential units to 14 residential units and commercial units. The proposed project would increase contributions to existing wastewater volumes. Because the surrounding existing sewer system that will serve this project is undersized the project would result in a potentially significant impact. The existing project site is connected to the City's utility infrastructure and includes 6-inch water lines and 6-inch sanitary sewer lines. Such piping has inadequate flow capacity for sewer and fire suppression needs. In general, the minimum diameter for public mains is 8 inches and larger. Although the California Fire Code/Uniform Building Code allows a percentage reduction in fire flow demands, the maximum flow that is provided by small 4-inch and 6-inch mains is typically only sufficient for single-family dwellings and small commercial buildings. Therefore, the project would require an upgrade to existing water and sanitary sewer infrastructure. The following mitigation measures would be included in order to reduce impacts of the project regarding wastewater to less than significant. Mitigation Measure UTIL-1: The project sponsor shall coordinate with the City Engineer to improve the public sanitary sewer infrastructure. Prior to issuance of a building permit, project sponsors shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. Mitigation Measure UTIL-2: Prior to issuance of a building permit, development plans for projects proposed in the Plan Area, shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection services, the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. With incorporation of Mitigation Measures UTIL-1 and UTIL-2, this impact would be less than significant. 0. Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? (Less than Significant) The project site is developed with residential uses including paved parking lots. However, the project would decrease the number of impervious surfaces from 14,636 square feet to 13,968 square feet. Accordingly, the amount of pervious surface would be increased from 973 square feet to 1,641 square feet. This system would comply with all City stormwater regulations and would utilize BMPs such as bioretention flow through planters located on the north and south sides of the project, permeable pavers located along Donnelly Avenue, and stormwater media filters. These stormwater management improvements would ensure that drainage and surface runoff in the area would not be substantially increased such that flooding would result. Additionally, this system would treat stormwater runoff prior to draining into the local stormwater drainage system such that the project would not be an additional source of polluted runoff. Because stormwater would be treated on site, no new or expanded stormwater drainage facilities would be required and the impact would be less than significant. e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (Less than Significant) As stated in the DSP IS/MND, the City uses less than its allocated amount of water from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) and is not expected to exceed its water allocations through 2030. The IS/MND, which included the Donnelly Avenue Area in its assumptions, concluded that implementation of the DSP would only result in a 1.82 percent increase over Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) demand projections for 2020 and a 3.77 percent increase over the UWMP demand projections for 2030. As such, implementation of the DSP would not significantly exceed the water demand forecasts for the City. Therefore, it was concluded that there are adequate water supplies available to serve development under the DSP. Because the project is within the DSP, this impact would be less than significant. The Ox Mountain Landfill had a remaining capacity of 22 million tons in 2015. There is currently a 10-year agreement for this facility, which will expire in 2029. According to Republic Services, which owns and operates the Ox Mountain Landfill, the landfill has a remaining life period that extends beyond the existing 10-year agreement at current disposal rates. The proposed project would likely increase the overall solid waste generation for the site because the project would increase in size. However, such an increase would be negligible, and the landfill would continue to have ample capacity for such an increase. Therefore, impacts related to solid waste disposal would be less than significant. The project proposes to increase residential development and maintain its residential land use, and therefore would not result in the generation of unique types of solid waste that would conflict with existing regulations applicable to waste disposal. The project would be required to comply with Burlingame's solid waste disposal requirements, including recycling programs established under Assembly Bill (AB) 939. As a result, the project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste and there would be no impact. 97 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 20 Wildfire If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, ® ❑ including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Setting The project site is located in a developed urbanized area in the northern portion of the downtown area. The project site consists of three parcels: 1214, 1218, and 1220 Donnelly Avenue. Of the three parcels, 1214 Donnelly Avenue is vacant following demolition of the Gates House in 2018. The majority of the site is covered in concrete. 1218 Donnelly Avenue contains an accessory structure at the rear of the lot that is no longer in use, and the foundation of the building which was destroyed by the 2013 fire. 1220 Donnelly Avenue contains a two-story residential structure at the front of the lot and a detached accessory residential structure at the rear of the lot. The two-story structure includes three residential units, and the accessory structure contains one residential unit. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection identifies fire hazards based on relevant factors such as fuels, terrain, and weather. There are no Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) within the urbanized portion of San Mateo County that are ranked with moderate to high fire susceptibility. The project site is located within an area of Local Responsibility Area (LRA), which extends throughout most of the City. Within the LRA, the project site is designated as Non -Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). Giza Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Discussion and and and a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than Significant) b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? (Less than Significant) c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? (Less than Significant) d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? (Less than Significant) As mentioned above in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, there are no formal evacuation routes or emergency response plans near the project site that would be impacted by the project. The existing land uses local to the project preclude factors such as slopes or strong winds from exacerbating wildlife risk. The topography of the surrounding area is generally flat and dense development prevents strong winds. Similarly, post -fire impacts such as drainage changes and landslides would not occur as the project site and its surroundings are highly urbanized and flat and do not have any steep slopes or hillsides that would be susceptible to landslides or flooding. The project would not require the installation or maintenance of infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk. Further, the project site is not located within a FHSZ. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance Less Than Significant or Significant Potentially Impact with Issues Significant Mitigation Less than Impact Incorporated Significant No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to ❑ ® ❑ ❑ substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects ® ❑ which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The project site is located in a densely developed area and contains no valuable or sensitive habitats. While trees located on and near the site may provide habitat for nesting birds, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 described above would ensure that impacts to biological resources would be less than significant. There is a possibility of encountering buried cultural resources during construction; however, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-3 would ensure that any impacts would be less than significant. 100 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? (Less than Significant) The existing project site is currently developed with residential uses, which would be replaced with new residential and commercial uses under the proposed project. The project would have potential impacts to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems. Incorporation of mitigation measures would reduce these impacts to a less -than - significant level. Furthermore, the project site is governed by the City's General Plan, DSP, and the Burlingame Municipal Code. The project would require a Conditional Use Permit for multi -family residential development in the mixed -use zone. However, the project would not conflict with the DSP. Because the project is consistent with local planning, this impact would be less than significant. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The implementation of the mitigation measures identified herein would reduce all potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Therefore, the project would thus not result in impacts that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 101 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study REFERENCES Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), 2017. Forecasts and Projections. Available: https://abag.ca.gov/planning/research/forecasts.htm1. Accessed: April 16, 2018 Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), 2016. Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets in California. Available: https://www.califaep.org/images/climate-change/AEP- 2016 Final White Paper.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2012. Understanding Particulate Matter: Protecting Public Health in the San Francisco Bay Area. Available: http://www.baagmd.gov/—/media/files/planning-and-research/plans/pm- planning/understandingpm draft aug-23.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. . 2017a. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Guidelines. Available: http://www.baagmd.gov/—/media/files/planning-and- research/cega/cega guidelines may20l7-pdf.pdf?la=en. Accessed: April 16, 2018. 2017b. Final 2017 Clean Air Plan. Available at: https://www.baagmd.gov/—/media/files/planning-and-research/plans/2017-clean-air- plan/attachment-a -proposed-final-cap-vol-l-pdf.pdf?la=en. Accessed: December 2019 Burlingame Parks & Recreation Foundation, 2018. Burlingame Parks and Recreation Facilities Guide. Available: http://www.supportburlingameparks.org/facilities/. Accessed: April 16, 2018. CaIEEMod. User's Guide. 2016. Available: www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Accessed: January 2020. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), 2008. CEQA & Climate Change. Available: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2010/05/CAPCOA- White-Paper.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. _. 2010. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. Available: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/CAPCOA-Quantification-Report-9-14- Final.pdf. Accessed: June 5, 2018. _. 2016. Air Toxic "Hot Spots" Program. Available: http://capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2016/08/CAPCOA%20Prioritization%20Guidelines%20- %20August%202016%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed: June 5, 2018. California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed: June 6, 2018. 2016. Summary: Diesel Particulate Matter Heath Impacts. Available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/diesel/diesel-health summ.htm. Accessed: April 16, 2018. 102 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue California Building Standards Commission, 2019. California Building Standards Code. Available at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes#@ViewBag.JumpTo. Accessed: December 2019. California Climate Action Registry (CCAR), 2009. California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol. Available: https://sfenvironment.org/sites/default/files/fliers/files/ccar grp 3-1 manuary2009 sfe- web.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. California Department of Conservation (DOC), 2000. Guidelines for Classification and Designation of Mineral Lands. Available: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/smgb/guidelines/documents/classdesig.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. _. 2019. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. Available at: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/alquist-priolo. Accessed: September 2019. California Department of Finance (DOF), 2019a. E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State —January 1, 2018 and 2019. Available: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-1/. Accessed: March 31, 2020. . 2019b. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 2011-2019, with 2010 Benchmark. Available: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-5/. Accessed: March 31, 2020. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2019a. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) - Rarefind 5. Available at: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and- Data (accessed August 2019). _. 2019b. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS). Available at http://bios.dfg.ca.gov (accessed August 2019). 2019c. Special Animals List. Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database. August 2019. _. 2019d. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database. August 2019. California Geological Survey (CGS), 2013. Update of Mineral Land Classification: Aggregate Materials in the North San Francisco Bay Production -Consumption Region, Sonoma, Napa, Marin, and Southwestern Solana Counties, California. Available: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/sr/SR 205/SR%20205%20North%20Bay%20Report F inal.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. California Legislative Information. 1987. California Health and Safety Code 7050.5. 1987. Available at: https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&section Num=7050.5. Accessed: December 2019. 103 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study . Public Resources Code 21080.3.1. 2014. Available: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PRC§ionNum. Accessed: January 2020 California Native Plant Society (CNPS). Rare Plant Program. 2019. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-03 0.45). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Available at: http://www.rareplants.cnps.org (accessed August 2019). California Regional Water Quality Control Board. San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit. 14 Oct. 2009. Available: www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water issues/programs/stormwater/Municipal/ R2-2015-0049.pdf. Accessed: January 2020 CalRecycle, 2015. Facility/Site Summary Details: Corinda Los Trancos Landfill (OX Mtn) (41-AA- 0002). Available: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/41-AA-0002/Detail. Accessed September 22, 2016. CEC (California Energy Commission). 2017. Transportation Energy Demand Forecast, 2018-2030. November 2017. Available: https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/getdocument.aspx?tn=221893. Accessed July 10, 2019 . 2018a. California Energy Demand 2018-2030 Revised Forecast. February 2018. Available: https:Hefiling.energy.ca.gov/getdocument.aspx?tn=223244. Accessed July 10, 2019. CEQA Statute and Guidelines. 2019. Available: resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/2019_CEQA_Statutes_and_Guidelines.pdf. Accessed February 2020. City of Burlingame, 2009. Burlingame Climate Action Plan. Available: http://www.ca- ilg.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/burlingame- climate action plan.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. . 2010. Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Available: https://www.burlingame.org/document center/Planning/General%20and%20Specific%20P1 ans/Draft%201nitia1%20Study%20Mitigated%20Negative%20Declaration. pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. . 2016. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for the City of Burlingame. Available: https://www.burlingame.org/document center/Water/2015%20Urban%20Water%20Mana Bement%20PIan.pdf. Accessed: June 6, 2018. . 2019a. Municipal Code. Available at: http://gcode.us/codes/burlingame/. . 2019b. Burlingame General Plan. Available at: https://www.burlingame.org/document center/Planning/General%20and%20Specific%20P1 ans/BurlingameGP Adopted Jan2019 Full.pdf. Accessed: December 2019 City of Hillsborough, 2007. Emergency Operations Plan. Available: http://www.hillsborough.net/DocumentCenter/View/591. Accessed: April 16, 2018. 104 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue Cleary, John et al, 2014. Final Report on Vibrations Due to Pile Driving at the Mobile River Bridge Site. Research Project 930-839R. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern Alabama. Available: https://mobileriverbridge.com/wp- content/uploads/2015/11/MRB-Final-Vibration-Study-01142016.Of. Accessed: April 16, 2018. County of San Mateo Public Works, 2015. Crystal Springs Dam Bridge Replacement Project. Available: http://publicworks.smcgov.org/crystal-springs-dam-bridge-replacement-project. Accessed September 22, 2016. Echo Barrier. 2018. H20Acoustic Enclosure. Accessed May 2018 at: http://www.echobarrier.com/product/h2o-acoustic-tent-enclosure/ Ellam, Rubina 2016. Rubina Ellam, Administrative Assistant; Central County Fire Department; Personal Communication; July 27, 2016. ENGEO, 2017. 920 Bayswater Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2006. Construction Noise Handbook. August 2006. Available: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/Environment/noise/construction noise/handbook/. Accessed: April 16, 2018. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), 2006. Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment. Available: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA Noise and Vibration Manual pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. Hellier, Gaby 2018. Hellier, Gaby; Assistant Superintendent/CBO; Burlingame School District; Personal Communication April, 2018 Icc. 2016. California Green Building Standards Code. Digital Codes Library. 2016. Available: codes.iccsafe.org/content/document/657?site_type=public. Accessed: January 2020 Illingworth & Rodkin, 2009. Environmental Noise Assessment for a Wal-Mart Expansion in Antioch. Available: http://www.ci.antioch.ca.us/CityGov/CommDev/PlanningDivision/docs/Walmart/DEIR- VOLII-APPENDICES-C-H/Appendix%20G%20Noise%20Assessment.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. 2019. 1214 Donnelly Avenue Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment. 2019. 1214 Donnelly Avenue Mixed -Use Noise and Vibration Assessment. Kiely, John 2020. Jay Kiely, Police Lieutenant; Burlingame Police Department; Personal Communication; April 7, 2020. Laundry Locker, 2018. How Laundry Locker Works. Available: https://Iaundrylocker.com/. Accessed: June 6, 2018. Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), 2018. Record search of the NAHC Sacred Lands File. 105 1214 Donnelly Avenue Initial Study Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic (NAVFAC). 2017. Final Report, Pile -Driving Noise Measurements atAtlantic Fleet Naval Installations: 28 May 2013 — 28 April 2016. Prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. January 2017. https://www.navymarinespeciesmonitoring.us/files/4814/9089/8563/Pile- driving Noise Measurements Final Report 12Jan2017.pdf Noise Meters Inc., 2018. Ldn, Lden, CNEL — Community Noise Calculators. Available: http://noisemeters.com/apps/Idn-caIcuIator.asp. Accessed: June 6, 2018. Northwest Information Center, 2018. California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search. Protech, 2016. Phase 1— Environmental Site Assessment. Reed, Christine 2020. Christine Reed, Deputy Fire Marshall; Central County Fire Department; Personal Communication; April 6, 2020. Romig Engineers Inc, 2016. Geotechnical Investigation for Mixed -Use Building. San Francisco, City and County of, 2017. Draft San Francisco International Airport 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 Study Update Noise Compatibility Program. Available: http://media.flvsfo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/SFO P150 NCP complete ada.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. San Mateo County, 1986. San Mateo County General Plan. Available: https://planning.smcgov.org/general-plan. Accessed: April 16, 2018. . 2016. C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance, Version 5.0. Available: http://www.flowstobay.org/sites/default/files/C3TG5/SMCWPPP C3TG%20V.5.0.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018 San Mateo Union High School District (SMUHSD), 2018. Burlingame High School Profile 2017- 2018. Available: https://www.smuhsd.org/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?modu lei nstanceid=1813&dataid =264&FileName=BHS%20Profile%202017-18.pdf. Accessed: April 11, 2018. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), 2012. Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport. Available: http://ccag.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/2014/10/Consolidated—CCAG—ALUCP—November-20121.pdf. Accessed: April 16, 2018. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019a. Information for Planning and Consultation. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ (accessed August 2019). 2019b. Critical Habitat Portal. Available at: https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe0989 3cf75b8dbfb77 (accessed August 2019). . 2019c. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Version 2. Updated March 18, 2019. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html (accessed August 2019). 106 Initial Study 1214 Donnelly Avenue United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2019. National Hydrography Dataset. Available at: https://nhd.usgs.gov/data.html (accessed August 2019). W-Trans, 2020. Draft 1214 Donnelly Avenue Traffic Impact Study. 107 *AV :11:1Ill r=3 City of Burlingame 1214 Donnelly Avenue Project Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) City File No: ND-607-P Prepared for: City of Burlingame Community Development Department 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (650)-558-7250 Prepared by: Circlepoint 46 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113 June 2020 This page intentionally left blank. MMRP Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing Aesthetics Mitigation Measure AES-1: The project developer Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design shall install low -profile, low -intensity lighting with Mitigation and construction directed downward to minimize light and glare. Incorporated Exterior lighting shall be low mounted, downward casting, and shielded. In general, the light footprint shall not extend beyond the periphery the property. Implementation of exterior lighting fixtures on all buildings shall also comply with the standard California Building Code (Title 24, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) to reduce the lateral spreading of light to surrounding uses, consistent with City Municipal Code 18.16.030 that requires that all new exterior lighting for residential developments be designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the light element is kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. In addition, lighting fixtures would not be located more than nine feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls would not be floodlit; and only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward would be used, except for illuminated street numbers required by the fire department. Air Quality Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Note that the Envision Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design Burlingame 2040 General Plan Policy HP-3.11 Dust with Mitigation and construction Abatement and Policy HP-3.12 Construction Best Incorporated Practices requires that projects apply BAAQMD- MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing recommended BMPs to control dust from construction projects. During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust. Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less -than -significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following BMPs that are required of all projects: 1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. 2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. 3. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. 4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing 5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. 6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. 8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Responsible Party Timing Factor Impact to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Air Quality Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Selection of equipment Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design during construction to minimize emissions. Such with Mitigation and operation equipment selection would include the following: Incorporated The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would achieve a fleet -wide average 20- percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. One feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: ■ All diesel -powered off -road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 3 engines that include CARB- certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF)12 or equivalent. Alternatively, equipment that meets U.S. EPA Tier 4 standards for particulate matter or the use of equipment that includes electric or alternatively -fueled equipment (i.e., non - diesel) would meet this requirement. Biological Resources Mitigation Measure B1O-1: Activities related to the Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design project, including, but not limited to, vegetation with Mitigation and construction removal, ground disturbance, and construction and Incorporated MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing demolition shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 1 through August 31) if feasible. If construction will commence during the breeding season, then a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre -construction survey shall be conducted within the disturbance footprint and a 300-foot buffer for raptors and 150-foot buffer for passerines where access can be authorized. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in San Mateo County. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (which is dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the avian biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed, and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-1: In the event Native Less than Significant Project Applicant/ Qualified During American or other archaeological resources are with Mitigation Archaeologist/City construction encountered during construction, work shall be Incorporated halted within 100 feet of the discovered materials and workers shall avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. If an archaeological site is encountered in any stage of development, a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine whether the resource qualifies as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource. In the event that it does qualify, the archaeologist will prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan to be implemented prior to or during site construction. The archaeologist shall also prepare a written report of the finding, file it with the appropriate agency, and arrange for curation of recovered materials. MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-2: In the event that human Less than Significant Project Applicant/City During remains are discovered during project construction, with Mitigation construction there shall be no further excavation or disturbance Incorporated of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. The county coroner shall be informed to evaluate the nature of the remains. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Lead Agency shall work with the Native American Heritage Commission and the applicant to develop an agreement for treating or disposing of the human remains. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Project design and Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design, construction shall adhere to Title 18, Chapter 18.28 with Mitigation prior to issuance of the City Municipal Code, and demonstrate Incorporated of building permit compliance with all design standards applicable to the California Building Code Zone 4 would ensure maximum practicable protection available to users of the buildings and associated infrastructure. MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-2: Foundations of the Less than Significant Project Applicant / Qualified During project will be reinforced to tolerate differential soil with Mitigation Paleontologist/City construction movement. The project may be supported on a Incorporated reinforced concrete mat foundation bearing on a properly prepared and compacted soil subgrade and a non -expansive fill section. Alternately, the project may be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation bearing on stiff native soils. Implementation of a reinforced foundation would reduce the potential for damage caused by liquefaction. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-3: Project design and Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design construction, including excavation activities, shall with Mitigation and construction comply with Chapter 33 of the CBC, which specifies incorporated the safety requirement to be fulfilled for site work. This would include prevention of subsidence and pavement or foundations caused by dewatering. MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Responsible Party Timing Factor Impact Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-4: The applicant shall Project Applicant Pre -construction, prepare a monitoring program to determine the Less than Significant during effects of construction on nearby improvements, with Mitigation construction including the monitoring of cracking and vertical incorporated movement of adjacent structures, and nearby streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements. As necessary, inclinometers or other instrumentation shall be installed as part of the shoring system to closely monitor lateral movement. The program shall include a pre -construction survey including photographs and installation of monitoring points for existing site improvements. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GEO-5: A discovery of a Less than Significant Project Applicant / Qualified During paleontological specimen during any phase of the with Mitigation Paleontologist/City construction project shall result in a work stoppage in the vicinity incorporated of the find until it can be evaluated by a professional paleontologist. Should loss or damage be detected, additional protective measures or further action (e.g., resource removal), as determined by a professional paleontologist, shall be implemented to mitigate the impact. Hazards and Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: The contractor shall Less than Significant Project Applicant/Contractor During Hazardous Materials comply with Title 8, California Code of with Mitigation Construction Regulations/Occupational Safety and Health Incorporated Administration requirements that cover construction work where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes the proper removal and disposal of MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Responsible Party Timing Factor Impact peeling paint, and appropriate sampling of painted building surfaces for lead prior to disturbance of the paint and disposal of the paint or painted materials. Hazards and Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: The applicant shall Less than Significant Project Applicant Project design, Hazardous Materials contract a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct with Mitigation prior to issuance an asbestos survey prior to disturbing potential Incorporated of a building asbestos containing building materials and following permit the Consultant's recommendations for proper handling and disposal. Hazards and Mitigation Measure HAZ-3: Workers handling Less than Significant Project Applicant/Contractor During Hazardous Materials demolition and renovation activities at the project with Mitigation Construction site will be trained in the safe handling and disposal Incorporated of any containments with which they are handling or disposing of on the project site. Noise Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Prior to the issuance of Less than Significant Project Applicant/Contractor During building permits, mechanical equipment shall be with Mitigation Construction selected and designed to reduce impacts on Incorporated surrounding uses to meet the City's 60 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime requirements at the property lines of surrounding noise sensitive uses. Section 5.2.5.8 of the City of Burlingame DSP includes a provision for rooftop equipment: Mixed -use buildings with a residential component should exhibit rooflines and architectural character consistent with the Downtown commercial character. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed 10 MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building and screened for noise. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City's noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line -of - sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors Noise Mitigation Measure N0I-2: As required under Less than Significant Project Applicant/Contractor During Section 9.9.20 of the City of Burlingame DSP, loaded with Mitigation construction truck and other vibration -generating equipment Incorporated shall avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent possible to still meet construction goals. Additionally, the following measures would be implemented during construction: ■ Operating equipment on the construction site shall be placed as far as possible from vibration -sensitive receptors. ■ Smaller equipment shall be used to the extent feasible to minimize vibration levels below the limits. 11 MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing ■ Use of vibratory rollers, tampers, and impact tools near sensitive areas shall be avoided to the extent feasible. ■ Neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site shall be notified of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels during project construction activities. ■ If heavy construction is proposed within 12 feet of commercial structures and/or 18 feet of residential structures, a construction vibration -monitoring plan shall be implemented prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities located within these setbacks. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks: ■ The contractor shall conduct a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for structures located within 25 feet of construction. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating construction 12 MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing activities located within 25 feet of the structure. The surveys shall include internal and external crack monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of the structure. • The contractor shall conduct a post -survey on the structure where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities. ■ The contractor shall designate a person responsible for registering and investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site. ■ The results of any vibration monitoring shall be summarized and submitted in a report shortly after substantial completion of each phase identified in the project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration certificates, and graphics as 13 MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Responsible Party Timing Factor Impact required to clearly identify vibration - monitoring locations. An explanation of all events that exceeded vibration limits will be included together with proper documentation supporting any such claims. Tribal Cultural See Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-2. Less than Significant See Mitigation Measure CUL- See Mitigation Resources with Mitigation 1 and CUL-2. Measure CUL-1 Incorporated and CUL-2. Utilities and Service Mitigation Measure UTIL-1: The project sponsor Less than Significant Project Applicant Pre -construction, Systems shall coordinate with the City Engineer to improve with Mitigation during the public sanitary sewer infrastructure. Prior to incorporated construction issuance of a building permit, project sponsors shall develop a plan to facilitate sanitary sewer improvements. The plan shall include a schedule for implementing sanitary sewer upgrades that would occur within the development site and/or contribution of a fair share fee toward those improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. Utilities and Service Mitigation Measure UTIL-2: Prior to issuance of a Less than Significant Project Applicant Pre -construction, Systems building permit, development plans for projects with Mitigation during proposed in the Plan Area, shall be reviewed by the incorporated construction Fire Marshal to determine if fire flow requirements would be met given the requirements of the proposed project, and the size of the existing water main(s). If the Fire Marshal determines improvements are needed for fire protection 14 MMRP 1214 Donnelly Avenue Environmental Factor Mitigation Measures Level of Environmental Impact Responsible Party Timing services, the project sponsor shall be required to provide a plan to supply adequate water supply for fire suppression to the project site, consistent with the Fire Marshal's requirements. The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of the plan including installation of new water mains, and/or incorporation of fire water storage tanks and booster pumps into the building design, or other measures as determined by the Fire Marshal. 15 MMRP This page intentionally left blank. 16 1214 Donnelly Avenue Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California MATERIALS, DETAILS, IMAGES 12.12.17 WITH REVISIONS 05.08.19, 07.19.19 Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California ROOF TILES 12.12.17 WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. RIDGE TILE MISSION CLAY TILES, TYP. GABLE TILE METAL GUTTER, PAINTED, TYP. 4 X SHAPED EDGE BEAM & OUTRIGGE PAINTED, Tti I . METAL DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, TYP. - PROVIDE FULL SIZE TEMPLATE FOR SHAPED EDGE BEAMS & OUTRIGGERS. ELEVATION PROFILE TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL TILE ROOF, TRIM, GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT MISSION CLAY TILES, TYP. GABLE TILE METAL GUTTER, PAINTED, TYP. 4 X SHAPED EDGE BEAM & OUTRIGGI PAINTED, T) METAL DOWNSPOU PAINTED, T) PROVIDE FL FOR SHAPE & OUTRIGGI ELEVATION PROFILE STAIR PENTHOUSE TILE ROOF & CORBELLED OUTRIGGER A 0 ERE Corona 9apered ,MissionTM ... Excellence in Tersatile Design Clay Roof Tile 70 Marriott's Newport Coast Villas, Newport Coast, CA - 4 Different Custom Blends: CB228-R, CB227-R, CB301-R Versatility Corona Tapered Mission is the most popular two-piece clay roof tile in the industry. It brings the traditional beauty and warmth of Hacienda or Tuscan design to any project. This versatile tile adds distinction and style to commercial buildings, custom homes, institutional and military projects throughout the world. Combined with the option of Turret Tile°, the appeal of Corona Tapered Mission Tile is extraordinary. Green Building Product Build Green and earn LEEDS points with MCA's Corona Tapered Mission Tile. MCA offers a wide range of colors and blends rated as Cool Roof by CRRC. LEEDS points can be achieved when specifying Corona Tapered is Mission Cool Roof Tile. Durability Corona Tapered Mission Tile is an extremely durable tile. It is rated ASTM C1167 Grade 1, the highest quality available, and meets freeze/ thaw and salt intrusion conditions. Competitively priced and 100% made in America, Corona Tapered Mission is backed by a 50-Year limited warranty. For more information, please contact MCA sales office at 1-800-736-6221 or visit the website at www.mca-tile.com. CC/CODES, CERTIFICATIONS • ICC Report ESR-2144 • Class A, E108 (UL790) • ASTM C1167, Grade 1 �CJIN� Corona Tapered Mission TM \� Tile offers you more colors, more textures, affordable prices and higher quality than any roof tile j,Q, in the Turret Roof Option industry today. lb The Tile is Vintage Red 2 www.mca-tile.com Corona ` ai yered-Missiowm - XaturaCR.ed & FCashed CoCors Clay Roo T�® OP/OVERALL PRODUCT 91 For the timely elegance of old world tradition, ............. ilnanr..- M.C.A. uses new technology to create our ,rr+itlr' FFFIIF uFFF I .... k4ol.F Corona Tapered MissionTM Tile. Originally � ' handcrafted by molding clay to the body's= min thigh this heritage has spanned the centuries F for today's installations. Old Spanish or atlll� r�mr + • F""'rF Mediterranean designs are well suited for Corona Tapered MissionTM Tile and will enhance the beauty of your project. Custom blends and colors -- are also available. B338 Palace Blend gft Bellagio Resort, Las Vegas, NV Various Custom Blends INSTALLATION METHOD (1) At roof pitches of 3:12 and steeper, provide a minimum of one layer ASTM D-226 Type II No. 30 (14kg) felt or upgraded material. Provide in strict accordance with pertinent requirements of governmental and/or other agencies having jurisdiction. (2) Install birdstop or 1 x 2 (18mm x 36mm) wood strip at eave to boost first course of tile. (3) Install first row of tile leaving a 3" (76mm) overhang with a minimum of one corrosion - resistant nail not less than No. 11 gauge (3mm dia.), 5/16" (7.9mm) head per tile or tile tie system. (4) Install booster tile above birdstops. (5) Install starter tiles directly above booster tile. (6) Install 2 x 6 (36mm x 140mm) nailer on hip and ridge, set neatly in ASTM C-270 Type M cement mortar. (7) Install rake tiles (if required) on all gable using 2 nails per tile. (8) Install 2 x 3 (36mm x 64mm) nailer under first row of cover tile after gable roll with adjacent 2 x 2 (36mm x 36mm) nailer along rake side. TILE SPECIFICATIONS: Actual size: 19" x 8.71 " (5.94")' Exposed size: 16" x 12" O.C. Weight per square: 1050 Ibs Weight per piece: 7 Ibs No. of pieces per sq: 150 pcs METRIC TILE SPECIFICATIONS: Actual size: 483mm x 222mm (151 mm)' Exposed size: 406mm x 305mm Weight per M2: 51.27 kg Weight per piece: 3.18 kg No. of pieces per M2: 16.15 pcs Metric conversion of lumber is actual dimensions of lumber; use lumber of the closest dimensions available. 'Dimension of the head of the tile. COUNTER FLASHING IN 16" RIDGE EXPOSURE txB Bock VG-ARLE RIFLASHING cEMENr MORTAR CEMENT MOROPTIONAL RIDnLE CLOSUFELTFIELDFLASHING DETAIL AT WALL P P rvMLER GABLEIL) le FIELD DETAIL CEMENT MORTAR UN DERLAVMENTSTRIP OVER WOOD NAILER BOOSTER FELT S UNDERLAVMENT FLASHING TMn"' OVER WOOD NAIL FOR FLASHING RIDGE DETAIL NAILERS & NAIL FOR UNDERLAYMENT WALLFINISH F'LA$ INGETAL ANNEL TILE OS ER THE FLASHING FELT - NAILFORFLASHING NAILER NAIL FOR UNDERLAYMENT 9¢NAILER CEMENTMORTAR Tim aOC—R THE RAKE DETAIL FELT FLASHING AT WALL FELT 12"3 Im .imm O.BLE"DETAIL CLATBIRDSTOP� FLASHING DETAIL AT WALL ST1" &T,'??3nm �Y2mm ELTMENT 9fi HALER NAILERS W NAILERHGABIE MGIRBIRD STOP DETAIL 800-736-6221 3 Clay Roof Tile Stone Creek Ranch, La Quinta, CA - 2/3 B317-R Taupe Smoke Blend, 1 /3 B340-R Vintage Red Blend Recreation Center, Turret Tile - F45 Tobacco, i F40 Natural Red, 2F43 Brick Red Gold Nugget Award Winner - Photo Provided Courtesy of Andrew Pierce Buliders, Palm Desert, CA - Two -Piece Corona Tapered Mission - Custom Blend CB227-R 800-736-6221 5 Designer's Selections rm� EGA® Clay Roof Tile 0 B319-R Ivory Smoke Blend B334-R Rustic Ivory Blend AM Solar Reflectance Avg. - 0.433 Solar Reflectance Avg. - 0.423 Thermal Emittance Avg. - 0.82 Thermal Emittance Avg. - 0.82 B320 Rustic Red Blend 1 , hh— - kk-- -#= B332 Houstonian Blend h y B331-R Zorro Blend Solar Reflectance Avg. - 0.383 Thermal Emittance Avg. - 0.82 W3 Rustic Smoke Blend F ---14 - kkb 30 Old Santa Barbara Blend B340 Vintage Red Blend B317 Taupe Smoke Blend NOTE: Some tiles may have slight variations in color due to the inherent nature of clay tile and the limitations of the lithographic printing process. www.mca-tile.com Suggested-ArchitecturaCSpecifications MADE IN ®d Clay Roof Tile U. S. A. rn�rnun (Edit as required. Delete non -applicable statements.) 1. GENERAL (use the standard Partl of your office) 2. PRODUCTS 2.1. ROOFING TILE: A. Where indicated on the Drawings, provide Corona Tapered Mission- Style roofing tile manufactured by M.C.A. Clay Roof Tile, Inc., 1985 Sampson Avenue, Corona, CA 92879, phone 800-736-6221, FAX (951) 736-6052, in color and with birdstop at eaves. B. Comply with pertinent provisions of ASTM C1167 (Grade 1) , and ICC Research Number ESR2144, and with the Tile Roof Institute Manual. 2.2. Other materials: A. Membrane: 1. Under all Corona Tapered Mission- Style roofing tile on roof pitches greater than 3:12, except where heavier membrane is required by governmental agencies having jurisdiction, provide not less than two layers of 30 lb (14 kg) asphalt -saturated felt placed at right angles to roof pitch, mopped solidly between layers with 25 Ibs It kg) of hot asphalt and mopped solidly on top of layers with hot asphalt. 2. At roof pitches of 3:12 and steeper, provide a minimum of one layer of membrane complying with ASTM D26, Type II, or one layer of membrane complying with ASTM D4869, Type IV or upgrade material placed with minimum 2" (51 mm) headlap and 6" (152 mm) sidelap. 3. Provide in strict accordance with pertinent requirements of governmental and/or other agencies having jurisdiction. B. Nailers: 1. Where indicated on the Drawings or otherwise required for proper nailing, provide: a. 2" x 6" (36 mm x 152 mm) nailing board at all hips and ridges; b. 2" x 3" (36 mm x 60 mm) nailing board under first row of cover tile after gable roll, with adjacent 2" x 2" (36 mm x 36 mm) nailing board along rake side; c. 2" x 4" (36mm x 102mm) nailing board full length from ridge to eave for all top tile where architect specifies 2" x 4" nailing system. C. Flashing: 1. Flash at roof valleys in strict accordance with IBC or required by local governmental agencies having jurisdiction: a. For valley flashing use not less than 0.019" (G90) (No. 26 gage) (.48 mm thick) corrosion resistant metal, extending at least 11" (279 mm) away from the centerline of the valley each way; b. Provide a splash diverter rib not less than 1" (25 mm) high at the flow line, formed as part of the flashing; c. Provide flashing overlap of not less than 4" (102 mm). 2. For other flashing use not less than 0.019" (G90) (No. 26 gage) (.48 mm thick) corrosion resistant metal; at sides of dormers, chimneys, and other walls, extend flashing at least 6" (152 mm) up the vertical surface. a. Thoroughly counterflash. b. Extend flashing under tile at least 4" (102 mm), and turn the edge up 1-1/2" (38 mm). 3. At lower side of dormers, chimneys, and other walls, extend flashing at least 3" (76 mm) up the wall and 4" (102 mm) over the tile, and then thoroughly counterflash. 4. At wood saddles and returns, line with not less than0.019" (G90) (No. 26 gage) (.48mm thick) corrosion resistant metal or 16 oz (454 g) copper extending up sloping roofs not less than 12" (305 mm), and more where necessary, and up vertical walls not less than 6" (152 mm), thoroughly counterflashed. 5. Make all counterflashing plugged, pointed, and secure. OM/OPERATION, MAINTENANCE Over 100 years of product knowledge has enabled us to create a roof tile that is highly resistant to chipping, wearing and fading. We stand behind our product 100%. To install M.C.A. Tile, use adequate numbers of skilled workmen who are thoroughly trained and experienced in the necessary crafts and who are completely familiar with the specified requirements 6. Extend gutter metal up the roof to a point higher than the outer edge of the gutter. D. Mortar, plastic cement, and sealant: 1. Provide Type M cement mortar complying with ASTM C-270 at all ridges and hips to completely seal the area under the ridge and hip tiles. 2. At gable, hip, ridges, and other conditions, provide a non -running, heavy body, plastic cement composed of asphalt and other mineral ingredients complying with ASTM D4586 and Fed Spec SSC-153 Type 1. 3. When using sealant in lieu of the plastic cement, provide a silicone sealant complying with ASTM D1002 or ASTM E42. E. Fasteners: 1. Fasteners shall comply with IRC section R905.3.6 and IBC section 1507.3.6 and UBC Section 1507.3. Corrosion resistant meeting ASTM A641 Class I or approved equal, number 11 gauge diameter and of sufficient length to properly penetrate 3/4" into or through the thickness of the deck or batten, whichever is less. The head of the nail used for tile fastening shall not be less than 5/16 inches and shall comply with ASTM F1667 for dimensinal tolerances. Other fastening systems such as screws, wire, or adhesive based systems as approved by code, or local building officials will be allowed. 2. In areas designated by the building official as being subject to high winds that exceed 80 mph, or where roof height exceeds 40 ft (12m) above grade, attach all tiles in strict accordance with Chapter 15 of IBC, Table 15-D-1, Footnote 2 or as required by local governmental agencies having jurisdiction. a. Nail the heads of all tiles; b. Fasten the noses of all eave course tiles with approved clips; c. Nail rake tiles with two nails; d. Set the noses of all ridge, hip, and rake tiles in a bead of approved mastic. 3. On slopes over 24:12, securely fasten the nose end of all tiles. 4. Provide "Wind Locks" where directed by the Architect. 5. Tile tie systems of stainless steel or galvanized wire may be used where approved by governmental agencies having jurisdiction: 6. At snow areas use "Wind Locks" with straw nails. In lieu of straw nails, install vertical 2x4 nailer boards full length from ridge to eave for all top tiles. F. Provide other materials, not specifically described but required for a complete and proper installation, as selected by the Contractor subject to the approval of the Architect. 2.3 FOR METAL OR POURED CONCRETE ROOF DECKS: A. Where design indicates concrete roof deck or metal roof deck, Twisted Tile -Tie system or Polypro AH160 roof tile adhesive may be used where approved by the governmental agencies having jurisdiction. 1. If Twisted Tile -Tie system is used, follow MCA Tile -Tie system detail. a. At coastal areas use only stainless steel; b. At high wind and snow areas use "Wind Locks"; c. Twisted Wire anchor span is no more than 4 feet 2. If Polypro AH160 roof tile adhesive is used, apply large paddy placement (seePolyform application detail) 3. EXECUTION 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS: A. Examine the areas and conditions under which work of this Section will be performed. Correct conditions detrimental to timely and proper completion of the work. Do not proceed until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. and the methods needed for proper performance of the work. M.C.A. Clay Roofing Tile may have color variations due to the inherent natural characteristics of the material used. To avoid color patterning, checkerboarding, spotting and stairstepping, the installer should periodically (after installing 80 pieces of roof tile) check the roof color from the ground level at approximately 40 feet (12m) from the building for a color "range." By following 3.2 INSTALLATION GENERAL: A. Membrane: 1. Verify that deck surfaces are clean and dry prior to installation of membrane. 2. Remove all foreign particles from substrate to assure proper seating and to prevent water damage. 3. Install the specified membrane in strict accordance with pertinent requirements of governmental agencies having jurisdiction. B. On vertical applications, and on extremely steep pitches where wind currents may cause lift, set the butt of each tile in a bead of the specified plastic cement or sealant, or provide stainless steel "Wind Locks" at intervals. Use plastic cement and sealant carefully, and avoid smearing the exposed tile surface. C. Chalk lines: 1. Chalk horizontal and vertical guide lines on the membrane to assure water tightness and proper appearance. 2. Space the chalk lines by measuring the delivered tiles for average length and width exposures. 3. Do not exceed an exposure length 1/4" (6 mm) beyond the average. 3.3 INSTALLING CORONA TAPERED MISSIONT. STYLE ROOFING TILES: 1. Birdstops and booster starters: a. Install the specified clay birdstops full length of all eaves. b. Install first row of pans 13" (330 mm) from the eave, leaving a 3" (76 mm) overhang. If rain gutter is involved, use 1 1/2" (38mm) overhang. c. Install booster above birdstops. d. Install starter tiles directly above booster tiles; length exposure shall not exceed 13" (330 mm) centers, and width exposure shall not exceed 12" (305 mm) centers. e. Install the specified nailers at ridges, rakes, and gables. 2. Install the tile in rows from left or right, beginning at the lowest portion of the roof. a. Install each tile successively, fastening each tile with the specified fasteners. b. Length of exposure on field tile shall not exceed 16" (406 mm) on centers, and width exposure on field tiles shall not exceed 12" (305 mm) on centers. c. Install ridge, hip, and valley tiles in accordance with pertinent requirements of governmental agencies having jurisdiction. (1) Provide cement mortar Type M complying with ASTM C270 at all ridges and hips to completely seal the area under ridge and hip tiles. (2) Install a thin coat of rich cement mortar (1 part Type I Portland cement complying with ASTM C150 to 3 parts sand complying with ASTM C144) along exposed edges of all ridge and hip tiles. (3) Completely and neatly fill and point up all voids. 3. To avoid color patterning, checker boarding, spotting, and stair stepping: a. After the installation of each 80 roofing tiles, make a visual inspection from the ground level and at a distance from the building of about 40 feet (12m); b. Verify that tile courses follow straight and true lines; c. Verify that color range is smooth with no abrupt changes. d. Make necessary corrections before proceeding with further installation. 3.4 CLEANING UP: A. Upon completion of the work of this Section, and as a condition of its acceptance, completely remove from the job site all tools, equipment, debris, and surplus materials pertaining to this portion of the work. this procedure, patteming or spotting should be avoided by blending the tiles over the entire deck. If this procedure is not followed, M.C.A. can not be held liable or responsible in any way once the tiles have been installed. All claims should be made in writing before installation of the tiles. No claims will be recognized after the tiles have been installed. Once M.C.A. Roof Tiles are installed, no maintenance is required. 10101 0MARUHACHI CERAMICS OF AMERICA, INC. S1985 Sampson Ave., Corona, CA 92879, U.S.A. 1-800-736-6221 FAX: (951) 736-6052 Clay Roof Tile www.mca-tile.com Email: sales@mca-tile.com Metric conversion of lumber is actual dimensions of lumber; use lumber of the closest dimensions available. 71lE �OUFIWa Ie rTITUTe m"u MeT�. Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California PAVERS 12.12.17 'A I I tttt ION w 0 4 MCNEAR BRICK & BLOCK Manufacturers Since 1868 Landscaping with Brick McNear Brick & Block's roots go back to 1868, making us one of the country's oldest brick manufacturers. We produce a broad selection of Face Brick, Thin Brick, and Brick Pavers in colors and textures ranging from the soft, handmade look of our Sandmold Series, to the "reclaimed"aesthetic of our Old California Series, to the vibrant, sharp colors and edges of our Commercial Series. In addition to the products shown within these pages, we have the capability of manufacturing custom blends, shapes, and colors. All the colors depicted herein are available as Brick Pavers, Face Brick, and Thin Brick. McNear Brick Pavers meet the standards of ASTM C902, Class SX, and McNear Face Brick and Thin Brick meet the standards of ASTM C216 and C1088, Grade SW. ;i0-l(6(1°6 McNear Clay Brick are manufactured with lfa*f�30-100% Post -consumer, Recycled Content. Itl's Y(AM ('ON"1FNT Thin Brick in Landscape Construction It is often more efficient and cost-effective to build landscape features from other materials, and then to veneer them with Thin Brick. This is true for both walls and pavements, and the underlying structure need not be new construction. Thin Brick can be applied to existing concrete driveways, stairs, and porches, bestowing the rich look of brick while keeping costs under control. Thin Brick gives multitudes of benefits without sacrific- ing any of the durability, low maintenance, beauty, and value of traditional brick construction. See our Clay Brick/Thin Brick brochure for more details. Visit www.mcnear.com to see our newest products and colors. LANDSCAPING WITH BRICK 2 "- In Pa side Piedmont . Salt House, Stratford' �. _ f. ' Tivo ' n'bridge 14 NL na �s { y } Old California 4 For thousands of years, bricks have been reclaimed from one structure for use in another. Each use and re -use adds its mark: mortar, plaster, chipped edges, and stains. The Old California Series incorporates a variety of different color schemes, representing the wide range of true reclaimed bricks. Available in: • Solid/Paver • Bullnose • Split Paver • Coping • Thin Paver • Cap • Face Brick • Tread .. , ,;,; T lk w rcadian CjOaveras iL +lv x I �w Portsmouth' Commercial Clean, straight edges, and monochromatic colors are the hallmarks of this series of clay pavers. These vibrant colors can be mixed as borders and contrasting sections, or they can be used together to create unique blends. Available in: • Solid/Paver • Bullnose • Split Paver • Coping • Thin Paver • Ca • Face Brick • Trea 30 -1 MY% RECYCLED CONTENT Z'," rr McNea {Red Sepia. Sienfia Somerset CC W Q J V • BRICK SIZES & SHAPES 0 �} 1 27/16" 81/8' 37/8" Standard a Solid/Paver Q 500/cu be, 2950 1 bs V Ll • cc W a Q J V • 9" Franciscan Bullnose 515/cube,24501bs OY 11/4' 81/8' 37/8" 9 9 O i 37/8' 37/8' 5/8"_11/4' r347 3/8' /? 6 3/4' - 71/8' 21/4 j 21/4 _� Standard Standard 9" Franciscan Split Paver Thin Paver Split/Thin Bullnose 1010/cube, 2880 1 bs 1.51bs.each, packaged per order Packaged per order 0O 3 7/8 9" i ® 0 r/4' a 9" Half -Round Q V Bullnose 515/cube,24501bs • W O Z J J Z) m Ll tA cc W a Q J V 0 37/8 111H, 8 W' ©© 21/4' 2 W' © �\ 101H, 37/$' ti� 10" 11.5" Franciscan Franciscan Cap Bullnose 444/cube, 24501bs 444/cube,27001bs 0 0 ,�8. 9" 3//8' 111/z' i �i t2W' I 0 �21/a ®® y ®® ®® 9" Half -Round Cap 11.5" Half -Round 515/cube, 2350 Ibs Bullnose 444/cube,27001bs 9" Half -Round Split/Thin Bullnose Packaged per order 10" �21/a <3�1;;;8 37/81/4' Franciscan Cap (Inverted) 444/cube,24501bs /8, 111/z' 21/a 0 ® y 11.5" Half -Round Cap 444/cube,26501bs We manufacture an extensive line of Face Brick and Thin Brick to match any of the paver colors shown in these pages, as well as other colors that are not available as pavers. See our Clay Brick/Thin Brick brochure for more details. r5l (�,� (!! > 0 6> < ) Flat Corner LH Corner Cap RH Corner Cap Long Edge Cap Short Edge Cap McNear Brick Pavers meet the standards ofASTM C902, Class SX, and McNear Face Brick and Thin Brick meet the standards ofASTM C276 and C1088, Grade SW. 21 LANDSCAPING WITH BRICK Visit www.mcnear.com to see our newest products and colors. Balmoral Camden Chartham Cotswold Cumberland Embarcadero Firenze Flagstaff Folsom Genova Kilburn Monticello Parkside Piedmont Salt House Stratford Tivoli Tunbridge Verona Arcadian Calaveras Greenhllls Portsmouth Red Hills Rustic Sacramento Rustic Santa Fe Rustic Whitehall McNear Red Sepia • Sienna Somerset • Tangiers Tuscan Canyon McNear Flash Newcastle Peacock Santa Cruz Stock Item: Items which can normally ship within a few days. ■ Not Available ElSpecial Order: Items which typically require extra lead times, and may require minimum order quantities. Visit www.mcnear.com to see our newest products and colors. LANDSCAPING WITH BRICK 22 Beauty and Sustainability When we opened our doors in 1868, our workers made bricks by hand and used wheelbarrows to load them onto scow schooners for delivery to the many small ports lining San Francisco Bay. The days of horse and sail are long gone, but the landmarks built with our products, such as Ghirardelli Square and the Golden Gate Bridge, remain. So too, does our commitment to beauty and durability. 30•IINWt no McNear Clay Brick are manufactured with L#o 30-100% Post -consumer, Recycled Content. RECYCLED CON ER See Our Other Lines of McNear Products Besides our full lines of Face Brick, Thin Brick, and Brick Pavers, McNear Brick & Block is a leading regional manufacturer of Interlocking Pavers and VERSA-LOK° Retaining Walls. Visit us online at www.mcnear.com to download or request brochures and samples, and to see our newest colors and products. • Thin Brick • Glazed Thin Brick • Face Brick • Interlocking Pavers • VERSA-LOK° Retaining Walls • Rumford Fireplaces ft%mcs EAR AR MMCNEAR . ' �um1oN l�Iao�r�FlnQlaots — I odhoodth WIGOIRMCNEAR BRICK & BLOCK 1 McNear Brickyard Rd., San Rafael, CA 94901 Phone: 888-442-6811 Fax: 415-257-6353 E-mail: sales@mcnear.com www.mcnear.com MBB-LWB0415 Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California CUSTOM IRON 12.12.17 REVISIONS 05.08.19 WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. CAP RAIL: 1" X 2" STEEL BAR, SHAPED. VERTICALS: 5/8" X 5/8" STEELBAR,SHAPED WHERE INDICATED, ALL JOINS WELDED,TYP. HORIZONTAL: 5/8" X 5/8" STEEL BAR, SHAPED, WELDED TO BACKING PLATE, TYP. BACKING PLATE: 1/8" STEEL PLATE. MOUNTING PLATE: 3/16" STEEL PLATE. ASSEMBLY PAINTED, TYP. PROVIDE MOUNTING POINTS. PROVIDE TEMPLATE FOR FABRICATION. ELEVATION DECORATIVE IRON GUARDRAIL REVISED 05.08.19 =NT YP. X 2" STEEL BAR STOCK , ALL JOINS AINTED, TYP. STEEL BAR STOCK , ALL JOINS AINTED, TYP. TEEL BAR STOCK, SERE INDICATED, VELDED, PAINTED, RIKE PLATE J -L ELEVATION T-1 " DECORATIVE METAL FATE TO ENTRY COURT ADDED 05.08.19 STEEL HINGE & MOUNTING PLAT WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. 4'-6" ELEVATION DECORATIVE METAL GATE TO EXTERIOR UTILITY AREA REVISED 05.08.19 /2" STEEL BAR STOCK ND, ALL JOINS , PAINTED, TYP. STRIKE PLATE " STEEL BAR STOCK, WHERE INDICATED, S WELDED, PAINTED, Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS AND DOORS 12.12.17 REVISIONS 05.08.19, 07.19.19 WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. WINDOWS: PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD WOOD WITH SIMULATED FULL DIVIDED LITES WITH SPACER BARS, TYP. 1 1/8" WIDTH HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL MUNTINS, TYP. WALL RETURN & SILL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. * ANDERSON OR PELLA ELEVATION TYPICAL RECESSED WINDOW REVISED 07.19.19 PROFILE WALL: CEMENT PLAS WALL RETURN CEMENT PLAS DOORS: IN -SWINGING, PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD V SIMULATED Fl, LITES WITH SP TYP. 1 1/8" WIDTH HORIZONTAL MUNTIN, TYP. ADA METAL SILL, T` WALKING SURFACE, TYF * ANDERSON OR PELLA ELEVATION TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL DOOR AT DECK OR PATIO REVISED 07.19.19 PROFILE 2017_18 PRODUCT GUIDE For Professionals Andersen. ARCHITECTURAL COLLECTION E-SERIES WINDOWS & DOORS Andersen. ARCH I T E C T U R A L COLLECTION Whether you're looking for style, performance or innovation, you'll find it in the windows and doors of the Architectural Collection, the culmination of more than a century -long commitment to quality and engineering excellence. These premiere products deliver ultimate design freedom by combining elegant craftsmanship with unlimited selection, architectural authenticity with unmatched performance, and monumental sizes with unexpected precision. The Andersen® Architectural Collection. Windows and doors for luxury homes. E-SERIES WINDOWS &DOORS Ur1llrniLeU r'ossibilities to Create an Original. For unmatched flexibility and design freedom, E-Series windows and doors are made to your exact specifications. They allow you to create custom shapes, dramatic sizes and striking combinations to set your work apart. You can choose from 50 standard exterior colors, custom colors and anodized finishes, plus a range of interior wood species and beautiful interior stains. Or, if your customers want something even more distinctive, we can source virtually any wood species they desire. If it's possible, it's possible with E-Series windows and doors. Made Strong Aluminum is a distinguishing element that enables us to offer the strength, beauty, and design freedom for which E-Series products are known. Through decades of innovation, we have elevated the extruded aluminum -clad window and door category and perfected a made -to -order process that is unsurpassed. Along with our network of dedicated dealers, we fulfill the dreams and vision of builders, architects and homeowners alike. Strength We harness the full strength of aluminum with heavy gauge, extruded aluminum -clad wood sash and frames. Our thick cladding offers greater structural capabilities than thinner, roll -form aluminum, while providing a superior exterior finish that resists the elements of inclement weather, abrasion and impact: Beauty Aluminum offers a smooth finish and versatility in design that enables us to create windows and doors with distinctive character and unparalleled beauty. It provides an essential foundation for our quality, baked -on silicone polyester finish, and it enables us to offer a broad array of unique accessory metals to create or recreate the architectural style you need. And beauty doesn't stop on the outside — we give you the design freedom you need to create a look of distinction both inside and out. Warranty We offer a 20/10 Transferable Limited Warranty" that provides peace of mind and confidence in the beauty and performance of our products. 'See the limited warranty for details. Versatility Aluminum's strength and versatility allow us to offer beautiful made -to -order design solutions for practically any combination of shapes and styles you can imagine. We offer dozens of exterior accessory metals to match any architectural style, and our colorful 2-, 3- and 4-tone exteriors truly broaden your creative palette. Durability Our aluminum cladding withstands nature's toughest elements — the extrusions slide onto the wood and are secured independently, allowing both wood and aluminum to expand and contract naturally. Our products are engineered to open, close, support, swing or slide reliably day after day' E-Series extruded aluminum cladding Solid wood interiors A solid wood core and extruded aluminum cladding give E-Series windows both strength and flexibility in many design applications. 50 Exterior Colors Our exclusive line of exterior colors offers a broad spectrum of quality, baked -on, silicone polyester enamel exteriors that meet the 10 AAMA 2604 specification. AAMA 2605 color compliance is also available: Our limited COLONYWHITE WHITE ABALONE BALSA WHITE warranty covers exteriors for 10 years against chalking and color change and 20 years against cracking, checking, peeling, flaking, blistering and loss of adhesion"" CANVAS MAPLE SYRUP HARVEST GOLD PRAIRIE GRASS T'N 0 0 0 0 0 FLAGSTONE SANDTONE PEBBLE TAN CARMEL TERRATONE HOT CHOCOLATE BOURBON ACORN COFFEE BEAN COCOA BEAN SIERRA BRONZE DARK BRONZE CLAY CANYON RED ROCK 0 MENNEN CARDINAL BING CHERRY FIRE ENGINE RED CINNAMON TOAST OLIVE SAGE BILLIARD GREEN MOSS FOREST GREEN MALLARD GREEN SPEARMINT AQUAMARINE PATINA SKY BLUE COUNTRY BLUE BLUE DENIM WATERCOLOR BLUE CARIBBEAN BLUE SLATE MOODY BLUE STORMY BLUE DOVE GRAY HARBOR MIST YORKTOWN PEWTER SMOKEY GRAY MYSTIC GRAY DARK ASH BLACK "AAMA 2605 finishes are available in any of our 50 colors, or select a custom color of your choice. "See the limited warranty for details. Printing limitations prevent exact color duplication. Please see your local dealer for actual samples. Grille Options ® Full Divided Light (Modern Divided Light) 24 Give any window an authentic look with full divided light grilles that are permanently applied to the interior and exterior of your window with a spacer between the glass. Available in ovolo (colonial) and contemporary profiles. SHOWN WITH CHAMFER EXTERIOR GRILLE AND OVOLO INTERIOR GRILLE PROFILES Simulated Divided Light (Classic Divided Light) An economical solution with traditional beauty, our Simulated Divided Light features fixed exterior and interior grilles without an internal spacer. Available in ovolo and contemporary profiles. SHOWN WITH CONTEMPORARY EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR GRILLE PROFILES Full & Simulated Divided Light _grille Profiles and Widths -Wood €'Aluminum Wood (interior), Ovolo (Colonial) Profile 1 /e" 11/2 2% Wood (interior) Contemporary Profile 5/8 7/8 ,, 1%'. 11/z" 21A Removable Interior Wood Grilles Our removable wood grilles are installed on the interior surface. They are available with an optional surround and an optional permanently applied exterior grille. Available in ovolo and contemporary profiles. SHOWN WITH OVOLO PROFILE AND OPTIONAL PERMANENTLY APPLIED EXTERIOR GRILLE WITH CHAMFER PROFILE Removable Interior Wood _grille Profiles and Widths Ovolo Contemporary I Aluminum (exterior), Chamfer Profile V 21/a" Aluminum (exterior), Contemporary Profile FinelightTM Grilles - Between -the -Glass Aluminum grilles conveniently placed between two panes of glass make the glass easy to clean inside and out. I%.' I%.' 2%„ SHOWN WITH 1" CONTOURED PROFILE Color Options 1" Color Options Choose from our broad palette of 50 colors or select from the ❑ COLONY WHITE following 2-tone paint combinations ■ SIERRA BRONZE LA COLONY WHITE/SIERRA BRONZE ■PEBBLETAN LA COLONY WHITE/PEBBLE TAN ■ FOREST GREEN LA COLONY WHITE/FOREST GREEN Finelight _grille Profiles and Widths Flat Contoured V 5/8 � 1i Casement Windows Frame & Sash O Select wood components are kiln dried, and treated with water/insect repellent and preservative. Interior wood surfaces are available in pine, mixed grain douglas fir, cherry, hickory, mahogany,` maple, oak, walnut, alder or vertical grain douglas fir. Interior surfaces are available unfinished or factory primed. Optional factory -applied finishes are available in a variety of stain and paint options. © Wood components are fitted with aluminum extrusions on the exterior. 50 exterior colors that meet AAMA 2604 and 2605 specifications are available, as well as custom colors. Also available is a selection of seven exterior anodized options. Integral, butyl -backed corner keys provide a positive, tight seal. © A Fibrex material thermal barrier encompasses the interior perimeter of the frame and is a neutral beige color. Glazing 0 High -Performance Low-EW glass with a low -conductivity spacer. Triple -pane glass, tinted, clear dual -pane, high -altitude glass and other special glazing options are available. © Glass is fixed in place from the interior with wood stops that can be removed for easy reglazing if necessary. Glass stops available in ovolo (colonial) and contemporary profiles. Weatherstrip 0 A continuous perimeter bulb weatherstrip around the frame is positioned on the Fibrex material and provides a solid surface contact with the sash. A secondary bulb weatherstrip is applied on three sides of the sash into a stand- alone kerf on the aluminum extrusion. Available in white or optional black. Hardware O Equipped with a stainless steel gear operator, concealed hinges and hinge track. Arch casement units use stainless steel piano hinges. Concealed sash locks (multi -point on units over 2'-8" high) provide a positive lock by operating one convenient lever. Stainless steel keepers resist corrosion — Locks, handles and operator covers are available in 10 finishes and can be shipped separately closer to job completion. Power operators are available in bronze, white, black or gold. Power Operator Available In go* BRONZE, WHITE, BLACK OR GOLD "The mahogany name is representative of non -endangered African mahoganies. —See the limited warranty for details. Casement Windows Casement 3 15/16 _f~ 2 7/6 Vertical Section 1 3/4 7/16 1 5/16 M 1 [116 5 2 5/16 3/4 3 1/16 DLO _ 3 1/16 FRAME WIDTH Horizontal Section Sash -Set (2-Piece) Casement 3 15/16 1 1/i6 2 7/6 1 5/16 a n Vertical Section 7/16 IIIIIY' f 111111 IRI^h,� �%^Ilil Us I )U) FRAME WDTH Horizontal Shown with ovolo (colonial) glass stoles. PROPER INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF E-SERIES PRODUCTS IS ESSENTIAL TO ATTAIN OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION. WRITTEN INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR PROPER INSTALLATION ARE AVAILABLE BY VISITING ANDERSENWINDOWS.COM ADDITIONAL CUSTOM SIZES ARE AVAILABLE. CONTACT YOUR LOCAL DEALER FOR MORE INFORMATION. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE. Hinged Patio Doors Frame & Panel O Select wood components are kiln dried, and treated with water/insect repellent and preservative. Interior wood surfaces are available in pine, mixed grain douglas fir, cherry, hickory, mahogany,` maple, oak, walnut, alder or vertical grain douglas fir. Interior surfaces are available unfinished or factory primed. Optional factory -applied finishes are available in a variety of stain and paint options. © Wood components are fitted with aluminum extrusions on the exterior. 50 exterior colors that meet AAMA 2604 and 2605 specifications are available, as well as custom colors. Also available is a selection of seven exterior anodized options. l� Sill © Premium grade aluminum inswing sill with an oak threshold. Sills have a built-in drainage channel that allows water to drain away from the interior of the door. A top plate is removable for easy channel cleaning. A polyurethane thermal barrier helps reduce heat loss. Available in unfinished aluminum or dark bronze anodized finish. 0 Premium grade aluminum outswing sill with oak threshold. Outswing door sill is backed with a compression foam weatherstrip. Available in unfinished aluminum or dark bronze anodized finish. © Aluminum low threshold sill available for outswing doors and inswing doors with jamb depths of 4%6" and 69/16". Low threshold design provides a smooth transition from interior to exterior and is wheelchair -accessible. A polyurethane thermal barrier helps reduce heat loss. Available in dark bronze anodized finish. �2] Ell Glazing High -Performance Low-E4® glass with a low -conductivity spacer. Triple -pane glass, tinted, clear dual -pane, high - altitude glass and other special glazing options are available. O Glass is fixed in place from the interior with wood stops that can be removed for easy reglazing if necessary. Glass stops available in ovolo (colonial) and contemporary profiles. Weatherstrip 0 The frame perimeter consists of a high -quality foam -filled weatherstrip. Hardware Autolatch® stainless steel multi -point locking system locks the panel in three locations to provide a secure, weather -resistant entry system. Some door heights lock the panel in four locations. 'The mahogany name is representative of non -endangered African mahoganies. Sill © Premium grade aluminum inswing sill with an oak threshold. Sills have a built-in drainage channel that allows water to drain away from the interior of the door. A top plate is removable for easy channel cleaning. A polyurethane thermal barrier helps reduce heat loss. Available in unfinished aluminum or dark bronze anodized finish. 0 Premium grade aluminum outswing sill with oak threshold. Outswing door sill is backed with a compression foam weatherstrip. Available in unfinished aluminum or dark bronze anodized finish. © Aluminum low threshold sill available for outswing doors and inswing doors with jamb depths of 4%6" and 69/16". Low threshold design provides a smooth transition from interior to exterior and is wheelchair -accessible. A polyurethane thermal barrier helps reduce heat loss. Available in dark bronze anodized finish. �2] Ell Glazing High -Performance Low-E4® glass with a low -conductivity spacer. Triple -pane glass, tinted, clear dual -pane, high - altitude glass and other special glazing options are available. O Glass is fixed in place from the interior with wood stops that can be removed for easy reglazing if necessary. Glass stops available in ovolo (colonial) and contemporary profiles. Weatherstrip 0 The frame perimeter consists of a high -quality foam -filled weatherstrip. Hardware Autolatch® stainless steel multi -point locking system locks the panel in three locations to provide a secure, weather -resistant entry system. Some door heights lock the panel in four locations. 'The mahogany name is representative of non -endangered African mahoganies. Hinged Inswing Patio Doors (4-9/16" Jamb Depth) Hinged Inswing Patio Door (Drainage Sill) Vertical Section Horizontal Section 6 1 /4 (Low Threshold Sill) DOUBLE DOOR ASTRAGAL CENTER POST DOOR ASTRAGAL Astragal Shown with ovolo (colonial) glass stops. PROPER INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF E-SERIES PRODUCTS IS ESSENTIAL TO ATTAIN OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION. WRITTEN INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR PROPER INSTALLATION ARE AVAILABLE BY VISITING ANDERSENWINDOWS.COM ADDITIONAL CUSTOM SIZES ARE AVAILABLE. CONTACT YOUR LOCAL DEALER FOR MORE INFORMATION. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE. Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT 12.12.17 REVISIONS 07.19.19 ELEVATION TYPICAL STOREFRONT WITH AWNING, TILE BASE REVISED 07.19.19 Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE ELEMENTS 12.12.17 REVISIONS 05.08.19, 07.19.19 WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. RIDGE TILE MISSION CLAY TILES, TYP. GABLE TILE METAL GUTTER, PAINTED, TYP. 4 X SHAPED EDGE BEAM & OUTRIGGE PAINTED, Tti I . METAL DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, TYP. - PROVIDE FULL SIZE TEMPLATE FOR SHAPED EDGE BEAMS & OUTRIGGERS. ELEVATION PROFILE TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL TILE ROOF, TRIM, GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT MISSION CLAY TILES, TYP. GABLE TILE METAL GUTTER, PAINTED, TYP. 4 X SHAPED EDGE BEAM & OUTRIGGI PAINTED, T) METAL DOWNSPOU PAINTED, T) PROVIDE FL FOR SHAPE & OUTRIGGI ELEVATION PROFILE STAIR PENTHOUSE TILE ROOF & CORBELLED OUTRIGGER ORNAMENTATION: STACKED MISSION TILES ecni ioon oonWinE BIRD STOPS TYP. ELEVATION ORNAMENTATION AT PARAPET REVISED 05.08.19 Corona ` ai yered-Missiowm - XaturaCR.ed & FCashed CoCors Clay Roo T�® OP/OVERALL PRODUCT 91 For the timely elegance of old world tradition, ............. ilnanr..- M.C.A. uses new technology to create our ,rr+itlr' FFFIIF uFFF I .... k4ol.F Corona Tapered MissionTM Tile. Originally � ' handcrafted by molding clay to the body's= min thigh this heritage has spanned the centuries F for today's installations. Old Spanish or atlll� r�mr + • F""'rF Mediterranean designs are well suited for Corona Tapered MissionTM Tile and will enhance the beauty of your project. Custom blends and colors -- are also available. B338 Palace Blend gft Bellagio Resort, Las Vegas, NV Various Custom Blends INSTALLATION METHOD (1) At roof pitches of 3:12 and steeper, provide a minimum of one layer ASTM D-226 Type II No. 30 (14kg) felt or upgraded material. Provide in strict accordance with pertinent requirements of governmental and/or other agencies having jurisdiction. (2) Install birdstop or 1 x 2 (18mm x 36mm) wood strip at eave to boost first course of tile. (3) Install first row of tile leaving a 3" (76mm) overhang with a minimum of one corrosion - resistant nail not less than No. 11 gauge (3mm dia.), 5/16" (7.9mm) head per tile or tile tie system. (4) Install booster tile above birdstops. (5) Install starter tiles directly above booster tile. (6) Install 2 x 6 (36mm x 140mm) nailer on hip and ridge, set neatly in ASTM C-270 Type M cement mortar. (7) Install rake tiles (if required) on all gable using 2 nails per tile. (8) Install 2 x 3 (36mm x 64mm) nailer under first row of cover tile after gable roll with adjacent 2 x 2 (36mm x 36mm) nailer along rake side. TILE SPECIFICATIONS: Actual size: 19" x 8.71 " (5.94")' Exposed size: 16" x 12" O.C. Weight per square: 1050 Ibs Weight per piece: 7 Ibs No. of pieces per sq: 150 pcs METRIC TILE SPECIFICATIONS: Actual size: 483mm x 222mm (151 mm)' Exposed size: 406mm x 305mm Weight per M2: 51.27 kg Weight per piece: 3.18 kg No. of pieces per M2: 16.15 pcs Metric conversion of lumber is actual dimensions of lumber; use lumber of the closest dimensions available. 'Dimension of the head of the tile. COUNTER FLASHING IN 16" RIDGE EXPOSURE txB Bock VG-ARLE RIFLASHING cEMENr MORTAR CEMENT MOROPTIONAL RIDnLE CLOSUFELTFIELDFLASHING DETAIL AT WALL P P rvMLER GABLEIL) le FIELD DETAIL CEMENT MORTAR UN DERLAVMENTSTRIP OVER WOOD NAILER BOOSTER FELT S UNDERLAVMENT FLASHING TMn"' OVER WOOD NAIL FOR FLASHING RIDGE DETAIL NAILERS & NAIL FOR UNDERLAYMENT WALLFINISH F'LA$ INGETAL ANNEL TILE OS ER THE FLASHING FELT - NAILFORFLASHING NAILER NAIL FOR UNDERLAYMENT 9¢NAILER CEMENTMORTAR Tim aOC—R THE RAKE DETAIL FELT FLASHING AT WALL FELT 12"3 Im .imm O.BLE"DETAIL CLATBIRDSTOP� FLASHING DETAIL AT WALL ST1" &T,'??3nm �Y2mm ELTMENT 9fi HALER NAILERS W NAILERHGABIE MGIRBIRD STOP DETAIL 800-736-6221 3 Yr 1rm mFa� mUlm .1r L]I�LIu ELEVATION TRELLIS AT DECK REVISED 05.08.19 SHAPED ' OUTRIGGER, T' PANELS AND TI PAINTED, TYP. SEE BELOW WINDOWS: PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD" SIMULATED FU LITES WITH SP, TYP. ELI SHAPED SILL 1X4 NOMINAL, ELEVATION BACK PANEL, T 1X3 NOMINAL, ' 1X4 NOMINAL, WOOD OR ARCHITECTURAL FOAM RELIEF PANELS ADDED 07.19.19 PROFILE �' _�_ -. --��:. -�-_�e. �:�.� ��� ;� �� � �� _��.� '�� � � : - - ,� �� ` � ��- ��� �, �� �. DOOR MATCH PANEL WITH APPLIED 3/4" DECORATIVE RELIEF, PAINTED. METAL FRAME, PAINTED. 3/4" WIDTH X DEPTH GROOVE, TYP. 3/0 X 7/0 METAL DOOR WITH APPLIED 3/4" DECORATIVE RELIEF, PAINTED. PROVIDE FULL SIZE TEMPLATE FOR FABRICATION. CEMENT PLASTER WALL AND RETURN TO RECESSED DOOR FRAME. ELEVATION DOOR, STAIR #1 GROUND LEVEL CAP MIN. DIAMETER 1'-2" COLUMN, CAP & BASE: CAST OR FORMED, STONE FINISH PROVIDE TEMPLATE FOR FABRICATION. MAX. DIAMETER 1'-8 1/2" MIN. DIAMETER 1'-5 1/2" BASE ELEVATION COLUMN WALL & RETURN: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. FLUSH PANEL OVER BACKING FRAME PAINTED. TYP. 2" X 2" WELDED WIRE MESH ATTACHED TO BACK OF PANELFRAME GAVANIZED, TYP. GRADE * McNICHOLES WELDED WIRE MESH ELEVATION SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR REVISED 05.08.19 MCNICHOLS° HOLE PRODUCTS SQUARE MESH WIRE MESH McNICHOLS® Square Mesh Wire Mesh is available in a wide range of meshes, weaves, and mesh sizes. Square Mesh is often used in applications such as infill panels, fan guards, enclosures, fencing, filtration, and more! SQUARE MESH - WOVEN Square Mesh Woven Mesh is a flexible product depending on the gauge and weave type. It is available in a wide range of meshes, weaves and material types. SQUARE IVAE'EH-- WOVEN SQUARE MESH - WELDED McNICHOLS® Square Mesh Welded Wire Mesh typically has larger openings than Woven Wire Mesh. Welded Wire Mesh is capable of maintaining its shape when stressed. AIFWLMESH - WELDED PLEASE NOTE: Pictures above are not to scale. For actual scale diagrams, please see pages 19-20. How To Measure Square Mesh ■■■■M M 2 Mesh (2 holes per linear inch) The number of openings per linear inch is determined by measuring from the center of wire to the center of wire. Please specify McNICHOLS on your next project. ©2018 800.237.3820 mcnichols.com Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California LIGHTING 12.12.17 Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California MECHANICAL PARKING SYSTEM 12.12.17 Page 1 of 6 Detail Product Data C E 10" } T 9' 1' 4" door dimensions see page 2 Frees ace TrendVa ri o CONFORMITY 4200' ' ' also Free space,— ocan kin9 spandle h?avter Upper floor (UF 5\n91e Paarded to ,a h ter date. be uploads Number of parking spaces: min. 3 to max. 29 vehicles x Dimensions: • Ground floor (GF) Groundin p • r c o All space requirements are minimum 0 = finished dimensions. Tolerances for space ra requirements+l" 0" � •v � aai v1 1 ® 10' - 10" 11 �� 11'-4" Rail details see page 11 . 12' - 6" 13' - 4" 17'- 11 " for vehicles up to 16'- 4" long 11 ®� 14'-5" 18' - 7" for vehicles up tol 7' long ,-without car S uita bl a for: Standard passenger car, station wagon/ ComCompact Type 4200 p Yp �xcl us Type 4200 Yp ' Van. Height and length according to contur. OF GF GF 0 Notes • If height H is larger, vehicles with the maximum height specified for the GF can be parked on the UF, otherwise there will be free space available on the ceiling. • In order to meet the minimum finished dimensions the tolerances specified must be met, they may be up to 1" greater than specified. • Tolerances for the evenness of the floor must be strictly complied with. • On the version without door, a 4" wide yellow -black markings compliant to ISO 3864 must be applied by the customer to the edge of the platform in the access area to mark the danger zone in compliance with DIN EN 14 010 • Potential equalization from foundation grounding connection to system (provided by the customer). • Maximum load of 5,720 Ibs optional. General notes If sprinklers are required make sure to provide the necessary free spaces during the planning stage. 11 ®10'-10"4'-11"4'-11" 11 WNW 1IM11111111111 11 ®a2,-2" 5'-7" 5,-7" M MJL2'-6" 5'-9" 5,-9" 11 �13'-4" 5'-9" 6,-7" 11 ®it'-5„ 6'-9„ 6'-9„ 6'-3" - . 6 max.4400/5720 Ibs - - ... max. 1100/ 1430 Ibs Standard passenger car 5' - 3" 2'-2" 4'- 9„ a 13° 16' - 4" (17' Standard station wagon/Van/SUV** 1' a v M 15° 6° 13° m 3'-3" " 16' - 4" (17' Standard passenger car, station wagon / Van/ SUV are vehicles without any sports options such as spoilers, low -profile tyres etc. * = Make sure to observe the weights and dimensions! [KILAII.51 multiparking Klaus Multiparking GmbH 2170 Dwight Way Berkeley, CA 94705 Phone 925-284-2092 Fax 925-284-3365 E-Mail sales@parklift.com Internet www.parklift.com (KILAvs multiparking Design Guide Cars Number of Usable Platform Width Grid Width Overall width Parked bays cm-T ft inches cm ft cm ft inches Small Platforms 3 2 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 520 17.06 204 12/16 5 3 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 770 25.26 303 2/16 7 4 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1020 33.46 401 9/16 9 5 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1270 41.67 500 11 6 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1520 49.87 598 7/16 13 7 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 1770 58.07 696 14/16 15 8 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2020 66.27 795 4/16 17 9 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2270 74.48 89311/16 19 10 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2520 82.68 992 2/16 21 11 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 2770 90.88 1090 9/16 23 12 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3020 99.08 1189 25 13 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3270 107.28 1287 6/16 27 14 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3520 115.49 1385 13/16 29 15 230 7.55 90 9/16 250 8.20 3770 123.69 1484 4/16 Medium Platforms 3 2 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 540 17.72 212 10/16 5 3 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 800 26.25 314 15/16 7 4 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1060 34.78 417 5/16 9 5 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1320 43.31 51911/16 11 6 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1580 51.84 622 1/16 13 7 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 1840 60.37 724 7/16 15 8 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2100 68.90 826 12/16 17 9 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2360 77.43 929 2/16 19 10 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2620 85.96 1031 8/16 21 11 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 2880 94.49 1133 14/16 23 12 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3140 103.02 1236 4/16 25 13 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3400 111.55 1338 9/16 27 14 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3660 120.08 1440 15/16 29 15 240 7.87 94 8/16 260 8.53 3920 128.61 1543 5/16 Large Platforms 3 2 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 560 18.37 220 8/16 5 3 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 830 27.23 326 12/16 7 4 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1100 36.09 433 1/16 9 5 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1370 44.95 539 6/16 11 6 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1640 53.81 64511/16 13 7 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 1910 62.66 751 15/16 (KILAvs multiparking 15 8 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2180 71.52 858 4/16 17 9 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2450 80.38 964 9/16 19 10 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2720 89.24 1070 14/16 21 11 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 2990 98.10 1177 3/16 23 12 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 3260 106.96 1283 7/16 25 13 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 3530 115.81 1389 12/16 27 14 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 3800 124.67 1496 1/16 29 15 250 8.20 98 7/16 270 8.86 4070 133.53 1602 6/16 ALLOWABLE COLUMN SPACING ■ Use for preliminary layout. Pior to finalizing design contact Klaus for a job specific layout drawing. s RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB 4" V-3., E Li Li Li I( Bi )I( B2 )I( Bi )I( B2 �I RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB u u u I� g3 g2 Bi ,I( B4 �I 4" L 4" Max Clear RB Column Bi B2 B3 B4 Platform Width 230 W-2-1/2" 8" 16' - 5" 241- 7" 16' - 9" 24' - 11" 240 W-6-3/8" 16" 17' - 1" 251- 7" 17' - 5" 25'- 11'' 250 8'-10-3/8" 24" 17' - 9" 261- 7" 18'- 1" 26' - 11" The column widths shown are the maximum width's allowed for each model. The columns may be spaced every two or three bays or a combination of every two or every three bays. On the ends of the machine the column is optional if there is a concrete wall present. Otherwise the end columns should be offset so that their edge lines up with the last platforms outside RB dimension line shown above in order to allow better access to the end platforms. Please note that the machine requires an additional 4 inches at each end beyond the RB grid dimensions. Au00 0m01010 0 00m 00 0 0 9 M 0 0 0 000m0 0 00000000 000000000000000m0 ou000 0m000 0 ®00000 0 00oo0oom0 0000mo 0 000 0 10100ommo0o00m00 00 10 0000m0 000m0 0 00m D0 0oo0oom0 0m00 0000 1NOM 0 00m 00 000000m0 omoo 0050 4" Rl Bt8" Longitudinal free space Moving direction 11 2 4 6 Upper floor Empty space Entrance level ' 3 ,, 5 Ground floor f e.g. for parking space No. 4: Check first that all doors are closed, then select No. 4 on operating panel. 1 2 � 1 2 � 4 1 3 — 5 3 5 3 Descending to entrance level (standard: Hold -to -run - device) Transverse repositioning 2 5 4 For driving the vehicle off platform The empty space is now below the vehicle The vehicle on platform No. 4 No. 4 the ground floor parking which shall be driven off the platform. can now be driven off the platform. platforms are shifted to the left. The platform No. 4 will be lowered. RECESSED RAIL SYSTEM Dependent upon the structural conditions of the garage, several different options are available for installation of the rails: When executing the carriageway, according to raw bottom Exact evenness of the carriageway: floor combined with a cement screed or — When exact evenness of the carriageway has successfully been When executing the carriageway with recesses for the rails: accomplished, the rails may be dowelled onto it — The set-up of the rails amounts to 10(height of floor screed 1 ❑ 121) — After the rails have eventually been laid, the area under the rails must be topped up with concrete by the customer N 2[31B❑ M E Direction of parking 2C3i8� o E Direction of parking Running a; 0 1 4 M o top edge Running 1 1 top edge rail Lj z a of finished Guide rail rail of finished Guide rail 1 floor floor 77r '. I`i`r II II III � �III1! III nl�� le:: nl1 a e::: nice Ime The Klaus Automat P210 provides independent access to all cars parked on the system. Each individual parking bay must be accessible from the drive aisle. The drive aisle shall comply with local regulations, but is typically 24' wide. The parking spaces are arranged on two levels. The upper level parking spaces move vertically. The lower parking spaces move horizontally (left and right) to allow upper level cars to come up or down to driveway level and be driven off the platforms. The lower level of the machine includes one less car than the upper to enable the lower cars to move left and right to create the vacant space. Consequently, a unit of three parking spaces ( 1 on the ground floor , 2 on the upper floor) is the smallest unit available for this parking system and can go up to 15 lifts or 2Ecars for the larger units. RANGE OF • This parking system is suitable for self parking by owners, renters, regular employees or anyone that can be trained on the system. The public may not park on this system without a valet. ENVIRONMENTAL• • • Environmental conditions for the systems: Temperature range 14' to 104' Q The system must be installed indoors. If lifting or lowering times are specified, they refer to an environmental temperature of 72' F and with system set up directly next to the hydraulic unit. At lower temperatures or with longer hydraulic lines, these times increase. The machine comes standard with manual doors and 2 keys per parking space. The key is inserted into a user control box centrally placed on the system. Electric doors are available. Infrared control transmitters are available. Standard space numbering is left to right with the empty space located in the first bay on the left. The empty space can be moved to another bay or even outside the normal machine if needed. The numbering sequence planned will be shown on the shop drawings and approved by the client. The sprinklers may be mounted at the front and rear of each level if needed. The hydraulic power unit is normally installed against the back wall on a metal bracket with rubber sound insulation. It consists of an electric motor, hydraulic motor and hydraulic oil reservoir in one unit. The hydraulic oil is biodegradable and environmentally friendly. The motor is a 3 phase 208 volt, 4.0 K11 . It is possible to use single phase power if needed. The power unit has a pressure gage and a pressure relief valve. The platforms are galvanized and the steel framing members are powder coated. The platforms should be cleaned annually to maximize their life. To maintain safe and reliable operation of the machine, it must be serviced twice per year. To machine has a complete one year parts and labor warranty. Klaus provides extended warranties. Numerous sound control features are standard. The hydraulic power unit is mounted on rubber pads. Steel hydraulic lines are mounted with rubber pipe supports. A rubber hose isolates the power unit from the steel hydraulic lines. Sound tests at the front of the machine show about 67dB to 69dB (A weighting) noise levels (speech at i foot is 68db). hi multifamily podium construction, normally no special construction for sound is performed. For residential or wood frame construction, placement of the power unit is critical. Klaus designers will assist with power unit placement and other sound issues. The machine has steel framing and is anchor bolted to the concrete garage slab with wedge anchors. The framework consists of steel columns and beams on a grid pattern. The machines steel columns are connected to the building at the rear wall and to a steel tube at the front of the machine. The tube steel is typically 10" x 10"and also provides seismic bracing as well as support for the gates. This tube steel and associated concrete columns are supplied and installed by the customer. Please refer to the Automat P210 Bracing Details drawing and Merkle engineering report for details. The platforms for the upper and lower cars consist of steel platforms that ride up and down the steel columns. The platforms for the cars at the driveway level run left-rignt on steel rails. The upper and lower platforms are constructed with two steel side members, three steel cross members, ribbed steel platform material which runs from side member to side member and one wheel stop. The platform is solid and does not allow oil or water to drip onto the lower cars. The lifting mechanism for the upper platforms consists of a hydraulic cylinder which raises the rear of the platform. The front of the platform is raised via a chain which runs on chain sprockets. There are safety switches that stop the machine in the event the chain goes loose for any reason. The platforms are suspended at the 4 corners and are guided along the front support columns. The lower platforms are moved via an electric motor located on each platform. The motor drives a sprocket that runs along a chain at grade level. The platform runs on steel guide rails and can be moved manually without power by releasing the brake on the electric motor. The machine includes several safety devices which include chain monitoring systems, and safety locks for the upper platforms. When a user is inside the machine all platforms are mechanically protected against lowering. 1. The pit and surrounding walls, columns and beams to provide support for the 5. Klaus will prepare shop drawings showing the location of all components. machine are provided by the customer. 6. The customer must close off the left and right sides of the machine with a wall or 2. All pit drainage is provided by the customer. fence. The fence must be 8' high and the lower 5 feet must have no openings greater 3. General lighting in the garage is provided by the customer. Klaus will supply than 1/2" inch. lighting within the machine. The lighting will be connected to the machine control 7. The customer must provide a 30 amp 3 phase 208V (or 2400 single phase) circuit box and will be activated when the doors are open. and fused disconnect for each machine and power must be available before installation 4. Klaus will supply design assistance and will confirm in writing that the proposed begins. machine will fit in the space provided. 8. Klaus provides all control wiring and conduit. V111TV441T F119TWFIR ViTIrF The Klaus company reserves the right in the course of technical progress to use newer or other technologies, sytems, processes, procedures or standards in the fullfillment of their obligations other than those originally offered provided the customer derives no disadvantage from their doing so. Architecture/Planning/Interiors 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103-1239 Tel:415/863-8881 Fax:415/863-8879 www.garygee.com 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE Residential Condominium Mixed Use Project Burlingame, California BICYCLE PARKING 12.12.17 ARC RACK p I '�; I& f V kw Ik lip ARC RACK 7 Black7Br!ghtY7ellowOrange !CNH RAL 2004 Light Green Green RAL 6018 RAL 6016 Dark Purple I Flat Black Light Gray Deep Red AL 7042 RAL 3003 Blue Sky Blue RAL 5005 PAL 5015 Sepia Brown Bronze RAL 8014 Wine Red RAL 3005 Black I Green I Red I Blue Hunter Green RAL 6005 Gray Brown r A, �I OR i Patent#8,950,592 9 i i y 1 The Next Level of Parking The Dero Decker takes bike parking to the next level — literally. By stacking bikes on a two -tiered system, capacity doubles. Unlike other two-tier systems our lift -assist top trays slide down inches from the ground, thus requiring only minimal lifting of the bike into the tray. The Dero Decker has a front wheel safety locking lever and tray dampers to provide safe lowering of upper trays. The near vertical lowered trays also reduce the required aisle space, giving the Dero Decker the smallest footprint on the market. V �EIRO a pLAYCORE-m INIVIGIMM 4 • Sturdy red handle grips • Lift -assist trays • Dampers for safe lowering of trays • Spring loaded levers hold bikes firmly in place • U-lock compatible • Smallest footprint • Smooth and silent operation • Simple installation • Low maintenance • Specially designed fat bike trays available • Adjustable downward resting position to accommodate different floor clearances. FINISH OPTIONS Black Light7GrayRAL CNH Bright Yellow Orange BlueRAL 2004 RAL Light Green Green Sepia Brown RAL 6018 RAL 6016 RAL 8014 www.dero.com 1 1-888-337-6729 Sky Blue RAL 5015 Silver 9007 eige AL 1001 F C>EIRO PLA CORE ­. [O]PIIIIIFAD .7 DERO DECKER nstaHation Instructions — Setbacks, Single Sided A1SLL MAX, M1N HERO www.dero.com 1-888-337-6729 PLAYCORE --y DERO DECKER Submittal Sheet HERO "r I_AYCORE --y CAPACITY 4 bikes per unit. MATERIALS Uprights: 4" 11g square tube Upright base: 1/4" plate Cantilevers: 11g plate Cantilever base: 1/4" plate Trays: 11g plate FINISHES Galvanized An after fabrication hot dipped galvanized finish is our standard option. Powder Coat Our powder coat finish assures a high level of adhesion and durability by following these steps: 1. Sandblast 2. Epoxy primer electrostatically applied 3. Final thick TGIC polyester powder coat MOUNT Surface OPTIONS Each upright has one 1/4" plate feet that accept 1/2" wedge anchors SETBACKS See following page www.dero.com 1-888-337-6729 aft Maximum Security The Dero Bike Locker" 33 offers bike parking for a single bicycle per unit, thus providing a narrower footprint when space is limited. This affordable bike locker is a perfect option for long-term bike parking applications, such as transit hubs and college campuses. Multiple locking options and all standard powder coat color options are available. Ships flat to save you money. F HERO © 2016 Dero Galvanized �J LOCKING OPTIONS U-lock/Padlock Handle White Keyed Lock CONFIGURATIONS Single -sided only FINISH OPTIONS NH Bright Yellow Orange RAL 2004 Light Green Green RAL 6018 RAL 6016 Powder Coat I""q'm Beige 10 RAL 1001 FLOORING An optional perforated, galvanized steel floor is available www.dero.com 1 1-888-337-6729 Silver 9007 I 2015y111M. 1214 Donnelly Avenue - Street View 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE FACADE CONCEPTS FOUR MAJOR VERTICAL MASSING DIVISIONS OCCUR AT: 1. GARAGE DRIVEWAY - BUILDING FACADE IS SET BACK 11'-11" FROM THE STREET WITH A 25'-8" WIDTH. 2. UNIT 102 WEST COMMERCIAL STORE FRONTAGE - THIS COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE ARE DIVIDED INTO A SEPARATE VERTICAL MASS 40'-7" IN WIDTH. 3. UNIT 101 EAST COMMERCIAL STORE FRONTAGE - THIS COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE ARE DIVIDED INTO A SEPARATE VERTICAL MASS 49'-5" IN WIDTH. 4. RESIDENTIAL ENTRY LOBBY - THIS RESIDENTIAL FRONTAGE IS 30'-4" WIDE AND IS FURTHER SUBDIVIDED INTO THREE (3) SMALLER DIVISIONS WITH A RECESSED RESIDENTIAL ENTRY, VERTICAL STAIR TOWER ELEMENT, AND GATED UTILITY AREA WITH PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PATIO ABOVE SETBACK 20'-0" FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. THREE MAJOR HORIZONTAL MASSING DIVISIONS OCCUR AT: 5. GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACES EMPHASIZE A BUILDING BASE ELEMENT WITH TWO SEPARATE STORE FRONTS, 15' CLEAR HEIGHT CEILINGS AND LARGE ALUMINUM DISPLAY WINDOWS HAVING TRANSOMS AND FABRIC CANOPIES. 6. THE SECOND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS HAVE EXTERIOR PATIOS OVERLOOKING THE STREET. THESE SECOND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS SETBACK 7', 8' AND 12' FURTHER FROM THE COMMERCIAL STORE FRONT WALLS. 7. THE THIRD FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALSO HAVE EXTERIOR PATIOS 7'-61, AND 8' SETBACK FROM THE FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL STREET WALL. ALL RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS WILL BE METAL CLAD DIVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE GLASS. WOOD TRELLIS ELEMENTS MODULATE THE MASSING AT THE THIRD LEVEL. MATERIALS: o EXTERIOR WALLS WILL HAVE CEMENT PLASTER. o RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS WILL BE METAL CLAD. COMMERCIAL WINDOWS WILL BE ALUMINUM. o ALL PATIO METAL GUARDRAILS WILL BE PAINTED. o FABRIC CANOPIES OVER COMMERCIAL STORE FRONT WINDOWS ADD VISUAL INTEREST TO THE BUILDING FACADE. o OTHER DETAIL FEATURES INCLUDE CERAMIC TILES UNDER THE COMMERCIAL STORE FRONT WINDOWS AND A GATED RESIDENTIAL ENTRY WITH AN EXTERIOR LANDSCAPE ENTRY COURT. o EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL EMPHASIZE THE COMMERCIAL STORE FRONTS AND RECESSED EXTERIOR RESIDENTIAL ENTRY COURT. THE OVERALL MIXED -USE BUILDING IMAGE WILL HAVE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL STORES WITH RESIDENTIAL PATIOS ON THE SECOND AND THIRD LEVELS STEPPING BACK AWAY AND OVERLOOKING THE STREET. 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. 14-022 Date 07.18.14 Revisions No. Issue / Date REVISED EE - PLANNING 06.28.18 PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Street View, Concepts Scale: NO SCALE AOOO PLANNING NOTES GENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAP 1214 Donnelly LOCATION: 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDINANCES AND AMENDMENTS. T� PARCEL NO.. 029-151-150, 160 & 170 ZONING: DAC 2. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: WEEKDAYS: 7:00 am 7:00 pm r ; F/ ► , -- Avenue LOT SIZE: EXISTING: PARCEL NO. 029-151-150: 6,572 SQ.FT. PARCEL NO. 029-151-160: 4,520 SQ.FT. PARCEL NO. 029-151-170: 4,614 SQ.FT. PROPOSED: COMBINED PARCELS: 15,706 SQ.FT. STREET FRONTAGE: PROPOSED: 146.94' SATURDAYS: 9:00 am - 6:00 m p SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS: No Work Allowed CONSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED TO WEEKDAYS AND NON -CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8:00 am AND 5:00 pm. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR FACE OF CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. N ��_ ,� .. .' '� "�`' � „ r, '+- /� `� �'. � > .:.;... .Y " ti • _. � � � � i; ► ,' Y .,;' + ,= s ` • o e - �� t • J ' - - APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 BUILDING HEIGHT: 5. DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS. 6. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE 1-HOUR RATED THROUGHOUT, N PROJECT SITE G A R Y EXCEPT AS NOTED. E F ALLOWED: 35'-0" 55'-0" WITH CONDITIONAL USE 7. BUILDING SHALL BE SPRINKLERED THROUGHOUT. A I A PROPOSED: 40'-10" TOP OF ROOF 8. ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 43'-10" TOP OF PARAPET PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT LOCATION MAP 98 Brady Street, #8 52'-0" PEAK OF MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE ROOF ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY San Francisco, CA 94103 54'-3 3/4" PEAK OF STAIR / ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE ROOF APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THE PLANNING Tel 415/863-8881 COMMISSION. Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT I984-20I9BYGARYGEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHACLREMAINTHE PROPERTY OFTHE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OFGARY GEEARCHITECTS,INC. BUILDING AREA: PROPOSED: 35,075 TOTAL SQ.FT. SETBACKS: REQUIRED: FRONT: NONE SIDEYARD: NONE REAR: NONE PROPOSED: FRONT: VARIES: 2'-0" MIN. - 24'-0" MAX. (62% OF BUILDING FRONTAGE 9. SEWER CONNECTION FEES MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO ISSUING THE BUILDING PERMIT. 10. A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO ISSUING THE PERMIT. AFTER NOTIFICATION BY THE BUILDING DIVISION THAT THE PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, CALL 650-558-7270 TO SCHEDULE THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING. BELLEVUE AVENUE _ _ I i i i p Q 0 , I LU ' , w 00- - - - W Q - - I - - z a -� - - - T>>>:.>> o J Project No. 14-022 Date 07.18.14 Revisions LESS THAN 10'-0" FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE) SIDEYARD: NONE DONNELLY AVENUE No. Issue /Date REAR: 19'-7" AT SECOND AND THIRD LEVELS PROJECT SITE: ti ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL SPACE: 1214 Donnelly Avenue Block 151 / Lots 15, 16 & 17 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 PROPOSED: OCCUPIED AREA: 4,584 SQ.FT. ISSUED FOR REVIEW GROSS AREA: 4,704 GROSS SQ.FT. 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 RESIDENTIAL UNITS: PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 PROPOSED: 14 UNITS: 12 2-BEDROOM, 2 1-BEDROOM TOTAL OCCUPIED AREA: 12,728 SQ.FT. TOTAL GROSS AREA: 13,907 SQ.FT. SCOPE OF WORK ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 OFF-STREET PARKING: DEMOLISH ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 COMMERCIAL: CONSTRUCT NEW 3 STORY MIXED -USE BUILDING, CONTAINING PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REQUIRED: NONE (EXEMPT) PROVIDED: NONE 2 LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS (R-2) OVER GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL RETAIL UNITS (M) AND PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE (S-2). REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING RESIDENTIAL: 05.08.19 REQUIRED: 1.0 PARKING SPACE PER STUDIO / 1-BEDROOM UNIT 1.5 PARKING SPACES PER 2-BEDROOM UNIT TWO (2) 1-BEDROOM UNITS X 1.0 = 2 SPACES REQUIRED TWELVE (12) 2-BEDROOM UNITS X 1.5 = 18 SPACES REQUIRED 20 SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED: 22 SPACES IN GROUND LEVEL PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE (21 MECHANICAL SYSTEM STALLS, 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) D RAW I N G INDEX GUEST: ARCHITECTURAL REQUIRED: NONE A0.0 COVER SHEET / STREET VIEW A0.1 PROJECT INFORMATION, DRAWING INDEX, PLANNING PROVIDED: NONE NOTES, GENERAL NOTES A0.2 BUILDING DIVISION NOTES, FIRE DIVISION NOTES, ON -SITE DELIVERY VEHICLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION NOTES, PARKS DIVISION NOTES, STORMWATER DIVISION NOTES REQUIRED: 1 SPACE A0.3 GREEN BUILDING CHECKLIST A0.4 PATH -OF -TRAVEL DIAGRAMS PROVIDED: 1 SPACE IN GROUND LEVEL PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE A0.5a ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS A0.5b ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS A0.5c ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS BICYCLE PARKING: A1.1 EXISTING SITE PLAN / DEMOLITION PLAN COMMERCIAL SHORT-TERM (MANDATORY MEASURES): A1.2 SITE PLAN REQUIRED: 5% OF NEW VISITOR MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING, MINIMUM ONE 2-BIKE RACK A2.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.2 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PROVIDED: ONE 2-BIKE RACK ON SIDEWALK (NO NEW VISITOR MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING A2.3 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PROVIDED) A2.4 ROOF PLAN A2.5 PENTHOUSE ROOF PLAN COMMERCIAL LONG-TERM (MANDATORY MEASURES): R1 STREET VIEW REQUIRED: 5% OF NEW TENANT MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING, MINIMUM ONE BIKE RACK A3.1 SOUTH ELEVATION A3.1 a SOUTH ELEVATION PROVIDED: ONE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED BICYCLE LOCKER PROVIDED IN GROUND LEVEL A3.2 EAST ELEVATION PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE (NO NEW TENANT MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING A3.3 NORTH ELEVATION PROVIDED) A3.4 WEST ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL SHORT-TERM (VOLUNTARY MEASURES): A4.1 SECTION A4.2 SECTION RECOMMENDED: 5% OF NEW VISITOR MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING, MINIMUM ONE 2-BIKE RACK A4.3 SECTION PROVIDED: ONE 2-BIKE RACK ON SIDEWALK (NO NEW VISITOR MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED) BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RESIDENTIAL LONG-TERM (VOLUNTARY MEASURES): RECOMMENDED: 1 SPACE PER TWO UNITS MINIMUM: 14 UNITS X .5 = 7 RACKS CIVIL PROVIDED: PERMANENTLY ANCHORED LIFT -ASSIST RACKS FOR 8 BICYCLES PROVIDED IN LOCKABLE ENCLOSURE IN GROUND LEVEL PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE C-1 TITLE, GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET INDEX C-2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C-3 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN OPEN SPACE: LANDSCAPE PRIVATE: L1.1 PLANTING PLAN REQUIRED: 75 SQ.FT. PER DWELLING UNIT CONTIGUOUS. MINIMUM DIMENSION ABOVE L1.2 PLANTING PLAN L2.1 IRRIGATION PLAN GROUND LEVEL: 3'-6". MINIMUM ADA DIMENSION: 5-0". L2.2 IRRIGATION PLAN PROVIDED: 87 SQ.FT. OR GREATER PER DWELLING UNIT CONTIGUOUS. MINIMUM DIMENSION OF DECKS AND PATIOS AT SECOND AND THIRD LEVELS: 5-0". (SEE TABULATION ON SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL PLANS.) COMMON: REQUIRED: 100 SQ.FT. PER DWELLING UNIT. MINIMUM DIMENSION: 15-0". 50% OF AREA MUST BE SOFT LANDSCAPING. MUST BE WITHIN 6' OF ESTABLISHED GRADE. 100 SQ.FT. X 14 UNITS = 1,400 SQ.FT. COMMON OPEN SPACE REQUIRED. PROVIDED: 2,695 SQ.FT. COMMON OPEN SPACE AT AT PODIUM LEVEL REAR YARD WITH MINIMUM DIMENSION OF APPROXIMATELY 19'-6". REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR SOFT LANDSCAPING. CONSTRUCTION HOURS WEEKDAYS: 7:00 am - 7:00 pm SATURDAYS: 9:00 am - 6:00 pm SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS: No Work Allowed Project Information CONSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED TO WEEKDAYS Scale: None AND NON -CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8:00 am AND 5:00 pm. STORMWATER DIVISION NOTES PARKS DIVISION NOTES FIRE DIVISION NOTES BUILDING DIVISION NOTES 1. THIS PROJECT MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE C.3 i NTCVISTING TREE ^"E4 8" IN GIRGUMFEREN E AT 64" FRGM 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE FIRE ACCESS TO THE REAR OF THE 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE . AND C.6 PROVISIONS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY MUNICIPAL TI F: L ^F TLJC TREE nnA4 BE PROPERTY. SIDE ROLL -UP GATES SHALL BE OPERABLE VIA A FOLLOWING: REGIONAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT (MRP). IF THE nnnTEGTEB TREE REME) iAl PERMITFRE)M TLIC PARKS FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS KEY AND HAVE THE MEANS FOR - 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) PROJECT WILL CREATE AND / OR REPLACE 10,000 S.F. OR MORE MANUAL OPERATION DURING LOSS OF ELECTRICAL POWER. - 2013 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AND; THE PROJECT WILL REPLACE - 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 50% OR MORE OF SITE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, THEN IT TRIMMEB 9R Z EXISTING STREET TOCC MA* NE4 BE GUT, 2. THE WEST ROOF ACCESS STAIR SHALL BE CONTINUOUS TO - 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE STORMWATER SOURCE CONTROL AND TREATMENT REME) EB WITHE) IT HERMIT FRGM PARKS 9IVI8IE)ATI- THE ROOF AND THE ROOF HATCH SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 48" - 2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE. X 60". - ALL APPLICABLE AMENDMENTS PER CITY OF BURLINGAME THE PROJECT PROPONENT MUST COMPLETE, SIGN AND 3. REPLACE PYRUS CALLERYANA STREET TREES WITH GINGKO ORDINANCE 1889 SUBMIT TO THE CITY, THE APPROPRIATE FORM FOR EACH BILOBA. 3. THE BUILDING SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED NFPA APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT FROM THE SUMMARY OF 13 SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT AND A NFPA 14 TYPE 1 2. THIS PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH THE 2013 CALIFORNIA APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. 4. USE CITY STANDARDS FOR TREE STAKING WITH BUBBLER STANDPIPE SYSTEM. SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE DRAWINGS ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS. IRRIGATION AND TREE GRATE. SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CENTRAL 2. COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN THE FOLLOWING FORMS: COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE 3. FOR DISABLED ACCESS, THIS PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH CBC A. C.3 AND C.6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED TO MEET "WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE ELECTRONICALLY MONITORED BY AN CHAPTERS 11A AND 11 B. B. WORKSHEET F, SPECIAL PROJECTS CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS." IRRIGATION APPROVED CENTRAL RECEIVING STATION. STANDPIPE C. WORKSHEET D-2, FEASIBILITY OF RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT. AUDIT DUE FOR FINAL. OUTLETS SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE INTERMEDIATE LANDINGS 4. NO PUBLIC MONEY OF ANY KIND WILL BE USED TO CONSTRUCT AND USE. OF STAIRS AND AT EITHER END OF THE ROOF. THIS PROJECT. 6. EXISTING STREET TREE SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE PROJECT 3. ANY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN THE CITY, REGARDLESS OF AND BY A NO -FEE PERMIT AND REPLACED TO ACHIEVE 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE IN 5. NO APPLICATION FOR TAX CREDITS HAS OR WILL BE SIZE, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S STORMWATER NPDES UNIFORMITY IN FRONT OF PROJECT SITE. ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ENGINEERING SUBMITTED FOR TAX REBATES. PERMIT TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY STORMWATER STANDARDS IS AVAILABLE FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER MAIN POLLUTION. PROJECT PROPONENTS SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL DRAIN AND INSPECTOR TEST ON THE BUILDING PLUMBING 6. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: CONTRACTORS IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE AND EFFECTIVE DRAWINGS. WEEKDAYS: 7:00 am - 7:00 pm BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) DURING ALL PHASES SATURDAYS: 9:00 am - 6:00 pm OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING DEMOLITION. WHEN 5. THE FIRE PROTECTION UNDERGROUND SHALL BE SUBMITTED SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS: No Work Allowed SUBMITTING PLANS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, PLEASE INCLUDE AND APPROVED BY THE BURLINGAME BUILDING DEPARTMENT A LIST OF CONSTRUCTION BMPs AS PROJECT NOTES, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PREFERABLY, ON A SEPARATE FULL SIZE (2' X 3' OR LARGER) ARE LIMITED TO WEEKDAYS AND NON -CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN PLAN SHEET. A DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC FILE IS 6. THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL NOT BE APPROVED BY THE 8:00 am AND 5:00 pm. AVAILABLE AT: http://www.flowstobay.org/Construction CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT UNTIL THE FIRE PROTECTION UNDERGROUND HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND 7. EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS LESS THAN 5' FROM THE PROPERTY 4. ALL EXTERIOR SURFACE PAVING MATERIALS, INCLUDING, BUT APPROVED BY THE BURLINGAME BUILDING DEPARTMENT. LINE WILL BE BUILT OF 1-HR. FIRE -RATED CONSTRUCTION. CBC NOT LIMITED TO THOSE USED ON DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, TABLE 602. WALKWAYS AND PATIOS, MUST BE IDENTIFIED (LABELED) AS 7. PROVIDE A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE BUIDING. PERVIOUS OR IMPERVIOUS ON PLANS. CLEARLY DELINEATE THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED 8. ALL OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS, BOTH PROTECTED AND AREA THAT REQUIRE STORMWATER TREATMENT, AS BY THE CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO UNPROTECTED, WILL COMPLY WITH CBC TABLE 705.8. SEE IDENTIFIED BY THE C3 AND C6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW INSTALLATION. THE SYSTEM SHALL MONITOR FLOW AND TABLE ALLOWABLE AREA OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS. CHECKLIST AND ASSOCIATED WORKSHEETS. THE PLANS MUST VALVES OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER / STANDPIPE SYSTEM. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE CHECKLIST. 9. A GRADING PERMIT, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 10. AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, SHORING CONTACT CAROLYN CRITZ, STORMWATER POLLUTION PLANS AND ENGINEERING WILL BE SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED PREVENTION COORDINATOR, FOR ASSISTANCE AT (650) BY CBC CHAPTER 31 REGARDING THE PROTECTION OF 342-3727, EXT. 18. ADJACENT PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED BY OSHA: a. IF SHORING IS REQUIRED, SPECIFY ON THE PLANS THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL THAT HAS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO DESIGN AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING, BRACING, FORMWORK, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. b. SHORING PLANS SHALL BE WET -STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE SURCHARGE LOADS FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES THAT ARE WITHIN THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE (45° WEDGE UP THE SLOPE FROM THE BASE OF THE RETAINING WALL) AND / OR DRIVEWAY SURCHARGE LOADS. c. ALL APPROPRIATE GUIDELINES OF OSHA SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SHORING DESIGN BY THE CONTRACTOR. WHERE SPACE PERMITS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SLOPES MAY BE UTILIZED IN LIEU OF SHORING. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE VERTICAL CUT FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT WILL BE 5'. BEYOND THAT HORIZONTAL BENCHES OF 5' WIDE WILL BE REQUIRED. TEMPORARY SHORES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL). IN SOME AREAS DUE TO HIGH MOISTURE CONTENT / WATER TABLE, FLATTER SLOPES WILL BE REQUIRED WHICH WILL BE RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. d. SHORING AND BRACING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FLOORS, ROOF, AND WALL SHEATHING HAVE BEEN ENTIRELY CONSTRUCTED. 11. AN OSHA PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED PER CAL / OSHA REQUIREMENTS. 12. PROVIDE HANDRAILS AT ALL STAIRS WHERE THERE ARE FOUR (4) OR MORE RISERS. CBC SECTION 1009. 13. PROVIDE LIGHTING AT ALL EXTERIOR LANDINGS. 14. PERMIT SUBMITTAL PLANS WILL INCLUDE A PLUMBING PLAN INCLUDING COMPLETE DETAILS FOR ALL REQUIRED OIL INTERCEPTORS AND CITY -REQUIRED BACKWATER PREVENTION DEVICES. 15. SINGLE -USER, UNISEX TOILET FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED AT GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL M OCCUPANCIES PER CPC 422.2 #3. REFER TO MINIMUM PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS TABLE. 16. ALL PATHS OF TRAVEL AND COMMON USE SPACES WILL BE ACCESSIBLE AND ALL LIVING UNITS WILL BE ADAPTABLE. 17. RESIDENTIAL UNITS WILL COMPLY WITH THE "ONE BATHROOM OPTION" PER CBC SECTION 1134A.2, OPTION #2. 18. PROVIDE GUARDRAILS AT ALL LANDINGS. CBC SECTION 1013.2. 19. ALL DWELLING UNIT INTERIOR DOORS WILL COMPLY WITH CBC 1132A.5.2. 20. ALL ENTRANCES, EXITS AND VEHICULAR PASSAGEWAYS TO AND VERTICAL CLEARANCES WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE MUST HAVE A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 8'-2" WHERE REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBILITY TO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. 21. AT EVERY PRIMARY PUBLIC ENTRANCE AND ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, THERE SHALL BE A SIGN DISPLAYING THE "INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY." SIGNS SHALL INDICATE THE DIRECTION TO ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCES AND FACILITIES AND SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 1143A. 22. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED AFTER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN FINALED. NO OCCUPANCY OF BUILDING IS TO OCCUR UNTIL A NEW CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED. 23. A CONDITION OF THIS PROJECT APPROVAL IS THAT THE DEMOLITION PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED AND NO WORK CAN BEGIN (INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ANY BUILDING COMPONENTS) UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE PROJECT. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THAT NO WORK IS AUTHORIZED OR PERFORMED. AREA TABULATION per Floor Space / Room Name Ground Floor OCCUPIED Area (Square Feet) GROSS Area (Square Feet) BUILDING Area (Square Feet) 14,715 SF COMMERCIAL SPACE 1, UNIT #101 COMMERCIAL SPACE 2, UNIT #102 PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE BICYCLE PARKING TRASH / RECYCLING STORAGE UTILITY _ CORRIDORS, STAIRS, ELEVATOR 2,265 SF 2,319 SF 2,324 SF 2,380 SF 6,186 SF 6,315 SF 112 SF 270 SF 166 SF 415 SF 10,199 SF Second Floor RESIDENTIAL UNIT #201 2 BR / 2 BA 991 SF 1,133 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #202 2 BR / 2 BA 943 SF 1,002 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #203 RESIDENTIAL UNIT #204 2 BR / 2 BA 2 BR/2 BA 923 SF 1,040 SF 995 SF 1,126 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #205 1 BR / 1 BA 528 SF 579 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #206 2 BR / 2 BA 917 SF 1,013 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #207 2 BR / 2 BA 943 SF 1,053 SF 1,026 SF ACCESSORY COMMON OPEN SPACE (for Residential tenants) 2,695 SF CORRIDORS, STAIRS, ELEVATOR Third Floor 9,408 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #301 2 BR / 2 BA 991 SF 1,133 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #302 2 BR / 2 BA 943 SF 1,002 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #303 2 BR/2 BA 916 SF 987 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #304 2 BR / 2 BA 1,040 SF 1,126 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #305 1 BR / 1 BA 693 SF 746 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #306 2 BR / 2 BA 917 SF 1,013 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT #307 2 BR / 2 BA 943 SF 1,026 SF CORRIDORS, STAIRS, ELEVATOR Roof 753 SF MECHANICAL 208 SF UTILITY 34 SF Total Building Area 35,075 SF CONSTRUCTION TYPE • TYPE V-A CONSTRUCTION (R-2 OCCUPANCY OVER M AND S-2 OCCUPANCIES) WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION 903.3.1.1. • BUILDING ELEMENTS ARE 1-HR. FIRE -RESISTIVE RATED CONSTRUCTION THROUGHOUT EXCEPT AS NOTED PER CBC TABLE 601. • 1-HR. HORIZONTAL SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN R-2 OCCUPANCY AND M AND S-2 OCCUPANCIES PER CBC TABLE 508.4. • R-2 AND S-2 OCCUPANCIES REQUIRE 1-HR. EXTERIOR WALLS LESS THAN 5' PER CBC TABLE 602. OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS Per 2013 CBC Section 1004 and Table 1004.1.2 Occupancy Group Ground Floor Area (Square Feet) Occupant Load Factor Total Occupant Load COMMERCIAL SPACE 1, UNIT #101 2,324 GSF 30 SF Gross 77 Occupants COMMERCIAL SPACE 2, UNIT #102 PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE 2,380 GSF 30 SF Gross 200 SF Gross 79 Occupants 31 Occupants 6,315 GSF Second Floor RESIDENTIAL UNIT #201 1,133 GSF 200 SF Gross 6 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #202 1,002 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #203 RESIDENTIAL UNIT #204 995 GSF 1,126 GSF 200 SF Gross 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants 6 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #205 579 GSF 200 SF Gross 3 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #206 1,013 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #207 1,026 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants ACCESSORY COMMON OPEN SPACE (for Residential Tenants) Third Floor 1,070 SF Net 15 SF Net 71 Occupants 1,133 GSF 200 SF Gross 6 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #301 RESIDENTIAL UNIT #302 1,002 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #303 987 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #304 1,126 GSF 200 SF Gross 6 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #305 746 GSF 200 SF Gross 4 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #306 1,013 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants RESIDENTIAL UNIT #307 1,026 GSF 200 SF Gross 5 Occupants * Not required to be counted in the Occupant Load Calculation per CBC Section 202, Floor Area, Net. Corridors* 0 0 Stairways* 0 0 Toilet Rooms* 0 0 Mechanical Rooms* 0 0 0 Closets* 0 Total Building Area 35,075 SF 258 Occupants + 71 Accessory Common Open Space ALLOWABLE AREA OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS Per 2013 CBC Section 705.8 and Table 705.8 CBC Section 705.8.1 states the maximum area of unprotected and protected openings permitted in an exterior wall in any story shall not exceed the percentages specified in Table 705.8. Fire Separation Distance Degree of Opening Allowable Area Protection SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL FACES STREET UNPROTECTED, UNLIMITED (FACES DONNELLY AVENUE) SPRINKLERED NORTH EXTERIOR WALL FACES REAR YARD - UNPROTECTED, NO LIMIT / NOT REQUIRED DISTANCE VARIES, SPRINKLERED 26'-3" TO 30'-6" EAST EXTERIOR WALL (ON PROPERTY N/A N/A N/A LINE) - NO OPENINGS EAST EXTERIOR WALL (STAIR #1) 1 V-1 3/4" UNPROTECTED, 45% SPRINKLERED SECOND LEVEL: Opening = 11 SF = 12% THIRD LEVEL: Opening = 17 SF = 7% ROOF: Opening = 17 SF = 6% WEST EXTERIOR WALL (ON PROPERTY N/A N/A N/A LINE) - NO OPENINGS WEST EXTERIOR WALL (at lightwell) 3'-2 3/4" UNPROTECTED, 15% SPRINKLERED SECOND LEVEL: Opening = 20 SF = 15% THIRD LEVEL: Opening = 20 SF = 12% WEST EXTERIOR WALL (at street) 26-10 3/4" UNPROTECTED, NO LIMIT SPRINKLERED WEST EXTERIOR WALL (at rear yard) 1 V-0 3/4" UNPROTECTED, 45% SPRINKLERED SECOND LEVEL: Opening = 13 SF = 17% THIRD LEVEL: Opening = 13 SF = 16% MINIMUM PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS Per 2013 CPC Chapter 4 Table 422.1 and Table A* Minimum Fixtures Required Provided Occupancy Occupancy Type Square Feet Occupant Load Factor* Total Occupant Load Water Closet Urinal Lavatory M F M F COMMERCIAL SPACE 1, UNIT #101 M 2,265 SF 200 SF 11 Occupants 1 1 0 1 1 1 Unisex Toilet Room (1 Water Closet & 1 Lavatory) COMMERCIAL SPACE 2, UNIT #102 M 2,319 SF 200 SF 12 Occupants 1 1 0 1 1 1 Unisex Toilet Room (1 Water Closet & 1 Lavatory) * CBC 2001, TABLE A29-A 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Notes Scale: None A002 GREEN BUILDING CHECKLIST: RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING CHECKLIST: NON-RESIDENTIAL 1214 2013 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE RESIDENTIAL CHECKLIST New residential buildings must be designed to include the Green Building mandatory measures specified in this checklist. These Green Building mandatory measures also apply to additions or alterations of existing residential buildings where the addition or alteration increases the buildings conditioned area, volume, or size. These requirements apply only to the specific area of addition or alteration. Building Permit Number: Site Address: 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame, CA in the column labeled "Plan Reference" specify where each Measure can be found on the plans. Green Building Measure Plan Reference SITE DEVELOPMENT (2013 CGC §4.106) A plan has been developed,and will be implemented, to manage storm waterdrainage during construction. CGC §4.106.2 & §4.106.3 ENERGY EFFICIENCY (2013 CGC §4.2 and the 2013 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards) 2013 Energy Code performance compliance documentation must be provided in 8-1/2" X 11" format and must be replicated on the plans. Sht. A0.3 Walls with 2 X 6 and larger framing require R-19 insulation §150.0 (c) 2 Hot water piping insulation §150,0 0) 2 A J Lighting -- new mandatory requirements for indoor rooms. §150.0 (k) Duct insulation (11-6) required §150.0 (m) 1 Duct leakage testing -6%w/o air handler and 41/6 with air handler §150.0 (m) 11 Return duct design/fan power, airflow testing, and grill sizing requirements §1S0.0(m)13 Water heating -120 volt receptacle < 3 ft., Cat III or IV vent, and gas supply line capacity of at least 200,000 Btu / hour §150.0 (n) New third -party HERS verification for ventilation and indoor air quality §150.0 (o) New mandatory U-factor (0.58) for fenestration and skylights §150.0 (q) Luminaire efficiency levels 201-3 California Energy Code Table 150,0 B Refrigerant charge verification for ducted package units, mini -splits, and other units §150.1(c) 7 Radiant barrier now required i n Climate Zane 3 §1SOA (c) 2 Reduce U-factor (0.32) and SHGC (0.25) for high performance windows §150.1 (c) 3 A 2013 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE CHECKLIST FOR NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Building Permit Number: Site Address: 1214 Donnelly Ave., Burlingame, CA in the column labeled "Plan Reference" specify where each Measure can be found on the plans. Green Building Measure Plan Reference SITE DEVELOPMENT (2013 CGC §5.106) Storm Water. Newly constructed projects which disturb lessthan one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of storm water runoff from the construction activities through local ordinance per 2013 CGC §5.106.1.1 BMP. Include a plan for Best Management Practices (BMP) on the plans. 2013 CGC §5.106.1.2 Short -Term Bicycle Parking. If the project is anticipated to generate visitortraffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle rackswithin 200feet of the Asitors' entrance, readily visibl eto passers-by,for 5 percentof newvisitor motorized vehicle parking being added, with a minimum of one two -bike capacity rack. 2013 CGC §5.106.4.1.1. Long -Term Bicycle Parking. For buildings with more than 10 tenant -occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5 percentoftenant-occupied motorized vehicle parking being added, with a minimum of one space. 2013 CGC §5.106.4.1.2. Designated Parking. Provide designated parking for any combination of low -emitting, fuel - efficient, and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in 2013 CGC Table 5.106.5.2. Parking stall marking shall comply with 2013 CGC §5.106.5.2.1 Light Pollution Reduction: outdoor lighting systems shall be designed and installedto complywith requirements in the 2013 California Energy Code and in compliance with 2013 CGC §5.106.8. ENERGY EFFICIENCY (2013 CGC §5.2 and the 2013 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards) 2013 Energy Code performance compliance documentation must be provided in 8-1/2" X 11" format and must be replicated on the plans. The building shall be in compliance with the Mandatory requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code §100.0 through §100.10 that are applicable to the building project. The building shall be in compliance with the Mandatory requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code §120.0 through §130.5. The building shall be in compliance with the performance compliance approach (energy budgets) in the 2013 California Energy Code §140.1, or the prescriptive compliance approach in §140.2 forthe Climate Zone in which the building will be located. Green Building Measure Plan Reference WATER EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION (2013 CGC §5.303) Meters. Separate sub -meters or metering devices shall be instal Iedforthe uses described in 2013 CGC §503.1.1 and §503.1.2. Buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet: Separate sub -meters shall be installed as follows: 1. For each individual leased, rented, or other tenant space within the building projected to consume more than 100 gal/day, including but not limited to, spaces used for laundry or cleaner, restaurant for food service, medical or dental office, laboratory or beauty salon or barber shop. 2. Where separate sub -meters for individual building tenants are infeasible, for water supplied to the following subsystem: a. Makeup water for cooling towers where flow through is greater than 500 GPM. b. Makeup water for evaporative coolers greater than 6 GPM. c. Steam and hot-water boilers with energy input more than 500,000 Btu/h. Excess Consumption. A separate sub -meter or metering device shall be provided for any tenant within a building that is projected to consume more than 1,000 gallons/day. 2013 CGC §5.303.1.2 Water Reduction. Plumbing fixtures shall meet the maximum flow rate value shown in 2013 CGC Table 5,303.2.3. Exception: Buildings that demonstrate 20% overall water use reduction. In this case, a calculation demonstrating 20% reduction in the building "water use baseline," as established in 2013 CGC Table 5.303.2.2, shall be provided. Water Conserving Plumbing Fixtures and Fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and urinals) and fittings (faucets and Showerheads) shall comply with the following prescriptive reduced flow rates: Water Closets: The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per flush. Note: The effective flush volume of dual flush toilets is defined as the composite, average flush volume of two reduced flushes and one full flush. 2013CGC§5.303.3.1 Urinals: The effective flush volume of urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush. 2013 CGC§5.303.3.2 Single Showerhead: Showerheads shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than o2.0 gallons per minute at 80 psi. 2013 CGC§5.303.3.3.1 Multiple Showerheads Serving One Shower: When a shower is served by more than one showerhead, the combined flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 2.0 gallons per minute at 80 psi, or the show shall be designed to allow only one shower outlet to be in operation at a time. Note: A hand-held shower is considered a showerhead. 2013 CGC §5.303.3.3.2 Wastewater Reduction. Each building shall reduce the generation of wastewater by one of the methods per 2013 CGC §5.303.4: OUTDOOR WATER USE (2013 CGC §5,3041 Water Budget. A water budget shall be developed for landscape irrigation use per 2013 CGC §5.304.1. 2 Green Building Measure Plan Reference Outdoor Potable Water Use. For new water service for landscaped areas between 1,000 square feet and 5,000 square feet, separate sub -meters or metering devices shall be installed for indoor and outdoor potable water use. 2013 CGC §5.304.2. Irrigation Design. In new non-residential projects with cumulative landscaped area s between 1,000 and 2,500 square feet (the level at which the MWELO applies) install irrigation controllers and sensors which include the following criteria and meet manufacturer's recommendations. 2013 CGC §5.304.3 Irrigation Controllers. Automatic irrigation system controllers installed at the time of final inspection. 2013 CGC §5.304.3.1 WEATHER RESITANCE AND MOISTURE MANAGEMENT (2013 CGC §5.407) Weather protection. Provide a weather -resistant exterior wall and foundation envelope as required by 2013CaGfornia Building §1403.2 and 2013 California Energy Code §150,the manufacturer's installation instructions, or Total ordinance, whichever is more stringent. 2013 CGC §5.407.1 Moisture Control. Employ moisture control measures by the following methods; Sprinklers. Prevent irrigation spray on structures per 2013 CGC §5.407.2.1. Entries and openings. Design exterior entries and openings to prevent water intrusion into buildings. 2013 CGC §5.407.2.2. CONSTRUCTION WASTE REDUCTION, DISPOSAL, AND RECYCLING (2013 CGC §5.408) Construction Waste Diversion. A minimum of 60%of the non-hazardouscon struction and demolition waste generated at the site wiII be diverted to an offsite recycle, diversion, or salvage facility. City of Burlingame Ordinance # 1704 BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (2013 CGC §5.4101 Recycling by Occupants. Provide read ilyaccess ible areas that serve the entire building and are identified forthe depositing, storage, and collection of nonhazardous materials for recycling including paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, and metals. 2013 CGC §5.410.1 Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 square feet and over, building commissioning for all building systems covered by the 2013 California Energy Code, Part 6, process systems, and renewable energy systems shall be included in the design and construction processes of the building project. Commissioning requirements shall include items listed in 2013 CGC §5.410.2. Commissioning Report. A report of commissioning process activities undertaken through the design and construction phases of the building project shall be completed and provided to the ❑wneror representative. 2013 CGC §5.410.2.6 Testing and Adjusting. Testing and adjusting of systems shall be required for buildings less than 10,000 square feet. 2013 CGC §5.410.4. Operation and Maintenance Manual. Provide the building owner with detailed operating and maintenance instructions and copies of guaranties/warranties far each system priorto final inspection. A copy of all inspection verifications and reports required by the enforcing agency must be included in this manual. 2013 California Building Code §5.410.4.5. FIREPLACES (2013 CGC §5.503) Install only a direct -vent sealed -combustion gas or sealed wood -burning fireplace or a sealed woodstove or a pellet stove, and refer to residential requirements in the 2013 California Energy Code, Title 24, Part 6, Subchapter 7, § 150. 3 Green Building Measure Plan Reference Woodstoves. Woodstoves and pellet stoves shall comply with US EPA Phase II emission limits. POLLUTANT CONTROL (2013 CGC §5.504) Temporary Ventilation. The permanent HVAC system shall only be used during construction if necessary to condition the building within the required temperature range for material and equipment installation. If the HVAC system is used during construction, use return air filters with a MERV of 8, based on ASHRAE 52.2-1999, or an average efficiencyof30%based on ASHRAE 52.1- 1992. Replace all filters immediately prior to occupancy. 2013 CGC §5.504.1.3 Covering of Duct Openings and Protection of Mechanical Equipment During Construction. At the time of rough installation or during storage on the construction site and until final startup of the heating, cooling and ventilating equipment, all duct and other related air distribution component openings shall be covered with tape, plastic, sheet metal or other methods acceptable to the enforcing agency to reduce the amount of dust or debris which may collect in the system. 2013 CGC §5.504.3. Finish Material Pollutant Control. Finish materials shall comply with 2013 CGC §5.504.4.1 through §5.504.4.4. Adhesives, sealants and caulks. Adhesives, sealants and caulks used on the project shall meet the requirements of the standards listed in 2013 CGC §5.504.4.1. Paints and Coatings. Architectural paints and coatings shall comply with 2013 CGCTable 5.504.4.3 unless more stringent local limits apply. Verification. Verification of compliance with this section shall be provided at the request of the enforcing agency. Carpet Systems. All carpet installed in the building interior shall meet the testing and product requirements of one of the standards listed in 2013 CGC §5.504.4.4. Composite Wood Products. Hardwood plywood, particleboard and medium density fiberboard composite wood products used on the interior or exterior of the building shall meet the requirements for formaldehyde as specified in 2013 CGC Table 5.504.4.5 Resilient flooring Systems. 80 percent of the floor area receiving resilient flooring shall comply with at least one of the pollutant control measures listed in 2013 CGC §5.504.4.6. Verification of Compliance. Documentation shall be provided verifying that resilient flooring materials meet the pollutant emission limits. 2013 CGC §5.504.4.6.1 Filters. In mechanically ventilated buildings, provide regularly occupied areas of the building with air filtration media for outside and return air prior to occupancy that provides at least a MERV of 8. MERV 8 filters shall be installed after any flushed -out or testing and prior to occupancy, and recommendations for maintenance with filters of the same value shall be included in the operation and maintenance manual. 2013 CGC §5.504.5.3 INDOOR MOISTURE CONTROL (2013 CGC §5.505) Buildings shall meet or exceed the provisions of the 2013 California Building Code, Chapter 12 (Ventilation) and Chapter 1.4 (Exterior Walls) for indoor moisture control. 2013 CGC §5.505 INDOOR AIR QUALITY (2013 CGC §5.505) Buildings must meet the minimum requirements of the 2013 California Building Code, Chapter 12 (Ventilation) for mechanically or naturally ventilated spaces. 2013 CGC §5.506.1 For Buildings equipped with demand control ventilation, CO2 sensors and vent. Controls shall be specified and installed in accordance with the 2013 California Energy Code. 2013 CGC 5.506.2 4 Green Building Measure Plan Reference ENVIRONMENTAL COMFORT (2013 CGC §5.507) Acoustical Control. Employ building assemblies and componentswith STC values determined in accordance with ASTM E90 and ASTM E413 or 0 ITC determined in accordance with ASTM E 1332, using eitherthe prescriptive or performance method in 2013 CGC §5.507.4.1 or §5.507.4.2. OUTDOOR AIR QUALITY (2013 CGC §5.508) Ozone Depletion and Greenhouse Gas Reductions. Installation of HVAC, refrigeration and fire suppression equipment shall comply with 2013 CGC §5.508.1.1 or §5.508.1.2. Supermarket Refrigerant Leak Reduction. New commercial refrigeration systems shall comply with 2013 CGC §5.508.2 when installed in retail food stores with 8,000 square feet or more of condition area, and that utilize either refrigerated display cases, or walk-in coolers, or freezers connected to remote compressor units or condensing units. The leak reduction measures applyto refrigeration systems containing high -global -warming potential (high- GWP) refrigerant with a GWP of 150 or greater. 2013 CGC §5.508.2 Responsible Designer's Declaration Statement Contractor Declaration Statement I hereby certify that this project has been designed to I hereby certify, as the builder or installer, under permit meet the requirements of the 2013 Green Building listed herein, that this project will be constructed to Code. meet the requirements of the 2013 Green Building Code. Name: Gary Gee Architects, Inc. Name: Address: 98 Brady St Address: City/State/Zip Code San Francisco, CA 94103 City/State/Zip Code Signature: Signature: Date: April 17, 2017 Date- 5 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 Green Building Checklist Scale: None A003 1214 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - I I OEM 4 I I I I I I 0,,M �I 0 UNOCCUPIED ROOF, TYP. I I ❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ UTILITY I I � SKYLIGHT, i MECHANICAL II TYP. ROOM EL ERAR N ROOF HATCH ■ ° I L— I I I I < UNOCCUPIED > $TAI I I ROOF, TYP. ME I I I I I I I I I I I � J I I I ROOF PLAN I I I I PRIVATE -DECK I I UNIT #307 1,037 GROSS SQ.FT 5OCCUPANTS ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL I DECK ABOVE, TYP. SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN NOTES AT EVERY PRIMARY PUBLIC ENTRANCE AND ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, THERE SHALL BE A SIGN DISPLAYING THE "INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY." SIGNS SHALL INDICATE THE DIRECTION TO ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCES AND FACILITIES AND SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 1143A. --- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --� I I -- 14T-3114" -- DIAGONAL a--- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- R RESIDENTIA4 TE RAMP 1,070 NET SQ. . — \�S RAMP , PR+VATEDECK- I r- F P E BECfE-I I I I I PRIVATE PATIO PRIVAT E PATIO �T T PRIVATE PATIO I PRIVATTE PATIO GONp,L UNIT #305 '��P 2 :OCCUPANTS I I I UNIT #301 UNIT #207 UNIT #205 �PGONP� la- UNIT #203 UNIT #201 15$ 746 GROSS SQ.FT. 987T. 1,133 GROSS SQ.FT. I I 1,037 GROSS SQ.FT. 579 GROSS SQ.FT. _ w 995 GROSS SQ.FT. 1,133 GROSS SQ.FT. 4OCCUPA15 6OCCUPANTS I I 5OCCUPANTS 3OCCUPAN 0 5OCCUPANTS 6OCCUPANTS CORRIDOR 1 �� EXIT PATH OF TRAVEL -� —I— CORRIDOR -- -- I j IELEV. i UNIT #306 LADDER & ROOF HATCH 78'-8 3/4" � DIST CE BETWEEN EXITS ® I I 1,033 GROSS SQ.FT. 5 OCCUPANTS UNIT #304 UNIT #302 I 1,126 GROSS SQ.FT. 1,002 GROSS SQ.FT. 7P]RIVA-7-TEEECK-i I 6OCCUPANTS 5OCCUPANTS I I ROOF —PRIVATE J L--- OVERHANG I DECK PRIVATE DECK ABOVE, TYP. PRIVATE DECK PRIVATE DECK — THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN THIRD LEVEL DIAGONAL: 158'-2 1 /8" 1/3 DIAGONAL: 52'-8 3/4" DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS: 78'-8 3/4" UNIT #206 1,033 GROSS SQ.FT. 5OCCUPANTS I 0 Irf I0 ,J DOR I —L+ EXIT PATH OF TRAVEL —a J CORRIDOR MIN of - ---------------- GIST _78'-8 3/4 CE BE-7) u UNIT #204 1,126 GROSS SQ.FT 6OCCUPANTS PRIVATE PRIVATE PATIO I PATIO REMOTE POINT U-0" TO EXIT SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SECOND LEVEL DIAGONAL: 158'-2 1/8" 1/3 DIAGONAL: 52'-8 3/4" DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS: 78'-8 3/4" COMMON OPEN SPACE DIAGONAL: 1/3 DIAGONAL: DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS NOTES PRIVATE PATIO N EXITS UNIT #202 1,002 GROSS SQ.FT. 5OCCUPANTS PRIVATE PATIO PRIVATE PATIO DECK ABOVE, TYP I I K/iIVJrVKIVItK VAULT DONNELLY AVENUE GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ACCESSIBLE PATH -OF -TRAVEL DIAGRAMS GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN COMMERCIAL 101 DIAGONAL: 71'-8 5/8" 1/3 DIAGONAL: 23'-10 7/8" DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS: 56-7 3/8" COMMERCIAL 102 147'-3 1/4" DIAGONAL: 73'-3 1/4" 49'-1" 1/3 DIAGONAL: 24'-5" 80'-8 3/4" DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS: 40'-0 3/8" PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE DIAGONAL: 144'-10 1 /2" 1/3 DIAGONAL: 48'-3 1 /2" DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS: 106-0 7/8" DONNELLY AVENUE SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" TRANSFORMER VAULT Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 — 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Path -of -Travel Diagrams 1. THE BUILDING IS FULLY SPRINKLERED PER CBC SECTION 903.3.1.1. 4. ALLOWABLE EXIT ACCESS DISTANCES INDICATED FOR VARIOUS OCCUPANCIES CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1016 2. OCCUPANT LOADS AND NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED FOR EACH AND TABLE 1016.2 FOR BUILDINGS WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER Scale: 1/16" = V-0" LEVEL AND OCCUPANCY ARE AS NOTED ON SHEET A0.2, OCCUPANT SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1. EXIT PATH -OF -TRAVEL DIAGRAMS � LOAD CALCULATIONS. 3. WHERE TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED, THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" BETWEEN EXITS IS 1/3 THE MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA SERVED MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN EXIT DOORS OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAYS PER CBC SECTION 1015.2.1, EXCEPTION 2. A004 1214 LEVEL MANEUVERING CLEARANCE @ DOORS, TYP. PULL SIDE 36" MIN. Donnelly Avenue PULL SIDE PULL SIDE ' CAR INDICATOROION APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 HANDRAIL 12" MIN. 12" MIN. GUIDE RAIL = 00 CENTERED @ 3"+/- co 1"H. M HANDRAIL TO SUIT & CURB, D SI N WHEEL GUIDE @3"+/-1"H. Z 24" IN. CLR. @ EXTERIOR DOORS 0 18" IN. CLR. @ INTERIOR DOORS cm 32" MIN. 12" MIN. CLR. - OPN'G. PROVIDE THIS °O ADDITIONAL SPACE IF Q DOOR IS EQUIPPED WITH PUSH SIDE BOTH A LATCH AND A CLOSER. � PUSH SIDE 54" MIN. Z Z o 0 cfl co a' NOTE: 48" MIN. IF DOOR JI HAS BOTH A LATCH AND A CLOSER Z NOTE: PUSH SIDE 48 MIN. IF DOOR HAS BOTH A LATCH AND A CLOSER 4" MI FLOOR LANDING HALL LANTERN JAMB SIGNAGE ON BOTH JAMBS - X- Q TACTILE o Z EMERGENCY CO EVACUATION SIGN X - z Q N ti = = 00 �- - HALL CALL BUTTON A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GUIDE RAIL NOTE: E E FRONT APPROACH © HINGE APPROACH © LATCH APPROACH SEE ELEVATOR PLAN THIS SHEET FOR A I A SECTION © DETAIL NO SCALE © SECTION OD DETAIL NO SCALE NOTES: TYPICAL NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1. ALL DOORS, DOOR HARDWARE & THRESHOLDS SHALL COMPLY WITH 98 Brady Street, #8 CBC CHAPTER 11 AND WITH CALIF. TITLE 24. San Francisco, CA 94103 2. SLOPE AND CROSS -SLOPE Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RAMP HANDRAILS LEVEL MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS ELEVATOR LOBBY SIGNAGE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF NO SCALE CBC SECTIONS 1124A AND 1143A. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WRITTEN SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY UTHORI ATION OF GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1114A. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2)WHOLE CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1126A.3 AND 11 B-404 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions LETTERS & NUMBERS SHALL BE RAISED 1/32", UPPER CASE, SANS SERIF OR No. Issue / Date SIMPLE SERIF TYPE AND SHALL BE ISSUED FOR REVIEW ACCOMPANIED WITH GRADE II BRAILLE. RAISED CHARACTERS SHALL BE AT 08.01.14 60" MIN. WHEN NO DOOR SWINGS ONTO LANDING 48" MIN. 48" MIN. 48" MIN. LEAST 5/8" HIGH, BUT NO HIGHER THAN 2". RAISED CHARACTERS TO BE WHITE 3/4" MIN. ON A BLACK BACKGROUND, TYP. 8SU8ED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 E 2 1 SEEN M\N 6Q 60„ 1 M O�E /N SEEN NOTES: _ 1. WHEN DOOR SWINGS ONTO LANDING 42 MIN. PLUS DOOR WIDTH. 2. MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF EACH RAMP AND RUN VARY. 3. SURFACE SLOPE OF RAMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:12 (8.33%). CROSS SLOPE OF RAMP SURFACE(S) SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:48 (2.083/0). = _ z z °r° _z = �. � = = z z 00 g Z_ -+48" MAX. FROM FLOOR °�° 5 6 IGHEST BUTTON ❑ cn TO H 3 4 3/8" MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN ROWS 1 2 OF CONTROL BUTTONS SB ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 NO-`E`Z SEE ,1 N �2 \�\ INTERMEDIATE LEVEL PLATFORM r VV/O%/ /�EQU/RCS BOTTOM EL PLATFORM TOP PLATFORM 4. SURFACE SLOPE OF LANDING(S) SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:50 (2%) IN ANY DIRECTION. 5. FINISHED SURFACE OF RAMP IS ROUGHENED OR CONSTRUCTED OF SLIP -RESISTANT MATERIALS (MEDIUM BROOM FINISH OR EQUIVALENT). 6. RAMPS AND LANDINGS WITH DROP-OFFS (OR RAMPS THAT EXCEED 10 FT. IN LENGTH AND ARE NOT BOUNDED BY A WALL OR FENCE) SHALL HAVE EDGE PROTECTION CONSISTING OF EITHER GUIDE CURB A MIN. OF 2" IN HEIGHT ON EACH SIDE OF THE RAMP OR A WHEEL GUIDE GUIDE RAIL CENTERED 3" PLUS OR MINUS 1" ON EACH SIDE OF PROVIDE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE IF DOOR IS EQUIPPED WITH BOTH A LATCH AND A CLOSER. �A DOORS IN SERIES BOTH DOORS OPEN OUT © DOORS AT ADJACENT OD DOORS AT OPPOSITE WALLS WALLS DGGROPEMN DOOR CLOSE PLACE STAR ALONG- / / / 1 0 ALARM BELL EMERGENCY STOP (� " SIDE MAIN EXIT +35 MIN. FROM FLOOR FLOOR NUMBER X __ `r g �T LOWEST BUTTON -'1 0 CAR CONTROL BUTTONS TO BE RAISED 1/8" PLUS OR MINUS 1/32" ABOVE THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AND SHALL BE ILLUMINATED. EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 THE RAMP. STRAIGHT -RUN RAMP VESTIBULES ELEVATOR CONTROL PANEL 3 CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 1 CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1114A. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 11 ' CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTIONS 1008.1.8, 1126A.3.3 AND 11B-404 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" CBC SECTIONS 1124A AND 1143A. 1 1/2" MAX. CONTROL PANELW/ EMERGENCY NOTE: HIGHEST BUTTON COMMUNICATIONS 12° MIN. 1-1/2" SIZE WITH 1/4" STROKE 1" SIZE WITH STAIR 1 1/4 STROKE �7,ROOF ACCESS 5" SIZE WITH2 3/4" STROKE -' JG THROUGH 4 CORRESPONDING GRADE II BRAILLE TO BE LOCATED DIRECTLY UNDER OR ADJACENT TO SIGNAGE INFORMATION, TYP. z o CID NOTES:IP O THE UNDERSIDES OF NOSINGS SHALL NOT BE ABRUPT. �o THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AT THE LEADING EDGE OF THE TREAD SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 1/2". RISERS SHALL BE SLOPED OR THE UNDERSIDE OF THE NOSING SHALL HAVE AN ANGLE NO LESS THAN 60' FROM THE 1 1/2" MAX. HORIZONTAL. NOSINGS SHALL PROJECT NO MORE THAN 1-1/2". WATER SHALL NOT ACCUMULATE ON TREAD SURFACE. TREAD SHALL BE SLIP RESISTANT. A NOTES: STAIR NOSING 1. HANDRAILS SHALL RETURN TO NO SCALE WALL OR TERMINATE IN NEWEL POST. 12' 2. INNER HANDRAIL AT LANDINGS OF STAIRS THAT DOUBLE BACK OR IMMEDIATELY TURN SHALL Q BE CONTINUOUS AND SHALL NOT 12„+TW TW - bo EXTEND INTO LANDING OR PATHco OF TRAVEL. 1 1/4" MIN. - 2" MAX. 1 1/2" MIN. Z N r @+48" TO q, LOWEST @+48" MAX. A.F.F. BUTTON @+35" MIN. FROM q FIXTURE TACTILE EMERGENCY Tp �. EVACUATION SIGN @+60" MIN. A.F.F. FROM � SIGN CALL BUTTON @+48" / MAX. A.F.F. FROM HANDRAIL @ +32" A.F.F. / FIXTURE U HALL LANTERN Z 51" MIN. CLR. @+72" MIN. A.F.F. - J FROM � FIXTURE 54" MIN. CLR. v C TOR I E , n C ELEVATOR /`1 I N FLOOR LANDING JAMB SIGNAGE @+48 MIN. TO 60" MAX. A.F.F. FROM FIXTURE NOTES: NOTE: THE INFORMATION ON THE SIGN MUST BE PRESENTED WITH RAISED ARABIC NUMERALS AND CORRESPONDING GRADE II BRAILLE. THE MEZZANINE LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER "M" PRECEDING FLOOR NUMBER. BASEMENT LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER "B" PRECEDING THE FLOOR NUMBER. 1. THE CENTERLINE OF THE SIGN IS LOCATED APPROX. 60" ABOVE THE FLOOR LANDING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE DOOR ON THE STRIKE SIDE. 2. THE SIGN IDENTIFIES THE STAIRWAY LOCATION, THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER, AND UPPER AND LOWER TERMINUS OF THE STAIRWAY. X Z 3. CLOSED RISERS ONLY. Q MAXIMUM RISE IS 7". ❑ M 4. 2" WIDE SOLID CONTRAST I. STRIPING FOR TOP AND BOTTOM Z TREAD ON INTERIOR STAIRS AND CONTRASTING STRIPE FOR ALL TREADS ON EXTERIOR STAIRS. co 1 �� „ 2 1. ELEVATOR SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2013 CBC CHAPTER 30, CALIFORNIA TITLE 24, AND SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH CURRENT ELEVATOR CODES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUP 4 ELEVATORS. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS PER CBC SECTION 3002.4.3a. THE ELEVATOR SHALL ACCOMMODATE AN AMBULANCE -TYPE GURNEY OR STRETCHER 84" x 24" IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS WITH LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION. MAX. TW - TREAD WIDTH 3. VERIFY EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS WITH ELEVATOR MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGS. STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION 1 CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" STAIR 1 O CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" STAIR HANDRAIL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" ELEVATOR (Side -Opening Door) CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" CBC SECTIONS 1022.9 AND 1143A. -" CBC SECTIONS 1115A AND 1123A. CBC SECTIONS 1115A AND 1123A. CBC SECTIONS 1124A AND 1143A. ACCESSIBLE BLUE BORDER AND DIAGONAL PARKING SIGN - / HATCH, TYP. 70 SQ.IN. MIN.VAN = INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY - WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE LANDING � X R DOWN DOWN LANDING X DOWN --)OR INNER HANDRAIL -- _ 1/2" DOWN DOWN NOTES: INNER HANDRAIL AT LANDINGS OF STAIRS THAT DOUBLE BACK IMMEDIATELY TURN SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND SHALL NOT EXTEND INTO LANDING OR PATH Z OF TRAVEL. LANDING X = cv X: EXTENSION OF HANDRAIL SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE TREAD _ WIDTH PLUS 12 INCHES. _ INNER HANDRAIL Z :E X = c� ACCESSIBLE E WHITE SYMBOL / TEXT ON DK. BLUE NIMUM BACKGROUND, FFINE$250 TYP. 60" MIN. A.F.F. OR GROUND SURFACE; OR MIN. A.F.F. OR GROUND SURFACE IF GROUND FINISHED GRADE LOCATED WITHIN AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF PARKING SPACE DA ELEVATION - PARKING IDENTIFICATION SIGN o r � WHEEL STOP CCESSIBLE NOTE: SURFACE OF LE PARKING SPACE AND Z ACCESSIBLE AISLE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/4" PER o ° FOOT (2.083%GRADIENT) _0 IN ANY DIRECTION. r° BACKGROUND X LANDING X LANDING GUARDRAIL DOWN MAY BE 7 LANDING GUARDRAIL DOWN MAY BE REQUIRED LANDING X NO SCALE NOTE: AN ADDITIONAL SIGN, NOT LESS THAN 17" w. X 22" h. IN SIZE W/MIN. 1" h. LETTERING, SHALL BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE AT THE OFF-STREET PARKING INTERNATIONAL ENTRANCE AND CLEARLY STATE: SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY STALL "Unauthorized" vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces EMBLEM, 36"h. X 36"w., 12 WHITE LET N 0 \ PARKING Accessibility DOWN not displaying distinguishing placards or special license plates WHITE SYMBOL ON issued for persons with disabilities will be towed away at the BLUE BACKGROUND owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by Li Standards telephoning the Burlingame Police Department at 9'-0" MIN. 8'-0" MIN. (650)777-4100." lo NOTE: MAINTAIN MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 8'-2" ALONG VEHICULAR PASSAGEWAY Scale: As noted - STAIR HANDRAILS VAN -ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE(�3) „_,„ CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1123A. SCALE: 1/4 - 1 -0 5 „_,„A0.5a CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1109A. SCALE: 1/4 - 1 -0 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions NOTE: PICTOGRAMS SHALL No. issue /Date SANITARY FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE TYPES HAVE A FIELD 0 0 0 HEIGHT OF 6" MIN.N OF SIGNAGE: ONE TYPE LOCATED ON THE DOORWAY TO THE FACILITY Z ® I AND ANOTHER TYPE MOUNTED ON THE WALL ADJACENT TO THE LATCH 9"y_ SIDE OF THE DOOR. =- CHARACTERS AND BRAILLE SHALL NOT MEN WOMEN UNISEX RESTROOMS DOOR MOUNTED SIGNAGE: o I ,, o BE LOCATED IN THE SEE ILLUSTRATIONS AT RIGHT PICTOGRAM FIELD. ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW A. (MEN'S) - EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE 1/4" THICK WITH EDGES 12" LONG AND A VERTEX 09.24.14 ISSUEDFOR REVIEW 6.15 POINTING UPWARD. TYPICAL WALL SIGNAGE B. (WOMEN'S) - 12" DIAMETER CIRCLE 1/4" THICK. PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 C. (UNISEX) - 12" DIAMETER CIRCLE 1/4" THICK WITH 1/4" THICK TRIANGLE SUPERIMPOSED WITHIN CIRCLE. ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 D. THE COLOR AND CONTRAST OF THE SIGN DISTINCTIVELY CONTRASTS WITH THE COLOR AND CONTRAST OF THE DOOR. EE 02.02.16 E. SIGNS ARE CENTERED ON THE DOOR 58" MIN. TO 60" MAX. FROM THE FLOOR TO CENTERLINE OF SYMBOL. c14 N EE-PLANNING WALL MOUNTED SIGNAGE: - " 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION SEE ILLUSTRATIONS AT RIGHT F. THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IS INSTALLED ON THE WALL ADJACENT TO THE LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. THE BORDER DIMENSION OF THIS PICTOGRAM TYPICAL DOOR -MOUNTED SIGNAGE 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" IN HEIGHT. NOTE: PICTOGRAMS AND/OR LETTERING ARE NOT 06.28.18 NOTE: WHERE THERE IS NO WALL SPACE ON THE LATCH SIDE, INCLUDING AT REQUIRED ON DOOR -MOUNTED SIGNAGE. REVISED PLANNING DOUBLE LEAF DOORS, SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE NEAREST ADJACENT 05.08.19 WALL, PREFERABLY ON THE RIGHT. G. VERBAL DESCRIPTION AS TO RESTROOM USAGE (I.E. MEN'S, WOMEN'S ETC.), IS PLACED DIRECTLY BELOW THE PICTOGRAM SIGNAGE. WHERE A TACTILE SIGN IS PROVIDED AT A DOOR, THE SIGN SHALL BE LOCATED ALONG SIDE THE H. THE CHARACTERS AND BACKGROUND OF THE SIGN IS EGGSHELL, MATTE, OR OTHER DOOR AT THE LATCH SIDE. NON -GLARE FINISH AND THE COLOR AND CONTRAST OF THE SIGN DISTINCTIVELY CONTRASTS WITH THE COLOR AND CONTRAST OF THE WALL. SIGNS CONTAINING TACTILE CHARACTERS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT A CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF NOTE: THE REQUIRED COLOR OF THE SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY CONSISTS 18" MIN. BY 18" MIN. CENTERED ON THE TACTILE OF A WHITE FIGURE ON A BLUE BACKGROUND. HOWEVER, THE CHARACTERS, IS PROVIDED BEYOND THE ARC OF APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY MAY APPROVE SPECIAL SIGNS TO ANY DOOR SWING BETWEEN THE CLOSED COMPLIMENT DECOR WHEN SUCH SIGNS PROVIDE ADEQUATE DIRECTION TO POSITION AND 45 DEGREE OPEN POSITION. DOOR -MOUNTED INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES. SIGNAGE NOTE: TACTILE CHARACTERS ON SIGNS SHALL I. WALL MOUNTED SIGNS SHALL BE LOCATED SO TACTILE CHARACTERS ARE 48" MIN. BE LOCATED 48" MIN. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR, ABOVE FINISH FLOOR, MEASURED FROM BASELINE OF LOWEST BRAILLE CELLS, AND MEASURED FROM BASELINE OF LOWEST RAISED CHARACTERS ARE 60" MAX. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR MEASURED FROM BASELINE OF BRAILLE CELLS. RAISED CHARACTERS SHALL ZL HIGHEST LINE OF CHARACTERS. BE LOCATED 60" MAX. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR M`" MEASURED FROM BASELINE OF HIGHEST LINE AN ADULT SIZE WHEELCHAIR AVERAGES 27" IN WIDTH. THE REQUIRED 32" CLEAR OPENING ALLOWS 2-1/2" ON RESIDENTIAL OPENING COMMERCIAL OPENING HARDWARE SHALL BE HARDWARE SHALL BE �� �� CENTERED BETWEEN 30 BETWEEN 34 MINIMUM AND 44" ABOVE FIN. FLOOR. AND 44" MAXIMUM ABOVE (CBC SECTIONS 1126A.6, FIN. FLOOR. (CBC SECTION 1132A.8) 11B-404.2.7) J. LETTERS AND NUMERALS ARE RAISED 1/32", ARE SANS -SERIF UPPERCASE CHARACTERS OF CHARACTERS. AND ARE ACCOMPANIED BY GRADE 2 BRAILLE. CHARACTERS ARE MINIMUM 5/81, HIGH z Q AND A MAXIMUM OF 2" HIGH. LETTER! G RAIS D 1/32" co co HEIGHT OF LETTERING K. MOUNTING LOCATION ALLOWS A PERSON TO APPROACH WITHIN 3" OF THE SIGNAGE ��� WITHOUT ENCOUNTERING PROTRUDING OBJECTS OR STANDING WITHIN THE SWING OF 5/8 MIN. TO 2 MAX. A DOOR. EACH SIDE FOR HANDS. CORRESPONDING - UPPERCASE 1/4" MAX. 2'61 BOTTOM 10" OF ALL DOORS BOTTOM 10" OF ALL DOORS AND GATES SHALL HAVE A AND GATES SHALL HAVE A GRADE II BRAILLE CHARACTERS ( ) 1 1/2" MAX. @1:2 SLOPE SMOOTH, UNINTERRUPTED SMOOTH, UNINTERRUPTED SURFACE. (CBC SECTIONS SURFACE. (CBC SECTION 1126A.7, 1132A.9) 11 B-404.2.10) B; DOOR �C/ PASSAGE CLEARANCE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL IDENTIFICATION SYMBOLS (Commercial Sanitary Facilities) NOTES: NOTES: CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 11 B-703. NO SCALE FINISH FLOOR EVEN COMPRESSED CARPET 1/4" MAX. BELOW THRESHOLD THRESHOLD DA FLOOR 2" CLEAR CLEAR OPENINGS MUST 2" CLEAR CLEAR OPENINGS FOR BE BETWEEN THE DOOR TWO LEAF DOORS IN IT'S 90° OPENING MUST BE BETWEEN POSITION AND THE FACE EITHER DOOR IN IT'S 90° OF THE STOP. OPEN POSITION AND THE EDGE OF THE 9 90° OTHER DOOR. b° MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE DOORS MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE INTERIOR SHALL NOT EXCEED 8-1/2 POUNDS FOR AND EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 EXTERIOR DOORS AND 5 POUNDS FOR POUNDS. MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE INTERIOR DOORS. MAXIMUM EFFORT TO FIRE DOORS SHALL NOT EXCEED 15 POUNDS. OPERATE FIRE DOORS SHALL NOT EXCEED 15 (2013 CBC SECTION 11B-404.2.9) POUNDS. (2013 CBC SECTIONS 1126A.4, 1132A.6) DOOR CLOSERS, IF PRESENT, MUST BE SET SO THAT IT TAKES 5 SECONDS MINIMUM TO DOOR CLOSERS, IF PRESENT, MUST BE SET CLOSE FROM AN OPEN POSITION OF 90° TO SO THAT IT TAKES AT LEAST 3 SECONDS TO WITHIN 12" OF THE LATCH. (2013 CBC CLOSE FROM AN OPEN POSITION OF 70° TO SECTION 11 B-404.2.8.1) STOP WITHIN 3" OF THE LATCH. (2013 CBC SECTION 1126A.4.1) 2 12 TYP. © 7 (A SINGLE DOOR © DOUBLE DOOR C RESIDENTIAL STANDARD ©COMMERCIAL STANDARD (CBC CHAPTER 11A) (CBC CHAPTER 11 B) 12"MAX.42" MIN. /// 36" MIN. " MAX. $„ 4" MI 2" MIN. Q 0 Q Z Z x M — — — - - 2 - O NIT C 7 CO M Z THRESHOLDS DOOR WIDTH ' DOOR HARDWARE 9 10 17" MIN. TYP. 11 " 1 ;I CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF NO SCALE CBC SECTIONS 1121A, 1126A.2 AND 1113-303. 1 CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" CBC SECTIONS 1126A, 1132A, 1138A, AND 11B-404 \ 10, CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" SECTIONS 1008.1.9.2, 1126A, 1132A, AND 11B-404. / B ELEVATION C ELEVATION D %' ELEVATION E %' ELEVATION NOTE: NOTES: DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CALIFORNIA 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE OF TITLE 24 ONLY. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS WITH LOCAL GOVERNING FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES WITH CURRENT ADA AND AGENCIES FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION, TYP. TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION, TYPICAL. 2. FLOOR SURFACES SHALL BE SMOOTH, HARD & NON -ABSORBENT, EXTENDING UPWARDS A MINIMUM OF 60" MIN. 5" ONTO WALLS. 1 " MIN. 1711-1811 KEY NOTES: 10 CLEAR MANUEVERING SPACE 3. GRAB BARS ARE 1 1/4" - 1 1/2" DIAMETER, SHALL NOT 2 6 a. 30" X 48" ROTATE WITHIN THEIR FITTINGS AND SHALL SUPPORT A MIN. 250 LB. POINT LOAD. PROVIDE REINFORCING IN b. 60" X 54" WALLS, TYPICAL. `� Z � Z — °O LO Cal_ - 3011 10" MAX. 48" MIN. A HIGH _LOW SIDE CB�) HIGH _LOIN FORWARD 811 Z X — Q `� 17" MIN. c. 60" DIAMETER TURNING CIRCLE 3 ® (5�—> L 4 20 MIRROR, 1/4" POLISHED PLATE GLASS 4. FAUCETS SHALL BE LEVER TYPE, ELECTRONICALLY Z 30 WALL -HUNG LAVATORY ACTIVATED OR APPROVED SELF -CLOSING VALVES (MIN. 1a 1b _ 4 FLOOR -MOUNTED WATER CLOSET 10 SEC. OPEN FLOW). FAUCETS SHALL BE OPERABLE W/ O ONE HAND AND NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, W FLUSH VALVE ON WIDE SIDE PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. A 5 LB. MAX. U © 36"L. (MIN.) GRAB BAR (PROVIDE REINFORCING) FORCE IS REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE CONTROLS. 07 42"L. (MIN.) GRAB BAR (PROVIDE REINFORCING) 1c 7 2 ® TOILET PAPER HOLDER W/OUT STOPS 5. OPERABLE PARTS OF ALL FIXTURES OR ACCESSORIES 1a o0 09 INSULATED DRAIN &HOT WATER PIPING SHALL BE LOCATED AT A MAXIMUM OF 40" ABOVE FLOOR. 10 KNEE SPACE / TOE SPACE OPERABLE WCONTROLS NONOEPHANDIAND NOT REIQUIRE TIGHT E 101 COVED BASE GRASPING, PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. A 5 izzx 12 SMOOTH, HARD, NON -ABSORBENT FINISH LB. MAX. FORCE IS REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE CONTROLS. 13 TOILET SEAT PAPER DISPENSER 6. SEE DET. 6/A0.5b FOR IDENTIFICATION SYMBOLS. Accessibility Standards OA TYPICAL PLAN Scale: As noted OVERHEAD CLEARANCE 17�(�3) TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF NO SCALE REACH LIMITS _,„ CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE. 1/4"- 1 -0 KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCE 9)05CONFORM ; CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" TYPICAL COMMERCIAL TOILET A005b CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTIONS 11B-603, 11B-604, 11B-606, AND 11B-609. SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" CBC SECTION 1116A, 1125A CBC SECTIONS 1138A.3 AND 11 B-308 CBC SECTIONS 1138A.2 AND 11 B-306 1214 CLEAR MANEUVERING SPACE, TYP. 30"x48" STONE COUNTERTOP, TYP., +36" A.F.F. SEE NOTE #6 BELOW. IN CABINET ABOVE E- 30"x48" v z 30"x48" 00 Nt 30"x48" I i I I I „ I I , � I ------ ---- ------------- ------ ---- ------------ ----------- ------ --- 30" MIN. 30" MIN. WORK SINK SURFACE COUNTER NOTES: 1. MIN. 30"X48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR PARALLEL APPROACH TO RANGE OR COOKTOP. 2. MIN. 30"X48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR PARALLEL OR FORWARD APPROACH TO KITCHEN SINK, WORK SURFACE AND ALL OTHER FIXTURES OR APPLIANCES. 3. MIN. CLEAR WIDTH OF 48" BETWEEN OPPOSING CABINETS, COUNTERTOPS OR APPLIANCE FACE. 4. MIN. 30" LENGTH OF COUNTERTOP PROVIDED FOR KITCHEN SINK INSTALLATION. 5. MIN. 30" LENGTH OF COUNTERTOP PROVIDED FOR WORK SURFACE. SINK AND WORK SURFACE MAY BE A SINGLE INTEGRAL UNIT 60" MIN. IN LENGTH OR IN SEPARATE COMPONENTS. TWO 15" MIN. WIDTH BREADBOARDS MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF 30" COUNTERTOP WORK SURFACE. 6. STONE, CULTURED STONE AND TILED COUNTERTOPS MAY BE USED WITHOUT MEETING THE REPOSITIONING REQUIREMENTS. ;RESIDENTIAL ADAPTABLE KITCHEN PLAN 111�_� CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1133A 36" CLR. MIN. DISHWASHER BELOW STEM WALL BELOW SEE NOTE #7 BELOW. 7. BASE CABINETS DIRECTLY UNDER THE KITCHEN SINK COUNTER AREA, INCLUDING TOEBOARD AND SHELVING, SHALL BE REMOVABLE WITHOUT THE USE OF SPECIALIZED TOOLS OR SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE FOR A WHEELCHAIR. THE FINISH FLOOR BENEATH THE KITCHEN SINK COUNTER AREA SHALL BE EXTENDED TO THE WALL AND THE BACK WALL AND SIDES OF ADJACENT CABINETS SHALL BE FINISHED. 8. LOWER SHELVING AND/OR DRAWER SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 48" ABOVE THE FLOOR. 9. FAUCET CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND SHALL NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, PINCHING OR TWISTING OF WRIST. THE FORCE REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE CONTROLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 5 LB. FORCE. LEVER -OPERATED, PUSH -TYPE AND ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED MECHANISMS ARE EXAMPLES OF ACCEPTABLE DESIGNS. SELF -CLOSING VALVES ARE ALLOWED IF FAUCET REMAINS OPEN FOR AT LEAST 10 SECONDS. 40"MIN. REINFORCING, TYP X Z N co M 12" MAX' 42" MIN. C---� I Ilk 26" MIN. �, 00 M DA ADAPTABLE WATER CLOSET 2013 CBC SECTION 1134A.7 NOTES: 1. AREAS OUTLINED IN DASHED LINES REPRESENT LOCATIONS FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION OF GRAB BARS FOR TYPICAL FIXTURE CONFIGURATIONS. GRAB BARS NEED NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN AN ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNIT PROVIDED ALL STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENTS FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS. THE REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF GRAB BARS AS SPECIFIED. THE REINFORCED WALL SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING A LOAD OF AT LEAST 250 POUNDS. 24�, "MIN. 6" MAX X 6" MAX. X z----� X z 0o - c0 CV co Co CO M X = SUFFICIENT LENGTH FOR A 48" GRAB BAR © ADAPTABLE BATHTUB 2013 CBC SECTION 1134A.5 2. WHERE THE WATER CLOSET IS NOT PLACED ADJACENT TO A SIDE WALL CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING A GRAB BAR, THE BATHROOM SHALL HAVE PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF FLOOR -MOUNTED, FOLDAWAY OR SIMILAR ALTERNATIVE GRAB BARS. 3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE 24 ONLY. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS WITH LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION, TYPICAL. SCALE: 1 /2" = V-0" 24" "I REINFORCING, TYP. C-� © ADAPTABLE BATHTUB 2013 CBC SECTION 1134A.5 2. WHERE THE WATER CLOSET IS NOT PLACED ADJACENT TO A SIDE WALL CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING A GRAB BAR, THE BATHROOM SHALL HAVE PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF FLOOR -MOUNTED, FOLDAWAY OR SIMILAR ALTERNATIVE GRAB BARS. 3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE 24 ONLY. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS WITH LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION, TYPICAL. SCALE: 1 /2" = V-0" 24" "I REINFORCING, TYP. C-� 36" MIN. 18" MIN. (FORWARD APPROACH) 24" MIN. (PARALLEL APPROACH) 18" MIN. 17"-18" STONE COUNTERTOP, +34" A.F.F., TYP. FUTURE FLIP -UP FUTURE GRAB BAR, GRAB BAR TYP. PROVIDE II WALL REINFORCING. ........ .......................... ..................................... POCKET DOOR 30"x48" O z w a O 30"x48" J U J ®O 18" CLR. z 75 32" MIN. CLR. OPENING 30"x48" 36"x48" CLEAR MANEUVERING 1 SPACE, TYP. STONE COUNTERTOP, +34" A.F.F., TYP. FUTURE GRAB BAR, - TYP. PROVIDE WALL REINFORCING. 30"x48" 30"x48" 18" MIN. (FORWARD APPROACH) 36" MIN. 24" MIN. (PARALLEL APPROACH) 18" MIN. 17" " -18 II I� II II II II ol II ---- II 11 � II CLEAR MANEUVERING SPACE, TYP. 36"x48" 18" MIN. (FORWARD APPROACH) I 36" MIN. 24" MIN. (PARALLEL APPROACH) 18" MIN. 17"-18" STONE COUNTERTOP, +34" A.F.F., TYP. FUTURE GRAB BAR, TYP. PROVIDE WALL REINFORCING. 30"x48" 30"x48" 30"x48" NOTES: 1. ONE BATHROOM IN EACH DWELLING UNIT SHALL CONFORM TO ALL PROVISIONS OF CBC SECTION 1134A.2, OPTION 2. 1. BATHROOM ENTRANCE DOORWAYS SHALL HAVE AN 18" CLEAR SPACE TO THE SIDE OF THE STRIKE EDGE OF THE DOOR ON THE SWING SIDE OF THE DOOR. 2. WALLS MUST BE REINFORCED TO SUPPORT FUTURE GRAB BARS AS REQUIRED BY CBC SECTION 1134A.5, 1134A.6 AND 1134A.7. SEE DETAIL 2/A0.5c. 3. THE TOP EDGE OF THE LAVATORY RIM SHALL BE 34" MAX. ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. 4. KNEE SPACE UNDER LAVATORY SHALL BE AT LEAST 30" WIDE AND 8" DEEP. THE KNEE SPACE SHALL BE AT LEAST 29" HIGH AT THE FRONT FACE AND REDUCING TO NOT LESS THAN 27" AT A POINT 8" BACK FROM THE FRONT EDGE. 5. TOE SPACE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30" WIDE AND CENTERED ON THE LAVATORY, AT LEAST 17" DEEP, MEASURED FROM THE FRONT EDGE AND AT LEAST 9" HIGH FROM THE FLOOR. 6. KNEE AND TOE SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A. THE SPACE BENEATH THE LAVATORY IS LEFT CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED; B. ANY CABINET BENEATH THE LAVATORY IS REMOVABLE WITHOUT THE USE OF SPECIALIZED KNOWLWEDGE OR SPECIALIZED TOOLS; OR C. DOORS TO CABINET BENEATH THE LAVATORY ARE REMOVABLE OR OPENABLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED UNOBSTRUCTED KNEE SPACE. �� 1.8+� CLR. 32" MIN. CLR. OPENING 7. REFER TO DETAIL 9/A0.5b FOR A PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION OF KNEE AND TOE SPACE DESCRIBED IN (4.) AND (5.). 8. THE FINISHED FLOOR BENEATH THE LAVATORY SHALL BE EXTENDED TO THE WALL. 9. HOT WATER AND DRAIN PIPES EXPOSED UNDER LAVATORIES SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHERWISE COVERED. THERE SHALL BE NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SURFACES UNDER LAVATORIES. 10. FAUCET CONTROLS AND OPERATION MECHANISMS SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND SHALL NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. THE FORCE REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE CONTROLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 5 LB. FORCE. LEVER -OPERATED, PUSH -TYPE AND ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED MECHANISMS ARE EXAMPLES OF ACCEPTABLE DESIGNS. SELF -CLOSING VALVES ARE ALLOWED IF THE FAUCET REMAINS OPEN FOR AT LEAST 10 SECONDS. 11. WHERE MIRRORS OR TOWEL FIXTURES ARE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH THE BOTTOM EDGE NO HIGHER THAN 40" FROM THE FLOOR. 12. WHEN THE DOOR SWINGS INTO THE BATHROOM, A 30" X 48" CLEAR MANEUVERING SPACE IS PROVIDED OUTSIDE THE SWING OF THE DOOR. FUTURE FLIP -UP GRAB BAR POCKET DOOR 1.9 36"x48" CLEAR MANEUVERING SPACE, TYP. 13. PROVISIONS OF CBC 1134A.2, OPTION 2 REQUIRE THAT ALL ADDITIONAL BATHROOMS COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: - BE PROVIDED WITH AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE INTO AND THROUGH THE BATHROOM. - DOORS, IF PROVIDE, SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1132A.5. - A MINIMUM 18" CLEAR MANEUVERING SPACE BE PROVIDED ON THE SWING SIDE OF THE DOOR AT THE STRIKE EDGE OF THE DOOR. - SWITCHES, OUTLETS AND CONTROLS COMPLY WITH SECTION 1142A. - REINFORCED WALLS TO ALLOW FOR THE FUTURE PROVISION OF GRAB BARS AROUND TOILET, TUB AND SHOWER. 14. CODE REFERENCES FOR CBC SECTION 1134A.2, OPTION 2: -POWDER ROOMS: SECTION 1134A.3 -TOILET, BATHING, AND SHOWER: SECTION 1134A.4 -BATHTUBS: SECTION 1134A.5 -SHOWERS: SECTION 1134A.6 -WATER CLOSETS: SECTION 1134A.7 - LAVATORIES, VANITIES, MIRRORS, TOWELS: SECTION 1134A.8 - GRAB BARS AND REINFORCEMENT: SECTIONS 1127A.4 AND 1127A.2.2 ITEM 4. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GAILY 99 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 Accessibility Standards RESIDENTIAL BATHROOM GRAB BAR REINFORCEMENT LOCATIONS 2 CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1134A RESIDENTIAL ADAPTABLE BATH PLAN (1 Bath Option per 2013 CBC Section 1143A.2, Option2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 CONFORM TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1134A SCALE: 1 /2" = 1'-0" Scale: As noted A0.5c LEGEND 1214 I I LOT F +� EXISTING RESIDENTIAL80 I U,J r- I I I � I I I I I I I I e-- w 0 LOT 18 EXISTING ADJACENT PUBLICJ PARKING AREA EXISTIN ADJACENT CHAINLINK FENCE PROPERTY LINE, j j -------to-T�o-Tl+4��c�-------� I I ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT I r I EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO BE J 1 REMOVED 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 LOT E EXISTING RESIDENTIAL F/// LOT D +, EXISTING RESIDENTIAL N I CIP I (E) POWER POLE w ----------- ------ — — — — - -- ---- ---------------- --------------- ----- - LO&T WIDTH 63.45' II ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT I � I=XISTIN BE REMOVED I� EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO BE J ` REMOVED I EXISTING PARKING TO r-------J BE REM'OV ED, TYP. I I r———— —————— L-OTVVI'DTiH 41.50' 1 1 I I I I PROPERTY LINE, TYP. r— — — — — — —� I I II L----J II F I EXISTING RET. WALL EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TO BE REMOVED, \ ` ------ L— I I TO BE REMOVED I TYP. y L----_� I I li i 1 I I F-----� PARCEL N0. 029 1151 - 170 ' F-RA GHQ - -0-. 0�9 - 151 - 160 i PARCEL NO. 029 - 151 - 150 DOCUM I �T#-98-024.606-- .R.- 1 I DOCUMENT # 9�-004330 O.R. i DOCUMENT # 98-004329 O.R. J 1220 DI!NJE4LY AVENUE i 1218 DONNELLY AVENUE o 1 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE r I LLLLL__�— LOT AREAS 4,614 S.F. I LOT AREA = 4,520 S.F. j j LOT AREA = 6,572 S.F. L r----- I � 1 1 � I I 1 �XISTING THREE RESIDENTIAL UNI1�S wp � 1 I FORMER TWO RESIDENTIAL UNIT$ Ip I L- EXISTING OFFICES O I O r I � I r I J 1 V EXISTING STRUCTURE I 1 FOOTPRINT OF I I EXISTING STRUCTURE I TO BE REMOVED J PREVIOUS BUILDING I I TO BE REMOVED J 1 I I I 1 I 1 r ---1 ----� 1 �J 1 1 I I t_ ---� F---------� I---------�I / >I L - - - r--------� r--- r =T=� I 4" AFRICAN 5" AFRICAN FERN PINE % FERN PINE II L==_� A I I i / I I , / I 1 L i EXISTING TREES TO L----------J --——— — — — — —J ' BE REMOVED, TYP. SEE ARBORIST'S II I REPORT, DATED MAPLE MAPLE LII APRIL 1, 2016 EXISTING CONCRETE I \ ,, 20" BRISBANE BOX — PAVING TO BE REMOVED,— TYP. — — LOT WIDTH 76' I \ I -------� _ TH 41.66' SLOT WID � LOT WIDTH 41.52' ____-------------1-===L=-===_--- - ----- -- ____---------------- r- \ LEL10O08'(E EL.99.79'(E)EL.100.5'(E) EXISTING DRIVEWAY-- --- AND CURB CUT TO BE EL 10001(E) ________----- - ------ ---- . REMOVED, TYP. ------------- I EL. 100.08'(E) EL.100.14'(E) EXISTING DRIVEWAY (E)STREET LIGHT EXISTING 21.5" LONDON EL.100.39'(E) AND CURB CUT TO BE PLANE STREET TREE TO EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING SIGN POST REMOVED, TYP. BE REMOVED. AND CURB CUT TO BE TO BE RELOCATED REMOVED, TYP. ............. + i r r. .�_ (E) DRIVEWAY, TYP (E) SIDEWALK, TYP. (E) LANDSCAPE AREA, TYP. EL. EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED, TYP. DONNELLY AVENUE (50' WIDE) LOT 14 EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING (E) SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. (E)ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION — — — EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED (E) EXISTING SIM. SIMILAR TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NOTES EXISTING SITE PLAN / DEMOLITION PLAN41 1. REFER TO SHEET A0.1 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION. SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" 2. REFER TO BOUNDARY &TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. 3. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, PAVING, SERVICES, UTILITIES, ETC. ON PROJECT SITE TO BE REMOVED. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 M - GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 Existina Site / Demolition Plan 4. REFER TO SHEET A1.2 FOR PROPOSED SITE PLAN. 5. REFER TO SHEET A2.1, GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION. Scale: 1/8" = V-0" Al 01 LEGEND 1214 IL LOT 18 EXISTING ADJACENT PUBLIC PARKING AREA F71' I / I / LOT F LOT E / LOT D EXISTING RESIDENTIAL / EXISTING RESIDENTIAL I EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LINE OF BUILDING FACE ABOVE PODIUM, TYP, co Lu I �. `................... ®�_ _ � • •••, I�NNNNNNNNNNN�1 r�lllllllllllllllllllllllllll_ •.•.•.•.•.•.•.•®�.•.•.•••••_�� . ®................... �li�lllllllllll��j ���...' I 1 ■111111111111111111111111111■ ••••••• • ��:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:�.®� i��;�;�;�;�;�;� ® ••••••' I 1 ■111111111111111111111111111■ ••••••_••• • • • _�40ME���G���G���G����1e�:7e ..ie ..e ..ie ��e:•���=��®�•�=��`•`�`•��`=���=--�������� Innnnnnnr,oannm �:::nnnnmi�e.r.■..._-- r �I ,I 3/41' 0 .......... ...... .............. ......................... ................... (E) DRIVEWAY, TYP (E) SIDEWALK, TYP. (E) LANDSCAPE AREA, TYP. EL. 18'-0" NEW CURB CUT M w SITE PLAN Q LOT \MDTH 146.94' - EL. 100.05'(E) W o� Y W EL.100.01'(E) Z � Q _I Q U) EL. 100.08'(E) U EL.100.14'(E) (N) TRANSFORMER JI VAULT w (N) STREET TREE, (N) CLASS 2 TWO -BIKE (E)STREET LIGHT TYP. OF 5 RACK, TYP. OF 2 (N) SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. DONNELLY AVENUE (50' WIDE) SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" +I zo EL. 99. LOT C EXISTING RESIDENTIAL (E)ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION NEW PERMEABLE PAVING NEW LANDSCAPE AREA NEW PERMEABLE PAVING (E) EXISTING SIM. SIMILAR TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LOT 14 EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING (E) SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GAILY E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 ti NOTES 1. REFER TO SHEET A0.1 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION. 2. REFER TO BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC Site Plan SURVEY. 3. REFER TO SHEET A1.1 FOR EXISTING SITE / DEMOLITION PLAN. 4. REFER TO SHEET A2.1, GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION. Scale: 1/8" = V-0" 5. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Al 02 WOOD STUDS AI.I.I.I.I.I.I. . NEW LANDSCAPE AREA 7YP. TYPICAL - - - U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Y44B__ A XA4.?) XA4.1) 4ACC G '�/O11 I /1T 1A/II'1TLJ :wl SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" OTHER AREAS: LOBBY, CORRIDORS, STAIRS, ELEVATOR, TRASH/RECYCLING, STORAGE, UTILITY, GROSS AREA: TOTAL GROUND FLOOR BUILDING AREA: ATER 1 I.- %L FE ACCESSIBILITY" SIGNS ALONG ACCESSIBLE 3,344 GROSS SQ.FT. ROUTE AND AT ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCES. 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Floor Plan Scale: 1 /4" = 1'4' 6. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE 14,317 SQ.FT. WATERPROOF AND ON A 24-HR. TIMER U.O.N. A201 2 3/4" F.zl 1214 4.3B A' 4 22 146'-0" A4.1 PROPERTY LINE, LANDSCAPE AREA IN PAVED WALKING METAL GUARDRAIL, (E)POWER POLE LANDSCAPE AREA IN METAL GUARDRAIL, TYP. RAISED PLANTER, TYP. SURFACE, TYP. TOP @ +42" A.F.F., TYP. RAISED PLANTER, TYP. TOP @ +42" A.F.F., TYP. BENCH, TYP. SCUPPER TYP. DRAIN TO FLOW - THROUGH PLANTER CN O 42" HIGH PARAPET, TYP. CN , s c? E0 0 0 co Un co N V_ 42" HIGH PARAPET, TYP. LEGEND a 1 I I R CO ON N R E BENCH, TYP. w a, 1,0 ET FT 2 G SS T. RAMP 1:12 = o N M 0 SIP I D N AL A .................................................................... RAMP 1:12 0 DN DN SEE DET. 19/A0.5a FOR RAMP - T 12 , STANDARDS TYP. E QRI ER .LL. FLOW -THROUGH ::: LLLL LLLLLL LLLLLL LLLL =LL= .......... ..................................................................................................................................................... ................ . FLOW -THROUGH ...................- -:--:':-:':-:':-:':-:':-:':-:':-:':- -:- -:- -:- -:- -:- -:--:':-:':-:':-:':-:':-:':-:'::':.:::'::'::'::'::'::': PLANTER TYP. ''::'::'::'::'::'::'::':-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:'::'::'::'::'::'::'::':::::::::::::::'::'::':: - LLLL` LL yLLLLLLyLL.LL...... PLANTER TYP. PLANTER, TYP. ' .................LL.LL. LL.LL.LL.LL.LL.LL.LL.LL.LL.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL..::: ::: :::::'::'::'::'::'::'::'::'::::::::: ::::.LL....LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL.. . . . ......._.LL._.LL._LL._.,..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL._.LL._.LL.LL.LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL._.LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL..LL.._ M ....... ....... cc ....... —42n h. METAL 60"Q� TURNING GUARDRAIL, PRIVATE PATIO N o CIRCLE, TYP. TYP. VATE PA PRIVATE PATIO _ I �r', 4'-2„I 293 SQ.FT. I I �, �� mil �� o PRIVATE PATIO :*A CONCRETE / CONCRETE MASONRY Ui; 7MME//:/, METAL STUDS WOOD STUDS 25'-8" (E) EXISTING SIM. SIMILAR TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 40'-7" SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN B NA4.2, 37'-5" 42" HIGH METAL GUARDRAIL, TYP. AWNING BELOW, TYP. 12'-0" ti SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" A NA4.1 AREA TABULATION RESIDENTIAL UNITS, OCCUPIED AREA: 6,285 SQ.FT. RESIDENTIAL UNITS, GROSS AREA: 6,874 SQ.FT. RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (PATIOS): UNIT #201 305 SQ.FT. UNIT #202 282 SQ.FT. UNIT #203 293 SQ.FT. UNIT #204 223 SQ.FT. UNIT #205 172 SQ.FT. UNIT #206 333 SQ.FT. UNIT #207 270 SQ.FT. COMMON OPEN SPACE FOR RESIDENTIAL TENANTS: 2,695 GROSS SQ.FT. TOTAL SECOND FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 10,199 SQ.FT. 9'-11" w U 0- z LL1 0- 0 z O O U CV zo 0 CN SE 1/A0.5c FOR TYP. ADAPTABLE BATH DIMENSIONS & NOTES C A4.3 0 0 FU R OUT WALL FOR PL MBING, TYP. O V_ NOTES 1. REFER TO GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, SHEET A2.1, FOR APPLICABLE NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION. 2. ALL RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE ADAPTABLE. REFER TO SHEETS A0.5a - A0.5c FOR ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCOI CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Floor Plan Scale: 1/4" = V-0" A202 CV zo FA " ft-w L'wjA CV CV ED C14 NT co DECK BELOW, TYP. 10'-10" 25'-8" 17'-0" LEGEND CONCRETE / CONCRETE MASONRY (E) EXISTING METAL STUDS SIM. SIMILAR WOOD STUDS TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 42" HIGH PARAPET, TYP. 40'-7" THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 17'-0" TYPICAL PAVER PATTERN AT DECKS & PATIOS 42" HIGH METAL GUARDRAIL, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE, TYP. 10'-11" 17'-0" 12'-5" 17'-0" 37'-5" 101.0 C LU Y O =CL= _ _::: CORRIDOR UNIT #302 MASTER 943 NET SQ.FT. BEDROOM 002 GROSS SQ.FT. UNIT #202 FOR SIM. FES AND DIMENSIONS. LIVING / DINING 13'-2 1 /4" 12'-11 3/4" Lc, �.. , 1 _., PATIOS 42" HIGH METAL GUARDRAIL, TYP. I 0 ti SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" 0 AREA TABULATION RESIDENTIAL UNITS, OCCUPIED AREA: RESIDENTIAL UNITS, GROSS AREA: RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (DECKS): U NIT #301 87 SQ. FT. U NIT #302 172 SQ. FT. U NIT #303 87 SQ. FT. U NIT #304 221 SQ.FT. U NIT #305 87 SQ. FT. U NIT #306 137 SQ. FT. U NIT #307 87 SQ. FT. TOTAL THIRD FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 8'-5" 0 N 0 r NOTES 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GAILY E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW C 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION A4.3 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 6,443 SQ.FT. 1. REFER TO SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, 7,033 SQ.FT. SHEET A2.2, FOR APPLICABLE NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION. 9,408 SQ.FT. Floor Plan Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A203 DECK BELOW, TYP. SPANISH BARF CLAY ROOF TII TYP. UNOCCUPIED ROOF, TYP. 3/0 x 3/0 OPAQ1 SKYLIGHTS, Tl 4/0 x 5/0 ROOF HATCH, 1 HOUI RATED 36" HIGH PARA TYP. U.O.N. SPANISH BARF CLAY ROOF TII TYP. LINE OF WALL BELOW DECK BELOW, TYP. LEGEND CONCRETE / CONCRETE MASONRY (E) EXISTING METAL STUDS SIM. SIMILAR WOOD STUDS TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ROOF PLAN I I I Ll A A4.1 91 C BUILDING PERIMETER, TYP 36" HIGH PARAPET, TYP. U.O.N. rc-, A4.3 UNOCCUPIED ROOF, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 Roof Plan Scale: 1/4" = V-0" A2.4 SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" 1214 rc__�� A4.3 A A4.1 rc__� INA4.3 SPANISH BARREL CLAY ROOF TILES, TYP. LINE OF WALL BELOW, TYP. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 0 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 Penthouse Roof Plan B N71 PENTHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A205 1214 Donnelly Avenue - Street View 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. 14-022 Date 07.18.14 Revisions No. Issue / Date REVISED EE - PLANNING 06.28.18 PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Street View Scale: NO SCALE 1214 Donnelly Avenue STACKED SPANISH BARREL TILES, TYP. 3X8 WOOD TRELLIS, PAINTED, TYP. SPANISH BARREL CLAY ROOF TILES, TYP. 4X6 WOOD OR ARCHITECTURAL FOAM BEAM AND OUTRIGGERS, PAINTED, TYP. GALVANIZED MTL GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, TYP. RECESSED PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES WITH SPACER BARS, TYP. DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL, 42" HIGH, PAINTED, TYP. DECORATIVE CLAY TILE OVERFLOW, TYP. CEMENT PLASTER, SMOOTH STEEL TROWELED FINISH, PAINTED, TYP. DECORATIVE CAST STONE FINISH COLUMN PANELIZED METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR, PAINTED - --------- - 711 --------------- - =� =� I ALUMINUM SASH, TRIM PAINTED WOOD DOORS, TILE BASE, TYP. TILE BASE, TYP. CANVAS AWNING ON METAL PROJECTIONS, TYP. DECORATIVE METAL GATE, AND SILL, TYP. DECORATIVE METAL PULLS, METAL FRAME, TYP. PAINTED, TYP. TYP. SOUTH ELEVATION (DONNELLY SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0° TOP OF RIDGE - STAIR ENCLOSURE LL. IVV.V/ AVERAGE TOP OF CURB PROPERTY LINE, TYP. APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame & California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 9 = _ GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 South Elevation Scale: 1/4" = V-0" A301 1214 SEE NUMBERED PROFILES ON THIS STACKED SPANISH 14 BARRELL CLAY TILES DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL, 42" HIGH, Donnelly TYP. SHEET, TYP. ` 1 o WOOD TRELLIS -------------- Avenue SPANISH BARREL CLAY APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 ROOF TILES, TYP. A Mixed -Use Condominium Project 3 l 4X6 BEAM AND OUTRIGGERS, PAINTED, TYP. CORBELLED OUTRIGGERS, Bur Burlingame California TYP. 4 OWNER: GALVANIZED MTL GUTTER Mn�CONTACT: PARAPET BRITTON TRUST 3 AND DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, I ELEV.+143.90' TYP. - - - - - - - - - - - ROOF JOHN BRITTON (f) L RECESSED PREFINISHED ELEV +I40.90' 1345 MISSION STREET A 94103 SAN FR415.934.1151 Ll METAL -CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ �� �� WITH SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES WITH ❑❑ LILI LL C �� �� ❑❑ ❑❑ �� �� ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ �� �� WOOD OR ARCHITECTURAL FOAM RELIEF PANEL 1 3 G A R Y �� �� �� 7� �� SPACER BARS, TYP. �� �� �� �� ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ �� �� PAINTED, TYP. E E SIMILAR 5 DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL, 42 HIGH, PAINTED, TYP. n fl __T-_ I THIRD LEVEL ELEV. +� 29.57' I RECESSED WINDOW, TYP. GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. n ❑ III C ❑ �� �� F7_1 0 0 0 0F_� 0 n ❑❑ ❑❑ I 11111111 �� �� n ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ �� �� WOOD OR ARCHITECTURAL FOAM TRIM, PAINTED, TYP. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 -A DECORATIVE CLAY TILE COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. OVERFLOW, TYP. 0 0 0 ® 0 0 SECOND LEVEL ELEV. +1 18.74' DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE CEMENT PLASTER, SMOOTH CEILING, COMMERCIAL `SPACE, TYP. ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BEUSED,IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR STEEL TROWELED FINISH, PAINTED, TYP. 71 ril F I rL] F❑- LGEE F7"7 ❑ ❑ :7711 APPROX. PROFILE OF PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date EXISTING ADJACENT 11 DECORATIVE CAST STONE BUILDING 14-022 07.18.14 FINISH COLUMN WOOD DOOR WITH APPLIED WOOD RELIEF, PAINTED, TYP. 9 Revisions 1 PANELIZED METAL FF I F SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR,----- --- No. Issue/Date PAINTED � STORMWATER TRANSITION Ll LJ J L BOX REVISED EE-PLANNING —1 06.28.18 - GROUND LEVEL REVISED PLANNING EL. 100.07' 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING AVERAGE TOP OF CURB PROPERTY LINE, TYP. 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 ALUMINUM AND SILL, TYP. SASH, TRIM PAINTED WOOD DOORS, DECORATIVE METAL TILE BASE $ CANVAS AWNING ON METAL FRAME, (A) METAL PROJECTIONS, TYP. DECORATIVE METAL GATE, PAINTED, TYP. DECORATIVE METAL GATE, PAINTED, TYP. PULLS, TYP. TYP. SOUTH ELEVATION (DONNELLY AVENUE) SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SEE ALSO REFERENCE PHOTO FILES FOR EXAMPLES OF SIMILAR DESIGN ELEMENTS WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, RIDGE TILE MISSION CLAY MISSION CLAY TILES, TYP. WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. ALL: CEMENT ASTER, TYP. WALL: TYP. TILES, TYP. GABLE TILE CAP RAIL: 1" X 2" <__ CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. GABLE TILE ❑ METAL GUTTER, STEEL BAR, SHAPED. WALL RETURN: CEMENT PLASTER, METAL GUTTER, PAINTED, PAINTED, TYP. VERTICALS: 5/8" X 5/8" STEEL BAR, SHAPED TYP. DOORS: TYP. WHERE INDICATED, ALL JOINS WELDED,TYP. CAP X 2 STEEL ABAR, * WINDOWS: IN -SWINGING, PREFINISHED METAL- CLAD WOOD WITH 4 X SHAPED EDGE BEAM & 5/8" X 2 1/2" STEEL BAR STOCK SURROUND, ALL JOINS HAPED. PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD WOOD WITH SIMULATED FULL DIVIDED SIMULATED FULL DIVIDED LITES WITH SPACER BARS, TYP. 4 X SHAPED EDGE BEAM & OUTRIGGERS, OUTRIGGERS, PAINTED, TYP. WELDED, PAINTED, TYP. 5 8" X 2 1/2" STEEL BAR STOCK SURROUND, ALL JOINS WELDED, PAINTED, TYP. LITES WITH SPACER BARS, PAINTED, TYP. STEEL HINGE & TYP. 1 1/8" WIDTH HORIZONTAL MUNTIN, TYP. METAL DOWNSPOUT, METAL DOWNSPOUT, MOUNTING PLATE o _ � 5/8" X 5/8" STEEL BAR STOCK, SHAPED WHERE INDICATED, 5 8" X 2 1/2" STEEL BAR STOCK URROUND1 ALL JOINS E1F2 1 1/8" WIDTH HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL MUNTINS, TYP. ADA METAL SILL, TYP. J L PAINTED, TYP. PAINTED, TYP. HORIZONTALS: 5/8" X 5/8" STEEL BAR, SHAPED, WELDED WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. ALL JOINS WELDED, PAINTED, TYP. WELDED, PAINTED, TYP. 5 8" X 5/8" STEEL BAR STOCK, WALL RETURN & SILL: WALKING SURFACE, PROVIDE FULL SIZE PROVIDE FULL SIZE TO BACKING PLATE, TYP.41 SHAPED WHERE INDICATED, CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. TYP. TEMPLATE FOR SHAPED EDGE TEMPLATE FOR SHAPED EDGE BACKING PLATE: 1/8" STEEL PLATE. 4'-6„ LPJOINS WELDED, PAINTED, WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, BEAMS & OUTRIGGERS. BEAMS & OUTRIGGERS. MOUNTING PLATE: 3/16" STEEL PLATE. TCH &STRIKE PLATE TYP. ASSEMBLY PAINTED, TYP. PROVIDE MOUNTING POINTS. * ANDERSON OR PELLA ANDER N OR PELLA PROVIDE FULL SIZE TEMPLATE FOR FABRICATION. ELEVATION PROFILE ELEVATION PROFILE ELEVATION PROFILE ELEVATION PROFILE ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION TYPICAL RECESSED TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL DOOR TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL TILE ROOF, TRIM, STAIR PENTHOUSE TILE ROOF & DECORATIVE METAL DECORATIVE METAL GATE DECORATIVE METAL GATE WINDOW AT DECK OR PATIO GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT CORBELLED OUTRIGGER GUARDRAIL TO EXTERIOR UTILITY AREA TO ENTRY COURT 1 REVISED 07.19.19 2 REVISED 07.19.19 3 4 5 REVISED 05.08.19 6 REVISED 05.08.19 7 ADDED 05.08.19 PROFILES SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" TRELLIS: SHAPED 3" X 8" WOOD BEAMS AT CEMENT PLASTER WALL AND RETURN TO RECIESSEE,CENTERS, APPROXIMATE V-7 1/2" TYP. PAIR SHAPED 3" X 8" WOOD CAP < MIN. DIAMETER 1'-2" SHAPED OUTRIGGER, TYP. CANVAS AWNING ON METAL FRAME, TYP. MAIN BEAMS, TYP. WALL &RETURN: PANELS AND TRIM, CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. SEE BELOW, TYP. DOOR MATCH PANEL WITH APPLIED 3/4" DECORATIVE RELIEF, PAINTED. E 6" X 6" WOOD COLUMN, COLUMN, CAP & BASE: CAST OR FLUSH PANEL OVERBACKING FRAME PAINTED, TYP. WINDOWS: PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD WOOD WITH > ORNAMENTATION: STACKED SPANISH BARRELL CLAY TILES, TYP. WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. PAINTED,TYP. FORMED, STONE FINISH SIMULATED FULL DIVIDED METAL FRAME, PAINTED. -H PROVIDE TEMPLATE FOR FABRICATION. * 2" X 2" WELDED WIRE MESH ATTACHED TO BACK OF PANEL FRAME GAVANIZED, LITES WITH SPACER BARS, TYP. ALUMINUM SASH, TYP. ALUMINUM TRIM, TYP. 3/4" WIDTH X DEPTH GROOVE, TYP. PROVI E CONCEALED POS MAX. DIAMETER 1'-8 1/2" - TYP. CEMENT PLASTER WALL 3/0 X 7/0 METAL DOOR WITH APPLIED 3/4" DECORATIVE ANCH R TYP. AND RETURN TO RECESSE SASH, TYP. RELIEF, PAINTED. SHAPED SILL PROVIDE FULL SIZE TEMPLATE FOR ALUMINUM SILL, TYP. FABRICATION. 1X4 NOMINAL, TYP. TILE BASE, TYP. CEMENT PLASTER WALL AND RETURN TO RECESSED DOOR FRAME. WALL: CEMENT PLASTER, TYP. _ °O MIN. DIAMETER V-5 1/2" < BASE GRADE BACK PANEL, TYP. 1X3 NOMINAL, TYP. ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION * McNICHOLS WELDED WIRE MESH ELEVATION 1X4 NOMINAL, TYP. III III ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION PROFILE TYPICAL STOREFRONT DOOR, STAIR #1 WOOD OR ARCHITECTURAL ORNAMENTATION WITH AWNING, TILE BASE GROUND LEVEL TRELLIS AT DECK COLUMN SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR FOAM RELIEF PANELS AT PARAPET Elevation with $ REVISED 07.19.19 9 10 REVISED 05.08.19 11 12 REVISED 05.08.19 13 ADDED 07.19.19 14 REVISED 05.08.19 Profiles PROFILES SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" Scale: As noted SEE ALSO REFERENCE PHOTO FILES FOR EXAMPLES OF SIMILAR DESIGN ELEMENTS A3.1a 1214 Donnelly Avenue JAMES HARDIF "DC\/C:A1 11 PANEL SYSTEI EXPOSED PRC WALL, TYP. 4X6 WOOD OR ARCHITECTUF FOAM OUTRIG PAINTED, TYP. SPANISH BAR[ CLAY ROOF TI TYP. 4X6 WOOD OR ARCHITECTUF FOAM CORBEL OUTRIGGERS, PAINTED, TYP. WOOD TRELLI SUPPORT COL PAINTED, TYP. RECESSED PREFINISHED METAL -CLAD � WINDOWS WI1 SIMULATED TF DIVIDED LITES SPACER BARS WHERE INDIC) TYP. DECORATIVE I GUARDRAIL, 4 PAINTED, TYP. CEMENT PLAS SMOOTH STEE TROWELED FII PAINTED, TYP. STORMWATEF TRANSITION B EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1DGE - CLOSURE 4.31' 3.90' 0.90, VEL 9.57' SMOOTH TROWELED CEMENT PLASTER SKIM COAT OVER CONCRETE OR CONCRETE BLOCK AT EXPOSED PROPERTY LINE WALL, PAINTED, TYP. iECOND LEVEL ELEV. +118.74' NALKING SURFACE / ;OMMON OPEN SPACE APPROXIMATE PROFILE, DENSE FOLLIAGE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY APPROXIMATE PROFILE, PROPERTY LINE WALL OF EXISTING BUILDING ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WOOD FENCE AT PROPERTY LINE GRADE AT PROPERTY LINE LEVEL 0.34' PROPERTY LINE, TYP. APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 1 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 East Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A302 1214 PROPERTY LINE, TYP. NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TOP OF RIDGE - STAIR ENCLOSURE 1.31' DGE - VTHOUSE LOT 11601 ).90' ROXIMATE PROFILE, TING NEAR TREE ON kCENT PROPERTY (EL ).57' �L GUARDRAIL ROPERTY LINE L, 42" HIGH TYP. ROXIMATE PROFILE, 3E FOLIAGE ON kCENT PROPERTY EVEL ELEV. +118.74' SURFACE/ OPEN SPACE ZOXI MATE :ILE, PROPERTY WALL OF FING BUILDING ON ,CENT PROPERTY .EVEL ).34' PROPERTY LINE, TYP. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 1 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 North Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A303 1214 Donnelly Avenue PROPERTY LINE, TYP. WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" TOP OF RIDGE - STAIR ENCLOSURE PROPERTY LINE, TYP. APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 1 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 West Elevation Scale: 1/4" = V-0" A304 1214 METAL GUAF 42" HIGH, PAI TYP. SPANISH BAF CLAY ROOF - TYP. WOOD TRELI SUPPORT CC PAINTED, TYI RECESSED PREFINISHE[ WOOD WIND, SIMULATED 1 WITH SPACE DECORATIVE GUARDRAIL, PAINTED, TYI WOOD OR DECORATIVE ARCHITECTI. FOAM RELIEF PAINTED, TYI CEMENT PLA SMOOTH STE TROWELED F PAINTED, TYI STACKED SP BARREL TILE CANVAS AWP METAL FRAM DECORATIVE PAINTED, TYI BUILDING SECTION A -A SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" TOP OF RIDGE - STAIR ENCLOSURE ELEV. +154.31' TOP OF RIDGE - MECH. PENTHOUSE PROPERTY LINE, TYP. XIMATE PROFILE, ENT STRUCTURE D. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame & California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Section Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" A401 1214 Donnelly Avenue SPANISH BARREL CLAY ROOF TILES, TYP. 42" HIGH DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL, PAINTED, TYP. CEMENT PLASTER, SMOOTH STEEL TROWELED FINISH, PAINTED, TYP. 42" HIGH DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL, PAINTED, TYP. CANVAS AWNING ON METAL FRAME, TYP. ARCHITECTURAL FOAM RELIEF PANEL, PAINTED, TYP., TYP. PROPERTY LINE, TYP. BUILDING SECTION B-B SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" TOP OF RIDGE - STAIR ENCLOSURE ELEV. +154.31' TOP OF RIDGE - MECH. PENTHOUSE ELEV. +152.07' PARAPET PROPERTY LINE, TYP. APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 ZATIVE REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 ;AIL, REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 ZATIVE ;AIL, 'ROFILE, JCTURE Section Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" A402 1214 SPANISH BARRE1 CLAY ROOF TILE TYP. GALVANIZED ME GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, TYP. CEMENT PLASTE SMOOTH STEEL TROWELED FINI; PAINTED, TYP. WALKING SURFACE / COMMON OPEN SPAC GRADE AT REAR PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE, TYP. L— — — — -- STAIR #3 1 IAIIT On-1 I IAII-r I)n4 1 IAIIT on? I IAII-r f)n7 r'nO01nnO 1 IAIIT I)nc I IAIIT Inc 1 IAII-r 01)7 I IAII-r nn7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIVATE PARKING GARAGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUILDING SECTION C-C SCALE: 1 /4" = V-0" TOP OF RIDGE - STAIR ENCLOSURE ELEV. +154.31' TOP OF RIDGE - MECH. PENTHOUSE ELEV. +152.07' PARAPET ELEV. +143.90' ROOF ELEV. +140.90' THIRD LEVEL ELEV. +129.57' SECOND LEVEL ELEV. +118.74' WALKING SURFACE / COMMON OPEN SPACE LINE OF CEILING OVER MECHANICAL CAR LIFTS GROUND LEVEL ELEV. +100.34' PROPERTY LINE, TYP. Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2019 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED PLANNING 07.19.19 REVISED PLANNING 06.17.20 Section Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" A4m3 -0/ri== �y 0� cn At L A\JDS- CF rJTY O BUFLLli�JGANdE r Y F)FJC, 1\J0, 95 0344cr 1R. LEGEND: L 0 1 r EXIS77NG BUILDING 2 �a FOUND NAI & SHINED L C) r D 0 r r IN POWER POLE PER 113 MAPS 87 DA5 (0.40') OFF CORNER 145.45'ILI �•, obti g�OD q$ WOOD FENCE 63.45 x x a f� 41� ,�� SHED �g 6 PAR IN"ACES 12 9 19$ x 9� 9 1ob .9,9 >� g9 g� g9 i g9 9 k CONC DRIVEWAY 9 99 9909 &� 99 gy -5 �p0 q o OHO STEPS ,? WOOD STEPS 1�o rOG r ; s• DOC. # 98-024606 O.R. °o DOC. # 98-004330 O.R. AREA = 4,614 S.F. AREA — 4,520 S.F. 0? DOC. # 98-004329 O.R. WOOD � AREA 6,572 S.F. STEPS WOOD N ti� STEPS �'s Ofl, dab §�� boy �S STEEL � 1ba• ��0 ,�$ �'� 4 'ABC' VAULT a EXl577NG 9iiRNEf] HOUSE pa• qQ 10a ` .� a WOOD s FEEL v STEPS _ " VAULT co s V 52 4 N r gO�6 1ai Z III �q0 � •Zg ' II W a "$ o PUBLIC PARKING AREA 7ba L o I *a❑ �I w LI e C 0 boa a a 0 100.9 4is I 1 ti0 Epp T-iNR� ry EXISTING ra R�SHd'� " BURNED HOUSE o �� k a -o4 by i �Fa ��qQb Fx►SVNG f ai RESIDENCE ❑ �� � a❑� �� �ba 8 b \ab. NON GM'S Dg 0 O aA �aa �3 + %Olt a W 0 �bO 1pp5$OLLARDS(TYP) Nap• 'b (s,- N0❑�' �tiaq' x BEGIN CHAIN CoN C ARE A4p � Q 4'4i'1 rQ0 �p0 �9 T LINK FENCE 6 ' } ,�� a' S48'45'54"W ❑ D3'24'36" 1 ��0 3 1 oa. a �� 1.37' d os'17'10" 44.1 s' —L 90.2D' � a 4 ��G I 1� hao'� Da kr 3 — -- 700.00}ltn+ = 47'23 00 0 t Sao LIGHTING $ q � "a❑ i�� 1a FluIWA ap 5s VAULT m 1 D0.57 "o.0 1a � E) I G� 9 a'aq Da b C7�1 1� PG&E �o VAULT 1 } GRADE BREAK i � pE BREAK er' VAULT WM � �.23 rp0 �+)oo.ao ,oa.T� �G� !� + 10D.39 1Q0-29 �F Op --e�. 1'I` 9g65 3 Wsn �aa s _ ..7a— — 1 SCRr F FIL -- arm .ao FL 99. s --- 9 .ss - FL 8� . `+ g5�y,� 9g �G D OSS �pO Ca gg 4G �pb G VAULT a 00-�� FOUND BRASS TAG "LS 5304" SET PER 20 ILLS 30, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED A/C ASPHALTIC CONCRETE AD AREA DRAIN aw BACK OF WALK CB CATCH BASIN Clip CAST IRON PIPE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CCNC CONCRETE CC CLEAN -OUT DI DROP INLET EM ELECTRIC METER FD FOUND FF FINISHED FLOOR FL FLOW LINE FH FIRE rHY7RANT GA GUY ANCHOR GM GAS METER GRD GROUND NCR IIAN❑ICAP RAMP NV. INVERT IP IRON PIPE LAT. LATERAL LG LIP OF GUTTER q13 0 k SS S5 SS SS DONNNELLY AVE. (50' R/W PER 13K. 278 OF DEEDS PG. 426) P.U.E. PUBLIC 'UTILITIES EASEMENT RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RWALL RETAINING WALL R/W RIGHT OF WAY SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUT SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE TBC TOP BACK DE CURB T/W TOP OF WALL U/G UNDERGROUND ',+CP VITRIrIED CLAY PIPE WV WATER VALVE WM WATER METER BOX -CTV- CABLE TELEVISION LINE -E- ELECTRICAL LIVE -G- GAS LINE -SS- SANITARY SEWER I_ NL -SQ_ STORM DRAIN LINE -T- TELEPHONE LINE -W- WATER LINE UTILITY NOTE: STEEL VAULT 9g 9a ��0 0 r 0 • U z 8 I 0 r c FOUND TAG "ROE 15290" -� PER 20 ILLS 30 & w PER 111 MAPS 30 ao in Of S48'36'06"W m J 41.27' L 0 T �� L � r S48'45'54"W 150.00' __ANT, , 07 FAY of DOC. NO. 2007 2-73,80 xrl C v i — — o ADJACENT BUILDING UJI 0 in o ao rk" r �pD U7 A- TOP X FLAT ROOF EL. = 117.2 102.00 !Q�'•37 cb or � spa 3a o /0' P�' E L, =L 55.3s` p4`13' k R 750.00' ti <-SCO r� �qp e 1 Q0.04 19 99 8 1 1 9g�0 FL •,ib }r�bRD 26 G4 I � ��L�o SS SS 55 SS SS I I� THE UTILITIES EXISTING ON [HE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY FIELD SURVEY. ALL UNDERGROUND U11L.IIILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FROM RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND THE SURVEYOR DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR COMPLETENESS, INDICATED LOCATION, OR SIZE. RECORD JTILITY LOCATION SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BY EXPOSING 7HE UTILITY. BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: ❑ = 03'09'16" L i L 7 .7 -- — S48'45'54"IN - 150.00' SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 55 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON AN ASSUMED DATUM. TBM: SET SCRIBED CROSS IN GUTTER, AS SHOWN ELEVATION = 99.55 BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING N 411 B'00" W A-ONG LOR-ON AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOL, 20 OF L.L.S. MAPS AT PAGE 30, 111 TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY. 5S SS z G � try WAYNE HAAS No. 77b1 12-31-14 ' 9r� OF C Al1F��`A BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LANDS OF BRITTON DOCUMENT #98— 004329 D.R. DOCUMENT #98— 004330 O.R. DOCUMENT #98-024606 O.R. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 029-151--150, 160,170 (ADDRESS) BURLINGAME SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1 " 10' MAY, 2014 B & H SURVEYING, INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING 901 WALTERMIRE ST. BELMONT, CA 94002 OFFICE (650) 637-1590 FAX (650) 637-1059 C/H OVERHEAD %Puo. DDJa— 14 DWG: 6538- FI N BY: 1214 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST CITY OF BURLINGAME STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ALL WORK WITHIN THE CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST CALTRANS STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. FINISH GRADE PROFILE REPRESENTS TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. ALL FILL AND CUT SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE SOILS ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION SO THAT THEIR LINES CAN BE MARKED. THOSE TO BE 4. NOTIFIED INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO: UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (800) 227-2600: PG&E, PACIFIC BELL, CABLE COMPANY, AND CITY OF BURLINGAME. 5. ANY DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES IN THESE PLANS WITHOUT OFFICIAL APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL ABSOLVE THE DESIGN ENGINEER OF ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY OF SAID DEVIATION OR CHANGE. THE SURVEYOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WHEN FIELD STAKING 6. IS TO BE REQUIRED. COMPACTION TESTS WILL BE PERFORMED ON ALL TRENCHES AND STREET WORK TO VERIFY THAT COMPACTION CONFORMS TO CITY STANDARDS. 7. ALL WORK ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BUTT UP TO FULL EXISTING SECTION. WHERE FULL SECTION IS NOT ENCOUNTERED, CONTINUE REMOVAL 8. OF ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT UNTIL A FULL SECTION IS FOUND. ALL PIPE GRADES SHOWN ARE FLOW LINE ELEVATIONS. 9. ONE SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AND CLEANOUT SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER AS DICTATED BY WATER COMPANY STANDARDS. 11. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SANITARY SEWER LATERALS TO CROSS UNDER WATER MAIN. 12. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, ENCROACHMENT PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND CALTRANS. 13 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A JOB SUPERINTENDENT OR A DESIGNATED RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE JOB SITE ANYTIME WORK IS IN PROGRESS 14. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IN WRITING OF THE NAME OF DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE INCLUDING PHONE NUMBER IN CASE OF EMERGENCY. THE CITY SHALL BE ADVISED IN WRITING IF THERE 15. IS TO BE A CHANGE IN JOB -SITE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MADE 16. TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED WHENEVER THE WORK COMES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF ANY OF THE PUBLIC AGENCIES. AFTER PERMIT IS OBTAINED, THE AGENCY MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO WORK BEING DONE AS REQUIRED IN THE PERMIT. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS -WASTEWATER GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION 17. CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. THIS INCLUDES WASTE FROM PAINTING, SAW CUTTING, CONCRETE WORK, ETC. A DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR GROUND WATER MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND APPLIED TO THE STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD UNDER THE GENERAL DISCHARGE PERMIT. NO CONSTRUCTION 18. WASTE WATER IS ALLOWED TO BE DISCHARGED INTO THE STORM OR SANITARY SYSTEM WITHOUT CITY APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO ELIMINATE DISCHARGES TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AND, IF NECESSARY, PROVIDE AN AREA FOR ON -SITE WASHING ACTIVITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. MATERIALS WHICH COULD CONTAMINATE STORM RUNOFF SHALL BE STORED IN AREAS WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO PREVENT EXPOSURE TO RAINFALL AND TO NOT ALLOW STORM WATER TO RUN ONTO THE AREA. LU z 0 z w ry x 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 19. PAVEMENT CLEANING - FLUSHING OF STREETS/PARKING LOTS TO REMOVE DIRT AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IS PROHIBITED UNLESS PROPER SEDIMENT CONTROL ARE USED. PREFERABLY, AREAS REQUIRING CLEANING SHOULD BE SWEPT. 20. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED. 21. DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT DUST CONTROL MEASURES ON -SITE. STREETS SHALL BE SWEPT AS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 22 THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY BEYOND THE ADEQUACY OF HIS DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN. 23. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE WORK AREA THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 24. ALL EXISTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 25. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB OR DESTROY ANY PERMANENT SURVEY POINTS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE CITY ENGINEER. ANY PERMANENT MONUMENTS OR POINTS DISTURBED OR DESTROYED SHALL BE REPLACED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER OR LICENSED SURVEYOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 26. PROVIDE GRADING OF LANDSCAPE AREAS TO GIVE A MINIMUM STRAIGHT LINE GRADE OF 2% FROM BUILDING TO ON -SITE CURBS, AND TO AN ELEVATION AT THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 27. SHOULD IT APPEAR THAT THE WORK TO BE DONE, OR ANY MATTER RELATIVE THERETO, IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED OR EXPLAINED ON THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LUK AND ASSOCIATES. 28. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE AND CHECK INVERTS ON EXISTING SEWERS AND STORM DRAINS, AND VERIFY CLEARANCE OF KNOWN CROSSINGS OR OTHER UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTING NEW PIPELINES. 29. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MATCHING EXISTING STREETS, SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITH A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN PAVING, CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, GRADING ETC., AND AVOIDING ANY ABRUPT OR APPARENT CHANGES IN GRADES OR CROSS SLOPES, LOW SPOTS OR HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS. 30. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINAL GRADE OF CONCRETE UNLESS FORMS ARE CHECKED PRIOR TO POURING. 31. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY UTILITY CONNECTION, DISCONNECTIONS, AND RELOCATIONS WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 32. ANY PROVIDED EARTHWORK QUANTITY IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF SAID GRADING QUANTITIES PRIOR TO BID SUBMITTALS. 33. ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS AND FINAL PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE. 34. WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS OF THE WATER AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AIR RELEASE VALVES ON HIGH POINTS OF THE WATER MAIN AND BLOW -OFFS ON THE LOW POINT OF THE WATER MAIN. ALL DOMESTIC WATERLINES AFTER METER SHALL COMPLY WITH UPC AND UBC. 35. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT CONFINED SPACE ENTRIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 5156-5159, GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS, TITLE 8, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS. FOR PURPOSES OF SANITARY SEWER WORK, CONFINED SPACES SHALL INCLUDE (1) EXISTING MANHOLES; (2) NEW MANHOLES CONSTRUCTED OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AFTER EXISTING PIPE IS BROKEN OUT, CUT OUT OR REMOVED; AND (3) NEW MANHOLES THAT ARE CONSTRUCTED AT THE END OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWERS (RI'S OR PLUGS) AFTER THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PLUG HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE END OF THE EXISTING SEWER. 36. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY FIELD CONFLICTS. 37 PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED TO WEEKDAYS AND NON -CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8:00 AM AND 5:00 PM. 38 A PRE -INSPECTION VIDEO OF THE STORM DRAIN AND SEWER MAIN FRONTING THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. A POST -CONSTRUCTION VIDEO WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE FINAL SIGN -OFF OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. ANY DAMAGE(S) IDENTIFIED SHALL BE REPAIRED TO CITY STANDARDS. BASIS OF BEARINGS BEARING N41'18"00" W ALONG LORTON AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOL. 20 OF L.L.S. MAPS AT PAGE 30, WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS. BENCHMARK ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON AS ASSUMED DATUM. TBM: SET SCRIBED CROSS IN GUTTER, AS SHOWN ELEVATION = 99.65 Co/i ford/o �tro/� PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS r CO/troi 1. A REMOVE/REPLACE UTILITIES ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED. c � vue Ave 2. NO STORM WATERS, UNDERGROUND WATERS DRAINING FROM ANY LOT, BUILDING, OR 0rki �Q ° �r PAVED AREAS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO DRAIN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES NOR SHALL P o,, THESE WATERS BE CONNECTED TO THE CITY'S SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. THESE �e\\e�'\p `0'9 WATERS SHALL ALL DRAIN TO EITHER ARTIFICIAL OR NATURAL STORM DRAINAGE G FACILITIES BY GRAVITY OR PUMPING REGARDLESS OF THE SLOPE OF THE PROPERTY. NO RAIN WATER FROM ROOFS OR OTHER RAIN WATER DRAINAGE SHALL DISCHARGE k�PROJECT UPON A PUBLIC SIDEWALK PER MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 18.08.090. 3. ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRE LINE PROTECTION ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD PROCEDURES AND SITE �� lJ �1L\EAM�1 J �t`�`��o so MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. CONTACT THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT FOR CONNECTION GroQ�� FEES. ALL FIRE SERVICES AND WATER SERVICES OVER 2-INCH SHALL BE INSTALLED Q o a BY BUILDER. �eP�z a 0 4. THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION. 5. ALL DEBRIS/GARBAGE CONTAINERS LOCATION SHALL BE ON PROPERTY. NO WET VICINITY MAP GARBAGE FLUID SHALL ENTER PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. NOT TO SCALE 6. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE THE START OF ANY EXCAVATION WORK. LEGEND SYMBOLS DESCRIPTION BOUNDARY - SUBJECT PROPERTY AC ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ADJ ADJOINER ADJOINERS PROPERTY LINE BLDG BUILDING - - CENTERLINE BSW BACK OF SIDEWALK 11 5"SID 15" STORM DRAIN " CONIC CONCRETE 10" SANITARY SEWER " 2" WATER LINE TC TOP OF CURB " 2" GAS LINE TW TOP FACE OF WALL ell OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINE SD STORM DRAIN i BUILDING LINE CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE - - OVERHANG LINE OH OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL o CB CATCH BASIN JP JOINT POLE O CO CLEAN OUT MK MARK y FH FIRE HYDRANT R/W RIGHT OF WAY 0 LITE LIGHT APN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER O PM PARKING METER PTR PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT O SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (T) TOTAL O BOL BOLLARD DOC. NO. DOCUMENT NUMBER O PM PARKING METER S.F. SQUARE FEET X WV WATER VALVE M.M. MONUMENT TO MONUMENT ❑ WM WATER METER ( ML-ML) MONUMENT LINE TO MONUMENT LINE ❑ PGE PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC BOX MEAS. MEASURED ❑ EB/ELEC ELECTRICAL BOX ❑ GM GAS METER ❑ SLB STREET LIGHT BOX Ac .34 TOP OF CURB ELEVATION VI- FLOW LINE ELEVATION LIP 3000 g2 LIP ELEVATION FF B FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION gSW � BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION SSMH RAM 34.45 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ELEVATION AP .A TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION C-1 TITLE, GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET INDEX C-2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C-3 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY ® E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 2016 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Luk and Associates Civil Engineering Land Planning Land Surveying 738 Alfred Nobel Drive Hercules, CA 94547 Phone (510) 724-3388 Fax (510) 724-3383 email: aluk@lukassociates.com Seal _pf ESS/0N ` LINc�� Fc' a No. c m C.75724 CIvIL qTF OF CAL�F� Project No. 14-022 Revisions No. I Issue / Date Title: TITLE, GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET INDEX Date: Scale: JUNE 2017 File No.: -,1C2-1B(194A10 d\Al z 0 z 0 n Q z Job No.: 16094... Sheet No.: Cmi Plot Date: JUNE 6, 2017 1214 V 06' 0 0 J LL 0 z 0 ry LU 2 H 0 m LU L.� w ry X v � D 0 N N N E L L Y A V E. 0 (50' R/W PER BK. 278 OF DEEDS PG. 426) Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY ® E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2016 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Luk and Associates Civil Engineering Land Planning Land Surveying 738 Alfred Nobel Drive Hercules, CA 94547 Phone (510) 724-3388 Fax (510) 724-3383 email: aluk@lukassociates.com Seal O pfESS/o a No. c m C.75724 CIv1L qTF OF CAL�F� Project No. 14-M Revisions No. I Issue / Date Title: PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN Date: Scale: JUNE 2017 File No.: iMASTER-16094A10.d\n/r Job No.: 16094A10 Sheet No.: Cm2 Plot Date: JUNE 6, 2017 1214 DONNELLY AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 .......... %iiiiiii ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND D e .. D d... . d' F7 DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY p IMPERMEABLE PAVEMENT FLOW THROUGH PLANTER D e d u p UN❑CCUPIED ROOF 0j PLANTER ON P❑DIUM PERMEABLE PAVERS 0000 O O P❑DIUM DECK (IMPERMEABLE) 0 0 00 0 0 AT GRADE LANDSCAPING A3-STB 9 SF DRAINAGE AREA 1 (Al) BMP: BIORETENTION FLOW THROUGH PLANTERS IMPERVIOUS REGION AREA (SF) MIN BMP REQ (SF) Al-R.1 8,531 341 Al -R.2 89 3.6 Al -R.3 89 3.6 Al -R.4 89 3.6 Al -R.5 89 3.6 Al -F3.1 66 2.6 Al -F3.2 66 2.6 Al -F3.3 66 2.6 Al -F3.4 66 2.6 Al-F2.1 ill 4.4 Al -F2.2 247 9.9 Al-F2.3 ill 4.4 Al -F2.4 126 5.0 Al -F2.5 165 6.6 PERVIOUS REGION AREA (SF) MIN BMP REQ (SF) N/A - 0 TOTAL 9,911 396 TOTAL 0 0 MIN BMP SIZE = 4% OF IMPERVIOUS AREA DRAINAGE AREA 2 (A2) BMP: PERMEABLE PAVERS IMPERVIOUS REGION AREA (SF) MIN BMP REQ (SF) A2-F1.1 68 34 A2-F1.2 41 21 A2-F1.3 52 26 A2-F1.4 73 37 A2-F1.5 96 48 A2-F1.6 21 11 A2-F1.7 18 9 A2-F1.8 31 16 TOTAL 400 200 PERVIOUS REGION AREA (SF) MIN BMP REQ (SF) A2-L1 24 1 A2-L2 11 1 A2-L3 58 3 BMP REGION AREA (SF) Al -FTP1 128 Al -FTP2 144 Al -FTP3 145 BMP CRITERIA REQ (SF) SATISFIED? TOTAL 1 417 396 YES BMP REGION AREA (SF) A2-PP1 212 A2-PP2 61 A2-PP3 94 A2-PP4 125 A2-PP5 25 A2-PP6 30 A2-PP7 152 BMP REQ (SF) TOTAL 1 93 1 5 TOTAL 1 699 205 MIN BMP SIZE - 50% OF EFFECTIVE IMPERVIOUS AREA (LANDSCAPING AREA = 10% OF EFFECTIVE IMPERVIOUS AREA) DRAINAGE AREA 3 (A3) BMP: CONTECH STORM FILTER (MEDIA FILTER) IMPERVIOUS REGION AREA (SF) MIN BMP REQ (SF) A3-D.1 1,978 N/A A2-R.1 78 N/A A2-R.2 66 N/A A2-R.3 66 N/A A2-R.4 66 N/A A2-R.5 50 N/A A2-R.6 295 N/A A2-F3.1 52 N/A A2-F3.2 284 N/A A2-F3.3 212 N/A A2-F2.1 246 N/A A2-F2.2 144 N/A A2-F2.3 120 N/A TOTAL 1 3,657 1 N/A PERVIOUS REGION AREA (SF) MIN BMP REQ (SF) A3-L1 93 N/A A3-1_2 94 N/A A3-1_3 100 N/A A3-1_4 72 N/A A3-1_5 44 N/A A3-1_6 20 N/A A3-STB 1 9 1 N/A TOTAL 432 1 N/A CONTECH CB STORM FILTER SIZING *STORMFILTER SIZING FOR DRAINAGE AREA 3: Q=C x I x A, WHERE C IS THE SURFACE RUNOFF FACTOR (0.9 FOR IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, 0.1 FOR LANDSCAPING), I = 0.2"/HR, A = ACRES Q = (0.9 x 0.2 x 3,657/43,560) + (0.1 x 0.2 x 432/43,560) = 0.015 cfs = 6.73 GPM. EACH CARTRIDGE IN THE STORMFILTER CAN HANDLE 0.033 cfs OR 15 GPM. 6.73 GPM IS LESS THAN 15 GPM --> THEREFORE, 1 UNIT IS SUFFICIENT. THIS PROJECT QUALIFIES AS A SPECIAL PROJECT, CATEGORY C (TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT). % OF PROJECT TREATED BY NON -LID TREATMENT: 26% % OF PROJECT PERMITTED TO BE TREATED BY NON -LID TREATMENT: 45% (25% (<I MI TO CALTRAIN) + 20% (0% AT GRADE SURFACE PARKING)) SURFACE TYPE SUMMARY TABLE SURFACE TYPE IMPERVIOUS (SF) PERVIOUS (SF) ROOF 9,508 - PODIUM DECK 4,060 - HARDSCAPE (AT GRADE) 400 - PLANTER (ON PODIUM) - 423 LANDSCAPING (AT GRADE) - 93 FLOW -THROUGH PLANTER - 417 PERMEABLE PAVERS - 699 OTHER (STB) - 9 SUBTOTAL 13,968 1,641 TOTAL 15,609 BMP AREA REGION (SF) CON TECT SF N/A BMP REQ (SF) CRITERIA SATISFIED? YES CRITERIA SATISFIED? I TOTAL I N/A I N/A I N/A I STORM WATER TREATMENT NOTES: PER SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM PUBLICATION: "C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE" WITH LATEST TECHINCAL GUIDANCE JUNE 2016 VERSION 5.0: 1) THE TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 13,968 SY (> 10,000 S.F). THE PROPOSED PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA BUT IS NOT WITHIN A HIM SUSCEPTIBLE AREA (HM CONTROL AREA MAP) . THE PROJECT ALSO CREATES LESS THAN 1-ACRE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. THEREFORE, HYDROMODIFICATION MANAGEMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE SITE PER SECTION 7.3 OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY "C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE" HANDBOOK, WHICH STATES THAT ALL THREE CONDITIONS MUST OCCUR TO TRIGGER HYDROMODIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. THERE IS NO AVAILABLE UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM (EITHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) WITH WHICH TO CONNECT TO. THEREFORE IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO PROVIDE TREATMENT MEASURES (HARDSHIP CONDITION). 2) THE STORMWATER TREATMENT METHOD IS CHOSEN TO BE A CONBINATION OF FLOW -THROUGH PLANTERS, SELF RETENTION AREAS (PERMEABLE PAVERS) AND MEDIA FILTERS (CONTECT STORM FILTER). CRITERIA APPLY TO FLOW -THROUGH PLANTERS: SIZING FACTOR PER SAN MATEO COUNTY SIZING REQUIREMENTS: BIORETENTION PLANTER SIZED A MINIMUM OF 0.04 OF THE AREA DRAINING TO IT. CRITERIA APPLY TO SELF RETENTION AREA: SIZING FACTOR PER SAN MATEO COUNTY SIZING REQUIREMENTS: ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR PERVIOUS AREA = 0.1 MAXIMUM RUN-ON RATIO IMPERVIOUS TO PAVER AREA = 2:1 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY ® E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2016 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Luk and Associates Civil Engineering Land Planning Land Surveying 738 Alfred Nobel Drive Hercules, CA 94547 Phone (510) 724-3388 Fax (510) 724-3383 email: aluk@lukassociates.com Seal O _ajESS/o Fti a No. c m C.75724 CIvi qTF OF CAL�F� Project No. 14-022 Revisions No. I Issue / Date Title: PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN Date: Scale: JUNE 2017 V = 10' File No.: MCP-16094A10.d\ n U 0 n Q z Job No.: 1609,+. Sheet No.: Cm3 Plot Date: JUNE 6, 2017 PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL CALL OUT QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME NOTES SIZE TREES (@ T1 5 GINKGO BILOBA MAIDENHAIR TREE 36" BOX PERENNIALS P1 3 AGAVE 'BLUE GLOW' 5 GAL P2 2 AGAVE VILMORINIANA'STAINED VARIEGATED OCTOPUS AGAVE 15 GAL GLASS' O P3 22 ALOE 'SAFARI ROSE' 5 GAL O P4 9 ANIGOZANTHOS 'RED CROSS' RED KANGAROO PAW 5 GAL O P5 15 LOMANDRA HYSTRIX TROPICBELLE TROPIC BELLE MAT RUSH 5 GAL (2�) P6 1 BOUGAINVILLEA 'BARBARA KARST' 5 GAL O P7 1 ALOE BARBERAE TREE ALOE 24" BOX r 4-KY 111x 2k4l" RMLR 71ti1W 1, HAM (Nn T' TM STAW PM SCH 40 FINE STAKE 1&�( 4 r ROM TREE 1 V4 A' 4rALV,. TO ROOIRNG 1 L MBSERft ?4 F M OR NAM TO STAII -(2)2' DtA LOOM POLE PINE STAkU ,r -0 GAL OR 9"ER -24" BOX OR LARGER -I've 4" ROUGH REDWOOD %Vl` H ILOCA E ON PNVAWNG WIND SWE) 2.0 OF RN9 S ENFD PIR EARK r- FINISHM ORWR ,h--SCAFUW MM ROOT #AM V40R GAGE � X CC3N�"AliiEt� SMNE DRAT MA 'TE COVER AM 3�1 7F3: SU68LE k WCAACIN LM 2 PIPES its CONCft-M '-OUT ARM PVF PIPE SCH.' so FVC NIPPLE Mpg CRATE COVER, PIPE SME — MATCH SME OF HEAD SLOB' TO ALLOW FOR S'T"i'LEMENT WRAPft!RFORATED PIF'•E3nlf` H I'li.TER FMRIG. PIPE MM 112 IN- D&AfN ROCK SUMER DETAIL 1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL W/ BUBBLER IRRIGATION NTS 8 UBOL ER HEAD ' 0 1" THICK AT EDGEg 3/8" SOLID GRATING LEVELING PAD` CENTER OPENING EXPANSION LINES 2 TREE GRATE PLAN AND SECTION 4'SQ. OT-T24 NTS AN PERIME TREE GRATE SPECIFICATIONS 1. MATERIAL WILL BE HIGH QUALITY 100% RECYCLED GREY IRON; ASTM A48 CLASS 35B OR BETTER; HARDNESS 170-223 BRINNELL. 2. FINISH WILL BE POWDER COATED GREEN, RAL 6009. 3. DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL 4. CAST IN TWO PIECES. 5. GRATE IS 1" THICK AT EDGE. 6. CENTER OPENING EXPANSIONS AT V-3" AND V-7". 7. NO OPENINGS GREATER THAN 1/2", IN CONFORMANCE WITH ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 8. GRATE WEIGHS 256 LBS. TREE GRATE FRAME SPECIFICATIONS 1. MATERIAL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MILD STEEL ASTM A36 2. FINISH WILL BE POWDER COATED GREEN, RAL 6009. 3. FRAME IS LOAD RATED FOR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ONLY 4. TYPICAL 1/8" HORIZONTAL GAP BETWEEN GRATE AND FRAME. ALL VISIBLE WELDS TO BE GROUND SMOOTH ON OUTSIDE EDGES. FRAMES WILL BE TRUE TO SQUARE OR DIAMETER. TOP OF GRATE FLUSH WITH GRADE OF SURROUNDING CONCRETE SLAB. 5. DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. #3 REBAR EMBEDMENT ANCHOR, EQUAL SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 18" O.C. TYP. ANGLE STOCK PERIMETER GRATE FRAME, SIZED TO COORDINATE WITH GRATE THICKNESS. 450 CONCRETE SLAB 6" MIN. TYP. #3 REBAR EMBEDMENT ANCHOR 6" TYP. OVERALL LENGTH 6" MIN 3 TREE GRATE FRAME 4'SQ. TYPE "S" PEDESTRIAN DUTY NTS PLANTING NOTES 1. SEE PLANT SCHEDULES FOR SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND MINIMUM SPACING. SEE PLANTING DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION AND LAYOUT. 2. A SOIL REPORT SHOULD BE PERFORMED FOR AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL REVIEW REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW FOR THE ADDITION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS AND CONDITIONERS IN SOIL PREPARATION AND FINISH GRADING. 4. 4 CUBIC YARDS OF COMPOST MUST BE INCORPORATED PER 1000 SF TO A DEPTH OF 6" OF PERMEABLE SOIL. COMPACTED SOILS MUST BE TRANSFORMED TO A FRIABLE CONDITION. 5. A LIGHTWEIGHT SOIL BLEND SHALL BE USED FOR THE PODIUM LEVEL RAISED PLANTER. 6. 3" DEPTH OF MULCH SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL. 7. SEE THE CIVIL ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS FOR THE FLOW THROUGH PLANTER SPECIFICATIONS. 8. LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE VERIFIED ON SITE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DUE TO VARYING FIELD CONDITIONS. 9. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL SUPERVISE THE PLANTING PROCESS. MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLANTING PLAN MAY OCCUR BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE AVAILABILITY OF PLANT MATERIAL. 10. FINAL PLANT LISTS WILL BE CONTINGENT UPON PLANT AVAILABILITY. IF SELECTED SPECIES ARE UNAVAILABLE FORM LOCAL NURSERIES THEN UPON PRIOR APPROVAL OTHER GENUS OR SPECIES WITH SIMILAR HYDROLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS MAYBE SUBSTITUTED. 11. ALL PLANTS, OTHER THAN THOSE LOCATED IN THE FLOW THROUGH PLANTER, WILL BE MULCHED WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES OF MULCH USING 1/4" FIR BARK CLEAN. THE MULCH IS NOT TO MAKE CONTACT WITH THE PLANT STEM. MULCH, KEEP 2" CLEAR JM BASE OF PLANT SOIL. ADD 2 FERTILIZER TABLETS TO SOIL 1 GAL PLANTS AND 3 FERTILIZER TABLETS 5 GAL PLANTS. RIFY ROOTBALL SURFACE TO %4" DEPTH. ,AVATION LINE 4 1 OR 5 GALLON PLANT NTS DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY BACKFLOW PREVENTER BUIIDING SPRINKLER BACKFLOW PREVENTER GAS METERS IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREVENTER STORMWATER TREATMENT STORMWATER TRANSITION BOX 1214 Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GAILY E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2018 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED EE-PLANNING 06.28.18 REVISED EE-PLANNING 09.04.18 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 JLLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 544 PACIFIC AVENUE PH: 415 - 350 - 6945 SAN FRANCISCO, 94133 E: jan@janlongwell.com Plantina Plan CP Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 1/411= 1 1-011 Ll 01 1214 RAISED PLANTER BENCH SCUPPER TYP DRAIN TO FLOW THROUGH PLANTEF PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL CALL OUT QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SHRUBS PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM O S1 11 SILVER SHEEN KOHUHU 15 GAL SILVER SHEEN' PERENNIALS/ GRASSES P1 60 STIPA ARUNDINACEA NEW ZEALAND WIND GRASS 1 GAL O P2 7 VERBENA BONARIENSIS 1 GAL P3 15 STIPA GIGANTEA GIANT FEATHER GRASS 1 GAL O P4 30 PENNISETUM SPATHIOLATUM SLENDER VELDT GRASS 1 GAL O P5 18 VERBENA LILACINA'DE LA MINA' 1 GAL VED WALKING SURFACE, TYP. NCH N THROUGH PLANTER V Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2016 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 06.17.20 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 AlREVISED 06.17.20 JLLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 156 South Park 415.350.6945 San Francisco, Ca 94107 jan@janlongwell.corn Planting Plan PODIUM LEVEL PLANTING PLAN 1 /499-1 9-099 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" Ll 02 1214 F DONNELLY AVENUE IRRIGATION NOTES 1. P.O.C. AND CONTROLLER TO BE LOCATED AT EXISTING MAIN WATER SUPPLY IN GARAGE. 2. IF MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE IN THE FIELD, ALL VALVES AND PIPING MUST BE SIZED PROPERLY TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARD GPM AND VELOCITY REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN OVERLAY SHOWING DESIGN MODIFICATIONS TO VALVES AND/OR PIPE SIZES AND HEAD LAYOUTS PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE CHANGED ITEMS. 3. ALL PIPING AND WIRE SHALL BE SLEEVED UNDER IRRIGATION LEGEND DRIP SYSTEM NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL DRIP ZONE BOUNDARIES PVC TO PE DRIP ADAPTOR 2" DRIP DISTRIBUTION TUBING - RAINBIRD XT-700-500 4" DRIP DISTRIBUTION TUBING - RAINBIRD XQ-250 DRIP EMITTERS (RAINBIRD XERI-BUG EMITTERS PLANT SIZE NO./EMITTER SIZE PAVING. ALL SLEEVES TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2X 1 GAL. (2) 2 GPH RAINBIRD XB-05-PC DIAMETER OF SLEEVED PIPE. ALL MAINLINE SHALL 2 GAL. (2) 2 GPH RAINBIRD XB-05-PC BE ACCOMPANIED WITH A MINIMUM 2-INCH 5 GAL. (2) 1 GPH RAINBIRD XB-10-PC DIAMETER WIRE SLEEVE. SLEEVING TO EXTEND 15 GAL. (4) 1 GPH RAINBIRD XB-10-PC MINIMUM 12" BEYOND PAVING. 24" BOX (4) 2 GPH RAINBIRD XB-20-PC 36" BOX (6) 2 GPH RAINBIRD XB-20-PC 4. ALL SHADED AREAS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN SHALL BE IRRIGATED USING 2" DISTRIBUTION TUBING AND EMITTERS DIRECTLY TO EACH PLANT. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PLACE 2" DISTRIBUTION TUBING PARALLEL TO CONTOURS. CONTROL AND UTILITIES RP FEBCO MODEL 825Y, REDUCED PRESSURE ASSEMBLY GV NIBCO T-113 CLASS 125 BRONZE GATE VALVE HUNTER PCC-600 CONTROLLER RAINBIRD COMMERCIAL CONTROL ZONE KIT W/ PRESSURE REGULATING, BASKET FILTER, XCZ-PRB-100-COM 0 HUNTER SOLAR SYNC (EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND RAIN BUCKET) PIPING — — — — — — — — SCH 40 PVC MAINLINE 3/4" SCH 40 PVC LATERAL LINE SCH 40 PVC SLEEVE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = 1/2" COPPER TUBING VALVE # GPM VALVE SIZE COPPER TUBING IN CEILING DOMESTIC WATER BACKFLOW PREVENTER GAS METERS SPRINKER BACKFLOW PREVENTER IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREVENTER STORMWATER TREATMENT STORMWATER TRANSITION BOX Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2016 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 07.18.14 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 AREVISED PLANNING JLLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 544 PACIFIC AVENUE PH: 415 - 350 - 6945 SAN FRANCISCO, 94133 E: jan@janlongwell.com Irrigation Plan STREET LEVEL_ IRRIGATION PLAN 1/4 1 9 0" Scale: 1 /4" = V-0" L201 1214 T V COPPER TUBING IN CEILING Donnelly Avenue APN 029-151-150, 160, 170 A Mixed -Use Condominium Project Burlingame 0 California OWNER: BRITTON TRUST CONTACT: JOHN BRITTON 1345 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 415.934.1151 GARY 0 E E A I A GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. 98 Brady Street, #8 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel 415/863-8881 Fax 415/863-8879 COPYRIGHT 1984 - 2016 BY GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECTS OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR SPECIFIC WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF GARY GEE ARCHITECTS, INC. Project No. Date 14-022 06.17.20 Revisions No. I Issue / Date ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.01.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08.08.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 09.24.14 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 03.06.15 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.20.15 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01.28.16 EE 02.02.16 EE-PLANNING 04.12.16 PLANNING COMMISSION 04.17.17 REVISED PLANNING 05.08.19 REVISED l 06.17.20 �� LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 544 PACIFIC AVENUE PH: 415 - 350 - 6945 SAN FRANCISCO, 94133 E: ian(q)ianIonqweII.corr Irrigation Plan Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 4- PODIUM LEVEL IRRIGATION PLAN 1 /499 9099 L202 To: Date: From: Subject STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council September 21, 2020 AGENDA NO: 10a MEETING DATE: September21, 2020 Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7204 Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 Adoption of a Resolution Suspending CUP Timelines for 778 Burlway During Evaluation of an Alternative Development Plan RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council consider the adoption of a resolution further suspending timelines embedded in the October 2016 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) extension granted to the Enterprise property located at 778 Burlway Road during the evaluation of an alternative development plan for the site. BACKGROUND and DISCUSSION The subject property located at 778 Burlway Road has been occupied by a non -conforming car rental use since 1985. The CUP under which this use is allowed has been modified over the years and has been extended several times at the request of the applicant. In October 2016, the Council granted a further extension of the CUP (see attached CUP conditions of approval). Anticipating a move to the then -planned SFO Car Rental facility, Enterprise and the Council agreed to timelines as well as escalating payments designed to offset the impacts of the non -conforming use and incentivize redevelopment of the site in a manner consistent with the Bayfront Specific Plan. Since that time, SFO has abandoned plans to build a consolidated car rental facility on its property. Additionally, increased focus on the jobs -housing ratio on the San Francisco Peninsula has led to less emphasis on intensive office development on the Bayfront. Given these changed conditions, in the spring of 2019 Enterprise approached the City with an alternative development plan for its site. The alternative would involve consolidation of activities through the construction of a multi- story garage for car storage, freeing up a portion of the area for possible acquisition and redevelopment by the City. June 15, 2019 Nine -Month Suspension. At a study session held on April 15, 2019, the Council considered the alternative presented by Enterprise and gave direction to the Mayor and staff to pursue further discussions. On June 3, 2019, the City Council adopted a resolution suspending timelines embedded in the October 2016 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) extension for a period of nine months to allow the evaluation of an alternative development plan for the site. 1 Enterprise CUP Extension September 21, 2020 Enterprise had been making progress on the alternative development proposal. Staff and a City Council subcommittee comprised of Councilmembers Brownrigg and Colson met with Enterprise representatives several times since the CUP timelines were suspended in June 2019. A study session was held on March 16, 2020 to allow the full City Council to review the concept being proposed by Enterprise and provide feedback (refer to further discussion below). February 3, 2020 Nine -Month Extension. The June 3, 2019 suspension was for a nine -month period, concluding in March 2020. Citing the progress in developing a concept for the site, the City Council granted an additional nine -month extension to the CUP timelines to allow sufficient time to develop the concept to be presented to the City Council on March 16t", and for Enterprise to follow up on Council direction. March 16, 2020 Study Session. On March 16, 2020, the City Council held a study session to review Enterprise's preliminary concept for use of the site. The presentation was part of a larger discussion of community benefit zoning for the Bayfront Commercial District as it applies to the Zoning Ordinance Update. The concept presented by Enterprise included a six -story parking garage that would exceed base -level development standards, but as a corresponding community benefit, a portion of the site would be made available for community use. While the proposal was still conceptual, Councilmembers were generally agreeable to the concept and the community benefits framework. Enterprise was directed to further develop the concept into a more detailed proposal. September 21, 2020 Six -Month Extension Request. The March 16, 2020 study session was the evening prior to San Mateo County and five other Bay Area counties issuing Orders directing all individuals living in these specific counties to shelter in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the initial shelter in place Order was issued, operations of both businesses and the public sector have been disrupted. While some businesses have been able to restore a semblance of operations, and government entities have been able to provide services remotely, the past few months have presented challenges to all sectors of the economy. On August 30, 2020, Enterprise Holdings submitted a letter requesting further suspension of timelines embedded in the October 2016 CUP extension (attached). The letter describes the challenges Enterprise has had to its business operations since March; these challenges have prevented it from moving forward with further developing the concept plans presented to the City Council on March 16t". Enterprise representatives have indicated they are confident they can now resume work on developing the plan concept, and are requesting a further six-month tolling period to make up for the lost time due to the pandemic outbreak. The additional six months, together with the previous two nine -month tollings, would provide a total tolling of 24 months. Given the complexity of the proposed project, including establishing the details of a community benefit framework, Enterprise believes this amount of time is needed to develop the specifics of the proposal with the City. If it is not suspended, the October 2016 CUP would impose escalating costs on Enterprise in subsequent years. Given Council's direction to pursue a possible alternative path and the time needed to develop the concept, Enterprise seeks reassurance that the existing CUP timelines will 2 Enterprise CUP Extension September 21, 2020 not be imposed during or immediately after the exploration phase. The ongoing payments called for in Paragraph 8 of the Conditions of Approval will continue during the extension. FISCAL IMPACT The City received the initial $1,854,000 payment specified in the CUP on October 17, 2016. This action will delay by an additional six months, until October 2022, the increased payments anticipated under the existing Enterprise CUP Extension. It may allow a negotiated alternative that is of equal or greater value to the City. Exhibits: • Resolution • Letter from Enterprise Holdings, dated August 30, 2020 • October 2016 Conditions of Approval for CUP Extension 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME SUSPENDING TIMELINES IN THE OCTOBER 2016 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE 778 BURLWAY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION WHEREAS, since 1985, the property at 778 Burlway Road has been used for car rental storage, which is a nonconforming use under the applicable specific plan; and WHEREAS, a conditional use permit (CUP) allowing the use has been modified and extended numerous times; and WHEREAS, the City Council imposed conditions on the latest extension granted in October 2016, some of which would impose timelines for submission and progress on redevelopment as well as escalating payments to the City; and WHEREAS, at its April 15, 2019 meeting, the City Council, recognizing changed regional circumstances, directed that exploration and negotiations proceed for an alternative development proposal submitted by Enterprise; and WHEREAS, at its June 3, 2019 meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution providing a nine -month extension on the deadlines and escalated payments contained in the 2016 extension in order to allow Enterprise time to pursue the alternative development proposal; and WHEREAS, at its February 3, 2020 meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution providing an additional nine -month extension on the deadlines and escalated payments contained in the 2016 extension in order to allow Enterprise time to further pursue the alternative development proposal to reflect ongoing input from the City Council and staff; and WHEREAS, in order to provide Enterprise with sufficient time to continue to pursue the alternative development proposal and recognize hardships imposed on business operations by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional six-month extension on the deadlines and escalated payments contained in the 2016 extension is appropriate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: The redevelopment timelines and escalated payments described in Paragraph 2 subsections a-f of the 778 Burlway (Enterprise) CUP Extension Conditions, adopted October 3, 2016, and each extended for a period of nine months on June 3, 2019 and February 3, 2020, are further extended for a period of six months, to the date October 3, 2022. 2. All other terms and conditions of the 778 Burlway (Enterprise) CUP Extension Conditions, adopted October 3, 2016, remain in full force and effect, including the ongoing obligation to make payments as described in Paragraph 8 of the Extension Conditions. Emily Beach, Mayor I, MEAGHAN HASSEL-SHEARER, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21 st day of September, 2020, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk ENTERPRISEHOLDINGS I 2633 Camino Ramon Ste 425 San Ramon. CA 94563 August 30, 2020 Burlingame City Council 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 778 Burlway — Enterprise Rent-A-Car Tolling extension of Conditioanl Use Permit Dear Burlingame City Council Members: This written statement is in regards to providing an additional 6 month tolling period for the Conditional Use Permit for Enterprise Rent-A-Car at 778 Burlway Road due to the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic. At the March 16, 2020 Study Session, the City Council was agreeable in moving forward with the concept of Enterprise building a new rental car facility on the property at 778 Burlway as well as dedicating a portion of the property to be used for community use. With this approval to move forward, we were prepared to work on developing a more detailed proposal and finalizing our facility plans as well as working with the city on what the community use transaction would look like. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to shut down almost all of our locations in the Bay Area for a considerable amount of time and it has had a tremendous impact on our business. We are still working on re -opening our facilities and trying to get back to operating our business. Since the March 16th Study Session, we have had no ability to move forward with this project since we were dealing with trying to operate through this pandemic. The last six months have been unprecedented and difficult to manage through. We look forward to the next six months and continuing the work pre-Covid to develop a site plan that is agreeable to both parties. We will continue to work on developing a more detailed plan on what the 778 Burlway site will look like and continue to work with the great staff at the City of Burlingame to move this project forward. We just ask that we get an additional six month tolling period to make up for the lost time due to the pandemic outbreak. Thank you for your consideration in this matter and feel free to reach out to me with any questions at 510-772-7839, Sincerely, Doug H tori Property Development & Facilities Manager Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of San Francisco, LLC 778 Burlway (Enterprise) CUP Extension Conditions (09/19/2016) The project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division and date stamped January 3, 2003, sheets A0.1, A1.0, A1.1, A2.1, and A22.1, site plan, partial site plan, second floor -administration, and building C floor plan, kiosk floor plan and reflected ceiling plan; 2. This approval shall expire seven (7) years following City Council action on October 3, 2016 (expiration on October 3, 2023) at which time all said uses on the site shall cease. Within ten (10) days of the date of approval of this conditional use permit extension, the applicant shall pay the sum of $1,854,000 to the City of Burlingame as an offset to provide mitigation for the negative impact the continued underutilization of the subject property for long-term airport parking will have on the economic development potential in the City's Bayfront area. During the seven (7) year term of the conditional use permit extension, the applicant shall be required to meet the following milestones and accompanying financial contributions to the City to provide assurance that satisfactory progress is made towards development of the site and in order to reduce future payments to the City for the use's negative economic impact: a. By October 3, 2020, applicant shall identify a qualified developer team for subsequent development of the property following cessation of the automobile rental business. Additionally, a project description for reuse of the property situated at 778 Burlway (project site) shall be submitted to the City that is in full compliance with the land -use policies in the City's General Plan and regulatory requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance in place as of the stated date (with such changes as may otherwise be requested in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance procedures for variances, conditional use permits or the like). Accompanying this project description shall be a conceptual site plan for the proposed development. Within ten (10) days of completing all items required by this milestone, the applicant shall remit a payment to the City in the amount of $213,500; b. By October 3, 2021 the applicant (and/or its selected developer) shall submit a complete application seeking approval of all required land use entitlements for development of the site to the Community Development Department — Planning Division, including a traffic impact analysis of the development concept and preliminary site analyses (e.g. Phase I site contamination analysis, geotechnical report, etc.). Additionally, the applicant (and/or its selected developer) shall work with the Planning Division staff to initiate analysis of the proposed development pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and shall pay the City, in advance, for the City's reasonably anticipated consultant costs related to this analysis, subject to an agreed -upon procedure for future reporting and adjustments for reimbursement of City consultant costs as such work progresses. Within ten (10) days of completing all items required by this milestone, the applicant shall remit a payment to the City in the amount of $213,500; C. In advance of October 3, 2022 the developer shall work diligently with City staff with the goal of ensuring that all required project entitlements are granted by the City and the CEQA analysis is completed and adopted/certified by said date. In the event the Community Development Director reasonably determines that the entitlement review is delayed for reasons beyond the control of the applicant (including City processing delays or administrative or judicial appeals), the Community Development Director (after consultation with the City Manager and 778 Burlway (Enterprise) CUP Extension Conditions (09/19/2016) City Attorney) shall adjust this compliance date appropriately to account for such delay. Within ten (10) days after all required project entitlements are granted by the City, the applicant shall remit a payment to the City in the amount of $213,500; d. By October 3, 2023 (or if the CEQA analysis or entitlements are appealed judicially, one year after the date that the project entitlements obtained under item 2c above become final and unappealable), the applicant shall submit a completed building permit application to the Community Development Department — Building Division. Within ten (10) days of completing all items required by this milestone, the applicant shall remit payment to the City in the amount of $213,500; e. In the event that the applicant fails to meet any of the milestones stated in items 2a through 2d above, applicant shall remit $713,500 on October 3 of each year in which the milestones set forth in this paragraph have not been met. Should applicant come into compliance with the milestones, the required mitigation payment shall be reduced from the date of compliance forward with no pro -rating for prior periods of non-compliance. In the event that applicant fails to make any of the required payments under Section 2.a through 2.e when due and such failure continues for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from City to applicant, the City may terminate the applicant's rights hereunder, upon which all obligations and rights of the parties hereunder shall cease. g. Applicant may terminate this CUP and the rights and uses authorized hereunder by written notice to the City, which notice shall specify the effective date of termination. Upon such termination, all future rights and obligations of applicant under this CUP shall cease, including, without limitation, the authorized uses hereunder and the obligation for future payments. 3. The car rental, maintenance and storage facility may be open for business from 6:00 a.m. to 10:30 p.m., seven days a week, and that there shall be no more an 50 employees and 25 customers on -site at any one time; 4. There shall be a maximum of 600 cars stored on the site at any one time, this number shall include cars that are on -site for maintenance and there shall be a maximum of 2 car carriers on -site to deliver vehicles at any one time; 5. No trucks delivering or picking up cars at this site shall arrive or depart between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. daily, and all such deliveries shall be made on - site with no impact on the public street or right-of-way; 6. The required number of handicap stalls for employees and/or customers shall be provided and designated at 778 Burlway Road as per the California Building Code, 2001 edition, and all employees shall be required to park in the 78 space employee parking lot in the southwestern portion of the site, employee parking shall be designated and employee cars shall have sticker identifying them as belonging to employees on -site; 7. All employee parking shall be provided 24 hours a day, seven days a week at the south end of the site; 778 Burlway (Enterprise) CUP Extension Conditions (09/19/2016) 8. The car rental operation at this site shall pay to the City of Burlingame $36,500 per year; the annual payment shall be payable in advance no later than April 30 of each year during which this permit is in effect. When one percent (1 %) of the total gross rental for any vehicles for lease or rental originating from this site, whether those agreements are signed in Burlingame or adjacent jurisdictions exceeds $36,500 during any calendar year, the applicant shall then pay one percent of the total gross rentals to the City of Burlingame on a quarterly basis for the duration of the permit; this amount shall be due and payable no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar -year quarter. For purposes of this condition, agreements for rental from San Francisco International Airport car rental facility shall not be included in calculating the 1 % payment to the City. In addition to making the payments required by this condition (either annual/flat amount or quarterly), the car rental operation shall file quarterly statements with the City of Burlingame Finance Department documenting the number of vehicle rental agreements signed at the site per month during the quarter on such forms as may be required by the City, and shall include a breakdown of the monthly vehicle rentals from the 778 Burlway Road site. In addition, the City of Burlingame shall accrue any sales tax revenue from rental contracts written in the City of Burlingame. Whether paying a fixed fee or 1 % of the gross rental rates, the car rental operation on this site shall keep and preserve, for a period of three years, all records as may be necessary to determine the rentals from which the one percent (1 %) payment calculation may be derived. Such records shall be available for delivery to the City for review with fifteen (15) days after request therefore; 9. No cars shall be loaded, unloaded or stored on any public street, in any public right-of- way, or in any public access area; 10. There shall be no intensification or changes of use of the subject property, except to substitute a permitted use under applicable zoning, as the allowed use under these provisions is non -conforming. 11. The fire lane from the east end of the site to Burlway Road shall be provided and maintained, unobstructed, on a permanent basis as required by the Fire and Public Works Department of the City of Burlingame; 12. The property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of the public access trail and improvements adjacent to the subject property for the life of the project and shall be liable for any damage caused to the public for failure to maintain these facilities to a safe standard, and further that the property owner shall seek Bay Conservation and Development Commission approval for redesigning the narrowest existing section of the trail and replacing and expanding the pavement in this area; 13. The property owner shall install and maintain on a regular basis as prescribed by the city's NPDES inspector, petroleum filter pillows in all parking lot catch basins throughout the site, that all water used for washing cars on site shall be recycled by a method approved by the City Engineer, and that failure to install these systems within 90 days of approval of this use permit amendment or failure to maintain the effectiveness of these systems on an on -going basis shall cause this conditional use permit to be review by the Planning Commission; and 14. Any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Code, 2010 edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. 778 Burlway (Enterprise) CUP Extension Conditions (09/19/2016) 15. At all times during the operation of the facility and, in particular, after cessation of the use, the property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner consistent with all applicable provisions of the Burlingame Municipal Code. STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council eptember 21, 2020 AGENDA NO: 10b MEETING DATE: September21, 2020 Carol Augustine, Finance Director — (650) 558-7222 Subject: Review of the FY 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary; and Adoption of a Resolution Amending the Operating Budget to Reflect Receipt of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) in FY 2020-21 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council accept the FY 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary, and adopt the attached resolutions amending the FY 2020-21 operating budget to reflect the receipt of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) in FY 2020-21. BACKGROUND The budget process for the current (FY 2020-21) year was significantly upended by the world-wide outbreak of a coronavirus in late February, when staff was completing the mid -year report for FY 2019-20. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted every facet of life and greatly altered the economic landscape at the national, state, and local levels. Staff prepared a revised economic outlook for the City and amended current -year projections for the City's key revenue sources. With the proposed revenue adjustments, the General Fund balance at June 30, 2020 was estimated to be $37.8 million, as opposed to the $50.5 million presented in the mid -year report. Lacking a solid basis for revenue estimates, adoption of a cautious budget for the 2020-21 fiscal year in June was justified. This report summarizes the City's General Fund fiscal status as of June 30, 2020 by providing an analysis of unaudited revenues and expenditures in comparison to the current adjusted budget for the 2019-20 fiscal year. Revised forecasts incorporate these unaudited results. DISCUSSION At the time of adoption, the City's FY 2019-20 budget anticipated another year of stable economic growth, with revenues generally expected to outpace those of the prior fiscal year by a moderate margin. The budget supported continued funding of the City's underfunded pension and retiree medical programs, as well as a $6.5 million contribution to the Capital Investment Reserve. The budget also provided $2 million for the anticipated debt service necessary to fund the new Community Center construction project. 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 The COVID-19 pandemic began to make headlines just as the City's mid -year financial report was being prepared, substantially altering the recommended mid -year adjustments to the 2019-20 fiscal year budget. This necessitated significant revenue budget revisions, including revising General Fund revenues downward by $9.9 million (12.5 percent), to reflect the impacts of the public health crisis on the travel industry and global economic growth as a whole. The City Council approved these budget changes at the same time that the fiscal year 2020-21 budget was being formulated, projecting a further 11.2 percent decline in revenue. City staff have worked diligently to close the books as of June 30, 2020 in preparation for the annual independent audit and the compilation of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year. Although the results presented at this time are not yet audited, staff is confident that they will not change significantly during the audit process. The City's year-end unaudited General Fund revenues are approximately $1.5 million (2.2 percent) higher than projected in the FY 2019-20 adjusted budget. While some of the budget variances are small, the larger variances merely reflect the difficulty in predicting the economic impact of the pandemic and the course of recovery that lies ahead. The major section of this analysis identifies the City's major General Fund Revenue variances, and, to the extent possible, the bearing these revenue results will have on the current -year budget. Departmental expenditure budget results are discussed in less detail, as the departmental budgets were not significantly altered toward the end of the fiscal year. Budgetary savings of $4.5 million serve to limit the draw on General Fund reserves: where the General Fund balance was anticipated to decrease nearly $11.9 million, a $5.9 million decrease is reported. In addition, a discussion of reimbursements of certain FY 2019-20 program expenditures from the Coronavirus Relief Fund is included to support the resolution to include these reimbursement grant revenues in the current - year budget. Two months into the new fiscal year, there is no additional data to warrant any General Fund expenditure budget amendments at this time. The mid -year report will provide an opportunity to more accurately reflect current needs, respond to further unanticipated events, support changes in programming direction, or utilize information that was not available at the time the FY 2020-21 budget was proposed. General Fund - Revenues The following table shows actual General Fund revenues for the 18-19 fiscal year, the unaudited revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, and the current -year adopted budget. There are four columns for the 2019-20 fiscal year: The "FY 19-20 Adjusted Budget" column shows the revenue budget as revised in May 2020; the "FY 19-20 Unaudited Results" column shows the most current results available for the fiscal year; the remaining two columns for the fiscal year reflect the budget variance in dollars and as a percentage of the adjusted revenue budget. A "FY 20-21 Adopted Budget" column is included to allow an overall assessment of the current year's revenue projections in light of the results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. As the City is only in the 2 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 third month of the new fiscal year, there is insufficient data to provide further insight into the adequacy of the FY 2020-21 Budget; this will be provided later in the fiscal year. CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES Property Tax Sales and Use Tax* Transient Occupancy Tax Other Taxes Franchise Tax Business Licenses Real Property Transfer Tax State HOPTR Licenses & Permits Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties Use of Money & Property Charges for Services Other Revenue State Subventions Interest Income Total, General Fund Revenue FY19-20 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY18-19 Adjusted Unaudited Budget Variance Adopted Actuals Budget Actuals $ % Budget $ 21,955,938 $ 23,435,600 $ 23,304,402 $ (131,198) -0.6% $ 25,136,000 17,819,970 14,230,000 14,562,627 332,627 2.3% 12,000,000 29,384,461 20,050,000 20,416,543 366,543 1.8% 14,000,000 1,657,802 1,642,000 1,656,664 14,664 0.9% 1,641,200 1,039,154 865,000 878,498 13,498 1.6% 730,000 476,852 360,000 534,517 174,517 48.5% 400,000 59,592 60,000 59,000 (1,000) -1.7% 60,000 84,610 79,500 98,904 19,404 24.4% 78,200 1,255,675 608,000 791,870 183,870 30.2% 560,000 1,870,150 130,000 101,996 (28,004) -21.5% 80,000 6,282,169 5,135,000 5,471,234 336,234 6.5% 5,007,000 59,071 30,000 81,033 51,033 170.1% 30,000 211,117 140,000 177,563 37,563 26.8% 143,000 2,380,791 2,400,000 2,466,249 66,249 2.8% 1,563,000 $ 84,537,352 $ 69,165,100 $ 70,601,100 $ 1,436,000 2.08% $ 61,428,400 * Sales and Use Tax - included Measure I revenue $1.96 million and $1.925 million, respectively, for the FY19-20 and FY20-21 Budget. Property Taxes - The San Francisco Bay Area housing sector has in the past been a sustaining factor in the local economy throughout the most difficult of past economic downturns. Property tax revenues leveled off in fiscal years 2010-11 and 2011-12, but have increased by over 70.4 percent since that time - nearly 40.0 percent in the last five years. Assessed property values continue to rise, increasing 11.52 percent in the past year, after rising 7.28 percent in the prior year. The local housing market appears to have remained strong throughout the first half of 2020, despite the cloud of economic uncertainty created by the pandemic. Mortgage/lending rates are extremely low. Although recent years have seen a continued interest in both residential and commercial real estate development, the stay-at-home orders have shifted the outlook for all commercial markets. Hotels, restaurants, and retail establishments have been hit hardest by the pandemic, but office vacancy rates are also expected to rise as businesses re -think their need for office space, and white-collar workers grow accustomed to working from home. Property tax rolls are established prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, fiscal year 2020-21 projections do not yet reflect any impact from the pandemic -induced recession. In fact, the County's roll value for Burlingame (land and improvements) has already increased 1.46 percent, excluding any inflationary factor of up to two percent applied each December to all California property assessments. As shown in the chart below, the preponderance of the City's property tax revenues (nearly 72 percent) comes from secured property taxes, which are established by the tax rolls and diminished only through refunds on successful appeals to the County Assessor's Office. 3 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA PROPERTY TAXES FY19-20 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY18-19 Adjusted Unaudited Budget Variance Adopted Actual Budget Actuals $ % Budget Current Secured Property Tax $ 14,649,598 $ 15,820,000 $ 15,825,904 $ 5,904 0.0% $ 17,573,000 Secured Supp. Property Tax 516,148 545,000 422,675 (122,325) -22.4% 491,000 Current Unsecured Property Tax 755,835 821,000 804,184 (16,816) -2.0% 821,000 Property Tax in Lieu of VLF 3,465,699 3,559,300 3,583,335 24,035 0.7% 3,560,000 ERAF Refund 2,252,373 2,374,300 2,374,327 27 0.0% 2,375,000 Unitary Tax 316,284 316,000 304,019 (11,981) -3.8% 316,000 Total, Property Taxes $ 21,955,938 $23,435,600 $23,314,442 $ (121,158) -0.5% $25,136,000 In FY 2019-20, actual property tax revenue receipts were within'/2 percent of the adjusted budget, representing an 8.0 percent increase in property taxes over the prior year. Revenues from secured property taxes are expected to rise approximately 11.0 percent in FY 2020-21, due partly to the addition of the newly developed properties at Burlingame Point. (The final assessed roll for Burlingame received from the County Controller in August reflects an 11.2 percent rise over the prior year.) Receipts of supplemental property taxes vary from year to year with the timing, value, and volume of property transfers and new construction. These revenues, which are difficult to predict, represent a small part of the secured roll. Revenues from unsecured property taxes (assessed on business fixtures, business personal property, boats, aircraft, etc.) fell slightly short of the budget projections in fiscal year 2019-20, but these are also less consequential to the total of property tax receipts. Unitary taxes are fairly consistent. Excess ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund) refunds have varied considerably over the years. Only in recent years has this revenue line item been fully budgeted, due to the possibility that the State's school funding formulas could change and require higher draws on the County's ERAF. Since 2010, the improved economy has had a positive effect on the County's ERAF, as it appears that the State can meet its obligations to educational agencies because of improved property tax revenues in the area. In fact, higher property tax revenues result in more funds from local agencies being held back for the ERAF, while fewer demands for education funding are being made on these funds. Therefore, the full amount of 2019-20 ERAF refunds ($2.37 million) was included in the property tax projection for fiscal year 2020-21. Although the amount of Property Tax In Lieu of VLF (which is based on growth in the County's secured property tax roll), should be fairly predictable, these revenues are funded from the county- wide ERAF, and then from the property tax revenues of non -basic aid school districts. The number of non -basic aid school districts in the County has fallen over recent years, resulting in less available property tax revenues to fund VLF. In FY 2019-20, there was a county -wide shortfall in the ERAF, decreasing the amount available for the VLF distribution. The County continues to work with its legislative advocates to request that any VLF shortfall amounts be appropriated in the State's subsequent year's budget. In addition, newly enacted SB 98 requires the State Controller's Office (SCO) to issue guidelines on how to determine a school district's ERAF entitlement no later E 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 than December 2020 and be effective in calculating ERAF distributions for FY 2019-20 and thereafter. This should bring some stability to Property Tax In Lieu of VLF revenues in the future. Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) — TOT revenues have (since 2011) constituted Burlingame's largest General Fund revenue source and are usually a good indicator of current economic activity. TOT revenues are reported and paid to the City each month (for the prior month), so results through July 31, 2020 have been collected as of the time of this report. The graph below shows the rapid and sharp decline in these revenues as international air traffic began to slow early in 2020, and the progression downward as the pandemic brought most travel - related activities to a halt. Burlingame hotels, which had experienced very high occupancy rates in past years, were forced to cut staff, shutting off floors and even suspending operations for whole hotels. Many area hotels experienced single -digit occupancy rates in April and May. In an attempt to slow transmission of the virus, the County continues to lease some hotel rooms in order to offer health care workers and patients an alternative to returning home. Other hotels are being used to alleviate the density in homeless shelters, where the virus can also spread rapidly. But this temporary re -purposing of rooms does nothing to help the hospitality industry or the economy as a whole. City of Burlingame Hotel Tax by Month t2018 t2019 —6-2020 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOT revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 were $20.4 million. Although this result is 1.8 percent above the projection, the final adjustment to the budget was made with only one quarter remaining in the fiscal year. The budget for FY 2020-21 was established assuming that the 31.8 percent decrease in TOT revenues in fiscal year 2019-20 would be followed by an additional 32.4 percent slide. These projections were based on a conservatively estimated recovery of 70 percent of these revenues by the end of the 2020-21 fiscal year. 5 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 Because TOT revenues are based on room rentals, the negative impacts of the pandemic on both occupancy and room rates are considered in developing a projection for these revenues. A more recent forecast for the San Francisco Metropolitan Area indicates that both occupancy and room rates will not fully recover until calendar year 2023. The slide below was provided to the Economic Development Subcommittee at its September 9t" meeting by John Hutar, CEO of the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (SMCCVB). It should be noted that Burlingame's larger hotels are heavily reliant on travel into the SFO Airport - particularly corporate travel from the East Coast. Not until restrictions on business travel are lifted will these hotels begin their recovery, and the length of the recovery will depend on how willing employees will be to travel once the restrictions are lifted. Although smaller hotels are poised to recover more quickly (historically the limited service segment recovers first), Burlingame hotels may not follow the same path to recovery as others in the San Francisco Metropolitan Area. For example, resort hotels in Half Moon Bay and Pacifica are experiencing a late summer surge, with much higher occupancy rates than other hotels in the county. IMPACT FORECASTED PERFORMANCE BASELINE FORECAST FRANCISCO MSA ON - - SAN Sun Frc mw MSA F.,ewA Sunvnoiy - Rl 7020 Year ou AI ADR A,I• RevPAR A•. P,R 2018 81 .9% -1 .0% $240.62 5.2% $197,13 4.1 % 2019 82.0% 0.0% $250.67 4.2% $205.46 4.2% 2020 81.9% -0.1% $247.98 -1.3% $203.13 -1.4% 2020 - Adj 45.4% -44.7% $188.46 -24.8% $85.50 -58.4% 2021 67.0% 47.7% $204.23 8.4% $136.87 60.1 % 2022 77.6% 15.9% $237.91 16.5% $184.72 35.0% 2023 82.0% 5.6% $249.91 5.0% $204.90 10.9% 2024 83.6% 2.0% $258.62 3.5% $216.24 5.5% Samce, CBRE HoIeh Rexoah, SIR, 012920 1 Eowast br 2020 pioi to a1PI0d 9, {BRE Holk Research, 51R, 04 2019 Long Run Averages 1988 to 2019 Occupancy: 62.6%, ADR Change: 3.0%, Rev?AR Change: 3.2% CBRE HOTEL COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO Although the "Re -opened and Ready" campaign spearheaded by the SMCCVB was widely implemented and has met with positive results, the trajectory of the recovery for Burlingame's hotels is unknown. As the fiscal year develops, staff will recommend an amendment to the adopted budget for TOT revenues as necessary. The "most probable" scenario of the 5-year forecast presented with the FY 2020-21 Budget assumed that TOT revenues would reach 83% of 2018-19 levels by fiscal year 2024-25 (the last year of the forecast). Given the information available at the time of this analysis, this assumption seems reasonable. Sales and Use Taxes - Note that the revenues from the City's Measure I tax, which was effective April 1, 2018, are included in this analysis. Although Measure I revenues and expenditures are W 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 tracked internally in a separate sub -fund, they are included as General Fund transactions for financial reporting purposes. Because of the time lag in the reporting and submission of sales taxes to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), the results of the second quarter of 2020 are just now being deciphered. Coupled with the Governor's decision to allow a 90-day extension for sales, use, and transactions tax returns and payments, it is difficult to ascertain the true damage to these revenues resulting from the COVID 19 pandemic and its aftermath, even after the data is collected. Sales tax receipts reflected a fairly healthy economy at the time of the FY 2019-20 mid -year, analysis, despite an anticipated slowdown in auto sales. Once the City's sales tax consultant, HdL, estimated the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic, staff proposed a downward adjustment for the 2019-20 fiscal year of over $2.6 million. The HdL forecast for California assumed that the statewide shelter -in -place order would continue until the end of May 2020. The forecast also assumed that the virus would have run its course by the end of September, and did not consider a return of the virus (and potential economic impacts) after that time. Under this scenario, declines in sales tax revenues were expected to continue through the fourth quarter of 2020, with only moderate gains for several quarters thereafter. The most dramatic decreases were expected during the first and second quarter of 2020. The CDTFA just recently released sales tax totals for the second quarter of 2020. HdL has adjusted the data for aberrations to provide a clearer picture of actual economic activity behind the sales tax receipts, resulting in the preliminary charts and graphs that follow. (Note that sales tax revenues are recognized by the City based on allocations by the state, not the HdL reports.) The chart below shows the devastating impact of the pandemic on the City's sales tax revenues, with major declines in most major industry groups compared to the same quarter of 2019. 51.400K S 1,200K S t .000K $600K S600K S400K S200K $0 K 2019 Compared To 2020 Autos State and Business Building Restaurants and County and and and Transportation Pools Induslry Construction Hotels ■ 2Q19 2020 General Food Fuel and Consumer and Sermce Goads Drugs Stations A review of Burlingame's second quarter data for 2020 indicates a decline in taxable transactions of approximately 33.6 percent from the second quarter of 2019. Not surprisingly, the industry group hardest hit as a percentage was Restaurants and Hotels, with a 68.3 percent decrease in taxable 7 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 sales. Fuel and Service Stations suffered a 60.8 percent decline — the result of a sudden decrease in commuter traffic coupled with lower per gallon gas prices than in 2019. The General Consumer Goods sector saw a decrease of 58.6 percent when compared to the second quarter of 2019. The Autos and Transportation sector, which comprises nearly a third of the City's taxable transactions, reflected a 31.8 percent decline in taxable sales. Some of the decline in auto sales was anticipated, as the prior -year totals were very strong. The allocation of taxes from the countywide use tax pool actually increased in the last two quarters of the 2019-20 fiscal year, constituting a larger portion of total sales tax revenues than ever before. This portion of the City's sales tax revenues had been growing faster than most other components of local sales tax receipts for several years, but that growth has been intensified by the pandemic: the increase reflects a continued acceleration of online shopping for merchandise shipped from out of state, particularly as brick -and -mortar retailers are closed (or allowed to operate at minimum capacity). The Wayfair decision implementation, launched in the second quarter of 2019, providing for the remittance of more sales tax on out-of-state/on-line transactions, has also added new revenues in this category. The shift in consumer spending habits to non-taxable goods and services may have been suspended during the pandemic, but the trend toward reliance on on-line purchases will continue to put pressure on the City's smaller retailers in the years to come. Although it is generally recognized that the virus will not "have run its course by the end of September," staff does not anticipate changes to the Sales Tax projection for fiscal year 2020-21 at this time. The adopted budget for FY 2020-21 for Sales and Use Tax provided for a slightly reduced forecast than projected by the HdL consultant and appears to be adequately conservative in light of the FY 2019-20 results. However, the allocations from the state rely on estimates of actual sales tax activity, and the analyses available from the data collected by the CDTFA are less than optimal due to the deferral of tax filings. More reliable data should be available once the deferrals have ended for all 2020 quarters. City of Burlingame Sales and Use Tax FY 2019-20 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 Major Industry Groups Adjusted Budget Unaudited Actual Adopted Budget Autos & Tranportaion 3,328,621 4,175,335 3,120,000 Building & Construction 1,019,769 1,058,200 1,020,000 Business & Industry 1,152,424 1,050,836 1,090,000 Food & Drugs 363,930 412,234 375,000 Fuel & Service Stations 720,359 334,045 720,000 General Consumer Goods 1,230,328 1,349,012 1,200,000 Restaurants & Hotels 1,657,358 1,761,270 1,550,000 State & County Pools 2,669,464 3,009,040 2,875,000 State & County Admin -776,378 12,142,253 12,373,594 11,950,000 Measure I (from State) 1,957,128 2,285,175 1,925,000 Public Safety Sales Tax 130,000 165,920 130,000 14, 229, 381 14,824, 689 14,005,000 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 Other Taxes — Although most of the City's franchise taxes came in very close to the adjusted budget for FY 2019-20, Real Property Transfer Taxes came in much higher, reflecting a volume of home sales apparently unabated by the pandemic. Month -to -month variation in real estate sales makes this revenue difficult to project, as the sales of significant properties can cause "spikes" in the amount of taxes collected. The current year budget of $400,000 for this line item appears to be appropriate. $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 City of Burlingame Real Property Transfer Tax Revenue Fiscal Years 2011- 2020 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20 [Unsud] Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties — This category consists largely of revenue from parking citations and vehicle code violation fines. Projections for parking citations were reduced (from $900,000 to $540,000) to reflect the lower volume of citations anticipated due to the waiving of parking fees in the downtown areas in the last quarter of the fiscal year. However, collections of these fines are delayed, so fees for citations issued prior to the pandemic continued to be paid. Actual parking citation fees collected in FY 2019-20 were nearly $714,000. Vehicle Code Fines, which were reduced from $70,000 to $60,000, came in at $63,000. Charges for Services — As seen in the chart below, most departments generate some amount of receipts in this revenue category. The budget was greatly reduced for FY 2019-20 when the impact of the pandemic on the remaining fiscal year became apparent. At a revised budget of $5.1 million, this category of receipts accounts for approximately 7.4 percent of Burlingame's total General Fund revenues. E 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA CHARGES FOR SERVICES BY DEPARTMENT FY19-20 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY18-19 Adjusted Unaudited Budget Variance Adopted By Department Actual Budget Actuals $ % Budget Police $ 91,570 $ 363,500 $ 617,948 $ 254,448 70.0% $ 75,000 Parks 127,470 140,000 103,817 (36,183) -25.8% 160,000 Recreation 3,374,909 2,304,000 2,067,907 (236,093) -10.2% 2,250,000 Aquatics 697 0 12,056 12,056 n/a 220,000 Planning 1,057,703 797,000 650,086 (146,914) -18.4% 887,000 Public Works 861,185 781,000 1,267,341 486,341 62.3% 681,000 Library 759,320 740,500 741,253 753 0.1% 725,000 Other 9,315 9,000 10,826 1,826 20.3% 9,000 Total, Departmental Fees $ 6,282,169 $ 5,135,000 $ 5,471,234 $ 336,234 6.55% $ 5,007,000 As a category, these General Fund revenues exceeded the adjusted budget in FY 2019-20 by $336,000. This is largely attributable to a reimbursement of the cost of the additional police detail assigned to Burlingame Avenue. (Although an upward adjustment was made mid -year for this reimbursement, it was unknown if the request for these public safety services would continue through the remainder of the fiscal year.) In addition, the Public Works Department experienced a $486,341 positive variance due largely to a shoring agreement for the 250 California Drive development project. These positive variances were somewhat offset by a decrease in Parks and Recreation fees due to the cancellation of many programs and summer camps. Planning fees also fell short of the adjusted budget for the fiscal year. Due to the uncertain nature of the recovery, staff has no further insight into the volume of services that will ultimately be provided in the current fiscal year. By mid -year there may be more clarity on the volume of ongoing application and permit activity, as well as recreational offerings that may be available. Investment Income — Similar to other cities, Burlingame invests in only the safest of securities (the highest priority of the City's investment policy is preservation of capital), and yields continued to hover at historic lows for the last ten years, rising only slightly in recent years prior to the COVID- 19 pandemic. The Federal Reserve spent the second quarter of 2020 mobilizing and refining its arsenal of emergency lending programs to provide liquidity and stabilize financial markets. The central bank left the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 0.00% to 0.25%. Due to its diversified, yet conservative holdings, the yield on the City's $124 million main portfolio dropped slowly from 2.42 percent as of June 30, 2019 to 1.99 percent as of June 30, 2020. Maintaining its focus on safety and liquidity, the City maintains funds in the State's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP). CAMP and LAIF are permitted investments for all local agencies under California Government Code §53601(p). The yield on the City's account with LAIF dropped from 2.42 to 1.22 percent over the fiscal year, and the yield on CAMP dropped from 2.48 to 0.51 percent over the same period. Investors are now braced for 10 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 interest rates to remain "lower for longer", so the reduced budget for General Fund interest income for FY 2020-21 of $1,563,000 seems appropriate. It should be noted that the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 will reflect an additional $2 million in "interest income" from the City's investment holdings due to the requirement to "mark -to -market" the portfolio at each year end. Changes in market value have a significant impact on the reported earnings of the portfolio, and because the City's safe investments were in high demand as of June 30, an unrealized gain was created when the investments were reported at market value. For this reason, the City's budget reflects investment income with the mark -to -market adjustment removed for all funds. Such treatment recognizes that the City typically holds its investments to maturity and removes the uncertainty of the market place from the City's revenue forecasts. Therefore, "actual" interest income received in the prior year has been restated to reflect earnings unadjusted for market value, and budgets have been established to reflect interest earning prior to the market adjustment at year end. State Subventions (Intergovernmental Revenues) — This revenue line item in the General Fund now consists largely of the State's COPS (Citizens' Option for Public Safety) program revenues. These funds are allocated to the counties and then distributed to the various agencies within each county, with a minimum of $100,000 to each law enforcement jurisdiction. Burlingame has received an increased allocation of COPS funding in recent years, and FY 2019-20 was no exception, with approximately $156,000 from this program. Other Revenues — The City receives other miscellaneous revenues from time to time. The budget for these miscellaneous revenues includes unclaimed property from the State, rebates, miscellaneous reimbursements, and refunds of prior -year expenses. Such amounts average about $30,000 annually. In fiscal year 2019-20, this category was credited with a $25,000 one-time license fee for the operation of electric vehicle chargers in the City's parking lot off Chula Vista. In total, over $71,000 was received in miscellaneous revenues in the past fiscal year. General Fund - Exnenditures The following table shows the FY 2019-20 actual (unaudited) General Fund expenditures by critical service area: 11 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FY19-20 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY18-19 Adjusted Unaudited Budget Variance Adopted Actuals Budget Actuals $ % Budget By General Fund Program General Government $ 5,513,693 $ 7,191,099 $ 6,482,228 $ (708,871) -9.9% $ 7,118,647 Public Safety 27,758,430 29,699,707 28,717,726 (981,981) -3.3% $ 30,157,969 Public Works 5,934,117 6,533,410 5,940,832 (592,578) -9.1% $ 7,073,458 Community Development 1,709,736 2,694,507 2,197,979 (496,528) -18.4% $ 2,549,168 Leisure & Culture 14,847,131 16,610,808 14,854,509 (1,756,299) -10.6% $ 16,395,637 Total Expenditures $ 55,763,107 $ 62,729,531 $ 58,193,274 $ (4,536,257) -7.2% $ 63,294,879 Again, there are four columns for fiscal year 2019-20. The "FY 19-20 Adjusted Budget" column shows the budget that the City Council revised in May 2020 after the short-term impacts of the pandemic could be analyzed. The second FY 2019-20 column shows the unaudited results for each program area's expenditures. The third and fourth FY 2019-20 columns show the resulting variance with the FY 2019-20 adjusted budget, by dollar amount and percentage. These columns are flanked by the prior year (FY 2018-19) actuals on the left and the FY 2020-21 Adopted Budget on the right, for sake of comparison. Below is the same data, by expense category: CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FY19-20 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY18-19 Adjusted Unaudited Budget Variance Adopted Actuals Budget Actuals $ % Budget By Expense Categories Salaries & Wages $ 18,005,210 $ 20,207,319 $ 19,080,567 $ (1,126,752) -5.6% $ 20,394,956 Benefits 10,970,167 12,648,341 12,156,450 (491,891) -3.9% 13,376,968 Operating Costs 22,478,484 25,445,119 22,644,706 (2,800,413) 11.0% 24,789,910 Internal Services 4,177,333 4,170,252 4,170,252 0 0.0% 4,570,045 Capital Outlay 131,913 258,500 141,298 (117,202) -45.3% 163,000 Total Expenditures $ 55,763,107 $ 62,729,531 $ 58,193,274 $ (4,536,257) -7.2% $ 63,294,879 A 7.2 percent variance exists for General Fund expenditures for the 2019-20 fiscal year. This is a rather high variance — departmental expenditures savings are usually within 3-4 percent of the adjusted budget. This large a variance would typically indicate a difficulty filling staff vacancies. Although much of the City's casual (part-time and seasonal) work -force was furloughed in April and eventually terminated in May, the largest contributor to this positive variance was in operating costs. As City facilities were closed to the public, many activities were halted, and the associated contractual and operating costs, particularly in the Parks and Recreation and Community Development departments, ceased. Very few adjustments were made to the departmental operating budgets in the last months of the fiscal year, except to provide for certain programs developed specifically in response to the public health crisis recovery, as discussed below. 12 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 Coronavirus Relief Fund Expenditures On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency as a result of the threat of COVID-19. A week later on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus outbreak a pandemic. The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors voted on March 10 to ratify a declaration of a local health emergency and a proclamation of a local emergency in response to COVID-19. The City of Burlingame declared its own local emergency at the City Council meeting on March 16t". Given the significant needs and quick response necessary during an emergency, the City took several actions to provide immediate economic relief to local businesses and residents. Such actions included the funding of small business loans to Burlingame businesses, procurement of emergency supplies, distribution of stored value debit cards to low income households, and assistance to non-profit organizations to provide rental assistance and alleviate food insecurity. The costs of all of these activities are reimbursable from the State's Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF). The fund was established by the federal CARES Act, and distribution was made by the state, based on population (although some funding was dedicated to specific localities with populations of at least 500,000). Burlingame will receive $371,871 (in six equal installments monthly thru December 2020) in the current fiscal year. The CARES Act requires that the payments from the Coronavirus Relief Fund only be used to cover expenses that— • are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); • were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and • were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 30, 2020. The U.S Treasury and California's State Department of Finance provided guidance on eligible uses of the funds. In addition to the > $1 million spent on the programs described above, municipal expenditures for public safety personnel engaged in response to the coronavirus were also eligible for reimbursement, even if included in the municipal budget. Since Burlingame's eligible expenditures far exceeded the amount of its CRF allocation, Police personnel and CCFD costs were not included in the initial reporting to the state. Because CRF revenues were not anticipated with the current -year budget adoption in June, approval of the resolution adjusting the fiscal year 2020-21 General Fund revenue budget for receipt of these funds is recommended with this report. General Fund O en rating Summary A summary of the unaudited operating results of the General Fund for fiscal year 2019-20 is shown in the schedule below: 13 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA GENERAL FUND OPERATING SUMMARY Total Revenue Expenditures Departmental Expenditures Transfers to Debt Services Transfers to Capital Project Fund Other Transfer In (Out) Total Expenditures Net Operating Surplus (Deficit) Transfer to Capital Investment Reserve Change in General Fund Balance FY19-20 FY19-20 FY18-19 Adjusted Unaudited Actuals Budget Actuals $ 84,537,352 $ 69,165,100 $ 70,601,100 FY20-21 Adopted Budget $ 61,428,400 (55,763,107) (62,729,531) (58,193,274) (63,294,879) (4,684,811) (4,708,763) (4,708,763) (2,728,338) (10,934,000) (9,485,000) (9,485,000) (3,155,000) 2,640,137 2,400,319 2,400,319 2,573,550 (68,741,781) (74,522,975) (69,986,718) (66,604,667) 15,795,571 (5,357,875) 614,383 (5,176,267) (3,000,000) (6,500,000) (6,500,000) 0 $ 12,795,571 $(11,857,875) $ (5,885,617) $ (5,176,267) As a result of a $1.4 million positive revenue variance and $4.5 million in departmental budgetary savings (positive expenditure) variance, the General Fund shows a nearly $5.9 million deficit (negative net operating revenues) for fiscal year 2019-20, an improvement over the $11.9 million deficit provided in the adjusted budget. General Fund Balance Unaudited results for the City's General Fund show a total fund balance of approximately $43.3 million at the end of the 2019-20 fiscal year. 14 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA CHANGES TO GENERAL FUND BALANCE Beginning Fund Balance (audited) Projected Revenues & Expenditures Projected revenues Projected departmental expenditures Subtotal, Revenues Net of Expenditures Transfer to Debt Service Transfer to Capital Project Fund Other Transfers In (Out) of General Fund Transfer to CIP Renewal & Replacement Reserve Ending Fund Balance (Projected) FY19-20 Unaudited FY 2020-21 Actuals Adopted Budget $ 49,167,751 $ 43,282,134 70,601,100 61,428,400 (58,193,274) (63,294,879) 12,407,827 (1,866,479) (4,708,763) (2,728,338) (9,485,000) (3,155,000) 2,400,319 2,573,550 (6,500,000) 0 $ 43,282,134 $ 38,105,867 The General Fund experienced a surplus of nearly $12.8 million for fiscal year 2018-19, largely reflected in the increased unassigned fund balance to nearly $20.4 million. This increase in General Fund unassigned fund balance provided the City opportunities to make progress in funding long-term pension liabilities and/or setting aside additional funds in the Capital Investment Reserve for infrastructure in the 2019-20 fiscal year. However, the abrupt decline in the City's revenues due to the pandemic in the third quarter of the fiscal year resulted in a $5.9 million decrease in the General Fund Balance, leaving an (unaudited) unassigned fund balance of $13.4 million as of June 30, 2020. Still, a $6.5 million transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Investment Reserve was maintained; the City's pension trust fund was increased by over $2.9 million (for General Fund liabilities), and retiree medical obligations continued to be funded and included in departmental operating expenses. These long-term obligations, and the City's strategies to provide for them as part of a sustainable budget, will be reviewed in detail in an upcoming City Council study session. As of June 30, 2020, the General Fund's fund balance of $43.3 million represents 61.8 percent of General Fund operating expenditures of $70.0 million. Because $10.8 million is restricted for pension benefits through the § 115 Trust Fund, a better measure of coverage may be that the unrestricted fund balance of nearly $32.9 million equates to 54.7 percent of the fund's operating expenditures. The City's General Fund Reserve Policy and resulting reserve target was based on an assessment of the City's revenue volatility and infrastructure risks, as well as the possibility of extreme events, in establishing a reserve target specifically for the City of Burlingame. As such, the Council's reserve management strategies reflect best practices in public finance. Once funded according to the policy, the City's reserves ($19.1 million) comprise the largest single portion of the General Fund's ending balance, an amount equal to 27.1 percent of General Fund revenues for the year. The reserve policy calls for an Economic Stability Reserve of 24 percent of budgeted revenues, a Catastrophic Reserve of $2 million, and a $500,000 Contingency Reserve. This leaves an unassigned fund balance of nearly $13.4 million. 15 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA GENERAL FUND BALANCE ASSIGNMENTS Economic Stability Reserve Catastrophic Reserve Contingency Reserve Subtotal, Assigned Fund Balance Add: Restricted for Pension Trust Fund (PARS) Add: Unassigned Fund Balance Total, Ending Fund Balance FY18-19 Actuals FY19-20 Unaudited Actuals FY20-21 Adopted Budget $ 18,837,000 $ 16,600,000 $ 14,743,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 21,337,000 19,100, 000 17, 243,000 7,459,442 10,823, 849 13, 073,849 20,371,309 13,358,285 7,789,018 $ 49,167,751 $ 43,282,134 $ 38,105,867 In past years, staff had recommended that surpluses of the prior year be used to provide additional funding to the Capital Investment Reserve at midyear. As no surpluses are indicated for the next few fiscal years, the Capital Investment Reserve will remain at $24,656,000, unless the City Council approves a drawdown of the reserve for specific purposes. CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA CHANGES TO CAPITAL INVESTMENT RESERVE Beginning Balance Established 3/31/15 (FY14-15) $ 3,000,000 Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2015-16 3,000,000 Add'I Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2015-16 (mid -year) 5,000,000 Decrease in Catastrophic Reserve Fund (mid -year) 2,500,000 Ending Balance 6/30/16 $ 13,500,000 Budgeted Transfer from General Fund in FY 2016-17 3,000,000 Add'I Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2016-17 (mid -year) 4,000,000 Ending Balance 6/30/17 $ 20,500,000 Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2017-18 3,000,000 Add'I Budget Transfer From General Fund in FY 2017-18 (mid year) 2,300,000 Ending Balance 6/30/18 $ 25,800,000 Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2018-19 3,000,000 Ending Balance 6/30/19 $ 28,800,000 Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2019-20 6,500,000 Transfer to fund New Community Center Project (10,644,000) Ending Balance 6/30/20 $ 24,656,000 Budget Transfer from General Fund in FY 2020-21 0 Budgeted Balance at 6/30/21 $ 24,656,000 Also in the past, the City Council has been comfortable with a $9-10 million unassigned fund balance for the General Fund. Because the pension trust fund is able to provide a better return on the City's investments than can be obtained in its general portfolio, staff recommends a continuation 16 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 of the pre -funding mechanism — the pension trust fund held by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) — established for that purpose. The trust fund is ultimately a very flexible placement of the City's funds. Although the funds can only be used to pay for retirement obligations through CaIPERS, the City's required contributions to CalPERS will be over $7.5 million in the current fiscal year, and increasing in future fiscal years. Should funds be needed for other purposes, the CalPERS contributions could be paid directly from the trust fund, freeing up the General Fund monies for other desired uses. Debt Service — Mid -year adjustments to the adopted budget for fiscal year 2019-20 were made to reflect issuance and administrative costs of the 2019 Lease Revenue Bonds sold in December, along with the debt service payments in the current fiscal year. Funds for the first debt service payment (due July 1st) were set aside with General Fund and Measure I transfers in both fiscal years 2018-19 and 2019-20. Therefore, an additional $2 million remained in the debt service fund for debt service payments beyond the 2019-20 fiscal year. The additional amount was anticipated in the development of the FY 2020-21 budget and will be applied to the debt service obligation. This application allows the General Fund a one-year reprieve from funding the 2019 Lease Revenue Bonds in the current fiscal year, as shown below. CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA GENERAL FUND DEBT SERVICE OBLIGATIONS FY19-20 FY19-20 FY20-21 Adjusted Unaudited Budget Variance Adopted Description Maturity Budget Actuals $ % Budget 2006 Pension Obligation Bonds FY2036 $ 976,500 $ 976,500 $ (0) 0.0% $998,891 2010 Lease Revenue Bonds (Corp Yard) FY2021 1,167,775 1,170,163 2,388 0.2% 1,164,375 2012 Lease Revenue Bonds (Burl Ave Streetscape)* FY2042 551,488 551,488 (0) 0.0% 546,688 2019 Lease Revenue Bonds (Community Center) FY2049 1,997,334 1,997,334 0 n/a 0 Cost of Issuance for 2019 Lease Rev Bonds 303,054 1 303,054 (0) 0.0% 0 Debt Administration Costs 41,250 33,130 (8,120) -19.7% 16,100 Subtotal, Principal and Interest 5,037,401 5,031,668 (5,733) -0.11% 2,726,054 Contributions from Other Funds (1,583,218) (1,583,219) (1) 0.0% (1,579,750) Net General Fund Debt Service $3,454,183 $3,448,449 ($5,734) -0.2% $1,146,304 *100%reimbursed bythe5pecial Assessment Districtand Parki General Fund Five -Year Financial Forecast The five-year forecast attached to this report was developed using the FY 2019-20 adjusted budget as a starting point for estimating revenues and expenses of future operating budgets. The forecast has been updated to reflect actual (unaudited) results for 2019-20. In addition, the forecast has also been updated to reflect the additional $371,871 grant revenue from the State's Coronavirus Relief Fund. No other adjustments have been made to the three scenarios. Adjustments to the five-year forecast will be prepared with careful consideration to each revenue and expenditure category with the City's mid -year report. General Fund revenues are monitored closely, and projections are based on detailed assumptions specific to each revenue and expenditure category, which are in turn based on the most up-to-date information available. 17 2019-20 Unaudited General Fund Financial Summary September 21, 2020 FISCAL IMPACT The presentation of the unaudited results of the General Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 creates no fiscal impact. The overall goal is to deliver the most accurate picture of the 2019- 20 fiscal year's standings so that some level of confidence can be placed in the FY 2020-21 budget, which should assist decision makers in planning for the City's needs in the long-term. The acceptance of $371,871 in Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) in FY 2020-21 will increase the current year's General Fund revenues by that amount. Exhibit: • Resolution to Amend the General Fund Revenue Budget for Receipt of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) in FY 2020-21. 5-year Forecast - Most Probable General Fund Five -Year Forecast Scenario A - Most Probable 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Unaudited Revised Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Revenue Categories Actuals Budget Property Taxes 23,304,402 25,136,000 26,274,000 27,469,000 28,724,000 29,778,000 Sales Tax (including Measure 1) 14,562,627 12,000,000 14,400,000 15,120,000 15,574,000 16,041,000 Transient Occupancy Tax 20,416,543 14,000,000 18,200,000 20,930,000 23,023,000 24,174,000 Other Taxes - Franchise Tax 1,656,664 1,641,200 1,672,000 1,687,000 1,703,000 1,720,000 Other Taxes - Business Licenses 878,498 730,000 803,000 811,000 831,000 856,000 Other Taxes -Transfer Tax 534,517 400,000 460,000 483,000 497,000 502,000 Other Taxes - State HOPTR 59,000 60,000 63,000 66,000 67,000 68,000 Licenses & Permits 98,904 78,200 82,000 86,000 88,000 90,000 Fines, Forfeitures & Penalties 791,870 560,000 728,000 750,000 773,000 796,000 Use of Money & Property 101,996 80,000 84,000 88,000 90,000 92,000 Charges for Services 5,471,234 5,007,000 5,758,000 6,334,000 6,524,000 6,720,000 Other Revenue 81,033 401,871 422,000 443,000 452,000 461,000 Federal & State Subventions 177,563 143,000 150,000 158,000 161,000 164,000 Interest Income 2,466, 249 1,563,000 2,345,000 2,580,000 2,709,000 2,844,000 Total Revenues 70,601,100 61,800,271 71,441,000 77,005,000 81,216,000 84,306,000 Expenditure Categories Salaries & Wages Benefits Operating Costs Internal Services Capital Outlay Total Expenditures Operating Revenue Transfer In (Out) Transfer to CIP Project Funds Transfer to Debt Service Fund Transfers In (Out) - otherfunds Transfer to Capital Investment (19,080,567) (20,394,956) (21,131,000) (21,765,000) (22,418,000) (23,090,000) (12,156,450) (13,376,968) (14,133,000) (15,138,000) (15,966,000) (16,864,000) (22, 644, 706) (24, 789, 910) (25, 708, 000) (26, 664, 000) (27, 661, 000) (28, 701, 000) (4,170,252) (4,570,045) (4,753,000) (4,896,000) (5,043,000) (5,194,000) (141,298) (163,000) (250,000) (258,000) (266,000) (274,000) (58,193,274) (63,294,879) (65,975,000) (68,721,000) (71,354,000) (74,123,000) 12,407,827 (1,494,608) 5,466,000 (9,485, 000) (3,155, 000) (9,405, 000) (4,708,763) (2,728,338) (3,580,400) 2,400,319 2,573,550 1,693,525 (6,500,000) - - 8,284,000 9,862,000 10,183,000 (7,435,000) (6,155,000) (5,835,000) (3,600,700) (3,623,500) (3,651,060) 1,723,779 1,755,120 1,790,059 Change in Fund Balance before Adjustments (5,885,617) (4,804,396) (5,825,875) (1,027,921) 1,838,620 2,486,999 Adjustments Transfer to Pension 115Trust (2,957,000) (2,250,000) (1,867,000) (1,285,000) (876,000) (503,000) Net Surplus / (Deficit) (8,842,617) (7,054,396) (7,692,875) (2,312,921) 962,620 1,983,999 FUND BALANCE 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 General Fund Beginning Bal. 49,167,751 43,282,134 38,477,738 32,651,863 34,623,942 36,462,562 General Fund Ending Bal. 43,282,134 38,477,738 32,651,863 31,623,942 36,462,562 38,949,561 Assigned Balance: 19,444,000 17,332,000 19,646,000 20,981,000 21,992,000 22,733,000 Econ. Stability Reserve @ 24% 16,944,000 14,832,000 17,146,000 18,481,000 19,492,000 20,233,000 Catastrophic Reserve ($2 mil.) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Contingency Reserve ($500,00 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 PARS restricted cash 10,823,849 13,073,849 14,940,849 16,225,849 17,101,849 17,604,849 Unassigned Fund Balance 13,014,285 8,071,889 (1,934,986) (5,582,907) (2,631,287) (1,388,288) FLO 5-year Forecast — Most Probable Scenario A - Most Probable (continued) General Fund - Top 3 Revenues Property Taxes Sales Tax (including Measure 1) Transient Occupancy Tax 40 35 30 2$— 29 26— 27� 29�— 30 25 22 225_—,— 23� 24 20 20� 200 21 15 1 / 15_ 14� 14__, 15� 16m� 16 3� 1Z 10 5 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actuals Actuals Unaudited Revised Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget General Fund Assigned + Unassigned Balance OFund Balance (Assigned +Unassigned) ODraw from Capital Investment �Econ. Stability Reserve @ 24% of GF Rev. —Catastrophic Reserve ($2 mil.) — Contingency Reserve ($500,000) 55 - 0 50 45 40 42 35 I 30 32 32 25 20 25 15 18 19 21 10 15 5 0 - 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 General Fund Revenues vs. Expenses Baseline Expenses Transfer to CIP IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlTransfer to Capital Investment —Revenues 110 o 2 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 30 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 981 5-year Forecast — Most Optimistic Scenario B - More Optimistic General Fund - Top 3 Revenues -Property Taxes -Sales Tax (including Measure 1) -Transient Occupancy Tax 40 c 35 30 2� 29 28- 74i 28 27� / 27� 25 - 25� 24 20 20� 22 23 20 2� 15 13/ 18\ 15- 15___,16� 16� 17 12 10 5 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actuals Actuals Unaudited Revised Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget General Fund Assigned + Unassigned Balance OFund Balance (Assigned+Unassigned) ODraw from Capital Investment ,Econ. Stability Reserve @ 24% of GF Rev. -Catastrophic Reserve ($2 mil.) Contingency Reserve ($500,000) 55 N o_ 50 45 40 42 35 30 32 32 32 25 27 20 25 15 10 5 0 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 General Fund Revenues vs. Expenses �Base IineExpenses Transfer to C I P IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlTransfer to Capital Investment Revenues 110 N 2 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 21 Scenario C - More Pessimistic General Fund - Top 3 Revenues Property Taxes Sales Tax (including Measure 1) Transient Occupancy Tax 40 — c 35 30 28 _ 29 27 28 25 25� 26 26 23— � 22 20 20 20 15 18\ 15____-_ 16— 16 13 1Z 10 5 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actuals Actuals Unaudited Revised Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget General Fund Assigned + Unassigned Balance oFund Balance (Assigned+Unassigned) oDraw from Capital Investment ,Econ. Stability Reserve @ 24% of GF Rev. —Catastrophic Reserve ($2 mil.) Contingency Reserve ($500,000) 55 c 50 45 40 35 30 25 32 20 15 10 5 0 (5) 2017-18 (10) (15) (20) 42 32 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 General Fund Revenues vs. Expenses IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBaselineExpenses Transfer to C I P iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiTransfer to Capital Investment Revenues 110 2 100 2 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 30 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 22 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 TO REFLECT RECEIPT OF CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUNDS (CRF) IN THE AMOUNT OF $371,871 WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency as a result of the threat of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the State of California; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the City Council of the City of Burlingame declared its own local emergency relating to the pandemic; and WHEREAS, the State of California included in its fiscal year 2020-21 budget ar allocation of monies from the Coronavirus Relief Funds to local governments, with $371,871 allocated to the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has expended funds eligible for reimbursement under the applicable provisions of the federal CARES Act in responding to the public health emergency present by the Coronavirus Disease 2019. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: The City of Burlingame's General Fund revenue budget for the 2020-21 fiscal year as adopted on June 15, 2020, is increased by the amount of $371,871 in recognition of this reimbursement grant funding. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council held on the 21st day of September, 2020, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk BUR— IN�AAGENDA NO: 10c STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 21, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 21, 2020 From: Lisa K. Goldman, City Manager — (650) 558-7243 Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7204 Subject: Adoption of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 6.10, "Minimum Wage" to Title 6, "Business Licenses and Reaulations." of the Burlinaame Municipal Code RECOMMENDATION By motion, the City Council should adopt the following ordinance: An Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Adding Chapter 6.10, "Minimum Wage" to Title 6, "Business Licenses and Regulations," of the Burlingame Municipal Code To do so, the Council should: 1. By motion, adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND The minimum wage in California has increased each year since 2017. On January 1, 2022, the California minimum wage will reach $15/hour for all employers with 26 or more employees. It will reach $15/hour for employers with 25 or fewer employees on January 1, 2023. After the state minimum wage reaches $15 an hour for all employees, the rate will be adjusted annually (beginning January 1, 2024) for inflation based on the national consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W). However, the minimum wage cannot be lowered, even if there is a negative CPI, and the highest raise allowed in any one year is 3.5%. DISCUSSION On February 3, 2020, the City Council held a study session to discuss its interest in considering a local minimum wage ordinance. On September 8, 2020, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and discussed the proposed ordinance establishing a local minimum wage in Burlingame of $15/hour effective January 1, 2021. The staff report from that meeting is attached. No changes to the proposed ordinance were requested. Therefore, the ordinance is presented to the City Council for adoption at its regular meeting of September 21, 2020. Adoption of Local Minimum Wage Ordinance September 21, 2020 FISCAL IMPACT The cost of contracting with the City of San Jose's Office of Equality Assurance for enforcement of the local minimum wage ordinance is approximately $13,500 per year. The impact on City wages due to the local minimum wage ordinance is relatively limited. The State minimum wage for employers with 26 or more employees (including the City of Burlingame) is currently $14.00/hour and will rise to $15.00/hour on January 1, 2022. That means that the City will only be paying $1.00/hour more than the existing State minimum wage for calendar year 2021. In 2022, the difference between the City's minimum wage and the State's minimum wage will be the CPI increase. In terms of staffing, no full-time permanent City employees are making less than $15.00/hour. There are seven part-time, casual employee classifications that will be affected —six in Parks and Recreation, and one in Police. In the Parks and Recreation Department, the Recreation Leader I position makes less than $15.00/hour. This position is staffed with high school students and is used primarily to assist with summer camps and preschool. If this position is raised to $15.00/hour, then the pay ranges for the five other positions in this series, Recreation Leader II, Senior Recreation Leader, Recreation Specialist, Preschool Teacher, and Preschool Site Coordinator, will all have to be raised. Based on pre-COVID staffing levels, the financial impact could be approximately $70,000 in the first year. This amount equates to an estimated 13-15% increase in programming fees for programs that are led by part-time staff should the City decide to pass along all of the costs to the program users. Given the uncertainty around programming for next summer due to the pandemic, it is unclear how much of an impact there will actually be on the budget for these positions. There is one classification in the Police Department, Police Services Aide, which is paid less than $15.00/hour. This is an intern position —generally staffed by people who are interested in eventually becoming Police Officers. The increase to the Police Department's budget would be approximately $1,400 in the first year. An earlier staff report about the local minimum wage estimated an impact of approximately $8,000 in the Public Works Department to account for summer crew employees. That number was in error as the wage for the summer crew position has already been raised to $15.00/hour. Exhibit: • Proposed Ordinance • September 8, 2020 Staff Report 2 CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDINANCE NO. 2020- ADDING CHAPTER 6.10, "MINIMUM WAGE" TO TITLE 6, `BUSINESS LICENSES AND REGULATIONS," OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the State of California has enacted a minimum wage that will reach $15.00 per hour in January of 2022; and WHEREAS, recognizing the higher cost of living on the Peninsula and in an effort to support the stability of the community and economic security of local workers, the City Council of the City of Burlingame wishes to enact a citywide minimum wage to reach $15.00 per hour before 2022; and WHEREAS, a higher minimum wage rate protects public health, safety and welfare by requiring that employees are compensated in such a manner as to enable and facilitate their individual self- reliance within the City of Burlingame and thereby lessen both displacement and reliance on other public services and subsidies; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame may adopt a higher minimum wage pursuant to the powers vested in the City under the laws and Constitution of the State of California including but not limited to the police powers vested in the City pursuant to Article XI, Section 7, of the California Constitution; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that: Section 1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to adopt a new Chapter 6.10 of Title 6 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to provide a minimum wage of $15.00 per hour on January 1, 2021 for most employers. Section 2. ADDING CHAPTER 6. 10 TO TITLE 6 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 6.10 Minimum Wage is added to Title 6 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 6.10 MINIMUM WAGE 6.10.010 DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (a) "Calendar week" shall mean a period of seven consecutive days starting on Sunday. (b) "City" shall mean the City of Burlingame. (c) "Employee" shall mean any person who qualifies as an employee entitled to payment of a minimum wage from any Employer under the California Minimum Wage law, as provided under Section 1197 of the California Labor Code and wage orders published by the State of California Industrial Welfare Commission. Employees shall include Learners, as defined by the California Industrial Welfare Commission. (d) "Employer" shall mean any person (including a natural person, corporation, non-profit corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability company, business trust, estate, trust, association, joint venture, agency, instrumentality, or any other legal or commercial entity, whether domestic or foreign), who directly or indirectly (including through the services of a temporary services or staffing agency or similar entity) employs or exercises control over the wages, hours or working conditions of any Employee. (f) "Minimum Wage" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.10.020 of this Chapter. 6.10.020 MIMIMUM WAGE. (a) Employers shall pay Employees no less than the Minimum Wage for each hour worked within the geographic boundaries of the City. (b) The Minimum Wage paid shall be as follows: Beginning January 1, 2021, the Minimum Wage shall be an hourly rate of $15.00. (c) Beginning on January 1, 2022, and each January thereafter, the minimum wage shall increase by an amount equal to the prior year's increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for San Francisco -Oakland -San Jose as determined by the United States Department of Labor. The change shall be calculated by using the August to August change in the CPI to calculate the annual increase, if any. A decrease in the CPI shall not result in a decrease in the minimum wage. (d) An Employee who is a Learner, as defined by California Industrial Welfare Commission Order No. 4-2001, shall be paid no less than 85 percent of the applicable Minimum Wage for the first 160 hours of employment. Thereafter, the Employee shall be paid the applicable Minimum Wage rate. (e) An Employer may not deduct an amount from wages due an Employee on account of any tip or gratuity, or credit the amount or any part thereof, of a tip or gratuity, against, or as a part of, the wages due the Employee from the Employer. (f) Exemptions: (1) First degree relatives (defined as the parents, siblings, or children) of a natural person who is an Employer under this ordinance or who is the sole owner or in sole control of an Employer are exempt from the minimum wage required by this ordinance, although all other relevant labor and employment laws continue to apply; and (2) persons who act as independent contractors or who otherwise provide services without attaining the status of an Employee are exempt from the minimum wage required by this chapter. 6.10.030 NOTICE AND POSTING. (a) By October 1 of each year, the City shall publish and make available to Employers a bulletin announcing the adjusted Minimum Wage rate, to take effect January 1 of the following year. In conjunction with this bulletin, the City shall, by November 1 of each year, publish and make available to Employers, in English and other languages as provided in any implementing regulations, a notice suitable for posting by Employers in the workplace informing Employees of the current Minimum Wage rate and of their rights under this Chapter. (b) Each Employer shall give written notification to each current Employee, and to each new Employee at time of hire, of his/her/their rights under this Chapter. The notification shall be in English and other languages as provided in any implementing regulations, and shall also be posted prominently in areas at the work site where it will be seen by all Employees. Every Employer shall also provide each Employee, at the time of hire, with the Employer's name, address, and telephone number in writing. Failure to post such notice shall constitute a violation of this Municipal Code. The City is authorized to prepare sample notices and Employers' use of such notices shall constitute compliance with this subsection. 6.10.040 IMPLEMENTATION. City may promulgate regulations for the implementation and enforcement of this Chapter. Any regulation promulgated by City shall have the force and effect of law and may be relied on by Employers, Employees and other parties to determine their rights and responsibilities under this Chapter. Any regulations may establish procedures for ensuring fair, efficient and cost-effective implementation of this Chapter, including supplementary procedures for informing Employees of their rights under this Chapter, for monitoring Employer compliance with this Chapter, and for providing administrative hearings or determining whether an Employer has violated the requirements of this Chapter. 6.10.050 ENFORCEMENT. (a) Enforcement by the City. City may take any enforcement action set forth in Title 1 of this Municipal Code to address violations of this Chapter. Alternatively, City may elect to contract for enforcement services with a third party. If City elects to enter into such a contract, the City shall provide public, written procedures for such enforcement and any such enforcement shall be consistent with the due process rights established by Title 1 of this Code and relevant law. (b) Private Rights of Action. An Employee claiming harm from a violation of this Chapter may bring an action against the Employer in court to enforce the provisions of this Chapter and shall be entitled to all remedies available to correct any violation of this Chapter, including but not limited to, back pay, reinstatement, injunctive relief, or civil penalties as provided herein. An Employee who is a prevailing party in an action to enforce this Chapter is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees, witness fees, and costs. (c) Remedies. (1) The remedies for violation of this Chapter include but are not limited to: (A) Reinstatement, the payment of back wages unlawfully withheld, and payment of an additional sum as a civil penalty in the amount of $50 to each Employee whose rights under this Chapter were violated for each day or portion thereof that the violation occurred or continued, and fines imposed pursuant to other provisions of this Code or state law. (B) Interest on all due and unpaid wages at the rate of interest specified in subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the California Civil Code, which shall accrue from the date that the wages were due and payable as provided in Part I (commencing with Section 200) of Division 2 of the California Labor Code, to the date the wages are paid in full. (C) Reimbursement of the City's administrative costs of enforcement and reasonable attorney fees. (D) The City may require the Employer to pay an additional sum as a civil penalty in the amount of $50 to the City for each Employee or person whose rights, under this Chapter, were violated for each day or portion thereof that the violation occurred or continued, and fines imposed pursuant to other provisions of this Code or state law, where there has been a previous violation of this Chapter. (2) The remedies, penalties and procedures provided under this Chapter are cumulative and are not intended to be exclusive of any other available remedies, penalties and procedures established by law which may be pursued to address violations of this Chapter. Actions taken pursuant to this Chapter shall not prejudice or adversely affect any other action, administrative or judicial, that may be brought to abate a violation or to seek compensation for damages suffered. (d) Retaliation Barred. (1) An Employer shall not discharge, reduce the compensation or otherwise retaliate against any Employee for making a complaint to the City, participating in any of the City's proceedings, using any civil remedies to enforce his or her rights, or otherwise asserting his or her rights under this Chapter. Within 120 days of an Employer being notified of such activity, it shall be unlawful for the Employer to discharge any Employee who engaged in such activity unless the Employer has clear and convincing evidence of just cause for such discharge. (2) No Employer may fund increases in compensation required by this Chapter, nor otherwise respond to the requirements of this Chapter, by reducing the wage rate paid to any Employee, nor by increasing charges to them for parking, meals, uniforms or other items, nor by reducing the citation or other non -wage benefits of any such Employee, except to the extent such prohibition would be pre-empted by the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act. (e) Retention of Records. Each Employer shall maintain for at least three years for each Employee, a record of his or her name, hours worked and pay rate. Each Employer shall provide each Employee a copy of the records relating to such Employee upon the Employee's reasonable request. 6.10.060 WAIVER THROUGH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. The provisions of this Chapter may be waived in whole or in part with respect to employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement if all of the following circumstances apply:(a) Both parties to the collective bargaining agreement agree in writing to such waiver in whole or in part; and (b) the collective bargaining agreement contains provisions which specifically allow waivers of municipal minimum wage rates in excess of the contractually required wage rates for any group or groups of covered employees. 6.10.070 NO PRE-EMPTION OF HIGHER STANDARDS. The purpose of this Chapter is to ensure minimum labor standards. This Chapter does not pre- empt or prevent the establishment of superior employment standards (including higher wages) or the expansion of coverage by ordinance, resolution, contract, or any other action of the City. This Chapter shall not be construed to limit a discharged Employee's right to bring a common law cause of action for wrongful termination. 6.10.080 FEDERAL OR STATE FUNDING. This Chapter shall not be applied to the extent it will cause the loss of any federal or state funding of City activities. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. In the event any section, clause or provision of this Ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional, such section, clause or provision shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. It is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this Ordinance irrespective of any such portion declared to be invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5), this action is categorically exempt from (CEQA) as an administrative activity that will not result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Section 5. PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933, published, and circulated in the City of Burlingame, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance was introduced on September 8, 2020 and adopted on , and shall be effective thirty days after its date of adoption. Emily Beach, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 8th day of September,2020, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 20_, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 8, 2020 From: Lisa K. Goldman, City Manager — (650) 558-7243 Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7204 AGENDA NO: 10a MEETING DATE: September 8, 2020 Subject: Introduction of an Ordinance to Establish a Local Minimum Wage in Burlingame RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council consider introduction of an ordinance adding Chapter 6.10 to the Burlingame Municipal Code establishing a local minimum wage. In order to do so, Council should: A. Receive the staff report and ask any questions of staff. B. Request that the City Clerk read the title of the proposed ordinance. C. By motion, waive further reading and introduce the ordinance. D. Conduct a public hearing. E. Following the public hearing, discuss the ordinance and determine whether to bring it back for second reading and adoption. If the Council is in favor of the ordinance, direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before its proposed adoption. BACKGROUND The minimum wage in California has increased each year since 2017. The following chart shows the current minimum wage and future minimum wage in California for all areas without local minimum wage ordinances. Date Minimum Wage for Employers with 25 Employees or Less Minimum Wage for Employers with 26 Employees or More January 1, 2020 $12.00/hour $13.00/hour January 1, 2021 $13.00/hour $14.00/hour January 1, 2022 $14.00/hour $15.00/hour January 1, 2023 $15.00/hour After the state minimum wage reaches $15 an hour for all employees, the rate will be adjusted annually (beginning January 1, 2024) for inflation based on the national consumer price index for 1 Introduction of a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance September 8, 2020 urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W). However, the minimum wage cannot be lowered, even if there is a negative CPI, and the highest raise allowed in any one year is 3.5%. On February 3, 2020, the City Council held a study session to discuss whether it wished to accelerate the increase in the minimum wage in Burlingame through adoption of a local ordinance. The staff report and meeting minutes from the study session are attached. After hearing from a number of speakers at the study session, Councilmembers indicated their interest in considering a local minimum wage ordinance that would be effective January 1, 2021, which is one year in advance of the state reaching $15/hour for employers with 26 or more employees. Councilmembers asked staff to use the City of San Mateo ordinance as a model. That ordinance is attached to this staff report. DISCUSSION Cities are permitted by law to enact their own higher minimum wage ordinances, and many in the Bay Area have elected to do so, often with the increase occurring over several years. The following chart shows the minimum wage for all San Mateo County cities that have a local minimum wage ordinance, ordered lowest to highest by 2021 rate. The total combined population in these nine cities represents approximately 65% of the county's population. City 2020 Min. Wage 2021 Min. Wage 2022 Min. Wage Daly City $13.75 $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (up to 3.5%) East Palo Alto State minimum wage $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (no limit) Half Moon Bay State minimum wage $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (no limit) Menlo Park $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (up to 2021 rate + CPI (up to 3%) 3%) San Carlos State minimum wage $15.00 + CPI (up to 2021 rate + CPI (up to 3.5%) 3.5%) South San Francisco $15.00 $15.00 + CPI (no limit) 2021 rate + CPI (no limit) Redwood City $15.38 $15.38 + CPI (no limit) 2021 rate + CPI (no limit) San Mateo $15.38 $15.38 + CPI (no limit) 2021 rate + CPI (no limit) Belmont $15.00 $15.90 $15.90 + CPI (up to 3.5%) The local minimum wage in these cities applies to all adults and minors who work two or more hours per week. (Employees classified as Learners, as defined by the California Industrial Welfare Commission Order No. 4-2001, can be paid no less than 85% of the minimum wage for the first 160 hours of employment. Thereafter, the employees must be paid the minimum wage.) Tips and other benefits may not be considered as an offset to the minimum wage. 2 Introduction of a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance September 8, 2020 Several cities in the Bay Area, including Redwood City and San Mateo, participate in a joint contract with the City of San Jose's Office of Equality Assurance to provide enforcement for the local minimum wage ordinance. Staff has been unable thus far to reach anyone at the Office of Equality Assurance to determine if the City of Burlingame will be able to participate in this joint contract and what the cost would be. A City of San Carlos staff report from last year estimates a cost of $15,000 annually. Other cities provide enforcement in-house through their City Attorney's Office or City Manager's Office. In both cases, enforcement is complaint -based and follows typical code violation procedures. At the February study session, staff noted that one or more Councilmembers from the City of Millbrae had indicated that their City planned to discuss a local minimum wage ordinance. As of the writing of this report, staff has been unable to find any information as to discussions about a local minimum wage ordinance in Millbrae. In addition to the cities listed above, several cities in Santa Clara County have already adopted local minimum wage ordinances. The list includes: Cupertino, Los Altos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale. All of these cities include a CPI escalator. San Mateo County has a living wage ordinance that sets a minimum wage contractors are required to pay employees providing services under County contracts. The current wage as of July 1, 2020, is $17.19. It will increase by CPI on July 1, 2021, and the program is set to sunset on June 30, 2022. Finally, the City and County of San Francisco has both a local minimum wage ordinance and a minimum compensation ordinance. The local minimum wage in San Francisco increased from $15.59 to $16.07 on July 1. The minimum compensation ordinance (MCO) covers most City service contractors and tenants at the San Francisco International Airport. Under the MCO, employers must provide their employees with no less than the minimum compensation wage rate, which is increased from $17.66/hour to $18.24/hour for for -profit employers. The rate for non-profit and public entity employers remains $16.50/hour. Ordinance Summary The draft ordinance before the City Council contains the following components: • The minimum wage is set at $15 per hour starting in January 2021 for Burlingame businesses. • Business owners do not have to pay first -degree relatives the increased minimum wage, but all other requirements of relevant state law continue to apply. Public Outreach During the February study session, Mayor Beach noted that she had reached out to a number of members of the Burlingame business community, including retailers and restaurateurs, to seek their input regarding a local minimum wage ordinance. A summary spreadsheet of those contacts is attached. 3 Introduction of a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance September 8, 2020 From August 20 to September 1, the City conducted a non -scientific local minimum wage survey via SurveyMonkey. The link to the survey was included in the City's eNews twice. It was also posted on Nextdoor, sent directly to the Chamber of Commerce and BIDs for distribution to their members, and shared with the hoteliers and Burlingame Talks Shop attendees who submitted their email addresses. The survey garnered 200 responses, with 173 respondents living in Burlingame, and 59 owning a business in Burlingame. (Note that some respondents living in Burlingame also own a business in Burlingame.) The overall survey responses are attached (with the answers to questions 7 and 8 at the end of the document) as well as two subsets of responses —those who checked that they were residents, and those who checked that they were business owners. Among those who checked that they were residents, 125 responded that they were strongly or somewhat in favor of an increase in the minimum wage, while 46 were somewhat or strongly against an increase. Among business owners, 30 were strongly or somewhat in favor of an increase in the minimum wage, while 29 were somewhat or strongly opposed to an increase. Questions from February Study Session Impacts on Child Care: At the February study session, Councilmembers expressed concern about the impact of a higher minimum wage on child care providers in Burlingame and whether child care would become unaffordable. In 2017, First 5 San Mateo County and the Child Care Partnership Council (CCPC) conducted a study of early childhood education workforce compensation practices in center -based programs within San Mateo County. According to the attached Building Our Future flyer, the lowest -paid employees in these programs were, on average, making more than $15/hour at the time of the survey. Staff does not have any data about wages paid by home -based child care providers. Business Closures in Local Cities with a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance: One Councilmember asked whether San Mateo County cities with local minimum wage ordinances had any data with respect to businesses closing or reducing full-time employees to part-time status as a result of the higher minimum wage. In response to this question, staff contacted the City Managers for Belmont, Menlo Park, Redwood City, San Mateo, and South San Francisco, all of which have a 2020 minimum wage of $15/hour or above. The Cities of Belmont, Redwood City, and San Mateo all responded that some of their businesses had warned that this would happen prior to passage of the ordinance, but the cities had no data to indicate that any businesses had actually closed or converted full-time staff to part-time staff as a result of the higher minimum wage. The City of San Mateo noted that prior to the pandemic, many of their businesses already had to pay a higher wage due to the tight labor market. The City of Menlo Park responded that the City had received a number of complaints from restaurants and two merchants in the early stages of implementation, but no complaints since then. The City of South San Francisco had not responded as of the writing of this report. Exemptions for Family Members and Babysitters: At the February study session, Councilmembers asked whether there could be exemptions made for family members and babysitters. The attached ordinance exempts family members of business owners (defined as first - degree relatives). The minimum wage requirement applies to those persons who meet the definition C Introduction of a Local Minimum Wage Ordinance September 8, 2020 of "employee" under the state labor code: most people providing ad hoc services, such as babysitters, and independent contractors would be exempt from the minimum wage requirement. FISCAL IMPACT Should the City Council choose to enact a local minimum wage ordinance, there will be unknown costs associated with noticing employers about the new wage rate and with enforcing the ordinance, either in-house or via a contract with another agency should that be available. There will also be additional personnel costs in several City Departments. Staff estimates that increased costs of approximately $8,000 in the Public Works Department in the first year, rising in subsequent years if the Council includes an escalator. The Parks and Recreation Department has eight active staff members (in the Recreation Leader 1 classification) making less than $15/hour. This position is a part-time, temporary position that generally assists with camps and similar programs. Because this position is part of a series of classifications, increases would likely be necessary in other classifications so as to avoid compaction issues. The City could recoup the increased costs through increased fees to participate in Parks and Recreation programming, or it could choose to subsidize the costs through General Fund support. The Council would need to consider its interest in subsidizing the programs during the budget process in the spring. If the City were to increase program fees to cover costs, staff estimates that there would be an increase of 8-10% initially, which would rise if an escalator is included. Depending on the timing of any increase, the City may also need to cover the increased costs of some programs for a period of time since fees for Parks and Recreation Department programs are advertised well in advance of the start of the programs. The Library has one casual employee classification with a starting salary just over $15/hour. Due to the COVID-19 shelter -in -place orders and the closure of the Library, there are no current employees in this classification. The Police Department has three Police Services Aide positions with a starting salary below $15/hour. Only one of these positions is currently filled. Exhibits: • Proposed Ordinance • February 3, 2020 Staff Report • February 3, 2020 Study Session Minutes • City of San Mateo Minimum Wage Ordinance • Mayor Beach Outreach Information • Survey Results: Total Results, Filtered by Resident, and Filtered by Business Owner • Building Our Future Flyer 5 11a BURLINGAME Memorandum To: City Council Date: September 21, 2020 From: Mayor Emily Beach Subject: Committee Report Top constituent issues during this period: Bike/Ped Master Plan, The Burlingame Collaborative, Local Minimum Wage, Burlingame Avenue & Broadway pilot program & parklets on adjacent streets, communicating shelter in place changes and enforcement. • Hosted 141h virtual constituent Q&A session during COVID-19. Burlingame Collaborative — 3rd Convening and Update Great progress happening, 8/17 was a productive 3rd meeting. Roster grew to 60 members. Breakout groups and follow-up committees focusing on three priorities this fall, driven by prior meetings and participant survey. Next full convening will take place on 12/16/20. Meanwhile, Collaborative members have access to Google Drive, meeting docs, and shared resources. Fall 2020 work includes: COVID-19 Community Resource Guide: Thanks to Terri Boesch (CALL Primrose) and John Kevranian (Broadway BID) for leading their team to pull content together. Guide published in a -News, Parks & Recreation Activity Guide, and circulated among Collaborative organizations. See attached or view it here. • Fundraising for resident financial/rental assistance and small businesses financial assistance: committee is exploring ways to augment existing programs with additional fundraising. • Neighborhood Helping Hand/Pen-Pal Program: Committee formed and preliminary planning underway, led by Sylvia Chu (The Trousdale) and Sarah Simson (BSD PTA Council President.) Caltrain / CalMod (Caltrain Local Policy Makers Group) Update Caltrain's 1/8 sales tax this November is called Measure RR. If passed, it will provide an ongoing source of reliable funding for Caltrain operations and infrastructure. Encourage Beach Committee Report September 21, 2020 everyone to learn more about this. California High Speed Rail Authority Update: Had an extensive briefing on sound impacts with SF to SJC project section, which included noise impacts, infrastructure for quiet zones, passing tracks, impact on Caltrain's service schedule, and grade separations. You can review staff notes located here. Robust discussion and concern that HSR's draft EIR does not accommodate long-term vision of Caltrain's business plan for moderate (or high) growth scenario. Without HSR installing passing tracks along the corridor, there is a strong possibility that Caltrain commuter rail service schedules will suffer. City of Burlingame sent letter to HSR with additional comments on the project and potential impacts on Burlingame. • 1 joined meeting with CM Goldman and PW Director Murtuza with California High Speed Rail Authority on 8/20 regarding Broadway station improvements required to run HSR trains on the blended system, and how those station improvements will be constructed and funded. Discussed different timing and funding scenarios for station improvements. All stakeholders recognize the value in coordinating these improvements with our Broadway Grade Separation project. Rule 20A PG&E Credits to help fund El Camino Real undergrounding • Per Council direction, met again virtually on 8/28 with Councilmember Brownrigg, Director Murtuza, and CM Goldman to develop our action plan to explore purchasing Rule 20A credits from other cities at an even deeper discount. Plan in progress. San Mateo County Transportation Authority Update (SMCTA) Adoption of SMCTA Fiscal Year 2021 budget (July 1, 2020-June 30, 2021) We project (estimate) -11.6% overall decrease in Measure A and Measure W sales tax returns compared to FY 2020. We also project -7.4% decrease in formula funds to local cites like Burlingame and other required allocations. • Interestingly, FY 2020 (ending June 2020) tallied surprisingly strong sales tax returns during the first few months of the pandemic. Overall, FY 2020 Measure A tax returns projected to be <1% lower than we budgeted in June 2019, due to strong on-line sales finishing out the fiscal year. • Received briefing on the Shuttle Program Study. Currently, the County has 45 shuttles run by multiple operators. The organic evolution of our County's shuttle system is not equipped to meet the growing shuttle demand. Shuttle study is exploring efficiencies, ways to simplify rider experience, improve service, and potentially create a unified shuttle system prior to next call for shuttles in FY 23/24. • Signed $100m bond issuance documents for the loan from TA to the County's Express Lane J PA. 2 Beach Committee Report September 21, 2020 SMC US 101 Express Lane JPA Board Meeting • Received an excellent update about our Equity Study underway. Consultants and community stakeholders are working hard to assess the program's goals, challenges, and key findings, then develop a robust public engagement process. Our goal is to create a world -class, visionary equity program funded by toll revenues. Other Events/Meeting Highlights • Traffic Safety Parking Commission Bike/Ped Master Plan Open House Preview • Burlingame BPAC's Bike/Ped Master Plan Open House Preview • 5th Grade Webelo Troop government discussion • Library Board of Trustees Meeting • Meetings & volunteer recruitment related to Burlingame Stands United Against Hate week, which will take place 11/30-12/6 in coordination with the national event • Commute.org strategic planning committee meeting • Jobs for Youth Annual Awards Celebration • Sustainable San Mateo County Ideas Bank RounclTable for Sustainable Transportation • League of Cities Peninsula Division Executive Committee meeting • Second Harvest /Union Grab & Go Food Distribution on Rollins Road — 841 families served / 3631 individuals. • C/CAG Congestion Management and Environmental Quality Committee Meeting 3 Burlingame COVID-19: STAY INFORMED www.Burlingame.org/residents/covid-19 Mantengase informado 2-1-1 Bay Area 211 Speak to an operator 24/7 Dial 2-1-1 or about resources (800) 273-6222 www.211bayarea.org/sanmateo Comprehensive information and referral service. • Phone and text services available 24/7 in 150 languages through phone interpretation • English and Spanish for text services • Connects callers with local community services such as food, shelter, counseling, and more Star Vista Crisis intervention & Suicide 24-Hour Hotline Prevention Center (650) 579-0350 (800) 273-8255 www.star-vista.org/programs/ Mills Peninsula Health Services Behavioral Services (650) 696-4666 www.MPHS.org/behavioralhealth Chemical Dependency Crisis Line (650) 696-5915 Second Harvest Food Connection Hotline (800)984-3663 www.SHFB.org/getfood CALL Primrose Drop -in Food Pantry I (650)342-2255 I www.callprimrose.org Great Plates (Qualified Seniors only) I SMC Aging and Adult Services (800) 675-8437 Samaritan House Essential services for individuals (650) 347-3648 & families in need www.samaritanhousesanmateo.org SMC Connect A referral site linking to www.smc-connect.org multiple community services San Mateo Immigrant Relief Fund www.bit.ly/sm-immi-relief Samaritan House Essential services for individuals (650) 347-3648 & families in need www.samaritanhousesanmatoo.org HIP Housing I Home sharing program (650) 348-6660 www.hiphousing.org/programs/home-sharing-program Bay Area Legal Aid (650) 358-0745 www.Baylegal.org Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (650) 558-0915 (800) 381-8898 www.legalaidsmc.org/getting-help Community Legal Services of East Palo Alto www.clsepa.org/services The San Mateo County Economic Development Assoc. (SAMCEDA) Designated by the County (650) 413-5600 as the lead for business www.samceda.org resources during the COVID-19 pandemic SMC Alert www.smcalert.info An alert notification system used to immediately contact you during urgent or emergency situations. Set preferences to receive text and voice messages to your: • Email accounts • Cell phones, smart phones, tablets • Voice messages to landline phones Un sistema de notificacion Para alertarlo de inmediato en caso de situaciones de emergencia Burlingame a -News I The City's weekly www.burlingame.org newsletter emailed every Thursday Call 2-1-1 to speak to an operator 24/7 about resources. Marque al 2-1-1 para comunicarse con un especialista y obtener asistencia personalizada sobre el COVID-19. Esta linea es gratis, confidencial, y disponible 24/7 en varios idiomas. i nanK you rsuriingame k-ouaooraiive voiunieers wno creaiea ine vision ana content Tor finis cuviu- i y t-ommunn:y hesource uuiae.